Long-term effectiveness in patients previously treated with cladribine tablets: a real-world analysis of the Italian multiple sclerosis registry (CLARINET-MS)

Clinical and biological predictors of Cladribine effectiveness in Multiple Sclerosis: A real-world, single Centre study considering a two-year interval from year-2 dosing

OBJECTIVES

Cladribine tablets (CLAD) for adult patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) have been available in Italy since 2018. We aimed to assess predictors of no-evidence-of-disease-activity-3 (NEDA-3) status after 24 months of the last dose of CLAD.

RESULTS

We included 88 patients (70.5% female, mean age at CLAD start 35.4 ± 11.4). Eighteen patients were treatment naïve, 48 switched to CLAD from a First line Disease Modifying Drug (DMD), and 22 from Second line DMDs. All patients were observed for a median follow-up time of 2.4 (1-4) years after the last dose of CLAD. Forty-nine patients (55.7%) showed NEDA at the last available follow-up. Naïve patients (p = 0.001), those with a lower number of previous DMDs (p < 0.001) and, even though not significantly, those switching from first line DMDs (p = 0.069) were more likely NEDA3 at the last available follow-up. In a subgroup of 30 patients (34%), Serum Light Neurofilaments (sNFL) levels showed a decrease from baseline to the 24 months of follow-up, statistically significant from baseline to the sixth month, and from the first to the second year detection. sNFL levels at 12th month showed a strong inverse correlation with the time to NEDA3 loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience provides information for the 2-years after the last dose of CLAD, confirming a higher effectiveness of CLAD when placed early in the treatment algorithm. Given the ongoing expansion of the therapeutic landscape in MS, sNfL could support individualized decision-making, used as blood-based biomarker for CLAD responses in clinical practice.

Holistic, Long-Term Management of People with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis with Cladribine Tablets: Expert Opinion from France

Cladribine tablets (CladT) has been available for therapeutic use in France since March 2021 for the management of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). This high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) acts as an immune reconstitution therapy. In contrast to most high-efficacy DMTs, which act via continuous immunosuppression, two short courses of oral treatment with CladT at the beginning of years 1 and 2 of treatment provide long-term control of MS disease activity in responders to treatment, without the need for any further pharmacological treatment for several years. Although the labelling for CladT does not provide guidance beyond the initial treatment courses, real-world data on the therapeutic use of CladT from registries of previous clinical trial participants and patients treated in routine practice indicate that MS disease activity is controlled for a period of years beyond this time for a substantial proportion of patients. Moreover, this clinical experience has provided useful information on how to initiate and manage treatment with CladT. In this article we, a group of expert neurologists from France, provide recommendations on the initiation of CladT in DMT-naïve patients, how to switch from existing DMTs to CladT for patients with continuing MS disease activity, how to manage patients during the first 2 years of treatment and finally, how to manage patients with or without MS disease activity in years 3, 4 and beyond after initiating treatment with CladT. We believe that optimisation of the use of CladT beyond its initial courses of treatment will maximise the benefits of this treatment, especially early in the course of MS when suppression of focal inflammation in the CNS is a clinical priority to limit MS disease progression.

Consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: 2023 revision of the MENACTRIMS guidelines

With evolving diagnostic criteria and the advent of new oral and parenteral therapies for Multiple Sclerosis (MS), most current diagnostic and treatment algorithms need revision and updating. The diagnosis of MS relies on incorporating clinical and paraclinical findings to prove dissemination in space and time and exclude alternative diseases that can explain the findings at hand. The differential diagnostic workup should be guided by clinical and laboratory red flags to avoid unnecessary tests. Appropriate selection of MS therapies is critical to maximize patient benefit. The current guidelines review the current diagnostic criteria for MS and the scientific evidence supporting treatment of acute relapses, radiologically isolated syndrome, clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing remitting MS, progressive MS, pediatric cases and pregnant women. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide practical recommendations and algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of MS based on current scientific evidence and clinical experience.

Practical Guidance on the Use of Cladribine Tablets in the Management or Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Expert Opinion from Qatar

The increasing availability of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMT) for the management of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) has increased the potential for individualised patient management but has added complexity to the design of treatment regimens. The long-term application of immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) is supported by an increasing database of real world studies that have added important information on the long-term safety and efficacy of this approach. Cladribine tablets (CladT) is an IRT given as two annual short courses of treatment, following which a majority of patients then demonstrate no significant MS disease activity over a period of years. Whether, and how, to treat patients beyond the first two years of treatment remains a matter for debate, as clinical evidence accumulates. We, a group of neurologists who manage people with RMS in Qatar, provide our expert consensus recommendations on the application and long-term management of CladT therapy based on our experience with treatment in the last 5 years. These include pragmatic recommendations for people with MS disease activity in years 3 and 4 (ie up to four years following first dose of CladT), and for people with or without MS disease activity in subsequent years. We believe our recommendations will help to ensure the optimal application of CladT-based IRT, with the potential benefit for the patient of achieving prolonged periods free of both MS disease symptoms and the burden of regular applications of immunosuppressive DMT.

Real-world use of cladribine tablets (completion rates and treatment persistence) in patients with multiple sclerosis in England: The CLARENCE study

BACKGROUND

Treatment with cladribine tablets, a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT), has been available in England since 2017 for patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Real-world data on treatment completion, persistence and switching in patients treated with cladribine tablets are beginning to emerge, but only small single and multicentre cohorts have reported so far. This longitudinal retrospective observational study (CLARENCE) evaluated a large cohort (>1900) of patients with highly active relapsing MS, receiving cladribine tablets across England, to determine rates of treatment completion, persistence and switching in the real world.

METHODS

Using data obtained from Blueteq® forms, a compulsory requirement for DMT reimbursement in England, we evaluated rates of treatment completion (defined as the proportion of patients who received the full 2-year course of cladribine tablets), treatment persistence (defined as the proportion of patients who did not switch and/or discontinue treatment before receiving the full 2-year course) and treatment switch (defined as the proportion of patients who switched treatment from cladribine tablets to another DMT at any point after their first course). The change in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between Years 1 and 2 of treatment was also determined. All data were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

Blueteq® forms were completed for 1934 MS patients treated with cladribine tablets; of these patients, 691 (36%) were treatment naïve. The median EDSS score (range) at treatment initiation with cladribine tablets was 2.5 (0, 8.5). At time of analysis (September 2021, last follow-up point), a total of 1020 (53%) patients had completed the full 2-year course of cladribine tablets. At the same time point, 1762 (91%) patients were considered as treatment persistent (i.e., the patient had completed either 1 course of tablets with <18 months of follow-up data or the full 2-year course of cladribine tablets). Overall, 78 (4%) patients switched to another DMT at any point after their first course, which included 33 (1.7%) patients who switched after completing the full 2-year course. In terms of their disability, 469 (84%) patients had stable EDSS scores between Years 1 and 2 of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In this large real-world study of patients receiving cladribine tablets across England, high rates of treatment persistence and low rates of switching were observed, with only 1.7% of patients receiving the full 2-year course and switching treatment. The majority (84%) of evaluable patients showed stable disability between Years 1 and 2 of treatment. These findings complement earlier data from clinical trials and real-world studies, confirming the effectiveness of cladribine tablets for patients with highly active relapsing MS.

Escalation Versus Induction/High-Efficacy Treatment Strategies for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Which is Best for Patients?

After more than 2 decades of recommending an escalating strategy for the treatment of most patients with multiple sclerosis, there has recently been considerable interest in the use of high-efficacy therapies in the early stage of the disease. Early intervention with induction/high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy may have the best risk-benefit profile for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who are young and have active disease, numerous focal T2 lesions on spinal and brain magnetic resonance imaging, and no irreversible disability. Although we have no curative treatment, at least seven classes of high-efficacy drugs are available, with two main strategies. The first strategy involves the use of high-efficacy drugs (e.g., natalizumab, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators, or anti-CD20 drugs) to achieve sustained immunosuppression. These can be used as a first-line therapy in many countries. The second strategy entails the use of one of the induction drugs (short-term use of mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab, cladribine, or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant) that are mainly recommended as a second-line or third-line treatment in patients with very active or aggressive multiple sclerosis disease. Early sustained immunosuppression exposes patients to heightened risks of infection and cancer proportionate to cumulative exposure, and induction drugs expose patients to similar risks during the initial post-treatment period, although these risks decrease over time. Their initial potential safety risks should now be revisited, taking account of long-term data and some major changes in their regimens: natalizumab with the long-term monitoring of John Cunningham virus; use of monthly courses of mitoxantrone with maximum cumulative doses of 36-72 mg/m2, followed by a safer disease-modifying drug; cladribine with only 2-weekly treatment courses required in years 1 and 2 and no systematic treatment for the following 2 years; alemtuzumab, whose safety and clinical impacts have now been documented for more than 6 years after the last infusion; and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant, which dramatically reduces transplantation-related mortality with a new regimen and guidelines. Escalation and induction/high-efficacy treatments need rigorous magnetic resonance imaging monitoring. Monitoring over the first few years, using the MAGNIMS score or American Academy of Neurology guidelines, considerably improves prediction accuracy and facilitates the selection of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis requiring aggressive treatment.

Expert Narrative Review of the Safety of Cladribine Tablets for the Management of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Cladribine tablets (CladT) is a highly active oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for the management of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). CladT acts as an immune reconstitution therapy, in that two short courses of treatment 1 year apart have been shown to suppress disease activity for a prolonged period in most patients, without need for continued DMT. Each course of CladT induces a profound reduction in B lymphocytes that recovers over months, and serious lymphopenia (Grade 3-4) is uncommon. Smaller reductions in levels of T lymphocytes occur slightly later: on average, these remain within the normal range and repopulate progressively. A larger effect occurs on CD8 vs. CD4 cells. Reactivation of latent or opportunistic infections (e.g. varicella zoster, tuberculosis) is mostly associated with very low lymphocyte counts (< 200/mm3). Screening and managing pre-existing infections, vaccinating non-exposed patients and delaying the 2nd year of treatment with CladT to allow lymphocytes to recover to > 800/mm3 (if necessary) are important for avoiding infections and higher-grade lymphopenia. There was no demonstrable or apparent effect of CladT on the efficacy of vaccinations, including against Covid-19. Adverse events consistent with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) represent a rare but potentially serious complication of CladT therapy in spontaneous adverse event reporting; patients should be screened for liver dysfunction before starting treatment. Ongoing hepatic monitoring is not required, but CladT must be withdrawn if signs and symptoms of DILI develop. There was a numerical imbalance for malignancies when comparing cladribine to placebo in the clinical programme, particularly in short-term data, but recent evidence shows that the risk of malignancy with CladT is similar to the background rate in the general population and to that with other DMTs. Overall, CladT is well tolerated with a favorable safety profile appropriate for the management of RMS.

Cladribine tablets in people with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A real-world multicentric study from southeast European MS centers

BACKGROUND

Cladribine is an oral disease-modifying drug authorized by the European Medicine Agency for the treatment of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVES

To provide real-world evidence of cladribine's effectiveness and safety in people with MS (pwMS).

METHODS

A retrospective observational multi-center, multi-national study of pwMS who were started on cladribine tablets in ten centers from five European countries.

RESULTS

We identified 320 pwMS treated with cladribine tablets. The most common comorbidities were arterial hypertension and depression. Three patients had resolved hepatitis B infection, while eight had positive Quantiferon test prior to cladribine commencement. There were six pwMS who had malignant diseases, but all were non-active. During year 1, 91.6% pwMS did not have EDSS worsening, 86.9% were relapse-free and 72.9% did not have MRI activity. During the second year, 90.2% did not experience EDSS worsening, 86.5% were relapse-free and 75.5% did not have MRI activity. NEDA-3 was present in 58.0% pwMS in year 1 and in 54.2% in year 2. In a multivariable logistic regression model age positively predicted NEDA-3 in year 1. The most common adverse events were infections and skin-related adverse events. Lymphopenia was noted in 54.7% of pwMS at month 2 and in 35.0% at month 6. Two pwMS had a newly discovered malignant disease, one breast cancer, and one melanoma, during the first year of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of cladribine tablets are comparable to the pivotal study and other real-world data with no new safety signals.

Safety and effectiveness of cladribine tablets for multiple sclerosis: Results from a single-center real-world cohort

BACKGROUND

Cladribine tablets are a highly effective immune reconstitution therapy licensed for treating relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) in Europe since 2017. Currently, there is a high demand for real-world data from different clinical settings on the effectiveness and safety profile of cladribine in MS.

METHODS

Within this report, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of RMS patients who received cladribine between August 2018 and November 2021 at our Belgian institute. Patients with data for three effectiveness endpoints, more specifically, relapses, MRI observations, and confirmed disability worsening were incorporated into the analysis of 'no evidence of disease activity' (NEDA-3) re-baselined at 3 months. Safety endpoints included lymphopenia, liver transaminases, and adverse events (AEs) during follow-up. Descriptive statistics and time-to-event analysis were performed, including subgroup analysis by pre-treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 84 RMS patients included in this study (age 42 [33-50], 64.3% female, diagnosis duration 6 [2-11] years, baseline EDSS 2.5 [1.5-3.6]), 14 (16.7%) patients experienced relapses, while disability progression and brain MRI activity occurred in 8.5% (6/71) and 6.3% (5/79). This resulted in 72.6% (n = 69, standard error 6%) retaining NEDA-3 status at the mean follow-up time of 22.6 ± 11.5 months. During the first year after cladribine initiation, disease activity prevailed more in patients with ≥2 prior DMTs and those switching from fingolimod, although both trends were not statistically significant. In terms of safety, 67.9% reported at least one AE during follow-up, the most frequent being fatigue (64.9%) and skin-related problems (38.6%).

CONCLUSION

Overall, our research results confirm cladribine's safety and effectiveness among RMS patients in real-world conditions. After the re-baseline, we observed high rates of NEDA-3-retention, and no new safety signals were noted.

Comparative effectiveness of cladribine tablets versus other oral disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis: Results from MSBase registry

BACKGROUND

Effectiveness of cladribine tablets, an oral disease-modifying treatment (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS), was established in clinical trials and confirmed with real-world experience.

OBJECTIVES

Use real-world data to compare treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in people with MS (pwMS) treated with cladribine tablets versus other oral DMTs.

METHODS

Retrospective treatment comparisons were based on data from the international MSBase registry. Eligible pwMS started treatment with cladribine, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, or teriflunomide tablets from 2018 to mid-2021 and were censored at treatment discontinuation/switch, death, loss to follow-up, pregnancy, or study period end. Treatment persistence was evaluated as time to discontinuation/switch; relapse outcomes included time to first relapse and annualized relapse rate (ARR).

RESULTS

Cohorts included 633 pwMS receiving cladribine tablets, 1195 receiving fingolimod, 912 receiving dimethyl fumarate, and 735 receiving teriflunomide. Individuals treated with fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, or teriflunomide switched treatment significantly more quickly than matched cladribine tablet cohorts (adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 4.00 (2.54-6.32), 7.04 (4.16-11.93), and 6.52 (3.79-11.22), respectively). Cladribine tablet cohorts had significantly longer time-to-treatment discontinuation, time to first relapse, and lower ARR, compared with other oral DMT cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Cladribine tablets were associated with a significantly greater real-world treatment persistence and more favorable relapse outcomes than all oral DMT comparators.

Expert opinion on the long-term use of cladribine tablets for multiple sclerosis: Systematic literature review of real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

Treatment with cladribine tablets (CladT), an immune reconstitution therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), involves two short courses of treatment in Year 1 and Year 2. Most patients achieve sustained efficacy with CladT, but a small proportion may experience new disease activity (DA). Following completion of the indicated dose, physicians may have questions relating to the long-term management of these patients. Since the EU approval of CladT over 5 years ago, real-world evidence (RWE) is increasing and may provide some insights and guidance for clinical practice. We describe a systematic literature review (SLR) of RWE and provide expert opinions relating to six questions regarding the long-term use of CladT.

METHODS

Pertinent clinical questions were developed by a steering committee (SC) of 14 international multiple sclerosis (MS) experts regarding breakthrough DA in Year 1, new DA after 2 years or more of treatment, long-term management of stable patients, and whether additional courses of CladT may be required or safe. An SLR was performed in EMBASE and PubMed using the population, intervention, comparators, outcomes, study design (PICOS) framework to identify relevant studies within the last 15 years. Searches of key congress proceedings for the last 2-3 years were also performed. Following review of the results and RWE, the SC drafted and agreed on expert opinion statements for each question.

RESULTS

A total of 35 publications reporting RWE for CladT were included in this review. In the real world, breakthrough DA in Year 1 is of low incidence (1.1-21.9%) but can occur, particularly in patients switching from anti-lymphocyte trafficking agents. In most patients, this DA did not lead to treatment discontinuation. Reported rates of DA after the full therapeutic effect of CladT has been achieved (end of Year 2, 3 or 4) range from 12.0 to 18.7% in the few studies identified. No RWE was identified to support management decisions for stable patients in Year 5 or later. Views among the group were also diverse on this question and voting on expert opinion statements was required. Only two studies reported the administration of additional courses of CladT, but detailed safety outcomes were not provided.

CONCLUSIONS

RWE for the long-term use of CladT in the treatment of RMS is increasing, however, gaps in knowledge remain. Where possible, the RWE identified through the SLR informed expert statements, but, where RWE is still lacking, these were based solely on experiences and opinion, providing some guidance on topics and questions that occur in daily clinical practice. More real-world studies with longer-term follow-up periods are needed and highly anticipated.

The Place of Immune Reconstitution Therapy in the Management of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in France: An Expert Consensus

The treatment strategy in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is a complex decision requiring individualization of treatment sequences to maximize clinical outcomes. Current local and international guidelines do not provide specific recommendation on the use of immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) as alternative to continuous immunosuppression in the management of RMS. The objective of the program was to provide consensus-based expert opinion on the optimal use of IRT in the management of RMS. A Delphi method was performed from May 2022 to July 2022. Nineteen clinical assertions were developed by a scientific committee and sent to 14 French clinical experts in MS alongside published literature. Two consecutive reproducible anonymous votes were conducted. Consensus on recommendations was achieved when more than 75% of the respondents agreed or disagreed with the clinical assertions. After the second round, consensus was achieved amongst 16 out of 19 propositions: 13 clinical assertions had a 100% consensus, 3 clinical assertions a consensus above 75% and 3 without consensus. Expert-agreed consensus is provided on topics related to the benefit of the early use of IRT from immunological and clinical perspectives, profiles of patients who may benefit most from the IRT strategy (e.g. patients with family planning, patient preference and lifestyle requirements). These French expert consensuses provide up-to-date relevant guidance on the use of IRT in clinical practice. The current program reflects status of knowledge in 2022 and should be updated in timely manner when further clinical data in IRT become available.

High persistence and low adverse events burden in cladribine treated MS patients from Argentina

BACKGROUND

Early initiation with high efficacy therapies seems to be better than an escalation approach in terms of disability prevention in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Although efficacy and safety of cladribine tablets have been shown in clinical trials, real-world evidence (RWE) studies from Latin America are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the Argentina Patient Support Program (PSP) for cladribine tablets (Adveva®), with at least 1 treatment course, evaluate treatment persistence, adverse event reports from PSP patients and reported relapses characterization.

METHODS

Anonymized data routinely collected by Adveva® team of patients that received the first dose of cladribine from April 16th 2018 to March 31st 2021 were analyzed. Treatment persistence was defined as the percentage of patients that initiated year 2 (Y2) from the population of patients with elapsed time since year 1 (Y1) cladribine tablet initiation of at least 18 months. In addition, using the pharmacovigilance data, reported adverse events and the time elapsed from treatment initiation to relapse were analyzed.

RESULTS

The present analysis included 269 patients (mean age: 41.7 ± 16 years) that had initiated Y1 of cladribine tablets treatment between April 16th 2018 and March 31st 2021. Although only 29.4% (79/269) of our population was treatment naïve, the ratio of naïve/switch patients that initiated cladribine tablets increased from April 2018-March 2019 to April 2020-March 2021. From the 110 patients with elapsed time since treatment initiation ≥18 months, 101 patients initiated Y2 indicating a persistence level of 91.8%. During follow-up, 425 adverse events were reported, mainly MS relapse (8.9%, 38/425), fatigue (3.8%, 16/425) and headache (3.5%, 15/425). Lymphopenia and infections were rarely reported by RRMS patients treated with cladribine tablets. MS relapse was more frequently reported in patients switching from a previous treatment (87.5%, 27/32) than in the naïve cohort (12.5%, 5/32).

CONCLUSIONS

The first real life experience in RRMS patients from Latin America demonstrated that the Adveva® enrolled support program patients have a high persistence level to oral treatment with cladribine tablets. Our results also confirmed the known safety profile of cladribine tablets, with a low incidence of lymphopenia and infections.

Treatment with Cladribine Tablets Beyond Year 4: A Position Statement by Southeast European Multiple Sclerosis Centers

Based on the results of the pivotal CLARITY study, cladribine tablets were approved for use in the European Union in 2017 as a high-efficacy therapy for highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Cladribine tablets are used as an induction therapy: half of the total dose is given in year 1 and the other half in year 2. In the CLARITY Extension trials, repeating the dose routinely in years 3 and 4, was not associated with significantly improved disease control. However, there is very limited evidence on how to manage people with MS (pwMS) beyond year 4, which is increasingly important because more and more patients are now ≥ 4 years after cladribine treatment. Overall, postapproval data show that treatment with two cladribine cycles effectively controls disease activity in the long term. However, there is general agreement that some pwMS with suboptimal response could benefit from retreatment. This study reviews the practical aspects of using cladribine tablets, summarizes the evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies on the safety and efficacy of cladribine, and proposes a treatment algorithm developed by expert consensus for pwMS previously treated with cladribine. In brief, we propose that additional courses of cladribine tablets should be considered in patients with minimal (no relapses, 1-2 new lesions) or moderate (1 relapse, 3-4 new lesions) disease activity, while significant disease activity (> 1 relapse, > 3 new lesions) or progression should warrant a switch to another high-efficacy treatment (HET). More evidence is needed to improve the treatment guidelines for pwMS who previously received cladribine.

Cladribine treatment for highly active multiple sclerosis: Real-world clinical outcomes for years 3 and 4

INTRODUCTION

Cladribine is an effective immunomodulatory treatment used for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical outcomes and rates of no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) in patients with highly-active disease treated with 2 years cumulative dose of cladribine, for years 3 and 4.

METHODS

We used the Sheba Multiple Sclerosis computerized data registry to retrospectively evaluate year-3 and year-4 clinical outcomes and NEDA-2 rates in highly active RRMS patients who completed the 2-dose 2-year cladribine treatment protocol (3.5 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years). The first week of treatment in year 1 was considered as baseline. Data analyses were performed using Python (version 3.0) and SAS® (version 9.4 SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Among 128 patients with highly-active MS that received cladribine treatment, 61 patients, 43 females, were studied for year-3 clinical outcomes, and 35 patients, 23 females, also for year-4. At the initiation of cladribine treatment, the mean ± SD age was 39.6 ± 10.74 years (45.9% of the patients were between 18 and 40 years), disease duration 12.7 ± 9.08 years, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 3.7 ± 1.86 (54% had EDSS score > 3.0), and the annual relapse rate was 1.6 ± 0.9. The annual relapse rate decreased to 0.36 in year-3 and was 0.17 in year-4; 68.9% (42/61) of the patients were relapse-free in year-3, and 82.9% (29/35) were relapse-free in year-4. Disability at year-3 was 3.1 ± 2.07; 83.6% (51/61) of the patients remained neurologically stable (33, 54.1%) or improved (18, 29.5%). In year-4, EDSS was 3.2 ± 1.91, and 85.7% (30/35) of the patients remained stable (20, 57.1%) or improved (10, 28.6%). NEDA-2 was achieved for 59.0% (36/61) of patients in year-3, and for 74.3% (26/35) in year-4 of cladribine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-world cladribine proved to be clinically effective in year-3 and year-4 of treatment in the majority of highly active RRMS patients.

Long-term management of multiple sclerosis patients treated with cladribine tablets beyond year 4

INTRODUCTION

Oral cladribine is a highly effective pulsed selective immune reconstitution therapy licensed for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) since 2017. A full treatment course comprises two treatment cycles given 1 year apart, followed by two treatment-free years. The management of cladribine-treated patients beyond year 4 needs to be addressed as patients have now passed the initial 4 years since European Medical Agency approval.

AREAS COVERED

A panel of neurologists and a neuroradiologist experienced in MS treatment/monitoring evaluated clinical trial data and real-world evidence and proposed recommendations for the management of cladribine-treated patients beyond year 4.

EXPERT OPINION

Continuous monitoring of disease activity during the treatment-free period is important. Subsequent management depends on the presence or absence of inflammatory disease activity, determined in the absence of consistent guidelines via practice-driven neurological decision criteria. Persisting or newly occurring inflammatory disease activity is an indication for further treatment, i.e. either re-initiation of cladribine or switching to another highly effective disease-modifying therapy. The decision to retreat or switch should be based on clinical and radiological evaluation considering disease course, treatment history, and safety aspects. In the absence of disease activity, either retreatment can be offered, or the treatment-free period can be extended under structured monitoring.

Predictors of Cladribine Effectiveness and Safety in Multiple Sclerosis: A Real-World, Multicenter, 2-Year Follow-Up Study

Introduction

Cladribine administration has been approved for the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) in 2017; thus, data on cladribine in a real-world setting are still emerging.

Methods

We report on cladribine effectiveness, safety profile, and treatment response predictors in 243 patients with MS followed at eight tertiary MS centers. Study outcomes were: (1) No Evidence of Disease Activity-3 (NEDA-3) status and its components (absence of clinical relapses, MRI activity, and sustained disability worsening); (2) development of grade III/IV lymphopenia. The relationship between baseline features and the selected outcomes was tested via multivariate logistic models.

Results

Of the 243 subjects included in the study (66.5% female, age 34.2 ± 10 years, disease duration 6.6 ± 9.6 years), 64% showed NEDA-3 at median follow-up (22 months). Patients with higher number of previous treatments had lower probability to retain NEDA-3 [odds ratio (OR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41–0.98, p = 0.04] and were more prone to experience clinical relapses (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1–2.6, p = 0.04). The presence of active lesions at baseline was associated with follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04–3.55, p = 0.04). Patients with higher rate of relapses in the year prior to cladribine start were at higher risk of developing sustained disability worsening (OR 2.95% CI 1–4.2, p = 0.04). Lymphopenia grade III/IV over the follow-up was associated with baseline lymphocyte count (OR 0.998, 95% CI 0.997–0.999, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

In this large cohort, we confirm previous data about cladribine effectiveness on disease activity and disability worsening and provide information on response predictors that might inform therapeutic choices.

Cladribine Tablets for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Clinician's Review

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease characterized by inflammation and demyelination for which there is currently no cure; therefore, the aim of therapy is to reduce the risk of relapse and disability progression. The treatment options for MS have increased greatly in recent years with the development of several disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and the advent of immune reconstitution therapy (IRT). IRTs are administered in short-dosing periods to produce long-term effects on the immune system. Treatment with an IRT is based on the 3Rs: reduction, repopulation, and reconstitution of lymphocytes, which leads to restoration of immune effector functions. Cladribine tablets represent a selective, high-efficacy, oral form of IRT for patients with MS that targets lymphocytes and spares innate immune cells. Patients require only two weekly treatment courses, with each course comprising two treatment weeks, in Years 1 and 2; therefore, cladribine tablets are associated with a lower monitoring burden than many other DMTs, while short dosing periods can help to improve adherence. This review provides an overview of IRT and offers the clinician's perspective on the current MS treatment landscape, with a focus on practical advice for the management of patients undergoing treatment with cladribine tablets based on the most recent evidence available, including risks associated with COVID-19 and recommendations for vaccination in patients with MS.

Real-world evidence for cladribine tablets in multiple sclerosis: further insights into efficacy and safety

Cladribine (CLAD) is a purine nucleoside analog approved in tablet form to treat highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). CLAD tablets are the first oral therapy with an infrequent dosing schedule, administered in two annual treatment courses, each divided into two treatment cycles comprising 4–5 days of treatment. The efficacy and safety of CLAD tablets have been verified in randomized controlled clinical trials. Clinical observational studies are performed in more representative populations and over more extended periods, and thus provide valuable complementary insights. Here, we summarize the available evidence for CLAD tablets from post-marketing trials, including two observational, four long-term extensions, and two comparative studies. The patients in the post-marketing setting differed from the cohort recruited in the pivotal phase III trials regarding demographics and MS-related disability. The limited number of studies with small cohorts corroborate the disease-modifying capacity of oral CLAD and report on a durable benefit after active treatment periods. Skin-related adverse events were common in the studies focusing on safety aspects. In addition, single cases of CLAD-associated autoimmune events have been reported. Lastly, CLAD tablets appear safe regarding COVID-19 concerns, and patients mount a robust humoral immune response to SARS-CoV‑2 vaccination. We conclude that the current real-world evidence for CLAD tablets as immune reconstitution therapy for treatment of MS is based on a small number of studies and a population distinct from the cohorts randomized in the pivotal phase III trials. Further research should advance the understanding of long-term disease control after active treatment periods and the mitigation of adverse events.

Treatment With Cladribine Selects IFNγ+IL17+ T Cells in RRMS Patients - An In Vitro Study

Background

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an incurable autoimmune disease mediated by a heterogeneous T cell population (CD3+CD161+CXCR3−CCR6+IFNγ−IL17+, CD3+CXCR3+CCR6+IFNγ+IL17+, and CD3+CXCR3+IFNγ+IL17− phenotypes) that infiltrates the central nervous system, eliciting local inflammation, demyelination and neurodegeneration. Cladribine is a lymphocyte-depleting deoxyadenosine analogue recently introduced for MS therapy as a Disease Modifying Drug (DMD). Our aim was to establish a method for the early identification and prediction of cladribine responsiveness among MS patients.

Methods

An experimental model was designed to study the cytotoxic and immunomodulatory effect of cladribine. T cell subsets of naïve relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients were analyzed ex vivo and in vitro comparatively to healthy controls (HC). Surviving cells were stimulated with rh-interleukin-2 for up to 14days. Cell proliferation and immunophenotype changes were analyzed after maximal (phorbol myristate acetate/ionomycin/monensin) and physiological T-cell receptor (CD3/CD28) activation, using multiparametric flow cytometry and xMAP technology.

Results

Ex vivo CD161+Th17 cells were increased in RRMS patients. Ex vivo to in vitro phenotype shifts included: decreased CD3+CCR6+ and CD3+CD161+ in all subjects and increased CD3+CXCR3+ in RRMS patients only; Th17.1 showed increased proliferation vs Th17 in all subjects; CD3+IL17+ and CD3+IFNγ+IL17+ continued to proliferate till day 14, CD3+IFNγ+ only till day 7. Regarding cladribine exposure: RRMS CD3+ cells were more resistant compared to HC; treated CD3+ cells proliferated continuously for up to 14 days, while untreated cells only up to 7 days; both HC/RRMS CD3+CXCR3+ populations increased from baseline till day 14; in RRMS patients vs HC, IL17 secretion from cladribine-treated cells increased significantly, in line with the observed proliferation of CD3+IL17+ and CD3+IFNγ+IL17+ cells; in both HC/RRMS, cladribine led to a significant increase in CD3+IFNγ+ cells at day 7 only, having no further effect at day14. IFNγ and IL17 secreted in culture media decreased significantly from ex vivo to in vitro.

Conclusions

CD3+ subtypes showed different responsiveness due to selectivity of cladribine action, in most patients leading to in vitro survival/proliferation of lymphocyte subsets known as pathogenic in MS. This in vitro experimental model is a promising tool for the prediction of individual responsiveness of MS patients to cladribine and other DMDs.

Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Consensus Group (MSTCG): position statement on disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (white paper)

Multiple sclerosis is a complex, autoimmune-mediated disease of the central nervous system characterized by inflammatory demyelination and axonal/neuronal damage. The approval of various disease-modifying therapies and our increased understanding of disease mechanisms and evolution in recent years have significantly changed the prognosis and course of the disease. This update of the Multiple Sclerosis Therapy Consensus Group treatment recommendation focuses on the most important recommendations for disease-modifying therapies of multiple sclerosis in 2021. Our recommendations are based on current scientific evidence and apply to those medications approved in wide parts of Europe, particularly German-speaking countries (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland).

[Multiple sclerosis treatment consensus group (MSTCG): position paper on disease-modifying treatment of multiple sclerosis 2021 (white paper)]

Die Multiple Sklerose ist eine komplexe, autoimmun vermittelte Erkrankung des zentralen Nervensystems, charakterisiert durch inflammatorische Demyelinisierung sowie axonalen/neuronalen Schaden. Die Zulassung verschiedener verlaufsmodifizierender Therapien und unser verbessertes Verständnis der Krankheitsmechanismen und -entwicklung in den letzten Jahren haben die Prognose und den Verlauf der Erkrankung deutlich verändert. Diese Aktualisierung der Behandlungsempfehlung der Multiple Sklerose Therapie Konsensus Gruppe konzentriert sich auf die wichtigsten Empfehlungen für verlaufsmodifizierende Therapien der Multiplen Sklerose im Jahr 2021. Unsere Empfehlungen basieren auf aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen und gelten für diejenigen Medikamente, die in weiten Teilen Europas, insbesondere in den deutschsprachigen Ländern (Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz), zugelassen sind.

Chronic Demyelination and Axonal Degeneration in Multiple Sclerosis: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Inflammatory attacks in MS lead to both demyelination and axonal damage. However, due to incomplete remyelination most MS lesions remain chronically demyelinated. In parallel, there is axonal degeneration in the CNS of MS patients, contributing to progressive disability. There are currently no approved therapies that adequately restore myelin or protect axons from degeneration. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology of axonal loss and chronic demyelination in MS and how understanding this pathophysiology is leading to the development of new MS therapeutics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ongoing research into the function of oligodendrocytes and myelin has revealed the importance of their relationship with neuronal health. Demyelination in MS leads to a number of pathophysiologic changes contributing to axonal generation. Among these are mitochondrial dysfunction, persistent neuroinflammation, and the effects of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. With this information, we review currently approved and investigational therapies designed to restore lost or damaged myelin and protect against neuronal degeneration. The development of therapies to restore lost myelin and protect neurons is a promising avenue of investigation for the benefit of patients with MS.

CLICK-MS and MASTER-2 Phase IV trial design: cladribine tablets in suboptimally controlled relapsing multiple sclerosis

Cladribine tablets 10 mg (3.5 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years) are approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including relapsing-remitting MS and active secondary progressive MS. However, real-world data on cladribine tablets are limited. CLICK-MS and MASTER-2 are single arm, observational, 30-month, Phase IV studies in the US evaluating the effectiveness and safety of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in patients with relapsing-remitting MS or active secondary progressive MS who had suboptimal response to prior injectable (CLICK-MS), or infusion/oral (MASTER-2) disease-modifying therapy. The primary end point is 24-month annualized relapse rate. Key secondary end points include patient-reported outcomes on quality of life measures, treatment adherence and adverse events. Studies began in 2019 and are expected to be completed in 2023. Trial registration number • CLICK-MS: NCT03933215 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Full title; CLadribine tablets: observational evaluation of effectIveness and patient-reported outcomes in suboptimally Controlled patients previously taKing injectable disease-modifying drugs for relapsing forms of Multiple Sclerosis • MASTER-2: NCT03933202 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Full title; Cladribine tablets: observational evaluation of effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes in suboptiMAlly controlled patientS previously Taking oral or infusion disEase-modifying dRugs for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.

Recent advances and remaining questions of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis

The judicious use of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for MS requires understanding the potential benefits, identifying the most appropriate patient, and acknowledging the risks and differences between different protocols. Recently, AHSCT for MS is occurring more frequently, with a better safety profile than earlier studies. This review assesses recently published studies to determine the advances that have been made and remaining questions that future studies are poised to answer. We included studies from January 2016 to November 2020 with 20 or more patients. The benefits of AHSCT, including "no evidence of disease activity", functional and patient-reported outcomes, novel biomarkers such as brain atrophy or neurofilament light chain, and cost-effectiveness were assessed. The patient selection, treatment protocols, and safety outcomes differ between reports. The overall efficacy of AHSCT is better than standard treatments. Younger patients with highly active disease have greater chance for improvement, while patients who have comorbidities, failed more treatments, and are transitioning to a more progressive phase may not respond as well to AHSCT. The safety profiles for all AHSCT protocols is improving, however the durability of treatment response may not be the same for all protocols. The goal of AHSCT is to stop disease activity, avoid worsening disability, and obviate the need for further disease-modifying treatment, while improving patient quality of life and minimizing treatment-related risk. Results from currently enrolling randomized controlled trials, as well as ongoing registries, will provide more evidence for the safe and appropriate use of AHSCT.

Normal antibody response after COVID-19 during treatment with cladribine

Cladribine is a highly effective, recently available treatment in multiple sclerosis. This case report describes a patient with COVID-19 infection during second year treatment with cladribine. The infection was mild and she was able to mount an adequate immune response with detectable antibodies three months later.