Longitudinal treatment responsiveness on plasma neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

The Role of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein as a Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

There is debate on the role of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as a reliable biomarker in multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and its potential to reflect disease progression. This review aimed to investigate the role of GFAP in MS and NMOSD. A systematic search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Sciences, was conducted up to 20 December 2023 to identify studies that measured GFAP levels in people with MS (PwMS) and people with NMOSD (PwNMOSD). R software version 4.3.3. with the random-effect model was used to pool the effect size with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Of 4109 studies, 49 studies met our inclusion criteria encompassing 3491 PwMS, 849 PwNMOSD, and 1046 healthy controls (HCs). The analyses indicated that the cerebrospinal fluid level of GFAP (cGFAP) and serum level of GFAP (sGFAP) were significantly higher in PwMS than HCs (SMD = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.86, p < 0.001, I2 = 29%, and SMD = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.99, p = 0.02, I2 = 90%, respectively). The sGFAP was significantly higher in PwNMOSD than in HCs (SMD = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.07, p < 0.001, I2 = 10%). Among PwMS, the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) exhibited significant correlations with cGFAP (r = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.59, p < 0.001, I2 = 91%) and sGFAP (r = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.49, p < 0.001, I2 = 78%). Regarding that GFAP is increased in MS and NMOSD and has correlations with disease features, it can be a potential biomarker in MS and NMOSD and indicate the disease progression and disability in these disorders.

Soluble biomarkers for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: a mini review

The Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSD) constitute a spectrum of rare autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system characterized by episodes of transverse myelitis, optic neuritis, and other demyelinating attacks. Previously thought to be a subtype of multiple sclerosis, NMOSD is now known to be a distinct disease with unique pathophysiology, clinical course, and treatment options. Although there have been significant recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of NMOSD, the field still lacks clinically validated biomarkers that can be used to stratify disease severity, monitor disease activity, and inform treatment decisions. Here we review many emerging NMOSD biomarkers including markers of cellular damage, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, complement, and cytokines, with a focus on how each biomarker can potentially be used for initial diagnosis, relapse surveillance, disability prediction, and treatment monitoring.

Neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a comprehensive review and integrated analysis with glial fibrillary acidic protein

BACKGROUND

In the context of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), there are several measures that serve as a biomarker. However, each of the methods has the intrinsic limitations. While neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) have emerged as an additional biomarker for NMOSD, a thorough investigation of their role remains incomplete. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive review of the current literature regarding NfL and GFAP as a biomarker and explore their potential utility in NMOSD.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify peer-reviewed articles investigating NfL and GFAP as a biomarker in NMOSD.

RESULTS

Our search identified 13 relevant studies. NfL consistently showed promise in distinguishing NMOSD patients from healthy individuals, although it had limited specificity in distinguishing NMOSD from other demyelinating diseases. NfL offered certain advantages over GFAP, notably its ability to predict disability worsening during attacks. In contrast, GFAP provided valuable insight, particularly in distinguishing NMOSD from multiple sclerosis and identifying clinical relapses. In addition, GFAP showed predictive potential for future attacks. Some studies even suggested that NfL may serve as an indicator of treatment response in NMOSD.

CONCLUSIONS

NfL and GFAP hold promise as biomarkers for NMOSD, demonstrating their usefulness in distinguishing patients from healthy individuals, assessing disease severity, and possibly reflecting treatment response. However, it is important to recognize that NfL and GFAP may, at some point, have different roles.

Deciphering prognostic indicators in AQP4-IgG-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: An integrative review of demographic and laboratory factors

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a group of inflammatory diseases affecting the central nervous system, characterized by optic neuritis and myelitis. The complex nature of NMOSD and varied patient response necessitates personalized treatment and efficient patient stratification strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of recent advances in clinical and biomarker research related to aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-immunoglobulin G (IgG)-seropositive NMOSD prognosis and identify key areas for future research.

METHODS

A comprehensive review and synthesis of recent literature were conducted, focusing on demographic factors and laboratory investigations.

RESULTS

Demographic factors, such as age, ethnicity, and sex, influence NMOSD prognosis. Key biomarkers for NMOSD prognosis include homocysteine, antinuclear antibodies, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, thyroid hormone levels, neurofilament light chain levels, and serum glial fibrillary acidic protein might also predict NMOSD attack prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Further investigation is required to understand sex-related disparities and biomarker inconsistencies. Identification and understanding of these factors can aid in the development of personalized therapeutic strategies, thereby improving outcomes for NMOSD patients. Future studies should focus on unifying research design for consistent results.

Serum Biomarker Profiles Discriminate AQP4 Seropositive and Double Seronegative Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) serum levels are useful to define disease activity in different neurologic conditions. These biomarkers are increased in patients with aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMOSD (AQP4+NMOSD) during clinical attacks suggesting a concomitant axonal and glial damage. However, there are contradictory results in double seronegative NMOSD (DS-NMOSD). The aim of this study was to characterize the neuronal, axonal, and glial damage of DS-NMOSD in comparison with AQP4+NMOSD.

METHODS

Patients with DS-NMOSD (i.e., for AQP4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies-MOG-Abs) and age-matched AQP4+NMOSD diagnosed according to the latest diagnostic criteria and with available serum samples obtained within 3 months from onset/relapse were retrospectively enrolled from 14 international centers. Clinical and radiologic data were collected. Serum NfL, GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1 levels were determined using an ultrasensitive paramagnetic bead-based ELISA (SIMOA). Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric tests and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

We included 25 patients with AQP4+NMOSD and 26 with DS-NMOSD. The median age at disease onset (p = 0.611) and female sex predominance (p = 0.072) were similar in the 2 groups. The most common syndromes at sampling in both AQP4+NMOSD and DS-NMOSD were myelitis (56% vs 38.5%) and optic neuritis (34.6% vs 32%), with no statistical differences (p = 0.716). Median EDSS at sampling was 3.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-7.7) in the AQP4+NMOSD group and 4 (IQR [3-6]) in the DS-NMOSD group (p = 0.974). Serum GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1 levels were higher in patients with AQP4+NMOSD compared with those with DS-NMOSD (median 308.3 vs 103.4 pg/mL p = 0.001; median 1.2 vs 0.5 pg/mL, p = 0.001; and median 61.4 vs 35 pg/mL, p = 0.006, respectively). The ROC curve analysis showed that GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1, but not NfL, values were able to discriminate between AQP4+ and DS-NMOSD (area under the curve (AUC) tau: 0.782, p = 0.001, AUC GFAP: 0.762, p = 0.001, AUC UCH-L1: 0.723, p = 0.006). NfL levels were associated with EDSS at nadir only in patients with AQP4+NMOSD.

DISCUSSION

Serum GFAP, tau, and UCH-L1 levels discriminate between AQP4+NMOSD and DS-NMOSD. The different biomarker profile of AQP4+NMOSD vs DS-NMOSD suggests heterogeneity of diseases within the latter category and provides useful data to improve our understanding of this disease.

Elevated plasma neurofilament light chain in immune-mediated neurological disorders (IMND) detected by immunomagnetic reduction (IMR)

BACKGROUND

In cases of immune-mediated neurological disorders (IMND), different syndromes are associated with antibodies against neuronal surface antigens, intra-neuronal antigens, astrocytic aquaporin, and gangliosides. These autoantibodies can be pathogenic or connected to neuroinflammation and resulting neuronal injuries. This study aims to identify a blood biomarker that can detect neuronal damage in individuals with IMND. To this end, we use immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) nanobead technology to measure plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL).

METHODS

The patients with IMND were enrolled in the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung from 2018 to 2023. Seronegative patients were excluded based on the results of antibody tests. The healthy controls (HC) were community-dwelling adults from the Northeastern Taiwan Community Medicine Research Cohort (NTCMRC) conducted by the Community Medicine Research Center of the Keelung CGMH from 2020 to 2022. IMR technique detects magnetic susceptibility via measuring magnetic signal reduction caused by antigen-antibody immunocomplex formation on magnetic nanobeads. The plasma level of NfL was determined by the magnetic susceptibility changes in IMR.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 57 IMND patients from the hospital and 73 HC participants from the communities. The plasma NfL was significantly higher in the IMND than in the HC (11.022 ± 2.637 vs. 9.664 ± 2.610 pg/mL, p = 0.004), regardless of age effects on plasma NfL in an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) (F = 0.720, p = 0.950). In the receiver of operation curve analysis, the area under curve for plasma NfL to discriminate IMND and HC was 0.664 (95% CI = 0.549 to 0.739, p = 0.005). The subgroup analysis of plasma NfL in the IMND patients showed no difference between peripheral immune-mediated neuropathy (IMN) and central immune-mediated encephalomyelitis (IMEM) (11.331 ± 2.895 vs. 10.627 ± 2.260 pg/mL, p = 0.322), nor between tumor and non-tumor IMND (10.784 ± 3.446 vs. 11.093 ± 2.391 pg/mL, p = 0.714). Additionally, the antibody class of ganglioside antibodies in IMN did not have an impact on plasma NfL level (p = 0.857).

CONCLUSION

Plasma NfL measurement is a reliable indicator of axonal injuries in patients with IMND. It is equally effective in detecting nerve injuries in inflammatory peripheral neuropathies and central neuroinflammation. The IMR nanobead technology offers a feasible method of detecting plasma NfL, which helps identify axonal injuries in IMND.

Anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein antibody and anti-aquaporin-4 antibody double-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A case report

BACKGROUND

A case of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) with positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) anti-aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-IgG) and anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein IgG (GFAP-IgG) at the time of relapse was reported. The exact roles of GFAP-IgG in NMOSD are not fully understood and are the subject of ongoing research. This study revealed the possible connection between GFAP-IgG and the occurrence or development of diseases.

CASE SUMMARY

A 19-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital due to a constellation of symptoms, including dizziness, nausea, and vomiting that commenced 1 year prior, reoccurred 2 mo ago, and were accompanied by visual blurring that also began 2 mo ago. Additionally, she presented with slurred speech and ptosis, both of which emerged 1 mo ago. Notably, her symptoms deteriorated 10 d prior to admission, leading to the onset of arm and leg weakness. During hospitalization, magnetic resonance imaging showed high T2-fluid attenuated inversion recovery signals, and slightly high and equal diffusion-weighted imaging signals. The serum antibody of AQP4-IgG tested positive at a dilution of 1:100. CSF antibody testing showed positive results for GFAP-IgG at a dilution of 1:10 and AQP4-IgG at a dilution of 1:32. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with NMOSD. She received intravenous methylprednisolone at a daily dose of 500 mg for 5 d, followed by a tapering-off period. Afterward, the rate of reduction was gradually slowed down and the timely use of immunosuppressants was implemented.

CONCLUSION

The CFS was slightly GFAP-IgG-positive during the relapse period, which can aid in the diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

Serum neurofilament light chain predicts spinal cord atrophy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Levels of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) are useful biomarkers of disease activity and disability in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Here we investigated the association of sNfL and sGFAP levels with brain and spinal cord volumes in patients with NMOSD. Fifteen patients with NMOSD were enrolled in this prospective study. The median baseline level of sNfL was 42.2 (IQR, 16.1-72.6) pg/mL and decreased to 8.5 (IQR, 7.4-16.6) pg/mL at the end of the study. The reduction in sNfL was associated with a 7.5% loss of cervical spinal cord volume (CSCV) (p = 0.001). The levels of sGFAP reduced from 239.2 (IQR, 139.0-3393.3) pg/mL at baseline to 108.5 (IQR, 74.2-154.6) pg/mL. However, there was no strong correlation between sGFAP levels and CSCV changes during the follow-up period. Our data suggested that sNfL level is a useful biomarker for predicting spinal cord atrophy in patients with NMOSD.

Serum neurofilament and glial fibrillary acidic protein in idiopathic and seropositive transverse myelitis

BACKGROUND

Serum levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) reflect the disease activity and disability in central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating diseases. However, the clinical significance of NfL and GFAP in idiopathic transverse myelitis (iTM), an inflammatory spinal cord disease with unknown underlying causes, remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate NfL and GFAP levels in iTM and their association with the clinical parameters compared with those in TM with disease-specific antibodies such as anti-aquaporin 4 or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (sTM).

METHODS

We collected serum and clinical data of 365 patients with CNS inflammatory diseases from 12 hospitals. The serum NfL and GFAP levels were measured in patients with iTM (n = 37) and sTM (n = 39) using ultrasensitive single-molecule array assays. Regression analysis was performed to investigate the associations between serum levels of NfL and GFAP and the clinical parameters such as higher EDSS scores (EDSS ≥ 4.0).

RESULTS

Mean NfL levels were not significantly different between iTM (50.29 pg/ml) and sTM (63.18 pg/ml) (p = 0.824). GFAP levels were significantly lower in iTM (112.34 pg/ml) than in sTM (3814.20 pg/ml) (p = 0.006). NfL levels correlated with expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores in sTM (p = 0.001) but not in iTM (p = 0.824). Disease duration also correlated with higher EDSS scores in sTM (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

NfL levels and disease duration correlated with EDSS scores in sTM, and GFAP levels could be a promising biomarker to differentiate iTM from sTM.

Clinically relevant increases in serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein in patients with Susac syndrome

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Serum levels of neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) are promising neuro-axonal damage and astrocytic activation biomarkers. Susac syndrome (SS) is an increasingly recognized neurological condition and biomarkers that can help assess and monitor disease evolution are highly needed for the adequate management of these patients. sNfL and sGFAP levels were evaluated in patients with SS and their clinical relevance in the relapse and remission phase of the disease was assessed.

METHODS

As part of a multicentre study that enrolled patients diagnosed with SS from six international centres, sNfL and sGFAP levels were assessed in 22 SS patients (nine during a relapse and 13 in remission) and 59 age- and sex-matched healthy controls using SimoaTM assay Neurology 2-Plex B Kit.

RESULTS

Serum NfL levels were higher than those of healthy controls (p < 0.001) in SS patients and in both subgroups of patients in relapse and in remission (p < 0.001 for both), with significantly higher levels in relapse than in remission (p = 0.008). sNfL levels showed a negative correlation with time from the last relapse (r = -0.663; p = 0.001). sGFAP levels were slightly higher in the whole group of patients than in healthy controls (p = 0.046) and were more pronounced in relapse than in remission (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

In SS patients, both sNFL and sGFAP levels increased compared with healthy controls. Both biomarkers had higher levels during clinical relapse and much lower levels in remission. sNFL was shown to be time sensitive to clinical changes and can be useful to monitor neuro-axonal damage in SS.

Biomarkers in autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system

The autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) represent individual heterogeneity with different disease entities. Although clinical and imaging features make it possible to characterize larger patient cohorts, they may not provide sufficient evidence to detect disease activity and response to disease modifying drugs. Biomarkers are becoming a powerful tool due to their objectivity and easy access. Biomarkers may indicate various aspects of biological processes in healthy and/or pathological states, or as a response to drug therapy. According to the clinical features described, biomarkers are usually classified into predictive, diagnostic, monitoring and safety biomarkers. Some nerve injury markers, humoral markers, cytokines and immune cells in serum or cerebrospinal fluid have potential roles in disease severity and prognosis in autoimmune diseases occurring in the CNS, which provides a promising approach for clinicians to early intervention and prevention of future disability. Therefore, this review mainly summarizes the potential biomarkers indicated in autoimmune disorders of the CNS.

SAkuraBONSAI: Protocol design of a novel, prospective study to explore clinical, imaging, and biomarker outcomes in patients with AQP4-IgG-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder receiving open-label satralizumab

Background

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare, autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that produces acute, unpredictable relapses causing cumulative neurological disability. Satralizumab, a humanized, monoclonal recycling antibody that targets the interleukin-6 receptor, reduced NMOSD relapse risk vs. placebo in two Phase 3 trials: SAkuraSky (satralizumab ± immunosuppressive therapy; NCT02028884) and SAkuraStar (satralizumab monotherapy; NCT02073279). Satralizumab is approved to treat aquaporin-4 IgG-seropositive (AQP4-IgG+) NMOSD. SAkuraBONSAI (NCT05269667) will explore fluid and imaging biomarkers to better understand the mechanism of action of satralizumab and the neuronal and immunological changes following treatment in AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD.

Objectives

SAkuraBONSAI will evaluate clinical disease activity measures, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), pharmacokinetics, and safety of satralizumab in AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD. Correlations between imaging markers (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and optical coherence tomography [OCT]) and blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers will be investigated.

Study design

SAkuraBONSAI is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, international, Phase 4 study that will enroll approximately 100 adults (18-74 years) with AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD. This study includes two patient cohorts: newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients (Cohort 1; n = 60); and inadequate responders to recent (<6 months) rituximab infusion (Cohort 2; n = 40). Satralizumab monotherapy (120 mg) will be administered subcutaneously at Weeks 0, 2, 4, and Q4W thereafter for a total of 92 weeks.

Endpoints

Disease activity related to relapses (proportion relapse-free, annualized relapse rate, time to relapse, and relapse severity), disability progression (Expanded Disability Status Scale), cognition (Symbol Digit Modalities Test), and ophthalmological changes (visual acuity; National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25) will all be assessed. Peri-papillary retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex thickness will be monitored using advanced OCT (retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thickness). Lesion activity and atrophy will be monitored by MRI. Pharmacokinetics, PROs, and blood and CSF mechanistic biomarkers will be assessed regularly. Safety outcomes include the incidence and severity of adverse events.

Conclusions

SAkuraBONSAI will incorporate comprehensive imaging, fluid biomarker, and clinical assessments in patients with AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD. SAkuraBONSAI will provide new insights into the mechanism of action of satralizumab in NMOSD, while offering the opportunity to identify clinically relevant neurological, immunological, and imaging markers.

Glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a current review

INTRODUCTION

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing, often debilitating neuroinflammatory disease, whose predominant clinical manifestations are longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and optic neuritis. About 80% of the patients with an NMOSD phenotype have pathogenic autoantibodies against the astrocyte water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG). While therapeutic options for NMOSD have greatly expanded in recent years, well-established biomarkers for prognosis or treatment response are still lacking. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is mainly expressed in astrocytes and can be detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood of patients with NMOSD.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we comprehensively review the current knowledge on GFAP as a biomarker in NMOSD.

EXPERT OPINION

In patients with AQP4-IgG⁺ NMOSD, GFAP levels are elevated in CSF and serum during acute attacks and correlate with disability, consistent with the pathophysiology of this antibody-mediated astrocytopathy. Serum GFAP levels tend to be higher in AQP4-IgG⁺ NMOSD than in its differential diagnoses, multiple sclerosis, and myelin oligodendrocyte antibody-associated disease. Importantly, serum GFAP levels in AQP4-IgG⁺ NMOSD during remission may be predictive of future disease activity. Serial serum GFAP measurements are emerging as a biomarker to monitor disease activity in AQP4-IgG⁺ NMOSD and could have the potential for application in clinical practice.

Pathomechanisms in demyelination and astrocytopathy: autoantibodies to AQP4, MOG, GFAP, GRP78 and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to highlight the recently emerging pathomechanisms of diseases associated with autoantibodies to AQP4, MOG, GFAP, GRP78 and further novel targets. We discuss novel biomarkers and therapeutic approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CDC) is regarded as the major effector mechanism for AQP4-IgG in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), recent studies helped to understand the relevance of complement-independent effector mechanisms. For MOG-IgG mediated diseases the role of CDC is less clear. MOG-IgG may trigger a tightly controlled FcR and BTK-driven microglia proliferative response in MOG-antibody-associated diseases. Differences of antibody-mediated tissue damage may reflect differential response to therapy. In addition, antibodies to GFAP, GRP78 and further novel targets have been implicated in demyelination and astrocytopathy.

SUMMARY

Elucidating the whole spectrum of effector functions in diseases mediated by AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG and understanding the role of additional novel autoantibodies involved in demyelination and astrocytopathy may guide further novel treatment decisions.

Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder and Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Associated Disease

The term neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) describes a group of clinical-MRI syndromes characterized by longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis, optic neuritis, brainstem dysfunction and/or, less commonly, encephalopathy. About 80% of patients harbor antibodies directed against the water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG), expressed on astrocytes, which was found to be both a biomarker and a pathogenic cause of NMOSD. More recently, antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG), have been found to be a biomarker of a different entity, termed MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), which has overlapping, but different pathogenesis, clinical features, treatment response, and prognosis when compared to AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD. Despite important refinements in the accuracy of AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG testing assays, a small proportion of patients with NMOSD still remain negative for both antibodies and are called “seronegative” NMOSD. Whilst major advances have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of these conditions, biomarkers that could help predict the risk of relapses, disease activity, and prognosis are still lacking. In this context, a number of serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers are emerging as potentially useful in clinical practice for diagnostic and treatment purposes. These include antibody titers, cytokine profiles, complement factors, and markers of neuronal (e.g., neurofilament light chain) or astroglial (e.g., glial fibrillary acidic protein) damage. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence regarding the role of emerging diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in patients with NMOSD and MOGAD.

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Blood as a Disease Biomarker of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a type III intermediate filament protein found in astrocytes in the brain. Damaged astrocytes release GFAP into cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Thus, GFAP levels in these body fluids may reflect the disease state of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), which includes astrocytopathy, characterized by pathogenic antibodies against aquaporin 4 located on astrocytes. Recently, single-molecule array technology that can detect these synaptic proteins in blood, even in the subfemtomolar range, has been developed. Emerging evidence suggests that GFAP protein is a strong biomarker candidate for NMOSD. This mini-review provides basic information about GFAP protein and innovative clinical data that show the potential clinical value of blood GFAP levels as a biomarker for NMOSD.