The evolving immunotherapeutic landscape in advanced oesophagogastric cancer

Timeliness of cancer care in a regional Victorian health service: A comparison of high-volume (Lung) and low-volume (oesophagogastric) tumour streams

Background

Timeliness of cancer care is vital for improved survival and quality of life of patients. Service and care centralisation at larger‐volume centres has been associated with improved outcomes. However, there is a lack of systematic data on the impact of tumour stream volume on timeliness of care.

Aims

To investigate and compare timeliness of care for lung cancer, a high‐volume (more commonly diagnosed) tumour stream, and oesophagogastric (OG) cancer, a low‐volume (less commonly diagnosed) tumour stream, at a regional health service in Victoria, Australia.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study comprising random samples of 75 people newly diagnosed with lung cancer (International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems‐10 [ICD‐10] diagnosis codes C34 in the Victorian Cancer Registry [VCR]) and 50 people newly diagnosed with OG cancer (ICD‐10 diagnosis codes C15 or C16 in VCR) at one regional Victorian health service between 2016 and 2017. Binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between patient factors and suboptimal timeliness of care.

Results

In comparison to OG cancer patients, lung cancer patients had reduced odds of suboptimal timeliness of care in reference to times outside OCP for referral to diagnosis (OR [95% CI] = 0.34 [0.14 to 0.83]) but increased odds of suboptimal timeliness for diagnosis to treatment (OR [95% CI] = 2.48 [1.01 to 6.09]).

Conclusion

In the low‐volume OG cancer stream, patients had longer wait times from referral to an MDM, where treatment decisions occur, but shorter time to commencement of first treatment. Conversely in the high‐volume lung cancer group, there was delayed initiation of first treatment following presentation at MDM. There is need to explore ways to fast‐track MDM presentation and commencement of therapy among people diagnosed with low‐volume and high‐volume cancers, respectively.

Synergism Between Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer: An Overview of Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract that is usually treated with a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy (RT), and/or surgery, according to disease status. Despite the availability of multimodal therapeutic strategies, local recurrence is frequently observed. Immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic approach that is currently highly investigated in association to standard therapies, including RT, with the aim to improve patients' outcomes. Materials and Methods: A PubMed search was performed with the following keywords in all fields: "esophageal cancer" and "radiotherapy" and "radiation" and "immunotherapy" and "PD-1" and "PD L1." For an overview of ongoing trials, an additional search on ClinicalTrials.gov website was performed using the keywords "esophageal cancer" and "immunotherapy" and "PD-L1" and "CTLA-4" and "radiation" and "radiotherapy." Emerging data from preclinical and clinical studies are suggesting a synergistic effect between immunotherapy and RT. With the aim to update the knowledge of this synergistic immune-mediated antitumor activity and discuss current challenges, the authors summarize published data concerning the basic mechanisms and the effectiveness and tolerance of the combination between immunotherapy and RT for patients with EC, followed by an overview of ongoing clinical trial. Conclusions: Published results encourage the use of personalized therapeutic approaches for EC patients in the future; results from ongoing studies will help to identify the optimal strategies for patient selection and treatment response evaluation.

A Phase II Study of Modified FOLFOX6 for Advanced Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies

INTRODUCTION

In patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to chemotherapy, the treatment options are limited. Via this phase II study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin (modified FOLFOX6).

METHODS

Patients who had histologically confirmed metastatic gastric cancer refractory to ≥ two previous chemotherapy regimens were included. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) by an independent central review. According to an assumption of a threshold ORR of 10% and expected ORR of 25%, with α = 0.05 and β = 0.20, at least 33 patients were required. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life measured by EQ-5D, and safety.

RESULTS

Among the 35 enrolled patients, 33 were included in the primary analysis. All patients previously received fluoropyrimidines, cisplatin, and taxanes, and 24 (73%) were pretreated with irinotecan. The confirmed ORR was 27% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13-46]. The median PFS and OS were 2.2 (95% CI 1.2-3.2) and 5.6 (95% CI 4.1-7.0) months, respectively. In the multivariate analyses, immunotherapy within 90 days and a Glasgow Prognostic Score of 0 were associated with better treatment outcomes. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse event was neutropenia (36%), and no febrile neutropenia was observed. The median EQ-5D scores did not change from baseline at 2, 4, and 8 weeks (p value = 0.38, 0.79, and 0.98, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) showed substantial activity and acceptable toxicity for chemotherapy-refractory advanced gastric cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000016416).

Ipilimumab or FOLFOX with Nivolumab and Trastuzumab in previously untreated HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic EsophagoGastric Adenocarcinoma - the randomized phase 2 INTEGA trial (AIO STO 0217)

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) currently represents a main cause of cancer related death. Despite an intensified treatment for locally advanced or metastatic EGA with a doublet chemotherapy consisting of a platinum compound and a fluoropyrimidine in combination with trastuzumab for HER2-positive disease or in selected cases with docetaxel, survival remains poor. Recently, immune-oncology based strategies relevantly improved the treatment of different solid tumors and showed some promise in late or later stage trials in EGA. Notably, the combination of immunotherapy with trastuzumab to enhance anti-tumor immunity through activation of innate and adaptive immunity was beneficial in preclinical studies or clinical studies in breast cancer.

METHODS

The INTEGA study is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, exploratory phase II trial designed to assess clinical performance, safety and tolerability of ipilimumab or 5-FU/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in combination with nivolumab and trastuzumab in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive, locally advanced or metastatic EGA. The primary objective is to determine the clinical performance of ipilimumab or FOLFOX in combination with nivolumab and trastuzumab in terms of overall survival. Secondary objectives are safety and tolerability, efficacy in terms of progression-free survival and objective response rate and blood-based signatures (e.g. immune response or suppression of anti-HER2 resistance) that may correlate with treatment response.

DISCUSSION

Recent evidence from the phase II NCT02954536 study (oxaliplatin, capecitabine, trastuzumab and pembrolizumab) suggests the clinical feasibility of combining chemotherapy, trastuzumab and checkpoint inhibition in EGA. However, evidence for a chemotherapy-free regimen is also mounting in HER2-positive disease (NCT02689284) i.e. margetuximab and Pembrolizumab. Both studies excelled with high overall response rates and manageable toxicities. The INTEGA study aims to comparatively assess these results and select a promising new 1st line regimen which then needs to be confirmed in a randomized phase III trial. Further, the translational part of the study might help to better stratify patients and tailor treatment of either arm.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03409848 24.01.2018.

Combination of Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Refractory or Intolerant to Standard Therapies

Here, we report the four cases with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma pretreated with standard chemotherapy who then received salvage-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil plus l-leucovorin (FOLFOX) at our institution. We identified four men following the mentioned regimen; their median age was 68.5 years (range, 65-76 years). All patients developed disease progression on 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and taxanes. Two patients achieved partial response; the other two achieved stable disease on receiving cisplatin-containing regimens as first-line therapy. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statuses were 1 in three patients and 2 in one patient. The best response was partial response in one patient, stable disease in one, and progressive disease in two. For the two patients who achieved partial response or stable disease, the times to progression were 5.7 and 5.2 months and the overall survival times were 8.1 and 9.5 months, respectively. A grade 3 encephalopathy in one patient improved soon after chemotherapy discontinuation and supportive therapies. There was no treatment-related death. This is the first report suggesting the potential effectiveness of FOLFOX as salvage chemotherapy for metastatic esophageal cancer.