1
|
Zheng M, Bernardo C, Stocks N, Hu P, Gonzalez-Chica D. Diabetes mellitus monitoring and control among adults in Australian general practice: a national retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069875. [PMID: 37185189 PMCID: PMC10151933 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigated whether the monitoring and control of clinical parameters are better among patients with newly compared with past recorded diabetes diagnosis. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING MedicineInsight, a national general practice database in Australia. PARTICIPANTS 101 875 'regular' adults aged 18+ years with past recorded (2015-2016) and 9236 with newly recorded (2017) diabetes diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Two different groups of outcomes were assessed in 2018. The first group of outcomes was the proportion of patients with clinical parameters (ie, glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood pressure (BP), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, estimated glomerular filtration rate and albumin-to-creatinine ratio) monitored at least once in 2018. The second group of outcomes were those related to diabetes control in 2018 (HbA1c ≤7.0%, (BP) ≤140/90 mm Hg, total cholesterol <4.0 mmol/L and LDL-C <2.0 mmol/L). Adjusted ORs (ORadj) and adjusted probabilities (%) were obtained based on logistic regression models adjusted for practice variables and patients' socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS The study included 111 111 patients (51.7% men; mean age 65.3±15.0 years) with recorded diabetes diagnosis (11.0% of all 1 007 714 adults in the database). HbA1c was monitored in 39.2% (95% CI 36.9% to 41.6%) of patients with newly recorded and 45.2% (95% CI 42.6% to 47.8%) with past recorded diabetes (ORadj 0.78, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.82). HbA1c control was achieved by 78.4% (95% CI 76.7% to 80.0%) and 54.4% (95% CI 53.4% to 55.4%) of monitored patients with newly or past recorded diabetes, respectively (ORadj 3.11, 95% CI 2.82 to 3.39). Less than 20% of patients with newly or past recorded diabetes had their HbA1c, BP and total cholesterol levels controlled (ORadj 1.08, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.21). CONCLUSIONS The monitoring of clinical parameters was lower among patients with newly than past recorded diabetes. However, diabetes control was similarly low in both groups, with only one in five monitored patients achieving control of all clinical parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyue Zheng
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Carla Bernardo
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nigel Stocks
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Peng Hu
- School of Health and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - David Gonzalez-Chica
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Rural Clinical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gordon J, Britt H, Miller GC, Henderson J, Scott A, Harrison C. General Practice Statistics in Australia: Pushing a Round Peg into a Square Hole. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19041912. [PMID: 35206101 PMCID: PMC8872542 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19041912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
In Australia, general practice forms a core part of the health system, with general practitioners (GPs) having a gatekeeper role for patients to receive care from other health services. GPs manage the care of patients across their lifespan and have roles in preventive health care, chronic condition management, multimorbidity and population health. Most people in Australia see a GP once in any given year. Draft reforms have been released by the Australian Government that may change the model of general practice currently implemented in Australia. In order to quantify the impact and effectiveness of any implemented reforms in the future, reliable and valid data about general practice clinical activity over time, will be needed. In this context, this commentary outlines the historical and current approaches used to obtain general practice statistics in Australia and highlights the benefits and limitations of these approaches. The role of data generated from GP electronic health record extractions is discussed. A methodology to generate high quality statistics from Australian general practice in the future is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Gordon
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Strengthening Rehabilitation Capacity in Health Systems, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Helena Britt
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (H.B.); (G.C.M.); (J.H.)
| | - Graeme C. Miller
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (H.B.); (G.C.M.); (J.H.)
| | - Joan Henderson
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; (H.B.); (G.C.M.); (J.H.)
| | - Anthony Scott
- Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia;
| | - Christopher Harrison
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee S, Doktorchik C, Martin EA, D'Souza AG, Eastwood C, Shaheen AA, Naugler C, Lee J, Quan H. Electronic Medical Record-Based Case Phenotyping for the Charlson Conditions: Scoping Review. JMIR Med Inform 2021; 9:e23934. [PMID: 33522976 PMCID: PMC7884219 DOI: 10.2196/23934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Electronic medical records (EMRs) contain large amounts of rich clinical information. Developing EMR-based case definitions, also known as EMR phenotyping, is an active area of research that has implications for epidemiology, clinical care, and health services research. Objective This review aims to describe and assess the present landscape of EMR-based case phenotyping for the Charlson conditions. Methods A scoping review of EMR-based algorithms for defining the Charlson comorbidity index conditions was completed. This study covered articles published between January 2000 and April 2020, both inclusive. Embase (Excerpta Medica database) and MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) were searched using keywords developed in the following 3 domains: terms related to EMR, terms related to case finding, and disease-specific terms. The manuscript follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Results A total of 274 articles representing 299 algorithms were assessed and summarized. Most studies were undertaken in the United States (181/299, 60.5%), followed by the United Kingdom (42/299, 14.0%) and Canada (15/299, 5.0%). These algorithms were mostly developed either in primary care (103/299, 34.4%) or inpatient (168/299, 56.2%) settings. Diabetes, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and rheumatology had the highest number of developed algorithms. Data-driven and clinical rule–based approaches have been identified. EMR-based phenotype and algorithm development reflect the data access allowed by respective health systems, and algorithms vary in their performance. Conclusions Recognizing similarities and differences in health systems, data collection strategies, extraction, data release protocols, and existing clinical pathways is critical to algorithm development strategies. Several strategies to assist with phenotype-based case definitions have been proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seungwon Lee
- Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Data Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Chelsea Doktorchik
- Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Elliot Asher Martin
- Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Adam Giles D'Souza
- Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Cathy Eastwood
- Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Abdel Aziz Shaheen
- Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Christopher Naugler
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Joon Lee
- Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Data Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Hude Quan
- Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|