Evaluation of the Effect of Carbohydrate Intake on Postprandial Glucose in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Insulin Pumps

Sensor-Based Glucose Metrics during Different Diet Compositions in Type 1 Diabetes-A Randomized One-Week Crossover Trial

By reducing carbohydrate intake, people with type 1 diabetes may reduce fluctuations in blood glucose, but the evidence in this area is sparse. The aim of this study was to investigate glucose metrics during a one-week low-carbohydrate-high-fat (HF) and a low-carbohydrate-high-protein (HP) diet compared with an isocaloric high-carbohydrate (HC) diet. In a randomized, three-period cross-over study, twelve adults with insulin-pump-treated type 1 diabetes followed an HC (energy provided by carbohydrate: 48%, fat: 33%, protein: 19%), HF (19%, 62%, 19%), and an HP (19%, 57%, 24%) diet for one week. Glucose values were obtained during intervention periods using a Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring system. Participant characteristics were: 33% females, median (range) age 50 (22-70) years, diabetes duration 25 (11-52) years, HbA1c 7.3 (5.5-8.3)% (57 (37-67) mmol/mol), and BMI 27.3 (21.3-35.9) kg/m2. Glycemic variability was lower with HF (30.5 ± 6.2%) and HP (30.0 ± 5.5%) compared with HC (34.5 ± 4.1%) (PHF-HC = 0.009, PHP-HC = 0.003). There was no difference between groups in mean glucose (HF: 8.7 ± 1.1, HP: 8.2 ± 1.0, HC: 8.7 ± 1.0 mmol/L, POverall = 0.08). Time > 10.0 mmol/L was lower with HP (22.3 ± 11.8%) compared with HF (29.4 ± 12.1%) and HC (29.5 ± 13.4%) (PHF-HP = 0.037, PHC-HP = 0.037). In conclusion, a one-week HF and, specifically, an HP diet improved glucose metrics compared with an isocaloric HC diet.

Associations of insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring use with pregnancy-related outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes

AIMS

To examine insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use with pregnancy-related outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

We abstracted medical records of 646 pregnancies in 478 women with type 1 diabetes, with information on insulin pump versus multiple daily injection (MDI) use and CGM use. We analyzed the associations of pump vs. MDI use, CGM use vs. non-use and pregnancy-related outcomes using mixed effect models.

RESULTS

Pump use was associated with lower HbA1c levels in the first [β (95% CI) = -0.33 (-0.51, -0.15) %] and second trimester [β (95% CI) = -0.13 (-0.24, -0.02) %], increased birth weight [β (95% CI) = 0.14 (0.02, 0.26) kg], birth weight percentile [β (95% CI) = 4.87 (0.49, 9.26) %], higher odds of large for gestational age [OR (95% CI) = 1.65 (1.06, 2.58)] and macrosomia [OR (95% CI) = 1.81 (1.03, 3.18)]. CGM use was associated with lower first [β (95% CI) = -0.38 (-0.64, -0.13) %] and third trimester [β (95% CI) = -0.17 (-0.33, -0.00) %] HbA1c levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with type 1 diabetes who used pump or CGM had better glycemic control during pregnancy; however, pump use was associated with higher birth weight measures.

Super Bolus: a remedy for a high glycemic index meal in children with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy?-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Postprandial hyperglycemia (PPH) is a common clinical problem among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), which is related to high glycemic index (h-GI) meals. The main problem is linked to high, sharp glycemic spikes following hypoglycemia after h-GI meal consumption. There is a lack of effective and satisfactory solutions for insulin dose adjustment to cover an h-GI meal. The goal of this research was to determine whether a Super Bolus is an effective strategy to prevent PPH and late hypoglycemia after an h-GI meal compared to a Normal Bolus.

Methods

A total of 72 children aged 10–18 years with T1D for at least 1 year and treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for more than 3 months will be enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, crossover clinical trial. The participants will eat a h-GI breakfast for the two following days and receive a prandial insulin bolus in the form of a Super Bolus 1 day and a Normal Bolus the next day. The glucose level 90 min after the administration of the prandial bolus will be the primary outcome measure. The secondary endpoints will refer to the glucose levels at 30, 60, 120, 150, and 180 min postprandially, the area under the blood glucose curve within 180 min postprandially, peak glucose level and the time to peak glucose level, glycemic rise, the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, and the number of hypoglycemia episodes.

Discussion

There are still few known clinical studies on this type of bolus. A Super Bolus is defined as a 50% increase in prandial insulin dose compared to the dose calculated based on the individualized patient’s insulin-carbohydrate ratio and a simultaneous suspension of basal insulin for 2 h. Our patients reported the best experience with such a combination. A comprehensive and effective solution to this frequent clinical difficulty of PPH after an h-GI meal has not yet been found. The problem is known and important, and the presented solution is innovative and easy to apply in everyday life.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04019821

Dietary intake of carbohydrates in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes-A narrative review

In pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, a low but sufficient, intake of carbohydrates is important to aim for near normal glycemic control. However, knowledge about the carbohydrate intake in this group is limited. To assess the average quantity and quality of carbohydrate intake in pregnant women with type 1diabetes compared to healthy pregnant women and current dietary reference intakes. A narrative literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library and by using a snow-ball search technique to identify papers published on studies conducted in industrialized countries within the last 20 years. Intakes of carbohydrate were assessed qualitatively in relation to the Dietary Reference Intakes recommended by the American Diabetes Association and quantitatively as mean intake of dietary fiber. Five observational studies including 810 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes and 15 observational studies with a total of 118,246 healthy pregnant women were identified. The mean total carbohydrate intake was within the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (45%-64% of energy intake) in both groups. In pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, the average total intake was 218 ± 19 g/day, which was 20% (53 g/day) lower than in healthy pregnant women. Mean intake of dietary fiber in women with diabetes was lower than the recommended adequate intake for healthy women. With the limitations of pronounced heterogeneity across the included studies, pregnant women with type 1 diabetes reported a mean total carbohydrate intake, which was lower than in healthy pregnant women but still within the recommended range.

13C/12C breath test ratio after the ingestion of a meal naturally enriched with (13C)carbohydrates is a surrogate marker of insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

AIMS

To test the hypotheses that exogenous carbohydrate oxidation affects postprandial glycaemic profiles and ¹³C/¹²C breath test could be used for estimating insulin resistance (IR) and insulin sensitivity (IS) in youths with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D).

METHODS

Non-randomized, cross-sectional study for repeated measures; fifteen youths (11-15 years) with T1D were enrolled. Respiratory exchanges were measured by indirect calorimetry after the ingestion of a mixed meal [13% protein, 29% fat, 58% carbohydrate (CHO; naturally enriched with [¹³C]carbohydrates)]. Total and exogenous CHOs oxidation was calculated by indirect calorimetry and ¹³C/¹²C breath test. IR and IS were calculated using estimated Glucose Disposal Rate (eGDR) and Insulin Sensitivity Score (ISS).

RESULTS

The blood glucose Area Under the Curve (BG-AUC) was significantly associated with the amount of exogenous CHOs oxidized (r = -0.67, p < 0.02) when adjusting for CHOs intake and %fat mass. A direct correlation between eGDR and ISS with exogenous CHOs oxidized (r = 0.70, p < 0.02; r = 0.61, p < 0.05 respectively) and with the differential of ¹³C/¹²C enrichment in the expired at breath test (r = 0.59, p < 0.05; r = 0.62, p < 0.05), was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing the capacity to oxidize exogenous CHOs (estimated by the differential of ¹³C/¹²C enrichment in the expired air at the breath test) could be used as a non-invasive surrogate marker of IR and IS in youths with T1D.

Influence of Flexible Insulin Dosing with Carbohydrate Counting Method on Metabolic and Clinical Parameters in Type 1 Diabetes Patients

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of providing and maintaining a proper metabolic control is to prevent the development of chronic complications. In this study, we aimed to determine the influence of flexible insulin dosing with carbohydrate counting method on metabolic and clinical parameters in type 1 diabetes patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

This study was conducted with patients following up at the Endocrinology Clinic with a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus between 2012 and 2015. Metabolic and clinical parameters before and after carbohydrate counting were compared.

RESULTS:

Forty patients were included in the study. Of the patients, 40% (n = 16) were female, and 60% (n = 24) were male, and mean age was 21.5 ± 7 year at the time of diagnosis. Statistically significant differences were not detected when haemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose, post-prandial glucose, LDL-cholesterol, and HDL-cholesterol levels were compared at standard dose insulin use and after carbohydrate counting (P < 0.005). Among the parameters measured when the patients received standard dose of insulin without counting carbohydrate and flexible insulin dosing by counting carbohydrate, statistically, significant differences were not detected for baseline insulin dose, bolus insulin dose, triglyceride level, body mass index, or monthly hypoglycemia episodes (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Flexible insulin dosing with carbohydrate counting provides significant improvements in clinical and metabolic control. We detected improvements in lipid profiles and glycemic control. Additionally, patients generally did not gain weight despite flexible nutrition, and frequency of hypoglycemia remained unchanged despite strict glycemic control.

Optimal prandial timing of bolus insulin in diabetes management: a review

The inability to achieve optimal diabetes glucose control in people with diabetes is multifactorial, but one contributor may be inadequate control of postprandial glucose. In patients treated with multiple daily injections of insulin, both the dose and timing of meal-related rapid-acting insulin are key factors in this. There are conflicting opinions and evidence on the optimal time to administer mealtime insulin. We performed a comprehensive literature search to review the published data, focusing on the use of rapid-acting insulin analogues in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of rapid-acting insulin analogues, together with postprandial glucose excursion data, suggest that administering these 15-20 min before food would provide optimal postprandial glucose control. Data from clinical studies involving people with Type 1 diabetes receiving structured meals and rapid-acting insulin analogues support this, showing a reduction in post-meal glucose levels of ~30% and less hypoglycaemia when meal insulin was taken 15-20 min before a meal compared with immediately before the meal. Importantly, there was also a greater risk of postprandial hypoglycaemia when patients took rapid-acting analogues after eating compared with before eating.

Improved Postprandial Glycemic Control with Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion

BACKGROUND

Faster aspart is insulin aspart (IAsp) in a new formulation, which in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in subjects with type 1 diabetes has shown a faster onset and offset of glucose-lowering effect than IAsp.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, crossover active-controlled trial compared 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) response, following 2 weeks of CSII with faster aspart or IAsp. Primary endpoint: mean change in PPG 2 h after a standardized meal test (ΔPG_av,0-2h). Subjects (n = 43) had masked continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) throughout.

RESULTS

Faster aspart provided a statistically significantly greater glucose-lowering effect following the meal versus IAsp: ΔPG_av,0-2h: 3.03 mmol/L versus 4.02 mmol/L (54.68 mg/dL vs. 72.52 mg/dL); estimated treatment difference (ETD) [95% CI]: -0.99 mmol/L [-1.95; -0.03] (-17.84 mg/dL [-35.21; -0.46]; P = 0.044). One hour postmeal, PG levels were -1.64 mmol/L (-29.47 mg/dL) lower with faster aspart versus IAsp (P = 0.006). Interstitial glucose (IG) profiles supported these findings; the largest differences were observed at breakfast: 9.08 versus 9.56 mmol/L (163.57 vs. 172.19 mg/dL; ETD [95% CI]: -0.48 mmol/L [-0.97; 0.01]; -8.62 mg/dL [-17.49; 0.24]; P = 0.057). Duration of low IG levels (≤3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL] per 24 h) was statistically significantly shorter for faster aspart versus IAsp (2.03 h vs. 2.45 h; ETD [95% CI]: -0.42 [-0.72; -0.11]; P = 0.008). No unexpected safety findings were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

CSII delivery of faster aspart had a greater glucose-lowering effect than IAsp after a meal test. CGM results recorded throughout all meals supported this finding, with less time spent with low IG levels.