1
|
Zhang S, Staples AE. Microfluidic-based systems for the management of diabetes. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2024; 14:2989-3008. [PMID: 38509342 PMCID: PMC11445324 DOI: 10.1007/s13346-024-01569-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Diabetes currently affects approximately 500 million people worldwide and is one of the most common causes of mortality in the United States. To diagnose and monitor diabetes, finger-prick blood glucose testing has long been used as the clinical gold standard. For diabetes treatment, insulin is typically delivered subcutaneously through cannula-based syringes, pens, or pumps in almost all type 1 diabetic (T1D) patients and some type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients. These painful, invasive approaches can cause non-adherence to glucose testing and insulin therapy. To address these problems, researchers have developed miniaturized blood glucose testing devices as well as microfluidic platforms for non-invasive glucose testing through other body fluids. In addition, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin levels, and cellular biomechanics-related metrics have also been considered for microfluidic-based diabetes diagnosis. For the treatment of diabetes, insulin has been delivered transdermally through microdevices, mostly through microneedle array-based, minimally invasive injections. Researchers have also developed microfluidic platforms for oral, intraperitoneal, and inhalation-based delivery of insulin. For T2D patients, metformin, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and GLP-1 receptor agonists have also been delivered using microfluidic technologies. Thus far, clinical studies have been widely performed on microfluidic-based diabetes monitoring, especially glucose sensing, yet technologies for the delivery of insulin and other drugs to diabetic patients with microfluidics are still mostly in the preclinical stage. This article provides a concise review of the role of microfluidic devices in the diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes, as well as the delivery of pharmaceuticals to treat diabetes using microfluidic technologies in the recent literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuyu Zhang
- Virginia Tech-Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
| | - Anne E Staples
- Virginia Tech-Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rimon MTI, Hasan MW, Hassan MF, Cesmeci S. Advancements in Insulin Pumps: A Comprehensive Exploration of Insulin Pump Systems, Technologies, and Future Directions. Pharmaceutics 2024; 16:944. [PMID: 39065641 PMCID: PMC11279469 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16070944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Insulin pumps have transformed the way diabetes is managed by providing a more accurate and individualized method of delivering insulin, in contrast to conventional injection routines. This research explores the progression of insulin pumps, following their advancement from initial ideas to advanced contemporary systems. The report proceeds to categorize insulin pumps according to their delivery systems, specifically differentiating between conventional, patch, and implantable pumps. Every category is thoroughly examined, emphasizing its unique characteristics and capabilities. A comparative examination of commercially available pumps is provided to enhance informed decision making. This section provides a thorough analysis of important specifications among various brands and models. Considered factors include basal rate and bolus dosage capabilities, reservoir size, user interface, and compatibility with other diabetes care tools, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices and so on. This review seeks to empower healthcare professionals and patients with the essential information to improve diabetes treatment via individualized pump therapy options. It provides a complete assessment of the development, categorization, and full specification comparisons of insulin pumps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sevki Cesmeci
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30458, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Amadou C, Melki V, Allain J, Clavel S, Gouet D, Chaillous L, Catargi B, Schaeplynck-Belicard P, Petit C, Thivolet C, Penfornis A. Performance and patients' satisfaction with the A7+TouchCare insulin patch pump system: A randomized controlled non-inferiority study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289684. [PMID: 37616289 PMCID: PMC10449223 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed the performance and patient satisfaction of a new insulin patch pump, the A7+TouchCare (Medtrum), compared with the Omnipod system. METHODS This multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled study enrolled 100 adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (A1C ≥ 6.5% and ≤ 9.5%, i.e., 48 to 80 mmol/mol) who were assigned with the Omnipod or with the A7+TouchCare pump for 3 months. The primary study outcome was the glucose management indicator (GMI) calculated with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). RESULTS Premature withdrawals occurs respectively in 2 and 9 participants in the Omnipod and TouchCare groups. In the Per Protocol analysis, the difference in GMI between groups was 0.002% (95% confidence interval -0.251; 0.255). The non-inferiority was demonstrated since the difference between treatments did not overlap the pre-defined non-inferiority margin (0.4%). There was no significant difference in CGM parameters between groups. On average, patients in both groups were satisfied/very satisfied with the insulin pump system. Patients preferred Omnipod as an insulin management system and especially the patch delivery system but preferred the A7+TouchCare personal diabetes manager to control the system. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that the A7+TouchCare insulin pump was as efficient as the Omnipod pump in terms of performance and satisfaction. CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION The study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov protocol register (NCT04223973).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coralie Amadou
- Service d’Endocrinologie, Diabétologie et Maladies Métaboliques, Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien de Corbeil-Essonnes, Corbeil-Essonnes, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Vincent Melki
- Service de Diabétologie–Maladies Métaboliques—Nutrition, CHU Hôpital Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Jennifer Allain
- Service d’Endocrinologie-Diabétologie, Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Gonesse, France
| | | | - Didier Gouet
- Hôpitaux La Rochelle, Ré, Aunis, La Rochelle, France
| | - Lucy Chaillous
- Hôpital Nord Laennec, CHU Nantes, Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | | | - Catherine Petit
- Service d’Endocrinologie, Diabétologie et Maladies Métaboliques, Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien de Corbeil-Essonnes, Corbeil-Essonnes, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Charles Thivolet
- Centre du diabète Diab-e-Care—Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Alfred Penfornis
- Service d’Endocrinologie, Diabétologie et Maladies Métaboliques, Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien de Corbeil-Essonnes, Corbeil-Essonnes, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kulzer B, Freckmann G, Heinemann L, Schnell O, Hinzmann R, Ziegler R. Patch Pumps: What are the advantages for people with diabetes? Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 187:109858. [PMID: 35367523 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM Patch pumps, i.e. insulin pumps without tubing, are an attractive alternative to conventional insulin pumps for people with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy. In this review, potential patient-relevant advantages and disadvantages of patch pumps are summarized and respective studies on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are assessed. METHODS Relevant studies were identified through a systematic PubMed search. Reference lists in respective articles and Google Scholar were also checked for additional references. Articles in English published before June 30, 2021, were included; no other criteria on publication dates were set. RESULTS A total of 12 studies were included. The results of this analysis provide evidence that patch pumps improve quality of life, reduce diabetes-related distress, increase patient satisfaction, and are preferred by patients compared to conventional insulin pumps and multiple daily injection therapy (MDI). However, several methodological limitations of the studies identified constrain the significance of this analysis. CONCLUSIONS Despite the limited number of studies evaluating the benefits of patch pumps on PROs, there is increasing evidence that people with diabetes prefer patch pumps. Although there are numerous PROs for patch pumps, it is surprising that this aspect has been relatively understudied. More systematic evaluation studies of the benefits of patch pumps on PROs are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Kulzer
- Research Institute of the Diabetes-Academy Mergentheim, Bad Mergentheim, Germany; Diabetes Center Mergentheim, Bad Mergentheim, Germany; University Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.
| | - Guido Freckmann
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Oliver Schnell
- Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V., Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ralph Ziegler
- Diabetes Clinic for Children and Adolescents, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nadia Ahmad NF, Nik Ghazali NN, Wong YH. Wearable patch delivery system for artificial pancreas health diagnostic-therapeutic application: A review. Biosens Bioelectron 2021; 189:113384. [PMID: 34090154 DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The advanced stimuli-responsive approaches for on-demand drug delivery systems have received tremendous attention as they have great potential to be integrated with sensing and multi-functional electronics on a flexible and stretchable single platform (all-in-one concept) in order to develop skin-integration with close-loop sensation for personalized diagnostic and therapeutic application. The wearable patch pumps have evolved from reservoir-based to matrix patch and drug-in-adhesive (single-layer or multi-layer) type. In this review, we presented the basic requirements of an artificial pancreas, surveyed the design and technologies used in commercial patch pumps available on the market and provided general information about the latest wearable patch pump. We summarized the various advanced delivery strategies with their mechanisms that have been developed to date and representative examples. Mechanical, electrical, light, thermal, acoustic and glucose-responsive approaches on patch form have been successfully utilized in the controllable transdermal drug delivery manner. We highlighted key challenges associated with wearable transdermal delivery systems, their research direction and future development trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Farrahain Nadia Ahmad
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
| | - Nik Nazri Nik Ghazali
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yew Hoong Wong
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ceriello A, deValk HW, Guerci B, Haak T, Owens D, Canobbio M, Fritzen K, Stautner C, Schnell O. The burden of type 2 diabetes in Europe: Current and future aspects of insulin treatment from patient and healthcare spending perspectives. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 161:108053. [PMID: 32035117 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Due to the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), initiation of insulin therapy is very likely in the disease continuum. This article aims at highlighting the current situation with regard to insulin therapy in people with T2DM in Europe and at presenting the associated unmet need. Challenges for both people with T2DM and healthcare professionals include clinical inertia also derived from fear of hypoglycaemia, weight gain and injections as well as increased need for a comprehensive diabetes management. We compare national and international guidelines and recommendations for the initiation and intensification of insulin therapy with the real-world situation in six European countries, demonstrating that glycaemic targets are only met in a minority of people with T2DM on insulin therapy. Furthermore, this work evaluates currently recorded numbers of people with T2DM treated with insulin in Europe, the proportion not achieving the stated glycaemic targets and thus in need to enhance insulin therapy e.g. by a change in means of insulin delivery including, but not limited to, insulin pens, wearable mealtime insulin delivery patches, patch pumps, and conventional insulin pumps with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harold W deValk
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bruno Guerci
- Endocrinology, Diabetology & Nutrition Clinical Unit, Brabois Hospital & Center of Clinical Investigation ILCV, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Nancy, University of Lorraine Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Thomas Haak
- Diabetes Klinik Bad Mergentheim, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - David Owens
- Diabetes Research Unit Cymru, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | | | | | | | - Oliver Schnell
- Sciarc GmbH, Baierbrunn, Germany; Forschergruppe Diabetes e.V., Muenchen-Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saunders A, Messer LH, Forlenza GP. MiniMed 670G hybrid closed loop artificial pancreas system for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: overview of its safety and efficacy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16:845-853. [PMID: 31540557 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1670639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Automated insulin delivery for people with type 1 diabetes has been a major goal in the diabetes technology field for many years. While a fully automated system has not yet been accomplished, the MiniMed™ 670G artificial pancreas (AP) system is the first commercially available insulin pump that automates basal insulin delivery, while still requiring user input for insulin boluses. Determining the safety and efficacy of this system is essential to the development of future devices striving for more automation. Areas Covered: This review will provide an overview of how the MiniMed 670G system works including its safety and efficacy, how it compares to similar devices, and anticipated future advances in diabetes technology currently under development. Expert Opinion: The ultimate goal of advanced diabetes technologies is to reduce the burden and amount of management required of patients with diabetes. In addition to reducing patient workload, achieving better glucose control and improving hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values are essential for reducing the threat of diabetes-related complications further down the road. Current devices come close to reaching these goals, but understanding the unmet needs of patients with diabetes will allow future technologies to achieve these goals more quickly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aria Saunders
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Denver , Denver , CO , USA
| | - Laurel H Messer
- Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Denver , Aurora , CO , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Newly developed patch pumps are starting to occupy a noticeable fraction of the insulin delivery market. New entrants, using novel technologies, promise accurate, flexible insulin delivery at lower costs. In the section, we review the currently available devices, discuss some of the devices on the horizon, and speculate about some fascinating new approaches. In this first article, we provide an overview of the simplified devices-V-Go, PAQ, and One Touch Via-and of the more complex devices-Omnipod, Cellnovo, JewelPump, Solo, SFC Fluidics pump, Libertas, Medtronic pump, and EOPatch. We also discuss controllers, smartphones, and cybersecurity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barry H. Ginsberg
- Diabetes Technology Consultants, Arlington, VA, USA
- Barry H. Ginsberg, MD, PhD, Diabetes Technology Consultants, 901 15th St South, Ste 1604, Arlington, VA 22202.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Insulin pumps are used by a steadily increasing number of patients with diabetes. Avoiding certain disadvantages of conventional pumps (ie, the insulin infusion set) might make pump therapy even more attractive. Patch pumps are usually attached by means of an adhesive layer to the skin and have several additional advantages (smaller, more discrete, easier to use, and cheaper than conventional insulin pumps). This review provides a general overview of patch pumps, the technologies used, basic clinical requirements, why a number of developments failed, which clinical studies are needed to provide sufficient evidence for their usage, which costs are associated, what the patient preferences are (which might differ between certain patient groups), and what is the future of patch pumps (ie, artificial pancreas systems).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lutz Heinemann
- Science Consulting in Diabetes GmbH, Neuss, Germany
- Lutz Heinemann, PhD, Science Consulting in Diabetes GmbH, Geulenstr. 50, 41462 Neuss, Germany.
| | | | | | - Ralph Ziegler
- Diabetologische Schwerpunktpraxis für Kinder und Jugendliche, Münster, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
In this special section of JDST, patch-pump delivery systems ("patch pumps") are discussed. Patch pumps are novel insulin delivery systems that have emerged on the market; offering flexible insulin delivery options. These systems offer several advantages over conventional insulin pump delivery systems and are gaining popularity. Patch pumps are free of tubing, small, and lightweight. In this special section, the authors discuss both the simple and complex patch pumps currently available on the US market as well as those that are currently under development. Current technologies used to operate these pumps are discussed in detail, and potential promising technologies are presented. Available data on patient preferences, clinical trial data, and the future of patch pumps are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bithika Thompson
- Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Curtiss B. Cook
- Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|