1
|
Zavagno D. Illusion as a Cognitive Clash Rooted in Perception. J Intell 2023; 11:215. [PMID: 37998714 PMCID: PMC10672324 DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence11110215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Illusions are important 'tools' in the study of perceptual processes. Their conception is typically linked to the notion of veridicality in a dual-world framework, in which we either see the macro physical world as it is (ecological approaches) or we derive a faithful representation (cognitive approaches) of it. Within such theoretical views, illusions are errors caused by inadequate sensory information (because of poor quality, insufficient quantity, contradictory, etc.). From a phenomenological stance, however, experiencing an illusion does not relate to the physical quality of the distal or proximal stimulus; rather, it depends on a comparison between the actual perception and what one believes should be perceived given the knowledge s/he has gained about the physical stimulus. Within such a framework, illusions are still considered of extreme importance in the study of the processes underpinning perception, but they are not conceived as errors. They represent instead a cognitive clash between actual perception and hypothesized perception based on some sort of comparison, thus also showing their potential as a tool for studying the underpinnings of cognitive processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Zavagno
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, P.zza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kobayashi Y, Zavagno D, Morikawa K. Distinct processes of lighting priors for lightness and 3-D shape perception. J Vis 2021; 21:1. [PMID: 34096984 PMCID: PMC8212428 DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.6.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The visual system often relies on prior assumptions when interpreting ambiguous visual inputs. A well-known example is the light-from-above prior, which aids the judgment of an object's three-dimensional (3-D) shape (i.e., convex or concave). Recent studies have revealed that the light-from-above prior also helps solve lightness ambiguity. This study aimed to examine whether 3-D shape perception and lightness perception share the same lighting prior. The study participants performed two tasks: one focusing on lightness perception and another focusing on 3-D shape perception. The dominant directions of the assumed lighting were calculated from participants’ performance in the two tasks. The results showed that the assumed lighting direction for 3-D shape perception were considerably biased toward the left, whereas the one for lightness perception was almost from directly above. The clear difference between these two directions supports the hypothesis that the visual system uses distinct lighting priors for 3-D shape perception and lightness perception. Experiments 1 and 2 involved Japanese speaking participants and European participants, respectively. The Japanese language can be read and written both horizontally (i.e., left to right) and vertically (i.e., up to down) with lines progressing from right to left. Nevertheless, the two experiments still produced the same result, which suggests that the present finding is universal regardless of reading/writing direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Kobayashi
- School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.,Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan., https://sites.google.com/site/ykobayashiwp/
| | - Daniele Zavagno
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.,
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kobayashi Y. Asymmetric Brightness Effects With Dark Versus Light Glare-Like Stimuli. Iperception 2021; 12:2041669521993144. [PMID: 33738087 PMCID: PMC7934062 DOI: 10.1177/2041669521993144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The glare effect is a brightness illusion that has captured the attention of the vision community since its discovery. However, its photometrical reversal, which we refer to here as photometrical reversed glare (PRG) stimuli, remained relatively unexplored. We presented three experiments that sought to examine the perceived brightness of a target area surrounded by luminance gradients in PRG stimuli and compare them with conventional glare effect configurations. Experiment 1 measured the brightness of the central target area of PRG stimuli through an adjustment task; the results showed that the target appeared brighter than similar, comparative areas not surrounded by luminance gradients. This finding was unexpected given the recent report that PRG stimuli cause pupil dilation. Meanwhile, Experiments 2 and 3 implemented a rating task to further test the findings in Experiment 1. Again, the study found a robust brightening illusion in the target area of PRG stimuli in a wide range of target and background luminance. The results are discussed in comparison with the brightness enhancement of the glare effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Kobayashi
- Yuki Kobayashi, Ritsumeikan University, 2-150, Iwakuracho, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-8570, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Agostini T, Murgia M, Sors F, Prpic V, Galmonte A. Contrasting a Misinterpretation of the Reverse Contrast. Vision (Basel) 2020; 4:vision4040047. [PMID: 33147734 PMCID: PMC7712676 DOI: 10.3390/vision4040047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The reverse contrast is a perceptual phenomenon in which the effect of the classical simultaneous lightness contrast is reversed. In classic simultaneous lightness contrast configurations, a gray surrounded by black is perceived lighter than an identical gray surrounded by white, but in the reverse contrast configurations, the perceptual outcome is the opposite: a gray surrounded by black appears darker than the same gray surrounded by white. The explanation provided for the reverse contrast (by different authors) is the belongingness of the gray targets to a more complex configuration. Different configurations show the occurrence of these phenomena; however, the factors determining this effect are not always the same. In particular, some configurations are based on both belongingness and assimilation, while one configuration is based only on belongingness. The evidence that different factors determine the reverse contrast is crucial for future research dealing with achromatic color perception and, in particular, with lightness induction phenomena.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiziano Agostini
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, 34100 Trieste, Italy; (M.M.); (F.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Mauro Murgia
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, 34100 Trieste, Italy; (M.M.); (F.S.)
| | - Fabrizio Sors
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, 34100 Trieste, Italy; (M.M.); (F.S.)
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34100 Trieste, Italy;
| | - Valter Prpic
- Institute for Psychological Science, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK;
| | - Alessandra Galmonte
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34100 Trieste, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sulutvedt U, Zavagno D, Lubell J, Leknes S, de Rodez Benavent SA, Laeng B. Brightness perception changes related to pupil size. Vision Res 2020; 178:41-47. [PMID: 33113435 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Dilating the pupils allow more quanta of light to impact the retina. Consequently, if one pupil is dilated with a pharmacological agent (Tropicamide), the brightness of a surface under observation should increase proportionally to the pupil dilation. Little is known about causal effects of changes in pupil size on perception of an object's brightness. In a psychophysical procedure of brightness adjustment and matching, we presented to one eye geometrical patterns with a central square (the reference pattern) that differed in physical brightness within backgrounds of constant luminance. Subsequently, with the other eye, participants (n = 30) adjusted to the same luminance a similar pattern (target) whose central square luminance was randomly set higher or lower in brightness than the reference. As only one eye was treated with Tropicamide, we assessed whether the subjective brightness of the target square shifted in a consistent direction when viewed with the dilated pupil compared to the untreated (control) eye. We found that, as the pupil increased post drug administration, so significantly did the sense of brightness of the pattern (i.e., higher brightness adjustments followed viewing the reference pattern with the treated (Tropicamide) eye). A reversed effect was observed when the control eye viewed the reference pattern first. The results confirm that even slight pupil dilations can result in an enhanced perceptual experience of brightness of the attended object, corresponding to an average increase of 2.09 cd/m2 for each 1 mm increase in pupil diameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Unni Sulutvedt
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Daniele Zavagno
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
| | - Jamie Lubell
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siri Leknes
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigrid A de Rodez Benavent
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bruno Laeng
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; RITMO Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time and Motion, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Daneyko O. See What You Feel: A Crossmodal Tool for Measuring Haptic Size Illusions. Iperception 2020; 11:2041669520944425. [PMID: 32850110 PMCID: PMC7425280 DOI: 10.1177/2041669520944425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to present the employment of a simple-to-use crossmodal method for measuring haptic size illusions. The method, that we call See what you feel, was tested by employing Uznadze's classic haptic aftereffect in which two spheres physically identical (test spheres) appear different in size after that the hands holding them underwent an adaptation session with other two spheres (adapting spheres), one bigger and the other smaller than the two test spheres. To measure the entity of the illusion, a three-dimensional visual scale was created and participants were asked to find on it the spheres that corresponded in size to the spheres they were holding in their hands out of sight. The method, tested on 160 right-handed participants, is robust and easily understood by participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Daneyko
- Department of Psychology, Sociology and Politics, Sheffield Hallam University
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rudd ME. Neurocomputational Lightness Model Explains the Appearance of Real Surfaces Viewed Under Gelb Illumination. JOURNAL OF PERCEPTUAL IMAGING 2020; 3:105021-1050216. [PMID: 36968520 PMCID: PMC10038117 DOI: 10.2352/j.percept.imaging.2020.3.1.010502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
One of the primary functions of visual perception is to represent, estimate, and evaluate the properties of material surfaces in the visual environment. One such property is surface color, which can convey important information about ecologically relevant object characteristics such as the ripeness of fruit and the emotional reactions of humans in social interactions. This paper further develops and applies a neural model (Rudd, 2013, 2017) of how the human visual system represents the light/dark dimension of color-known as lightness-and computes the colors of achromatic material surfaces in real-world spatial contexts. Quantitative lightness judgments conducted with real surfaces viewed under Gelb (i.e., spotlight) illumination are analyzed and simulated using the model. According to the model, luminance ratios form the inputs to ON- and OFF-cells, which encode local luminance increments and decrements, respectively. The response properties of these cells are here characterized by physiologically motivated equations in which different parameters are assumed for the two cell types. Under non-saturating conditions, ON-cells respond in proportion to a compressive power law of the local incremental luminance in the image that causes them to respond, while OFF-cells respond linearly to local decremental luminance. ON- and OFF-cell responses to edges are log-transformed at a later stage of neural processing and then integrated across space to compute lightness via an edge integration process that can be viewed as a neurally elaborated version of Land's retinex model (Land & McCann, 1971). It follows from the model assumptions that the perceptual weights-interpreted as neural gain factors-that the model observer applies to steps in log luminance at edges in the edge integration process are determined by the product of a polarity-dependent factor 1-by which incremental steps in log luminance (i.e., edges) are weighted by the value <1.0 and decremental steps are weighted by 1.0-and a distance-dependent factor 2, whose edge weightings are estimated to fit perceptual data. The model accounts quantitatively (to within experimental error) for the following: lightness constancy failures observed when the illumination level on a simultaneous contrast display is changed (Zavagno, Daneyko, & Liu, 2018); the degree of dynamic range compression in the staircase-Gelb paradigm (Cataliotti & Gilchrist, 1995; Zavagno, Annan, & Caputo, 2004); partial releases from compression that occur when the staircase-Gelb papers are reordered (Zavagno, Annan, & Caputo, 2004); and the larger compression release that occurs when the display is surrounded by a white border (Gilchrist & Cataliotti, 1994).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Rudd
- Department of Psychology and Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557-0296
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zavagno D. The Influence of Physical Illumination on Lightness Perception in Simultaneous Contrast Displays. Iperception 2018; 9:2041669518787212. [PMID: 30046432 PMCID: PMC6055112 DOI: 10.1177/2041669518787212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Three experiments investigated the role of physical illumination on lightness perception in simultaneous lightness contrast (SLC). Four configurations were employed: the classic textbook version of the illusion and three configurations that produced either enhanced or reduced SLC. Experiment 1 tested the effect of ambient illumination on lightness perception. It simulated very dark environmental conditions that nevertheless still allowed perception of different shades of gray. Experiment 2 tested the effect of the intensity of Gelb lighting on lightness perception. Experiment 3 presented two conditions that integrated illumination conditions from Experiments 1 and 2. Our results demonstrated an illumination effect on both lightness matching and perceived SLC contrast: As the intensity of illumination increased, the target on the black background appeared lighter, while the target on the white background was little affected. We hypothesize the existence of two illumination ranges that affect lightness perception differently: low and normal. In the low range, the SLC contrast was reduced and targets appeared darker. In the normal range, the SLC contrast and lightness matchings for each background were little changed across illumination intensities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Zavagno
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy
| |
Collapse
|