Hypovolemia and reduced hemoglobin mass in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

A fundamental tenet of heart failure (HF) pathophysiology hinges on a propensity for fluid retention leading to blood volume (BV) expansion and hemodilution. Whether this can be applied to heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains uncertain. The present study sought to determine BV status and key hormones regulating fluid homeostasis and erythropoiesis in HFpEF patients. BV and hemoglobin mass (Hb_mass) were determined with high‐precision, automated carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing in 20 stable HFpEF patients (71.5 ± 7.3 years, left ventricular ejection fraction = 55.7 ± 4.0%) and 15 healthy age‐ and sex‐matched control individuals. Additional measurements comprised key circulating BV‐regulating hormones such as pro‐atrial natriuretic peptide (proANP), copeptin, aldosterone and erythropoietin (EPO), as well as central hemodynamics and arterial stiffness via carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). Carotid–femoral PWV was increased (+20%) in HFpEF patients versus control individuals. With respect to hematological variables, plasma volume (PV) did not differ between groups, whereas BV was decreased (−14%) in HFpEF patients. In consonance with the hypovolemic status, Hb_mass was reduced (−27%) in HFpEF patients, despite they presented more than a twofold elevation of circulating EPO (+119%). Plasma concentrations of BV‐regulating hormones, including proANP (+106%), copeptin (+99%), and aldosterone (+62%), were substantially augmented in HFpEF patients. HFpEF patients may present with hypovolemia and markedly reduced Hb_mass, underpinned by a generalized overactivation of endocrine systems regulating fluid homeostasis and erythropoiesis. These findings provide a novel perspective on the pathophysiological basis of the HFpEF condition.

Beyond the myocardium? SGLT2 inhibitors target peripheral components of reduced oxygen flux in the diabetic patient with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Recent cardiovascular outcome trials have highlighted the propensity of the antidiabetic agents, SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2is or -flozin drugs), to exert positive clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease at risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Of interest in cardiac diabetology is the physiological status of the patient with T2DM and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a well-examined association. Underlying this pathologic tandem are the effects that long-standing hyperglycemia has on the ability of the HFpEF heart to adequately deliver oxygen. It is believed that shortcomings in oxygen diffusion or utilization and the resulting hypoxia thereafter may play a role in underlying the clinical sequelae of patients with T2DM and HFpEF, with implications in the long-term decline of extra-cardiac tissue. Oxygen consumption is one of the most critical factors in indexing heart failure disease burden, warranting a probe into the role of SGLT2i on oxygen utility in HFpEF and T2DM. We investigated the role of oxygen flux in the patient with T2DM and HFpEF extending beyond the heart with focuses on cellular metabolism, perivascular fibrosis with endothelial dysfunction, hematologic changes, and renal effects with neurohormonal considerations in the patient with HFpEF and T2DM. Moreover, we give a commentary on potential therapeutic targets of these components with SGLT2i to gain insight into disease burden amelioration in patients with HFpEF and T2DM.

Oxidative stress and inflammation in the evolution of heart failure: From pathophysiology to therapeutic strategies

Both oxidative stress and inflammation are enhanced in chronic heart failure. Dysfunction of cardiac mitochondria is a hallmark of heart failure and a leading cause of oxidative stress, which in turn exerts detrimental effects on cellular components, including mitochondria themselves, thus generating a vicious circle. Oxidative stress also causes myocardial tissue damage and inflammation, contributing to heart failure progression. Furthermore, a subclinical inflammatory state may be caused by heart failure comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes mellitus or sleep apnoeas. Some markers of both oxidative stress and inflammation are enhanced in chronic heart failure and hold prognostic significance. For all these reasons, antioxidants or anti-inflammatory drugs may represent interesting additional therapies for subjects either at high risk or with established heart failure. Nonetheless, only a few clinical trials on antioxidants have been carried out so far, with several disappointing results except for vitamin C, elamipretide and coenzyme Q10. With regard to anti-inflammatory drugs, only preliminary data on the interleukin-1 antagonist anakinra are currently available. Therefore, a comprehensive, deep understanding of our current knowledge on oxidative stress and inflammation in chronic heart failure is key to providing some suggestions for future research on this topic.

Monitoring functional capacity in heart failure

This document reflects the key points of a consensus meeting of the Heart Failure Association of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) held to provide an overview the role of physiological monitoring in the complex multimorbid heart failure (HF) patient. This article reviews assessments of the functional ability of patients with HF. The gold standard measurement of cardiovascular functional capacity is peak oxygen consumption obtained from a cardiopulmonary exercise test. The 6-min walk test provides an indirect measure of cardiovascular functional capacity. Muscular functional capacity is assessed using either a 1−repetition maximum test of the upper and lower body or other methods, such as handgrip measurement. The short physical performance battery may provide a helpful, indirect indication of muscular functional capacity.

Efficacy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and mild to moderate chronic kidney disease

Background Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors are first-line treatments for chronic kidney disease, but it is not known if these agents can improve outcome in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and chronic kidney disease. Design This was a post-hoc analysis of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial. Methods The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or hospitalization for heart failure. We analyzed hazard ratios in patients taking RAS inhibitors compared with those not taking RAS inhibitors using Cox proportional hazard models. Results A total of 1465 HFpEF patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease was included. The mean follow-up period was 2.8 years; 502 patients experienced at least one confirmed primary outcome event. The primary outcome event rates in patients not taking and taking RAS inhibitors were 175.4 and 112.8 per 1000 person-years, respectively. The risks of primary outcome events and all-cause death were significantly lower in patients taking RAS inhibitors than in those not taking RAS inhibitors (adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for primary outcome events: 0.75 (0.60-0.95), p = 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause death: 0.69 (0.52-0.93), p = 0.01). Among propensity score-matched patients, these risks were also significantly lower in those taking RAS inhibitors than in those not taking RAS inhibitors (hazard ratio: 0.67 (0.50-0.90), p = 0.008; hazard ratio: 0.60 (0.41-0.88), p = 0.01). Conclusion Use of RAS inhibitors was associated with reduced risks of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease.

Determinants of exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Severe exercise intolerance (EI), demonstrated by impaired peak oxygen consumption, intrinsically characterizes heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Controversy exists on the determinants of EI in patients with HFpEF according to case-control studies. The purpose of this study is to systematically review and clarify the main (Fick) determinants of EI in HFpEF.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science since their inceptions until January 2017 for articles assessing peak cardiac output and/or arteriovenous oxygen difference (a-vO_2diffpeak) with incremental exercise in patients diagnosed with HFpEF and age-matched control individuals. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the standardized mean difference (SMD) in peak cardiac index (CI_peak) and a-vO_2diffpeak between HFpEF and control groups. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to evaluate potential moderating factors.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included after systematic review, comprising a total of 213 HFpEF patients and 179 age-matched control individuals (mean age=51-73years). After data pooling, CI_peak (n=392, SMD=-1.42; P<0.001) and a-vO_2diffpeak (n=228, SMD=-0.52; P=0.002) were impaired in HFpEF patients. In subgroup analyses, a-vO_2diffpeak was reduced in HFpEF versus healthy individuals (n=114, SMD=-0.85; P<0.001) but not compared with control patients without heart failure (n=92, SMD=-0.12; P=0.57). The SMD in a-vO_2diffpeak was negatively associated with age (B=-0.05, P=0.046), difference in % females (B=-0.01, P=0.026) and prevalence of hypertension (B=-0.01, P=0.015) between HFpEF and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HFpEF is associated with a predominant impairment of CI_peak, accompanied by sex- and comorbidity-dependent reduced oxygen extraction at peak exercise.