1
|
Hormone replacement therapy and mammographic density: a systematic literature review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 182:555-579. [PMID: 32572713 PMCID: PMC7320951 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05744-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is used to reduce climacteric symptoms of menopause and prevent osteoporosis; however, it increases risk of breast cancer. Mammographic density (MD) is also a strong risk factor for breast cancer. We conducted this review to investigate the association between HRT use and MD and to assess the effect of different HRT regimens on MD. METHODS Two of authors examined articles published between 2002 and 2019 from PubMed, Embase, and OVID using Covidence systematic review platform. Any disagreements were discussed until consensus was reached. The protocol used in this review was created in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Quality of each eligible study was assessed using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) hierarchy. RESULTS Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies showed that using estrogen plus progestin (E + P) HRT was associated with higher MD than estrogen alone. Four studies reported that continuous estrogen plus progestin (CEP) users had higher MD than sequential estrogen plus progestin (SEP) and estrogen alone users. However, two studies showed that SEP users had slightly higher MD than CEP users and estrogen alone users. CONCLUSIONS Epidemiological evidence is rather consistent suggesting that there is a positive association between HRT use and MD with the highest increase in MD among current users, and CEP users. Our results suggest that due to increase in MD and masking effect, current E + P users may require additional screening procedures, shorter screening intervals, or using advanced imaging techniques.
Collapse
|
2
|
Lynge E, Vejborg I, Andersen Z, von Euler-Chelpin M, Napolitano G. Mammographic Density and Screening Sensitivity, Breast Cancer Incidence and Associated Risk Factors in Danish Breast Cancer Screening. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8112021. [PMID: 31752353 PMCID: PMC6912479 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8112021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Attention in the 2000s on the importance of mammographic density led us to study screening sensitivity, breast cancer incidence, and associations with risk factors by mammographic density in Danish breast cancer screening programs. Here, we summarise our approaches and findings. Methods: Dichotomized density codes: fatty, equal to BI-RADS density code 1 and part of 2, and other mixed/dense data from the 1990s—were available from two counties, and BI-RADS density codes from one region were available from 2012/13. Density data were linked with data on vital status, incident breast cancer, and potential risk factors. We calculated screening sensitivity by combining data on screen-detected and interval cancers. We used cohorts to study high density as a predictor of breast cancer risk; cross-sectional data to study the association between life style factors and density, adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI); and time trends to study the prevalence of high density across birth cohorts. Results: Sensitivity decreased with increasing density from 78% in women with BI-RADS 1 to 47% in those with BI-RADS 4. For women with mixed/dense compared with those with fatty breasts, the rate ratio of incident breast cancer was 2.45 (95% CI 2.14–2.81). The percentage of women with mixed/dense breasts decreased with age, but at a higher rate the later the women were born. Among users of postmenopausal hormone therapy, the percentage of women with mixed/dense breasts was higher than in non-users, but the patterns across birth cohorts were similar. The occurrence of mixed/dense breast at screening age decreased by a z-score unit of BMI at age 13—odds ratio (OR) 0.56 (95% CI 0.53–0.58)—and so did breast cancer risk and hazard ratio (HR) 0.92 (95% CI 0.84–1.00), but it changed to HR 1.01 (95% CI 0.93–1.11) when controlled for density. Age and BMI adjusted associations between life style factors and density were largely close to unity; physical activity OR 1.06 (95% CI 0.93–1.21); alcohol consumption OR 1.01 (95% CI 0.81–1.27); air pollution OR 0.96 (95% 0.93–1.01) per 20 μg/m3; and traffic noise OR 0.94 (95% CI 0.86–1.03) per 10 dB. Weak negative associations were seen for diabetes OR 0.61 (95% CI 0.40–0.92) and cigarette smoking OR 0.86 (95% CI 0.75–0.99), and a positive association was found with hormone therapy OR 1.24 (95% 1.14–1.35). Conclusion: Our data indicate that breast tissue in middle-aged women is highly dependent on childhood body constitution while adult life-style plays a modest role, underlying the need for a long-term perspective in primary prevention of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsebeth Lynge
- Nykøbing Falster Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Ejegodvej 63, DK-4800 Nykøbing Falster, Denmark
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +45-2042-1863
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Radiology Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 København Ø, Denmark;
| | - Zorana Andersen
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, DK-1014 København K, Denmark; (Z.A.); (M.v.E.-C.); (G.N.)
| | - My von Euler-Chelpin
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, DK-1014 København K, Denmark; (Z.A.); (M.v.E.-C.); (G.N.)
| | - George Napolitano
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, DK-1014 København K, Denmark; (Z.A.); (M.v.E.-C.); (G.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 177:251-276. [PMID: 31177342 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05300-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is well established that high mammographic density (MD), when adjusted for age and body mass index, is one of the strongest known risk factors for breast cancer (BC), and also associates with higher incidence of interval cancers in screening due to the masking of early mammographic abnormalities. Increasing research is being undertaken to determine the underlying histological and biochemical determinants of MD and their consequences for BC pathogenesis, anticipating that improved mechanistic insights may lead to novel preventative or treatment interventions. At the same time, technological advances in digital and contrast mammography are such that the validity of well-established relationships needs to be re-examined in this context. METHODS With attention to old versus new technologies, we conducted a literature review to summarise the relationships between clinicopathologic features of BC and the density of the surrounding breast tissue on mammography, including the associations with BC biological features inclusive of subtype, and implications for the clinical disease course encompassing relapse, progression, treatment response and survival. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS There is reasonable evidence to support positive relationships between high MD (HMD) and tumour size, lymph node positivity and local relapse in the absence of radiotherapy, but not between HMD and LVI, regional relapse or distant metastasis. Conflicting data exist for associations of HMD with tumour location, grade, intrinsic subtype, receptor status, second primary incidence and survival, which need further confirmatory studies. We did not identify any relationships that did not hold up when data involving newer imaging techniques were employed in analysis.
Collapse
|
4
|
Regular physical activity and mammographic density: a cohort study. Cancer Causes Control 2018; 29:1015-1025. [PMID: 30194548 PMCID: PMC6245045 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-018-1075-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Physical activity is a modifiable lifestyle risk factor in prevention of breast cancer. Mammographic density (MD) is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. We investigate the association of regular physical activity with MD. Methods For 5,703 women who participated in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort (1993–1997) and attended mammographic screening in Copenhagen (1993–2001), MD was assessed at the first screening after cohort entry. MD was defined as a binary measure equivalent to Breast Imaging Report and Data System (BI-RADS) to either mixed/dense or fatty. Participation and duration in physical activities (hours/week) and confounders were assessed by questionnaire at cohort baseline. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations [odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI)] between physical activities and MD. Results 56.3% of women had mixed/dense MD and 47.6% participated in sports. We found a significant positive association between participation in sports (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.03–1.28) and do-it-yourself work (1.17; 1.05–1.31) and odds of having mixed/dense MD, which attenuated (1.08; 0.96–1.22 and 1.11; 0.98–1.25, respectively) in a fully adjusted model. No associations were found for time spent on physical activities or total metabolic equivalent of task scores with MD, in fully adjusted models. There was no effect modification of association between any physical activities and MD by obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and menopause status. Conclusions Physical activity is not a determinant of MD. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10552-018-1075-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
5
|
Azam S, Lange T, Huynh S, Aro AR, von Euler-Chelpin M, Vejborg I, Tjønneland A, Lynge E, Andersen ZJ. Hormone replacement therapy, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk: a cohort study. Cancer Causes Control 2018; 29:495-505. [PMID: 29671181 PMCID: PMC5938298 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-018-1033-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use increases breast cancer risk and mammographic density (MD). We examine whether MD mediates or modifies the association of HRT with the breast cancer. Methods For the 4,501 participants in the Danish diet, cancer and health cohort (1993–1997) who attended mammographic screening in Copenhagen (1993–2001), MD (mixed/dense or fatty) was assessed at the first screening after cohort entry. HRT use was assessed by questionnaire and breast cancer diagnoses until 2012 obtained from the Danish cancer registry. The associations of HRT with MD and with breast cancer were analyzed separately using Cox’s regression. Mediation analyses were used to estimate proportion [with 95% confidence intervals (CI)] of an association between HRT and breast cancer mediated by MD. Results 2,444 (54.3%) women had mixed/dense breasts, 229 (5.4%) developed breast cancer, and 35.9% were current HRT users at enrollment. Compared to never users, current HRT use was statistically significantly associated with having mixed/dense breasts (relative risk and 95% CI 1.24; 1.14–1.35), and higher risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio 1.87; 1.40–2.48). Association between current HRT use and breast cancer risk was partially mediated by MD (percent mediated = 10%; 95% CI 4–22%). The current HRT use-related breast cancer risk was higher in women with mixed/dense (1.94; 1.37–3.87) than fatty (1.37; 0.80–2.35) breasts (p value for interaction = 0.15). Conclusions MD partially mediates some of the association between HRT and breast cancer risk. The association between HRT and breast cancer seems to be stronger in women with dense breasts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shadi Azam
- Unit for Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark.
| | - Theis Lange
- Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Center for Statistical Science, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Stephanie Huynh
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Neuroscience, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusets, USA.,Danish Institute for Study Abroad, Vestergade 5-7, 1456, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Arja R Aro
- Unit for Health Promotion, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, 6700, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - My von Euler-Chelpin
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Elsebeth Lynge
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Zorana J Andersen
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roswall N, Andersen ZJ, von Euler-Chelpin M, Vejborg I, Lynge E, Jensen SS, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Tjønneland A, Sørensen M. Residential traffic noise and mammographic breast density in the Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort. Cancer Causes Control 2018. [PMID: 29520472 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-018-1021-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Traffic is the most important source of community noise, and it has been proposed to be associated with a range of disease outcomes, including breast cancer. As mammographic breast density (MD) is one of the strongest risk factors for developing breast cancer, the present study investigated whether there is an association between residential exposure to traffic noise and MD in a Danish cohort. METHODS We included women with reproductive and lifestyle information available from the Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort, who also participated in the Copenhagen Mammography Screening Programme (n = 5,260). Present and historical addresses from 1987 to 2011 were found in national registries, and traffic noise was modeled 5 years before mammogram. Analyses between residential traffic noise and MD were performed using logistic regression. RESULTS We found no association between residential road and railway noise exposure 5 years before mammogram, and having a mixed/dense versus a fatty mammogram, and no interaction with menopausal status, BMI, HRT use, and railway noise exposure, for analyses on road traffic noise. CONCLUSION The present study does not suggest an association between residential traffic noise exposure and subsequent MD in a cohort of middle-aged Danish women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Roswall
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Zorana Jovanovic Andersen
- Department of Public Health, Center for Epidemiology and Screening, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - My von Euler-Chelpin
- Department of Public Health, Center for Epidemiology and Screening, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Department of Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Elsebeth Lynge
- Department of Public Health, Center for Epidemiology and Screening, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Ole Raaschou-Nielsen
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Sørensen
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of natural Science and Environment, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moshina N, Roman M, Sebuødegård S, Waade GG, Ursin G, Hofvind S. Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density. Acta Radiol 2018; 59:154-160. [PMID: 28565960 DOI: 10.1177/0284185117712540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Breast radiologists of the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program subjectively classified mammographic density using a three-point scale between 1996 and 2012 and changed into the fourth edition of the BI-RADS classification since 2013. In 2015, an automated volumetric breast density assessment software was installed at two screening units. Purpose To compare volumetric breast density measurements from the automated method with two subjective methods: the three-point scale and the BI-RADS density classification. Material and Methods Information on subjective and automated density assessment was obtained from screening examinations of 3635 women recalled for further assessment due to positive screening mammography between 2007 and 2015. The score of the three-point scale (I = fatty; II = medium dense; III = dense) was available for 2310 women. The BI-RADS density score was provided for 1325 women. Mean volumetric breast density was estimated for each category of the subjective classifications. The automated software assigned volumetric breast density to four categories. The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was assessed using weighted kappa (kw). Results Mean volumetric breast density was 4.5%, 7.5%, and 13.4% for categories I, II, and III of the three-point scale, respectively, and 4.4%, 7.5%, 9.9%, and 13.9% for the BI-RADS density categories, respectively ( P for trend < 0.001 for both subjective classifications). The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was kw = 0.5 (95% CI = 0.47-0.53; P < 0.001). Conclusion Mean values of volumetric breast density increased with increasing density category of the subjective classifications. The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was moderate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gunvor G Waade
- Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo, Norway
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, USA
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Buschard K, Thomassen K, Lynge E, Vejborg I, Tjønneland A, von Euler-Chelpin M, Andersen ZJ. Diabetes, diabetes treatment, and mammographic density in Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort. Cancer Causes Control 2016; 28:13-21. [PMID: 27832382 PMCID: PMC5219016 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-016-0829-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Purpose We examined whether diabetes and diabetes treatment are associated with MD in a cohort study of Danish women above age of 50 years. Methods Study cohort consisted of 5,644 women (4,500 postmenopausal) who participated in the Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health cohort (1993–1997) and subsequently attended mammographic screening in Copenhagen (1993–2001). We used MD assessed at the first screening after the cohort entry, defined as mixed/dense or fatty. Diabetes diagnoses and diabetes treatments (diet, insulin, or oral antidiabetic agents) were self-reported at the time of recruitment (1993–1997). The association between MD and diabetes was analyzed by logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders. Effect modification by menopausal status and body mass index (BMI) was performed by introducing an interaction term into the model and tested by Wald test. Results Of 5,644 women with mean age of 56 years, 137 (2.4%) had diabetes and 3,180 (56.3%) had mixed/dense breasts. Having diabetes was significantly inversely associated with having mixed/dense breasts, in both, the crude model (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval: 0.33; 0.23–0.48), and after adjustment for adiposity and other risk factors (0.61; 0.40–0.92). Similar inverse associations were observed for 44 women who controlled diabetes by diet only and did not receive any medication (0.56; 0.27–1.14), and 62 who took oral antidiabetic agents only for diabetes (0.59; 0.32–1.09), while women taking insulin had increased odds of mixed/dense breasts (2.08; 0.68–6.35). There was no effect modification of these associations by menopausal status or BMI. Conclusions Having diabetes controlled by diet or oral antidiabetic agents is associated with a decrease in MD, whereas taking insulin is associated with an increase in MD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karsten Buschard
- Bartholin Institute, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Katrin Thomassen
- Department of Public Health, Center for Epidemiology and Screening, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Elsebeth Lynge
- Department of Public Health, Center for Epidemiology and Screening, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Department of Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Danish Cancer Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - My von Euler-Chelpin
- Department of Public Health, Center for Epidemiology and Screening, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Zorana Jovanovic Andersen
- Department of Public Health, Center for Epidemiology and Screening, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huynh S, von Euler-Chelpin M, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Hertel O, Tjønneland A, Lynge E, Vejborg I, Andersen ZJ. Long-term exposure to air pollution and mammographic density in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort. Environ Health 2015; 14:31. [PMID: 25879829 PMCID: PMC4392475 DOI: 10.1186/s12940-015-0017-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2014] [Accepted: 03/19/2015] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Growing evidence suggests that air pollution may be a risk factor for breast cancer, but the biological mechanism remains unknown. High mammographic density (MD) is one of the strongest predictors and biomarkers of breast cancer risk, but it has yet to be linked to air pollution. We investigated the association between long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and MD in a prospective cohort of women 50 years and older. METHODS For the 4,769 women (3,930 postmenopausal) participants in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort (1993-1997) who attended mammographic screening in Copenhagen (1993-2001), we used MD assessed at the first screening after cohort entry. MD was defined as mixed/dense or fatty. Traffic-related air pollution at residence was assessed by modeled levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The association between mean NOx and NO2 levels since 1971 until cohort baseline (1993-97) and MD was analyzed using logistic regression, adjusting for confounders, and separately by menopause, smoking status, and obesity. RESULTS We found inverse, statistically borderline significant associations between long-term exposure to air pollution and having mixed/dense MD in our fully adjusted model (OR; 95% CI: 0.96; 0.93-1.01 per 20 μg/m(3) of NOx and 0.89; 0.80- 0.98 per 10 μg/m(3) of NO2). There was no interaction with menopause, smoking, or obesity. CONCLUSION Traffic-related air pollution exposure does not increase MD, indicating that if air pollution increases breast cancer risk, it is not via MD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Huynh
- Center for Epidemiology and Screening, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Department of Neuroscience, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - My von Euler-Chelpin
- Center for Epidemiology and Screening, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | - Ole Hertel
- Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Danish Center for Cancer Research, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Elsebeth Lynge
- Center for Epidemiology and Screening, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Zorana J Andersen
- Center for Epidemiology and Screening, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|