1
|
Gmitroski KL, Hastings KG, Legault G, Barbic S. Métis health in Canada: a scoping review of Métis-specific health literature. CMAJ Open 2023; 11:E884-E893. [PMID: 37788865 PMCID: PMC10558240 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20230006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Métis are a culturally unique and distinct population, yet little research has evaluated their health separate from the broader Indigenous population. We sought to explore current literature regarding the health of Métis Peoples in Canada and identify potential trends and gaps. METHODS Using the Arksey-O'Malley, 5-stage, scoping review method, we searched PubMed, MEDLINE, iPortal Indigenous Articles Portal Research Tool and pertinent reference lists using the terms "Métis," "health" and "Canada." Two reviewers conducted the initial searches independently, including English articles from 2012 to 2022, and focused on only Métis populations' health within Canada. We described characteristics of the articles and themes for discussion. RESULTS Of the 572 articles we identified, we included a total of 28 articles in this scoping review, of which 16 were quantitative, 9 were qualitative and 3 used mixed methods. Thirteen articles used consultation with Métis communities as part of their methods, and 8 extracted data from national surveys. One article focused on children, while all other articles focused on adults. Nine articles used data from across Canada, 6 were based in Ontario, 5 in Alberta and 4 each in British Columbia and Manitoba. Themes included health, well-being and spirituality; mental health and substance use; health conditions and risk factors; access to adequate health resources; and experiences in health care. INTERPRETATION Métis-specific health research is lacking in Canada, with a gap in volume, subject matter and diversity in the demographics studied. This review illustrates the need for more research with strong community engagement to further explore Métis health and health service needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krysta-Leigh Gmitroski
- Faculty of Medicine (Gmitroski, Barbic), and School of Population and Public Health (Hastings), University of British Columbia; Foundry (Hastings, Barbic), Vancouver, BC; Department of Community, Culture, and Global Studies (Legault), University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Barbic), University of British Columbia; Providence Research (Barbic); Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences (Barbic), Vancouver, BC
| | - Katherine G Hastings
- Faculty of Medicine (Gmitroski, Barbic), and School of Population and Public Health (Hastings), University of British Columbia; Foundry (Hastings, Barbic), Vancouver, BC; Department of Community, Culture, and Global Studies (Legault), University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Barbic), University of British Columbia; Providence Research (Barbic); Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences (Barbic), Vancouver, BC
| | - Gabrielle Legault
- Faculty of Medicine (Gmitroski, Barbic), and School of Population and Public Health (Hastings), University of British Columbia; Foundry (Hastings, Barbic), Vancouver, BC; Department of Community, Culture, and Global Studies (Legault), University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Barbic), University of British Columbia; Providence Research (Barbic); Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences (Barbic), Vancouver, BC
| | - Skye Barbic
- Faculty of Medicine (Gmitroski, Barbic), and School of Population and Public Health (Hastings), University of British Columbia; Foundry (Hastings, Barbic), Vancouver, BC; Department of Community, Culture, and Global Studies (Legault), University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Barbic), University of British Columbia; Providence Research (Barbic); Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences (Barbic), Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tait CL. Challenges facing Indigenous transplant patients living in Canada: exploring equity and utility in organ transplantation decision-making. Int J Circumpolar Health 2022; 81:2040773. [PMID: 35200099 PMCID: PMC8881076 DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2022.2040773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Indigenous peoples in Canada and in the Circumpolar North face a higher disease burden leading to end-stage organ failure and face geographic and systemic barriers to accessing health-care services, including those for end-stage organ failure and organ donation and transplantation (ODT). To address these issues, I present a think tank model used in Saskatchewan, Canada, which focused on ODT and recommended research and policy changes that address inequitable Indigenous access to ODT, most specifically in northern and remote regions. Over the past three years, think tank members, comprised of Indigenous cultural leaders, elders, and persons with lived experience in ODT, and complemented by medical and advocacy exports, have highlighted equity and utility issues as key concerns, and discussed ways in which these issues can be addressed. Recommendations include culturally-safe methods for documenting and tracking Indigenous identity, development of training to address culturally specific needs, and additional
funding to support Indigenous transplant donors and recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline L Tait
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huria T, Pitama SG, Beckert L, Hughes J, Monk N, Lacey C, Palmer SC. Reported sources of health inequities in Indigenous Peoples with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of quantitative studies. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1447. [PMID: 34301234 PMCID: PMC8299576 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11180-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To summarise the evidentiary basis related to causes of inequities in chronic kidney disease among Indigenous Peoples. METHODS We conducted a Kaupapa Māori meta-synthesis evaluating the epidemiology of chronic kidney diseases in Indigenous Peoples. Systematic searching of MEDLINE, Google Scholar, OVID Nursing, CENTRAL and Embase was conducted to 31 December 2019. Eligible studies were quantitative analyses (case series, case-control, cross-sectional or cohort study) including the following Indigenous Peoples: Māori, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander, Métis, First Nations Peoples of Canada, First Nations Peoples of the United States of America, Native Hawaiian and Indigenous Peoples of Taiwan. In the first cycle of coding, a descriptive synthesis of the study research aims, methods and outcomes was used to categorise findings inductively based on similarity in meaning using the David R Williams framework headings and subheadings. In the second cycle of analysis, the numbers of studies contributing to each category were summarised by frequency analysis. Completeness of reporting related to health research involving Indigenous Peoples was evaluated using the CONSIDER checklist. RESULTS Four thousand three hundred seventy-two unique study reports were screened and 180 studies proved eligible. The key finding was that epidemiological investigators most frequently reported biological processes of chronic kidney disease, particularly type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease as the principal causes of inequities in the burden of chronic kidney disease for colonised Indigenous Peoples. Social and basic causes of unequal health including the influences of economic, political and legal structures on chronic kidney disease burden were infrequently reported or absent in existing literature. CONCLUSIONS In this systematic review with meta-synthesis, a Kaupapa Māori methodology and the David R Williams framework was used to evaluate reported causes of health differences in chronic kidney disease in Indigenous Peoples. Current epidemiological practice is focussed on biological processes and surface causes of inequity, with limited reporting of the basic and social causes of disparities such as racism, economic and political/legal structures and socioeconomic status as sources of inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Huria
- Māori Indigenous Health Institute, University of Otago Christchurch, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.
| | - Suzanne G Pitama
- Māori Indigenous Health Institute, University of Otago Christchurch, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand
| | - Lutz Beckert
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - Nathan Monk
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Cameron Lacey
- Māori Indigenous Health Institute, University of Otago Christchurch, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand
| | - Suetonia C Palmer
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bello AK, Ronksley PE, Tangri N, Kurzawa J, Osman MA, Singer A, Grill AK, Nitsch D, Queenan JA, Wick J, Lindeman C, Soos B, Tuot DS, Shojai S, Brimble KS, Mangin D, Drummond N. Quality of Chronic Kidney Disease Management in Canadian Primary Care. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1910704. [PMID: 31483474 PMCID: PMC6727682 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are routinely managed in primary care settings, no nationally representative study has assessed the quality of care received by these patients in Canada. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the current state of CKD management in Canadian primary care practices to identify care gaps to guide development and implementation of national quality improvement initiatives. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study leveraged Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network data from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015, to develop a cohort of 46 162 patients with CKD managed in primary care practices. Data analysis was performed from August 8, 2018, to July 31, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The study examined the proportion of patients with CKD who met a set of 12 quality indicators in 6 domains: (1) detection and recognition of CKD, (2) testing and monitoring of kidney function, (3) use of recommended medications, (4) monitoring after initiation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), (5) management of blood pressure, and (6) monitoring for glycemic control in those with diabetes and CKD. The study also analyzed associations of divergence from these quality indicators. RESULTS The cohort comprised 46 162 patients (mean [SD] age, 69.2 [14.0] years; 25 855 [56.0%] female) with stage 3 to 5 CKD. Only 4 of 12 quality indicators were met by 75% or more of the study cohort. These indicators were receipt of an outpatient serum creatinine test within 18 months after confirmation of CKD, receipt of blood pressure measurement at any time during follow-up, achieving a target blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or lower, and receiving a hemoglobin A1c test for monitoring diabetes during follow-up. Indicators in the domains of detection and recognition of CKD, testing and monitoring of kidney function (specifically, urine albumin to creatinine ratio testing), use of recommended medications, and appropriate monitoring after initiation of treatment with ACEIs or ARBs were not met. Only 6529 patients (18.4%) with CKD received a urine albumin test within 6 months of CKD diagnosis, and 3954 (39.4%) had a second measurement within 6 months of an abnormal baseline urine albumin level. Older age (≥85 years) and CKD stage 5 were significantly associated with not satisfying the criteria for the quality indicators across all domains. Across age categories, younger patients (aged 18-49 years) and older patients (≥75 years) were less likely to be tested for albuminuria (314 of 1689 patients aged 18-49 years [18.5%], 1983 of 11 919 patients aged 75-84 years [61.6%], and 614 of 5237 patients aged ≥85 years [11.7%] received the urine albumin to creatinine ratio test within 6 months of initial estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2; P < .001). Patients aged 18 to 49 years were less commonly prescribed recommended medications (222 of 2881 [7.7%]), whereas patients aged 75 to 84 years were prescribed ACEIs or ARBs most frequently (2328 of 5262 [44.2%]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings suggest that management of CKD across primary care practices in Canada varies according to quality indicator. This study revealed potential priority areas for quality improvement initiatives in Canadian primary care practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aminu K. Bello
- Division of Nephrology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paul E. Ronksley
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Navdeep Tangri
- Department of Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Julia Kurzawa
- Division of Nephrology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Mohamed A. Osman
- Division of Nephrology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alexander Singer
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Allan K. Grill
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dorothea Nitsch
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - John A. Queenan
- Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, Department of Family Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Wick
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cliff Lindeman
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Boglarka Soos
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Delphine S. Tuot
- Division of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco
- Kidney Health Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Soroush Shojai
- Division of Nephrology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - K. Scott Brimble
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dee Mangin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil Drummond
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sawhney S, Robinson HA, van der Veer SN, Hounkpatin HO, Scale TM, Chess JA, Peek N, Marks A, Davies GI, Fraccaro P, Johnson MJ, Lyons RA, Nitsch D, Roderick PJ, Halbesma N, Miller-Hodges E, Black C, Fraser S. Acute kidney injury in the UK: a replication cohort study of the variation across three regional populations. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e019435. [PMID: 29961002 PMCID: PMC6042563 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A rapid growth in the reported rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) has led to calls for greater attention and greater resources for improving care. However, the reported incidence of AKI also varies more than tenfold between previous studies. Some of this variation is likely to stem from methodological heterogeneity. This study explores the extent of cross-population variation in AKI incidence after minimising heterogeneity. DESIGN Population-based cohort study analysing data from electronic health records from three regions in the UK through shared analysis code and harmonised methodology. SETTING Three populations from Scotland, Wales and England covering three time periods: Grampian 2003, 2007 and 2012; Swansea 2007; and Salford 2012. PARTICIPANTS All residents in each region, aged 15 years or older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Population incidence of AKI and AKI phenotype (severity, recovery, recurrence). Determined using shared biochemistry-based AKI episode code and standardised by age and sex. RESULTS Respectively, crude AKI rates (per 10 000/year) were 131, 138, 139, 151 and 124 (p=0.095), and after standardisation for age and sex: 147, 151, 146, 146 and 142 (p=0.257) for Grampian 2003, 2007 and 2012; Swansea 2007; and Salford 2012. The pattern of variation in crude rates was robust to any modifications of the AKI definition. Across all populations and time periods, AKI rates increased substantially with age from ~20 to ~550 per 10 000/year among those aged <40 and ≥70 years. CONCLUSION When harmonised methods are used and age and sex differences are accounted for, a similar high burden of AKI is consistently observed across different populations and time periods (~150 per 10 000/year). There are particularly high rates of AKI among older people. Policy-makers should be careful not draw simplistic assumptions about variation in AKI rates based on comparisons that are not rigorous in methodological terms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Sawhney
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
| | - Heather A Robinson
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sabine N van der Veer
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Hilda O Hounkpatin
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- NIHR CLAHRC Wessex Data Science Hub, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Timothy M Scale
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- University of Swansea, Swansea, UK
| | - James A Chess
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- University of Swansea, Swansea, UK
| | - Niels Peek
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Angharad Marks
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
| | - Gareth Ivor Davies
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- University of Swansea, Swansea, UK
| | - Paolo Fraccaro
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew J Johnson
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- NIHR CLAHRC Wessex Data Science Hub, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ronan A Lyons
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- University of Swansea, Swansea, UK
| | - Dorothea Nitsch
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Paul J Roderick
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nynke Halbesma
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Eve Miller-Hodges
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Corrinda Black
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
| | - Simon Fraser
- Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, UK
- Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|