Anterior Plate-Screws and Lower Postoperative T1 Slope Affect Cervical Allospacer Failures in Multi-Level ACDF Surgery: Anterior Versus Posterior Fixation

Early radiographic outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anatomic versus lordotic cages

Background

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) interbody implants are shaped anatomically, with a convex superior aspect, or lordotically, with an angle and flat surfaces. However, the effect of implant shape on cervical sagittal balance (CSB) is not well described.

Methods

Of the 192 cases reviewed from 2018 to 2019, 118 were included with matching pre- and postoperative imaging. Cases were categorized by interbody implant type (anatomic or lordotic) and number of levels fused (1-level, 2-level, etc.). SurgiMap was used to measure cervical lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope (T1S), and T1S minus CL (T1S-CL) on pre- and postoperative imaging. Pre- and postoperative parameters were compared within and between each cohort. Change in CL (ΔCL), cSVA (ΔcSVA), and T1S-CL (ΔT1S-CL) were calculated as the difference between pre- and postoperative values and were compared accordingly (1) anatomic versus lordotic and (2) 1-level versus 2-level versus 3-level fusion.

Results

Thirty-nine (33.1%), 57 (48.3%), and 22 (18.6%) cases comprised the anatomic, lordotic, and mixed (anatomic and lordotic) groups, respectively. ACDFs improved CL and T1S-CL by 5.71° (p<.001) and 3.32° (p<.01), respectively. CL was improved in the lordotic (5.27°; p<.01) and anatomic (4.57°; p<.01) groups, while only the lordotic group demonstrated improvement in T1S-CL (3.4°; p=.02). There were no differences in ΔCL (p=.70), ΔcSVA (p=.89), or ΔT1S-CL (p=.1) between the groups. Two- and 3-level fusions improved CL by 7.48° (p<.01) and 9.62° (p<.01), and T1S-CL by 4.43° (p<.01) and 5.96° (p<.01), respectively.

Conclusions

Overall, ACDFs significantly improved CL and T1S-CL however, there were no differences in CSB correction between the anatomic and lordotic groups. Two- and 3-level fusions more effectively improved CL (vs. single-level) and T1S-CL (vs. 3-level). These results suggest that implants should continue to be personalized to the patient's anatomy, however, future research is needed to validate these findings and incorporate the effects of preoperative deformities.

Assessment of Biomechanical Advantages in Combined Anterior-Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery by Radiological Outcomes: Pedicle Screws over Lateral Mass Screws

BACKGROUND

The combined anterior-posterior approach has shown good clinical outcomes for multilevel cervical diseases. This work describes the biomechanical advantage of cervical-pedicle-screw fixation over lateral-mass-screw fixation in combined anterior-posterior cases.

METHOD

Seventy-six patients who received combined cervical surgery from June 2013 to December 2020 were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the lateral-mass-screw group (LMS) and the pedicle-screw group (PPS). Radiological outcomes were assessed with lateral cervical spine X-rays for evaluating sagittal alignment, subsidence, and bone remodeling.

RESULTS

At 1 year postoperatively, the numbers of patients whose C2-C7 cervical lordosis was less than 20 degrees decreased by more in the PPS group (p-value = 0.001). The amount of vertical-length change from immediately to 1 year postsurgery was less in the PPS group than in the LMS group (p-value = 0.030). The mean vertebral-body-width change was larger in the PPS group than in the LMS group during 3 months to 1 year postsurgery (p-value = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

In combined anterior-posterior cervical surgery cases, maintenance of cervical lordosis and protection of the vertebral body from subsidence were better with the pedicle-screw fixation. More bone remodeling occurred when using the pedicle-screw fixation method.

Which Radiographic Parameter Can Aid in Deciding Optimal Allograft Height for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To identify preoperative radiographic parameters that can guide optimal allograft height selection for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Allograft height selection for ACDF depends on intraoperative assessment supported by trials; however, there is currently no radiographic reference parameter that could aid in allograft height selection for improved outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 148 patients who underwent ACDF using allografts and were followed up for more than 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Fusion rates, subsidence, segmental lordosis, and foraminal height were assessed. Segments were divided into 2 groups according to whether the inserted allograft height was within 1 mm from the following 3 reference radiographic parameters: (1) uncinate process height, (2) adjacent disc height, and (3) preoperative disc height +2 mm.

RESULTS

This study included 101 patients with 163 segments. Segments with an allograft-uncinate height difference of ≤1 mm had a significantly higher fusion rate at 1-year follow-up compared with segments with allograft-uncinate height difference of >1 mm [85/107 (79.4%) vs. 35/56 (62.5%); P =0.025]. Subsidence, segmental lordosis, and foraminal height did not significantly differ between the groups when segments were divided according to uncinate height. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that allograft-uncinate height difference of ≤1 mm and allograft failure were factors associated with fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The uncinate process height can guide optimal allograft height selection for ACDF. Using an allograft with an allograft-uncinate height difference of ≤1 mm resulted in a higher fusion rate. Therefore, the uncinate process height should be checked preoperatively and used in conjunction with intraoperative assessment when selecting allograft height.

Variation in Prevertebral Soft Tissue Swelling after Staged Combined Multilevel Anterior-Posterior Complex Cervical Spine Surgery: Anterior Then Posterior (AP) versus Posterior Then Anterior-Posterior (PAP) Surgery

The influence of the sequence of surgery in the development of prevertebral soft tissue swelling (PSTS) in staged combined multilevel anterior-posterior complex spine surgery was examined. This study was conducted as a retrospective study of patients who underwent staged combined multilevel anterior-posterior complex cervical spine surgery from March 2014 to February 2021. Eighty-two patients were identified, of which fifty-seven were included in the final analysis after screening. PSTS was measured from routine serial monitoring lateral cervical radiographs prior to and after surgery for five consecutive days at each cervical level from C2 to C7 in patients who underwent anterior then posterior (AP) and posterior then anterior-posterior (PAP) surgery. The mean PSTS measurements significantly differed from the preoperative to postoperative monitoring days at all cervical levels (p = 0.0000) using repeated measures analysis of variance in both groups. PSTS was significantly greater in PAP than in AP at level C2 on postoperative day (POD) 1 (p = 0.0001). PSTS was more prominent at levels C2-4 during PODs 2-4 for both groups. In staged combined multilevel anterior-posterior complex spine surgery, PSTS is an inevitable complication. Therefore, surgeons should monitor PSTS after surgery when performing anterior-posterior complex cervical spine surgery, especially in the immediate postoperative period after PAP surgery.

Handgrip Strength Correlated with Falling Risk in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Background: Few studies have investigated associations between hand grip strength (HGS) and the surgical outcomes of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Methods: This study was designed as a prospective observational study of 203 patients who had undergone fusion surgery for DCM. We divided the patients according to sex and HGS differences. Clinical outcome parameters, including HGS, a fall diary and four functional mobility tests (alternative step test, six-meter walk test, timed up and go test, and sit-to-stand test) were measured preoperatively, at 3 months and 1 year after surgery. Results: Mean patient ages were 59.93 years in the male group and 67.33 years in the female group (p = 0.000; independent t-test). The mean HGS of both hands improved significantly at postoperative 3 months and 1 year in all patients (p = 0.000 for both; ANOVA). In male patients, preoperative risk of falls was negatively correlated with HGS (p = 0.000). In female patients, pre- and postoperative risk of falls were correlated negatively with HGS (p = 0.000). The postoperative incidence of falls decreased in both groups (p = 0.000) Conclusions: Postoperative HGS in patients with DCM is correlated with postoperative falls and functional outcome differently, when comparing male and female patients, for predicting favorable outcomes and neurologic deficit recovery after surgery in DCM patients.