Telemedicine Improves Access to Care for Spine Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status

Improving Access to MS Care Through Technology

People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) experience many barriers to accessing multiple sclerosis (MS) care that lead to diagnostic delays, delayed treatment, interrupted care, and significant economic burden. These barriers include limited geographic healthcare resources, financial burden, physical limitations, and inequities within the healthcare system. Telemedicine has the potential to reduce these barriers and improve access to care. The lack of geographic proximity to neurologists and MS Centers can be overcome by leveraging telemedicine which has been shown to significantly reduce travel burden. Furthermore, cross-sectional studies have shown telemedicine reduces indirect costs for PwMS including significantly lower mean costs in parking, gas, tolls, and wages lost compared to in-person visits. Although there has been evidence that telemedicine can reduce many barriers there is still a need to demonstrate the impact of longitudinal telemedicine care and its direct impact on access to MS care.

Telemedicine Use Following Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic Was Associated With Youth and White Race but Not With Socioeconomic Deprivation: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Orthopedic Patients

Background

The use of telemedicine increased greatly following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is unclear whether and how sociodemographic factors have affected orthopedics patients' use of this technology in the pandemic.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine how patient demographic variability in telemedicine use is influenced by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and distance to clinical site among patients seeking care for hip and knee arthritis from orthopedic surgeons.

Methods

Demographic data and visit type were collected from the electronic medical record for patients seen in our academic medical center either before or during the COVID-19 pandemic by orthopedic surgeons who specialize in hip and knee arthroplasty. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed regarding age, race, insurance status, ADI, and distance to a clinical site.

Results

In the COVID era, among 4901 visits with 3124 unique patients, those using telemedicine were younger and more likely to be White compared to those who did not use telemedicine. There was no significant difference in telemedicine use based on ADI, distance to a clinical site, or insurance status.

Conclusions

This retrospective analysis suggests that orthopedic patients who were White and of younger age were more likely to use telemedicine in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no statistically significant relationship between distance from a clinical site or ADI and telemedicine use, suggesting that factors other than these are greater contributors to telemedicine utilization in our cohort. Further information is needed to determine how telemedicine may disproportionately limit access to orthopedic care according to these and other patient factors.

Characteristics of Patients Utilizing Telemedicine in Hand and Upper-Extremity Surgery

BACKGROUND

The impact of social determinants of health on patients' access to medical care and health outcomes is increasingly recognized. Telemedicine's rapid and widespread adoption altered the delivery of care. This study describes the characteristics of patients undergoing telemedicine visits with hand surgeons, without COVID-19 pandemic-related restrictions.

METHODS

All telemedicine encounters for 4 hand surgeons at a single institution between September 2022 and September 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics were recorded as well as the encounter type. The distance of the patients' residential address and the area deprivation index (ADI) were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty patient encounters were recorded. Forty-seven percent were male and 53% were female, 5 (8.3%) were new patients, 44 (73.3%) were established patients, and 11 (18.3%) were postoperative. The mean age was 43, and the mean and median distances from the clinic were 72 and 18 miles, respectively. Forty-three patients (72%) were from high ADI residences. Upon comparison of low ADI (0-50th percentile) and high ADI (50th-100th percentile) patients, no statistically significant differences in age, sex, distance from clinic, or encounter type were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine in hand surgery at this single institution is most frequently used for follow-up encounter types in patients living in high ADI communities, far from clinic sites. Low or high ADI did not correlate with seasonal changes in the use of telemedicine, encounter type, or patient demographics. Telemedicine may improve patient access to hand surgery follow-up care. This may particularly benefit patients facing geographic and economic challenges to healthcare access.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV.

Exploring Health Inequalities and Presurgical Attitudes on Postsurgical Outcomes in Spine Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The influence of social determinants of health on health disparities is substantial. However, their impact on postsurgical outcomes in spine can be challenging to ascertain at the community level. This study aims to explore the interplay between presurgical attitudes, area deprivation index (ADI), income, employment status, and body mass index (BMI) on postsurgical outcomes at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after elective spine surgery.

METHODS

The study involved 127 patients who underwent elective spine surgery between August 2021 and August 2022 at a large academic institution. The main objective involved a prospective analysis of presurgical attitudes, coupled with a retrospective assessment of ADI, income, employment status, and BMI over 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following elective spine surgery using a univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Utilizing the univariate analyses, ADI displayed a significant correlation with increased Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and Visual Analog Scale scores both before surgery and at the 3-, 6-, and 9-month postsurgical intervals (P < 0.05). One year after surgery, patients in the lowest income group (annual income under $25,000) consistently demonstrated the highest Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain (8.00, P = 0.022). Patients who were not employed had significantly lower levels of social support (P = 0.042) and confidence in the health care system (P = 0.009). Individuals who were unemployed were most likely to be readmitted six weeks after surgery (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Presurgical attitudes, ADI, income, employment status, and BMI were important factors associated with improved surgical outcome measurements, indicating potential focal points for combating health disparities in spinal surgery patients.

Impact of Patient Factors on Attendance at Remote Telehealth Swallow Therapy

In-person swallow therapy is a primary and effective treatment for dysphagia. However, remote telehealth is now a widely utilized component of healthcare delivery for therapeutic interventions. This study evaluates potential factors influencing attendance at telehealth swallow therapy. Retrospective review of 308 patients referred for telehealth swallow therapy from April 2020-November 2021 included patient referral diagnosis, diagnostic swallowing evaluations, and sociodemographic information including age, race, health insurance, interpreter use, and socioeconomic status. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared patient and appointment factors for those who attended telehealth swallow therapy with those who did not attend. Overall, 71.8% of patients attended at least one telehealth swallow therapy appointment while 28.2% did not attend any. The most common referral diagnoses were "Cancer" (19.2%) and "Dysphagia Unspecified" (19.2%). Patients diagnosed with "Cancer" and "Muscle Tension" were significantly less likely to attend telehealth swallow therapy compared to those with "Dysphagia Unspecified," "Globus," and "Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease/Laryngopharyngeal Reflux" after adjusting for covariates. Lower socioeconomic status (p = 0.023), no interpreter use (p < 0.001), and more diagnostic evaluations (p = 0.001) correlated with higher telehealth swallow therapy attendance. Race and sex did not correlate with attendance. Most patients referred to telehealth swallow therapy attended at least one appointment. Patients with dysphagia associated with cancer and muscle tension, those with higher socioeconomic status, interpreter use, and fewer diagnostic swallowing evaluations were less likely to attend telehealth swallow therapy. Future research should investigate and compare attendance and efficacy of telehealth swallow therapy with in-person therapy.

Telemedicine in Follow-up after Spine Surgery: Need of the Hour

Purpose  There is an acute shortage of neurosurgeons and spine surgeons especially in rural areas of low- and middle-income countries including India. Patients of spine surgery need to travel long distances for follow-up at tertiary care hospitals. This study was done to evaluate role and success rate of telemedicine in follow-up after spine surgery based on patients' diagnosis and demographic features and to identify barriers to successful telemedicine consultations. Materials and Methods  All patients undergoing spine surgeries including craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgeries from January 2021 to June 2022 were included in the study. Success rate of telemedicine was calculated using a simple formula: Success rate of telemedicine = successful telemedicine consultations / total number of telemedicine consultation × 100. Success rate was evaluated with respect to demographic features and underlying disease-related factors. Results  Eighty-four patients formed the study group in which a total of 181 video teleconsultations were done. Overall success rate of telemedicine was 82.87%. Higher socioeconomic and educational statuses were related to higher success rates of tele-consultations ( p  < 0.05). Difficulty in assessing neurological condition using video call in follow-up cases of CVJ and issues related to Internet communication network leading to inability to video call and share image/videos were major causes of failures. Conclusion  Telemedicine may prove an effective option for following up patients undergoing spine surgeries except CVJ, which is likely to improve further with improvements in Internet connectivity.

Use of Telemedicine Among Hand Surgeons and Their Patients

PURPOSE

Initially designed to address geographic obstacles to patient care, reliance on telemedicine rapidly increased during the coronavirus pandemic. The purpose of this study was to analyze the proficiency of computer and mobile device usage among a cohort of surgeons and their patients who either used telemedicine or had in-person visits.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who had an outpatient telemedicine visit (T group), or in-person visit (NT group) with a hand and wrist orthopedic surgeon, between March 2020 and July 2020. These patients and their surgeons were sent the Computer Proficiency Questionnaire (CPQ-12) and the Mobile Device Questionnaire (MDPQ-16) via email. A total of 602 survey responses were collected, 279 of which belonged to patients in the T group and 323 to patients in the NT group.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in demographics, including age and sex. Scores on the CPQ-12 and MDPQ-16 did not significantly differ between the two groups. In the patient sample, there was no correlation between CPQ-12 and MDPQ-16 scores and the proportion of telehealth visits. The orthopedic surgeon group also had no observed correlation between the CPQ-12 and MDPQ-16 scores and number or proportion of telemedicine visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall proficiency with computer and mobile devices was not correlated with the likelihood of patients or orthopedic surgeons using telemedicine visits. Patient selection appears to be driven by other factors, which could include limitations in transportation, convenience, and time constraints.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Orthopedic surgeons should continue to offer telehealth visits to their patients regardless of estimated capabilities with electronic devices of both the patient and the surgeon.

Older Patient Receptivity to the Integration of Patient Portals and Telehealth in Urogynecology: Promoters and Deterrents

IMPORTANCE

Limited studies focus on the integration of online portals, including telehealth services, in urogynecology while identifying promoters and deterrents of utilization, especially for the older population.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify facilitators, concerns, technical or personal issues encountered, and the desired features of the online patient portals among older urogynecology patients.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of older patients (≥65 years). The survey was devised using 2 focus groups with questions addressing older patient practicality and comfort with virtual visits for menopause and urogynecology-specific conditions.

RESULTS

A total of 205 patients completed the study. Promoters of use included health care professional encouragement, enrollment on site with concurrent education, and clarification of relevance of the virtual care to one's care. Patients who were uncomfortable with portal use reported anxiety and technical issues as deterrents for using such technology. More than half of the patients were comfortable having online visits for preoperative (51.7%), postoperative (66.3%), and medical management (73.7%). Up to 60.5% of the patients believed that virtual visits were equally stressful as in-person visits, whereas 24.4% believed that the logistics of in-person visits were the cause of stress.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve access to care, augment the utilization of online patient portals, and combat ageism, enhancing the older urogynecologic patient's portal experience is vital. Investment in this population's needs includes education of patients, active enrollment, and engagement by health care systems, and addressing technical concerns.

Lower socioeconomic status is not associated with severity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched cohort analysis

PURPOSE

Assessing the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on the severity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) on initial presentation to the spinal surgeon remains a challenge. The area deprivation index (ADI) is a validated measure of SES that abstracts multiple domains of disadvantage into a single score. We hypothesized that patients with low SES (high ADI) present to the orthopedic clinic with more advanced curve pathology.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with AIS. Subjects were assigned ADI scores based on Zip codes. Matched cohorts of high and low ADI were generated using propensity scores. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors impacting the magnitude of the curve at presentation.

RESULTS

A total of 425 patients with appropriate imaging were included. After matching, the study population was 69.2% female and 92.3% Black. The mean BMI percentile was 61.9. Medicaid covered 57.3% of subjects, and 42.7% had commercial insurance. The mean ADI was 55.5. The mean Cobb angle at presentation was 33.6 degrees. Cobb angle was significantly greater among female patients (36.0 degrees vs 28.0) and among patients with greater BMI percentile (β = 0.127), but was not significantly associated with ADI, race, or insurance type. ADI was not associated with the rate of surgery.

CONCLUSION

ADI is not predictive of curve severity in pediatric patients presenting to the clinic for AIS. Female sex and BMI are independently associated with advanced curvature. Public health workers, primary care providers, and surgeons should remain aware of the complex interactions of socioeconomic factors, BMI and sex when addressing barriers to timely care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III.

Telehealth in PM&R: Past, present, and future in clinical practice and opportunities for translational research

Telehealth refers to the use of telecommunication devices and other forms of technology to provide services outside of the traditional in-person health care delivery system. Growth in the use of telehealth creates new challenges and opportunities for implementation in clinical practice. The American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) assembled an expert group to develop a white paper to examine telehealth innovation in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R). The resultant white paper summarizes how telehealth is best used in the field of PM&R while highlighting current knowledge deficits and technological limitations. The report identifies new and transformative opportunities for PM&R to advance translational research related to telehealth and enhance patient care.

Feasibility Using Telehealth for Planning Use of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in a Sports Medicine Clinic

(1) Background: The purpose of this study is to describe whether telehealth compared with in-person visits, led to a similar agreement of primary diagnosis reached at the time of procedure using extracorporeal shockwave therapy. (2) Methods: This retrospective study consisted of chart reviews of all new patients evaluated in a sports medicine clinic prior to performing extracorporeal shockwave therapy from April 2020 to March 2021. The primary outcome of the study was describing agreement in primary diagnosis at the time of evaluation (telehealth and in-person) and during the procedure using extracorporeal shockwave therapy. Logistic regression was utilized to identify patient characteristics that may predict agreement of diagnosis using telehealth. (3) Results: The chart review identified 166 patients (45 telehealth and 121 in-person) evaluated for extracorporeal shockwave therapy. Agreement of diagnosis was similar for patients evaluated using telehealth compared to in-person visits (84% vs. 92%, Χ² = 1.90, p = 0.168). Agreement on diagnosis was more likely in patients who started shockwave within the 1 week of initial visit (OR = 8.27, 95% CI = 1.69-45.29), patients over age 60 (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90-0.99), and in patients without a history of osteoarthritis (OR = 14.00, 95% CI = 1.88-113.46). (4) Conclusions: Telehealth resulted in a similar agreement to in-person visits to identify a primary diagnosis for planning extracorporeal shockwave therapy. Telehealth may be a reasonable alternative to in-person visits for procedural planning of extracorporeal shockwave therapy.