Listening Effort in School-Aged Children With Limited Useable Hearing Unilaterally: Examining the Effects of a Personal, Digital Remote Microphone System and a Contralateral Routing of Signal System

Predictors of Listening-Related Fatigue in Adolescents With Hearing Loss

PURPOSE

Self-reported listening-related fatigue in adolescents with hearing loss (HL) was investigated. Specifically, the extent to which listening-related fatigue is associated with school accommodations, audiologic characteristics, and listening breaks was examined.

METHOD

Participants were 144 adolescents with HL ages 12-19 years. Data were collected online via Qualtrics. The Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale-Child was used to measure listening-related fatigue. Participants also reported on their use of listening breaks and school accommodations, including an Individualized Education Program (IEP) or 504 plan, remote microphone systems, closed captioning, preferential seating, sign language interpreters, live transcriptions, and notetakers.

RESULTS

After controlling for age, HL laterality, and self-perceived listening difficulty, adolescents with an IEP or a 504 plan reported lower listening-related fatigue compared to adolescents without an IEP or a 504 plan. Adolescents who more frequently used remote microphone systems or notetakers reported higher listening-related fatigue compared to adolescents who used these accommodations less frequently, whereas increased use of a sign language interpreter was associated with decreased listening-related fatigue. Among adolescents with unilateral HL, higher age was associated with lower listening-related fatigue; no effect of age was found among adolescents with bilateral HL. Listening-related fatigue did not differ based on hearing device configuration.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents with HL should be considered at risk for listening-related fatigue regardless of the type of hearing devices used or the degree of HL. The individualized support provided by an IEP or 504 plan may help alleviate listening-related fatigue, especially by empowering adolescents with HL to be self-advocates in terms of their listening needs and accommodations in school. Additional research is needed to better understand the role of specific school accommodations and listening breaks in addressing listening-related fatigue.

Use of Socioeconomic Demographic Data in Studies on Pediatric Unilateral Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Social determinants of health (SDOH) (healthcare access and quality, education access and quality, socioeconomic status, social and cultural context, neighborhood and built environment) ( Healthy People 2030 ) have been shown to impact a wide range of health-related outcomes and access to care. Given the medical and nonmedical costs associated with children with unilateral hearing loss (UHL), the varied insurance coverage for hearing healthcare services, and the differences in hearing aid utilization rates between children of different sociodemographic classes, the sociodemographic information of children with UHL enrolled in research studies should be collected to ensure the generalizability of hearing healthcare interventions. Therefore, the objective of this scoping review is to assess the reporting of SDOH data for participants in studies of pediatric UHL and its comparison to population trends.

DESIGN

Two searches of published literature were conducted by a qualified medical librarian. Two reviewers then evaluated all candidate articles. Study inclusion parameters were from 2010 to present, peer-reviewed studies with prospective study design, and participant population including children (age 0 to 18 years old) with UHL.

RESULTS

Two literature searches using PubMed Medline and Embase found 442 and 3058 studies each for review. After abstract and paper review, 87 studies were included in final qualitative review, with 22 of these studies reporting race distribution of participants, 15 reporting insurance status or family income, and 12 reporting the maternal education level.

CONCLUSIONS

Sociodemographic data are not commonly reported in research studies of children with UHL. In reported samples, research participants are more likely to have private insurance and higher family income compared with overall population distribution. These demographic biases may affect the generalizability of study results to all children with UHL. Further evaluation is warranted to evaluate whether participant recruitment affects outcomes that reflect the overall population.

A Comparison of Listening Skills of Autistic and Non-Autistic Youth While Using and Not Using Remote Microphone Systems

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to compare (a) listening-in-noise (accuracy and effort) and (b) remote microphone (RM) system benefits between autistic and non-autistic youth.

DESIGN

Groups of autistic and non-autistic youth that were matched on chronological age and biological sex completed listening-in-noise testing when wearing and not wearing an RM system. Listening-in-noise accuracy and listening effort were evaluated simultaneously using a dual-task paradigm for stimuli varying in type (syllables, words, sentences, and passages). Several putative moderators of RM system effects on outcomes of interest were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Autistic youth outperformed non-autistic youth in some conditions on listening-in-noise accuracy; listening effort between the two groups was not significantly different. RM system use resulted in listening-in-noise accuracy improvements that were nonsignificantly different across groups. Benefits of listening-in-noise accuracy were all large in magnitude. RM system use did not have an effect on listening effort for either group. None of the putative moderators yielded effects of the RM system on listening-in-noise accuracy or effort for non-autistic youth that were significant and interpretable, indicating that RM system benefits did not vary according to any of the participant characteristics assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to expectations, autistic youth did not demonstrate listening-in-noise deficits compared to non-autistic youth. Both autistic and non-autistic youth appear to experience RM system benefits marked by large gains in listening-in-noise performance. Thus, the use of this technology in educational and other noisy settings where speech perception needs enhancement might be beneficial for both groups of children.

Effect of Hearing Device Use on Speech-in-Noise Performance in Children with Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVES

Limited evidence exists for the use of rerouting devices in children with severe-to-profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Many laboratory studies to date have evaluated hearing-in-noise performance in specific target-masker spatial configurations within a small group of participants and with only a subset of available hearing devices. In the present study, the efficacy of all major types of nonsurgical devices was evaluated within a larger group of pediatric subjects on a challenging speech-in-noise recognition task.

DESIGN

Children (7-18 years) with unaided severe-to-profound unilateral hearing loss (UHL' n = 36) or bilateral normal hearing (NH, n = 36) participated in the present study. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) required for 50% speech understanding (SNR-50) was measured using BKB sentences in the presence of proprietary restaurant noise (R-SPACE BSIN-R) in the R-SPACE Sound System. Subjects listened under 2 target/masker spatial configurations. The target signal was directed toward subjects' NH or hearing-impaired ear (45º azimuth), while the interfering restaurant noise masker was presented from the remaining 7 loudspeakers encircling the subject, spaced every 45º. Head position was fixed during testing. The presentation level of target sentences and masking noise varied over time to estimate the SNR-50 (dB). The following devices were tested in all participants with severe-to-profound UHL: air conduction (AC) contralateral routing of signal (CROS), bone conduction (BC) CROS fitted on a headband with and without the use of remote microphone (RM), and an ear-level RM hearing assistance technology (HAT) system.

RESULTS

As a group, participants with severe-to-profound UHL performed best when the target signal was directed toward their NH ear. Across listening conditions, there was an average 8.5 dB improvement in SNR-50 by simply orienting the NH ear toward the target signal. When unaided, participants with severe-to-profound UHL performed as well as participants with NH when the target signal was directed toward the NH ear. Performance was negatively affected by AC CROS when the target signal was directed toward the NH ear, whereas no statistically significant change in performance was observed when using BC CROS. When the target signal was directed toward participants' hearing-impaired ear, all tested devices improved SNR-50 compared with the unaided condition, with small improvements (1-2 dB) observed with CROS devices and the largest improvement (9 dB) gained with the personal ear-level RM HAT system. No added benefit nor decrement was observed when RM was added to BC CROS using a 50/50 mixing ratio when the target was directed toward the impaired ear.

CONCLUSIONS

In a challenging listening environment with diffuse restaurant noise, SNR-50 was most improved in the study sample when using a personal ear-level RM HAT system. Although tested rerouting devices offered measurable improvement in performance (1-2 dB in SNR-50) when the target was directed to the impaired ear, benefit may be offset by a detriment in performance in the opposing condition. Findings continue to support use of RM HAT for children with severe-to-profound UHL in adverse listening environments, when there is one primary talker of interest, to ensure advantageous SNRs.