Comparison of Frequency of Home Births in the Member States of the EU Between 2015 and 2019

Midwife-attended planned home births versus planned hospital births in Spain: Maternal and neonatal outcomes

BACKGROUND

The debate on the safety and outcomes of home versus hospital births highlights the need for evidence-based evaluations of these birthing settings, particularly in Catalonia where both options are available.

AIM

To compare sociodemographic characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes between low-risk women opting for home versus hospital births in Catalonia, Spain.

METHODS

This observational cross-sectional study analysed 3,463 low-risk births between 2016 and 2018, including 2,713 hospital and 750 home births. Researchers collected sociodemographic data, birthing processes, and outcomes, using statistical analysis to explore differences between the settings.

FINDINGS

Notable differences emerged: Women choosing home births typically had higher education levels and were predominantly Spanish. They were 3.43 times more likely to have a spontaneous birth and significantly less likely to undergo instrumental births than those in hospitals. Home births were associated with higher utilization of non-pharmacological analgesia and a more pronounced tendency to iniciate breastfeeding within the first hour post birth and stronger inclination towards breastfeeding. Hospital births, conversely, showed higher use of the lithotomy position and epidural analgesia. There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

Home births managed by midwives offered better obstetric and neonatal outcomes for low-risk women than hospital births. These results suggest home birth as a safe, viable option that promotes natural birthing processes and reduces medical interventions. The study supports the integration of midwife-led home birth into public health policies, affirming its benefits for maternal and neonatal health.

Exploring home births in Catalonia (Spain): A cross-sectional study of women's experiences and influencing factors

AIM

The study explores the experiences of women with low-risk pregnancies and no complications who planned a home birth.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire.

METHODS

The questionnaire included socio-demographic, obstetric and perinatal variables. Birth satisfaction was evaluated via the Spanish version of the childbirth experience questionnaire. The study group comprised home-birthing women in Catalonia, Spain. Data were collected from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS.

RESULTS

A total of 236 women responded. They reported generally positive experiences, with professional support and involvement being the most highly rated dimensions. Better childbirth experiences were associated with labour lasting less than 12 h, no perineal injuries, no intrapartum transfers to hospital, euthocic delivery and the presence of a midwife.

CONCLUSIONS

Women's positive home birth experiences were linked to active participation and midwife support. Multiparous women felt safer. Medical interventions, especially transfers to hospitals, reduced satisfaction, highlighting the need for improved care during home births.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE

Home births should be included among the birthplace options offered by public health services, given the extremely positive feedback reported by women who gave birth at home.

IMPACT

Home birth is not an option offered under Catalonia's public health system only as a private service. The experience of home-birthing women is unknown. This study shows a very positive birth experience due to greater participation and midwife support. The results help stakeholders assess home birth's public health inclusion and understand valued factors, supporting home-birthing women.

REPORTING METHOD

The study followed the STROBE checklist guidelines for cross-sectional studies.

PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Women who planned a home birth participated in the pilot test to validate the instrument, and their contributions were collected by the lead researcher. The questionnaire gathered the participants' email addresses, and a commitment was made to disseminate the study's results through this means.

Adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the provider attitudes towards planned home birth (PAPHB) Scale

Maternity health care professionals' attitudes on the option of home birth can influence the choices and decisions women and their partners make about place of birth. Midwives are particularly influential in this space. The study outlined in this paper aimed to translate and validate the Provider Attitudes towards Planned Home Birth (PAPHB) scale questionnaire for use in the Portuguese maternity context.

METHODS

A total of 118 Portuguese midwives were selected through intentional sampling. The procedure was divided into two phases. In the first phase, a triple translation from the original language into Portuguese and a cross-cultural adaptation of the Provider Attitudes towards Planned Home Birth (PAPHB) scale were carried out, obtaining three versions of the same questionnaire. The second phase consisted of the validation of the questionnaire, for which the Provider Attitudes towards Planned Home Birth (PAPHB) scale was submitted to a panel of 20 experts and to a pilot test. Subsequently, the reliability and statistical validity of the scale were evaluated.

RESULTS

After content analysis, the results confirmed a four-dimensional structure with a Cronbach's α value of 0.933 for the Provider Attitudes towards Planned Home Birth (PAPHB) scale as a whole, showing good internal consistency. Finally, a bivariate analysis was carried out identifying associations between variables and midwives' attitudes towards home birth. Positive attitudes towards homebirth were strongly influenced by previous clinical experience and exposure to home birth during midwives' academic education.

CONCLUSION

The 18-item scale is a reliable and valid tool to quantify attitudes towards planned home births in Portugal as the results obtained in the study showed very good internal consistency.

Sex-specific newborn screening for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy

Males with X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) are at high risk for developing adrenal insufficiency and/or progressive leukodystrophy (cerebral ALD) at an early age. Pathogenic variants in ABCD1 result in elevated levels of very long-chain fatty acids (VLCFA), including C26:0-lysophosphatidylcholine (C26:0-LPC). Newborn screening for ALD enables prospective monitoring and timely therapeutic intervention, thereby preventing irreversible damage and saving lives. The Dutch Health Council recommended to screen only male newborns for ALD without identifying untreatable conditions associated with elevated C26:0-LPC, like Zellweger spectrum disorders and single peroxisomal enzyme defects. Here, we present the results of the SCAN (Screening for ALD in the Netherlands) study which is the first sex-specific newborn screening program worldwide. Males with ALD are identified based on elevated C26:0-LPC levels, the presence of one X-chromosome and a variant in ABCD1, in heel prick dried bloodspots. Screening of 71 208 newborns resulted in the identification of four boys with ALD who, following referral to the pediatric neurologist and confirmation of the diagnosis, enrolled in a long-term follow-up program. The results of this pilot show the feasibility of employing a boys-only screening algorithm that identifies males with ALD without identifying untreatable conditions. This approach will be of interest to countries that are considering ALD newborn screening but are reluctant to identify girls with ALD because for girls there is no direct health benefit. We also analyzed whether gestational age, sex, birth weight and age at heel prick blood sampling affect C26:0-LPC concentrations and demonstrate that these covariates have a minimal effect.

Does Advanced Maternal Age Comprise an Independent Risk Factor for Caesarean Section? A Population-Wide Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between a mother's age and the risk of caesarean section (CS) when controlling for health factors and selected sociodemographic characteristics.

METHODS

Binary logistic regression models for all women who gave birth in Czechia in 2018 (N = 111,749 mothers who gave birth to 113,234 children).

RESULTS

An increase in the age of a mother significantly increases the odds of a CS birth according to all of the models; depending on the model, OR: 1.62 (95% CI 1.54-1.71) to 1.84 (95% CI 1.70-1.99) for age group 35-39 and OR: 2.83 (95% CI 2.60-3.08) to 3.71 (95% CI 3.23-4.27) for age group 40+ compared to age group 25-29. This strong association between the age of a mother and the risk of CS is further reinforced for primiparas (probability of a CS: 11% for age category ≤ 19, 23% for age category 35-39, and 38% for age category 40+). However, the increasing educational attainment of young women appears to have weakened the influence of increasing maternal age on the overall share of CS births; depending on the model, OR: 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.91) to 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.91) for tertiary-educated compared to secondary-educated women.

CONCLUSIONS

The age of a mother comprises an independent risk factor for a CS birth when the influence of health, socioeconomic, and demographic characteristics is considered.