1
|
Tomás-Rodríguez MI, Asensio-García MDR, García RN, Delicado-Miralles M, Sánchez SH, Segura-Heras JV. Short- and medium-term effects of a single session of pain neuroscience education on pain and psychological factors in patients with chronic low back pain. A single-blind randomized clinical trial. Eur J Pain 2024. [PMID: 39017623 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biopsychosocial approach in patients suffering chronic low back pain (CLBP) promotes pain self-management strategies. Current evidence recommends high dose of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) for clinically significant differences. However, the workload and time constraints experienced by healthcare providers impede the application of the recommended treatment regimen. In fact, Back School with a biomechanical model is the main approach to manage CLBP in public systems. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to explore the effect of a 60 min single session of PNE as an adjunct to back school on pain intensity and psychological variables patients with CLBP. METHODS A double-blind, two-arm randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in patients with CLBP who attended back school sessions held in a Spanish public hospital. A total of 121 patients were randomized into control group, who received the Back School program during 5 weeks, and intervention group, who additionally received a single session of PNE. Patient-reported outcomes were the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Central Sensitization Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, with a 12-week follow-up. RESULTS A total of 113 patients were analysed. Intervention and control group presented similar effects on pain and kinesiophobia. At follow-up, intervention group exhibited reduced sensitization and catastrophism scores compared with control, including the subscales. Additionally, PNE reduced the percentage of participants classified as having central sensitization compared with control. CONCLUSIONS Adding a single PNE session in the back school program did not reduce pain but improved psychological factors as central sensitization and pain catastrophizing at medium-term. This study highlights the potential of PNE to optimize treatment strategies for CLBP, especially in public health centres where time resources are scarce. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Adding a single PNE session in the back school program did not reduce pain but improved psychological factors as central sensitization and pain catastrophism at medium-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mª Isabel Tomás-Rodríguez
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Center for Translational Research in Physiotherapy, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Rauf Nouni García
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Miguel Delicado-Miralles
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Center for Translational Research in Physiotherapy, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Sergio Hernández Sánchez
- Department of Pathology and Surgery, Center for Translational Research in Physiotherapy, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Jose Vicente Segura-Heras
- Instituto Centro de Investigación Operativa, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Benedict TM, Nitz AJ, Gambrel MK, Louw A. Pain neuroscience education improves post-traumatic stress disorder, disability, and pain self-efficacy in veterans and service members with chronic low back pain: Preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY 2024; 36:376-392. [PMID: 38913769 PMCID: PMC11197901 DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2023.2188046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and chronic low back pain (CLBP) are frequently co-morbid. Some research suggests that PTSD and CLBP may share common neurobiological mechanisms related to stress. Traditional biomedical education may be ineffective for PTSD and CLBP, especially when co-morbid. The purpose of this study is to determine if pain neuroscience education (PNE) is more effective than traditional education in reducing PTSD, disability, pain, and maladaptive beliefs in patients with CLBP. Participants with CLBP and possible PTSD/PTSD-symptoms were recruited for this study. Participants were randomly allocated to a PNE group or a traditional education group. The intervention included 30 minutes of education followed by a standardized exercise program once a week for 4-weeks with a 4 and 8-week follow-up and healthcare utilization assessed at 12-months. Forty-eight participants consented for this research study with 39 allocated to treatment (PNE n = 18, traditional n = 21). PNE participants were more likely to achieve a clinically meaningful reduction in PTSD symptoms and disability at short-term follow-up. At 12-months, the PNE group utilized healthcare with 76% lower costs. In participants with CLBP, PNE may reduce hypervigilance toward pain and improve PTSD symptoms. Participants who received PNE were more confident body-tissues were safe to exercise. These beliefs about pain could contribute to a decrease in perceived disability and healthcare consumption for CLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy M. Benedict
- Baylor University – Keller Army Community Hospital, Division 1 Sports Physical Therapy Fellowship, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York
| | - Arthur J. Nitz
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Michael K. Gambrel
- Department of Physical Therapy, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Adriaan Louw
- Director of Pain Science, Evidence in Motion, Story City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilson MV, Braithwaite FA, Arnold JB, Crouch SM, Moore E, Heil A, Cooper K, Stanton TR. The effectiveness of peer support interventions for community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Pain 2024:00006396-990000000-00636. [PMID: 38916521 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This systematic review and meta-analysis critically examined the evidence for peer support interventions to reduce pain and improve health outcomes in community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain (PROSPERO CRD42022356850). A systematic search (inception-January 2023) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, with risk of bias and GRADE assessments performed on included studies. Meta-analyses used a generic, inverse-variance, random-effects model, calculating mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Of 16,445 records identified, 29 records reporting on 24 studies (n = 6202 participants) were included. All evidence had unclear/high risk of bias and low-very low certainty. Peer support interventions resulted in small improvements in pain (medium-term: MD -3.48, 95% CI -6.61, -0.35; long-term: MD -1.97, 95% CI -3.53, -0.42), self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.16, 0.36; long-term: SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.36), and function (long-term: SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.19, -0.00) relative to usual care and greater self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.51) relative to waitlist control. Peer support interventions resulted in similar improvement as active (health professional led) interventions bar long-term self-efficacy (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.77, -0.05), which favoured active interventions. No point estimates reached minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Pooled health service utilisation outcomes showed unclear estimates. Self-management, quality of life, and social support outcomes had mixed evidence. Despite low-very low evidence certainty, peer support interventions demonstrated small improvements over usual care and waitlist controls for some clinical outcomes, suggesting that peer support may be useful as an adjunct to other treatments for musculoskeletal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique V Wilson
- Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
- Persistent Pain Research Group, Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Felicity A Braithwaite
- Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
- Persistent Pain Research Group, Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - John B Arnold
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sophie M Crouch
- Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Emily Moore
- Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alrun Heil
- Department of Health Sciences, Bern University of Applied Sciences (BFH), Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kay Cooper
- School of Health Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
- The Scottish Centre for Evidence-based, Multi-professional Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Tasha R Stanton
- Innovation, IMPlementation And Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
- Persistent Pain Research Group, Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Natoli A, Jones MD, Long V, Mouatt B, Walker ED, Gibbs MT. How do people with chronic low back pain perceive specific and general exercise? A mixed methods survey. Pain Pract 2024; 24:739-748. [PMID: 38379359 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Exercise prescriptions for chronic low back pain (CLBP) often utilize reductionistic, trunk-focused exercise aimed at addressing proposed pain mechanisms. It is unknown if the use of these trunk-focused exercises imply beliefs to people with CLBP about the rationale for their use (e.g., etiology), even without concurrent biomedical narratives. This study aimed to explore people's perceptions of specific and general exercise without an accompanying narrative when experiencing CLBP. METHODS An anonymous online survey was distributed. Mixed methods were utilized for analysis. Six-point Likert scales categorized people's beliefs about individual exercises. Open-ended questions were used to gather further beliefs which were then coded into themes. RESULTS People with CLBP perceived specific exercise as more beneficial than general exercise. Eight themes and five subthemes were defined. A high volume of positive beliefs were centered around strengthening the low back and abdominal musculature, emphasizing the importance of correct technique. Negative beliefs were held against spinal flexion and external load. Both positive and negative beliefs were underpinned by spinal/pelvic stability being important as well as certain exercises being achievable or not. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that people with CLBP consider specific exercises to be more beneficial than general exercises for CLBP. Specific exercises irrespective of an accompanying narrative can imply meaning about the intent of an exercise. Understanding this requires practitioners to be mindful when prescribing and communicating exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Natoli
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M D Jones
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - V Long
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - B Mouatt
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - E D Walker
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M T Gibbs
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Salazar-Méndez J, Cuyul-Vásquez I, Ponce-Fuentes F, Guzmán-Muñoz E, Núñez-Cortés R, Huysmans E, Lluch-Girbés E, Viscay-Sanhueza N, Fuentes J. Pain neuroscience education for patients with chronic pain: A scoping review from teaching-learning strategies, educational level, and cultural perspective. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 123:108201. [PMID: 38387389 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE (1) To identify the characteristics of PNE programs in terms of teaching-learning strategies, session modality, content delivery format, number of sessions, total minutes and instructional support material used in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, (2) to describe PNE adaptations for patients with different educational levels or cultural backgrounds, and (3) to describe the influence of the patient's educational level or cultural background on the effects of PNE. METHODS The PRISMA guideline for scoping reviews was followed. Nine databases were systematically searched up to July 8, 2023. Articles that examined clinical or psychosocial variables in adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain who received PNE were included. RESULTS Seventy-one articles were included. Studies found benefits of PNE through passive/active teaching-learning strategies with group/individual sessions. However, PNE programs presented great heterogeneity and adaptations to PNE were poorly reported. Most studies did not consider educational level and culture in the effects of PNE. CONCLUSIONS Despite the large number of studies on PNE and increased interest in this intervention, the educational level and culture are poorly reported in the studies. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS It is recommended to use passive and/or active teaching-learning strategies provided in individual and/or group formats considering the patient's educational level and culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Iván Cuyul-Vásquez
- Departamento de Procesos Terapéuticos, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Chile; Facultad de las Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco, Chile
| | - Felipe Ponce-Fuentes
- Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Mayor, Temuco, Chile
| | - Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz
- Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás, Chile; Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, Chile
| | - Rodrigo Núñez-Cortés
- Physiotherapy in Motion Multispeciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Departament of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Eva Huysmans
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy,Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels 1090, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels 1090, Belgium; Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Enrique Lluch-Girbés
- Physiotherapy in Motion Multispeciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy,Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels 1090, Belgium
| | | | - Jorge Fuentes
- Clinical Research Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, Catholic University of Maule, Chile; Faculty of Rehab Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lorimer Moseley G, Leake HB, Beetsma AJ, Watson JA, Butler DS, van der Mee A, Stinson JN, Harvie D, Palermo TM, Meeus M, Ryan CG. Teaching Patients About Pain: The Emergence of Pain Science Education, its Learning Frameworks and Delivery Strategies. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:104425. [PMID: 37984510 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Since it emerged in the early 2000's, intensive education about 'how pain works', widely known as pain neuroscience education or explaining pain, has evolved into a new educational approach, with new content and new strategies. The substantial differences from the original have led the PETAL collaboration to call the current iteration 'Pain Science Education'. This review presents a brief historical context for Pain Science Education, the clinical trials, consumer perspective, and real-world clinical data that have pushed the field to update both content and method. We describe the key role of educational psychology in driving this change, the central role of constructivism, and the constructivist learning frameworks around which Pain Science Education is now planned and delivered. We integrate terminology and concepts from the learning frameworks currently being used across the PETAL collaboration in both research and practice-the Interactive, Constructive, Active, Passive framework, transformative learning theory, and dynamic model of conceptual change. We then discuss strategies that are being used to enhance learning within clinical encounters, which focus on the skill, will, and thrill of learning. Finally, we provide practical examples of these strategies so as to assist the reader to drive their own patient pain education offerings towards more effective learning. PERSPECTIVE: Rapid progress in several fields and research groups has led to the emergence 'Pain Science Education'. This PETAL review describes challenges that have spurred the field forward, the learning frameworks and educational strategies that are addressing those challenges, and some easy wins to implement and mistakes to avoid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Lorimer Moseley
- The Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Hayley B Leake
- The Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Anneke J Beetsma
- The Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Research group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - James A Watson
- The Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Centre for Rehabilitation, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK; Integrated Musculoskeletal Service, Community Pain Management, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
| | - David S Butler
- The Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Annika van der Mee
- The Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Consumer Representative, Research group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jennifer N Stinson
- The Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children and Lawrence S. Bloomberg, Faculty of Nursing, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Harvie
- The Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Tonya M Palermo
- The Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mira Meeus
- The Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; MOVANT research group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cormac G Ryan
- The Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration; Centre for Rehabilitation, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Munneke W, Demoulin C, Nijs J, Morin C, Kool E, Berquin A, Meeus M, De Kooning M. Development of an interdisciplinary training program about chronic pain management with a cognitive behavioural approach for healthcare professionals: part of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:331. [PMID: 38519899 PMCID: PMC10960450 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05308-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many applied postgraduate pain training programs are monodisciplinary, whereas interdisciplinary training programs potentially improve interdisciplinary collaboration, which is favourable for managing patients with chronic pain. However, limited research exists on the development and impact of interdisciplinary training programs, particularly in the context of chronic pain. METHODS This study aimed to describe the development and implementation of an interdisciplinary training program regarding the management of patients with chronic pain, which is part of a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. The targeted groups included medical doctors, nurses, psychologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, dentists and pharmacists. An interdisciplinary expert panel was organised to provide its perception of the importance of formulated competencies for integrating biopsychosocial pain management with a cognitive behavioural approach into clinical practice. They were also asked to provide their perception of the extent to which healthcare professionals already possess the competencies in their clinical practice. Additionally, the expert panel was asked to formulate the barriers and needs relating to training content and the implementation of biopsychosocial chronic pain management with a cognitive behavioural approach in clinical practice, which was complemented with a literature search. This was used to develop and adapt the training program to the barriers and needs of stakeholders. RESULTS The interdisciplinary expert panel considered the competencies as very important. Additionally, they perceived a relatively low level of healthcare professionals' possession of the competencies in their clinical practice. A wide variety of barriers and needs for stakeholders were formulated and organized within the Theoretical Domain Framework linked to the COM-B domains; 'capability', 'opportunity', and 'motivation'. The developed interdisciplinary training program, including two workshops of seven hours each and two e-learning modules, aimed to improve HCP's competencies for integrating biopsychosocial chronic pain management with a cognitive behavioural approach into clinical practice. CONCLUSION We designed an interdisciplinary training program, based on formulated barriers regarding the management of patients with chronic pain that can be used as a foundation for developing and enhancing the quality of future training programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter Munneke
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM)
- Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | - Christophe Demoulin
- Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM)
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of rehabilitation medicine and physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carine Morin
- Société Scientifique de Médecine Générale (SSMG), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Anne Berquin
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM)
- MOVANT research group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Margot De Kooning
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
- Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), .
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Najem C, Wijma AJ, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Ayoubi F, Van Oosterwijck J, De Meulemeester K, Van Wilgen CP. Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of pain neuroscience education in the current Lebanese physical therapist health care approach: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:524-532. [PMID: 36655277 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2168076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this paper was first to gain an in-depth understanding of the barriers and facilitators to implementing the BPS model and pain neuroscience education in the current Lebanese physical therapy health care approach and explore its acceptability. METHOD A qualitative semi-structured interview using purposive sampling was conducted with eight Lebanese physical therapists practising in different governorates. The transcribed text from the interviews was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Two topics were generated and constructed by the researchers: (1) "barriers to the implementation of pain neuroscience education, with subthemes including (a) "current health care approach," (b) "basic curriculum and continuing education," (c) "patients' barriers"; (2) "facilitators to the implementation of pain neuroscience education," with subthemes containing (a) "interest in the BPS model, (b) "therapeutic alliance," and (c) "motivation for future training on BPS approach." CONCLUSION The analysis of the results showed that Lebanese physical therapists currently hold a strong biomedical view of chronic pain, assessment, and treatment. However, despite the presence of barriers and challenges, they are aware and open to consider the implementation and future training about the BPS model and pain neuroscience education in their approach.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe exploration of potential barriers and facilitators to the bio-psychosocial model and pain neuroscience education implementation may provide an opportunity for better development and design of a culturally sensitive pain neuroscience education material for Arab-speaking and Lebanese physical therapists.The exploration of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of pain neuroscience education will help to improve pain education and ensure better clinical pain management.The most important barriers were the dominant characteristic of the Lebanese physical therapist's health approach, which is focused on a biomechanically oriented model, and their lack of knowledge to approach chronic pain from a biopsychosocial perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Najem
- Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Department of physiotherapy, Faculty of Public Health, Antonine University, Hadath Baabda, Lebanon
- Pain in Motion International Research Group www. paininmotion.be
| | - A J Wijma
- Pain in Motion International Research Group www. paininmotion.be
- Transcare Transdisciplinary Pain Management Center, Groningen, the Netherlands
- PAIN - VUB Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
| | - M Meeus
- Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group www. paininmotion.be
- MOVANT Research group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - B Cagnie
- Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - F Ayoubi
- Department of physiotherapy, Faculty of Public Health, Antonine University, Hadath Baabda, Lebanon
- Department of physiotherapy, Faculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Lebanon
| | - J Van Oosterwijck
- Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group www. paininmotion.be
- MOVANT Research group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
- Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgium
| | - K De Meulemeester
- Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group www. paininmotion.be
| | - C P Van Wilgen
- Pain in Motion International Research Group www. paininmotion.be
- Transcare Transdisciplinary Pain Management Center, Groningen, the Netherlands
- PAIN - VUB Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Roose E, Huysmans E, Leysen L, Mostaqim K, Van Wilgen P, Beckwée D, De Couck M, Timmermans A, Bults R, Nijs J, Lahousse A. Effect of perceived injustice-targeted pain neuroscience education compared with biomedically focused education in breast cancer survivors: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (BCS-PI trial). BMJ Open 2024; 14:e075779. [PMID: 38233049 PMCID: PMC10806532 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current treatments for pain in breast cancer survivors (BCSs) are mostly biomedically focused rather than biopsychosocially driven. However, 22% of BCSs with pain are experiencing perceived injustice, which is a known predictor for adverse pain outcomes and opioid prescription due to increased maladaptive pain behaviour. Educational interventions such as pain neuroscience education (PNE) are suggested to target perceived injustice. In addition, motivational interviewing can be an effective behavioural change technique. This trial aims to examine whether perceived injustice-targeted PNE with the integration of motivational interviewing is superior to biomedically focused pain education in reducing pain after 12 months in BCS with perceived injustice and pain. In addition, improvements in quality of life, perceived injustice and opioid use are evaluated, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will finally result in a recommendation concerning the use of perceived injustice-targeted PNE in BCSs with perceived injustice and pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This two-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial will recruit female BCS (n=156) with pain and perceived injustice. Participants will be randomly assigned to perceived injustice-targeted PNE or biomedically focused pain education in each centre. Both interventions include an online session, an information leaflet and three one-to-one sessions. The primary outcome (pain), secondary outcomes (quality of life, perceived injustice and outcomes for cost-effectiveness analysis) and explanatory outcomes (pain phenotyping, sleep, fatigue and cognitive-emotional factors) will be assessed at baseline and at 0, 6, 12 and 24 months postintervention using self-reported questionnaires online. Treatment effects over time will be evaluated using linear mixed model analyses. Additionally, a cost-utility analysis will be done from a healthcare payer and societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The ethical agreement was obtained from the Main Ethics Committee (B.U.N.1432020000068) at the University Hospital Brussels and all other participating hospitals. Study results will be disseminated through presentations, conferences, social media, press and journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04730154.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Roose
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- REVAL Research Group, Universiteit Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Rehabilitation Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Eva Huysmans
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- Research Foundation-Flanders, (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurence Leysen
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kenza Mostaqim
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Research Foundation-Flanders, (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paul Van Wilgen
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Transcare Pain Transdisciplinary Pain Treatment Center, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - David Beckwée
- Rehabilitation Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Marijke De Couck
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Rinske Bults
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gotenburg, Sweden
| | - Astrid Lahousse
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Machado PM, Carmo ACN, Leal LBLG, de Souza RP, Rocha PRS, Funez MI. A systematic review of the added value of perioperative pain neuroscience education. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 117:107984. [PMID: 37742593 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and summarize evidence about the benefits of perioperative pain neuroscience education (PNE) on pain-related and psychosocial outcomes. METHODS Included were reports written in English that carried out PNE or its synonyms; perioperative period; aged ≥ 18 years; interventional studies and observational studies. Secondary studies, conference abstracts, and editorials were excluded. There was no time limitation. INFORMATION SOURCES PubMed, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct. Search: June 20th 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists, and synthesis followed the recommendations of the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline. Register: Center for Open Science website (10.17605/OSF.IO/ZTNEJ). RESULTS The sample consisted of 18 reports. For pain outcomes, it was not possible to attribute PNE benefits because ten reports found improvements in both intervention and control groups. For psychosocial outcomes, fourteen reports found benefits for PNE groups. All the analyzed reports showed low risk of bias. CONCLUSION PNE had additional benefits beyond those obtained with conventional treatment for psychosocial outcomes. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Due to the lack of evidence, it was not possible to indicate the clinical use of PNE. It is suggested that further studies are needed aimed at clarifying the possible benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Muniz Machado
- University of Brasilia, School of Ceilândia, Graduate Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Federal District, Brasilia, Brazil.
| | - Anne Caroline Nunes Carmo
- University of Brasilia, School of Ceilândia, Collegiate of the Nursing Course, Federal District, Brasilia, Brazil.
| | | | - Raquel Pereira de Souza
- University of Brasilia, School of Ceilândia, Graduate Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Federal District, Brasilia, Brazil.
| | | | - Mani Indiana Funez
- University of Brasilia, School of Ceilândia, Graduate Program in Health Sciences and Technology and Collegiate of the Nursing Course, Federal District, Brasilia, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pulling BW, Braithwaite FA, Butler DS, Vogelzang AR, Moseley GL, Catley MJ, Murray CM, Stanton TR. Item development and pre-testing of an Osteoarthritis Conceptualisation Questionnaire to assess knowledge and beliefs in people with knee pain. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286114. [PMID: 37773973 PMCID: PMC10540977 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Many people with osteoarthritis hold beliefs that physical activity is unhelpful or dangerous for their joints, despite high-level evidence suggesting otherwise. Recent advances in scientific understanding of osteoarthritis have led to new treatments that target an individual's understanding both of their condition and the importance of best-practice management strategies, such as physical activity. Conceptual change has been proposed as an important mechanism by which cognitive interventions, such as pain science education, may reduce pain and improve function. There are currently no specific assessments of osteoarthritis conceptualisation to determine the effectiveness of cognitive interventions in effecting conceptual change in people with knee osteoarthritis. Therefore, we aimed to develop an item bank, as the first phase of developing a questionnaire to assess people's conceptualisations about their knee osteoarthritis and the role of physical activity in managing their osteoarthritis. Using a guideline-informed mixed method design, a panel of experts identified domains relevant to conceptualisation about knee osteoarthritis and physical activity (knowledge, beliefs, understanding) based upon available evidence. The panel created 33 provisional items. Qualitative and quantitative pretesting were used to explore how people with knee osteoarthritis understood the provisional items. Eighteen people with knee osteoarthritis completed cognitive interviews about their comprehension of the wording/grammar of each provisional item. The provisional item bank was field tested with 100 people with knee osteoarthritis. Readability was adequate with a Flesch reading ease score of 57.7. Although 14.7% used the 'Strongly agree' response option, only 3.4% of responses used the 'Strongly disagree' option, suggesting possible response bias. Predictive quality testing identified relevant modifications to the questionnaire instructions. The panel of experts appraised the qualitative data to assess whether and how items should be modified to address the problems identified, resulting in a final item bank of 45 items that can be evaluated for psychometric properties in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian W. Pulling
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Persistent Pain Research Group, Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Felicity A. Braithwaite
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Persistent Pain Research Group, Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - David S. Butler
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anna R. Vogelzang
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - G. Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mark J. Catley
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Carolyn M. Murray
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tasha R. Stanton
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Persistent Pain Research Group, Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Caña-Pino A, Apolo-Arenas MD, Falla D, Lluch-Girbés E, Espejo-Antúnez L. Supervised exercise with or without laser-guided feedback for people with non-specific chronic low back pain. A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2023; 70:102776. [PMID: 37163815 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among the most effective therapeutic interventions in non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP), clinical practice guidelines highlight exercise therapy and patient education; However, regarding the combined intervention of exercise and Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE), there is no consensus on the most effective form of exercise. OBJETIVE To find out what changes occurred after the application of two exercise modalities [Supervised Exercise (SE) and Laser-Guided Exercise (LGE)] and PNE on pain, pain pressure thresholds, disability, catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and lumbar proprioception in subjects with NSCLBP. METHODS Single-blind randomized clinical controlled trial. 60 subjects with NSCLBP. Both groups performed a a total of 16 therapeutic exercise sessions and 8 Pain Neuroscience Education sessions. With the Laser-Guided Exercise Therapy group performing laser-guided exercises. RESULTS A significant decrease was observed for pain intensity for both groups between baseline and post-intervention and the 3 month follow-up (p < 0.001). There was a significant between-group difference between baseline and post-intervention scores in terms of pain intensity and kinesiophobia in favour of the LGE group. CONCLUSION Supervised exercise with or without laser feedback, when combined with PNE, reduces pain intensity, disability, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia and improves proprioception and PPTs in patients with NSCLBP. At a 3-month follow-up, the combination of LGE plus PNE is most effective for reducing pain intensity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Caña-Pino
- Departamento Terapéutica Médico Quirúrgica, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Grupo Investigación PhysioH, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | - M D Apolo-Arenas
- Departamento Terapéutica Médico Quirúrgica, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Grupo Investigación PhysioH, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
| | - D Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), College of Life and Environmental Sciences, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - E Lluch-Girbés
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Pain in Motion" International Research Group, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; Department of Human Physiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Vrije University Brussels, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - L Espejo-Antúnez
- Departamento Terapéutica Médico Quirúrgica, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Grupo Investigación PhysioH, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Supe HM, Mungikar SS, Katage GA, Garg KA, Wani SK. Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education with Conventional Physiotherapy via Telerehabilitation on Pain Catastrophizing and Function in Patients with Osteoarthritis Knee: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Midlife Health 2023; 14:123-129. [PMID: 38029040 PMCID: PMC10664057 DOI: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_33_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim By explaining to the patient the biological processes underneath their pain condition, pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a form of educational intervention that aims to relieve pain and impairment. Materials and Methods Patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) referred to outpatient physiotherapy clinic in India during August 2021 to June 2022 were asked to participate. Out of the eligible patients, 35 were randomly assigned to PNE group and 35 to the control group. Self-reports of Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Patient Specific Function Scale (PSFS), and Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were recorded at baseline (T1) and at 2 weeks (T2). Results After 2 weeks of follow-up, all the three outcome measures were found to be significant in the PNE group. The results of the unpaired t-test revealed statistically significant result posttest for PCS (mean difference 11.4) and NPRS (mean difference 1.20). There was no mean difference found in the patient function (PSFS) between groups. Conclusion The results suggest that adding a program of PNE to conventional physiotherapy exercises led to a greater reduction in pain catastrophization, patient-specific function, and pain intensity rather than conventional physiotherapy alone in patients with knee OA at 2 weeks' follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiral Manohar Supe
- Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, MGM Institute of Physiotherapy, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sanket S. Mungikar
- Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, MGM Institute of Physiotherapy, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
| | - Goutami A. Katage
- Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, MGM Institute of Physiotherapy, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kapil A. Garg
- Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, MGM Institute of Physiotherapy, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
| | - Surendra Kiran Wani
- Department of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, MGM Institute of Physiotherapy, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ibrahim AA, Akindele MO, Ganiyu SO. Effectiveness of patient education plus motor control exercise versus patient education alone versus motor control exercise alone for rural community-dwelling adults with chronic low back pain: a randomised clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:142. [PMID: 36823567 PMCID: PMC9948461 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06108-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common health problem in rural Nigeria but access to rehabilitation is limited. Current clinical guidelines unanimously recommend patient education (PE) including instruction on self-management, and exercises as frontline interventions for CLBP. However, the specific content of these interventions and how they are best delivered remain to be well-described, particularly for low-resource communities. This study determined the effectiveness of PE plus motor control exercise (MCE) compared with either therapy alone among rural community-dwelling adults with CLBP. METHODS A single-blind, three-arm parallel-group, randomised clinical trial including 120 adult rural dwellers (mean [SD] age, 46.0 [14.7] years) with CLBP assigned to PE plus MCE group (n = 40), PE group (n = 40), and MCE group (n = 40) was conducted. The PE was administered once weekly and the MCE twice weekly. Each group also received stretching and aerobic exercises twice weekly. All interventions were administered for 8 weeks. Blinded assessments for pain intensity and disability level as primary outcomes, and quality of life, global perceived recovery, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophising, back pain consequences belief and pain medication use as secondary outcomes were conducted at baseline, 8-week (immediately after intervention) and 20-week follow-ups. RESULTS All the groups showed significant improvements in all the primary and secondary outcomes evaluated over time. Compared with PE alone, the PE plus MCE showed a significantly greater reduction in pain intensity by an additional -1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.04 to -0.25) points at the 8-week follow-up and -1.25 (95% CI, -2.14 to -0.35) points at the 20-week follow-up. For disability level, both PE plus MCE and MCE alone showed a significantly greater improvement compared with PE alone by an additional -5.04% (95% CI, -9.57 to -0.52) and 5.68% (95% CI, 1.15 to 10.2) points, respectively, at the 8-week follow-up, and -5.96% (95% CI, -9.84 to -2.07) and 6.57% (95% CI, 2.69 to 10.4) points, respectively, at the 20-week follow-up. For the secondary outcomes, at the 8-week follow-up, PE plus MCE showed a significantly greater reduction in fear-avoidance beliefs about physical activity compared with either therapy alone, and a significantly greater reduction in pain medication use compared with PE alone. However, compared with PE plus MCE, PE alone showed a significantly greater reduction in pain catastrophising at all follow-up time points, and a significantly greater improvement in back pain consequences belief at the 20-week follow-up. Additionally, PE alone compared with MCE alone showed a significantly greater improvement in back pain consequences belief at all follow-up time points. No significant between-group difference was found for other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Among rural community-dwelling adults with CLBP, PE plus MCE led to greater short-term improvements in pain and disability compared with PE alone, although all intervention strategies were associated with improvements in these outcomes. This trial provides additional support for combining PE with MCE, as recommended in current clinical guidelines, to promote self-management and reduce the burden of CLBP in low-resource rural communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03393104), Registered on 08/01/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aminu A. Ibrahim
- grid.510479.eDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Skyline University Nigeria, Kano State, Nigeria
| | - Mukadas O. Akindele
- grid.411585.c0000 0001 2288 989XDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, P.M.B 3011, Kano State, Nigeria
| | - Sokunbi O. Ganiyu
- grid.411585.c0000 0001 2288 989XDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, P.M.B 3011, Kano State, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Louw A, Farrell K, Nielsen A, O’Malley M, Cox T, Puentedura EJ. Virtual McKenzie extension exercises for low back and leg pain: a prospective pilot exploratory case series. J Man Manip Ther 2023; 31:46-52. [PMID: 35739614 PMCID: PMC9848382 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2092822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current evidence supports the inclusion of directional preference exercises for a subgroup of patients with low back (LBP) and leg pain. Recent pain neuroscience strategies have suggested that cortical restructuring associated with movement activating the body map representation in the brain might account for the observed improvement with the directional preference approach. OBJECTIVES To explore whether or not a motor imagery directional preference approach would result in any changes in patients with LBP and leg pain. METHODS A consecutive convenience sample of patients with LBP and leg pain were recruited at two outpatient physical therapy clinics. Measurements of LBP, leg pain, fear-avoidance beliefs (FABQ), pain catastrophizing (PCS), active lumbar flexion, and straight leg raise (SLR) were compared before and immediately after a virtual (motor imagery) directional preference exercise. RESULTS Statistically significant differences for LBP, FABQ, PCS, active lumbar flexion, and SLR were observed, but only SLR changes met or exceeded the minimally clinically important difference (MCID). CONCLUSIONS A brief virtual motor imagery extension treatment yielded some immediate positive shifts in patients presenting to physical therapy with LBP and leg pain. Our results indicate that randomized comparison trials are needed to determine the effect of this intervention on the short- and longer-term outcomes in patients with LBP and leg pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriaan Louw
- Department of Physical Therapy, Evidence in Motion, Story City, IA, USA
| | - Kevin Farrell
- Department of Physical Therapy Education, Residency Program, St. Ambrose University, Health Sciences Center, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Anthony Nielsen
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rock Valley Physical Therapy, Bettendorf, IA, USA
| | - Max O’Malley
- Department of Physical Therapy, AMN Healthcare, Lincolnwood, IL, USA
| | - Terry Cox
- Department of Physical Therapy, Southwest Baptist University, Bolivar, MO, USA
| | - Emilio J. Puentedura
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Baylor University, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Waco, TX, USA,CONTACT Emilio J. Puentedura Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Baylor University, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, One Bear Place, Waco, TX97303, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Adenis N, Gosselin K, Stetsenko N, Thevenon A. Clarification of the "pain neuroscience education" concept in the management of patients with persistent low back pain: A scoping review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2023; 36:995-1010. [PMID: 37458022 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-220370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient education is a recommended treatment strategy for persistent low back pain (PLBP). Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is an emerging concept with boundaries still unclear. OBJECTIVE To clarify the PNE concept and identify its key characteristics in PLBP management. METHODS A systematic search was conducted using the following databases: Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Pedro. INCLUSION CRITERIA publications in English or French on pain neuroscience education and chronic low back pain, educational books cited in white literature. Three reviewers independently selected eligible studies for final inclusion. Numerical analysis and narrative synthesis were carried out from the extracted data. RESULTS From 919 identified publications, 54 were selected. Ten educational resources were added. PNE refers to a theoretical framework, a specific educational intervention, and an overall care approach. It is characterized by the intention to help the patient reconceptualize their PLBP from a tissue injury marker to a protective, neurobiological perspective, and then to increase adherence to biopsychosocial rehabilitation and normalize cognitive-behavioral responses. Pain sciences concepts are presented with an optimization of learning strategies. CONCLUSION PNE stands out from other educational and cognitive behavioral approaches through its objective of changing the pain concept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Adenis
- URePSSS University of Lille, Lille, France
- Physiotherapy Practice, Lille, France
| | | | | | - André Thevenon
- URePSSS University of Lille, Lille, France
- Pôle RRSS, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Khosrokiani Z, Letafatkar A, Hadadnezhad M, Sokhanguei Y. The comparison between the effects of pain education interventions with online and face-to-face exercise and the control group received biomedical education + standardized physical therapy in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain during COVID-19: protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:1031. [PMID: 36539843 PMCID: PMC9763812 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06932-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various psychological issues and serious health concerns during the imposed lockdown by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have induced many changes in the treatment of patients. More effective self-management strategies through tele-rehabilitation are suggested to be applied for patients with chronic neck pain to reduce referrals to health cares and disability support through COVID-19. Also, the pain neuroscience education (PNE) approach is an educational method used by health professionals to assist patients in understanding the biology, physiology, and psychosocial factors affecting their pain experience and aligning with the cognitions and beliefs associated with pain and recurrent disability. PNE combined with tele-rehabilitation could be a new solution to encourage patients to manage their condition by themselves and increase the continuity of practice instead of face-to-face sessions. OBJECTIVE This randomized control trial (RCT) aims to investigate the effects of PNE with online and face-to-face exercise interventions, and the control group received biomedical education + standardized physical therapy on neck pain and disability, psychological factors, and function in non-traumatic chronic neck pain. METHODS/DESIGN Patients with non-traumatic chronic neck pain (patient-centered care and active involvement of patients and the public) will be recruited via flyers displayed in hospitals and universities to participate in an RCT with two experimental and one control group designed to investigate the effects of PNE with online and face-to-face exercise interventions, and the control group received biomedical education + standardized physical therapy on neck pain and disability, psychological factors, and function in non-traumatic chronic neck pain. The outcomes will be measured at baseline, after PNE, and after 3 months of an exercise intervention. All outcomes are presented as mean ± SD, and statistical significance was set at α level of < 0.05. The normal distribution of the variables was verified by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, following a descriptive analysis. DISCUSSION It seems that PNE plus online and face-to-face exercise interventions are appropriate educational models for the treatment of patients with neck pain during COVID-19. Also, online training seems to encourage patients to continue their treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT20150503022068N5. Registered on 09 September 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zohre Khosrokiani
- grid.412265.60000 0004 0406 5813Biomechanics and Corrective Exercise Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Department of Biomechanics and Sport Injuries, Kharazmi University, Mirdamad Blvd., Hesari St, Tehran, 00982122258084 Iran
| | - Amir Letafatkar
- grid.412265.60000 0004 0406 5813Biomechanics and Corrective Exercise Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Department of Biomechanics and Sport Injuries, Kharazmi University, Mirdamad Blvd., Hesari St, Tehran, 00982122258084 Iran
| | - Malihe Hadadnezhad
- grid.412265.60000 0004 0406 5813Biomechanics and Corrective Exercise Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Department of Biomechanics and Sport Injuries, Kharazmi University, Mirdamad Blvd., Hesari St, Tehran, 00982122258084 Iran
| | - Yahya Sokhanguei
- grid.472458.80000 0004 0612 774XUniversity of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kanaan SF, Alhendi ZM, Almhdawi KA, Aldahamsheh Z, Ismail N, Khalil H. Evaluating the effectiveness of a comprehensive education on low back pain treatment outcomes: A controlled clinical study. Clin Rehabil 2022; 37:98-108. [PMID: 36071623 DOI: 10.1177/02692155221122661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the effect of integrating an individualized, evidence-based low back pain comprehensive education package on low back pain treatment outcomes. DESIGN Single-blind, controlled clinical study using the alternate allocation of patients. SETTING Outpatient clinic. SUBJECTS In total, 54 participants with chronic low back pain (46.75 ± 11.11 years, 80% females) were randomized to intervention (n = 27) or a control group (n = 27). INTERVENTION The intervention group received additional four one-hour low back pain-related education sessions to eight 45 minutesstandard physical therapy sessions over 4 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES Assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 months. Outcome measures included pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale), knowledge (Low Back Pain Knowledge Questionnaire), attitude (the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire), disability (the Oswestry Disability Index), mental health symptoms (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, DASS-21 scale), and fear-avoidance (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire). RESULTS The intervention group showed significantly lower pain intensity ((4 weeks (3.58 ± 1.50 vs. 5.54 ± 1.92), 3 months (3.21 ± 1.74 vs. 5.69 ± 2.51)), higher knowledge ((4 weeks (21.67 ± 2.12 vs. 11.62 ± 3.47), three months (22.08 ± 3.40 vs. 12.23 ± 3.24)), lower negative attitudes ((4 weeks (99.29 ± 11.02 vs. 134.31 ± 12.97), 3 months (102.92 ± 15.58 vs. 132.42 ± 17.79)), lower disability ((4 weeks (26.30 ± 11.37 vs. 45.14 ± 18.67), 3 months (22.83 ± 16.06 vs. 44.13 ± 15.02)), lower stress score ((4 weeks (3.54 ± 3.01 vs. 8.81 ± 5.19), 3 months (3.21 ± 3.22 vs. 7.21 ± 4.36)), lower anxiety ((4 weeks (2.63 ± 3.16 vs. 6.42 ± 4.75), three months (2.63 ± 3.80 vs. 5.73 ± 4.44)), lower depression ((4 weeks (2.42 ± 2.15 vs. 6.42 ± 3.68), three months (2.63 ± 4.18 vs. 7.08 ± 4.41)), and lower fear-avoidance ((4 weeks (13.88 ± 12.32 vs. 50.88 ± 23.25), three months (15.50 ± 16.75 vs. 54.65 ± 31.81)). CONCLUSION Integrating low back pain comprehensive education into standard physical therapy might optimize the treatment outcomes of low back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saddam F Kanaan
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 37251Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan.,Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, 61780Qatar University, Qatar
| | - Zainab M Alhendi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 37251Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
| | - Khader A Almhdawi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 37251Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
| | - Zaid Aldahamsheh
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 155132Royal Medical Services, Jordan
| | - Noor Ismail
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 37251Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
| | - Hanan Khalil
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, 61780Qatar University, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Van Looveren E, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Ickmans K, Bilterys T, Malfliet A, Goubert D, Nijs J, Danneels L, Moens M, Mairesse O. Combining Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia and Chronic Spinal Pain Within Physical Therapy: A Practical Guide for the Implementation of an Integrated Approach. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6604584. [PMID: 35689809 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzac075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Most people who have nonspecific chronic spinal pain (nCSP) report comorbid insomnia. However, in current treatment strategies for nCSP, insomnia is usually not addressed. Considering the bidirectional interaction between pain and sleep and its underlying psychophysiological mechanisms, insomnia may increase the risk of developing adverse physical and psychological health outcomes and should thus no longer be left untreated. As suggested by previous pilot studies, adding cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia to the contemporary evidence-based biopsychosocial physical therapy approach may also improve pain outcomes in nCSP. This manuscript aims to provide practical guidelines on hybrid physical therapy, including the combination of the following components: (1) pain neuroscience education (eg, to reconceptualize pain) and cognition-targeted exercise therapy (eg, graded exposure to functional daily life movements), and (2) cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (sleep psychoeducation, behavioral and cognitive therapy, correction of sleep hygiene, and relaxation therapy) can be deployed for the management of patients who have chronic spinal pain. Impact. Due to the major impact sleep disturbances have on pain and disability, insomnia as a comorbidity should no longer be ignored when treating patients with chronic spinal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline Van Looveren
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education, and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Barbara Cagnie
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kelly Ickmans
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education, and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.,Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thomas Bilterys
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education, and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anneleen Malfliet
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education, and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.,Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dorien Goubert
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education, and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lieven Danneels
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maarten Moens
- Department of Neurosurgery and Radiology, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.,Center of Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Oliver Mairesse
- Department of Psychology - Brain, Body and Cognition (BBCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Brugmann University Hospital, Sleep Laboratory and Unit for Clinical Chronobiology, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ziegler AM, Minkalis AL, Langdon ER, Vining R. Learning the neurobiology of pain: A scoping review of pain education from an instructional design perspective. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:1379-1401. [PMID: 34579995 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Learning modern pain biology concepts can improve important clinical outcomes for people with chronic pain. The primary purpose of this scoping review is to examine and report characteristics of chronic musculoskeletal pain education programs from an instructional design perspective. METHODS Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, PubMed, Medline, and CINAHL databases were systematically searched. Articles included expert recommendations and those reporting pain education programs used in clinical trials enrolling adults with chronic neuromusculoskeletal pain and published in English between 1990 and 2021. Three authors independently evaluated articles for eligibility through title, abstract, and full text review. Instructional design characteristics such as learning outcomes, support materials, learning assessment methods, and key concepts communicated were summarized. RESULTS The search revealed 5260 articles of which 40 were included: 27 clinical studies, 7 expert recommendations, and 6 articles reporting on pain education from participant perspectives. Detailed reporting of instructional design characteristics informing replication in subsequent studies is sparse. Most included trials used only lecture and did not assess participant learning. CONCLUSIONS More comprehensive reporting of pain education programs is needed to facilitate replicability. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS This article proposes detailed and standardized reporting of trials using pain education programs employing a modified version of the TIDieR checklist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Marie Ziegler
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA 52803, USA.
| | - Amy L Minkalis
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA 52803, USA.
| | | | - Robert Vining
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA 52803, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Suso-Martí L, Cuenca-Martínez F, Alba-Quesada P, Muñoz-Alarcos V, Herranz-Gómez A, Varangot-Reille C, Domínguez-Navarro F, Casaña J. Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PAIN MEDICINE 2022; 23:1837-1850. [PMID: 35587171 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnac077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) on patients with fibromyalgia (FM) in terms of pain intensity, fibromyalgia impact, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with RStudio software for relevant outcomes and were pooled in a meta-analysis using the random effects model. RESULTS A total of 8 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant differences in the pain intensity with a moderate clinical effect in 7 studies in the post-intervention assessment (SMD:-0.76; 95% CI:-1.33- -0.19; p < 0.05) with evidence of significant heterogeneity (p < 0.05, I2=92%) but not in fibromyalgia impact, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing (p > 0.05). Regarding the follow-up assessment, only the fibromyalgia impact showed significant improvements with a very small clinical effect in 9 studies (SMD:-0.44; 95% CI:-0.73- -0.14; p < 0.05) with evidence of significant heterogeneity (p < 0.05, I2 = 80%). Applying a sensitivity analysis with the PNE face-to-face interventions, the meta-analysis showed a significant decrease of pain intensity with a moderate clinical effect at post-intervention and follow-up without evidence of significant heterogeneity (p < 0.05, I2=10%). CONCLUSIONS There is low quality evidence that in patients with FM, PNE can decrease the pain intensity post-intervention and also the fibromyalgia impact in the follow-up. However, it appears that PNE showed no effect on anxiety and pain catastrophizing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Suso-Martí
- Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ferran Cuenca-Martínez
- Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Patricio Alba-Quesada
- Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Vicente Muñoz-Alarcos
- Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Aida Herranz-Gómez
- Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Clovis Varangot-Reille
- Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Fernando Domínguez-Navarro
- Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Casaña
- Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lane E, Magel JS, Thackeray A, Greene T, Fino NF, Puentedura EJ, Louw A, Maddox D, Fritz JM. Effectiveness of training physical therapists in pain neuroscience education for patients with chronic spine pain: a cluster-randomized trial. Pain 2022; 163:852-860. [PMID: 34354017 PMCID: PMC8816964 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Chronic spinal pain poses complex challenges for health care around the world and is in need of effective interventions. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a promising intervention hypothesized to improve pain and disability by changing individuals' beliefs, perceptions, and expectations about pain. Pain neuroscience education has shown promise in small, controlled trials when implemented in tightly controlled situations. Exploration of promising interventions through more pragmatic methodologies is a crucial but understudied step towards improving outcomes in routine clinical care. The purpose was to examine the impact of pragmatic PNE training on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic spine pain. The cluster-randomized clinical trial took place in 45 outpatient physical therapist (PT) clinics. Participants included 108 physical therapists (45 clinics and 16 clusters) and 319 patients. Clusters of PT clinics were randomly assigned to either receive training in PNE or no intervention and continue with usual care (UC). We found no significant differences between groups for our primary outcome at 12 weeks, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function computer adaptive test {mean difference = 1.05 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.73 to 2.83), P = 0.25}. The PNE group demonstrated significant greater improvements in pain self-efficacy at 12 and 2 weeks compared with no intervention (mean difference = 3.65 [95% CI: 0.00-7.29], P = 0.049 and = 3.08 [95% CI: 0.07 to -6.09], P = 0.045, respectively). However, a similar percentage of participants in both control (41.1%) and treatment (44.4%) groups reported having received the treatment per fidelity question (yes or no to pain discussed as a perceived threat) at 2 weeks. Pragmatic PT PNE training and delivery failed to produce significant functional changes in patients with chronic spinal pain but did produce significant improvement in pain self-efficacy over UC PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Lane
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - John S. Magel
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Anne Thackeray
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Tom Greene
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- Population Health, Research Study Design and Biostatistics Center, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Nora F. Fino
- Division of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | | | - Adriaan Louw
- Department of Physical Therapy, Evidence in Motion, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Daniel Maddox
- Department of Physical Therapy, Brenau University, Gainesville, GA, United States
| | - Julie M. Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gibbs MT, Morrison NM, Raftry S, Jones MD, Marshall PW. Does a powerlifting inspired exercise programme better compliment pain education compared to bodyweight exercise for people with chronic low back pain? A multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2022; 36:1199-1213. [PMID: 35466696 DOI: 10.1177/02692155221095484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contemporary management of chronic low back pain involves combined exercise and pain education. Currently, there is a gap in the literature for whether any exercise mode better pairs with pain education. The purpose of this study was to compare general callisthenic exercise with a powerlifting style programme, both paired with consistent pain education, for chronic low back pain. We hypothesised powerlifting style training may better compliment the messages of pain education. METHODS An 8-week single-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted comparing bodyweight exercise (n = 32) with powerlifting (n = 32) paired with the same education, for people with chronic low back pain. Exercise sessions were one-on-one and lasted 60-min, with the last 5-15 min comprising pain education. Pain, disability, fear, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, anxiety, and depression were measured at baseline, 8-weeks, 3-months, and 6-months. RESULTS No significant between-group differences were observed for pain (p≥0.40), or disability (p≥0.45) at any time-point. Within-group differences were significantly improved for pain (p ≤ 0.04) and disability (p ≤ 0.04) at all time-points for both groups, except 6-month disability in the bodyweight group (p = 0.1). Behavioural measures explained 39-60% of the variance in changes in pain and disability at each time-point, with fear and self-efficacy emerging as significant in these models (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Both powerlifting and bodyweight exercise were safe and beneficial when paired with pain education for chronic low back pain, with reductions in pain and disability associated with improved fear and self-efficacy. This study provides opportunity for practitioners to no longer be constrained by systematic approaches to chronic low back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell T Gibbs
- School of Health Sciences, 7800University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,School of Health Science, 6489Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Sean Raftry
- School of Health Science, 6489Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew D Jones
- School of Health Sciences, 7800University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for IMPACT (Investigating Mechanisms of Pain, Advancing Clinical Translation), 6803Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul W Marshall
- School of Health Science, 6489Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Exercise Sciences, 1415University of Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gorji SM, Mohammadi Nia Samakosh H, Watt P, Henrique Marchetti P, Oliveira R. Pain Neuroscience Education and Motor Control Exercises versus Core Stability Exercises on Pain, Disability, and Balance in Women with Chronic Low Back Pain. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19052694. [PMID: 35270384 PMCID: PMC8910692 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background: Several interventions have been used to relieve chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study aimed to compare the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) followed by motor control exercises (MCEs) with core stability training (CST) on pain, disability, and balance in women with CLBP. Methods: Thirty-seven women with CLBP were randomly divided into two groups of PNE/MCE (n = 18, 55.2 ± 2.6 years) or CST (n = 19, 54.6 ± 2.4 years). Eight weeks of PNE/MCE or CST were prescribed for each group, independently. Pain intensity (VAS scale), disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), unipodal static balance, and dynamic balance (time up and go test) were measured at the beginning and 8 weeks after the intervention. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the results with alpha of 5%. Results: After 8 weeks, there was a significant difference in VAS scale between groups (p = 0.024), with both PNE/MCE and CST showing 58% and 42% reductions, respectively. There were no differences for all other variables between groups. Regarding pre- to post-comparisons, both groups showed improvements in all dependent variables (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The treatment with PNE/MCE was more effective in improving pain disability and unipodal static and dynamic balance than treatment with CST. Even so, both treatments were shown to be valid and safe in improving all dependent variables analyzed in women with CLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahar Modares Gorji
- Department of Biomechanics and Corrective Exercises and Sports Injuries, University of ARAK, Arak 38156879, Iran
- Correspondence:
| | - Hadi Mohammadi Nia Samakosh
- Department of Biomechanics and Corrective Exercises and Sports Injuries, University of Kharazmi, Tehran 15719-14911, Iran;
| | - Peter Watt
- Environmental Extremes Lab, Sport and Exercise Science and Medicine Research and Enterprise Group, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, East Sussex, Brighton BN2 4AT, UK;
| | | | - Rafael Oliveira
- Sports Science School of Rio Maior–Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, 2140-413 Rio Maior, Portugal;
- Research Center in Sport Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Life Quality Research Centre, 2140-413 Rio Maior, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bilterys T, Kregel J, Nijs J, Meeus M, Danneels L, Cagnie B, Van Looveren E, Malfliet A. Influence of education level on the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 57:102494. [PMID: 34953290 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current evidence supports the use of pain neuroscience education (PNE) in several chronic pain populations. However, the effects of PNE at group level are rather small and little is known about the influence of personal factors (e.g. level of education [LoE]). OBJECTIVE To examine whether the effectiveness of PNE differs in chronic spinal pain (CSP) patients with high LOE (at least a Bachelor's degree) versus lower educated patients. METHOD A total of 120 Belgian CSP patients were randomly assigned to the experimental (PNE) or control group (biomedical-focused neck/back school). Participants within each group were further subcategorized based on highest achieved LoE. ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc analyses were used to evaluate differences in effectiveness of the interventions between higher and lower educated participants. RESULTS No differences between higher and lower educated participants were identified for pain-related disability. Significant interactions (P < .05) were found for kinesiophobia and several illness perceptions components. Bonferroni post-hoc analysis revealed a significant improvement in kinesiophobia (P < .001 and P < .002, medium effect sizes) and perceived negative consequences (P < .001 and P < .008, small effect sizes) in the PNE groups. Only the higher education PNE group showed a significant improvement in perceived illness cyclicity (P = .003, small effect size). Post-treatment kinesiophobia was significant lower in the higher educated PNE group compared to the higher educated control group (p < .001). CONCLUSION Overall, the exploratory findings suggest no clinical meaningful differences in effectiveness of PNE between higher and lower educated people. PNE is effective in improving kinesiophobia and several aspects of illness perceptions regardless of LoE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Bilterys
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium(1); Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Kregel
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium(1); Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium(1); Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium(1); Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lieven Danneels
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Barbara Cagnie
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eveline Van Looveren
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium(1); Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anneleen Malfliet
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Belgium(1); Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bilterys T, Van Looveren E, Mairesse O, Nijs J, Meeus M, Ickmans K, Cagnie B, Goubert D, Willaert W, De Pauw R, Danneels L, Moens M, Malfliet A. Predictors for physical activity and its change after active physical therapy in people with spinal pain and insomnia: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther 2022; 26:100456. [PMID: 36372043 PMCID: PMC9661644 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In healthy people and people with nonspecific chronic spinal pain (nCSP) and/or insomnia, participation in physical activity on a regular basis has several physical and psychological health benefits. However, people with chronic conditions often tend to reduce physical activity participation which can lead to deconditioning over time. Currently, there are no known predictors for an (in)active lifestyle (before and after physical therapy treatment) in people with chronic spinal pain and comorbid insomnia. OBJECTIVE To examine predictors of pre-treatment moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and to examine determinants for a change in MVPA in response to 14-weeks of active physical therapy treatment in people with nonspecific chronic spinal pain (nCSP) and comorbid insomnia. METHODS Baseline data and post-treatment data were analyzed for 66 participants. A linear multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine which factors predict MVPA at baseline. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to identify determinants for change in MVPA in response to an active physical therapy treatment. RESULTS Physical fatigue (b = -0.9; 95%CI: -1.59, -0.15), less limitations in functioning as a result of emotional problems (b = 0.1; 95%CI: 0.03, 0.10), mental fatigue (b = -1.0; 95%CI: -1.67, -0.43), lower general sleep quality (b= 0.7; 95%CI: 0.22, 1.17), and body mass index (b = -0.5; 95%CI: -0.93, -0.16) were significant predictors of baseline MVPA. The regression model explained 33.3% of the total variance in baseline MVPA. The change of MVPA in response to the treatment ranged from a decrease of 17.5 to an increase of 16.6 hours per week. No determinants for change in MVPA after treatment could be identified. CONCLUSION People with nCSP and comorbid insomnia are more likely to engage in MVPA if they report, at baseline, lower sleep quality, fewer limitations in functioning resulting from emotional problems, lower body mass index, as well as less physical and mental fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Bilterys
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium,Pain in Motion International Research Group
| | - Eveline Van Looveren
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium,Pain in Motion International Research Group
| | - Olivier Mairesse
- Brain, Body and Cognition, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium,Sleep Laboratory and Unit for Clinical Chronobiology, Bregman University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium,Pain in Motion International Research Group,Department of Physical Medicine and Physcal Therapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium,Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physical Therapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. University of Gothenburg Center for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium,Pain in Motion International Research Group,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kelly Ickmans
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium,Pain in Motion International Research Group,Department of Physical Medicine and Physcal Therapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium,Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Barbara Cagnie
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dorien Goubert
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ward Willaert
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium,Pain in Motion International Research Group
| | - Robby De Pauw
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lieven Danneels
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maarten Moens
- Pain in Motion International Research Group,Department of Neurosurgery and Radiology, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium,Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium,Stimulus research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anneleen Malfliet
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium,Pain in Motion International Research Group,Department of Physical Medicine and Physcal Therapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium,Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.,Corresponding author at: Pain in Motion, Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Huysmans E, Baeyens JP, Dueñas L, Falla D, Meeus M, Roose E, Nijs J, Lluch Girbés E. Do Sex and Pain Characteristics Influence the Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in People Scheduled for Total Knee Arthroplasty? Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther 2021; 101:6352443. [PMID: 34459493 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This explorative study investigates the moderating effect of sex and baseline pain characteristics on the effectiveness of preoperative pain neuroscience education (PNE) plus knee joint mobilization versus biomedical education plus knee joint mobilization in patients who have knee osteoarthritis and are scheduled to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS After baseline assessment of self-reported questionnaires (pain intensity, disability, symptoms of central sensitization and pain cognitions) and quantitative sensory testing, 44 participants with knee osteoarthritis were randomized into the PNE plus knee joint mobilization or biomedical education plus knee joint mobilization group. The questionnaires were retaken directly after and 1 month after 4 sessions of treatment and at 3 months after surgery. Based on baseline quantitative sensory testing results, the sample was subdivided into a high (showing high experimental pain levels and low pressure pain thresholds) and low pain cluster using principal components analysis and cluster analysis. Therapy effects over time were evaluated using 3-way analysis of variance, with time as the within factor and treatment, sex, and baseline pain cluster as between factors. RESULTS Women benefited significantly more from the PNE intervention compared with the control intervention in terms of self-reported symptoms of central sensitization. For both pain clusters, differences in therapeutic effects concerning pain intensity and pain cognitions were found, with higher superiority of the PNE intervention in the high-pain cluster subgroup compared with the low-pain cluster. CONCLUSION Based on these explorative analyses, it can be concluded that sex and preoperative pain measures may influence the effectiveness of preoperative PNE for some specific outcome measures in people scheduled to undergo TKA. IMPACT Although further research on this topic is needed, the potential influence of sex and preoperative pain measures on the effectiveness of preoperative PNE should be considered when implementing this intervention in people undergoing TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Huysmans
- Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.,Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), www.paininmotion.be
| | - Jean-Pierre Baeyens
- EXAN Research Group, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,THIM - Internationale Hochschule für Physiotherapie, Landquart, Switzerland
| | - Lirios Dueñas
- Physiotherapy in Motion, Multi-Specialty Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physical Therapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mira Meeus
- Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), www.paininmotion.be.,MovAnt, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eva Roose
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), www.paininmotion.be.,Rehabilitation Research (RERE) Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), www.paininmotion.be
| | - Enrique Lluch Girbés
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group (PiM), www.paininmotion.be.,Physiotherapy in Motion, Multi-Specialty Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physical Therapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Saracoglu I, Leblebicier MA, Yaman F, Kavuncu V. Pain neuroscience education combined with usual treatment for fibromyalgia syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Rheum Dis 2021; 24:1409-1418. [PMID: 34609084 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.14223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education (PNE) in addition to usual treatment in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. METHODS Forty patients were randomized into 2 groups. The experimental group underwent PNE sessions over 6 weeks in addition to pharmacological treatment, and the control group was given only pharmacological treatment. The primary outcome measure was functional status and the secondary outcome measures were widespread pain pressure threshold and kinesiophobia level. All assessments were conducted before the intervention and at the end of the 6th and 12th weeks by the same blinded researcher. RESULTS The intervention group had significantly greater improvement than the control group in terms of the mean total scores in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (P = .001) and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (P = .001) with large effect sizes. The intervention group also had significantly greater improvement in the pain pressure threshold values of the cervical (P = .040), thoracic (P = .001), lumbar (P < .001), elbow (P = .005) and calf (P = .006) regions with moderate-to-large effect sizes. CONCLUSION This study showed that the addition of 6-week PNE sessions to pharmacological treatment was successful in improving functional status, widespread pain pressure threshold, and level of kinesiophobia in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome during a 12-week follow-up period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Saracoglu
- Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Turkey
| | - Merve Akdeniz Leblebicier
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Turkey
| | - Fatima Yaman
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Turkey
| | - Vural Kavuncu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Watson S, Louw A, Wingood M, Rico D, Podolak J, Maiers N, Cox T. Pain Neuroscience Education for Older Adults. PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/02703181.2021.1970692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Watson
- Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Adriaan Louw
- Evidence in Motion Pain Science, Story City, IA, USA
| | - Mariana Wingood
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Debbie Rico
- Physical Therapy, Rockhurst University, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - Nicholas Maiers
- Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA, USA
| | - Terry Cox
- Physical Therapy, Southwest Baptist University, Bolivar, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Stanton TR, Braithwaite FA, Butler D, Moseley GL, Hill C, Milte R, Ratcliffe J, Maher C, Tomkins-Lane C, Pulling BW, MacIntyre E, Esterman A, Stanford T, Lee H, Fraysse F, Metcalf B, Mouatt B, Bennell K. The EPIPHA-KNEE trial: Explaining Pain to target unhelpful pain beliefs to Increase PHysical Activity in KNEE osteoarthritis - a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with clinical- and cost-effectiveness analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:738. [PMID: 34454458 PMCID: PMC8401372 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04561-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite well-established benefits of physical activity for knee osteoarthritis (OA), nine of ten people with knee OA are inactive. People with knee OA who are inactive often believe that physical activity is dangerous, fearing that it will further damage their joint(s). Such unhelpful beliefs can negatively influence physical activity levels. We aim to evaluate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of integrating physiotherapist-delivered pain science education (PSE), an evidence-based conceptual change intervention targeting unhelpful pain beliefs by increasing pain knowledge, with an individualised walking, strengthening, and general education program. Methods Two-arm, parallel-design, multicentre randomised controlled trial involving 198 people aged ≥50 years with painful knee OA who do not meet physical activity guideline recommendations or walk regularly for exercise. Both groups receive an individualised physiotherapist-led walking, strengthening, and OA/activity education program via 4x weekly in-person treatment sessions, followed by 4 weeks of at-home activities (weekly check-in via telehealth), with follow-up sessions at 3 months (telehealth) and 5 and 9 months (in-person). The EPIPHA-KNEE group also receives contemporary PSE about OA/pain and activity, embedded into all aspects of the intervention. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcomes are physical activity level (step count; wrist-based accelerometry) and self-reported knee symptoms (WOMAC Total score) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, pain intensity, global rating of change, self-efficacy, pain catastrophising, depression, anxiety, stress, fear of movement, knee awareness, OA/activity conceptualisation, and self-regulated learning ability. Additional measures include adherence, adverse events, blinding success, COVID-19 impact on activity, intention to exercise, treatment expectancy/perceived credibility, implicit movement/environmental bias, implicit motor imagery, two-point discrimination, and pain sensitivity to activity. Cost-utility analysis of the EPIPHA-KNEE intervention will be undertaken, in addition to evaluation of cost-effectiveness in the context of primary trial outcomes. Discussion We will determine whether the integration of PSE into an individualised OA education, walking, and strengthening program is more effective than receiving the individualised program alone. Findings will inform the development and implementation of future delivery of PSE as part of best practice for people with knee OA. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12620001041943 (13/10/2020). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04561-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasha R Stanton
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, G.P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
| | - Felicity A Braithwaite
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, G.P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia
| | - David Butler
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, G.P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.,NOIgroup Pty Ltd, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, G.P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia
| | - Catherine Hill
- Rheumatology Department, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.,Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Rachel Milte
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Carol Maher
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Christy Tomkins-Lane
- Department of Health and Physical Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada
| | - Brian W Pulling
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, G.P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia
| | - Erin MacIntyre
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, G.P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia
| | - Adrian Esterman
- Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ty Stanford
- Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Hopin Lee
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Rehabilitation Research in Oxford (RRIO), Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Francois Fraysse
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ben Metcalf
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brendan Mouatt
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, G.P.O. Box 2471, Adelaide, 5001, Australia
| | - Kim Bennell
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Keen S, Lomeli-Rodriguez M, Williams ACDC. Exploring how people with chronic pain understand their pain: a qualitative study. Scand J Pain 2021; 21:743-753. [PMID: 34331751 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2021-0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A fundamental principle of pain management is educating patients on their pain using current neuroscience. However, current pain neurophysiology education (PNE) interventions show variable success in improving pain outcomes, and may be difficult to integrate with existing understanding of pain. This study aimed to investigate how people with chronic pain understand their pain, using qualitative exploration of their conceptualisations of pain, and how this understanding accommodated, or resisted, the messages of PNE. METHODS Twelve UK adults with chronic pain were recruited through advertisements on online pain networks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted remotely, with responses elicited using the Grid Elaboration Method (GEM) and then a PNE article. Participants' grid elaborations and responses to PNE were analysed using thematic analysis (TA). RESULTS Three main themes were extracted from participants' grid elaborations: communicating pain, explaining pain and living with pain. These themes incorporated varied, inconsistent sub-themes: of pain as simultaneously experiential and conceptual; in the body and in the mind; diagnosable and inexplicable; manageable and insuperable. Generalised, meta-level agreement was identified in participants' PNE responses, but with doubts about its practical value. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that people understand pain through inconsistent experiential models that may resist attempts at conceptual integration. Participants' elaborations showed diverse and dissonant conceptualisations, with experiential themes of restricted living; assault on the self; pursuit of understanding pain and abandonment of that pursuit. Responses, although unexpectedly compatible with PNE, suggested that PNE was perceived as intellectually engaging but practically inadequate. Experiential disconfirmation may be required for behavioural change inhibited by embedded fears and aversive experiences. ETHICAL COMMITTEE NUMBER UCL REC# 17833/003.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Keen
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Martha Lomeli-Rodriguez
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Amanda C de C Williams
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Barbari V, Storari L, Maselli F, Testa M. Applicability of pain neuroscience education: Where are we now? J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2021; 34:511-520. [PMID: 33749636 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-200091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Explaining pain to patients through pain neuroscience education (PNE) is currently a widespread treatment studied in the musculoskeletal context. Presently, there is sufficient evidence supporting the effectiveness of PNE in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. However, clinicians must pay attention to the actual possibility to transfer research findings in their specific clinical context. OBJECTIVE We analysed the applicability of results of studies focused on PNE, which has not been done previously. METHODS A detailed discussion on PNE applicability is provided, starting from published randomized controlled trials that investigated the effectiveness of PNE. RESULTS This paper markedly points out the awareness of clinicians on the need for an accurate contextualization when choosing PNE as an intervention in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
33
|
Willaert W, Leysen L, Lenoir D, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Nijs J, Sterling M, Coppieters I. Combining Stress Management With Pain Neuroscience Education and Exercise Therapy in People With Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Clinical Perspective. Phys Ther 2021; 101:6184954. [PMID: 33764474 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Individuals classified as having whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) grade II, which reflects approximately 93% of people with WAD who are commonly managed by health care professionals, exhibit both physical (eg, pain and disability) and psychological (eg, fear of movement, anxiety, posttraumatic stress) problems that, in approximately 50% of cases, persist beyond 3 months. There is still much ongoing debate regarding factors predictive of poor recovery. The strongest associations have been found for high initial pain and disability following whiplash injury. In addition, a growing body of evidence supports the clinical importance of characteristic features, such as disturbed nociceptive processing (eg, local or general hyperalgesia to cold and mechanical stimuli), inefficient cognitions and beliefs about pain/movement/recovery, and posttraumatic stress symptoms, in the development and maintenance of physical and psychological manifestations in individuals with WAD. For this reason, the field shifted away from single interventions that mainly follow a biomedical approach, such as exercise therapy and activity programs, to gold standard multimodal care (at least 2 distinct therapeutic modalities given by 1 or more health care professionals) that acknowledges the biopsychological nature of WAD. To date, there exist several multimodal care approaches to managing WAD; however, for most, the efficacy has been found to be rather limited. One may argue that the limited success of some approaches can be attributed to the fact that they focused mainly on rehabilitating the physical symptoms (eg, pain, disability) rather than also the associated cognitive (eg, catastrophizing) and psychological (eg, posttraumatic stress symptoms) symptoms of the condition, leaving much room for improvement. In this article, current and previous evidence is used to explain why and how a comprehensive and multimodal treatment for people with WAD-consisting of a combination of pain neuroscience education, cognition-targeted exercise therapy, and stress management-can be applied in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ward Willaert
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurence Leysen
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dorine Lenoir
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Barbara Cagnie
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michele Sterling
- Recover Injury Research Centre and NHMRC CRE in Road Traffic Injury Recovery, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Iris Coppieters
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Coppieters I, Willaert W, Lenoir D, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Ickmans K, Malfliet A, Danneels L, De Petter B, Nijs J. A contemporary neuroscience approach compared to biomedically focused education combined with symptom-contingent exercise therapy in people with chronic whiplash associated disorders: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Braz J Phys Ther 2021; 25:356-366. [PMID: 33109480 PMCID: PMC8134836 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To address the need for a better treatment of chronic whiplash associated disorders (WAD), a contemporary neuroscience approach can be proposed. OBJECTIVE To examine the effectiveness of a contemporary neuroscience approach, comprising pain neuroscience education, stress management, and cognition-targeted exercise therapy versus conventional physical therapy for reducing disability (primary outcome measure) and improving quality of life and reducing pain, central sensitization, and psychological problems (secondary outcome measures) in people with chronic WAD. METHODS The study is a multi-center, two-arm randomized, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up and will be performed in two university-based and one regional hospital. People with chronic WAD (n=120) will be recruited. The experimental group will receive pain neuroscience education followed by cognition-targeted exercise therapy, and stress management. The control group will receive biomedically focused education followed by graded and active exercise therapy focusing on muscle endurance, strength, and flexibility, and ergonomic principles. The treatment will have a duration of 16 weeks. Functional status (Neck Disability Index) is the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures include quality of life, pain, central sensitization, and psychological and socio-economic factors. In addition, electroencephalography will measure brain activity at rest and during a conditioned pain modulation paradigm. Assessments will take place at baseline, immediately post-treatment and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This study will examine whether a contemporary neuroscience approach is superior over conventional physical therapy for improving functioning, quality of life, and reducing pain, central sensitization, and psychological problems in people with chronic WAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Coppieters
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Ward Willaert
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dorine Lenoir
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Barbara Cagnie
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kelly Ickmans
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anneleen Malfliet
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lieven Danneels
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Brenda De Petter
- Sint-Jozefkliniek, Campus Bornem (AZ Rivierenland), Bornem, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rabiei P, Sheikhi B, Letafatkar A. Comparing Pain Neuroscience Education Followed by Motor Control Exercises With Group-Based Exercises for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Pract 2020; 21:333-342. [PMID: 33135286 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different individualized interventions have been used to improve chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, their superiority over group-based interventions has yet to be elucidated. We compared an individualized treatment involving pain neuroscience education (PNE) plus motor control exercise (MCE) with group-based exercise (GE) in patients with CLBP. METHODS Seventy-three patients with CLBP were randomly assigned into the PNE plus MCE group (n = 37) and GE group (n = 36). Both PNE plus MCE and GE were administered twice weekly for 8 weeks. Pain intensity (as measured using the VAS), disability (as measured using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), fear-avoidance beliefs (as measured using the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire), and self-efficacy (as measured using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire) were assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. A 2 × 2 variance analysis (treatment group × time) with a mixed-model design was applied to statistically analyze the data. RESULTS Both groups showed significant improvements in all the outcome measures, with a large effect size (P < 0.001, partial eta squared [ηp2 ] = 0.66 to 0.81) after the intervention. The PNE plus MCE group showed greater improvements, with a moderate effect size in pain intensity (P = 0.041, ηp2 = 0.06) and disability (P = 0.021, ηp2 = 0.07) compared to the GE group. No significant difference was found in fear-avoidance beliefs during physical activity and work, and self-efficacy (P > 0.05) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION PNE and MCE seem to be better at reducing pain intensity and disability compared to GE, while no significant differences were observed for fear-avoidance beliefs and self-efficacy between the 2 groups in patients with CLBP. With regard to the superiority of individualized interventions over group-based ones, more studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pouya Rabiei
- Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
| | - Bahram Sheikhi
- Sports Injury and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amir Letafatkar
- Sports Injury and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Nishimura T, Miyachi R. Relationship between low back pain and lumbar and hip joint movement in desk workers. J Phys Ther Sci 2020; 32:680-685. [PMID: 33132530 PMCID: PMC7590845 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.32.680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
[Purpose] The study aimed to determine the relationship between low back pain and lumbar
and hip movement in desk workers with chronic non-specific low back pain, in order to
obtain basic data regarding measures for preventing low back pain in desk workers.
[Participants and Methods] The study included 10 desk workers (all female, age: 47.1 ±
6.0 years). The following measurements were recorded: numerical rating scale score for
pain assessment at the time of maximum forward and backward bending of the trunk while
standing, and the amount of movement of the trunk and the lumbar and hip joint. The ratio
of the lumbar and hip joint movements during maximum forward and backward bending of the
trunk was calculated. [Results] For maximum forward and backward bending of the trunk, a
positive correlation between the numerical rating scale score and the ratio of movement
for the lumbar and a negative correlation with that of the hip joint were noted.
[Conclusion] Moving the hip joint while suppressing excessive lumbar movement is one of
the measures for preventing low back pain in desk workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Nishimura
- Nanto City Visiting Nursing Station: 938 Inami, Nanto-shi, Toyama 932-0211, Japan.,Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate Course of Rehabilitation Science, Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Japan
| | - Ryo Miyachi
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kyoto Tachibana University, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Louw A, Rico D, Langerwerf L, Maiers N, Diener I, Cox T. Preoperative pain neuroscience education for shoulder surgery: A case series. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY 2020; 76:1417. [PMID: 32935067 PMCID: PMC7479411 DOI: 10.4102/sajp.v76i1.1417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Central sensitisation, in addition to high levels of fear-avoidance and pain catastrophisation may exist in a subgroup of patients with shoulder pain. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) has been shown to positively influence sensitivity of the nervous system, as well as reduce fear and catastrophisation prior to lumbar and total knee surgery. To date, no study has examined the application of PNE prior to shoulder surgery. Objectives This study examined the response to preoperative PNE in patients preparing for shoulder surgery. Method An exploratory pre–post case series was conducted. Twelve patients scheduled for surgery completed various pre-education measurements including shoulder pain, fear-avoidance, pain catastrophisation, beliefs and expectations regarding surgery, active shoulder flexion and pressure pain thresholds for the involved and uninvolved shoulder and the dominant-sided knee. Patients underwent a standard 30-min, one-on-one PNE session with a physiotherapist prior to surgery. Results Following education, all measures improved with some failing to reach significance: self-reported pain (p = 0.125), pain catastrophisation (p = 0.250) and pain pressure threshold of the uninvolved shoulder (p = 0.68) and knee (p = 0.097). Fear-avoidance (p = 0.013), active shoulder flexion (p = 0.013) and pain pressure threshold for the involved shoulder (p = 0.004) significantly improved. Conclusion A small patient group improved beyond minimal detectable change and/or minimal clinical important difference after education. No significant shifts of the preoperative beliefs occurred after education. Clinical implications Preoperative PNE may be beneficial to a subgroup of patients scheduled for shoulder surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriaan Louw
- Evidence in Motion, San Antonio, United States of America
| | - Debra Rico
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rockhurst University, Kansas City, United States of America
| | | | - Nicholas Maiers
- Department of Physical Therapy, Des Moines University, Des Moines, United States of America
| | - Ina Diener
- Department of Physiotherapy, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Terry Cox
- Department of Physical Therapy, Southwest Baptist University, Bolivar, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nijs J, Wijma AJ, Willaert W, Huysmans E, Mintken P, Smeets R, Goossens M, van Wilgen CP, Van Bogaert W, Louw A, Cleland J, Donaldson M. Integrating Motivational Interviewing in Pain Neuroscience Education for People With Chronic Pain: A Practical Guide for Clinicians. Phys Ther 2020; 100:846-859. [PMID: 31995191 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and motivational interviewing (MI) have been widely implemented and tested in the field of chronic pain management, and both strategies have been shown to be effective in the short term (small effect sizes) for the management of chronic pain. PNE uses contemporary pain science to educate patients about the biopsychosocial nature of the chronicity of their pain experience. The goal of PNE is to optimize patients' pain beliefs/perceptions to facilitate the acquisition of adaptive pain-coping strategies. MI, on the other hand, is a patient-centered communication style for eliciting and enhancing motivation for behavior change by shifting the patient away from a state of indecision or uncertainty. Conceptually, PNE and MI appear to be complementary interventions, with complementary rather than overlapping effects; MI primarily improves cognitive and behavioral awareness and, potentially, adherence to treatment principles, whereas PNE potentially increases pain knowledge/beliefs, awareness, and willingness to explore psychological factors that are potentially associated with pain. Therefore, combining PNE with MI might lead to improved outcomes with larger and longer-lasting effect sizes. The combined use of PNE and MI in patients having chronic pain is introduced here, along with a description of how clinicians might be able to integrate PNE and MI in the treatment of patients experiencing chronic pain. Clinical trials are needed to examine whether combining PNE with MI is superior to PNE or MI alone for improving pain and quality of life in patients having chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Nijs
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Pain in Motion International Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Building F-KIMA, Laarbeeklaan 103, BE-1090 Brussels, Belgium; and Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Amarins J Wijma
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Pain in Motion International Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brussels; and Transcare Pain, Transdisciplinary Treatment Center, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ward Willaert
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Pain in Motion International Research Group,Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brussels; and Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eva Huysmans
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Pain in Motion International Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brussels; Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO); and Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
| | - Paul Mintken
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, and Wardenburg Health Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
| | - Rob Smeets
- Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, and CIR Revalidatie Eindhoven/Zwolle, Eindhoven/Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle Goossens
- Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, and CIR Revalidatie Eindhoven/Zwolle
| | - C Paul van Wilgen
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Pain in Motion International Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel; and Transcare Pain, Transdisciplinary Treatment Center
| | - Wouter Van Bogaert
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Pain in Motion International Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
| | - Adriaan Louw
- Department of Physical Therapy, International Spine and Pain Institute, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Josh Cleland
- Department of Physical Therapy, Franklin Pierce University, Manchester, New Hampshire
| | - Megan Donaldson
- Physical Therapy Program, School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Willaert W, Malfliet A, Coppieters I, Lenoir D, De Pauw R, Danneels L, Roussel N, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Nijs J, Kregel J. Does Pain Neuroscience Education and Cognition-Targeted Motor Control Training Improve Cervical Motor Output? Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Pain Pract 2020; 20:600-614. [PMID: 32187789 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the context of interventions aimed at reducing pain, disability, and maladaptive pain cognitions in chronic neck pain, it is hypothesized that patients who have greater symptom reduction possibly also demonstrate greater improvement in cervical motor output. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of pain neuroscience education plus cognition-targeted motor control training on cervical motor output. METHODS Impairments in cervical motor output were measured in 64 subjects with chronic neck pain using standardized tests. Cervical muscle strength, cervical mobility, balance, and cervical neuromuscular control were derived. To assess the differences between groups in response to treatment, a random-intercept linear mixed-models analysis, applying a diagonal covariance matrix, was used. RESULTS A significant treatment × time interaction effect was found for neuromuscular control of the deep cervical flexors, favoring the experimental treatment at 3 months' follow-up (mean group difference: 1.982; 95% confidence interval 0.779, 3.185; large effect size d = 0.82). Significant main effects of time were found for the neuromuscular capacity of scapulothoracic muscles and for cervical mobility. No significant effects were found for balance, cervical muscle strength, or endurance of cervical flexors. CONCLUSION Pain neuroscience education combined with cognition-targeted motor control training is not more effective than biomedically focused education and exercise therapy for improving cervical motor output in people with chronic neck pain. Our findings question the relative importance of factors such as pain, disability, and maladaptive pain cognitions on cervical motor output and the need to address it in treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ward Willaert
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anneleen Malfliet
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussel, Belgium.,Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Iris Coppieters
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Dorine Lenoir
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Robby De Pauw
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lieven Danneels
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nathalie Roussel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Barbara Cagnie
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Kregel
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Louw A, Goldrick S, Bernstetter A, Van Gelder LH, Parr A, Zimney K, Cox T. Evaluation is treatment for low back pain. J Man Manip Ther 2020; 29:4-13. [PMID: 32091317 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1730056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of the examination process (history taking and physical examination) on pain and function. Methods: An observational cohort trial of patients presenting to outpatient physical therapy clinics for the first time with low back pain (n = 34, 57.7 ± 18.7 years, 53% female). A blinded investigator measured participants prior to the beginning of the initial evaluation and after each component of evaluation (history taking and physical examination). Another physical therapist provided normal history taking and physical examination as the patient case presented itself. Primary outcome measure was numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) for the low back and leg. Secondary outcomes and time during examination process and connection between PT and patient were also measured as potential confounders. Results: Participants showed a significant reduction in pain through just the history taking and physical exam for both the back with an NPRS reduction of 1.23 and the leg showing a 0.95 NPRS reduction. The most significant reduction occurs after history taking. Discussion: The evaluation process produced small, but significant, therapeutic effects related to pain, fear-avoidance, pain catastrophization, and functional measures of mobility and sensitivity. The therapist's report of connection with the patient did not alter the patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriaan Louw
- International Spine Pain Institute , Story City, IA, USA.,Department of Physical Therapy, St. Ambrose University , Davenport, IA, USA.,Pain Science Fellowship, Evidence in Motion , San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Steve Goldrick
- International Spine Pain Institute , Story City, IA, USA.,Pain Science Fellowship, Evidence in Motion , San Antonio, TX, USA.,Kitsap Physical Therapy , Silverdale, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Aaron Parr
- ProActive Physical Therapy , Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Kory Zimney
- International Spine Pain Institute , Story City, IA, USA.,Pain Science Fellowship, Evidence in Motion , San Antonio, TX, USA.,Department of Physical Therapy, University of South Dakota , Vermillion, SD, USA
| | - Terry Cox
- International Spine Pain Institute , Story City, IA, USA.,Department of Physical Therapy, Southwest Baptist University , Bolivar, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Neurophysiological Pain Education for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin J Pain 2019; 34:778-786. [PMID: 29443723 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of neurophysiological pain education (NPE) for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS A systematic search was performed in 6 electronic databases. Eligible randomized-controlled trials were those with at least 50 % of patients with CLBP and in which NPE was compared with no intervention or usual care. Methodological quality was assessed independently by 2 of the authors using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool. The effect of NPE was summarized in a random effect meta-analysis for pain, disability, and behavioral attitudes. Effect was estimated as weighted mean difference (WMD) if outcomes were on the same scale or as standardized mean difference (SMD). The overall quality of evidence was evaluated according to GRADE guidelines. RESULTS Seven randomized-controlled trial studies (6 low and 1 high quality) were included. Statistically significant differences in pain, in favor of NPE, were found after treatment, WMD=-1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.55 to -1.52), and after 3 months, WMD=-1.09 (95% CI, -2.17 to 0.00). Furthermore statistically significant lower disability was found in the NPE group after treatment, SMD=-0.47 (95% CI, -0.80 to -0.13) and after 3 months SMD=-0.38 (95% CI, -0.74 to -0.02). The difference in favor of NPE in reduction in Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia was not statistically significant, WMD=-5.73 (95% CI, -13.60 to 2.14) and after 3 months WMD=-0.94 (95% CI, -6.28 to 4.40). DISCUSSION There was moderate evidence supporting the hypothesis that NPE has a small to moderate effect on pain and low evidence of a small to moderate effect on disability immediately after the intervention. NPE has a small to moderate effect on pain and disability at 3 months follow-up in patients with CLBP.
Collapse
|
42
|
Nijs J, Wijma AJ, Leysen L, Pas R, Willaert W, Hoelen W, Ickmans K, Wilgen CPV. Explaining pain following cancer: a practical guide for clinicians. Braz J Phys Ther 2019; 23:367-377. [PMID: 30606621 PMCID: PMC6823686 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain is one of the most prevalent and debilitating symptom following cancer treatment. OBJECTIVES This paper entails a practical guide for clinicians willing to apply pain neuroscience education (PNE) in this specific population, or clinical researchers willing to examine the effects of PNE in patients suffering from pain following cancer. RESULTS Patient-specific information (i.e. beliefs, cognitions, pain memories, social factors) as well as identification of the dominant pain mechanism are needed to tailor the education to the specific needs and beliefs of the patient. Therapists require an in-depth understanding of pain mechanisms, the skills to explain to their patients various pain mechanisms, specific communication skills (e.g. Socratic-style dialogof education) and experience with current evidence-based biopsychosocially-driven pain management strategies for successful implementation of PNE in the clinic. Rather than purely focusing on the biomedical characteristics of pain following cancer (e.g., tissue damage due to past cancer treatment), PNE implies teaching patients about the underlying biopsychosocial mechanisms of pain. Its application is backed-up by mounting evidence supporting the effectiveness of PNE in non-cancer pain populations, and a pilot study in patients having pain following cancer. CONCLUSION PNE is a potential solution to improve pain outcome in cancer survivors. Further research using sufficiently powered and well-designed randomized clinical trials should be conducted to examine the potential of PNE in patients having pain following cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Nijs
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Amarins J Wijma
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Transcare Transdisciplinary Pain Management Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Laurence Leysen
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roselien Pas
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ward Willaert
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wouter Hoelen
- De Berekuyl, Private Practice for Physiotherapy in Oncology & Lymphology, Hierden, The Netherlands; The Berekuyl Academy, Hierden, The Netherlands
| | - Kelly Ickmans
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Paul van Wilgen
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Transcare Transdisciplinary Pain Management Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Harrison LE, Pate JW, Richardson PA, Ickmans K, Wicksell RK, Simons LE. Best-Evidence for the Rehabilitation of Chronic Pain Part 1: Pediatric Pain. J Clin Med 2019; 8:E1267. [PMID: 31438483 PMCID: PMC6780832 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8091267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain is a prevalent and persistent problem in middle childhood and adolescence. The biopsychosocial model of pain, which accounts for the complex interplay of the biological, psychological, social, and environmental factors that contribute to and maintain pain symptoms and related disability has guided our understanding and treatment of pediatric pain. Consequently, many interventions for chronic pain are within the realm of rehabilitation, based on the premise that behavior has a broad and central role in pain management. These treatments are typically delivered by one or more providers in medicine, nursing, psychology, physical therapy, and/or occupational therapy. Current data suggest that multidisciplinary treatment is important, with intensive interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation (IIPT) being effective at reducing disability for patients with high levels of functional disability. The following review describes the current state of the art of rehabilitation approaches to treat persistent pain in children and adolescents. Several emerging areas of interventions are also highlighted to guide future research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Harrison
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Joshua W Pate
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Patricia A Richardson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Kelly Ickmans
- Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy (KIMA), Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rikard K Wicksell
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology division, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Laura E Simons
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Diener I, Zimney KJ, Cox T. Pain neuroscience education: Which pain neuroscience education metaphor worked best? SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY 2019; 75:1329. [PMID: 31535053 PMCID: PMC6739553 DOI: 10.4102/sajp.v75i1.1329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of pain neuroscience education (PNE) has been shown to be effective in reducing pain, improving function and lowering fear and catastrophisation. Pain neuroscience education utilises various stories and metaphors to help patients reconceptualise their pain experience. To date no individualised study has looked at which stories and metaphors may be the most effective in achieving the positive outcomes found with the use of PNE. OBJECTIVES This study examined patient responses to the usefulness of the various stories and metaphors used during PNE for patients who underwent surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. METHOD Twenty-seven participants who received preoperative PNE from a previous randomised control trial (RCT) were surveyed 1-year post-education utilising a 5-point Likert scale (0 - 'do not remember', 4 - 'very helpful') on the usefulness of the various stories and metaphors used during the PNE session. Participant demographics and outcomes data (pain intensity, function and pain knowledge) were utilised from the previous RCT for analysis and correlations. RESULTS Nineteen surveys were returned for a response rate of 70%. No story or metaphor mean was below 2 - 'neutral', lowest mean at 2.53; 6 of the 11 stories or metaphors scored a mean above 3 - 'helpful'. CONCLUSION No individual story or metaphor stood out as being predominately important in being helpful in the recovery process through the use of PNE. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The overall messages of reconceptualising pain during PNE may be more important than any individual story or metaphor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriaan Louw
- International Spine and Pain Institute, Story City, United States
| | | | | | - Kory J Zimney
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, United States
| | - Terry Cox
- Department of Physical Therapy, Southwest Baptist University, Bolivar, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nijs J, Leysen L, Vanlauwe J, Logghe T, Ickmans K, Polli A, Malfliet A, Coppieters I, Huysmans E. Treatment of central sensitization in patients with chronic pain: time for change? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20:1961-1970. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1647166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Chronic pain rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurence Leysen
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Johan Vanlauwe
- Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tine Logghe
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kelly Ickmans
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Chronic pain rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, AZ Sint Dimpna hospital, Geel, Belgium
| | - Andrea Polli
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, AZ Sint Dimpna hospital, Geel, Belgium
| | - Anneleen Malfliet
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Chronic pain rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, AZ Sint Dimpna hospital, Geel, Belgium
- Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Iris Coppieters
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Chronic pain rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eva Huysmans
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Chronic pain rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, AZ Sint Dimpna hospital, Geel, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Goudman L, Huysmans E, Ickmans K, Nijs J, Moens M, Putman K, Buyl R, Louw A, Logghe T, Coppieters I. A Modern Pain Neuroscience Approach in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Clinical Perspective. Phys Ther 2019; 99:933-945. [PMID: 30921465 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzz053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Around 20% of patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy develop chronic pain after surgery, leading to high socioeconomic burden. Current perioperative interventions, including education and rehabilitation, are not always effective in preventing prolonged or chronic postoperative pain and disability. Here, a shift in educational intervention from a biomedical towards a biopsychosocial approach for people scheduled for lumbar surgery is proposed. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a biopsychosocial approach that aims to decrease the threat value of pain by reconceptualizing pain and increasing the patient's knowledge about pain. This paper provides a clinical perspective for the provision of perioperative PNE, specifically developed for patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. Besides the general goals of PNE, perioperative PNE aims to prepare the patient for postsurgical pain and how to cope with it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Goudman
- Pain in Motion International Research Group; Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel; and Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eva Huysmans
- Pain in Motion International Research Group; Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Building F-KIMA, Laarbeeklaan 103, BE-1090 Brussels, Belgium; I-CHER, Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research; Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel; and Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
| | - Kelly Ickmans
- Pain in Motion International Research Group; Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel; and Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion International Research Group; Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel; and Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
| | - Maarten Moens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel; Center for Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel; and Department of Manual Therapy (MANU), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
| | - Koen Putman
- Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
| | - Ronald Buyl
- Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
| | - Adriaan Louw
- International Spine and Pain Institute, Story City, Iowa
| | - Tine Logghe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Revalidation, Sint-Dimpna Ziekenhuis Geel, Geel, Belgium
| | - Iris Coppieters
- Pain in Motion International Research Group and Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy (KIMA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Reed J, Zimney K, Grimm D, Landers MR. A controlled clinical trial of preoperative pain neuroscience education for patients about to undergo total knee arthroplasty. Clin Rehabil 2019; 33:1722-1731. [DOI: 10.1177/0269215519857782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine if a preoperative pain neuroscience education program would result in superior outcomes compared to usual preoperative education for total knee arthroplasty. Design: Controlled clinical trial with alternating allocation. Setting: Community-based hospital. Subjects: Consecutive sample of 120 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty. Intervention: Traditional hospital preoperative total knee arthroplasty education program on its own, or with an additional 30-minute group pain neuroscience education session. Main measures: Primary outcomes were measurements at one, three, and six months for pain, function, fear of movement, and pain catastrophization. We also compared opioid usage, healthcare expenses, and patient satisfaction between groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in any outcome measures between the two groups over time, except for patient satisfaction. Those in the experimental group had more agreement with statements about “preparation for surgery” ( P = .038), “would do again” ( P = .032), and “met expectations” ( P = .033) compared to those in the control group averaged over the three measurement times. Patients improved in several outcome measures over time regardless of group assignment, with a 34% improvement in pain, 36% improvement in function, 16% improvement in fear of movement, and 23% improvement in pain catastrophization scores. Conclusion: Adding a brief 30-minute pain neuroscience education session to a traditional preoperative total knee arthroplasty education program did not result in any significant improvements, except patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriaan Louw
- International Spine Pain Institute, Story City, IA, USA
| | - Emilio J Puentedura
- International Spine Pain Institute, Story City, IA, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Jordan Reed
- Department of Physical Therapy, Spencer Hospital, Spencer, IA, USA
| | - Kory Zimney
- International Spine Pain Institute, Story City, IA, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, USA
| | - Derek Grimm
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Spencer Hospital, Spencer, IA, USA
| | - Merrill R Landers
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Louw A, Farrell K, Choffin B, Foster B, Lunde G, Snodgrass M, Sweet R, Weitzel M, Wilder R, Puentedura EJ. Immediate effect of pain neuroscience education for recent onset low back pain: an exploratory single arm trial. J Man Manip Ther 2019; 27:267-276. [PMID: 31161919 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2019.1624006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Study Design: A prospective, single-arm, pre-postintervention study.Objective: To determine the preliminary usefulness of providing pain neuroscience education (PNE) on improving pain and movement in patients presenting with non-chronic mechanical low back pain (LBP).Background: PNE has been shown to be an effective intervention for the treatment of chronic LBP but its usefulness in patients with non-chronic LBP has not been examined.Methods: A single group cohort pilot study was conducted. Eighty consecutive patients with LBP < 3 months completed a demographics questionnaire, leg and LBP rating (Numeric Pain Rating Scale - NPRS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index), fear-avoidance (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), central sensitization (Central Sensitization Inventory), pain knowledge (Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire), risk assessment (Keele STarT Back Screening Tool), active trunk flexion and straight leg raise (SLR). Patients received a 15-minute verbal, one-on-one PNE session, followed by repeat measurement of LBP and leg pain (NPRS), trunk flexion and SLR.Results: Immediately after intervention, LBP and leg pain improved significantly (p < 0.001), but the mean change did not exceed minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 2.0. Active trunk flexion significantly improved (p < 0.001), with the mean improvement (4.7 cm) exceeding minimal detectible change (MDC). SLR improved significantly (p = 0.002), but mean change did not exceed MDC.Conclusions: PNE may be an interesting option in the treatment of patients with non-chronic mechanical LBP. The present pilot study provides the rationale for studying larger groups of patients in controlled studies over longer periods of time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriaan Louw
- International Spine and Pain Institute, Story City, IA, USA.,Department of Physical Therapy Education, Residency Program, St. Ambrose University, Health Sciences Center, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Kevin Farrell
- Department of Physical Therapy Education, Residency Program, St. Ambrose University, Health Sciences Center, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Breanna Choffin
- Department of Physical Therapy Education, Residency Program, St. Ambrose University, Health Sciences Center, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Brooke Foster
- Department of Physical Therapy Education, Residency Program, St. Ambrose University, Health Sciences Center, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Grace Lunde
- Department of Physical Therapy Education, Residency Program, St. Ambrose University, Health Sciences Center, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Michelle Snodgrass
- Department of Physical Therapy Education, Residency Program, St. Ambrose University, Health Sciences Center, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Robert Sweet
- Department of Physical Therapy Education, Residency Program, St. Ambrose University, Health Sciences Center, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Matthew Weitzel
- Department of Physical Therapy Education, Residency Program, St. Ambrose University, Health Sciences Center, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Rebecca Wilder
- Department of Physical Therapy Education, Residency Program, St. Ambrose University, Health Sciences Center, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Emilio J Puentedura
- International Spine and Pain Institute, Story City, IA, USA.,Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Baylor University Graduate School, Waco, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Benedict TM, Singleton MD, Nitz AJ, Shing TL, Kardouni JR. Effect of Chronic Low Back Pain and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder on the Risk for Separation from the US Army. Mil Med 2019; 184:431-439. [DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usz020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionCo-morbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and low back pain (LBP) are common reasons for increased disability in the Veteran communities. Medical discharge from the military represents a considerable financial cost to society. Little is currently known about the impact of LBP and PTSD as longitudinal risk factors for medical discharge from Active Duty military service.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of US Army Active Duty Soldiers from 2002 to 2012 was performed to determine the risk for medical discharge. Four levels of exposure for were identified as independent variables: no chronic LBP or PTSD, chronic LBP only, PTSD only, and co-morbid PTSD present with chronic LBP. Statistical analysis utilized modified Poisson regression controlling for sex, age, rank, time in service, deployment, mental health, sleep disorders, alcohol use, tobacco use, obesity, and military occupation. This study was approved by a Department of Defense Institutional Review Board.ResultsAfter controlling for potential confounding variables, the RR for chronic LBP and PTSD independently was 3.65 (95% CI: 3.59–3.72) and 3.64 (95% CI: 3.53–3.75), respectively, and 5.17 (95% CI: 5.01–5.33) when both were present.ConclusionsThis is the first study to identify a history of both chronic LBP and PTSD as substantial risk factors for medical discharge from the US Army. PTSD and chronic LBP may mutually reinforce one another and deplete active coping strategies, making Soldiers less likely to be able to continue military service. Future research should target therapies for co-morbid PTSD and chronic LBP as these conditions contribute a substantial increase in risk of medical discharge from the US Army.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy M Benedict
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Kentucky, 900 S. Limestone Ave Lexington, KY
| | - Michael D Singleton
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, 111 Washington Ave, Lexington, KY
| | - Arthur J Nitz
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Kentucky, 900 S. Limestone Ave Lexington, KY
| | - Tracie L Shing
- U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Kansas St, Natick, MA
| | - Joseph R Kardouni
- U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Kansas St, Natick, MA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
The type and pain provoking nature of exercise prescribed for low back pain: A survey of Australian health professionals. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2018; 38:37-45. [PMID: 30243199 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the type of exercise prescribed by Australian health professionals for LBP, and whether the exercises prescribed are pain-free or into pain. METHODS A survey of physiotherapists and exercise physiologists was conducted from all states/territories in Australia. The survey contained two chronic LBP vignettes with different pain mechanisms (dominant nociceptive or central sensitisation pain) and one acute LBP vignette. Respondents were asked if they would prescribe advice to stay active and exercise. If exercise was prescribed, respondents were asked to specify the type and pain provoking nature (exercise with no pain, exercise to the start of pain, exercise with pain at a tolerable level or exercise irrespective of pain). RESULTS The response rate was 17%(218/1276). Most respondents prescribed advice to stay active(≥95%) and exercise(≥90%) for all vignettes. Irrespective of the vignette, several exercises were prescribed [aerobic (57-85% of clinicians), motor control (62-84% of clinicians), range of motion (72-75% of clinicians)]. Strengthening exercise was prescribed more for chronic(>60%) than acute LBP(23%). Irrespective of the exercise, between 20 and 25% of respondents prescribed pain-free exercise, between 71 and 79% of respondents prescribed exercise into pain, and ≤4% prescribed exercise irrespective of pain for acute and chronic LBP. CONCLUSIONS Several exercises are prescribed for LBP, irrespective of pain mechanism or duration, with more clinicians prescribing strengthening exercise for chronic than acute LBP. Most clinicians prescribed exercise into pain for acute and chronic LBP, irrespective of the exercise. Further research should determine which exercises are beneficial based on pain mechanism and duration, and whether exercise into pain should be prescribed for LBP.
Collapse
|