Dexamethasone eluting electrodes for cochlear implantation: Effect on residual hearing

Vestibular function and hearing preservation in children following a minimally invasive cochlear implantation

PURPOSE

This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effect of minimally invasive cochlear implantation (CI) on the vestibular function (VF) and residual hearing (RH) as well as their relationship in pediatric recipients before and after surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-four pediatric patients with preoperative low frequency residual hearing (LFRH) (250 or 500 Hz ≤ 80 dB HL) who underwent minimally invasive CI were enrolled. Pure-tone thresholds, the cervical/ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP/oVEMP), and video head impulse test (vHIT) were all evaluated in the 24 pediatric patients with preoperative normal VF before and at 1 and 12 months after surgery. The relationship between changes in hearing and VF was analyzed preoperatively and at 1 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences on VF preservation and hearing preservation (HP) at both 1 and 12 months post-CI (p > 0.05). At 1 month post-CI, the correlations of the variations in vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gains of horizontal semicircular canal (HSC) and posterior semicircular canal (PSC) and the shift in 250 Hz threshold were negatively correlated (r = - 0.41, p = 0.04 and r = - 0.43, p = 0.04, respectively). At 12 months post-CI, the shift in 250 Hz threshold negatively correlated to the variations in VOR gain of superior semicircular canal (SSC) (r = - 0.43, p = 0.04); the HP positively correlated to the variation in oVEMP-amplitude ratio (AR) (r = 0.41, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that there were partial correlations between VF preservation and HP both in the short- and long-terms after atraumatic CI surgery, especially with the 250 Hz threshold. Regarding the variation of PSC function, the correlation with hearing status was variable with time after atraumatic CI surgery. Minimally invasive techniques for HP are successful and effective for the preservation of VF in pediatric patients both in the short- and long-terms.

Outcomes following cochlear implantation with eluting electrodes: A systematic review

Objectives

To establish audiological and other outcomes following cochlear implantation in humans and animals with eluting electrodes.

Methods

Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched (April 2023): MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science. Studies reporting outcomes in either humans or animals following cochlear implantation with a drug-eluting electrode were included. No limits were placed on language or year of publication. Risk of bias assessment was performed on all included studies using either the Brazzelli or Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) assessment tools. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement.

Results

Searches identified 146 abstracts and 108 full texts. Of these, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 523 animals (17 studies) and 24 humans (1 study). Eluting electrodes included dexamethasone (16 studies), aracytine (1 study), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (1 study), the growth factors insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (1 study), and neurotrophin-3 (1 study). All included studies compare outcomes following implantation with an eluting electrode with a control non-eluting electrode. In the majority of studies, audiological outcomes (e.g., auditory brainstem response threshold) were superior following implantation with an eluting electrode compared with a standard electrode. Most studies which investigated post-implantation impedance reported lower impedance following implantation with an eluting electrode. The influence of eluting electrodes on other reported outcomes (including post-implantation cochlear fibrosis and the survival of hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons) was more varied across the included studies.

Conclusions

Eluting electrodes have shown promise in animal studies in preserving residual hearing following cochlear implantation and in reducing impedance, though data from human studies remain lacking. Further in-human studies will be required to determine the clinical usefulness of drug-eluting cochlear implants as a future treatment for sensorineural hearing loss.

Preparation, characterization, and in vitro/vivo evaluation of a multifunctional electrode coating for cochlear implants

Cochlear implantation (CI) is the primary intervention for patients with sensorineural hearing loss to restore their hearing. However, approximately 90 % of CI recipients experience unexpected fibrosis around the inserted electrode arrays due to acute and chronic inflammation. This fibrosis leads to progressive residual hearing loss. Addressing this complication is crucial for enhancing CI outcomes, yet an effective treatment has not yet been found. In this study, we developed a multifunctional dexamethasone (DXM)-loaded polytrimethylene carbonate (PTMC) electrode coating to mitigate inflammatory reactions and fibrosis after CI. This thin and flexible coating could preserve the mechanical performance of the electrode and reduce the implantation resistance for CI. The in vitro release studies demonstrated the DXM-PTMC coating's efficient drug loading and sustained release capability over 90 days. DXM-PTMC also showed long-term stability, high biocompatibility, and effective anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in vivo. Compared with the uncoated group, DXM-PTMC coating significantly inhibited the expression of inflammatory factors, such as NO, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. DXM-PTMC coating suppressed fibrosis in rat implantation models for 3 weeks by reducing both acute and chronic inflammation. Our findings suggest that DXM-PTMC coating is a novel strategy to improve the outcomes of CI.

Minimally invasive surgical techniques in vestibular function preservation in patients with cochlear implants

Background

Cochlear implantation (CI) is an effective and successful method of treating individuals with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Coupled with it’s great clinical effectiveness, there is a risk of vestibular damage. With recent advances in surgical approach, modified electrode arrays and other surgical techniques, the potential of hearing preservation (HP) has emerged, in order to preserve the inner ear function. These techniques may also lead to less vestibular damage. However, a systematic study on this at different follow-ups after CI surgery has not been documented before.

Aims

To investigate changes of vestibular function systematically in recipients at short and long follow-ups after a minimally invasive CI surgery.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 72 patients (72 ears) with minimally invasive CI were recruited. All participants selected had bilateral SNHL and pre-operative residual hearing (RH) and underwent unilateral CI. They were treated to comprehensive care. All patients underwent vestibular function tests 5 days prior to CI. During the post-operative period, follow-up tests were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The contemporaneous results of caloric, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP), and video head impulse (vHIT) tests were followed together longitudinally.

Results

On the implanted side, the percent fail rate of caloric test was significantly higher than that of vHIT at 1, 3, and 9 months post-operatively (p < 0.05); the percent fail rate of oVEMP was higher than vHIT of superior semicircular canal (SSC), posterior semicircular canal (PSC), or horizontal semicircular canal (HSC) at 1, 3, and 9 months (p < 0.05); at 3 and 9 months, the percent fail rate of cVEMP was higher than that of SSC and PSC (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the percent fail rates among all tests at 6 and 12 months post-CI (p > 0.05). The percent fail rates showed decreased trends in caloric (p = 0.319) and HSC tested by vHIT (p = 0.328) from 1–3 to 6–12 months post-operatively. There was no significant difference in cVEMP between 1–3 and 6–12 months (p = 0.597). No significant differences on percent fail rates of cVEMP and oVEMP between short- and long-terms post-CI were found in the same subjects (p > 0.05). Before surgery, the abnormal cVEMP and oVEMP response rates were both lower in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) than patients with a normal cochlea (p = 0.001, 0.018, respectively).

Conclusion

The short- and long-term impacts on the vestibular function from minimally invasive CI surgery was explored. Most of the vestibular functions can be preserved with no damage discrepancy among the otolith and three semicircular canal functions at 12 months post-CI. Interestingly, a similar pattern of changes in vestibular function was found during the early and the later stages of recovery after surgery.

The Clinical Effect of Steroids for Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: Conclusions Based on Three Cochlear Implant Systems and Two Administration Regimes

The main aim of this study was to assess the clinical effect of steroids (dexamethasone and prednisone) on hearing preservation in patients who underwent cochlear implantation with different cochlear implant systems (Oticon®, Advanced Bionics®, Med-El®). 147 adult patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled to the study and divided into three groups depending on the brand of cochlear implant they received and participated in all follow-up visits regularly. They were also randomly divided into three subgroups depending on the steroid administration regime: (1) intravenous dexamethasone (0.1 mg/kg body weight twice a day for three days); (2) combined intravenous and oral steroids (dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg body weight twice a day plus prednisone 1 mg/kg weight once a day); and (3) no steroids (control group). The results were measured by pure tone audiometry (PTA) at three time points: (i) before implantation, (ii) at processor activation, and (iii) 12 months after activation. A hearing preservation (HP) figure was also calculated by comparing the preoperative results and the results after 12 months. Further measures collected were electrode impedance and hearing threshold in the non-operated ear. The highest HP measures (partial and complete) were obtained in the subgroups who were given steroids. Of the 102 patients given steroids, HP was partial or complete in 63 of them (62%). In comparison, partial or complete HP was achieved in only 15 patients out of 45 (33%) who were not given steroids. There were differences between the three cochlear implant groups, with the Med-El and Advanced Bionics groups performing better than the Oticon group (45% and 43% of the former two groups achieved partial or complete HP compared to 20% in the latter). Hearing thresholds in the non-operated ear were stable over 12 months. Generally, impedance was slightly lower in the 12 month follow-up in comparison with the activation period, with the exception of the Oticon group. (4) Conclusions: Pharmacological treatment with steroids in patients undergoing cochlear implantation helps to preserve residual hearing.

Current Concepts and Future Trends in Increasing the Benefits of Cochlear Implantation: A Narrative Review

Hearing loss is the most common neurosensory disorder, and with the constant increase in etiological factors, combined with early detection protocols, numbers will continue to rise. Cochlear implantation has become the gold standard for patients with severe hearing loss, and interest has shifted from implantation principles to the preservation of residual hearing following the procedure itself. As the audiological criteria for cochlear implant eligibility have expanded to include patients with good residual hearing, more attention is focused on complementary development of otoprotective agents, electrode design, and surgical approaches. The focus of this review is current aspects of preserving residual hearing through a summary of recent trends regarding surgical and pharmacological fundamentals. Subsequently, the assessment of new pharmacological options, novel bioactive molecules (neurotrophins, growth factors, etc.), nanoparticles, stem cells, and gene therapy are discussed.

Inner Ear Drug Delivery for Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Current Challenges and Opportunities

Most therapies for treating sensorineural hearing loss are challenged by the delivery across multiple tissue barriers to the hard-to-access anatomical location of the inner ear. In this review, we will provide a recent update on various pharmacotherapy, gene therapy, and cell therapy approaches used in clinical and preclinical studies for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss and approaches taken to overcome the drug delivery barriers in the ear. Small-molecule drugs for pharmacotherapy can be delivered via systemic or local delivery, where the blood-labyrinth barrier hinders the former and tissue barriers including the tympanic membrane, the round window membrane, and/or the oval window hinder the latter. Meanwhile, gene and cell therapies often require targeted delivery to the cochlea, which is currently achieved via intra-cochlear or intra-labyrinthine injection. To improve the stability of the biomacromolecules during treatment, e.g., RNAs, DNAs, proteins, additional packing vehicles are often required. To address the diverse range of biological barriers involved in inner ear drug delivery, each class of therapy and the intended therapeutic cargoes will be discussed in this review, in the context of delivery routes commonly used, delivery vehicles if required (e.g., viral and non-viral nanocarriers), and other strategies to improve drug permeation and sustained release (e.g., hydrogel, nanocarriers, permeation enhancers, and microfluidic systems). Overall, this review aims to capture the important advancements and key steps in the development of inner ear therapies and delivery strategies over the past two decades for the treatment and prophylaxis of sensorineural hearing loss.

3D Printed Cell Culture Chamber for Testing the Effect of Pump-Based Chronic Drug Delivery on Inner Ear Tissue

Cochlear hair cell damage and spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) degeneration are the main causes of sensory neural hearing loss. Cochlear implants (CIs) can replace the function of the hair cells and stimulate the SGNs electrically. The condition of the SGNs and their spatial distance to the CI are key factors for CI-functionality. For a better performance, a high number of neurons and a closer contact to the electrode are intended. Neurotrophic factors are able to enhance SGN survival and neurite outgrowth, and thereby might optimize the electrode-nerve interaction. This would require chronic factor treatment, which is not yet established for the inner ear. Investigations on chronic drug delivery to SGNs could benefit from an appropriate in vitro model. Thus, an inner ear inspired Neurite Outgrowth Chamber (NOC), which allows the incorporation of a mini-osmotic pump for long-term drug delivery, was designed and three-dimensionally printed. The NOC’s function was validated using spiral ganglion explants treated with ciliary neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin-3, or control fluid released via pumps over two weeks. The NOC proved to be suitable for explant cultivation and observation of pump-based drug delivery over the examined period, with neurotrophin-3 significantly increasing neurite outgrowth compared to the other groups.

Inner Ear Pharmacotherapy for Residual Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review

Cochlear implantation initiates an inflammatory cascade in which both acute insertion trauma and chronic foreign body reaction lead to intracochlear fibrosis and loss of residual hearing. Several strategies have been proposed to attenuate the local reactive process after implantation, including intracochlear drug delivery. The present study gives an overview of what is being investigated in the field of inner ear therapeutics and cochlear implant surgery. The aim is to evaluate its potential benefit in clinical practice. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases identifying comparative prospective studies examining the effect of direct inner ear drug application on mechanical cochlear trauma. Both animal and human studies were considered and all studies were assessed for quality according to the validated risk of bias tools. Intracochlear administration of drugs is a feasible method to reduce the local inflammatory reaction following cochlear implantation. In animal studies, corticosteroid use had a significant effect on outcome measures including auditory brainstem response, impedance, and histological changes. This effect was, however, only durable with prolonged drug delivery. Significant differences in outcome were predominantly seen in studies where the cochlear damage was extensive. Six additional reports assessing non-steroidal agents were found. Overall, evidence of anti-inflammatory effects in humans is still scarce.

Dexamethasone-loaded cochlear implants: How to provide a desired "burst release"

Cochlear implants containing iridium platinum electrodes are used to transmit electrical signals into the inner ear of patients suffering from severe or profound deafness without valuable benefit from conventional hearing aids. However, their placement is invasive and can cause trauma as well as local inflammation, harming remaining hair cells or other inner ear cells. As foreign bodies, the implants also induce fibrosis, resulting in a less efficient conduction of the electrical signals and, thus, potentially decreased system performance. To overcome these obstacles, dexamethasone has recently been embedded in this type of implants: into the silicone matrices separating the metal electrodes (to avoid short circuits). It has been shown that the resulting drug release can be controlled over several years. Importantly, the dexamethasone does not only act against the immediate consequences of trauma, inflammation and fibrosis, it can also be expected to be beneficial for remaining hair cells in the long term. However, the reported amounts of drug released at “early” time points (during the first days/weeks) are relatively low and the in vivo efficacy in animal models was reported to be non-optimal. The aim of this study was to increase the initial “burst release” from the implants, adding a freely water-soluble salt of a phosphate ester of dexamethasone. The idea was to facilitate water penetration into the highly hydrophobic system and, thus, to promote drug dissolution and diffusion. This approach was efficient: Adding up to 10% dexamethasone sodium phosphate to the silicone matrices substantially increased the resulting drug release rate at early time points. This can be expected to improve drug action and implant functionality. But at elevated dexamethasone sodium phosphate loadings device swelling became important. Since the cochlea is a tiny and sensitive organ, a potential increase in implant dimensions over time must be limited. Hence, a balance has to be found between drug release and implant swelling.

Junctional Modulation of Round Window Membrane Enhances Dexamethasone Uptake into the Inner Ear and Recovery after NIHL

Delivery of substances into the inner ear via local routes is increasingly being used in clinical treatment. Studies have focused on methods to increase permeability through the round window membrane (RWM) and enhance drug diffusion into the inner ear. However, the clinical applications of those methods have been unclear and few studies have investigated the efficacy of methods in an inner ear injury model. Here, we employed the medium chain fatty acid caprate, a biologically safe, clinically applicable substance, to modulate tight junctions of the RWM. Intratympanic treatment of sodium caprate (SC) induced transient, but wider, gaps in intercellular spaces of the RWM epithelial layer and enhanced the perilymph and cochlear concentrations/uptake of dexamethasone. Importantly, dexamethasone co-administered with SC led to significantly more rapid recovery from noise-induced hearing loss at 4 and 8 kHz, compared with the dexamethasone-only group. Taken together, our data indicate that junctional modulation of the RWM by SC enhances dexamethasone uptake into the inner ear, thereby hastening the recovery of hearing sensitivity after noise trauma.

The Clinical Effects of Steroids Therapy in the Preserving Residual Hearing after Cochlear Implantation with the OTICON Neuro Zti EVO

Background: A prospective clinical study was conducted to investigate whether two different pharmacotherapy strategies of steroid administration impact hearing preservation in adult patients who underwent cochlear implantation with the Oticon Medical Neuro cochlear implant system. Methods: Twenty nine adult participants were included. Pure tone audiometry was performed before implantation, during processor activation and 12 months after activation. There were three treatment groups: (1) intravenous steroid therapy (standard steroid therapy with dexamethasone administrated intravenously at the dose 0.1 mg/kg body mass twice a day); (2) combined oral and intravenous steroid therapy (extended steroid therapy with dexamethasone administrated intravenously at the dose 0.1 mg/kg b.m. twice a day and prednisone (orally) at the dose 1 mg/kg body mass/24 h), and (3) no steroid therapy (a control group). Patients’ hearing thresholds before implantation were on average 103 dB HL, 89 dB HL, and 93 dB HL, respectively. Results: Deterioration of hearing thresholds was observed in all three patients’ groups. Twelve months after surgery the patients with and without steroid therapy had similar hearing thresholds. Conclusions: The steroid regimen used in this study did not play a significant role in patients with non-functional residual hearing, who underwent cochlear implantation with the Oticon Medical Neuro cochlear implant system.

Nanocarriers for drug delivery to the inner ear: Physicochemical key parameters, biodistribution, safety and efficacy

Despite the high incidence of inner ear disorders, there are still no dedicated medications on the market. Drugs are currently administered by the intratympanic route, the safest way to maximize drug concentration in the inner ear. Nevertheless, therapeutic doses are ensured for only a few minutes/hours using drug solutions or suspensions. The passage through the middle ear barrier strongly depends on drug physicochemical characteristics. For the past 15 years, drug encapsulation into nanocarriers has been developed to overcome this drawback. Nanocarriers are well known to sustain drug release and protect it from degradation. In this review, in vivo studies are detailed concerning nanocarrier biodistribution, their pathway mechanisms in the inner ear and the resulting drug pharmacokinetics. Key parameters influencing nanocarrier biodistribution are identified and discussed: nanocarrier size, concentration, surface composition and shape. Recent advanced strategies that combine nanocarriers with hydrogels, specific tissue targeting or modification of the round window permeability (cell-penetrating peptide, magnetic delivery) are explored. Most of the nanocarriers appear to be safe for the inner ear and provide a significant efficacy over classic formulations in animal models. However, many challenges remain to be overcome for future clinical applications.

Long-Term in vivo Release Profile of Dexamethasone-Loaded Silicone Rods Implanted Into the Cochlea of Guinea Pigs

Glucocorticoids are used intra-operatively in cochlear implant surgeries to reduce the inflammatory reaction caused by insertion trauma and the foreign body response against the electrode carrier after cochlear implantation. To prevent higher systemic concentrations of glucocorticoids that might cause undesirable systemic side effects, the drug should be applied locally. Since rapid clearance of glucocorticoids occurs in the inner ear fluid spaces, sustained application is supposedly more effective in suppressing foreign body and tissue reactions and in preserving neuronal structures. Embedding of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone into the cochlear implant electrode carrier and its continuous release may solve this problem. The aim of the present study was to examine how dexamethasone concentrations in the electrode carrier influence drug levels in the perilymph at different time points. Silicone rods were implanted through a cochleostomy into the basal turn of the scala tympani of guinea pigs. The silicone rods were loaded homogeneously with 0.1, 1, and 10% concentrations of dexamethasone. After implantation, dexamethasone concentrations in perilymph and cochlear tissue were measured at several time points over a period of up to 7 weeks. The kinetic was concentration-dependent and showed an initial burst release in the 10%- and the 1%-dexamethasone-loaded electrode carrier dummies. The 10%-loaded electrode carrier resulted in a more elevated and longer lasting burst release than the 1%-loaded carrier. Following this initial burst release phase, sustained dexamethasone levels of about 60 and 100 ng/ml were observed in the perilymph for the 1 and 10% loaded rods, respectively, during the remainder of the observation time. The 0.1% loaded carrier dummy achieved very low perilymph drug levels of about 0.5 ng/ml. The cochlear tissue drug concentration shows a similar dynamic to the perilymph drug concentration, but only reaches about 0.005–0.05% of the perilymph drug concentration. Dexamethasone can be released from silicone electrode carrier dummies in a controlled and sustained way over a period of several weeks, leading to constant drug concentrations in the scala tympani perilymph. No accumulation of dexamethasone was observed in the cochlear tissue. In consideration of experimental studies using similar drug depots and investigating physiological effects, an effective dose range between 50 and 100 ng/ml after burst release is suggested for the CI insertion trauma model.

Presbycusis: An Update on Cochlear Mechanisms and Therapies

Age-related hearing impairment (ARHI), also referred to as presbycusis, is the most common sensory impairment seen in the elderly. As our cochlea, the peripheral organ of hearing, ages, we tend to experience a decline in hearing and are at greater risk of cochlear sensory-neural cell degeneration and exacerbated age-related hearing impairments, e.g., gradual hearing loss, deterioration in speech comprehension (especially in noisy environments), difficulty in the localization sound sources, and ringing sensations in the ears. However, the aging process does not affect people uniformly; nor, in fact, does the aging process appear to be uniform even within an individual. Here, we outline recent research into chronological cochlear age in healthy people, and exacerbated hearing impairments during aging due to both extrinsic factors including noise and ototoxic medication, and intrinsic factors such as genetic predisposition, epigenetic factors, and aging. We review our current understanding of molecular pathways mediating ARHL and discuss recent discoveries in experimental hearing restoration and future prospects.

Otoprotection to Implanted Cochlea Exposed to Noise Trauma With Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode

Cochlear implantation (CI) is now widely used to provide auditory rehabilitation to individuals having severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, CI can lead to electrode insertion trauma (EIT) that can cause damage to sensory cells in the inner ear resulting in loss of residual hearing. Even with soft surgical techniques where there is minimal macroscopic damage, we can still observe the generation of molecular events that may initiate programmed cell death via various mechanisms such as oxidative stress, the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and activation of the caspase pathway. In addition, individuals with CI may be exposed to noise trauma (NT) due to occupation and leisure activities that may affect their hearing ability. Recently, there has been an increased interest in the auditory community to determine the efficacy of drug-eluting electrodes for the protection of residual hearing. The objective of this study is to determine the effect of NT on implanted cochlea as well as the otoprotective efficacy of dexamethasone eluting electrode to implanted cochlea exposed to NT in a guinea pig model of CI. Animals were divided into five groups: EIT with dexamethasone eluting electrode exposed to NT; EIT exposed to NT; NT only; EIT only and naïve animals (control group). The hearing thresholds were determined by auditory brainstem recordings (ABRs). The cochlea was harvested and analyzed for transcript levels of inflammation, apoptosis and fibrosis genes. We observed that threshold shifts were significantly higher in EIT, NT or EIT + NT groups compared to naive animals at all the tested frequencies. The dexamethasone eluting electrode led to a significant decrease in hearing threshold shifts in implanted animals exposed to NT. Proapoptotic tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α, TNF-α receptor 1a (TNFαR1a)] and pro-fibrotic transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ) genes were more than two-fold up-regulated following EIT and EIT + NT compared to the control group. The use of dexamethasone releasing electrode significantly decreased the transcript levels of pro-apoptotic and pro-fibrotic genes. The dexamethasone releasing electrode has shown promising results for hearing protection in implanted animals exposed to NT. The results of this study suggest that dexamethasone releasing electrode holds great potential in developing effective treatment modalities for NT in the implanted cochlea.

A 3D Microscaffold Cochlear Electrode Array for Steroid Elution

In cochlear implants, the electrode insertion trauma during surgery can cause damage residual hearing. Preserving the residual hearing is an important challenge and the localized administration of drugs, such as steroids, is one of the most promising ways, but remains a challenge. Here, a microscaffold cochlear electrode array (MiSCEA) consisting of a microfabricated flexible electrode array and a 3D microscaffold for steroid reservoir is reported. The MiSCEA without loaded drug is tested by measuring the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response of the cochlea in guinea pigs (n = 4). The scaffold is then coated with steroid (dexamethasone) encapsulated in polylactic-co-glycolic acid and the continuous release of the steroid into artificial perilymph during six weeks is monitored. The steroid-containing scaffolds are then implanted into guinea pigs (n = 4) and threshold shifts are analyzed for four weeks by measuring the acoustically evoked auditory brainstem response. The threshold shifts tend to be lower in the group implanted with the steroid-containing MiSCEAs. The feasibility of 3D MiSCEA opens up the development of potential next-generation cochlear electrode with improved steroid release dynamics into cochlea.

Gene Therapy for Human Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Hearing loss is the most common sensory impairment in humans and currently disables 466 million people across the world. Congenital deafness affects at least 1 in 500 newborns, and over 50% are hereditary in nature. To date, existing pharmacologic therapies for genetic and acquired etiologies of deafness are severely limited. With the advent of modern sequencing technologies, there is a vast compendium of growing genetic alterations that underlie human hearing loss, which can be targeted by therapeutics such as gene therapy. Recently, there has been tremendous progress in the development of gene therapy vectors to treat sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in animal models in vivo. Nevertheless, significant hurdles remain before such technologies can be translated toward clinical use. These include addressing the blood-labyrinth barrier, engineering more specific and effective delivery vehicles, improving surgical access, and validating novel targets. In this review, we both highlight recent progress and outline challenges associated with in vivo gene therapy for human SNHL.

Electric and Acoustic Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Hearing Preservation

Hearing loss affects 30 million people in the United States, and a subset of these patients have normal low-frequency hearing and ski-sloped high-frequency hearing loss. For these patients, hearing aids alone may not provide adequate benefit. Cochlear implantation alone has been utilized to improve speech perception. The addition of high-frequency electric hearing to low-frequency acoustic hearing in these patients is beneficial. Technical improvements have allowed preservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implant recipients, allowing for electric and acoustic stimulation in the same ear with significant improvements in speech perception, sound localization, music appreciation, and quality of life.

Toward Cochlear Therapies

Sensorineural hearing impairment is the most common sensory disorder and a major health and socio-economic issue in industrialized countries. It is primarily due to the degeneration of mechanosensory hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons in the cochlea via complex pathophysiological mechanisms. These occur following acute and/or chronic exposure to harmful extrinsic (e.g., ototoxic drugs, noise...) and intrinsic (e.g., aging, genetic) causative factors. No clinical therapies currently exist to rescue the dying sensorineural cells or regenerate these cells once lost. Recent studies have, however, provided renewed hope, with insights into the therapeutic targets allowing the prevention and treatment of ototoxic drug- and noise-induced, age-related hearing loss as well as cochlear cell degeneration. Moreover, genetic routes involving the replacement or corrective editing of mutant sequences or defected genes are showing promise, as are cell-replacement therapies to repair damaged cells for the future restoration of hearing in deaf people. This review begins by recapitulating our current understanding of the molecular pathways that underlie cochlear sensorineural damage, as well as the survival signaling pathways that can provide endogenous protection and tissue rescue. It then guides the reader through to the recent discoveries in pharmacological, gene and cell therapy research towards hearing protection and restoration as well as their potential clinical application.

Protecting against electrode insertion trauma using dexamethasone

OBJECTIVE

To compare the benefits of a dexamethasone-eluting array for hearing preservation and cochlear histopathology in low trauma (soft-surgery) and high trauma models of cochlear implant surgery.

METHODS

Adult guinea pigs were implanted with an intra-cochlear array using two different surgical procedures: either a soft-surgery approach or following generation of electrode insertion trauma (high trauma). Two methods of dexamethasone delivery were evaluated: elution from an electrode array alone, and elution from a cochlear implant electrode array in combination with a pre-operative systemic injection. All electrode arrays were implanted for a period of 4 weeks. Outcome measures at 4 weeks post-implantation included auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds, histological analysis of spiral ganglion neuron density, fibrotic tissue, new bone growth, and cochlear damage.

RESULTS

Animals exposed to high surgical trauma showed greater hearing loss than those in the low trauma model, irrespective of the presence of dexamethasone. Whilst the area of intra-cochlear fibrotic tissue growth post-implantation was also independent of dexamethasone administration, new bone growth was significantly reduced in its presence. Our high trauma model effectively obliterated the organ of Corti and significantly reduced spiral ganglion neuron densities in the lower basal turn. This trauma-induced reduction in spiral ganglion neuron survival decreased with the inclusion of a dexamethasone-eluting array. A pre-operative systemic injection of dexamethasone did not significantly improve any outcome measures beyond those provided with a dexamethasone-eluting array alone.

CONCLUSION

Dexamethasone-eluting intra-cochlear arrays may inhibit osteoneogenesis, and reduce spiral ganglion neuron loss following traumatic cochlear implantation.

Hybrid Ear Cubes for local controlled dexamethasone delivery to the inner ear

A new type of miniaturized implants for local controlled drug delivery to the inner ear is proposed: Hybrid Ear Cubes. They are composed of two main parts: (i) a cylinder, which is placed into a tiny hole (<0.4 mm) drilled into (or close to) the oval (or round) window, and (ii) a cuboid, which is placed into the middle ear. The drug is released at a pre-programmed rate into the perilymph: (i) via the cylindrical part of the implant, which is in direct contact with this liquid, and (ii) via diffusion from the cuboid through the oval/round window. Importantly, the cylindrical part assures a reliable fixation of the drug delivery system at the site of administration. Furthermore, the cuboid provides a relatively "large" drug reservoir, without expulsing perilymph from the cochlea. The required surgery is minimized compared to the placement of an intracochlear implant. In contrast to previously proposed Ear Cubes, which are mono-block systems, Hybrid Ear Cubes consist of two halves, which can: (i) be loaded with different drugs, (ii) be loaded with the same drug at different concentrations, and/or (iii) be based on two different matrix formers. This offers a substantially increased formulation flexibility. Different types of silicone-based Hybrid Ear Cubes were prepared, loaded with 10% dexamethasone in one half and 0-60% dexamethasone in the other half. Importantly, tiny drug crystals were homogeneously distributed throughout the respective implant halves. The observed drug release rates were very low (e.g., <0.5% after 2 months), which can be attributed to the type of drug and silicone as well as to the very small surface area exposed to the release medium. Importantly, no noteworthy implant swelling was observed.

Preservation of Hearing Following Cochlear Implantation Using Different Steroid Therapy Regimens: A Prospective Clinical Study

Background

A prospective clinical study was conducted to assess different regimens of steroid therapy and preservation of hearing following cochlear implantation.

Material/Methods

Study participants were ≥18 years-of-age, with a cochlear duct length ≥27.1 mm measured by computed tomography (CT), with hearing sound levels in the range of 10–120 decibels (dB) and sound frequencies of 125–250 hertz (Hz); sound levels of 35–120 dB and frequencies of 500–1,000 Hz; sound levels of 75–120 dB and frequencies of 2,000–8,000 Hz. Study exclusion criteria included diseases with contraindications for steroid therapy or medications that increased the effects of steroids. Patients had cochlear implantation and were divided into three treatment groups: intravenous (IV) steroid therapy (standard steroid therapy): combined oral and IV steroid therapy (prolonged steroid therapy); and a control group (cochlear implantation without steroid therapy). Hearing preservation was established by pure tone audiometry based on the pre-operative and postoperative average hearing thresholds according to the formula developed by the HEARRING Network.

Results

There were 36 patients included in the study. In all cases, the cochlear implant electrode was inserted via the round window approach with a straight electrode length of 28 mm. Patients with combined oral and IV steroid therapy (prolonged steroid therapy) had better results when compared with patients with intravenous (IV) steroid therapy (standard steroid therapy) and the control group.

Conclusions

Prolonged steroid therapy using combined oral and IV steroids stabilized hearing thresholds and preserved hearing in adult patients following cochlear implantation.

Preparation, characterization and application research of a sustained dexamethasone releasing electrode coating for cochlear implantation

Cochlear inflammatory response after cochlear implantation (CI) is an important mechanism for implantation trauma and hearing loss. The hearing loss was also caused by damage to auditory hair cells (HCs), whereas ion homeostasis within the cochlea can ensure survival of HCs. In our study, pure hyaluronic acid (HA) was crosslinked with 1, 4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) and the successful preparation of the cross-linked hydrogel (CHA) was confirmed by rheological characteristics and FTIR spectra. Artificial perilymph (APL) was prepared to simulate the ion homeostasis microenvironment within scala tympani of human cochlear, and served as the major component of artificial perilymph soaked CHA (APL-CHA). The conductivity experiment indicated that APL-CHA is more suitable to the requirements of the electrical conductivity in scala tympani. The electrode coating process found that the extrusion coating method have advantages of controllable adhesive capacity of APL-CHA, uniform coating thickness and smooth surface as compared to common method. Due to CI surgery application requirement, optimization of coating process was selected as follows: extrusion coating method, degree of 3.6 vol%, pinhole diameter of 32G (110 μm), pressure of 200 ± 15.81 Psi. Controlled dexamethasone 21-phosphate sodium salt (DSP) release of 20 days could be demonstrated using the hydrogel filled reservoir via a validated HPLC method. The morphological structure of CHA showed different sizes of porous structure among APL-CHA provided structural basis for drug delivery. L929 fibroblasts culture and Spiral Ganglion Neuron Explants culture results revealed that APL-CHA possesses fine biological compatibility. APL-CHA shows a promising application in CI surgery and has great potential in preventing hearing loss with well simulation of ion homeostasis within the cochlear, local DSP delivery for target anti-inflammatory, approximate conductivity within the scala tympani and optimization of electrode coating process.

Effects of dexamethasone on intracochlear inflammation and residual hearing after cochleostomy: A comparison of administration routes

Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant is an important issue with regards to hearing performance. Various methods of steroid administration have been widely used in clinical practice to reduce inflammation and preserve residual hearing. Here we compare the effect of different routes of dexamethasone administration on intracochlear inflammation and residual hearing in guinea pig ears. Dexamethasone was delivered into the guinea pigs either through intracochlear, intratympanic or systemic route. The intracochlear concentration of dexamethasone, residual hearing, inflammatory cytokines and histopathologic changes were evaluated over time. A higher intracochlear dexamethasone concentration was observed after intracochlear administration than through the other routes. Residual hearing was better preserved with local dexamethasone administration as was supported by the reduced inflammatory cytokines, more hair cell survival and less severe intracochlear fibrosis and ossification concurrently seen in the local delivery group than in the systemic group. The results demonstrate that local dexamethasone delivery can reduce intracochlear inflammation and preserve residual hearing better than in systemically administered dexamethasone.

Pharmacokinetic principles in the inner ear: Influence of drug properties on intratympanic applications

Local drug delivery to the ear has gained wide clinical acceptance, with the choice of drug and application protocol in humans largely empirically-derived. Here, we review the pharmacokinetics underlying local therapy of the ear using the drugs commonly used in clinical practice as examples. Based on molecular properties and perilymph measurements interpreted through computer simulations we now better understand the principles underlying entry and distribution of these and other drugs in the ear. From our analysis, we have determined that dexamethasone-phosphate, a pro-drug widely-used clinically, has molecular and pharmacokinetic properties that make it ill-suited for use as a local therapy for hearing disorders. This polar form of dexamethasone, used as a more soluble agent in intravenous preparations, passes less readily through lipid membranes, such as those of the epithelia restricting entry at the round window membrane and stapes. Once within the inner ear, dexamethasone-phosphate is cleaved to the active form, dexamethasone, which is less polar, passes more readily through lipid membranes of the blood-perilymph barrier and is rapidly eliminated from perilymph without distributing to apical cochlear regions. Dexamethasone-phosphate therefore provides only a brief exposure of the basal regions of the cochlea to active drug. Other steroids, such as triamcinolone-acetonide, exhibit pharmacokinetic properties more appropriate to the ear and merit more detailed consideration.

Local inner ear application of dexamethasone in cochlear implant models is safe for auditory neurons and increases the neuroprotective effect of chronic electrical stimulation

Dexamethasone (DEX) can reduce fibrous tissue growth as well as loss of residual hearing which may occur after cochlear implantation. Little is known about the effect of local inner ear DEX treatment on the spiral ganglion neurons (SGN), which are the target of the electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant (CI). Three different clinically relevant strategies of DEX-delivery into the inner ear were used. DEX was either eluted from the electrode carriers' silicone, released from a reservoir by passive diffusion, or actively applied using a pump based system. The effect of the locally applied DEX on SGN density, size and function was evaluated. DEX did not affect the SGN density compared to the relevant control groups. Simultaneously applied with chronic electrical stimulation (ES), DEX increased the neuroprotective effect of ES in the basal region and the hearing threshold tended to decrease. The EABR thresholds did not correlate with the relevant SGN density. When correlating the SGN number with fibrosis, no dependency was observed. DEX concentrations as applied in these animal models are safe for inner ear delivery in terms of their effect on SGN density. Additionally, DEX tends to improve the neuroprotective effect of chronic electrical stimulation by increasing the number of surviving neurons. This is an important finding in regard to clinical applications of DEX for local treatment of the inner ear in view of cochlear implantation and other applications.

Intracochlear drug delivery in combination with cochlear implants : Current aspects

Local drug application to the inner ear offers a number of advantages over systemic delivery. Local drug therapy currently encompasses extracochlear administration (i. e., through intratympanic injection), intracochlear administration (particularly for gene and stem cell therapy), as well as various combinations with auditory neurosensory prostheses, either evaluated in preclinical or clinical studies, or off-label. To improve rehabilitation with cochlear implants (CI), one focus is the development of drug-releasing electrode carriers, e. g., for delivery of glucocorticosteroids, antiapoptotic substances, or neurotrophins to the inner ear. The performance of cochlear implants may thus be improved by protecting neuronal structures from insertion trauma, reducing fibrosis in the inner ear, and by stimulating growth of neuronal structures in the direction of the electrodes. Controlled drug release after extracochlear or intracochlear application in conjunction with a CI can also be achieved by use of a biocompatible, resorbable controlled-release drug-delivery system. Two case reports for intracochlear controlled release drug delivery in combination with cochlear implants are presented. In order to treat progressive reduction in speech discrimination and increased impedance, two cochlear implant patients successfully underwent intracochlear placement of a biocompatible, resorbable drug-delivery system for controlled release of dexamethasone. The drug levels reached in inner ear fluids after different types of local drug application strategies can be calculated using a computer model. The intracochlear drug concentrations calculated in this way were compared for different dexamethasone application strategies.

Perilymph pharmacokinetics of marker applied through a cochlear implant in guinea pigs

Patients undergoing cochlear implantation could benefit from a simultaneous application of drugs into the ear, helping preserve residual low-frequency hearing and afferent nerve fiber populations. One way to apply drugs is to incorporate a cannula into the implant, through which drug solution is driven. For such an approach, perilymph concentrations achieved and the distribution in the ear over time have not previously been documented. We used FITC-labeled dextran as a marker, delivering it into perilymph of guinea pigs at 10 or 100 nL/min though a cannula incorporated into a cochlear implant with the outlet in the mid basal turn. After injections of varying duration (2 hours, 1 day or 7 days) perilymph was collected from the cochlear apex using a sequential sampling technique, allowing dextran levels and gradients along scala tympani to be quantified. Data were interpreted quantitatively using computer simulations of the experiments. For injections of 2 hours duration, dextran levels were critically influenced by the presence or absence of fluid leakage at the cochleostomy site. When the cochleostomy was fluid-tight, substantially higher perilymph levels were achieved at the injection site, with concentration declining along scala tympani towards the apex. Contrary to expectations, large dextran gradients along scala tympani persisted after 24 hours of sustained injection and were still present in some animals after 7 days injection. Functional changes associated with implantation and dextran delivery, and the histological state of the implant and cannula were also documented. The persistent longitudinal gradients of dextan along the ear were not readily explained by computer simulations of the experiments based on prior pharmacokinetic data. One explanation is that inner ear pharmacokinetics are altered in the period after cochlear implantation, possibly by a permeabilization of the blood-labyrinth barrier as part of the immune response to the implant.

[Implants for drug substance delivery]

Implants for controlled drug delivery can be very helpful to improve the therapeutic efficacy of a medical treatment, and at the same time reduce the risk of toxic side effects. In this article, four different strategies are exemplarily presented: hybrid bone substitutes combining hydroxyapatite and chitosan hydrogels; vascular stents coated with a bio-inspired polymer; cochlear implants for local dexamethasone delivery; and in-situ forming implants for periodontitis treatment. But this is only a restricted selection, and numerous other approaches and applications based on implants releasing a drug (or a combination of drugs) exist. Compared to conventional implants or pharmaceutical dosage forms, they might offer decisive advantages.

Trans-Oval-Window Implants, A New Approach for Drug Delivery to the Inner Ear: Extended Dexamethasone Release From Silicone-based Implants

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to develop a new strategy to deliver drugs to the inner ear from dexamethasone (DXM)-loaded silicone implants and to evaluate the distribution of the drug in the cochlea with confocal microscopy.

BACKGROUND

Systemic drug administration for the treatment of inner ear disorders is tricky because of the blood-cochlear barrier, a difficult anatomical access, the small size of the cochlea, and can cause significant adverse effects. An effective way to overcome these obstacles is to administer drugs locally.

METHODS

In vitro, the drug release from DXM-loaded silicone-based thin films and tiny implants into artificial perilymph was thoroughly analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. In vivo, a silicone implant loaded with 10% DXM and 5% polyethylene glycol 400 was implanted next to the stapes's footplate of gerbils. Delivery of DXM into the inner ear was proved by confocal microscopy imaging of the whole cochlea and the organ of Corti.

RESULTS

The study showed a continuous and prolonged release during 90 days in vitro. This was confirmed by confocal microscopy that allowed detection of DXM by fluorescence labeling in the cell body of the hair cells for at least 30 days. Interestingly, fluorescence was already observed after 20 minutes of implantation, reached a climax at day 7, and could still be detected 30 days after implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, we developed a new device for local corticosteroids delivery into the oval window with an extended drug release of DXM to the inner ear.

In vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic study of a dexamethasone-releasing silicone for cochlear implants

Cochlear implants have been widely used for patients with profound hearing loss and partial deafness. Residual low-frequency hearing, however, may deteriorate due to insertion trauma and tissue response around the electrode array. The present study investigated in vitro and in vivo release of dexamethasone from silicone used for cochlear implant electrode carriers. The in vitro experiment involved an apparatus simulating the inner ear fluid environment in humans. Release from two sizes of silicone films (200 µm × 1 mm × 10 mm and 500 µm × 1 mm × 10 mm), each loaded with 2 % dexamethasone, and was measured for 24 weeks. In the in vivo experiment, silicone rods loaded with 2 or 10 % dexamethasone, respectively, were implanted into the scala tympani of guinea pigs. Perilymph concentrations were measured during the first week after implantation. The results showed that dexamethasone was released from the silicone in a sustained manner. After a burst release, perilymph concentration was similar for silicone incorporated with 2 and 10 % dexamethasone, respectively. The similar pharmacokinetic profile was found in the in vitro experiment. The period of sustained drug delivery was maintained for 20 weeks in vitro and for 1 week in vivo. The results of the present study suggest that drugs like dexamethasone are released in a controlled manner from silicon electrode carriers of cochlear implants. Further studies will identify optimal release profiles for the use with cochlear implants to improve their safety and long-term performance.

Cochlear implantation: a biomechanical prosthesis for hearing loss

Cochlear implants are a medical prosthesis used to treat sensorineural deafness, and one of the greatest advances in modern medicine. The following article is an overview of cochlear implant technology. The history of cochlear implantation and the development of modern implant technology will be discussed, as well as current surgical techniques. Research regarding expansion of candidacy, hearing preservation cochlear implantation, and implantation for unilateral deafness are described. Lastly, innovative technology is discussed, including the hybrid cochlear implant and the totally implantable cochlear implant.