Fondaparinux is a safe alternative in case of heparin intolerance during pregnancy

Women and Ischemic Stroke

Although men are at higher risk of stroke throughout most of their lifespan, the incidence of stroke in women climbs with age, increasing after menopause and rising sharply after 85 years. This, combined with women's longer life expectancy, results in most of the stroke deaths occurring in women. In addition to accounting for a larger proportion of strokes, women may also suffer a survival disadvantage, which may be due to several factors. In many families, women are the primary caretakers. When they become disabled, there may be limited options to care for them. Others suggest that some of the disparities in stroke outcomes in women may be related to age, pre-stroke functional status, and comorbidities. Regardless of the cause, the increased disability and post-stroke care requirements of women, particularly in our aging population, highlight the importance of determining successful strategies for stroke prevention, acute stroke treatments, optimization of stroke rehabilitation, and effective secondary prevention measures in women.

Coronary Events in the Pregnant Patient: Who Is at Risk and How Best to Manage?

Coronary events in pregnancy are a rare but growing cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Pregnancy presents unique challenges across a broad spectrum of disciplines and requires a multidisciplinary approach to optimise maternal and fetal outcomes. The early involvement of the "cardio-obstetrics" team in prepregnancy counselling, the antenatal period, delivery, and postpartum is vital to ensuring better outcomes for patients at high risk of coronary pathology. The overall risk for coronary events complicating pregnancy is increasing owing to a number of factors, including advancing maternal age and increases in traditional cardiac risk factors contributing to higher rates of maternal morbidity and mortality. The majority of pregnant women experiencing a coronary event do not have previous coronary disease, and the pathologic mechanisms involved are predominantly nonatherosclerotic. Diagnosis and management should follow standard guideline-based practices for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including the use of diagnostic coronary angiography to guide percutaneous intervention when needed. Management of ACS should not be delayed to facilitate delivery, which can proceed following stent implantation and dual antiplatelet therapy. The timing and mode of delivery should be based on assessment of maternal and fetal status, but vaginal delivery is preferred when possible. This review aims to provide an overview of the major etiologies, risk factors, diagnoses, and management strategies for patients at risk of or presenting with coronary events in pregnancy.

Fondaparinux Pre-, Peri-, and/or Postpartum for the Prophylaxis/Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism (FondaPPP)

We analyzed data for women who received fondaparinux for ≥7 days during pregnancy. The study retrospectively included women who received fondaparinux pre-, peri- and/or postpartum for ≥7 days for prophylaxis/venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment at German specialist centers (2004-2010). Data on pregnancy, VTE risk factors, anticoagulant treatment, pregnancy outcome and adverse events were extracted from medical records. 120 women (mean age 31.5 years) were included. Among 84 women with prior pregnancies, 41.0% had ≥1 abortion. Anticoagulation was indicated for prophylaxis in 92.5% cases, including 82.5% women with an elevated VTE risk (82.8% thrombophilia, 34.2% VTE history). All women received low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) as first-line therapy; 3 also unfractionated heparin. Treatment changed to fondaparinux, due to heparin allergy (41.7%) or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (10.0%). Fondaparinux was generally well tolerated. Adverse events included bleeding events (n = 5), abortion (n = 2), premature births (n = 2), stillbirth (n = 1), arrested labors (n = 2), injection site erythema (n = 4) and unspecified drug hypersensitivity (n = 6). No VTE events or increased liver enzymes occurred during treatment. In this retrospective study, fondaparinux was effective and well tolerated. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01004939.

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia: position paper from the Italian Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SISET)

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare immune mediated adverse drug reaction occurring after exposure to heparin. It is a serious and potentially fatal condition, which may be associated with the development of arterial or venous thrombotic events. Although known for many years, HIT is still often misdiagnosed. Pre- test clinical probability, screening for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies and documentation of their platelet activating capacity are the cornerstones of diagnosis. However, both clinical algorithms and test modalities have limited predictive values and limited diffusion so that the diagnosis and management is challenging in the clinical practice. For this reason, there is an unmet need for novel rational non-anticoagulant therapies based on the pathogenesis of HIT.The present paper reports the position of the Italian Society on Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET) in order to increase awareness of HIT among clinicians and other health care professionals and to provide information on the most appropriate management.

Retrospective Analysis of Fondaparinux and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in the Treatment of Women With Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical efficacy of fondaparinux and LMWH and provide clinical evidence for the effectiveness of fondaparinux in the treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion caused by PTS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted for 120 patients diagnosed with a recurrent spontaneous abortion caused by PTS in Qingdao Jinhua Women's Hospital from March 2019 to April 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: 68 cases in the control group, treated with LMWH, 52 cases in the observational group, treated with fondaparinux. The pregnancy outcomes and adverse reactions between the two groups of recurrent miscarriage patients were compared.

RESULTS

No significant difference was detected in the general data between the two groups of patients before treatment (P>0.05). In the observational group, the R value was increased, and the α and MA values were decreased after three months of treatment compared to those before treatment (P<0.05). In the control group, the R value was increased, and the MA value was decreased after three months of treatment compared to those before treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, no significant difference was observed in the pregnancy outcome between the two groups (P>0.05). The total adverse reaction rate of the fondaparinux group was lower than that of the LMWH group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, no significant difference was detected in the pregnancy outcome between fondaparinux and LMWH in the treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion caused by PTS, but fondaparinux had a low occurrence rate of adverse reactions and high safety.

Deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy: incidence, pathogenesis and endovascular management

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) during pregnancy is associated with high mortality, morbidity, and costs. Pulmonary embolism (PE), its most feared complication, is the leading cause of maternal death in the developed world. DVT can also result in long-term complications that include postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) adding to its morbidity. Women are up to 5 times more likely to develop DVT when pregnant. The current standard of care for this condition is anticoagulation. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathogenesis, prophylaxis and diagnosis of DVT during pregnancy, and then focuses on endovascular treatment modalities. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement and pharmacomechanical catheter directed thrombolysis (PCDT) in the pregnant patient are discussed, as well as patient selection criteria, and complications.

Guidance for the treatment and prevention of obstetric-associated venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which may manifest as pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is a serious and potentially fatal condition. Treatment and prevention of obstetric-related VTE is complicated by the need to consider fetal, as well as maternal, wellbeing when making management decisions. Although absolute VTE rates in this population are low, obstetric-associated VTE is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. This manuscript, initiated by the Anticoagulation Forum, provides practical clinical guidance on the prevention and treatment of obstetric-associated VTE based on existing guidelines and consensus expert opinion based on available literature where guidelines are lacking.

Saudi Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension: Pregnancy in pulmonary hypertension

Pregnancy in pulmonary hypertension (PH) is known to be associated with high morbidity and mortality. The physiological changes occur during normal pregnancy, such as increase blood volume and cardiac output (CO) may be detrimental in PH patients. Several practice guidelines advise against pregnancy and even recommend termination of pregnancy. Occasionally PH may be diagnosed for the first time during pregnancy, as stress of pregnancy can unmask previously undiagnosed PH in an asymptomatic individual. This narrative review provides a detailed discussion about the physiologic parameters associated in pregnancy and their negative effect on the right ventricle. It also gives practical evidence-based recommendations about different management issues in PH pregnant patients.

Preventing thrombophilia-related complications of pregnancy: an update

Approximately half of all pregnancy-related venous thromboembolic events are associated with thrombophilia. Although the most compelling data for a link between thrombophilia and other adverse pregnancy outcomes derive from women with antiphospholipid antibodies, some studies also suggest an association between these pregnancy complications and hereditary thrombophilias. Management of thrombophilia often involves anticoagulant therapy; however, use of these agents during pregnancy is challenging. There is a paucity of high-quality studies and consequently, recommendations are based largely on extrapolation from data in nonpregnant women, in addition to observational studies and a few small randomized studies. This article will review the impact of the thrombophilias on pregnancy and its outcome, evidence for therapies aimed at the prevention of thrombophilia-related pregnancy complications, and the most recent recommendations contained in the 9th Edition of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

A systematic review on the use of new anticoagulants in pregnancy

New anticoagulants such as direct factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors have been recently developed, but their experience in pregnancy is limited. This review therefore aims to systematically search for studies on the use of these newer anticoagulants in pregnancy and the puerperal period. Searches were performed on electronic databases MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1974) and the Cochrane Library, until October 2011 using terms of 'pregnancy', 'puerperium', 'breastfeeding' and names of specific anticoagulants. The search yielded 561 citations and 11 studies (10 on fondaparinux, 1 on ximelagatran) were included. Newer anticoagulants (fondaparinux, hirudin and argatroban) on the limited evidence appear not to have adverse pregnancy outcomes, but there is currently no experience of new oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, apixaban, betrixaban or dabigatran) use in pregnancy. There is a need for reporting on new oral anticoagulation use in pregnancy to provide more information about the safety and risks to the fetus in utero.

Antithrombotic therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: guidelines translated for the clinician

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinicopathologic syndrome initiated by heparin exposure and characterized by thrombocytopenia and paradoxical thrombophilia. HIT is mediated by the formation of antibodies against the platelet factor 4/heparin complex, which leads to platelet activation, thrombin generation, and potentially fatal thrombotic sequelae. The clinical presentation of HIT is variable and can be easily overlooked. Although a number of functional and antigen-based immunoassays have been developed to detect the presence of HIT antibodies, initial diagnosis is often based on recognition of thrombocytopenia in the appropriate clinical context and later confirmed with immunologic testing. Given the serious clinical consequences of HIT, immediate cessation of heparin products and administration of non-heparin anticoagulants are crucial components of treatment. We provide a review of the clinical syndrome and practical summary of treatment recommendations from the most recent 2012 American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based guidelines for the treatment and prevention of HIT.

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated adverse drug reaction that can lead to devastating thromboembolic complications, including pulmonary embolism, ischemic limb necrosis necessitating limb amputation, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement.

RESULTS

Among the key recommendations for this article are the following: For patients receiving heparin in whom clinicians consider the risk of HIT to be > 1%, we suggest that platelet count monitoring be performed every 2 or 3 days from day 4 to day 14 (or until heparin is stopped, whichever occurs first) (Grade 2C). For patients receiving heparin in whom clinicians consider the risk of HIT to be < 1%, we suggest that platelet counts not be monitored (Grade 2C). In patients with HIT with thrombosis (HITT) or isolated HIT who have normal renal function, we suggest the use of argatroban or lepirudin or danaparoid over other nonheparin anticoagulants (Grade 2C). In patients with HITT and renal insufficiency, we suggest the use of argatroban over other nonheparin anticoagulants (Grade 2C). In patients with acute HIT or subacute HIT who require urgent cardiac surgery, we suggest the use of bivalirudin over other nonheparin anticoagulants or heparin plus antiplatelet agents (Grade 2C).

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies evaluating the role of fondaparinux and the new oral anticoagulants in the treatment of HIT are needed.

Hypercoagulable states

Hypercoagulable states can be inherited or acquired. Inherited hypercoagulable states can be caused by a loss of function of natural anticoagulant pathways or a gain of function in procoagulant pathways. Acquired hypercoagulable risk factors include a prior history of thrombosis, obesity, pregnancy, cancer and its treatment, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and myeloproliferative disorders. Inherited hypercoagulable states combine with acquired risk factors to establish the intrinsic risk of venous thromboembolism for each individual. Venous thromboembolism occurs when the risk exceeds a critical threshold. Often a triggering factor, such as surgery, pregnancy, or estrogen therapy, is required to increase the risk above this critical threshold.

Pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment

Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and this condition remains an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. The use of anticoagulant therapy for treatment and prophylaxis of VTE during pregnancy is challenging because of the potential for fetal, as well as maternal, complications. Although evidence-based recommendations for the use of anticoagulants have been published, given the paucity of available data, guidelines are based largely upon observational studies and from data in nonpregnant patients. This article reviews the available literature and provides guidance for the management and prevention of VTE during pregnancy.

VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The use of anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is challenging because of the potential for both fetal and maternal complications. This guideline focuses on the management of VTE and thrombophilia as well as the use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement.

RESULTS

We recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pregnant women instead of unfractionated heparin (Grade 1B). For pregnant women with acute VTE, we suggest that anticoagulants be continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum (for a minimum duration of therapy of 3 months) compared with shorter durations of treatment (Grade 2C). For women who fulfill the laboratory criteria for antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) syndrome and meet the clinical APLA criteria based on a history of three or more pregnancy losses, we recommend antepartum administration of prophylactic or intermediate-dose unfractionated heparin or prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin combined with low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/d) over no treatment (Grade 1B). For women with inherited thrombophilia and a history of pregnancy complications, we suggest not to use antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 2C). For women with two or more miscarriages but without APLA or thrombophilia, we recommend against antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 1B).

CONCLUSIONS

Most recommendations in this guideline are based on observational studies and extrapolation from other populations. There is an urgent need for appropriately designed studies in this population.

Fondaparinux - data on efficacy and safety in special situations

New anticoagulants promise to have better efficacy, more safety and/or a better manageability than traditional anticoagulants. However, knowledge is limited regarding special situations such as renal insufficiency, obesity, pregnancy, long-term therapy, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, treatment in patients with mechanical heart valves, use for children, and in patients with a high risk of thromboembolic complications. These situations have rarely or even never been the objective of randomised controlled trials. The purpose of the present article is to summarize and discuss available data on efficacy and safety in these special situations for one of the first new anticoagulants, the indirect factor-Xa inhibitor fondaparinux. Furthermore, we discuss safety in licensed indications and management of bleeding complications and comment on measuring of drug concentration in plasma.

[News on antithrombotic therapy and pregnancy]

OBJECTIVES

State of the art of antithrombotics and their use recommendations during pregnancy.

METHODS

A review

RESULTS

Aspirin and heparins remain the safest molecules during pregnancy, and oral anticoagulants are still used for mechanical valves. Heparinoids are the methods of choice in case of heparin-induced thrombopenia but other molecules could find their place: fondaparinux at first and possibly the direct thrombin inhibitors. Thrombolysis may be used in case of life-threatening incident. At present, the new oral forms can not be used during pregnancy

CONCLUSIONS

During pregnancy, all antithrombotics, except the oral forms, can be used, but the low molecular weight heparins replacing the unfractionated ones in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism remain the treatment of choice.

Pregnancy and pulmonary hypertension

When pulmonary hypertension (PH) occurs in pregnancy, physiologic stress can overwhelm an already strained right ventricle resulting in right ventricular failure and death. Mortality remains unacceptably high (25%-30%). Patients with PH should be counseled to avoid pregnancy. This article discusses the physiologic changes of pregnancy that make it difficult for patients with PH, the pitfalls of transthoracic echocardiography in diagnosing PH in pregnancy, and the historical data regarding mortality. The causes of development of PH during pregnancy are discussed, and the limited data on management of patients with PH who choose to carry their pregnancy to term are reviewed.

Use of fondaparinux in a pregnant woman with pulmonary embolism and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

A serious complication of heparin treatment, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is rarely observed in pregnant women. Drug therapy during pregnancy should always be chosen to minimize fetal risk. The management of HIT in pregnancy represents a medical challenge. Unlike heparins, the anticoagulants used in patients with HIT do cross the placenta, with unknown fetal effects.

CASE REPORT

We present a case of a 24-year-old female presenting for care at 34 weeks of gestation with acute pulmonary embolism treated initially with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), who developed HIT. She was then successfully treated with fondaparinux.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first case reports describing a successful use of fondaparinux in the treatment of HIT in a third-trimester pregnant woman, providing a novel approach for this subset of patients.

Anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs in pregnancy: what are the anesthetic implications for labor and cesarean delivery?

Neuraxial anesthetic techniques are commonly used during the peripartum period to provide effective pain relief for labor and anesthesia during cesarean delivery. Major neurologic complications are rare after neuraxial anesthesia; however, spinal hematoma is associated with catastrophic neurologic outcomes (including lower-limb paralysis). Anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs can increase the risk of spinal hematoma after neuraxial anesthesia, and better understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticoagulants has led to greater appreciation for withholding anticoagulation before and after neuraxial anesthesia. A number of national anesthetic societies have produced guidelines for performing neuraxial anesthesia in patients receiving anticoagulation. However, there is limited information about anesthetic implications of anticoagulation during the peripartum period. This article will review the risks of spinal hematoma after neuraxial anesthesia in pregnant patients; current guidelines for neuraxial anesthesia for anticoagulated patients; and relevant pharmacological data of specific anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs in pregnancy.

Hypercoagulable states

Hypercoagulable states can be inherited or acquired. Inherited hypercoagulable states can be caused by a loss of function of natural anticoagulant pathways or a gain of function in procoagulant pathways. Acquired hypercoagulable risk factors include a prior history of thrombosis, obesity, pregnancy, cancer and its treatment, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and myeloproliferative disorders. Inherited hypercoagulable states combine with acquired risk factors to establish the intrinsic risk of venous thromboembolism for each individual. Venous thromboembolism occurs when the risk exceeds a critical threshold. Often a triggering factor, such as surgery, pregnancy, or estrogen therapy, is required to increase the risk above this critical threshold.

Managing a pregnant patient with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in the era of eculizumab

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare clonal stem cell disorder, which affects women of child-bearing age. PNH is associated with thrombotic complications, which are the main causes of morbidity and mortality. Management of a pregnant woman with PNH remains a challenge due to high incidence of thrombotic complications and the difficulty of differentiating a PNH crisis from the complications of pregnancy. PNH is associated with an increased rate of premature labor and fetal loss. Eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the terminal complement protein C5, has revolutionized treatment of PNH. However, the role of eculizumab in pregnancy is unclear. We review the current strategies for the management of pregnant women with PNH, underline the controversies and present our recommendations.

Management of inherited thrombophilia in pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the currently available data concerning risk and management of venous thromboembolism in pregnant women with inherited thrombophilia.

SUMMARY

Pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state, and inherited thrombophilia increases this risk further. Despite the risks, the actual incidence of venous thromboembolism remains low, and therefore, the widespread use of anticoagulants for pregnant women with inherited thrombophilia is not advised. Although randomized, placebo-controlled trials investigating the risks and benefits of anticoagulation have not been performed, there are data to support the use of low molecular weight heparin for high and intermediate-risk women. We will review these data and treatment recommendations, which are based on retrospective and case-control studies as well as expert opinion and consensus statements.

Incidence and causes of heparin-induced skin lesions

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the incidence and causes of heparin-induced skin lesions. The 2 most commonly reported causes of heparin-induced skin lesions are immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions.

METHODS

We prospectively examined consecutive patients who received subcutaneous heparin (most often enoxaparin or nadroparin) for the presence of heparin-induced skin lesions. If such lesions were identified, we performed a skin biopsy, platelet count measurements, and antiplatelet-factor 4 antibody and allergy testing.

RESULTS

We enrolled 320 patients. In total, 24 patients (7.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7%-10.6%) had heparin-induced skin lesions. Delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions were identified as the cause in all 24 patients. One patient with histopathologic evidence of delayed-type hypersensitivity tested positive for antiplatelet-factor 4 antibodies. We identified the following risk factors for heparin-induced skin lesions: a body mass index greater than 25 (odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% CI 1.7-15.3), duration of heparin therapy longer than 9 days (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.9-26.3) and female sex (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-8.8).

INTERPRETATION

Heparin-induced skin lesions are relatively common, have identifiable risk factors and are commonly caused by a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction (type IV allergic response).

A retrospective analysis of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin treatment in women with infertility or pregnancy loss

PROBLEM

We compared the pregnancy success rates and safety parameters of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin, combined with immunotherapy, in patients with a history of miscarriage and/or infertility and coagulant defects.

METHOD OF STUDY

A total of 127 pregnancies in 110 patients with a history of miscarriage and/or infertility were retrospectively evaluated. Of these, 29 pregnancies used fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily and 98 pregnancies used enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily.

RESULTS

The pregnancy success rate was 59% (17/29; 95% CI, 41-75%) for patients receiving fondaparinux and 58% (57/98; 95% CI, 48-68%) for patients receiving enoxaparin. No difference was detected in birth weight (2.7 +/- 0.8 and 2.9 +/- 0.6 kg, respectively) or gestational age at delivery (37.3 +/- 2.2 and 37.7 +/- 2.1 weeks, respectively). No birth defects, severe bleeding-related complications, or serious allergic reactions were observed.

CONCLUSION

In patients with a history of miscarriage, infertility, and coagulant defects receiving immunotherapy, fondaparinux resulted in successful pregnancy outcomes comparable with enoxaparin therapy. Although no difference in outcome was observed in our analysis, a much larger study is required to achieve statistical power.

Anticoagulation with argatroban in a parturient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin are currently the anticoagulants of choice for the prevention of recurrent thromboembolic disease during pregnancy. However, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia contraindicates the use of unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin. We describe a patient who was admitted to our hospital with deep vein thrombosis at 18 weeks of gestation and who developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during her antenatal care. Therapeutic anticoagulation was initially achieved with argatroban, then changed to fondaparinux. During early labor, fondaparinux was discontinued and intravenous argatroban was substituted. Argatroban was discontinued during transition to active labor. After return of a normal partial thromboplastin time, combined spinal-epidural analgesia was induced for routine completion of labor and vaginal delivery. We discuss the decisions made in the maintenance of this patient's anticoagulation during the peripartum period as well as timing of her neuraxial labor analgesia.

Preventing thrombophilia-related complications of pregnancy

Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and approximately half of all pregnancy-related VTEs are associated with thrombophilia. Recent studies suggest that there is a link between thrombophilia and other adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as fetal loss, preeclampsia, placental abruption and intrauterine growth restriction. However, the associations reported are modest, and high quality data are limited. Although the most compelling data derive from pregnant women with antiphospholipid antibodies, the use of anticoagulants for the prevention of pregnancy complications other than VTE in women with heritable thrombophilias is becoming more frequent. In this article, we review the impact of the various thrombophilias on pregnancy and its outcome, the evidence for therapies aimed at prevention of thrombophilia-related pregnancy complications, and briefly discuss the role of screening for thrombophilia in pregnancy.

Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy

The purpose of this review is to summarize the epidemiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy and describe strategies used to prevent and treat it. The main reason for the increased risk of VTE in pregnancy is hypercoagulability. The hypercoagulability of pregnancy, which has likely evolved to protect women from the bleeding challenges of miscarriage and childbirth, is present as early as the first trimester and so is the increased risk of VTE. Other risk factors include a history of thrombosis, inherited and acquired thrombophilia, certain medical conditions, and complications of pregnancy and childbirth. Candidates for anticoagulation are women with a current thrombosis, a history of thrombosis, thrombophilia, and a history of poor pregnancy outcome, or postpartum risk factors for VTE. For fetal reasons, the preferred agents for anticoagulation in pregnancy are heparins. There are no large trials of anticoagulants in pregnancy and recommendations are based on case series and the opinion of experts. Nonetheless, anticoagulants are believed to improve the outcome of pregnancy for women who have or have had VTE.

Successful use of argatroban during the third trimester of pregnancy: case report and review of the literature

Direct thrombin inhibitors are commonly used anticoagulants in patients with known or suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). All three direct thrombin inhibitors available in the United States-argatroban, bivalirudin, and lepirudin-are pregnancy category B drugs based on animal studies, but little data are available on the safety of these agents during human pregnancy. Whereas several case reports support the safe use of lepirudin, only one case report has been published with argatroban and none with bivalirudin. We describe a 26-year-old pregnant woman with portal vein thrombosis and thrombocytopenia treated with argatroban for possible HIT during her last trimester. An argatroban infusion was started at 2 microg/kg/minute during her 33rd week of pregnancy, with the dosage titrated based on the activated partial thromboplastin time; infusion rates ranged from 2-8 microg/kg/minute. Treatment continued until her 39th week of pregnancy, when labor was induced. Argatroban therapy was discontinued 7 hours before epidural anesthesia. The patient successfully delivered a healthy male newborn, devoid of any known adverse effects from argatroban. The infant was found to have a small ventricular septal defect and patent foramen ovale at birth, but it is unlikely that these were caused by argatroban since organogenesis occurs in the first trimester. Even though the cause of this patient's thrombocytopenia was later determined to be idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, this is an important case that adds to the literature on use of argatroban during pregnancy.