The role of complete response in multiple myeloma

Comparative Efficacy of Talquetamab vs. Current Treatments in the LocoMMotion and MoMMent Studies in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Talquetamab, a bispecific antibody targeting GPRC5D × CD3, is approved for the treatment of patients with triple-class -exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) on the basis of the results from the phase I/II MonumenTAL-1 trial. The relative effectiveness of talquetamab vs. real-world physician's choice of therapy (RWPC) was assessed using adjusted comparisons.

METHODS

An external control arm for MonumenTAL-1 (subcutaneously administered talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg weekly [QW] and 0.8 mg/kg every other week [Q2W]) was created from two observational real-world studies: LocoMMotion and MoMMent. Imbalances in baseline covariates were adjusted using inverse probability weighting. The relative effectiveness of talquetamab vs. RWPC was estimated for overall response rate (ORR), ≥ very good partial response (VGPR), and ≥ complete response (CR); odds ratios and relative response ratios (RRs) were derived from weighted logistic regression. Hazard ratios (HRs) for duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

After reweighting, baseline characteristics were balanced across cohorts. In adjusted comparisons, patients treated with talquetamab QW (n = 143) had significantly improved outcomes vs. RWPC; RRs were ORR 2.67, p < 0.0001; ≥ VGPR 4.70, p < 0.0001; ≥ CR 78.05, p = 0.0002; and HRs were PFS 0.52, p < 0.0001; TTNT 0.48, p < 0.0001; OS 0.36, p < 0.0001. Patients treated with talquetamab Q2W (n = 145) also had significantly improved outcomes vs. RWPC; RRs were ORR 2.62, p < 0.0001; ≥ VGPR 5.04, p < 0.0001; ≥ CR 101.14, p = 0.0002; and HRs were PFS 0.40, p < 0.0001; TTNT 0.39, p < 0.0001; OS 0.37, p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSION

Effectiveness of talquetamab for both schedules was significantly better than RWPC for ORR, ≥ VGPR, ≥ CR, PFS, OS, and TTNT, highlighting its clinical benefit for patients with TCE RRMM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

MonumenTAL-1, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03399799/NCT04634552; LocoMMotion, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04035226; MoMMent, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05160584.

Potential future direction of measurable residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease plagued by high relapse rates. Deeper and more sustainable responses, however, have been consistently shown to improve outcomes and could eventually pave the way to achieving a cure. Our understanding of disease response has surpassed complete response (CR), because the current definitions are suboptimal, and the treatment goal should aim even beyond stringent CR, toward molecular and flow CR, that is, measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity. It has been more than 20 years since the discrepancy in the outcome between patients in CR with and without MRD has been demonstrated, and the field has come a long way from multiparameter flow cytometry to next-generation flow and next-generation sequencing, able to detect up to a limit of detection of a single myeloma cell from 1 million healthy counterparts. This review aims to summarize the current available data regarding MRD but also its potential future use as a coprimary outcome both in clinical and trial settings as a survival surrogate as well as its use to evaluate treatment efficacy and for adaptive response-based and early-rescue therapy. Furthermore, we discuss whether these concepts are applicable in different settings (eg, newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory myeloma, patients who are eligible and ineligible for tansplant, and standard- and high-risk disease).

Outcome and characteristics of nonsecretory multiple myeloma compared with secretory multiple myeloma: a retrospective multicenter study from China

BACKGROUND

Nonsecretory multiple myeloma (NSMM) is a rare type of multiple myeloma (MM). Few studies have described the clinical features and outcomes of NSMM in novel agents. Additionally, the prognostic characteristics have remained controversial in recent years.

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical and prognostic features of NSMM and explore the prognostic value of involved free light chain (FLC) levels in NSMM patients in the Chinese population.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 176 newly diagnosed NSMM cases between January 2005 and December 2021 from 19 clinical centers in China. The control group was selected using a 1:4 propensity score matching technique of newly diagnosed secretory MM, with age, sex and diagnosis time as the matching variables.

RESULTS

The median age of NSMM patients was 60 years, and 22.6% of patients were classified as ISS stage 3. The ORR of the NSMM patients was 87.4%, and the CR was 65.8%. Compared to the matched secretory MM patients, more NSMM patients achieved CR after first-line treatment (65.8% vs. 36%, p = 0.000). The ORR of first-line treatment was not significantly different between NSMM and secretory MM (89.45% vs. 84.7%, p = 0.196). The first-line PFS was 27.5 m and 23 m (p = 0.063), and the median OS was 81 m and 70 months (p = 0.401). However, for CR-achieved NSMM and CR-not-achieved NSMM patients, the median PFS was 37 m vs. 16 m (p = 0.021), while the median OS showed no difference (107 m vs. 87 m, p = 0.290). In multivariate analysis, the significant factors for PFS were age ≥ 65 and ISS-3. ISS-3 was the only independent prognostic factor of OS. The iFLC ≥ 50 mg/L group had a high ORR of 97.3%, and the median PFS and OS were 48 m and NR, respectively. Compared to the matched secretory MM, the iFLC ≥ 50 mg/L group also showed more CR and longer OS (NR vs. 70 m, p = 0.006) and PFS (48 m vs. 23 m, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that Chinese NSMM patients are younger and have a higher CR but not superior survival. The subgroup of NSMM patients with iFLC ≥ 50 mg/L had better outcomes than secretory MM.

Comparative Efficacy of Teclistamab Versus Current Treatments in Real-World Clinical Practice in the Prospective LocoMMotion Study in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (TCE-RRMM) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody, was studied in patients with TCE-RRMM in the single-arm MajesTEC-1 study. To assess the relative effectiveness of teclistamab versus real-world physician's choice of therapy (RWPC), adjusted comparisons were performed using individual patient data from MajesTEC-1 and LocoMMotion, a prospective study of patients with TCE-RRMM.

METHODS

An external control arm for MajesTEC-1 was created from patients in LocoMMotion (n = 248; clinical cut-off: November 2, 2021) and compared with treated patients (n = 165) from MajesTEC-1 (teclistamab 1.5 mg/kg weekly; clinical cut-off: March 16, 2022). Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for imbalances in baseline covariates. For binary endpoints [overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR) rate, complete response or better (≥ CR)], relative effect of teclistamab versus RWPC was estimated with an odds ratio and relative response rate and 95% confidence interval (CI), derived from weighted logistic regression. Weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for time-to-event endpoints [duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)].

RESULTS

After weighting, baseline characteristics were balanced across cohorts. In adjusted comparisons, teclistamab-treated patients were 2.3-fold, 5.2-fold and 148.3-fold, more likely to reach ORR [response-rate ratio (RR) = 2.31, 95% CI 1.77-2.85, p < 0.0001], ≥ VGPR (RR = 5.19, 95% CI 3.26-7.12, p < 0.0001) and ≥ CR (RR = 148.25, 95% CI 20.63-1065.40, p < 0.0001), respectively, versus patients receiving RWPC. Following adjustment, DOR (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.54, p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.35-0.65, p < 0.0001) were significantly longer with teclistamab versus RWPC. OS was numerically better with teclistamab versus RWPC [HR 0.77 (0.55-1.09), p = 0.1419].

CONCLUSION

Teclistamab demonstrated improved effectiveness versus RWPC, highlighting its clinical benefit as a novel and effective treatment for patients with TCE-RRMM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Majest TEC-1, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04557098; LocoMMotion, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04035226.

Risk Assessment for Newly Diagnosed Fit Young Patients with Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Treatment Modalities: Should There Be Additional Factors Taken into Consideration??

Introduction

The optimal treatment for young patients with high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) remains a challenge.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 58 NDMM patients younger than 55 years treated in our center from 2010 to 2021 with the current recommended protocols.

Results

After a median follow-up of 48 months, median overall survival (OS) was not reached; however, approximately 25% of them died within 4 years after diagnosis. Advanced disease stage, presence of extramedullary disease, elevated LDH, and less than very good remission before autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation adversely affected patient survival. Based on these factors, we created a risk-assessment scoring system that sufficiently discriminated young NDMM patients at risk of poor outcome. The 4-year OS was superior for patients with zero to two factors to those with three to five factors (86% vs 44%, p<0.001).

Conclusion

The proposed scoring system could be reliably used at diagnosis and at interim disease evaluation in aiming for personalized treatment for young NDMM patients.

Bortezomib and high-dose melphalan conditioning regimen in frontline multiple myeloma: an IFM randomized phase 3 study

High-dose melphalan (HDM) and transplantation are recommended for eligible patients with multiple myeloma. No other conditioning regimen has proven to be more effective and/or safer. We previously reported in a phase 2 study that bortezomib can safely and effectively be combined with HDM (Bor-HDM), with a 32% complete response (CR) rate after transplantation. These data supported a randomized phase 3 trial. Randomization was stratified according to risk and response to induction: 300 patients were enrolled, and 154 were allocated to the experimental arm (ie, arm A) with bortezomib (1 mg/m2 intravenously [IV]) on days -6, -3, +1, and +4 and melphalan (200 mg/m2 IV) on day -2. The control arm (ie, arm B) consisted of HDM alone (200 mg/m2 IV). There were no differences in stringent CR + CR rates at day 60 posttransplant (primary end point): 22.1% in arm A vs 20.5% in arm B (P = .844). There were also no differences in undetectable minimum residual disease rates: 41.3% vs 39.4% (P = .864). Median progression-free survival was 34.0 months for arm A vs 29.6 months for arm B (adjusted HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61-1.13; P = .244). The estimated 3-year overall survival was 89.5% in both arms (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.62-2.64; P = .374). Sixty-nine serious adverse events occurred in 18.7% of Bor-HDM-treated patients (vs 13.1% in HDM-treated patients). The proportion of grade 3/4 AEs was similar within the 2 groups (72.0% vs 73.1%), mainly (as expected) blood and gastrointestinal disorders; 4% of patients reported grade 3/4 or painful peripheral neuropathy in arm A (vs 1.5% in arm B). In this randomized phase 3 study, a conditioning regimen with Bor-HDM did not improve efficacy end points or outcomes compared with HDM alone. The original trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02197221.

Utility of PET/CT in Assessing Early Treatment Response in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by diverse clinical presentations. While biochemical assessment of disease activity is commonly utilized to monitor treatment response, findings on magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), among other imaging modalities, have proven to harbor prognostic value. We sought to corroborate these findings by examining the prognostic significance of Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT scanning in the setting of newly diagnosed MM. We retrospectively analyzed 195 patients with a PET/CT available both at diagnosis and at 6 months post-treatment to examine the value of PET/CT results as an adjuvant metric to conventional hematologic responses in terms of time to next treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS). The median TTNT and OS for the entire cohort were 24.6 (95% CI=20.4-29.1) and 79 (95% CI=63.1-119.1) months, respectively. When comparing PET/CT (-) with PET/CT (+) patients, we found significantly prolonged median TTNT (55.2 vs. 17.8 months, p<0.0001) and OS (unreached vs. 60.8 months, p<0.0001) for the PET/CT (-) group. We then examined the additive value of PET/CT on the hematologic response achieved at 6 months, and we found that PET/CT (-) is associated with significantly increased median TTNT and OS for both the very good partial response (VGPR) group and the less than VGPR group. Importantly, PET/CT retained prognostic significance after adjusting for multiple other predictive variables. We conclude that a PET/CT (-) at 6 months confers a significant prognostic advantage for newly diagnosed MM patients and adds significant value to the hematologic response assessment.

Requirements for operational cure in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma is usually considered as an incurable disease. However, with the therapeutic improvement observed in the last few years, achievement of an "operational" cure is increasingly becoming a realistic goal. The advent of novel agents, with or without high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation, uncovered a correlation between the depth of response to treatment and the outcome. Of note, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity is increasingly shown to be associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS), and MRD status is becoming a well-established and strong prognostic factor. Here, we discuss the impact of MRD negativity on PFS and long-term disease control, as a surrogate for a potential cure in a significant proportion of patients. The MRD value and impact should be examined by focusing on different parameters: (i) sensitivity or lower limit of detection level (method used); (ii) timing of assessment and sustainability (iii) type and duration of treatment; (iv) initial prognostic factors (most importantly, cytogenetics) and (v) patient age. Currently, the highest probability of an operational cure is in younger patients receiving the most active drugs, in combination with autologous transplantation followed by maintenance therapy. Older patients are also likely to achieve operational cure, especially if they are treated upfront with an anti-CD38 antibody-based therapy, but also with novel immunotherapies in future protocols. The incorporation of MRD as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials, would allow the shortening of these, leading to more personalised management, and achievement of long-term cure.

Efficacy and safety profile of deep responders to carfilzomib-based therapy: a subgroup analysis from ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR

To understand the profile of best responders (complete response or better [≥CR]) to carfilzomib, we described the characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) data, and the safety of patients who achieved ≥CR to carfilzomib-based treatment in ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR. In post hoc analyses from ASPIRE and ENDEAVOR, median PFS and OS were longer for ≥CR patients versus those who achieved a very good partial response or partial response (VGPR/PR). In the carfilzomib arm of ASPIRE, median PFS was 50.4 months for ≥CR versus 22.1 months for VGPR/PR; median OS was 67.0 versus 44.2 months, respectively. In the carfilzomib arm of ENDEAVOR, median PFS was 34.0 for ≥CR versus 20.4 months for VGPR/PR; median OS was non-estimable. Despite the longer treatment duration, fewer patients with ≥CR versus VGPR/PR experienced treatment-emergent adverse events that led to discontinuation of carfilzomib-based treatment in ASPIRE or ENDEAVOR. Low serum lactate dehydrogenase was the only factor associated with achieving ≥CR vs patients not achieving CR in ASPIRE in multivariate regression analyses. No association was found between cytogenetic risk status and reaching ≥CR. Carfilzomib treatment may lead to rapid and deep responses, irrespective of most patient characteristics.

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Vindesine-Based and Bortezomib-Based Regimens for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Study of Efficacy and Safety

Purpose

Although pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has been approved in combination with bortezomib for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), the antitumor efficacy and tolerability of PLD in different regimens for patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) have not been fully defined.

Methods

A total of 249 NDMM patients diagnosed between January 2008 and October 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 112 patients received vindesine-based chemotherapy (35 vDD and 77 vAD) and 137 received bortezomib-based chemotherapy (58 VDD and 79 VD).

Results

In bortezomib-containing regimens, the complete response rate (48.3 vs. 30.4%, p = 0.033) and very good partial response or better rate (74.1 vs. 57.0%, p = 0.038) of VDD were significantly higher than those of VD subgroup. While no superior survival was found between VDD and VD subgroup. In vindesine-containing regimens, no statistical significance was identified between vDD and vAD in terms of response rate and survival. The occurrence rates of all cardiac AEs were similar between VDD and VD.

Conclusions

The vDD regimen was similar with vAD in the aspect of response rate, survival, and toxicity in NDMM patients. The addition of PLD to VD brought deeper response without increased toxicity, while no superior survival was found.

Disease monitoring with quantitative serum IgA levels provides a more reliable response assessment in multiple myeloma patients

Unlike IgG monoclonal proteins (MCPs), IgA MCP quantification is unreliable due to beta-migration of IgA MCPs on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP). The utility of nephelometric quantitative IgA (qIgA) to monitor IgA multiple myeloma (MM) is unclear. We retrospectively studied disease response kinetics using qIgA versus MCPs by SPEP, and developed and validated novel qIgA disease assessment criteria in 491 IgA MM patients. The SPEP MCP nadir occurred a median of 41 (IQR 0-102) days before the qIgA. The median time to achieve a partial response (PR) was shorter using standard IMWG versus qIgA response criteria (32 vs 58 days, p < 0.001). Stratification by qIgA criteria, unlike IMWG criteria, led to clear separation of the progression-free survival curves of patients achieving a PR or very good PR. There was a consistent trend toward earlier detection of disease progression using qIgA versus IMWG progression criteria. In conclusion, monitoring IgA MM using MCP-based IMWG criteria may be falsely reassuring, given that MCP levels on SPEP decrease faster than qIgA levels. The qIgA response criteria more accurately stratify patients based on the progression risk and may detect disease progression earlier, which may lead to more consistent measurement of trial endpoints and improved patient outcomes.

The Acidic Microenvironment: Is It a Phenotype of All Cancers? A Focus on Multiple Myeloma and Some Analogies with Diabetes Mellitus

Simple Summary

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by an abnormal clone of plasma cells in the bone marrow. Currently, both the disease progression and its therapy are too often followed by a series of complications and the standard treatment for MM is aimed at improving the quality of life and to prolong progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of patients. This review looks at MM therapies from a different sight. It starts from a clear scientific background, suggesting that many malignant tumors have some common phenotype that isolates the tumor from the rest of the body. Between these phenotypes, extracellular acidity exerts a key role and data collected in the last two decades support the use of anti-acidic drugs in the treatment of cancers, including MM. Lastly, as many cancers, MM has some similarities with type II diabetes mellitus (DM) in the mechanism leading to the extracellular acidity, supporting the use of both a wide panel of proton transporters inhibitors and probably also of some anti-DM drugs in the treatment of both MM and DM.

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy with a poor prognosis while with a long and progressive outcome. To date, the therapeutic options are restricted to few drugs, including thalidomide or its derivates and autologous transplantation including stem-cell transplantation. More recently, the use of both proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies have been included in MM therapy, but the clinical results are still under evaluation. Unfortunately, death rates (within the 5-year overall survival rates) are still very high (45%), with no relevant improvement over the past 10 years. Here, we discuss data supporting a new therapeutic approach against MM, based on a common phenotype of tumor malignancies, which is the acidic microenvironment. Extracellular acidity drastically reduces the efficacy of both anti-tumor drugs and the immune reaction against tumors. Pre-clinical data have shown that anti-acidic drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), have a potent cytotoxic effect against human MM cells, thus supporting their use in the treatment of this malignancy. Here, we discuss also similarities between MM and type II diabetes mellitus (DM) with high risk of developing MM, suggesting that both anti-diabetic drugs and a hypocaloric diet may help in curing MM patients.

The clinical significance of stringent complete response in multiple myeloma is surpassed by minimal residual disease measurements

Background

Stringent complete response (sCR) is used as a deeper response category than complete response (CR) in multiple myeloma (MM) but may be of limited value in the era of minimal residual disease (MRD) testing.

Methods

Here, we used 4-colour multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) of immunoglobulin genes to analyse and compare the prognostic impact of sCR and MRD monitoring. We included 193 treated patients in two institutions achieving CR, for which both bone marrow aspirates and biopsies were available.

Results

We found that neither the serum free light chain ratio, clonality by immunohistochemistry (IHC) nor plasma cell bone marrow infiltration identified CR patients at distinct risk. Patients with sCR had slightly longer progression-free survival. Nevertheless, persistent clonal bone marrow disease was detectable using MFC or NGS and was associated with significantly inferior outcomes compared with MRD-negative cases.

Conclusion

Our results confirm that sCR does not predict a different outcome and indicate that more sensitive techniques are able to identify patients with differing prognoses. We suggest that MRD categories should be implemented over sCR for the future classification of MM responses.

Blockade of VLA4 sensitizes leukemic and myeloma tumor cells to CD3 redirection in the bone marrow microenvironment

Redirecting T cells to specifically kill malignant cells has been validated as an effective anti-cancer strategy in the clinic with the approval of blinatumomab for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, the immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment potentially poses a significant hurdle to T cell therapies. In hematological malignancies, the bone marrow (BM) niche is protective to leukemic stem cells and has minimized the efficacy of several anti-cancer drugs. In this study, we investigated the impact of the BM microenvironment on T cell redirection. Using bispecific antibodies targeting specific tumor antigens (CD123 and BCMA) and CD3, we observed that co-culture of acute myeloid leukemia or multiple myeloma cells with BM stromal cells protected tumor cells from bispecific antibody-T cell-mediated lysis in vitro and in vivo. Impaired CD3 redirection cytotoxicity was correlated with reduced T cell effector responses and cell-cell contact with stromal cells was implicated in reducing T cell activation and conferring protection of cancer cells. Finally, blocking the VLA4 adhesion pathway in combination with CD3 redirection reduced the stromal-mediated inhibition of cytotoxicity and T cell activation. Our results lend support to inhibiting VLA4 interactions along with administering CD3 redirection therapeutics as a novel combinatorial regimen for robust anti-cancer responses.

Survival analysis of multiple myeloma patients after autologous stem cell transplantation

Background

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been applied to treat the hematologic malignancies since the 1980s. However, allogenic transplantation has inherent complications such as graft-versus-host disease and graft failure. Autologous transplantation has become more and more popular because of its lower transplant-related mortality. This study was performed to analyze the possible prognostic factors for myeloma patients post stem cell transplantation.

Methods

Patients' information was collected by history review and follow-up through the phone call. Kaplan-Meier was used to exhibit overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards model. A P<0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Results

Thirty patients with multiple myeloma were included in this study, 7 of them died because of myeloma relapse and myeloma-associated complications. The average survival time was 29.8 months and the median follow-up was 25.1 months. The 1-year OS and PFS were 93.3% and 90.0%, respectively. Both the 3-year OS and PFS were 76.7%. In a variety of factors, improved renal function showed a good effect on the outcome of transplantation.

Conclusions

To prevent cancer relapse after autologous transplantation, it is of great significance to achieve a complete remission prior to the transplantation.

High efficacy and safety of VTD as an induction protocol in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma eligible for high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation: A report of the Polish Myeloma Study Group

The present retrospective analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of the VTD (bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone) regimen in 205 newly-diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (MM) eligible for high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) in routine clinical practice. With a median of 6 cycles (range, 1–8), at least partial response was achieved in 94.6% and at least very good partial response (VGPR) was achieved in 67.8% of patients. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) grade 2–4 was observed in 28.7% of patients. In 72% of patients undergoing stem cell mobilization one apheresis allowed the number of stem cells sufficient for transplantation to be obtained. Following HDT/ASCT the sCR rate increased from 4.9 to 14.4% and CR from 27.8 to 35.6%. The results demonstrated that VTD as an induction regimen was highly efficient in transplant eligible patients with MM with increased at least VGPR rate following prolonged treatment (≥6 cycles). Therapy exhibited no negative impact on stem cell collection, neutrophils and platelets engraftment following ASCT. Therapy was generally well tolerated and PN was the most common reason of dose reduction or treatment discontinuation.

Autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplant in small-sized and peripheral centers: a 10-year experiment

Background

Along with continuing changes in therapeutic modalities, indications of autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) have been emerging and changing considerably, especially in the era of targeted therapy and small molecule inhibitors. Patients treated with novel agents tend to have a longer survival period, thus eventually reaching higher ages at ASCT. Herein, and to address the question of ASCT outcomes in small, community-based, peripheral French centers, we report the 10-year follow-up results of 136 patients who received ASCT in our eight-bed ASCT unit, situated in an urban area.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 136 patients treated between 2008 and 2017 at the Duchenne Hospital Center. Of these 136 patients, 75 underwent ASCT for myeloma, while 61 underwent ASCT for lymphoma, amongst which 57 patients were treated for B-cell lymphoma. The median age was 65 years (range, 27-72) for myeloma patients, and 62 years (range, 27-71) for patients with lymphoma.

Results

The cohort median follow up was estimated at 33 months; 10-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 71% and 64% for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 75% and 45% for myeloma, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found for OS or 1-year PFS between patients who received ASCT from 2008 to 2012, and those who received it from 2013 to 2017.

Conclusions

In the absence of randomized trials studying the role of center size, experience, and standardization procedure for ASCT outcome, these results may suggest that ASCT in peripheral accredited small-sized centers could be a viable option to facilitate follow up and enable access to this treatment, especially for elderly patients, in comparison with referring the patient to central large hospitals to undergo ASCT.

High-dose bendamustine and melphalan conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma

High-dose melphalan (MEL200) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM). Bendamustine induces responses in MM resistant to other alkylators. Our prior Phase I trial adding bendamustine to MEL200 transplant conditioning resulted in no additional toxicity. We now report a single-arm, phase II study that evaluated the efficacy of bendamustine 225 mg/m² with MEL200 conditioning for ASCT in 18 patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and 17 with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). The primary end point was the complete response (CR/sCR) rate at day+ 100. Sample size was determined according to Simon's two-stage design. At stage 1, sixteen patients entered the study. As there were eight patients with CR/sCR, enrollment increased to 28 patients. Sixteen out of the first 28 evaluable patients achieved CR/sCR, meeting the design criteria. Enrollment was then expanded to a total of 35 patients. 51% achieved a CR/sCR. After a median follow-up of 65 months, 21 patients progressed, including 7 deaths. The median PFS for NDMM and RRMM was 48 and 45 months, respectively. Bendamustine/MEL200 conditioning resulted in excellent overall and depth of response as well as PFS, particularly in the RRMM patients, and is worthy of further investigation (NCT00916058).

The role of carfilzomib in treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Despite improvement of prognosis since approval of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs, myeloma remains largely incurable. The outcome of first-line treatment is known to be crucial for survival and, therefore, implementation of novel strategies remains one of the key aims of clinical myeloma research. Since approval of carfilzomib for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, a new therapeutic option with a favorable safety profile regarding neuropathy is available. Regarding its superior response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) when combined with other agents in heavily pretreated patients, the compound rapidly became a matter of great interest in search for first-line treatment. With an ORR up to 98% and promising PFS data, it might become an important partner in treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma.

A comparison of response in the presence or absence of a delay in induction therapy with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone

Purpose

Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) has emerged as a preferred induction therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) in the United States. Due to lenalidomide's teratogenic risk, patients and prescribers must comply with a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) program. The REMS program limits dispensing to certain third-party specialty pharmacies, whose average prescription fill times are longer than in-house specialty pharmacies. In practice, a delay in procurement of lenalidomide may mean that patients start therapy with only bortezomib and dexamethasone, delaying the start of more effective triplet therapy. The primary objective of this study is to determine if a delay from start of bortezomib and dexamethasone to start of triplet therapy with lenalidomide impacts rate of achievement of very good partial response (VGPR) after four cycles of RVd.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective review of adults with newly diagnosed MM who received RVd induction therapy at University of North Carolina Medical Center between April 2014 and June 2017. Patients who started lenalidomide ≥10 days after bortezomib comprised the “Delay” group, while those who started lenalidomide concurrently with bortezomib or within 1–9 days after bortezomib comprised the “No Delay” group. The primary outcome was VGPR or better response rate after four cycles of RVd.

Results

Thirty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. Nine patients (23.7%) experienced any delay in initiation of lenalidomide, with a mean delay of 7.8 days (range 1–18). Four patients (10.5%) experienced a delay ≥10 days. No patients in the Delay group were of reproductive potential, compared to 8.8% in the No Delay group ( p = 0.54). VGPR or better response rate did not differ between the Delay and No Delay groups (66.7% vs. 58.8%, p = 0.79). The mean number of lenalidomide prescriptions generated per RVd cycle was 1.35 (range 1–5, SD 0.74).

Conclusions

This study did not demonstrate an effect on clinical response after delays ≥10 days between bortezomib and lenalidomide initiation. No patients in the delay group were females of reproductive potential, which is the primary target for increased safety behind the REMS program.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: Post-transplant outcomes of Taiwan Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a monoclonal plasma cell malignancy. The primary choice of treatment for MM is induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This study aimed to analyze the treatment efficacy of ASCT in a Taiwanese cohort and evaluate possible prognostic factors.

METHODS

From the database of the Taiwan Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry, data on 396 patients with MM who underwent ASCT were reviewed.

RESULTS

The average age of participants was 54.8 years, and there were more men than women (57.6% vs. 42.4%). Most patients were diagnosed with IgG-type myeloma (52.4%), followed by IgA-type (23.2%) and light-chain type (21.4%). Patients with Durie Salmon Staging System (DSS) III disease accounted for 61.9% of the study cohort, while 23.7% had stage II and 14.4% had stage I disease. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after ASCT were 46.5 months and 70.4 months, respectively. DSS III was a poor prognostic factor affecting both PFS and OS with a duration of 35.9 months and 69.0 months, respectively, compared with the other two stages (p = 0.006 and p = 0.03, respectively). In addition, patients with better treatment response before ASCT had better PFS and OS compared with those who did not show a response (both p < 0.0001). The overall incidence of organ toxicities associated with transplantation was low.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our cohort showed that myeloma patients with early DSS and better treatment response before ASCT had better long-term survival outcomes.

Novel Treatments for Multiple Myeloma: What Role Do They Have in Older Adults?

Multiple myeloma is a malignant plasma cell disease, which typically affects older patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 70 years. The recent introduction of novel drugs and ongoing improvements in supportive care have significantly contributed to overall better management and outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma. Autologous stem-cell transplantation has been a standard part of therapy for myeloma patients for many years, first in younger patients and increasingly in older, and may still be considered in selected older patients with myeloma. In addition, in both newly diagnosed patients and in the relapsed/refractory setting, a number of novel agents tested in large phase III trials have yielded improvements in overall outcomes. As clinical trials under-enrol older patients and have stringent exclusion criteria, the data and results from them may not be generalizable to all older adults. In this review, we examine the treatment options for older adults with myeloma with a specific focus on the currently available data on novel agents in this cohort. The clinical efficacy and unique toxicity profile of each novel agent must be considered prior to the treatment plan in older adults.

Polymorphisms in the promoter region of the CRBN gene as a predictive factor for the first-line CTD therapy in multiple myeloma patients

Cereblon is a primary molecular target for immunomodulatory drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of selected clinical and molecular factors including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CRBN gene on the efficacy of first line CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone) chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma. Study group consisted of 68 patients. Analysis of CRBN gene SNPs (rs6768972, rs1672753) was performed using Real-Time PCR genotyping technique. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 15 months and overall survival (OS) 79 months. Factors associated with significantly shorter OS included ISS 3, kidney disease, weight loss, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, elevated β2-microglobuline and CRP. The presence of t(4;14) was associated with significantly shorter PFS and OS. Both examined SNPs proved to be statistically significant, independent predictive factors of efficacy of the CTD chemotherapy. The presence of AA genotype (rs6768972) correlated with longer median PFS (18 vs 9 months; HR=0.49,95% CI: 0.26-0.91, p=0.0062). Conversely, in the carriers of CC genotype (rs1672753) significantly shorter median PFS was observed (4 vs 16 months; HR=3.93, 95% CI: 0.26-59.64, p=0.0321). In conclusion, SNPs of the CRBN gene may be useful in qualifying patients for treatment with regimens containing thalidomide.

Use of depth of response to predict progression-free survival in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Evaluation of results from 102 clinical trials

Progression-free survival (PFS) is the standard endpoint for demonstration of clinical effectiveness of novel therapies in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, the long evaluation times for PFS limits its usefulness in the development of new therapies. Therefore, the objective of this analysis was to determine the relationship between response rates and median PFS in RRMM. A database was systematically developed from 268 identified RRMM trials reported from 1999 to 2016. Evaluated covariates for the relationship between response rates and PFS included age, sex, drug class(es), and number of drug classes. One-hundred two (102) trials involving 136 cohorts were included in the meta-analysis, representing 13 322 patients in total. Regression analysis using response rates and median PFS indicated that the correlation between very good partial response (VGPR) or better and median PFS was higher (R2  = 0.63) than the separately analyzed correlations between clinical benefit, overall response, or complete response rate and median PFS (R2  = 0.47 - 0.52). Subsequent covariate analysis revealed that treatment with an immunomodulatory imide drug (IMiD) further improved the relationship (R2  = 0.69), with a longer median PFS at a given VGPR or better rate when at least 1 drug treatment was an IMiD. Number of drug classes was not found to alter this relationship. In conclusion, VGPR or better rate can be used to predict the median PFS, with adjustment for the additional PFS provided by an IMiD.

Hematologists' Preferences for First-line Therapy Characteristics for Multiple Myeloma in Japan: Attribute Rating and Discrete Choice Experiment

PURPOSE

With the progress being made in the treatment of multiple myeloma and other complex cancers, a variety of clinical research and treatment options are being pursued. This study uses a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to estimate treatment characteristic preferences of hematologists in Japan.

METHODS

A 2-stage process was applied within this study. The first stage is an attribute-rating exercise in which each of the full list of 21 attributes is rated on its importance by the clinicians when selecting a first-line therapy. The top 8 rated attributes from a stepwise logistic regression model are then used to develop a DCE to estimate hematologists' willingness to trade-off characteristics of the treatment options in their recommendation of a first-line treatment. A logit model was used to identify the attribute levels that were the strongest determinants of the physicians' treatment preferences.

FINDINGS

From among the potential treatment attributes presented, improved overall survival had the most significant impact on the treatment choice of participating Japanese hematologists. Improvement in the ability to promptly reduce M-protein is also a highly prioritized treatment characteristic, with hematologists willing to sacrifice just over 1 month extra overall survival for this. Additionally, the hematologists' value improved suitability for chromosomal abnormalities with poor prognosis, suitability of the mechanism of action in initial treatment, and promptly improving calcium-renal-anemia-bone symptoms each at roughly 0.9 months extended overall survival. The reduction of adverse events is among the other significant factors in choice of treatment, though it was not found to be as strong a determinant as those mentioned.

IMPLICATIONS

This study reinforces the expectation that clinical research and treatment options should continue to focus on overall survival and are key priorities in multiple myeloma treatment development. However, clinicians are willing to consider and trade off other clinical factors and markers in their choice of treatment. The potential improvements presented were also found to have a greater impact on treatment choice than aversion to the potential worse outcomes presented.

Management of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: novel agents, antibodies, immunotherapies and beyond

Despite enormous advances, management of multiple myeloma (MM) remains challenging. Multiple factors impact the decision to treat or which regimen to use at MM relapse/progression. Recent major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed widely varying progression-free survivals (PFS), ranging from a median of 4 months (MM-003) to 23.6 months (ASPIRE). Based on these RCTs, next-generation proteasome inhibitors (carfilzomib and ixazomib), next-generation immunomodulatory agent (pomalidomide), and monoclonal antibodies (elotuzumab and daratumumab) were approved for relapsed and refractory MM. Daratumumab, targeting CD38, has multiple mechanisms of action including modulation of the immunosuppressive bone marrow micro-environment. In addition to the remarkable single agent activity in refractory MM, daratumumab produced deep responses and superior PFS in MM when combined with lenalidomide/dexamethasone, or bortezomib/dexamethasone. Other anti-CD38 antibodies, such as isatuximab and MOR202, are undergoing assessment. Elotuzumab, targeting SLAMF7, yielded superior response rates and PFS when combined with lenalidomide/dexamethasone. New combinations of these next generation novel agents and/or antibodies are undergoing clinical trials. Venetoclax, an oral BH3 mimetic inhibiting BCL2, showed single agent activity in MM with t(11;14), and is being studied in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone. Selinexor, an Exportin-1 inhibitor, yielded promising results in quad- or penta-refractory MM including patients resistant to daratumumab. Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD1 check-point inhibitor, is being tested in combination with lenalidomide/dexamethasone or pomalidomide/dexamethasone. Chimeric antigen receptor-T cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen have yielded deep responses in RRMM. Finally, salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an important treatment in MM relapsing/progressing after a first ASCT. Herein, the clinical trial data of these agents are summarized, cautious interpretation of RCTs highlighted, and algorithm for salvage treatment of relapse/refractory MM proposed.

Impact of Dose-Adjusted Melphalan in Obese Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Limited guidance exists for dosing melphalan for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the obese patient population, because the current literature reports conflicting clinical outcomes between obese and nonobese patients. In 2014, the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation published conditioning chemotherapy dosing guidelines for obese patients and recommended dosing of melphalan using actual body weight (ABW) in the body surface area calculation. The practice at Barnes-Jewish Hospital has consistently been to dose melphalan using adjusted body weight (AdBW), with a 20% correction when a patient weighs ≥120% of his or her ideal body weight (IBW). The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of melphalan ASCT in patients with multiple myeloma between obese (≥120% IBW) and nonobese (<120% IBW) populations. This retrospective, single-center study included adult patients with multiple myeloma undergoing first ASCT with melphalan conditioning between January 2009 and December 2012. Patient demographic data, transplantation characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was 3-year event-free survival (EFS). Secondary outcomes included response at 100 days post-transplantation, 3-year overall survival, treatment-related mortality (TRM), time to neutrophil engraftment, and hospital length of stay (LOS). To ensure that melphalan dosage adjustment in the obese population did not impact efficacy, the primary outcome was assessed using a noninferiority design, with a predetermined noninferiority margin of 7%. Assuming a 70% 3-year EFS in the nonobese population, a noninferiority margin of 7%, a power of 80%, and an α value of .05, an analysis of 280 patients was required. A total of 270 patients, including 171 (63%) obese patients and 99 (37%) nonobese patients, met our inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were well matched between the 2 cohorts, including high-risk cytogenetics, disease severity at diagnosis, and use of maintenance therapy, with the only detectable differences related to weight itself. The 3-year EFS was 41% for the total cohort, with fewer events occurring in the obese cohort compared with the nonobese cohort (51% versus 40%; P = .0025). The 95% lower confidence limit established noninferiority. High-risk cytogenetics, disease severity at diagnosis, and therapy response pre- and post-ASCT were all associated with significantly shorter EFS. No between-group differences in TRM, time to engraftment, or hospital LOS were noted. This retrospective, single-center study found that using AdBW to dose melphalan in obese patients was not inferior to the nonobese population in terms of 3-year EFS. This study adds to the limited evidence on melphalan dosing and suggests that transplantation efficacy is not affected by AdBW dosing in obese patients. Further studies are needed to provide additional insight into the pharmacokinetic differences and best dosing practices for obese patients.

High level of soluble interleukin-2 receptor in serum predicts treatment resistance and poor progression-free survival in multiple myeloma

The IL-2/IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) system plays a central role in maintaining normal T cell immunity, and its disturbance is associated with several hematologic disorders. Studies have found in several types of lymphoma that abnormal amounts of soluble IL-2R (sIL-2R) may result in imbalance of the IL-2/IL-2R system and hence of the T cell immunoregulation. Whether the level of sIL-2R in blood could predict treatment outcomes or not needs to be investigated in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The level of sIL-2R in serum was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 81 patients with newly diagnosed MM. Twenty-six patients (32.1%) were treated with bortezomib-based regimens and 55patients (67.9%) received old drugs-based regimens. The mean concentration of sIL-2R for myeloma patients was 8.51 ng/ml, significantly higher than that of healthy controls (0.56 ng/ml, p < 0.0001). The best cutoff value for sIL-2R in predicting high risk for disease progression is 6.049 ng/ml with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.665 (p = 0.013). Thirty-six patients (44.4%) were classified as higher sIL-2R level group (> 6.049 ng/ml), and 45 patients (55.6%) as lower group (≤ 6.049 ng/ml). The overall response rate (ORR) was 60.0% in lower sIL-2R level group, and 41.7% in higher level group (p = 0.156). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 12 months (range, 2.0-65 months) and 20 months (range, 2.0-118 months), respectively. In a multivariate survival analysis, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, treatment response, and sIL-2R level, it was found that all these three parameters were significantly independent prognostic factors for PFS (p = 0.032, 0.016, and 0.043, respectively), but none factors maintained their value in predicting OS. Subgroup analysis revealed that high level of sIL-2R is correlated with significantly inferior PFS in patients treated with bortezomib-based regimens (p = 0.004). Serum sIL-2R level is an independent prognostic factor for PFS, indicating novel drugs targeting the imbalance of IL-2/IL-2R system may be a promising strategy in MM.

High sensitivity blood-based M-protein detection in sCR patients with multiple myeloma

We assessed the ability of a mass spectrometry-based technique, called monoclonal immunoglobulin rapid accurate mass measurement (miRAMM), to extend the analytical range of M-protein detection in serum samples obtained from myeloma patients in stringent complete response (sCR) post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). To aid the M-protein detection post ASCT, the accurate molecular mass of the M-protein light chain at diagnosis was determined in all patients (N=30) and used to positively identify clones in the sCR serum. Day 100 post-ASCT, sCR samples had miRAMM identifiable M-proteins in 81% of patients. Patients who had achieved only a partial remission (PR) pre-ASCT and those with IgG isotypes serum samples had the highest rate of M-protein detection by miRAMM. miRAMM positivity at single time points (day 100, 6 months or 12 months) did not correlate with progression-free survival (PFS). In contrast, sCR patients who did not decrease their miRAMM M-protein intensities in serial measurements had shorter PFS than those whose miRAMM intensities decreased (median 17.9 months vs 51.6 months; P<0.0017). miRAMM M-protein is a more sensitive blood-based test than traditional M-protein tests and could cost effectively aid in serially monitoring complete remission for continue response or biochemical relapse.

Targeting complete response with upfront bortezomib consolidation versus observation after the achievement of complete response following autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma (TUBA study)

Complete response (CR) after treatment for multiple myeloma is associated with superior progression-free survival (PFS). Multiple myeloma patients were prospectively recruited for induction treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD) followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) between 2010 and 2012. If patients did not achieve CR after auto-HCT, BD consolidation therapy was added to target CR. After the BD induction phase (n = 46), greater than or equal to CR was achieved in 4 patients (8%). After auto-HCT (n = 34), greater than or equal to CR was achieved in 9 patients (20%) and very good partial response (VGPR) was achieved in 11 (24%). Of the 24 patients who received auto-HCT and whose response was less than CR, 21 received BD consolidation therapy for a median of 4 courses. Finally, the maximum response with or without BD consolidation was greater than or equal to CR in 19 (41%), VGPR in 7 (15%), and PR in 6 (13%). Through BD consolidation, CR was achieved in 8 of 11 patients with post-HCT VGPR and in 2 of 12 patients with post-HCT PR. In total, 4 year PFS and overall survival were 43 and 80%, respectively. After adjusting for clinical factors, there was no difference in PFS between CR patients after auto-HCT and BD consolidation, while patients with less than or equal to VGPR after consolidation had a significantly lower PFS. Patients with post-HCT CR showed good PFS, and targeting CR through BD consolidation could improve the CR rate. It would be worthwhile to prospectively compare the efficacy of consolidation only for patients who failed to achieve CR to a universal consolidation strategy.

Standardisation of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma

The assessment of the effectiveness of chemotherapy in oncology cannot disregard the concept of minimal residual disease (MRD). In fact, the efforts of numerous scientific groups all over the world are currently focusing on this issue, with the sole purpose of defining sensitive, effective assessment criteria that are, above all, able to give acceptable, easily repeatable results worldwide. Regarding this issue, especially with the advent of new drugs, multiple myeloma is one of the haematologic malignancies for which a consensus has not yet been reached. In this review, we analyse various techniques that have been used to improve the sensitivity of response, aimed at reducing the cut-off values previously allowed, as well as serological values like serum-free light chain, or immunophenotypic tools on bone marrow or peripheral blood, like multi-parameter flow cytometry, or molecular ones such as allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO)-qPCR and next-generation/high-throughput sequencing technologies (NGS). Moreover, our discussion makes a brief reference to promising techniques, such as mass spectrometry for identifying Ig light chain (LC) in peripheral blood, and the assessment of gene expression profile not only in defining prognostic risk at the diagnosis but also as a tool for evaluation of response.

Heavy+light chain monitoring correlates with clinical outcome in multiple myeloma patients

Novel anti-myeloma agents have improved patient response rates, which are historically based on reductions of the M-protein. These methods can be inaccurate for quantifying M-proteins at low concentrations. We compared the consistency and clinical impact of response assignment by electrophoretic and heavy+light chain (HLC) immunoassays post-consolidation in 463 newly diagnosed patients. The two methods gave similar assignments in patients with partial (PR; 79% agreement) or complete response (⩾CR; 92%). However, in patients achieving very good PR (VGPR) there was poor concordance between methods (45%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for standard VGPR patients was 34.5 months; HLC responses stratified these patients further into PR, VGPR and ⩾CR, with median PFS of 21.3, 28.9 months and not reached, respectively; P<0.001. At this time, abnormal HLC ratios had better concordance with multiparametric flow cytometry (sensitivity 10⁻⁴) (37 and 34% positive, respectively), compared to immunofixation (62% positive). In addition, HLC-pair suppression was identified in 38% of patients and associated with shorter PFS (30.6 months vs not reached; P<0.001). We conclude that HLC monitoring could augment electrophoretic assessments in patients achieving VGPR. The prognostic significance of HLC responses might partly depend on the patients’ ability to recover their immune system, as determined by normalisation of HLC measurements.

International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma

Treatment of multiple myeloma has substantially changed over the past decade with the introduction of several classes of new effective drugs that have greatly improved the rates and depth of response. Response criteria in multiple myeloma were developed to use serum and urine assessment of monoclonal proteins and bone marrow assessment (which is relatively insensitive). Given the high rates of complete response seen in patients with multiple myeloma with new treatment approaches, new response categories need to be defined that can identify responses that are deeper than those conventionally defined as complete response. Recent attempts have focused on the identification of residual tumour cells in the bone marrow using flow cytometry or gene sequencing. Furthermore, sensitive imaging techniques can be used to detect the presence of residual disease outside of the bone marrow. Combining these new methods, the International Myeloma Working Group has defined new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging-based absence of extramedullary disease, to allow uniform reporting within and outside clinical trials. In this Review, we clarify several aspects of disease response assessment, along with endpoints for clinical trials, and highlight future directions for disease response assessments.

High-dose gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan for autologous stem-cell transplant in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma: a phase 2 trial and matched-pair comparison with melphalan

BACKGROUND

High-dose melphalan is of limited benefit as autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) regimen for relapsed/refractory myeloma. Its poor results in this setting prompted us to study a new high-dose combination of infusional gemcitabine/busulfan/melphalan (Gem/Bu/Mel).

METHODS

We conducted a phase 2 trial of Gem/Bu/Mel in patients with primary refractory or relapsed disease after bortezomib and/or an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), or receiving a salvage ASCT. Gemcitabine (1,875 mg/m² over 3 hours × 2 days) was followed by busulfan (target AUC 4,000/day × 4 days) and melphalan (60 mg/m²/day × 2 days). The primary endpoint of this trial was to determine the stringent complete remission (sCR) rate of Gem/Bu/Mel in this population. We then retrospectively compared the study patients with all other concurrent patients eligible for this trial who, instead, received melphalan at 200 mg/m² IV at our center. For survival outcomes, we used a statistical algorithm to select a subset from the control cohort that matched with the Gem/Bu/Mel patients by gender, age, disease status, double refractoriness to proteasome inhibitors/IMIDs, duration from diagnosis to transplant and cytogenetic risk, in a 1–2:1 ratio. All analyses are per protocol. This is the final analysis of the clinical trial. Trial registered at NCI.gov (NCT01237951).

FINDINGS

We enrolled 74 patients on the Gem/Bu/Mel trial, median age 58 (interquartile range [IQR], 11), median 2 prior therapy lines (IQR, 3), 38 high-risk cytogenetics, 17 unresponsive to all prior treatments, and 33 receiving a salvage ASCT. Toxicities of Gem/Bu/Mel included grade 3 mucositis (N=12), grade 3 dermatitis (N=5), grade 3 transaminase elevation (N=7), grade 3 diarrhea (N=2), grade 5 sudden death (N=1) and grade 5 sepsis (N=2). The study patients and the 184 concurrent controls received similar post-ASCT maintenance. Gem/Bu/Mel resulted in more sCR (24.6% v 12.6%, P=0.040), similar overall responses (73.8% v 74.1%, P=0.77) and similar transplant-related mortality (4.0% v 3.8%, P=0.90). The median follow-up times for the Gem/Bu/Mel patients and the matched subset (N=111) were 36 months (IQR, 15.2) and 34 months (IQR, 27), respectively. Gem/Bu/Mel resulted in improved progression-free survival (median 15.1 v 9.3 months, P=0.0030; hazard ratio=0.60; P=0.021) and overall survival (median 37.5 v 23 months, P=0.0092; hazard ratio=0.65, P=0.0087).

INTERPRETATION

Gem/Bu/Mel is a safe and active ASCT regimen for refractory/relapsed myeloma, with better outcomes than a concurrent matched cohort receiving melphalan.

Funding

Supported by a grant from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc. and NCI Grant P30 CA016672.

The genetic and genomic background of multiple myeloma patients achieving complete response after induction therapy with bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD)

The prime focus of the current therapeutic strategy for Multiple Myeloma (MM) is to obtain an early and deep tumour burden reduction, up to the level of complete response (CR). To date, no description of the characteristics of the plasma cells (PC) prone to achieve CR has been reported. This study aimed at the molecular characterization of PC obtained at baseline from MM patients in CR after bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) first line therapy.

One hundred and eighteen MM primary tumours obtained from homogeneously treated patients were profiled both for gene expression and for single nucleotide polymorphism genotype. Genomic results were used to obtain a predictor of sensitivity to VTD induction therapy, as well as to describe both the transcription and the genomic profile of PC derived from MM with subsequent optimal response to primary induction therapy.

By analysing the gene profiles of CR patients, we identified a 5-gene signature predicting CR with an overall median accuracy of 75% (range: 72%–85%). In addition, we highlighted the differential expression of a series of genes, whose deregulation might explain patients' sensitivity to VTD therapy. We also showed that a small copy number loss, covering 606Kb on chromosome 1p22.1 was the most significantly associated with CR patients.

Association between complete response and outcomes in transplant-eligible myeloma patients in the era of novel agents

OBJECTIVES

Achieving complete response (CR) has been linked to improved progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival in myeloma. A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate whether this holds true in the era of novel agents (bortezomib, lenalidomide, thalidomide).

METHODS

A total of 24 studies in newly diagnosed patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) that reported associations between responses and long-term outcomes (PFS/OS rates post-ASCT by response, or hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals from Cox models) were identified and analyzed.

RESULTS

Achievement of CR vs. <CR post-ASCT reduced risk of progression/death by 38% [risk ratio (RR): 0.62, P < 0.0001]; risk of death was 41% lower (RR: 0.59, P < 0.0001). Subgroup meta-analyses showed significant PFS risk reduction with CR post-ASCT with novel (RR: 0.32, P < 0.006) and non-novel (RR: 0.72, P < 0.0001) agents, and corresponding OS risk reduction with novel (RR: 0.33, P = 0.0013) and non-novel (RR: 0.64, P < 0.0001) agents. Risk reduction was greater with novel vs. non-novel agents (PFS: P = 0.047; OS: P = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving CR during first-line therapy remains important in the novel-agent era; magnitude of association between achieving CR and outcomes appears higher for CR obtained using novel vs. non-novel agents.

Improved clinical outcomes for multiple myeloma patients treated at a single specialty clinic

Despite recent advances made in its treatment, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable B cell malignancy. Thus, the objective for treating these patients is to prolong overall survival (OS) and preserve patients' quality of life. We have analyzed data from 264 consecutive MM patients who had their initial visit between July 1, 2004 and December 1, 2014 and have received treatment in a single clinic specializing in MM. We determined their progression-free survival (PFS, OS, and 5-year OS). The PFS for frontline (n = 165 treatments), salvage (n = 980), and all treatments (n = 1145) were 13.9, 4.6, and 5.5 months, respectively. The median OS of all patients was 98 months with a 5-year survival of 74%. The results of this study show a marked improvement in OS for unselected MM patients compared with historical data. There were no significant differences in OS between patients with different International Staging System (ISS) stages. Younger patients (<65 years old) showed a longer OS. The results of this study should help physicians predict outcomes for MM patients and be encouraging for patients with this B cell malignancy.

Predictors of inferior clinical outcome in patients with standard-risk multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Outcome of patients with standard-risk (SR) multiple myeloma (MM) has improved; however, subsets of patients do worse than expected. We sought to identify the factors associated with inferior outcome.

METHODS

We evaluated 51 patients with SR MM that received upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) after induction and had a progression-free survival (PFS) of ≤18 months.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 61 yr. Forty-one (80%) patients received induction with immunomodulatory drugs, proteosome inhibitors, or combination of both. The overall response rate (ORR) after auto-HCT was 96% (stringent complete response 23%, complete response 10%, very good partial response 22%, and partial response 39%). The median PFS was 7.8, and median overall survival (OS) was 56.3 months. On univariate analysis, concurrent light-chain amyloidosis (AL) was associated with inferior PFS [hematological response (HR); 2.51, 95% CI; 0.64-10.58, P = 0.03] and occurrence of soft tissue plasmacytoma was associated with a significantly shorter OS (HR: 3.05, 95% CI: 0.57-16.29, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that concurrent AL and soft tissue plasmacytoma were associated with shorter PFS and OS, respectively. Heterogeneity in clinical outcome of SR MM merits better tools for prognostication, such as gene expression profiling and minimal residual disease assessment to identify high-risk patients.

Gene Expression Profiles in Myeloma: Ready for the Real World?

Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell malignancy characterized by molecular and clinical heterogeneity. The outcome of the disease has been dramatically improved with the advent of new drugs in the past few years. However, even in this context of increasing therapeutic options, important challenges remain, such as accurately evaluating patients' prognosis and predicting sensitivity to specific treatments and drug combinations. Transcriptomic studies have largely contributed to help decipher multiple myeloma complexity, characterizing multiple myeloma subgroups distinguished by different outcomes. Microarrays and, more recently, RNA sequencing allow evaluation of expression of coding and noncoding genes, alternate splicing events, mutations, and novel transcriptome modifiers, providing new information regarding myeloma biology, prognostication, and therapy. In this review, we discuss the role and impact of gene expression profiling studies in myeloma. Clin Cancer Res; 22(22); 5434-42. ©2016 AACR SEE ALL ARTICLES IN THIS CCR FOCUS SECTION, "MULTIPLE MYELOMA MULTIPLYING THERAPIES".

Serum levels of soluble programmed death ligand 1 predict treatment response and progression free survival in multiple myeloma

Immune checkpoint signaling plays an important role in immunosuppression in multiple myeloma (MM). Blood levels of soluble programmed death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1), a checkpoint-relevant protein, might predict treatment response and survival outcomes in MM patients. We used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure serum sPD-L1 levels in 81 newly diagnosed MM patients. We found that myeloma patients had higher sPD-L1 concentrations than healthy controls. The best sPD-L1 cutoff value for predicting disease progression risk was 2.783 ng/mL. The overall response rate to treatment was higher in low sPD-L1 patients than in high sPD-L1 patients. The 3-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients were 16% and 64%, respectively. Multivariate survival analysis including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, treatment response, and sPD-L1 level showed that a less than partial treatment response (PR) and higher sPD-L1 levels (>2.783 ng/ml) were independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS; neither factor was predictive of OS. The serum sPD-L1 level is a valuable biomarker for predicting treatment response and an independent prognostic factor for PFS. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade may be a promising novel immune-based therapeutic strategy in MM.

Proton pump inhibitors induce a caspase-independent antitumor effect against human multiple myeloma

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy and is responsive to a limited number of drugs. Unfortunately, to date, despite the introduction of novel drugs, no relevant increase in survival rates has been obtained. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been shown to have significant antitumor action as single agents as well as in combination with chemotherapy. This study investigates the potential anti-tumor effectiveness of two PPIs, Lansoprazole and Omeprazole, against human MM cells. We found that Lansoprazole exerts straightforward efficacy against myeloma cells, even at suboptimal concentrations (50 µM), while Omeprazole has limited cytotoxic action. The Lansoprazole anti-MM effect was mostly mediated by a caspase-independent apoptotic-like cytotoxicity, with only a secondary anti-proliferative action. This study provides clear evidence supporting the use of Lansoprazole in the strive against MM with an efficacy proven much higher than current therapeutical approaches and without reported side effects. It is however conceivable that, consistent with the results obtained in other human tumors, Lansoprazole may well be combined with existing anti-myeloma therapies with the aim to improve the low level of efficacy of the current strategies.

Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in the Context of Multiple Myeloma Treatment

With contemporary therapeutic strategies in multiple myeloma, heretofore unseen depth and rate of responses are being achieved. These strategies have paralleled improvements in outcome of multiple myeloma patients. The integration of the next generation of proteasome inhibitors and antibody therapeutics promise continued improvements in therapy with the expectation of consistent depth of response not quantifiable by current clinical methods. As such, there is a growing need to develop adequate tools to evaluate deeper disease response after therapy and to refine the response criteria including the minimal residual disease. Several emerging techniques are being evaluated for these purposes including multi-parameter flow cytometry, allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing, and imaging modalities. In this review, we highlight the recent developments and evaluate advantages and limitations of the current technologies to assess minimal residual disease. We also discuss future applications of these methodologies in potentially guiding multiple myeloma treatment decisions.

High level of interleukin-10 in serum predicts poor prognosis in multiple myeloma

Background:

Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is a inhibiting inflammatory cytokine that plays an important role in immune suppressive microenvironment in multiple myeloma (MM). Whether the level of serum IL-10 could predict treatment response and survival outcomes or not needs to be investigated in MM patients.

Methods:

The level of IL-10 in serum was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 188 patients with newly diagnosed MM.

Results:

The best cutoff value for IL-10 in predicting survival is 169.69 pg ml⁻¹ with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.747 (P<0.001). In all, 92 patients (48.9%) were classified as high-IL-10 group (>169.96 pg ml⁻¹) and 96 patients (51.1%) as low-IL-10 group (⩽169.96 pg ml⁻¹). The overall response rate (ORR) was 79.2% in low-IL-10 group, significantly higher than that in high-IL-10 group (53.3%, P<0.001). Patients in low-IL-10 group had significantly better survival compared with those in high-IL-10 group (3-year PFS rate: 69.3% vs 13.3%, P<0.001; 3-year OS rate: 93.6% vs 51.9%, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that serum IL-10 level >169.96 pg ml⁻¹ at diagnosis and certain cytogenetic abnormalities were two adverse factors for PFS and OS.

Conclusions:

Our data suggest that serum IL-10 at diagnosis is a novel, powerful predictor of prognosis for MM.

Long-term outcomes of different bortezomib-based regimens in Chinese myeloma patients

Bortezomib has significantly increased the response rates in multiple myeloma (MM), but optimal bortezomib-based regimens for initial MM therapy have not yet been defined. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of 128 patients newly diagnosed with symptomatic MM who received either bortezomib combined with dexamethasone (PD) or three-drug combinations of PD with liposomal doxorubicin (PAD) or thalidomide (PTD). The overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response (VGPR) rate, and complete remission CR/near-complete remission (nCR) results were better for the PAD and PTD regimens than for the PD group. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 80.1%, 72.5%, and 61.8% with PAD, PTD, and PD regimens, respectively. The 3-year OS rate of PAD and PTD was significantly higher than that of PD (80.1% vs 61.8%, P=0.024; 72.5% vs 61.8%, P=0.035), but the difference was not statistically significant between PAD and PTD (80.1% vs 72.5%, P=0.843). Similarly, the PAD and PTD regimens resulted in significantly superior 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates. The patients in the PTD arm were more frequently observed with grade 1–3 peripheral neuropathy (PN), compared to those in the PAD and PD groups, especially grade 2–3 PN. PN developed less frequently without sacrificing the efficacy when bortezomib was administered subcutaneously rather than intravenously. Our experience suggests that the three-drug combinations PAD and PTD produce a better outcome than PD, especially with respect to PAD, with fewer adverse events.

Minimal Residual Disease by Next-Generation Sequencing: Pros and Cons

The wealth of data recently generated highlights that minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status can be achieved in a large proportion of patients. These studies, in addition to a meta-analysis, clearly suggest significant improvement in both event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) among those patients achieving MRD-negative status, especially with sensitivity of one cell in 1 million bone marrow cells. There is an evolving consensus that achieving MRD-negative status should become the ultimate goal of therapeutic intervention. Further future efforts should now be directed at determining how MRD status can be used to guide and personalize further therapy including type of consolidation and maintenance therapy.