Functional characterization of a 13-bp deletion (c.-1522_-1510del13) in the promoter of the von Willebrand factor gene in type 1 von Willebrand disease

Application of genetic testing for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most frequent inherited bleeding disorder, with an estimated symptomatic prevalence of 1 per 1000 in the general population. VWD is characterized by defects in the quantity, quality, or multimeric structure of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a glycoprotein being hemostatically essential in circulation. VWD is classified into 3 principal types: low VWF/type 1 with partial quantitative deficiency of VWF, type 3 with virtual absence of VWF, and type 2 with functional abnormalities of VWF, being classified as 2A, 2B, 2M, and 2N. A new VWD type has been officially recognized by the ISTH SSC on von Willebrand factor which has also been discussed by the joint ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH 2021 guidelines (ie, type 1C), indicating patients with quantitative deficiency due to an enhanced VWF clearance. With the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the process of genetic diagnosis has substantially changed and improved accuracy. Therefore, nowadays, patients with type 3 and severe type 1 VWD can benefit from genetic testing as much as type 2 VWD. Specifically, genetic testing can be used to confirm or differentiate a VWD diagnosis, as well as to provide genetic counseling. The focus of this manuscript is to discuss the current knowledge on VWD molecular pathophysiology and the application of genetic testing for VWD diagnosis.

Mechanisms regulating heterogeneity of hemostatic gene expression in endothelial cells

The hemostatic system involves an array of circulating coagulation factors that work in concert with platelets and the vascular endothelium to promote clotting in a space- and time-defined manner. Despite equal systemic exposure to circulating factors, bleeding and thrombotic diseases tend to prefer specific sites, suggesting an important role for local factors. This may be provided by endothelial heterogeneity. Endothelial cells differ not only between arteries, veins, and capillaries but also between microvascular beds from different organs, which present unique organotypic morphology and functional and molecular profiles. Accordingly, regulators of hemostasis are not uniformly distributed in the vasculature. The establishment and maintenance of endothelial diversity are orchestrated at the transcriptional level. Recent transcriptomic and epigenomic studies have provided a global picture of endothelial cell heterogeneity. In this review, we discuss the organotypic differences in the hemostatic profile of endothelial cells; we focus on 2 major endothelial regulators of hemostasis, namely von Willebrand factor and thrombomodulin, to provide examples of transcriptional mechanisms that control heterogeneity; finally, we consider some of the methodological challenges and opportunities for future studies.

Regulation of VWF (Von Willebrand Factor) in Inflammatory Thrombosis

Increasing evidence indicates that inflammation promotes thrombosis via a VWF (von Willebrand factor)-mediated mechanism. VWF plays an essential role in maintaining the balance between blood coagulation and bleeding, and inflammation can lead to aberrant regulation. VWF is regulated on a transcriptional and (post-)translational level, and its secretion into the circulation captures platelets upon endothelial activation. The significant progress that has been made in understanding transcriptional and translational regulation of VWF is described in this review. First, we describe how VWF is regulated at the transcriptional and post-translational level with a specific focus on the influence of inflammatory and immune responses. Next, we describe how changes in regulation are linked with various cardiovascular diseases. Recent insights from clinical diseases provide evidence for direct molecular links between inflammation and thrombosis, including atherosclerosis, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and COVID-19. Finally, we will briefly describe clinical implications for antithrombotic treatment.

Identification of von Willebrand factor D4 domain mutations in patients of Afro-Caribbean descent: In vitro characterization

Background

Von Willebrand disease was diagnosed in two Afro‐Caribbean patients and sequencing of the VWF gene (VWF) revealed the presence of multiple variants located throughout the gene, including variants located in the D4 domain of VWF: p.(Pro2145Thrfs*5) in one patient and p.(Cys2216Phefs*9) in the other patient. Interestingly, D4 variants have not been studied often.

Objectives

Our goal was to characterize how the D4 variants p.(Pro2145Thrfs*5) and p.(Cys2216Phefs*9) influenced VWF biosynthesis/secretion and functions using in vitro assays.

Methods

Recombinant VWF (rVWF), mutant or wild‐type, was produced via transient transfection of the human embryonic kidney cell line 293T. The use of different tags for the wild‐type and the mutant allele allowed us to distinguish between the two forms when measuring VWF antigen in medium and cell lysates. Binding of rVWF to its ligands, collagen, factor VIII, ADAMTS13, and platelet receptors was also investigated.

Results

Homozygous expression of the p.(Cys2216Phefs*9)‐rVWF mutation resulted in an almost complete intracellular retention of the protein. Heterozygous expression led to secretion of almost exclusively wild‐type‐rVWF, logically capable of normal interaction with the different ligands. In contrast, the p.(Pro2145Thrfs*5)‐rVWF exhibited reduced binding to type III collagen and αIIbβ3 integrin compared to wild‐type‐rVWF.

Conclusions

We report two mutations of the D4 domains that induced combined qualitative and quantitative defects.

SvAnna: efficient and accurate pathogenicity prediction of coding and regulatory structural variants in long-read genome sequencing

Structural variants (SVs) are implicated in the etiology of Mendelian diseases but have been systematically underascertained owing to sequencing technology limitations. Long-read sequencing enables comprehensive detection of SVs, but approaches for prioritization of candidate SVs are needed. Structural variant Annotation and analysis (SvAnna) assesses all classes of SVs and their intersection with transcripts and regulatory sequences, relating predicted effects on gene function with clinical phenotype data. SvAnna places 87% of deleterious SVs in the top ten ranks. The interpretable prioritizations offered by SvAnna will facilitate the widespread adoption of long-read sequencing in diagnostic genomics. SvAnna is available at https://github.com/TheJacksonLaboratory/SvAnn a .

Innovative Molecular Testing Strategies for Adjunctive Investigations in Hemostasis and Thrombosis

Clinicians and scientists in the fields of hemostasis and thrombosis have been among those first to integrate new molecular strategies for the purpose of enhancing disease diagnosis and treatment. The molecular diagnosis and introduction of gene therapy approaches for hemophilia are obvious examples of this tendency. In this review, the authors summarize information concerning three molecular technologies that have reached various stages of translational potential for their incorporation into the clinical management of disorders of hemostasis. Chromatin conformation assays are now being used to capture structural knowledge of long-range genomic interactions that can alter patterns of gene expression and contribute to quantitative trait pathogenesis. Liquid biopsies in various forms are providing opportunities for early cancer detection, and in the context of tumor-educated platelets, as described here, can also characterize tumor type and the extent of tumor progression. This technology is already being trialed in patients with unprovoked venous thrombosis to assess the potential for occult malignancies. Lastly, advances in single cell transcriptome analysis, provide opportunities to definitively determine molecular events in rare cells, such as antigen-specific regulatory T cells, within the context of heterogeneous cell populations.

Genetic regulation of plasma von Willebrand factor levels in health and disease

Plasma levels of the multimeric glycoprotein von Willebrand factor (VWF) constitute a complex quantitative trait with a continuous distribution and wide range in the normal population (50-200%). Quantitative deficiencies of VWF (< 50%) are associated with an increased risk of bleeding, whereas high plasma levels of VWF (> 150%) influence the risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Although environmental factors can strongly influence plasma VWF levels, it is estimated that approximately 65% of this variability is heritable. Interestingly, although variability in VWF can account for ~ 5% of the genetic influence on plasma VWF levels, other genetic loci also strongly modify plasma VWF levels. The identification of the additional sources of VWF heritability has been the focus of recent observational trait-mapping studies, including genome-wide association studies or linkage analyses, as well as hypothesis-driven research studies. Quantitative trait loci influencing VWF glycosylation, secretion and clearance have been associated with plasma VWF antigen levels in normal individuals, and may contribute to quantitative VWF abnormalities in patients with a thrombotic tendency or type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD). The identification of genetic modifiers of plasma VWF levels may allow for better molecular diagnosis of type 1 VWD, and enable the identification of individuals at increased risk for thrombosis. Validation of trait-mapping studies with in vitro and in vivo methodologies has led to novel insights into the life cycle of VWF and the pathogenesis of quantitative VWF abnormalities.

Genetics of Hypercoagulable and Hypocoagulable States

Hemostasis is the normal process of blood coagulation in vivo to stop pathologic bleeding. Virchow triad includes venous stasis, hypercoagulability, and vascular injury. Natural anticoagulants include protein C, protein S, and antithrombin. Factor V Leiden is the most common inherited thrombophilia, followed by prothrombin gene mutation. All inherited thrombophilias are passed down in an autosomal dominant fashion. Patients harboring the antiphospholipid antibodies have an increased risk for thrombosis. von Willebrand disease is the most common inherited bleeding disorder; the pattern of inheritance is autosomal. Hemophilia A and B are the only hereditary bleeding disorders inherited in a sex-linked recessive pattern.

The role of von Willebrand factor in thrombotic microangiopathy

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is caused by thrombus formation in the microvasculature. The disease spectrum of TMA includes, amongst others, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). TTP is caused by defective cleavage of von Willebrand factor (VWF), whereas aHUS is caused by overshooting complement activation and subsequent endothelial cell (EC) injury. Despite their distinct pathophysiology, the clinical manifestation of TTP and aHUS consisting of microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopenia is often similar and difficult to distinguish. Recent evidence hints at both a genetic and functional link between TTP and aHUS, especially between VWF and the complement system. There is novel in vitro evidence that complement activation not only results in VWF release from ECs, but that VWF also functions as a negative complement regulator, thus protecting the EC surface from ongoing complement attack. Although contrary to previous experimental work suggesting that complement can be activated on VWF multimers, there may be an explanation in vivo that rationalizes these apparently contradictory findings, whereby a system primarily meant to regulate becomes overwhelmed or pathologic in the disease state. The importance of unravelling these recent findings for our understanding of TMA pathology becomes even more evident considering that glomerular ECs express VWF in a heterogeneous pattern with an overall decreased expression level, thus potentially leaving the glomerular ECs vulnerable to complement-mediated injury. Taken together, these findings support the concept that TTP and aHUS represent two extreme ends of a TMA disease spectrum rather than isolated disease entities.

How much do we really know about von Willebrand disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last nine decades, large advances have been made toward the characterization of the pathogenic basis and clinical management of von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder. Pathological variations at the von Willebrand factor (VWF) locus present as a range of both quantitative and qualitative abnormalities that make up the complex clinical spectrum of VWD. This review describes the current understanding of the pathobiological basis of VWD.

RECENT FINDINGS

The molecular basis of type 2 (qualitative abnormalities) and type 3 VWD (total quantitative deficiency) have been well characterized in recent decades. However, knowledge of type 1 VWD (partial quantitative deficiency) remains incomplete because of the allelic and locus heterogeneity of this trait, and is complicated by genetic variability at the VWF gene, interactions between the VWF gene and the environment, and the involvement of external modifying loci. Recent genome wide association studies and linkage analyses have sought to identify additional genes that modify the type 1 VWD phenotype.

SUMMARY

Understanding the pathogenic basis of VWD will facilitate the development of novel treatment regimens for this disorder, and improve the ability to provide complementary molecular diagnostics for type 1 VWD.

Von Willebrand disease mutation spectrum and associated mutation mechanisms

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a bleeding disorder that is mainly caused by mutations in the multimeric protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). These mutations may lead to deficiencies in plasma VWF or dysfunctional VWF. VWF is a heterogeneous protein and over the past three decades, hundreds of VWF mutations have been identified. In this review we have organized all reported mutations, spanning a timeline from the late eighties until early 2017. This resulted in an overview of 750 unique mutations that are divided over the VWD types 1, 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N and 3. For many of these mutations the disease-causing effects have been characterized in vitro through expression studies, ex vivo by analysis of patient-derived endothelial cells, as well as in animal or (bio)physical models. Here we describe the mechanisms associated with the VWF mutations per VWD type.

Diagnosing von Willebrand disease: genetic analysis

Investigation of a patient with possible von Willebrand disease (VWD) includes a range of phenotypic analyses. Often, this is sufficient to discern disease type, and this will suggest relevant treatment. However, for some patients, phenotypic analysis does not sufficiently explain the patient's disorder, and for this group, genetic analysis can aid diagnosis of disease type. Polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing have been mainstays of genetic analysis for several years. More recently, next-generation sequencing has become available, with the advantage that several genes can be simultaneously analyzed where necessary, eg, for discrimination of possible type 2N VWD or mild hemophilia A. Additionally, several techniques can now identify deletions/duplications of an exon or more that result in VWD including multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and microarray analysis. Algorithms based on next-generation sequencing data can also identify missing or duplicated regions. These newer techniques enable causative von Willebrand factor defects to be identified in more patients than previously, aiding in a specific VWD diagnosis. Genetic analysis can also be helpful in the discrimination between type 2B and platelet-type VWD and in prenatal diagnosis for families with type 3.

New insights into genotype and phenotype of VWD

Recent advances in VWD research have improved our understanding of the genotype and phenotype of VWD. The VWF gene is highly polymorphic, with a large number of sequence variations reported in healthy individuals. This can lead to some difficulty when attempting to discern genotype-phenotype correlations because sequence variations may not represent disease. In type 1 VWD, mutations can be found throughout the VWF gene, but likely pathogenic sequence variations are found in only ∼2/3 of type 1 VWD patients. Sequence variations in type 2 VWD are located in the region corresponding to the defect in the VWF protein found in each type 2 variant. In type 3 VWD, sequence variations are not confined to a specific region of the VWF gene and also include large deletions that may not be picked up using conventional sequencing techniques. Use of genetic testing may be most helpful in diagnosis of type 2 VWD, in which a larger number of known, well characterized mutations are present and demonstration of one of these may help to confirm the diagnosis. Bleeding symptoms in general are more severe with decreasing VWF levels and more severe in type 2 and type 3 VWD compared with type 1 VWD. Prediction of phenotype for an individual patient, however, is still difficult, and the addition of genetic data will be most helpful in ascertaining the correct diagnosis for VWD patients.

New insights into genotype and phenotype of VWD

Recent advances in VWD research have improved our understanding of the genotype and phenotype of VWD. The VWF gene is highly polymorphic, with a large number of sequence variations reported in healthy individuals. This can lead to some difficulty when attempting to discern genotype–phenotype correlations because sequence variations may not represent disease. In type 1 VWD, mutations can be found throughout the VWF gene, but likely pathogenic sequence variations are found in only ∼2/3 of type 1 VWD patients. Sequence variations in type 2 VWD are located in the region corresponding to the defect in the VWF protein found in each type 2 variant. In type 3 VWD, sequence variations are not confined to a specific region of the VWF gene and also include large deletions that may not be picked up using conventional sequencing techniques. Use of genetic testing may be most helpful in diagnosis of type 2 VWD, in which a larger number of known, well characterized mutations are present and demonstration of one of these may help to confirm the diagnosis. Bleeding symptoms in general are more severe with decreasing VWF levels and more severe in type 2 and type 3 VWD compared with type 1 VWD. Prediction of phenotype for an individual patient, however, is still difficult, and the addition of genetic data will be most helpful in ascertaining the correct diagnosis for VWD patients.

von Willebrand disease: advances in pathogenetic understanding, diagnosis, and therapy

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common autosomally inherited bleeding disorder. The disease represents a range of quantitative and qualitative pathologies of the adhesive glycoprotein von Willebrand factor (VWF). The pathogenic mechanisms responsible for the type 2 qualitative variants of VWF are now well characterized, with most mutations representing missense substitutions influencing VWF multimer structure and interactions with platelet GPIbα and collagen and with factor VIII. The molecular pathology of type 3 VWD has been similarly well characterized, with an array of different mutation types producing either a null phenotype or the production of VWF that is not secreted. In contrast, the pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for type 1 VWD remain only partially resolved. In the hemostasis laboratory, the measurement of VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo are key components in the diagnostic algorithm for VWD, although the introduction of direct GPIbα-binding assays may become the functional assay of choice. Molecular genetic testing can provide additional benefit, but its utility is currently limited to type 2 and 3 VWD. The treatment of bleeding in VWD involves the use of desmopressin and plasma-derived VWF concentrates and a variety of adjunctive agents. Finally, a new recombinant VWF concentrate has just completed clinical trial evaluation and has demonstrated excellent hemostatic efficacy and safety.

von Willebrand disease: advances in pathogenetic understanding, diagnosis, and therapy

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common autosomally inherited bleeding disorder. The disease represents a range of quantitative and qualitative pathologies of the adhesive glycoprotein von Willebrand factor (VWF). The pathogenic mechanisms responsible for the type 2 qualitative variants of VWF are now well characterized, with most mutations representing missense substitutions influencing VWF multimer structure and interactions with platelet GPIbα and collagen and with factor VIII. The molecular pathology of type 3 VWD has been similarly well characterized, with an array of different mutation types producing either a null phenotype or the production of VWF that is not secreted. In contrast, the pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for type 1 VWD remain only partially resolved. In the hemostasis laboratory, the measurement of VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo are key components in the diagnostic algorithm for VWD, although the introduction of direct GPIbα-binding assays may become the functional assay of choice. Molecular genetic testing can provide additional benefit, but its utility is currently limited to type 2 and 3 VWD. The treatment of bleeding in VWD involves the use of desmopressin and plasma-derived VWF concentrates and a variety of adjunctive agents. Finally, a new recombinant VWF concentrate has just completed clinical trial evaluation and has demonstrated excellent hemostatic efficacy and safety.

von Willebrand disease: clinical and laboratory lessons learned from the large von Willebrand disease studies

During the past 25 years, our knowledge concerning the pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, and treatment of von Willebrand disease (VWD) has increased significantly. Following the immunological differentiation of factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand factor (VWF) in the 1970s and the cloning of the FVIII and VWF genes in the mid-1980s, substantial progress has been made in our understanding of this, the most common inherited bleeding disorder. We now recognize that VWD represents a range of genetic diseases all with the clinical endpoint of increased mucocutaneous bleeding. The molecular pathology of Type 2 and 3 VWD is now comprehensively documented and involves rare sequence variants at the VWF locus. In contrast, the genetic causation of Type 1 disease remains incompletely defined and in many cases appears to involve genetic determinants in addition to or instead of VWF. The diagnostic triad of a personal history of excessive mucocutaneous bleeding, laboratory tests for VWF that are consistent with VWD, and a family history of the condition remain the keystone to VWD identification. In the laboratory, measurement of VWF antigen and function continue to be the most important diagnostic studies, and while our understanding of the molecular genetic pathology of VWD has advanced considerably in the past decade, genetic testing as a component of diagnosis is limited to certain distinct subtypes of the disorder. Treatment of VWD has been relatively unchanged for the past decade and continues to involve either stimulation of the release of intrinsic VWF with desmopressin or the infusion of VWF concentrates.