Comparable survival after HLA-well-matched unrelated or matched sibling donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission with unfavorable cytogenetics at diagnosis. Blood. 2010;116:1839-1848. [PMID: 20538804 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-278317]

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from alternative donors in acute myeloid leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) potentially provides a cure for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are unlikely to be cured with chemotherapy alone. Previously, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donors were used exclusively, which made the procedure available for a limited proportion of patients. The introduction of high-resolution HLA-typing technology, innovations in immunosuppressive therapy, and improved supportive care measures have significantly changed the situation. Now, patients without a matched related donor have an ample opportunity to receive allogeneic HCT with the use of matched or mismatched unrelated donors, umbilical cord blood grafts, or haploidentical related donors. The outcomes of alternative donor transplantations have improved over the past decades, and the growth of unrelated donor registries as well as the donor diversification have enhanced the chance of finding a suitable donor. With multiple alternative donor choices available for most patients, the donor selection is becoming increasingly important. To discuss the optimal donor choice in case of unavailability of an HLA-matched related donor, this article reviews the existing literature of retrospective and prospective comparisons of different alternative donor transplantations in AML and discusses the current state-of-art modalities in allogeneic HCT using alternative donors.

Comparison of Older Related versus Younger Unrelated Donors for Older Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Large Single-Center Analysis

For patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), HLA-matched related donors (MRDs) have traditionally been the preferred donor source. However, as the age of recipients increases, their sibling donors are aging as well. In this study, we investigated whether younger matched unrelated donors (MUDs) might be a better donor source than similarly aged sibling donors for patients age >60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A total of 499 patients age 60 to 70 years with AML or MDS who underwent alloHCT from an older MRD (donor age ≥50 years) or a younger MUD (donor age ≤35 years) between 2010 and 2022 were evaluated. Of these, 360 patients (72%) received an MUD graft and 139 (28%) received an MRD graft. The median recipient age was 64 years in the MRD group and 66 years in the MUD group. With a median follow-up among survivors of 53 months (range, 9 to 147 months ), the 4-year progression-free survival was 40% in the MRD group and 41% in the MUD group (P = .79) and the 4-year overall survival was 50% and 44%, respectively (P = .15), with no between-group differences in nonrelapse mortality, relapse, and acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease. In the MUD group, we also compared the effect of donor age 18 to 24 years and donor age 25 to 35 years and found no differences in outcomes between the groups. We conclude that outcomes are comparable between the use of older MRDs and use of younger MUDs for elderly patients with AML or MDS, that there is no donor age effect among younger MUDs, and that the use of either donor type is reasonable.

Strategies to reduce relapse risk in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a centrally important curative strategy in adults with acute myeloid leukaemia; however, relapse occurs in a significant proportion of patients and remains the leading cause of treatment failure. The prognosis for patients who relapse post-transplant remains poor, and the development of new strategies with the ability to reduce disease recurrence without increasing transplant toxicity remains a priority. In this review, within the context of our understanding of disease biology and the graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) effect, we will discuss established, evolving and novel approaches for increasing remission rates, decreasing measurable residual disease pretransplant, future methods to augment the GVL effect and the opportunities for post-transplant maintenance. Future progress depends upon the development of innovative trials and networks, which will ensure the rapid assessment of emerging therapies in prospective clinical trials.

Age barriers in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: Raising the silver curtain

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is no longer exclusively for the young. With an aging population, development of non-intensive remission-inducing strategies for hematologic malignancies, and novel graft-versus-host disease-prevention platforms, an older population of patients is pursuing HCT. The evolving population of HCT recipients requires an overhaul in the way we risk-stratify and optimize patients prior to HCT. Here, we review the history and current state of HCT for older adults and propose an assessment and intervention flow to bridge the gaps in today's clinical guidelines.

Cytogenetic abnormalities predict survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a PDWP/EBMT study

Poor-risk (PR) cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities generally direct pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). We assessed the predictive value of cytogenetic risk classification at diagnosis with respect to post-HSCT outcomes in pediatric patients. Patients younger than 18 years at the time of their first allogeneic HSCT for AML in CR1 between 2005 and 2022 who were reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry were subgrouped into four categories. Of the 845 pediatric patients included in this study, 36% had an 11q23 abnormality, 24% had monosomy 7/del7q or monosomy 5/del5q, 24% had a complex or monosomal karyotype, and 16% had other PR cytogenetic abnormalities. In a multivariable model, 11q23 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66, P = 0.03) and other PR cytogenetic abnormalities (HR = 0.55, P = 0.02) were associated with significantly better overall survival when compared with monosomy 7/del7q or monosomy 5/del5q. Patients with other PR cytogenetic abnormalities had a lower risk of disease relapse after HSCT (HR = 0.49, P = 0.01) and, hence, better leukemia-free survival (HR = 0.55, P = 0.01). Therefore, we conclude that PR cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis predict overall survival after HSCT for AML in pediatric patients.

Determining the predictive impact of donor parity on the outcomes of human leukocyte antigen matched hematopoietic stem cell transplants: a retrospective, single-center study

Introduction

Donor choosing remains to play a pivotal role in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Numerous criteria beyond HLA compatibility impact the selection of a suitable donor.

Methods

We evaluated the effect of donor parity on transplant outcomes in a large homogeneously treated population that received an HLA-matched allo-HSCT between 2010 and 2021 at our center. All patients were transplanted from a peripheral blood stem cell source following a myeloablative Busulfan-based conditioning and an identical protocol for graftversus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen.

Results

A total of 1103 allo-HSCT recipients were included. 188 (17%) had transplants from parous female donors, whereas 621 (56.30%) and 294 (26.70%) received transplants from male and nulliparous female donors, respectively. HSCTs from parous female donors compared to male and nulliparous females were associated with a significantly higher incidence of grade III-IV acute (a) GVHD (55.27% vs. 11.34 and 10.84%) and extensive chronic (c) GVHD (64.32% vs. 15.52 and 13.65%), as well as lower relapse incidence (RI).

Discussion

This study finds that while parous female donors are associated with higher incidences of grade III-IV aGVHD and extensive cGVHD post-allo-HSCT, the advantages, such as a lower RI, outweigh the risks. The results of our study provide valuable insights for donor selection.

Comparison of Allogeneic Transplant Outcomes Between Matched Sibling Donors and Alternative Donors in Patients Over 50 Years of Age with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 8/8 Allele-Matched Unrelated Donors and Unrelated Cord Blood Provide Better Leukemia-Free Survival Compared with Matched Sibling Donors During Nonremission Status

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The increased availability of alternative donor sources has broadened donor types for older patients without HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). It is uncertain if an MSD should be the first option for allogeneic HCT in patients with AML over 50 years of age. The objective of this study was to compare survival and other post-transplant outcomes between MSDs, 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donors (MUDs), 7/8 allele-MUDs, unrelated cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. We conducted a retrospective study to compare outcomes in 5704 patients with AML over 50 years of age and receiving allogeneic HCT between 2013 and 2021, using either MSD, 8/8 allele-MUD, 7/8 allele-MUD, UCB, or haploidentical donors in Japan. Complete remission (CR) and nonremission at HCT were analyzed separately for all analyses. In total, 3041 patients were CR, and 2663 patients were nonremission at the time of HCT. In multivariate analysis, donor type did not determine overall survival, irrespective of disease status at HCT. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) was significantly better for 8/8 allele-MUD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.93; P = .005) and UCB (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.88; P < .001), but not for 7/8 allele-MUD (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.19; P = .794), and haploidentical donor (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; P = .146) compared to the MSD group in nonremission status. However, donor type did not determine LFS among CR status. Relapse rates were significantly lower for 8/8 allele-MUD and UCB, whereas nonrelapse mortality was higher for UCB compared to the MSD group among both CR and nonremission status. Our registry-based study demonstrated that MSDs do not lead to superior survival compared to alternative donors for patients with AML over 50 years of age. Furthermore, 8/8 allele-MUDs and UCB provide better LFS compared with MSDs during nonremission status. Therefore, MSD is not necessarily the best donor option for allogeneic HCT in this population.

Choosing Between Older Matched Sibling Donor and Younger Matched Unrelated Donor in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

The choice between an older matched sibling donor (MSD) and a younger matched unrelated donor (MUD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a subject of ongoing debate. In this single-center retrospective study of 377 patients who received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplants for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we compared outcomes of 85 patients who received grafts from MSDs age >60 years and 292 patients who received grafts from MUDs age <30 years. Compared to recipients of MSD transplants, recipients of MUD transplants were younger and more likely to receive dual T cell depletion (TCD), a higher CD34+ cell dose, and a fresh graft. Recipients of MSD transplants were maintained on immunosuppressive therapy longer than those who received MUD grafts. We found no differences in overall survival, relapse-free survival, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, engraftment, graft failure, and acute GVHD between recipients of MSD grafts and recipients of MUD grafts. We report a higher 30-day incidence, but not 1-year incidence, of bloodstream infections among recipients of MUD transplants compared to subjects who received their grafts from a MSD. The incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was higher in MSD graft recipients compared with MUD graft recipients in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. Although this difference could reflect the greater use of dual TCD, known to be associated with very low rates of chronic GVHD in MUD transplant recipients, the incidence of moderate-severe chronic GVHD was no different between MSD and MUD transplant recipients following propensity score matching, suggesting that other variables could be responsible. Taken together, our data suggest that in patients with AML or MDS who receive PBSC transplants, such factors as convenience, ease of access, and costs should be considered when selecting an older MSD over a younger MUD.

Graft versus Leukemia in 2023

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is commonly utilized in the management of leukemia across multiple subtypes. Graft versus leukemia (GVL) is a critical component of successful transplantation and involves donor cells eradicating residual leukemia within the recipient. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) by contrast is a common complication of the transplantation process in which donor cells identify the recipient's various organ systems as foreign, thereby leading to a multitude of organ toxicities that can be described as autoimmune in nature. As both GVL and GVHD are mediated by a similar mechanism, these processes are felt to occur in tandem with one another. Here, we review the allogeneic HCT process in the context of GVL.

The use of prognostic models in allogeneic transplants: a perspective guide for clinicians and investigators

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) can cure many hematologic diseases, but it carries the potential risk of increased morbidity and mortality rates. Prognostic evaluation is a scientific entity at the core of care for potential recipients of HCT. It can improve the decision-making process of transplant vs no transplant, help choose the best transplant strategy and allows for future trials targeting patients' intolerances to transplant; hence, it ultimately improves transplant outcomes. Prognostic models are key for appropriate actuarial outcome estimates, which have frequently been shown to be better than physicians' subjective estimates. To make the most accurate prognostic evaluation for HCT, one should rely on >1 prognostic model. For relapse and relapse-related mortality risks, the refined disease risk index is currently the most informative model. It can be supplemented with disease-specific models that consider genetic mutations as predictors in addition to information on measurable residual disease. For nonrelapse mortality and HCT-related morbidity risks, the HCT-comorbidity index and Karnofsky performance status have proven to be the most reliable and most accepted by physicians. These can be supplemented with gait speed as a measure of frailty. Some other global prognostic models might add additional prognostic information. Physicians' educated perceptions can then put this information into context, taking into consideration conditioning regimen and donor choices. The future of transplant mandates (1) clinical investigators specifically trained in prognostication, (2) increased reliance on geriatric assessment, (3) the use of novel biomarkers such as genetic variants, and (4) the successful application of novel statistical methods such as machine learning.

New strategies for mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT)

With increasing numbers of patients with hematologic malignancies requiring allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), including minority racial and ethnic groups, the limited availability of matched related donors and matched unrelated donors remains a significant obstacle. Hence, the use of alternative donors such as haploidentical and mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs) is on the rise. Herein, we present case studies to outline a rational and stepwise approach with a focus on the use of MMUD for HCT in patients with hematologic malignancies. We also review novel approaches used to reduce the incidence of severe graft-versus-host disease and improve HCT outcomes in patients undergoing MMUD HCT.

Conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: Real-world data from the Japanese registry studies

Conditioning regimens play a crucial role in preventing relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In early times, myeloablative conditioning was used exclusively, but it was associated with significant toxicity. However, the advent of reduced-intensity conditioning has allowed allogeneic HCT to be performed more safely, leading to an expansion of our choices for conditioning regimens. As the transplantation methods have become highly diversified, it is reasonable to determine an optimal conditioning regimen in consideration of patient-, disease-, and transplantation-related factors. In this context, large-scale registry-based studies provide real-world data to allow for a detailed evaluation of the utility of individual conditioning regimens in specific clinical settings. The Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy has been conducting a nationwide survey for HCT since 1993 that currently covers >99% of all the transplantation centers nationwide, and >1,000 allogeneic HCTs performed for adults with AML are registered per year. We have been using the registry data to implement a number of studies focusing on adults with AML, and the large number of patients registered consecutively from nearly all transplantation centers nationwide represent real-world practice in Japan. This article reviews and discusses the results obtained from our registry-based studies pertaining to various conditioning regimens.

The improvement in overall survival from unrelated donor transplantation in Australia and New Zealand is driven by a reduction in non-relapse mortality: A study from the ABMTRR

Unrelated donors (UDs) are the commonest source for allogeneic transplantation (alloSCT), with higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) than siblings. We analyzed data from the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry from adults receiving a first UD alloSCT during 2001-2015, to determine whether and how NRM has changed. Predictors of outcome were determined using cox regression, accounting for time-interactions and competing risks. A total of 2308 patients met inclusion criteria. Changes over time included increasing age, utilization of peripheral blood cells, reduced intensity conditioning, and T-cell depletion. Three-year OS increased significantly from 44% in 2001-2005 to 58% in 2011-2015 (p < 0.001). This was attributed to a reduction in NRM from 35% to 24% (p < 0.001) with no change in relapse. Factors associated with increased NRM included age, male sex, CMV seropositivity, HLA mismatch, transplant more than 6 months from diagnosis, and T-cell depletion when administered during 2001-2005. Survival following UD SCT has improved by almost 15% over the past decade, driven by improvements in NRM. This has occurred despite increasing recipient age and appears to be due to better donor selection, reduced delays to transplantation, and improved prevention and management of GVHD.

The clinical outcomes of B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Treated with Haploidentical Stem Cells Combined with Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes of the transplantation strategy combined with a haploidentical stem cell graft and an unrelated umbilical cord blood unit (haplo-cord HSCT) for the treatment of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical outcomes of haplo-cord HSCT in B-ALL patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 112 B-ALL patients who received haplo-cord HSCT and 64 patients who received haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) in our center from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively included in this study, and clinical outcomes and prognostic factors were further analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 94.6% (106/112) of the haplo-cord patients achieved complete haploidentical chimerism, while 5.4% (6/112) of patients had mixed cord blood chimerism. No differences were observed in neutrophil and platelet recovery or the incidences of GVHD, CMV/EBV viremia, bloodstream infection or hemorrhagic cystitis between the haplo-cord HSCT and haplo-HSCT groups. Compared to haplo-HSCT group, the haplo-cord HSCT group had a higher absolute number of CD3⁺ cells (P=0.029) and a lower ratio of CD3⁺CD4⁺ /CD3⁺CD8⁺ cells (P=0.049) at 1 month after transplantation. Moreover, Haplo-cord HSCT patients showed lower minimal residual disease (MRD) levels at 1 month (P=0.020) and 100 days (P=0.038) after transplantation and better 3-year prognoses than the haplo-HSCT group (OS: P=0.016; DFS: P=0.041; cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR): P=0.016). The CIRs in patients with adverse genomic features (P=0.040) or flow cytometry-based minimal residual disease (FCM-MRD)≥1 × 10^-4 (P=0.033) were improved by haplo-cord HSCT. By multivariate analysis, we found that haplo-cord HSCT could independently improve the 3-year OS, DFS and CIR of B-ALL patients (OS: P=0.029; DFS: P=0.024; CIR: P=0.024). Additionally, allo-HSCT at CR1 was an independent parameter associated with 3-year OS for B-ALL patients (P=0.014). FCM-MRD≥1 × 10^-4 pre-HSCT could independently predict unfavorable 3-year DFS and CIR (DFS: P=0.020; CIR: P=0.036) in B-ALL patients.

CONCLUSION

Haplo-cord HSCT could independently improve survival in B-ALL patients.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from Alternative Donors in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: A Comparative Analysis

In the absence of HLA-matched related and unrelated donors, alternative donors must be found for patients in need of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). There are at least 3 donor options: a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD), umbilical cord blood (UCB), and a haploidentical related donor (haplo); however, the optimal alternative donor type remains to be established. This study aimed to address how the outcomes of patients receiving these 3 alternative donor HCTs differ, and whether these outcomes change over time post-transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed Japanese nationwide transplantation registry data of adults with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic HCT while in first complete remission (CR) from an MMUD with a 7/8 match at the allele level (n = 601), with UCB (n = 1110), or from a haploidentical related donor (n = 221) between 2007 and 2018. For patients who underwent transplantation between 2007 and 2014, the 3-year overall survival (OS) for the MMUD, UCB, and Haplo groups was 60%, 54%, and 47%, respectively (P = .022). For those who underwent transplantation between 2015 and 2018, the 3-year OS in these groups was 60%, 66%, and 63%, respectively (P = .693). Multivariate analysis revealed that the risks of both overall mortality and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were significantly lower in the later period than in the earlier period in the UCB group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [P < .001] for OS; HR, 0.64 [P < .001] for NRM) and the Haplo group (HR, 0.58 [P = .019 for OS; HR, 0.39 [P = .004] for NRM), but not in the MMUD group (HR, 1.07 [P = .631] for OS; HR, 1.26 [P = .175] for NRM). The results of a test for interaction showed a significant difference in the effect of transplantation period on OS and NRM between the MMUD and UCB groups (P = .014 for OS; P = .004 for NRM) and between the MMUD and Haplo groups (P = .034 for OS; P = .003 for NRM). These findings demonstrate the recent improvements in the outcomes of UCB and Haplo transplantations in patients with AML in first CR that have resulted in a similar OS in patients undergoing HCT with grafts from MMUDs, UCB, and haploidentical donors in the later period of the study.

Novel Immune Cell-Based Therapies to Eradicate High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Adverse genetic risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) includes a wide range of clinical-pathological entities with extremely poor outcomes; thus, novel therapeutic approaches are needed. Promising results achieved by engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in other blood neoplasms have paved the way for the development of immune cell-based therapies for adverse genetic risk AML. Among these, adoptive cell immunotherapies with single/multiple CAR-T cells, CAR-natural killer (NK) cells, cytokine-induced killer cells (CIK), and NK cells are subjects of ongoing clinical trials. On the other hand, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) still represents the only curative option for adverse genetic risk AML patients. Unfortunately, high relapse rates (above 50%) and associated dismal outcomes (reported survival ~10–20%) even question the role of current allo-HSCT protocols and emphasize the urgency of adopting novel effective transplant strategies. We have recently demonstrated that haploidentical allo-HSCT combined with regulatory and conventional T cells adoptive immunotherapy (Treg-Tcon haplo-HSCT) is able to overcome disease-intrinsic chemoresistance, prevent leukemia-relapse, and improve survival of adverse genetic risk AML patients. In this Perspective, we briefly review the recent advancements with immune cell-based strategies against adverse genetic risk AML and discuss how such approaches could favorably impact on patients’ outcomes.

Haploidentical age-adapted myeloablative transplant and regulatory and effector T cells for acute myeloid leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the most effective treatment in eradicating high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, we present data from a novel HLA-haploidentical HSCT protocol that addressed the 2 remaining major unmet medical needs: leukemia relapse and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Fifty AML patients were enrolled in the study. The conditioning regimen included total body irradiation for patients up to age 50 years and total marrow/lymphoid irradiation for patients age 51 to 65 years. Irradiation was followed by thiotepa, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide. Patients received an infusion of 2 × 106/kg donor regulatory T cells on day -4 followed by 1 × 106/kg donor conventional T cells on day -1 and a mean of 10.7 × 106 ± 3.4 × 106/kgpurified CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells on day 0. No pharmacological GVHD prophylaxis was administered posttransplantation. Patients achieved full donor-type engraftment. Fifteen patients developed grade ≥2 acute GVHD (aGVHD). Twelve of the 15 patients with aGVHD were alive and no longer receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Moderate/severe cGVHD occurred in only 1 patient. Nonrelapse mortality occurred in 10 patients. Only 2 patients relapsed. Consequently, at a median follow-up of 29 months, the probability of moderate/severe cGVHD/relapse-free survival was 75% (95% confidence interval, 71%-78%). A novel HLA-haploidentical HSCT strategy that combines an age-adapted myeloablative conditioning regimen with regulatory and conventional T-cell adoptive immunotherapy resulted in an unprecedented cGVHD/relapse-free survival rate in 50 AML patients with a median age of 53 years. This trial was registered with the Umbria Region Institutional Review Board Public Registry as identification code 02/14 and public registry #2384/14 and at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03977103.

The demise of islet allotransplantation in the United States: A call for an urgent regulatory update

Islet allotransplantation in the United States (US) is facing an imminent demise. Despite nearly three decades of progress in the field, an archaic regulatory framework has stymied US clinical practice. Current regulations do not reflect the state-of-the-art in clinical or technical practices. In the US, islets are considered biologic drugs and "more than minimally manipulated" human cell and tissue products (HCT/Ps). In contrast, across the world, human islets are appropriately defined as "minimally manipulated tissue" and not regulated as a drug, which has led to islet allotransplantation (allo-ITx) becoming a standard-of-care procedure for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This regulatory distinction impedes patient access to islets for transplantation in the US. As a result only 11 patients underwent allo-ITx in the US between 2016 and 2019, and all as investigational procedures in the settings of a clinical trials. Herein, we describe the current regulations pertaining to islet transplantation in the United States. We explore the progress which has been made in the field and demonstrate why the regulatory framework must be updated to both better reflect our current clinical practice and to deal with upcoming challenges. We propose specific updates to current regulations which are required for the renaissance of ethical, safe, effective, and affordable allo-ITx in the United States.

Natural killer cell alloreactivity in HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation: a study on behalf of the CTIWP of the EBMT

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class-I mismatches that trigger donor-versus-recipient natural killer (NK)-cell alloreactivity reduce the incidence of leukemia relapse and improve survival of acute myeloid leukemia patients after T-cell-depleted HLA-haplotype mismatched ("haploidentical") hematopoietic transplantation. In murine graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) models, alloreactive NK-cells also prevent GvHD. Here we report the results of a non-interventional, prospective study performed on behalf of the Cellular Therapy and Immunobiology Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. The study was aimed at re-assessing the role of NK-cell alloreactivity in a cohort of haploidentical transplants performed in Europe between 2012 and 2015 and composed of unmanipulated, as well as T-cell-depleted transplants. One hundred thirty-eight patients with acute myeloid or lymphoid leukemias were analyzed. Eighty-six patients received ex-vivo T-cell-depleted transplants, 52 patients received unmanipulated transplants. Fifty patients were transplanted from NK alloreactive donors, 88 from non-NK alloreactive donors. NK cell alloreactivity did not impact on GvHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) in unmanipulated transplants (HR: 1.66 (0.9-3.1), p = 0.1). In contrast, it did impact beneficially on GRFS in T-cell-depleted transplants (HR: 0.6, (0.3-1.2), p = 0.14, interaction p < 0.001). This effect was the consequence of reduced incidences of acute and chronic GvHD and non-relapse mortality.

The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute leukemia

Acute leukemia is a constellation of rapidly progressing diseases that affect a wide range of patients regardless of age or gender. Traditional treatment options for patients with acute leukemia include chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation. The advent of cancer immunotherapy has had a significant impact on acute leukemia treatment. Novel immunotherapeutic agents including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies have efficacy and have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with acute leukemia. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline composed of consensus recommendations on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia.

Comparable outcomes of haploidentical transplant with TBF conditioning versus matched unrelated donor with fludarabine/busulfan conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia

We compared transplant outcomes of 708 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients receiving haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation using thiotepa/busulfan/fludarabine (TBF) conditioning with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (ptCy), to 2083 patients receiving matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation using fludarabine/busulfan (FB) conditioning and in vivo T-cell depletion. For intermediate cytogenetic risk AML transplanted in first complete remission (CR1), multivariate analysis revealed that haplo-TBF significantly increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (HR 2.1; p = 0.0006) but did not affect relapse incidence (RI), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), or graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). For high cytogenetic risk AML transplanted in CR1, haplo-TBF significantly increased NRM (HR = 2.7; p = 0.02), decreased RI (HR = 0.45; p = 0.03) but had no influence on LFS, OS, or GRFS. For AML transplanted in CR2, haplo-TBF significantly increased NRM (HR = 2.36; p = 0.008), decreased RI (HR = 0.38; p = 0.005), but had no influence on LFS, OS, or GRFS. Finally, for AML patients transplanted with active disease, haplo-TBF had no influence on transplant outcomes. In conclusion, compared to MUD-FB, haplo-TBF increased NRM, reduced RI in high-risk AML in CR, resulting in similar LFS, OS, and GRFS. These results comparing two different approaches support the use of a haploidentical family donor for high-risk AML patients lacking a matched sibling donor.

The role of EVI1 gene quantification in AML patients with 11q23/MLL rearrangement after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

It remains unclear about the role of the EVI1 gene in AML patients with 11q23/MLL rearrangement (MLL-r AML) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We analyzed the clinical value of EVI1 gene quantification in 96 MLL-r AML patients. High EVI1 expression was found in 73% (70/96) of MLL-r AML patients, and EVI1-high MLL-r AML patients were characterized by high WBC counts (P = 0.046) and low platelet counts (P < 0.001) and commonly had t(6;11) (P = 0.032). In addition, a significant difference was observed in the SETD2 gene mutation between the EVI1 high and low groups (0% vs. 50%, P < 0.001). EVI1-high MLL-r AML patients had worse 2-year OS (49.8% vs. 79.7%, P = 0.01) and 2-year PFS (40.2% vs. 68.1%, P = 0.014) than EVI1-low patients. In 57 MLL-r AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT, poorer 2-year PFS (48.6% vs. 72.4%, P = 0.039) and higher CIR (33.2% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.035) were observed in the EVI1-high patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that pre-EVI1⁺ was the sole independent factor of high CIR (P = 0.035, HR = 4.97, 95% CI: 1.12-22.04). EVI1⁺ at 100 days post allo-HSCT was associated with a significantly higher 2-year CIR (P = 0.017). The quantification of the EVI1 gene could be used as an additional marker for early predicting relapse in allo-HSCT MLL-r AML patients.

Predicting non-relapse mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation during first remission of acute myeloid leukemia

The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive system for predicting non-relapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) during first complete remission (CR) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). After dividing 2344 eligible patients randomly into a training set and a validation set, we first identified and scored five parameters, that is, age, sex, performance status, HCT-comorbidity index (HCT-CI), and donor type, on the basis of their impact on non-relapse mortality for patients in the training set. The non-relapse mortality-J (NRM-J) index using the sum of these scores was then applied to patients in the validation set, resulting in a clear differentiation of non-relapse mortality, with expected 2-year rates of 11%, 16%, 27%, and 33%, respectively (P < 0.001). The estimated c-statistic was 0.67, which was significantly higher than that of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation score (0.60, P = 0.002) and the HCT-CI (0.57, P < 0.001). The NRM-J index showed a significant association with overall survival, but not with relapse. Our findings demonstrate that the NRM-J index is useful for predicting post-transplant non-relapse mortality for patients with AML in first CR, for whom the decision of whether to perform allogeneic HCT is critical.

Which patients with acute myeloid leukemia in CR1 can be spared an allogeneic transplant?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Disease relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) treated with intensive chemotherapy alone. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) reduces the risk of disease recurrence, and thus the advent of reduced intensity-conditioning regimens coupled with increased donor availability has increased the deliverability of potentially curative transplant therapy in AML. However, allo-SCT remains associated with significant additional morbidity and mortality, and it is therefore important to identify patients whose outcome if treated with chemotherapy alone is good enough to spare them the risks associated with allo-SCT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Characterization of cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities present at diagnosis coupled with dynamic assessments of measurable residual disease now permit greater accuracy in defining the relapse risk in patients treated with chemotherapy alone. At the same time, the risk of transplant-related mortality can be predicted by a number of scoring systems which assess patient comorbidity. Taken together, such assessments permit a dynamic assessment of the risks and benefits of transplantation aiding the identification of patients who are unlikely to benefit from transplantation in CR1.

SUMMARY

Increasingly accurate risk stratification in adults with AML CR1 aids the rational utilization of allo-SCT. Future research integrating the results of serial MRD analysis in molecularly defined subtypes of AML will further improve rational selection of patients for transplant.

Upregulation of Glutamic-Oxaloacetic Transaminase 1 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

One of the key features of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a group of very aggressive myeloid malignancies, is their strikingly heterogenous outcomes. Accurate biomarkers are needed to improve prognostic assessment. Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase 1 (GOT1) is essential for cell proliferation and apoptosis by regulating cell's metabolic dependency on glucose. It is unclear whether the expression level of GOT1 has clinical implications in AML. Therefore, we analyzed the data of 155 AML patients with GOT1 expression information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Among them, 84 patients were treated with chemotherapy alone, while 71 received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In both treatment groups, high GOT1 expression was associated with shorter event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified several independent risk factors for both EFS and OS in the chemotherapy-only group, including high GOT1 expression, age ≥60 years, white blood cell count ≥15 × 10⁹/L, bone marrow blasts ≥70%, and DNMT3A, RUNX1 or TP53 mutations (all P < 0.05); but in the allo-HSCT group, the only independent risk factor for survival was high GOT1 expression (P < 0.05 for both EFS and OS). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis showed that the genes related to GOT1 expression were mainly concentrated in “hematopoietic cell lineage” and “leukocyte transendothelial migration” signaling pathways. Collectively, GOT1 expression may be a useful prognostic indicator in AML, especially in patients who have undergone allo-HSCT.

Prognostic role of SCAMP family in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant disease of myeloid hematopoietic stem or progenitor cells characterized by abnormal proliferation of primary and immature myeloid cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Gene mutation and expression profiles can be used as prognosis predictors for different prognostic subgroups. Secretory carrier-associated membrane proteins (SCAMPs) are a multigenic family with five members and act as cell surface vectors in the post-Golgi recycling pathways in mammals. Nevertheless, the prognostic and clinical influence of SCAMP family has hardly ever been illustrated in AML. In our study, expression patterns of SCAMP family (SCAMP1-5) were analyzed in 155 AML patients which were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas database. In chemotherapy, only subgroup, higher SCAMP1 level was significantly associated with longer EFS and OS (all P = 0.002), and SCAMP1 was confirmed to be an independent favorable factor in un-transplanted patients by Multivariate analysis (all P < 0.05). Nevertheless, in the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) treatment subgroup, none of the SCAMP genes had any effect on the clinical survival. Our study found that high expression level of SCAMP1 is a favorable prognostic factor in AML, but allo-HSCT may neutralize its prognostic effect.

The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukaemia: a triumph of hope and experience

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is the commonest indication for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) worldwide. The accumulated experience of allografting in AML over the last four decades has provided critical insights into both the contribution of the conditioning regimen and the graft-versus-leukaemia effect to the curative potential of the most common form of immunotherapy utilised in standard clinical practice. Coupled with advances in donor availability and transplant technologies, this has resulted in allo-SCT becoming an important treatment modality for the majority of adults with high-risk AML. At the same time, advances in genomic classification, coupled with progress in the accurate quantification of measurable residual disease, have increased the precision with which allo-mandatory patients can be identified, whilst simultaneously permitting accurate identification of those patients who can be spared the toxicity of an allograft. Despite this progress, disease recurrence still remains a major cause of transplant failure and AML has served as a paradigm for the development of strategies to reduce the risk of relapse - notably the novel concept of post-transplant maintenance, utilising pharmacological or cellular therapies.

Time-Varying Effects of Graft Type on Outcomes for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

This study aimed to investigate time-varying effects of graft type on outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. For this purpose we analyzed 3952 patients, 720 of whom underwent matched related bone marrow transplantation (BMT), 1004 matched related peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), 856 matched unrelated BMT, and 1372 umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) during complete remission. The 4-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 59.1%, 52.8%, 59.5%, and 50.6%, respectively. Compared with related BMT, related PBSCT, unrelated BMT, and UCBT were associated with higher risk of nonrelapse mortality and unrelated BMT and UCBT with lower risk of relapse. As a result, both RFS and overall survival were comparable between related BMT and unrelated BMT but were worse for related PBSCT and UCBT than for related BMT. Adverse impact of UCBT was observed only during the early phase of transplant, whereas that of related PBSCT continued even after 2 years post-transplant. Our findings raise concerns about the increased risk of late nonrelapse mortality with the use of PBSC grafts and suggest that related BMT is preferable to related PBSCT; matched unrelated BMT is the next choice in the absence of a matched related donor.

Ex Vivo T Cell-Depleted Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia in First and Second Remission: Long-Term Disease-Free Survival with a Significantly Reduced Risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease

Large series of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) after ex vivo T cell-depleted (TCD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) have not been reported previously. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 266 patients (median age, 54 years) with AML who received CD34-selected TCD allo-HSCTs while in first (75%) or second (25%) complete remission (CR1/CR2) at a single institution. The conditioning regimens were all myeloablative, and no additional graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was given. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD at 180 days were 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 18%) and 3% (95% CI, 1% to 5%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 3 years was 3% (95% CI, 1% to 6%). The 3-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 21% (95% CI, 16% to 26%) and that of relapse was 21% (95% CI, 17% to 27%). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 75%, 61%, and 56% and 68%, 57%, and 53%, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS, DFS, and relapse rates for patients who underwent transplantation in CR1 and those who did so in CR2. However, patients with high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis had significantly poorer outcomes. The OS and DFS rates compare favorably with those for unmodified allo-HSCT, but with considerably lower rates of GVHD.

Conditioning Intensity for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Poor-Prognosis Cytogenetics in First Complete Remission

The optimal intensity of conditioning regimen may be dependent on not only age and comorbidities but also disease characteristics and risk of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We, therefore, analyzed the transplant outcomes of 840 adult patients with cytogenetically poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) who received first allogeneic HCT with either myeloablative conditioning (MAC; n = 652) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC; n = 188) between 2006 and 2017. The median age at HCT was 50.5 years (range: 16 to 77 years). The multivariate analysis showed that patients receiving MAC had a significantly higher overall survival and lower leukemia-related mortality than those receiving RIC (P = .011 and P = .025, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, these results applied to patients aged 16 to 59 years, with HCT-comorbidity index scores ≥3, and with cytogenetic remission. Among MAC regimens, there was a trend for worse survival and nonrelapse mortality with the busulfan/fludarabine-based regimen compared with the total body irradiation (TBI) ≥8 Gy-based regimen (P = .082 and P = .062, respectively), whereas the busulfan/cyclophosphamide-based regimen and the fludarabine/melphalan-based regimen had similar outcomes with the TBI-based regimen. These data suggest that MAC is preferable to RIC for patients with cytogenetically poor-risk AML undergoing allogeneic HCT in CR1.

Prognostic role of DOK family adapters in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a genetically and clinically heterogeneous disease. Gene mutational and expressional profile can aid the identification of different prognostic subgroups. Downstream of tyrosine kinase (DOK) proteins are a multigenic family of adaptors; some of them are key negative regulators of immune cell signaling. However, the expression and clinical implication of DOK family in AML has rarely been investigated. A total of 155 AML patients with DOK family (DOK1-7) expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database were enrolled in the study. In patients who only received chemotherapy, those with high expressions of DOK4 or DOK5 had significantly shorter EFS and OS than patients with low expressions (all P < 0.001), whereas high DOK7 expressers had longer EFS and OS than the low expressers (all P < 0.05). In patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), however, all DOK members had no impact on EFS and OS. Multivariate analysis confirmed that high DOK5 expression was an independent risk factor for EFS and OS in untransplanted patients (all P < 0.05). Our study suggests that in AML, high expressions of DOK4 and DOK5 are adverse prognostic factors, high DOK7 expression is a good prognostic factor, but their effects can be overcome by allo-HSCT.

High EGFL7 expression may predict poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Epithelial growth factor-like 7 (EGFL7) is a secretory protein with a well-characterized role in angiogenesis and the oncogenesis of certain solid tumors. Overexpression of EGFL7 is associated with adverse prognosis in patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML). However, whether this association persists after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains unclear. To further clarify the prognostic role of EGFL7, seventy-one AML patients with EGFL7 expression data who underwent allo-HSCT from The Cancer Genome Atlas database were included and divided into either EGFL7^high or EGFL7^low group based on the median EGFL7 expression level. Two groups had similar clinical and molecular characteristics except that the EGFL7^high group had less frequent NPM1 mutations (P= .001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that high EGFL7 expressers had shorter OS than the low expressers (P= .040). Univariate analysis showed that high EGFL7 expression, MLL-PTD, RUNX1 and TP53 mutations were associated with short OS (all P< .05). Multivariate analysis indicated that high EGFL7 expression, FLT3-ITD, RUNX1 and TP53 mutations were independent risk factors for OS (all P< .05). Collectively, our study suggested that EGFL7, like the other widely-used risk stratification factors, could serve as a prognostic tool and therapeutic target in AML, even after allo-HCST.

Veto cells for safer nonmyeloablative haploidentical HSCT and CAR T cell therapy

Haploidentical donors are a readily available source for mismatched hematopoietic bone marrow transplantation. The application of this regimen is constantly increasing with the advent of methods that overcome T-cell alloreactions that occur due to human-leukocyte-antigen disparity between host and donor. One successful method to overcome both graft rejection and graft-vs-host disease is transplantation of large numbers T-cell-depleted (TCD) haploidentical stem cell grafts (haploSCT), after myeloablative conditioning. The success of stem cell dose escalation is attributed to a unique immunoregulatory cell-property, termed "veto-activity." However, engraftment of mismatched hematopoietic stem cells following reduced-intensity conditioning still represents a major challenge. Here, we describe how the addition of post-transplant high-dose cyclophosphamide can promote immune tolerance induction after megadose TCD haploSCT, following nonmyeloablative conditioning. We also discuss ways of harnessing the immune regulatory properties of adoptively transferred "veto" cells to support mixed chimerism further and confer tolerance to cell-therapies, such as CAR-T cells. These approaches will soon be tested in phase 1-2 clinical studies and may prove to be a safe and efficacious treatment for many disorders such as hemoglobinopathies, autoimmune diseases, and as a prelude for organ tolerance. Moreover, this approach could pave the way for "off-the-shelf" cell-therapy agents, making them cheaper and easily obtainable.

Graft-versus-host disease in recipients of male unrelated donor compared with parous female sibling donor transplants

Optimal donor selection is critical for successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Donor sex and parity are well-established risk factors for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), with male donors typically associated with lower rates of GVHD. Well-matched unrelated donors (URDs) have also been associated with increased risks of GVHD as compared with matched sibling donors. These observations raise the question of whether male URDs would lead to more (or less) favorable transplant outcomes as compared with parous female sibling donors. We used the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry to complete a retrospective cohort study in adults with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome, who underwent T-cell replete HCT from these 2 donor types (parous female sibling or male URD) between 2000 and 2012. Primary outcomes included grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and overall survival. Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival, transplant-related mortality, and relapse. In 2813 recipients, patients receiving male URD transplants (n = 1921) had 1.6 times higher risk of grade 2 to 4 aGVHD (P < .0001). For cGVHD, recipient sex was a significant factor, so donor/recipient pairs were evaluated. Female recipients of male URD grafts had a higher risk of cGVHD than those receiving parous female sibling grafts (relative risk [RR] = 1.43, P < .0001), whereas male recipients had similar rates of cGVHD regardless of donor type (RR = 1.09, P = .23). Donor type did not significantly affect any other end point. We conclude that when available, parous female siblings are preferred over male URDs.

Enhanced expressions of FHL2 and iASPP predict poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia

iASPP is a negative regulator of the apoptotic function of p53, and it can enhance the ability of hematopoietic stem cells to self-renew and resist chemo- and radiation therapy. Recent study showed that iASPP could impact the proliferation and apoptosis of leukemia cells by interacting with FHL2. However, whether they have prognostic significance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is unknown. Eighty-four AML patients with FHL2 and iASPP expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database were enrolled in the study. Patients with high expressions of FHL2 and iASPP had significantly shorter event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients with low expressions (P = 0.005, P = 0.003, respectively). Univariate analysis indicated that high expressions of FHL2 or iASPP were unfavorable for EFS and OS (all P < 0.05), while multivariate analysis confirmed that high FHL2 expression was an independent risk factor for EFS and OS (all P < 0.05). In patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), however, EFS and OS were not significantly different between FHL2 or iASPP high- and low-expression groups. Our results suggested that high expressions of FHL2 and iASPP were poor prognostic factors for AML, but the prognostic effect might be overcome by allo-HSCT.

Comparable Outcomes after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from Mother Donors and Matched Unrelated Donors in Patients with Hematopoietic Malignancies

Haploidentical transplantations have achieved comparable survival as HLA fully matched unrelated donors (URDs). When choosing the best donor for HLA haploidentical transplantations, most institutions prioritize using young male donors over mother donors. In a retrospective study we compared outcomes in mother donor and URD transplantations. We found that both 2-year overall survival and 2-year leukemia-free survival were comparable between the mother donor group and URD group (74.8% versus 72.9%, P = .937, and 71.7% versus 67.0%, P = .580, respectively). Higher incidences of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD were observed in the mother donor group than in the URD group (43.5% versus 14.0%, P = .001, and 62.2% versus 38.7%, P = .007, respectively). The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse were significantly decreased in the mother donor group (7.6% versus 20.9%, P = .036). These findings suggest mother donor transplantations could achieve comparable survival with URD transplantations and exhibited decreased rates of relapse but increased rates of GVHD, indicating that mother donors would be a suitable choice for patients without an identical sibling donor.

Efficacy and safety of lenalidomide for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Lenalidomide is effective for the treatment of low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with deletion 5q abnormalities. However, whether lenalidomide leads to a significant improvement in treatment response and overall survival (OS) in cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in the treatment of AML.

Methods

Clinical studies were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Efficacy outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), complete remission (CR), and OS. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence of grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

Results

Eleven studies were included in our meta-analysis; collectively these studies featured 407 AML patients. Pooled estimates for overall ORR and CR were 31% (95% CI: 26%–36%) and 21% (95% CI: 16%–27%), respectively. Thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, and infection were the most common grade 3 and 4 AEs.

Conclusion

Lenalidomide may have some clinical activity in AML, but the population that would benefit from lenalidomide and incorporating lenalidomide into combination drug strategies need to be better defined.

Prognostic significance of microRNA-99a in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Overexpression of microRNA-99a (miR-99a) have been associated with adverse prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Nevertheless, whether it also predicts poor outcome in post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) AML patients remains unclear. To further elucidate the prognostic value of miR-99a, 74 AML patients with miR-99a expression report who underwent allo-HSCT from The Cancer Genome Atlas database were identified and grouped into either miR-99a^high or miR-99a^low based on their miR-99a expression levels relative to the median. Two groups had similar clinical and molecular characteristics except that miR-99a^high group had fewer patients of the French-American-British M4 subtype (P = 0.018) and more frequent CEBPA mutations (P = 0.005). Univariate analysis indicated that high miR-99a expression was unfavorable for both event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.029; P = 0.012, respectively). Multivariate analysis suggested that high miR-99a expression was an independent risk factor for both EFS and OS in AML patients who underwent allo-HSCT [hazard ratio (HR) 1.909, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.043-3.494, P = 0.036 and HR 2.179, 95% CI 1.192-3.982, P = 0.011, respectively]. Our results further proved that high miR-99a expression could predict worse outcome in AML patients, even in those who underwent intensive post-remission therapy such as allo-HCST.

Allocation to Matched Related or Unrelated Donor Results in Similar Clinical Outcomes without Increased Risk of Failure to Proceed to Transplant among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Analysis from the Time of Transplant Approval

Clinical outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) from unrelated donors (URDs) approach those of matched related donor (MRD) transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Yet, available data fail to account for differences in pretransplantation outcomes between these donor selection strategies. In this regard, URD allo-HSCT is associated with longer waiting times to transplantation, potentially resulting in higher probabilities of failure to reach transplant. We retrospectively analyzed 108 AML patients accepted for first allo-HSCT from the time of approval to proceed to transplant. Fifty-eight (54%) patients were initially allocated to MRD, while URD search was initiated in 50 (46%) patients. Time to transplant was longer in patients allocated to a URD when compared with patients assigned to an MRD (median 142 days versus 100 days; p < .001). Forty-three of 58 (74%) patients in the MRD group and 35 of 50 (70%) patients in the URD group underwent transplantation (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; p = .63). Advanced disease status at the time of allo-HSCT approval was the only predictor of failure to reach transplantation in the multivariate analysis (OR, 4.78; p = .001). Disease progression was the most common cause of failure to reach allo-HSCT (66.7%) in both the MRD and URD groups. With a median follow-up from transplantation of 14.5 (interquartile range, 5 to 29) months, the 2-year estimate of overall survival (OS) from allo-HSCT was 46% in the MRD group and 57% in the URD group (p = .54). There were no differences in OS according to donor type allocation in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.01; p = .83). When including patients from the time of transplant approval, 2-year OS was 39% in the MRD group versus 42% in the URD group. Our study suggests that allocation of AML patients to URDs may result in comparable clinical outcomes to MRD assignment without a significant increase in the risk of failure to reach transplant.

NOTCH and Graft-Versus-Host Disease

In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is the major curative therapy for hematological malignancies, T cells play a key role in the development of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). NOTCH pathway is a conserved signal transduction system that regulates T cell development and differentiation. The present review analyses the role of the NOTCH signaling as a new regulator of acute GvHD. NOTCH signaling could also represent a new therapeutic target for GvHD.

Relative Impact of HLA Matching and Non-HLA Donor Characteristics on Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Increasing donor-recipient HLA disparity is associated with negative outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but its comparative relevance amid non-HLA donor characteristics is not well established. We addressed this question in 3215 HSCTs performed between 2005 and 2013 in Germany for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Donors were HLA-matched related (MRD; n = 872) or unrelated (10/10 MUD, n = 1553) or HLA-mismatched unrelated (<10/10 MMUD, n = 790). Overall survival (OS) was similar after MRD compared with 10/10 MUD HSCT, reflecting opposing hazards of relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; P < .002) and nonrelapse mortality (HR, .63; P < .001). After UD HSCT, increasing HLA disparity was associated with inferior OS (HR, 1.21 [P < .02] and HR, 1.57 [P < .001] for 9/10 and ≤8/10 MMUD, respectively, compared with 10/10 MUD). Among non-HLA donor characteristics, age, sex mismatching (male recipient-female donor), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) mismatching (positive recipient-negative donor) impacted OS. Multivariate subgroup analysis showed that OS was similar after HSCT from the youngest 9/10 MMUD (<30 years) compared with the oldest 10/10 MUD (>40 years) (HR, 1.18; P = .25) and also in male patients transplanted from female 10/10 MUD compared with male 9/10 MMUD (HR, .89; P = .46). In contrast, OS of CMV-positive patients tended to be better with CMV-negative 10/10 MUDs compared with CMV-positive 9/10 MMUDs (HR, 1.31; P = .04). Because of low patient numbers in subgroups, definite conclusions and establishment of a hierarchy among HLA matching and non-HLA donor characteristics could not be made. Our data suggest that the impact of donor age and sex mismatch but not CMV mismatch on outcome of allogeneic HSCT may be comparable with that of single HLA disparity.

Long-term clinical outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation for intermediate-to-poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia during first remission according to available donor types

Standard therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) consists of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) including autologous-HCT (AUTO) and allogeneic-HCT from a matched-sibling donor (MSD) or well-matched unrelated donor (WM-URD). When a conventional donor is not available, HCT from a partially-matched (PM)-URD or familial-mismatched donor (FMMD) is typically considered. We analyzed 561 patients with intermediate to poor-risk molecular cytogenetics who underwent transplant from 2002 to 2013 in their first remission. Engraftment was successful in all donor types except five patients who died in aplasia. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was 61.4% for MSD, 62.1% for WM-URD, 65.3% for FMMD, 44.7% for AUTO and 36.8% for PM-URD. AUTO showed the highest relapse rate (51.0%) compared to MSD (23.5%) and FMMD (18.5%), but showed the lowest 5-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate (3.8%). PM-URD showed the highest NRM (29.3%) with more instances of acute graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) with grade≥III (29.3%), compared to MSD (15.6%) and FMMD (15.7%). In a poor-risk subgroup, the 5-year DFS for FMMD and MSD was 59.8% and 46.7%, respectively, while for AUTO and PM-URD it was 12.6% and 0.0%, respectively, which was caused by a high relapse rate (87.1% in AUTO, 83.3% in PM-URD). In the intermediate-risk subgroup, the 5-year DFS of AUTO (53.9% was not different from the conventional donors in multivariate analysis, presenting a low NRM rate (5.1%). FMMD should be considered prior to PM-URD in intermediate-to-poor-risk AML and GVHD prophylaxis should be intensified when PM-URD is needed. AUTO might be considered for selected patients in the intermediate-risk group.

Improvement of treatment outcome over 2 decades in children with acute myeloid leukemia

Background

The prognosis of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has recently improved. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology, changes in treatment strategies, and improvement of outcomes in Gwangju-Chonnam children with AML over 2 decades.

Methods

Medical records of 116 children with newly diagnosed AML were retrospectively reviewed for demographic characteristics, prognostic groups including cytogenetic risks, treatment protocols, and survival rates over the periods between 1996 and 2005 (Period I, N=53), and 2006 and 2015 (Period II, N=38).

Results

The annual incidence of AML has decreased with reduced pediatric population. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimated overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates in 110 AML patients were 53.2±5.1% and 43.8±5.1%, respectively. The 5-year OS rate significantly improved during period II (70.3±7.0%) as compared to that during period I (40.0±6.8%) (P =0.001). The 5-year OS was not significantly different among cytogenetic risk groups (P =0.11). Fifty-eight patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The K-M 5-year estimated survival for transplanted patients was 53.7±7.0%, while that for chemotherapy-only patients was 30.1±9.1% (P =0.014). Among the prognostic factors, treatment modality was the only independent factor. The chemotherapy-only group had a relative risk of 2.06 for death compared with the transplantation group (P=0.015).

Conclusion

The survival of Korean children with AML has improved to a level comparable with that of developed countries over 2 decades, owing to a change in induction strategy, better supportive care with economic growth, refinement of HSCT techniques including a better selection of patients based on prognostic groups, and stem cell donor selection.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) yields a high rate of curability for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), it is also associated with transplant-related morbidity and mortality (TRM). The risk and severity of TRM increase with the use of an alternative donor graft in the absence of an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD). With the declining birthrate and aging of the population, the numbers of patients with an MSD are decreasing, and alternative donor transplants, including the post-transplant cyclophosphamide method using haplo-identical donors, are increasing. Autologous (auto)-HSCT, which enables the intensification of chemotherapy, has the advantage of high availability of a transplant graft, and is associated with a lower TRM, but these benefits may be offset by a higher rate of relapse due to the lack of a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Although allo-HSCT remains the first-line treatment for poor and very-poor-risk patients, auto-HSCT is again gaining increased attention. It has also recently been suggested that cord blood grafts may induce a stronger GVL effect than other grafts; as such, the positioning of cord blood transplantation should also be reconsidered for AML patients.