Prognostic significance of immunohistochemical biomarkers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study from the Lunenburg Lymphoma Biomarker Consortium

Recent advances in CD5+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), is substantially heterogeneous. Approximately 5-10% of DLBCLs express CD5, which makes CD5+ DLBCL a rare subgroup. Different studies have shown that CD5+ DLBCL patients are often older and female and have higher lactate dehydrogenase levels, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status > 1, and higher International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores. Moreover, patients often have advanced stage disease with a high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) relapse and bone marrow involvement. CD5+ DLBCL cells are more likely to express MYC, BCL-2, and MUM-1, less likely to express CD10, and most belong to the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype. The potential mechanisms underlying the poor prognosis of CD5+ DLBCL patients may be related to CD5-mediated B-cell receptor (BCR)-dependent and -independent pathways. The efficacy of the traditional rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) regimen is unsatisfactory in CD5+ DLBCL patients. Despite supporting evidence from retrospective studies, it is currently unclear whether dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin plus rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) can improve outcomes in this population. Several new drugs, such as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), BCL-2 inhibitors, and CXCR4 antagonists, as well as immunotherapy, may help to improve the prognosis of CD5+ DLBCL patients, but additional clinical explorations are needed to determine the optimal therapeutic strategy for this disease.

Nomogram for predicting survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The international prognostic index (IPI) system has been widely used to predict prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, this system categorizes DLBCL patients into four risk groups, and cannot optimize individualized prognosis. In addition, other clinicopathological factors, such as molecular aberrations, are not incorporated into the system. To partly overcome these weak points, we developed nomograms to predict individual patient survival. We also incorporated MYD88L265P and CD79BY196 mutations into the nomograms since these mutations are associated with a worse prognosis and their signaling pathways have been highlighted as a therapeutic target. We analyzed 302 DLBCL cases for which multivariate analysis by Cox proportional hazard regression was performed. Nomograms for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were constructed and assessed by a concordance index (C-index). The nomograms were also evaluated using an open external dataset (n = 187). The MYD88L265P and/or CD79BY196 (MYD88/CD79B) mutation was detected in 62/302 patients. The nomograms incorporating IPI factors exhibited a C-index of 0.738 for PFS and a C-index of 0.765 for OS. The nomograms incorporating IPI factors and the MYD88/CD79B mutation showed a C-index of 0.745 for PFS and a C-index of 0.769 for OS. The nomograms we created were evaluated using an external dataset and were well validated. The present nomograms incorporating IPI factors and the MYD88/CD79B mutation have sufficient discrimination ability, and may effectively predict prognosis in DLBCL patients. The prognostic models we have presented here may help clinicians personalize prognostic assessments and clinical decisions.

Challenges identifying DLBCL patients with poor outcomes to upfront chemoimmunotherapy and its impact on frontline clinical trials

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has a variable course of disease among patients as it consists of subgroups that are clinically, biologically and molecularly heterogeneous. In this review, we will discuss how this heterogeneity has likely hindered the ability of traditional prognostic models to identify DLBCL patients at high risk of having poor outcomes with conventional upfront chemoimmunotherapy. We will highlight the challenges and downsides of using these models for risk stratification in clinical trials. Also, we present some of the novel prognosticators that have shown a prognostic value independently or when incorporated into existing prognostic models. Additionally, since the failure of frontline clinical trials to improve outcomes beyond R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy may be at least partially explained by the restrictive eligibility criteria, risk stratification methods and the selection bias encountered due to the complexed logistics of clinical trials; we will discuss strategies to refine and modernize clinical trial design.

A retrospective head-to-head comparison of the Lugano classification and PERCIST for FDG-PET/CT response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of lymphoma. European guidelines recommend FDG-PET/CT for staging and end of treatment (EOT) response assessment, mid-treatment response assessment is optional. We compared the Lugano classification and PET Response Criteria In Solid Tumours (PERCIST) for FDG-PET/CT response assessment in DLBCL head-to-head.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients with DLBCL who underwent first-line R-CHOP(-like) therapy (2013-2020). Interim and EOT FDG-PET/CT response were reevaluated using the Lugano classification and PERCIST. Response was dichotomized into complete metabolic response (CMR) versus non-CMR (interim and EOT) and responders versus nonresponders (interim only). The cutoff for nonresponse at interim was a Deauville score of 5 (DS5) with the Lugano classification and a partial metabolic response with ≤66% reduction in SULpeak using PERCIST (PERCIST66).

RESULTS

In multivariable Cox regression (N = 170), DS5 at interim, PERCIST66 at interim, non-CMR at EOT with the Lugano classification and non-CMR at EOT with PERCIST were predictive of progression-free survival (PFS). The Lugano classification and PERCIST agreed perfectly at interim and EOT and with 98.4% for the identification of nonresponders at interim. The accuracy for predicting events within 2 years of diagnosis was 84.2% for DS-5 at interim, 87.6% for PERCIST66 at interim, 86% for non-CMR with the Lugano classification at EOT and 83.3% for non-CMR with PERCIST at EOT.

CONCLUSION

The Lugano classification and PERCIST were equally predictive of PFS. Nonresponse at interim and non-CMR at EOT were predictive of poor PFS with comparable accuracy for predicting events within 2 years.

Extranodal Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma With Primary Clinical Presentation as Acute Cholecystitis: A Case Report

This case describes a rare presentation of a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (DLBC NOS) in the gallbladder. We report the case of an 89-year-old male who initially presented with a two-week history of weakness and abdominal discomfort. We performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for suspicion of acute cholecystitis. After the initial uneventful course, readmission occurred for persisting weakness a few weeks after surgery. Computed tomography revealed progressive retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. With new emerging neurological symptoms, taking into account the histopathological findings of the gallbladder specimen, the diagnosis of DLBCL NOS was confirmed. Due to the rapid clinical deterioration and extranodal involvement, the patient opted against further therapy. When the suspicion of cholecystitis is inconclusive, rare differential diagnoses need to be considered. This analysis may improve the understanding of the presentation and course of DLBC NOS in abdominal organs and could form the basis for a systematic review to improve diagnosis and therapy.

Meta-Analysis of MS-Based Proteomics Studies Indicates Interferon Regulatory Factor 4 and Nucleobindin1 as Potential Prognostic and Drug Resistance Biomarkers in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

The prognosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is inaccurately predicted using clinical features and immunohistochemistry (IHC) algorithms. Nomination of a panel of molecules as the target for therapy and predicting prognosis in DLBCL is challenging because of the divergences in the results of molecular studies. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics in the clinic represents an analytical tool with the potential to improve DLBCL diagnosis and prognosis. Previous proteomics studies using MS-based proteomics identified a wide range of proteins. To achieve a consensus, we reviewed MS-based proteomics studies and extracted the most consistently significantly dysregulated proteins. These proteins were then further explored by analyzing data from other omics fields. Among all significantly regulated proteins, interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) was identified as a potential target by proteomics, genomics, and IHC. Moreover, annexinA5 (ANXA5) and nucleobindin1 (NUCB1) were two of the most up-regulated proteins identified in MS studies. Functional enrichment analysis identified the light zone reactions of the germinal center (LZ-GC) together with cytoskeleton locomotion functions as enriched based on consistent, significantly dysregulated proteins. In this study, we suggest IRF4 and NUCB1 proteins as potential biomarkers that deserve further investigation in the field of DLBCL sub-classification and prognosis.

RAC1, a Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker for Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

The gene changes for diagnosis and prognosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) still remain unclear. RAC1 was reported to be asso;ciated with the B cell receptor signal pathway, but its relations with DLBCL have not yet been systematically explored. In this study, we have conducted molecular, bioinformatics and clinical analyses by using publicly available data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Wilcoxon signed-rank test and logistic regression were performed to evaluate the association between RAC1 and clinical features in patients. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to examine the impacts of RAC1 expression level on overall survival, and a nomogram was performed to illustrate the correlation between RAC1 and the risk of DLBCL. Our results revealed that the expression level of RAC1 in DLBCL was higher than that in normal tissues or lymphadenitis. High-level expression of RAC1 was significantly associated with clinical stage, as well as being an independent factor affecting overall survival. RAC1 was negatively correlated with Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK). The association between RAC1 gene expression and the risk of DLBCL was presented in a nomogram. In conclusion, RAC1 expression patterns may be used to predict the development and prognosis of DLBCL.

Enhanced lipid metabolism confers the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in CD5-positive non-MYC/BCL2 double expressor lymphoma

Lymphoma cells expressing CD5 (CD5+) confer inferior outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), especially in non–MYC/BCL2 double expressor (non-DE) patients. In tumor microenvironment, CD5+ non-DE tumor revealed increased proportion of immunosuppressive M2 macrophages and enhanced pathways related to macrophage activation and migration. In accordance to M2 activation, lipid metabolism was upregulated, including fatty acid uptake and fatty acid oxidation, which supplied energy for M2 macrophage polarization and activation. Meanwhile, CD36 expression was upregulated and strongly correlated to the proportion of M2 macrophages in CD5+ non-DE DLBCL. In vitro, a DLBCL cell line (LY10) overexpressing CD5 significantly increased M2 proportion in comparison with control when cocultured with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The addition of metformin significantly decreased the M2 proportion and the CD36 expression level in the coculture systems, indicating that metformin could target altered lipid metabolism and decrease M2 macrophages in DLBCL, especially in CD5+ non-DE lymphoma. In conclusion, enhanced lipid metabolism and M2 macrophage activation contributed to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and could be potential therapeutic targets in CD5+ non-DE DLBCL.

Metabolic Pathways in Breast Cancer Reprograming: An Insight to Non-Coding RNAs

Cancer cells reprogram their metabolisms to achieve high energetic requirements and produce precursors that facilitate uncontrolled cell proliferation. Metabolic reprograming involves not only the dysregulation in glucose-metabolizing regulatory enzymes, but also the enzymes engaging in the lipid and amino acid metabolisms. Nevertheless, the underlying regulatory mechanisms of reprograming are not fully understood. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) as functional RNA molecules cannot translate into proteins, but they do play a regulatory role in gene expression. Moreover, ncRNAs have been demonstrated to be implicated in the metabolic modulations in breast cancer (BC) by regulating the metabolic-related enzymes. Here, we will focus on the regulatory involvement of ncRNAs (microRNA, circular RNA and long ncRNA) in BC metabolism, including glucose, lipid and glutamine metabolism. Investigation of this aspect may not only alter the approaches of BC diagnosis and prognosis, but may also open a new avenue in using ncRNA-based therapeutics for BC treatment by targeting different metabolic pathways.

Circulating tumor DNA in B-cell lymphoma: technical advances, clinical applications, and perspectives for translational research

Noninvasive disease monitoring and risk stratification by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling has become a potential novel strategy for patient management in B-cell lymphoma. Emerging innovative therapeutic options and an unprecedented growth in our understanding of biological and molecular factors underlying lymphoma heterogeneity have fundamentally increased the need for precision-based tools facilitating personalized and accurate disease profiling and quantification. By capturing the entire mutational landscape of tumors, ctDNA assessment has some decisive advantages over conventional tissue biopsies, which usually target only one single tumor site. Due to its non- or minimal-invasive nature, serial and repeated ctDNA profiling provides a real-time picture of the genetic composition and facilitates quantification of tumor burden any time during the course of the disease. In this review, we present a comprehensive overview of technologies used for ctDNA detection and genotyping in B-cell lymphoma, focusing on pre-analytical and technical requirements, the advantages and limitations of various approaches, and highlight recent advances around improving sensitivity and suppressing technical errors. We broadly review potential applications of ctDNA in clinical practice and for translational research by describing how ctDNA might enhance lymphoma subtype classification, treatment response assessment, outcome prediction, and monitoring of measurable residual disease. We finally discuss how ctDNA could be implemented in prospective clinical trials as a novel surrogate endpoint and be utilized as a decision-making tool to guide lymphoma treatment in the future.

Next-Generation Sequencing Highlights of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India

Introduction: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) elucidates the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) genetic characteristics by finding recurrent and novel somatic mutations. This observational study attempted to create an NGS panel with a focus on identifying novel somatic mutations which could have potential clinical and therapeutic implications. This panel was created to look for mutations in 133 genes chosen on basis of a literature review and it was used to sequence the tumor DNA of 20 DLBCL patients after a centralized histopathologic review.

Methods: The study included 20 patients having DLBCL. The quality and quantity of tumor cells were accessed by H&E staining and correlated with histopathology and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) status. Patients were grouped as ABC (activated B-cell), PMBL (primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma), and other or unclassified subtypes. The lymphoma panel of 133 was designed on targeted sequencing of multiple genes for the coding regions through NGS. The libraries were prepared and sequenced using the Illumina platform. The alignment of obtained sequences was performed using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner and identification of somatic mutations was done using LoFreq (version 2) variant caller. The mutations were annotated using an annotation pipeline (VariMAT). Previously published literature and databases were used for the annotation of clinically relevant mutations. The common variants were filtered for reporting based on the presence in various population databases (1000G, ExAC, EVS, 1000Japanese, dbSNP, UK10K, MedVarDb). A custom read-depth-based algorithm was used to determine CNV (Copy Number Variants) from targeted sequencing experiments. Rare CNVs were detected using a comparison of the test data read-depths with the matched reference dataset. Reportable mutations were prioritized and prepared based on AMP-ASCO-CAP (Association for Molecular Pathology-American Society of Clinical Oncology-College of American Pathologists), WHO guidelines, and also based on annotation metrics from OncoMD (a knowledge base of genomic alterations).

Results: The informativity of the panel was 95 percent. NOTCH 1 was the most frequently mutated gene in 16.1% of patients followed by 12.9% who had ARID1A mutations. MYD88 and TP53 mutations were detected in 9.6% of the patient while 6.4% of patients had CSF3R mutations. NOTCH 1 and TP 53 are the most frequently reported gene in the middle age group (40-60). Mutation in MYD88 is reported in every age group. MYD88 (51%) is the most common mutation in ABC subtypes of DLBCL, followed by NOTCH 1 (44%) and SOCS 1 (33%) according to our findings. NOTCH 1 mutations are frequent in ABC and PMBL subtypes. Closer investigation reveals missense mutation is the most frequent mutation observed in the total cohort targeting 68.4% followed by frameshift deletion reported in 26.3%. Six novel variants have been discovered in this study.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the high yield of information in DLBCL using the NGS Lymphoma panel. Results also highlight the molecular heterogeneity of DLBCL subtypes which indicates the need for further studies to make the results of the NGS more clinically relevant.

An integrated prognostic model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most frequent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma subtype, is characterized by strong biological, morphological, and clinical heterogeneity, but patients are treated with immunochemotherapy in a relatively homogeneous way. Here, we have used a customized NanoString platform to analyze a series of 197 homogeneously treated DLBCL cases. The platform includes the most relevant genes or signatures known to be useful for predicting response to R-CHOP (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone) in DLBCL cases. We generated a risk score that combines the International Prognostic Index with cell of origin and double expression of MYC/BCL2, and stratified the series into three groups, yielding hazard ratios from 0.15 to 5.49 for overall survival, and from 0.17 to 5.04 for progression-free survival. Group differences were highly significant (p < 0.0001), and the scoring system was applicable to younger patients (<60 years of age) and patients with advanced or localized stages of the disease. Results were validated in an independent dataset from 166 DLBCL patients treated in two distinct clinical trials. This risk score combines clinical and biological data in a model that can be used to integrate biological variables into the prognostic models for DLBCL cases.

Reproducibility of Gene Expression Signatures in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Multiple gene expression profiles have been identified in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Besides the cell of origin (COO) classifier, no signatures have been reproduced in independent studies or evaluated for capturing distinct aspects of DLBCL biology. We reproduced 4 signatures in 175 samples of the HOVON-84 trial on a panel of 117 genes using the NanoString platform. The four gene signatures capture the COO, MYC activity, B-cell receptor signaling, oxidative phosphorylation, and immune response. Performance of our classification algorithms were confirmed in the original datasets. We were able to validate three of the four GEP signatures. The COO algorithm resulted in 94 (54%) germinal center B-cell (GCB) type, 58 (33%) activated B-cell (ABC) type, and 23 (13%) unclassified cases. The MYC-classifier revealed 77 cases with a high MYC-activity score (44%) and this MYC-high signature was observed more frequently in ABC as compared to GCB DLBCL (68% vs. 32%, p < 0.00001). The host response (HR) signature of the consensus clustering was present in 55 (31%) patients, while the B-cell receptor signaling, and oxidative phosphorylation clusters could not be reproduced. The overlap of COO, consensus cluster and MYC activity score differentiated six gene expression clusters: GCB/MYC-high (12%), GCB/HR (16%), GCB/non-HR (27%), COO-Unclassified (13%), ABC/MYC-high (25%), and ABC/MYC-low (7%). In conclusion, the three validated signatures identify distinct subgroups based on different aspects of DLBCL biology, emphasizing that each classifier captures distinct molecular profiles.

Analysis of prognostic factors in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma associated with rheumatic diseases

Objective

The risk of developing diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is increased in many rheumatic diseases (RDs). It is possible that RD-associated DLBCL is a distinct subset within the category of ‘DLBCL’, exhibiting characteristic biological features and clinical behaviour. However, information on RD-associated DLBCL is limited.

Methods

We searched the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology (Russia) database from 1996 to 2021 for patients with RDs and coexisting DLBCL. Prognostic factors including the International Prognostic Index (IPI), bulk disease and c-MYC/8q24 gene rearrangements were analysed. Furthermore, we stratified DLBCLs as germinal centre B-cell (GCB) subtype and non-GCB subtype based on Hans’ immunohistochemical algorithm and also examined Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status.

Results

Twenty-seven patients with RD-associated DLBCL were identified. Twenty patients had primary Sjogren’s syndrome, three had systemic lupus erythematosus, two had rheumatoid arthritis and two had systemic sclerosis. Secondary Sjogren’s syndrome was found in four patients. The median age at the time of diagnosis of DLBCL was 59 years with a female predominance (26:1). Based on IPI, 16 patients were assigned to the intermediate-high and high-risk groups. Bulk disease was detected in 29% of patients. Of the 20 examined cases, 4 (20%) were classified as the GCB subtype and 16 (80%) were classified as the non-GCB subtype. EBV was detected in 2 of the 21 tested cases (10%), and the c-MYC/8q24 gene rearrangement was not found in any of the 19 examined cases. After the lymphoma diagnosis, the median overall survival (OS) was 10 months (range: 0–238 months).

Conclusions

Except for the more common non-GCB subtype, we did not identify any other prognostic factor that could influence the prognosis of patients with RD-associated DLBCL. We believe that short OS in our patients was predominantly associated with decreased tolerance to lymphoma treatment.

How to Diagnose and Treat CD5-Positive Lymphomas Involving the Spleen

Patients with CD5-expressing lymphomas presenting with splenomegaly are frequently diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The most important differential diagnosis is mantle cell lymphoma, both in its classical and leukemic, non-nodal forms, given its prognostic and therapeutic implications. Other small B-cell neoplasms that frequently involve the spleen and occasionally express CD5 include the splenic marginal zone lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia and, rarely, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. The frequency of CD5 positivity depends in part on the sensitivity of the detection methods employed. Usually, a combination of morphological, immunophenotypic and molecular findings allows for a precise sub-classification of CD5-positive, low-grade B-cell lymphomas of the spleen. Some of these tumors may display a mixture of small and larger B cells, raising the possibility of more aggressive lymphomas, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Approximately 5-10% of DLBCL are CD5-positive and some may manifest as primary splenic lesions. When available, the morphology of DLBCL in the splenic tissue is distinctive and a leukemic picture is very rare. In conclusion, the appropriate morphological and clinical context assisted by flow cytometry panels and/or immunohistochemistry allows the differential diagnosis of CD5-positive, non-Hodgkin, B-cell lymphomas involving the spleen.

Liquid biopsy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: utility in cell origin determination and survival prediction in Chinese patients

The utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in classifying the cell origin of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has not been explored in the Chinese population. In this study, we aimed to investigate the genetic characteristics of DLBCL based on both tumor and ctDNA sequencing and to assess the predictive value of ctDNA in DLBCL. A targeted sequencing panel of 413 genes was applied to tumor biopsies and paired plasma samples obtained from 30 patients with DLBCL before therapeutic intervention (pretreatment). The concordance between plasma genotyping classification and traditional cell-of-origin classification using tumor tissue was 80.0% (20/25). Patients with higher baseline plasma ctDNA levels had poorer survival compared to those with lower ctDNA levels (2-year progression survival rate: 40.0% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.011; 5-year overall survival rate: 30.5% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.004). Collectively, our results demonstrated that pretreatment ctDNA analysis could assist origin determination and prognosis prediction clinically.

Evaluation of Ki-67 as a Prognostic Marker in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma-A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma and prognostic information is essential in finding the right treatment. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of Ki-67 in patients with DLBCL.

METHODS

Patients with DLBCL, treated with first-line R-CHOP, were retrospectively analyzed in groups of high (>70%) and low (≤70%) Ki-67. Parameters of interest were the international prognostic index (IPI), treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was conducted to analyze categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were applied for survival analyses. Finally, a multivariate linear regression analysis was performed, including gender, Ki-67 ≤ 70% or >70%, IPI and presence of B symptoms.

RESULTS

Overall, 58 patients were included. No significant association was found between Ki-67 status and IPI (p = 0.148) or treatment response (p = 0.373). Survival in patients with high Ki-67 was significantly inferior with respect to OS (p = 0.047) but not PFS (p = 0.138). Multivariate linear regression, however, yielded only IPI as a risk factor for OS.

CONCLUSION

Future studies with larger patient cohorts are needed in order to elucidate the prognostic role of Ki-67 in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP.

Venetoclax with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R as initial therapy for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1 study

BACKGROUND

Dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab) is a front-line treatment for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Bcl-2 is associated with chemoresistance due to BCL2 gene rearrangement or protein overexpression and is antagonised by venetoclax. We aimed to assess the safety of venetoclax with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R as initial therapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm, phase 1 study across seven treatment centres in the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18-80 years with histologically confirmed, previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, transformed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, high-grade B-cell lymphoma with double-hit or not otherwise specified, or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, with Ann Arbor stage II-IV and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Participants received six cycles of oral venetoclax 400 mg, 600 mg, or 800 mg once daily for 10 days per cycle with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (one cycle every 3 weeks; baseline doses were intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m² on day 1, intravenous etoposide 50 mg/m² on days 1-4, oral prednisone 60 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-5, intravenous vincristine 0·4 mg/m² on days 1-4, intravenous cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² on day 5, and intravenous doxorubicin 10 mg/m² on days 1-4). A subsequent cohort received venetoclax 600 mg once daily for 5 days per cycle. The primary endpoints were the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, and the recommended phase 2 dose of venetoclax. Analyses were done per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03036904, and enrolment is now closed.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 3, 2017, and June 4, 2019, 34 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 30 were enrolled and received venetoclax with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R. The median patient age was 64·0 years (IQR 51·6-69·4). The maximum tolerated dose was 800 mg for 10 days and the established recommended phase 2 dose was 600 mg for 5 days due to tolerability for treatment duration. One (3%) of 30 patients had a dose-limiting toxicity in cycle one (grade 4 thrombocytopenia with 800 mg dose). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were cytopenias (28 [93%] of 30 patients); febrile neutropenia occurred in 19 (63%) patients. Grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events included hypophosphataemia (n=10), hypokalaemia (n=7), and hyperglycaemia (n=5). Serious adverse events included infection (n=7) and gastrointestinal toxicities including abdominal pain (n=3), colonic perforation (n=1), and small intestinal obstruction (n=1). There was one treatment-related death (sepsis). Overall response rate was 96·7% (95% CI 82·8-99·9); 28 (93·3% [77·9-99·2]) of 30 patients had complete response and one (3·3% [0·1-17·2]) had a partial response.

INTERPRETATION

Venetoclax with dose-adjusted EPOCH-R showed an acceptable safety profile at the recommended phase 2 dose and had encouraging preliminary activity in this population at high risk of adverse outcomes, and is worthy of further study. The combination is being investigated in Alliance 051701 (NCT03984448).

FUNDING

Genentech.

Dysregulation of miRNAs in DLBCL: Causative Factor for Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Prognosis

MicroRNA is a small non-coding RNA (sncRNA) involved in gene silencing and regulating post-transcriptional gene expression. miRNAs play an essential role in the pathogenesis of numerous diseases, including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, viral diseases and cancer. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), arising from different stages of B-cell differentiation whose pathogenesis involves miRNAs. Various viral and non-viral vectors are used as a delivery vehicle for introducing specific miRNA inside the cell. Adenoviruses are linear, double-stranded DNA viruses with 35 kb genome size and are extensively used in gene therapy. Meanwhile, Adeno-associated viruses accommodate up to 4.8 kb foreign genetic material and are favorable for transferring miRNA due to small size of miRNA. The genetic material is integrated into the DNA of the host cell by retroviruses so that only dividing cells are infected and stable expression of miRNA is achieved. Over the years, remarkable progress was made to understand DLBCL biology using advanced genomics and epigenomics technologies enabling oncologists to uncover multiple genetic mutations in DLBCL patients. These genetic mutations are involved in epigenetic modification, ability to escape immunosurveillance, impaired BCL6 and NF-κβ signaling pathways and blocking terminal differentiation. These pathways have since been identified and used as therapeutic targets for the treatment of DLBCL. Recently miRNAs were also identified to act either as oncogenes or tumor suppressors in DLBCL pathology by altering the expression levels of some of the known DLBCL related oncogenes. i.e., miR-155, miR-17-92 and miR-21 act as oncogenes by altering the expression levels of MYC, SHIP and FOXO1, respectively, conversely; miR-34a, mir-144 and miR-181a act as tumor suppressors by altering the expression levels of SIRT1, BCL6 and CARD11, respectively. Hundreds of miRNAs have already been identified as biomarkers in the prognosis and diagnosis of DLBCL because of their significant roles in DLBCL pathogenesis. In conclusion, miRNAs in addition to their role as biomarkers of prognosis and diagnosis could also serve as potential therapeutic targets for treating DLBCL.

Maintenance therapy for untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background:

Several clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the role of maintenance therapy in untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with complete response or partial response following standard immunochemotherapy; however, the effect of maintenance therapy remains uncertain, and a suitable maintenance strategy has not been determined because of the lack of direct/indirect comparisons.

Methods:

We performed a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to analyze and compare the effectiveness of different maintenance regimens in newly diagnosed DLBCL patients. We searched the PubMed Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant papers from inception to 18 March 2021. Our study was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020168864). Data on overall survival (OS) were extracted and the treatments were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve.

Results:

Eight trials and seven treatments involving 3525 patients were analyzed. OS analysis indicated that none of the drugs showed any benefit compared with non-maintenance therapy. Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide (SUCRA 69.3%) was ranked first in terms of OS.

Conclusion:

Based on the OS results observed in this NMA, we do not recommend maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed DLBLC after first-line therapy.

Prognostic molecular biomarkers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era and their therapeutic implications

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents a group of tumors characterized by substantial heterogeneity in terms of their pathological and biological features, a causal factor of their varied clinical outcome. This variation has persisted despite the implementation of rituximab in treatment regimens over the last 20 years. In this context, prognostic biomarkers are of great importance in order to identify high-risk patients that might benefit from treatment intensification or the introduction of novel therapeutic agents. Herein, we review current knowledge on specific immunohistochemical or genetic biomarkers that might be useful in clinical practice. Gene-expression profiling is a tool of special consideration in this effort, as it has enriched our understanding of DLBCL biology and has allowed for the classification of DLBCL by cell-of-origin as well as by more elaborate molecular signatures based on distinct gene-expression profiles. These subgroups might outperform individual biomarkers in terms of prognostication; however, their use in clinical practice is still limited. Moreover, the underappreciated role of the tumor microenvironment in DLBCL prognosis is discussed in terms of prognostic gene-expression signatures, as well as in terms of individual biomarkers of prognostic significance. Finally, the efficacy of novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of DLBCL patients are discussed and an evidence-based therapeutic approach by specific genetic subgroup is suggested.

Role of Cell-Origin Profiling Using Immunohistochemistry to Predict the Survival of Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Indonesia

Background

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Asia and Indonesia. DLBCL could be further classified according to cell of origin as the germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype or the non-germinal center B-cell (non-GCB) subtypes; of these, the non-GCB subtype usually has poorer prognosis. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between the cell-origin subtype and 3-year overall survival of patients with DLBCL at Kariadi General Hospital Semarang.

Methods

This research represents an observational analytical study of 36 patients with DLBCL who visited Kariadi General Hospital between January and August 2017. Data on age of diagnosis, tumor location, disease stage, and 3-year overall survival were collected. DLBCL subtype was determined via immunohistochemical examination of CD10, BCL6, and MUM1 protein expression. Data analyses, including the chi squared test and Kaplan-Meier curves, were conducted.

Results

The study population included 18 patients with GCB-subtype DLBCL and 18 patients with non-GCB-subtype DLBCL. No significant difference (P = 0.171) between disease stage and cell-origin subtype was noted between groups. Patients with the non-GCB subtype had a 3-year overall survival that was significantly worse than that of patients with the GCB subtype (P = 0.026). Moreover, the 3-year survival rate of patients with the non-GCB subtype of the disease was 38.9% while that of patients with the GCB subtype was 77.8%. Patients with advanced stages of DLBCL also had a 3-year overall survival that was significantly worse than those of patients with early stages of the disease (P < 0.001), with the 3-year survival rate of patients with advanced stage was 14.3%.

Conclusion

Patients with non-GCB-subtype DLBCL or advanced stages of the disease have a lower 3-year overall survival rate and poorer prognosis compared with those with other subtypes or earlier stages of the disease.

A phase 2 study of venetoclax plus R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The phase 2 CAVALLI (NCT02055820) study assessed efficacy and safety of venetoclax, a selective B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) inhibitor, with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in first-line (1L) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including patients demonstrating Bcl-2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry (Bcl-2 IHC+). Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and had previously untreated DLBCL, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and International Prognostic Index 2 to 5. Venetoclax 800 mg (days 4-10, cycle 1; days 1-10, cycles 2-8) was administered with rituximab (8 cycles) and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (6-8 cycles) in 21-day cycles. Primary end points were safety, tolerability, and research_plete response (CR) at end of treatment (EOT). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Comparative analyses used covariate-adjusted R-CHOP controls from the GOYA/BO21005 study, an appropriate contemporary benchmark for safety and efficacy. Safety and efficacy analyses included 206 patients. CR rate at EOT was 69% in the overall population and was maintained across Bcl-2 IHC+ subgroups. With a median follow-up of 32.2 months, trends were observed for improved investigator-assessed PFS for venetoclax plus R-CHOP in the overall population (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.87) and Bcl-2 IHC+ subgroups (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.89) vs R-CHOP. Despite a higher incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (86%), related mortality was not increased (2%). Chemotherapy dose intensity was similar in CAVALLI vs GOYA. The addition of venetoclax to R-CHOP in 1L DLBCL demonstrates increased, but manageable, myelosuppression and the potential of improved efficacy, particularly in high-risk Bcl-2 IHC+ patient subgroups.

The Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Relative Cerebral Blood Volume (rCBV) with Ki-67 Expression in Central Nervous System Lymphoma

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma presents as the dense infiltration of tumor cells in the perivascular space and blood-brain barrier disruption, on histopathological examination. The Ki-67 expression has been significantly correlated with tumor proliferation and is considered to be a prognostic factor. Objectives: This study aimed at analyzing the correlations among the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), the relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), and the Ki-67 proliferation index in CNS lymphoma. Methods: From August 2019 to March 2020, 26 patients (14 men and 12 women) who underwent biopsy or surgery and were histologically confirmed as CNS lymphoma were included in this retrospective study. Diffusion and perfusion acquisitions were performed in 26 and 10 examinations, respectively. The Ki-67 proliferation index was available for all cases. Results: The mean tADC, rADC, and rCBV values were 0.61 ± 0.12 × 10-3 mm2/s, 0.73 ± 0.14, and 1.1 ± 0.32, respectively. Negative correlations were identified between both tADC and rADC and the Ki-67 proliferation index (r = -0.656, P < 0.01 and r = -0.540, P < 0.01, respectively). No significant correlations were found between rCBV values and the Ki-67 proliferation index, between rCBV and rADC, or between rCBV and tADC. Conclusions: tADC and rADC values can be used as noninvasive indicators to predict cell proliferation in CNS lymphoma.

BCL2 Expression in First-Line Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Identifies a Patient Population With Poor Prognosis

INTRODUCTION

The prognostic value of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) expression in de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with immunochemotherapy is of interest to define a target patient population for clinical development of BCL2 inhibitors. We aimed to develop a reproducible immunohistochemistry algorithm and assay to determine BCL2 protein expression and assess the prognostic value of BCL2 in newly diagnosed DLBCL cohorts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The prospectively defined algorithm incorporated BCL2 staining intensity and percentage of BCL2-positive cells. Functionally relevant cutoffs were based on the sensitivity of lymphoma cell lines to venetoclax. This assay was highly reproducible across laboratories. The prognostic impact of BCL2 expression was assessed in DLBCL patients from the phase 3 MAIN (n = 230) and GOYA (n = 366) trials, and a population-based registry (n = 310).

RESULTS

Approximately 50% of tumors were BCL2 positive, with a higher frequency in high International Prognostic Index (IPI) and activated B-cell-like DLBCL subgroups. BCL2 expression was associated with poorer progression-free survival in the MAIN study (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-3.40; multivariate Cox regression adjusted for IPI and cell of origin). This trend was confirmed in the GOYA and registry cohorts in adjusted multivariate analyses (GOYA: HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.05-2.82; registry: HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.29-2.78). Patients with BCL2 immunohistochemistry-positive and IPI-high disease had the poorest prognosis: 3-year progression-free survival rates were 51% (GOYA) and 37% (registry).

CONCLUSION

Findings support use of our BCL2 immunohistochemistry scoring system and assay to select patients with BCL2-positive tumors for future studies.

High Ki67 proliferation index but not cell-of-origin subtypes is associated with shorter overall survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Background:

CD10, BCL6, and MUM1 are commonly used immunohistochemical stains for classifying diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which is useful in predicting outcome. Conflicting reports of the prognostic value of other markers such as BCL2, CD23, and Ki67 proliferation index have been reported. Our objective was to correlate these immunostains and Hans classification with response to therapy and overall survival.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with DLBCL from 2008–2014 at a tertiary-care cancer hospital. The slides with the IHC stains were reviewed by two independent pathologists. The clinical outcomes––assessed independently––were response to therapy and overall survival. The treatment response evaluation was based on the new Lugano classification. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Fisher’s exact test and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results:

Forty-one patients were included in the study with a known Hans classification, available clinical data, and at least 5-year follow-up. CD10 immunostain was reported in all patients, whereas CD23 was the least reported in only four patients. No significant association was observed between CD10, BCL6, MUM1, BCL2, and both Response to therapy and overall survival. Owing to few cases reported CD23 immunostain, further analysis of association is not reported. High Ki67 proliferative index of >80% was statistically significantly associated with shorter overall survival and not statistically significant associated with no response to therapy. Hans classification subtypes were not predictive in regard to therapy response.

Conclusion:

High Ki67 expression (>80%) was associated with shorter overall survival in DLBCL. Hans classification subtypes were not predictive.

DA-EPOCH-R combined with high-dose methotrexate in patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IV CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a single-arm, open-label, phase II study

CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (CD5+ DLBCL) is characterized by poor prognosis and a high frequency of central nervous system relapse after standard immunochemotherapy. We conducted a phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of dose-adjusted (DA)- EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab) combined with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in newly diagnosed patients with CD5+ DLBCL. Previously untreated patients with stage II to IV CD5+ DLBCL according to the 2008 World Health Organization classification were eligible. Four cycles of DA-EPOCH-R followed by two cycles of HD-MTX and four additional cycles of DAEPOCH- R (DA-EPOCH-R/HD-MTX) were planned as the protocol treatment. The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). Between September 25, 2012, and November 11, 2015, we enrolled 47 evaluable patients. Forty-five (96%) patients completed the protocol treatment. There were no deviations or violations in the DA-EPOCH-R dose levels. The complete response rate was 91%, and the overall response rate was 94%. At a median follow up of 3.1 years (range, 2.0-4.9 years), the 2- year PFS was 79% [95% confidence interval (CI): 64-88]. The 2-year overall survival was 89% (95%CI: 76-95). Toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia in 46 (98%) patients, grade 4 thrombocytopenia 12 (26%) patients, and febrile neutropenia in 31 (66%) patients. No treatment-related death was noted during the study. DA-EPOCH-R/HD-MTX might be a first-line therapy option for stage II-IV CD5+ DLBCL and warrants further investigation. (Trial registered at: UMIN-CTR: UMIN000008507.).

Statistical Challenges in Development of Prognostic Models in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Comparison Between Existing Models - A Systematic Review

Background and Aim

Based on advances in the diagnosis, classification, and management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a number of new prognostic models have been proposed. The aim of this study was to review and compare different prognostic models of DLBCL based on the statistical methods used to evaluate the performance of each model, as well as to analyze the possible limitations of the methods.

Methods and Results

A literature search identified 46 articles that proposed 55 different prognostic models for DLBCL by combining different clinical, laboratory, and other parameters of prognostic significance. In addition, six studies used nomograms, which avoid risk categorization, to create prognostic models. Only a minority of studies assessed discrimination and/or calibration to compare existing models built upon different statistical methods in the process of development of a new prognostic model. All models based on nomograms reported the c-index as a measure of discrimination. There was no uniform evaluation of the performance in other prognostic models. We compared these models of DLBCL by calculating differences and ratios of 3-year overall survival probabilities between the high- and the low-risk groups. We found that the highest and lowest ratio between low- and high-risk groups was 6 and 1.31, respectively, while the difference between these groups was 18.9% and 100%, respectively. However, these studies had limited duration of follow-up and the number of patients ranged from 71 to 335.

Conclusion

There is no universal statistical instrument that could facilitate a comparison of prognostic models in DLBCL. However, when developing a prognostic model, it is recommended to report its discrimination and calibration in order to facilitate comparisons between different models. Furthermore, prognostic models based on nomograms are becoming more appealing owing to individualized disease-related risk estimations. However, they have not been validated yet in other study populations.

Characteristics of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome

Aim

Patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) have an increased risk of developing diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which is an aggressive and heterogeneous non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. This study aimed to characterize DLBCLs in patients with pSS.

Method

We identified 18 patients with DLBCL and pSS over a 22‐year period. Based on the 2016 WHO guidelines, we characterized DLBCL based on immunohistochemical tests using a broad panel of antibodies, and an Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) test using in situ hybridization.

Results

The median time from initial pSS symptom onset to the DLBCL diagnosis was 20.5 years and the median time from the pSS diagnosis until the DLBCL diagnosis was 14 years. After the lymphoma diagnosis, the median overall survival was 3 months (range: 0‐212 months) and the 5‐year overall survival rate was 37.5%. Thirteen DLBCLs were re‐classified as DLBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS) in nine cases; EBV‐positive DLBCL, NOS in two cases; and T‐cell/histiocyte‐rich large B‐cell lymphoma in two cases. Five cases of DLBCLs were not re‐classified because their EBV status was unknown. The Hans algorithm, which uses a combination of staining for CD10, BCL6, and MUM1, was used to classify the DLBCLs into the germinal center B‐cell (GCB) subtype for three cases and the non‐GCB subtype for nine cases.

Conclusion

These results indicate that DLBCL tends to occur late in pSS cases and is mainly related to the non‐GCB subtype of DLBCL.

Available prognostic models for risk stratification of diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients: a systematic review

The International Prognostic Index (IPI) has been used for risk stratification for a long time in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Based on new clinical and biological prognostic markers, many new prognostic models have been described. This review aims to present the progress in development and validation of these prognostic models. A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify studies that proposed a new prognostic model in DLBCL. A total of 38 studies met the inclusion criteria. The IPI, revised IPI (R-IPI), and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-IPI were the most studied prognostic indexes, externally validated and commonly used to compare to other models. Despite an increasing number of prognostic models have been proposed lately, most of them lack external validation. Further studies, that combine biological and clinical markers with prognostic significance, are needed to determine the optimal prognostic tool for more personalized treatment approach to DLBCL patients.

Prognostic impact of MYD88 mutation, proliferative index and cell origin in diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Background

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, among non-Hodgkin lymphomas, is one of the most frequent subtypes. Clinical laboratory data and post-treatment outcomes are scarce in the Brazilian population.

Objective

The main objective of this retrospective study was to assess the impact of tumor markers, including the Myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MYD88) mutation.

Method

Eighty-three patients were included and treated with R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens.

Results

Median age was 64-years old and 58% were female patients. The median follow-up was 42 months. The progression free survival (PFS) at this time was 63% and overall survival (OS), 66%. In the patients with tumors expressing Myc proto-oncogene protein (MYC) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2), assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), known as dual protein expressers, median post-progression survival was 31 (15–45) months. An increased proliferative index were associated with a high rate of progression (hazard ratio 2.31 [95% confidence interval [1.05–5.12]; p = 0.04). The cell of origin (COO), identified by IHC, was not able to predict PFS (p = 0.76). The MYD88 L265P mutation was present in 10.8% (9/83) of patients and did not show a prognostic correlation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the MYD88 mutation, although an important tool for diagnosis and a possible target drug, presented at a low frequency and was not a prognostic marker in this population.

Prognostic impact of serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor level at diagnosis in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a clinically heterogeneous disease. To evaluate the clinical relevance of the serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) level, we retrospectively analyzed 178 patients aged ≥60 years who were newly diagnosed with DLBCL. We determined the cutoff value of the sIL-2R level to be 1280 U/mL using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The high sIL-2R group exhibited significantly inferior 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (36.2% vs. 86.1%, p < .001) and 5-year overall survival (OS) (49.7% s. 83.8%, p < .001) than the low sIL-2R group. Multivariate analysis revealed that a high sIL-2R level was a significant prognostic factor for PFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.65, p < .001 and HR: 2.99, p = .001, respectively). This study showed that measurement of the sIL-2R level at diagnosis is clinically beneficial for identifying elderly patients with DLBCL who have a poor prognosis.

Spanish Lymphoma Group (GELTAMO) guidelines for the diagnosis, staging, treatment, and follow-up of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) accounts for approximately 30% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cases in adult series. DLBCL is characterized by marked clinical and biological heterogeneity, encompassing up to 16 distinct clinicopathological entities. While current treatments are effective in 60% to 70% of patients, those who are resistant to treatment continue to die from this disease. An expert panel performed a systematic review of all data on the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of DLBCL published in PubMed, EMBASE and MEDLINE up to December 2017. Recommendations were classified in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, and the proposed recommendations incorporated into practical algorithms. Initial discussions between experts began in March 2016, and a final consensus was reached in November 2017. The final document was reviewed by all authors in February 2018 and by the Scientific Committee of the Spanish Lymphoma Group GELTAMO.

The pretreatment albumin to globulin ratio as a significant predictor in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

The pretreatment albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) has been used to predict survival in several types of tumors. However, whether AGR can predict outcomes in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains unclear. We evaluated the prognosis value of AGR in DLBCL patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the available serum biochemical results of 335 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL before treatment. The AGR was calculated as: albumin (g/L)/globulin. X-tile program was used to generate an optimal cut-off value of 1.3 for AGR. And all patients were respectively divided into the low AGR and high AGR groups according to the cut-off value.

RESULTS

The low AGR group displayed more adverse clinical chacteristics, including old age, sex (female), increased β2-microglobulinpoor (β2-MG), increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), B symptoms, poor performance status (PS), advanced stage, number of extranodal sites ≥ 2 and higher International Prognostic Index (IPI). AGR was negatively correlated with age, IPI score, ECOG score, Ann Arbor stage, B symptoms, β2-MG, LDH, and extranodal involvement, while positively correlated with gender. Patients with a low AGR presented with significantly poorer overall survival (OS, P = .001). Multivariate analysis further demonstrated that a low AGR was an independent adverse predictor for OS (HR = 0.613; 95% CI = 0.412-0.910, P = .015). In addition, AGR distinguished patients with different prognosis in stage III-IV and the non-germinal center B cell-like lymphoma (non-GCB) groups, a low AGR was also significantly associated with poor OS in 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment AGR was a simple and effective clinical marker of survival in patients with DLBCL, and may had an additional prognostic value based on Ann Arbor stage and cell of origin for DLBCL.

Genetics of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most frequent subtype of lymphoid malignancy, remains a significant clinical challenge, as ∼30% of patients are not cured. Over the past decade, remarkable progress has been made in the understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease, spurred by the implementation of powerful genomic technologies that enabled the definition of its genetic and epigenetic landscape. These studies have uncovered a multitude of genomic alterations that contribute to the initiation and maintenance of the tumor clone by disrupting biological functions known to be critical for the normal biology of its cells of origin, germinal center B cells. The identified alterations involve epigenetic remodeling, block of differentiation, escape from immune surveillance, and the constitutive activation of several signal transduction pathways. This wealth of new information offers unique opportunities for the development of improved diagnostic and prognostic tools that could help guide the clinical management of DLBCL patients. Furthermore, a number of the mutated genes identified are potentially actionable targets that are currently being explored for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. This review summarizes current knowledge of the most common genetic alterations associated with DLBCL in relation to their functional impact on the malignant transformation process, and discusses their clinical implications for mechanism-based therapeutics.

Round-robin test for the cell-of-origin classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-a feasibility study using full slide staining

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is subdivided by gene expression analysis (GEP) into two molecular subtypes named germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) and activated B-cell-like (ABC) after their putative cell-of-origin (COO). Determination of the COO is considered mandatory in any new-diagnosed DLBCL, not otherwise specified according to the updated WHO classification. Despite the fact that pathologists are free to choose the method for COO classification, immunohistochemical (IHC) assays are most widely used. However, to the best of our knowledge, no round-robin test to evaluate the interlaboratory variability has been published so far. Eight hematopathology laboratories participated in an interlaboratory test for COO classification of 10 DLBCL tumors using the IHC classifier comprising the expression of CD10, BCL6, and MUM1 (so-called Hans classifier). The results were compared with GEP for COO signature and, in a subset, with results obtained by image analysis. In 7/10 cases (70%), at least seven laboratories assigned a given case to the same COO subtype (one center assessed one sample as not analyzable), which was in agreement with the COO subtype determined by GEP. The results in 3/10 cases (30%) revealed discrepancies between centers and/or between IHC and GEP subtype. Whereas the CD10 staining results were highly reproducible, staining for MUM1 was inconsistent in 50% and for BCL6 in 40% of cases. Image analysis of 16 slides stained for BCL6 (N = 8) and MUM1 (N = 8) of the two cases with the highest disagreement in COO classification were in line with the score of the pathologists in 14/16 stainings analyzed (87.5%). This study describes the first round-robin test for COO subtyping in DLBCL using IHC and demonstrates that COO classification using the Hans classifier yields consistent results among experienced hematopathologists, even when variable staining protocols are used. Data from this small feasibility study need to be validated in larger cohorts.

Prognostic significances of overexpression MYC and/or BCL2 in R-CHOP-treated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A Systematic review and meta-analysis

Numerous studies have investigated the prognostic values of MYC and/or BCL2 protein overexpression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the results still demonstrate discrepancies among different studies. We aimed to do a systematic review and meta-analysis on the relationships between overexpression MYC and/or BCL2 and DLBCLs treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). This study followed the guidelines of PRISMA and Cochrane handbook. The hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) were pooled to estimate the main effect size. Twenty studies recruited a total of 5576 patients were available for this meta-analysis. The results showed that MYC (HR = 1.96, 95%CI (confidence interval) = 1.69–2.27)without heterogeneity(I² = 17.2%, P = 0.280), BCL2 (HR = 1.65, 95%CI = 1.43–1.89, I² = 20.7%, P = 0.234) protein overexpression, and co-overexpression (HR = 2.58, 95%CI = 2.19–3.04, I² = 17.2%, P = 0.275) had a poor prognosis in R-CHOP treated DLBCL patients, respectively. The current analysis indicated that MYC and/or BCL2 protein overexpression, and particularly co-overexpression was related to short overall survival in R-CHOP treated DLBCL patients, showing that application of the two new biomarkers can help to better stratify DLBCL patients and guide targeted treatment.

Comparison of the algorithms classifying the ABC and GCB subtypes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Different immunohistochemical algorithms for the classification of the activated B-cell (ABC) and germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are applied in different laboratories. In the present study, 127 patients with DLCBL were investigated, all treated with rituximab and cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, oncovin and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP-like regimens between April 2004 and December 2010. Multi-tumor tissue microarrays were prepared and were tested according to 4 algorithms: Hans; modified Hans; Choi; and modified Choi. For 39 patients, the flow cytometric quantification of CD19 and CD20 antigen expression was performed and the level of expression presented as molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome units. The Choi algorithm was demonstrated to be prognostic for OS and classified patients into the GCB subgroup with an HR of 0.91. No difference in the expression of the CD19 antigen between the ABC and GCB groups was observed, but the ABC subtype exhibited a decreased expression of the CD20 antigen compared with the GCB subtype.

BCL2 expression but not MYC and BCL2 coexpression predicts survival in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma independently of cell of origin in the phase 3 LNH03-6B trial

Background

Our aim was to evaluate whether the cell of origin (COO) as defined by the Hans algorithm and MYC/BCL2 coexpression, which are the two main biological risk factors in elderly patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP), maintain their prognostic value in a large prospective clinical trial.

Patients and methods

We evaluated 285 paraffin-embedded samples from patients (60-80 years of age) enrolled in the Lymphoma Study Association trial LNH03-6B who were treated with R-CHOP. We correlated the COO defined by the transcriptome according to the Wright algorithm with that defined by the Hans algorithm in a subset of 62 tumors with available frozen tissue samples.

Results

The non-germinal center B-cell-like phenotype according to the Hans algorithm and BCL2 expression (but not MYC and BCL2 coexpression) predicted worse progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR)=1.78, P = 0.003 and HR = 1.79, P = 0.003, respectively] and overall survival (HR = 1.85, P = 0.005 and HR = 1.67, P = 0.02, respectively) independently of the International Prognostic Index. The correlation between the Hans algorithm and the Wright algorithm was 91%, with an almost perfect concordance according to a kappa test (0.81).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that immunohistochemically defined COO remains a useful tool for predicting prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma when performed under optimized standardized conditions and that BCL2 expression may help to identify elderly patients at risk for relapse and who could potentially respond to anti-BCL2 targeted agents. In this prospective phase III trial, the coexpression of MYC and BCL2 does not appear to predict worse survival.

Clinical trial Number

NCT00144755.

An inflammation-based cumulative prognostic score system in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma in rituximab era

Background

Systemic inflammatory parameters are associated with poor outcomes in malignant patients. Several inflammation-based cumulative prognostic score systems were established for various solid tumors. However, there is few inflammation based cumulative prognostic score system for patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 564 adult DLBCL patients who had received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-CHOP) therapy between Nov 1 2006 and Dec 30 2013 and assessed the prognostic significance of six systemic inflammatory parameters evaluated in previous studies by univariate and multivariate analysis:C-reactive protein(CRP), albumin levels, the lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio(NLR), the platelet-lymphocyte ratio(PLR)and fibrinogen levels.

Results

Multivariate analysis identified CRP, albumin levels and the LMR are three independent prognostic parameters for overall survival (OS). Based on these three factors, we constructed a novel inflammation-based cumulative prognostic score (ICPS) system. Four risk groups were formed: group ICPS = 0, ICPS = 1, ICPS = 2 and ICPS = 3. Advanced multivariate analysis indicated that the ICPS model is a prognostic score system independent of International Prognostic Index (IPI) for both progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). The 3-year OS for patients with ICPS =0, ICPS =1, ICPS =2 and ICPS =3 were 95.6, 88.2, 76.0 and 62.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). The 3-year PFS for patients with ICPS = 0–1, ICPS = 2 and ICPS = 3 were 84.8, 71.6 and 54.5%, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The prognostic value of the ICPS model indicated that the degree of systemic inflammatory status was associated with clinical outcomes of patients with DLBCL in rituximab era. The ICPS model was shown to classify risk groups more accurately than any single inflammatory prognostic parameters. These findings may be useful for identifying candidates for further inflammation-related mechanism research or novel anti-inflammation target therapies.

KLHL6 Is Preferentially Expressed in Germinal Center-Derived B-Cell Lymphomas

OBJECTIVES

KLHL6 is a recently described BTB-Kelch protein with selective expression in lymphoid tissues and is most strongly expressed in germinal center B cells.

METHODS

Using gene expression profiling as well as immunohistochemistry with an anti-KLHL6 monoclonal antibody, we have characterized the expression of this molecule in normal and neoplastic tissues. Protein expression was evaluated in 1,058 hematopoietic neoplasms.

RESULTS

Consistent with its discovery as a germinal center marker, KLHL6 was positive mainly in B-cell neoplasms of germinal center derivation, including 95% of follicular lymphomas (106/112). B-cell lymphomas of non-germinal center derivation were generally negative (0/33 chronic lymphocytic leukemias/small lymphocytic lymphomas, 3/49 marginal zone lymphomas, and 2/66 mantle cell lymphomas).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to other germinal center markers, including BCL6, CD10, HGAL, and LMO2, KLHL6 immunohistochemistry may prove a useful adjunct in the diagnosis and future classification of B-cell lymphomas.

Maintenance therapy following induction chemoimmunotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: current perspective

BACKGROUND

Maintenance therapy has proven efficacy in indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), yet its role in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an area of ongoing investigation. While DLBCL is potentially curable, >30% of patients relapse following front-line therapy and have a poor prognosis, especially those with refractory disease. Maintenance therapy holds promise to maintain response post-induction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Keyword searches were carried out in PubMed and congress abstracts of 'diffuse large B-cell lymphoma' and 'maintenance' and focused on phase II/III studies of maintenance following front-line induction.

RESULTS

Although used in indolent forms of NHL, studies of maintenance therapy with rituximab in patients with DLBCL responding to front-line R-CHOP (rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) have not improved efficacy and are not recommended. Targeted agents enzastaurin and everolimus reported results from the phase III studies PRELUDE and PILLAR-2, respectively, both of which showed no proven maintenance benefit following front-line chemoimmunotherapy induction. Overall, the reported efficacy results with these agents in the maintenance setting do not outweigh the risks. Lenalidomide for maintenance has been reported in three studies. Results from two phase II trials on lenalidomide maintenance revealed positive outcomes in higher-risk patients following induction, resulting in improved progression-free survival in relapsed DLBCL patients who were ineligible for transplantation. First analysis from the phase III REMARC trial showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival for lenalidomide versus placebo, with no difference in overall survival, following front-line R-CHOP induction in elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on currently available studies of DLBCL maintenance therapies, initial results in front-line, as well as the relapsed setting, with immunomodulators such as lenalidomide show promise for further research to identify appropriate patients who would most benefit. Overall, this review of maintenance studies underscores the need for additional analyses of patient subtypes, clinical risk status, and molecular profiles, with careful consideration of study end points.

Determination of Molecular Subtypes of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Using a Reverse Transcriptase Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification Classifier: A CALYM Study

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It includes three major subtypes termed germinal center B-cell-like, activated B-cell-like, and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. With the emergence of novel targeted therapies, accurate methods capable of interrogating this cell-of-origin classification should soon become essential in the clinics. To address this issue, we developed a novel gene expression profiling DLBCL classifier based on reverse transcriptase multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. This assay simultaneously evaluates the expression of 21 markers, to differentiate primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, activated B-cell-like, germinal center B-cell-like, and also Epstein-Barr virus-positive DLBCLs. It was trained using 70 paraffin-embedded biopsies and validated using >160 independent samples. Compared with a reference classification established from Affymetrix U133 + 2 data, reverse transcriptase multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification classified 85.0% samples into the expected subtype, comparing favorably with current diagnostic methods. This assay also proved to be highly efficient in detecting the MYD88 L265P mutation, even in archival paraffin-embedded tissues. This reliable, rapid, and cost-effective method uses common instruments and reagents and could thus easily be implemented into routine diagnosis workflows, to improve the management of these aggressive tumors.

Is now the time for molecular driven therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?

INTRODUCTION

Recent genetic and molecular discoveries regarding alterations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) deeply changed the approach to this lymphoproliferative disorder. Novel additional predictors of outcomes and new therapeutic strategies are being introduced to improve outcomes. Areas covered: This review aims to analyse the recent molecular discoveries in DLBCL, the rationale of novel molecular driven treatments and their impact on DLBCL prognosis, especially in ABC-DLBCL and High Grade B Cell Lymphoma. Pre-clinical and clinical evidences are reviewed to critically evaluate the novel DLBCL management strategies. Expert commentary: New insights in DLBCL molecular characteristics should guide the therapeutic approach; the results of the current studies which are investigating safety and efficacy of novel 'X-RCHOP' will probably lead, in future, to a cell of origin (COO) based upfront therapy. Moreover, it is necessary to identify early patients with DLBCL who carried MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements double hit lymphomas (DHL) because they should not receive standard R-CHOP but high intensity treatment as reported in many retrospective studies. New prospective trials are needed to investigate the more appropriate treatment of DHL.