Rurioctocog alfa pegol PK-guided prophylaxis in hemophilia A: results from the phase 3 PROPEL study

Future needs for continuing innovation in hemophilia: improving outcomes for individuals of all severities, including women and those in resource-constrained regions

Over recent decades, management of people with hemophilia (PwH) has been greatly improved by scientific advances that have resulted in a rich and varied therapeutic landscape. Nevertheless, treatment limitations continue to drive innovation, and emerging options have the potential to realize further improvement. We advocate four general principles to optimize benefits from innovation: individualizing the treatment approach, targeting 'normal,' making the most of available resources, and considering treatment affordability. Ultimately, all PwH-men and women, of all ages and severities, and worldwide-should have access to treatment that fully prevents bleeding, while allowing personal, social, family, and professional lives of choice. Clearly, we are not there yet, but developing goals/milestones based on the principles we describe may help to achieve this.

Bleeding phenotype according to factor level in 825 children with nonsevere hemophilia: data from the PedNet cohort

BACKGROUND

Information on bleeding phenotype in nonsevere hemophilia may be used to determine target factor levels for prophylaxis or gene therapy in severe hemophilia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the association between endogenous factor level and bleeding phenotype in children with nonsevere (factor [F]VIII/FIX activity 1%-25%) hemophilia A (HA) and B without prophylaxis.

METHODS

Data on annualized bleeding rate (ABR), annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR), and onset of bleeding were extracted from the international PedNet cohort including children born since 2000. Mean ABR and AJBR were modeled and compared according to FVIII/FIX endogenous activity (1%-2%, 3%-5%, 6%-10%, 11%-15%, 16%-20%, and 21%-25%) using negative binomial regression. Onset of bleeding was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

Eight hundred twenty-five children (40% with moderate hemophilia; 87% with HA) with median follow-up of 7.4 years/child were included. The median age at onset of bleeding and median bleeding rates changed with increasing endogenous activity. From endogenous FVIII 1% to 2% to 21% to 25%, the age at onset of bleeding changed from a median of 1.4 to 14.2 years, ABR from 1.6 to 0.1/y, and AJBR from 0.5 to 0.0/y. From endogenous FIX 1% to 2% to 16% to 25%, the onset of bleeding changed from a median of 1.7 to 6.1 years, ABR from 0.5 to 0.1/y, and AJBR from 0.1 to 0.0/y. The negative correlation between AJBR and factor level was most strongly pronounced up to a factor level of 6% in HA and hemophilia B.

CONCLUSION

Endogenous factor activity of >5% was identified as a threshold to significantly lower joint bleeding rate, while FVIII levels >15% and FIX levels >10% were sufficient to achieve the goal of 0 bleeds in this pediatric cohort.

International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis clinical practice guideline for treatment of congenital hemophilia A and B based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia is a rare congenital bleeding disorder that results from complete or partial deficiency of blood coagulation factor (F)VIII (hemophilia A) or FIX (hemophilia B) due to pathogenic variants in their coding genes. Hemophilia requires complex management. To date, there is no evidence-based clinical practice guideline on hemophilia treatment based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

OBJECTIVES

This evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis aims to provide an overview of evidence and support patients, caregivers, hematologists, pediatricians, other clinicians, researchers, and stakeholders in treatment decisions about congenital hemophilia A and B.

METHODS

The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel of physicians and patients with global representation, balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The panel prioritized a set of clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. A methodological team supported the guideline development process, including searching for evidence and performing systematic reviews. The GRADE approach was used, including GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks. The recommendations were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel selected 13 questions, of which 11 addressed the treatment of hemophilia A and 2 the treatment of hemophilia B. Specifically, the panel addressed questions on prophylactic and episodic treatment with FVIII concentrates, bypassing agents, and nonfactor therapy (emicizumab) for hemophilia A (with and without inhibitors) as well as immune tolerance induction for hemophilia A. For hemophilia B, the panel addressed questions on prophylactic and episodic treatment of bleeding events with FIX concentrates. Agreement was reached for all 13 recommendations, of which 7 (54%) were based on evidence from randomized clinical trials, 3 (23%) on observational studies, and 3 (23%) on indirect comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Strong recommendations were issued for prophylactic over episodic treatment for severe and moderately severe hemophilia A and B. Only conditional recommendations were issued for the remaining questions. Future research should focus on direct treatment comparisons and the treatment of hemophilia B with and without inhibitors. Future updates of this guideline will provide an updated evidence synthesis on the current questions and focus on new FVIII and FIX concentrates, novel nonfactor therapies, and gene therapy for severe and nonsevere hemophilia A and B.

Efanesoctocog Alfa Prophylaxis for Children with Severe Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa provides high sustained factor VIII activity with superior bleeding prevention as compared with prestudy factor VIII prophylaxis in previously treated patients 12 years of age or older with severe hemophilia A. Data on outcomes of efanesoctocog alfa treatment in children younger than 12 years of age with severe hemophilia A are limited.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3, open-label study involving previously treated patients younger than 12 years of age with severe hemophilia A. Patients received prophylaxis with once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa (50 IU per kilogram of body weight) for 52 weeks. The primary end point was the occurrence of factor VIII inhibitors (neutralizing antibodies against factor VIII). Secondary end points included annualized rates of treated bleeding episodes, bleeding treatment, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

A total of 74 male patients were enrolled (38 with an age of <6 years and 36 with an age of 6 to <12 years). No factor VIII inhibitors developed. Most adverse events were nonserious. No serious adverse events that were assessed by the investigator as being related to efanesoctocog alfa were reported. In the 73 patients treated according to the protocol, the median and model-based mean annualized bleeding rates were 0.00 (interquartile range, 0.00 to 1.02) and 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.90), respectively. A total of 47 patients (64%) had no treated bleeding episodes, 65 (88%) had no spontaneous bleeding episodes, and 61 (82%) had no episodes of bleeding into joints. A total of 41 of 43 bleeding episodes (95%) resolved with one injection of efanesoctocog alfa. Mean factor VIII activity at steady state was more than 40 IU per deciliter for 3 days and more than 10 IU per deciliter for almost 7 days after dose administration. The geometric mean terminal half-life was 40.0 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with severe hemophilia A, once-weekly prophylaxis with efanesoctocog alfa provided high sustained factor VIII activity in the normal to near-normal range (>40 IU per deciliter) for 3 days and more than 10 IU per deciliter for almost 7 days after administration, leading to effective bleeding prevention. Efanesoctocog alfa was associated with mainly nonserious adverse events. (Funded by Sanofi and Sobi; XTEND-Kids ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04759131.).

Ultra-Long factor VIII: a major step forward toward a hemophilia-free mind

A remarkable step forward in the treatment of hemophilia A has recently been achieved with the development of an Ultra-Long modified factor (F)VIII. Leveraging expertise gained with fusion to immunoglobulin Fc fragments, disconnecting FVIII from endogenous von Willebrand factor (via a D'-D3 fragment), and benefiting from the pharmacokinetic prolongation provided by the addition of hydrophilic polypeptides, efanesoctocog alfa opens a new era in the treatment of hemophilia A. The term Ultra-Long FVIII has been proposed to designate it and differentiate it from extended half-life FVIII. The level of FVIII correction within the normal range for several days provided by this molecule should allow an increasing number of patients to free themselves from the physical and psychological constraints of hemophilia A. Certainly, the burden of weekly intravenous infusions persists but is compensated by a correction of hemostasis whose amplitude and duration remain unmatched by other therapeutic options currently available.

Immunogenicity profile of rurioctocog alfa pegol in previously treated patients with severe congenital hemophilia A

ABSTRACT

Rurioctocog alfa pegol is an extended-half-life full-length recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) bound to 20-kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) that has been shown to be well tolerated and efficacious in the treatment and prevention of bleeding events in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of immunogenicity data collected during 6 clinical studies of rurioctocog alfa pegol, including a total of 360 unique previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. The analysis included treatment-emerging FVIII-neutralizing antibodies (FVIII inhibitors); preexisting and treatment-emerging antibodies binding to FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG; and treatment-emerging antibodies binding to Chinese hamster ovary host cell proteins. Moreover, the potential association between the presence of these binding antibodies and adverse events (AEs) observed in patients was investigated, and the potential impact of these antibodies on the incremental recovery of rurioctocog alfa pegol in patients was analyzed. Overall, the data indicate that rurioctocog alfa pegol is not associated with any unexpected immunogenicity characteristics. Of 360 patients, 1 patient developed a transient FVIII inhibitor with a titer of 0.6 Bethesda units per mL, which was not associated with any serious AEs. Antibodies binding to FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG were not detected at the time when the inhibitor was present. Moreover, 54 of 360 patients either entered the clinical studies with preexisting binding antibodies or developed these antibodies after exposure to rurioctocog alfa pegol. These antibodies were transient in most patients and did not show any causal relationship to either AEs or spontaneous bleeding episodes.

Nonsevere Hemophilia: The Need for a Renewed Focus and Improved Outcomes

People with nonsevere hemophilia (PWNSH) are phenotypically more diverse than those with severe hemophilia. Perceptions relating to a "nonsevere" phenotype have contributed to fewer research initiatives, fewer guidelines on optimal management, and a lack of standards for surveillance and clinical assessment for affected individuals. In many cases, episodes of abnormal bleeding could, if investigated, have led to earlier diagnosis. Furthermore, the major recent developments in therapy for hemophilia have largely focused on severe disease and, as a group, PWNSH have not been included in many key clinical trials. Benefiting people with severe disease, innovative replacement therapies have generally targeted factor levels that are above those present in a large proportion of PWNSH. Therapeutic advances can lead to improvement in phenotype for people with severe hemophilia over that currently experienced by many PWNSH. As a result, we are approaching a point where PWNSH may, in many countries, have a higher risk of bleeding and restriction in lifestyle than those with severe disease but with more limited therapeutic options. Given the multiple major advances in treatment for people with hemophilia, it is timely to review the aspects of nonsevere disease, to ensure equity in care and management for all individuals with this condition.

Expert United Kingdom consensus on the preservation of joint health in people with moderate and severe haemophilia A: A modified Delphi panel

AIM

For people with haemophilia A (PwHA), bleeding in the joints leads to joint damage and haemophilia-related arthropathy, impacting range of motion and life expectancy. Existing guidelines for managing haemophilia A support healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwHA in their efforts to preserve joint health. However, such guidance should be reviewed, considering emerging evidence and consensus as presented in this manuscript.

METHODS

Fifteen HCPs experienced in the management of PwHA in the UK participated in a three-round Delphi panel. Consensus was defined at ≥70% of panellists agreeing or disagreeing for Likert-scale questions, and ≥70% selecting the same option for multiple- or single-choice questions. Questions not reaching consensus were revised for the next round.

RESULTS

26.8% (11/41), 44.8% (13/29) and 93.3% (14/15) of statements reached consensus in Rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively. HCPs agreed that prophylaxis should be offered to patients with a baseline factor VIII (FVIII) level of ≤5 IU/dL and that, where there is no treatment burden, the aim of prophylaxis should be to achieve a trough FVIII level ≥15 IU/dL and maintain a longer period with FVIII levels of ≥20-30 IU/dL to provide better bleed protection. The aspirational goal for PwHA is to prevent all joint bleeds, which may be achieved by maintaining normalised (50-150 IU/dL) FVIII levels.

CONCLUSION

The panel of experts were largely aligned on approaches to preserving joint health in PwHA, and this consensus may help guide HCPs.

Predictive performance of pharmacokinetic-guided prophylactic dosing of factor concentrates in hemophilia A and B

Background

Pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing is used to individualize factor (F)VIII and FIX replacement therapy.

Objectives

This study investigates the reliability and feasibility of PK-guided prophylactic dosing of factor concentrates in hemophilia A and B.

Methods

In this multicenter, prospective cohort study, people of all ages with hemophilia received prophylactic treatment with factor concentrates based on individual PK parameters. During follow-up, at least 4 measured FVIII/FIX levels per patient were compared with corresponding predicted levels obtained by Bayesian forecasting. Predictive performance was defined as adequate when ≥80% of measured FVIII/FIX levels were within ±25% of prediction (relative error). Additionally, mean absolute error and mean error were calculated. In post hoc analyses, predictive performance was assessed allowing maximum absolute errors of 1 (trough), 5 (mid), and 15 (peak) IU/dL. Five-point scale questionnaires addressed feasibility of PK guidance.

Results

We included 50 patients (median age, 19 years; range: 2-72 years). Median follow-up was 36 weeks. Seventy-one percent of levels (58% trough, 83% mid, and 80% peak) were within ±25% of prediction. Mean absolute errors were 0.8 (trough), 2.0 (mid), and 8.6 (peak) IU/dL. In post hoc analyses, 81% (trough), 96% (mid), and 82% (peak) of levels were within set limits. Patients reported low burden and high satisfaction.

Conclusion

PK-guided dosing was reliable according to post hoc analyses, based on low absolute errors that were regarded as clinically irrelevant in most cases. The predefined predictive performance was achieved in mid and peak factor levels but not in trough factor levels due to measurement inaccuracy. PK guidance also seemed feasible.

Nothing short of a revolution: Novel extended half-life factor VIII replacement products and non-replacement agents reshape the treatment landscape in hemophilia A

Hemophilia A, an X-linked genetic disorder, is characterized by a deficiency or dysfunction of clotting Factor VIII. The treatment landscape has substantially changed by introducing novel extended half-life factor VIII (EHL-FVIII) replacement therapies such as efanesoctocog Alfa and non-factor replacement therapy such as emicizumab. These agents signal a shift from treatments requiring multiple weekly infusions to advanced therapies with long half-lives, offering superior protection against bleeding and improving patient adherence and quality of life. While EHL-FVIII treatment might lead to inhibitor development in some patients, non-factor replacement therapy carries thrombotic risks. Therefore, ongoing research and the generation of robust clinical evidence remain vital to guide the selection of optimal and cost-effective first-line therapies for hemophilia A patients.

The effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with hemophilia A: up to 7-year follow-up of the real-world AHEAD international study

Background

Real-world data assessing treatment outcomes in patients with hemophilia A in routine clinical practice are limited.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with moderate/severe hemophilia A receiving treatment in clinical practice.

Design

The international Antihemophilic Factor Hemophilia A Outcome Database study is an observational, noninterventional, prospective, multicenter study.

Methods

This planned interim data read-out was conducted following 7 years of observation of patients receiving octocog alfa (cut-off, 30 June 2020). The primary endpoint was joint health status, assessed by the Gilbert Score. Secondary endpoints included annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), health-related quality of life, consumption, and safety. This post hoc analysis stratified data by hemophilia severity at baseline [moderate, factor VIII (FVIII) 1-5%; severe, FVIII <1%].

Results

Of the 711 patients in this analysis, 582 (82%) were receiving prophylaxis with octocog alfa at enrollment, and 498 (70%) had severe disease. Median Gilbert Scores were higher with on-demand therapy versus prophylaxis and scores were comparable in moderate and severe disease. In patients receiving prophylaxis, there was an improvement in HJHS Global Gait Score over 7 years of follow-up overall and in patients with severe disease. ABRs and annualized joint bleeding rates were low across all 7 years. An ABR of zero was reported in 34-56% of prophylaxis patients versus 20-40% in the on-demand group. ABRs were similar in severe and moderate disease. In total, 13/702 (1.9%) patients experienced 18 treatment-related adverse events.

Conclusion

These data demonstrate the long-term effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with moderate and severe hemophilia A, especially in those receiving prophylaxis. The high number of patients receiving on-demand treatment experiencing zero bleeds could be due to selection bias within the study, with patients with less severe disease more likely to be receiving on-demand treatment.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02078427.

Noninterventional study assessing joint health in persons with hemophilia A after switching to turoctocog alfa pegol: design of pathfinderReal

Background

Joint damage affects the quality of life of persons with hemophilia A. The long-term safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP) prophylaxis in persons with hemophilia A has been investigated in pivotal phase 3 trials in children, adolescents, and adults (pathfinder program). However, there is a lack of data on joint health in adult persons with hemophilia A treated with N8-GP.

Objectives

To describe the design of the ongoing pathfinderReal study investigating the joint health status in adult persons with hemophilia A after switching to N8-GP.

Methods

pathfinderReal is a multicountry, noninterventional, single-arm study (NCT05621746) of joint health in adult (≥18 years) male persons with hemophilia A who have switched to N8-GP. Patients enrolled in other interventional studies and those who have previously terminated N8-GP treatment will be excluded. Approximately 124 adults with hemophilia A will be enrolled and followed up for a maximum of 24 months. Data from routine clinical assessments of patients' joint health will be collected. The primary endpoint is change in Hemophilia Joint Health Score (defined as a change in total score of ≤2) from initiation of N8-GP treatment until the end of the study. Secondary endpoints include number of bleeding episodes, number and resolution of target joints, patient-reported outcomes of problem joint score, pain score, and change in physical function levels. An exploratory endpoint is included to measure the number of patients achieving improved Hemophilia Joint Health Score from the initiation of N8-GP until the end of the study.

Conclusion

The pathfinderReal study will provide insights regarding the impact of N8-GP on joint health in persons with hemophilia A in a real-world setting.

Evaluation of collagen turnover biomarkers as an objective measure for efficacy of treatment with rurioctocog alfa pegol in patients with hemophilia A: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with hemophilia who have recurrent hemarthroses develop hemophilic arthropathy (HA). Regular prophylaxis with factor (F) VIII (FVIII) can reduce HA, but there is a need for objective outcome measures to evaluate treatment efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate and assess collagen turnover biomarkers in patients with hemophilia A to determine the efficacy of rurioctocog alfa pegol treatment and understand their potential as tools for guiding treatment decisions and monitoring outcomes.

METHODS

Joint remodeling was assessed by analyzing serum levels of collagen remodeling products at baseline and months 3, 6, 9, and 12 in a 98 patient subset receiving pharmacokinetics-guided prophylaxis with rurioctocog alfa pegol, targeting FVIII trough levels of 1 to 3 International Units (IU)/dL or 8 to 12 IU/dL (PROPEL study, NCT0285960).

RESULTS

Basement membrane metabolism-related type 4 collagen remodeling products (C4M and PRO-C4) decreased after 3 months at all time points by up to 25% at 1 to 3 IU/dL (P = .049, P < .0001) and 8 to 12 IU/dL FVIII trough levels (P = .0002, P < .0001). Interstitial tissue metabolism-related type 3 (C3M) and 5 (PRO-C5) collagen remodeling products decreased after 3 months, by up to 19% at 1 to 3 IU/dL FVIII trough level (P = .0001, P = .009) and 23% at 8 to 12 IU/dL FVIII trough level (P = .0002, P = .001). An increase of up to 12% was seen for cartilage metabolism-related type 2 collagen product (PRO-C2, not C2M) after 6 months at both trough levels (P = .01, P = .005). When stratified by prior treatment, changes in C3M (P = .03) and C4M (P = .02) levels were observed between trough levels for prior on-demand treatment but not for prophylaxis prior to study entry.

CONCLUSION

Joint improvement measured by collagen remodeling biomarkers specific to the basement membrane, interstitial matrix, and cartilage was seen with pharmacokinetics-guided prophylaxis. These collagen remodeling biomarkers warrant further exploration as biomarkers to guide treatment toward improvement in HA.

In vivo genome editing using 244-cis LNPs and low-dose AAV achieves therapeutic threshold in hemophilia A mice

Gene therapy and rebalancing therapy have emerged as promising approaches for treating hemophilia A, but there are limitations, such as temporary efficacy due to individual differences. Genome editing for hemophilia has shown long-term therapeutic potential in preclinical trials. However, a cautious approach is necessary because genome editing is irreversible. Therefore, we attempted to induce low-level human factor 8 (hF8) gene knockin (KI) using 244-cis lipid nanoparticles and low-dose adeno-associated virus to minimize side effects and achieve a therapeutic threshold in hemophilia A mice. We selected the serpin family C member 1, SerpinC1, locus as a target to enable a combined rebalancing strategy with hF8 KI to augment efficacy. This strategy improved blood coagulation activity and reduced hemophilic complications without adverse effects. Furthermore, hemophilic mice with genome editing exhibit enhanced survival for 40 weeks. Here, we demonstrate an effective, safe, and sustainable treatment for hemophilia A. This study provides valuable information to establish safe and long-term genome-editing-mediated treatment strategies for treating hemophilia and other protein-deficient genetic diseases.

Pharmacokinetic-guided versus standard prophylaxis in hemophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling more readily available and PK-guided prophylaxis endorsed by current hemophilia guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to summarize current evidence in the literature.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of PK-guided compared with non-PK-guided prophylaxis.

METHODS

We did not restrict inclusion to specific study design labels and included all studies consisting of at least one distinct cohort arm receiving PK-guided prophylaxis. We searched the following databases from inception to date of search: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the EU Clinical Trial Register. Following title, abstract, and full-text screening conducted independently by 2 review authors, we summarized studies qualitatively and synthesized included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) quantitatively by fitting random-effects models.

RESULTS

Search of databases on February 3, 2023, yielded 25 studies fitting our inclusion criteria. Of those, only 2 RCTs and 17 nonrandomized studies included a standard prophylaxis comparator group. Furthermore, risk of bias in the latter was substantial, primarily due to before-after study designs and retrospective comparator groups. Thus, nonrandomized studies were only presented qualitatively. A random-effects meta-analysis of the 2 identified RCT remained inconclusive with regards to bleeding outcomes (ratio of means, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.85-1.56) and factor consumption (ratio of means, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.58-1.18).

CONCLUSION

Evidence in the literature suggesting a clinical benefit of PK-guided over standard fixed-dose prophylaxis was weak and mainly found in nonrandomized studies limited by lack of concurrent controls, heterogeneity in outcome reporting, small sample sizes, and high risk of bias.

Targeting higher factor VIII levels for prophylaxis in haemophilia A: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care in severe haemophilia A is prophylaxis, which has historically aimed for a factor VIII (FVIII) trough level of ≥1%. However, despite prophylactic treatment, people with haemophilia remain at risk of bleeds that have physical and quality of life implications, and that impact everyday life.

AIM

The aim of this review was to evaluate evidence supporting the relationship between targeting higher FVIII activity levels with prophylaxis and improved outcomes in people with haemophilia A.

METHODS

We conducted a narrative review that defined the unmet needs and treatment goals in people with haemophilia A, evaluated evidence to support targeting higher FVIII activity levels, and highlighted therapies that may support higher and sustained FVIII activity levels and improved outcomes for people with haemophilia A.

RESULTS

Despite recent advances in treatment, unmet needs remain, and people with haemophilia continue to experience joint and functional impairment, acute and chronic pain, and poor mental health. All these negatively impact their health-related quality of life. Evidence suggests that FVIII activity levels of up to 50% may be needed to achieve a near-zero joint bleed rate. However, achieving high FVIII activity levels with current standard and extended half-life (EHL) FVIII replacement therapies is associated with a high treatment burden. Innovative treatment options may provide high sustained FVIII activity levels and improved patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that FVIII activity levels in people with haemophilia A should be sustained at higher levels to improve joint and patient outcomes and enable progression towards health equity.

Clinical efficacy of simoctocog alfa versus extended half-life recombinant FVIII concentrates in hemophilia A patients undergoing personalized prophylaxis using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison method

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to indirectly compare the efficacy of personalized prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) versus three extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) concentrates.

METHODS

Treatment effects were compared using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons after matching individual patient-level baseline characteristics for simoctocog alfa (pharmacokinetic [PK]-guided personalized prophylaxis) against published aggregate personalized prophylaxis data for efmoroctocog alfa, damoctocog alfa pegol, and rurioctocog alfa pegol.

RESULTS

A higher percentage (p < .001) of patients with zero bleeds was found with simoctocog alfa compared with efmoroctocog alfa (75% vs. 45%), damoctocog alfa pegol (77% vs. 38%), and rurioctocog alfa pegol (target trough level 1%-3%; 78% vs. 42%). Similar efficacy was found comparing simoctocog alfa against rurioctocog alfa pegol 8%-12% (77% vs. 62%). The mean total annualized bleeding rate was lower (p < .001) with simoctocog alfa than damoctocog alfa pegol (1.5 vs. 4.9). Consistent with approved dosing, the mean FVIII weekly dose was higher (p < .001) for simoctocog alfa than efmoroctocog alfa, damoctocog alfa pegol, or rurioctocog alfa pegol 1%-3%, but lower (p < .001) than rurioctocog alfa pegol 8%-12%.

CONCLUSIONS

Indirect comparisons demonstrated that PK-guided, personalized prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa can lead to higher zero bleed rates compared with personalized EHL rFVIII concentrate regimens, albeit with higher weekly doses, and a lower percentage of patients treated twice weekly or less.

Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for individualized dosing of BAY 81-8973, A full-length recombinant factor VIII, in pediatric patients with haemophilia A

BACKGROUND

As the most commonly used coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate in China, the individualized dosing prediction model of Kovaltry (BAY81-8973) is not fully investigated in pediatric patients. The prophylaxis tailored by population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model can optimize dosing regimens.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop PopPK models of BAY 81-8973 in pediatric patients, identify quantitative relationships of blood type (as a substitution for von Willebrand factor) on FVIII clearance and provide model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) procedures.

METHODS

Pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A were enrolled and PK tests were conducted. The blood samples were collected at six time point. One-stage-based activated partial thromboplastin time was used for FVIII activity. Basic demographics and key covariates (blood type and von Willebrand factor antigen) were collected. A nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NONMEM) approach was employed to establish PopPK model. Simulations were performed to evaluate current dosing regimens and present MIPD strategies.

RESULTS

A total of 30 pediatric patients were included in the analysis. In the final model, Fat-free mass calculated from weight, age, and height was included as a size descriptor which affect FVIII apparent volume of distribution and clearance. Both von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) and blood type accounted for the interindividual variability of FVIII clearance, but only one can retain in the final model. Therefore, two PopPK models based on VWF:Ag or blood type were developed. When the VWF:Ag value is doubled, the FVIII clearance is reduced by 35 %. Compared with blood type non-O, the clearance in pediatric patients with blood type O increased by 25.9 %. Weight-based dosing without regard to age and blood type resulted in large differences in FVIII trough activity. Patient demographics, dosing information, sparse blood samples and PopPK model together with Bayesian estimate constituted the MIPD workflow. Using it, the individual parameters and optimized dosing regimen could be achieved.

CONCLUSION

This is the first predictive model designed to predict individualized dosing of BAY 81-8973 in pediatric patients with Hemophilia A. These results are useful in the PK-guided prophylaxis among pediatric patients and hold great potential to improve their long-term clinical outcomes.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

Effects of PK-guided prophylaxis on clinical outcomes and FVIII consumption for patients with moderate to severe Haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, there has been increased focus on individualizing treatment for persons with hemophilia including pharmacokinetic-guided (PK) dosing.

AIMS

In this retrospective study clinical outcomes before and after PK-guided prophylaxis were examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight Haemophilia Treatment Centres from the United States participated in the study and included 132 patients classified into two cohorts: those undergoing a PK-assessment for product switch (switchers) or to optimize treatment (non-switchers). Subset analyses for the two most common products and patients with dosing per prescription label were included for annual bleeding rates (ABR), mean weekly consumption outcomes, and annualized cost of prophylaxis.

RESULTS

The most common products before and after index date were octocog alfa, rurioctocog alfa pegol, and efmoroctocog alfa. Seventy-four (56%) patients were identified as switchers and 58 (44%) patients were classified as non-switchers. The majority of patients (78.0%) experienced either a decrease in ABR post-index or maintained 0 ABR during pre- and post-index time periods, with similar proportions identified in both switchers (77.0%) and non-switchers (79.3%) populations. Non-switchers were identified as having no significant change in cost of therapy, while switchers experienced increased cost of therapy driven by higher price of extended half-life products. Within subset analyses, patients receiving rurioctocog alfa pegol and efmoroctocog alfa had mean ABR under 1 after index date.

CONCLUSION

PK-guided prophylaxis has the potential to improve clinical outcomes without increase in cost of therapy for patients maintaining product and can aid in maintaining effective protection against bleeds in those switching product.

The road to implementation of pharmacokinetic-guided dosing of factor replacement therapy in hemophilia and allied bleeding disorders. Identifying knowledge gaps by mapping barriers and facilitators

Clinical guidelines and expert groups recommend the use of pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing of factor replacement therapy for the treatment of bleeding disorders, especially for patients with hemophilia. Although PK-guided dosing is increasingly applied, it is generally not considered standard clinical practice. The aim of this scoping review is to map barriers and facilitators for the implementation of PK-guided dosing in clinical practice and to identify knowledge gaps. A literature search was performed and 110 articles were included that describe PK-guided dosing in patients with bleeding disorders, mostly hemophilia A. We defined two overarching themes, efficacy and feasibility, and discuss five topics within each theme. For each topic, barriers, facilitators and knowledge gaps were described. Although consensus was found with regard to some topics, contradicting reports were found for others, especially with respect to the efficacy of PK-guided dosing. These contradictions highlight the need for future research to elucidate current ambiguities.

Targeting an elevated FVIII level using personalized rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis in specific patient populations with hemophilia A: post hoc subanalysis of the randomized, phase 3 PROPEL study

Background

The phase 3, prospective PROPEL study demonstrated that pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided prophylaxis targeting elevated factor VIII (FVIII) troughs in patients with hemophilia A resulted in lower annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) and a higher proportion of patients experiencing zero bleeds in the second 6 months of treatment when targeting a FVIII trough of 8-12% versus 1-3%.

Objective

To investigate the benefit of PK-guided prophylaxis with rurioctocog alfa pegol targeting two FVIII trough levels in specific patient subgroups in a post hoc analysis using data from PROPEL.

Design

This is a post hoc analysis of data from the PROPEL study. The design and primary outcomes of the prospective, randomized PROPEL study (NCT02585960) have been reported previously.

Methods

This post hoc analysis reports data stratified by FVIII half-life (t1/2), hemophilic arthropathy status, number of target joints at screening, previous treatment regimen, and ABR range in the 12 months before study entry.

Results

Targeting an elevated FVIII trough of 8-12% was associated with higher average FVIII levels over time, regardless of FVIII t1/2 at baseline. The decrease in total ABR between the 8-12% and 1-3% arms was greatest in patients with a FVIII t1/2 of 6 to <12 h (0.7 versus 3.5); a higher number of target joints, that is, at least four target joints, at baseline (0.2 versus 1.6); the presence of arthropathy (0.1 versus 1.7); and those previously treated on-demand (0.3 versus 1.8).

Conclusion

These results support the feasibility of targeting elevated FVIII levels using personalized rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis. These benefits may be especially important in patients with a short FVIII t1/2 and those receiving standard prophylaxis with frequent breakthrough bleeds, arthropathy, and target joints.

Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02585960; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02585960.

Immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of rurioctocog alfa pegol in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A: interim results from a phase 3, prospective, multicenter, open-label study

AIM

To determine the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of rurioctocog alfa pegol in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A (HA).

METHODS

This prospective, phase 3 study (NCT02615691) was conducted in PUPs, or patients with ≤2 exposure days (EDs) prior to screening, aged <6 years with severe HA. The primary endpoint was incidence of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor development. This protocol-specified interim analysis was conducted after 50 patients had completed ≥50 EDs without developing FVIII inhibitors or had developed a confirmed inhibitor at any time.

RESULTS

Of the enrolled patients, 59/80 (73.8%) received ≥1 dose of rurioctocog alfa pegol; 54 received prophylaxis, and 35 on-demand treatment. Incidence of inhibitor development was 0.19 (10/52). Total annualized bleeding rate (95% CIs) was 3.2 (2.0-5.0) for patients receiving prophylaxis and 3.2 (1.6-6.3) for on-demand treatment. Hemostatic efficacy of most bleedings was rated as 'excellent' or 'good' after 24 hours (122/131 [93.1%]) and at resolution (161/170 [94.7%]). Five patients received ≥1 dose of rurioctocog alfa pegol for immune tolerance induction (ITI) and 1 patient was defined as having ITI success. Thirteen patients experienced 14 treatment-related adverse events, including 10 cases of FVIII inhibitor development.

CONCLUSION

This is the first prospective study of rurioctocog alfa pegol for the treatment of PUPs with severe HA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT02615691).

Plasma Clearance of Coagulation Factor VIII and Extension of Its Half-Life for the Therapy of Hemophilia A: A Critical Review of the Current State of Research and Practice

Factor VIII (FVIII) is an important component of blood coagulation as its congenital deficiency results in life-threatening bleeding. Current prophylactic therapy of the disease (hemophilia A) is based on 3-4 intravenous infusions of therapeutic FVIII per week. This poses a burden on patients, demanding reduction of infusion frequency by using FVIII with extended plasma half-life (EHL). Development of these products requires understanding FVIII plasma clearance mechanisms. This paper overviews (i) an up-to-date state of the research in this field and (ii) current EHL FVIII products, including recently approved efanesoctocog alfa, for which the plasma half-life exceeds a biochemical barrier posed by von Willebrand factor, complexed with FVIII in plasma, which results in ~1 per week infusion frequency. We focus on the EHL FVIII products' structure and function, in particular related to the known discrepancy in results of one-stage clotting (OC) and chromogenic substrate (CS) assays used to assign the products' potency, dosing, and for clinical monitoring in plasma. We suggest a possible root cause of these assays' discrepancy that is also pertinent to EHL factor IX variants used to treat hemophilia B. Finally, we discuss approaches in designing future EHL FVIII variants, including those to be used for hemophilia A gene therapy.

Efficacy of emicizumab is maintained throughout dosing intervals for bleed prophylaxis

Background

Across the HAVEN clinical trial program, the efficacy of emicizumab has been demonstrated in children, adolescents, and adults with hemophilia A, with or without factor VIII inhibitors. After the 4-week loading dose period, emicizumab concentrations are expected to remain at levels that provide bleed protection throughout the entire dosing interval, regardless of the chosen maintenance dosing regimen, ie, weekly, every 2 weeks, or every 4 weeks.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to examine the timing of treated bleeds within the dosing intervals for emicizumab administered during the HAVEN 1 to 4 studies.

Methods

In this post hoc analysis, we pooled data from all the participants of the HAVEN 1 to 4 studies and analyzed the timing of treated bleeds in relation to the emicizumab dose.

Results

A total of 392 participants were included in this analysis, with a median (range) age of 28.0 years (1.1-77.0 years). Target joints were identified in 237 of 392 (60.5%) participants before the study entry. Overall, 211 of 392 (53.8%) participants experienced 907 treated bleeding events. The total mean (SD) annualized bleeding rate across the 4 studies was 1.6 (5.9). There was no evidence that bleeding events clustered on any 1 particular day in any dosing schedule from HAVEN 1 to 4 (P > .05 for all 3 treatment regimens).

Conclusion

Data from the HAVEN 1 to 4 trials show consistent bleed prevention within the dosing interval, regardless of the dosing regimen chosen. These findings provide further evidence of the sustained efficacy of emicizumab across all approved dosing regimens to reduce bleeding in people with hemophilia A.

Microsimulation to compare activity-related bleed risks between pharmacokinetic-guided rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis and emicizumab

BACKGROUND

Owing to a lack of clinical study data, computational modeling was used to estimate activity-related bleed risk during prophylaxis with either rurioctocog alfa pegol or emicizumab.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A pharmacokinetic (PK)-based computational model was used to estimate factor VIII (FVIII) levels for individual patients in the PROPEL study who were treated with PK-guided rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis targeting FVIII trough levels of 1-3% or 8-12%. Emicizumab was assumed to have 20% FVIII equivalency. Six hypothetical patient activity profiles were created using the National Hemophilia Foundation's physical activity risk ratings scale. For each profile and treatment regimen combination, the total bleed risk over a 2-week period was estimated relative to a patient who was participating in a low-risk activity with 0% FVIII, and the overall relative bleed risks were compared.

RESULTS

For all evaluated activity profiles, rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis targeting either 1-3% or 8-12% FVIII trough levels was associated with a lower estimated bleed risk compared with emicizumab prophylaxis with assumed 20% FVIII equivalency (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although this model does not reflect actual patient outcomes, it suggests that PK-guided rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis may reduce the bleed risk during physical activities.

Current Understanding of Inherited Modifiers of FVIII Pharmacokinetic Variation

The inherited bleeding disorder hemophilia A involves the quantitative deficiency of the coagulation cofactor factor VIII (FVIII). Prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A patients with FVIII concentrates aims to reduce the frequency of spontaneous joint bleeding and requires personalized tailoring of dosing regimens to account for the substantial inter-individual variability of FVIII pharmacokinetics. The strong reproducibility of FVIII pharmacokinetic (PK) metrics between repeat analyses in the same individual suggests this trait is genetically regulated. While the influence of plasma von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) levels, ABO blood group, and patient age on FVIII PK is well established, estimates suggest these factors account for less than 35% of the overall variability in FVIII PK. More recent studies have identified genetic determinants that modify FVIII clearance or half-life including VWF gene variants that impair VWF-FVIII binding resulting in the accelerated clearance of VWF-free FVIII. Additionally, variants in receptors that regulate the clearance of FVIII or the VWF-FVIII complex have been associated with FVIII PK. The characterization of genetic modifiers of FVIII PK will provide mechanistic insight into a subject of clinical significance and support the development of personalized treatment plans for patients with hemophilia A.

Long-term prophylaxis: what are our options and how to define success?

Currently, we are at an enviable place in hemophilia treatment. Although full prophylaxis with standard half-life recombinant or plasma-derived factor concentrates has been definitively shown to be inadequate for full protection against bleeding and arthropathy, a number of novel therapies with improved hemostatic enhancement are clinically available or in promising clinical trials. In order to compare outcomes among a number of very efficacious therapies, it is necessary to have sensitive tools employed in long-term follow-up for several years for participants with no or minimal joint disease. The tool kit must be comprehensive, with outcomes of bleeding, factor level restoration or hemostatic capacity, joint structure, joint function, pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. This article reviews the history of prophylaxis, the promise of emerging therapies, and the sensitive tools used to assess long-term efficacy for joint structure and function.

Individualised prophylaxis based on personalised target trough FVIII level optimised clinical outcomes in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

As standard care of severe haemophilia A (SHA), prophylaxis should be individualised.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of this new-proposed individualised prophylaxis protocol.

METHODS

Boys with SHA were enrolled and followed a PK-guided, trough-level escalating protocol of prophylaxis after a six-month observational period. In the next 2 years, clinical assessments including joint bleeds, ultrasound (US) scores and Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) in both sides of ankles, knees and elbows were conducted every 6 months as a scoring system, which determined whether the trough level's escalation. Adjustment of dosing regimen was based on WAPPS-Hemo.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight SHA boys were finally analysed. Their age and bodyweight were 5.3(2.8,6.9) years and 21.5(16,25) kg. During the study, 47 escalations were conducted. At study exit, the patient number and proportion of different trough level groups were: < 1 IU/dl, 17.2% (10/58); 1-3 IU/dl, 53.5% (31/58); 3-5 IU/dl, 15.5% (9/58); > 5 IU/dl, 13.8% (8/58). Significantly reduced annualised bleeding rate [4(0,8) to 0(0,2), p < .0001] and annualised joint bleeding rate [2(0,4) to 0(0,.25), p < .0001] was observed at study exit as well as the continuous trend of increased zero bleeding proportion (ZBP) (27.6%-69.0%) and zero joint bleeding proportion (46.5%-81.3%). Besides, 85% (6/7) of the target joints vanished. Statistical improvements of US scores (p = .04) and HJHS (p = .02) were also reported at study exit.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed the effectiveness of our protocol based on individualised target trough level and emphasise the importance of personalised prophylaxis.

Comparison of Real-World Dose and Consumption for Two Extended Half-Life Recombinant Factor VIII Products for the Treatment of Hemophilia A in the United States

Background

US patients with hemophilia A can receive prophylaxis with extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products, including efmoroctocog alfa (fragment crystallizable fusion protein) and rurioctocog alfa pegol (antihemophilic factor [recombinant], PEGylated).

Objective

To evaluate dosing patterns and weekly consumption of extended half-life rFVIII products in the United States.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis using the US Specialty Pharmacy Database (2015–2018). Included patients had a diagnosis of hemophilia A, ≥2 consecutive monthly claims for efmoroctocog alfa or rurioctocog alfa pegol for prophylaxis, and weight data. Outcome measures included weekly dosing frequency and dispensed weekly dose.

Results

The analysis included 774 patients (efmoroctocog alfa, 506; rurioctocog alfa pegol, 268). Mean (SD) age was 24.2 (15.8) and 26.3 (14.9) years for patients receiving efmoroctocog alfa and rurioctocog alfa pegol, respectively; mean (SD) weight was 68.4 (36.8) and 79.8 (37.7) kg, respectively. The most frequent efmoroctocog alfa regimen was twice weekly (45.7%), followed by every 4 days (20.6%), every 3 days (9.1%), and 3 times per week (7.5%). The most frequent rurioctocog alfa pegol regimen was twice weekly (72.4%), followed by 3 times per week (8.7%), every 4 days (7.6%), and every 3 days (5.5%). The proportion of efmoroctocog alfa twice-weekly dispensing records increased from 31.5% to 50.9%, and every 4 days dispensing records decreased from 31.3% to 14.5% (2015–2018). The proportion of rurioctocog alfa pegol dispensing records remained broadly stable (2016–2018). Overall, mean (SD; median) weekly prophylactic dose was 105.4 (77.9; 92.6) IU/kg with efmoroctocog alfa, and 96.8 (41.9; 90.9) IU/kg with rurioctocog alfa pegol.

Conclusion

In this database study, the most frequently observed dosing frequency was twice weekly for patients receiving efmoroctocog alfa or rurioctocog alfa pegol. The observed mean weekly consumption was slightly higher, and variation was greater, in patients receiving efmoroctocog alfa versus rurioctocog alfa pegol.

The Impact of Pharmacokinetic-Guided Prophylaxis on Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Hemophilia A Patients: Real-World Evidence from the CHESS II Study

Background

Using a pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided approach to personalize the dose and frequency of prophylactic treatment can help achieve and maintain targeted factor VIII (FVIII) trough levels in patients with hemophilia A.

Objective

Investigate clinical and healthcare resource use outcomes in patients with hemophilia A treated with or without PK-guided prophylaxis using data from the Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: A Socioeconomic Survey (CHESS) II database.

Methods

CHESS II was a cross-sectional, retrospective, burden-of-illness study incorporating data from eight European countries. Patients were eligible for this analysis if they were male, ≥18 years of age, and diagnosed with congenital hemophilia A of any severity. The clinical endpoints included annualized bleeding rate (ABR), presence and number of problem/target joints, and occurrence of joint surgeries. Healthcare resource utilization endpoints included the number of hematologist consultations and bleed-related hospitalizations or emergency department admissions. Data from November 2018 to October 2020 were included and were stratified according to treatment regimen and use of PK-guided dosing.

Results

Altogether, 281 patients on prophylaxis had available FVIII trough level data. Mean (SD) age was 35.7 (13.8) years. A specific FVIII trough level was targeted in 120 (42.7%) patients and 47 (39.2%) received PK-guided dosing. Patients receiving PK-guided dosing had a mean (SD) ABR of 2.8 (2.1) and target joint number of 0.5 (0.7), compared with 3.9 (2.7) and 0.9 (1.4), respectively, for patients receiving non-PK-guided treatment. The mean (SD) number of hematologist consultations was 7.1 (5.3) for patients receiving PK-guided dosing versus 10.7 (5.7) for those who were not. A higher proportion of patients in the non-PK-guided group required hospitalization during their lifetime compared with the PK-guided group.

Conclusion

This analysis of real-world data suggests that PK-guided dosing for prophylaxis has a beneficial impact on clinical and healthcare resource utilization outcomes in patients with hemophilia A.

Immunogenicity of Current and New Therapies for Hemophilia A

Anti-drug antibody (ADA) development is a significant complication in the treatment of several conditions. For decades, the mainstay of hemophilia A treatment was the replacement of deficient coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) to restore hemostasis, control, and prevent bleeding events. Recently, new products have emerged for hemophilia A replacement therapy, including bioengineered FVIII molecules with enhanced pharmacokinetic profiles: the extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FVIII products. However, the main complication resulting from replacement treatment in hemophilia A is the development of anti-FVIII neutralizing alloantibodies, known as inhibitors, affecting approximately 25–30% of severe hemophilia A patients. Therefore, the immunogenicity of each FVIII product and the mechanisms that could help increase the tolerance to these products have become important research topics in hemophilia A. Furthermore, patients with inhibitors continue to require effective treatment for breakthrough bleedings and procedures, despite the availability of non-replacement therapy, such as emicizumab. Herein, we discuss the currently licensed treatments available for hemophilia A and the immunogenicity of new therapies, such as EHL-rFVIII products, compared to other products available.

Recent advances in therapeutic options for rare hemostatic disorders: selected poster extracts of recent research in hemophilia A, congenital hemophilia with inhibitors, von Willebrand disease, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura presented at the 29th congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH 2021, Jul 17-21; virtual congress)

Hemophilia, von Willebrand disease (VWD), and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) are rare diseases affecting normal hemostasis. Although they differ in their pathogenesis and clinical manifestation, if left undiagnosed and untreated, all these conditions can result in severe long-term consequences and can be potentially life-threatening. This article summarizes a poster series funded by Takeda and presented virtually at the 29th annual congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) in 2021: Data from real-world evidence highlight the importance of joint health and personalized prophylaxis to prevent bleeding for patients with hemophilia, the need to further raise disease awareness in support of timely diagnosis and access to treatment in general practice settings for patients with VWD, and describe the clinical burden for patients with TTP and the importance to advance treatment options for these patients.

Pharmacokinetic profile of children with haemophilia A receiving low-dose FVIII prophylaxis in Indonesia: A single centre experience

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of low-dose prophylaxis (LDP) of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in children with severe haemophilia A (SHA) are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the PK profile of children with SHA receiving LDP of FVIII.

METHODS

Paediatric patients receiving FVIII infusions (10 IU/kg twice weekly) were included. PK profiles were estimated using the Web Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service for Haemophilia (WAPPS-Haemo). The primary outcomes were the terminal half-life (t_1/2 ), concentration-time profile, and time to reach an FVIII level of < 1%. The secondary outcome was the suggested dosing interval of FVIII prophylaxis based on the individual PK profile.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were recruited; their mean age was 12.3 ± 3.0 years. The t_1/2 differed among patients receiving LDP of FVIII twice weekly, with a median of t_1/2 was 14.8 h (IQR 12.6-16). The median time to reach an FVIII level of < 1% was 73.8 h (IQR 58.8-80.3). Most patients could maintain a trough level of FVIII > 1% longer than 48 h. At 72-96 h, patients needed a second dose of FVIII infusion because the FVIII level was < 1%. The suggested dosing interval of FVIII prophylaxis ranged from daily to every 96 h, depending on the individual PK profile.

CONCLUSION

Our study identified inter-individual differences in the PK parameters using LDP of FVIII twice weekly. The inter-individual results in different dosing intervals advise the timing of LDP. Estimating individual PK parameters enables the identification of the optimal prophylaxis frequency to prevent bleedings.

Hemophilia A: Strategies for Improving Long-Term Holistic Management, Adherence, and Quality of Life

Hemophilia A is a rare inherited bleeding disorder characterized by a deficiency in factor VIII. The evolution of currently approved prophylaxis therapy in hemophilia A will be reviewed, including the clinical value of prophylaxis, real-world experience with prophylaxis, and patient quality-of-life factors that must be considered when choosing treatment options for these patients.

Expert opinion on current and future prophylaxis therapies aimed at improving protection for people with hemophilia A

The next frontier in hemophilia A management has arrived. However, questions remain regarding the broader applicability of new and emerging hemophilia A therapies, such as the long-term safety and efficacy of non-factor therapies and optimal regimens for individual patients. With an ever-evolving clinical landscape, it is imperative for physicians to understand how available and future hemophilia A therapies could potentially be integrated into real-life clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. Against this background, nine hemophilia experts from Central European countries participated in a pre-advisory board meeting survey. The survey comprised 11 multiple-choice questions about current treatment practices and future factor and non-factor replacement therapies. The survey questions were developed to reflect current unmet needs in hemophilia management reflected in the literature. The experts also took part in a follow-up advisory board meeting to discuss the most important unmet needs for hemophilia management as well as the pre-meeting survey results. All experts highlighted the challenge of maintaining optimal trough levels with prophylaxis as their most pressing concern. Targeting trough levels of ≥30-50 IU/L or even higher to achieve less bleeding was highlighted as their preferred strategy. However, the experts had an equal opinion on how this could be achieved (i.e., more efficacious non-factor therapies or factor therapy offering broader personalization possibilities such as targeting trough levels to individual pharmacokinetic data). In summary, our study favors personalized prophylaxis to individual pharmacokinetic data rather than a "one-size-fits-all" approach to hemophilia A management to maintain optimal trough levels for individual patients.

Efanesoctocog alfa for hemophilia A: results from a phase 1 repeat-dose study

Efanesoctocog alfa (rFVIIIFc-VWF-XTEN; BIVV001) is a new class of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement that breaks the von Willebrand factor-imposed FVIII half-life ceiling. In a phase 1/2a study, single-dose efanesoctocog alfa was well tolerated, and no safety concerns were identified. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of repeat-dose efanesoctocog alfa in a phase 1 study in previously treated adults (≥150 exposure days) with severe hemophilia A. Participants received 4 once weekly doses of efanesoctocog alfa (cohort 1, 50 IU/kg; cohort 2, 65 IU/kg). All enrolled participants (cohort 1, n = 10; cohort 2, n = 14) completed the study. Inhibitor development to FVIII was not detected. After the last dose of efanesoctocog alfa, geometric mean (range) FVIII activity half-life, area under the activity-time curve, and steady-state maximum concentration for cohort 1 and cohort 2 were 41.3 (34.2-50.1) and 37.3 (28.9-43.8) hours, 8290 (5810-10 300) and 11 200 (7040-15 800) hours × IU/dL, and 131 (96-191) and 171 (118-211) IU/dL, respectively. There was minimal accumulation after 4 doses. Mean FVIII activity for cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively, was 46% and 69% on day 3 postdose and 10% and 12% on day 7 postdose. Overall, 4 once-weekly doses of efanesoctocog alfa were well tolerated, no safety concerns were identified, and no bleeds were reported during the treatment period. Once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa provided high sustained FVIII activity within the normal to near-normal range for 3 to 4 days postdose and may improve protection against bleeds in patients with hemophilia A. The trial is study 2018-001535-51 in the EU Clinical Trials Register.

How do we optimally utilize factor concentrates in persons with hemophilia?

The current mainstay of therapy for hemophilia is to replace the deficient clotting factor with the intravenous administration of exogenous clotting factor concentrates. Prophylaxis factor replacement therapy is now considered the standard of care in both pediatric and adult patients with hemophilia with a severe phenotype to protect musculoskeletal health and improve quality of life. Heterogeneity in bleeding presentation among patients with hemophilia due to genetic, environmental, and treatment-related factors has been well described. Accordingly, the World Federation of Hemophilia recommends an individualized prophylaxis regimen that considers the factors mentioned above to meet the clinical needs of the patient, which can vary over time. This review focuses on the practical points of choosing the type of factor concentrate, dose, and interval while evaluating appropriate target trough factor levels and bleeding triggers such as level of physical activity and joint status. We also discuss the use of a pharmacokinetics assessment and its incorporation in the clinic for a tailored approach toward individualized management. Overall, adopting an individualized prophylaxis regimen leads to an optimal utilization of factor concentrates with maximum efficacy and minimum waste.

Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for prophylactic treatment in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Background: Patients with severe hemophilia often present with painful joint and soft tissue bleeding which may restrict them from their daily activities. The current standard of care still relies on a regular prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII), which has a high daily treatment burden. Recently, rurioctocog alfa pegol, a third-generation recombinant FVIII with a modification in its polyethylene glycol (PEG) component, has been developed. Several trials have studied this synthetic drug as bleeding prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: This study was conducted in conformity with the PRISMA guidelines. Data were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library, and CINAHL (via EBSCOhost). Study qualities were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Modified Jadad scales. Results: Four studies involving 517 previously treated severe hemophilia A patients were included in this study. The pooled mean of total annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and hemostatic efficacy was 2.59 (95% CI = 2.04-3.14) and 92% (95% CI = 85%-97%), respectively. Only 30 (2.3%) non-serious and one (1.4%) serious adverse events were considered related to rurioctocog alfa pegol treatment. At the end of the studies, no development of FVIII inhibitory antibodies was observed. None of the developed binding antibodies to FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG was correlated to the treatment efficacy and safety. Conclusions: Despite the limited availability of direct comparison studies, our analyses indicate that rurioctocog alfa pegol could serve as a safe and effective alternative for bleeding prophylaxis in previously treated hemophilia A patients. Moreover, it appears to have low immunogenicity, which further increases the safety profile of the drug in such clinical conditions.

Efficacy safety and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for prophylactic treatment in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Background: Patients with severe hemophilia often present with painful joint and soft tissue bleeding which may restrict them from their daily activities. The current standard of care still relies on a regular prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII), which has a high daily treatment burden. Recently, rurioctocog alfa pegol, a third-generation recombinant FVIII with a modification in its polyethylene glycol (PEG) component, has been developed. Several trials have studied this synthetic drug as bleeding prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: This study was conducted in conformity with the PRISMA guidelines. Data were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library, and CINAHL (via EBSCOhost). Study qualities were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Modified Jadad scales. Results: Four studies involving 517 previously treated severe hemophilia A patients were included in this study. The pooled mean of total annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and hemostatic efficacy was 2.59 (95% CI = 2.04-3.14) and 92% (95% CI = 85%-97%), respectively. Only 30 (2.3%) non-serious and one (1.4%) serious adverse events were considered related to rurioctocog alfa pegol treatment. At the end of the studies, no development of FVIII inhibitory antibodies was observed. None of the developed binding antibodies to FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG was correlated to the treatment efficacy and safety. Conclusions: Despite the limited availability of direct comparison studies, our analyses indicate that rurioctocog alfa pegol could serve as a safe and effective alternative for bleeding prophylaxis in previously treated hemophilia A patients. Moreover, it appears to have low immunogenicity, which further increases the safety profile of the drug in such clinical conditions.

Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for prophylactic treatment in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Background: Patients with severe hemophilia often present with painful joint and soft tissue bleeding which may restrict them from their daily activities. The current standard of care still relies on a regular prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII), which has a high daily treatment burden. Recently, rurioctocog alfa pegol, a third-generation recombinant FVIII with a modification in its polyethylene glycol (PEG) component, has been developed. Several trials have studied this synthetic drug as bleeding prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: This study was conducted in conformity with the PRISMA guidelines. Data were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library, and CINAHL (via EBSCOhost). Study qualities were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Modified Jadad scales. Results: Four studies involving 517 previously treated severe hemophilia A patients were included in this study. The pooled mean of total annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and hemostatic efficacy was 2.59 (95% CI = 2.04-3.14) and 92% (95% CI = 85%-97%), respectively. Only 30 (2.3%) non-serious and one (1.4%) serious adverse events were considered related to rurioctocog alfa pegol treatment. At the end of the studies, no development of FVIII inhibitory antibodies was observed. None of the developed binding antibodies to FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG was correlated to the treatment efficacy and safety. Conclusions: Despite the limited availability of direct comparison studies, our analyses indicate that rurioctocog alfa pegol could serve as a safe and effective alternative for bleeding prophylaxis in previously treated hemophilia A patients. Moreover, it appears to have low immunogenicity, which further increases the safety profile of the drug in such clinical conditions.

Addressing unmet needs in rare bleeding disorders: selected poster extracts of recent research in hemophilia A and von Willebrand disease presented at the 14th Annual Congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD) (Feb 3-5, 2021; virtual congress)

Hemophilia A and von Willebrand disease (VWD) are inherited rare bleeding disorders affecting normal hemostasis. Patients with VWD, especially those with severe disease types, share some similarities to patients with hemophilia A in their burden of disease: they suffer from an increased risk of potentially severe and life-threatening bleeds and associated long-term consequences, such as impaired joint health and overall lower quality of life. However, the two bleeding disorders differ in their primary cause and affected patient population, and comprise a range of different bleeding phenotypes with varying unmet needs. Generating scientific evidence to advance health care for patients with rare bleeding disorders is challenging due to the low prevalence and heterogeneity of affected populations, including patient demographics and symptom severities. Innovative study designs are needed to adequately answer relevant scientific questions and address patients' unmet needs. In support of advancing clinical outcomes and treatment options for these patients, at the recent EAHAD 2021 annual congress, novel approaches and data from clinical and real-world observational studies, as well as systematic literature analyses, were presented. Herein, extracts from seven selected posters reporting research in hemophilia A and VWD funded by Takeda are discussed.

Clotting factor concentrates for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in previously treated individuals with haemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

The hallmark of severe hemophilia (A or B) is recurrent bleeding into joints and soft tissues with progressive joint damage, despite on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis has long been used, but not universally adopted, because of medical, psychosocial, and cost controversies.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of clotting factor concentrate prophylaxis in managing previously-treated individuals with hemophilia A or B.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. In addition, we searched MEDLINE and Embase and online trial registries. Most recent search of Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register: 24 February 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating people with hemophilia A or hemophilia B, who were previously treated with clotting factor concentrates to manage their hemophilia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed trials for eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. The authors used the GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials (including 608 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Eight of the trials (477 participants) had arms comparing two or more prophylactic regimens to one another and four of the trials (n = 258) compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment (two trials had multiple arms and were included in both comparisons). Comparison of two or more prophylactic regimens For trials comparing one prophylaxis regimen to another, given the heterogeneity of the data, none of the data were pooled for this comparison. Considering the individual trials, three trials reported the primary outcome of joint bleeding, and none showed a dfference between dosing regimens (low-certainty evidence). For the secondary outcome of total bleeding events, prophylaxis with a twice-weekly regimen of FIX likely results in reduced total bleeds compared to a once-a-week regimen of the same dose, mean difference (MD) 11.2 (5.81 to 16.59) (one trial, 10 participants, low-certainty evidence). Transient low-titer anti-FVIII inhibitors were reported in one of the trials. Blood-transmitted infections were not identified. Other adverse events reported include hypersensitivity, oedema, and weight gain. These were, however, rare and unrelated to study drugs (very low-certainty evidence). Comparison of prophylactic and on-demand regimens Four of the trials (258 participants) had arms that compared prophylaxis to on-demand treatment. Prophylaxis may result in a large decrease in the number of joint bleeds compared to on-demand treatment, MD -30.34 (95% CI -46.95 to -13.73) (two trials, 164 participants, low-certainty evidence). One of these trials (84 participants) also reported the long-term effects of prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy showing improved joint function, quality of life, and pain; but no differences between groups in joint structure when assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In one trial (84 participants) validated measures for joint health and pain assessment showed that prophylaxis likely improves joint health compared to an on-demand regimen with an estimated change difference of 0.94 points (95% CI 0.23 to 1.65) and improves total pain scores, MD -17.20 (95% CI -27.48 to -6.92 (moderate-certainty evidence). Two trials (131 participants) reported that prophylaxis likely results in a slight increase in adverse events, risk ratio 1.71 (1.24 to 2.37) (moderate-certainty evidence). No inhibitor development and blood-transmitted infections were identified. Overall, the certainty of the body of evidence was judged to be low because of different types of bias that could have altered the effect.   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence from RCTs that prophylaxis, as compared to on-demand treatment, may reduce bleeding frequency in previously-treated people with hemophilia. Prophylaxis may also improve joint function, pain and quality of life, even though this does not translate into a detectable improvement of articular damage when assessed by MRI.  When comparing two different prophylaxis regimens, no significant differences in terms of protection from bleeding were found. Dose optimization could, however, result in improved efficacy. Given the heterogeneity of the data, pooled estimates were not obtained for most comparisons.  Well-designed RCTs and prospective observational controlled studies with standardised definitions and measurements are needed to establish the optimal and most cost-effective treatment regimens.

Nonfactor Therapies: New Approaches to Prophylactic Treatment of Haemophilia

For several decades, the treatment of haemophilia has relied on factor replacement therapy, which restores haemostasis by replacing the missing coagulation factor. In recent years, novel alternative therapies for the treatment of haemophilia in patients with and without inhibitors have been developed. These emergent therapies promote haemostasis by mimicking coagulation factors or inhibiting natural anticoagulants. They provide a less invasive route of administration (i.e. subcutaneous) and some offer reduced frequency of dosing (i.e. every 2 weeks, monthly) compared with the majority of factor replacement therapies, and thus have the potential to simplify treatment, increase adherence and subsequently improve outcomes for patients. Their introduction has transformed the care of haemophilia patients with inhibitors to factor VIII, with similar expectation for haemophilia B patients with inhibitors. However, these therapies also come with several new challenges including their limitation to prophylactic treatment, the observed increased incidence of thrombosis, or their impact on the natural history of the disease and potential disruption of existing treatment guidelines like the use of immune tolerance induction. Moreover, questions remain regarding the long-term impact of non-replacement therapies on joint health as well as the optimal strategy to manage breakthrough bleeds in patients with inhibitors.

Current and Future Options of Haemophilia A Treatments

Introduction: The standard treatment of hemophilia A consists of the prophylactic administration of a coagulation factor concentrate, to be administered intravenously several times a week. Newly approved factor concentrates and non-factor products reduce the frequency of injection and offer better protection against bleeding.Areas covered: New treatment options for hemophilia A are either coagulation factor concentrates based on innovative active principles extending half-life (EHL) or non-factor products allowing subcutaneous application with an extended half-life, so that their broader application only needs to be made every one to four weeks. Other new therapeutic options are still in clinical studies, such as the inhibition of TFPI (tissue factor pathway inhibitor) or small interfering mRNA molecule against antithrombin and gene therapy for hemophilia A.Expert opinion: It can be expected that patients with hemophilia will benefit significantly from the new treatment options and that the protection against bleeding and joint damage as well as the quality of life will increase. The availability of alternatives to classical replacement therapy will require the development of treatment algorithms for patients with hemophilia. It is still unclear to what extent factor substitution will be challenged by the new therapies as first-line therapy.