Conditioning intensity and peritransplant flow cytometric MRD dynamics in adult AML

Measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing in haematological cancers: A giant leap forward or sideways?

Measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing is used in many haematological cancers to estimate relapse risk and to direct therapy. Sometimes MRD-test results are used for regulatory approval. However, some people including regulators wrongfully believe results of MRD-testing are highly accurate and of proven efficacy in directing therapy. We review MRD-testing technologies and evaluate the accuracy of MRD-testing for predicting relapse and the strength of evidence supporting efficacy of MRD-guided therapy. We show that at the individual level MRD-test results are often an inaccurate relapse predictor. Also, no convincing data indicate that increasing therapy-intensity based on a positive MRD-test reduces relapse risk or improves survival. We caution against adjusting therapy-intensity based solely on results of MRD-testing.

Measurable residual disease monitoring in AML: Prospects for therapeutic decision-making and new drug development

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is strongly associated with risk of relapse and long-term survival outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Apart from its clear prognostic impact, MRD information is also increasingly used to guide therapeutic decision-making, including selection of appropriate patients for stem cell transplant, use of post-transplant maintenance, and candidacy for non-transplant maintenance therapies or MRD-directed clinical trials. While much progress has been made in accurately assessing MRD and understanding its clinical importance, many questions remain about how to optimize MRD testing and guide treatment decisions for individual patients. In this review, we discuss the common methods to assess MRD in AML and the prognostic impact of MRD across common clinical scenarios. We also review emerging and investigational strategies to target MRD and discuss some of the important unanswered questions and challenges in the field.

Second Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT2) is potentially curative for adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS)/AML experiencing relapse after a first allograft (HCT1), but prognostic factors for outcomes are poorly characterized. To provide a detailed analysis of HCT2 outcomes and associated prognostic factors in a large single-center cohort, with a focus on identifying predictors of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), we studied adults ≥18 years who underwent HCT2 at a single institution between April 2006 and June 2022 for relapsed AML (n = 73) or MDS/AML (n = 8). With a median follow-up among survivors of 74.0 (range: 10.4 to 187.3) months, there were 30 relapses and 57 deaths, of which 29 were NRM events, contributing to the estimates for relapse, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and NRM. Three-year estimates for relapse, RFS, and OS were 37% (95% confidence interval: 27% to 48%), 32% (23% to 44%), and 35% (26% to 47%). The rate of NRM at 100 days and 18 months was 20% (12% to 29%) and 28% (19% to 39%). Outcomes differed markedly across patient subsets and were substantially worse for patients who underwent HCT2 with active disease (ie, morphologic evidence of bone marrow and/or extramedullary disease), for patients who relapsed ≤6 months after HCT1, and for patients with higher HCT-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) or treatment-related mortality (TRM) scores. After multivariable adjustment, active disease was associated with a higher risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.19, P = .006) and shorter RFS (HR = 2.41, P = .008) as well as OS (HR = 2.17, P = .027) compared to transplant in morphologic remission without multiparameter flow cytometric evidence of measurable residual disease. Similarly, a relapse-free interval ≤6 months after the first allograft was associated with higher risk of relapse (HR = 5.86, P < .001) and shorter RFS (HR = 2.86; P = .001) and OS (HR = 2.45, P = .003). Additionally, a high HCT-CI score was associated with increased NRM (HR = 4.30, P = .035), and shorter RFS (HR = 3.87, P = .003) and OS (HR = 3.74, P = .006). Likewise, higher TRM scores were associated with increased risk of relapse (HR = 2.27; P = .024) and NRM (HR = 2.01, P = .001), and inferior RFS (HR = 1.90 P = .001) and OS (HR = 1.88, P = .001). A significant subset of patients with AML or MDS/AML relapse after HCT1 are alive and leukemia-free 3 years after undergoing HCT2. Our study identifies active leukemia at the time of HCT2 and early relapse after HCT1 as major adverse prognostic factors, highlighting patient subsets in particular need of novel therapeutic approaches, and supports the use of the HCT-CI and TRM scores for outcome prognostication.

Relationship between morphologic remission with or without hematologic recovery and outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adult acute myeloid leukemia

Outcomes of adults with AML after allografting vary widely. While numerous covariates have been associated with relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and/or shorter survival, the impact of incomplete blood count recovery before transplantation has remained unclear. To address this uncertainty, we examined all adults with AML or MDS/AML who received an allograft in first or second remission between 2006 and 2023 at a single institution. Of 1264 patients, 891 (70%) met criteria for CR, whereas 291 (23%), 24 (2%), and 58 (5%) were classified as CRh, CRi, and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), respectively. CR, CRh, CRi, and MLFS patients differed significantly regarding demographics, disease biology, pre-transplant measurable residual disease, and types of transplants. After multivariable adjustment, outcomes for CRh and CRi patients were not significantly different from each other or from those of CR patients. In contrast, outcomes of MLFS patients were substantially worse than those of CR and CRh patients, with significantly higher risk of NRM and relapse, and significantly shorter relapse-free and overall survival. Similar results were obtained in several distinct subsets. Together, our analysis provides empiric evidence for the importance of distinguishing MLFS from CR and CRh patients for optimized risk assessment and, possibly, individualized treatment decision making.

Relative prognostic value of flow cytometric measurable residual disease before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with MDS/AML or AML

Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) measurable residual disease (MRD) before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) independently predicts poor outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Conversely, its prognostic value in the newly defined disease entity, myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS)/AML is unknown. To assess the relationship between disease type, pre-HCT MRD, and post-HCT outcomes, we retrospectively analyzed 1265 adults with MDS/AML (n = 151) or AML (n = 1114) who received a first allograft in first or second morphologic remission at a single institution between April 2006 and March 2023. At 3 years, relapse rates (29% for MDS/AML vs. 29% for AML, p = .98), relapse-free survival (RFS; 50% vs. 55%, p = .22), overall survival (OS; 52% vs. 60%, p = .073), and non-relapse mortality (22% vs. 16%, p = .14) were not statistically significantly different. However, a significant interaction was found between pre-HCT MFC MRD and disease type (MDS/AML vs. AML) for relapse (p = .009), RFS (p = .011), and OS (p = .039). The interaction models indicated that the hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between pre-HCT MRD and post-HCT outcomes were lower in patients with MDS/AML (for relapse: HR = 1.75 [0.97-3.15] in MDS/AML vs. 4.13 [3.31-5.16] in AML; for RFS: HR = 1.58 [1.02-2.45] vs. 2.98 [2.48-3.58]; for OS: HR = 1.50 [0.96-2.35] vs. 2.52 [2.09-3.06]). On the other hand, residual cytogenetic abnormalities at the time of HCT were equally informative in MDS/AML as in AML patients. Our data indicate that MFC-based pre-HCT MRD testing, but not testing for residual cytogenetic abnormalities, is less informative for MDS/AML than AML patients when used for prognostication of post-HCT outcomes.

Impact of socioeconomic disparities on outcomes in adults undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

Racial and socioeconomic disparities impact outcomes after chemotherapy and limit access to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), yet studies have yielded mixed results on the influence of disparities on post-HCT outcomes. Therefore, we studied 1024 adults with AML who underwent allogeneic HCT between 5/2006 and 10/2021 at a single large university-affiliated cancer center. Collected data included non-biologic and demographic characteristics (including race/ethnicity, marital status, distance traveled, and household size), transplant- and disease-related characteristics, and area-level and individual-level socioeconomic factors (i.e., area deprivation index and occupational status). After multivariable adjustment, no socioeconomic- or non-biologic factors were associated with non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), or relapse except being married (associated with improved NRM: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.7 [0.50-0.97]) and having no insurance (associated with worse OS: HR = 1.49 [1.05-2.12] and RFS: HR = 1.41 [1.00-1.98]). Despite a relatively racially homogenous cohort, Asian race was associated with improved NRM (HR = 0.47 [0.23-0.93]) and American Indian/Alaskan Native race was associated with higher relapse risk (HR = 2.45 [1.08-5.53]). In conclusion, in our retrospective analysis, socioeconomic-, demographic-, and non-biologic factors had limited impact on post-HCT outcomes in AML patients allografted in morphologic remission. Further research is needed to investigate disparities among HCT-eligible patients.

The graft versus leukemia effect: donor lymphocyte infusions and cellular therapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative therapy for many hematologic malignancies as well as non-malignant conditions. Part of the curative basis underlying HSCT for hematologic malignancies relies upon induction of the graft versus leukemia (GVL) effect in which donor immune cells recognize and eliminate residual malignant cells within the recipient, thereby maintaining remission. GVL is a clinically evident phenomenon; however, specific cell types responsible for inducing this effect and molecular mechanisms involved remain largely undefined. One of the best examples of GVL is observed after donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI), an established therapy for relapsed disease or incipient/anticipated relapse. DLI involves infusion of peripheral blood lymphocytes from the original HSCT donor into the recipient. Sustained remission can be observed in 20-80% of patients treated with DLI depending upon the underlying disease and the intrinsic burden of targeted cells. In this review, we will discuss current knowledge about mechanisms of GVL after DLI, experimental strategies for augmenting GVL by manipulation of DLI (e.g. neoantigen vaccination, specific cell type selection/depletion) and research outlook for improving DLI and cellular immunotherapies for hematologic malignancies through better molecular definition of the GVL effect.

Quantification of measurable residual disease using duplex sequencing in adults with acute myeloid leukemia

The presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) is strongly associated with treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite the correlation with clinical outcomes, MRD assessment has yet to be standardized or routinely incorporated into clinical trials and discrepancies have been observed between different techniques for MRD assessment. In 62 patients with AML, aged 18-60 years, in first complete remission after intensive induction therapy on the randomized phase III SWOG-S0106 clinical trial (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT00085709), MRD detection by centralized, high-quality multiparametric flow cytometry was compared with a 29-gene panel utilizing duplex sequencing (DS), an ultrasensitive next-generation sequencing method that generates double-stranded consensus sequences to reduce false positive errors. MRD as defined by DS was observed in 22 (35%) patients and was strongly associated with higher rates of relapse (68% vs. 13%; hazard ratio [HR] =8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-24.5; P<0.001) and decreased survival (32% vs. 82%; HR=5.6; 95% CI: 2.3-13.8; P<0.001) at 5 years. DS MRD strongly outperformed multiparametric flow cytometry MRD, which was observed in ten (16%) patients and marginally associated with higher rates of relapse (50% vs. 30%; HR=2.4; 95% CI: 0.9-6.7; P=0.087) and decreased survival (40% vs. 68%; HR=2.5; 95% CI: 1.0-6.3; P=0.059) at 5 years. Furthermore, the prognostic significance of DS MRD status at the time of remission for subsequent relapse was similar on both randomized arms of the trial. These findings suggest that next-generation sequencing-based AML MRD testing is a powerful tool that could be developed for use in patient management and for early anti-leukemic treatment assessment in clinical trials.

Understanding differential technologies for detection of MRD and how to incorporate into clinical practice

Patient- and leukemia-specific factors assessed at diagnosis classify patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in risk categories that are prognostic for outcome. The induction phase with intensive chemotherapy in fit patients aims to reach a complete remission (CR) of less than 5% blasts in bone marrow by morphology. To deepen and sustain the response, induction is followed by consolidation treatment. This postremission treatment of patients with AML is graduated in intensity based on this favorable, intermediate, or adverse risk group classification as defined in the European Leukemia Network (ELN) 2022 recommendations. The increment of evidence that measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction can be superimposed on risk group at diagnosis is instrumental in tailoring further treatment accordingly. Several techniques are applied to detect MRD such as multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative (digital) polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing. The clinical implementation of MRD and the technique used differ among institutes, leading to the accumulation of a wide range of data, and therefore harmonization is warranted. Currently, evidence for MRD guidance is limited to the time point after induction using MFC or quantitative PCR for NPM1 and core binding factor abnormalities in intermediate-risk patients. The role of MRD in targeted or nonintensive therapies needs to be clarified, although some data show improved survival in patients achieving CR-MRD negativity. Potential application of MRD for selection of conditioning before stem cell transplantation, monitoring after consolidation, and use as an intermediate end point in clinical trials need further evaluation.

Test Then Erase? Current Status and Future Opportunities for Measurable Residual Disease Testing in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Measurable residual disease (MRD) test positivity during and after treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been associated with higher rates of relapse and worse overall survival. Current approaches for MRD testing are not standardized leading to inconsistent results and poor prognostication of disease. Pertinent studies evaluating AML MRD testing at specific times points, with various therapeutics and testing methods are presented.

SUMMARY

AML is a set of diseases with different molecular and cytogenetic characteristics and is often polyclonal with evolution over time. This genetic diversity poses a great challenge for a single AML MRD testing approach. The current ELN 2021 MRD guidelines recommend MRD testing by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in those with a validated molecular target or multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in all other cases. The benefit of MFC is the ability to use this method across disease subsets, at the relative expense of suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. AML MRD detection may be improved with molecular methods. Genetic characterization at AML diagnosis and relapse is now standard of care for appropriate therapeutic assignment, and future initiatives will provide the evidence to support testing in remission to direct clinical interventions.

KEY MESSAGES

The treatment options for patients with AML have expanded for specific molecular subsets such as FLT3 and IDH1/2 mutated AML, with development of novel agents for NPM1 mutated or KMT2A rearranged AML ongoing, but also due to effective venetoclax-combinations. Evidence regarding highly sensitive molecular MRD detection methods for specific molecular subgroups, in the context of these new treatment approaches, will likely shape the future of AML care.

Optimal Post-Remission Consolidation Therapy in Patients with AML

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances, 40-85% of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) achieve complete remission after intensive chemotherapy. However, without optimal treatment after remission, the risk of relapse remains high.

SUMMARY

A variable number of consolidation cycles consisting of intermediate doses of cytarabine are the most commonly used regimens in low-intermediate-risk AML, while patients at higher risk of relapse should consolidate response by proceeding to HSCT. Different post-consolidation (maintenance therapies) have demonstrated their benefit in prolonging relapse-free survival, and others are still under investigation. Careful consideration should be given to which patients benefit most from each of these interventions, considering that the risk of relapse is dynamic.

KEY MESSAGES

Patients consolidated with chemotherapy should receive either 2 courses of HDAC or no more than 3-4 cycles of IDAC with dose reduction in patients over 60 years. Patients with mutated FLT3 AML benefit from post-consolidation maintenance with FLT3 inhibitors, and selected patients not fit for adequate consolidation may benefit from CC-468 maintenance. Patients at higher risk of relapse should proceed to allogeneic SCT as soon as possible, opting for a more intensive conditioning in patients younger than 55 years. However, autologous HSCT may still have role in favourable-risk MRD-negative AML. Multiple treatment options targeting MRD are emerging, either as definitive treatment or as a bridge to allogeneic transplantation, and are likely to become increasingly relevant.

Phase 1/2 study of sorafenib added to cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, G-CSF, and mitoxantrone in untreated AML

The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib improves event-free survival (EFS) when used with 7 + 3 in adults with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), irrespective of the FLT3-mutation status. Here, we evaluated adding sorafenib to cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and mitoxantrone (CLAG-M) in a phase 1/2 trial of 81 adults aged ≤60 years with newly diagnosed AML. Forty-six patients were treated in phase 1 with escalating doses of sorafenib and mitoxantrone. No maximum tolerated dose was reached, and a regimen including mitoxantrone 18 mg/m2 per day and sorafenib 400 mg twice daily was declared the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Among 41 patients treated at RP2D, a measurable residual disease-negative complete remission (MRD- CR) rate of 83% was obtained. Four-week mortality was 2%. One-year overall survival (OS) and EFS were 80% and 76%, without differences in MRD- CR rates, OS, or EFS between patients with or without FLT3-mutated disease. Comparing outcomes using CLAG-M/sorafenib with those of a matched cohort of 76 patients treated with CLAG-M alone, multivariable-adjusted survival estimates were improved for 41 patients receiving CLAG-M/sorafenib at RP2D (OS: hazard ratio,0.24 [95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.82]; P = .023; EFS: hazard ratio, 0.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.53]; P = .003). Benefit was limited to patients with intermediate-risk disease (univariate analysis: P = .01 for OS; P = .02 for EFS). These data suggest that CLAG-M/sorafenib is safe and improves OS and EFS relative to CLAG-M alone, with benefits primarily in patients with intermediate-risk disease. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02728050.

Moving toward a conceptualization of measurable residual disease in myelodysplastic syndromes

Approximately 90% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) have somatic mutations that are known or suspected to be oncogenic in the malignant cells. The genetic risk stratification of MDSs has evolved substantially with the introduction of the clinical molecular international prognostic scoring system, which establishes next-generation sequencing at diagnosis as a standard of care. Furthermore, the International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias has refined the MDS diagnostic criteria with the introduction of a new MDS/acute myeloid leukemia category. Monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) has historically been used to define remission status, improve relapse prediction, and determine the efficacy of antileukemic drugs in patients with acute and chronic leukemias. However, in contrast to leukemias, assessment of MRD, including tracking of patient-specific mutations, has not yet been formally defined as a biomarker for MDS. This article summarizes current evidence and challenges and provides a conceptual framework for incorporating MRD into the treatment of MDS and future clinical trials.

Posttransplant MRD and T-cell chimerism status predict outcomes in patients who received allografts for AML/MDS

Allogeneic stem-cell transplant allows for the delivery of curative graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplasia (AML/MDS). Surveillance of T-cell chimerism, measurable residual disease (MRD) and blast HLA-DR expression may inform whether GVL effectiveness is reduced. We report here the prognostic impact of these biomarkers in patients allografted for AML/MDS. One hundred eighty-seven patients from FIGARO, a randomized trial of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens in AML/MDS, were alive and relapse-free at the first MRD time-point and provided monitoring samples for flow cytometric MRD and T-cell chimerism, requested to month+12. Twenty-nine (15.5%) patients had at least 1 MRD-positive result posttransplant. MRD-positivity was associated with reduced overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; P = .0028) as a time-varying Cox variable and remained significant irrespective of pretransplant MRD status in multivariate analyses (P < .001). Ninety-four patients had sequential MRD with T-cell chimerism results at months+3/+6. Patients with full donor T-cell chimerism (FDTC) had an improved OS as compared with patients with mixed donor T-cell chimerism (MDTC) (adjusted HR=0.4; P = .0019). In patients with MDTC (month+3 or +6), MRD-positivity was associated with a decreased 2-year OS (34.3%) vs MRD-negativity (71.4%) (P = .001). In contrast, in the group with FDTC, MRD was infrequent and did not affect the outcome. Among patients with posttransplant MRD-positivity, decreased HLA-DR expression on blasts significantly reduced OS, supporting this as a mechanism for GVL escape. In conclusion, posttransplant MRD is an important predictor of the outcome in patients allografted for AML/MDS and is most informative when combined with T-cell chimerism results, underlining the importance of a GVL effect in AML/MDS.

Sorafenib maintenance after allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia: long-term follow-up of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Our open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial showed that sorafenib maintenance after haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) improved overall survival and reduced relapse for patients with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Here, we present a post-hoc analysis on the 5-year follow-up data of this trial.

METHODS

This phase 3 trial, done in seven hospitals in China, included patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT, who were aged 18-60 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, had composite complete remission before and after transplantation, and had haematopoietic recovery within 60 days after transplantation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sorafenib maintenance (400 mg orally twice daily) or non-maintenance (control) at 30-60 days after transplantation. Randomisation was done with permuted blocks (block size four) via an interactive web-based system. Investigators and participants were not masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse, which was reported previously. For this updated analysis, the 5-year endpoints were overall survival; cumulative incidence of relapse; non-relapse mortality; leukaemia-free survival; graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS); cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD; and late effects in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02474290, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between June 20, 2015, and July 21, 2018, 202 patients were randomly assigned to sorafenib maintenance (n=100) or non-maintenance (n=102). Median follow-up was 60·4 months (IQR 16·7-73·3). Extended follow-up showed improved overall survival (72·0% [95% CI 62·1-79·7] vs 55·9% [45·7-64·9]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·55, 95% CI 0·34-0·88; p=0·011), leukaemia-free survival (70·0% [60·0-78·0] vs 49·0% [39·0-58·3]; 0·47, 0·30-0·73; p=0·0007), and GRFS (58·0% [47·7-67·0] vs 39·2% [29·8-48·5]; 0·56, 0·38-0·83; p=0·0030), lower cumulative incidence of relapse (15·0% [8·8-22·7] vs 36·3% [27·0-45·6]; 0·33, 0·18-0·60; p=0·0003), and no increase in non-relapse mortality (15·0% [8·8-22·7] vs 14·7% [8·6-22·3]; 0·79, 0·39-1·62; p=0·98) for patients in the sorafenib group compared with those in the control group. The 5-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (54·0% [43·7-63·2] vs 51·0% [40·8-60·3]; 0·82, 0·56-1·19; p=0·73) did not differ significantly between the two groups and we did not find substantial differences in late effects between the two groups. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

With extended follow-up, sorafenib maintenance after transplantation is associated with improved long-term survival and reduced relapse rates compared with non-maintenance, further supporting this strategy as a standard of care for patients with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukaemia undergoing allogeneic HSCT.

FUNDING

None.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

A novel risk model for predicting early relapse in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

Relapse remains the leading cause of death in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), limiting the efficacy of allo-HSCT. Thus, the ability to identify high-risk patients in a manner that permits early intervention has the potential to improve survival outcomes. We retrospectively enrolled 414 younger patients (aged 14-60 years) with AML who received allo-HSCT between January 2014 and May 2020. From June 2020 to June 2021, 110 consecutive patients were included prospectively in the validation cohort. The primary outcome was early relapse (relapse within 1 year). The cumulative incidence of early relapse after allo-HSCT was 11.8%. The overall survival rate for patients who relapsed within 1-year was 4.1% at 3 years after relapse. After multivariable adjustment, statistically significant associations between primary resistance, pre-transplantation measurable residual disease, DNMT3A mutation, or white blood cell count at diagnosis and early relapse were observed. An early relapse prediction model was developed based on these factors and the model performed well. Patients deemed to have a high risk or a low risk of early relapse had early relapse rates of 26.2% and 6.8%, respectively (P < 0.001). The prediction model could be used to help identify patients at risk for early relapse and to guide personalized relapse prevention.

Using Measurable Residual Disease to Optimize Management of AML, ALL, and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

In this review, we discuss the use of measurable residual disease (MRD) in AML, ALL, and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Our aims were to review the different methodologies for MRD assessment; describe the clinical relevance and medical decision making on the basis of MRD; compare and contrast the usage of MRD across AML, ALL, and CML; and discuss what patients need to know about MRD as it relates to their disease status and treatment. Finally, we discuss ongoing challenges and future directions with the goal of optimizing MRD usage in leukemia management.

Overcoming relapse: prophylactic or pre-emptive use of azacitidine or FLT3 inhibitors after allogeneic transplantation for AML or MDS

Relapse remains the most critical obstacle in treatment by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Non-relapse mortality has improved annually, but relapse mortality remains high. Post-transplant maintenance treatment, such as hypomethylating agents and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors, has been investigated for decades as a means of preventing disease relapse after HSCT. Other factors besides the relapse tendency of the primary disease that can affect the transition of estimated disease burden in patients undergoing HSCT are disease status at HSCT (non-remission, remission with minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD), and remission without MRD) and conditioning regimen intensity. Optimal selection of patients at high risk for relapse who can tolerate a long duration of therapy is pivotal for successful post-transplant maintenance therapy. In this review, we provide an overview of current progress in research on post-transplant maintenance treatment using azacitidine or FLT3 inhibitors for preventing disease relapse after HSCT for AML or MDS, and discuss the future outlook in this area.

Comparison of reduced intensity and nonmyeloablative conditioning for adults with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in first or second remission

Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning regimens have expanded use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in AML to include older and medically less-fit patients, but relative efficacies and toxicities remain poorly defined. Here, we analyzed outcomes from 343 adults transplanted in remission after RIC (n = 137) or NMA (n = 206) conditioning between 2006 and 2021. The characteristics of RIC and NMA HCT patients were similar except that RIC patients were younger and their time between most recent remission achievement and allografting was shorter. There were no significant differences in relapse risk, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) between RIC and NMA HCT patients, both overall (relapse: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80, P = 0.27; RFS: HR = 0.93, P = 0.61; OS: HR = 0.93, P = 0.66; NRM: HR = 1.13, P = 0.59) and when patients were stratified by pre-HCT measurable residual disease (MRD) status. After multivariable adjustment, there was no statistically significant association between conditioning intensity and relapse (HR = 0.69, P = 0.088), RFS (HR = 0.86, P = 0.37), OS (HR = 0.89, P = 0.49), or NRM (HR = 1.37, P = 0.19). In this non-randomized cohort of adults undergoing allografting for AML in first or second remission at our center, we could not detect statistically significant differences in outcomes between those assigned to RIC and those assigned to NMA conditioning.

Quantification of measurable residual disease using duplex sequencing in adults with acute myeloid leukemia

The presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) is strongly associated with treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite the correlation with clinical outcomes, MRD assessment has yet to be standardized or routinely incorporated into clinical trials. Discrepancies have been observed between different techniques for MRD assessment and there remains a need to compare centralized, high-quality multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and ultrasensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) in AML patients with diverse mutational profiles. In 62 patients with AML, aged 18-60, in first complete remission after intensive induction therapy on the randomized phase 3 SWOG-S0106 clinical trial, MRD detection by MFC was compared with a 29 gene panel utilizing duplex sequencing (DS), an NGS method that generates double-stranded consensus sequences to reduce false positive errors. Using DS, detection of a persistent mutation utilizing defined criteria was seen in 22 (35%) patients and was strongly associated with higher rates of relapse (68% vs 13% at year 5; HR, 8.8; 95% CI, 3.2-24.5; P<0.001) and decreased survival (32% vs 82% at year 5; HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.3-13.8; P<0.001). MRD as defined by DS strongly outperformed MFC, which was observed in 10 (16%) patients and marginally associated with higher rates of relapse (50% vs 30% at year 5; HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 0.9-6.7; P=0.087) and decreased survival (40% vs 68% at year 5; HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.0-6.3; P=0.059). Furthermore, the prognostic significance of DS MRD status at the time of remission was similar on both randomized arms of the trial, predicting S0106 clinical trial outcomes. These findings suggest that DS is a powerful tool that could be used in patient management and for early treatment assessment in clinical trials.

Prognostic Value of Measurable Residual Disease in Patients with AML Undergoing HSCT: A Multicenter Study

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents the best therapeutic option for many patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, relapse remains the main cause of mortality after transplantation. The detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in AML, before and after HSCT, has been described as a powerful predictor of outcome. Nevertheless, multicenter and standardized studies are lacking. A retrospective analysis was performed, including 295 AML patients undergoing HSCT in 4 centers that worked according to recommendations from the Euroflow consortium. Among patients in complete remission (CR), MRD levels prior to transplantation significantly influenced outcomes, with overall (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) at 2 years of 76.7% and 67.6% for MRD-negative patients, 68.5% and 49.7% for MRD-low patients (MRD < 0.1), and 50.5% and 36.6% for MRD-high patients (MRD ≥ 0.1) (p < 0.001), respectively. MRD level did influence the outcome, irrespective of the conditioning regimen. In our patient cohort, positive MRD on day +100 after transplantation was associated with an extremely poor prognosis, with a cumulative incidence of relapse of 93.3%. In conclusion, our multicenter study confirms the prognostic value of MRD performed in accordance with standardized recommendations.

Association between Prior Cytotoxic Therapy, Antecedent Hematologic Disorder, and Outcome after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia

(1) Background: Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML), i.e., AML arising from prior therapy (therapy-related) and/or an antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD) is generally associated with worse outcomes compared to de novo AML. However, recognizing the prognostic importance of genetic characteristics rather than clinical history, secondary AML is now considered a diagnostic qualifier rather than a separate disease entity. (2) Methods: To assess the association between clinical history and AML outcomes in the context of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), we retrospectively analyzed 759 patients with de novo AML, 115 with AHD AML, and 105 with therapy-related AML who received first allografts while in first or second remission. (3) Results: At the time of HCT, these three cohorts differed significantly regarding many patient and disease-specific characteristics, including age (p < 0.001), gender (p < 0.001), disease risk (p = 0.005), HCT-CI score (p < 0.001), blood count recovery (p = 0.003), first vs. second remission (p < 0.001), remission duration (p < 0.001), measurable residual disease (MRD; p < 0.001), and conditioning intensity (p < 0.001). Relative to patients with de novo AML, relapse rates were similar for patients with AHD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07, p = 0.7) and therapy-related AML (HR = 0.86, p = 0.4) after multivariable adjustment, as were relapse-free survival (HR = 1.20, p = 0.2, and HR = 0.89, p = 0.5) and overall survival (HR = 1.19, p = 0.2, and HR = 0.93, p = 0.6). Non-relapse mortality was higher for AHD AML (HR = 1.59, p = 0.047). (4) Conclusions: These data suggest that the clinical history by itself contains limited prognostic value for adults with AML undergoing allografting, supporting the most recent approach to use this information as a diagnostic qualifier rather than a disease entity.

Immunophenotypic measurable residual disease monitoring in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) offers a survival benefit to adult patients affected by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, to avoid an overt disease relapse, patients with pre or post transplant persistence or occurrence of measurable residual disease (MRD) may require cellular or pharmacological interventions with eventual side effects. While the significance of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) in the guidance of ALL treatment in both adult and pediatric patients is undebated, fewer data are available regarding the impact of MRD monitoring, as assessed by MFC analysis, in the allo-HSCT settings. Aim of this article is to summarize and discuss currently available information on the role of MFC detection of MRD in adult ALL patients undergoing allo-HSCT. The significance of MFC-based MRD according to sensitivity level, timing, and in relation to molecular techniques of MRD and chimerism assessment will be also discussed.

Achieving MRD negativity in AML: how important is this and how do we get there?

Multiple studies have demonstrated that patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have measurable residual disease (MRD) detected during or after treatment have higher relapse rates and worse survival than similar patients testing negative. Updated response criteria for AML reflect the understanding that achievement of complete remission (CR) with no detectable MRD using high-sensitivity tests represents a superior response over conventional cytomorphological CR alone. Potential use cases for AML MRD testing are diverse and include patient selection for clinical trials and therapeutic assignment, early relapse detection and intervention during sequential monitoring, and drug development, including deep quantification for antileukemia efficacy and as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in regulatory approvals. Testing for AML MRD has not, however, been harmonized, and many technical and clinical questions remain. The implications of MRD test results for specific therapeutic combinations, molecular subsets, test types, treatment time points, sample types, and patient characteristics remain incompletely defined. No perfect AML MRD test or testing strategy currently exists, and the evidence basis for clinical recommendations in this rare disease is sparse but growing. It is unproven whether conversion of an MRD test result from positive to negative by additional therapeutic intervention improves relapse risk and survival. Several national- and international-level consortia have recently been initiated to advance the generation and collection of evidence to support the use of AML MRD testing in clinical practice, drug development, and regulatory approvals.

Relationship Between Pretransplantation Nutritional Status and Outcome in Adults with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Pretransplantation nutritional status may impact outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Various simple screening tools have been developed and used to identify patients at risk of malnutrition; however, how best to use these screening tools is unclear, and their accuracy for the prediction of adverse outcomes is unknown. To investigate how these different measures contribute to outcome prediction, we examined a large cohort of adults with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) who underwent allogeneic HCT in first or second remission at our institution between April 2006 and May 2021. We assessed the prognostic role of the Nutrition Risk Index (NRI), which combines weight loss and serum albumin, in 970 adults with AML in first or second remission who had usual body weight information available at AML diagnosis or relapse and before HCT. A low NRI at the time of conditioning for HCT was associated with higher nonrelapse mortality (hazard ratio [HR], .97; 95% confidence interval [CI], .95 to .98; P < .001) and relapse risk (HR, .98; 95% CI, .96 to .99; P < .001) and decreased relapse-free survival (HR, .97; 95% CI, .96 to .98; P < .001) and overall survival (HR, .97; 95% CI, .96 to .98; P < .001), as was a low pre-HCT serum albumin level. After multivariable adjustment, NRI, but not weight loss alone, was associated with outcome. The predictive ability of NRI was overall relatively low and comparable to that of serum albumin, with a C-statistic not exceeding .59. Taken together, our data indicate that pre-HCT level of serum albumin, an acute-phase protein recognized to more accurately reflect the severity of the inflammatory response compared with poor nutritional status, but not weight loss, is independently associated with post-HCT outcome in patients with AML. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN

The 2010 and 2017 editions of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults are widely recognized among physicians and investigators. There have been major advances in our understanding of AML, including new knowledge about the molecular pathogenesis of AML, leading to an update of the disease classification, technological progress in genomic diagnostics and assessment of measurable residual disease, and the successful development of new therapeutic agents, such as FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, and BCL2 inhibitors. These advances have prompted this update that includes a revised ELN genetic risk classification, revised response criteria, and treatment recommendations.

Relative impact of residual cytogenetic abnormalities and flow cytometric measurable residual disease on outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adult acute myeloid leukemia

Measurable residual disease (MRD) before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an independent established prognostic factor in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Several methods exist to evaluate the presence of residual leukemia cells, but how these are used best in combination is unclear. In order to examine how residual cytogenetic abnormalities and MRD testing by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) may refine risk assessment before HCT, we analyzed 506 adults with cytogenetically abnormal AML who underwent both routine karyotyping and MFC MRD testing before receiving a first allograft while in morphologic remission. Testing for residual cytogenetic abnormalities and MFC MRD identified four groups of patients with differential relapse-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR]=1.63 for Cytoabnormal/MFCnegative [P=0.01, n=63], HR=3.24 for Cytonormal/MFCpositive [P<0.001, n=60], and HR=5.50 for Cytoabnormal/MFCpositive [P<0.001, n=56] with Cytonormal/MFCnegative as reference [n=327]) and overall survival (OS) (HR=1.55 for Cytoabnormal/MFCnegative [P=0.03], HR=2.69 for Cytonormal/MFCpositive [P<0.001], and HR=4.15 for Cytoabnormal/MFCpositive [P<0.001] with Cytonormal/MFCnegative as reference). Results were similar for patients who received myeloablative or non-myeloablative conditioning. C-statistic values were higher, indicating higher accuracy, when using pre-HCT cytogenetic and MFC MRD information together for prediction of relapse, RFS, and OS, rather than using either test result alone. This study indicates that residual cytogenetic abnormalities and MFC MRD testing provide complementary prognostic information for post- HCT outcomes in patients with cytogenetically abnormal AML undergoing allogeneic HCT.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) status before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation impact on secondary acute myeloid leukemia outcome. A Study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may help physicians to identify a subgroup of patients at high risk of relapse for de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but its relevance among patients affected by secondary AML (sAML) is still unknown. We assessed the impact of MRD among 318 adult patients with sAML who received an allogeneic HCT in first complete remission. At the time of HCT, a total of 208 (65%) patients achieved MRD negativity, while 110 (35%) had positive MRD. 2-year overall survival (OS) was 58.8 % (95% CI 52.2-64.9) with leukemia-free survival (LFS) of 50.0 % (95% CI 43.7-56.1), relapse incidence of 34.2% (95% CI 28.4-40.1) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 23.3 % (95% CI 19-27.7) for the entire cohort. In multivariate analysis, HCT recipients with KPS ≥ 90 experienced less disease recurrence (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.4-0.94) with better LFS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.89) and OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.86). There were no differences in major clinical endpoints between patients with MRD-positive and MRD-negative status at the time of HCT. Pre-transplantation assessment of MRD was not informative on post-HCT outcomes in this retrospective registry-based analysis among patients affected by sAML.

Phase 1/2 Trial of CLAG-M with Dose-Escalated Mitoxantrone in Combination with Fractionated-Dose Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Other High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms

Simple Summary

Several studies have demonstrated that gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) improves outcomes with intensive chemotherapy in some adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but it has remained unclear which dosing schedule of GO is best. Here, we conducted a phase 1/2 study in 66 adults with newly diagnosed AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasm, and found that a fractionated dosing schedule of GO (GO3) can be safely combined with cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, G-CSF, and dose-escalated mitoxantrone (CLAG-M). Fifty-two out of sixty (87%) patients treated with CLAG-M/GO3 achieved a complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 45/52 (87%) without flow cytometric measurable residual disease. Six- and twelve-month event-free survival were 73% and 58%; among favorable-risk patients, these estimates were 100% and 95%. Compared to 186 medically matched adults treated with CLAG-M alone, CLAG-M/GO3 was associated with better survival in patients with favorable-risk disease. These data indicate that CLAG-M/GO3 is safe and more efficacious than CLAG-M alone in favorable-risk AML/high-grade myeloid neoplasm.

Abstract

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) improves outcomes when added to intensive AML chemotherapy. A meta-analysis suggested the greatest benefit when combining fractionated doses of GO (GO3) with 7 + 3. To test whether GO3 can be safely used with high intensity chemotherapy, we conducted a phase 1/2 study of cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, G-CSF, and dose-escalated mitoxantrone (CLAG-M) in adults with newly diagnosed AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasm (NCT03531918). Sixty-six patients with a median age of 65 (range: 19–80) years were enrolled. Cohorts of six and twelve patients were treated in phase 1 with one dose of GO or three doses of GO (GO3) at 3 mg/m² per dose. Since a maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was declared to be GO3. At RP2D, 52/60 (87%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 45/52 (87%) without flow cytometric measurable residual disease (MRD). Eight-week mortality was 0%. Six- and twelve-month event-free survival (EFS) were 73% and 58%; among favorable-risk patients, these estimates were 100% and 95%. Compared to 186 medically matched adults treated with CLAG-M alone, CLAG-M/GO3 was associated with better survival in patients with favorable-risk disease (EFS: p = 0.007; OS: p = 0.030). These data indicate that CLAG-M/GO3 is safe and leads to superior outcomes than CLAG-M alone in favorable-risk AML/high-grade myeloid neoplasm.

Utility of the Treatment-Related Mortality (TRM) score to predict outcomes of adults with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

There is long-standing interest in estimating non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for AML, but existing tools have limited discriminative capacity. Using single-institution data from 861 adults with AML, we retrospectively examined the Treatment-Related Mortality (TRM) score, originally developed to predict early mortality following induction chemotherapy, as a predictor of post-HCT outcome. NRM risks increased stepwise across the four TRM score quartiles (at 3 years: 9% [95% confidence interval: 5-13%] in Q1 vs. 28% [22-34%] in Q4). The 3-year risk of relapse was lower in patients with lower TRM score (26% [20-32%] in Q1 vs. 37% [30-43%] in Q4). Consequently, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates progressively decreased (RFS at 3 years: 66% [59-72%] in Q1 vs. 36% [29-42%] in Q4; OS at 3 years: 72% [66-78%] in Q1 vs. 39% [33-46%] in Q4). With a C-statistic of 0.661 (continuous variable) or 0.642 (categorized by quartile), the TRM score predicted NRM better than the Pretransplantation Assessment of Mortality (PAM) score (0.603) or the HCT-CI/age composite score (0.576). While post-HCT outcome prediction remains challenging, these findings suggest that the TRM score may be useful for risk stratification for adults with AML undergoing allogeneic HCT.