Efficacy of tixagevimab-cilgavimab in preventing SARS-CoV-2 for patients with B-cell malignancies

Management of infections for patient treated with ibrutinib in clinical practice

Ibrutinib, a highly effective inhibitor of the Bruton tyrosine kinase, has significantly transformed the therapeutic approach in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Despite these advancements, the disease continues to be characterized by immune dysfunction and increased susceptibility to infections, with mortality rates from infections showing no significant improvement over the past few decades. Therefore, timely prevention, recognition, and treatment of infections remains an important aspect of the standard management of a patient with CLL. A panel of hematologists with expertise in CLL met to discuss existing literature and clinical insights for the management of infectious in CLL undergoing ibrutinib treatment. Despite not being a fully comprehensive review on the topic, this work provides a set of practical recommendations that can serve as a guide to healthcare professionals who manage these patients in their daily clinical practice.

Patients with multiple myeloma infected with COVID-19 during autologous stem cell transplantation

Despite the global vaccination campaigns, certain patient groups remain highly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 and are at high risk for unfavorable COVID-19 outcomes. As previously shown by our group and a more recent report by Chang Su and coworkers, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) represent one of such high-risk populations. This is due to the underlying disease-related immunodeficiency, suboptimal response to vaccines, heavy exposure to dexamethasone, and the use of high-dose melphalan prior to the ASCT procedure. Contracting SARS-CoV-2 and developing COVID-19 during the ASCT procedure remain high-risk events for these patients. It is then crucial to maintain and implement all appropriate strategies to prevent COVID-19 breakthroughs in this clinical setting. This might include targeted pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies, based on the circulation and prevalence of different SARS-CoV-2 variants/subvariants, and the prompt use of antivirals if, despite prophylaxis, MM patients develop COVID-19 during the transplantation procedure. We emphasize the importance of regularly monitoring MM patients for SARS-CoV-2 infection at all stages of the ASCT procedure. This is crucial to promptly implement measures to reduce the risk of unfavorable COVID-19 outcomes during the current post-pandemic phase.

Efficacy of Combination of Antiviral Therapy With Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies for Recurrent Persistent SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia in Patients With Lymphoma

Despite the potential of neutralizing antibodies in the management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), clinical research on its efficacy in Chinese patients remains limited. This study is aimed at investigating the therapeutic effect of combination of antiviral therapy with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for recurrent persistent SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in patients with lymphoma complicated by B cell depletion. A prospective study was conducted on Chinese patients who were treated with antiviral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy and the neutralizing antibody tixagevimab-cilgavimab (tix-cil). The primary outcome was the rate of recurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Five patients with lymphoma experienced recurrent SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and received tix-cil treatment. All patients had a history of CD20 monoclonal antibody use within the year preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection, and two patients also had a history of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor use. These patients had notably low lymphocyte counts and exhibited near depletion of B cells. All five patients tested negative for serum SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies. None of the patients developed reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia after antiviral and tix-cil treatment during the 6-month follow-up period. In conclusion, the administration of antiviral and SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies showed encouraging therapeutic efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in patients with lymphoma complicated by B cell depletion, along with the potential preventive effect of neutralizing antibodies for up to 6 months.

Real World Use of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis of COVID-19 in Immunocompromised Individuals: Data from the OCTOPUS Study

Objective. We aimed to report the real-world use and outcomes over time in immunocompromised individuals receiving tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Methods. This observational study included participants who received T/C PrEP, categorized into three groups: (i) No COVID-19 (NoC), i.e., participants who never had COVID-19; (ii) Hybrids (H), i.e., participants who had COVID-19 before PrEP; and (iii) Break-through Infections (BTIs), i.e., participants who had COVID-19 after PrEP. The study measured several immune markers at the administration of T/C (T0) at 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 9 (T3) months afterward. These markers included: anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG antibodies; BA.5-neutralizing antibodies (nAbs); mucosal IgG; and T cell immunity. The incidence rate ratios for BTIs were analyzed using a Poisson regression model. Results. A total of 231 participants with a median age of 63 years (IQR 54.0-73.0). were included. Among these, 84% had hematological diseases and received a median of three vaccine doses. N = 72 participants belonged to the NoC group, N = 103 to the H group, and n = 56 to the BTI group (24%), with most BTIs being mild/moderate. The incidence rate (IR) of BTIs was 4.2 per 100 patient-months (95% CI 3.2-5.4), with no associated risk factors identified. There was a significant increase in anti-RBD IgG levels 3 months after the T/C administration in all groups, followed by a decline at 6 months, whereas at the same time points, geometric mean titers (GMTs) of anti-BA.5 nAbs were low for all groups and were around or below the detection threshold. No significant changes were observed in IFN-γ levels. The mucosal immune response was observed only 3 months after the PrEP administration. Conclusion. We provided a real-world experience model on the clinical efficacy of T/C PrEP in preventing severe COVID-19 during the Omicron wave through a comprehensive virological and immunological study. While waiting for the arrival of new monoclonal antibodies that can effectively neutralize the most recent variants, T/C PrEP remains the only viable strategy in the available armamentarium today to prevent COVID-19 complications in an extremely fragile population with suboptimal immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines.

Clinical characteristics and COVID-19-related outcomes of immunocompromised patients receiving tixagevimab/cilgavimab pre-exposure prophylaxis in Japan

OBJECTIVE

Tixagevimab/cilgavimab is a cocktail of two long-acting monoclonal antibodies approved for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (cause of coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) in immunocompromised (IC) or high-risk patients. We investigated the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of IC patients administered tixagevimab/cilgavimab for PrEP in real-world use in Japan.

METHODS

This observational study used anonymous secondary data from Real-World Data Co., Ltd. for IC patients aged ≥12 years administered tixagevimab/cilgavimab between September 2022 and September 2023. We analyzed the baseline characteristics and event-rates of COVID-19-related clinical outcomes within 6 months of administration.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed for 397 IC patients. About half (53.4 %) were male and the median age was 71.0 (interquartile range 61.0, 77.0) years. Malignancy (97.2 %), cardiovascular disease (71.3 %), and diabetes (66.5 %) were frequent comorbidities. Systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were prescribed to 87.4 % and 24.9 %, respectively. The two most common target clinical conditions were active therapy for hematologic malignancies (88.2 %) and treatment with B cell-depleting therapies (57.4 %). The event-rates per 100 person-months (95 % confidence interval; number) for medically attended COVID-19, COVID-19 hospitalization, in-hospital mortality due to COVID-19, and all-cause death were 4.14 (3.06-5.48; n = 49), 1.74 (1.09-2.64; n = 22), 0.07 (0.00-0.42; n = 1), and 0.60 (0.26-1.17; n = 8), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report using a multicenter database to describe the clinical characteristics and COVID-19-related outcomes of IC patients administered with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in real-world settings in Japan. This cohort of IC patients who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab included many elderly patients with comorbidities.

Saliva Is a Sensitive and Accessible Sample Both for SARS-CoV-2 Detection and for the Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness in Follow-Up Studies

Despite emerging evidence indicating that molecular SARS-CoV-2 tests performed on saliva have diagnostic sensitivity and specificity comparable to those observed with nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs), most in vivo follow-up studies on the efficacy of drugs against SARS-CoV-2 have been performed on NPSs, not considering saliva as a possible alternative matrix. For this reason, in this study, we used, in parallel, saliva and NPS samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time RT-PCR in patients receiving Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab, Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, or Sotrovimab as a treatment against SARS-CoV-2. Our results showed a good correlation between the NPS and saliva samples for each drug; moreover, comparable changes in the cycle threshold (Ct) levels in saliva and NPSs were observed both 7 days and 30 days after treatment, thus confirming that the saliva represents a good matrix for in vivo follow-up studies verifying the effectiveness of treatments against SARS-CoV-2.

ACE2 decoy Fc-fusions and bi-specific killer engager (BiKEs) require Fc engagement for in vivo efficacy against SARS-CoV-2

SARS-CoV-2 virus has continued to evolve over time necessitating the adaptation of vaccines to maintain efficacy. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 were a key line of defense for unvaccinated or immunocompromised individuals. However, these mAbs are now ineffective against current SARS-CoV-2 variants. Here, we tested three aspects of αSARS-CoV-2 therapeutics. First, we tested whether Fc engagement is necessary for in vivo clearance of SARS-CoV-2. Secondly, we tested bi-specific killer engagers (BiKEs) that simultaneously engage SARS-CoV-2 and a specific Fc receptor. Benefits of these engagers include the ease of manufacturing, stability, more cell-specific targeting, and high affinity binding to Fc receptors. Using both mAbs and BiKEs, we found that both neutralization and Fc receptor engagement were necessary for effective SARS-CoV-2 clearance. Thirdly, due to ACE2 being necessary for viral entry, ACE2 will maintain binding to SARS-CoV-2 despite viral evolution. Therefore, we used an ACE2 decoy Fc-fusion or BiKE, instead of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody sequence, as a potential therapeutic that would withstand viral evolution. We found that the ACE2 decoy approach also required Fc receptor engagement and, unlike traditional neutralizing antibodies against specific variants, enabled the clearance of two distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants. These data show the importance of Fc engagement for mAbs, the utility of BiKEs as therapies for infectious disease, and the in vivo effectiveness of the ACE2 decoy approach. With further studies, we predict combining neutralization, the cellular response, and this ACE2 decoy approach will benefit individuals with ineffective antibody levels.

Abbreviations

ACE2, scFv, mAb, BiKE, COVID-19, Fc, CD16, CD32b, CD64, d.p.i.

Key points

With equal dosing, both neutralization and Fc engagement are necessary for the optimal efficacy of in vivo antibodies and bi-specific killer engagers (BiKEs) against SARS-CoV-2. BiKEs can clear SARS-CoV-2 virus and protect against severe infection in the hACE2-K18 mouse model. ACE2 decoys as part of Fc-fusions or BiKEs provide in vivo clearance of two disparate SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Efficacy and safety of tixagevimab/cilgavimab as passive immunisation against COVID-19 infections in patients with hematological malignancies

Monoclonal antibodies, as tixagevimab/cilgavimab, have been introduced as prophylaxis against COVID-19 infections in high-risk populations. However, data on efficacy are limited. This study investigates efficacy and tolerability of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in hematological patients under real-life conditions. Tixagevimab/cilgavimab was administered to 155 hematological patients (March-August 2022) at two Austrian centres. S/RBD-antibody assessments were performed before (T0), four weeks (T1), and six months (T2) after application. Side effects, the occurrence of COVID-19 infections, and the course of S/RBD-antibody titres were analysed retrospectively in relation to clinical variables. 155 hematological patients, who refused tixagevimab/cilgavimab, were included as a control group to compare the frequency of COVID-19 infections. Of all immunised patients (52.3% males; 91% triple vaccinated), 25.8% had a COVID-19 breakthrough infection (76% mild) compared to 43.9% in the control group. Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL)/lymphoma were at highest risk of a COVID-19 infection (OR = 2.21; 95% CI 1.05-4.65; p = 0.037). After immunisation, a steep increase in median antibody levels (1193.4BAU/ml, IQR 0-2318.94) was observed in 67.8%, followed by a rapid decrease between T1 and T2 (465.95BAU/ml, IQR 0-1900.65.3) with the greatest declines in CLL/lymphoma (848.7BAU/ml, IQR 0-1949.6, p = 0.026). Side-effects occurred in 21.2% (CTCAE I/II). These real-world data indicate that S/RBD antibodies respond rapidly after passive immunisation in all hematological patients without safety concerns. Given the rapid decline in S/RBD antibodies, early booster immunisations should be considered for future scenarios in this vulnerable group.

Management of vaccinations in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Vaccinations are fundamental tools in preventing infectious diseases, especially in immunocompromised patients like those affected by non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). The COVID-19 pandemic made clinicians increasingly aware of the importance of vaccinations in preventing potential life-threatening SARS-CoV-2-related complications in NHL patients. However, several studies have confirmed a significant reduction in vaccine-induced immune responses after anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment, thus underscoring the need for refined immunization strategies in NHL patients. In this review, we summarize the existing data about COVID-19 and other vaccine's efficacy in patients with NHL and propose multidisciplinary team-based recommendations for the management of vaccines in this specific group of patients.

Decoding the historical tale: COVID-19 impact on haematological malignancy patients-EPICOVIDEHA insights from 2020 to 2022

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic heightened risks for individuals with hematological malignancies due to compromised immune systems, leading to more severe outcomes and increased mortality. While interventions like vaccines, targeted antivirals, and monoclonal antibodies have been effective for the general population, their benefits for these patients may not be as pronounced.

Methods

The EPICOVIDEHA registry (National Clinical Trials Identifier, NCT04733729) gathers COVID-19 data from hematological malignancy patients since the pandemic's start worldwide. It spans various global locations, allowing comprehensive analysis over the first three years (2020-2022).

Findings

The EPICOVIDEHA registry collected data from January 2020 to December 2022, involving 8767 COVID-19 cases in hematological malignancy patients from 152 centers across 41 countries, with 42% being female. Over this period, there was a significant reduction in critical infections and an overall decrease in mortality from 29% to 4%. However, hospitalization, particularly in the ICU, remained associated with higher mortality rates. Factors contributing to increased mortality included age, multiple comorbidities, active malignancy at COVID-19 onset, pulmonary symptoms, and hospitalization. On the positive side, vaccination with one to two doses or three or more doses, as well as encountering COVID-19 in 2022, were associated with improved survival.

Interpretation

Patients with hematological malignancies still face elevated risks, despite reductions in critical infections and overall mortality rates over time. Hospitalization, especially in ICUs, remains a significant concern. The study underscores the importance of vaccination and the timing of COVID-19 exposure in 2022 for enhanced survival in this patient group. Ongoing monitoring and targeted interventions are essential to support this vulnerable population, emphasizing the critical role of timely diagnosis and prompt treatment in preventing severe COVID-19 cases.

Funding

Not applicable.

Improving the safety of CAR-T-cell therapy: The risk and prevention of viral infection for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma undergoing CAR-T-cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, an innovative immunotherapeutic against relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma, faces challenges due to frequent viral infections. Despite this, a comprehensive review addressing risk assessment, surveillance, and treatment management is notably absent. This review elucidates immune response compromises during viral infections in CAR-T recipients, collates susceptibility risk factors, and deliberates on preventive strategies. In the post-pandemic era, marked by the Omicron variant, new and severe threats to CAR-T therapy emerge, necessitating exploration of preventive and treatment measures for COVID-19. Overall, the review provides recommendations for viral infection prophylaxis and management, enhancing CAR-T product safety and recipient survival.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy after COVID-19 in refractory high-grade B-cell lymphoma

Although chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies have dramatically improved the outcomes of relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies, recipients suffer from severe humoral immunodeficiencies. Furthermore, patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a poor prognosis, as noted in several case reports of recipients who had COVID-19 before the infusion. We report the case of a 70-year-old woman who developed COVID-19 immediately before CAR-T therapy for high-grade B-cell lymphoma. She received Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab chemotherapy and radiation therapy but never achieved remission. She was transferred to our hospital for CAR-T therapy, but developed COVID-19. Her symptoms were mild and she was treated with long-term molnupiravir. On day 28 post-infection, lymphodepleting chemotherapy was restarted after a negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was confirmed. The patient did not experience recurrence of COVID-19 symptoms or severe cytokine release syndrome. Based on the analysis and comparison of the previous reports with this case, we believe that CAR-T therapy should be postponed until a negative PCR test is confirmed. In addition, Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab and long term direct-acting antiviral agent treatment can be effective prophylaxis for severe COVID-19 and shortening the duration of infection.

Effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in patients with hematological malignancies as a pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent severe COVID-19: a Czech retrospective multicenter study

Despite lower virulence, the omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) still poses a relevant threat for immunocompromised patients. A retrospective multicentric study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) with a 6-month follow-up for preventing severe COVID-19 in adult patients with hematology malignancy. Among the 606 patients in the cohort, 96 (16%) contracted COVID-19 with a median of 98.5 days after Evusheld administration. A total of 75% of patients had asymptomatic or mild severity of COVID-19, while just 25% of patients with SARS-CoV-2 positivity had to be hospitalized. Two patients (2%) died directly, and one patient (1%) in association with COVID-19. Eight patients (1.3%) of every cohort experienced adverse events related to Evusheld, mostly grade 1 and of reversible character. It was found that complete vaccination status or positive seroconversion was not associated with lower risk of COVID-19 infection. Previous treatment with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody was associated with higher rates of COVID-19, while previous treatment with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody was not, as was the case for recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or CAR-T cell therapy. Presence of other comorbidities was not associated with more severe COVID-19. The results support the growing evidence for Evusheld's efficacy against severe COVID-19 in patients with hematology malignancies.

Efficacy of Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab as Immunoprophylaxis in Patients With Hematologic Cancer

This cohort study compares outcomes for patients with hematologic malignant tumors who prophylactically received tixagevimab-cilgavimab against SARS-CoV-2 with those who did not.

Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab: Still a Valid Prophylaxis against COVID-19 New Variants?

BACKGROUND

this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld™) against various SARS-CoV-2 variants, including newer Omicron sublineages, in an immunocompromised cohort and in vitro.

STUDY DESIGN

Conducted in Italy, this research involves immunocompromised patients who received Evusheld. It evaluates serum neutralization activity against different SARS-CoV-2 strains (20A.EU1, BA.5, BQ.1, XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, and EG.5) before (T0), after 14 (T1), and after 30 (T2) days from the tixagevimab/cilgavimab injection. Furthermore, the in vitro activity of Evusheld against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs was evaluated.

RESULTS

The cohort was composed of 72 immunocompromised patients. The serum neutralizing activity of tixagevimab/cilgavimab-treated patients was notably lower against newer variants such as BQ.1, XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, and EG.5. Then, the in vitro study detailed specific EC50 values to quantify the activity of tixagevimab/cilgavimab against various SARS-CoV-2 VOCs. Newer variants like BQ.1 and XBB.1.5 exhibited notably lower neutralization, underscoring the challenges in effectively countering the evolving virus. Interestingly, tixagevimab/cilgavimab maintained reduced but still valid activity against EG.5 with an EC50 of 189 ng/mL and Cmax/EC90 of 110.7.

CONCLUSIONS

Tixagevimab/cilgavimab efficacy wanes against novel subvariants. This underscores the critical need for ongoing adaptation and vigilance in prophylactic strategies to effectively counter the dynamic and unpredictable nature of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Efficacy and safety of tixagevimab-cilgavimab versus SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection in the hematological conditions

BACKGROUND

Managing SARS-CoV-2 infection in frail and immunosuppressed patients still represents an open challenge, but, starting from the phase 3 PROVENT study, prophylaxis with tixagevimab-cilgavimab has improved the approach in this category of patients, guaranteeing a better outcome and inferior mortality. Real-life data in a heterogeneous cohort are few.

METHODS

The aim of this study is to evaluate the benefit of prophylaxis with tixagevimab-cilgavimab in a cohort of 202 patients affected by different hematological diseases (lymphoproliferative, myeloproliferative, autoimmune, patients recently receiving a bone marrow transplant), active (with ongoing treatment), or in watch-and-wait strategy, followed in our center, during a median follow-up of 249 (45-325) days.

RESULTS

An incidence of 44 breakthrough infections (21.8%) is reported, with no treatment-related adverse effects. Age ≥70 years, ongoing treatment (above all with monoclonal antibodies), baseline lymphoproliferative disorders, and prior virus exposure are identified as risk factors related to subsequent infection (p < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence is higher in low/nonresponse to prior vaccination (p = .002). Patients treated with tixagevimab-cilgavimab had a mild course of the infection and a reduction of the duration compared with preprophylaxis infection (11 vs. 15 days, p < .001). The concurrent treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma still confers a higher duration of infection despite prophylaxis. No deaths attributable to the infection occurred.

CONCLUSION

Prophylaxis treatment seems to be a valid and safe strategy, although not preventing breakthrough infection, but the severe complications associated with the infection and the possible delays in administering lifesaving therapies from long positivity.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the Omicron BA.5 wave at a single institution in Japan

Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab was considered a useful strategy to protect immunocompromised patients from COVID-19 based on the phase 3 PROVENT trial conducted between November 2020 and March 2021. However, after late 2021, the dominant substrains of COVID-19 changed to Omicron substrains, which showed resistance to tixagevimab/cilgavimab. Therefore, it is important to re-evaluate the real-world efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab for the prevention of COVID-19 in the Omicron era. To this end, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of tixagevimab/cilgavimab prophylaxis for COVID-19 during the Omicron BA.5 wave in Japan. A total of 240 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies received tixagevimab/cilgavimab at our institution from October 18, 2022, to January 31, 2023. Among them, the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 at 90 days was 6.4%. A total of 10/14 (71.4%) had mild infection, and 4/14 (28.5%) had severe infection. No patient died due to COVID-19. Adverse events consisted of deep vein thrombosis in 2 patients. Our analysis indicated that pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab might have clinical effectiveness in reducing the severity of COVID-19 in Japanese HM patients, even in the Omicron BA.5 surge. It also suggested that tixagevimab/cilgavimab may be associated with cardiovascular complications.

Impact of Sars-CoV-2 Prophylaxis with Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab in High-Risk Patients with B-Cell Malignancies: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection can result in different clinical manifestations (COVID-19), starting from asymptomatic disease to life threatening respiratory insufficiency. Onco-haematologic patients are at higher risk to develop severe COVID-19. In particular, patients affected by lymphoproliferative diseases, given the impaired cell-mediated and antibody-mediated immunity and treatment toxicity, develop more often a symptomatic and a more serious disease of Covid-19. Various therapeutic and prophylactic agents are being used against COVID‐19 such as antiviral drugs, vaccines and antiviral S‐protein monoclonal antibodies. Pre-exposure prophylaxis with AZD442/Evusheld (tixagevimab-cilgavimab) may be a complementary strategy to decrease the incidence or severity of COVID-19 for patients with B-cell malignancies. Tixagevimab-cilgavimab is a combination of two monoclonal antibodies that bind SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and inhibits the attachment to the surface of cells, preventing viral entry in the cell and COVID-19 development. In the setting of hematology real-life, few data are available on the impact of pre-exposure prophylaxis, given the multiple factors involved in the clinical behavior of SARS-CoV-2 . Our aim was to evaluate the clinical benefit and the safety of this strategy at our center.

Tixagevimab and cilgavimab use in Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder during anti-CD20 treatment: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

B-cell-depleting treatments, such as ocrelizumab and rituximab (anti-CD20), reduce humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 in people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) and are associated with an increased risk of a more severe course of COVID-19 disease. The combination of tixagevimab and cilgavimab was authorized for COVID-19 prevention in immunocompromised subjects at high risk of severe COVID-19 disease, including patients treated with anti-CD20. Few real-world studies are available regarding the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in pwMS/NMOSD. In the present study, we describe the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab for SARS-CoV-2 pre-exposure prophylaxis in a cohort of pwMS and NMOSD, treated with ocrelizumab and rituximab respectively.

METHODS

26 subjects were treated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab, while we used 18 patients as the control group. We collected clinical data at baseline in all patients and during scheduled follow up evaluations. SARS-CoV-2 serological status pre- and post-tixagevimab/cilgavimab treatment was available for 10 patients.

RESULTS

We observed no adverse events following tixagevimab/cilgavimab treatment. Post-tixagevimab/cilgavimab anti-Spike-1-RBD IgG were significantly higher when compared to baseline values. No difference was found when comparing the percentage of COVID-19 infections between groups. All patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 had mild disease which did not require hospitalization. In patients treated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab, the rate of infection among patients exposed to SARS-CoV-2 was lower, without reaching statistical significance. We observed a significantly longer negativization time in the treated group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are not consistent with what was observed in the registration trial and some more recent studies. We did not observe a difference in COVID-19 incidence nor in disease severity in MS and NMOSD between treated and untreated patients. Our different results may be partially explained by the change in SARS-CoV-2 variants epidemiology (i.e. reduced efficacy of tixagevimab and cilgavimab against the currently dominant variants) as well as different patient selection included in the trial and different dose of tixagevimab/cilgavimab used in other studies. The present report provides a real-life experience with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in pwMS and NMOSD treated with anti-CD20, with findings that are in line with the current SARS-CoV-2 epidemiology and the recent evidence regarding SARS-CoV-2 variants. Our results warrant further research to best treat patients in the present and future pandemic scenario.

COVID-19 in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: What Have We Learned?

BACKGROUND

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a prevalent hematological malignancy (HM) characterized by inherent immunodeficiency, which is further pronounced by disease-directed therapy. The COVID-19 pandemic has had devastating outcomes, and although its impact has diminished over time, it continues to be a cause of significant morbidity and mortality, particularly among immunodeficient patients.

SUMMARY

In this review, we describe mechanisms of immune dysfunction in CLL in relation to COVID-19, provide an overview of the clinical outcomes of the disease in this patient population, and identify risk factors associated with severe morbidity and mortality. Additionally, we acknowledge the influence of the rapidly evolving landscape of new disease variants. The review further delineates the humoral and cellular responses to vaccination and their clinical efficacy in preventing COVID-19 in CLL patients. Moreover, we explore potential approaches to enhance these immune responses. Pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis strategies are discussed, along with description of common agents in the treatment of the disease in both outpatient and inpatient setting. Throughout the review, we emphasize the interplay between novel therapies for CLL and COVID-19 outcomes, prevention, and treatment and describe the impact of COVID-19 on the utilization of these novel agents. This information has the potential to guide clinical decision making in the management CLL patients.

KEY MESSAGES

CLL patients are at risk for severe COVID-19 infection. Vaccinations and COVID-19 directed therapy have improved outcomes in patients with CLL, yet clinical challenges persist.

Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis against COVID-19 for Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Prospective Study in the Omicron Era

Background: tixagevimab/cilgavimab, distributed under the name "Evusheld", was the first available pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 other than vaccination. It received an EUA from the FDA after sufficient trial data showed efficacy in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections and subsequent severe disease. Its potential benefits for high-risk immunocompromised patients generated a lot of interest. Individuals with multiple myeloma fall into this category, as they are characterized by attenuated immune responses and, in some cases, vaccines have limited efficacy. Methods: this single-center, prospective study included consecutive patients with multiple myeloma. All individuals were considered high-risk for COVID-19 due to their underlying disease. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as data regarding COVID-19 infection and antibodies, were collected. Patients were administered two intramuscular 150 mg doses of Evusheld and were monitored during the follow-up period. Results: one hundred and eleven multiple myeloma patients were included in this analysis, with a median age of 64 years (range 58-69) and fifty-three were females (47.7%). Fourteen patients (12.6%) had a prior history of COVID-19 and all patients were vaccinated with either three or four doses of mRNA-based vaccines. An increase was observed in the median neutralizing-antibody levels before and after tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration, from 92.6% to 97.3%. The high levels were sustainable, with a median neutralizing-antibody level of 95.4% at 3 months post Evusheld administration. Overall, nine patients (8.1%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 during the follow-up period, at a median of 31 days. There were no SARS-CoV-2- infection-related hospitalizations or deaths. The monoclonal antibody combination was well tolerated, with no infusion-related reactions or major adverse events, and pain at the injection site only was reported by 33 patients (30%). Conclusions: tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) seemed beneficial for patients with multiple myeloma, who presented high neutralizing-antibody levels and a low incidence of COVID-19 during the initial Omicron wave. No new safety concerns emerged. However, novel combinations of monoclonal antibodies against the new circulating variants of SARS-CoV-2 are deemed necessary in view of the emergence of immune tolerance.

Response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination evaluated by B-cell receptor repertoire after tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration

The use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody products like tixagevimab/cilgavimab represents an important strategy to protect immunocompromised patients with haematological malignancies from COVID-19. Although patients who receive these agents should still be vaccinated, the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab can mask the production of anti-spike antibody after vaccination, making it hard to assess vaccine response. We have newly established a quantification method to assess the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination at the mRNA level using B-cell receptor (BCR) repertoire assay and the Coronavirus Antibody Database (CoV-AbDab). Repeated blood samples before and after vaccination were analysed for the BCR repertoire, and BCR sequences were searched in the database. We analysed the number and percentage frequency of matched sequences. We found that the number of matched sequences increased 2 weeks after the first vaccination and quickly decreased. Meanwhile, the number of matched sequences more rapidly increased after the second vaccination. These results show that the postvaccine immune response can be assessed at the mRNA level by analysing the fluctuation in matching sequences. Finally, BCR repertoire analysis with CoV-AbDab clearly demonstrated the response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination even after tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration in haematological malignancy patients who underwent allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Immune Dysfunction and Infection - Interaction between CLL and Treatment: A Reflection on Current Treatment Paradigms and Unmet Needs

BACKGROUND

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a hematological malignancy characterized by immune dysfunction, which significantly contributes to increased morbidity and mortality due to infections.

SUMMARY

Advancement in therapeutic strategies based on combination chemoimmunotherapy and targeted treatment have increased life expectancy for patients affected by CLL. However, mortality and morbidity due to infection showed no improvement over the last decades. Although therapy options are highly efficient in targeting leukemic cells, several studies highlighted the interactions of different treatments with the tumor microenvironment immune components, significantly impacting their clinical efficacy and fostering increased risk of infections.

KEY MESSAGES

Given the profound immune dysfunction caused by CLL itself, treatment can thus represent a double-edged sword. Thus, it is essential to increase our understanding and awareness on how conventional therapies affect the disease-microenvironment-infection axis to ensure the best personalized strategy for each patient. This requires careful consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of efficient treatments, whether chemoimmunotherapy or targeted combinations, leading to risk of infectious complications. To this regard, our machine learning-based algorithm CLL Treatment-Infection Model, currently implemented into the local electronic health record system for Eastern Denmark, aims at early identification of patients at high risk of serious infections (PreVent-ACaLL; NCT03868722). We here review strategies for management of immune dysfunction and infections in CLL.

Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as pre-exposure prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with hematological malignancies

The approved combination of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab has been shown to decrease the rate of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients at increased risk of inadequate response to vaccination. However, Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab was tested in a few studies that included patients with hematological malignancies, even if this population has shown an increased risk of unfavorable outcomes following infection (with high rates of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and mortality) and poor significant immunization following vaccines. We performed a real-life prospective cohort study to evaluate the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection following pre-exposure prophylaxis with Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab in anti-spike seronegative patients compared to a cohort of seropositive patients who were observed or received a fourth vaccine dose. We recruited 103 patients with a mean age of 67 years: 35 (34%) received Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab and were followed from March 17, 2022, until November 15, 2022. After a median follow-up of 4.24 months, the 3-month cumulative incidence of infection was 20% versus 12% in the Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab and observation/vaccine groups respectively (HR 1.57; 95% CI: 0.65-3.56; p = 0.34). In this study, we report our experience with Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab and a tailored approach to SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention in patients with hematological malignancies during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron surge.

Cancer and COVID-19: unravelling the immunological interplay with a review of promising therapies against severe SARS-CoV-2 for cancer patients

Cancer patients, due to their immunocompromised status, are at an increased risk for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Since severe SARS-CoV-2 infection causes multiple organ damage through IL-6-mediated inflammation while stimulating hypoxia, and malignancy promotes hypoxia-induced cellular metabolic alterations leading to cell death, we propose a mechanistic interplay between both conditions that results in an upregulation of IL-6 secretion resulting in enhanced cytokine production and systemic injury. Hypoxia mediated by both conditions results in cell necrosis, dysregulation of oxidative phosphorylation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. This produces free radicals and cytokines that result in systemic inflammatory injury. Hypoxia also catalyzes the breakdown of COX-1 and 2 resulting in bronchoconstriction and pulmonary edema, which further exacerbates tissue hypoxia. Given this disease model, therapeutic options are currently being studied against severe SARS-COV-2. In this study, we review several promising therapies against severe disease supported by clinical trial evidence-including Allocetra, monoclonal antibodies (Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab), peginterferon lambda, Baricitinib, Remdesivir, Sarilumab, Tocilizumab, Anakinra, Bevacizumab, exosomes, and mesenchymal stem cells. Due to the virus's rapid adaptive evolution and diverse symptomatic manifestation, the use of combination therapies offers a promising approach to decrease systemic injury. By investing in such targeted interventions, cases of severe SARS-CoV-2 should decrease along with its associated long-term sequelae and thereby allow cancer patients to resume their treatments.

Passive pre-exposure immunization by tixagevimab/cilgavimab in patients with hematological malignancy and COVID-19: matched-paired analysis in the EPICOVIDEHA registry

Only few studies have analyzed the efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab to prevent severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and related complications in hematologic malignancies (HM) patients. Here, we report cases of breakthrough COVID-19 after prophylactic tixagevimab/cilgavimab from the EPICOVIDEHA registry). We identified 47 patients that had received prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in the EPICOVIDEHA registry. Lymphoproliferative disorders (44/47, 93.6%) were the main underlying HM. SARS-CoV-2 strains were genotyped in 7 (14.9%) cases only, and all belonged to the omicron variant. Forty (85.1%) patients had received vaccinations prior to tixagevimab/cilgavimab, the majority of them with at least two doses. Eleven (23.4%) patients had a mild SARS-CoV-2 infection, 21 (44.7%) a moderate infection, while 8 (17.0%) had severe infection and 2 (4.3%) critical. Thirty-six (76.6%) patients were treated, either with monoclonal antibodies, antivirals, corticosteroids, or with combination schemes. Overall, 10 (21.3%) were admitted to a hospital. Among these, two (4.3%) were transferred to intensive care unit and one (2.1%) of them died. Our data seem to show that the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab may lead to a COVID-19 severity reduction in HM patients; however, further studies should incorporate further HM patients to confirm the best drug administration strategies in immunocompromised patients.

Clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infections occurring in multiple myeloma patients after vaccination and prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab

Introduction

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) frequently reported immune impairment with an increased risk for infection-related mortality. We aimed to evaluate the immune response in MM patients vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 during active treatment.

Methods

We enrolled 158 patients affected by active MM or smoldering MM (SMM) and 40 healthy subjects. All subjects received 2 or 3 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) vaccine, and the anti-spike IgG values were evaluated after every dose. We applied the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) as a consequence of the limited sample size and its heterogeneity to adjust for differences in baseline clinical variables between MM patients who achieved or not a vaccine response after 2 or 3 doses.

Results

At 30 days from the second dose, the median antibodies level in MM was 25.2 AU/mL, lower than in SMM and in the control group. The same results were confirmed after the third dose, with lower median anti-spike IgG levels in MM, compared to SMM and control group. Following PSM, lack of response to SARS-CoV-2 complete vaccination plus boost was associated with age more than 70 years old and use of high-dose of steroids. We failed to identify an association between specific treatment types and reduced vaccine response. The use of prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab for 40 non-responder patients after 3 doses of vaccine has proven to be an effective and safe approach in reducing the risk of serious illness in the event of a breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection, faced with a mild symptomatic course, and in providing protection instead of long-term humoral immune vaccine responses. Following PSM, only the high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were associated with an increased risk of developing a breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Conclusion

Monitoring the immune response is fundamental in MM patients that remain highly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 despite the vaccine. The use of prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab can guarantee better protection from the severe form of the disease.

Newly approved and forthcoming T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE

Summarize the background, clinical trials, and place in therapy for the newly Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved and forthcoming bispecific antibodies for relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the PubMed database was conducted using the following search terms: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), teclistamab, myeloma, BsAbs, GPRC5D, and bispecific. Ongoing clinical trials as well as abstracts from ASH and ASCO evaluating the efficacy and safety of novel agents were evaluated. Prescribing information was also reviewed.

SUMMARY

For patients with R/R multiple myeloma who have failed available therapies, treatment options are limited and survival is short. The FDA recently approved teclistamab, a T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibody, in patients with R/R multiple myeloma who have failed four prior lines of therapy. Teclistamab targets both CD3 expressed on T-cells and BCMA expressed on the surface of myeloma cells, mediating T-cell activation and lysis of plasma cells that express BCMA. Accelerated approval was granted based upon the results of the MajesTEC-1 study, which showed a durable response in a high proportion of heavily pretreated patients. Teclistamab is the first bispecific antibody approved for use in patients with multiple myeloma and the fourth approved agent targeting BCMA. Additional T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies for use in multiple myeloma are also currently being studied.

CONCLUSION

Teclistamab is the newest agent granted FDA approval for use in R/R multiple myeloma and represents a promising new option for patients. Ongoing trials are investigating teclistamab and other novel bispecific antibodies in the upfront and R/R setting.

Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld™) Prophylaxis Prevents Breakthrough COVID-19 Infections in Immunosuppressed Population: 6-Month Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Persons with neuroinflammatory diseases (pwNID) treated with potent immunosuppressives are at risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes and reduced vaccine seroconversion. We aimed at determining the real-world efficacy of tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld™) in immunosuppressed pwNID in preventing breakthrough COVID-19 infections.

METHODS

31 immunosuppressed pwNID were followed for 6 months after administration of tixagevimab and cilgavimab as a prophylactic COVID-19 medication (January 2022-July 2022). Only pwNID treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators were considered eligible for the study. A control group of 126 immunosuppressed pwNID (38 seropositive and 88 seronegative after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination) were included. Breakthrough COVID-19 infections rate and their severity was determined over the follow-up.

RESULTS

The pwNID treated with tixagevimab and cilgavimab had more comorbidities when compared with the total and seronegative pwNID control group (54.8% vs. 30.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.02 and p = 0.005, respectively). After a 6-month follow-up, significantly lower numbers of pwNID treated with tixagevimab and cilgavimab had breakthrough COVID-19 when compared with the control pwNID group (6.5% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.002) and seronegative control pwNID group (6.5% vs. 38.6%, p < 0.001). All COVID-19 infections in Evusheld-treated pwNID were mild, whereas 9/43 COVID-19 infections in the control group were moderate/severe. No side effects to tixagevimab and cilgavimab were recorded.

CONCLUSION

In pwNID treated with immunosuppressive therapies, tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld™) significantly reduced the numbers and severity of breakthrough COVID-19 infections during the Omicron (BA.2-BA.5 variants) wave.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the COVID-19 era

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients are especially vulnerable to coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), because of their profound immunodeficiency. Indeed, the first pandemic wave was marked by a high mortality rate in this population. Factors increasing immunodepression such as older age, immunosuppressive treatments or a short delay between transplant and infection appear to worsen the prognosis. Many changes in clinical practice had to be implemented in order to limit this risk, including postponing of transplant for non-malignant diseases, preference for local rather than international donations and for peripheral blood as stem cell source, and the widespread use of cryopreservation. The great revolution in the COVID-19 pandemic came from the development of mRNA vaccines that have shown to be able to prevent severe forms of the disease. More than 75% of allo-HSCT recipients develop seroconversion after 2 doses of vaccine. Multiple studies have identified lymphopenia, exposure to immunosuppressive or anti-CD20 therapies, and a short post-transplant period as factors associated with a poor response to vaccination. The use of repeated injections of the vaccine, including a third dose, not only improves the seroconversion rate but also intensifies the immune response, both in B cells and T cells. Vaccines are an effective and well-tolerated method in this high-risk population. Some studies investigated the possibility of immune protection being transferred from a vaccinated donor to a recipient, with encouraging initial results. However, dynamic mutations and immune escape of the virus can lead to breakthrough infections with new variants in vaccinated individuals and still represent a threat of severe disease in allo-HSCT recipients. New challenges include the need to adapt vaccine protection to emerging variants.

Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab in SARS-CoV-2 Prophylaxis and Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Experience

Effective treatments and vaccines against COVID-19 used in clinical practice have made a positive impact on controlling the spread of the pandemic, where they are available. Nevertheless, even if fully vaccinated, immunocompromised patients still remain at high risk of adverse outcomes. This has driven the largely expanding field of monoclonal antibodies, with variable results. Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab (AZD7442), a long-acting antibody combination that inhibits the attachment of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to the surface of cells, has proved promising in reducing the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 or death in high-risk individuals without major adverse events when given as prophylaxis, as well as early treatment. Real-world data confirm the antibody combination's prophylaxis efficacy in lowering the incidence, hospitalization, and mortality associated with COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients, patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and hematological malignancies, and patients in B-cell-depleting therapies. Data suggest a difference in neutralization efficiency between the SARS-CoV-2 subtypes in favor of the BA.2 over the BA.1. In treating COVID-19, AZD7442 showed a significant reduction in severe COVID-19 cases and mortality when given early in the course of disease, and within 5 days of symptom onset, without being associated with severe adverse events, even when it is used in addition to standard care. The possibility of the development of spike-protein mutations that resist monoclonal antibodies has been reported; therefore, increased vigilance is required in view of the evolving variants. AZD7442 may be a powerful ally in preventing COVID-19 and the mortality associated with it in high-risk individuals. Further research is required to include more high-risk groups and assess the concerns limiting its use, along the SARS-CoV-2 evolutionary trajectory.

Efficacy and Safety of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab to Prevent COVID-19 (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TGM/CGM) are neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against different epitopes of the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that have been considered as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Objectives: This study seeks to assess the efficacy and safety of TGM/CGM to prevent COVID-19 in patients at high risk for breakthrough and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection who never benefited maximally from SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and for those who have a contraindication to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Design: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed. Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, medRxiv, ProQuest, Wiley online library, Medline, and Nature) were searched from 1 December 2021 to 30 November 2022 in the English language using the following keywords alone or in combination: 2019-nCoV, 2019 novel coronavirus, COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019, SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, tixagevimab, cilgavimab, combination, monoclonal, passive, immunization, antibody, efficacy, clinical trial, cohort, pre-exposure, prophylaxis, and prevention. We included studies in moderate to severe immunocompromised adults (aged ≥18 years) and children (aged ≥12 years) who cannot be vaccinated against COVID-19 or may have an inadequate response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The effect sizes of the outcome of measures were pooled with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and risk ratios (RRs). Results: Of the 76 papers that were identified, 30 articles were included in the qualitative analysis and 13 articles were included in the quantitative analysis (23 cohorts, 5 case series, 1 care report, and 1 randomized clinical trial). Studies involving 27,932 patients with high risk for breakthrough and severe COVID-19 that reported use of TGM/CGM combination were analyzed (all were adults (100%), 62.8% were men, and patients were mainly immunocompromised (66.6%)). The patients’ ages ranged from 19.7 years to 79.8 years across studies. TGM/CGM use was associated with lower COVID-19-related hospitalization rate (0.54% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.27), lower ICU admission rate (0.6% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.68), lower mortality rate (0.2% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.67), higher neutralization of COVID-19 Omicron variant rate (12.9% vs. 6%, p = 0.60), lower proportion of patients who needed oxygen therapy (8% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.27), lower RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate (2.1% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.01), lower proportion of patients who had severe COVID-19 (0% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.79), lower proportion of patients who had symptomatic COVID-19 (1.8% vs. 6%, p = 0.22), and higher adverse effects rate (11.1% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.0066) than no treatment or other alternative treatment in the prevention of COVID-19. Conclusion: For PrEP, TGM/CGM-based treatment can be associated with a better clinical outcome than no treatment or other alternative treatment. However, more randomized control trials are warranted to confirm our findings and investigate the efficacy and safety of TGM/CGM to prevent COVID-19 in patients at risk for breakthrough or severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.