Clinical outcomes of older patients with AML receiving hypomethylating agents: a large population-based study in the United States

Treatment challenges and outcomes of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia from India

Globally, overall survival (OS) of older patients with AML continues to be suboptimal with very little data from India. In a multicenter registry analysis, we evaluated 712 patients with AML older than 55 years. Only 323 (45.3%) underwent further treatment, of which 239 (74%) received HMAs, and 60 (18%) received intensive chemotherapy (IC). CR was documented in 39% of those receiving IC and 42% after HMAs. Overall, 100 (31%) patients died within 60 days of diagnosis, most commonly due to progressive disease (47%) or infections (30%). After a median follow-up of 176 days, 228 (76%) of patients had discontinued treatment. At one year from diagnosis, 211 (65%) patients had died, and the median OS was 186 days (IQR, 137-234). Only 12 (3.7%) patients underwent stem cell transplantation. Survival was significantly lower for those older than 60 years (p < 0.001). Patients who died had a higher median age (p = .027) and baseline WBC counts (p = .006). Our data highlights suboptimal outcomes in older AML patients, which are evident from 55 years of age onwards, making it necessary to evaluate HMA and targeted agent combinations along with novel consolidation strategies to improve survival in this high-risk population.

Survival of adult AML patients treated with chemotherapy in the U.S. population by age, race and ethnicity, sex, calendar-year period, and AML subgroup, 2001-2019

Background

Population-based survival studies of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have not simultaneously evaluated age at diagnosis, race and ethnicity, sex, calendar period or AML subtypes/subgroups among chemotherapy-treated patients.

Methods

For 28,473 chemotherapy-treated AML patients diagnosed at ages ≥20 years in population-based cancer registry areas of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (2001-2018, followed through 2019), we evaluated 1-month through 5-year relative survival (RS) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using the actuarial method in the SEER∗Stat Survival Session and overall survival (OS) using multivariable Cox regression to estimate proportional hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI.

Findings

RS decreased with increasing age (20-39, 40-59, 60-74, 75-84, ≥85 years) at AML diagnosis. RS declined substantially within the first month and, except for acute promyelocytic leukemia, decreasing patterns continued thereafter for core binding factor AML, AML with antecedent condition/therapy, and all other AML. For all ages, acute promyelocytic leukemia RS stabilized after the first year. For total AML the hazard of death was significantly increased for non-Hispanic (NH)-Black (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.12-1.24) and NH-Pacific Islander patients (HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.11-1.55) compared with NH-White patients. In contrast, NH-Asian and Hispanic patients had similar OS to NH-White patients across all ages and most AML subgroups. Males had significantly inferior survival to females with some exceptions. Compared to 2001-2006, in 2013-2018 OS improved for all age and AML subgroups.

Interpretation

Chemotherapy-treated U.S. adults with AML have notable differences in survival by age, race and ethnicity, sex, calendar-year period, and AML subgroup. Despite survival gains over time, our findings highlight the need for improving early outcomes across all AML subgroups, older ages, and Black and Pacific Islander patients and long-term outcomes among most treated groups.

Funding

Intramural Research Program of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology.

Cellular therapies in older adults with hematological malignancies: A case-based, state-of-the-art review

Cellular therapies, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), and chimeric antigen receptor- (CAR-) T cell therapies are essential treatment modalities for many hematological malignancies. Although their use in older adults has substantially increased within the past decades, cellular therapies represent intensive treatment approaches that exclude a large percentage of older adults due to comorbidities and frailty. Under- and overtreatment in older adults with hematologic malignancy is a challenge and many treatment decisions are influenced by chronologic age. The advent of efficient and well-tolerated newer treatment approaches for multiple myeloma has challenged the role of ASCT. In the modern era, there are no randomized clinical trials of transplant versus non-transplant strategies for patients ≥65 years. Nonetheless, ASCT is feasible for selected older patients and does not result in long-term compromise in quality of life. AlloHCT is the only curative approach for acute myeloid leukemia of intermediate and unfavourable risk but carries a significant risk for non-relapse mortality depending on comorbidities, general fitness, and transplant-specific characteristics, such as intensity of conditioning and donor choice. However, alloHCT is feasible in appropriately-selected older adults. Early referral for evaluation is strongly encouraged as this is the most obvious barrier. CAR-T cell therapies have shown unprecedented clinical efficacy and durability in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Its use is well tolerated in older adults, although evidence comes from limited case numbers. Whether patients who are deemed unfit for ASCT qualify for CAR-T cell therapy remains elusive, but the tolerability and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy appears promising, especially for older patients. The evidence from randomized trials is strong in favor of using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to reduce treatment-related toxicities and guide treatment intensity in the care for solid tumors; its use for evaluation of cellular therapies is less evidence-based. However, CGA can provide useful information on patients' fitness, resilient mechanisms, and reveal potential optimization strategies for compensating for vulnerabilities. In this narrative review, we will discuss key questions on cellular therapies in older adults based on illustrative patient cases.

Real-Life Multicenter Experience of Venetoclax in Combination with Hypomethylating Agents in Previously Untreated Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Greece

BACKGROUND

The landscape of first-line treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy has changed remarkably after venetoclax approval. Accumulating real-world data further apprises us with more knowledgeable use. To assess the efficacy and safety challenges in the real-life setting of the combination of hypomethylated agent (HMA) and venetoclax, we conducted a multi-center retrospective study.

METHODS

Forty adult AML patients treated with the combination of HMA and venetoclax as a first-line treatment after full approval (2020) were included. To confirm VIALE-A results, this group was compared to a historical cohort of 17 chemotherapy-ineligible AML patients treated with HMA monotherapy before 2020.

RESULTS

The combination of HMA-venetoclax achieved a composite complete response rate of 86.8% (p < 0.001), median overall survival, and event-free survival of 33.8 and 19.7 months, respectively, in a median follow-up of 17.8 months (pos < 0.001, HR = 0.276, CI: 0.132-0.575, pEFS = 0.004, HR = 0.367, CI: 0.174-0.773). High rates of neutropenia (90%) and consequent infection rates (57.5%) were noted. Only 55% of our patients received antifungal prophylaxis, as its use remains controversial, and invasive fungal infections were presented in 7.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidently, venetoclax-HMA yields high response rates and profound survival benefits in real life and has changed our approach to alternative chemotherapy options.

Comparative analysis of hypomethylating agents as maintenance therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute leukemia

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 136 consecutive patients who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) at our center. Among them, 76 cases used hypomethylating agents (decitabine, n = 40; azacitidine, n = 36) as post-transplant maintenance therapy, whereas 60 contemporaneous patients did not adopt maintenance therapy. The 3-year incidences of relapse in two groups were 16.6% and 39.2% (p = .001). The 3-year OS and DFS in maintenance group were 84.0% and 78.6%, which were remarkably improved than in control group (60.0% and 58.0%) (p = .004, p = .011). Moreover, the 3-year relapse rates for patients receiving decitabine and azacitidine therapy were 8.5% and 25.0%, respectively (p = .019). Patients utilizing decitabine had more common possibility of grade 3-4 neutropenia than azacitidine (20.0% vs. 2.8%, p = .031). These results indicate that maintenance therapies using hypomethylating agents could reduce the risk of post-transplant recurrence, resulting into remarkable superior survival. Decitabine might lower relapse after allo-HSCT with somewhat more severe myelosuppression when being compared to azacitidine.

Survival Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults Diagnosed with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Frontline Therapy in Daily Practice

Acute myeloid leukemia has a poor prognosis in older adults, and its management is often unclear due to its underrepresentation in clinical trials. Both overall survival (OS) and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) are key outcomes in this population, and patient-reported outcomes may contribute to patient stratification and treatment assignment. This prospective study included 138 consecutive patients treated in daily practice with the currently available non-targeted therapies (intensive chemotherapy [IC], attenuated chemotherapy [AC], hypomethylating agents [HMA], or palliative care [PC]). We evaluated patients' condition at diagnosis (Life expectancy [Lee Index for Older Adults], Geriatric Assessment in Hematology [GAH scale], HRQoL [EQ-5D-5L questionnaire], and fatigue [fatigue items of the QLQ-C30 scale]), OS, early death (ED), treatment tolerability (TT) and change in HRQoL over 12 months follow-up. The median OS was 7.1 months (IC not reached, AC 5.9, HMA 8.8, and PC 1.0). Poor risk AML category and receiving just palliative care, as well as a higher Lee index score in the patients receiving active therapy, independently predicted a shorter OS. The Lee Index and GAH scale were not useful for predicting TT. The white blood cell count was a valid predictor for ED. Patients' HRQoL remained stable during follow-up.

Real-world effectiveness of intensive chemotherapy with 7&3 versus venetoclax and hypomethylating agent in acute myeloid leukemia

Intensive chemotherapy with cytarabine and anthracycline (7&3) remains the standard therapy for patients medically fit for induction, but the assessment of fitness remains controversial. Venetoclax and hypomethylating agent (ven/HMA) combination therapy has improved outcomes in unfit patients but no prospective study has assessed ven/HMA versus 7&3 as initial therapy in older, fit patients. Given no studies and expectation of ven/HMA use in patients outside of trial criteria, we evaluated retrospective outcomes among newly diagnosed patients. A nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived database and the University of Pennsylvania EHR identified 312 patients receiving 7&3 and 488 receiving ven/HMA who were 60-75 years old without history of organ failure. Ven/HMA patients were older and more likely to have secondary AML, adverse cytogenetics, and adverse mutations. Median overall survival (OS) for patients receiving intensive chemotherapy was 22 versus 10 months for ven/HMA (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.60). Controlling for measured baseline characteristic imbalances reduced survival advantage by half (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.94). A sub-group of patients with equipoise, likelihood at least 30%-70% of receiving either treatment, had similar OS outcomes (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75-1.6). Regarding safety outcomes, 60-day mortality was higher for ven/HMA (15% vs. 6% at 60 days) despite higher documented infections and febrile neutropenia for 7&3. In this multicenter real-word dataset, patients selected for intensive chemotherapy had superior OS but a large group had similar outcomes with ven/HMA. Prospective randomized studies, controlling for both measured and unmeasured confounders, must confirm this outcome.

The Role of Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Past, Present, and Future Directions

Relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is hallmarked by dramatic prognosis. Treatment remains challenging, with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as the only curative option. The BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) has proven to be a promising therapy for AML and is currently the standard of care in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) for newly diagnosed AML patients ineligible for induction chemotherapy. Given its satisfactory safety profile, VEN-based combinations are increasingly being investigated as a part of the therapeutic strategy for R/R AML. The current paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the main evidence regarding VEN in the setting of R/R AML, with a specific focus on combinational strategies, including HMAs and cytotoxic chemotherapy, as well as different clinical settings, especially in view of the crucial role of HSCT. A discussion of what is known about drug resistance mechanisms and future combinational strategies is also provided. Overall, VEN-based regimes (mainly VEN + HMA) have provided unprecedented salvage treatment opportunities in patients with R/R AML, with low extra-hematological toxicity. On the other hand, the issue of overcoming resistance is one of the most important fields to be addressed in upcoming clinical research.

Acute myeloid leukemia in the medically unfit elderly patients

Acute Myeloid Leukemia is a clonal proliferative disorder whose incidence increases with age. While studies have shown that the elderly medically unfit patients have poorer outcomes with intensive chemotherapy, a vast majority of them are deemed ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Multiple studies have also shown that poor performance status prior to treatment initiation affects the prognosis. An accurate comprehensive assessment is hence vital to the selection of such patients. The chemotherapy agents that have been used for AML in the medically unfit patients have also changed significantly in the past few years. In this review we focus on the importance of comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to chemotherapy initiation among patients who are 75 years and older and the treatment approaches available for the medically unfit, Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients.

Venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in the first-line treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

Treatment paradigms for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have evolved at a rapid pace in recent years. The combination of venetoclax with a hypomethylating agent prolonged survival in clinical trials when compared to hypomethylating agent monotherapy. However, little is known about the performance of venetoclax-based regimens outside of clinical trials, given conflicting safety and efficacy data. Even less is known about the impact of the hypomethylating agent backbone. In this study, we demonstrate that decitabine-venetoclax is associated with a significantly higher rate of grade three or higher thrombocytopenia, but lower rates of lymphocytopenia compared to azacitidine-venetoclax. There was no difference in response or survival across ELN 2017 cytogenetic risk categories in the overall cohort. Significantly more patients succumb to relapsed or refractory disease than death from any other cause. We demonstrated that a Charlson comorbidity index score threshold of seven identifies exceptionally high-risk patients, providing evidence for clinical use to reduce the risk of early treatment-related mortality. Lastly, we provide evidence that measurable residual disease negativity and an IDH mutation predict a significant survival benefit outside clinical trials. Taken together, these data illuminate the real-world performance of venetoclax and decitabine or azacitidine in the treatment of AML.

Mechanisms of response and resistance to combined decitabine and ipilimumab for advanced myeloid disease

The challenge of eradicating leukemia in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) after initial cytoreduction has motivated modern efforts to combine synergistic active modalities including immunotherapy. Recently, the ETCTN/CTEP 10026 study tested the combination of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine together with the immune checkpoint inhibitor ipilimumab for AML/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) either after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or in the HSCT-naïve setting. Integrative transcriptome-based analysis of 304 961 individual marrow-infiltrating cells for 18 of 48 subjects treated on study revealed the strong association of response with a high baseline ratio of T to AML cells. Clinical responses were predominantly driven by decitabine-induced cytoreduction. Evidence of immune activation was only apparent after ipilimumab exposure, which altered CD4+ T-cell gene expression, in line with ongoing T-cell differentiation and increased frequency of marrow-infiltrating regulatory T cells. For post-HSCT samples, relapse could be attributed to insufficient clearing of malignant clones in progenitor cell populations. In contrast to AML/MDS bone marrow, the transcriptomes of leukemia cutis samples from patients with durable remission after ipilimumab monotherapy showed evidence of increased infiltration with antigen-experienced resident memory T cells and higher expression of CTLA-4 and FOXP3. Altogether, activity of combined decitabine and ipilimumab is impacted by cellular expression states within the microenvironmental niche of leukemic cells. The inadequate elimination of leukemic progenitors mandates urgent development of novel approaches for targeting these cell populations to generate long-lasting responses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02890329.

What's Next after Hypomethylating Agents Failure in Myeloid Neoplasms? A Rational Approach

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) such as azacitidine and decitabine are a mainstay in the current management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as either single agents or in multidrug combinations. Resistance to HMA is not uncommon, and it can result due to several tumor cellular adaptations. Several clinical and genomic factors have been identified as predictors of HMA resistance. However, the management of MDS/AML patients after the failure of HMA remains challenging in the absence of standardized guidelines. Indeed, this is an area of active research with several potential therapeutic agents currently under development, some of which have demonstrated therapeutic potential in early clinical trials, especially in cases with particular mutational characteristics. Here, we review the latest findings and give a rational approach for such a challenging scenario.

Hypomethylating agent-based therapies in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia - A joint review by the Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology and European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Trainee Committee

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcomes in older adults. A major goal of treatment is to balance quality of life and functional independence with disease control. With the approval of new, more tolerable regimens, more older adults are able to receive AML-directed therapy. Among these options are hypomethylating agents (HMAs), specifically azacitidine and decitabine. HMAs have become an integral part of AML therapy over the last two decades. These agents are used either as monotherapy or nowadays more commonly in combination with other agents such as the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax. Biological AML characteristics, such as molecular and cytogenetic risk factors, play crucial roles in guiding treatment decisions. In patients with high-risk AML, HMAs are increasingly used rather than intensive chemotherapy, although further trials based on a risk-adapted approach using patient- and disease-related factors are needed. Here, we review trials and evidence for the use of HMA monotherapy and combination therapy in the management of older adults with AML. Furthermore, we discuss the use of HMAs and HMA combination therapies in AML, mechanisms of action, their incorporation into hematopoietic stem cell transplantation strategies, and their use in patients with comorbidities and reduced organ function.

Therapeutic Targeting of P53: A Comparative Analysis of APR-246 and COTI-2 in Human Tumor Primary Culture 3-D Explants

Background: TP53 is the most commonly mutated gene in human cancer with loss of function mutations largely concentrated in “hotspots” affecting DNA binding. APR-246 and COTI-2 are small molecules under investigation in P53 mutated cancers. APR binds to P53 cysteine residues, altering conformation, while COTI-2 showed activity in P53 mutant tumors by a computational platform. We compared APR-246 and COTI-2 activity in human tumor explants from 247 surgical specimens. Methods: Ex vivo analyses of programmed cell death measured drug-induced cell death by delayed-loss-of-membrane integrity and ATP content. The LC50s were compared by Z-Score. Synergy was conducted by the method of Chou and Talalay, and correlations were performed by Pearson moment. Results: APR-246 and COTI-2 activity favored hematologic neoplasms, but solid tumor activity varied by diagnosis. COTI-2 and APR-246 activity did not correlate (R = 0.1028) (NS). COTI-2 activity correlated with nitrogen mustard, cisplatin and gemcitabine, doxorubicin and selumetinib, with a trend for APR-246 with doxorubicin. For ovarian cancer, COTI-2 showed synergy with cisplatin at 25%. Conclusions: COTI-2 and APR-246 activity differ by diagnosis. A lack of correlation supports distinct modes of action. Cisplatin synergy is consistent with P53’s role in DNA damage. Different mechanisms of action may underlie disease specificity and offer better disease targeting.

Comparison between azacitidine and decitabine as front-line therapy in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy

We compared the efficacy of azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) in elderly patients with untreated AML, diagnosed according to WHO criteria. In the two groups, we evaluated complete remission (CR), overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS). The AZA and DEC groups included 139 and 186 patients, respectively. To minimize the effects of treatment selection bias, adjustments were made using the propensity-score matching method, which yielded 136 patient pairs. In the AZA and DEC cohort, median age was 75 years in both, (IQR, 71-78 and 71-77), median WBCc at treatment onset 2.5 × 10⁹/L (IQR, 1.6-5.8) and 2.9 × 10⁹/L (IQR, 1.5-8.1), median bone marrow (BM) blast count 30% (IQR, 24-41%) and 49% (IQR, 30-67%), 59 (43%) and 63 (46%) patients had a secondary AML, respectively. Karyotype was evaluable in 115 and 120 patients: 80 (59%) and 87 (64%) had intermediate-risk, 35 (26%) and 33 (24%) an adverse risk karyotype, respectively. Median number of cycles delivered was 6 (IQR, 3.0-11.0) and 4 (IQR, 2.0-9.0), CR rate was 24% vs 29%, median OS and 2-year OS rates 11.3 (95% CI 9.5-13.8) vs 12.0 (95% CI 7.1-16.5) months and 20% vs 24%, respectively. No differences in CR and OS were found within the following subgroup: intermediate- and adverse-risk cytogenetic, frequency of WBCc at treatment ≥ 5 × 10^9 L and < 5 × 10^9/L, de novo and secondary AML, BM blast count < and ≥ 30%. Median DFS for AZA and DEC treated patients was 9.2 vs 12 months, respectively. Our analysis indicates similar outcomes with AZA compared to DEC.

Early Real-World First-Line Treatment With Venetoclax Plus HMAs Versus HMA Monotherapy Among Patients With AML in a Predominately US Community Setting

BACKGROUND

Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is standard-of-care in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ≥ 75 years old or unfit for intensive chemotherapy. We examined early real-world treatment experience among patients with AML receiving venetoclax+HMAs or HMA monotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used an electronic health record-derived, deidentified, United States nationwide database comprised of patient-level structured and unstructured data, curated via technology-enabled abstraction. Patients with an AML diagnosis on or after January 1, 2014, who had ≥ 2 clinic visits, and initiated treatment with venetoclax+HMAs from June 1, 2018 to March 31, 2021, or HMA monotherapy from January 1, 2016 to May 31, 2018, were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate time to last administration (TTLA) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Overall, 619 patients treated with venetoclax+HMAs and 480 treated with HMA monotherapy were selected from the database. Median age at diagnosis was 76 and 78 years, respectively, most patients were treated in community practice (83.4% and 89.4%, respectively), and almost half had secondary AML (47.2% and 47.3%, respectively). Adjusted analyses showed both significantly longer TTLA (3.6 months vs. 2.3 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-0.80], P< .0001) and OS (9.3 months vs. 5.9 months; HR = 0.71 [95% CI, 0.61-0.82], P < .0001) in patients treated with venetoclax+HMAs versus HMA monotherapy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study shows benefit in real-world outcomes of venetoclax+HMAs relative to HMA monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed AML, using a predominantly community-based database.

The Cup Runneth Over: Treatment Strategies for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Since 2017, the number of agents for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has rapidly expanded. Given the increased therapeutic options, better identification of high-risk subsets of AML and more refined approaches to patient fitness assessment, the decisions surrounding selection of intensive chemotherapy versus lower-intensity treatment have grown increasingly more nuanced. In this review, we present available data for both standard and investigational approaches in the initial treatment of AML using an intensive chemotherapy backbone or a lower-intensity approach. We summarize management strategies in newly diagnosed secondary AML, considerations around allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and the role of maintenance therapy. Finally, we highlight important areas of future investigation and novel agents that may hold promise in combination with standard therapies.

Blasts in context: the impact of the immune environment on acute myeloid leukemia prognosis and treatment

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a cancer that originates from the bone marrow (BM). Under physiological conditions, the bone marrow supports the homeostasis of immune cells and hosts memory lymphoid cells. In this review, we summarize our present understanding of the role of the immune microenvironment on healthy bone marrow and on the development of AML, with a focus on T cells and other lymphoid cells. The types and function of different immune cells involved in the AML microenvironment as well as their putative role in the onset of disease and response to treatment are presented. We also describe how the immune context predicts the response to immunotherapy in AML and how these therapies modulate the immune status of the bone marrow. Finally, we focus on allogeneic stem cell transplantation and summarize the current understanding of the immune environment in the post-transplant bone marrow, the factors associated with immune escape and relevant strategies to prevent and treat relapse.

OLFML2A Overexpression Predicts an Unfavorable Prognosis in Patients with AML

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant clonal disease of the myeloid hematopoietic system. Clinically, standard treatment options include conventional chemotherapy as well as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Among them, chemotherapy has a remission rate of 60% to 80% and nearly 50% relapse in consolidation therapy. Some patients have a poor prognosis due to the presence of unfavorable factors such as advanced age, hematologic history, poor prognosis karyotype, severe infection, and organ insufficiency, which cannot tolerate or are not suitable for standard chemotherapy regimens, and scholars have tried to find new treatment strategies to improve this situation. In the pathogenesis and treatment of leukemia, epigenetics has received attention from experts and scholars.

Objective

To investigate the relationship between OLFML2A overexpression and AML patients.

Methods

From The Cancer Genome Atlas, researchers used the data of OLFML2A gene to analyze and study the pan-cancer using R language and then divided the high and low levels of this protein into two groups to study its relationship with the clinical characteristics of the disease. The relationship between the high levels of OLFML2A and various clinical features of the disease was studied with emphasis on the relationship between the high levels of OLFML2A and various clinical features of the disease. A multidimensional Cox regression analysis was also performed to study the factors affecting patient survival. The correlation between OLFML2A expression and immune infiltration through the immune microenvironment was analyzed. The researchers then conducted a series of studies to analyze the data collected in the study. The focus was on the relationship between the high levels of OLFML2A and immune infiltration. Gene ontology analysis was also performed to study the interactions between the different genes associated with this protein.

Results

According to the pan-cancer analysis, OLFML2A was differentially expressed in different tumors. More importantly, the analysis of OLFML2A in the TCGA-AML database revealed that OLFML2A was highly expressed in AML. The researchers found that the high levels of OLFML2A were associated with different clinical features of the disease, and that the expression of the protein was different in different groups. Those patients with the high levels of OLFML2A were found to have substantially longer survival times compared to those with low-protein levels.

Conclusions

The OLFML2A gene is able to act as a molecular indicator involved in the diagnosis, prognosis, and immune process of AML. It improves the molecular biology prognostic system of AML, provides help for the selection of AML treatment options, and provides new ideas for future biologically targeted therapy of AML.

Experimental drugs in clinical trials for acute myeloid leukemia: innovations, trends, and opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by many cytogenetic and molecular alterations. Due to better knowledge of the molecular basis of AML, many targeted therapies have been introduced and registered, e.g. FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutation inhibitors, and Bcl-2 inhibitor. Despite that, the cure for AML remains an unmet clinical need in most patients.

AREAS COVERED

The review aims to present new, not yet registered drugs for AML. We searched the English literature for articles concerning AML, targeted drugs, menin inhibitors, DOT1L, BET, IDH inhibitors, FLT3, hedgehog inhibitors, Polo-like kinase inhibitors, RNA splicing, and immune therapies via PubMed. Publications from January 2000 to August 2022 were scrutinized. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles and Google search. Conference proceedings from the previous 5 years of The American Society of Hematology, the European Hematology Association, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references.

EXPERT OPINION

For several years, the therapeutic approach in AML has become more individualized. Novel groups of drugs give hope for greater curability. High response rates have agents that restore the activity of the p53 protein. In addition, agents that work independently of a particular mutation seem promising for AML without any known mutation.

Clinical Utility of Azacitidine in the Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Update on Patient Selection and Reported Outcomes

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is predominantly a disease of the elderly, and a significant proportion of these patients are not candidates for intensive, curative-intent therapies. Epigenetic dysregulation resulting in abnormal DNA hypermethylation is one of the hallmarks of AML pathogenesis. For the past two decades, hypomethylating agents including azacitidine (AZA) have been the mainstay of treatment for AML patients who are ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapies. As our understanding of AML disease biology has improved, several novel treatment combinations have been developed to improve the outcome of AML patients, with remarkable success. A considerable proportion of these novel combinations have utilized AZA as the backbone of their treatment scheme. In this review, we have highlighted the evolution of AML treatment, focusing on novel AZA-based treatment combinations and their clinical efficacy.

Prognosis of older patients with newly diagnosed AML undergoing antileukemic therapy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The prognostic value of age and other non-hematological factors in predicting outcomes in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing antileukemic therapy is not well understood. We performed a systematic review to determine the association between these factors and mortality and health-related quality of life or fatigue among these patients.

METHODS

We searched Medline and Embase through October 2021 for studies in which researchers quantified the relationship between age, comorbidities, frailty, performance status, or functional status; and mortality and health-related quality of life or fatigue in older patients with AML receiving antileukemic therapy. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, conducted random-effects meta-analyses, and assessed the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

We included 90 studies. Meta-analysis showed that age (per 5-year increase, HR 1.16 95% CI 1.11-1.21, high-quality evidence), comorbidities (Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index: 3+ VS less than 3, HR 1.60 95% CI 1.31-1.95, high-quality evidence), and performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/ World Health Organization (ECOG/WHO): 2+ VS less than 2, HR 1.63 95% CI 1.43-1.86, high-quality evidence; ECOG/WHO: 3+ VS less than 3, HR 2.00 95% CI 1.52-2.63, moderate-quality evidence) were associated with long-term mortality. These studies provided inconsistent and non-informative results on short-term mortality (within 90 days) and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

High-quality or moderate-quality evidence support that age, comorbidities, performance status predicts the long-term prognosis of older patients with AML undergoing antileukemic treatment.

Updates on the Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia is a heterogeneous disease defined by a large spectrum of genetic aberrations that are potential therapeutic targets. New targeted therapies have changed the landscape for a disease with poor outcomes. They are more effective than standard chemotherapy with a good safety profile. For "fit patients" in first-line, the combination of gemtuzumab ozogamicin or midostaurin with intensive chemotherapy or Vyxeos is now considered the "standard of care" for selected patients. On the other hand, for "unfit patients", azacitidine-venetoclax has been consolidated as a frontline treatment, while other combinations with magrolimab or ivosidenib are in development. Nevertheless, global survival results, especially in relapsed or refractory patients, remain unfavorable. New immunotherapies or targeted therapies, such as Menin inhibitors or sabatolimab, represent an opportunity in this situation. Future directions will probably come from combinations of different targeted therapies ("triplets") and maintenance strategies guided by measurable residual disease.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Venetoclax in Combination with Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: From a US Third Party Payer Perspective

OBJECTIVES

Using individual patient-level data from the phase 3 VIALE-A trial, this study assessed the cost-effectiveness of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine compared with azacitidine monotherapy for patients newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, from a United States (US) third-party payer perspective.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model with a 28-day cycle and three health states (event-free survival (EFS), progressive/relapsed disease, and death) was developed to estimate costs and effectiveness of venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine over a lifetime (25-year) horizon. Efficacy inputs (overall survival (OS), EFS, and complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi) rate) were estimated using VIALE-A data. Best-fit parametric models per Akaike Information Criterion were used to extrapolate OS until reaching EFS and extrapolate EFS until Year 5. Within EFS, the time spent in CR/CRi was estimated by applying the CR/CRi rate to the EFS curve. Past Year 5, patients still in EFS were considered cured and to have the same mortality as the US general population. Mean time on treatment (ToT) for both regimens was based on the time observed in VIALE-A. Costs of drug acquisition, drug administration (initial and subsequent treatments), subsequent stem cell transplant procedures, adverse events (AEs), and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) associated with health states were obtained from the literature/public data and inflated to 2021 US dollars. Health state utilities were estimated using EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level data from VIALE-A; AE disutilities were obtained from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per life-year (LY) and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained were estimated. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA), scenario analyses, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were also performed.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine led to gains of 1.89 LYs (2.99 vs. 1.10, respectively) and 1.45 QALYs (2.30 vs. 0.84, respectively). Patients receiving venetoclax + azacitidine incurred higher total lifetime costs ($250,486 vs. $110,034 (azacitidine)). The ICERs for venetoclax + azacitidine versus azacitidine were estimated at $74,141 per LY and $96,579 per QALY gained. Results from the DSA and scenario analyses supported the base-case findings, with ICERs ranging from $60,718 to $138,554 per QALY gained. The results were most sensitive to varying the parameters for the venetoclax + azacitidine base-case EFS parametric function (Gompertz), followed by alternative approaches for ToT estimation, treatment costs of venetoclax + azacitidine, standard mortality rate value and ToT estimation, alternative sources to inform HRU, different cure modeling assumptions, and the parameters for the venetoclax + azacitidine base-case OS parametric function (log-normal). Results from the PSA showed that, compared with azacitidine, venetoclax + azacitidine was cost-effective in 99.9% of cases at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that venetoclax + azacitidine offers a cost-effective strategy in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy from a US third-party payer perspective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02993523. Date of registration: 15 December 2016.

Hypomethylating agents combined with low-dose chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: a real-world clinical experience

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based regimens in the treatment of older adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), unfit for standard induction chemotherapy. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of 140 older adult patients with AML who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy and were treated with HMA-based therapies were retrospectively analysed. The median age of the group was 70 years, and poor-risk cytogenetics and secondary/treatment-related AML (s/t-AML) accounted for 45.6% and 34.3% of these patients, respectively. The overall response rate was 48.6%, and 40.1% for patients who achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery. The median overall survival (OS) was 10.4 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 42.6%, 19.9%, and 4.9%, respectively. Early mortality accounted for 4.3% of all cases, and infection occurred in 87.1% of all patients during induction therapy. Patients who received HMA and low-dose chemotherapy presented with significantly superior response and long-term survival rates compared to those who received HMA alone. They also showed comparable outcomes to those treated with the azacitidine plus venetoclax protocol. Low-dose chemotherapy in combination with decitabine or azacitidine showed a similar response rate and prognosis. Age ≥ 75years and a white blood cell (WBC) count ≥ 10 × 109 cells/L were identified as independent adverse prognostic factors for OS, while poor-risk cytogenetics, percentage of bone marrow blasts, and s/tAML had no significant impact on OS when patients were treated with HMA-based regimens. In conclusion, HMA combined with low-dose chemotherapy was effective and safe in older adults with AML who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy, and no difference was observed between decitabine and azacitidine.

Azacitidine and its role in the upfront treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) predominantly affects elderly population. This poses challenges in management, as patients are frequently not candidates for intensive therapy given comorbidities or frailty. Currently, azacitidine (AZA), either as monotherapy or in combination regimens, is the backbone treatment in this group of patients.

AREAS COVERED

We review the mechanism of action, pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of AZA. It reviews current combination therapies of AZA with other targeted therapies for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML.

EXPERT OPINION

AZA is a cornerstone for the treatment of patients considered ineligible for intensive chemotherapy induction, but better results and therapies are required for these patients. AZA has shown synergistic properties when combined with other medications. Its safety profile and few drug interactions make it a suitable medication to use as backbone. Newer therapies are being combined with AZA, demonstrating safety and in cases, improved responses, and survival. AZA/venetoclax has emerged as the standard of care for patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Doublet and triplet combinations are increasingly being studied. With the results observed in elderly patients, the intensive chemotherapy paradigm might be put to test in younger populations, with AZA combinations being at the forefront.

Are We Moving the Needle for Patients with TP53-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia?

The currently available therapeutic options for patients with TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are insufficient, as they translate to a median overall of only 6-9 months, and less than 10% of patients undergoing the most aggressive treatments, such as intensive induction therapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, will be cured. The lack of clear differences in outcomes with different treatments precludes the designation of a standard of care. Recently, there has been growing attention on this critical area of need by way of better understanding the biology of TP53 alterations and the disparities in outcomes among patients in this molecular subgroup, reflected in the development and testing of agents with novel mechanisms of action. Promising preclinical and efficacy data exist for therapies that are directed at the p53 protein rendered dysfunctional via mutation or that inhibit the CD47/SIRPα axis or other immune checkpoints such as TIM-3. In this review, we discuss recently attractive and emerging therapeutic agents, their preclinical rationale and the available clinical data as a monotherapy or in combination with the currently accepted backbones in frontline and relapsed/refractory settings for patients with TP53-mutated AML.

Azacitidine vs. Decitabine in Unfit Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Results from the PETHEMA Registry

The hypomethylating agents, decitabine (DEC) and azacitidine (AZA), allowed more elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients to be treated. However, there are little direct comparative data on AZA and DEC. This multicenter retrospective study compared the outcomes of AZA and DEC in terms of response and overall survival (OS). Potential predictors associated with response and OS were also evaluated. A total of 626 AML patients were included (487 treated with AZA and 139 with DEC). Response rates were similar in both groups: CR was 18% with AZA vs. 23% with DEC (p = 0.20), CR/CRi was 20.5% vs. 25% (p = 0.27) and ORR was 32% vs. 39.5% (p = 0.12), respectively. Patients with leukocytes < 10 × 109/L, bone marrow blasts < 50% and ECOG ≥ 2 had higher ORR with DEC than with AZA. OS was similar in both groups: 10.4 months (95% CI: 9.2−11.7) vs. 8.8 months (95% CI: 6.7−11.0, p = 0.455), for AZA and DEC, respectively. Age (≥80 years), leukocytes (≥ 10 × 109/L), platelet count (<20 × 109/L) and eGFR (≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2) were associated with higher OS with AZA compared to DEC. In conclusion, we found no differences in response and OS rates in AML patients treated with AZA or DEC.

The Clinical Value of Decitabine Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Decitabine (5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine) is a hypomethylating agent used in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Decitabine inhibits DNA methyltransferases, causing DNA hypomethylation, and leading amongst others to re-expression of silenced tumor suppressor genes. Decitabine is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed de novo or secondary AML who are not eligible for standard induction chemotherapy. The initial authorization in 2012 was based on the results of the open-label, randomized, multicenter phase 3 DACO-016 trial, and supported by data from the supportive phase 2 open-label DACO-017 trial. Compared with standard care, decitabine significantly improved overall survival, event-free survival, progression-free survival, and response rate. Decitabine was generally well tolerated, offering a valuable treatment option in patients with AML irrespective of age, especially for patients achieving a complete response. Several observational “real-life” studies confirmed these results. In contrast to standard chemotherapy, the presence of adverse-risk karyotypes or TP53 mutations does not negatively impact sensitivity to hypomethylating therapy albeit with lower durability. Data suggest a potential positive effect of decitabine in patients with monosomal karyotype-positive AML. For the time being, decitabine is an appropriate option as monotherapy for patients with AML who are unfit to receive more intensive combination therapies, but emerging data suggest that decitabine-based doublet or triplet combinations may be future treatment options for patients with AML.

New Perspectives in Treating Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Driving towards a Patient-Tailored Strategy

For decades, intensive chemotherapy (IC) has been considered the best therapeutic option for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with no curative option available for patients who are not eligible for IC or who have had failed IC. Over the last few years, several new drugs have enriched the therapeutic arsenal of AML treatment for both fit and unfit patients, raising new opportunities but also new challenges. These include the already approved venetoclax, the IDH1/2 inhibitors enasidenib and ivosidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, the liposomal daunorubicin/cytarabine formulation CPX-351, and oral azacitidine. Venetoclax, an anti BCL2-inhibitor, in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs), has markedly improved the management of unfit and elderly patients from the perspective of improved quality of life and better survival. Venetoclax is currently under investigation in combination with other old and new drugs in early phase trials. Recently developed drugs with different mechanisms of action and new technologies that have already been investigated in other settings (BiTE and CAR-T cells) are currently being explored in AML, and ongoing trials should determine promising agents, more synergic combinations, and better treatment strategies. Access to new drugs and inclusion in clinical trials should be strongly encouraged to provide scientific evidence and to define the future standard of treatment in AML.

Targeting Mitochondrial Proteases for Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Targeting cancer metabolism has emerged as an attractive approach to improve therapeutic regimens in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Mitochondrial proteases are closely related to cancer metabolism, but their biological functions have not been well characterized in AML. According to different catogory, we comprehensively reviewed the role of mitochondrial proteases in AML. This review highlights some 'powerful' mitochondrial protease targets, including their biological function, chemical modulators, and applicative prospect in AML.

Epigenetic modifications and targeted therapy in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy resulting from the genetic alterations and epigenetic dysregulations of the hematopoietic progenitor cells. One-third of children with AML remain at risk of relapse even though outcomes have improved in recent decades. Epigenetic dysregulations have been identified to play a significant role during myeloid leukemogenesis. In contrast to genetic changes, epigenetic modifications are typically reversible, opening the door to the development of epigenetic targeted therapy. In this review, we provide an overview of the landscape of epigenetic alterations and describe the current progress that has been made in epigenetic targeted therapy, and pay close attention to the potential value of epigenetic abnormalities in the precision and combinational therapy of pediatric AML.

Treatment patterns, economic burden, and overall survival in US Medicare Advantage beneficiaries newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2015-2020

The present study assessed changes in patient management, economic burden, and overall survival (OS) in a contemporary cohort of 2775 US Medicare Advantage beneficiaries aged ≥66 years newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) between 01 January 2015 and 30 June 2020. Use of venetoclax-based therapy increased and replaced hypomethylating agent (HMA) monotherapy as the most common first-line treatment choice in 2019-2020. In newly diagnosed AML patients aged ≥75 and 66-74 years, mean per-patient 1-year healthcare expenditures were $81,818 and $156,033 (2020 USD) and median OS was 2.3 and 8.5 months, respectively. In addition, 40% of Medicare Advantage patients with newly diagnosed AML continue to receive supportive care alone. These findings indicate that at the population level clinical outcomes remain poor for older adults with AML, pointing to a continuing unmet medical need.

Pharmacoeconomic considerations for acute myeloid leukemia pharmacotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rare blood cancer with a poor prognosis. Recently, targeted drugs have improved survival both in the elderly and in fit patients. However, as monthly costs of targeted agents are high, regulatory bodies often impose restrictions on their use.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the value-for-cost of targeted drugs such as gemtuzumab ozogamycin, CPX-351, midostaurin, gilteritinib, glasdegib, venetoclax, oral azacytidine and enasidenib used to treat adult AML. EMBASE and TRIP databases, together with authority websites were searched for technology assessments. Add-on drugs, namely midostaurin and gemtuzumab ozogamycin, have been reported to have the best pharmacoeconomic profile for newly diagnosed fit patients with FLT3 mutation or favorable/intermediate cytogenetics, since allogeneic transplant rates were stable or reduced. Most of the other drugs, on the other hand, did not achieve highly favorable cost-for-benefit, due to a poor absolute survival gain and/or increased transplant rates.

EXPERT OPINION

The cost of most targeted therapies for AML in unfit patients seems unfair in comparison to the absolute survival advantage provided in fit patients. Point of cure and transplant outcomes should be standardized to allow comparability among the models.

What to use to treat AML: the role of emerging therapies

The development and approval of novel substances have resulted in substantial improvements in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In the current era of novel treatment options, genetic and molecular testing at the time of diagnosis and relapse becomes increasingly relevant. Midostaurin in combination with intensive chemotherapy is the standard of care as upfront therapy in younger AML patients with mutated fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3). Gilteritinib, a second- generation FLT3 inhibitor, represents a key drug for relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated AML patients. Targeted therapy has also been developed for patients with mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ivosidenib as a monotherapy for newly diagnosed older adult IDH1-mutated patients and enasidenib for R/R IDH2-mutated AML patients. CPX-351, a liposomal formulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine, has become an important upfront treatment strategy for fit patients with therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes that are generally challenging to treat. The antibody drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin was approved in combination with intensive therapy for patients with newly diagnosed (FDA/European Medicines Agency [EMA]) as well as R/R CD33+ AML. The combination of venetoclax, an oral selective B-cell leukemia/lymphoma-2 inhibitor, with hypomethylating agents or low-dose AraC (LDAC) has changed the treatment landscape and prognosis for older adult patients very favorably. The addition of glasdegib, a small-molecule hedgehog inhibitor, to LDAC is another example of novel options in older patients. Further substances have shown promising results in early clinical trials.

Molecular determinants of therapy response of venetoclax-based combinations in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous, highly malignant disease of the bone marrow. After decades of slow progress, recent years saw a surge of novel agents for its treatment. The most recent advancement is the registration of the Bcl-2 inhibitor ventoclax in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) in the US and Europe for AML patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. Treatment of newly diagnosed AML patients with this combination results in remission rates that so far could only be achieved with intensive treatment. However, not all AML patients respond equally well, and some patients relapse early, while other patients experience longer periods of complete remission. A hallmark of AML is its remarkable genetic, molecular and clinical heterogeneity. Here, we review the current knowledge about molecular features of AML that help estimate the probability of response to venetoclax-containing therapies. In contrast to other newly developed AML therapies that target specific recurrent molecular alterations, it seems so far that responses are not specific for a certain subgroup. One exception is spliceosome mutations, where good response has been observed in clinical trials with venetoclax/azacitidine. These mutations are rather associated with a more unfavorable outcome with chemotherapy. In summary, venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents represents a significant novel option for AML patients with various molecular aberrations. Mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance seem to overlap with those towards chemotherapy.

Use of Azacitidine or Decitabine for the Up-Front Setting in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Azacitidine and decitabine have been increasingly used for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in older patients. The choice between azacitidine and decitabine depends mostly on the experience and preference of the attending physician, since they have not been compared directly in a randomised clinical trial. In this study, we identified the best treatment regimen for each drug and compare the efficacy of decitabine and azacitidine monotherapy in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia. We found no significant differences regarding 1-year mortality and overall survival for azacitidine and decitabine (roughly 9 months). Moreover, there were no significant differences in the efficacy of 5-day versus 10-day schedules of decitabine. However, patients treated with the shortened 5-day azacitidine scheme showed worsened outcomes compared to the standard 7-day regimen. Hopefully, our results might be helpful for the design of azacitidine/decitabine-based combination schedules to be tested in future trials.

Abstract

Irruption of decitabine and azacitidine has led to profound changes in the upfront management of older acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). However, they have not been directly compared in a randomised clinical trial. In addition, there are no studies comparing the optimal treatment schedule of each drug in AML. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of decitabine and azacitidine monotherapy in newly diagnosed AML was conducted. Randomised controlled trials and retrospective studies were included. A total of 2743 patients from 23 cohorts were analysed (10 cohorts of azacitidine and 13 of decitabine). Similar response rates were observed for azacitidine (38%, 95% CI: 30–47%) compared to decitabine (40%, 95% CI: 32–48%) (p = 0.825). Overall survival (OS) between azacitidine (10.04 months, 95% CI: 8.36–11.72) and decitabine (8.79 months, 95% CI: 7.62–9.96) was also similar (p = 0.386). Patients treated with azacitidine showed a lower median OS when azacitidine was administered for 5 days (6.28 months, 95% CI: 4.23–8.32) compared to the standard 7-day schedule (10.83 months, 95% CI: 9.07–12.59, p = 0.002). Among patients treated with decitabine, response rates and OS were not significantly different between 5-day and 10-day decitabine regimens. Despite heterogeneity between studies, we found no differences in response rates and OS in AML patients treated with azacitidine or decitabine.

A phase II study of sequential decitabine and rapamycin in acute myelogenous leukemia

A phase II study was conducted to ascertain whether sequential exposure to decitabine followed by rapamycin, an mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) inhibitor would result in better responses than decitabine alone. Newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients who were >65 years old and not eligible for intensive induction regimens or patients with relapsed or refractory AML received 10 days of decitabine followed by 12 days of rapamycin in cycle 1 and 5 days of decitabine followed by 17 days of rapamycin in subsequent cycles. The composite complete remission rate (CR) was 33 % (CR plus CR with incomplete count recovery). Median overall survival was 7.7 months in newly diagnosed elderly AML patients and 6.6 months in relapsed/refractory AML patients. Twenty-four evaluable patients were enrolled, and the study did not meet its primary endpoint of demonstrating a significant improvement in composite CR rate with the combination as compared to an established historical CR rate of 25 % with decitabine alone. Despite that, the survival rates in relapsed/refractory cases appear comparable to what is reported with other salvage regimens, and no significant patterns of non-hematologic toxicity were noted. 50 % of subjects in the de novo group achieved a composite CR which is significantly higher (p = 0.02) than the rate of 25 % with decitabine alone. This trial is registered at clinical trials.gov as NCT02109744.

Evolving Therapeutic Approaches for Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in 2021

Simple Summary

The better understanding of disease biology, the availability of new effective drugs and the increased awareness of patients’ heterogeneity in terms of fitness and personal expectations has made the current treatment paradigm of AML in the elderly very challenging. Here, we discuss the evolving criteria used to define eligibility for induction chemotherapy and transplantation, the introduction of new agents in the treatment of patients with very different clinical conditions, the implications of precision medicine and the importance of quality of life and supportive care, proposing a simplified algorithm that we follow in 2021.

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older patients is characterized by unfavorable prognosis due to adverse disease features and a high rate of treatment-related complications. Classical therapeutic options range from intensive chemotherapy in fit patients, potentially followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), to hypomethylating agents or palliative care alone for unfit/frail ones. In the era of precision medicine, the treatment paradigm of AML is rapidly changing. On the one hand, a plethora of new targeted drugs with good tolerability profiles are becoming available, offering the possibility to achieve a prolonged remission to many patients not otherwise eligible for more intensive therapies. On the other hand, better tools to assess patients’ fitness and improvements in the selection and management of those undergoing allo-HCT will hopefully reduce treatment-related mortality and complications. Importantly, a detailed genetic characterization of AML has become of paramount importance to choose the best therapeutic option in both intensively treated and unfit patients. Finally, improving supportive care and quality of life is of major importance in this age group, especially for the minority of patients that are still candidates for palliative care because of very poor clinical conditions or unwillingness to receive active treatments. In the present review, we discuss the evolving approaches in the treatment of older AML patients, which is becoming increasingly challenging following the advent of new effective drugs for a very heterogeneous and complex population.

Resistance to Hypomethylating Agents in Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia From Clinical Data and Molecular Mechanism

The nucleoside analogs decitabine (5-AZA-dC) and azacitidine (5-AZA) have been developed as targeted therapies to reverse DNA methylation in different cancer types, and they significantly improve the survival of patients who are not suitable for traditional intensive chemotherapies or other treatment regimens. However, approximately 50% of patients have a response to hypomethylating agents (HMAs), and many patients have no response originally or in the process of treatment. Even though new combination regimens have been tested to overcome the resistance to 5-AZA-dC or 5-AZA, only a small proportion of patients benefited from these strategies, and the outcome was very poor. However, the mechanisms of the resistance remain unknown. Some studies only partially described management after failure and the mechanisms of resistance. Herein, we will review the clinical and molecular signatures of the HMA response, alternative treatment after failure, and the causes of resistance in hematological malignancies.

Significance of NPM1 Gene Mutations in AML

The aim of this literature review is to examine the significance of the nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) gene in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This will include analysis of the structure and normal cellular function of NPM1, the type of mutations commonly witnessed in NPM1, and the mechanism by which this influences the development and progression of AML. The importance of NPM1 mutation on prognosis and the treatment options available to patients will also be reviewed along with current guidelines recommending the rapid return of NPM1 mutational screening results and the importance of employing a suitable laboratory assay to achieve this. Finally, future developments in the field including research into new therapies targeting NPM1 mutated AML are considered.

The Real-Life Efficacy of Fixed-Dose Hypomethylating Agents in Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A 10-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Hypomethylating agent (HMA) is one of recommended treatment for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, their high cost precludes their general use, especially in developing countries. Therefore, the fixed-dose HMAs approach was adopted to reduce the expenses. This study focuses on the clinical outcome of various treatment protocols, including intensive chemotherapy, fixed-dose HMAs, and palliative treatment in Thai elderly patients with AML. Fixed-dose HMAs include 5-azacitidine given at 100 mg per day for seven days and decitabine given at 30 mg per day for 5 days.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a 10-year cohort study focused on elderly AML patients aged over 60 years. The exclusion criteria were acute promyelocytic leukemia.

RESULTS

A total of 243 AML patients were enrolled. Comparing 3 groups of treatment regimens (intensive chemotherapy, fixed-dose HMAs, and palliative treatment), the proportions of patients in each category accounted for 23.5%, 21.4%, and 55.1%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) in each therapeutic option was 7.7, 11, and 2.5 months, respectively. From multivariate analysis, palliative treatment was significantly inferior OS comparing to the fixed-dose HMAs and intensive treatment (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.42; 95% CI, 0.29-0.60; P value <.001 and HR: 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.61; P value <.001, respectively). Nevertheless, the OS outcome in patients with fixed-dose HMAs was comparable to those who received intensive treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the fixed-dose regimen of HMAs is the reasonable treatment for these patients, and this approach is not inferior to intensive therapy. Thai Clinical Trials Registry identifier: TCTR20210514007.

Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a poor prognosis and treatment remains challenging. For the majority of r/r patients, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment approach. Salvage therapy is given in order to reduce the leukemia load prior to transplantation. Patients achieving complete remission prior to allogeneic HSCT have a more favorable outcome. Intensive salvage regimens commonly consist of an anthracycline and high-dose cytarabine backbone. Donor lymphocyte infusions have shown efficacy in patients relapsing after allogeneic HSCT. For patients who cannot be intensively treated (eg, elderly AML patients), outcome is generally very poor and combinations with novel agents are currently under investigation. Mutational analysis should be repeated at the time of relapse to identify aberrations that can be targeted with new agents. For r/r AML patients with mutated fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), gilteritinib has shown superior results to intensive salvage regimens. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved gilteritinib for FLT3 mutated r/r AML patients. Ivosidenib and enasidenib, inhibitors for mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2, respectively, have received approval for IDH1/IDH2 mutated r/r AML by the FDA (not EMA). APR-246 restores the function of mutated TP53 and early study results are promising. Other agents targeting CD47, menin, neural-precursor-cell-expressed developmentally down-regulated 8, as well as bispecific antibodies or chimeric antigen receptor T cells are under investigation. Further trials are needed to understand how to best combine novel agents with each other or with chemotherapy.

Eprenetapopt (APR-246) and Azacitidine in TP53-Mutant Myelodysplastic Syndromes

PURPOSE

Approximately 20% of patients with TP53-mutant myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) achieve complete remission (CR) with hypomethylating agents. Eprenetapopt (APR-246) is a novel, first-in-class, small molecule that restores wild-type p53 functions in TP53-mutant cells.

METHODS

This was a phase Ib/II study to determine the safety, recommended phase II dose, and efficacy of eprenetapopt administered in combination with azacitidine in patients with TP53-mutant MDS or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20%-30% marrow blasts (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03072043).

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (40 MDS, 11 AML, and four MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms) with at least one TP53 mutation were treated. The overall response rate was 71% with 44% achieving CR. Of patients with MDS, 73% (n = 29) responded with 50% (n = 20) achieving CR and 58% (23/40) a cytogenetic response. The overall response rate and CR rate for patients with AML was 64% (n = 7) and 36% (n = 4), respectively. Patients with only TP53 mutations by next-generation sequencing had higher rates of CR (69% v 25%; P = .006). Responding patients had significant reductions in TP53 variant allele frequency and p53 expression by immunohistochemistry, with 21 (38%) achieving complete molecular remission (variant allele frequency < 5%). Median overall survival was 10.8 months with significant improvement in responding versus nonresponding patients by landmark analysis (14.6 v 7.5 months; P = .0005). Overall, 19/55 (35%) patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant, with a median overall survival of 14.7 months. Adverse events were similar to those reported for azacitidine or eprenetapopt monotherapy, with the most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events being febrile neutropenia (33%), leukopenia (29%), and neutropenia (29%).

CONCLUSION

Combination treatment with eprenetapopt and azacitidine is well-tolerated yielding high rates of clinical response and molecular remissions in patients with TP53-mutant MDS and oligoblastic AML.

Cedazuridine/decitabine: from preclinical to clinical development in myeloid malignancies

Since the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of parenteral decitabine and azacitidine, DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, otherwise referred to as DNA hypomethylating agents (HMAs), have been a mainstay in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. The development of oral HMAs has been an area of active interest; however, oral bioavailability has been quite poor due to rapid metabolism by cytidine deaminase (CDA). This led to the development of the novel CDA inhibitor cedazuridine, which was combined with an oral formulation of decitabine. Preclinical work demonstrated a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile approximate to parenteral decitabine, leading to early-phase clinical trials of oral cedazuridine-decitabine (C-DEC) in myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). A combination of oral decitabine 35 mg with oral cedazuridine 100 mg was established as the recommended phase 2 dose. Phase 2 data confirmed bioequivalence of C-DEC when compared with parenteral decitabine, and a larger phase 3 trial has demonstrated similar results, leading to the FDA approval of C-DEC for use in intermediate/high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and CMML. This review will focus upon the current role of HMA therapy in MDS/CMML, preclinical and clinical development of C-DEC, and potential roles of oral HMA therapy in myeloid malignancies moving forward.

Real-World Outcomes of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Taiwan: A Nationwide Population-Based Study, 2011-2015

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy originating from myeloid precursor cells, with different cytogenetic abnormalities, genetic mutations and diverse clinical prognoses. We investigated the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of adult AML patients in Taiwan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included 3851 patients with AML in the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database from 2011 to 2015. We excluded patients younger than 20 years, with acute promyelocytic leukemia, and with no pathological confirmation.

RESULTS

Among the 3292 patients included, 2179 received induction chemotherapy and 1113 did not, because of older age and higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score. Among the 2179 treated patients, 162 received high-dose cytarabine-based chemotherapy, 1535 received standard-dose cytarabine with anthracyclines, 209 received low-dose cytarabine-based chemotherapy, and 273 received chemotherapy without cytarabine. Patients in the low-dose cytarabine group had the oldest age and highest CCI scores compared with the other groups. In the analysis of overall survival (OS), the median OS of the overall study population was 6.27 months. Treated patients with AML had a longer OS than untreated ones (12.43 months treated vs. 2.03 months not treated; P < .0001). In the multivariate analyses of the treated patients with AML, several factors indicated better prognosis, including receiving standard-dose or high-dose cytarabine, female sex, younger age, lower CCI score, treatment at a medical center, favorable cytogenetic abnormalities, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Our study was a population-based study that illustrates the real-world outcomes of adult patients with AML in Taiwan.

Maintenance therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: sustaining the pursuit for sustained remission

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Maintenance therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been studied for decades with mixed results. However, the application of modern agents has renewed interest and the recent data from randomized trials has provided evidence for the use of maintenance therapy in certain populations of AML patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unselected patients are unlikely to benefit from maintenance therapy as has been previously and consistently demonstrated. The increasing availability of newer and targeted agents like oral hypomethylating agents, protein modifiers, as well as FLT3, IDH1/2 BCL-2 and immune checkpoint inhibitors have restoked interest in maintenance therapy for which randomized, placebo-controlled trials have recently demonstrated benefits, including in the post-transplant setting. Patients with high-risk disease, suboptimal consolidation or remission associated with measurable residual disease (MRD) appear to be beneficiaries of this strategy. The influence of MRD status and the platform by which it is measured are important factors in the current understanding of when maintenance therapy works and how future studies should be designed.

SUMMARY

The recent positive findings in support of maintenance therapy for certain AML patient populations are practice changing and bolster the need for properly designed, randomized studies using unified and standardized MRD techniques.