Treatment of allosensitized patients receiving allogeneic transplantation

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Current Status and Future Directions of Donor Selection

The landscape of HLA matching in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is continuously advancing, introducing more nuanced criteria beyond traditional 10/10 HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 allele matching. For 10/10 matched donors, prioritizing a donor with a "core" permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch is recommended over "noncore" permissive mismatches, with nonpermissive mismatches being the least prefered. In the one-antigen mismatched setting (7/8 HLA-matched), HLA-C matching, particularly avoiding high-expression mismatches at residues 116 or 77/80, is preferred over HLA-A or HLA-B mismatches. HLA B-leader matching is beneficial in both one-antigen mismatched and haploidentical HCT. Additionally, specific HLA mismatches in haploidentical HCT, such as DRB1 mismatches with DQB1 matches and DPB1 nonpermissive mismatches are linked to better outcomes. Among non-HLA factors, evidence consistently underscores the pivotal impact of donor age on overall survival. For HLA-mismatched transplants, including haploidentical HCT, avoidance of donors against whom the recipient has preformed donor-specific antibodies is paramount. Selecting a cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative donor is important particularly for CMV-negative recipients; however, more research is needed in the letermovir prophylaxis era. The impact of ABO-matching on transplant outcomes is debatable. Other unanswered questions include defining "younger" donors and establishing hierarchy in donor selection based on factors like CMV status, ABO compatibility, or sex-mismatch, to name a few. Future research addressing these issues will refine donor selection algorithms and improve transplant success. In conclusion, selecting a donor for HCT requires multifaceted considerations, integrating evolving HLA-matching criteria and non-HLA factors, to optimize HCT outcomes in this rapidly advancing field.

Future directions in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Outcomes of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) have improved over time. Graft failure and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which were important complications in major human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-disparity stem cell transplantation, have significantly decreased. These improvements have led to an exponential increase in the use of haploidentical donors for transplantation, as well as in the number of publications evaluating haplo-SCT outcomes. Many studies focused on factors important in donor selection, novel conditioning regimens or GVHD prophylaxis, the impact of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA), as well as strategies to prevent disease relapse post-transplant. DSA represents an important limitation and multimodality desensitization protocols, including plasma exchange, rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin and donor buffy coat infusion, can contribute to the successful engraftment in patients with high DSA levels and is currently the standard therapy for highly allosensitized individuals. With regards to donor selection, younger donors are preferred due to lower risk of complications and better transplant outcomes. Moreover, recent studies also showed that younger haploidentical donors may be a better choice than older-matched unrelated donors. Improvement of disease relapse remains a top priority, and several studies have demonstrated that higher natural killer (NK) cell numbers early post-transplant are associated with improved outcomes. Prospective studies have started to assess the role of NK cell administration in decreasing post-transplant relapse. These studies suggest that the incorporation of other cell products post-transplant, including the administration of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, should be explored in the future.

Pretransplant desensitization of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies with plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin produces equivalent outcomes to patients with no donor specific antibodies in haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplants (haplo-HCT) with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) are associated with high rates of primary graft failure and poor overall survival (OS). Limited data exists regarding the effect of desensitization. Our institution began routine desensitization for patients with DSAs in 2014. Adult patients undergoing haplo-HCT at Washington University from 2009-2021 were identified and divided into three cohorts: no DSA, untreated DSA (2009-2014) or treated DSA (2014-2021). Desensitization therapy using plasmapheresis and IVIg was performed. Retrospectively, 304 patients were identified. 14 of 30 patients with DSAs underwent desensitization. By day +2, 57% of patients cleared all DSAs. After multivariable analysis, OS was similar between treated DSA and no DSA (HR: 0.69, p = 0.37). Untreated DSA had significantly lower OS compared to no DSA group (HR 1.80, p = 0.046). Desensitization with a backbone of plasmapheresis and IVIg before haplo-HCT may produce similar outcomes to patients without DSAs.

ASTCT Consensus Recommendations on Testing and Treatment of Patients with Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are an important cause of engraftment failure and may negatively impact survival outcomes of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using an HLA-mismatched allograft. The incidence of DSA varies across studies, depending on individual factors, detection or identification methods and thresholds considered clinically relevant. Although DSA testing by multiplex bead arrays remains semiquantitative, it has been widely adopted as a standard test in most transplant centers. Additional testing to determine risk of allograft rejection may include assays with HLA antigens in natural conformation, such as flow cytometric crossmatch, and/or antibody binding assays, such as C1q testing. Patients with low level of DSA (<2,000 mean fluorescence intensity; MFI) may not require treatment, while others with very high level of DSA (>20,000 MFI) may be at very high-risk for engraftment failure despite current therapies. By contrast, in patients with moderate or high level of DSA, desensitization therapy can successfully mitigate DSA levels and improve donor cell engraftment rate, with comparable outcomes to patients without DSA. Treatment is largely empirical and multimodal, involving the removal, neutralization, and blocking of antibodies, as well as inhibition of antibody production to prevent activation of the complement cascade. Desensitization protocols are based on accumulated multicenter experience, while prospective multicenter studies remain lacking. Most patients require a full intensity protocol that includes plasma exchange, while protocols relying only on rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin may be sufficient for patients with lower DSA levels and negative C1q and/or flow cytometric crossmatch. Monitoring DSA levels before and after HSCT could guide preemptive treatment when high levels persist after stem cell infusion. This paper aims to standardize current evidence-based practice and formulate future directions to improve upon current knowledge and advance treatment for this relatively rare, but potentially serious complication in allogeneic HSCT recipients.

The use of haploidentical stem cell transplant as an alternative donor source in patients with decreased access to matched unrelated donors

INTRODUCTION

The likelihood of finding HLA-matched unrelated donors for rare HLA types and non-white European ancestry continues to be a challenge with less than a 70% chance of finding a full match. Mismatched transplants continue to have high rates of transplant-related mortality. With the near-universal ability to find a haploidentical donor in families, haploidentical transplants have become of more critical importance in ethnic minority groups and patients with rare HLA types.

METHODS

Data was collected through clinical trials, review articles, and case reports published in the National Library of Medicine.

RESULTS

The use of improved lymphodepleting conditioning regimens, graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis using regimens such as post-transplant cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate, and tacrolimus have improved engraftment to nearly 100 percent and reduced transplant-related mortality to less than 20 percent. Attention to donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) with interventions using bortezomib, rituximab, and plasmapheresis has decreased graft failure rates.

CONCLUSION

With improved prevention of GVHD with interventions such as post-transplant cyclophosphamide and management of DSAs, haploidentical transplants continue to improve transplant-related mortality (TRM) compared to patients who received matched-related donor transplants. While TRM continues to improve, ongoing research with haploidentical transplants will focus on improving graft and donor immunosuppression and identifying the best regimens to improve TRM without compromising relapse-free survival.

Donor selection in allogeneic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent progress in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) characterization, increased accrual of unrelated donors and cord blood units, and a new platform for haploidentical transplantation have resulted in the widespread availability of donors for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in HLA typing have identified an increasing number of loci and alleles that are crucial for successful transplantation. Newer HLA A, B, C, DRB1, and DQB1 alleles, DPB1 mismatches, and HLA B leader sequence matching are incorporated into donor selection algorithms. Donor selection is highly relevant because of recently published conflicting studies using different donor types. These studies are largely retrospective and compare patients with different diseases and stages, conditioning regimens, graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and time periods. A broad consensus indicates that the best donor is an available matched sibling, followed by a matched unrelated donor, and then alternative donors such as haploidentical, mismatched unrelated, and cord blood units. This consensus is being challenged by other factors, such as donor age, patient condition, urgency of transplantation, and costs involved.

SUMMARY

In this review, we will analyze the unique characteristics of each donor type, the HLA and non HLA factors that affect donor choices, and the outstanding comparative outcome studies of different donor usage in hematologic malignancies.

Desensitization Strategies for Donor-Specific Antibodies in HLA-Mismatched Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients: What We Know and What We Do Not Know

In human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantation settings, donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) can independently lead to graft failure, including both primary graft rejection and primary poor graft function. Although several strategies, such as plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and bortezomib, have been used for DSA desensitization, the effectiveness of desensitization and transplantation outcomes in some patients remain unsatisfactory. In this review, we summarized recent research on the prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies and the underlying mechanism of DSAs in the pathogenesis of graft failure. We mainly focused on desensitization strategies for DSAs, especially novel methods that are being investigated in the preclinical stage and those with promising outcomes after preliminary clinical application.

Relevance of donor-specific HLA antibodies in hematopoietic cell transplantation

Advances in hematopoietic cell transplantation have expanded the use of alternative donors such as haploidentical family donors or mismatched unrelated donors. However, donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) have been recognized as a significant risk factor of primary graft failure after HLA incompatible transplantation. Therefore, screening for HLA antibodies and taking DSA into consideration in the process of donor search play an increasingly important role in donor selection. If an HLA compatible donor is not available, desensitization may enable a successful transplantation. In this review, we describe the currently most widely used methods for HLA antibody detections including their pitfalls. In addition, we summarize the results of the studies on the impact of preformed DSA on transplant outcomes and their treatment options. Many more and larger studies are needed to clarify laboratory issues as well as immunological and clinical aspects in the management of DSA.

A simple predictor for donor-specific anti-HLA antibody desensitisation in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA) has been recognised as an independent risk factor for graft failure in patients undergoing haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), as a first-line strategy for DSA desensitisation, can promptly reduce serum DSA levels. This study aimed to investigate DSA characteristics and identify a biomarker predicting the efficacy of DSA desensitisation in patients proceeding to HID HSCT. We retrospectively enrolled 32 patients with DSA from April 2021 to January 2024, and analysed the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) value of DSA at the different time points of desensitisation treatment. Compared with baseline DSA level before TPE, the median MFI of HLA class I DSA was reduced from 8178.6 to 795.3 (p < 0.001), and HLA class II DSA decreased from 6210.9 to 808.8 (p < 0.001) after TPE. The DSA level in 1:16 diluted pre-TPE serum correlated well with DSA value in post-TPE serum (class I, r = 0.85, p < 0.0001; class II, r = 0.94, p < 0.0001), predicting TPE efficacy in 84.4% of patients. Based on the degree of DSA reduction after TPE, patients were divided into complete responders (decreased by >70%), partial responders (decreased by 30 to 70%) and non-responders (decreased by <30%) and the percentages were 43.8%, 25% and 31.2%, respectively. Non-responders receiving aggressive immunotherapy had longer overall survival compared to those receiving standard strategies (p < 0.05). The 1:16 diluted pre-TPE serum may predict the efficacy of TPE and allow for more rational immunotherapy strategy for patients with DSA proceeding to HID HSCT.

Successful treatment of refractory donor-specific-human leukocyte antigen-antibody-induced primary graft-failure with daratumumab: A case report

Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies represent a main cause of primary graft failure specifically in the setting of haploidentical stem cell transplantation. Newer therapy strategies including daratumumab could overcome some of these limitations. We describe the case of a patient with refractory acute myeloid leukemia. A haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation was therefore initiated. HLA-antibodies testing revealed a high titer of donor-specific antibodies. First desensitization therapy failed, resulting in primary graft failure. A second desensitization regimen including plasmapheresis, intravenous gammaglobulins, and daratumumab resulted in good engraftment. Daratumumab is a promising and effective desensitization option in high-risk allo-sensitized patients undergoing haploidentical stem cell transplantation.

Histocompatibility assessment in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: recommendations from the Italian Society for Immunogenetics and Transplantation Biology (Associazione Italiana di Immunogenetica e Biologia dei Trapianti - AIBT)

The outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is significantly influenced by the degree of HLA histocompatibility between donor and recipient. To provide shared indications for required histocompatibility testing and interpretation before HSCT, the Italian Society for Immunogenetics and Transplantation Biology (Associazione Italiana di Immunogenetica e Biologia dei Trapianti [AIBT]) gathered members and created a working group to discuss and develop recommendations for histocompatibility assessment in HSCT.After a review of the literature and multiple panel discussions, AIBT developed up-to-date recommendations for the resolution levels of HLA typing, histocompatibility definitions of patients and donors, importance of anti-HLA antibodies, and significance of NK alloreactivity, which are reported in this document. These recommendations have been shared with the Italian Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation (Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto di Midollo Osseo, cellule staminali emopoietiche e terapia cellulare [GITMO]) and the Italian National Center for Transplantation (Centro Nazionale Trapianti [CNT]). Notably, the increased use of HLA-mismatched transplantation (i.e., mismatched unrelated, haploidentical) in recent years has made these indications even more relevant for the standardization and improvement of quality of care.This document represents a useful instrument for health care workers involved in the field of HSCT, enhancing synergy with transplant physicians and enabling greater optimization of the available resources.

Daratumumab for De-sensitization of Donor Specific Antibodies: Is it a Quicker and Easier way?

Antibodies directed against donor-specific HLA loci (DSA) has been proved as a main culprit for graft rejection, more specifically in HLA mismatched and haplo-identical transplant settings. There is no standardized regimen to manage the presence of DSAs in allogeneic stem cell transplantations (allo-SCTs). Most widely regimen includes combination of rituximab (anti CD20 antibody), Immunoglobulin (IVIG), plasma exchange, and buffy coat infusion, which is costly and time-consuming. Daratumumab (anti CD38 monoclonal antibody) is an effective therapeutic agent to deplete plasma cells and hence, it has a potential to reduce DSA. It has been utilized widely in solid organ transplantation for this purpose. We used this agent in two haplo-identical transplant patients to eliminate or reduce DSA. We observed definite either reduction or elimination in DSA levels in these cases and we could perform haplo-identical transplantation without much delay and with successful primary engraftment in both scenarios. We emphasize that literature on real-world utilization of daratumumab in allo-SCTs is limited. However, it has been utilized widely in solid organ transplantation for this purpose. Our experience with daratumumab regarding effective reduction of DSA followed by successful engraftment might encourage its use in de-sensitization protocols without much delay in transplantation.

Pretransplant Desensitization of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies with Plasmapheresis and Immunoglobulin Produces Equivalent Outcomes to Patients with No Donor Specific Antibodies in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

In patients requiring haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant (haplo-HCT), the presence of donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) is associated with high rates of primary graft failure and poor overall survival (OS). There is limited data regarding the effect of desensitization. Adult patients undergoing haplo-HCT at Washington University School of Medicine from 2009-2021 were identified. Patients were divided into three cohorts: no DSA, untreated DSA or treated DSA. DSA testing was performed. Desensitization therapy using plasmapheresis and IVIg (immunoglobulin) was performed. We retrospectively identified 304 patients for study inclusion. 14 of 30 patients with DSAs underwent desensitization. By day +2, 57% of patients cleared all DSAs. OS was expectedly worse in patients with untreated DSAs. There were similar results between treated DSA and patients without DSA (OS median: control: 352 days vs. treated: 1331 days vs. untreated: 137 days, p = 0.02). RFS was also significantly different between the groups however with similar RFS in treated DSA and control groups (RFS median: control: 248 vs. treated: 322 v. untreated: 119, p = 0.03). Desensitization before haplo-HCT produces similar outcomes to patients without DSAs. While the optimal desensitization protocol has not been established, all patients received a backbone of plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin.

The impact of pre-transplant anti-HLA antibodies in transplants from HLA-identical sibling donors: A multicenter study

Few studies have performed comparative analysis of the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors (ISD-HSCT) in patients with or without anti-HLA Abs. In this study we retrospectively collected data from a multicenter study to analyze the distribution and impact of the pre-existing anti-HLA Abs in ISD-HSCT. Among 402 recipients, 111 were positive for anti-HLA Abs. Gender, time from diagnosis to transplantation and distribution of primary disease might be risk factors for the occurrence of anti-HLA Abs. We found that patients with anti-HLA Abs had delayed neutrophil engraftment and were more vulnerable to experience Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation. The presence of anti-HLA Abs was proved to be an independent risk factor for neutrophil engraftment (HR 1.42 95% CI 1.13-1.80, p = 0.003) and CMV reactivation (HR 2.03 95% CI 1.19-3.46, p = 0.009). We found that anti-HLA Abs have a negative impact on the prognosis in the early period after transplantation from sibling donors and anti-HLA Abs was also an independent risk factor for the overall survival (OS) at 180 days (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.03-5.27, p = 0.042) among female recipients. In conclusion, anti-HLA Abs have a negative impact on the prognosis early after ISD-HSCT.

Double filtration plasmapheresis combined with rituximab for donor-specific antibody desensitization in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT). Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) avoids the unnecessary loss of plasma proteins and increases the efficiency of purification. To investigate the effectiveness of the desensitization protocol including DFPP and rituximab, we conducted a nested case-control study. Thirty-three patients who had positive DSA were desensitized by the protocol and 99 patients with negative DSA were randomly matched as control. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity values before and after DFPP treatment were 7505.88 ± 4424.38 versus 2013.29 ± 4067.22 (p < 0.001). All patients in DSA group achieved haematopoietic reconstitution and the median neutrophils and platelets engraftment times were 13 (10-21) and 13 (10-29) days respectively. Although the cumulative incidence of II-IV aGVHD (41.4% vs. 28.1%) and 3-year moderate to severe cGVHD (16.8% vs. 7.2%) were higher in DSA cohort than in the control, no statistical significance was observed. The 3-year non-relapse mortality and the overall survival were 6.39% and 72.0%, respectively, in the DSA cohort, which were comparable to the negative control. In conclusion, DFPP and rituximab could be effectively used for desensitization and overcome the negative effects of DSA in Haplo-HSCT.

Successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a patient with type I CD36 deficiency: a case study and literature review

BACKGROUND

CD36-deficient individuals may produce anti-CD36 antibodies through antigenic exposure to CD36, in situations including blood transfusions. Therefore, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from CD36-positive donors to CD36-negative patients remains a challenge.

CASE REPORT

A 64-year-old man with acute myeloid leukemia became refractory to platelet transfusions during chemotherapy. Anti-CD36 antibodies without anti-HLA antibodies were detected in serum, and the absence of CD36 expression on platelets and monocytes confirmed type I CD36 deficiency. The patient achieved complete remission, and received maintenance therapy with CD36-negative platelet transfusions. However, he relapsed soon afterward, and thus underwent peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from a CD36-positive unrelated donor. The anti-CD36 antibody titer had decreased before the transplant, and the PBSCT-course was uneventful. The patient has been well without any complications associated with CD36 status mismatch.

DISCUSSION

The few reports of allogeneic HSCT in patients with CD36 deficiency have suggested that anti-CD36 antibodies could be involved in several post-transplant complications, such as delayed platelet recovery, transfusion refractoriness, and transfusion-related acute lung injury. Our present case confirmed that stem cell transplantation from CD36-positive donors to negative patients is feasible, when it includes careful prior assessment of anti-CD36 antibody titers and interventions to attenuate them.

Fifty years of BMT: risk stratification, donor matching, and stem cell collection for transplantation

In this review, we discuss recipient risk assessment for allo-HCT regarding comorbidities present at baseline to predict non relapse mortality. We further reviewed the incorporation of remission status and cytogenetic risk prior to allograft transplantation to predict relapse rates for hematologic malignancies. HCT-CI and DRI are tools available to physicians to assess the risk-benefit of allo-HCT in patients referred for transplantation. Next, we discuss our algorithm for donor selection and criteria for donor selection in case matched donors are not available. Finally, we discuss our approach for stem cell mobilization, especially in donors failing G-CSF, and our approach for the use of plerixafor and data supporting its use.

[Impact of immunosuppression intensified conditioning regimen for patients with strong positive pre-transplantation donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

Objective: To explore the efficacy of immunosuppression intensified conditioning regimen in patients who have strongly positive donor-specific Anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) and received a haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) . Methods: Clinical data of 10 patients with strongly positive pretransplant DSAs (defined as MFI ≥10000) were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All of them received a haplo-HSCT in the Hematology Department of Shanghai Zhaxin Traditional Chinese & Western Medicine Hospital. Results: ① Of all ten patients, three were males, and seven were females, with a median age of 53.5 (36-64) years. Of the 10 patients, three were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia, two were myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), two were chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), two were in an accelerated phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-AP), and one was primary myelofibrosis (PMF). ② Conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine (Flu) /busulfan (Bu) combined with whole-body irradiation (TBI) /cyclophosphamide (Cy). ③ On the seventh day after transplantation, the median pretransplant DSA level was MFI 15 999 (10 210-23 417) and 10 787 (0-22 720). ④ Eight patients acquired hematopoietic reconstitution; the median time of neutrophil engraftment was 14 (10-16) days; and 18 (14-20) days for platelet engraftment. After a median follow-up of 12.5 (1.5-27) months, primary graft failure was found in one patient and another with poor graft function. Seven patients remained in a disease remission state, and all were DSA-negative. Conclusions: An intensified immunosuppression conditioning regimen can efficiently decrease the level of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs), leading to good short-term efficacy.

Applying Rituximab During the Conditioning Regimen Prevents Epstein-Barr Virus Infection Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in a Children's Cohort: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

Since hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is an important therapy for malignant and non-malignant pediatric diseases, improving transplant-related mortality remains a challenge. Currently, rituximab, a monoclonal antibody of anti-CD20, is widely used for several post-HSCT complications. However, few studies have focused on the application of rituximab before HSCT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study from January 2019 to July 2021 to determine this effect in a single center. Forty-eight patients were included in the rituximab group, with a one-to-one ratio matched to the control group.

RESULTS

Both the occurrence rate and cumulative incidence rate of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection were significantly lower in the rituximab group than in the without-rituximab group (10.4% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.014 and 12.2% vs. 39.3% p = 0.0026, respectively). Furthermore, without the application of rituximab was identified as a risk factor for post-HSCT EBV infection via both univariate [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.17, 95%CI (1.52-11.43), p = 0.005] and multivariate analyses [HR = 4.65, 95%CI (1.66-13.0), p = 0.003]. Although the overall survival (OS) probability of the rituximab group was comparable to the without-rituximab group, a markedly improved OS of the rituximab group was found in the malignant disease subgroup (78.9% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.032). The outcomes of graft-versus-host disease, neutrophil and platelet engraftment, other viral infections, and the reconstitution of lymphocytes showed no significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of rituximab before HSCT may prevent EBV infection following HSCT.

Results of haploidentical transplant in patients with donor-specific antibodies: a survey on behalf of the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant and Cell Therapy

Background

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are IgG allo-antibodies against mismatched donor HLA molecules and can cause graft failure (GF) in the setting of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). Our aim was to report the experience of the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant (GETH-TC) in DSA-positive patients who had undergone haplo-HSCT.

Methods

We conducted a survey of patients who underwent haplo-HSCT in GETH-TC centers between 2012 and 2021. Data were collected on the DSA assay used, monitoring strategy, complement fixation, criteria for desensitization, desensitization strategies and transplant outcomes.

Results

Fifteen centers from the GETH-TC responded to the survey. During the study period, 1,454 patients underwent haplo-HSCT. Seventy of the transplants were performed in 69 DSA-positive patients, all of whom lacked a suitable alternative donor; 61 (88%) patients were female (90% with prior pregnancies). All patients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Regarding baseline DSA intensity, 46 (67%) patients presented mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) >5,000, including 21 (30%) with MFI >10,000 and three (4%) with MFI >20,000. Six patients did not receive desensitization treatment, four of them with MFI <5,000. Of 63 patients receiving desensitization treatment, 48 (76%) were tested after desensitization therapy, and a reduction in intensity was confirmed in 45 (71%). Three patients (5%) experienced an increase in MFI after desensitization, two of whom experienced primary GF. Cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment at day 28 was 74% in a median of 18 days (IQR, 15─20); six patients died before engraftment due to toxicity or infection and eight patients had primary GF despite desensitization in seven of them. After a median follow-up of 30 months, two-year overall and event-free survival were 46.5% and 39%, respectively. The two-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 16% and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 43%. Infection was the most frequent cause of NRM, followed by endothelial toxicity. Multivariate analysis identified baseline MFI >20,000 as an independent risk factor for survival and an increase in titers after infusion as an independent risk factor for GF.

Conclusions

Haplo-HSCT is feasible in DSA-positive patients, with high rates of engraftment after desensitization guided by DSA intensity. Baseline MFI >20,000 and increased intensity after infusion are risk factors for survival and GF.

Donor-specific HLA antibodies are associated with graft failure and delayed hematologic recovery after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft failure (GF) is one of the major concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although earlier reports have associated the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) with increased risk of GF after unrelated donor allo-HCT, recent studies have failed to confirm this association.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to validate the presence of DSAs as a risk factor for GF and hematologic recovery in the unrelated donor allo-HCT setting.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated 303 consecutive patients who underwent their first unrelated donor allo-HCT at our institution from January 2008 to December 2017. DSA evaluation was performed using 2 Single Antigen Beads (SAB) assays, DSA titration with 1:2, 1:8, and 1:32 dilutions, C1q-binding assay, and absorption/elution protocol to assess possible false-positive DSA reactivity. The primary endpoints were neutrophil and platelet recovery and GF, whereas the secondary endpoint was overall survival. Multivariable analyses were performed using Fine-Gray competing risks regression or Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 14 years (range, 0-61 years), 56.1% were male, and 52.5% were transplanted for nonmalignant diseases. Eleven patients (3.63%) were DSA-positive. Of them, 10 had preexisting DSAs, and one showed post-transplant de novo DSA. Nine patients had 1 DSA, 1 had 2 DSAs, and 1 had 3 DSAs, with a median MFI of 4334 (range, 588-20,456) and 3581 (range, 227-12,266) in LABScreen and LIFECODES SAB assays, respectively. Overall, 21 patients experienced GF. Of them, 12 had primary graft rejection, 8 had secondary graft rejection, and 1 had primary poor graft function. The cumulative incidences of GF at 28, 100, and 365 days were 4.0% (95% CI, 2.2%-6.6%), 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.8%), and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4%-10.2%), respectively. In the multivariable analyses, DSA-positive patients had significantly delayed neutrophil (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; P = .006) and platelet recovery (SHR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.74; P = .0003) than patients without DSAs. In addition, only DSAs were significant predictors of primary GF at 28 days (SHR = 2.78; 95% CI, 1.65-4.68; P = .0001). The Fine-Gray regression also demonstrated that the presence of DSAs was strongly associated with a higher incidence of overall GF (SHR = 7.60; 95%CI, 2.61-22.14; P = .0002). DSA-positive patients with GF had significantly higher median MFI values than DSA-positive patients who achieved engraftment in LIFECODES SAB assay using neat serum (10,334 vs. 1250; P = .006) and in LABScreen SAB at 1:32 dilution (1627 vs. 61; P = .006). All 3 patients with C1q-positive DSAs failed to engraft. DSAs were not predictive of inferior survival (hazard ratio = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.20-1.26, P = .14).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results validate the presence of DSAs as a significant risk factor for GF and poor hematologic recovery after unrelated donor allo-HCT. Thus, careful pre-transplant DSA evaluation may optimize unrelated donor selection and improve allo-HCT outcomes.

High-Dose immunoglobulin Intervention as an effective and simple strategy for donor specific Anti-HLA antibody desensitization in haploidentical transplant

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) is a significant obstacle to successful haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) and is associated with poor engraftment rates. DSA strongly positive patients with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) over 5000 have a primary poor graft function (PGF) rate of over 60%. Currently, there is no consensus on the desensitization of DSA, and existing strategies are complex and have limited effectiveness. To address this issue, we conducted a retrospective study on 19 patients with strongly positive DSA (MFI over 5000) who underwent haplo-HSCT and were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)-based therapy. We also included 38 baseline-matched patients with DSA-negative as controls. Our findings revealed that the cumulative incidence of engraftment, PGF, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), virus infection, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in the DSA strongly positive group after desensitization were comparable to those in the DSA negative group (P > 0.05). Our multivariable analysis showed that disease remission was a protective factor against PGF (P = 0.005, OR = 0.019, 95% CI 0.001-0.312). Subgroup analysis revealed that the desensitization efficacy was equal regardless of DSA type against HLA-I or II, and MFI value over 5000 or not. In conclusion, we propose a simple and effective DSA desensitization strategy based on immunoglobulin to ensure successful engraftment and improve patient prognosis.

Treatment with the combination of rituximab and intravenous γ globulin is effective in promoting engraftment in donor specific antibody positive patients receiving myeloablative conditioning haploidentical stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT). Effective procedures are needed for those who demand urgent transplantation and have no other donor options.

OBJECTIVE

We here retrospectively analyzed 13 patients with DSAs successfully treated with desensitization of rituximab and intravenous γ globulin prior to HaploSCT from March 2017 to July 2022.

STUDY DESIGN

All 13 patients were with DSA MFI >4000 of at least one loci before desensitization. Of the 13 patients, 10 patients were with the initial diagnosis of malignant hematological diseases, and 3 were diagnosed with aplastic anemia. Patients were treated with one (n=3) or two(n=10) doses of rituximab (375mg/m² for one dose). All patients receive the same total dose of 0.4g/kg of intravenous γ globulin (IVIg) within 72 hours before haploidentical stem cell administration to neutralize the remaining DSA.

RESULTS

All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment and 12 patients achieved primary platelet engraftment. The patient with primary platelet engraftment failure received purified CD34 positive stem cell infusion nearly 1 year after transplantation and achieved platelet engraftment thereafter. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) is 73.4%.

CONCLUSION

Although further studies on larger numbers of patients are needed, it is clear that the combination of IVIg and rituximab is an effective way to clear DSA and has a strong effect on promoting engraftment and survival for patients with DSA. It is a practical and adaptable combination of treatment options.

Adverse effect of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies directed at HLA-DP/-DQ on engraftment in cord blood transplantation

BACKGROUND AIMS

While donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) in the recipient before transplantation are associated with graft failure in cord-blood transplantation (CBT), effects of DSAs other than against HLA-A, -B or -DRB1 on transplantation outcomes remained poorly understood.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 567 single-unit CBT recipients to evaluate impact of DSAs against HLA-DP and -DQ on CBT outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 143 recipients (25.2%) who had anti-HLA antibodies, nine harbored DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ. DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ were associated with a significantly lower neutrophil engraftment rate (55.6% versus 91.8%, P = 0.032) and with a marginally lower platelet engraftment rate (46.7% versus 75.3%, P = 0.128) at day 100 after transplantation, compared with patients without anti-HLA antibodies. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in patients with DSAs for HLA-DP or -DQ was significantly longer than that in patients without anti-HLA antibodies (median, 25 versus 21 days, P = 0.002 in neutrophil; median 61 versus 46 days, P = 0.014 in platelet). Cumulative incidence of bacterial infection at day 100 was significantly greater (88.9% versus 57.1%, P = 0.024), and re-transplant-free survival was marginally lower (55.6% versus 76.8%, P = 0.132) in patients with DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ, compared with those without anti-HLA antibodies. These findings suggest that DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ lead to unfavorable engraftment, which may increase risk of bacterial infection, and reduce survival soon after CBT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the importance of evaluating DSAs against HLA-DP and -DQ in recipients before selecting CB units.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: An overview of obstacles and opportunities

As an important treatment for acute myeloid leukemia, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) plays an important role in reducing relapse and improving long-term survival. With rapid advancements in basic research in molecular biology and immunology and with deepening understanding of the biological characteristics of hematopoietic stem cells, allo-HSCT has been widely applied in clinical practice. During allo-HSCT, preconditioning, the donor, and the source of stem cells can be tailored to the patient’s conditions, greatly broadening the indications for HSCT, with clear survival benefits. However, the risks associated with allo-HSCT remain high, i.e. hematopoietic reconstitution failure, delayed immune reconstitution, graft-versus-host disease, and post-transplant relapse, which are bottlenecks for further improvements in allo-HSCT efficacy and have become hot topics in the field of HSCT. Other bottlenecks recognized in the current treatment of individuals diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia and subjected to allo-HSCT include the selection of the most appropriate conditioning regimen and post-transplantation management. In this paper, we reviewed the progress of relevant research regarding these aspects.

Graft failure in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients: diagnosis and treatment

Graft failure is a group of complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which occurs according to different data up to 30%. The group of complications includes primary and secondary graft failure, primary, secondary and transient poor graft function and graft rejection. Diagnostic difficulties consist in the lack of unified diagnostic criteria accepted in the transplantation community and in the dual interpretation of these complications according to the foreign literature. The purpose of this literature review was to identify the most common criteria of different types of graft failure and determine the tactics of diagnosis and treatment. In this review we analyzed data from various literature sources, gave definitions of graft failure and poor graft function. We analyzed the literature data on the methods used to treat these conditions.

New strategies for mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT)

With increasing numbers of patients with hematologic malignancies requiring allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), including minority racial and ethnic groups, the limited availability of matched related donors and matched unrelated donors remains a significant obstacle. Hence, the use of alternative donors such as haploidentical and mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs) is on the rise. Herein, we present case studies to outline a rational and stepwise approach with a focus on the use of MMUD for HCT in patients with hematologic malignancies. We also review novel approaches used to reduce the incidence of severe graft-versus-host disease and improve HCT outcomes in patients undergoing MMUD HCT.

Outcomes of patients who underwent treatment for anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies before receiving a haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant

Pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients who receive many blood product transfusions, such as individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD), severe aplastic anemia (SAA) or indolent hematologic malignancies, are at high risk for developing donor-specific antibodies (DSA). DSAs with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) greater than 5000 have been associated with significant graft failure, but lower MFI values between 2000 and 5000 may result in poor graft function after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Desensitization strategies have been developed to reduce the DSA burden in HCT recipients before graft infusion, but the experience with these strategies in the pediatric and AYA populations is not well described in the literature. Here, we describe our experience with successful desensitization by using a combination of treatment strategies in five pediatric and AYA patients, including a novel use of daratumumab in a young adult patient who had refractory DSAs and had suffered serious side effects from conventional desensitization strategies. The presence of elevated DSAs in pediatric and AYA recipients of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched haploidentical HCT can be overcome by a multipronged treatment strategy.

Antigen-guided depletion of anti-HLA antibody-producing cells by HLA-Fc fusion proteins

Platelet transfusion and transplantation of allogeneic stem cells and solid organs are life-saving therapies. Unwanted alloantibodies to nonself human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) on donor cells increase the immunological barrier to these therapies and are important causes of platelet transfusion refractoriness and graft rejection. Although the specificities of anti-HLA antibodies can be determined at the allelic level, traditional treatments for antibody-mediated rejection nonselectively suppress humoral immunity and are not universally successful. We designed HLA-Fc fusion proteins with a bivalent targeting module derived from extracellular domains of HLA and an Fc effector module from mouse IgG2a. We found that HLA-Fc with A2 (A2Fc) and B7 (B7Fc) antigens lowered HLA-A2- and HLA-B7-specific reactivities, respectively, in sera from HLA-sensitized patients. A2Fc and B7Fc bound to B-cell hybridomas bearing surface immunoglobulins with cognate specificities and triggered antigen-specific and Fc-dependent cytotoxicity in vitro. In immunodeficient mice carrying HLA-A2-specific hybridoma cells, A2Fc treatment lowered circulating anti-HLA-A2 levels, abolished the outgrowth of hybridoma cells, and prolonged survival compared with control groups. In an in vivo anti-HLA-A2-mediated platelet transfusion refractoriness model, A2Fc treatment mitigated refractoriness. These results support HLA-Fc being a novel strategy for antigen-specific humoral suppression to improve transfusion and transplantation outcomes. With the long-term goal of targeting HLA-specific memory B cells for desensitization, further studies of HLA-Fc's efficacy in immune-competent animal models are warranted.

Donor selection for KIR alloreactivity is associated with superior survival in haploidentical transplant with PTCy

With the continuous increase in the use of haploidentical donors for transplantation, the selection of donors becomes increasingly important. Haploidentical donors have been selected primarily based on clinical characteristics, while the effects of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) on outcomes of haploidentical-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) remain inconclusive. The present study aimed to thoroughly evaluate the effect of KIRs and binding ligands assessed by various models, in addition to other patient/donor variables, on clinical outcomes in haplo-HSCT. In a cohort of 354 patients undergoing their first haplo-HSCT, we found that a higher Count Functional inhibitory KIR score (CF-iKIR) was associated with improved progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; P = .029) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.66; P = .016), while none of the other models predicted for survival in these patients. Moreover, using exploratory classification and regression tree analysis, we found that donor age &lt;58 years combined with cytomegalovirus-nonreactive recipient was associated with the best OS, whereas donor age &gt;58 years was associated with the worst OS. In the rest of our cohort (80%), cytomegalovirus-reactive recipients with a donor &lt;58 years old, a higher CF-iKIR was associated with superior OS. The 3-year OS rates were 73.9%, 54.1% (HR, 1.84; P = .044), 44.5% (HR, 2.01; P = .003), and 18.5% (HR, 5.44; P &lt;.001) in the best, better, poor, and worse donor groups, respectively. Our results suggest that KIR alloreactivity assessed by CF-iKIR score can help optimize donor selection in haplo-HSCT.

The impact of Rituximab administered before transplantation in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A real-world study

Rituximab is used to eliminate B cells as a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, a B-cell antigen expressed on B cells. To explore the impact of rituximab administered before transplantation, we implemented a retrospective, monocentric study and utilized real-world data collected at our center between January 2018 and December 2020, and then followed until December 2021. Based on whether a dose of 375mg/m2 rituximab was used at least once within two weeks before transplantation, patients undergoing allo-HSCT were classified into two groups: rituximab (N=176) and non-rituximab (N=344) group. Amongst all the patients, the application of rituximab decreased EBV reactivation (P&lt;0.01) and rituximab was an independent factor in the prevention of EBV reactivation by both univariate and multivariate analyses (HR 0.56, 95%CI 0.33-0.97, P=0.04). In AML patients, there were significant differences in the cumulative incidence of aGVHD between the two groups (P=0.04). Our data showed that rituximab was association with a decreased incidence of aGVHD in AML patients according to both univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no difference between the two groups in other sets of populations. Thus, our study indicated that rituximab administered before transplantation may help prevent EBV reactivation in all allo-HSCT patients, as well as prevent aGVHD in AML patients after allo-HSCT.

Donor specific HLA antibody in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Implications for donor selection

Advances in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) have led to changes in the approach to donor selection. Many of these new approaches result in greater HLA loci mismatching, either through the selection of haploidentical donors or permissive HLA mismatches. Although these approaches increase the potential of transplant for many patients by expanding the number of acceptable donor HLA genotypes, they add the potential barrier of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). DSA presents a unique challenge in HSCT, as it can limit engraftment and lead to graft failure. However, transient reduction of HLA antibodies through desensitization treatments can limit the risk of graft failure and facilitate engraftment. Thus, the consideration of DSA in donor selection and the management of DSA prior to transplant are playing an increasingly important role in HSCT. In this review, we will discuss studies addressing the role of HLA antibodies in HSCT, the reported impact of desensitization on DSA levels, and the implications for selecting donors for patients with DSA. We found that there is a clear consensus that moderate strength DSA should be avoided, while desensitization strategies are reported to be effective in most cases at reducing DSA to amenable levels. There is limited information regarding the impact of specific characteristics of DSA, such as HLA loci or overall level of sensitization, which could further aid in donor selection for sensitized HSCT candidates.

The impact of HLA donor-specific antibodies on engraftment and the evolving desensitization strategies

The majority of contemporary allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) procedures utilize partially HLA-mismatched stem cell grafts. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are associated with primary graft failure independent of the graft source, conditioning intensity and other patient and donor factors. Here we provide an update on testing and monitoring of DSA, review the impact of DSA on stem cell engraftment, and present promising desensitization modalities. Ultimately, we attempt to provide practical recommendations for DSA screening and mitigation strategies.