Beta agonists, inhaled steroids, and the risk of intensive care unit admission for asthma

Over-the-counter use of short-acting beta-2 agonists: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The widespread use of short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) as an as-needed treatment for asthma is well-established. However, excessive use of SABA has been linked to undesirable outcomes such as increased risk of asthma attacks, exacerbations, and even death. The availability of SABA as an over-the-counter (OTC) medication has contributed to their overuse, leading to undertreated asthma and reduced access to asthma education.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to summarize the prevalence, characteristic features of, and factors contributing to over-the-counter SABA purchase or overuse.

METHODS

The databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Springer Link, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and APA PsycArticles. Original research articles reporting the prevalence, characteristics features, and factors regarding over-the-counter SABA use, available as full text, published in English language between the year 2000 and April 2023 were included in this review. Commentaries, letters to editor, review articles, qualitative studies, clinical trials, and conference proceedings were excluded. Data extraction was followed by a review of the quality of studies included and data were then synthesized for meaningful findings. This systematic review had been registered in the PROSPERO with registration number CRD42023421007.

RESULTS

A total of 18 articles were included. The prevalence range of OTC SABA users in populations were 1.4% to 39.6% and SABA over-users among OTC users were 14% to 66.4%. Factors mostly associated with this behavior were moderate-severe asthma, and less use of preventers. On top of that, not understanding the risk of SABA overuse was clear in many studies that explored this factor.

CONCLUSION

Over-the-counter purchase and overuse of SABA medication is a common problem, leading to adverse consequences such as uncontrolled asthma and increased healthcare utilization. Addressing these issues requires improved patient education about their conditions and adequate information regarding the potential long-term effects of SABA use by the healthcare providers. Management and education of asthma patients, including regular monitoring and follow-up, can help reduce overuse of SABA medication and prevent negative consequences.

Asthma in the intensive care unit: A review of patient characteristics and outcomes

Background

Most asthma-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, and South Africa (SA) is ranked fifth in global asthma mortality. Little is known about the characteristics and outcome of asthma patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission in SA.

Objectives

To identify and characterise patients with acute severe asthma admitted to the respiratory ICU at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, SA, in order to evaluate outcomes and identify predictors of poor outcomes in those admitted.

Methods

We performed a retrospective descriptive study of patients with severe asthma admitted to the respiratory ICU at Groote Schuur Hospital between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019.

Results

One hundred and three patients (110 admission episodes) were identified with an acute asthma exacerbation requiring ICU admission; all were mechanically ventilated. There was a female preponderance (53.6%; n=59/110), with a median (range) age overall of 33 (13 - 84) years. Of all admissions, 40 (36.4%) were current tobacco smokers and 16 (14.5%) patients with a history of substance abuse. Two thirds (60.0%; n=66/110) of the patients were using an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). No predictors of mortality were evident in multivariate modelling, although those who died were older, and had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores and longer duration of admission. Only 59 of the surviving 96 individual patients (61.5%) attended a specialist pulmonology clinic after discharge.

Conclusion

Among patients admitted to the respiratory ICU at Groote Schuur Hospital for asthma exacerbations, there was a high prevalence of smokers and poor coverage with inhaled ICSs. Although mortality was low compared with general ICU mortality, more needs to be done to prevent acute severe asthma exacerbations.

Study synopsis

What the study adds. Intensive care unit (ICU) admission represents the most severe form of exacerbation of asthma. South Africa (SA) has a very high rate of asthma deaths, and this study demonstrates that admission to an ICU with a very severe asthma exacerbation frequently results in a good outcome. However, many of the patients admitted to the ICU were not adequately treated with background asthma medications prior to their admission. Implications of the findings. Death from asthma should be avoidable, and admission to an ICU is not associated with high mortality. Patients are therefore likely to be dying at home or out of hospital. Better education and access to medication and early access to health services rather than improved in-hospital care would potentially alter SA's high asthma mortality.

Characteristics of Reliever Inhaler Users and Asthma Control: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study in Portuguese Community Pharmacies

PURPOSE

SABA overuse might indicate poorly managed or uncontrolled asthma and be responsible for poor health outcomes. The aim of this study integrated in new fourth multi-design SABINA+ pillar was to characterize the population using short-acting β2-agonists for asthma and examine the patterns of its use among community pharmacy customers in Portugal, as well as identify characteristics associated with disease control and explore potential differences between GINA treatment steps.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted in Portuguese community pharmacies between 29 May 2018 and 15 August 2018. Participants were adults (age ≥18 years) self-reporting asthma diagnosis recruited in the context of a short-acting β2-agonist dispense. A two-part questionnaire (pharmacist interview and self-administered) was used to collect information about sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, reliever inhaler use, healthcare resource consumption and self-reported disease control (assessed by the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test - CARAT®). Descriptive statistics was done to characterize the study sample. After categorizing patients according to GINA steps, based on their therapeutic regimen, we performed an exploratory subgroup analysis to evaluate if there were any differences between such groups in terms of the variables collected. A logistic regression was used to identify the potential determinants of overall disease control.

RESULTS

Around 50.8% of patients were male, and the average age was 52 years old. Half of the patients never smoked, and 51.9% were employed. More than half of the patients report inhaler overreliance - purchasing more than 1 pack in 3 months (65.0%) or using the inhaler on more than 8 days over the previous 4 weeks (50.2%). Of the total number of patients in the study, 79.1% had poorly controlled asthma symptoms, and 78.7% had overall poorly controlled respiratory symptoms. We found statistically significant differences between GINA treatment steps in all sociodemographic characteristics (sex, mean age, education level, employment status); maximum number of SABA uses in 24h, CARAT score (total an asthma sub-score); history of exacerbations requiring ED visits or treatment with OCS for at least 3 days in the previous 12 months. Logistic regression revealed that patients reporting SABA use in more than 8 days in the previous 4 weeks and patients with at least 1 exacerbation requiring treatment with OCS for at least 3 days in the previous 12 months have greater odds of poor disease control [adjusted OR (95% CI): 2.6 (1.3-5.2) and 3.0 (1.3-6.6)].

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, it can be inferred that the asthma population using SABA is largely uncontrolled and uses reliever inhalers excessively.

Short-acting bronchodilators purchase as a marker for asthma control

BACKGROUND

Administrative data has been used to quantify the amount of medication use in order to identify at-risk asthma patients. In our previous study we used short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) inhalers as a marker for asthma control.

METHODS

We further analyzed patient data from the SABA inhalers study in which asthma control was classified by GINA guidelines, physician assessment and the patients overall estimation. We identified all short-acting bronchodilator purchases (SABA and anticholinergic inhalers and solutions) in the year prior to administering the questionnaire relating to asthma control, and compared inhaled and systemic steroid use.

RESULTS

Of 241 asthma patients, 83 completed questionnaires. Using the GINA guidelines criteria, 26 were symptom controlled, 46 were partially controlled and 11 were uncontrolled. Using patients' overall impression of their asthma control, mean annual short-acting bronchodilator purchases were significantly higher in the partially controlled and uncontrolled patients (10 and 8.9 respectively) than in the controlled patients (2, p = 0.005). Most asthma patients purchase less than half of the controller medications prescribed to them.

CONCLUSION

When using administrative data, 3 or more -of all types of short-acting bronchodilator purchases in one year should alert the physician to evaluate asthma control and purchase alerts should notify both physicians and patients when controller consumption is low.

Development of a pediatric asthma predictive index for hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Variation in emergency department (ED) management for asthma exacerbation leads to disparities in care. Current asthma severity scores are insufficient to be used for hospitalization decisions.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and internally validate an asthma predictive index for hospitalization (APIH) to guide practitioners in their admission decision for children with asthma exacerbations.

METHODS

Data were collected from 12,066 children between 5 and 18 years old diagnosed with asthma exacerbation in the ED. Epidemiologic findings, number of inhaled corticosteroid canisters, short-acting β-blocker canisters, oral steroids, coexisting atopy, family history of atopy, insurance, and prior asthma ED visits or hospitalizations were compared between patients hospitalized and discharged. We used univariate analysis and multivariate analysis to determine the best predictor variables for hospitalization. Our study internally validated the prediction index to estimate future performance of the prediction rule.

RESULTS

The highest risk factors associated with asthma hospitalization from the ED are oxygen saturation less than 94%, respiratory rate greater than 31/min, history of pneumonia, and asthma ED visits in past 12 months. With a reduced predictive model that combined these risk factors, the odds ratio was 44.9 (95% CI, 32.8-61.4), which is extremely significant. Our C index of discrimination of 0.77 was similar to the validation C index of 0.78, which confirms a solid prediction model.

CONCLUSION

We have developed and internally validated a pediatric hospitalization prediction index for acute asthma exacerbation in the ED. Further studies are needed to externally validate the APIH before its implementation into clinical practice.

Determination of asthma control using administrative data regarding short-acting beta-agonist inhaler purchase

BACKGROUND

Symptom control is a primary goal in asthma. We hypothesized that administrative data regarding rescue inhaler purchases may correlate with asthma symptom control.

METHODS

We identified all patients who purchased short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) inhalers during the course of one year in the database of a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO). Primary physicians identified asthma patients and classified their asthma symptom control into three groups according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. Asthma patients were asked to answer symptom questionnaires and grade their asthma control. SABA inhaler purchases were compared between asthma control groups as classified by the guidelines, the physicians and the patients. We also compared the agreement on asthma control between the three methods of classification.

RESULTS

Of 241 asthma patients, 83 completed the questionnaires. Using the GINA guidelines criteria, 26 were symptom controlled, 46 were partially controlled and 11 were uncontrolled. SABA inhaler purchases were not significantly lower in the controlled group. Using patients' overall impression of their asthma control, the mean numbers of SABA inhalers purchased were 1.5, 4.4 and 6.4 per year in the controlled, partially controlled and uncontrolled groups, respectively (p = 0.03). Patients' classification of asthma control had better agreement (kappa = 0.34) with GINA guidelines than physician's' agreement (kappa = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

When using administrative data for asthma patients, 2 or more SABA inhaler purchases in one year should alert the physician for the need for asthma control evaluation. Purchase of at least 4 SABA inhalers a year may be regarded as a marker for asthma that is not controlled.

The Benefits and Challenges of Managing Asthma in Hispanic Families in South Texas: A Mixed-Methods Study

Background

Understanding the experience of Hispanic parents of children diagnosed with asthma can be useful in the delivery of effective and meaningful asthma education. In order to assess the needs of Hispanic families with asthmatic children in South Texas, investigators utilized a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods.

Objectives

This study aimed (1) to assess the impact of asthma in the quality of life of Hispanic children and their families and (2) to identify barriers and challenges to asthma management as perceived by parents of children diagnosed with asthma.

Methods

A mixed-methods study included a quality-of-life survey and focus group discussions. The Children’s Health Survey for Asthma (CHSA) was completed by 90 parents of children with asthma. Three focus groups were conducted with 15 low-income, Hispanic parents of asthmatic children to assess their needs and experience in managing the disease.

Results

Results from the CHSA showed that asthma significantly affects the quality of life of children with asthma and their families, particularly the emotional dimensions and the child’s physical health. Fifty-three percent of the children had visited the emergency room, and 51% had been hospitalized due to asthma. One out of five parents had missed work, and 27% of children had missed school in the past 2 weeks due to the child’s asthma. In the focus group discussions, the key themes emerging included lack of asthma knowledge, the burden of disease for asthmatic children and their families, and the importance of asthma education and self-management behaviors for asthma control.

Conclusion

One of the main challenges faced by Hispanic families with asthmatic children is the lack of asthma-related knowledge to help understand and control their children’s disease. Lack of knowledge and self-management skills lead to significant stress and anxiety among children with asthma and their parents. Results highlight that while asthma has an effect on the quality of life of children and their families, particularly on the emotional health domain, a wide dissemination of asthma management education in different settings might help prevent asthma attacks and improve symptom control among those suffering from this disease along the US–Mexico border.

Bronchodilator reliever use and its association with the economic and humanistic burden of COPD: a propensity-matched study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Short-acting bronchodilators are normally used as supplemental relief medication for breakthrough symptoms in COPD patients. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to assess if more frequent vs infrequent use of relief medication in maintenance-treated COPD patients, split by the severity dyspnea, was associated with an increase in the overall disease burden.

METHODS

A population-based cross-sectional survey (Adelphi DSP) was conducted among patients with COPD in five European countries. Information was collected on demographic and clinical characteristics, reliever inhaler use, dyspnea (mMRC), health status (CAT, EQ-5D), sleep quality (JSEQ) and healthcare resource use including moderate-severe COPD exacerbations, physician visits, COPD medications and other COPD related resources. The humanistic and economic burden was compared between patients with infrequent reliever use (<1 occasion/week) and more frequent use (≥ 1 occasion/week). The association between increased reliever use and economic burden was also examined after matching patients based on propensity-scores balancing demographic and disease burden characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the 1373 COPD patients prescribed a reliever inhaler, 29% reported using reliever medication ≥1 occasion/week. In the unmatched cohort, more frequent reliever use (n = 377) compared to infrequent use (n = 996) was linked to poorer health status (CAT: 25.7 vs 20.0; p < .0001; EQ-5D-3L: 0.63 vs 0.82; p < .0001) and poorer sleep quality (JSEQ: 8.6 vs 4.6 units; p < .0001). More frequent reliever use was also associated with higher annual rates of moderate/severe exacerbations (1.6 vs 1.0 events/year; p < .0001) and respiratory specialist visits (2.8 vs 2.2 events/year; p = .0001). In the propensity-score matched population, more frequent reliever use was also associated with significantly higher annual costs for COPD management (€5,034 vs €3,705, p = .0327) compared to patients with infrequent reliever use.

CONCLUSION

In moderate-to-severe COPD, more frequent reliever use is associated with increased exacerbation risk and increased management costs.

Need for intensive care in patients admitted for asthma: Red flags from the social history

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Asthma deaths in Australia are associated with illicit substance abuse, mental health problems and social issues. However, a large proportion of these deaths occurs out of hospital and is difficult to avert by the time the individuals seek medical attention. We hypothesized that these characteristics may also increase the risk for a patient to require intensive care admission when they present to emergency departments.

METHODS

We studied consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary metropolitan hospital with a primary diagnosis of asthma between January 2010 and January 2014. Clinical and demographical data were obtained from chart review. The patient's postcode was used as a surrogate for socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

There were 482 asthma patients admitted during the study period, of which 39 required intensive care. Ten patients admitted to intensive care (26%) used illicit drugs compared with 29 (7%) of those admitted to the ward (adjusted odds ratio: 3.6, P = 0.012). For illicit users, nonadherence to preventer therapy was associated with an even higher risk of intensive care unit admission. Socioeconomic index was lower in the group requiring intensive care admission. The frequency of psychiatric diagnoses was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Among patients admitted to hospital for asthma, illicit substance abuse is a strong independent risk factor for intensive care requirement. Preventer therapy nonadherence further increases this risk. Lower socioeconomic status is also associated with increased risk. These historical features should be actively sought on admission and may serve as useful 'red flags' to prompt consideration of intensive monitoring.

The potential role of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the management of asthma

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition characterised by reversible airflow obstruction and airway hyperreactivity. The course of the illness may be punctuated by exacerbations resulting in deterioration in quality of life and, in some cases, days lost from school or work. That asthma is common and increasingly prevalent magnifies the importance of any potential economic costs, and promoting asthma control represents an important public health agenda. While lifestyle changes represent a valuable contribution in some patients, the majority of asthmatic patients require therapeutic intervention. The recognition of the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of asthma has led to an emphasis on regular anti-inflammatory therapy, of which inhaled corticosteroid treatment remains the most superior. In selected patients, further improvements in asthma control may be gained by the addition of regular inhaled long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists or oral leukotriene receptor antagonists to inhaled corticosteroid therapy. However, a significant minority of patients with asthma remain poorly controlled despite appropriate treatment, suggesting that additional corticosteroid nonresponsive inflammatory pathways may be operative. Furthermore, some patients with asthma display an accelerated decline in lung function, suggesting that active airway re-modeling is occurring. Such observations have focused attention on the potential to develop new therapies which complement existing treatments by targeting additional inflammatory pathways. The central role of phosphodiesterase (PDE), and in particular the PDE4 enzyme, in the regulation of key inflammatory cells believed to be important in asthma - including eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophils and airway smooth muscle - suggests that drugs designed to target this enzyme will have the potential to deliver both bronchodilation and modulate the asthmatic inflammatory response. In vivo studies on individual inflammatory cells suggest that the effects are likely to be favorable in asthma, and animal study models have provided proof of concept; however, first-generation PDE inhibitors have been poorly tolerated due to adverse effects. The development of second-generation agents such as cilomilast and roflumilast heralds a further opportunity to test the potential of these agents, although to date only a limited amount of data from human studies has been published, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions.

Asthma medications should be available for over-the-counter use: con

The United States Food and Drug Administration recently considered a policy to transfer inhaled short-acting bronchodilators to over-the-counter status if conditions of safe use can be established. The American Thoracic Society filed a comment in opposition to the proposal. This article examines the negative consequences that might result from allowing nonprescription access to bronchodilators and other inhaled asthma medications. Such a proposed policy change conflicts directly with current guidelines for asthma management and would undermine efforts to achieve adequate asthma control in patients. In addition, a policy change to convert asthma medications to over-the-counter status could result in increased costs to patients as well as increased health care costs to society overall due to a worsening of asthma control in the population.

Real-time asthma outreach reduces excessive short-acting β2-agonist use: a randomized study

BACKGROUND

Excessive use of short-acting β2-agonists (SABA) indicates impaired asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether real-time outreach to excessive SABA users reduces SABA canister dispensings.

METHODS

After real-time determination of a seventh SABA canister dispensing in the prior 12 months by using informational pharmacy technology, 12 to 56 year old patients with physician-coded asthma and inhaled corticosteroid dispensing were block randomized by prior asthma specialist care and medication step-care level into intervention (n = 1001) and control groups (n = 998). Intervention included real-time letter notification to patients and an electronic message to their physician with management suggestions, including facilitated allergy referral for patients without prior asthma specialist care. The control group received this organization's standard asthma care management without research contact. Frequency of the seventh SABA canister dispensing in the follow-up year was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, intervention patients reached 7 SABA canister dispensings less frequently (50.7% vs 57.1%; risk ratio 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82-0.97]; P = .007) and later (hazard ratio 0.80 [95% CI, 0.71-0.91; P < .001). SABA canister dispensings (mean ± SD) were less in intervention (7.5 ± 4.9 canisters) than controls (8.6 ± 5.3 canisters) (rate ratio 0.87 [95% CI, 0.82-0.93]; P < .001). The intervention reduced the risk of ≥7 SABA canister dispensings in patients without specialist care compared with patients with specialist care in the prior 3 years (P < .001) (P = .04 for interaction by prior specialist care). Visits to allergists were more frequent for intervention patients (30.9%) than for control patients (16.8%) (risk ratio 1.83 [95% CI, 1.54-2.16]; P < .001). Asthma exacerbations were unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel administrative-based asthma outreach program improves markers of asthma impairment in patients without prior asthma specialist care and is adaptable to managed care organizations with electronic medical records.

Metrics of salbutamol use as predictors of future adverse outcomes in asthma

BACKGROUND

Beta-agonist overuse is associated with adverse outcomes in asthma, however, the relationships between different metrics of salbutamol use and future risk are uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between metrics of salbutamol use and adverse outcome.

METHODS

In a 24-week randomized controlled trial of 303 asthma patients at risk of severe exacerbations which compared the efficacy and safety of combination budesonide/formoterol inhaler according to a single inhaler regimen (SMART) with a fixed-dose regimen with salbutamol as reliever ('Standard'), actual medication use was measured by electronic monitoring (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number ACTRN12610000515099). A nested cohort study explored the relationship between metrics of baseline salbutamol use over 2 weeks and future severe asthma exacerbations, poor asthma control (ACQ-5 ≥ 1.5) or 'extreme' salbutamol overuse (> 32 salbutamol actuations/24-h period).

RESULTS

Higher mean daily salbutamol use (per two actuations/day) [Odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) 1.24 (1.06-1.46)], higher days of salbutamol use (per 2 days in 2 weeks) [OR 1.15 (1.00-1.31)] and higher maximal 24-h use (per two actuations/day) [OR 1.09 (1.02-1.16)] were associated with future severe exacerbations. Higher mean daily salbutamol use was associated with future poor asthma control [OR 1.13 (1.02-1.26)]. Higher mean daily salbutamol use [OR 2.73 (1.84-4.07)], number of days of use [OR 1.46 (1.24-1.71)], and maximal daily use [OR 1.57 (1.31-1.89)] were associated with an increased risk of future extreme salbutamol overuse.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Electronically recorded frequency of current salbutamol use is a strong predictor of risk of future adverse outcomes in asthma, with average daily use performing the best. These findings provide new information for clinicians considering metrics of salbutamol as predictors of future adverse outcomes in asthma.

Socioeconomic status and the quality of prescribing asthma drugs in Sweden

INTRODUCTION

Socioeconomic status (SES) is strongly associated with morbidity as well as with health care utilization and expenditure. The association between SES and quality of prescribing of asthma drugs is less studied.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the association between socioeconomic factors, i.e. education, income and country of birth, and the prevalence, incidence and adherence to guidelines for antiasthmatic drugs.

METHODS

This registry study includes all Swedish citizens aged 25-44 years who redeemed at least one prescription of an antiasthmatic drug during 2010. Incidence and prevalence was calculated. The adherence to guidelines was studied using two defined quality indicators. Heavy users were also assessed.

RESULTS

Incidence for antiasthmatic drugs was 18.4 per 1000 person-years and the prevalence 50.9 per 1000 inhabitants. Previously untreated patients who redeemed fixed combination ranged from 45% to 49%. Patients who purchase long-acting beta-2-adrenoceptor agonists (LABA) without inhaled corticosteroid ranged from 43% to 59%. Six percent of the population was classified as heavy users.

CONCLUSION

The study showed a high incidence and prevalence of asthma drug use with a poor adherence to guidelines for rational drug prescribing. Fixed combination as first line asthma treatment as well as purchasing LABA without concomitant ICS was more common in patients born outside Scandinavia. Heavy users of short-acting bronchodilators were associated with male sex, high age, low income levels and low levels of education.

Efficacy and safety of maintenance and reliever combination budesonide-formoterol inhaler in patients with asthma at risk of severe exacerbations: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The Single combination budesonide-formoterol inhaler Maintenance And Reliever Therapy (SMART) regimen reduces severe asthma exacerbations in patients, but whether the high doses of corticosteroid and β agonist increase the risk of adverse effects with both short-term and cumulative exposure is not certain. Our aim was to investigate whether the SMART regimen would reduce the risk of overuse of β agonist, reduce the likelihood of patients to seek medical review when such episodes occurred, and if any reduction in severe asthma exacerbations would be at the cost of a higher burden of systemic corticosteroid.

METHODS

In this 24-week trial undertaken at four primary health-care practices and one hospital in New Zealand, patients (aged 16-65 years) with a recent asthma exacerbation were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the SMART or standard fixed-dose regimen. Treatment in the SMART group consisted of two actuations of budesonide-formoterol (200 μg and 6 μg, respectively, per actuation) twice daily, delivered through a combination metered dose inhaler (MDI), with one extra actuation as needed for relief of symptoms; treatment in the standard group consisted of two actuations of budesonide-formoterol (200 μg and 6 μg, respectively, per actuation) twice daily through a combination MDI with one to two actuations of salbutamol (100 μg per actuation) by MDI as needed for relief of symptoms. MDIs were monitored electronically to measure actual use of medication. The allocation sequence for randomisation was computer generated, with a block size of eight per site. Participants, investigators, and the statistician were not masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with at least one high-use episode of β agonist (more than eight actuations per day of budesonide-formoterol in addition to the four maintenance doses in the SMART group or more than 16 actuations per day of salbutamol in the standard group). Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12610000515099.

FINDINGS

303 patients were randomly assigned to the SMART (n=151) or standard group (n=152). No significant difference was noted between the SMART and standard groups in the proportion of participants with at least one high-use episode of β agonist (84 [56%] vs 68 [45%], respectively, relative risk 1·24 [95% CI 0·99-1·56]; p=0·058). There were fewer days of high use in the SMART group (mean 5·1 days [SD 14·3] vs 8·9 days [20·9], relative rate 0·58 [0·39-0·88]; p=0·01). Of the patients who had at least one high-use episode, those in the SMART group had fewer days of high use without medical review (8·5 days [17·8] vs 18·3 days [24·8], 0·49 [0·31-0·75]; p=0·001). The SMART regimen resulted in higher inhaled corticosteroid exposure (943·5 μg budesonide per day [1502·5] vs 684·3 μg budesonide per day [390·5], respectively; ratio of means 1·22 [1·06-1·41]; p=0·006), but reduced oral corticosteroid exposure (77·5 mg prednisone [240·5] vs 126·6 mg prednisone [382·1], respectively; p=0·011), with no significant difference in composite systemic corticosteroid exposure (793·7 mg prednisone equivalent per year [893·1] vs 772·1 mg prednisone equivalent per year [1062·7], respectively; 1·03 [0·86-1·22]; p=0·76). Participants in the SMART group had fewer severe asthma exacerbations (35 [weighted mean rate per year 0·53] vs 66 [0·97]; relative rate 0·54 [0·36-0·82]; p=0·004).

INTERPRETATION

The SMART regimen has a favourable risk-to-benefit profile and can be recommended for use in adults at risk of severe asthma exacerbations.

FUNDING

Health Research Council of New Zealand.

Adult asthma and risk of coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and heart failure: a prospective study of 2 matched cohorts

Asthma has been associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The authors ascertained the association of asthma with CVD and the roles that sex, concurrent allergy, and asthma medications may play in this association. They assembled a cohort of 203,595 Northern California adults with asthma and a parallel asthma-free referent cohort (matched 1:1 on age, sex, and race/ethnicity); both cohorts were followed for incident nonfatal or fatal CVD and all-cause mortality from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2008. Each cohort was 66% female and 47% white. After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, cardiac risk factors, and comorbid allergy, asthma was associated with a 1.40-fold (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.35, 1.45) increased hazard of coronary heart disease, a 1.20-fold (95% CI: 1.15, 1.25) hazard of cerebrovascular disease, a 2.14-fold (95% CI: 2.06, 2.22) hazard of heart failure, and a 3.28-fold (95% CI: 3.15, 3.41) hazard of all-cause mortality. Stronger associations were noted among women. Comorbid allergy predicted CVD but did not synergistically increase the CVD risk associated with asthma. Only asthma patients using asthma medications (particularly those on oral corticosteroids alone or in combination) were at enhanced risk of CVD. In conclusion, asthma was prospectively associated with increased risk of major CVD. Modifying effects were noted for sex and asthma medication use but not for comorbid allergy.

High-Quality Asthma Care: It's Not Just About Drugs

ASTHMA CARE IS BASED ON THREE SIMPLE, BASIC CONCEPTS: reduce triggers, use controller medicine, and take early action in flare-ups. Implementing these concepts is difficult, however, and nonadherence is common. The patient, family, and health care system tend to focus their attention on crisis care instead of on control, and long-standing behaviors are hard to change. Adherence to asthma control regimens can be improved if clinicians and their patients focus more attention on communication skills, mutual problem solving, and follow-up. Use of a stages-of-change model also can be valuable for facilitating important behavioral change.

The effect of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy on the risk of severe asthma exacerbations following episodes of high reliever use: an exploratory analysis of two randomised, controlled studies with comparisons to standard therapy

BACKGROUND

Divergent strategies have emerged for the management of severe asthma. One strategy utilises high and fixed doses of maintenance treatment, usually inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA), supplemented by a short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) as needed. Alternatively, budesonide/formoterol is used as both maintenance and reliever therapy. The latter is superior to fixed-dose treatment in reducing severe exacerbations while achieving similar or better asthma control in other regards. Exacerbations may be reduced by the use of budesonide/formoterol as reliever medication during periods of unstable asthma. We examined the risk of a severe exacerbation in the period after a single day with high reliever use.

METHODS

Episodes of high reliever use were quantified and exacerbations occurring post-index day with these episodes were examined post hoc in two double-blind studies comparing the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort SMART™, Turbuhaler®) 160/4.5 μg twice daily plus as needed with similar or higher maintenance doses of ICS/LABA plus SABA or formoterol.

RESULTS

Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy significantly reduced the risk of episodes of high reliever use (>6 inhalations/day) vs. all alternative ICS/LABA regimens. With conventional fixed-dose treatment the need for exacerbation treatment within 21 days ranged from 6.0-10.1% of days post-index for all regimens compared with 2.5-3.4% of days with budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy reduces the incidence of high reliever episodes and the exacerbation burden immediately following these episodes vs. alternative ICS/LABA plus SABA regimens at up to double the maintenance dose of ICS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

These studies do not have registration numbers as they were conducted before clinical trial registration was required.

Asthma diagnosis and management

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease that is commonly seen in the emergency department (ED). This article provides an evidence-based review of diagnosis and management of asthma. Early recognition of asthma exacerbations and initiation of treatment are essential. Treatment is dictated by the severity of the exacerbation. Treatment involves bronchodilators and corticosteroids. Other treatment modalities including magnesium, heliox, and noninvasive ventilator support are discussed. Safe disposition from the ED can be considered after stabilization of the exacerbation, response to treatment and attaining peak flow measures.

An update on the safety of long-acting beta-agonists in asthma patients using inhaled corticosteroids

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Pooled trial data have shown that long-acting beta-agonists increase the risk for asthma hospitalizations and deaths by two to fourfold compared with placebo. Until recently, it was unclear whether concomitant inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) could eliminate this risk.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review summarizes the available data on the safety of long-acting beta-agonist use in asthma, with and without concomitant ICSs. The results from an updated meta-analysis are presented, with data through December 2008.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

In pooled trial data, catastrophic asthma events (defined as asthma-related intubation or death) were increased fourfold for concomitant treatment with long-acting beta-agonists and ICSs compared with corticosteroids alone (odds ratio 3.7; 95% CI 1.4 - 9.6). It is estimated that the addition of long-acting beta-agonists to ICS therapy is associated with an absolute increase of one catastrophic event per 1500 patient-years.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

When the available trial data are pooled together, it is clear that long-acting beta-agonists significantly increase the risk for asthma-related intubations and deaths, even when used in a controlled fashion with concomitant ICSs. Clinical guidelines should readdress the role long-acting beta-agonists have in the management of asthma.

Adherence and asthma control with mometasone furoate versus fluticasone propionate in adolescents and young adults with mild asthma

INTRODUCTION

Because adherence to asthma controller medication among adolescents and young adults is poor but critical for asthma control, strategies are needed to improve adherence. One strategy is to reduce the number of daily doses necessary to maintain adequate control. Mometasone furoate delivered through a dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI) is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) approved for once-daily dosing in most patients. Fluticasone propionate (FP) is an ICS approved for twice-daily dosing. A retrospective claims analysis was performed to assess treatment adherence and markers of asthma control in adolescent and young adult patients with mild asthma who began treatment with MF-DPI or FP.

METHODS

Data from approximately 37 million patients in an administrative insurance claims database in the United States were analyzed. Patients, 12-25 years, with mild asthma and previous asthma medication use were assigned an index date based on their first prescription fill of MF-DPI or FP between 1 January 2005 and 10 October 2008. Demographics, prescription claims, and health care utilization data were captured in the 365-day period before (preindex) and after (postindex) the index date. Patients from each cohort were propensity score-matched 1:1 based on preindex data. Adherence was measured by prescription fills and percentage of days covered (PDC); asthma control was measured by exacerbations and short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) canister claims. Bivariate and multivariate generalized linear model (GLM) analyses were conducted to determine differences in outcomes between the cohorts.

RESULTS

After matching, 692 patients per group (average age - 16 years) were analyzed. Adherence in the postindex period was significantly higher in the MF-DPI cohort compared with the FP cohort as measured by PDC (23.5% vs. 14.5%; p< .0001) and prescription fills (2.70 vs. 1.91; p< .0001). The mean number of postindex SABA canister claims was significantly lower in the MF-DPI cohort compared with the FP cohort (1.04 vs. 1.40; p< .0001). There was no significant difference in the mean number of postindex exacerbations between the cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Adolescent/young adult patients with mild asthma who received MF-DPI had better postindex adherence and fewer SABA canister claims than patients receiving FP.

The sustainability of a community pharmacy intervention to improve the quality use of asthma medication

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

A previously published asthma intervention used a software application to data mine pharmacy dispensing records and generate a list of patients with potentially suboptimal management of their asthma; in particular, a high rate of provision of reliever medication. These patients were sent educational material from their community pharmacists and advised to seek a review of their asthma management from their general practitioner. The intervention resulted in a 3-fold improvement in the ratio of dispensed preventer medication (inhaled corticosteroids) to reliever medication (short-acting beta-2 agonists). This follow-up study aimed to determine the long-term effects of the intervention programme on the preventer-to-reliever (P:R) ratio.

METHODS

The same data mining software was modified so that it could re-identify patients who were originally targeted for the intervention. Community pharmacists who participated in the previous intervention installed the modified version of the software. The dispensing data were then de-identified, encrypted and transferred via the Internet to a secure server. The follow-up dispensing data for all patients were compared with their pre- and post-intervention data collected originally.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Of the 1551 patients who were included in the original study, 718 (46·3%) were eligible to be included in the follow-up study. The improved P:R ratio was sustained for at least 12 months following the intervention (P < 0·01). The sustained increase in the P:R ratio was attributed to significant decreases in the average daily usage of reliever medication (P < 0·0001).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The follow-up study demonstrated a sustained improvement in the ratio of dispensed preventer medication to reliever medication for asthma. The intervention has the potential to show long-lasting and widespread improvements in asthma management, improved health outcomes for patients, and ultimately, a reduced burden on the health system.

Asthma and the prospective risk of anaphylactic shock and other allergy diagnoses in a large integrated health care delivery system

BACKGROUND

The association between asthma and anaphylaxis remains poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain, in a managed care organization in northern California, the association of asthma and asthma severity with future risk of anaphylactic shock and other selected allergy diagnoses.

METHODS

Using electronic data and validated algorithms, we assembled a cohort of 526,406 patients who met the criteria for asthma between 1996 and 2006 and a referent cohort (with no utilization for asthma) individually matched on age, sex, and race/ethnicity. In each cohort, 54% of patients were female and 55% were white; their mean (SD) age was 24 (20) years. The main outcome measures were anaphylactic shock (caused by an adverse food reaction, caused by serum, or other/idiopathic), allergic urticaria, anaphylaxis after sting(s), and angioedema.

RESULTS

The incidence of anaphylactic shock was 109.0 per 100,000 person-years in the asthma cohort and 19.9 per 100,000 person-years in the referent cohort. After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, and immunotherapy, asthma was associated with a 5.2-fold (95% confidence interval, 4.7- to 5.6-fold) increased hazard of anaphylactic shock. Asthma was also significantly associated with an increased risk of the 3 selected allergy diagnoses, with hazard ratios of 1.4 to 1.9. A significant trend by severity of asthma was apparent for food-related and other/idiopathic anaphylactic shock and for anaphylaxis after sting(s).

CONCLUSIONS

In this insured population, asthma was prospectively associated with increased risk of anaphylactic shock and other allergy diagnoses. However, the effect of asthma severity was not consistent across outcome measures.

Assessing Primary Care Physician's Beliefs and Attitudes of Asthma Exacerbation Treatment and Follow-Up

Objective:

The objective of this survey was to assess adult primary care physicians’ and pediatricians’ perceptions of asthma exacerbation management, including beliefs concerning the discharge of patients from the emergency department (ED) following asthma exacerbations.

Methods:

This was a cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians (PCPs) treating adult or pediatric patients. Surveys were mailed to physicians and included questions on how PCPs define an exacerbation, how they are notified and how they followed-up with their patients who experienced exacerbations.

Results:

A total of 189 physicians were targeted in this survey, with 124 (65%) returning a completed survey. The majority of physicians agreed that an exacerbation included worsening asthma requiring a course of oral corticosteroids (83%). However, ≥70% of physicians agreed that an exacerbation could also include events which did not require OCS. Overall, 71% of PCPs believed that the majority of their patients’ asthma exacerbations were treated in the doctor’s office with only 6% believing the majority were treated in the ED. Over 90% of PCPs surveyed said they scheduled a follow-up with their patients “all or most of the time” when notified of an ED visit for an asthma exacerbation. Of the adult PCPs surveyed, 20% said they were never notified when one of their patients received treatment in the hospital because of an asthma exacerbation, whereas only 10% of pediatricians said they were never notified. The majority of PCPs surveyed (79%) indicated that if a controller medication was warranted, the ED staff should initiate treatment at time of discharge.

Conclusions:

This study showed that healthcare providers may not share a common definition of an asthma exacerbation. In addition, most physicians believe that the majority of exacerbations are treated in their office or at home. Further, most agreed that if a controller medication was warranted, the ED or urgent care staff should initiate treatment.

Continuity of prescribers of short-acting beta agonists among children with asthma

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) prescriber continuity was associated with emergency department visits among children with asthma.

STUDY DESIGN

An analysis of Michigan Medicaid administrative claims (2004-2005) for children ages 5 to 18 with asthma. Logistic regression models assessed the effect of SABA prescriber continuity (the number and site of prescribers) on emergency department visits, controlling for demographics, historical (2004) asthma use and SABA prescription frequency (2-5 low; > or = 6 high).

RESULTS

Most children had one SABA prescriber (62%); 13% had multiple prescribers in the same practice as the primary care provider and 25% had multiple prescribers in different practices. Children with multiple prescribers in different practices had increased odds of an emergency department visit compared with those with 1 prescriber, among those with high SABA prescription frequency (AOR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.9, 3.9), as well as those with low prescription frequency (AOR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.3, 2.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with discontinuity of SABA prescribers have an increased risk of asthma emergency department visits, irrespective of their SABA prescription frequency. Primary care providers may have difficulty identifying patients at high risk with asthma solely on the basis of SABAs prescribed within their own practices.

Data-mining of medication records to improve asthma management

OBJECTIVES

To use community pharmacy medication records to identify patients whose asthma may not be well managed and then implement and evaluate a multidisciplinary educational intervention to improve asthma management.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We used a multisite controlled study design. Forty-two pharmacies throughout Tasmania ran a software application that "data-mined" medication records, generating a list of patients who had received three or more canisters of inhaled short-acting beta(2)-agonists in the preceding 6 months. The patients identified were allocated to an intervention or control group. Pre-intervention data were collected for the period May to November 2006 and post-intervention data for the period December 2006 to May 2007.

INTERVENTION

Intervention patients were contacted by the community pharmacist via mail, and were sent educational material and a letter encouraging them to see their general practitioner for an asthma management review. Pharmacists were blinded to the control patients' identities until the end of the post-intervention period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Dispensing ratio of preventer medication (inhaled corticosteroids [ICSs]) to reliever medication (inhaled short-acting beta(2)-agonists).

RESULTS

Thirty-five pharmacies completed the study, providing 702 intervention and 849 control patients. The intervention resulted in a threefold increase in the preventer-to-reliever ratio in the intervention group compared with the control group (P < 0.01) and a higher proportion of patients in the intervention group using ICS therapy than in the control group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Community pharmacy medication records can be effectively used to identify patients with suboptimal asthma management, who can then be referred to their GP for review. The intervention should be trialled on a national scale to determine the effects on clinical, social, emotional and economic outcomes for people in the Australian community, with a longer follow-up to determine sustainability of the improvements noted.

Patients' understanding of the reasons for starting and discontinuing inhaled corticosteroids

AIM

Although early discontinuation of treatment in new users of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has been widely discussed, the reasons for stopping have not been investigated in depth. We aimed to describe reasons for discontinuation from a patient's perspective in relation to their experience of symptoms at the time of the investigation.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study among new users that discontinued ICS use in the Netherlands was performed. Patients were interviewed by telephone, aiming to identify the symptoms for which they were prescribed ICS, the reasons for discontinuing treatment and the respiratory symptoms patients still experienced at the time of the survey. In addition, automated dispensing records of all patients were retrieved.

RESULTS

From 287 eligible patients, 230 (80.1%) were interviewed. Only 22 patients (9.6%) mentioned asthma as the reason for a first ICS prescription. A decrease in symptoms was the main reason for discontinuation (45%). Thirty patients (13%) reported clinically significant residual symptoms. These patients reported more seasonal variation of symptoms and were more often prescribed short-acting beta(2)-agonists.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients mentioned a wide range of symptoms and conditions, other than asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as the reason for the start of ICS therapy. Most of these conditions may be expected to be of short duration. Not surprisingly a decrease in symptoms was the main, and justifiable, reason for discontinuing ICS. However, a non-negligible proportion of patients reported residual symptoms that suggest the need of continued ICS use. Physicians and pharmacists could cooperate in identifying those patients for which ICS are really indicated and motivate them to continue the use of ICS.

Three generations of ongoing controversies concerning the use of short acting beta-agonist therapy in asthma: a review

An increase in asthma mortality in 1960s noted by British authors stirred a debate about the use of beta-adrenergic therapy that has persisted in the medical literature. The cause appears to be isoproterenol and fenoterol overuse. A second debate evolved around the possible deleterious, pro-inflammatory effects, of the albuterol distomer. Most clinical studies showed improved bronchodilatation, but limited benefits from using levalbuterol. Recently, genotyping has uncovered a single nucleotide polymorphism at codon 16 that appears to affect the long term response to both regular and as needed use of albuterol, calling for a new genotype based therapeutic approach in asthma.

BMI and health status among adults with asthma

BACKGROUND

A convincing body of literature links obesity with a higher risk for developing adult-onset asthma. The impact of obesity on asthma severity among adults with pre-existing asthma, however, is less clear.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

In a prospective cohort study of 843 adults with severe asthma, we studied the impact of BMI on asthma health status.

RESULTS

The prevalence of obesity and overweight were 44% (95% confidence interval (CI) 41-47%) and 28% (95% CI 25-32%). The obese BMI group was associated with a higher risk for daily or near daily asthma symptoms than was the normal BMI group (odds ratio (OR) 1.81; 95% CI 1.10-2.96). Compared to the normal BMI group, generic physical health status was worse in the overweight (mean score decrement -2.42 points; 95% CI -4.39 to -0.45) and the obese groups (-6.31 points; 95% CI -8.14 to -4.49). Asthma-specific quality of life was worse in the underweight (mean score increment 8.66 points; 95% CI 2.53-14.8) and obese groups (4.51 points; 95% CI 2.21-6.81), compared to those with normal BMI. Obese persons also had a higher number of restricted activity days that past month (5.05 days; 95% CI 2.90-7.19 days).

DISCUSSION

It appears that obesity has a substantive negative effect on health status among adults with asthma. Further work is needed to clarify the precise mechanisms. Clinicians should counsel dietary modification and weight loss for their overweight and obese patients with asthma.

Chronic inhaled corticosteroids do not affect the course of acute severe asthma exacerbations in children

Chronic therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) suppresses airway inflammation and increases airway responsiveness to beta(2)-adrenergic receptor agonists. We hypothesized that the chronic use of ICS would be associated with shorter duration of hospitalization in severely ill children with status asthmaticus. An 8-year retrospective chart review was conducted of all children admitted to the ICU with status asthmaticus. During the study period, 241 children were admitted, and 44% reported the use of chronic ICS. ICS use was associated with increased baseline asthma severity, previous hospitalization for asthma, and public insurance status. However, ICS use had no effect on hospital or ICU length of stay, type, and duration of treatments received, or the rate of recovery determined by a standard severity of illness scoring system. In the subsets of patients including children with persistent asthma and those who received intravenous terbutaline, there was also no improvement in outcomes with the use of chronic ICS showing that the chronic use of ICS did not improve response to beta(2)-adrenergic receptor agonists in severely ill children with status asthmaticus. Although useful as a preventive therapy, the chronic use of ICS does not appear to affect the course of severe acute asthma exacerbations in pediatric patients once hospitalized.

Risk factors for work disability in severe adult asthma

PURPOSE

We aimed to elucidate the prevalence of and risk factors for work disability in severe adult asthma and to evaluate the impact of work disability on downstream health outcomes.

METHODS

We used data from a prospective cohort study of 465 adults with severe asthma. Structured telephone interviews ascertained asthma status and employment history. A job exposure matrix (JEM) was used to characterize the likelihood of workplace exposure to "asthmagens."

RESULTS

The prevalence of asthma-related complete work disability was 14% among working-age adults with severe asthma (95% confidence interval, 11%-18%). Among those who were currently employed, the prevalence of partial work disability was 38% (95% confidence interval, 31%-45%). Sociodemographic (P = .027) and medical factors (P = .020) were related to the risk of complete work disability. Both sociodemographic characteristics (P = .06) and work exposures based on the JEM (P = .012) were related to partial work disability. In additional models, poorer asthma severity, physical health status, and mental health status were all associated with a higher risk of complete and partial work disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Work disability is common among adults with severe asthma. There are three sets of risk factors for work disability that are potentially modifiable: smoking, workplace exposures, and asthma severity.

Combination inhalers containing inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists: improved clinical efficacy and dosing options in patients with asthma

Combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) is a recognized treatment for adults with moderate to severe asthma. The introduction of inhalers containing both an ICS and a LABA simplifies treatment and improves asthma control. This review discusses clinical evidence that budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone are effective and well tolerated in asthma treatment. Moreover, the rapid onset of effect and long duration of action of budesonide and formoterol make once-daily dosing, adjustable maintenance dosing, and the novel treatment strategy of using budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and as needed for symptom relief, valuable treatment options for patients with asthma.

The impact of allergy and pulmonary specialist care on emergency asthma utilization in a large managed care organization

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the longitudinal impact of asthma specialist care on the risk of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalization for asthma.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING

A prospective cohort study using both telephone survey and computerized utilization data.

STUDY DESIGN

We recruited a prospective cohort of 4,742 adult members of a closed panel managed care organization who were hospitalized for asthma (the "baseline hospitalization").

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Visits to asthma specialists were ascertained from computerized utilization databases. Specialist visits after baseline hospitalization were defined as time-dependent covariates. An alternative analysis defined specialist visits during the year preceding baseline hospitalization. A subcohort of 596 subjects completed telephone interviews.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Compared with subjects who received no specialist visits after baseline hospitalization, treatment by allergists (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04; 95 percent confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.26) or pulmonologists (HR 0.92; 95 percent CI 0.71-1.19) was not associated with a reduction in the risk of future ED visits for asthma in the entire cohort, controlling for age, sex, race, recent asthma medication dispensing, and pharmacy benefits status. There was also no association between allergist visits and the risk of subsequent hospitalizations for asthma (HR 0.93; 95 percent CI 0.75-1.14). In contrast, visits to pulmonologists (HR 0.74; 95 percent CI 0.55-0.99) were related to a reduced risk of rehospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary specialist visits appeared to reduce the risk of hospitalization for asthma, whereas asthma specialist visits did not reduce the risk of ED visits. In the context of comprehensive prepaid health care, the benefit of specialist care was modest.

Directly measured second hand smoke exposure and asthma health outcomes

BACKGROUND

Because they have chronic airway inflammation, adults with asthma could have symptomatic exacerbation after exposure to second hand smoke (SHS). Surprisingly, data on the effects of SHS exposure in adults with asthma are quite limited. Most previous epidemiological studies used self-reported SHS exposure which could be biased by inaccurate reporting. In a prospective cohort study of adult non-smokers recently admitted to hospital for asthma, the impact of SHS exposure on asthma health outcomes was examined.

METHODS

Recent SHS exposure during the previous 7 days was directly measured using a personal nicotine badge (n = 189) and exposure during the previous 3 months was estimated using hair nicotine and cotinine levels (n = 138). Asthma severity and health status were ascertained during telephone interviews, and subsequent admission to hospital for asthma was determined from computerised utilisation databases.

RESULTS

Most of the adults with asthma were exposed to SHS, with estimates ranging from 60% to 83% depending on the time frame and methodology. The highest level of recent SHS exposure, as measured by the personal nicotine badge, was related to greater asthma severity (mean score increment for highest tertile of nicotine level 1.56 points; 95% CI 0.18 to 2.95), controlling for sociodemographic covariates and previous smoking history. Moreover, the second and third tertiles of hair nicotine exposure during the previous month were associated with a greater baseline prospective risk of hospital admission for asthma (HR 3.73; 95% CI 1.04 to 13.30 and HR 3.61; 95% CI 1.0 to 12.9, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Directly measured SHS exposure appears to be associated with poorer asthma outcomes. In public health terms, these results support efforts to prohibit smoking in public places.

Short-acting beta-agonist prescription fills as a marker for asthma morbidity

OBJECTIVES

Hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits have traditionally been used to assess the strength of association between environmental exposures, such as air pollution, and asthma morbidity. In the current study, we evaluate the use of short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) prescriptions as a surrogate marker for asthma exacerbation with respect to these more traditional markers.

METHODS

Claims data for recipients covered by Illinois Medicaid with a diagnosis of asthma were obtained for fiscal-years 1996 through June 1998. Claims for short-acting bronchodilators and asthma-related ED visits and hospital admissions for 31,140 adults were identified. The odds ratio for the association of either an ED visit or hospital admission and an SABA prescription was calculated for time lags ranging from -28 to +28 days. Individual-subject heterogeneity and seasonal effects were corrected for using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

After adjustment for individual and seasonal effects, there was a significant positive association between SABA prescriptions and ED visits or hospital admissions for asthma on any single day. In addition, a significant positive association was also found between the ED visits or hospital admissions occurring on the few days prior to an SABA prescription. No significant relation was found (after adjusting for subject and seasonal effects) between prescriptions and admissions when an SABA prescription date preceded that of a hospital admission or an ED visit.

CONCLUSIONS

A very strong and significant association between ED visits or hospital admissions for asthma and SABA prescriptions was observed, which suggests that SABA prescription fills can be used as a marker for asthma morbidity. In addition, a temporal association exists between claims for ED visits or hospital admissions for asthma and SABA prescription claims when an ED visit or hospital admission precedes the SABA prescription.

Impact of depressive symptoms on adult asthma outcomes

BACKGROUND

Psychological disorders, including depression, are common in adults with asthma. Although depression is treatable, its impact on longitudinal asthma outcomes is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the impact of depressive symptoms on patient-centered outcomes and emergency health care use in adults with asthma.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of 743 adults with asthma who were recruited after hospitalization for asthma. Depressive symptoms were defined as having a score of 16 or more on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. We examined the impact of depressive symptoms on patient-centered outcomes (validated severity-of-asthma score, Marks Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary score) and on future emergency health care use for asthma ascertained from computerized databases.

RESULTS

The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-21%) among adults with asthma. Depressive symptoms were associated with greater severity-of-asthma scores after controlling for age, sex, race/ ethnicity, educational attainment, and cigarette smoking (mean score increment, 2.6 points; 95% CI, 1.8-3.4 points). Furthermore, depressive symptoms were associated with poorer asthma-specific quality of life (mean score increment, 19.9 points; 95% CI, 17.7-22.1 points) and poorer physical health status (mean score decrement, 3.7 points; 95% CI, 1.5-5.8 points). Depressive symptoms were associated with a greater longitudinal risk of hospitalization for asthma (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.98-1.84). After controlling for differences in preventive care for asthma, the relationship was stronger (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.05-2.0).

CONCLUSION

Depressive symptoms are common in adults with asthma and are associated with poorer health outcomes, including greater asthma severity and risk of hospitalization for asthma.

Costs of hospitalization for severe acute asthma of patients not treated according to guidelines and recommendations. French prospective study of 169 cases

This prospective study of 169 adult patients hospitalized for severe acute asthma in four pneumology wards compared the incidence and costs of patients who were managed (group A) or not managed (group P) before hospitalization, according to the guidelines and international recommendations (11 criteria judged by experts). Ambulatory costs were calculated by questioning patients. Valuation of hospital costs was based DRGs weighted by length of stay. The incidence in group P patients was estimated at 70%; A patients were 14 years younger than those in group P and had less severe asthma. Their annual ambulatory care prior to hospitalization was less costly irrespective of age category or degree of severity (euro 685 vs. euro 1,145 in group A); their length of hospital stay was shorter (6.03 vs. 10.78 days), resulting in a lower cost of hospitalization (euro 2,820 vs. euro 4,843). In group P a specific education program based on increased understanding, compliance, self-management, and smoking cessation, particularly in young patients should lead to reductions in hospitalizations.

Budesonide/formoterol combination therapy as both maintenance and reliever medication in asthma

Asthma control is improved by combining inhaled corticosteroids with long-acting beta2-agonists. However, fluctuating asthma control still occurs. We hypothesized that in patients receiving low maintenance dose budesonide/formoterol (bud/form), replacing short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA) reliever with as-needed bud/form would provide rapid symptom relief and simultaneous adjustment in antiinflammatory therapy, thereby reducing exacerbations. In this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 2,760 patients with asthma aged 4-80 years (FEV1 60-100% predicted) received either terbutaline 0.4 mg as SABA with bud/form 80/4.5 microg twice a day (bud/form + SABA) or bud 320 microg twice a day (bud + SABA) or bud/form 80/4.5 microg twice a day with 80/4.5 microg as-needed (bud/form maintenance + relief). Children used a once-nocte maintenance dose. Bud/form maintenance + relief prolonged time to first severe exacerbation (p < 0.001; primary endpoint), resulting in a 45-47% lower exacerbation risk versus bud/form + SABA (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.44, 0.67) or bud + SABA (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.43, 0.65). Bud/form maintenance + relief also prolonged the time to the first, second, and third exacerbation requiring medical intervention (p < 0.001), reduced severe exacerbation rate, and improved symptoms, awakenings, and lung function compared with both fixed dosing regimens.

Combination therapy in asthma--fixed or variable dosing in different patients?

The introduction of combination products, for the coadministration of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with a long-acting beta2-agonist in a single inhaler, has greatly simplified asthma therapy. The two combination inhalers currently available, Symbicort (budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler) and Seretide (salmeterol/fluticasone), comply with Step 3 of international guidelines that recommend the addition of a long-acting beta2-agonist to ICS in patients who are inadequately controlled on ICS alone. Importantly, combination inhalers ensure that patients cannot neglect their ICS maintenance therapy in favour of the long-acting beta2-agonist--which may improve adherence and overall asthma control. In vitro experiments suggest that ICS and long-acting beta2-agonists may interact beneficially when they are administered via one inhaler. The efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone have been demonstrated. There are currently two approaches for treating asthma using combination therapy--fixed and adjustable dosing. Fixed dosing with budesonide/formoterol or salmeterol/fluticasone provides effective asthma control in line with guideline goals. However, given the inherent variability of asthma, there is increasing evidence that adjusting the dose of ICS according to fluctuations in symptoms is beneficial. Findings from a series of studies comparing fixed and adjustable symptom-guided dosing regimens demonstrate that adjustable dosing may improve asthma control at an overall lower steroid dose. Ultimately, if adjustable dosing proves to be an effective treatment option, it may be possible to use budesonide/formoterol for both maintenance therapy and symptom relief, thereby overcoming the need for a separate reliever inhaler. This is because formoterol has a more rapid onset and greater dose-related effects than salmeterol in salmeterol/fluticasone. Given that all patients are different, with different disease severities and treatment preferences, both fixed and adjustable dosing strategies are likely to be important in the long-term management of asthma. It is possible that different treatment options will be used for different patients, depending on their disease severity, personality and ability to adhere to therapy.

Rates and characteristics of intensive care unit admissions and intubations among asthma-related hospitalizations

BACKGROUND

A life-threatening attack of asthma that leads to intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation, or both identifies patients at high risk of subsequent morbidity and mortality and represents a major cost burden.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the rates, characteristics, and costs of ICU admissions and intubations among asthma-related hospitalizations.

METHODS

This analysis was performed using a database of 215 hospitals representing more than 3 million annual inpatient visits. Asthma-related hospital admissions were identified by a primary diagnosis code for asthma during 2000. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for predictors of ICU admission, intubation, and in-hospital mortality. Ordinary least squares regression was used to estimate adjusted mean costs and length of stay.

RESULTS

Of 29,430 admissions with a primary diagnosis of asthma, 10.1% were admitted to the ICU and 2.1% were intubated. The risk of in-hospital death was significantly greater in patients who were intubated but not admitted to the ICU (OR, 96.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 50.24-184.20), those who were admitted to the ICU and intubated (OR, 62.69; 95% CI, 38.17-102.96), and patients with more severe comorbidities (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.38-1.70). On average, intubated patients stayed in the hospital 4.5 days longer and incurred more than $11,000 in additional costs; patients admitted to the ICU stayed 1 day longer and accounted for $3,000 in additional costs vs standard admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

The inpatient mortality, morbidity, and cost burden of life-threatening asthma in the United States is considerable. This study characterizes patients with asthma at risk of ICU admissions and intubations. Appropriate recognition and treatment are needed to prevent these severe and potentially life-threatening events.

Persistence with inhaled corticosteroid therapy in daily practice

OBJECTIVE

To quantify persistence with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) among new users in daily practice and identify determinants of persistence.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed with data from the Dutch PHARMO system. This system consists of medication and hospital admission records of 325,000 inhabitants of 12 Dutch cities. In patients who were already using other drugs with a labeled indication of obstructive lung diseases (ATC: R03), individuals with a first dispensing of ICS between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2000 were identified. Persistence with ICS was defined as the number of days on ICS treatment in the first year of use. Determinants of persistence were identified one year before start of the first dispensing of ICS.

RESULTS

Approximately 50% of the patients used inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for less than 200 days, while 18% continued treatment for one year. One-year persistence rates increased to 40% in patients with a history of multiple respiratory disease related drugs. Persistence rates also increased with lower initial doses, if the initial prescription was instituted by a medical specialist, if a patient was previously hospitalized for obstructive lung diseases, and with increasing age.

CONCLUSION

The persistence rate of ICS is poor. Preventing early treatment discontinuation may be important to ensure maximal benefit from ICS treatment.

Managing asthma in the real world

Asthma treatment is suboptimal in many patients, with impacts on morbidity and mortality, healthcare resource utilisation and patients' quality of life. The reasons for this include the inherent variability of asthma and the unpredictability of exacerbations, which can range from mild to fatal. In addition, asthma can be difficult to diagnose, particularly in the very young and old. Although treatment guidelines are widely available and well publicised, surveys have identified a significant gap between treatment aims and current levels of asthma control. Patient adherence to inhaled corticosteroids is poor, and many patients rely on short-acting beta2-agonists. The reasons for this are complex but are believed to include poor perception by patients of their asthma severity, concerns about the safety and efficacy of medication and low treatment expectations. Patients appear to be unaware of the extent to which airway inflammation can be controlled and are therefore satisfied with poor asthma control, accepting a high level of symptoms. Increasing patient understanding of asthma and its treatment, allowing patients greater involvement in treatment decisions, increasing the role of asthma nurses and improved communication between physicians and patients may improve outcomes in patients with asthma.

Use of asthma medication dispensing patterns to predict risk of adverse health outcomes: a study of Medicaid-insured children in managed care programs

BACKGROUND

Regular use of inhaled anti-inflammatory (AI) medication improves outcomes for children with persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To relate 3 measures of asthma medication dispensing to physical health and hospital-based events among children with asthma who were enrolled in 1 of 5 managed care health plans.

METHODS

Parents of Medicaid-insured children with asthma were interviewed at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Utilization data were collected from the health plans in which the children were enrolled. Subjects were stratified into 3 subgroups according to asthma severity: intermittent asthma; persistent asthma for which beta-agonist (BA) medication was dispensed infrequently (< or = 3 times per year); and persistent asthma for which BA medication was dispensed frequently (> or = 4 times per year).

RESULTS

Baseline interviews were completed by 1,663 parents (63% response rate), 1,504 of whom were enrolled in their health plan for at least 11 months during the baseline year. Follow-up interviews were completed by 1,287 (86%) of the 1,504 parents. Among the subgroup of children with persistent asthma for whom BA was dispensed frequently, those who had 1 to 3 AI dispensings had a greater risk for hospital-based events than those with 6 or more AI dispensings. Baseline-year AI medication utilization patterns were not associated with follow-up-year outcomes. No clinically meaningful association was found in subgroups with less severe asthma; however, few AI medications were dispensed to these children.

CONCLUSIONS

Policymakers and clinicians who wish to use medication-based measures to evaluate quality of asthma care should consider counting the number of times AI medication is dispensed among children with more severe asthma.

Risk factors for an intensive care unit admission in children with asthma

An admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) with asthma is a marker of asthma severity and may be a precursor of asthma death. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for acute severe asthma needing an ICU admission. We hypothesized that children admitted to the ICU represent a severe phenotype with identifiable premorbid clinical features. The study was case-control in design. One hundred and forty-one children were studied. Seventy children admitted to the ICU and 71 children admitted to the general medical ward served as cases and controls, respectively. Children were aged between 1-16 years. They underwent skin prick allergy testing, and had a nasopharyngeal aspirate and serology performed to screen for respiratory pathogens. Their parents completed an asthma and allergy symptom questionnaire and the Newcastle Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire (NAKQ). On univariate analysis, an admission to the ICU was more likely in children with 1) "frequent episodic" or "persistent" background asthma; 2) three or more previous admissions for asthma; 3) one or more asthma admissions in the previous 12 months; 4) three or more presentations to the Emergency Department (ED) in the preceding 12 months; 5) three or more positive responses on skin prick allergy testing; 6) an elevated IgE level; 7) oxygen saturation on presentation < or =91%; 8) longer duration of asthma; 9) lower level of maternal education; 10) an admission during autumn; 11) three or more siblings; and 12) being prescribed antibiotics. Risk factors that remained significant on multivariate analysis were three or more presentations to the ED in the preceding 12 months (P=0.003), an elevated IgE level (P=0.01), oxygen saturation on presentation < or =91% (P=0.003), and longer asthma duration (P=0.02). ICU patients took longer to see a doctor and to commence oral steroids. No differences were found between cases and controls in the proportion taking preventer therapy (58% vs. 52%), provided with a written asthma action plan (32% vs. 25%), or in whom spirometry or peak flow was measured (28% vs. 42%). However, rates were low in both groups. Parental asthma knowledge was generally poor. This study identified risk factors for an ICU admission in children with asthma. A potentially preventable risk factor is a history of multiple ED presentations in the past year. Specialist referral of children with multiple ED presentations may improve asthma control and reduce the risk of an ICU admission. Background asthma management remains suboptimal in children needing hospitalization.

Living with a variable disease

Asthma is a variable disease which, when not fully controlled, may leave the patient with a sense of bewilderment, fear, anger and a loss of many 'normal' activities of daily living. The reasons for these fears range from the concern of having an asthma attack to concerns about taking medications, perhaps especially steroids. Complex treatment regimens and a lack of understanding by the patient of their asthma may lead to denial and a reduction in adherence to medication resulting in poor treatment outcomes. Patients' lack of understanding may originate from poor communication between patient and physician. Improved communication and ensuring that all of the patient's questions are answered, as well as simpler treatment regimens may improve asthma control. Detailed, written personal asthma action plans should act as a foundation for building good relationships between doctor and patient and enhance adherence. Simplifying treatment regimens, such as having an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting, beta(2)-agonist in a single inhaler, used in conjunction with these personal asthma action plans, should provide a therapy that enables patients to be in control of their asthma without having to live in fear of their illness.