Dupilumab increases aspirin tolerance in NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease

Critical pathomechanisms of NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) clarified by treatment with omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody

Characteristic symptoms of NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) include asthma, chronic eosinophilic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, cysteinyl LT (CysLT) overproduction and NSAIDs hypersensitivity. Some N-ERD patients present with episodic treatment-resistant extra-respiratory symptoms (CysLT-associated coronary artery vasospasm, gastroenteritis, or skin rash). Even when using standard treatments for respiratory and extra-respiratory symptoms, including systemic corticosteroids and aspirin desensitization, it is difficult to control the clinical symptoms and severe type 2 inflammation involved with mast cells, eosinophils, ILC2s, and platelet activation. Few treatment options are applicable in a clinical setting. Therefore, identifying effective treatments is essential for managing N-ERD patients who suffer from these conditions. Our previous observational study demonstrated 12-month omalizumab treatment of N-ERD was clinically effective against respiratory symptoms. Despite the remaining eosinophilia, omalizumab significantly reduced urinary LTE4 and PGD2 metabolites to near normal levels at steady state. Based on the preliminary study, we demonstrated that omalizumab induced tolerance to aspirin in N-ERD patients 3 months after therapy initiation and suppressed activation of mast cells during 24 h of initiation in a randomized manner. Moreover, omalizumab had significant efficacy against extra-respiratory symptoms at baseline (lacking aspirin exposure) as well as throughout aspirin challenge. This review addresses the latest discoveries related to N-ERD pathogenesis and the significant effectiveness of omalizumab on N-ERD as a mast cell stabilizer. Our findings regarding omalizumab-associated mast cell inhibitory effects are indirect evidence that mast cell dysregulation and, possibly, IgE are pivotal components of N-ERD.

Upper airway comorbidities of asthma

Asthma, characterized as a chronic heterogeneous airway disease, often presents with common comorbid conditions. The concept of "one airway, one disease" was coined more than 20 years ago, emphasizing the connection between asthma and upper airway comorbidities (UACs) such as allergic or nonallergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps, and aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease. Since then, numerous studies have demonstrated that UACs are closely related and affect asthma phenotypes. Recognizing these UACs and managing them are crucial aspects of comprehensive asthma care. Addressing these conditions as part of asthma treatment can lead to better control of symptoms, improved lung function, and better quality of life. Moreover, it is important to explore the field of respiratory biologics, which represents the latest advancements in medical treatment options for patients with asthma and UACs.

Efficacy of Biologics in NSAID-ERD: United Airways From the Nose to the Bronchi

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD), the clinical triad of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and respiratory reactions to cyclooxygenase 1 inhibitors, is often challenging to manage, with many patients failing first-line therapies for CRSwNP and asthma. There are now 6 biologic medications approved for asthma and/or severe CRSwNP: omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab. With the availability of respiratory biologic treatment for both asthma and CRSwNP, clinicians now have a multitude of additional management options for patients with NSAID-ERD. Herein, we review the currently available clinical trial and real-world evidence for biologic efficacy and safety in patients with NSAID-ERD, discuss the mechanisms of biologic therapy specific to NSAID-ERD, and review evidence regarding the use of biologic therapy versus endoscopic sinus surgery for CRSwNP in patients with NSAID-ERD. We propose a management approach for choosing biologic therapy or endoscopic sinus surgery paired with aspirin therapy after desensitization for patients with NSAID-ERD.

Current Goals of NSAID-ERD Management: Patient-Centered Approaches Involving NSAID Desensitization With and Without Biologics

The classic approach of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD) includes pharmaceutical and surgical treatments, as well as avoidance of cyclooxygenase 1-inhibitor NSAIDs. The introduction of biologics in the treatment of severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps represents an alternative therapeutic approach to the classical aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) in some regions, and with convincing results. However, their use is limited due to approval and/or high-cost restrictions. NSAID-ERD is a mainly type 2 and highly eosinophilic disease, and mAbs targeting IgE or IL-5, IL-4, and IL-13 have been shown to be effective for both severe asthma and severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. So far, dupilumab demonstrated greater efficacy in patients with NSAID-ERD than in aspirin-tolerant patients with regard to several clinical outcomes. Patients with NSAID-ERD respond very rapidly to omalizumab also, with reduction in the release of prostaglandin D2 and cysteinyl leukotrienes. Patients favored biologic treatment over ATAD in multiple retrospective analyses, which must be acknowledged when choosing one or the other option. Although this review will summarize ATAD in general, it will more prominently focus on when ATAD should be considered, even when type 2 biologics are available. In addition, there are conflicting studies as to whether patients on a type 2 biologic become desensitized to NSAIDs, because omalizumab proved to restore tolerance to aspirin in only two-third of patients. This goal of NSAID tolerance should be considered as part of disease control future approaches, representing one of many aspects in a patient-centered care approach.

IL-4Rα signaling promotes barrier-altering oncostatin M and IL-6 production in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

BACKGROUND

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a severe disease involving dysregulated type 2 inflammation. However, the role other inflammatory pathways play in AERD is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to broadly define the inflammatory milieu of the upper respiratory tract in AERD and to determine the effects of IL-4Rα inhibition on mediators of nasal inflammation.

METHODS

Twenty-two AERD patients treated with dupilumab for 3 months were followed over 3 visits and compared to 10 healthy controls. Nasal fluid was assessed for 45 cytokines and chemokines using Olink Target 48. Blood neutrophils and cultured human mast cells, monocytes/macrophages, and nasal fibroblasts were assessed for response to IL-4/13 stimulation in vitro.

RESULTS

Of the nasal fluid cytokines measured, nearly one third were higher in AERD patients compared to healthy controls, including IL-6 and the IL-6 family-related cytokine oncostatin M (OSM), both of which correlated with nasal albumin levels, a marker of epithelial barrier dysregulation. Dupilumab significantly decreased many nasal mediators, including OSM and IL-6. IL-4 stimulation induced OSM production from mast cells and macrophages but not from neutrophils, and OSM and IL-13 stimulation induced IL-6 production from nasal fibroblasts.

CONCLUSION

In addition to type 2 inflammation, innate and IL-6-related cytokines are also elevated in the respiratory tract in AERD. Both OSM and IL-6 are locally produced in nasal polyps and likely promote pathology by negatively affecting epithelial barrier function. IL-4Rα blockade, although seemingly directed at type 2 inflammation, also decreases mediators of innate inflammation and epithelial dysregulation, which may contribute to dupilumab's therapeutic efficacy in AERD.

[Does aspirin therapy after desensitization still have a role in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis in the era of biologics?]

The prevalence of analgesic intolerance syndrome (AIS), internationally known as NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), is reported to be 0.5-5.7% in the general population. The disease often begins with nasal symptoms, which are later joined by chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), asthma, and respiratory hypersensitivity reactions following use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In the setting of chronic respiratory disease, the type 2 inflammatory endotype is predominant in approximately 80% of patients with CRSwNP, rendering biologics directed against interleukin (IL)-4, IL‑5, IL-13, and IgE of high clinical interest, particularly in patients with severe CRSwNP and NERD. NERD is often associated with CRSwNP and asthma. Patients with CRSwNP and NERD have been treated, among other therapies, with aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD). With the approval of monoclonal antibodies for CRSwNP and asthma, the question arises as to what extent ATAD, which is associated with undesirable side effects, is still useful in the treatment of CRSwNP. In this manuscript, the use of ATAD in CRSwNP patients is discussed from different medical and socioeconomic points of view, both alternatively to or in combination with monoclonal antibodies. Accordingly, both ATAD and biologics continue to play a supporting role in modern treatment of CRSwNP in NERD patients, and should be used judiciously to complement each other.

Pre-asthma: a useful concept? A EUFOREA paper. Part 2-late onset eosinophilic asthma

The concept of pre-diabetes has led to provision of measures to reduce disease progression through identification of subjects at risk of diabetes. We previously considered the idea of pre-asthma in relation to allergic asthma and considered that, in addition to the need to improve population health via multiple measures, including reduction of exposure to allergens and pollutants and avoidance of obesity, there are several possible specific means to reduce asthma development in those most at risk (pre- asthma). The most obvious is allergen immunotherapy (AIT), which when given for allergic rhinitis (AR) has reasonable evidence to support asthma prevention in children (2) but also needs further study as primary prevention. In this second paper we explore the possibilities for similar actions in late onset eosinophilic asthma.

The Possible Roles of IL-4/IL-13 in the Development of Eosinophil-Predominant Severe Asthma

Bronchial asthma is characterized by airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness, and reversible airway obstruction. Eosinophils contribute to the pathogenesis of airway disease mainly by releasing eosinophil-specific granules, lipid mediators, superoxide anions, and their DNA. Type-2 cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 also play roles in the development of bronchial asthma. Among these cytokines, IL-4 is involved in T-cell differentiation, B-cell activation, B-cell differentiation into plasma cells, and the production of immunoglobulin E. Although IL-13 has similar effects to IL-4, IL-13 mainly affects structural cells, such as epithelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts. IL-13 induces the differentiation of goblet cells that produce mucus and induces the airway remodeling, including smooth muscle hypertrophy. IL-4 and IL-13 do not directly activate the effector functions of eosinophils; however, they can induce eosinophilic airway inflammation by upregulating the expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (for adhesion) and CC chemokine receptor 3 ligands (for migration). Dupilumab, a human anti-IL-4 receptor α monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, decreases asthma exacerbations and mucus plugs and increases lung function in moderate to severe asthma. In addition, dupilumab is effective for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and for atopic dermatitis, and IL-4/IL-13 blocking is expected to suppress allergen sensitization, including transcutaneous sensitization and atopic march.

Deep immune profiling of chronic rhinosinusitis in allergic and non-allergic cohorts using mass cytometry

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a persistent nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa inflammation comprising two phenotypes, namely CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and without (CRSsNP). CRSwNP can be associated with asthma and hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in a syndrome known as NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD). Furthermore, CRS frequently intertwines with respiratory allergies. This study investigated levels of 33 different nasal and serum cytokines and phenotypic characteristics of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) within cohorts of CRS patients (n = 24), additionally examining the influence of comorbid respiratory allergies by mass cytometry. N-ERD patients showed heightened type 2 nasal cytokine levels. Mass cytometry revealed increased activated naive B cell levels in CRSwNP and N-ERD, while resting naive B cells were higher in CRSsNP. Th2a cell levels were significantly elevated in allergic subjects, but not in CRS groups. In conclusion, there are distinct immunological features in PBMCs of CRS phenotypes and allergy.

Management of Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease: What Does the Future Hold?

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps (CRSwNP) and asthma with higher recurrence of nasal polyps after surgery and severe asthma. Patients with CRSwNP and asthma should be screened for AERD by detailed history of aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug reactions and review of medications that may mask aspirin reaction or directly by aspirin challenge. Treatment of AERD may require more intensive therapy, including endoscopic sinus surgery, daily aspirin therapy, leukotriene modifiers, or biologics.

Should Biologics Be Used Before Aspirin Desensitization in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease?

There has been a paradigm shift in the management of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). It started in 2015 when the first biologic was Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for severe eosinophilic asthma. Thus, there emerged a new era in the treatment of patients with type 2-mediated airway diseases. This has led to an increasing number of options for patients, undoubtably a great thing, but has left clinicians without a clear answer for how to balance the therapies that exist for AERD, what to recommend for treatment, and how to best assess the benefits and risks of each therapy. This paper aims to explore these benefits and risks, and to provide a roadmap for future studies.

[Diagnosis and treatment of asthma: a guideline for respiratory specialists 2023 - published by the German Respiratory Society (DGP) e. V.]

The management of asthma has fundamentally changed during the past decades. The present guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma was developed for respiratory specialists who need detailed and evidence-based information on the new diagnostic and therapeutic options in asthma. The guideline shows the new role of biomarkers, especially blood eosinophils and fractional exhaled NO (FeNO), in diagnostic algorithms of asthma. Of note, this guideline is the first worldwide to announce symptom prevention and asthma remission as the ultimate goals of asthma treatment, which can be achieved by using individually tailored, disease-modifying anti-asthmatic drugs such as inhaled steroids, allergen immunotherapy or biologics. In addition, the central role of the treatment of comorbidities is emphasized. Finally, the document addresses several challenges in asthma management, including asthma treatment during pregnancy, treatment of severe asthma or the diagnosis and treatment of work-related asthma.

The Role of Biologics in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

The last decade has seen significant developments in the field of biologics for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Translational research borne from knowledge of the pathophysiology of type 2 inflammatory disease of the lower airways and the strong association with CRSwNP, has led to major therapeutic breakthroughs, with phase 3 trials of four biologics completed at the time of writing, and more underway. This article explores the evidence behind biologics for CRSwNP, the guidance on their use and the health economic factors influencing their position amongst the established therapeutic options for this common chronic condition.

Mechanistic and clinical updates in AERD: 2021-2022

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a unique and often clinically severe disease affecting a subgroup of adults with asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Works published in 2021-2022 confirmed the critical role of lipid mediator dysregulation and mast cell activation and expanded our understanding of basophils, macrophages, fibrin dysregulation, and the 15-lipoxygenase pathway in disease pathogenesis. Translational studies established inflammatory heterogeneity in the upper and lower airway at baseline and during aspirin-induced respiratory reactions. Clinical cohorts provided insights into the mechanistic actions of frequently utilized biologic therapies in AERD. These advances are already changing clinical care delivery and affecting patient outcomes. Despite this, further work is needed to improve clinical tools to reliably diagnose AERD and identify factors that could prevent development of the disease altogether. Additionally, the impact of inflammatory heterogeneity on clinical trajectories and the utility and safety of combination biologic and daily aspirin therapies remains unanswered.