Computed tomographic findings in subjects who died from respiratory disease in the National Lung Screening Trial

Can lung semi-quantitative measurements and mediastinal adipose tissue volume predict prognosis in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)? A CT-based preliminary study

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess the potential of subcutaneous adipose tissue volume, mediastinal adipose tissue volume, lung density, and lung volume (as measured on high-resolution computed tomography) to predict disease progression in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Additionally, the study aimed to evaluate the changes in these semiquantitative measures over time.

Materials and Methods

The HRCT images of 57 patients diagnosed with IPF were retrospectively screened. Subcutaneous adipose tissue volume, mediastinal adipose tissue volume, and mean lung density and volume were measured at the time of diagnosis and at the 12th month. The ability of these parameters to predict progression was evaluated using the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

Results

Low mediastinal adipose tissue volume at diagnosis had a 0.991-fold effect [odds ratio (OR)= 0.991, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 0.984-0.997, p< 0.001] on progression. Low mediastinal adipose tissue volume at diagnosis had a 0.993-fold effect [odds ratio (OR)= 0.993, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 0.975-1.011, p< 0.001] and progression development at the 12th month had a 6.5-fold effect [odds ratio (OR)= 6.516, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 1.594-26.639, p< 0.009] on mortality.

Conclusion

This study indicate that the prognosis was better in those with a large mediastinal adipose tissue volume among the patients with IPF.

Pathogenesis and management of emphysema in people with HIV

INTRODUCTION

Since early in the HIV epidemic, emphysema has been identified among people with HIV (PWH) and has been associated with increased mortality. Smoking cessation is key to risk reduction. Health maintenance for PWH and emphysema should ensure appropriate vaccination and lung cancer screening. Treatment should adhere to inhaler guidelines for the general population, but inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) should be used with caution. Frontiers in treatment include targeted therapeutics. Major knowledge gaps exist in the epidemiology of and optimal care for PWH and emphysema, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMIC).

AREAS COVERED

Topics addressed include risk factors, pathogenesis, current treatment and prevention strategies, and frontiers in research.

EXPERT OPINION

There are limited data on the epidemiology of emphysema in LMIC, where more than 90% of deaths from COPD occur and where the morbidity of HIV is most heavily concentrated. The population of PWH is aging, and age-related co-morbidities such as emphysema will only increase in salience. Over the next 5 years, the authors anticipate novel trials of targeted therapy for emphysema specific to PWH, and we anticipate a growing body of evidence to inform optimal clinical care for lung health among PWH in LMIC.

Prevalence and Long-term Outcomes of CT Interstitial Lung Abnormalities in a Health Screening Cohort

Background The association between interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and long-term outcomes has not been reported in Asian health screening populations. Purpose To investigate ILA prevalence in an Asian health screening cohort and determine rates and risks for ILA progression, lung cancer development, and mortality within the 10-year follow-up. Materials and Methods This observational, retrospective multicenter study included patients aged 50 years or older who underwent chest CT at three health screening centers over a 4-year period (2007-2010). ILA status was classified as none, equivocal ILA, and ILA (nonfibrotic or fibrotic). Progression was evaluated from baseline to the last follow-up CT examination, when available. The log-rank test was performed to compare mortality rates over time between ILA statuses. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess factors associated with hazards of ILA progression, lung cancer development, and mortality. Results Of the 2765 included patients (mean age, 59 years ± 7 [SD]; 2068 men), 94 (3%) had a finding of ILA (35 nonfibrotic and 59 fibrotic ILA) and 119 (4%) had equivocal ILA. The median time for CT follow-up and the entire observation was 8 and 12 years, respectively. ILA progression was observed in 80% (48 of 60) of patients with ILA over 8 years. Those with fibrotic and nonfibrotic ILA had a higher mortality rate than those without ILA (P < .001 and P = .01, respectively) over 12 years. Fibrotic ILA was independently associated with ILA progression (hazard ratio [HR], 10.3; 95% CI: 6.4, 16.4; P < .001), lung cancer development (HR, 4.4; 95% CI: 2.1, 9.1; P < .001), disease-specific mortality (HR, 6.7; 95% CI: 3.7, 12.2; P < .001), and all-cause mortality (HR, 2.5; 95% CI: 1.6, 3.8; P < .001) compared with no ILA. Conclusion The prevalence of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) in an Asian health screening cohort was approximately 3%, and fibrotic ILA was an independent risk factor for ILA progression, lung cancer development, and mortality. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Hatabu and Hata in this issue.

Suspected Interstitial Lung Disease in COPDGene Study

Rationale: Although interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA), specific patterns of incidentally-detected abnormal density on computed tomography, have been associated with abnormal lung function and increased mortality, it is unclear if a subset with incidental interstitial lung disease (ILD) accounts for these adverse consequences. Objectives: To define the prevalence and risk factors of suspected ILD and assess outcomes. Methods: Suspected ILD was evaluated in the COPDGene (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Genetic Epidemiology) study, defined as ILA and at least one additional criterion: definite fibrosis on computed tomography, FVC less than 80% predicted, or DLCO less than 70% predicted. Multivariable linear, longitudinal, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations with St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, 6-minute-walk test, supplemental oxygen use, respiratory exacerbations, and mortality. Measurements and Main Results: Of 4,361 participants with available data, 239 (5%) had evidence for suspected ILD, whereas 204 (5%) had ILA without suspected ILD. In multivariable analyses, suspected ILD was associated with increased St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (mean difference [MD], 3.9 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-7.1; P = 0.02), reduced 6-minute-walk test (MD, -35 m; 95% CI, -56 m to -13 m; P = 0.002), greater supplemental oxygen use (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-5.1; P = 0.03) and severe respiratory exacerbations (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1-7.5; P = 0.03), and higher mortality (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-4.6; P = 0.01) compared with ILA without suspected ILD. Risk factors associated with suspected ILD included self-identified Black race (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.3; P = 0.01) and pack-years smoking history (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3; P = 0.0005). Conclusions: Suspected ILD is present in half of those with ILA in COPDGene and is associated with exercise decrements and increased symptoms, supplemental oxygen use, severe respiratory exacerbations, and mortality.

Interstitial Lung Abnormalities at CT: Subtypes, Clinical Significance, and Associations with Lung Cancer

Interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) is defined as an interstitial change detected incidentally on CT images. It is seen in 4%-9% of smokers and 2%-7% of nonsmokers. ILA has a tendency to progress with time and is associated with respiratory symptoms, decreased exercise capability, reduced pulmonary function, and increased mortality. ILAs can be classified into three subcategories: nonsubpleural, subpleural nonfibrotic, and subpleural fibrotic. In cases of ILA, clinically significant interstitial lung disease should be identified and requires clinically driven management by a pulmonologist. Risk factors for the progression of ILA include clinical elements (ie, inhalation exposures, medication use, radiation therapy, thoracic surgery, physiologic findings, and gas exchange findings) and radiologic elements (ie, basal and peripheral predominance and fibrotic findings). It is recommended that individuals with one or more clinical or radiologic risk factors for progression of ILA be actively monitored with pulmonary function testing and CT. To avoid overcalling ILA at CT, radiologists must recognize the imaging pitfalls, including centrilobular nodularity, dependent abnormality, suboptimal inspiration, osteophyte-related lesions, apical cap and pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis-like lesions, aspiration, and infection. There is a close association between ILA and lung cancer, and many studies have reported an increased incidence of lung cancer, worse prognoses, and/or increased pulmonary complications in relation to cancer treatment in patients with ILA. ILA is considered to be an important comorbidity in patients with lung cancer. Accordingly, all radiologists involved with body CT must have sound knowledge of ILAs owing to the high prevalence and potential clinical significance of these anomalies. An overview of ILAs, including a literature review of the associations between ILAs and lung cancer, is presented. ©RSNA, 2022.

The relationship between interstitial lung abnormalities, mortality, and multimorbidity: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are associated with increased mortality. It is unclear whether multimorbidity accounts for the mortality association or how strongly ILA is associated with mortality relative to other common age-associated diseases. We determined the association of ILA with all-cause mortality adjusted for multimorbidity, compared mortality associated with ILA and prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer and also determined the association between ILA and these diseases.

METHODS

We measured ILA (none, indeterminant, definite) using blinded reads of CT images, prevalent chronic diseases and potential confounders in two observational cohorts, the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) (n=2449) and Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility - Reykjavik Study (AGES-Reykjavik) (n=5180). We determined associations with mortality using Cox proportional hazards models and between ILA and diseases with multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 8.8 (1.4) years in FHS and 12.0 (7.7) years in AGES-Reykjavik, in adjusted models, ILAs were significantly associated with increased mortality (HR, 95% CI 1.95, 1.23 to 3.08, p=0.0042, in FHS; HR 1.60, 1.41 to 1.82, p<0.0001, in AGES-Reykjavik) adjusted for multimorbidity. In both cohorts, the association of ILA with mortality was of similar magnitude to the association of most other diseases. In adjusted models, ILAs were associated only with prevalent kidney disease (OR, 95% CI 1.90, 1.01 to 3.57, p=0.0452) in FHS and with prevalent CVD (OR 1.42, 1.12 to 1.81, p=0.0040) in AGES-Reykjavik.

CONCLUSIONS

ILAs were associated with mortality adjusted for multimorbidity and were similarly associated with increased mortality compared with several common chronic diseases. ILAs were not consistently associated with the prevalence of these diseases themselves.

Incidental discovery of interstitial lung disease: diagnostic approach, surveillance and perspectives

The incidental discovery of pre-clinical interstitial lung disease (ILD) has led to the designation of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA), a radiological entity defined as the incidental finding of computed tomography (CT) abnormalities affecting more than 5% of any lung zone. Two recent documents have redefined the borders of this entity and made the recommendation to monitor patients with ILA at risk of progression. In this narrative review, we will focus on some of the limits of the current approach, underlying the potential for progression to full-blown ILD of some patients with ILA and the numerous links between subpleural fibrotic ILA and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Considering the large prevalence of ILA in the general population (7%), restricting monitoring only to cases considered at risk of progression appears a reasonable approach. However, this suggestion should not prevent pulmonary physicians from pursuing an early diagnosis of ILD and timely treatment where appropriate. In cases of suspected ILD, whether found incidentally or not, the pulmonary physician is still required to make a correct ILD diagnosis according to current guidelines, and eventually treat the patient accordingly.

In patients with interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA), monitoring of those at risk of progression is currently recommended, and pulmonary physicians should pursue an early diagnosis when ILA become clinically significant to facilitate timely treatment https://bit.ly/3HKOQc8

Quantitative inspiratory-expiratory chest CT findings in COVID-19 survivors at the 6-month follow-up

We evaluated pulmonary sequelae in COVID-19 survivors by quantitative inspiratory-expiratory chest CT (QCT) and explored abnormal pulmonary diffusion risk factors at the 6-month follow-up. This retrospective study enrolled 205 COVID-19 survivors with baseline CT data and QCT scans at 6-month follow-up. Patients without follow-up pulmonary function tests were excluded. All subjects were divided into group 1 (carbon monoxide diffusion capacity [DL_CO] < 80% predicted, n = 88) and group 2 (DL_CO ≥ 80% predicted, n = 117). Clinical characteristics and lung radiological changes were recorded. Semiquantitative total CT score (0-25) was calculated by adding five lobes scores (0-5) according to the range of lesion involvement (0: no involvement; 1: < 5%; 2: 5-25%; 3: 26-50%; 4: 51-75%; 5: > 75%). Data was analyzed by two-sample t-test, Spearman test, etc. 29% survivors showed air trapping by follow-up QCT. Semiquantitative CT score and QCT parameter of air trapping in group 1 were significantly greater than group 2 (p < 0.001). Decreased DL_CO was negatively correlated with the follow-up CT score for ground-glass opacity (r = - 0.246, p = 0.003), reticulation (r = - 0.206, p = 0.002), air trapping (r = - 0.220, p = 0.002) and relative lung volume changes (r = - 0.265, p = 0.001). COVID-19 survivors with lung diffusion deficits at 6-month follow-up tended to develop air trapping, possibly due to small-airway impairment.

Incidental Findings on Low-Dose CT Scan Lung Cancer Screenings and Deaths From Respiratory Diseases

BACKGROUND

Incidental respiratory disease-related findings are frequently observed on low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screenings. This study analyzed data from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) to assess the relationship between such findings and respiratory disease mortality (RDM), excluding lung cancer.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are incidental respiratory findings on LDCT scanning associated with increased RDM?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Subjects in the NLST LDCT arm received three annual screens. Trial radiologists noted findings related to possible lung cancer, as well as respiratory-related incidental findings. Demographic characteristics, smoking history, and medical history were captured in a baseline questionnaire. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess cumulative RDM. Multivariate proportional hazards models were used to assess risk factors for RDM; in addition to incidental CT scan findings, variables included respiratory disease history (COPD/emphysema, and asthma), smoking history, and demographic factors (age, race, sex, and BMI).

RESULTS

Of 26,722 subjects in the NLST LDCT arm, 25,002 received the baseline screen and a subsequent LDCT screen. Overall, 59% were male, 26.5% were aged ≥ 65 years at baseline, and 10.6% reported a history of COPD/emphysema. Emphysema on LDCT scanning was reported in 30.7% of subjects at baseline and in 44.2% at any screen. Of those with emphysema on baseline LDCT scanning, 18% reported a history of COPD/emphysema. Median mortality follow-up was 10.3 years. There were 3,639 deaths, and 708 were from respiratory diseases. Among subjects with no history of COPD/emphysema, 10-year cumulative RDM ranged from 3.9% for subjects with emphysema and reticular opacities to 1.1% for those with neither condition; the corresponding range among subjects with a COPD/emphysema history was 17.3% (both) to 3.7% (neither). Emphysema on LDCT imaging was associated with a significantly elevated RDM hazard ratio (2.27; 95% CI, 1.92-2.7) in the multivariate model. Reticular opacities (including honeycombing/fibrosis/scar) also had a significantly elevated hazard ratio (1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.62).

INTERPRETATION

Incidental respiratory disease-related findings observed on NLST LDCT screens were frequent and associated with increased mortality from respiratory diseases.

Detection and Early Referral of Patients With Interstitial Lung Abnormalities: An Expert Survey Initiative

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) may represent undiagnosed early-stage or subclinical interstitial lung disease (ILD). ILA are often observed incidentally in patients who subsequently develop clinically overt ILD. There is limited information on consensus definitions for, and the appropriate evaluation of, ILA. Early recognition of patients with ILD remains challenging, yet critically important. Expert consensus could inform early recognition and referral.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can consensus-based expert recommendations be identified to guide clinicians in the recognition, referral, and follow-up of patients with or at risk of developing early ILDs?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Pulmonologists and radiologists with expertise in ILD participated in two iterative rounds of surveys. The surveys aimed to establish consensus regarding ILA reporting, identification of patients with ILA, and identification of populations that might benefit from screening for ILD. Recommended referral criteria and follow-up processes were also addressed. Threshold for consensus was defined a priori as ≥ 75% agreement or disagreement.

RESULTS

Fifty-five experts were invited and 44 participated; consensus was reached on 39 of 85 questions. The following clinically important statements achieved consensus: honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis or bronchiolectasis indicate potentially progressive ILD; honeycombing detected during lung cancer screening should be reported as potentially significant (eg, with the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System "S-modifier" [Lung-RADS; which indicates clinically significant or potentially significant noncancer findings]), recommending referral to a pulmonologist in the radiology report; high-resolution CT imaging and full pulmonary function tests should be ordered if nondependent subpleural reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, centrilobular ground-glass nodules, or patchy ground-glass opacity are observed on CT imaging; patients with honeycombing or traction bronchiectasis should be referred to a pulmonologist irrespective of diffusion capacity values; and patients with systemic sclerosis should be screened with pulmonary function tests for early-stage ILD.

INTERPRETATION

Guidance was established for identifying clinically relevant ILA, subsequent referral, and follow-up. These results lay the foundation for developing practical guidance on managing patients with ILA.

Interstitial Lung Abnormalities, Emphysema and Spirometry in Smokers

BACKGROUND

Most pulmonary conditions reduce forced vital capacity (FVC), but studies of patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema demonstrate that reductions in FVC are less than expected when these two conditions coexist clinically.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA), chest computed tomography (CT) imaging findings that may suggest an early stage of pulmonary fibrosis in undiagnosed individuals, affect the association between emphysema and FVC?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Measures of ILA and emphysema were available in 9579 and 5277 participants from phases 1 (2007-2011) and 2 (2012-2016) of COPDGene, respectively. ILA were defined by Fleischner Society guidelines. Adjusted linear regression models were used to assess the associations and interactions between ILA, emphysema, measures of spirometry and lung function.

RESULTS

ILA were present in 528 (6%), and 580 (11%), of participants in phases 1 and 2 of COPDGene, respectively. ILA modified the association between emphysema and FVC (P<0.0001 for interaction) in both phases. In phase 1, in those without ILA, a 5% increase in emphysema was associated with a reduction in FVC (-110 cc, 95% confidence interval [CI] -121, -100; P<0.0001) however, in those with ILA it was not (-11cc, 95% CI -53,31; P=0.59). In contrast, there was no interaction between ILA and emphysema on total lung capacity (TLC) nor on diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO).

INTERPRETATION

The presence of ILA attenuates the reduction in FVC associated with emphysema.

Interstitial Lung Abnormalities: State of the Art

The clinical importance of interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) is increasingly recognized. In July 2020, the Fleischner Society published a position paper about ILA. The purposes of this article are to summarize the definition, existing evidence, clinical management, and unresolved issues for ILA from a radiologic standpoint and to provide a practical guide for radiologists. ILA is a common incidental finding at CT and is often progressive and associated with worsened clinical outcomes. The hazard ratios for mortality range from 1.3 to 2.7 in large cohorts. Risk factors for ILA include age, smoking status, other inhalational exposures, and genetic factors (eg, gene encoding mucin 5B variant). Radiologists should systematically record the presence, morphologic characteristics, distribution, and subcategories of ILA (ie, nonsubpleural, subpleural nonfibrotic, and subpleural fibrotic), as these are informative for predicting progression and mortality. Clinically significant interstitial lung disease should not be considered ILA. Individuals with ILA are triaged into higher- and lower-risk groups depending on their risk factors for progression, and systematic follow-up, including CT, should be considered for the higher-risk group. Artificial intelligence-based automated analysis for ILA may be helpful, but further validation and improvement are needed. Radiologists have a central role in clinical management and research on ILA.

The Association of Aging Biomarkers, Interstitial Lung Abnormalities, and Mortality

Rationale: The association between aging and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has been established. The associations between aging-related biomarkers and interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) have not been comprehensively evaluated.Objectives: To evaluate the associations among aging biomarkers, ILA, and all-cause mortality.Methods: In the FHS (Framingham Heart Study), we evaluated associations among plasma biomarkers (IL-6, CRP [C-reactive protein], TNFR [tumor necrosis factor α receptor II], GDF15 [growth differentiation factor 15], cystatin-C, HGBA1C [Hb A1C], insulin, IGF1 [insulin-like growth factor 1], and IGFBP1 [IGF binding protein 1] and IGFBP3]), ILA, and mortality. Causal inference analysis was used to determine whether biomarkers mediated age. GDF15 results were replicated in the COPDGene (Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Study.Measurements and Main Results: In the FHS, there were higher odds of ILA per increase in natural log-transformed GDF15 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.4 [1.8-6.4]; P = 0.0002), TNFR (3.1 [1.6-5.8]; P = 0.004), IL-6 (1.8 [1.4-2.4]; P < 0.0001), and CRP (1.7 [1.3-2.0]; P < 0.0001). In the FHS, after adjustment for multiple comparisons, no biomarker was associated with increased mortality, but the associations of GDF15 (hazard ratio, 2.0 [1.1-3.5]; P = 0.02), TNFR (1.8 [1.0-3.3]; P = 0.05), and IGFBP1 (1.3 [1.1-1.7]; P = 0.01) approached significance. In the COPDGene Study, higher natural log-transformed GDF15 was associated with ILA (odds ratio, 8.1 [3.1-21.4]; P < 0.0001) and mortality (hazard ratio, 1.6 [1.1-2.2]; P = 0.01). Causal inference analysis showed that the association of age with ILA was mediated by IL-6 (P < 0.0001) and TNFR (P = 0.002) and was likely mediated by GDF15 (P = 0.008) in the FHS and was mediated by GDF15 (P = 0.001) in the COPDGene Study.Conclusions: Some aging-related biomarkers are associated with ILA. GDF15, in particular, may explain some of the associations among age, ILA, and mortality.

Interstitial lung abnormalities detected incidentally on CT: a Position Paper from the Fleischner Society

The term interstitial lung abnormalities refers to specific CT findings that are potentially compatible with interstitial lung disease in patients without clinical suspicion of the disease. Interstitial lung abnormalities are increasingly recognised as a common feature on CT of the lung in older individuals, occurring in 4-9% of smokers and 2-7% of non-smokers. Identification of interstitial lung abnormalities will increase with implementation of lung cancer screening, along with increased use of CT for other diagnostic purposes. These abnormalities are associated with radiological progression, increased mortality, and the risk of complications from medical interventions, such as chemotherapy and surgery. Management requires distinguishing interstitial lung abnormalities that represent clinically significant interstitial lung disease from those that are subclinical. In particular, it is important to identify the subpleural fibrotic subtype, which is more likely to progress and to be associated with mortality. This multidisciplinary Position Paper by the Fleischner Society addresses important issues regarding interstitial lung abnormalities, including standardisation of the definition and terminology; predisposing risk factors; clinical outcomes; options for initial evaluation, monitoring, and management; the role of quantitative evaluation; and future research needs.

ESR/ERS statement paper on lung cancer screening

In Europe, lung cancer ranks third among the most common cancers, remaining the biggest killer. Since the publication of the first European Society of Radiology and European Respiratory Society joint white paper on lung cancer screening (LCS) in 2015, many new findings have been published and discussions have increased considerably. Thus, this updated expert opinion represents a narrative, non-systematic review of the evidence from LCS trials and description of the current practice of LCS as well as aspects that have not received adequate attention until now. Reaching out to the potential participants (persons at high risk), optimal communication and shared decision-making will be key starting points. Furthermore, standards for infrastructure, pathways and quality assurance are pivotal, including promoting tobacco cessation, benefits and harms, overdiagnosis, quality, minimum radiation exposure, definition of management of positive screen results and incidental findings linked to respective actions as well as cost-effectiveness. This requires a multidisciplinary team with experts from pulmonology and radiology as well as thoracic oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pathologists, family doctors, patient representatives and others. The ESR and ERS agree that Europe's health systems need to adapt to allow citizens to benefit from organised pathways, rather than unsupervised initiatives, to allow early diagnosis of lung cancer and reduce the mortality rate. Now is the time to set up and conduct demonstration programmes focusing, among other points, on methodology, standardisation, tobacco cessation, education on healthy lifestyle, cost-effectiveness and a central registry.

ESR/ERS statement paper on lung cancer screening

In Europe, lung cancer ranks third among the most common cancers, remaining the biggest killer. Since the publication of the first European Society of Radiology and European Respiratory Society joint white paper on lung cancer screening (LCS) in 2015, many new findings have been published and discussions have increased considerably. Thus, this updated expert opinion represents a narrative, non-systematic review of the evidence from LCS trials and description of the current practice of LCS as well as aspects that have not received adequate attention until now. Reaching out to the potential participants (persons at high risk), optimal communication and shared decision-making will be key starting points. Furthermore, standards for infrastructure, pathways and quality assurance are pivotal, including promoting tobacco cessation, benefits and harms, overdiagnosis, quality, minimum radiation exposure, definition of management of positive screen results and incidental findings linked to respective actions as well as cost-effectiveness. This requires a multidisciplinary team with experts from pulmonology and radiology as well as thoracic oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pathologists, family doctors, patient representatives and others. The ESR and ERS agree that Europe's health systems need to adapt to allow citizens to benefit from organised pathways, rather than unsupervised initiatives, to allow early diagnosis of lung cancer and reduce the mortality rate. Now is the time to set up and conduct demonstration programmes focusing, among other points, on methodology, standardisation, tobacco cessation, education on healthy lifestyle, cost-effectiveness and a central registry.Key Points• Pulmonologists and radiologists both have key roles in the set up of multidisciplinary LCS teams with experts from many other fields.• Pulmonologists identify people eligible for LCS, reach out to family doctors, share the decision-making process and promote tobacco cessation.• Radiologists ensure appropriate image quality, minimum dose and a standardised reading/reporting algorithm, together with a clear definition of a "positive screen".• Strict algorithms define the exact management of screen-detected nodules and incidental findings.• For LCS to be (cost-)effective, it has to target a population defined by risk prediction models.

Imaging Patterns Are Associated with Interstitial Lung Abnormality Progression and Mortality

Rationale: Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) are radiologic abnormalities on chest computed tomography scans that have been associated with an early or mild form of pulmonary fibrosis. Although ILA have been associated with radiologic progression, it is not known if specific imaging patterns are associated with progression or risk of mortality. Objectives: To determine the role of imaging patterns on the risk of death and ILA progression. Methods: ILA (and imaging pattern) were assessed in 5,320 participants from the AGES-Reykjavik Study, and ILA progression was assessed in 3,167 participants. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with ILA progression, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess time to mortality. Measurements and Main Results: Over 5 years, 327 (10%) had ILA on at least one computed tomography, and 1,435 (45%) did not have ILA on either computed tomography. Of those with ILA, 238 (73%) had imaging progression, whereas 89 (27%) had stable to improved imaging; increasing age and copies of MUC5B genotype were associated with imaging progression. The definite fibrosis pattern was associated with the highest risk of progression (odds ratio, 8.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-25; P = 0.0003). Specific imaging patterns were also associated with an increased risk of death. After adjustment, both a probable usual interstitial pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia pattern were associated with an increased risk of death when compared with those indeterminate for usual interstitial pneumonia (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.4; P = 0.001; hazard ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-6.8;P < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: In those with ILA, imaging patterns can be used to help predict who is at the greatest risk of progression and early death.

Interstitial lung abnormalities: erecting fences in the path towards advanced pulmonary fibrosis

Interstitial lung abnormalities, when present in members of undiagnosed family members recruited on the basis of familial interstitial pneumonia, or in undiagnosed research participants, have been associated with a syndrome that includes distinct sets of imaging abnormalities, restrictive physiological and exercise impairments, and an increased prevalence of histopathological findings, and genetic predictors, that have been noted in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Recent longitudinal studies have demonstrated that qualitative and quantitative assessments of interstitial abnormalities are associated with accelerated lung function decline, an increased rate of clinical diagnoses of interstitial lung disease and an increased rate of mortality. In this perspective, in addition to reviewing the prior information, four major efforts that could help the field of early pulmonary fibrosis detection move forward are discussed. These efforts include: (1) developing standards for characterising and reporting imaging findings from patients with existing CTs; (2) developing consensus statements on when undiagnosed and asymptomatic imaging abnormalities should be considered a disease; (3) identifying populations for which screening efforts might be beneficial; and (4) considering approaches to developing effective secondary prevention trials.

Incidental perifissural nodules on routine chest computed tomography: lung cancer or not?

Objectives

Perifissural nodules (PFNs) are a common finding on chest CT, and are thought to represent non-malignant lesions. However, data outside a lung cancer-screening setting are currently lacking.

Methods

In a nested case-control design, out of a total cohort of 16,850 patients ≥ 40 years of age who underwent routine chest CT (2004-2012), 186 eligible subjects with incident lung cancer and 511 controls without were investigated. All non-calcified nodules ≥ 4 mm were semi-automatically annotated. Lung cancer location and subject characteristics were recorded.

Results

Cases (56 % male) had a median age of 64 years (IQR 59–70). Controls (60 % male) were slightly younger (p<0.01), median age of 61 years (IQR 51–70). A total of 262/1,278 (21 %) unique non-calcified nodules represented a PFN. None of these were traced to a lung malignancy over a median follow-up of around 4.5 years. PFNs were most often located in the lower lung zones (72 %, p<0.001). Median diameter was 4.6 mm (range: 4.0–8.1), volume 51 mm³ (range: 32–278). Some showed growth rates < 400 days.

Conclusions

Our data show that incidental PFNs do not represent lung cancer in a routine care, heterogeneous population. This confirms prior screening-based results.

Key Points

• One-fifth of non-calcified nodules represented a perifissural nodule in our non-screening population.

• PFNs fairly often show larger size, and can show interval growth.

• When morphologically resembling a PFN, nodules are nearly certainly not a malignancy.

• The assumed benign aetiology of PFNs seems valid outside the screening setting.