ECMO during the COVID19 pandemic: moving from rescue therapy to more reasonable indications

Changes in Therapy and Outcome of Patients Requiring Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19

BACKGROUND

 Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) is related with poor outcome, especially in Germany. We aimed to analyze whether changes in vv-ECMO therapy during the pandemic were observed and lead to changes in the outcome of vv-ECMO patients.

METHODS

 All patients undergoing vv-ECMO support for COVID-19 between 2020 and 2021 in a single center (n = 75) were retrospectively analyzed. Weaning from vv-ECMO and in-hospital mortality were defined as primary and peri-interventional adverse events as secondary endpoints of the study.

RESULTS

 During the study period, four infective waves were observed in Germany. Patients were assigned correspondingly to four study groups: ECMO implantation between March 2020 and September 2020: first wave (n = 11); October 2020 to February 2021: second wave (n = 23); March 2021 to July 2021: third wave (n = 25); and August 2021 to December 2021: fourth wave (n = 20). Preferred cannulation technique changed within the second wave from femoro-femoral to femoro-jugular access (p < 0.01) and awake ECMO was implemented. Mean ECMO run time increased by more than 300% from 10.9 ± 9.6 (first wave) to 44.9 ± 47.0 days (fourth wave). Weaning of patients was achieved in less than 20% in the first wave but increased to approximately 40% since the second one. Furthermore, we observed a continuous numerically decrease of in-hospital mortality from 81.8 to 57.9% (p = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

 Preference for femoro-jugular cannulation and awake ECMO combined with preexisting expertise and patient selection are considered to be associated with increased duration of ECMO support and numerically improved ECMO weaning and in-hospital mortality.

[COVID-19 in the intensive care unit]

The acute respiratory failure as well as ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) have challenged clinicians since the initial description over 50 years ago. Various causes can lead to ARDS and therapeutic approaches for ARDS/ARF are limited to the support or replacement of organ functions and the prevention of therapy-induced consequences. In recent years, triggered by the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen, numerous cases of acute lung failure (C-ARDS) have emerged. The pathophysiological processes of classical ARDS and C-ARDS are essentially similar. In their final stages of inflammation, both lead to a disruption of the blood-air barrier. Treatment strategies for C-ARDS, like classical ARDS, focus on supporting or replacing organ functions and preventing consequential damage. This article summarizes the treatment strategies in the intensive care unit.

ERS International Congress 2023: highlights from the Respiratory Intensive Care Assembly

Early career members of Assembly 2 (Respiratory Intensive Care) attended the 2023 European Respiratory Society International Congress in Milan, Italy. The conference covered acute and chronic respiratory failure. Sessions of interest to our assembly members and to those interested in respiratory critical care are summarised in this article and include the latest updates in respiratory intensive care, in particular acute respiratory distress syndrome and mechanical ventilation.

Outcome of Emergency Pulmonary Lobectomy under ECMO Support in Patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

 Not much is known about the results of nonelective anatomical lung resections in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients put on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of lobectomy under ECMO support in patients with acute respiratory failure due to severe COVID-19.

METHODS

 All COVID-19 patients undergoing anatomical lung resection with ECMO support at a German university hospital were included into a prospective database. Study period was April 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021 (first, second, and third waves in Germany).

RESULTS

 A total of nine patients (median age 61 years, interquartile range 10 years) were included. There was virtually no preexisting comorbidity (median Charlson score of comorbidity 0.2). The mean interval between first positive COVID-19 test and surgery was 21.9 days. Clinical symptoms at the time of surgery were sepsis (nine of nine), respiratory failure (nine of nine), acute renal failure (five of nine), pleural empyema (five of nine), lung artery embolism (four of nine), and pneumothorax (two of nine). Mean intensive care unit (ICU) and ECMO days before surgery were 15.4 and 6, respectively. Indications for surgery were bacterial superinfection with lung abscess formation and progressive septic shock (seven of nine) and abscess formation with massive pulmonary hemorrhage into the abscess cavity (two of nine). All patients were under venovenous ECMO with femoral-jugular configuration. Operative procedures were lobectomy (eight) and pneumonectomy (one). Weaning from ECMO was successful in four of nine. In-hospital mortality was five of nine. Mean total ECMO days were 10.3 ± 6.2 and mean total ICU days were 27.7 ± 9.9. Mean length of stay was 28.7 ± 8.8 days.

CONCLUSION

 Emergency surgery under ECMO support seems to open up a perspective for surgical source control in COVID-19 patients with bacterial superinfection and localized pulmonary abscess.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 and influenza associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used extensively for H1N1 influenza and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) to improve gas exchange and quickly correct hypoxemia and hypercapnia. This systematic review summarized the evidence on ECMO for the treatment of COVID-19 and influenza-associated ARDS.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to compare the efficacy and safety of ECMO with conventional mechanical ventilation in adults with COVID-19 and influenza-associated ARDS. The study performed a structured search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and The Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The study included 15 observational studies with 5239 patients with COVID-19 and influenza-associated ARDS. The use of ECMO significantly reduced in-hospital mortality in COVID-19-associated ARDS (OR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.27-0.58; P < 0.00001) but did not reduce influenza-related mortality (OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.41-2.87; P = 0.87). Moreover, ECMO treatment meaningfully increased the incidence of bleeding complications (OR = 7.66; 95% CI = 2.47-23.72; P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

The use of ECMO significantly reduced in-hospital mortality in COVID-19- associated ARDS, which may be related to the advances in ECMO-related techniques and the increased experience of clinicians. However, the incidence of bleeding complications remains high. [Figure: see text].

Voriconazole Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A Retrospective Comparative Case-Control Study

Voriconazole, an antifungal agent, displays high intra- and inter-individual variability. The predictive pharmacokinetic (PK) index requires a minimum plasma concentration (C_min) in patient serum of between 1-5.5 mg/L. It is common to encounter fungal infections in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, and data regarding voriconazole PK changes during ECMO are scarce. Our study compared voriconazole PKs in patients with and without ECMO support in a retrospective cohort of critically-ill patients. Fifteen patients with 26 voriconazole C_min determinations in the non-ECMO group and nine patients with 27 voriconazole C_min determinations in the ECMO group were recruited. The ECMO group had lower C_min (0.38 ± 2.98 vs. 3.62 ± 3.88, p < 0.001) and higher infratherapeutic C_min values (16 vs. 1, p < 0.001) than the non-ECMO group. Multivariate analysis identified ECMO support (-0.668, CI₉₅ -0.978--0.358) and plasma albumin levels (-0.023, CI₉₅ -0.046--0.001) as risk factors for low C_min values. When comparing pre- and post-therapeutic drug optimisation samples from the ECMO group, the dose required to achieve therapeutic C_min was 6.44 mg/kg twice a day. Therapeutic drug optimisation is essential to improve target attainment.

New and personalized ventilatory strategies in patients with COVID-19

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus and may lead to severe respiratory failure and the need for mechanical ventilation (MV). At hospital admission, patients can present with severe hypoxemia and dyspnea requiring increasingly aggressive MV strategies according to the clinical severity: noninvasive respiratory support (NRS), MV, and the use of rescue strategies such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Among NRS strategies, new tools have been adopted for critically ill patients, with advantages and disadvantages that need to be further elucidated. Advances in the field of lung imaging have allowed better understanding of the disease, not only the pathophysiology of COVID-19 but also the consequences of ventilatory strategies. In cases of refractory hypoxemia, the use of ECMO has been advocated and knowledge on handling and how to personalize strategies have increased during the pandemic. The aims of the present review are to: (1) discuss the evidence on different devices and strategies under NRS; (2) discuss new and personalized management under MV based on the pathophysiology of COVID-19; and (3) contextualize the use of rescue strategies such as ECMO in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Expert consensus statement on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ECMO for COVID-19 severe ARDS: an international Delphi study

BACKGROUND

The high-quality evidence on managing COVID-19 patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is insufficient. Furthermore, there is little consensus on allocating ECMO resources when scarce. The paucity of evidence and the need for guidance on controversial topics required an international expert consensus statement to understand the role of ECMO in COVID-19 better. Twenty-two international ECMO experts worldwide work together to interpret the most recent findings of the evolving published research, statement formulation, and voting to achieve consensus.

OBJECTIVES

To guide the next generation of ECMO practitioners during future pandemics on tackling controversial topics pertaining to using ECMO for patients with COVID-19-related severe ARDS.

METHODS

The scientific committee was assembled of five chairpersons with more than 5 years of ECMO experience and a critical care background. Their roles were modifying and restructuring the panel's questions and, assisting with statement formulation in addition to expert composition and literature review. Experts are identified based on their clinical experience with ECMO (minimum of 5 years) and previous academic activity on a global scale, with a focus on diversity in gender, geography, area of expertise, and level of seniority. We used the modified Delphi technique rounds and the nominal group technique (NGT) through three face-to-face meetings and the voting on the statement was conducted anonymously. The entire process was planned to be carried out in five phases: identifying the gap of knowledge, validation, statement formulation, voting, and drafting, respectively.

RESULTS

In phase I, the scientific committee obtained 52 questions on controversial topics in ECMO for COVID-19, further reviewed for duplication and redundancy in phase II, resulting in nine domains with 32 questions with a validation rate exceeding 75% (Fig. 1). In phase III, 25 questions were used to formulate 14 statements, and six questions achieved no consensus on the statements. In phase IV, two voting rounds resulted in 14 statements that reached a consensus are included in four domains which are: patient selection, ECMO clinical management, operational and logistics management, and ethics.

CONCLUSION

Three years after the onset of COVID-19, our understanding of the role of ECMO has evolved. However, it is incomplete. Tota14 statements achieved consensus; included in four domains discussing patient selection, clinical ECMO management, operational and logistic ECMO management and ethics to guide next-generation ECMO providers during future pandemic situations.

The role of ECMO in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure: Defining risk factors for mortality

BACKGROUND

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) utilization increased substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic, but without patient selection criteria.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of all adult patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS placed on VV ECMO at our institution from April 2020 through June 2022.

RESULTS

162 patients were included (n = 95 Pre-Delta; n = 58 Delta; n = 9 Omicron). The frequency of ECMO duration greater than three weeks was variable by pandemic period (17% pre-Delta, 41% Delta, 22% Omicron, p = 0.003). In-hospital mortality was 60.5%. Age ≥50 years (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01, 1.62), ≥7 days of respiratory support (1.39, 95% CI 1.05, 1.83) and pre-cannulation renal failure requiring dialysis (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13, 1.78) were associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of VV ECMO patients with COVID-19, older age, a longer duration of pre-ECMO respiratory support, and pre-ECMO renal failure all increased the risk of mortality by approximately 30%.

Outcomes of patients with acute respiratory failure on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation requiring additional circulatory support by veno-venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Objective

Veno-venous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used to support patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In case of additional cardio-circulatory failure, some experienced centers upgrade the V-V ECMO with an additional arterial return cannula (termed V-VA ECMO). Here we analyzed short- and long-term outcome together with potential predictors of mortality.

Design

Multicenter, retrospective analysis between January 2008 and September 2021.

Setting

Three tertiary care ECMO centers in Germany (Hannover, Bonn) and Switzerland (Zurich).

Patients

Seventy-three V-V ECMO patients with ARDS and additional acute cardio-circulatory deterioration required an upgrade to V-VA ECMO were included in this study.

Measurements and main results

Fifty-three patients required an upgrade from V-V to V-VA and 20 patients were directly triple cannulated. Median (Interquartile Range) age was 49 (28–57) years and SOFA score was 14 (12–17) at V-VA ECMO upgrade. Vasoactive-inotropic score decreased from 53 (12–123) at V-VA ECMO upgrade to 9 (3–37) after 24 h of V-VA ECMO support. Weaning from V-VA and V-V ECMO was successful in 47 (64%) and 40 (55%) patients, respectively. Duration of ECMO support was 12 (6–22) days and ICU length of stay was 32 (16–46) days. Overall ICU mortality was 48% and hospital mortality 51%. Two additional patients died after hospital discharge while the remaining patients survived up to two years (with six patients being lost to follow-up). The vast majority of patients was free from higher degree persistent organ dysfunction at follow-up. A SOFA score > 14 and higher lactate concentrations at the day of V-VA upgrade were independent predictors of mortality in the multivariate regression analysis.

Conclusion

In this analysis, the use of V-VA ECMO in patients with ARDS and concomitant cardiocirculatory failure was associated with a hospital survival of about 50%, and most of these patients survived up to 2 years. A SOFA score > 14 and elevated lactate levels at the day of V-VA upgrade predict unfavorable outcome.