Validation of a new serum granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibody testing kit

Pathogenesis-driven treatment of primary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis

Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) is a syndrome that results from the accumulation of lipoproteinaceous material in the alveolar space. According to the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms, three different forms have been identified, namely primary, secondary and congenital. Primary PAP is caused by disruption of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) signalling due to the presence of neutralising autoantibodies (autoimmune PAP) or GM-CSF receptor genetic defects (hereditary PAP), which results in dysfunctional alveolar macrophages with reduced phagocytic clearance of particles, cholesterol and surfactant. The serum level of GM-CSF autoantibody is the only disease-specific biomarker of autoimmune PAP, although it does not correlate with disease severity. In PAP patients with normal serum GM-CSF autoantibody levels, elevated serum GM-CSF levels is highly suspicious for hereditary PAP. Several biomarkers have been correlated with disease severity, although they are not specific for PAP. These include lactate dehydrogenase, cytokeratin 19 fragment 21.1, carcinoembryonic antigen, neuron-specific enolase, surfactant proteins, Krebs von Lungen 6, chitinase-3-like protein 1 and monocyte chemotactic proteins. Finally, increased awareness of the disease mechanisms has led to the development of pathogenesis-based treatments, such as GM-CSF augmentation and cholesterol-targeting therapies.

Cytokine profiles associated with disease severity and prognosis of autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) is characterized by an abnormal accumulation of surfactants in the alveoli. Most cases are classified as autoimmune PAP (APAP) because they are associated with autoantibodies against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). However, GM-CSF autoantibody levels are unlikely to correlate with the disease severity or prognosis of APAP.

METHODS

We collected clinical records and measured 38 serum cytokine concentrations for consecutive patients with APAP. After exclusion of 21 cytokines because of undetectable levels, 17 cytokine levels were compared between low and high disease severity scores (DSSs). We also compared whole lung lavage (WLL)-free survival with cut-off values defined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of cytokine levels and WLL administration at 11 months.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with APAP were enrolled in the study. Five were classified as DSS 1 or 2, while the others were classified as DSS 4 or 5. Comparison between DSS 1-2 and 4-5 revealed that the concentrations of IP-10 and GRO increased in the latter groups (p < 0.05). Fifteen patients underwent WLL. Comparison between those who underwent WLL within 11 months and the others showed that IP-10 and TNF-α were tended to be elevated in the former group (p = 0.082 and 0.057, respectively). The cut-off values of IP-10, 308.8 pg/mL and TNF-α, 19.1 pg/mL, defined by the ROC curves, significantly separated WLL-free survivals with log-rank analyses (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The concentrations of IP-10 and GRO may reflect the DSSs of APAP. A combination of IP-10 and TNF-α levels could be a biomarker to predict WLL-free survival.

A case of autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis during the course of treatment of rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonia associated with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (APAP) is a diffuse lung disease that causes abnormal accumulation of lipoproteins in the alveoli; however, its pathogenesis remains unclear. Recently, APAP cases have been reported during the course of dermatomyositis. The combination of these two diseases may be coincidental; however, it may have been overlooked because differentiating APAP from a flare-up of interstitial pneumonia associated with dermatomyositis is challenging. This didactic case demonstrates the need for early APAP scrutiny.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 50-year-old woman was diagnosed with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5) antibody-positive dermatitis and interstitial pneumonia in April 2021. The patient was treated with corticosteroids, tacrolimus, and cyclophosphamide pulse therapy for interstitial pneumonia complicated by MDA5 antibody-positive dermatitis, which improved the symptoms and interstitial pneumonia. Eight months after the start of treatment, a new interstitial shadow appeared that worsened. Therefore, three additional courses of cyclophosphamide pulse therapy were administered; however, the respiratory symptoms and interstitial shadows did not improve. Respiratory failure progressed, and 14 months after treatment initiation, bronchoscopy revealed turbid alveolar lavage fluid, numerous foamy macrophages, and numerous periodic acid-Schiff-positive unstructured materials. Blood test results revealed high anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) antibody levels, leading to a diagnosis of APAP. The patient underwent whole-lung lavage, and the respiratory disturbance promptly improved. Anti-GM-CSF antibodies were measured from the cryopreserved serum samples collected at the time of diagnosis of anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatitis, and 10 months later, both values were significantly higher than normal.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis complicated by interstitial pneumonia with APAP, which may develop during immunosuppressive therapy and be misdiagnosed as a re-exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia. In anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis, APAP comorbidity may have been overlooked, and early evaluation with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and anti-GM-CSF antibody measurements should be considered, keeping the development of APAP in mind.

A dried blood spot test for diagnosis of autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis

Granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies (GMAbs) mediate the pathogenesis of autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (autoimmune PAP) and their quantification in serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) - the serum GMAb test - is the 'gold standard' for diagnosis of autoimmune PAP. Because GMAbs are high in autoimmune PAP and low or undetectable in healthy people, we hypothesized that the ELISA could be adapted for evaluation of blood obtained from the fingertip using a dried blood spot card (DBSC) for specimen collection. Here, we report development of such a method - the DBSC GMAb test - and evaluate its ability to measure GMAb concentration in blood and to diagnose autoimmune PAP. Fresh, heparinized whole blood was obtained from 60 autoimmune PAP patients and 19 healthy people and used to measure the GMAb concentration in blood (by the DBSC GMAb test). After optimization, the DBSC GMAb test was evaluated for accuracy, precision, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and ruggedness. The coefficient of variation among repeated measurements was low with regard to well-to-well, plate-to-plate, day-to-day, and inter-operator variation, and results were unaffected by exposure of prepared DBSC specimens to a wide range of temperatures (from -80 °C to 65 °C), repeated freeze-thaw cycles, or storage for up to 2.5 months before testing. The limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and lower limit of quantification (LLoQ), were 0.01, 0.21, and 3.5 μg/ml of GMAb in the blood, respectively. Receiver operating curve characteristic analysis identified 2.7 μg/ml as the optimal GMAb concentration cutoff value to distinguish autoimmune PAP from healthy people. This cutoff value was less than the LLoQ and the ranges of GMAb results for autoimmune PAP patients and healthy people were widely separated (median (interquartile range): 22.6 (13.3-43.8) and 0.23 (0.20-0.30) μg/ml, respectively). Consequently, the LLoQ is recommended as the lower limit of the range indicating a positive test result (i.e., that autoimmune PAP is present); lower values indicate a negative test result (i.e., autoimmune PAP is not present). Among the 30 autoimmune PAP patients and 19 healthy people evaluated, the sensitivity and specificity of the DBSC GMAb test were both 100% for a diagnosis of autoimmune PAP. Results demonstrate the DBSC GMAb test reliably measures GMAbs in blood and performs well in the diagnosis of autoimmune PAP.

Serum cytokine changes induced by direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber in patients with acute respiratory failure

BACKGROUND

Polymyxin B-immobilized Fiber therapy (PMX-DHP) may improve the prognosis of patients with rapidly progressive interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). However, the mechanisms by which PMX-DHP ameliorates oxygenation are unclear. The present study aimed to clarify the changes in serum cytokine concentrations during PMX-DHP with steroid pulse therapy.

METHODS

Patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and rapidly progressive ILDs, acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and treated with PMX-DHP were assessed, including patients with IPF. The serum concentrations of 38 cytokines were compared between the ARF and IPF groups before treatment. In the ARF group, cytokine levels were compared before, immediately after PMX-DHP, and the day after termination of steroid pulse therapy.

RESULTS

Fourteen ARF and eight IPF patients were enrolled. A comparison of the cytokine levels before treatment initiation revealed that EGF, GRO, IL-10, MDC, IL-12p70, IL-15, sCD40L, IL-7, IP-10, MCP-1, and MIP-1β were significantly different between the two groups. In the ARF group treated with PMX-DHP, the concentrations of MDC, IP-10, and TNF-α continuously decreased during treatment (P < 0.01). Further, the cytokine levels of GRO, IL-10, IL-1Ra, IL-5, IL-6, and MCP-1 decreased after the entire treatment period, with no change observed during the steroid-only period (P < 0.01, except GRO and MCP-1). Although PMX-DHP significantly reduced eotaxin and GM-CSF serum levels (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05), these levels did not change after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

PMX-DHP combined with steroid pulse therapy might reduce GRO, IL-10, IL-1Ra, IL-5, IL-6, and MCP-1 levels in ARF, contributing to better oxygenation in the disorder.

Immunodeficiency and Autoantibodies to Cytokines

BACKGROUND

Anti-cytokine autoantibodies (AAbs) associated with an infectious phenotype are now included along with anti-complement AAbs and somatic pathogenic gene variants as a distinct category termed 'phenocopies of primary immunodeficiencies' in the classification of inborn errors of immunity. Anti-cytokine AAbs target specific cytokine pathways, leading to inordinate susceptibility to specific organisms, generally in the setting of immunocompetence.

CONTENT

Anti-cytokine AAbs are detected in the majority of healthy individuals and may play a regulatory role in limiting exaggerated responses to cytokines. While it is not well understood why some individuals with anti-cytokine AAbs develop increased susceptibility to organisms of low pathogenicity and others do not, it is likely that genetics and environment play a role. To date, AAbs to interferon gamma (IFNγ), interferon alpha (IFNα), interleukins-17 and 22 (IL-17/IL-22), interleukin-6 and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and their association with increased susceptibility to nontuberculous mycobacteria and other intracellular organisms, viral infections, Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus and other pyogenic organisms, and fungal infections respectively, have been described. The clinical phenotype of these patients is very similar to that of individuals with pathogenic gene variants in the specific cytokine pathway that the autoantibody targets, hence the term 'phenocopy.' Recognition of anti-cytokine AAbs as a distinct cause of immunodeficiency or immune dysregulation is important for appropriate management of such patients.

SUMMARY

Understanding the roles that anti-cytokine AAbs play in health and disease continues to be a fascinating area of research. Evaluating generally immunocompetent individuals who present with chronic, treatment refractory, or unusual infections for anti-cytokine AAbs is critical as it may direct therapy and disease management.

Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Specific Autoantibodies and Cerebral Nocardia With Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis

In this study, we report the history of a 40-year-old man with a primary cerebral abscess caused by Nocardia abscessus that led to the discovery of autoimmune pulmonary alveolar lipoproteinosis (anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF] autoantibodies). Anti-GM-CSF autoantibodies promote immunodeficiency and should be monitored to prevent opportunistic and disseminated infections and to diagnose asymptomatic pulmonary alveolar lipoproteinosis.

Clinical significance of serum anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies in patients with sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Background

Anti-granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibody (GMAb) has been recognized as a diagnostic biomarker for autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP). The aims of this study were to know the incidence of increased level of serum GMAb in granulomatous lung diseases (sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis [HP]) and to clarify the role of GMAb. Consecutive individuals diagnosed with sarcoidosis (n = 92) and HP (n = 45) at National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center were retrospectively analyzed. We measured serum GMAb levels at the diagnosis. Cut-off values of GMAb discriminating aPAP (n = 110) from healthy controls (n = 31) were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. We compared the clinical features of sarcoidosis and HP patients with GMAb levels above the cut-off value (“Elevated-GMAb”) with those of patients whose GMAb levels below the cut-off value (“Low-GMAb”). Radiological and pathological findings in elevated-GMAb patients were re-evaluated to elucidate the role of GMAb in granulomatous lung diseases.

Results

Analysis of ROC indicated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% at GMAb level of 3.33 μg/mL for discriminating aPAP from healthy controls (area under curve = 1.000, p < 0.0001). The percentages of elevated-GMAb sarcoidosis and HP patients were 5.4% (n = 5) and 11.1% (n = 5), respectively. The number of comorbid sarcoidosis and HP patients with aPAP was two and one, respectively. Elevated-GMAb sarcoidosis patients presented with significantly higher serum levels of Krebs von den Lungen (KL)-6, surfactant protein-D (SP-D), lactate dehydrogenase, and the requirement of systemic corticosteroid therapy. Elevated-GMAb HP patients demonstrated older age, higher serum KL-6, SP-D, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cytokeratin fragment 21-1 levels, and a higher percentage of lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage than low-GMAb patients. A subset of patients presented with radiological and pathological findings characteristic of aPAP.

Conclusions

We demonstrated the percentage of elevated-GMAb sarcoidosis and HP patients who presented with several features suggestive of aPAP. Elevated-GMAb sarcoidosis and HP patients without definitive aPAP diagnosis may have subclinical or early-stage aPAP and may not necessarily indicate false positives. Upon diagnosis of sarcoidosis or HP, measurement of GMAb may be useful in detecting possible comorbidity of subclinical or early-onset aPAP.