Clinical and economic comparison of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa

Epoetin alfa treatment for patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

Anemia (hemoglobin [Hb] < 12 g/dL) is a frequent and debilitating complication in the treatment of cancer. The negative effects of anemia include impairment of organ systems, disruption of important aspects of patient quality of life, and potential interference with completion and outcomes of cancer chemotherapy. Guidelines issued by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Hematology/American Society of Clinical Oncology jointly suggest that anemia in patients with cancer be managed by restoring Hb levels to approximately 12 g/dL, thereby minimizing transfusion requirements and resolving clinical symptoms associated with anemia. Recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) administered 150 U/kg 3 times weekly or 40,000 U once weekly has been shown in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and large, open-label, nonrandomized, community-based studies to effectively and safely correct anemia in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Several clinical trials support that treatment with epoetin alfa results in quality of life benefits that significantly correlate with Hb increases. Areas currently being investigated with epoetin alfa in the chemotherapy setting include the following: extended dosing regimens beyond the Food and Drug Administration-approved 3-times-weekly and once-weekly dosing regimens, early intervention for mild anemia, effects on treatment outcomes and survival, and optimal administration of concurrent iron supplementation.

Drug utilization and cost for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in a long-term care resident population with chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

To compare drug-utilization patterns and costs in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), not on dialysis, yet receiving epoetin alfa (EPO) or darbepoetin alfa (DARB) in a long-term care setting.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of pharmacy dispensing from January 2007 through March 2009, was conducted using the AnalytiCareSM LTC database.

SETTING

Long-term care.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

Patients>or=18 years of age, with >or=1 EPO or DARB dose dispensed, were included. Patients dispensed both agents, diagnosed with cancer, receiving chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or renal dialysis, were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean cumulative erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dose was used to calculate drug cost (using April 2009 wholesale acquisition cost) and dose ratio (Units EPO:mcg DARB). Results were also stratified by payer types.

RESULTS

A total of 2,259 patients were identified (EPO 1,640; DARB 619). EPO patients were slightly older (76.1 vs. 74.8 years of age, P=0.021), with similar proportion of women, compared with DARB patients. Mean (SD) cumulative dose was 98,420 (122,381) Units for EPO and 360 (428) mcg for DARB, resulting in a dose ratio of 273:1 (Units EPO:mcg DARB). The corresponding drug cost was 42% higher with DARB than with EPO ($1,734 vs. $1,217, P<0.001). Stratified analysis by payer types yielded similar results (dose ratios: 299:1 and 270:1 [Units EPO:mcg DARB]); cost premiums: 30% and 44% for Medicare Part A/Facility and Medicare Part D/Medicaid groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of long-term care CKD patients receiving ESAs reported 42% higher drug cost with DARB compared with EPO and a dose ratio of 273:1.

Cost-effectiveness of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa in patients with chemotherapy-related anemia

Anemia frequently develops during cancer chemotherapy and contributes to a variety of adverse clinical outcomes. Correction of anemia has been shown to improve patient outcomes; however, the cost considerations of supportive-care interventions have also become increasingly important to payors. Chemotherapy-related anemia can be managed via red blood cell transfusion; however, inherent transfusion-associated risks (e.g., infectious transmission and immunosuppression) can be particularly problematic in patients with cancer. Epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa, alternatives to blood transfusion in patients with chemotherapy-related anemia, are both effective at improving hemoglobin levels and transfusion requirements in patients actively receiving chemotherapy. Determining the relative cost-effectiveness of these erythropoietic therapies is an active research area.

Ribavirin dosage in patients with HCV genotypes 2 and 3 who completed short therapy with peg-interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin

BACKGROUND

The optimal dose of ribavirin to be used in combination with Peg-IFN in patients with HCV genotypes 2 and 3 undergoing short treatment has not been established.

AIM

To explore the relationship between starting ribavirin doses, expressed as mg/kg body weight and both rapid viral response at treatment week 4 (RVR) and sustained virological response (SVR) in patients treated for 12-14 weeks with peg-interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of data collected from two multicenter clinical trials was performed. Multiple regression analyses were employed to identify independent baseline and on-treatment predictors of RVR and SVR. For each dose of ribavirin, the empirical estimated probability of response was computed and the continuous exposure index was dichotomized by using a recursive partitioning and amalgamation method.

RESULTS

A nonlinear relationship was ascertained between ribavirin dose and RVR, but not SVR. A dose of 15.2 mg/kg was selected as the best splitting value for discriminating RVR vs. non-RVR. Regression analysis identified low baseline viraemia, genotype 2 and high ribavirin dose as independent prognostic factors for RVR. The likelihood of an SVR was not correlated with baseline ribavirin dose, but was independently predicted by adherence to the full dose throughout treatment and normal platelet counts.

CONCLUSIONS

Starting high ribavirin doses appears capable of increasing the rate of RVR in patients with HCV genotypes 2 and 3 undergoing short treatment. Maintenance of the full planned dose throughout treatment is essential for achieving optimal SVR rates.

[Direct medical cost of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in anaemia treatment of chronic renal failure patient: a literature review]

INTRODUCTION

Management of anaemia in chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) represents an important medico-economic challenge because of the great number of patients and the cost of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). The aim of this study was to identify determinants of the costs associated with these treatments in order to choose, with equal efficacy, the most efficient ASE.

METHOD

A bibliographic research was realised by Medline database interrogation.

RESULTS

Among the direct medical costs, five studies showed that acquisition of epoetine alfa (EA) compared to darbepoetin alfa (DA) was less expensive. Concerning the costs associated with the route of administration, the subcutaneous injection (SC) of epoetine allowed a gain in costs because of the decrease of doses compared to the intravenous (IV) route. The switch from EA in SC to DA in IV, for hemodialysis patients, was associated with a reduction of the number of injections and with a treatment's cost lower by DA than by EA. Costs related to the regimen of administration, notably those related to nursing, medical and pharmaceutical time, were negligible towards those associated to the acquisition of the ASE. Finally, the costs of the therapeutic follow-up and treatment of the adverse effects of the ASE were similar between the EA and the DA.

CONCLUSION

The costs associated with the prices of acquisition of the ASE, negotiated by the structure of care, represent the most important part of the direct medical costs.

Meeting New Challenges in the Management of Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease Through Collaborative Care with Pharmacists

Objective:

To evaluate chronic kidney disease (CKD)–associated anemia management challenges and limitations and discuss strategies to improve treatment rates and patient response to therapy, monitoring of patient response to therapy, and education of prescribing providers and patients.

Data Sources:

Multiple MEDLINE searches were performed using a comprehensive search term list to identify studies for inclusion, including, but not limited to, anemia, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), epoetin, darbepoetin, CERA, hemoglobin, CKD, dialysis, end-stage renal disease, quality of life, and pharmacist. Annual data reports and clinical practice guidelines published by the National Kidney Foundation and US Renal Data System were included. Information provided within product package inserts for recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa; Epogen, Procrit) and darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) were also included.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Only articles that were published in English and were relevant for this review were included.

Data Synthesis:

Anemia is a common complication of CKD, with significant impact on patients' quality of life. Anemia of CKD represents a significant burden on the healthcare system, with ESA use resulting in substantial financial costs. As new therapies, formularies, and dosing regimens evolve, the collaborative role of the clinical pharmacist is integral to a multidisciplinary treatment strategy, both in the inpatient and outpatient settings, such as hospitals or dialysis centers, respectively. This review focuses on initial and target hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations, as well as patient characteristics, treatment preferences, and dosing schedules, which are important considerations in managing CKD-associated anemia. To ensure effective therapeutic strategies, a patient-centered approach is required. Pharmacists are ideally positioned to help select ESA therapy, influence formulary use, educate healthcare professionals and patients, develop and implement dosing and monitoring protocols, and possibly promote quality improvement.

Conclusions:

An approach to CKD-associated anemia management that involves collaboration with pharmacists is essential to achieve patient-specific, cost-effective ESA therapy.

Drug utilisation and cost considerations of erythropoiesis stimulating agents in oncology patients receiving chemotherapy: observations from a large managed-care database

OBJECTIVE

Erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) resource utilisation in cancer chemotherapy patients is of importance to managed-care organisations. To understand current real-world utilisation of ESAs, this study examined epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) treatment patterns (dosing and treatment duration), dose ratio and ESA treatment costs.

METHODS

An analysis of medical claims data from January 2006 through to January 2008 was conducted using the PharMetrics Patient-Centric database of over 85 health plans. Patients included in the study were > or =18 years of age, had at least one cancer claim within 90 days prior to ESA treatment initiation, were newly initiated on EPO or DARB, received at least two doses, and were treated with concomitant chemotherapy (at least one chemotherapy claim during ESA treatment). Mean cumulative ESA dose was used to calculate drug cost (based on April 2008 wholesale acquisition cost) and dose ratio (units EPO : microg DARB).

RESULTS

A total of 4,111 EPO patients and 6,817 DARB patients met inclusion criteria and formed the study population. EPO-treated patients were slightly older (mean age: EPO 63.6, DARB 61.8, p<0.0001) with a greater proportion of women in the DARB-treated group (EPO 60.9%, DARB 64.1%, p=0.0007). The mean treatment duration was slightly longer in the EPO group (EPO 58.4 days, DARB 55.4 days, p=0.0019). The mean cumulative ESA dose administered was EPO 329,129 units and DARB 1,289 microg, resulting in a dose ratio of 255:1 (units EPO:microg DARB). Mean drug cost per treatment episode was significantly lower in the EPO group by $1,768 (EPO $4,321, DARB $6,089, p<0.0001). After controlling for covariates, the incremental cost associated with DARB treatment remained stable and statistically significant (adjusted cost difference: $1,806 per treatment episode higher for DARB patients than EPO, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study of 10,928 oncology patients receiving chemotherapy reported a dose ratio of 255:1 (units EPO:microg DARB) with 29% lower treatment cost in the EPO group. These findings are similar to those previously reported from published clinical trials and real-world utilisation studies.

Darbepoetin alfa for anemia in chronic kidney disease

Anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common, yet it is often under-recognized and undertreated, with serious adverse consequences. It is highly responsive to treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Darbepoetin alfa is a hyperglycosylated ESA that has a lower affinity to the erythropoietin receptor but a longer half-life than recombinant human erythropoietin, irrespective of administration by a subcutaneous or intravenous route. Owing to its pharmacokinetic characteristics, darbepoetin alfa has been used in extended dosing intervals ranging from once every week to once every 4 weeks in CKD patients on dialysis, as well as in CKD patients not on dialysis. Darbepoetin alfa has been shown to be safe and effective in clinical trials. The safety profile of darbepoetin alfa is similar to that of recombinant human erythropoietin. While target hemoglobin levels in CKD anemia remain debatable, treatment of anemia with ESAs has the proven benefits of reducing transfusions and improving quality of life. Darbepoetin alfa has the potential to simplify the treatment of CKD anemia with many advantages, including infrequent dosing, improved patient convenience and compliance, and decreased healthcare resource utilization.

Management of anaemia: a critical and systematic review of the cost effectiveness of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are genetically engineered forms of erythropoietin that are used in the treatment of anaemia. Their successful use in the treatment of anaemia associated with renal disease, cancer and other diseases, as well as the development of multiple agents, has increased the visibility of these agents in the clinical and health economics literature. The circumstances under which the use of ESAs is cost effective, or indeed, whether it is cost effective, is of central concern for clinicians and payers who must make informed decisions regarding the management of these costly resources. Much of the recent literature on ESAs in the treatment of anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease and cancer, the two major therapeutic areas for ESA treatment, has focused on comparisons between individual ESAs, particularly epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa. While there have been some studies of cost effectiveness, many studies in these treatment areas have employed a cost-minimization approach and have relied on published prices rather than actual market prices. In general, this review of the literature suggests a cost advantage for epoetin alfa relative to darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of anaemia in renal and oncology indications. For other indications in which the literature is less developed, such as anaemia induced by antiviral therapy and blood management in surgery, small prospective studies or decision-analytic models comparing ESA therapy and standard care have been most common. Few conclusions can be drawn about the overall and relative costs or cost effectiveness of ESAs in these treatment areas. With the recent concerns about the safety of ESAs, especially when used outside the approved product labelling, future evaluations of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa should factor their safety profiles into estimates of cost effectiveness. Moreover, additional studies are needed to evaluate whether the treatment of anaemia with ESAs is cost effective compared with no treatment or minimal blood transfusions, and whether the cost effectiveness of ESAs would be improved if ESA doses and durations were reduced. With the introduction of new longer-acting ESAs, such as the continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, the relative cost effectiveness among the different ESAs will continue to be an important question for public and private payers, policy makers and clinicians who must consider the emergence of new data and changing dosing patterns when making decisions about the use of these important but costly agents.

Budget impact analysis of darbepoetin alfa every 3 weeks versus epoetin alfa every week for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia from a US payer's perspective

OBJECTIVE

This analysis was conducted to compare the direct medical costs of treatment with darbepoetin alfa every 3 weeks (Q3W) and epoetin alfa every week (QW) in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia (CIA) from the payer's perspective.

METHODS

An analysis was conducted from a US health plan perspective to compare the annual budget impact for CIA with darbepoetin alfa Q3W and epoetin alfa QW over a 16-week treatment period. Dosing regimens were obtained from registration clinical trials.

RESULTS

Mean doses, including dose adjustments, were 375.6 microg Q3W for darbepoetin alfa and 43,187 U QW for epoetin alfa. Costs of medical resources included drug acquisition and administration costs. The base case analysis resulted in a per-patient budget impact of $8,544 and $8,667 for darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa, respectively. Per member per month cost was $0.90 for darbepoetin alfa and $0.91 for epoetin alfa, based on an estimate of 2,735 CIA patients in a health plan population of 2.17 million. The analysis was most sensitive to drug dose, treatment period and drug price.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that per-patient direct medical costs of CIA treatment, when initiated at labelled starting doses, are comparable for darbepoetin alfa Q3W and epoetin alfa QW.

Extended-dosage-interval regimens of erythropoietic agents in chemotherapy-induced anemia

PURPOSE

The safety and efficacy of extended-dosage-interval regimens of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for managing chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Anemia is a frequent complication of chemotherapy. The ESAs epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa have been shown to safely and effectively manage CIA; comparable outcomes have been demonstrated between epoetin alfa 40,000 units once weekly and darbepoetin alfa 200 microg every two weeks. These commonly prescribed regimens necessitate extra clinic visits by cancer patients receiving cyclic chemotherapy. ESA administration can now often be synchronized with a three-week chemotherapy cycle because of the recent approval of darbepoetin alfa 500 microg every three weeks for CIA. However, in the Phase III trial providing the basis for this new dosage recommendation, more than 70% of patients required a 40% reduction in the dosage, resulting in an average dose of 375 microg every three weeks. The extended-dosage-interval regimens have not been associated with an increase in cardiovascular or thrombotic adverse events. Extended-dosage-interval regimens of epoetin alfa are under investigation and may provide additional alternatives. Synchronizing ESA therapy with scheduled chemotherapy visits would help minimize disruptions for patients and caregivers and improve the use of health care resources.

CONCLUSION

Administration of darbepoetin alfa every three weeks offers the convenience of synchronization of treatment with 21-day-cycle chemotherapy in many patients with CIA. Extended-dosage-interval regimens for epoetin alfa are being investigated and show promise.

Cost analytic model to determine the least costly inpatient erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen

BACKGROUND

Unlike in outpatient settings, the comparative costs of epoetin alpha (EPO) and darbepoetin alpha (DARB) have not been evaluated broadly from the inpatient hospital perspective.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a cost analytic model comparing hospital inpatient costs for erythropoiesis stimulating therapies within the nephrology and oncology settings.

METHODS

A cost analytic model incorporating erythropoietic drug, pharmacy, and nursing costs was developed from the inpatient hospital perspective to evaluate comparative costs of EPO and DARB. Erythropoietic drug costs were calculated using unit wholesale acquisition cost multiplied by the number of units or micrograms while comparing the following dosing regimens: EPO 3 times weekly, EPO once weekly, and DARB once weekly. Pharmacy costs included dispensing and delivery costs, while nursing costs incorporated administration time costs; all were calculated by estimated fractional hours per activity multiplied by hourly wages. The total frequency of erythropoiesis stimulating therapy administrations was determined based on the average hospital length of stay. The first erythropoiesis stimulating therapy dose was assumed to occur on day 3 of hospitalization. For total inpatient costs, a weighted average was calculated across disease states. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying length of stay, day of initial erythropoiesis stimulating therapy dose, pharmacy and nursing costs, and once-weekly DARB dose.

RESULTS

EPO 3 times weekly was the least costly regimen across all disease states evaluated. Threshold analysis indicated that the cost of once-weekly DARB regimens would have to be reduced by 37% to equal the cost of EPO 3 times weekly for an average length of stay. Sensitivity analyses did not considerably affect the results.

CONCLUSIONS

EPO 3 times weekly was found to be the least costly erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen for nephrology and oncology inpatients for the average length of stay as well as most other lengths of stay considered. Once-weekly EPO was the least costly erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen for several other lengths of stay, while once-weekly DARB was never found to be the least costly regimen.

Dose and cost comparison of erythropoietic agents in the inpatient hospital setting

PURPOSE

The inpatient dosing patterns and treatment costs in cancer and predialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients treated with erythropoietic agents from a hospital pharmacy perspective were studied.

METHODS

An analysis of electronic inpatient records from the Premier Perspective comparative hospital database was conducted. Study participants were identified through hospitalizations recorded between July 2002 and March 2005 from over 500 hospitals nationwide. Adult patients with an admitting diagnosis of cancer or predialysis CKD and treated with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa during hospitalization were included. Patients who had received renal dialysis or both agents during a hospitalization were excluded. Wholesale acquisition costs from September 2006 were used to calculate drug costs.

RESULTS

A total of 25,645 hospitalized patients with cancer (22,873 received epoetin alfa; 2,772 received darbepoetin alfa) and 66,822 hospitalized patients with CKD (60,079 received epoetin alfa; 6,743 received darbepoetin alfa) were identified. The mean cumulative dose per hospitalization resulted in dose ratios of 245:1 and 242:1 (units epoetin alfa:micrograms darbepoetin alfa) for cancer and CKD patients, respectively. On the basis of the cumulative dose per hospitalization, drug costs for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients were approximately 50% higher than drug costs for epoetin alfa-treated patients for both oncology and CKD patients.

CONCLUSION

Epoetin alfa was associated with less cost compared with darbepoetin alfa for treating inpatients with cancer or CKD. Further research including the patients' clinical outcomes is necessary to determine the true pharmacoeconomic differences between the two agents.

Risks and benefits of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer management

Anemia is frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer and its treatment is an important clinical problem. The deficiency in red blood cells (RBCs) can be a debilitating problem, and anemia correlates with poor performance status, deteriorates quality of life, and may negatively influence the prognosis of cancer patients. The development of recombinant human erythropoietins (rhEPO) provides a therapeutic option in patients with mild to moderate anemia. However, clinical experience demonstrates that more than half of anemic cancer patients are not treated. There is clear evidence that rhEPO reliably increases haemoglobin (Hb) levels in patients suffering from cancer-related or treatment-associated anemia. The dosing and management of these patients should strictly follow evidence-based guidelines of the clinical societies, as well as the manufacturer's recommendations. Furthermore, treatment of patients beyond the correction of anemia must be regarded as potentially harmful and should only be conducted in an experimental clinical setting. In this review, recently published recommendations and standards for the use of rhEPO will be discussed.

Dosing patterns, drug costs, and hematologic outcome in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease switching from darbepoetin alfa to epoetin alfa

OBJECTIVE

To compare real-world dosing patterns, drug costs, and hematologic outcome in anemic chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, not receiving dialysis, who switched from darbepoetin alfa (DARB) to epoetin alfa (EPO) in a community practice setting.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective observational chart review from a US nephrology clinic included 153 anemic CKD patients > or = 18 years of age who did not receive dialysis during the study period, switched from DARB to EPO between 8/2003 and 8/2005, and received > or = 2 doses of both agents. Paired t-test and McNemar's chi-square were performed comparing pre-switch and post-switch outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean interval between doses increased from 24.3 +/- 11.1 days with DARB to 28.8 +/- 19.8 days with EPO (p = 0.001). Weighted mean pre-switch weekly dose for DARB was 25 mug, while weighted mean post-switch weekly dose for EPO was 7090 Units, resulting in a dose ratio (Units EPO:microg DARB) of 287:1. These doses resulted in mean weekly costs of $110 (DARB) and $86 (EPO). Mean hemoglobin (Hb) levels increased over time from 10.8 g/dL at 6 months pre-switch to 11.1 g/dL 6 months after EPO initiation (p = 0.0132). Mean Hb levels were > 11 g/dL, but below 12 g/dL, while patients received EPO.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients switching from DARB to EPO had a greater mean interval between doses, lower drug costs, and consistently maintained recommended Hb levels over time.

LIMITATIONS

The reverse direction (EPO to DARB) was not investigated. Although treatment outcomes were not assessed in a randomized, controlled setting, the study's observational nature provided actual evidence in a real-world setting.

Dosing patterns, hematologic outcomes, and costs of erythropoietic agents in anemic predialysis chronic kidney disease patients from an observational study

INTRODUCTION

Epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) are two erythropoietic agents currently available in the United States for the treatment of anemia in patients with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD). The goal of this study was to assess and compare EPO- and DARB-treated CKD patients with respect to dosing patterns, hematologic outcomes, and associated costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, retrospective chart review, 400 charts of anemic predialysis CKD patients (200 treated with EPO and 200 treated with DARB) were sequentially selected from a large self-insured employer health insurance database. The database included both employees and their dependents. Selection criteria included patients newly initiated on EPO or DARB between July 2002 and December 2003 who had at least 24 weeks of dosing and hematologic laboratory data available. Patients with a diagnosis of malignancy or on dialysis were excluded. Dosing frequency was categorized as once weekly (QW), once every 2 weeks (Q2W), every 3 weeks (Q3W), or every 4 weeks (Q4W). Hemoglobin (Hb) levels and dates/doses of EPO and DARB administrations were recorded. Costs were calculated using 2005 wholesale acquisition costs.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics were similar in the EPO and DARB groups with respect to race, sex, renal function, and Hb. Extended dosing (defined as > or =Q2W) was common in both groups. The predominant dosing frequency was Q2W (59.5% of patients) for EPO and Q3W (68.0% of patients) for DARB. Hematologic response (defined as Hb > or = 11 g/dL) was significantly greater in the EPO group at early time points (week 4: EPO 28%, DARB 12%; week 8: EPO 39%, DARB 21%; week 12: EPO 98%, DARB 89%). In both groups, 99% of patients achieved hematologic response by week 24. The mean cumulative dose during the first 12 weeks (initiation phase) was EPO 141,481 +/- 32,426 units and DARB 499 +/- 152 microg. The 24 week mean cumulative dose (initiation and maintenance phase) was EPO 243,715 +/- 39,264 units and DARB 902 +/- 265 microg, corresponding to a drug cost of EPO $2,966 and DARB $3,933 and a dose ratio of 270:1 (units EPO:microg DARB).

CONCLUSION

Extended dosing frequency (> or = Q2W) was common in both groups. EPO treatment was associated with a significantly greater hematologic response at early time points (weeks 4, 8, and 12). Erythropoietic agent cost was 33% higher in the DARB group.

Strategies for managing anemia in hepatitis C patients undergoing antiviral therapy

Anemia is a common side effect that begins soon after the initiation of peginterferon/ribavirin in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. It can cause symptoms that negatively impact quality of life (QOL) and is the most common reason for reducing the dose and temporarily or permanently discontinuing ribavirin. Such dose modifications have been shown to reduce the efficacy of treatment. Administering erythropoietin can improve anemia caused by peginterferon and ribavirin therapy and is more effective than dose reduction at improving QOL during treatment. However, erythropoietin, which is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in patients with HCV infection, adds another parenteral drug to the patient's treatment regimen, and is associated with additional costs, inconvenience, and potential side effects. A new ribavirin analog, viramidine, is expected to be associated with a lower incidence of anemia and, if proven effective, may eventually be substituted for ribavirin in combination with peginterferon to treat chronic hepatitis C. In the meantime, physicians must make the best possible use of the available options for managing anemia, especially in select patient groups who are most at risk for anemia and its complications.

Speed of haemoglobin response in patients with cancer: a review of the erythropoietic proteins

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer-related anaemia generally have a poor prognosis. Evidence suggests that an effective erythropoietic protein (epoetin)-mediated haemoglobin (Hb) response provides marked improvement in quality of life (QoL). An early Hb response to erythropoietic protein therapy in these patients would appear ideal but few studies have compared the speed of response to different erythropoietic proteins, or the potential benefits associated with an early Hb response.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of commercially available erythropoietic proteins are reviewed along with available clinical data to examine Hb response and associated clinical outcomes for each of these agents. Randomised, head-to-head trials comparing epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa suggest that patients administered with epoetin alfa achieve a satisfactory Hb response significantly earlier than those given darbepoetin alfa, and with consistently lower monthly transfusion rates. Non-comparative studies support this, suggesting also that epoetin beta may provide a relatively faster Hb response in a greater number of patients than either epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa, irrespective of malignancy or chemotherapy type. Moreover, studies suggest consistently that a 'front-loading' dosing regimen with epoetin alfa does not convey improved speed of Hb response over epoetin beta administered according to current clinical practice guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the poor prognosis of anaemic patients with cancer, the use of an agent which provides clinical benefits quickly but with minimal thromboembolic risk, should be considered an essential component of anaemia management in these patients. However, more head-to-head studies are required to confirm the relative efficacy of currently available erythropoietic proteins.

Erythropoietic therapy for the treatment of anemia in patients with cancer: a valuable clinical and economic option

BACKGROUND

Healthcare organizations must evaluate the cost effectiveness of the alternative therapies that are available to treat anemia and improve quality of life (QoL) of patients with cancer, that is, erythropoietic protein therapy and blood transfusion.

METHODS

Pharmacoeconomic studies that evaluated the cost of not treating anemia or treating with transfusion or erythropoietic protein therapy were reviewed and compared. Studies of individual erythropoietic proteins (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta or darbepoetin alfa) were also assessed. As no prospective trials have compared the erythropoietic proteins, retrospective studies and the results of separate trials were analyzed. The database searched for this review was PubMed (open date to August 2006). Recent conference abstracts were also searched (2003-July 2006).

RESULTS

There is a high cost associated with anemia in cancer patients. Treatment of anemia is likely to lead to increased hemoglobin (Hb) levels and improved QoL as principal outcomes. Therefore, in assessing erythropoietic protein versus transfusion, it is more appropriate to use Hb or QoL as endpoint rather than quality adjusted life year. Studies with the former approach showed that erythropoietic protein therapy is more cost effective than transfusion. Also, its cost effectiveness should be improved with the use of evidence-based guidelines for patient selection and more tailored utilization. Increasing evidence suggests there might be differences among the erythropoietic proteins in terms of response rate, speed of response, and need for dose escalation.

CONCLUSION

Significant costs are incurred when anemia in cancer is not treated. Erythropoietic protein therapy is more cost effective than blood transfusion for the treatment of cancer-related anemia. Transfusion should be reserved for patients with poor responses to erythropoietic protein or for the emergency setting, when rapid improvement in Hb is required.

Dosing patterns and costs of erythropoietic agents in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis in managed care organizations

BACKGROUND

Epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) are erythropoietic agents indicated in the United States for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD).

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated dosing patterns and costs associated with the use of erythropoietic-stimulating therapy (EST) in patients with CKD not on dialysis who were newly starting EPO or DARB therapy in managed care organizations.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of medical claims data from >30 health plans for the period from July 2002 to February 2005. Patients were included if they were aged > or =18 years, had > or =1 claim for CKD within 90 days before the initiation of treatment, had newly started therapy with EPO or DARB, and had received > or =2 doses of treatment. If a patient was undergoing renal dialysis, data were censored 30 days before the first date of dialysis. Patients with a diagnosis of cancer or who had undergone chemotherapy were excluded from the analysis. The mean dosing interval was determined for both groups. Mean weekly doses and costs (using 2005 wholesale acquisition costs), weighted by the treatment duration, were calculated. The frequency of outpatient nephrologist visits was described and included in cost considerations.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 595 patients who received EPO and 260 who received DARB. The EPO group was significantly older than the DARB group (mean age, 63.5 vs 61.2 years, respectively; P = 0.020). The proportion of women was similar between the 2 groups (51.6% and 50.4%). Use of extended dosing (> or =q2wk) was common in both groups (63.2% and 90.8%). The weighted mean weekly dose was 11,536 U for EPO and 42.5 mug for DARB. The mean number of outpatient nephrologist visits during treatment was similar between the 2 groups (3.9 and 3.5). Mean weekly costs (EST drug cost plus cost of nephrologist visits) were significantly lower for EPO compared with DARB (159 dollars vs 205 dollars; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of these CKD patients newly started on EST in managed care organizations received extended dosing regimens (> or =q2wk) of EPO or DARB. EPO treatment was associated with significantly lower mean weekly costs compared with DARB. The number of outpatient nephrology visits did not differ significantly between groups.

Cost comparison of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha for cancer patients with anaemia in the clinical practice setting

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cost control is becoming an increasingly important consideration for clinicians when planning how to provide the best treatment for anaemic cancer patients. Administration of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha) has become the standard of care for treatment of anaemia in cancer patients. However, only limited information is available on the economic comparability of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha, and thus this study was conducted to compare cost per patient of each of these agents for anaemic cancer patients.

METHODS

All prescriptions of the agents over 1 year were analysed by two Austrian regional public health insurance associations and cost per patient for each agent was calculated from invoicing data. Data from the two regions were combined to obtain total mean drug costs per patient per year.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Analyses showed significantly lower costs for epoetin alpha ( 2,743.27 euros) than for darbepoetin alpha (3,627.98 euros ) or epoetin beta ( 3,292.28 euros): epoetin alpha vs. darbepoetin alpha (P < 0.0001); epoetin beta vs. darbepoetin alpha (P = 0.0001); epoetin alpha vs. epoetin beta (P = 0.0009). As costs of the three agents in Austria are identical for therapeutically equivalent doses, the higher cost of darbepoetin alpha was believed to be due mainly to longer treatment duration to target haemoglobin level.

CONCLUSION

The finding of a cost difference favouring epoetin alpha over darbepoetin alpha suggests the need for prospective randomized studies comparing efficacy and cost effectiveness of all three agents to obtain more definitive data.

Cancer-related anemia and recombinant human erythropoietin--an updated overview

For cancer patients, anemia can be a debilitating problem that negatively influences their overall quality of life and worsens their prognosis. The condition is caused either by the cancer itself or by cytotoxic treatment. Anemia is the primary indication for transfusion of red blood cells, but the development of recombinant human erythropoietins (epoetins) provides an alternative to red blood cell transfusions. Treatment with epoetins has been shown to reduce transfusion rates and increase hemoglobin response. There is some evidence that epoetins improve quality of life. It remains unclear, however, whether erythropoietin affects tumor growth and survival, and this area requires further investigation. Data from clinical trials suggest that erythropoietin increases the risk of thromboembolic complications. In the management of anemic patients, physicians should follow closely the dosing recommendations in products' package inserts or the ASCO/American Society of Hematology guidelines. Treatment of patients beyond the correction of anemia, however, has to be regarded as experimental and is potentially harmful, so should only be conducted in clinical trials.

Cost-minimization analysis of darbepoetin alfa versus epoetin alfa in the hospital setting

PURPOSE

The cost of darbepoetin alfa versus that of epoetin alfa in a hospital setting was studied.

METHODS

The study was an observational, retrospective review of the hospitalwide use of darbepoetin and epoetin during hospital admissions beginning in the period from January 2003 through April 2003. After the identification from daily charge reports of patients who used at least one of the study drugs during an admission, charts were requested for review. Drug product costs were determined from hospital purchasing information. Material and labor costs were combined to estimate drug administration costs. Total costs were calculated as the sum of drug product costs and administration costs.

RESULTS

A total of 429 epoetin records and 80 darbepoetin records were included. The two cohorts were similar with respect to demographic characteristics. With respect to costs, the only significant difference between cohorts was in daily administration costs, which were lower for patients receiving darbepoetin. Sensitivity analysis found lower costs for darbepoetin only after the dose-conversion ratio (DCR) was increased to above 256.74 units:1 microg. The overall DCR based on the median daily dose of each drug was 244.90 units:1 microg.

CONCLUSION

A cost-minimization study in a hospital showed no cost difference between treatment with epoetin and darbepoetin.

Dosing patterns, hematologic outcomes, and costs of erythropoietic agents in predialysis chronic kidney disease patients with anemia

OBJECTIVE

Few observational studies have evaluated the use of epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with anemia. The objective of this study was to investigate dosing patterns, hematologic outcomes, and intervention costs with EPO and DARB in anemic CKD patients treated in an ambulatory care setting.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective, chart review of predialysis CKD patients with anemia treated with EPO or DARB. Charts were sequentially selected from 435 EPO and 432 DARB patients naive to erythropoietic therapy and treated for > or = 24 weeks. Hemoglobin (Hb) levels, dates, and EPO/DARB doses were recorded. Drug costs using 2005 wholesale acquisition costs (WAC) and Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) pricing were based on the mean cumulative drug dose over the 24-week study period.

RESULTS

A total of 393 EPO and 396 DARB charts met all criteria with predominantly male subjects (EPO: 94%; DARB: 96%). Mean baseline GFR and Hb levels were similar. Once-weekly and extended dosing (> or = Q2W) was common in both groups. At Weeks 4, 8, and 12 following initiation of therapy, a greater proportion of EPO than DARB patients reached target Hb levels (> or = 11 g/dL) (p < 0.0001); at Week 24, all patients reached target Hb levels. Mean 24-week cumulative doses were EPO 279 336 +/- 68 302 units and DARB 1084 +/- 246 microg. Drug cost was higher for DARB independent of pricing utilized (WAC: EPO = 3400 US dollars, DARB = 4726 US dollars; FSS: EPO = 1528 US dollars, DARB = 2379 US dollars).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended dosing (Q2W) was common in EPO- and DARB-treated patients with CKD-related anemia, with EPO-treated patients experiencing a significantly greater hematologic response (at Weeks 4, 8, and 12). In addition, drug cost was 39-56% higher in the DARB group. The male predominance may limit generalizability, warranting further research in other populations.

Epoetin alfa for the treatment of cancer- and chemotherapy-related anaemia: product review and update

Anaemia, often associated with chemotherapy, is a common and debilitating disorder in cancer patients. Recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) was introduced in the 1990s for the treatment of chemotherapy-related anaemia. Data from randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies and large, non-randomised, community-based studies have demonstrated that either of the FDA-approved dosing schedules of epoetin alfa 150 - 300 U/kg three times weekly or 40,000-60,000 U/week s.c., significantly increases haemoglobin levels, reduces transfusion requirements, and improves quality of life in anaemic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy. Guidelines for the effective and safe use of epoetin alfa have been published by major oncology/haematology organisations and are reviewed in this article. Areas of recent and ongoing investigation with epoetin alfa are also covered in this review.

Epoetin beta in oncology: examining the current evidence

Anemia is highly prevalent in patients with cancer and its impact on quality of life and long-term outcome in these patients is well documented. Recombinant human erythropoietins, or epoetins, have been used to treat cancer-related or antitumor therapy-induced anemia for many years. Through a combination of clinical studies and extensive experience in the real-life clinical setting, epoetin beta has been shown to be efficacious and well tolerated, increasing hemoglobin levels, reducing the need for transfusion and improving quality of life. This favorable efficacy and safety profile has been demonstrated across a broad range of malignancy types, irrespective of the treatment used (platinum or nonplatinum based). The effect of treatment with epoetin beta is rapid, with mean hemoglobin increases of 1 g/dl seen as early as 4 weeks following the start of therapy. Furthermore, there is no evidence that epoetin beta negatively affects overall survival or tumor progression in anemic patients with cancer. The approved 30,000 IU once-weekly dosing regimen (as opposed to the 10,000 IU three-times weekly regimen) provides greater convenience and may result in improved treatment compliance.

Dosing Patterns and Treatment Costs of Erythropoietic Agents in Elderly Patients with Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease in Managed Care Organisations

OBJECTIVES

To investigate dosing patterns and drug costs of erythropoietic agents and assess the frequency of outpatient nephrologist visits in an elderly population with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (pCKD) newly initiated on epoetin alfa (EPO) or darbepoetin alfa (DARB).

METHODS

An analysis of medical claims from more than 30 healthcare plans covering all census regions of the US in the period July 2002 through February 2005 was conducted. Patients were included if they were > or = 65 years of age, had at least one claim for CKD within 90 days prior to the initiation of any erythropoietic agent, were newly commenced on either EPO or DARB, and had received at least two treatment doses. If a patient received renal dialysis, data were censored 30 days prior to the first date of dialysis. Patients diagnosed with cancer or those who had undergone chemotherapy were excluded from the analysis. The average dosing interval for both EPO and DARB was calculated and classified as once weekly (qw), every 2 weeks (q2w) or every 3 weeks or less frequently (> or = q3w). Weighted average weekly doses were scaled based on treatment duration. The frequency of outpatient nephrologist visits was analysed. Average weekly treatment costs were calculated and presented using the May 2005 Wholesale Acquisition Costs.

RESULTS

A total of 293 EPO and 102 DARB patients met the inclusion criteria. The two groups of patients had similar mean age (74.4 years for EPO vs 74.3 years for DARB) and gender distribution (47.4% female for EPO vs 51.0% for DARB). Extended dosing (every 2 weeks or less frequently: > or = q2w) during treatment was observed in both groups (EPO: qw 49.8%, q2w 31.7%, > or = q3w 18.4%; DARB: qw 19.6%, q2w 52.9%, > or = q3w 27.5%). The average dosing interval between injections was 13.6 days for the EPO group and 17.3 days for the DARB group. The weighted average weekly dose was 12,748 units for EPO and 43.5 microg for DARB. The average weekly erythropoietic treatment cost was significantly greater for DARB compared with EPO (190 US dollars vs 155 US dollars per week [2005 values]; p = 0.028). After controlling for covariates, the cost difference between the two groups was more pronounced and remained statistically significant (adjusted cost difference 41 US dollars/week higher for DARB patients; p = 0.013). The frequency of outpatient nephrologist visits during treatment was similar between the two groups (EPO 3.4 vs DARB 3.0 visits).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this analysis of claims data from more than 30 US healthcare plans, extended dosing (> or = q2w) of EPO and DARB was common in elderly pCKD patients treated with erythropoietic agents, with significantly higher weekly drug costs observed in the DARB group compared with the EPO group. The number of outpatient nephrologist visits was not significantly different between EPO and DARB patients. This study was the first to evaluate the dosing patterns of EPO and DARB in elderly pCKD patients in a large managed care population.

Epoetin alfa versus darbepoetin alfa in chemotherapy-related anemia

OBJECTIVE

To review and compare the data concerning the clinical activity of epoetin alfa versus darbepoetin alfa when administered to patients with cancer who are experiencing treatment-related anemia.

DATA SOURCES

English-language publications from the MEDLINE database (1990-June 2005), published articles, and meeting abstracts were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant data were extracted from published reports and abstracts on studies of humans with cancer who developed treatment-related anemia and were treated with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa are similar agents with identical indications for treatment of anemia in patients with cancer. Clinical trials have demonstrated that both agents can significantly improve hemoglobin levels, reduce transfusion requirements, and improve quality of life. Epoetin alfa is approved for administration at a dose of 150 units/kg subcutaneously 3 times per week, and darbepoetin alfa is approved for administration at a dose of 2.25 units/kg once a week. Clinical studies have demonstrated that epoetin alfa may be administered at 40,000 units once a week and that darbepoetin alfa may be administered at 200 microg every 2 weeks without loss of efficacy. Cost analysis, based on the average wholesale price of each drug alone administered for 12 weeks at Food and Drug Administration-approved doses, revealed that epoetin alfa is less expensive than darbepoetin alfa. When they are administered in the extended schedules, the cost of darbepoetin alfa is slightly less than that of epoetin alfa. However, the total expense associated with the extended schedule of either agent is further reduced by a reduction in other costs associated with drug administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa have identical indications for treatment of anemia in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Clinical trials have demonstrated similar activities with both agents. Darbepoetin alfa, with a longer half-life, can be administered less frequently, saving costs as well as reducing patient office visits.

The cost-effectiveness of weekly epoetin alfa relative to weekly darbepoetin alfa in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost-effectiveness of epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA), using dosing regimens approved by the FDA (EPO 40,000 U once weekly and DARB 2.25 U once weekly and DARB 2.25 mcg/kg once weekly).

METHODS

The study compared published results of two double-blind, randomized, phase III trials one utilizing EPO (N = 166) and the other, DARB (N = 367). Patients in both trials similar baseline characteristics. Effectiveness was measured as the proportion of EPO or DARB patients who were successfully treated (i.e., did not require blood transfusion) during weeks 0-16 and 5-16, respectively. Estimated drug costs were presented in 2005 USD based on wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) and average drug utilization over 16 weeks. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the estimated drug costs divided by transfusion effectiveness. Threshold analysis was used to determine the break-even point at which EPO and DARB had the same drug costs.

RESULTS

Estimated drug costs over 16 weeks were $9,039 for EPO and $13,555 for DARB. During weeks 5-16, 85% of EPO patients and 73% of DARB patients were successfully treated, resulting in average cost-effectiveness ratios of $106 for EPO and $186 for DARB per one per cent of successfully treated patients. A 33% reduction in DARB WAC was required to achieve the same drug costs as for EPO.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing FDA-approved doses, EPO was found to result in lower drug costs and better treatment success when compared to DARB. Hence, EPO is a dominant alternative compared to DARB for the treatment of CIA. The analyses presented here are not without limitations. Specifically, although the studies were comparable, patients were ultimately drawn from different populations.