Brentuximab vedotin with AVD for stage II-IV HIV-related Hodgkin lymphoma (AMC 085): phase 2 results from an open-label, single arm, multicentre phase 1/2 trial

BACKGROUND

Brentuximab vedotin in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) is approved in the upfront setting for advanced stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). People living with HIV have been excluded from these studies. We aimed to understand the activity and safety of brentuximab vedotin-AVD in people living with HIV diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma, while focusing on HIV disease parameters and antiretroviral therapy (ART) interactions.

METHODS

We present the phase 2 portion of a multicentre phase 1/2 study. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had untreated stage II-IV HIV-associated cHL (HIV-cHL), a Karnofsky performance status of more than 30%, a CD4+ T-cell count of 50 cells per μL or more, were required to take ART, and were not on strong CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein inhibitors. Patients were treated intravenously with 1·2 mg/kg of brentuximab vedotin (recommended phase 2 dose) with standard doses of AVD for six cycles on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 portion was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), assessed in all eligible participants who began treatment. Accrual has been completed. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01771107.

FINDINGS

Between March 8, 2013, and March 7, 2019, 41 patients received study therapy with a median follow up of 29 months (IQR 16-38). 34 (83%) of 41 patients presented with stage III-IV and seven (17%) with stage II unfavourable HIV-cHL. 37 (90%) of 41 patients completed therapy, all 37 of whom achieved complete response. The 2-year PFS was 87% (95% CI 71-94) and the overall survival was 92% (78-97). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were peripheral sensory neuropathy (four [10%] of 41 patients), neutropenia (18 [44%]), and febrile neutropenia (five [12%]). One treatment-related death was reported, due to infection.

INTERPRETATION

Brentuximab vedotin-AVD was highly active and had a tolerable adverse event rate in HIV-cHL and is an important therapeutic option for people with HIV-cHL. The complete reponse rate is encouraging and is possibly related to a unique aspect of HIV-cHL biology. Upcoming 5-year data will evaluate the sustainability of the outcomes obtained.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute.

Open-label, Phase 2 study of roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-myeloid malignancies

Anemia is a common side effect of myelosuppressive chemotherapy; however, chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) management options are suboptimal. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in this setting. This open-label Phase 2 study included patients with non-myeloid malignancies and CIA (hemoglobin [Hb] ≤10 g/dL) who had planned concurrent myelosuppressive chemotherapy for ≥8 additional weeks. Oral roxadustat was administered for ≤16 weeks (starting dose 2.0 or 2.5 mg/kg, then titrated every 4 weeks). The primary efficacy endpoint was mean maximum change in Hb within 16 weeks of baseline without red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Patients were assigned to roxadustat 2.0 (n = 31) or 2.5 mg/kg (n = 61) starting doses, and 89 were assessed for efficacy. The mean (standard deviation) maximum Hb change from baseline without RBC transfusion was 2.4 (1.5) and 2.5 (1.5) g/dL in the roxadustat 2.0 and 2.5 mg/kg groups, respectively. Median (range) time to Hb increase of ≥2 g/dL was 71 (57-92) days. Twelve patients (14.5%) had RBC transfusions (Week 5 to the end of treatment). Roxadustat was efficacious regardless of tumor type and chemotherapy regimen. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred in 14 (15.2%) and nine (9.8%) patients, respectively, and three had serious adverse events attributed to roxadustat in the opinion of the investigators (PE: n = 2 [2.2%]; DVT: n = 1 [1.1%]). Roxadustat increased Hb in patients with CIA regardless of tumor type and chemotherapy regimen. Adverse events were consistent with observations in patients with advanced-stage malignancies.

Open-label, phase 2 study of roxadustat for treatment of anemia in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-myeloid malignancies

12085

Background: Anemia is prevalent in patients (pts) receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy (> 60%) and exacerbated by repeated treatment cycles due to cytotoxic agent accumulation. Chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) management options are suboptimal. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in pts with anemia receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, proof-of-concept Phase 2 study included pts with mostly advanced, non-myeloid malignancies and CIA (hemoglobin [Hb] ≤10 g/dL) who had not received red blood cell (RBC) transfusion or erythropoietin-stimulating agents within 4 weeks of enrollment. Patients were treated with oral roxadustat for ≤16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was maximum mean change in Hb within 16 weeks of baseline without RBC transfusion in pts who had received ≥1 dose of roxadustat and who had a baseline and ≥1 post-dose Hb assessment. Hb response and safety data were preliminarily assessed in pts receiving a starting dose of 2.0 mg/kg thrice weekly (TIW) for 4 weeks: doses of 100, 150, and 200 mg were given to pts weighing < 70, 70–100, and > 100 kg, respectively. Following a review of data from these pts, dose was increased to 2.5 mg/kg—150, 200, and 250 mg TIW to pts weighing < 70, 70–100, and > 100 kg, respectively—and adjusted every 4 weeks from Week 5 based on Hb response. Results: Patients were assigned to 2.0 mg/kg (n = 31) and 2.5 mg/kg (n = 61) starting doses, and 89 were assessed for efficacy. The maximum mean Hb change from baseline without RBC transfusion was 2.47±1.51 g/dL and 2.52±1.54 g/dL in the 2.0 mg/kg and 2.5 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. Hb increased by ≥1.5 g/dL in 73% of pts and ≥2.0 g/dL in 61% of pts. Median time to ≥2.0 g/dL Hb increase was 71.0 days. Both cohorts had higher proportions of pts with a Hb increase of ≥1, ≥1.5, or ≥2 g/dL at Week 16 compared with baseline. Median time to ≥1 and ≥2 g/dL Hb increase was shorter in pts who started on 2.5 mg/kg compared with 2.0 mg/kg doses (≥1 g/dL: 30 vs 44; ≥2 g/dL 57 vs 105, respectively). Fewer pts required an RBC transfusion (Week 5 to end of treatment) when starting on 2.5 mg/kg compared with 2.0 mg/kg doses (10.2% vs 20.0%). Subgroup analyses based on major tumor and baseline chemotherapy types demonstrated efficacy of roxadustat at both starting doses. The overall safety profile observed was consistent with the patient population under study. Overall, 92% of pts experienced an adverse event (AE). Most AEs were consistent with the underlying malignancies and chemotherapy regimens used. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 15.2% (n = 14) and pulmonary embolism was 9.8% (n = 9). There were 17 deaths (18.5%) during the study; none were attributed to roxadustat, and most were associated with disease progression. Conclusions: Roxadustat increased Hb in CIA regardless of tumor type and chemotherapy regimen. These data support additional clinical study. Clinical trial information: NCT04076943.

Lenalidomide and the expanding toolkit to manage Kaposi sarcoma

Lenalidomide recently was shown to have clinical activity in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated Kaposi sarcoma. Immunomodulatory imine drugs thus provide another tool in the treatment of this challenging neoplasm.

Risk factors associated with skeletal-related events following discontinuation of denosumab treatment among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors: A real-world machine learning approach

•

This study investigated SRE risk factors after densomuab treatment discontinuation.

•

An unbiased machine learning approach was developed to evaluate >60 variables.

•

Prior SREs and short denosumab treatment duration were primary risk factors.

•

The results can guide denosumab persistence decisions and improve patient outcomes.

Background

Clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of bone-targeting agents for preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. The anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody denosumab is approved for the prevention of SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. However, real-world data are lacking on the impact of individual risk factors for SREs, specifically in the context of denosumab discontinuation.

Purpose

We aim to identify risk factors associated with SRE incidence following denosumab discontinuation using a machine learning approach to help profile patients at a higher risk of developing SREs following discontinuation of denosumab treatment.

Methods

Using the Optum PanTher Electronic Health Record repository, patients diagnosed with incident bone metastases from primary solid tumors between January 1, 2007, and September 1, 2019, were evaluated for inclusion in the study. Eligible patients received ≥ 2 consecutive 120 mg denosumab doses on a 4-week (± 14 days) schedule with a minimum follow-up of ≥ 1 year after the last denosumab dose, or an SRE occurring between days 84 and 365 after denosumab discontinuation. Extreme gradient boosting was used to develop an SRE risk prediction model evaluated on a test dataset. Multiple variables associated with patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, treatments, and denosumab exposures were examined as potential factors for SRE risk using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Univariate analyses on risk factors with the highest importance from pooled and tumor-specific models were also conducted.

Results

A total of 1,414 adult cancer patients (breast: 40%, prostate: 30%, lung: 13%, other: 17%) were eligible, of whom 1,133 (80%) were assigned to model training and 281 (20%) to model evaluation. The median age at inclusion was 67 (range, 19–89) years with a median duration of denosumab treatment of 253 (range, 88–2,726) days; 490 (35%) patients experienced ≥ 1 SRE 83 days after denosumab discontinuation. Meaningful model performance was evaluated by an area under the receiver operating curve score of 77% and an F1 score of 62%; model precision was 60%, with 63% sensitivity and 78% specificity. SHAP identified several significant factors for the tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific models that predicted an increased SRE risk following denosumab discontinuation, including prior SREs, shorter denosumab treatment duration, ≥ 4 clinic visits per month with at least one hospitalization (all-cause) event from the baseline period up to discontinuation of denosumab, younger age at bone metastasis, shorter time to denosumab initiation from bone metastasis, and prostate cancer.

Conclusion

This analysis showed a higher cumulative number of SREs, prior SREs relative to denosumab initiation, a higher number of hospital visits, and a shorter denosumab treatment duration as significant factors that are associated with an increased SRE risk after discontinuation of denosumab, in both the tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific models. Our machine learning approach to SRE risk factor identification reinforces treatment guidance on the persistent use of denosumab and has the potential to help clinicians better assess a patient’s need to continue denosumab treatment and improve patient outcomes.

Roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: Open-label, dose-selection, lead-in stage of a phase 3 study

Anemia is the predominant cytopenia in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and treatment options are limited. Roxadustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor approved for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease in the UK, EU, China, Japan, South Korea, and Chile. MATTERHORN is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in anemia of lower risk-MDS. Eligible patients had baseline serum erythropoietin ≤ 400 mIU/mL, and a low packed RBC transfusion burden. In this open-label (OL), dose-selection, lead-in phase, enrolled patients were assigned to 1 of 3 roxadustat starting doses (n = 8 each): 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mg/kg. The primary efficacy endpoint of the OL phase was the proportion of patients with transfusion independence (TI) for ≥ 8 consecutive weeks in the first 28 treatment weeks. A secondary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a ≥ 50% reduction in RBC transfusions over an 8-week period compared with baseline. Adverse events were monitored. Patients were followed for 52 weeks. Of the 24 treated patients, TI was achieved in 9 patients (37.5%) at 28 and 52 weeks; 7 of these patients were receiving 2.5 mg/kg dose when TI was achieved. A ≥ 50% reduction in RBC transfusions was achieved in 54.2% and 58.3% of patients at 28 and 52 weeks, respectively. Oral roxadustat dosed thrice weekly was well tolerated. There were no fatalities or progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Based on these outcomes, 2.5 mg/kg was the chosen starting roxadustat dose for the ongoing double-blind study phase.

Efficacy and safety of ferric carboxymaltose infusion in reducing anemia in patients receiving chemotherapy for nonmyeloid malignancies: A randomized, placebo-controlled study (IRON-CLAD)

Erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESA) are effective for chemotherapy‐induced anemia (CIA) but associated with serious adverse events. Safer alternatives would be beneficial in this population. The efficacy and safety of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) as monotherapy for CIA was evaluated. This Phase 3, 18‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study randomized adults with ≥ 4 weeks of chemotherapy remaining for treatment of nonmyeloid malignancies with CIA to FCM (two 15 mg/kg infusions 7 days apart; maximum dose, 750 mg single/1500 mg total) or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage of patients with decreases in hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 0.5 g/dL from weeks 3 to 18; the key secondary efficacy endpoint was change in Hb from baseline to week 18. Inclusion criteria included: (Hb) 8–11 g/dL, ferritin 100–800 ng/mL, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) ≤35%. In 244 patients (n = 122, both groups), the percent of patients who maintained Hb within 0.5 g/dL of baseline from weeks 3 to 18 was significantly higher with FCM versus placebo (50.8% vs. 35.3%; p = 0.01). Mean change in Hb from baseline to week 18 was similar between FCM and placebo (1.04 vs. 0.87 g/dL) but significantly greater with FCM with baseline Hb ≤ 9.9 g/dL (1.08 vs. 0.42 g/dL; p = 0.01). The percent with ≥ 1 g/dL increase from baseline was significantly higher with FCM versus placebo (71% vs. 54%; p = 0.01), occurring in a median 43 versus 85 days (p = 0.001). Common adverse events in the FCM arm included neutropenia (17%), hypophosphatemia (16%), and fatigue (15%). FCM monotherapy effectively maintained Hb and was well tolerated in CIA.

Risk factors associated with skeletal-related events following denosumab cessation among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors: A real-world machine learning approach

1567

Background: The anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody denosumab has been shown to be superior to the bisphosphonate zoledronate for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with incident bone metastases (BM) from solid tumors (ST). Clinical guidelines recommend the use of a bone-targeting agent for SRE prevention for ≥ 2 years. However, real-world treatment patterns in the U.S. suggest that the denosumab treatment duration is often < 1 year. Applying a machine learning approach, we sought to identify risk factors associated with SRE incidence following cessation of denosumab to help inform optimal clinical SRE prevention strategies. Methods: Using the Optum PanTher Electronic Health Record repository, patients diagnosed with incident BM from a primary ST between 1 Jan 2007 and 1 Sep 2019 were evaluated for inclusion in the study. Eligible patients had to receive ≥ 2 consecutive 120 mg denosumab doses on an every 4-week (± 14 days) schedule and have a minimum follow-up ≥ 1 year after the last denosumab dose or an SRE occurring between days 84 and 365 after denosumab cessation. Extreme gradient boosting was used to develop an SRE risk prediction model evaluated on a test dataset. Impact and relative importance of available medical, clinical, and treatment factors on SRE risk following denosumab cessation were extracted from the model using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Univariate analyses on risk factors with the highest importance from pooled and tumor-specific models were also conducted. Results: A total of 1,414 patients (breast, n = 563 [40%]; prostate, 421 [30%]; lung, 180 [13%]; other cancers, 250 [17%]) met inclusion criteria, with a median of 253 (min, 88; max, 2726) days of denosumab treatment; 490 (35%) experienced ≥ 1 SRE following denosumab cessation. With a meaningful model performance based on an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) score of 77%, SHAP identified several significant factors that predicted an increased SRE risk following denosumab cessation, including prior SREs, shorter denosumab treatment duration, and a higher number of clinic visits as the top-ranked factors (Table). Conclusions: A machine learning approach to SRE risk factor identification may help clinicians better assess the individualized patient’s need for denosumab treatment persistence and improve patient outcomes. Results from tumor-specific groups will be presented at the meeting.[Table: see text]

A randomized phase III study of immune checkpoint inhibition with chemotherapy in treatment-naive metastatic anal cancer patients: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (EA2176)

TPS3614

Background: Anal cancer is growing in annual incidence globally and human papillomavirus (HPV) remains the predominant risk factor underlying its development. Due to its relative rarity, clinical trials in anal cancer have historically been difficult to conduct and treatment options for metastatic disease remain limited. Carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) was compared to cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (historical standard of care) in a recent randomized phase II clinical trial (InterAACT; EA2133) in treatment-naïve metastatic anal cancer, finding that response rates were equivocal, but that overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the CP arm (20 months vs 12.3 months, p = 0.014). Additionally, reduced grade 3/4 toxicities were seen in the CP arm. NCI9673, a single-arm phase II study, established safety and efficacy of nivolumab in previously-treated metastatic anal cancer. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (95% CI 3.0-7.9) and OS was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.1-not estimable). Multiple randomized trials in lung cancer have demonstrated efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy combined with checkpoint inhibitors. Together these studies form the rationale behind combining CP and nivolumab in treatment-naïve metastatic anal cancer. Methods: EA2176 (NCT04444921) is the first NCTN phase III randomized clinical trial in treatment-naïve metastatic anal cancer. Stratification factors include HIV status and history of chemoradiation for curative intent. Patients will be randomized to carboplatin (AUC = 5, Day 1) plus paclitaxel (80mg/m2, Days 1, 8, 15) +/- nivolumab 240mg IV (Cycle 1 = Days 1, 15; Cycle ≥2 = Day 1, 480mg) q 28-days until disease progression or treatment intolerance. CP will be given for up to 6 cycles, while nivolumab will be continued as maintenance for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary objectives include OS, response rate, and toxicity. Goal enrollment is 205 patients and the study continues accrual. This sample size will provide 80% power at a two-sided α of 0.05 to detect a 4.8-month improvement in PFS assuming 8 months in the control arm. Novel correlative studies include sequential quantitative tumor-derived cell-free HPV ctDNA levels (serotypes 16 and 18; Sysmex-Inostics SafeSEQ NGS assay). Correlative funding provided in part by the Farrah Fawcett Foundation and Sysmex Inostics, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT04444921.

Response-adapted therapy with infusional EPOCH chemotherapy plus rituximab in HIV-associated, B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Four cycles of rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy is as effective as 6 cycles in low-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Here we report a post-hoc analysis of a prospective clinical trial in patients with HIV-associated DLBCL and high-grade lymphoma treated with 4-6 cycles of EPOCH plus rituximab based a response-adapted treatment strategy. 106 evaluable patients with HIV-associated DLBCL or high-grade CD20-positive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomized to receive rituximab (375 mg/m2) given either concurrently prior to each infusional EPOCH cycle, or sequentially (weekly for 6 weeks) following completion of EPOCH. EPOCH consisted of a 96-hour IV infusion of etoposide, doxorubicin, and vincristine plus oral prednisone followed by IV bolus cyclophosphamide every 21 days for 4 to 6 cycles. Patients received 2 additional cycles of therapy after documentation of a complete response (CR) by computerized tomography after cycles 2 and 4. 64 of 106 evaluable patients (60%, 95% CI 50%, 70%) had a CR in both treatment arms. The 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rates were similar in the 24 patients with CR who received 4 or fewer EPOCH cycles (78%, 95% confidence intervals [55%, 90%]) due to achieving a CR after 2 cycles, compared with those who received 5-6 cycles of EPOCH (85%, 95% CI 70%, 93%) because a CR was first documented after cycle 4. A response-adapted strategy may permit a shorter treatment duration without compromising therapeutic efficacy in patients with HIV-associated lymphoma treated with EPOCH plus rituximab, which merits further evaluation in additional prospective trials. Clinical Trials.gov identifier NCT00049036.

A retrospective analysis of venous thromboembolism trends in chemotherapy‐induced anemia: Red blood cell transfusion versus erythrocyte stimulating agent administration

Background

Patients receiving a variety of chemotherapy regimens often develop chemotherapy‐induced anemia (CIA), which contributes to poor outcomes including increased mortality. Prompt and effective treatment of CIA is essential to prevent fewer chemotherapy dose delays and reductions. Optimal therapy of CIA is controversial and involves the solitary and combined use of intravenous iron, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs). Despite the baseline coagulopathies present in patients with malignancy, administration of both RBC transfusions and ESAs is associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). It remains unknown whether the risk of VTE in patients with CIA is greater among patients who receive RBC transfusions or ESAs.

Methods

A retrospective study analyzed 10,269 University of Pennsylvania Health System patients with malignancies of various type, stage, and histopathology who developed CIA between 2008 and 2017. Using multivariate Cox regression, we determined adjusted hazard ratios (and corresponding 95% confidence intervals) of VTE development after adjusting for RBC and ESA intervention (all during the 90 days following CIA diagnosis).

Results

Among the 10,269 patients with CIA, 2,642 (25.7%) developed a VTE within the 90‐day period. VTE risk following RBC transfusion (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.24‐1.50, P < .001) was more than twice as common as VTE risk following ESA administration (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.40‐0.69, P < .001).

Conclusion

While both RBC transfusion and ESA are independently associated with VTE, our data suggest a greater risk of VTE development with RBC transfusion as compared with ESA.

A retrospective analysis of venous thromboembolism trends in chemotherapy-induced anemia

e15515

Background: Anemia is a common and unfortunate consequence of chemotherapy. Patients receiving a variety of chemotherapy regimens often develop chemotherapy–induced anemia (CIA), which contributes to poor outcomes, including increased mortality. Prompt and effective treatment of CIA is essential to prevent fewer chemotherapy dose delays and reductions. Despite the baseline coagulopathies present in patients with malignancy, administration of RBC transfusions is associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). It remains unknown whether the risk of VTE in patients with CIA is greater among patients who receive single or multiple RBC transfusions. Methods: A retrospective study analyzed 10,269 University of Pennsylvania Health System patients with malignancies of various type, stage, and histopathology who developed CIA between 5/1/08-12/31/17. We analyzed rates of VTE development after adjusting for RBC intervention with a 95% confidence interval during the 90 days following CIA diagnosis. Results: Among the 10,269 patients with CIA, 2,008 patients (19.6%) received only RBC transfusion as anemia treatment; of that group, 545 (27.1%) developed a VTE. Transfusion of 2+ units RBC compared with 1 unit of RBC was associated with an increase in VTE development (RR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.72). The relationship of higher VTE development with increasing number of transfusions is displayed below. Conclusions: While RBC transfusion in patients with CIA is independently associated with VTE, our data further suggests an exponential risk of VTE development with increasing numbers of RBC transfusions. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Highlights of BRCA genetic testing in prostate cancer from a real-world patient cohort in Australia

e13574

Background: There is an increase in interest and awareness in BRCA 1/2 testing recently. However, despite high awareness of these tests due to their frequent use among patients with certain cancer types such as ovarian cancer or breast cancer, BRCA testing is still only emerging in the prostate cancer (PC) treatment landscape. This study aims to understand what is driving the interest and use of BRCA testing in PC as well as the main barriers to testing in Australia. Methods: Between September 2019 and November 2019, n = 51 physicians of different specialties (n = 26 medical oncologists, n = 11 urologists, n = 14 pathologists) in Australia provided their quantitative and qualitative insights on BRCA testing. Medical oncologists and urologists (n = 37) also submitted patient tissue record forms of PC patients (n = 102) who received at least one biomarker test. The findings are derived from perceptual questionnaires, patient tissue record forms, and qualitative interviews. Results: The data suggests high (100%) awareness of BRCA testing in PC among medical oncologists and urologists, however that’s not the case among pathologists (36%). BRCA testing was seen in almost half of the patient records collected, primarily as blood tests (40%) as opposed to tissue (28%) or any other tests. Larger number (40%) of blood tests are carried out post-diagnosis with almost half (46%) of them initiated due to family history. Prior treatment history and patient request are more common patient selection criteria when deciding whether to test any PC patient for BRCA. The main barrier (64%) to BRCA testing is lack of funding/reimbursement for the test in PC at the moment. Only clinical trial PC patients typically have access to funded BRCA tests or those patients who are supported by the genetic counsellor program. Conclusions: Driven by significant uptake in ovarian and breast cancer and high awareness among oncologists and urologists, BRCA testing for prostate cancer is being increasingly used in the clinical setting in Australia. However, significant barriers remain; addressing these barriers should result in further uptake.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Noninferiority Study of the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Darbepoetin Alfa for Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in Patients With Advanced NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated noninferiority of darbepoetin alfa versus placebo for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in anemic patients with NSCLC treated to a 12.0-g/dL hemoglobin (Hb) ceiling.

METHODS

Adults with stage IV NSCLC expected to receive two or more cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy and Hb less than or equal to 11.0 g/dL were randomized 2:1 to blinded 500 μg darbepoetin alfa or placebo every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was OS; a stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate noninferiority (upper confidence limit for hazard ratio [HR] < 1.15). Secondary endpoints were PFS and incidence of transfusions or Hb less than or equal to 8.0 g/dL from week 5 to end of the efficacy treatment period.

RESULTS

The primary analysis set included 2516 patients: 1680 were randomized to darbepoetin alfa; 836 to placebo. The study was stopped early per independent Data Monitoring Committee recommendation after the primary endpoint was met with no new safety concerns. Darbepoetin alfa was noninferior to placebo for OS (stratified HR = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83‒1.01) and PFS (stratified HR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.87‒1.04). Darbepoetin alfa was superior to placebo for transfusion or Hb less than or equal to 8.0 g/dL from week 5 to end of the efficacy treatment period (stratified odds ratio = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.57‒0.86; p < 0.001). Objective tumor response was similar between the groups (darbepoetin alfa, 36.4%; placebo, 32.6%). Incidence of serious adverse events was 31.1% in both groups. No unexpected adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Darbepoetin alfa dosed to a 12.0-g/dL Hb ceiling was noninferior to placebo for OS and PFS and significantly reduced odds of transfusion or Hb less than or equal to 8.0 g/dL in anemic patients with NSCLC receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

A retrospective analysis of venous thromboembolism trends in chemotherapy-induced anemia: Red blood cell transfusion versus erythrocyte stimulating agent (ESA) administration

e14685

Background: Anemia is a common and unfortunate consequence of chemotherapy; patients receiving a variety of chemotherapy regimens often develop chemotherapy–induced anemia (CIA), which contributes to poor outcomes including increased mortality. Prompt and effective treatment of CIA is essential to prevent fewer chemotherapy dose delays and reductions. Optimal therapy of CIA is controversial and involves the solitary and combined use of intravenous iron, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs). Despite the baseline coagulopathies present in patients with malignancy, administration of both RBC transfusions and ESAs is associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). It remains unknown whether the risk of VTE in patients with CIA is greater among patients who receive RBC transfusions or ESAs. Methods: A retrospective single-institution study analyzed 7360 patients with varying malignancies who developed CIA and received ESAs and RBC transfusion from 1998-2017. These patients were evaluated for subsequent development of VTE and categorized by prior receipt of RBC transfusion or ESA. Results: Among the 7360 patients with CIA, 5503 received either RBC transfusion or ESA and 1857 received both. Among all patients, 3466/7360 (47.1%) developed a VTE. The absolute risk of developing a VTE with receipt of a RBC transfusion was 0.38 compared to 0.19 with ESA. Patients with CIA who received RBC had twice the risk of developing a VTE compared with those who received ESA (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: While both RBC transfusion and ESA administration are independently associated with VTE, our data suggests a greater risk of VTE development with RBC transfusion as compared with ESA administration.[Table: see text]

Tolerability of paclitaxel/carboplatin (PCb) in solid tumor patients (pts) infected with HIV

e14077

Background: Although cancer has long been a recognized hallmark of the HIV epidemic, the preservation of immunologic health with modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) and aging has resulted in a population increasingly susceptible to cancers not traditionally associated with advancing immunosuppression. Several of these cancers (including lung, anal and head & neck) are seen in excess compared to the background population. Defining tolerability of standard treatments and analyzing potential interactions between ART and chemotherapy provides evidence necessary to mitigate treatment disparities. Methods: We conducted a study to evaluate the tolerability of PCb in HIV+ cancer pts. AMC-078 (NCT01249443), originally designed as a phase I of vorinostat in combination with fixed doses of P (at 175mg/m2) and Cb (AUC 6) every 3 weeks, was amended to study pts treated with PCb alone after phase III testing in the background population was negative for the combination in lung cancer. Eligibility criteria: PS ≤ 2, advanced solid tumor and normal organ function, including CD4 count > 100 cells/mcL on stable ART. Up to 6 cycles of PCb were permitted. Clinically significant adverse events (AE) in prior cycles were managed by dose reductions. Results: 17 pts (10M/7F; median CD4, 389/mcL) were accrued, including lung (9) and anal (3) cancers; 8 pts had ritonavir (potent CYP inhibitor)-containing ART. 65 PCb cycles were administered to 16 evaluable pts, for a mean of 4+ cycles/pt; only 2 pts were treated with vorinostat. AE of special interest included ≥G3 (febrile) neutropenia and ≥ G2 neuropathy, below. 4 pts had partial responses (3 confirmed). Pharmacokinetic analyses (7 pts) are pending. Conclusions: PCb has similar toxicity profile in fit pts with HIV infection. No signal for worse myelosuppression or neuropathy was observed by ART regimen. Routine use of GCSF or empiric dose reduction for presumed risk is unjustified. Results support standard cancer treatment for this underserved population. Clinical trial information: NCT01249443. [Table: see text]

Cetuximab Plus Chemoradiotherapy for HIV-Associated Anal Carcinoma: A Phase II AIDS Malignancy Consortium Trial

Purpose Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) is characterized by high locoregional failure (LRF) rates after definitive chemoradiation (CRT), associated with anogenital human papilloma virus, and often appears in HIV infection. Because cetuximab enhances the effect of radiation therapy in human papilloma virus-associated oropharyngeal SCC, we hypothesized that adding cetuximab to CRT would reduce LRF in SCCAC. Methods Forty-five patients with stage I to III SCCAC and HIV infection received CRT: 45 to 54 Gy radiation therapy to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes plus eight once-weekly doses of concurrent cetuximab and two cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil. The study was designed to detect at least a 50% reduction in 3-year LRF rate (one-sided α, 0.10; power, 90%), assuming a 35% LRF rate from historical data. Results The 3-year LRF rate was 42% (95% CI, 28% to 56%; one-sided P = .9) by binomial proportional estimate using the prespecified end point (LRF or alive without LRF and followed < 3 years), and 20% (95% CI, 10% to 37%) by Kaplan-Meier estimate in post hoc analysis using definitions and methods consistent with historical data. Three-year rates by Kaplan-Meier estimate were 72% (95% CI, 56% to 84%) for progression-free survival and 79% (95% CI, 63% to 89%) for overall survival. Grade 4 toxicity occurred in 26%, and 4% had treatment-associated deaths. Conclusion HIV-associated SCCAC is potentially curable with definitive CRT. Although addition of cetuximab may result in less LRF, the 20% recurrence and 26% grade 4 toxicity rates indicate the continued need for more-effective and less-toxic therapies.

Efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa initiated at hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL in patients with stage IV cancer and chemotherapy-induced anemia

Data on efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa (DA) administered at hemoglobin (Hb) ≤10 g/dL are limited. In this analysis, we examined DA's efficacy and safety in patients with Stage IV cancers and chemotherapy‐induced anemia (CIA) initiated on DA at Hb ≤10 g/dL. Data for patients with Stage IV cancers and CIA and who initiated DA at Hb ≤10 g/dL were extracted from three phase 3 trials identified in a central database of Amgen‐sponsored DA studies in CIA. Efficacy outcomes were assessed by achievement of Hb increases of ≥1 g/dL and ≥2 g/dL and red blood cell (RBC) or whole blood transfusion requirements. Data were analyzed for all patients with baseline Hb ≤10 g/dL, and by the subgroups of patients with baseline Hb ≥9 to ≤10 g/dL versus <9 g/dL. Crude and Kaplan–Meier proportions of patients who experienced each outcome and time (days) to each outcome were summarized by treatment. Meta‐analysis (fixed‐effects inverse‐variance model) was performed to compare outcomes for DA versus placebo. Safety was assessed by occurrence of adverse events. Data from 213 patients were analyzed: DA, n = 115; placebo, n = 98. More patients in the DA versus the placebo subgroup achieved Hb increase of ≥1 g/dL (72% vs. 36%; HR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.95, 4.39) and ≥2 g/dL (44% vs. 18%; HR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.71, 5.21) during the first 12 treatment weeks. Median times to Hb increase of ≥1 g/dL and ≥2 g/dL were 36 days and 78 days for DA, respectively. RBC or whole blood transfusions were less common in patients in the DA versus the placebo subgroup (24% vs. 45%; HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.73). No new safety issues were reported. Our results confirm that DA use in patients with Stage IV cancer and CIA is more effective than placebo at increasing Hb levels and at reducing transfusion needs when DA treatment is initiated at Hb ≤10 g/dL.

Bone targeting agent treatment patterns and the impact of bone metastases on patients with advanced breast cancer in the US

93

Background: Bone is the most common site of distant metastasis in patients with advanced breast cancer. Bone metastases (BMs) often lead to skeletal-related events (SREs) and may result in debilitating bone pain which impacts a patient’s quality of life. Bone targeting agents (BTAs) reduce the incidence of SREs and progression of pain due to BMs. This study aims to understand real world patients’ experience of bone pain and to assess BTAs treatment patterns. Methods: Data were extracted from the Adelphi Breast Cancer Disease-Specific Programme (DSP), a cross-sectional survey of 98 US oncologists conducted from February to May 2015 in the USA. Each physician completed comprehensive record forms capturing the following information about the next 12 patients being treated for advanced breast cancer: Presence of BMs, patient’s pain state at diagnosis of BMs, current pain state, time since diagnosis of BMs, current analgesic use and reasons for prescribing BTAs. Results: Bone pain was more prevalent (p < 0.001) in patients with BMs (67% of 485) than those without BM (7% of 791). Mean time for pain assessment was 6.2 months after BM diagnosis. Among breast cancer patients with BMs and bone pain (n = 323), 98% required analgesic medications to manage the pain, including 40% (n = 130) who were treated with strong opioids (e.g., morphine, oxycodone, hydromorphone, or methadone). Of these patients, 100 (77%) had moderate/severe bone pain. Of the patients with BMs, 69% (n = 337) were treated with a BTA and treatment was initiated within 3 months of BMs diagnosis in 91% (n = 306) of them. The reasons for prescribing a BTA within 3 months of BM diagnosis were “bone pain” (32%), “high risk of bone complications” (25%), “prior history of bone complications”(18%), “number of BMs” (11%) and “location of BMs” (4%). Conclusions: Advanced breast cancer patients with BMs are more likely to experience bone pain, and three-fourths of the patients treated with strong opioids experienced moderate/severe bone pain.The majority of patients with BMs receive a BTA prescription for the reduction of bone pain and risk of bone complications.

An interview with David Henry: supportive oncology, anemia and cancer

David H Henry, MD, is a practicing hematologist/medical oncologist and Clinical Professor of Medicine at the Pennsylvania Hospital in Philadelphia (PA, USA), where he holds the title of Vice Chairman of the Department of Medicine. He is Editor in Chief of the Journal of Community and Supportive Oncology. For the past 25 years, he has had a special interest in supportive oncology and participated in clinical trials using growth factors to treat cancer-related anemia with or without intravenous iron, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and bone metabolism due to bone metastases. He is also the Director of the HIV Malignancy Program and Director of the Austrian Medical Student Program at Pennsylvania Hospital.

Hypocalcaemia in patients with metastatic bone disease treated with denosumab

BACKGROUND

This analysis was performed to further characterise treatment-emergent hypocalcaemia in patients with bone metastases receiving denosumab.

METHODS

Laboratory abnormalities and adverse events of hypocalcaemia in patients with metastatic bone disease were analysed using data from three identically designed phase 3 trials of subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg (n = 2841) versus intravenous zoledronic acid 4 mg (n = 2836).

RESULTS

The overall incidence of laboratory events of hypocalcaemia grade ⩾ 2 was higher with denosumab (12.4%) than with zoledronic acid (5.3%). Hypocalcaemia events were primarily grade 2 in severity and usually occurred within the first 6 months of treatment. Patients who reported taking calcium and/or vitamin D supplements had a lower incidence of hypocalcaemia. Prostate cancer or small-cell lung cancer, reduced creatinine clearance and higher baseline bone turnover markers of urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTx; > 50 versus ⩽ 50 nmol/mmol) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP; > 20.77 μg/L [median] versus ⩽ 20.77 μg/L) values were important risk factors for developing hypocalcaemia. The risk associated with increased baseline BSAP levels was greater among patients who had > 2 bone metastases at baseline versus those with ⩽ 2 bone metastases at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Hypocalcaemia was more frequent with denosumab versus zoledronic acid, consistent with denosumab's greater antiresorptive effect. Low serum calcium levels and potential vitamin D deficiency should be corrected before initiating treatment with a potent osteoclast inhibitor, and corrected serum calcium levels should be monitored during treatment. Adequate calcium and vitamin D intake appears to substantially reduce the risk of hypocalcaemia.

Pharmacovigilance in practice: erythropoiesis-stimulating agents

Pharmacovigilance (PV) is the science and activities relating to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects or other problems related to medical products after they have been licensed for marketing. The purpose of PV is to advance the safe use of marketed medical products. Regulatory agencies and license holders collaborate to collect data reported by health care providers, patients, and the public as well as data from systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and individual clinical and nonclinical studies. They validate and analyze the data to determine whether safety signals exist, and if warranted, develop an action plan to mitigate the identified risk. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) provide an example of how PV is applied in reality. Among other approved indications, ESAs may be used to treat anemia in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. ESAs increase hemoglobin levels and reduce the need for transfusions; they are also associated with a known increased risk of thromboembolic events. Starting in 2003, emerging data suggested that ESAs might reduce survival. As a result of PV activities by regulatory agencies and license holders, labeling for ESAs addresses these risks. Meta-analyses and individual clinical studies have confirmed that ESAs increase the risk of thromboembolic events, but when used as indicated, ESAs have not been shown to have a significant effect on survival or disease progression. Ongoing safety studies will provide additional data in the coming years to further clarify the risks and benefits of ESAs.

A phase 1/pharmacokinetic study of sunitinib in combination with highly active antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients with cancer: AIDS Malignancy Consortium trial AMC 061

BACKGROUND

The treatment of non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-defining cancers may be complicated by drug interactions between highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and chemotherapy. This trial is the first by the AIDS Malignancy Consortium to assess targeted therapies and HAART in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00890747).

METHODS

In a modified phase 1 study of sunitinib, patients were stratified into 2 treatment arms based on whether they were receiving therapy with ritonavir, a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor. Patients in treatment arm 1 (non-ritonavir HAART) received standard sunitinib dosing (50 mg/day). Treatment arm 2 (ritonavir-based HAART) used a phase 1, 3 + 3 dose escalation design (from 25 mg/day to 50 mg/day). Cycles were comprised of 4 weeks on treatment followed by a 2-week break (6 weeks total). The pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its active metabolite (N-desethyl sunitinib) were assessed.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled and were evaluable. Patients on treatment arm 1 tolerated treatment with no dose-limiting toxicity observed. In treatment arm 2, a dose-limiting toxicity was experienced at a dose of 37.5 mg, and an additional 3 of 5 patients experienced grade 3 neutropenia (toxicity graded as per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]), an uncommon toxicity of sunitinib. No patient achieved a response, but 10 patients had stable disease, including 8 with prolonged disease stability. Efavirenz, a potent inducer of CYP3A4, resulted in increased exposure of N-desethyl sunitinib, whereas ritonavir caused decreased exposure of the metabolite. Hand-foot syndrome was associated with higher steady-state trough concentrations of sunitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving non-ritonavir-based HAART regimens tolerated standard dosing of sunitinib. Patients receiving ritonavir-based therapy who were treated with a dose of 37.5 mg/day experienced higher toxicities. Dose reductions of sunitinib to 37.5 mg may be warranted in patients receiving ritonavir.

Systemically circulating viral and tumor-derived microRNAs in KSHV-associated malignancies

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are stable, small non-coding RNAs that modulate many downstream target genes. Recently, circulating miRNAs have been detected in various body fluids and within exosomes, prompting their evaluation as candidate biomarkers of diseases, especially cancer. Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is the most common AIDS-associated cancer and remains prevalent despite Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART). KS is caused by KS-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), a gamma herpesvirus also associated with Primary Effusion Lymphoma (PEL). We sought to determine the host and viral circulating miRNAs in plasma, pleural fluid or serum from patients with the KSHV-associated malignancies KS and PEL and from two mouse models of KS. Both KSHV-encoded miRNAs and host miRNAs, including members of the miR-17–92 cluster, were detectable within patient exosomes and circulating miRNA profiles from KSHV mouse models. Further characterization revealed a subset of miRNAs that seemed to be preferentially incorporated into exosomes. Gene ontology analysis of signature exosomal miRNA targets revealed several signaling pathways that are known to be important in KSHV pathogenesis. Functional analysis of endothelial cells exposed to patient-derived exosomes demonstrated enhanced cell migration and IL-6 secretion. This suggests that exosomes derived from KSHV-associated malignancies are functional and contain a distinct subset of miRNAs. These could represent candidate biomarkers of disease and may contribute to the paracrine phenotypes that are a characteristic of KS.

Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs), such as those found in exosomes, have emerged as diagnostic tools and hold promise as minimally invasive, stable biomarkers. Transfer of tumor-derived exosomal miRNAs to surrounding cells may be an important form of cellular communication. Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is the etiological agent of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), the most common AIDS-defining cancer worldwide. Here, we survey systemically circulating miRNAs and reveal potential biomarkers for KS and Primary Effusion Lymphoma (PEL). This expands previous tissue culture studies by profiling clinical samples and by using two new mouse models of KSHV tumorigenesis. Profiling of circulating miRNAs revealed that oncogenic and viral miRNAs were present in exosomes from KS patient plasma, pleural effusions and mouse models of KS. Analysis of human oncogenic miRNAs, including the well-known miR-17-92 cluster, revealed that several miRNAs were preferentially incorporated into exosomes in our KS mouse model. Gene ontology analysis of upregulated miRNAs showed that the majority of pathways affected were known targets of KSHV signaling pathways. Transfer of these oncogenic exosomes to immortalized hTERT-HUVEC cells enhanced cell migration and IL-6 secretion. These circulating miRNAs and KS derived exosomes may therefore be part of the paracrine signaling mechanism that mediates KSHV pathogenesis.

Hypocalcemia in patients with metastatic bone disease receiving denosumab

9628

Background: Patients (pts) with metastatic bone disease (MBD) are at risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). Potent antiresorptives reduce the risk of SREs, by inhibiting cancer-induced bone destruction, which also reduces release of skeletal calcium (Ca) into the bloodstream. Hypocalcemia (hypoCa) may occur if Ca and vit D intake is inadequate while taking antiresorptive agents. A combined analysis of 3 phase III trials in pts with MBD showed denosumab (DMAb) was superior to zoledronic acid (ZA) in preventing SREs. The overall safety profiles were similar; hypoCa was more common with DMAb (9.6%) than ZA (5.0%). Characteristics of hypoCa events in DMAb pts in these clinical trials and from post marketing adverse event (AE) reports are presented. Methods: Pts with solid tumors or multiple myeloma and MBD were randomized (1:1) to DMAb 120 mg SC or ZA 4 mg IV (adjusted for renal function) every 4 weeks (Q4W). Pts were advised to take daily Ca (≥ 500 mg) and vit D (≥ 400 IU); intake was collected by pt report. Albumin-corrected serum Ca was measured Q4W by central lab. HypoCa events were collected as decreases in serum Ca per central lab and investigator-reported AEs. Post marketing data from spontaneous reports of hypoCa to the sponsor's global safety department (AGS) were reviewed. Results: In the 3 trials, 2841 pts received DMAb and 2836 pts received ZA. The median Ca levels for both treatment groups were similar over time. Among DMAb pts, hypoCa was most common within 6 months of starting treatment and was more common in pts who did not report use of Ca and vit D vs those who did (15.8% vs 8.7%). Grade 3 or 4 (< 7 mg/dL; < 1.75 mmol/L) decreases in serum Ca were reported in 3.1% of DMAb pts and 1.3% of ZA pts. No fatal cases of hypoCa were reported in the trials. From May to Nov 2012, 37 cases of severe symptomatic hypoCa (seizures, tetany, prolonged QTc, altered mental state) were reported to AGS; fatal outcomes were reported for 3 other pts with advanced cancers and various comorbidities. Conclusions: HypoCa is a known risk with antiresorptive therapy, including DMAb 120 mg. HypoCa occurred less often in pts who reported taking Ca and vit D. HypoCa should be corrected prior to starting DMAb and Ca monitored during treatment. Pts should take adequate Ca and vit D while receiving DMAb. Clinical trial information: NCT00321464, NCT00321620, and NCT00330759.

Incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients receiving denosumab or zoledronic acid for bone metastases from solid tumors or multiple myeloma: Results from three phase III trials

9640

Background: In patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD), the use of antiresorptive therapies such as denosumab or zoledronic acid (ZA) reduces the risk of skeletal-related events but is associated with a small risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). Two phase 3 clinical trials of denosumab vs ZA in patients with MBD showed overall cumulative ONJ incidences to be 3.8% to 4.7% at approximately 5 years of treatment with denosumab across blinded and open-label extension phases. ONJ associated with ZA was only assessed in the blinded treatment phases, as patients switched to denosumab once superior efficacy was demonstrated. Here we report incidence rates of ONJ by first vs subsequent years of exposure for the blinded treatment phase of all three phase III clinical trials. Methods: Patients (n = 5,677) with bone metastases from solid tumors or multiple myeloma received either SC denosumab 120 mg and IV placebo or IV ZA 4 mg (adjusted for renal function) and SC placebo Q4W in the double-blinded treatment phase of each trial. Patients who received ≥ 1 active dose during the blinded treatment phase were included in this analysis for up to 44.5 months of denosumab exposure and 41.3 months of ZA exposure. Oral assessments were conducted at baseline and every 6 months thereafter by the investigator or other qualified examiner. Potential ONJ events were independently adjudicated by a blinded committee of experts. Results: The median (Q1, Q3) time to onset of ONJ was similar in both treatment groups (15.6 [9.5, 20.0] months for denosumab, 15.8 [11.0, 23.6] months for ZA). Cumulative incidence rates of ONJ during the blinded treatment phases for all three trials by patient-years of follow-up are shown below (Table). Conclusions: The incidence of ONJ increased with longer duration of antiresorptive exposure. There were no significant differences between treatment groups in ONJ incidence at year 1 or beyond. Clinical trial information: NCT00321464; NCT00330759; NCT00321620. [Table: see text]

Clinical benefit in patients with metastatic bone disease: results of a phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic bone disease are living longer in the metastatic stage due to improvements in cancer therapy, making strategies to prevent the aggravation of bone disease and its complications, such as skeletal-related events (SREs) and pain, increasingly important.

PATIENTS AND RESULTS

In this phase 3 trial in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma, denosumab reduced the risk of radiation to bone by 22% relative to zoledronic acid (P = 0.026), prevented worsening of pain and pain interference (2-point increase in Brief Pain Inventory score; P < 0.05 versus zoledronic acid), and reduced the frequency of a shift from no/weak opioid analgesic use to strong opioids (P < 0.05 versus zoledronic acid at months 3-5). Denosumab delayed the time to moderate-to-severe pain compared with zoledronic acid in patients with mild or no pain at the baseline (P = 0.04), supporting early treatment. Health-related quality-of-life scores were similar in both groups. The number needed to treat to avoid one SRE for denosumab was 3 patient-years versus placebo and 10 patient-years versus zoledronic acid.

CONCLUSION

The use of denosumab was associated with better prevention of the complications of metastatic bone disease secondary to solid tumors or multiple myeloma versus zoledronic acid.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone in AIDS-related lymphoma: AIDS Malignancy Consortium Study 047

PURPOSE

Infusional chemotherapy is efficacious in patients with AIDS-related lymphoma, but it may be difficult to administer. We studied standard agents with rituximab plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (DR-COP) in an attempt to provide a more practical approach to therapy while ascertaining rates of response, potential infectious complications, and prognostic role of biologic markers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multi-institutional phase II trial, employing (day 1) pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2), rituximab 375 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) (not > 2 mg), and prednisone 100 mg orally on days 1 through 5, with concomitant antiretroviral therapy.

RESULTS

In 40 evaluable patients, median CD4 cells was 114/μL (range, 5 to 1,026/μL), and median HIV-1 viral load (VL) was 25,000 copies/mL. High or intermediate/high age-adjusted International Prognostic Index was present in 28%. Overall response was 67.5%, with complete remission in 47.5% (95% CI, 31.5 to 63.9). Of 19 complete responders, 84% had extranodal disease, 47% had CD4 < 100/μL, and 47% had VL > 50,000 copies/mL; one relapsed. With 25.5-month median follow-up, 62% (95% CI, 44 to 75) of patients remain alive. Sixteen patients (40%) experienced 22 infections, with grade 4 in only two (5%). No patient died as a result of infection during treatment; one had opportunistic infection.

CONCLUSION

Profound immunodeficiency and high HIV-1 viral load do not preclude attainment of complete response after DR-COP with highly active antiretroviral therapy. The regimen is tolerable, and use of rituximab was not associated with death as a result of infection during treatment. This approach may be useful in patients in whom the more intensive infusional regimens are impractical.

Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND

Patients with bone metastases from advanced cancer often experience skeletal-related events (SRE), which cause substantial pain and morbidity. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK Ligand (RANKL), is a novel bone-targeted agent with a distinct mechanism of action relative to the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid, for prevention of SRE. This pre-planned analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of denosumab versus zoledronic acid across three pivotal studies.

METHODS

Patient-level data from three identically designed, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trials of patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer, other solid tumours or multiple myeloma were combined. End-points included time to first SRE, time to first and subsequent (multiple) SRE, adverse events, time to disease progression and overall survival.

FINDINGS

Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in delaying time to first on-study SRE by a median 8.21months, reducing the risk of a first SRE by 17% (hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.90]; P<0.001). Efficacy was demonstrated for first and multiple events and across patient subgroups (prior SRE status; age). Disease progression and overall survival were similar between the treatments. In contrast to zoledronic acid, denosumab did not require monitoring or dose modification/withholding based on renal status, and was not associated with acute-phase reactions. Hypocalcaemia was more common for denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred at a similar rate (P=0.13).

CONCLUSION

Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in preventing SRE with favourable safety and convenience in patients with bone metastases from advanced cancer.

Outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related lymphoma diagnosed 1999-2008 and treated with curative intent in the AIDS Malignancy Consortium

No comparative studies exist for relapsed/refractory (rel/rfr) acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related lymphoma (ARL). To determine practices over the last decade and to assess the outcomes of salvage chemotherapy with curative intent and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), we retrospectively evaluated treatment outcomes in patients with rel/rfr ARL who were treated in 13 national AIDS Malignancy Consortium (AMC) sites between 1999 and 2008 (n = 88). The most commonly used second-line therapies were ICE (ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide, n = 34), dose adjusted EPOCH (etoposide/prednisone/vincristine/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin, n = 17) and ESHAP (etoposide/methylprednisolone/cytarabine/cisplatin, n = 11). The odds of achieving a response were lower for those with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) than for those with HL and for those with primary refractory disease than for those with relapse. Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer for those with relapsed disease compared to those with refractory disease and for those with non-Burkitt NHL compared to those with Burkitt. OS was longer in patients who underwent ASCT compared to those who did not (1-year OS: 63.2% vs. 37.2%). However, among 32 patients (36%) who achieved a complete or partial response (CR/PR) after second-line therapy, 1-year OS was not different between the two groups (87.5% for ASCT vs. 81.8% for non-ASCT). Long-term survival in some patients with rel/rfr ARL may be possible without transplant, although transplant remains the standard of care for chemotherapy sensitive disease.

Assessing a prognostic model for predicting VTE occurrence in cancer patients

1577

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant health risk to cancer patients and is one of the leading causes of death among this population. The most effective way to prevent VTE and reduce its prominence as a public health burden is by identifying high-risk patients and administering prophylactic measures. In 2008, Khorana et al. developed a model that classified patients by risk based on clinical factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to test this model’s efficacy, on 150 patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy at an outpatient oncology clinic between January 1 and August 1, 2011. We aggregated data and assigned points based on the five factors in the Khorana model: site of cancer with 2 points for very high-risk site and 1 point for high-risk site, 1 point each for leukocyte counts more than 11 x 109/L, platelet counts greater than 350 X 109/L, hemoglobin levels less than 100 g/L and/or the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and BMI greater than 35 kg/m2 (Khorana et al., Blood 2008). Based on this scoring system, patients with 0 points were grouped into the low-risk category, those with 1-2 points were considered intermediate-risk, and those with 3-4 points were classified as high-risk. Results: As shown in the table, VTE incidence for the low-risk group was 1.9%, intermediate-risk group was 3.9%, and high-risk group was 9.1%. Conclusions: High-risk patients were about 4.5 times more likely to develop a VTE than low risk patients. These results provide valuable insight in determining which patients might benefit from prophylaxis and in motivating the design of prospective clinical trials that assess the VTE predictive model in various ambulatory cancer settings. [Table: see text]

Phase II trials of cetuximab (CX) plus cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiation (RT) in immunocompetent (ECOG 3205) and HIV-positive (AMC045) patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCAC): Safety and preliminary efficacy results

4030

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and HPV infection are common in SCAC. We therefore initiated 2 phase II studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the EGFR inhibitor CX given concurrently with CDDP/5-FU/RT in HIV-positive (AMC045) and immunocompetent (E3205) patients with SCAC. Methods: All patients received CX (400 mg/m2 loading, then 250 mg/m2/wk IV x 6-8 wks) plus CDDP (75 mg/m2 IV q28 days x 2) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day IV infusion days 1-4 q 28 days x 2) concurrently with RT (45-54 Gy) beginning with CX dose 2. Patients in E3205 also received 2 cycles of CDDP/5-FU alone prior to CX/CDDP/5-FU/RT; this was discontinued on recommendation of the NCI Anorectal Task Force after 28 patients. Both trials were powered to detect a reduction in 3-year local-regional failure (LRF) rate from 35% to 17.5% (alpha=0.10, beta=0.10), the primary end point. Other endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The results below include complete toxicity and preliminary efficacy data (including only the first 28 patients from E3205). Results: Expedited reporting was required for type I (any grade 5, grade 4 cardiac) or II (grade 4 RT skin, diarrhea) adverse events, with prespecified rates of >5% or >20%, respectively defined as unacceptable. Early stopping rules were not invoked for either trial. LRF rates data will be presented after more detailed case review is completed. Conclusions: CX plus CDDP/5-FU/RT is feasible in patients with SCAC, including patients with HIV infection. Preliminary safety and efficacy data appear encouraging, but accrual without neoadjuvant CDDP/5-FU continues in E3205, and additional followup of both study cohorts is required in order to determine whether pre-specified efficacy endpoints were met. [Table: see text]

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of osteonecrosis of the jaw: integrated analysis from three blinded active-controlled phase III trials in cancer patients with bone metastases

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been reported in patients receiving bisphosphonates for metastatic bone disease. ONJ incidence, risk factors, and outcomes were evaluated in a combined analysis of three phase III trials in patients with metastatic bone disease receiving antiresorptive therapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors or myeloma were randomly assigned to receive either s.c. denosumab (120 mg) or i.v. zoledronic acid (4 mg) every 4 weeks. On-study oral examinations were conducted by investigators at baseline and every 6 months. Oral adverse events were adjudicated by an independent blinded committee of dental experts.

RESULTS

Of 5723 patients enrolled, 89 (1.6%) patients were determined to have ONJ: 37 (1.3%) received zoledronic acid and 52 (1.8%) received denosumab (P = 0.13). Tooth extraction was reported for 61.8% of patients with ONJ. ONJ treatment was conservative in >95% of patients. As of October 2010, ONJ resolved in 36.0% of patients (29.7% for zoledronic acid and 40.4% for denosumab).

CONCLUSIONS

In this combined analysis of three prospective trials, ONJ was infrequent, management was mostly conservative, and healing occurred in over one-third of the patients. Educating physicians about oral health before and during bone-targeted therapy may help reduce ONJ incidence and improve outcomes.

Thrombocytosis and venous thromboembolism in cancer patients with chemotherapy induced anemia may be related to ESA induced iron restricted erythropoiesis and reversed by administration of IV iron

ESA therapy can increase hemoglobin, decrease blood transfusions, and improve quality of life in patients with chemotherapy induced anemia (CIA). Despite its benefits, ESA therapy increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients by 50% and can also cause iron restricted erythropoiesis in CIA patients, which may augment the tendency to develop VTE. We postulated that thrombocytosis, a risk factor for VTE in cancer patients, in CIA patients on ESA therapy might be a result of ESA induced iron restricted erythropoiesis. We performed a retrospective analysis of 187 CIA patients who were randomized to receive weekly Epoetin and IV ferric gluconate, oral ferrous sulfate, or no iron for 8 weeks. Nineteen patients experienced 29 VTEs, and patients, whose platelets increased to ≥350,000 cells/uL were three times more likely to experience a VTE (OR 2.9, P = 0.036, logistic regression) with a four times greater incidence of VTE (IRR 4.4, P = 0.001, Poisson regression). Patients treated with IV iron were significantly less likely to develop platelets of ≥350,000 cells/uL (IRR 0.7, P = 0.013, Poisson regression) and had a decreased incidence of VTE. Our study suggests that ESA associated VTE in CIA patients may be, in part, related to the thrombocytosis of ESA induced iron restricted erythropoiesis and may be countered by IV iron.

Hematologic outcomes and blood utilization in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) pre- and post-national coverage determination (NCD): results from a multicenter chart review

PURPOSE

In July 2007, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) limited coverage of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) through a National Coverage Determination (NCD). The primary objective of this study was to compare transfusion rates in patients with CIA with lung, breast, or colorectal cancer before and after the NCD.

METHODS

Adult Medicare patients with CIA treated at 49 community oncology clinics were selected from two time periods based on clinics' NCD implementation date. Chart data were abstracted for 12 weeks post-CIA episode start, defined as hemoglobin (Hb) level <11 g/dL while receiving chemotherapy or within 60 days of the last chemotherapy dose. Multivariate analyses were used to calculate the odds of transfusion and to assess the units of blood transfused, controlling for differences in demographics, clinical history, and chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Eight hundred pre-NCD and 994 post-NCD patients from 49 sites were selected. Of the patients, 56% used ESAs post-NCD vs. 88% pre-NCD (p < 0.0001). The duration of ESA use decreased in the post-NCD (32.1 days) vs. pre-NCD (48.4 days, p < 0.0001) group. The post-NCD group reported significantly lower Hb levels, higher odds of receiving a transfusion (odds ratio: 1.41, 95% CI 1.05-1.89, p = 0.0238) and increased blood utilization of 53% (units transfused: OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.15-2.04, p = 0.0034).

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased frequency and duration of ESA administration were reported in the post-NCD vs. pre-NCD period. Findings were accompanied by a modest but statistically significant increase in transfusions and a decrease in Hb values.

Epoetin alfa treatment for patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

Anemia (hemoglobin [Hb] < 12 g/dL) is a frequent and debilitating complication in the treatment of cancer. The negative effects of anemia include impairment of organ systems, disruption of important aspects of patient quality of life, and potential interference with completion and outcomes of cancer chemotherapy. Guidelines issued by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Hematology/American Society of Clinical Oncology jointly suggest that anemia in patients with cancer be managed by restoring Hb levels to approximately 12 g/dL, thereby minimizing transfusion requirements and resolving clinical symptoms associated with anemia. Recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) administered 150 U/kg 3 times weekly or 40,000 U once weekly has been shown in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and large, open-label, nonrandomized, community-based studies to effectively and safely correct anemia in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Several clinical trials support that treatment with epoetin alfa results in quality of life benefits that significantly correlate with Hb increases. Areas currently being investigated with epoetin alfa in the chemotherapy setting include the following: extended dosing regimens beyond the Food and Drug Administration-approved 3-times-weekly and once-weekly dosing regimens, early intervention for mild anemia, effects on treatment outcomes and survival, and optimal administration of concurrent iron supplementation.

Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma

PURPOSE

This study compared denosumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand antibody, with zoledronic acid (ZA) for delaying or preventing skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases (excluding breast and prostate) or myeloma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind, double-dummy design to receive monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg (n = 886) or intravenous ZA 4 mg (dose adjusted for renal impairment; n = 890). Daily supplemental calcium and vitamin D were strongly recommended. The primary end point was time to first on-study SRE (pathologic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression).

RESULTS

Denosumab was noninferior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98; P = .0007). Although directionally favorable, denosumab was not statistically superior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (P = .03 unadjusted; P = .06 adjusted for multiplicity) or time to first-and-subsequent (multiple) SRE (rate ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; P = .14). Overall survival and disease progression were similar between groups. Hypocalcemia occurred more frequently with denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred at similarly low rates in both groups. Acute-phase reactions after the first dose occurred more frequently with ZA, as did renal adverse events and elevations in serum creatinine based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events grading.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab was noninferior (trending to superiority) to ZA in preventing or delaying first on-study SRE in patients with advanced cancer metastatic to bone or myeloma. Denosumab represents a potential novel treatment option with the convenience of subcutaneous administration and no requirement for renal monitoring or dose adjustment.

Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma

PURPOSE

This study compared denosumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand antibody, with zoledronic acid (ZA) for delaying or preventing skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with advanced cancer and bone metastases (excluding breast and prostate) or myeloma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind, double-dummy design to receive monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg (n = 886) or intravenous ZA 4 mg (dose adjusted for renal impairment; n = 890). Daily supplemental calcium and vitamin D were strongly recommended. The primary end point was time to first on-study SRE (pathologic fracture, radiation or surgery to bone, or spinal cord compression).

RESULTS

Denosumab was noninferior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98; P = .0007). Although directionally favorable, denosumab was not statistically superior to ZA in delaying time to first on-study SRE (P = .03 unadjusted; P = .06 adjusted for multiplicity) or time to first-and-subsequent (multiple) SRE (rate ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.04; P = .14). Overall survival and disease progression were similar between groups. Hypocalcemia occurred more frequently with denosumab. Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred at similarly low rates in both groups. Acute-phase reactions after the first dose occurred more frequently with ZA, as did renal adverse events and elevations in serum creatinine based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events grading.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab was noninferior (trending to superiority) to ZA in preventing or delaying first on-study SRE in patients with advanced cancer metastatic to bone or myeloma. Denosumab represents a potential novel treatment option with the convenience of subcutaneous administration and no requirement for renal monitoring or dose adjustment.

Parenteral iron therapy in cancer-associated anemia

Anemia is common in cancer patients. Its cause is multifactorial, so a brief workup is always necessary to rule out simple, reversible causes. Anemia of chronic disease/inflammation and chemotherapy-induced anemia are the most common causes. Symptomatic or clinically severe anemia may require treatment with blood transfusion or an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). If ESA therapy is chosen, developing evidence now suggests that, similar to chronic renal failure patients on hemodialysis, the addition of intravenous iron can improve the response to ESA because of iron-restricted erythropoiesis, even in the iron-replete patient.