Have we forgotten the pivotal role of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in atherosclerosis prevention?

Association between Perchlorate and Indirect Indicators of Thyroid Dysfunction in NHANES 2001-2002, a Cross-Sectional, Hypothesis-Generating Study

BACKGROUND

A previous study based on NHANES 2001-2002 observed that increased levels of urinary perchlorate were associated with increased levels of thyroid stimulating hormone among all women, and with decreased levels of thyroxine among women with low urinary iodine. No associations were observed for men.

METHODS

Using the same NHANES 2001-2002 data, associations of urinary perchlorate with indirect biomarkers of thyroid hormone disruption were investigated. Decreased levels of hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), and high density lipoprotein (HDL) have been observed among subjects with subclinical hypothyroidism. To investigate the suitability of these indicators for use in observational studies, subjects were divided into six groups: boys, age 6-19; men, age 20-85; girls, age 6-14; non-pregnant women, age 15-49; women, age 50-85; and pregnant women. Use of perchlorate quintiles (Q1-Q5) and continuous log-transformed perchlorate in the regression models allowed investigation of both non-linear and linear associations. Adjustments were made for age, urinary creatinine, race/ethnicity, body mass index, cotinine, poverty index, hours of fasting, thiocyanate, nitrate, daily kcal intake, C-reactive protein. Adjustment for alcohol consumption depended on availability. Adjustment for prescription drugs (beta-blockers, sex hormones, antihyperlipidemic and antidiabetic drugs) was made if it changed the perchlorate estimate by ≥10%.

RESULTS

Statistically significant decreases were observed for HGB and HCT among boys, men, women age 15-49, and pregnant women, and for HDL among men.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the mean response biomarkers were within normal range, their association with urinary perchlorate is of interest. HGB and HCT among pregnant women showed a stronger association with urinary perchlorate than non-pregnant women age 15-49. Statistically significant associations were observed for individual perchlorate quintiles. Assumption of linearity of log-transformed perchlorate may result in underestimation of some associations.

Fibrates in the treatment of cardiovascular risk and atherogenic dyslipidaemia

PURPOSE

New data have emerged over the last few years about the role of fibrates in treatment of microvascular and macrovascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endpoint studies have been conducted with fibrates in coronary heart disease (CHD) since 1971 and initial results were contradictory. Fibrates later showed benefits in patients with low HDL-C and low LDL-C. The prominence ascribed to the lipid triad of the metabolic syndrome and the increasing prevalence of diabetes has increased the topicality of fibrates given their main action of converting small dense to light buoyant LDL. The Fenofibrate Intervention in Endpoint Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study has carried on the tradition. Fenofibrate therapy in 9795 patients comprising a mixed low-risk primary and a medium-risk secondary prevention cohort resulted in an 11% reduction in coronary events (P = 0.16), a similar but significant reduction in cardiovascular events (P = 0.04; number-needed-to-treat = 70). The benefits were concentrated in primary prevention and on nonfatal myocardial events, and post-hoc greater effects were seen in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridaemia (>2.3 mmol/l) and low HDL-C, as had previously been noted in a trial with bezafibrate. Safety was generally good, including in combination with statins, but old concerns about sudden death, pancreatitis and venous thrombosis returned. Unexpected benefits were seen with fenofibrate for microvascular endpoints including microalbuminuria and retinopathy.

SUMMARY

Fenofibrate and bezafibrate are reasonable second-line therapies for dyslipidaemia and in diabetes, and well tolerated in combination therapy. The benefits of fenofibrate for microvascular disease and its potential role in combination therapy require further confirmation.

Fibrates: no ACCORD on their use in the treatment of dyslipidaemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New data have emerged over the last few years about the role of fibrates in treatment of microvascular and macrovascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endpoint studies have been conducted with fibrates in coronary heart disease since 1971 and results have been contradictory. Fibrates have shown benefits in patients with low HDL-cholesterol and low LDL-cholesterol. Fibrates remain topical, given their actions on the lipid triad present in the metabolic syndrome and in diabetes. In the Fenofibrate Intervention in Endpoint Lowering in Diabetes study of mixed primary and secondary prevention cohorts, fenofibrate therapy resulted in an 11% reduction in coronary or cardiovascular events in monotherapy. Despite frequent use, there was little endpoint data on fibrate-statin combination therapy until recently. The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial of fenofibrate added to baseline simvastatin therapy in diabetes showed a nonsignificant 8% reduction in cardiovascular events. The benefits were concentrated in men, and women did slightly worse with fibrate therapy. In post-hoc analysis, slight beneficial effects of fenofibrate were seen in patients with moderate hypertriglyceridaemia (>2.3 mmol/l) and low HDL-cholesterol (<0.88 mmol/l). The safety profile of fibrate-simvastatin combination was good.

SUMMARY

Fenofibrate and bezafibrate are reasonable second-line therapies for dyslipidaemia and in diabetes. They are safe in combination therapy with statins but add little endpoint benefit except possibly in patients with a significant degree of atherogenic dyslipidaemia (high triglycerides and low HDL-cholesterol). The benefits of fibrates on microvascular disease remain to be fully explored.

Impact of change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline on risk for major cardiovascular events

INTRODUCTION

Low concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) has increasingly been recognized as a strong and independent predictor of cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study was to determine the association between change in HDL-C concentration from baseline and risk of a major cardiovascular event in a commercially insured population cohort with suboptimal HDL-C and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations at baseline.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal survival analysis was conducted using claims data from a large, commercial US health plan. To be included, patients had to be > or =50 years of age on the index date (laboratory test date between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2003 on which both their LDL-C and HDL-C were not at goal), be continuously enrolled for a minimum of 6 months prior to and 12 months after the index date, and had to have at least one other laboratory panel result within 1 year prior to the cardiovascular event or study disenrollment. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to assess the association between change in HDL-C concentrations and risk of a major cardiovascular event (defined as a > or =1-day hospitalization for a cardiovascular disease [CVD] diagnosis or an invasive cardiovascular procedure) within 5 years of the index date, after adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

A 0.026 mmol/L (1 mg/dL) increase in HDL-C from baseline was associated with a statistically significant 1.9% decreased risk of a major cardiovascular event (P<0.0001; hazard ratio: 0.981; 95% CI: 0.974, 0.989), after adjustment for covariates.

CONCLUSION

Our finding of an inverse association between change in HDL-C concentrations and risk of a major cardiovascular event confirms previously reported results. Increasing HDL-C concentrations may serve as an effective measure for preventing future cardiovascular events.

Perturbation of lipids and glucose metabolism associated with previous 2,4-D exposure: a cross-sectional study of NHANES III data, 1988-1994

BACKGROUND

Results from previous population studies showed that mortality rates from acute myocardial infarction and type-2 diabetes during the 1980s and 1990s in rural, agricultural counties of Minnesota, Montana, North and South Dakota, were higher in counties with a higher level of spring wheat farming than in counties with lower levels of this crop. Spring wheat, one of the major field crops in these four states, was treated for 85% or more of its acreage with chlorophenoxy herbicides. In the current study NHANES III data were reviewed for associations of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) exposure, one of the most frequently used chlorophenoxy herbicides, with risk factors that are linked to the pathogenesis of acute myocardial infarction and type-2 diabetes, such as dyslipidemia and impaired glucose metabolism.

METHODS

To investigate the toxicity pattern of chlorophenoxy herbicides, effects of a previous 2,4-D exposure were assessed by comparing levels of lipids, glucose metabolism, and thyroid stimulating hormone in healthy adult NHANES III subjects with urinary 2,4-D above and below the level of detection, using linear regression analysis. The analyses were conducted for all available subjects and for two susceptible subpopulations characterized by high glycosylated hemoglobin (upper 50th percentile) and low thyroxine (lower 50th percentile).

RESULTS

Presence of urinary 2,4-D was associated with a decrease of HDL levels: 8.6% in the unadjusted data (p-value = 0.006), 4.8% in the adjusted data (p-value = 0.08), and 9% in the adjusted data for the susceptible subpopulation with low thyroxine (p-value = 0.02). An effect modification of the inverse triglycerides-HDL relation was observed in association with 2,4-D. Among subjects with low HDL, urinary 2,4-D was associated with increased levels of triglycerides, insulin, C-peptide, and thyroid stimulating hormone, especially in the susceptible subpopulations. In contrast, subjects with high HDL did not experience adverse 2,4-D associated effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that exposure to 2,4-D was associated with changes in biomarkers that, based on the published literature, have been linked to risk factors for acute myocardial infarction and type-2 diabetes.

Gender differences in the lipid profile of dyslipidemic subjects

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the gender-associated differences in lipid profile of subjects intended to receive lipid-lowering therapy with emphasis on the associations between triglycerides (TG) and other plasma lipid variables.

DESIGN

Lipid profiles of 1385 patients [aged 55+/-11 years, 549 women (40%)] were evaluated. Eligible subjects fulfilled one or more of the following criteria: total cholesterol (TC)>or=6.2 mmol/l, TG>or=1.7 mmol/l, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)<1.0 mmol/l. Patients were divided into subgroups according to TG and HDL-C levels.

RESULTS

Women aged on average 3.5 years older, had higher TC and HDL-C, lower TG and a correspondingly lower TC/HDL-C ratio than men. High TG and low HDL-C in tandem appeared twice more frequently in men. Inverse correlations between HDL-C and TG levels were found to exist in the entire cohort (r=-0.354, p<0.001) and in all various subgroups. In the subgroup with TG<1.7 mmol/l, women had higher TC and HDL-C, lower TG levels and lower TC/HDL-C ratio compared with men. In the subgroup with TG>or=1.7 mmol/l, women had higher TC and HDL-C levels and lower TC/HDL ratio compared with men. In the subgroup with HDL-C>or=1.0 mmol/l women had higher HDL-C, lower TG levels and lower TC/HDL-C ratio compared with men.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated TG levels and low HDL-C in tandem are common lipid abnormalities in the clinical setting of primary and secondary preventions. Gender-associated differences in the lipid profile are evident in subjects presenting with dyslipidemia and might be of potential relevance for diagnostics and therapy for the prevention of atherosclerosis.

Lipid-Altering Therapies and the Progression of Atherosclerotic Disease

Lipids play a key role in the progression of atherosclerosis, and lipid-lowering therapies have been studied for 30 years in coronary disease. Measurement of the progression of atherosclerosis through carotid intima-media thickness, coronary mean lumen diameter, and, mostly recently, intravascular ultrasound is generally accepted. This article reviews the role of lipid-lowering therapies in changing the rate of atherosclerosis progression in the coronary and carotid circulations. Statins are the primary therapy used to reduce atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events, including strokes and transient ischemic attacks, and have benefits in reducing events in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. In contrast, data for other agents, including fibrates and nicotinic acid, in reducing the progression of atherosclerosis are less extensive and not as well known. There is increasing interest in optimizing the whole lipid profile, as this might deliver extra benefits over and above statin therapy alone. Initial proof of this concept has recently come from studies that measured the progression of atherosclerosis and showed that adding nicotinic acid to statin therapy and, more directly, infusion of high-density lipoprotein-like particles reduced progression and indeed might induce regression of the disease. It is likely that the management of significant carotid stenosis will become ever more drug focused and will be customized to the lipid profile of each patient with intervention reserved only for late-stage symptomatic disease.

Fibrates after the FIELD study: Some answers, more questions

Fibrates have a long history in cardiovascular disease. These drugs raise high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, reduce triglycerides and improve small dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) so would be expected to have large effects in type 2 diabetes, where this is the typical lipid profile. The general trial results with these agents have been confusing, with varying cardiovascular benefits. The Fenofibrate Intervention and Endpoint Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study recruited a low-risk population with a lipid profile that would be more usually treated with a statin. FIELD showed a non-significant 11% reduction (p = 0.16) in the primary end point of coronary events and a significant 11% benefit on the secondary end point of cardiovascular events and procedures (p = 0.04). Most of the benefits were seen in primary prevention and non-fatal myocardial events. Fenofibrate had little effect on HDL-C; the effects of the trial are consistent with the LDL-C reducing potential of this drug. FIELD, because of unequal statin drop-in, gives little evidence on statin-fibrate combination therapy but does reinforce the available data on the safety of fenofibrate-statin combination therapy. In addition, fenofibrate showed possible benefits on microvascular disease end points, including albuminuria and retinopathy. On current data fenofibrate and gemfibrozil seem to be reasonable second-line agents in type 2 diabetes or secondary prevention with low HDL-C, respectively, based on outcome evidence. In combination therapy, drug-specific safety considerations will affect the exact choice of agent, especially in combination with statins, but the efficacy of combination therapy still requires validation in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study.

FIELDS of dreams, fields of tears: a perspective on the fibrate trials

Endpoint studies have been performed with fibrates in coronary heart disease since 1971. The results have been confusing - starting with initial benefits in small studies, but contradicted by either minimal benefits in the Coronary Drug Project or adverse noncardiovascular (non-CV) effects in the World Health Organization Clofibrate Study. Fibrates returned for patients with low HDL-C and low LDL-C after a 25% event reduction were seen in the Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial. The greater prominence ascribed to the lipid triad of the metabolic syndrome and the increasing prevalence of diabetes increased the topicality of fibrates given their main action of converting small dense to light buoyant LDL. The Fenofibrate Intervention in Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) Study has carried on the tradition. Fenofibrate therapy in 9795 patients comprising a mixed low-risk primary and a medium-risk secondary prevention cohort resulted in an 11% reduction in coronary events (p = 0.16), a similar but significant reduction in CV events (p = 0.04; number needed to treat = 70). The benefits were concentrated in primary prevention and on nonfatal myocardial events, but the study was confounded by asymmetrical statin drop-in due to the LDL-C-lowering effect of fenofibrate. Safety was generally good, including in combination with statins, but old concerns about sudden death, pancreatitis and venous thrombosis returned. Unexpected benefits were seen with fenofibrate on microvascular endpoints including microalbuminuria and retinopathy. Fenofibrate is a reasonable second-line therapy for dyslipidaemia in diabetes and safe in combination therapy. Its benefits on microvascular disease and in combination therapy require further confirmation.

Endothelial dysfunction: Mechanisms of development and therapeutic options

Introduction. Vascular endothelial cells play a key role in cardiovascular regulation by producing a number of potent vasoactive agents, including the vasodilator molecule nitric oxide (NO) and the vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin (ET). Endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial dysfunction is recognized as the initial step in the atherosclerotic process. Impairment of NO synthesis, or increased inactivation of NO by superoxide radicals, may account for the increased peripheral vascular tone, as well as contribute to the clinical consequences of different pathophysiological conditions-which include vascular hypertrophy, increased platelet and monocyte adhesion to the endothelium, atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction and stroke. To date, most interventions attempting to improve endothelial dysfunction have targeted one or more of the numerous risk factors that can cause endothelial damage: hypertension (ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists), hypercholesterolemia (lipid-lowering agents), cigarette smoking (cessation), sedentary lifestyle (increased physical activity), menopause (estrogen replacement therapy), and diabetes mellitus (control of metabolic abnormalities). Several pharmacologic agents have been suggested to achieve vascular protection through mechanisms that go beyond their primary therapeutic actions (ACE-and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors). Beneficial changes to the endothelium might result from promotion of vasorelaxation, inhibition of vasoconstriction, reduction in the production of free radicals, or other mechanisms that protect the endothelium from injury. Conclusion. This study deals with the results of many experimental and clinical investigations. The possibility of using different classes of drugs was also established, including ACE inhibitors, Ca-antagonists, AT and endothelin receptor antagonists, direct activator of adenyl cyclase, statins, antioxidants, L-arginine, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, beta-blockers and organic nitrates. .

Pharmacologic augmentation of high-density lipoproteins: mechanisms of currently available and emerging therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the limited effects of low-density lipoprotein-based lipid intervention, more attention is being paid to drugs that augment or mimic high-density lipoprotein's beneficial effects. A thorough understanding of the anti-atherogenic effects of high-density lipoprotein, and the mechanisms of existing or emerging high-density lipoprotein-based therapies, is essential for rational strategy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

High-density lipoprotein mediates its beneficial effects through reverse cholesterol transport and direct anti-inflammatory effects of apolipoprotein AI and other component parts. Currently available drugs increase high-density lipoprotein-C through increasing apoAI synthesis (statins, fibrates) and decreasing apolipoprotein AI catabolism (niacin). Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors dramatically raise high-density lipoprotein-C, but clinical data are still required to verify their cardioprotective effects. Novel therapies such as apolipoprotein AImilano, apolipoprotein AI mimetic peptide, and exogenous phospholipids show tremendous promise as treatments for atherosclerosis.

SUMMARY

High-density lipoprotein and its defining functional protein apoAI prevent atherosclerosis through reverse cholesterol transport and other direct effects. Research has led to the development of novel therapies that increase high-density lipoprotein-C or that mimic direct anti-atherogenic effects of apolipoprotein AI. As these emerging therapies find a place in clinical medicine, we can anticipate preventing a much higher degree of cardiovascular events.