Retrospective observational study of patients with chemotherapy-related anemia receiving erythropoietic agents

The Impact of Biosimilars in Supportive Care in Cancer

Collapse

Utilization and cost comparison of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in inpatient and outpatient hospital settings

OBJECTIVE

To compare utilization and associated costs of epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB), two erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis in inpatient and outpatient hospital settings.

METHODS

An analysis of medical claims recorded between January 2006 and December 2009 was conducted using the Premier Perspective Comparative Hospital database. Patients included were ≥18 years old with cancer and chemotherapy or with pre-dialysis CKD and with ≥1 claim for EPO or DARB during a hospital inpatient or outpatient treatment episode. Patients treated with both ESAs or who were receiving dialysis were excluded. Mean cumulative drug costs and dose ratios (units EPO: mcg DARB) were calculated using cumulative dose and April 2010 wholesale acquisition costs.

RESULTS

Cancer chemotherapy: 13,832 inpatient stays (EPO: 10,454; DARB: 3378) and 5590 outpatient treatment episodes (EPO: 2856; DARB: 2734) were identified. The inpatient and outpatient populations reported ESA dose ratios of 230:1 and 238:1 with DARB cost premiums of 42% (EPO: $948; DARB: $1348) and 38% (EPO: $3358; DARB: $4627), respectively. CKD: 148,746 hospital stays (EPO: 116,017; DARB: 32,729) and 11,012 outpatient treatment episodes (EPO: 6921; DARB 4091) were identified. The inpatient and outpatient populations reported ESA dose ratios of 251:1 and 257:1 with DARB cost premiums of 30% (EPO: $566; DARB: $738) and 27% (EPO: $2077; DARB: $2642), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

The lack of randomization may have led to confounding by indication. In addition, statistical significance must be interpreted with caution in studies involving large samples.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of 19,422 patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and 159,758 patients with pre-dialysis CKD reported ESA dose ratios ranging from 230:1-257:1 (units EPO: mcg DARB) and associated cost premiums of 27-42% for DARB.

Epoetin alfa treatment for patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

Anemia (hemoglobin [Hb] < 12 g/dL) is a frequent and debilitating complication in the treatment of cancer. The negative effects of anemia include impairment of organ systems, disruption of important aspects of patient quality of life, and potential interference with completion and outcomes of cancer chemotherapy. Guidelines issued by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Hematology/American Society of Clinical Oncology jointly suggest that anemia in patients with cancer be managed by restoring Hb levels to approximately 12 g/dL, thereby minimizing transfusion requirements and resolving clinical symptoms associated with anemia. Recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) administered 150 U/kg 3 times weekly or 40,000 U once weekly has been shown in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and large, open-label, nonrandomized, community-based studies to effectively and safely correct anemia in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Several clinical trials support that treatment with epoetin alfa results in quality of life benefits that significantly correlate with Hb increases. Areas currently being investigated with epoetin alfa in the chemotherapy setting include the following: extended dosing regimens beyond the Food and Drug Administration-approved 3-times-weekly and once-weekly dosing regimens, early intervention for mild anemia, effects on treatment outcomes and survival, and optimal administration of concurrent iron supplementation.

Anemia and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent administration in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone ± rituximab chemotherapy: results from an observational study

CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) ± rituximab [(± R)CHOP] is the current standard of care for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Anemia resulting from chemotherapy can be treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). As part of the observational IMPACT NHL study, data were collected on ESA use and anemia-related outcomes in 1829 adults receiving (± R)CHOP-14 or (± R)CHOP-21. Overall, 33% of patients were anemic during chemotherapy. Older age, lower baseline hemoglobin (Hb), worse performance status, more advanced disease stage, and use of CHOP-14 were significant predictors of transfusion and anemia in logistic regression models. ESAs were received by 404 patients, usually in response to low or declining Hb levels. Most patients (65%) had Hb 9-11 g/dL at ESA initiation, and 89% (Kaplan-Meier percentage) achieved Hb 10-12 g/dL. In conclusion, two-thirds of anemic patients with NHL receiving (± R)CHOP initiated ESA treatment at Hb 9-11 g/dL, and most achieved target Hb levels (10-12 g/dL).

Drug utilisation and cost considerations of erythropoiesis stimulating agents in oncology patients receiving chemotherapy: observations from a large managed-care database

OBJECTIVE

Erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) resource utilisation in cancer chemotherapy patients is of importance to managed-care organisations. To understand current real-world utilisation of ESAs, this study examined epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) treatment patterns (dosing and treatment duration), dose ratio and ESA treatment costs.

METHODS

An analysis of medical claims data from January 2006 through to January 2008 was conducted using the PharMetrics Patient-Centric database of over 85 health plans. Patients included in the study were > or =18 years of age, had at least one cancer claim within 90 days prior to ESA treatment initiation, were newly initiated on EPO or DARB, received at least two doses, and were treated with concomitant chemotherapy (at least one chemotherapy claim during ESA treatment). Mean cumulative ESA dose was used to calculate drug cost (based on April 2008 wholesale acquisition cost) and dose ratio (units EPO : microg DARB).

RESULTS

A total of 4,111 EPO patients and 6,817 DARB patients met inclusion criteria and formed the study population. EPO-treated patients were slightly older (mean age: EPO 63.6, DARB 61.8, p<0.0001) with a greater proportion of women in the DARB-treated group (EPO 60.9%, DARB 64.1%, p=0.0007). The mean treatment duration was slightly longer in the EPO group (EPO 58.4 days, DARB 55.4 days, p=0.0019). The mean cumulative ESA dose administered was EPO 329,129 units and DARB 1,289 microg, resulting in a dose ratio of 255:1 (units EPO:microg DARB). Mean drug cost per treatment episode was significantly lower in the EPO group by $1,768 (EPO $4,321, DARB $6,089, p<0.0001). After controlling for covariates, the incremental cost associated with DARB treatment remained stable and statistically significant (adjusted cost difference: $1,806 per treatment episode higher for DARB patients than EPO, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study of 10,928 oncology patients receiving chemotherapy reported a dose ratio of 255:1 (units EPO:microg DARB) with 29% lower treatment cost in the EPO group. These findings are similar to those previously reported from published clinical trials and real-world utilisation studies.

Dosing and Outcomes Study of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Therapies (DOSE) : a registry for characterizing anaemia management and outcomes in oncology patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To report the design, methodology, implementation and initial results of the Dosing and Outcomes Study of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Therapies (DOSE) Registry, the first US patient registry to collect and report on practice patterns and outcomes associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating therapy (EST) for anaemia management in oncology patients.

METHODS

DOSE is a prospective ongoing registry of oncology patients treated with epoetin-alpha or darbepoetin-alpha. Patients from either community or academic centres who meet prespecified entry criteria are eligible for inclusion in the registry. Data collected include patient demographic and clinical characteristics, EST administration, haematological parameters, patient-reported outcomes and medical resource utilization. Patients are followed from EST initiation through to the end of therapy or 16 weeks, whichever is earlier.

RESULTS

Initial results from 45 sites for 861 patients (epoetin-alpha, n = 312; darbepoetin-alpha, n = 549) showed that baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar between the two treatment groups. Administration of EST at both weekly and > or =2-weekly intervals was observed in both groups, with similar numbers of haemoglobin determinations. However, the mean number of office visits was higher in the darbepoetin-alpha group despite more frequent administration of therapy at > or =2-weekly intervals in this group. Mean treatment duration was approximately 8 weeks for both groups. Mean post-baseline haemoglobin levels of 11-12 g/dL were achieved and maintained at all timepoints assessed with epoetin-alpha but not with darbepoetin-alpha. Both groups had similar rates of packed red blood cell transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The DOSE Registry is a valuable source of data relating to anaemia management, practice patterns and outcomes in oncology patients from the perspective of actual clinical practice. Results from this registry should provide patients, clinicians and healthcare decision makers with a better understanding of the relationship between EST dosage and outcomes in the clinical setting.

Management of anaemia: a critical and systematic review of the cost effectiveness of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are genetically engineered forms of erythropoietin that are used in the treatment of anaemia. Their successful use in the treatment of anaemia associated with renal disease, cancer and other diseases, as well as the development of multiple agents, has increased the visibility of these agents in the clinical and health economics literature. The circumstances under which the use of ESAs is cost effective, or indeed, whether it is cost effective, is of central concern for clinicians and payers who must make informed decisions regarding the management of these costly resources. Much of the recent literature on ESAs in the treatment of anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease and cancer, the two major therapeutic areas for ESA treatment, has focused on comparisons between individual ESAs, particularly epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa. While there have been some studies of cost effectiveness, many studies in these treatment areas have employed a cost-minimization approach and have relied on published prices rather than actual market prices. In general, this review of the literature suggests a cost advantage for epoetin alfa relative to darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of anaemia in renal and oncology indications. For other indications in which the literature is less developed, such as anaemia induced by antiviral therapy and blood management in surgery, small prospective studies or decision-analytic models comparing ESA therapy and standard care have been most common. Few conclusions can be drawn about the overall and relative costs or cost effectiveness of ESAs in these treatment areas. With the recent concerns about the safety of ESAs, especially when used outside the approved product labelling, future evaluations of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa should factor their safety profiles into estimates of cost effectiveness. Moreover, additional studies are needed to evaluate whether the treatment of anaemia with ESAs is cost effective compared with no treatment or minimal blood transfusions, and whether the cost effectiveness of ESAs would be improved if ESA doses and durations were reduced. With the introduction of new longer-acting ESAs, such as the continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, the relative cost effectiveness among the different ESAs will continue to be an important question for public and private payers, policy makers and clinicians who must consider the emergence of new data and changing dosing patterns when making decisions about the use of these important but costly agents.

Anaemia management with epoetin alfa in lung cancer patients in The Netherlands

Anaemia seriously threatens the quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. In this article results are presented on the lung cancer population from a Dutch observational study. This study addressed the real-life situation of recombinant human erythropoietin (r-Hu-EPO or epoetin alfa) treatment in anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, with a focus on efficacy. In total 781 patients were enrolled in the observational study, including 382 patients with lung cancer. At enrolment patients were receiving epoetin alfa treatment and/or patients had a haemoglobin (Hb) level </=11.3g/dl. Analysis was focused on lung cancer patients who were treated with epoetin alfa (n=343). Type of cancer, chemotherapy agents, type of anaemia management and Hb levels were documented. Hb development was analysed and the effect of epoetin alfa treatment was investigated. In total 343 lung cancer patients were treated with epoetin alfa: 210 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 133 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The majority of patients (99.4%) received 40,000 IU epoetin alfa once weekly. Before epoetin alfa treatment was started during chemotherapy, Hb levels decreased with a rate of 1.3g/dl per 4 weeks, both for NSCLC as well as for SCLC. Epoetin alfa treatment was started on average at an Hb level of 10.6g/dl for NSCLC and 10.4g/dl for SCLC, respectively. Hb increases of 0.5-0.6g/dl per 4 weeks and 0.2g/dl per 4 weeks were reached for NSCLC and SCLC, respectively. Although significant increases of Hb levels were reached, the epoetin alfa treatment could not fully correct the Hb decrease which had taken place during chemotherapy before the start of epoetin alfa, resulting in suboptimal Hb levels. In contrast, early intervention with epoetin alfa (start in first week of chemotherapy at Hb>11.3g/dl) was especially effective for NSCLC patients where it resulted in a stabilization of Hb at baseline level. For SCLC patients this strategy was less effective. Furthermore, early intervention seemed to diminish the need for a blood transfusion, i.e., the higher the Hb at epoetin initiation the more patients did not receive any blood transfusion. Results from this observational study demonstrate that epoetin alfa treatment corrects chemotherapy-related anaemia in both NSCLC as well as SCLC patients. Early epoetin alfa intervention seems advantageous for lung cancer patients both in terms of maintaining adequate Hb levels during chemotherapy as well as reducing transfusions.

Dose and cost comparison of erythropoietic agents in the inpatient hospital setting

PURPOSE

The inpatient dosing patterns and treatment costs in cancer and predialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients treated with erythropoietic agents from a hospital pharmacy perspective were studied.

METHODS

An analysis of electronic inpatient records from the Premier Perspective comparative hospital database was conducted. Study participants were identified through hospitalizations recorded between July 2002 and March 2005 from over 500 hospitals nationwide. Adult patients with an admitting diagnosis of cancer or predialysis CKD and treated with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa during hospitalization were included. Patients who had received renal dialysis or both agents during a hospitalization were excluded. Wholesale acquisition costs from September 2006 were used to calculate drug costs.

RESULTS

A total of 25,645 hospitalized patients with cancer (22,873 received epoetin alfa; 2,772 received darbepoetin alfa) and 66,822 hospitalized patients with CKD (60,079 received epoetin alfa; 6,743 received darbepoetin alfa) were identified. The mean cumulative dose per hospitalization resulted in dose ratios of 245:1 and 242:1 (units epoetin alfa:micrograms darbepoetin alfa) for cancer and CKD patients, respectively. On the basis of the cumulative dose per hospitalization, drug costs for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients were approximately 50% higher than drug costs for epoetin alfa-treated patients for both oncology and CKD patients.

CONCLUSION

Epoetin alfa was associated with less cost compared with darbepoetin alfa for treating inpatients with cancer or CKD. Further research including the patients' clinical outcomes is necessary to determine the true pharmacoeconomic differences between the two agents.

Erythropoietic therapy: Cost efficiency and reimbursement

PURPOSE

The practice of blood conservation is aimed at improving patient outcomes by avoiding allogeneic transfusions via a coordinated multidisciplinary, multipronged approach. The numerous blood conservation techniques and transfusion alternatives now available are described.

SUMMARY

Ongoing concerns exist regarding the availability of the nation's and the world's blood supply. In addition, the number of measures required to ensure blood safety has led to increases in the price of blood and blood products over the past 10-15 years. Moreover, blood transfusion carries inherent risks even under the most favorable circumstances. Investigations have established that injudicious transfusion is associated with development of ventilator-associated pneumonia, nosocomial infection, and organ dysfunction. Because most single blood-conservation techniques reduce blood usage by a mere 1-2 units, a series of integrated conservation approaches are required. These include preoperative autologous donation, use of erythropoietic agents, blood conservation techniques such as acute normovolemic hemodilution, individualized assessment of anemia tolerance, implementation of conservative transfusion thresholds, meticulous surgical techniques, and judicious use of phlebotomy and pharmacologic agents for limiting blood loss. Erythropoietic agents such as epoetin alfa have been used successfully to increase hemoglobin and decrease transfusion requirements, and are appropriate when used in advance of elective surgical procedures. Acquisition costs of erythropoietic stimulating agents versus costs of blood justify economic evaluation by hospitals to make the most cost-effective choice under current economic constraints.

CONCLUSION

Initiating a blood management program requires planning and support from those who are concerned about blood usage reduction and outcomes improvement. Launching a vigorous and ongoing educational program to raise awareness about the risks and hazards associated with blood transfusion is an important step in helping to reshape the medical staffs' attitudes about transfusion and the most cost-effective way to achieve clinical goals.

Dosing patterns and costs of erythropoietic agents in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis in managed care organizations

BACKGROUND

Epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) are erythropoietic agents indicated in the United States for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD).

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated dosing patterns and costs associated with the use of erythropoietic-stimulating therapy (EST) in patients with CKD not on dialysis who were newly starting EPO or DARB therapy in managed care organizations.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of medical claims data from >30 health plans for the period from July 2002 to February 2005. Patients were included if they were aged > or =18 years, had > or =1 claim for CKD within 90 days before the initiation of treatment, had newly started therapy with EPO or DARB, and had received > or =2 doses of treatment. If a patient was undergoing renal dialysis, data were censored 30 days before the first date of dialysis. Patients with a diagnosis of cancer or who had undergone chemotherapy were excluded from the analysis. The mean dosing interval was determined for both groups. Mean weekly doses and costs (using 2005 wholesale acquisition costs), weighted by the treatment duration, were calculated. The frequency of outpatient nephrologist visits was described and included in cost considerations.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 595 patients who received EPO and 260 who received DARB. The EPO group was significantly older than the DARB group (mean age, 63.5 vs 61.2 years, respectively; P = 0.020). The proportion of women was similar between the 2 groups (51.6% and 50.4%). Use of extended dosing (> or =q2wk) was common in both groups (63.2% and 90.8%). The weighted mean weekly dose was 11,536 U for EPO and 42.5 mug for DARB. The mean number of outpatient nephrologist visits during treatment was similar between the 2 groups (3.9 and 3.5). Mean weekly costs (EST drug cost plus cost of nephrologist visits) were significantly lower for EPO compared with DARB (159 dollars vs 205 dollars; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of these CKD patients newly started on EST in managed care organizations received extended dosing regimens (> or =q2wk) of EPO or DARB. EPO treatment was associated with significantly lower mean weekly costs compared with DARB. The number of outpatient nephrology visits did not differ significantly between groups.

Drug administration frequency and provider office visit patterns for oncology patients during treatment with erythropoietic agents: An analysis of four observational studies

BACKGROUND

Several drug administration regimens of epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) are used for the management of anemia in cancer patients in the clinical practice setting.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present analysis was to assess whether drug administration regimens were associated with differences in the number of provider office visits and hemoglobin assessments during treatment with these agents.

METHODS

Data from 4 observational studies that examined treatment patterns of EPO and DARE and health care resource utilization were analyzed. These studies, selected based on the availability of office visit and/or hemoglobin determination data during the course of treatment, included a retrospective chart review, 2 retrospective claims analyses, and an ongoing prospective patient registry. The treatment patterns and oncology-related provider visits and/or the frequency of hemoglobin evaluations among the studies were reported.

RESULTS

Data from 15,845 cancer patients were included in the analysis. The patient demographic and baseline characteristics were similar across all 4 studies; patients were predominantly women (62%-71%) with a mean age range of 56 to 63 years. Mean treatment duration ranged from 7.1 to 8.4 weeks without significant differences between EPO and DARE in any study. Weekly and extended (at least every 2 weeks [> or =Q2W]) drug administration frequencies were observed in both treatment groups. The most frequent drug administration schedule for EPO was once weekly (53%-75% of patients), and for DARE Q2W (67%-73%). Despite the difference in erythropoietic agent administration frequency, no significant differences were observed between EPO and DARB for either the number of oncology-related provider visits or the number of hemoglobin assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of oncology-related provider visits and hemoglobin assessments appears to be independent of the EPO and DARB administration frequency. These findings might provide useful information for health care providers and oncology patients in understanding patterns of care during treatment with erythropoietic agents.

Dosing patterns, treatment costs, and frequency of physician visits in adults with cancer receiving erythropoietic agents in managed care organizations

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the dosing patterns and treatment costs of erythropoietic agents in adult (>or= 18 years of age) cancer patients newly initiated on epoetin alfa (EPO) or darbepoetin alfa (DARB) in managed care organizations.

METHODS

An analysis of US medical claims (30 million lives in over 35 health plans) in the period July 1, 2002-February 28, 2005 was conducted. Patients with >or= 1 cancer claim within 90 days prior to initiating EPO or DARB, and who received at least two doses of the same erythropoietic agent, were included in this analysis. Weighted average weekly dosing, cumulative treatment dose, associated drug cost, dosing frequency patterns, and the frequency of outpatient visits were evaluated. The EPO:DARB dose ratio, based on average cumulative treatment doses, was assessed.

RESULTS

5639 EPO and 2166 DARB patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The EPO group was older (EPO 59.1 years; DARB 57.6 years; p < 0.001) with a higher proportion of men (EPO 38.1%; DARB 33.1%; p < 0.001). Variable dosing frequency was observed with similar treatment durations for the two groups (days: EPO 55.6; DARB 57.7; p = 0.122). A dose ratio of 236:1 was observed (average cumulative dose: EPO 252 856 U; DARB 1072 mcg). Average drug cost was significantly higher in the DARB group (drug cost: EPO 3077 dollars; DARB 4674 dollars; p < 0.001). The average number of hematology/oncology outpatient visits per patient (visits: EPO 7.4; DARB 7.3; p = 0.676) and outpatient visits for hemoglobin determination (visits: EPO 6.7; DARB 6.4; p = 0.093) during treatment was similar between the two groups.

LIMITATIONS

The results were based on medical claims only. The absence of information on actual injection dates in pharmacy claims prevented their incorporation in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the average cumulative doses, the EPO:DARB dose ratio was 236:1 (Units EPO: mcg DARB) with 52% greater drug cost in the DARB group. Despite the variable administration frequency observed between the two agents, the number of hematology/oncology outpatient visits was not different.

Randomized, open-label comparison of epoetin alfa extended dosing (80 000 U Q2W) vs weekly dosing (40 000 U QW) in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

OBJECTIVE

This randomized, open-label, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of epoetin alfa (EPO) 80 000 U every 2 weeks (Q2W) to the FDA-approved regimen of 40 000 U weekly (QW) in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 310 patients with nonmyeloid malignancy and baseline hemoglobin (Hb) <or= 11 g/dL who were scheduled to receive chemotherapy for a minimum of 12 weeks were randomized to EPO Q2W or QW for up to 12 weeks, with dose modification to maintain Hb at approximately 12 g/dL. Efficacy analyses used the per-protocol population (patients who completed the study with a value for Hb change) for the primary endpoint only and the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (patients who received study drug and had at least one postbaseline Hb value) for the primary and secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Analysis of the primary endpoint revealed that the mean change in Hb from baseline to study end was comparable between the Q2W and QW groups in the per-protocol population (1.6 g/dL vs 1.8 g/dL, respectively; treatment difference, -0.2 g/dL; one-sided 95% confidence interval [-0.56, -]); similar results were observed in the mITT population. Among patients on study at Day 29, 9.6% (13/135) and 11.1% (14/126) of patients in the Q2W and QW groups, respectively, received a transfusion between Day 29 and the end of the study (p = 0.709). Dose withholds (21% vs 42%, p < 0.001) and dose reductions (41% vs 59%, p = 0.003) were less common for Q2W than QW. Safety profiles were similar between groups; clinically relevant thrombotic vascular events occurred in 8% of patients in each group. The open-label dosing and the patient attrition rate did not appear to influence overall study results.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended dosing (80 000 U Q2W) and once-weekly dosing (40 000 U QW) of EPO provided comparable safety and efficacy for chemotherapy-induced anemia.