Randomized, open-label comparison of epoetin alfa extended dosing (80 000 U Q2W) vs weekly dosing (40 000 U QW) in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anaemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical factor in the treatment of malignant diseases. Therapeutic alternatives are recombinant human erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell transfusions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of ESAs to either prevent or treat anaemia in cancer patients.

SEARCH METHODS

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004. We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE and other databases. Searches were done for the periods 01/1985 to 12/2001 for the first review, 1/2002 to 04/2005 for the first update and to November 2011 for the current update. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials on managing anaemia in cancer patients receiving or not receiving anti-cancer therapy that compared the use of ESAs (plus transfusion if needed).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Several review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data. One review author assessed quality assessment and extracted data, a second review author checked for correctness.

MAIN RESULTS

This update of the systematic review includes a total of 91 trials with 20,102 participants. Use of ESAs significantly reduced the relative risk of red blood cell transfusions (risk ratio (RR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.68, 70 trials, N = 16,093). On average, participants in the ESAs group received one unit of blood less than the control group (mean difference (MD) -0.98; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.78, 19 trials, N = 4,715). Haematological response was observed more often in participants receiving ESAs (RR 3.93; 95% CI 3.10 to 3.71, 31 trials, N = 6,413). There was suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve Quality of Life (QoL). There was strong evidence that ESAs increase mortality during active study period (hazard ratio (HR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.29, 70 trials, N = 15,935) and some evidence that ESAs decrease overall survival (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11, 78 trials, N = 19,003). The risk ratio for thromboembolic complications was increased in patients receiving ESAs compared to controls (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.74; 57 trials, N = 15,498). ESAs may also increase the risk for hypertension (fixed-effect model: RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.56; random-effects model: RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.33, 31 trials, N = 7,228) and thrombocytopenia/haemorrhage (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.42; 21 trials, N = 4,507). There was insufficient evidence to support an effect of ESA on tumour response (fixed-effect RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.06, 15 trials, N = 5,012).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

ESAs reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions but increase the risk for thromboembolic events and deaths. There is suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve QoL. Whether and how ESAs affects tumour control remains uncertain. The increased risk of death and thromboembolic events should be balanced against the potential benefits of ESA treatment taking into account each patient's clinical circumstances and preferences. More data are needed for the effect of these drugs on quality of life and tumour progression. Further research is needed to clarify cellular and molecular mechanisms and pathways of the effects of ESAs on thrombogenesis and their potential effects on tumour growth.

An open-label pilot study to evaluate a flexible dosing regimen of epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia: 60,000 units weekly followed by 60,000 units every 2 weeks

PURPOSE

This open-label, single-arm pilot study assessed the safety and efficacy of administering an Initials epoetin alfa dose of 60,000 U subcutaneously once weekly (Initials dosing phase [IDP]) followed by an extended dose regimen of 60,000 U subcutaneously every 2 weeks (extended dosing phase [EDP]).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had a hematologic response, defined as hemoglobin (Hb) level increase >/= 1 g/dL from week 1 baseline at any time during the 4-week IDP (the primary efficacy endpoint), were eligible to enter the EDP at week 5 and receive every-other-week treatment for up to 12 additional weeks. Patients who did not exhibit this increase in the IDP were withdrawn.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were enrolled; the mean baseline Hb level was 10.1 g/dL +/- 0.79 g/dL. Thirty-three patients (64.7%) met the primary efficacy endpoint of Hb increase >/= 1 g/dL during the IDP; 29 patients (56.9%) proceeded to the EDP. Mean Hb level at entry to the EDP was 12.4 g/dL +/- 0.99 g/dL. Further Hb increase in the EDP (average Hb level >/= week 5 Hb value) was achieved in 12 of 29 patients (41.4%). Final Hb value for patients in the EDP was 11.7 g/dL +/- 1.28 g/dL. Four patients received a total of 5 red blood cell transfusions during the study. Epoetin alfa was well tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that observed with labeled dosing. Two patients experienced a clinically relevant thrombotic vascular event.

CONCLUSION

RESULTS from this pilot study suggest that higher Initials weekly dosing of epoetin alfa followed by extended dosing is safe and effective for treating chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Darbepoetin alpha in the treatment of cancer chemotherapy-induced anemia

Anemia is a common, but underestimated and undertreated, complication of patients with cancer receiving chemo- or radiotherapy, and negatively affects their quality of life (QoL). Erythropoietic proteins (EPS) offer an effective treatment of cancer anemia and ameliorate QoL, although their use requires the correct targeting of hemoglobin increase to avoid thromboembolic complications. Currently the effort is focused on offering patients this effective treatment with reduced frequency of administration. Higher weekly single doses of recombinant human Epo (rHuEpo) either alpha or beta, instead of three times per week, have been proposed for the treatment. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the hyperglycosylated protein darbepoetin alpha permit even longer inter vals between administrations. Every other week or every three weeks schedules have shown results (erythropoietic response, reduction of transfusion requirements, and improvement of QoL) comparable with those of weekly rHuEpo.

Epoetin alfa treatment for patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

Anemia (hemoglobin [Hb] < 12 g/dL) is a frequent and debilitating complication in the treatment of cancer. The negative effects of anemia include impairment of organ systems, disruption of important aspects of patient quality of life, and potential interference with completion and outcomes of cancer chemotherapy. Guidelines issued by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society of Hematology/American Society of Clinical Oncology jointly suggest that anemia in patients with cancer be managed by restoring Hb levels to approximately 12 g/dL, thereby minimizing transfusion requirements and resolving clinical symptoms associated with anemia. Recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) administered 150 U/kg 3 times weekly or 40,000 U once weekly has been shown in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and large, open-label, nonrandomized, community-based studies to effectively and safely correct anemia in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Several clinical trials support that treatment with epoetin alfa results in quality of life benefits that significantly correlate with Hb increases. Areas currently being investigated with epoetin alfa in the chemotherapy setting include the following: extended dosing regimens beyond the Food and Drug Administration-approved 3-times-weekly and once-weekly dosing regimens, early intervention for mild anemia, effects on treatment outcomes and survival, and optimal administration of concurrent iron supplementation.

Erythropoietin: a hormone with multiple functions

Erythropoietin (EPO), the main hemopoietic hormone synthesized by the kidney as well as by the liver in fetal life, is implicated in mammalian erythropoiesis. Production and secretion of EPO and the expression of its receptor (EPO-R) are regulated by tissue oxygenation. EPO and EPO-R, expressed in several tissues, exert pleiotropic activities and have different effects on nonhemopoietic cells. EPO is a cytokine with antiapoptotic activity and plays a potential neuroprotective and cardioprotective role against ischemia. EPO is also involved in angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and the immune response. EPO can prevent metabolic alterations, neuronal and vascular degeneration, and inflammatory cell activation. Consequently, EPO may be of therapeutic use for a variety of disorders. Many tumors express EPO and/or EPO-R, but the action of EPO on tumor cells remains controversial. It has been suggested that EPO promotes the proliferation and survival of cancer cells expressing EPO-R. On the other hand, other reports have concluded that EPO-R plays no role in tumor progression. This review provides a detailed insight into the nonhemopoietic role of EPO and its mechanism(s) of action which may lead to a better understanding of its potential therapeutic value in diverse clinical settings.

Outcomes of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

Purpose

To assess the clinical and economic outcomes among patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) treated with United States Food and Drug Administration-approved fixed dosing regimens of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA).

Methods

Data were employed from the Dosing and Outcomes Study of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Therapies (DOSE) registry to evaluate CIA patients who were initiated on either epoetin alfa (EPO) 40,000 Units (U) or darbepoetin alfa (DARB) 500 micrograms (mcg) between January 1, 2006 and May 8, 2009. Study measurements included ESA treatment dose and dose ratio, changes in hemoglobin (Hb) levels from baseline, and cumulative ESA costs.

Results

Five hundred forty patients treated in 44 clinical centers were evaluated, of which 420 were initiated on EPO 40,000 U and 120 were initiated on DARB 500 mcg. Both cohorts had similar baseline characteristics, although EPO patients were less likely than DARB patients to have received iron supplementation before ESA initiation (11.4% EPO vs. 20.0% DARB, p = 0.015). The EPO-to-DARB dose ratio based on cumulative ESA dose was 169:1 (U EPO: mcg DARB). EPO patients showed statistically greater Hb improvement compared to DARB patients, and compared to EPO patients, a greater proportion of DARB patients required a blood transfusion (13.9% EPO vs. 22.5% DARB, p = 0.026). Mean cumulative ESA cost was significantly lower for EPO patients than DARB patients ($4,261 EPO vs. $8,643 DARB, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

These findings reported that patients with CIA achieved more favorable clinical and economic outcomes if initiated with EPO 40,000 U vs. DARB 500 mcg.

Erythropoietin or Darbepoetin for patients with cancer--meta-analysis based on individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) reduce anemia in cancer patients and may improve quality of life, but there are concerns that ESAs might increase mortality.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to examine the effect of ESAs and identify factors that modify the effects of ESAs on overall survival, progression free survival, thromboembolic and cardiovascular events as well as need for transfusions and other important safety and efficacy outcomes in cancer patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and conference proceedings for eligible trials. Manufacturers of ESAs were contacted to identify additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials comparing epoetin or darbepoetin plus red blood cell transfusions (as necessary) versus red blood cell transfusions (as necessary) alone, to prevent or treat anemia in adult or pediatric cancer patients with or without concurrent antineoplastic therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing epoetin alpha, epoetin beta or darbepoetin alpha plus red blood cell transfusions versus transfusion alone, for prophylaxis or therapy of anemia while or after receiving anti-cancer treatment. Patient-level data were obtained and analyzed by independent statisticians at two academic departments, using fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analysis. Analyses were according to the intention-to-treat principle. Primary endpoints were on study mortality and overall survival during the longest available follow-up, regardless of anticancer treatment, and in patients receiving chemotherapy. Tests for interactions were used to identify differences in effects of ESAs on mortality across pre-specified subgroups. The present review reports only the results for the primary endpoint.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 13933 cancer patients from 53 trials were analyzed, 1530 patients died on-study and 4993 overall. ESAs increased on study mortality (combined hazard ratio [cHR] 1.17; 95% CI 1.06-1.30) and worsened overall survival (cHR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00-1.12), with little heterogeneity between trials (I(2) 0%, p=0.87 and I(2) 7.1%, p=0.33, respectively). Thirty-eight trials enrolled 10441 patients receiving chemotherapy. The cHR for on study mortality was 1.10 (95% CI 0.98-1.24) and 1.04; 95% CI 0.97-1.11) for overall survival. There was little evidence for a difference between trials of patients receiving different cancer treatments (P for interaction=0.42).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

ESA treatment in cancer patients increased on study mortality and worsened overall survival. For patients undergoing chemotherapy the increase was less pronounced, but an adverse effect could not be excluded.

Dosing and Outcomes Study of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Therapies (DOSE) : a registry for characterizing anaemia management and outcomes in oncology patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To report the design, methodology, implementation and initial results of the Dosing and Outcomes Study of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Therapies (DOSE) Registry, the first US patient registry to collect and report on practice patterns and outcomes associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating therapy (EST) for anaemia management in oncology patients.

METHODS

DOSE is a prospective ongoing registry of oncology patients treated with epoetin-alpha or darbepoetin-alpha. Patients from either community or academic centres who meet prespecified entry criteria are eligible for inclusion in the registry. Data collected include patient demographic and clinical characteristics, EST administration, haematological parameters, patient-reported outcomes and medical resource utilization. Patients are followed from EST initiation through to the end of therapy or 16 weeks, whichever is earlier.

RESULTS

Initial results from 45 sites for 861 patients (epoetin-alpha, n = 312; darbepoetin-alpha, n = 549) showed that baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar between the two treatment groups. Administration of EST at both weekly and > or =2-weekly intervals was observed in both groups, with similar numbers of haemoglobin determinations. However, the mean number of office visits was higher in the darbepoetin-alpha group despite more frequent administration of therapy at > or =2-weekly intervals in this group. Mean treatment duration was approximately 8 weeks for both groups. Mean post-baseline haemoglobin levels of 11-12 g/dL were achieved and maintained at all timepoints assessed with epoetin-alpha but not with darbepoetin-alpha. Both groups had similar rates of packed red blood cell transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The DOSE Registry is a valuable source of data relating to anaemia management, practice patterns and outcomes in oncology patients from the perspective of actual clinical practice. Results from this registry should provide patients, clinicians and healthcare decision makers with a better understanding of the relationship between EST dosage and outcomes in the clinical setting.

Extended-dosage-interval regimens of erythropoietic agents in chemotherapy-induced anemia

PURPOSE

The safety and efficacy of extended-dosage-interval regimens of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for managing chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Anemia is a frequent complication of chemotherapy. The ESAs epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa have been shown to safely and effectively manage CIA; comparable outcomes have been demonstrated between epoetin alfa 40,000 units once weekly and darbepoetin alfa 200 microg every two weeks. These commonly prescribed regimens necessitate extra clinic visits by cancer patients receiving cyclic chemotherapy. ESA administration can now often be synchronized with a three-week chemotherapy cycle because of the recent approval of darbepoetin alfa 500 microg every three weeks for CIA. However, in the Phase III trial providing the basis for this new dosage recommendation, more than 70% of patients required a 40% reduction in the dosage, resulting in an average dose of 375 microg every three weeks. The extended-dosage-interval regimens have not been associated with an increase in cardiovascular or thrombotic adverse events. Extended-dosage-interval regimens of epoetin alfa are under investigation and may provide additional alternatives. Synchronizing ESA therapy with scheduled chemotherapy visits would help minimize disruptions for patients and caregivers and improve the use of health care resources.

CONCLUSION

Administration of darbepoetin alfa every three weeks offers the convenience of synchronization of treatment with 21-day-cycle chemotherapy in many patients with CIA. Extended-dosage-interval regimens for epoetin alfa are being investigated and show promise.

An extended maintenance dosing regimen of epoetin alfa 80,000 U every 3 weeks in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of epoetin alfa (EPO) at an initial dose of 60,000 Units (U) once weekly (QW) followed by extended dosing of 80,000 U every 3 weeks (Q3W) in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Anemic patients (hemoglobin [Hb] < or = 11 g/dl) receiving Q3W chemotherapy for nonmyeloid malignancy were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, single-arm study to receive EPO 60,000 U subcutaneously (SC) QW (initial dosing phase [IDP]) until a target Hb level of 12 g/dl was reached (maximum 12 weeks). Patients who achieved an Hb level of 12 g/dl at any point during the IDP then entered the extended dosing phase (EDP; EPO 80,000 U SC Q3W). Maximum study duration (IDP + EDP) was 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a hematopoietic response (Hb increase > or = 2 g/dl from baseline or Hb > or = 12 g/dl) during the IDP.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen patients were enrolled. During the IDP, 76% (84/110) of patients achieved a hematopoietic response, and 15% (17/115) received red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Sixty-three percent (73/115) of patients entered the EDP, and 88% (64/73) of these patients maintained a mean Hb level > 11.0 and < or =13.0 g/dl. Two of 73 patients received RBC transfusion during the EDP. Adverse events were consistent with the underlying disease and chemotherapy treatment.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that initiation of EPO 60,000 U SC QW is effective in the treatment of CIA and that EPO 80,000 U SC Q3W can be an effective extended dosing option.

Cost analytic model to determine the least costly inpatient erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen

BACKGROUND

Unlike in outpatient settings, the comparative costs of epoetin alpha (EPO) and darbepoetin alpha (DARB) have not been evaluated broadly from the inpatient hospital perspective.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a cost analytic model comparing hospital inpatient costs for erythropoiesis stimulating therapies within the nephrology and oncology settings.

METHODS

A cost analytic model incorporating erythropoietic drug, pharmacy, and nursing costs was developed from the inpatient hospital perspective to evaluate comparative costs of EPO and DARB. Erythropoietic drug costs were calculated using unit wholesale acquisition cost multiplied by the number of units or micrograms while comparing the following dosing regimens: EPO 3 times weekly, EPO once weekly, and DARB once weekly. Pharmacy costs included dispensing and delivery costs, while nursing costs incorporated administration time costs; all were calculated by estimated fractional hours per activity multiplied by hourly wages. The total frequency of erythropoiesis stimulating therapy administrations was determined based on the average hospital length of stay. The first erythropoiesis stimulating therapy dose was assumed to occur on day 3 of hospitalization. For total inpatient costs, a weighted average was calculated across disease states. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying length of stay, day of initial erythropoiesis stimulating therapy dose, pharmacy and nursing costs, and once-weekly DARB dose.

RESULTS

EPO 3 times weekly was the least costly regimen across all disease states evaluated. Threshold analysis indicated that the cost of once-weekly DARB regimens would have to be reduced by 37% to equal the cost of EPO 3 times weekly for an average length of stay. Sensitivity analyses did not considerably affect the results.

CONCLUSIONS

EPO 3 times weekly was found to be the least costly erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen for nephrology and oncology inpatients for the average length of stay as well as most other lengths of stay considered. Once-weekly EPO was the least costly erythropoiesis stimulating therapy regimen for several other lengths of stay, while once-weekly DARB was never found to be the least costly regimen.

Guidelines and Recommendations for the Management of Anaemia in Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies

Patients with lymphoid malignancies frequently require repetitive and intensive anticancer treatments to induce and maintain disease remission. Anaemia (haemoglobin [Hb] <12 g/dL) is a common and debilitating problem associated with both the malignancy itself and its treatment burden. Anaemia negatively impacts on all aspects of patient quality of life (QOL) and treatment outcomes and survival, particularly in this disease setting. Widely acknowledged goals of anaemia treatment include Hb correction to approximately 12 g/dL, reduction in transfusion requirements and optimisation of patient QOL. Since the introduction of recombinant human erythropoietic therapy, transfusion (once the only anaemia treatment option available) is now primarily reserved for non-responders or those with severe or life-threatening anaemia. Data from randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, and large, non-randomised, open-label, community-based studies, along with almost 15 years of practical experience, support the assertion that epoetin alfa administered at a dosage of 150-300 U/kg three times weekly or 40,000-60,000U once weekly, both of which are US FDA-approved dose administration schedules, can effectively and safely achieve anaemia treatment goals for the majority of patients with lymphoid malignancies. Data and practical experience collected over the last 5 years on another erythropoietic agent with a slightly longer half-life but lower binding affinity, darbepoetin alfa, show that this agent when administered according to the FDA-approved dose administration schedules (2.25-4.5 microg/kg once weekly or 500microg once every 3 weeks) or according to a commonly-administered dose in clinical practice (3.0-5.0 microg/kg once every 2 weeks) can also effectively and safely correct anaemia, reduce transfusion requirements and improve QOL in many patients with lymphoid malignancies. One comparative head-to-head trial suggested that epoetin alfa might be superior to darbepoetin alfa in anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with respect to timing and magnitude of Hb correction, although further study is necessary, especially concerning optimal dose administration. Alternative dose administration schedules, such as epoetin alfa 80,000U every 2 weeks from initiation or 80,000U every 3 weeks following initiation with once weekly administration and darbepoetin alfa 4.5 microg/kg every 3 weeks following initiation with once weekly administration, are being actively investigated with the goal of increased flexibility for patients and healthcare providers. The treatment of anaemia in patients with lymphoid malignancies is an important part of overall disease management, as evidenced by continuous investigation of existing erythropoietic agents and new agents. Although treatment guidelines issued by organisations such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Society of Hematology (ASH)/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) suggest intervention with erythropoietic therapy when Hb falls below 10-11 g/dL or based on clinical symptoms, data suggest that anaemia is vastly under-recognised and under-treated. Clearly, an update on the definition, identification and optimal management of anaemia in patients with lymphoid malignancies is warranted.