Candidemia in the critically ill: initial therapy and outcome in mechanically ventilated patients

Initial micafungin treatment does not improve outcomes compared to fluconazole treatment in immunocompromised and critically ill patients with candidaemia

BACKGROUND

Candidaemia is associated with poor outcomes including high mortality rates. Controversy remains regarding whether fluconazole or an echinocandin is the optimal choice for initial candidaemia treatment, particularly among high-risk patients such as the immunocompromised or critically ill.

OBJECTIVES

To understand optimal initial treatment of candidaemia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of immunocompromised or ICU adult patients with candidaemia from 2010 to 2014. Patients who received ≥3 consecutive days of initial treatment with fluconazole or micafungin were included. The primary outcome was complete response at day 14, defined as clinical improvement and blood culture sterilization. Secondary outcomes included microbiological and clinical success, survival and recurrent candidaemia.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients were included; 76 received fluconazole and 121 received micafungin. There was no difference in complete response between the fluconazole and micafungin groups (ICU: 38% versus 40%, P = 0.87; immunocompromised: 57% versus 59%, P = 0.80). Secondary outcomes including survival were also similar. In multivariable analysis, among ICU patients, Pitt bacteraemia score < 4 (P = 0.002) and time to antifungal (P = 0.037) were associated with meeting the primary outcome; white blood cell count > 11 cells × 103/µL on day 0 (P < 0.001) and Candida isolated from a non-blood site (P = 0.025) were associated with not meeting the primary outcome. Among immunocompromised patients, white blood cells > 11 × 103/µL (P = 0.003) and Candida isolated from a non-blood site (P = 0.026) were associated with not meeting the primary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that among ICU or immunocompromised patients, severity of illness rather than initial antifungal choice drove clinical outcomes.

Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infection in Neonates: A Narrative Review for Practical Purposes

Candida albicans is the most frequent cause of invasive fungal disease in preterm and/or low birth weight neonates, followed by Candida parapsilosis, whilst infections from other species are rare. Considering the severity of the disease, associated with poor clinical signs and diagnostic difficulties, primary prophylaxis becomes relevant. This paper summarizes the pathogenesis and clinical presentation of invasive candidiasis in neonates, focusing on prophylaxis. For late onset invasive disease, e.g., those occurring after the 3rd (or 7th according to some definitions) day of life possible approaches are the use of fluconazole, recommended in case of weight <1000 g or <1500 g if the local incidence of invasive candidiasis is higher than 2%, or the use of nystatin (for patients < 1500 g). Micafungin must be used in case of colonization by Candida auris, or in centers with a high prevalence of this pathogen. Concurrently, correct management of the central venous catheter and isolation procedures, with special regard to patients colonized by resistant strains, are fundamental. Other approaches such as reduced use of H₂ blockers and broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g., 3rd generation cephalosporins or carbapenems) and promotion of breast feeding proved useful. Reduction of early-onset infections (those occurring in the first 3 days of life) can also be obtained by treating maternal vulvo-vaginal candidiasis, which can represent a fastidious problem during pregnancy. In this case, topic azoles (the only recommendable treatment) can represent a kind of "prophylaxis" of early neonatal candidiasis. However, it must always be remembered that prophylaxis reduces the risk of invasive candidiasis but can not completely eliminate its occurrence, with the parallel risk of selecting for antifungal-resistant strains. Clinicians must maintain a high level of suspicion to start an appropriate therapy and strict epidemiological surveillance to identify the occurrence of clusters and the appearance of strains resistant to prophylaxis.

Characteristics of candidemia in COVID-19 patients; increased incidence, earlier occurrence and higher mortality rates compared to non-COVID-19 patients

Severe COVID‐19 patients in ICU are at high risk for candidemia due to exposure to multiple risk factors for candidemia. We aimed to compare the incidence of candidemia in ICU patients with and without COVID‐19, and to investigate epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of candidemia patients and risk factors for mortality in candidemia patients. This retrospective study was conducted in patients followed in the ICUs of Ankara City Hospital for 2 years, divided into pre‐pandemic and pandemic periods. The incidence (event per 1000 patient‐days) and epidemiology of candidemia, clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients were compared in COVID‐19 and non‐COVID‐19 groups. Candidemia incidence was higher in the COVID‐19 group (2.16, 95% CI 1.77–2.60) than the non‐COVID‐19 group (1.06, 95% CI 0.89–0.125) (p < .001). A total of 236 candidemia episodes (105 in COVID‐19 patients and 131 in non‐COVID‐19 patients) were detected during the study periods. COVID‐19 cases had a higher rate of corticosteroid use (63.8% vs. 9.9%, p < .001). Epidemiology of candidemia and antifungal susceptibility were similar. Candidemia developed 2 weeks earlier in COVID‐19 groups and resulted in higher mortality (92.5% vs. 79.4%, p .005). One‐third of candidemia patients died before receiving any antifungal treatment, and this rate was higher in the COVID‐19 group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, corticosteroid use, presence of sepsis and age older than 65 years were independent risk factors for mortality in candidemia patients. Candidemia with high mortality is a more serious problem for COVID‐19 patients due to its increased incidence, earlier occurrence and a higher rate of mortality.

Defining standards of CARE for invasive fungal diseases in the ICU

The aim of this article is to review the current recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal infection in the ICU setting and to explore whether there are standards of care for this patient population. The text focuses mainly on the two most common invasive fungal diseases that afflict non-neutropenic patients: candidaemia and invasive candidosis (IC), and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA).

Initial Antifungal Strategy Reduces Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Candidemia: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis of a Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the empirical therapy with fluconazole or an echinocandin on 30- and 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with candidemia. The outcome of patients in whom the empirical echinocandin was deescalated to fluconazole was also assessed.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational multicenter study.

SETTING

Medical and surgical ICUs in nine Spanish hospitals.

PATIENTS

Adult patients (≥ 18 yr) with an episode of Candida bloodstream infection during ICU admission from January 2011 to April 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Patient characteristics, infection-related variables, therapeutic interventions, and metastatic complications were reviewed. A propensity score-adjusted multivariable analysis was performed to identify the risk factors significantly associated with 30-day and 90-day mortality.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 294 patients were diagnosed of candidemia in the participant ICUs. Sixty patients were excluded (other antifungals in the primary therapy or the patient died without empirical antifungal therapy). The study group comprised 115 patients who received fluconazole (30-day mortality, 37.4%) and 119 patients treated empirically with an echinocandin (30-day mortality, 31.9%). The use of an echinocandin in the empirical therapy was a protective factor for 30-day (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.66; p = 0.002) and 90-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.93; p = 0.014) in the propensity score- adjusted multivariable analysis. Deescalation of the empirical echinocandin to fluconazole was not associated with a higher mortality or the occurrence of long-term complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Empirical use of an echinocandin in critically ill patients with documented candidemia reduces mortality at 30 and 90 days significantly. Deescalation of the empirical echinocandin to fluconazole is safe and effective in fluconazole-susceptible infections.

Epidemiological and mycological characteristics of candidemia in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To date, there has been no comprehensive review of the epidemiology, risk factors, species distribution, and outcomes of candidemia in Iran. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all reported candidemia cases in Iran until December 2015. The review process occurred in three steps, namely a literature search, data extraction and statistical analyses. After a comprehensive literature search, we identified 55 cases. The mean age of patients was 46.80±24.30 years (range 1-81 years). The main risk factors for candidemia were surgery and burns (23.6%), followed by malignancies (20%), use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (18.2%), and diabetes (7.3%). Candida parapsilosis (n=17, 30.8%) was the leading agent, followed by Candida albicans (n=15, 27.3%), Candida glabrata (n=10, 18.2%), and Candida tropicalis (n=8, 14.5%). The frequencies of candidemia cases due to C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. albicans were significantly higher among patients aged>60, 21-40, and 41-60 years, respectively. Comparison of risk factors for candidemia by multiple logistic regression showed that one of the most important risk factors was surgery (OR: 4.245; 95% CI: 1.141-15.789; P=0.031). The outcome was recorded in only 19 cases and 13 of those patients (68.4%) expired. This study confirms that knowledge of the local epidemiology is important when conducting surveillance studies to prevent and control candidemia and will be of interest for antifungal stewardship.

Candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults: A narrative review

Candidemia and invasive candidiasis are major causes of morbidity and mortality, and their incidence is increasing because of the growing complexity of patients. Five species of Candida (Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis and Candida krusei) account for more than 90% of all diagnosed cases, but their relative frequency varies depending on the population involved, geographical region, previous anti-fungal exposure, and patient age. The best evidence regarding the anti-fungal treatment for invasive candidiasis comes from randomized controlled trials in which more than 85% of the recruited patients had candidemia. In the case of less frequent forms of invasive candidiasis, the recommendations are based on retrospective studies, meta-analyses (when available) and experts' opinions. A pre-emptive approach based on biomarkers and clinical rules is recommended because of the high rate of infection-related mortality among critically ill patients.

Is Fluconazole or an Echinocandin the Agent of Choice for Candidemia

OBJECTIVE

Candidemia is among the most common nosocomial bloodstream infections and is associated with high mortality, increased length of hospital stay, and significant economic burden. The introduction of the echinocandins in the 2000s has expanded the armamentarium against Candida spp and provides therapeutic options that are effective, safe, and tolerable. Although the Infectious Diseases Society of America favors echinocandins as treatment for candidemia in selected settings (at least as initial therapy), there remain divergent opinions about whether an echinocandin or fluconazole is the preferred agent for candidemia, and clinical practice guidelines are in flux. In this review, the currently available laboratory and clinical data are summarized and critically evaluated.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search of the English language literature was performed using the search terms echinocandin, fluconazole, and candidemia. References of review articles and guidelines were also screened for inclusion.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies whose primary goal was to compare echinocandins with fluconazole were evaluated as well as studies that differentiated pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties between agents.

DATA SYNTHESIS

It is clear that echinocandins and fluconazole each have roles in the management of candidemia. Specific recommendations are provided that will hopefully optimize outcomes in candidemia while incorporating stewardship concepts of cost-effectiveness and limiting the emergence of resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the advantages brought by the echinocandins and fluconazole, outcomes among patients with candidemia remain suboptimal. Improved treatment of candidemia may ultimately be achieved by optimizing the use of antifungal agents rather than the development of new drugs.

Candidaemia observed at a university hospital in Milan (northern Italy) and review of published studies from 2010 to 2014

BACKGROUND

Candida species represent the fourth leading cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections (BSI) worldwide. However, candidaemia rates and species involved vary geographically.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the epidemiological pattern, risk factors for mortality and antifungal therapy of Candida BSI over a 5-year period (2008-2012) in a university hospital in northern Italy together with a review of the recent literature concerning candidaemia.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study cross-linked with microbiology database was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 89 Candida BSI were identified in 42 males (47 %) and 47 females (52.8 %). The median age was 69 years (interquartile range 55-78) with 61.8 % of patients being older than 65 years. Considering all hospitalized patients, the overall incidence rate of candidaemia increased significantly from 2008 to 2012 (from 0.4 to 1.68 episodes per 10,000 patient/days) (p = 0.0001) with a mean linear increase in 5 new cases per year. Candida albicans was the predominant species isolated (64 %) followed by C. glabrata (19.1 %). The latter species was observed with significantly higher frequency in Internal Medicine and Intensive Care Units (ICU). In-hospital crude mortality was 41.6 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Candidaemia is an increasing BSI in our university hospital, in accordance with that observed in northern Italy, and it is still associated with high in-hospital crude mortality.

A multicenter study of septic shock due to candidemia: outcomes and predictors of mortality

PURPOSE

Candida is the most common cause of severe yeast infections worldwide, especially in critically ill patients. In this setting, septic shock attributable to Candida is characterized by high mortality rates. The aim of this multicenter study was to investigate the determinants of outcome in critically ill patients with septic shock due to candidemia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in which patients with septic shock attributable to Candida who were treated during the 3-year study period at one or more of the five participating teaching hospitals in Italy and Spain were eligible for enrolment. Patient characteristics, infection-related variables, and therapy-related features were reviewed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors significantly associated with 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 216 patients (mean age 63.4 ± 18.5 years; 58.3 % males) were included in the study. Of these, 163 (75 %) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Overall 30-day mortality was 54 %. Significantly higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, dysfunctional organs, and inadequate antifungal therapy were compared in nonsurvivors and survivors. No differences in survivors versus nonsurvivors were found in terms of the time from positive blood culture to initiation of adequate antifungal therapy. Multivariate logistic regression identified inadequate source control, inadequate antifungal therapy, and 1-point increments in the APACHE II score as independent variables associated with a higher 30-day mortality rate.