1
|
Kalra K, Moumneh MB, Nanna MG, Damluji AA. Beyond MACE: a multidimensional approach to outcomes in clinical trials for older adults with stable ischemic heart disease. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1276370. [PMID: 38045910 PMCID: PMC10690830 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1276370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The global population of older adults is expanding rapidly resulting in a shift towards managing multiple chronic diseases that coexist and may be exacerbated by cardiovascular illness. Stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) is a predominant contributor to morbidity and mortality in the older adult population. Although results from clinical trials demonstrate that chronological age is a predictor of poor health outcomes, the current management approach remains suboptimal due to insufficient representation of older adults in randomized trials and the inadequate consideration for the interaction between biological aging, concurrent geriatric syndromes, and patient preferences. A shift towards a more patient-centered approach is necessary for appropriately and effectively managing SIHD in the older adult population. In this review, we aim to demonstrate the distinctive needs of older adults who prioritize holistic health outcomes like functional capacity, cognitive abilities, mental health, and quality of life alongside the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes reported in cardiovascular clinical trials. An individualized, patient-centered approach that involves shared decision-making regarding outcome prioritization is needed when any treatment strategy is being considered. By prioritizing patients and addressing their unique needs for successful aging, we can provide more effective care to a patient population that exhibits the highest cardiovascular risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kriti Kalra
- Inova Center of Outcomes Research, Inova Heart and Vascular, Fairfax, VA, United States
| | - Mohamad B. Moumneh
- Inova Center of Outcomes Research, Inova Heart and Vascular, Fairfax, VA, United States
| | - Michael G. Nanna
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Abdulla A. Damluji
- Inova Center of Outcomes Research, Inova Heart and Vascular, Fairfax, VA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grudniewicz A, Gray CS, Boeckxstaens P, De Maeseneer J, Mold J. Operationalizing the Chronic Care Model with Goal-Oriented Care. THE PATIENT 2023; 16:569-578. [PMID: 37642918 PMCID: PMC10570240 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00645-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
The Chronic Care Model has guided quality improvement in health care for almost 20 years, using a patient-centered, disease management approach to systems and care teams. To further advance efforts in person-centered care, we propose strengthening the Chronic Care Model with the goal-oriented care approach. Goal-oriented care is person-centered in that it places the focus on what matters most to each person over the course of their life. The person's goals inform care decisions, which are arrived at collaboratively between clinicians and the person. In this paper, we build on each of the elements of the Chronic Care Model with person-centered, goal-oriented care and provide clinical examples on how to operationalize this approach. We discuss how this adapted approach can support our health care systems, in particular in the context of growing multi-morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carolyn Steele Gray
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Jan De Maeseneer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - James Mold
- George Lynn Cross Emeritus Professor, Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boeykens D, Decoster L, Lenoir D, De Sutter A, Haverals R, Lahousse L, Pype P, Van de Velde D, Boeckxstaens P, De Vriendt P. Building an understanding of goal-oriented care through the experiences of people living with chronic conditions. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 107:107567. [PMID: 36379862 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand the concept of goal-oriented care (GOC) through the experiences of people with chronic conditions. METHOD Interviews with people living with chronic conditions (n = 50) were analyzed in two ways. A deductive approach based on GOC attributes generated in a concept analysis on GOC: goal-elicitation, goal-setting, goal-evaluation, patients' context, and patients' needs and preferences. An inductive approach based on a thematic analysis using descriptive phenomenology. RESULTS The phase of goal-elicitation was recognized by the participants, whereas goal-setting and goal-evaluation were experienced to a lesser extent. Regarding the underpinning attributes, mixed feelings were reported concerning the integration of the patient's context and the presence of their needs and preferences throughout the care process. The inductive analysis revealed specific attention to informing patients about their condition and treatment options and discussing goals in interprofessional collaboration. CONCLUSION Goal-elicitation was already present and seems to be a good foundation for GOC. More attention should be given to goal-setting and goal-evaluation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Developing guidance by means of a workflow, tools, or questions might support people with chronic conditions and providers to underpin the entire care process with patients' personal goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dagje Boeykens
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Lara Decoster
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Dorine Lenoir
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - An De Sutter
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Reini Haverals
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Lies Lahousse
- Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Peter Pype
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; End-of-Life Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, VUB and Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Dominique Van de Velde
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Department of Occupational Therapy, Artevelde University of Applied Sciences, Voetweg 66, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Pauline Boeckxstaens
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Patricia De Vriendt
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Department of Occupational Therapy, Artevelde University of Applied Sciences, Voetweg 66, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Frailty in Ageing (FRIA) Research Group, Department of Gerontology and Mental Health and Wellbeing (MENT) Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit, Laarbeeklaan 102, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang C, Aranishi T, Reed C, Anderson P, Austin J, Davis VA, Quinones E, Piercy J. Impact of Patient and Physician Disconnect on Satisfaction with Treatment for Atopic Dermatitis in Japan. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2023; 13:505-522. [PMID: 36515820 PMCID: PMC9884735 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-022-00866-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory disease causing severe skin itching. Data on patient-physician disconnect on treatment satisfaction in patients with AD in Japan are limited. We investigated patient-physician disconnect on treatment satisfaction in AD and if it influences treatment patterns, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS Data were drawn from the Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme (DSP), a real-world, point-in-time survey of physicians and patients with AD conducted in Japan from April to July 2019. Patients and physicians were grouped according to level of treatment satisfaction ("extremely satisfied" to "extremely dissatisfied"); with any level of dissatisfaction recorded as "less than satisfied." Data were collected on treatment patterns, clinical characteristics, and PROs including the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. RESULTS Data were provided by 184 patients with AD and 56 physicians; 72.8% of patient-physician pairs reported a fair (kappa coefficient: 0.40) level of agreement on treatment satisfaction, 51.6% of patient-physician pairs were both satisfied, and 21.2% were both less than satisfied. Satisfied physicians prescribed a mean 1.2 fewer treatments than dissatisfied physicians (p < 0.05). Cases where both physician and patient were less than satisfied or where patients were less satisfied than their physicians reported the worst PROs, DLQI (both less than satisfied: mean 10.7 versus patient less satisfied than physician: 10.6 versus overall: 7.9), POEM (19.5 versus 17.3 versus 17.0), EQ-5D-3L (0.82 versus 0.81 versus 0.87) (all, p < 0.05). Work impairment was highest when both patient and physician were less than satisfied (p < 0.05). Physicians cited treatment efficacy and patients cited efficacy and usability as main reasons for dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION Overall, 12.0% of patients were less satisfied with their AD treatment than the physician, demonstrating some of the worst PROs, suggesting unmet need that could be improved by better patient-physician communication.
Collapse
|
5
|
Boeykens D, Haverals R, Sirimsi MM, Timmermans L, Van de Velde D, De Vriendt P, Boeckxstaens P, Verté E, Van Bogaert P, De Loof H, Van den Broeck K, Anthierens S, Huybrechts I, Raeymaeckers P, Buffel V, Devroey D, Aertgeerts B, Schoenmakers B, Timmermans L, Foulon V, Declerq A, Verhaeghe N, De Sutter A, Lahousse L, Pype P, Van Hecke A, Decat P, Roose R, Martin S, Rutten E, Pless S, Gauwe V, Reynaert D, Van Landschoot L, Hartmann ML, Claeys T, Vandenhoudt H, De Vliegher K. Creating space to talk about patients' personal goals: experiences from primary care stakeholders. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:11. [PMID: 36641431 PMCID: PMC9840292 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01956-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To address the many challenges health systems and communities face, primary care is constantly searching for new strategies to improve quality of care. One of the strategies is to focus on patients' personal goals to direct the care process. To adopt an explicit focus on patients' personal goals, actions at different levels are required. As a first step in this process, this study aims to explore the experiences of primary care stakeholders (i.e., scholars, primary care providers, and policy makers) and develop a comprehensive understanding on the idea 'putting patients' goals first'. This will help to formulate suggestions about what these actions should include. METHOD In this study, 41 primary care stakeholders participating in six focus groups between January 2020 and September 2020, were recruited via maximal variation purposive sampling. Data collection was done through an open-ended semi-structured interview guide. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed following a phenomenological-hermeneutical philosophy of Lindseth and Norberg. RESULTS All participants expressed a strong fundamental belief for putting patients' personal goals first. The primary care providers shared that they created space for patients' personal goals by letting them talk about their values and stories. They reported to integrate their medical expertise with patients' personal goals in order to develop a balanced relationship. In this context, they also talked about the importance of taking into account the perspectives of patients' significant others. Primary care providers also talked about how they used patients' personal goals as a guide in interprofessional collaboration. Scholars denoted that (future) care providers need more training to acquire competencies to discuss patients' personal goals. The providers and policy makers talked about organizational limitations in terms of time restrictions and the lack of registration systems to support a workflow oriented towards patients' personal goals. CONCLUSIONS This study can be used to support the coherence of the development of different actions and strategies to get primary care stakeholders fully on board to support the adoption of patients' personal goals in care delivery at different levels. However, models of practice and policy plans are needed to work towards a person-centered integrated system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dagje Boeykens
- grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium ,grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Reini Haverals
- grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Muhammed Mustafa Sirimsi
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium ,grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Department of Primary Care and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lotte Timmermans
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Dominique Van de Velde
- grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium ,Department of Occupational Therapy, Artevelde University of Applied Sciences, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Patricia De Vriendt
- grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium ,Department of Occupational Therapy, Artevelde University of Applied Sciences, Ghent, Belgium ,grid.8767.e0000 0001 2290 8069Frailty in Ageing (FRIA) Research Group, Department of Gerontology and Mental Health and Wellbeing (MENT) Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pauline Boeckxstaens
- grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kanavos PG, Hartgers-Gubbels ES, Chambers M. Value Insider Season 1 Episode 6: How Will Market Access and Value Demonstration Evolve? (Future Outlook) [Podcast]. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:8429-8435. [DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s394354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
7
|
Giunta S, Butow P, Juraskova I, Sharpe L, Ferguson E, Laidsaar-Powell R. Empowering family carers of people with multimorbidity as partners in chronic health care: Insights from health professionals. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:3550-3557. [PMID: 36096983 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES People living with multimorbidity often rely on the support of informal family carers, yet challenges frequently arise when carers of people with multimorbidity (PwM) interact with health professionals (HPs) and healthcare systems. This study aimed to provide insights into the experiences and challenges involved in working with carers of PwM, from HPs' perspectives. METHODS Twenty-one HPs (11 doctors, 5 nurses and 5 allied health professionals) from varying specialities participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed and qualitatively analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Five themes were identified: carer involvement makes multimorbidity easier to manage, differing views on HP's responsibilities to carers, multimorbidity makes management harder for HPs, strategies to support carers of PwM, and multimorbidity is one aspect of complexity. CONCLUSIONS HPs recognise unique needs of carers of PwM, yet perceive challenges addressing these needs and supporting this commonly overlooked group. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The unmet needs of carers of PwM that HPs identified in this study suggest pathways for future improvements and interventions, including HP education and training, and appropriate referral pathways for carers of PwM to access supportive services. Underpinning these findings is the need for greater recognition and respect for the critical work of family carers in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Giunta
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Centre for Medical Psychology & evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Sydney, Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eliza Ferguson
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Centre for Medical Psychology & evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Sydney, Australia; The University of Sydney, Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bujold M, Pluye P, Légaré F. Decision-making and related outcomes of patients with complex care needs in primary care settings: a systematic literature review with a case-based qualitative synthesis. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:279. [PMID: 36352376 PMCID: PMC9644584 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01879-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In primary care, patients increasingly face difficult decisions related to complex care needs (multimorbidity, polypharmacy, mental health issues, social vulnerability and structural barriers). There is a need for a pragmatic conceptual model to understand decisional needs among patients with complex care needs and outcomes related to decision. We aimed to identify types of decisional needs among patients with complex care needs, and decision-making configurations of conditions associated with decision outcomes. METHODS We conducted a systematic mixed studies review. Two specialized librarians searched five bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and SSCI). The search strategy was conducted from inception to December 2017. A team of twenty crowd-reviewers selected empirical studies on: (1) patients with complex care needs; (2) decisional needs; (3) primary care. Two reviewers appraised the quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We conducted a 2-phase case-based qualitative synthesis framed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and Gregor's explicative-predictive theory type. A decisional need case involved: (a) a decision (what), (b) concerning a patient with complex care needs with bio-psycho-social characteristics (who), (c) made independently or in partnership (how), (d) in a specific place and time (where/when), (e) with communication and coordination barriers or facilitators (why), and that (f) influenced actions taken, health or well-being, or decision quality (outcomes). RESULTS We included 47 studies. Data sufficiency qualitative criterion was reached. We identified 69 cases (2997 participants across 13 countries) grouped into five types of decisional needs: 'prioritization' (n = 26), 'use of services' (n = 22), 'prescription' (n = 12), 'behavior change' (n = 4) and 'institutionalization' (n = 5). Many decisions were made between clinical encounters in situations of social vulnerability. Patterns of conditions associated with decision outcomes revealed four decision-making configurations: 'well-managed' (n = 13), 'asymmetric encounters' (n = 21), 'self-management by default' (n = 8), and 'chaotic' (n = 27). Shared decision-making was associated with positive outcomes. Negative outcomes were associated with independent decision-making. CONCLUSION Our results could extend decision-making models in primary care settings and inform subsequent user-centered design of decision support tools for heterogenous patients with complex care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Bujold
- Department of Management, Evaluation and Health Policy, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Pierre Pluye
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sun L, Liu JE, Ji M, Wang Y, Chen S, Wang L. Coping with multiple chronic conditions among Chinese older couples: A community of shared destiny. Geriatr Nurs 2022; 48:214-223. [PMID: 36279804 DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) affect patients and their spouses. We explored the experience of Chinese older couples living with MCCs to gain deeper understanding of how they cope with MCCs as dyads. A qualitative research design using semi-structured in-depth interviews was conducted. Sixteen couples (≥60 years) were included and a thematic analysis was undertaken using NVivo software. Four themes under an overarching theme "A community of shared destiny" were identified: (i) various changes and impacts in normal life; (ii) perceived dynamic stress and dyadic challenges of MCCs; (iii) acceptance and reflection on MCCs influenced by aging and fatalism; (iv) mutual support and dyadic adjustment based on a shared destiny. Coping with MCCs was a dyadic and periodic journey for older couples. They perceived themselves as a community of shared destiny. Our findings are important for healthcare professionals to develop targeted interventions for older couples living with MCCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liu Sun
- School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, 10(#), Xitoutiao, You An Men Wai, Feng Tai District, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Jun-E Liu
- School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, 10(#), Xitoutiao, You An Men Wai, Feng Tai District, Beijing 100069, China.
| | - Meihua Ji
- School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, 10(#), Xitoutiao, You An Men Wai, Feng Tai District, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Yanling Wang
- School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, 10(#), Xitoutiao, You An Men Wai, Feng Tai District, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Shaohua Chen
- School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, 10(#), Xitoutiao, You An Men Wai, Feng Tai District, Beijing 100069, China
| | - Lingyun Wang
- Desheng Community Health Service Center, Capital Medical University, 34(#), De Wai street, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ho M, Pullenayegum E, Burnes D, Fuller-Thomson E. Successful Aging among Immigrant and Canadian-Born Older Adults: Findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:13199. [PMID: 36293780 PMCID: PMC9603725 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies in Canada have focused on the relationship between immigrant status and successful aging. The concept of successful aging used in this study includes the ability to accomplish both activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), freedom from mental illness, memory problems and disabling chronic pain, adequate social support and older adults' self-reported happiness and subjective perception of their physical health, mental health and aging process as good. METHODS The present study analyzed the first two waves of data from the comprehensive cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). The sample includes 7651 respondents aged 60+ at time 2, of whom 1446 respondents were immigrants. Bivariate and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS Canadian-born older adults had a slightly higher prevalence and age-sex adjusted odds of achieving successful aging than their immigrant counterparts (aOR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.34, p < 0.001). After adjusting for 18 additional factors, immigrant status remained statistically significant (aOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.41, p < 0.001). Significant baseline factors associated with successful aging among immigrants included being younger, having higher income, being married, not being obese, never smoking, engaging in moderate or strenuous physical activities, not having sleeping problems and being free of heart disease or arthritis. CONCLUSIONS Immigrant older adults had a lower prevalence of successful aging than their Canadian-born peers. Further research could investigate whether policies and interventions supporting older immigrants and promoting a healthy lifestyle enhance older adults achieve successful aging in later life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mabel Ho
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada
- Institute for Life Course & Aging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada
| | - Eleanor Pullenayegum
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - David Burnes
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada
- Institute for Life Course & Aging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada
| | - Esme Fuller-Thomson
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada
- Institute for Life Course & Aging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Miranda RN, Bhuiya AR, Thraya Z, Hancock-Howard R, Chan BC, Steele Gray C, Wodchis WP, Thavorn K. An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Older Adults With Complex Chronic Conditions: Cost-Utility Analysis. JMIR Aging 2022; 5:e35075. [PMID: 35442194 PMCID: PMC9069297 DOI: 10.2196/35075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background eHealth technologies for self-management can improve quality of life, but little is known about whether the benefits gained outweigh their costs. The electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) mobile app and portal system supports patients with multiple chronic conditions to collaborate with primary health care providers to set and monitor health-related goals. Objective This study aims to estimate the cost of ePRO and the cost utility of the ePRO intervention compared with usual care provided to patients with multiple chronic conditions and complex needs living in the community, from the perspective of the publicly funded health care payer in Ontario, Canada. Methods We developed a decision tree model to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for the ePRO tool versus usual care over a time horizon of 15 months. Resource utilization and effectiveness of the ePRO tool were drawn from a randomized clinical trial with 6 family health teams involving 45 participants. Unit costs associated with health care utilization (adjusted to 2020 Canadian dollars) were drawn from literature and publicly available sources. A series of sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. Results The total cost of the ePRO tool was CAD $79,467 (~US $ 63,581; CAD $1733 [~US $1386] per person). Compared with standard care, the ePRO intervention was associated with higher costs (CAD $1710 [~US $1368]) and fewer QALYs (–0.03). The findings were consistent with the clinical evidence, suggesting no statistical difference in health-related quality of life between ePRO and usual care groups. However, the tool would be considered a cost-effective option if it could improve by at least 0.03 QALYs. The probability that the ePRO is cost-effective was 17.3% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CAD $50,000 (~US $40,000)/QALY. Conclusions The ePRO tool is not a cost-effective technology at the commonly used WTP value of CAD $50,000 (~US $40,000)/QALY, but long-term and the societal impacts of ePRO were not included in this analysis. Further research is needed to better understand its impact on long-term outcomes and in real-world settings. The present findings add to the growing evidence about eHealth interventions’ capacity to respond to complex aging populations within finite-resourced health systems. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02917954; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02917954
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael N Miranda
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aunima R Bhuiya
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zak Thraya
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rebecca Hancock-Howard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian Cf Chan
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,KITE - Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carolyn Steele Gray
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kednapa Thavorn
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Malmir S, Navipour H, Negarandeh R. Exploring challenges among Iranian family caregivers of seniors with multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative research study. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:270. [PMID: 35365077 PMCID: PMC8973877 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-02881-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It is believed that seniors with multiple chronic diseases are in dire need of support from their family caregivers; however, it can impose a significant burden on these caregivers. Therefore, it is imperative to take into account caregivers’ needs, as covert patients, along with the needs of patients; besides, it is necessary to develop supportive and health promotion programs for them. There is a critical gap in the knowledge about health problems related to family caregivers of the growing population of these senior citizens. The present study aimed to explain the challenges imposed on family caregivers of seniors with several chronic diseases in Iran. Methods This study was conducted based on the conventional qualitative content analysis method. For this purpose, 13 family caregivers of seniors with several chronic diseases were selected using the purposive sampling method. The study population included those referred to two health centers and outpatient clinics of two public hospitals in Khorramabad, Iran. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Data analysis was performed along with data collection using inductive thematic analysis proposed by Elo and Kyngäs. Besides, Guba and Lincoln’s criteria were used to ensure the trustworthiness of the data. Results The analysis of the obtained data led to the identification of challenges of family caregivers of the older patients with multiple chronic diseases; these challenges were classified into six main categories, including the impact of caregiving on family relationships, disruption of social relationships, disruption of personal and occupational plans, physical health-related issues, negative emotions, and dealing with the high costs of care. Conclusions Given that family caregivers may face several challenges while taking care of seniors with multiple chronic diseases, healthcare providers should design and plan various interventions based on such challenges using a caregiver-centered approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahar Malmir
- Nursing Department, Faculty of Medical Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hassan Navipour
- Department of Nursing, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Reza Negarandeh
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prevalence of multi-morbidities among older adults in India: Evidence from national Sample Survey organization, 2017-18. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cegh.2022.101025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
14
|
Svensson A, Bremer A, Rantala A, Andersson H, Devenish S, Williams J, Holmberg M. Ambulance clinicians' attitudes to older patients' self-determination when the patient has impaired decision-making ability: A Delphi study. Int J Older People Nurs 2021; 17:e12423. [PMID: 34510764 DOI: 10.1111/opn.12423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The proportion of older people is increasing and reflects in the demand on ambulance services (AS). Patients can be more vulnerable and increasingly dependent, especially when their decision-making ability is impaired. Self-determination in older people has a positive relation to quality of life and can raise ethical conflicts in AS. Hence, the aim of this study was to empirically explore attitudes among Swedish ambulance clinicians (ACs) regarding older patients' self-determination in cases where patients have impaired decision-making ability, and who are in urgent need of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS An explorative design was adopted. A Delphi technique was used, comprising four rounds, involving a group (N = 31) of prehospital emergency nurses (n = 14), registered nurses (n = 10) and emergency medical technicians (n = 7). Focus group conversations (Round 1) and questionnaires (Rounds 2-4) generated data. Round 1 was analysed using manifest content analysis, which ultimately resulted in the creation of discrete items. Each item was rated with a five-point Likert scale together with free-text answers. Consensus (≥70%) was calculated by trichotomising the Likert scale. RESULTS Round 1 identified 108 items which were divided into four categories: (1) attitudes regarding the patient (n = 35), (2) attitudes regarding the patient relationship (n = 8), (3) attitudes regarding oneself and one's colleagues (n = 45), and (4) attitudes regarding other involved factors (n = 20). In Rounds 2-4, one item was identified in the free text from Round 2, generating a total of 109 items. After four rounds, 72 items (62%) reached consensus. CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight the complexity of ACs' attitudes towards older patients' self-determination. The respect of older patients' self-determination is challenged by the patient, other healthcare personnel, significant others and/or colleagues. The study provided a unique opportunity to explore self-determination and shared decision-making. AS have to provide continued ethical training, for example to increase the use of simulation-based training or moral case deliberations in order to strengthen the ACs' moral abilities within their professional practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Ambulance services must develop opportunities to provide continued training within this topic. One option would be to increase the use of simulation-based training, focusing on ethical aspects of the care. Another option might be to facilitate moral case deliberations to strengthen the ACs' abilities to manage these issues while being able to share experiences with peers. These types of interventions should illuminate the importance of the topic for the individual AC, which, in turn, may strengthen and develop the caring abilities within an integrated care team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Svensson
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.,Centre of Interprofessional Collaboration within Emergency care (CICE), Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.,Department of Ambulance Service, Växjö, Sweden
| | - Anders Bremer
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.,Centre of Interprofessional Collaboration within Emergency care (CICE), Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.,Department of Ambulance Service, Kalmar, Sweden
| | - Andreas Rantala
- Centre of Interprofessional Collaboration within Emergency care (CICE), Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.,Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Emergency Department, Helsingborg General Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Henrik Andersson
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.,Centre of Interprofessional Collaboration within Emergency care (CICE), Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.,Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden
| | - Scott Devenish
- Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Julia Williams
- Paramedic Clinical Research Unit (ParaCRU), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Mats Holmberg
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.,Centre of Interprofessional Collaboration within Emergency care (CICE), Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.,Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.,Department of Ambulance Service, Region Sörmland, Katrineholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Amanatullah DF, Eppler SL, Shah RF, Mertz K, Roe AK, Murasko M, Kamal RN. A Qualitative Study of Patient Themes for the Quality of the Total Joint Arthroplasty Experience. Orthopedics 2021; 44:117-122. [PMID: 34038694 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20210217-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Patients have limited involvement in the development of quality measures that address the experience of undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Current quality measures may not fully assess the aspects of care that are important to patients. The goal of this study was to understand quality of care in TJA from the patient perspective by exploring patients' knowledge gaps, experiences, and goals. The authors completed a prospective qualitative analysis of patients who had undergone hip or knee TJA. Patients completed an open-ended, structured questionnaire about the surgical and recovery process as it relates to quality of care. The authors used a phenomenologic approach and purposeful sampling to enroll 74 patients 6 to 8 weeks after TJA. Responses underwent thematic analysis. Codes were used to identify themes that were important to patients in quality of care in TJA. The authors identified 3 themes: (1) returning to activity without pain or complication, which included psychological, functional, and complication-related goals; (2) negotiating the physical and psychological challenges of recovery, which encompassed the need for assistance from the caregiver as well as psychological and physical barriers to recovery; and (3) being prepared and informed for the process of surgery, including physical, logistical, and psychological preparation. Both patients and health systems may benefit from efforts to address these patient-centered themes of quality care through quality measures for TJA (eg, improving the psychological challenges of recovery). Future quality measures, such as assessment of patient experience, may be made more patient centered if they measure and improve aspects of care that matter to patients. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):117-122.].
Collapse
|
16
|
Peckham A, Wright JG, Marani H, Abdelhalim R, Laxer D, Allin S, Alam N, Marchildon G. Putting the Patient First: A Scoping Review of Patient Desires in Canada. Healthc Policy 2021; 16:46-69. [PMID: 34129478 PMCID: PMC8200834 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-centred care is a key priority for governments, providers and stakeholders, yet little is known about the care preferences of patient groups. We completed a scoping review that yielded 193 articles for analysis. Five health states were used to account for the diversity of possible preferences based on health needs. Five broad themes were identified and expressed differently across the health states, including personalized care, navigation, choice, holistic care and care continuity. Patients' perspectives must be considered to meet the diverse needs of targeted patient groups, which can inform health system planning, quality improvement initiatives and targeting of investments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allie Peckham
- Assistant Professor, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ; North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - James G Wright
- Chief, Economics, Policy and Research, Ontario Medical Association, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Husayn Marani
- Research Assistant, North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Reham Abdelhalim
- Research Assistant, North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Dara Laxer
- Executive Director, Health Policy and Promotion, Ontario Medical Association, Toronto, ON
| | - Sara Allin
- Director of Operations, North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; Assistant Professor, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Nadia Alam
- Past President, Ontario Medical Association, Toronto, ON
| | - Greg Marchildon
- Director, North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; Professor, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ungar A, Rivasi G, Coscarelli A, Boccanelli A, Marchionni N, Alboni P, Baldasseroni S, Bo M, Palazzo G, Rozzini R, Terrosu P, Vetta F, Zito G, Desideri G. Hypertension in older persons: why one size does not fit all. Minerva Med 2021; 113:616-625. [PMID: 33832215 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4806.21.07502-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Over recent years, managing hypertension in older people has gained increasing attention, with particular reference to very old, frailer individuals. In these patients, hypertension treatment may be challenging due to a higher risk of hypotension-related adverse events which commonly overlaps with a higher cardiovascular risk. Additionally, frailer older adults rarely satisfy inclusion criteria of randomized clinical trials, which determines a substantial lack of scientific data. Although limited, available evidence suggests that the association between blood pressure and adverse outcomes significantly varies at advanced age according to frailty status. In particular, the negative prognostic impact of hypertension seems to attenuate or even revert in individuals with older biological age, e.g. patients with disability, cognitive impairment, and poor physical performance. Consequently, one size doesn't fit all and personalized treatment strategies are needed, customized to individuals' frailty and functional status. Similar to other cardiovascular diseases, hypertension management in older people should be characterized by a geriatric approach based on biological rather than chronological age and a geriatric comprehensive evaluation including frailty assessment is required to provide the most appropriate treatment, tailored to patients' prognosis and health care goals. This review illustrates the importance of a patient-centered geriatric approach to hypertension management in older people with the final purpose to promote a wider implementation of frailty assessment in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ungar
- Department of Geriatric and Intensive Care Medicine, Hypertension Clinic, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, Florence, Italy - .,SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy -
| | - Giulia Rivasi
- Department of Geriatric and Intensive Care Medicine, Hypertension Clinic, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Coscarelli
- Department of Geriatric and Intensive Care Medicine, Hypertension Clinic, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Paolo Alboni
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Mario Bo
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Palazzo
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | - Renzo Rozzini
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Vetta
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | - Giovanni Zito
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | - Giovambattista Desideri
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy.,Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Medication review and reconciliation in older adults. Eur Geriatr Med 2021; 12:499-507. [PMID: 33583002 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-021-00449-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Older people are frequently exposed to polypharmacy, inappropriate prescribing, and adverse drug events. Two clinical processes can help geriatricians to optimize and increase the safety of drug prescriptions for older adults: medication reconciliation and medication review. Medication reconciliation provides the best possible medication history and identifies and resolves discrepancies in drug prescriptions. During the medication review, the best possible medication history is crosschecked against other data, including morbidities, patient's preferences, or geriatric syndromes, to produce a personalized medication strategy. Alignment of treatment recommendations with patient preferences and goals through shared decision-making is particularly important in medication review. Medication reconciliation and medication review have proven to be effective, but their broad implementation remains difficult. Indeed, these procedures are time-consuming and require specific skills, coordination between different healthcare professionals, organizations and dedicated means. The involvement of geriatricians therefore remains essential for the successful implementation of medication reconciliation and medication review in geriatric settings and among frail older people.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ploeg J, Garnett A, Fraser KD, Baird LG, Kaasalainen S, McAiney C, Markle-Reid M, Dufour S. The complexity of caregiving for community-living older adults with multiple chronic conditions: A qualitative study. JOURNAL OF COMORBIDITY 2020; 10:2235042X20981190. [PMID: 33403202 PMCID: PMC7739080 DOI: 10.1177/2235042x20981190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: Older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) rely heavily on caregivers for assistance with care. However, we know little about their psychosocial experiences and their needs for support in managing MCC. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of caregivers of older adults living in the community with MCC. Methods: This qualitative study was a secondary analysis of previously collected data from caregivers in Ontario and Alberta, Canada. Participants included caregivers of older adults (65 years and older) with three or more chronic conditions. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using Thorne’s interpretive description approach. Results: Most of the 47 caregiver participants were female (76.6%), aged 65 years of age or older (61.7%), married (87.2%) and were spouses to the care recipient (68.1%). Caregivers’ experiences of caring for community-living older adults with MCC were complex and included: (a) dealing with the demands of caregiving; (b) prioritizing chronic conditions; (c) living with my own health limitations; (d) feeling socially isolated and constrained; (e) remaining committed to caring; and (f) reaping the rewards of caregiving. Conclusions: Healthcare providers can play key roles in supporting caregivers of older adults with MCC by providing education and support on managing MCC, actively engaging them in goal setting and care planning, and linking them to appropriate community health and social support services. Communities can create environments that support caregivers in areas such as social participation, social inclusion, and community support and health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Ploeg
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Canada.,Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University, Canada
| | - Anna Garnett
- Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kimberly D Fraser
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Canada.,Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Canada
| | - Lisa Garland Baird
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada
| | - Sharon Kaasalainen
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carrie McAiney
- Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Canada.,School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maureen Markle-Reid
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Canada.,Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sinéad Dufour
- School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mertz K, Shah RF, Eppler SL, Yao J, Safran M, Palanca A, Hu SS, Gardner M, Amanatullah DF, Kamal RN. A Simple Goal Elicitation Tool Improves Shared Decision Making in Outpatient Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:766-773. [PMID: 32744134 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20943520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction. Shared decision making involves educating the patient, eliciting their goals, and collaborating on a decision for treatment. Goal elicitation is challenging for physicians as previous research has shown that patients do not bring up their goals on their own. Failure to properly elicit patient goals leads to increased patient misconceptions and decisional conflict. We performed a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a simple goal elicitation tool in improving patient involvement in decision making. Methods. We conducted a randomized, single-blind study of new patients presenting to a single, outpatient surgical center. Prior to their consultation, the intervention group received a demographics questionnaire and a goal elicitation worksheet. The control group received a demographics questionnaire only. After the consultation, both groups were asked to complete the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS) survey. We compared the mean PICS scores for the intervention and control groups using a nonparametric Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon test. Secondary analysis included a qualitative content analysis of the patient goals. Results. Our final cohort consisted of 96 patients (46 intervention, 50 control). Both groups were similar in terms of demographic composition. The intervention group had a significantly higher mean (SD) PICS score compared to the control group (9.04 [2.15] v. 7.54 [2.27], P < 0.01). Thirty-nine percent of patient goals were focused on receiving a diagnosis or treatment, while 21% of patients wanted to receive education regarding their illness or their treatment options. Discussion. A single-step goal elicitation tool was effective in improving patient-perceived involvement in their care. This tool can be efficiently implemented in both academic and nonacademic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Mertz
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - Romil F Shah
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - Sara L Eppler
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Yao
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - Marc Safran
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - Ariel Palanca
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - Serena S Hu
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - Michael Gardner
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - Derek F Amanatullah
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | - Robin N Kamal
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
General practitioner strategies for managing patients with multimorbidity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:131. [PMID: 32611391 PMCID: PMC7331183 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01197-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background General practitioners (GPs) increasingly manage patients with multimorbidity but report challenges in doing so. Patients describe poor experiences with health care systems that treat each of their health conditions separately, resulting in fragmented, uncoordinated care. For GPs to provide the patient-centred, coordinated care patients need and want, research agendas and health system structures and policies will need to adapt to address this epidemiologic transition. This systematic review seeks to understand if and how multimorbidity impacts on the work of GPs, the strategies they employ to manage challenges, and what they believe still needs addressing to ensure quality patient care. Methods Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies reporting GP experiences of managing patients with multimorbidity. The search included nine major databases, grey literature sources, Google and Google Scholar, a hand search of Journal of Comorbidity, and the reference lists of included studies. Results Thirty-three studies from fourteen countries were included. Three major challenges were identified: practising without supportive evidence; working within a fragmented health care system whose policies and structures remain organised around single condition care and specialisation; and the clinical uncertainty associated with multimorbidity complexity and general practitioner perceptions of decisional risk. GPs revealed three approaches to mitigating these challenges: prioritising patient-centredness and relational continuity; relying on knowledge of patient preferences and unique circumstances to individualise care; and structuring the consultation to create a sense of time and minimise patient risk. Conclusions GPs described an ongoing tension between applying single condition guidelines to patients with multimorbidity as security against uncertainty or penalty, and potentially causing patients harm. Above all, they chose to prioritise their long-term relationships for the numerous gains this brought such as mutual trust, deeper insight into a patient’s unique circumstances, and useable knowledge of each individual’s capacity for the work of illness and goals for life. GPs described a need for better multimorbidity management guidance. Perhaps more than this, they require policies and models of practice that provide remunerated time and space for nurturing trustful therapeutic partnerships.
Collapse
|
22
|
Baker N, Lawn S, Gordon SJ, George S. Older Adults' Experiences of Goals in Health: A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis. J Appl Gerontol 2020; 40:818-827. [PMID: 32396500 DOI: 10.1177/0733464820918134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To synthesize older adults' experiences and perceptions of goal setting and pursuit within health systems. Methods: Six databases were searched to May 2019 using a combination of MeSH and free text terms. Included papers were written in English and reported original qualitative research for participants aged 65 years and older. Participant quotes from the results sections of included studies were gathered for thematic analysis and synthesis. Results: Initial search yielded 9,845 articles, and 134 were identified for full-text review. Fifteen papers were included in the final synthesis. Two main themes were identified: enablers (intrinsic and extrinsic) and barriers (personal and system). Conclusion: Older adults' self-belief is the strongest enabler for goal activities, enhanced by a personalized coaching approach from health staff. Conversely, inconsistent goal terminology confuses patients and reduces engagement. Likewise, fatigue has profound physical and cognitive impact on patients' ability to engage and participate in goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicky Baker
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sharon Lawn
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Susan J Gordon
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Stacey George
- Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Valaitis R, Cleghorn L, Ploeg J, Risdon C, Mangin D, Dolovich L, Agarwal G, Oliver D, Gaber J, Chung H. Disconnected relationships between primary care and community-based health and social services and system navigation for older adults: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:69. [PMID: 32326880 PMCID: PMC7181491 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01143-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background There are gaps in knowledge and understanding about the relationships between primary care and community-based health and social services in the context of healthy aging at home and system navigation. This study examined provider perspectives on: a) older adults’ health and social needs; b) barriers to accessing services; c) the nature of relationships between primary care and health and social services; and d) ways to facilitate primary care and health and social services navigation to optimize older adults’ health. Methods Four focus groups were conducted involving providers (n = 21) in: urban primary care clinics and health and social services organizations serving older adults in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Purposive sampling was employed to recruit community health and social services managers, directors or supervisors and primary health care providers in a Family Health Team via email. Results Health and social services needs were exacerbated for community-dwelling older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Strong family/caregiver social support and advocacy was often lacking. Access barriers for older adults included: financial challenges; lack of accessible transportation; wait times and eligibility criteria; and lack of programs to address older adults’ needs. Having multiple providers meant that assessments among providers and older adults resulted in contradictory care pathways. Primary care and health and social services linkages were deficient and complicated by poor communication with patients and health literacy barriers. Primary care had stronger links with other health services than with community-based health and social services; primary care providers were frustrated by the complex nature of health and social services navigation; and care coordination was problematic. Health and social services referred older adults to primary care for medical needs and gathered patient information to gauge program eligibility, but not without challenges. Conclusions Results point to strategies to strengthen primary care and health and social services system navigation for older adults including: using a person-focused approach; employing effective primary care and health and social services communication strategies; applying effective system navigation; building trust between primary care and health and social services providers; advocating for improved program access; and adapting services/programs to address access barriers and meet older adults’ needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruta Valaitis
- Aging Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, McMaster University, HSC 3N25, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S4K1, Canada.
| | - Laura Cleghorn
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Jenny Ploeg
- Aging Community and Health Research Unit, School of Nursing, McMaster University, HSC 3N25, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S4K1, Canada
| | - Cathy Risdon
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Derelie Mangin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Lisa Dolovich
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Gina Agarwal
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Doug Oliver
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Jessica Gaber
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, David Braley Health Sciences Centre, 100 Main Street West, 5th floor, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Harjit Chung
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, HSC 3N25, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S4K1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Xu W, Li Z, Pan Z, He R, Zhang L. Prevalence and associated factors of self-treatment behaviour among different elder subgroups in rural China: a cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health 2020; 19:32. [PMID: 32164667 PMCID: PMC7069192 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-1148-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Self-treatment is a common and widespread behaviour, of which the risks are multiplied in old age. However, the determinants of self-treatment among elders in rural China remain unclear. This study aims to explore the prevalence and associated factors of self-treatment among elders in rural China, trying to discover the vulnerable groups as well as the service gaps among the rural elders. Methods Based on a multi-stage stratified random sampling method, a cross-sectional household survey was conducted among 30 villages in Sinan County, an impoverished county in western China. Data were collected through a household–individual combined questionnaires. The analysis was restricted to elders who reported illness within the last 2 weeks, and the final sample size was 330 (individuals). Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed in the whole sample group and four subgroups to obtain the prevalence ratios regarding the associated factors. Results In the present study, 35.2% of the elders with illness within the last 2 weeks reported self-treatment. The variables associated with self-treatment in the whole sample group were health status (OR 6.75, 95%CI 1.93–23.60), recent alcohol consumption (OR 0.42, 95%CI 0.21–0.83) and the utilisation of family practice services (OR 0.59, 95%CI 0.36–0.96); the same predictors were found in the subgroup of elders with chronic diseases. No significant predictors were found in the subgroup of elders without chronic diseases. Empty-nest elders with higher affinity to traditional Chinese medicine (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.18–0.86) or drinking alcohol recently (OR 0.28, 95%CI 0.09–0.82) were less likely to self-treat, while the non-empty-nest elders who were no less than 75 years old (OR 3.10, 95%CI 1.33, 7.22) or at better health status (OR 9.20, 95%CI 1.73–48.75) were more likely to self-treat. Conclusion Self-treatment was prevalent among the elders in rural China. Better health status, no recent alcohol consumption and no utilisation of family practice are associated with self-treatment among rural elders. Older elders in the non-empty nest group were more likely to self-treat, while the empty-nest elders with self-care habits in traditional Chinese medicine were less likely to self-treat. Deeper understanding of the self-treatment behaviour among rural elders may provide insights for identifying the potential service gaps and developing improvement strategies in the health care delivery system for the elderly in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanchun Xu
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No 13 Hangkong Road, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Zhong Li
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No 13 Hangkong Road, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Zijing Pan
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No 13 Hangkong Road, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Ruibo He
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No 13 Hangkong Road, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Liang Zhang
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No 13 Hangkong Road, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Oksavik JD, Kirchhoff R, Sogstad MKR, Solbjør M. Sharing responsibility: municipal health professionals' approaches to goal setting with older patients with multi-morbidity - a grounded theory study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:141. [PMID: 32093653 PMCID: PMC7041090 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-4983-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent health policy promoting integrated care emphasizes to increase patients' health, experience of quality of care and reduce care utilization. Thus, health service delivery should be co-produced by health professionals and individual patients with multiple diseases and complex needs. Collaborative goal setting is a new procedure for older patients with multi-morbidity. The aim is to explore municipal health professionals' experiences of collaborative goal setting with patients with multi-morbidity aged 80 and above. METHODS A qualitative study with a constructivist grounded theory approach. In total twenty-four health professionals from several health care services in four municipalities, participated in four focus group discussions. RESULTS Health professionals took four approaches to goal setting with older patients with multi-morbidity: motivating for goals, vicariously setting goals, negotiating goals, and specifying goals. When 'motivating for goals', they educated reluctant patients to set goals. Patients' capacity or willingness to set goals could be reduced, due to old age, illness or less knowledge about the health system. Health professionals were 'vicariously setting goals' when patients did not express or take responsibility for goals due to adaptation processes to disease, or symptoms as cognitive impairment or exhaustion. By 'Negotiating goals', health professionals handled disagreements with patients, and often relatives, who expected to receive more services than usual care. They perceived some patients as passive or having unrealistic goals to improve health. 'Specifying goals' was a collaboration. Patients currently treated for one condition, set sub-goals to increase health. Patients with complex diseases prioritized one goal to maintain health. These approaches constitute a conceptual model of how health professionals, to varying extents, share responsibility for goal setting with patients. CONCLUSIONS Goal setting for patients with multi-morbidity were carried out in an interplay between patients' varying levels of engagement and health professionals' attitudes regarding to what extents patients should be responsible for pursuing the integrated health services' objectives. Even though goal setting seeks to involve patients in co-production of their health service delivery, the health services´ aims and context could restrict this co-production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannike Dyb Oksavik
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Ralf Kirchhoff
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Maren Kristine Raknes Sogstad
- The Centre for Care Research, and Department for Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Marit Solbjør
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sathanapally H, Sidhu M, Fahami R, Gillies C, Kadam U, Davies MJ, Khunti K, Seidu S. Priorities of patients with multimorbidity and of clinicians regarding treatment and health outcomes: a systematic mixed studies review. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033445. [PMID: 32051314 PMCID: PMC7045037 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify studies that have investigated the health outcome and treatment priorities of patients with multimorbidity, clinicians or both, in order to assess whether the priorities of the two groups are in alignment, or whether a disparity exists between the priorities of patients with multimorbidity and clinicians. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and Cochrane databases from inception to May 2019 using a predefined search strategy, as well as reference lists containing any relevant articles, as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane guidelines. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included studies reporting health outcome and treatment priorities of adult patients with multimorbidity, defined as suffering from two or more chronic conditions, or of clinicians in the context of multimorbidity or both. There was no restriction by study design, and studies using quantitative and/or qualitative methodologies were included. DATA SYNTHESIS We used a narrative synthesis approach to synthesise the quantitative findings, and a meta-ethnography approach to synthesise the qualitative findings. RESULTS Our search identified 24 studies for inclusion, which comprised 12 quantitative studies, 10 qualitative studies and 2 mixed-methods studies. Twelve studies reported the priorities of both patients and clinicians, 10 studies reported the priorities of patients and 2 studies reported the priorities of clinicians alone. Our findings have shown a mostly low level of agreement between the priorities of patients with multimorbidity and clinicians. We found that prioritisation by patients was mainly driven by their illness experiences, while clinicians focused on longer-term risks. Preserving functional ability emerged as a key priority for patients from across our quantitative and qualitative analyses. CONCLUSION Recognising that there may be a disparity in prioritisation and understanding the reasons for why this might occur, can facilitate clinicians in accurately eliciting the priorities that are most important to their patients and delivering patient-centred care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018076076.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Manbinder Sidhu
- School of Social Policy, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Radia Fahami
- University of Leicester Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Clare Gillies
- University of Leicester Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Umesh Kadam
- University of Leicester Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Kamlesh Khunti
- University of Leicester Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Samuel Seidu
- University of Leicester Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ngangue PA, Forgues C, Nguyen T, Sasseville M, Gallagher F, Loignon C, Stewart M, Belle Brown J, Chouinard MC, Fortin M. Patients, caregivers and health-care professionals' experience with an interdisciplinary intervention for people with multimorbidity in primary care: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2020; 23:318-327. [PMID: 32035012 PMCID: PMC7104629 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multimorbidity challenges the health‐care system and requires innovative approaches. In 2015, a 4‐month patient‐centred interdisciplinary pragmatic intervention was implemented in primary care with the aim of supporting self‐management for patients with multimorbidity. Objective To explore the perceptions and experiences of health‐care professionals, patients and their caregivers with a 4‐month patient‐centred interdisciplinary pragmatic intervention in primary care. Design A descriptive, qualitative study using semi‐structured interviews was conducted. Setting and participants A purposive sample of 30 participants was recruited from seven family medicine groups including patients, caregivers and health‐care professionals (HCPs). Interviews were analysed using Thorne's interpretive description approach. Results Findings were grouped into the benefits and challenges of participating in the intervention. The programme allowed patients to adopt realistic and adapted objectives; to customize interventions to the patient's reality; and to help patients gain confidence, improve their knowledge, skills and motivation to manage their condition. Interprofessional collaboration eased the exchange of information via team meetings and electronic medical records. Challenges were related to collaboration, communication, coordination of work and integration of newly relocated HCPs mainly due to part‐time assignments and staff turnover. HCPs part‐time schedules limited their availability and hindered patients’ follow‐up. Discussion and conclusion This intervention was useful and rewarding from the HCPs, patients and caregivers’ perspective. However, to ensure the success of this complex interdisciplinary intervention, implementers and managers should anticipate organizational barriers such as availability and time management of relocated HCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrice Alain Ngangue
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Catherine Forgues
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Tu Nguyen
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Maxime Sasseville
- Department of health sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada
| | - Frances Gallagher
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Christine Loignon
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Moira Stewart
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Judith Belle Brown
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| | | | - Martin Fortin
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bernard L, Ecochard R, Gueyffier F, Letrilliart L. Drug prescription goals in primary care: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:6. [PMID: 31898496 PMCID: PMC6941394 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4870-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care goals are often implicit, although their identification is a key element of any prescription process. This study aimed to describe the clinical goals of drug prescriptions in general practice, their determinants and the agreement between physicians and patients. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study conducted by 11 resident trainees acting as observers in 23 general practices. The residents recorded the indication and main physician's goal for all drugs prescribed during five consultation days in each practice in December 2015, and the main patient's goal for a sub-sample of consultations. We used an eight-category generic classification of prescription goals, including three specific (mortality, morbidity and cure), three non-specific (symptoms, quality of life, functioning) and two non-specified (other goal, no goal) categories. Analyses were based on a multivariable, multilevel model and on the kappa statistic applied to the sub-sample of consultations. RESULTS The sample encompassed 2141 consultations and 5036 drugs. The main physicians' goal of drug prescriptions was to relieve symptoms (43.3%). The other goals were to decrease the risk of morbidity (22.4%), to cure disease (11.7%), to improve quality of life (10.6%), to decrease the risk of mortality (8.5%) and to improve functioning (1.8%). The choice of a specific goal was more frequent in patients with the following characteristics: over 50 (OR [1.09;1.15]), of male gender (OR [1.09;1.39]), with full financial coverage for a long-term condition (OR [1.47;1.97]), known by the physician (OR [1.19;2.23]), or with a somatic health problem (OR [2.56;4.17]). Cohen's kappa for drug prescription goals between the patients and the physicians was 0.26 (0.23-0.30). CONCLUSIONS Physicians' goals are poorly shared with patients. It remains to be assessed whether it is possible to collect and discuss information on prescription goals on a daily basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Bernard
- Univ. Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Collège universitaire de médecine générale, F-69008 Lyon, France
| | - René Ecochard
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Biostatistique-Bioinformatique, Lyon, France
- Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
- Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, Équipe Biostatistique-Santé, CNRS, Villeurbanne, France
| | - François Gueyffier
- UMR5558, service de pharmacologie et toxicologie, faculté Laennec, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Letrilliart
- Univ. Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Collège universitaire de médecine générale, F-69008 Lyon, France
- Univ. Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, HESPER EA 7425, F-69008 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gonzalez AI, Schmucker C, Nothacker J, Motschall E, Nguyen TS, Brueckle MS, Blom J, van den Akker M, Röttger K, Wegwarth O, Hoffmann T, Straus SE, Gerlach FM, Meerpohl JJ, Muth C. Health-related preferences of older patients with multimorbidity: an evidence map. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e034485. [PMID: 31843855 PMCID: PMC6924802 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically identify knowledge clusters and research gaps in the health-related preferences of older patients with multimorbidity by mapping current evidence. DESIGN Evidence map (systematic review variant). DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, CINAHL and Science Citation Index/Social Science Citation Index/-Expanded from inception to April 2018. STUDY SELECTION Studies reporting primary research on health-related preferences of older patients (mean age ≥60 years) with multimorbidity (≥2 chronic/acute conditions). DATA EXTRACTION Two independent reviewers assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data and clustered the studies using MAXQDA-18 content analysis software. RESULTS The 152 included studies (62% from North America, 28% from Europe) comprised 57 093 patients overall (range 9-9105). All used an observational design except for one interventional study: 63 (41%) were qualitative (59 cross-sectional, 4 longitudinal), 85 (57%) quantitative (63 cross-sectional, 22 longitudinal) and 3 (2%) used mixed methods. The setting was specialised care in 85 (56%) and primary care in 54 (36%) studies. We identified seven clusters of studies on preferences: end-of-life care (n=51, 34%), self-management (n=34, 22%), treatment (n=32, 21%), involvement in shared decision making (n=25, 17%), health outcome prioritisation/goal setting (n=19, 13%), healthcare service (n=12, 8%) and screening/diagnostic testing (n=1, 1%). Terminology (eg, preferences, views and perspectives) and concepts (eg, trade-offs, decision regret, goal setting) used to describe health-related preferences varied substantially between studies. CONCLUSION Our study provides the first evidence map on the preferences of older patients with multimorbidity. Included studies were mostly conducted in developed countries and covered a broad range of issues. Evidence on patient preferences concerning decision-making on screening and diagnostic testing was scarce. Differences in employed terminology, decision-making components and concepts, as well as the sparsity of intervention studies, are challenges for future research into evidence-based decision support seeking to elicit the preferences of older patients with multimorbidity and help them construct preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Open Science Framework (OSF): DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/MCRWQ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Isabel Gonzalez
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas, Madrid, Spain
| | - Christine Schmucker
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Julia Nothacker
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Edith Motschall
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Truc Sophia Nguyen
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
| | - Maria-Sophie Brueckle
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
| | - Jeanet Blom
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Marjan van den Akker
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
| | - Kristian Röttger
- Patient Representative, Federal Joint Committee, Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, Berlin, Germany
| | - Odette Wegwarth
- Center for Adaptative Rationality, Max-Planck-Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tammy Hoffmann
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ferdinand M Gerlach
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Christiane Muth
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Millar E, Stanley J, Gurney J, Stairmand J, Davies C, Semper K, Dowell A, Lawrenson R, Mangin D, Sarfati D. Effect of multimorbidity on health service utilisation and health care experiences. J Prim Health Care 2019; 10:44-53. [PMID: 30068451 DOI: 10.1071/hc17074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multimorbidity, the co-existence of two or more long-term conditions, is associated with poor quality of life, high health care costs and contributes to ethnic health inequality in New Zealand (NZ). Health care delivery remains largely focused on management of single diseases, creating major challenges for patients and clinicians. AIM To understand the experiences of people with multimorbidity in the NZ health care system. METHODS A questionnaire was sent to 758 people with multimorbidity from two primary health care organisations (PHOs). Outcomes were compared to general population estimates from the NZ Health Survey. RESULTS Participants (n = 234, 31% response rate) reported that their general practitioners (GPs) respected their opinions, involved them in decision-making and knew their medical history well. The main barriers to effective care were short GP appointments, availability and affordability of primary and secondary health care, and poor communication between clinicians. Access issues were higher than for the general population. DISCUSSION Participants generally had very positive opinions of primary care and their GP, but encountered structural issues with the health system that created barriers to effective care. These results support the value of ongoing changes to primary care models, with a focus on patient-centred care to address access and care coordination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinor Millar
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - James Stanley
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jason Gurney
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jeannine Stairmand
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | - Kelly Semper
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Anthony Dowell
- Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | - Dee Mangin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diana Sarfati
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Going Beyond the Guidelines in Individualising the Use of Antihypertensive Drugs in Older Patients. Drugs Aging 2019; 36:675-685. [PMID: 31175614 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-019-00683-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Hypertension is commonly diagnosed in older patients, with increasing cardiovascular (CV) risk as systolic blood pressure (BP) increases. Maximising CV risk reduction must be reconciled with minimising the risk of treatment-related harms and burden, especially among frail, multi-morbid and older old patients who have been excluded from most randomised trials. Contemporary clinical guidelines, based on such trials, differ in their recommendations as to threshold levels warranting treatment with antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) and target levels that should be achieved. In optimising AHD prescribing in older patients, we propose the following decision framework: decide therapeutic goals in accordance with patient characteristics and preferences; estimate absolute CV risk; measure and profile BP accurately in ways that account for lability in BP levels and minimise error in BP measurement; determine threshold and target BP levels likely to confer net benefit, taking into account age, co-morbidities, frailty and cognitive function; and consider situations that warrant AHD deprescribing on the basis of potential current or future harm. In applying this framework to older persons, and based on a review of relevant randomised trials and observational studies, individuals most likely to benefit from treating systolic BP to no less than 130 mmHg are those of any age who are fit and have high baseline systolic BP (≥ 160 mmHg); high CV risk, i.e. established CV disease or risk of CV events exceeding 20% at 10 years; previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack; heart failure; and stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease with proteinuria. Individuals most likely to be harmed from treating BP to target systolic < 140 mmHg are those who have no CV disease and aged over 80 years; moderate to severe frailty, cognitive impairment or functional limitations; labile BP and/or history of orthostatic hypotension, syncope and falls; or life expectancy < 12 months. Treatment should never be so intense as to reduce diastolic BP to < 60 mmHg in any older person. At a time when guidelines are calling for less conservative management of hypertension in all age groups, we contend that a more temperate approach, such as that offered here and based on the totality of available evidence, may assist in maximising net benefit in older patients.
Collapse
|
32
|
Ploeg J, Yous ML, Fraser K, Dufour S, Baird LG, Kaasalainen S, McAiney C, Markle-Reid M. Healthcare providers' experiences in supporting community-living older adults to manage multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19:316. [PMID: 31744477 PMCID: PMC6862842 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1345-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC), the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions, is becoming more prevalent as the population ages. Primary care and home care providers play key roles in caring for older adults with MCC such as facilitating complex care decisions, shared decision-making, and access to community health and support services. While there is some research on the perceptions and experiences of these providers in caring for this population, much of this literature is focused specifically on family physicians. Little is known about the experiences of other primary care and home care providers from multiple disciplines who care for this vulnerable group. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of primary and home care healthcare providers in supporting the care of older adults with MCC living in the community, and identify ways of improving care delivery and outcomes for this group. Methods The study used an interpretive descriptive design. A total of 42 healthcare providers from two provinces in Canada (Ontario and Alberta) participated in individual semi-structured, face-to-face 60-min interviews. Participants represented diverse disciplines from primary care and home care settings. Inductive thematic analysis was used for data analysis. Results The experiences and recommendations of healthcare providers managing care for older adults with MCC were organized into six major themes: (1) managing complexity associated with MCC, (2) implementing person-centred care, (3), supporting caregivers, (4) using a team approach for holistic care delivery, (5) encountering challenges and rewards, and (6) recommending ways to address the challenges of the healthcare system. Healthcare providers identified the need for a more comprehensive, integrated system of care to improve the delivery of care and outcomes for older adults with MCC and their family caregivers. Conclusions Study findings suggest that community-based healthcare providers are using many relevant and appropriate strategies to support older adults living with the complexity of MCC, such as implementing person-centred care, supporting caregivers, working collaboratively with other providers, and addressing social determinants of health. However, they also identified the need for a more comprehensive, integrated system of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Ploeg
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Associate Member, Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Marie-Lee Yous
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences and Associate Member, Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Kimberly Fraser
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca, AB, T9S 3A3, Canada
| | - Sinéad Dufour
- School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, IAHS -403, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Lisa Garland Baird
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, C1A4P3, Charlottetown, PEI, Canada
| | - Sharon Kaasalainen
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca, AB, T9S 3A3, Canada
| | - Carrie McAiney
- Schlegel Research Chair in Dementia, School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Maureen Markle-Reid
- Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ten Koppel M, Pasman HRW, van der Steen JT, van Hout HPJ, Kylänen M, Van den Block L, Smets T, Deliens L, Gambassi G, Froggatt K, Szczerbińska K, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Consensus on treatment for residents in long-term care facilities: perspectives from relatives and care staff in the PACE cross-sectional study in 6 European countries. BMC Palliat Care 2019; 18:73. [PMID: 31464624 PMCID: PMC6714096 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-019-0459-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In long-term care facilities often many care providers are involved, which could make it difficult to reach consensus in care. This may harm the relation between care providers and can complicate care. This study aimed to describe and compare in six European countries the degree of consensus among everyone involved in care decisions, from the perspective of relatives and care staff. Another aim was to assess which factors are associated with reporting that full consensus was reached, from the perspective of care staff and relatives. Methods In Belgium, England, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland a random sample of representative long-term care facilities reported all deaths of residents in the previous three months (n = 1707). This study included residents about whom care staff (n = 1284) and relatives (n = 790) indicated in questionnaires the degree of consensus among all involved in the decision or care process. To account for clustering on facility level, Generalized Estimating Equations were conducted to analyse the degree of consensus across countries and factors associated with full consensus. Results Relatives indicated full consensus in more than half of the residents in all countries (NL 57.9% - EN 68%), except in Finland (40.7%). Care staff reported full consensus in 59.5% of residents in Finland to 86.1% of residents in England. Relatives more likely reported full consensus when: the resident was more comfortable or talked about treatment preferences, a care provider explained what palliative care is, family-physician communication was well perceived, their relation to the resident was other than child (compared to spouse/partner) or if they lived in Poland or Belgium (compared to Finland). Care staff more often indicated full consensus when they rated a higher comfort level of the resident, or if they lived in Italy, the Netherland, Poland or England (compared to Finland). Conclusions In most countries the frequency of full consensus among all involved in care decisions was relatively high. Across countries care staff indicated full consensus more often and no consensus less often than relatives. Advance care planning, comfort and good communication between relatives and care professionals could play a role in achieving full consensus. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-019-0459-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ten Koppel
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - H R W Pasman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J T van der Steen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H P J van Hout
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Kylänen
- National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie, 166, Helsinki, Finland
| | - L Van den Block
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan, 103, Brussels, Belgium
| | - T Smets
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan, 103, Brussels, Belgium
| | - L Deliens
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan, 103, Brussels, Belgium
| | - G Gambassi
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito 1, Rome, Italy
| | - K Froggatt
- International Observatory on End-of-Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK
| | - K Szczerbińska
- Unit for Research on Aging Society, Department of Sociology of Medicine, Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Chair, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, ul. Kopernika 7a, Krakow, Poland
| | - B D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Porat T, Marshall IJ, Sadler E, Vadillo MA, McKevitt C, Wolfe CDA, Curcin V. Collaborative design of a decision aid for stroke survivors with multimorbidity: a qualitative study in the UK engaging key stakeholders. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030385. [PMID: 31420396 PMCID: PMC6701575 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Effective secondary stroke prevention strategies are suboptimally used. Novel development of interventions to enable healthcare professionals and stroke survivors to manage risk factors for stroke recurrence are required. We sought to engage key stakeholders in the design and evaluation of an intervention informed by a learning health system approach, to improve risk factor management and secondary prevention for stroke survivors with multimorbidity. DESIGN Qualitative, including focus groups, semistructured interviews and usability evaluations. Data was audio recorded, transcribed and coded thematically. PARTICIPANTS Stroke survivors, carers, health and social care professionals, commissioners, policymakers and researchers. SETTING Stroke survivors were recruited from the South London Stroke Register; health and social care professionals through South London general practices and King's College London (KCL) networks; carers, commissioners, policymakers and researchers through KCL networks. RESULTS 53 stakeholders in total participated in focus groups, interviews and usability evaluations. Thirty-seven participated in focus groups and interviews, including stroke survivors and carers (n=11), health and social care professionals (n=16), commissioners and policymakers (n=6) and researchers (n=4). Sixteen participated in usability evaluations, including stroke survivors (n=8) and general practitioners (GPs; n=8). Eight themes informed the collaborative design of DOTT (Deciding On Treatments Together), a decision aid integrated with the electronic health record system, to be used in primary care during clinical consultations between the healthcare professional and stroke survivor. DOTT aims to facilitate shared decision-making on personalised treatments leading to improved treatment adherence and risk control. DOTT was found acceptable and usable among stroke survivors and GPs during a series of evaluations. CONCLUSIONS Adopting a user-centred data-driven design approach informed an intervention that is acceptable to users and has the potential to improve patient outcomes. A future feasibility study and subsequent clinical trial will provide evidence of the effectiveness of DOTT in reducing risk of stroke recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talya Porat
- Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Iain J Marshall
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Euan Sadler
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, UK
| | - Miguel A Vadillo
- Departamento de Psicología Básica, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Christopher McKevitt
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Charles D A Wolfe
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Vasa Curcin
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Since the population continues ageing and the number of patients with multiple chronic diseases is rising in Western countries, a shift is recommended from disease oriented towards goal-oriented healthcare. As little is known about individual goals and preferences of older hospitalised patients, the aim of this study is to elucidate the goals of a diverse group of older hospitalised patients. DESIGN Qualitative descriptive method with open interviews analysed with inductive content analysis. SETTING A university teaching hospital and a regional teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-eight hospitalised patients aged 70 years and older. RESULTS Some older hospitalised patients initially had difficulties describing concrete goals, but after probing all were able to state more concrete goals. A great diversity of goals were categorised into wanting to know what the matter is, controlling disease, staying alive, improving condition, alleviating complaints, improving daily functioning, improving/maintaining social functioning, resuming work/hobbies and regaining/maintaining autonomy. CONCLUSIONS Older hospitalised patients have a diversity of goals in different domains. Discussing goals with older patients is not a common practice yet. Timely discussions about goals should be encouraged because individual goals are not self-evident and this discussion can guide decision making, especially in patients with multimorbidity and frailty. Aids can be helpful to facilitate the discussion about goals and evaluate the outcomes of hospitalisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Johanna van der Kluit
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Geriatric Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Geke J Dijkstra
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, Applied Health Research, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sophia E de Rooij
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Geriatric Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Price ML, Surr CA, Gough B, Ashley L. Experiences and support needs of informal caregivers of people with multimorbidity: a scoping literature review. Psychol Health 2019; 35:36-69. [PMID: 31321995 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1626125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Describe and synthesise existing published research on the experiences and support needs of informal caregivers of people with multimorbidity.Design: Scoping literature review. Primary database and secondary searches for qualitative and/or quantitative English-language research with an explicit focus on informal carers of people with multimorbidity (no date restrictions). Quality appraisal of included papers. Thematic analysis to identify key themes in the findings of included papers.Results: Thirty-four papers (reporting on 27 studies) were eligible for inclusion, the majority of which were rated good quality, and almost half of which were published from 2015 onwards. The review highlights common difficulties for informal carers of people with multiple chronic illnesses, including practical challenges related to managing multiple health care teams, appointments, medications and side effects, and psychosocial challenges including high levels of psychological symptomatology and reduced social connectedness. Current gaps in the literature include very few studies of interventions which may help support this caregiver group.Conclusion: Interest in this research area is burgeoning. Future work might fruitfully examine the potential benefits of audio-recorded health care consultations, and digitally delivered psychosocial interventions such as online peer support forums, for supporting and enhancing the caring activities and wellbeing of this caregiver group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mollie L Price
- School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire A Surr
- School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Brendan Gough
- School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| | - Laura Ashley
- School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Barton JL, Hulen E, Schue A, Yelin EH, Ono SS, Tuepker A, Koenig CJ. Experience and Context Shape Patient and Clinician Goals For Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Qualitative Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 70:1614-1620. [PMID: 29438606 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Alignment of patient and clinician goals, which is central to effective patient-centered care, has been linked to improved patient experience and outcomes but has not been explored in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to analyze goal conceptualization among RA patients and clinicians. METHODS Seven focus groups and 1 semi-structured interview were conducted with RA patients and clinicians who were recruited from 4 rheumatology clinics. An interview guide was developed to explore goal concordance related to RA treatment. Researchers utilized a concurrent deductive-inductive data analysis approach. RESULTS Nineteen patients (mean age 55 years, 74% female, 32% non-white, and 26% Spanish-speaking) and 18 clinicians (44% trainees, 44% female, 28% non-white) participated. Across clinician and patient focus groups, the 2 identified domains were patient knowledge of RA and psychosocial dynamics (stress) in RA treatment. Within the knowledge domain, 3 themes emerged: RA knowledge for informed choice, RA knowledge to ensure adherence and medication safety, and clinician assumption of patient inability to interpret information. Within the second domain of RA and stress, 2 themes emerged: patient illness experience informs treatment context in ways that are not shared by clinicians, and the impact of patient-clinician communication and decision-making on goal concordance. CONCLUSION Knowledge is a shared goal, but RA patients and clinicians hold divergent attitudes towards this goal. While knowledge is integral to self-management and effective shared decision-making, mismatches in attitudes may lead to suboptimal communication. Tools to support patient goal-directed RA care may promote high quality patient-centered care and result in reduced disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Barton
- Oregon Health & Science University and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | | | - Sarah S Ono
- Oregon Health & Science University and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | - Anais Tuepker
- Oregon Health & Science University and VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| | - Christopher J Koenig
- San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, and VA San Francisco Health Care System, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ploeg J, Canesi M, D Fraser K, McAiney C, Kaasalainen S, Markle-Reid M, Dufour S, Garland Baird L, Chambers T. Experiences of community-dwelling older adults living with multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e023345. [PMID: 30898800 PMCID: PMC6475239 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to understand the experiences of living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) from the perspective of community-living older adults with MCC. DESIGN A qualitative study using an interpretive description approach. SETTING Participants were recruited from southern Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS 21 community-living, older adults (≥65 years) with an average of 7.4 chronic conditions including one of diabetes, dementia or stroke. METHODS Data were collected through digitally-recorded, in-depth, semi-structured in-person interviews. Interview transcripts were analysed and coded using Thorne's interpretive description approach. RESULTS Five themes were identified representing older adults' experiences of living with MCC: (a) trying to stay healthy while living with MCC, (b) depending on family caregivers for support with just about everything, (c) paying the high costs of living with MCC, (d) making healthcare decisions by proxy and (e) receiving healthcare services that do not address the complex needs of persons living with MCC. CONCLUSIONS The experience of living with MCC in the community was complex and multi-faceted. The need for a person-centred and family-centred approach to care in the community, which includes the coordination of health and social services that are tailored to the needs of older adults and their informal caregivers, was underscored. Such an approach would facilitate improved information-sharing and discussion of care management options between health professionals and their patients, enable older adults with MCC to actively engage in priority-setting and decision-making and may result in improved health and quality of life for older adults with MCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Ploeg
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marta Canesi
- School of Nursing, Universita degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Kimberly D Fraser
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Carrie McAiney
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Maureen Markle-Reid
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sinead Dufour
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Tracey Chambers
- School of Nursing, Aging, Community and Health Research Unit, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cavers D, Habets L, Cunningham-Burley S, Watson E, Banks E, Campbell C. Living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: a qualitative systematic review and evidence synthesis. J Cancer Surviv 2019; 13:148-159. [PMID: 30685822 PMCID: PMC6394454 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-019-0734-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To identify the qualitative evidence on the experience of cancer and comorbid illness from the perspective of patients, carers and health care professionals to identify psycho-social support needs, experience of health care, and to highlight areas where more research is needed. Methods A qualitative systematic review following PRISMA guidance. Relevant research databases were searched using an exhaustive list of search terms. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and discussed variations. Included articles were subject to quality appraisal before data extraction of article characteristics and findings. Thomas and Harden’s thematic synthesis of extracted findings was undertaken. Results Thirty-one articles were included in the review, covering a range of cancer types and comorbid conditions; with varying time since cancer diagnosis and apparent severity of disease for both cancer and other conditions. The majority of studies were published after 2010 and in high income countries. Few studies focused exclusively on the experience of living with comorbid conditions alongside cancer; such that evidence was limited. Key themes identified included the interaction between cancer and comorbid conditions, symptom experience, illness identities and ageing, self-management and the role of primary and secondary care. Conclusions In addition to a better understanding of the complex experience of cancer and comorbidity, the review will combine with research prioritisation work with consumers to inform an interview study with the defined patient group. Implications for Cancer Survivors Expanding this evidence base will help to illuminate developing models of cancer patient-centred follow-up care for the large proportion of patients with comorbid conditions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11764-019-0734-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Cavers
- Usher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
| | - Liset Habets
- Leiden University Medical Center, University of Leiden, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, Leiden, ZA, Netherlands
| | - Sarah Cunningham-Burley
- Medical and Family Sociology, Usher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| | - Eila Watson
- Supportive Cancer Care, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Jack Straws Lane, Marston, Oxford, OX3 0FL, UK
| | - Elspeth Banks
- , 1 Carnwath Lane, Carluke, South Lanarkshire, ML8 4QU, UK
| | - Christine Campbell
- Usher Institute, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mudge AM, Hubbard RE. Management of frail older people with acute illness. Intern Med J 2019; 49:28-33. [DOI: 10.1111/imj.14182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Revised: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alison M. Mudge
- Department of Internal Medicine and Aged Care; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital; Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Ruth E. Hubbard
- Centre for Health Services Research; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Queensland Australia
- PA-Southside Clinical Unit, School of Clinical Medicine; The University of Queensland; Brisbane Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Waller A, Turon H, Bryant J, Zucca A, Evans TJ, Sanson-Fisher R. Medical oncology outpatients' preferences and experiences with advanced care planning: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:63. [PMID: 30642289 PMCID: PMC6332530 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5272-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical oncology outpatients are a group for whom advance care planning (ACP) activities are particularly relevant. Patient views can help prioritise areas for improving end of life communication. The study aimed to determine in a sample of medical oncology outpatients: (1) the perceived importance of participating in ACP activities; (2) the proportion of patients who have ever participated in ACP activities; and (3) the proportion of patients who had not yet participated in ACP activities who were willing to do so in next month. METHODS Adult medical oncology outpatients in two Australian cancer treatment centres were consecutively approached to complete a pen-and-paper survey. Items explored perceived importance, previous participation, and willingness to participate across key ACP activities including: discussing wishes with their family or doctor; recording wishes in a written document; appointing a substitute decision maker (SDM); and discussing life-expectancy. RESULTS 185 participants completed the survey (51% consent rate). Most patients agreed it was important to: discuss end of life wishes with family (85%) and doctors (70%) and formally record wishes (73%). Few had discussed end of life wishes with a doctor (11%), recorded their wishes (15%); chosen a SDM (28%); discussed life expectancy (30%); or discussed end of life wishes with family (30%). Among those who had not participated in ACP, most were willing to discuss life expectancy (66%); discuss end of life wishes with family (57%) and a doctor (55%); and formally record wishes (56%) in the next month. Fewer wanted to appoint a SDM (40%). CONCLUSION Although medical oncology outpatients perceive ACP activities are important, rates of uptake are relatively low. The willingness of many patients to engage in ACP activities suggests a gap in current ACP practice. Efforts should focus on ensuring patients and families have clarity about the legal and other ramifications of ACP activities, and better education and training of health care providers in initiating conversations about end of life issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Heidi Turon
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Jamie Bryant
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Alison Zucca
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Tiffany-Jane Evans
- Clinical Research Design and Statistics Support Unit, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
The decision-making process for unplanned admission to hospital unveiled in hospitalised older adults: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18:318. [PMID: 30577791 PMCID: PMC6303984 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-1013-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The hazards of hospitalisation, and the growing demand for goal-oriented care and shared decision making, increasingly question whether hospitalisation always aligns with the preferences and needs of older adults. Although decision models are described comprehensively in the literature, little is understood about how the decision for hospitalisation is made in real life situations, especially under acute conditions. The aim of this qualitative study was to gain insight into how the decision to hospitalise was made from the perspective of the older patient who was unplanned admitted to hospital. METHODS Open interviews were conducted with 21 older hospitalised patients and/or their next of kin about the decision-making process leading to hospitalisation. Data were analysed according to the Constructivist Grounded Theory approach. RESULTS Although a period of complaints preceded the decision to unplanned hospitalisation, ranging from hours to years, the decision to hospitalise was always taken acutely. In all cases, there was an acute moment in which the home as a care environment was no longer considered adequate. This conclusion was based on a combination of factors including factors related to complaints, general practitioner and home environment. Three parties were involved in this assessment: the patient, his next of kin and the general practitioner. At the same time, a very positive value was attributed towards the hospital. Depending on the assessment of the home as care environment by the various parties, there were four routes to hospitalisation: referral, shared, demanding and bypassing. CONCLUSIONS For all participants, the decision to hospitalisation was taken acutely, even if the problems evoking admission were not acute, but present for a longer period. Participants saw admission as inevitable, due to the negative perceptions of the care environment at home at that moment, combined with the positive expectations of hospital care. Advance care planning, nor shared decision making were rarely seen in these interviews. An ethical dilemma occurred when the next of kin consented to hospitalisation against the wishes of the patient. More attention for participation of older adults in decision making and their goals is recommended.
Collapse
|
43
|
Jennings LA, Ramirez KD, Hays RD, Wenger NS, Reuben DB. Personalized Goal Attainment in Dementia Care: Measuring What Persons with Dementia and Their Caregivers Want. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66:2120-2127. [PMID: 30298901 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a process of goal-setting and measurement of goal attainment in a dementia care management program. DESIGN Observational. SETTING Dementia care management program in an urban academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS Persons with dementia (N=101) and their caregivers; nurse practitioner dementia care managers (N=5). INTERVENTION Specification of a personalized health goal and action plan and measurement of goal attainment using goal attainment scaling in a clinical care visit. MEASUREMENTS Goal attainment at 6 and 12 months; focus groups of 5 dementia care managers. RESULTS Eighty-four percent of participant goals were nonmedical, 47% were related to quality of life, and 29% were caregiver support goals. Eighty-eight percent of participants felt that the goal they set was meaningful and 74% that the goal-setting process captured something different from usual care, and 85% found the process helpful in planning for future care. At 6 months, 74% of dyads had achieved or exceeded their expected level of goal attainment. Dementia care managers felt that the goal-setting process improved their understanding of what was most important to the patient, helped set expectations about disease progression and care needs, and provided positive reinforcement when goals were accomplished and an opportunity for revision when goals were not met. CONCLUSION Goal setting using goal attainment scaling can be incorporated into the care of persons with dementia to establish and attain person-centered goals. Research is needed to further develop personalized goal attainment as an outcome measure for dementia care. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2120-2127, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee A Jennings
- Reynolds Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Karina D Ramirez
- Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ron D Hays
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Neil S Wenger
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - David B Reuben
- Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
McGilton KS, Vellani S, Yeung L, Chishtie J, Commisso E, Ploeg J, Andrew MK, Ayala AP, Gray M, Morgan D, Chow AF, Parrott E, Stephens D, Hale L, Keatings M, Walker J, Wodchis WP, Dubé V, McElhaney J, Puts M. Identifying and understanding the health and social care needs of older adults with multiple chronic conditions and their caregivers: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18:231. [PMID: 30285641 PMCID: PMC6167839 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0925-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the population is aging, the number of persons living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) is expected to increase. This review seeks to answer two research questions from the perspectives of older adults with MCC, their caregivers and their health care providers (HCPs): 1) What are the health and social care needs of community-dwelling older adults with MCC and their caregivers? and 2) How do social and structural determinants of health impact these health and social care needs? METHODS We conducted a scoping review guided by a refinement of the Arksey & O'Malley framework. Articles were included if participants were 55 years or older and have at least two chronic conditions. We searched 7 electronic databases. The data were summarized using thematic analysis. RESULTS Thirty-six studies were included in this review: 28 studies included participants with MCC; 12 studies included HCPs; 5 studies included caregivers. The quality of the studies ranged from moderate to good. Five main areas of needs were identified: need for information; coordination of services and supports; preventive, maintenance and restorative strategies; training for older adults, caregivers and HCPs to help manage the older adults' complex conditions; and the need for person-centred approaches. Structural and social determinants of health such as socioeconomic status, education and access influenced the needs of older adults with MCC. CONCLUSION The review highlights that most of the needs of older adults with MCC focus on lack of access to information and coordination of care. The main structural and social determinants that influenced older adults' needs were their level of education/health literacy and their socioeconomic status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine S McGilton
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M6K 2R7 416 597 3422 (2500), Canada.
| | - Shirin Vellani
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lily Yeung
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jawad Chishtie
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M6K 2R7 416 597 3422 (2500), Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elana Commisso
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jenny Ploeg
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Melissa K Andrew
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Ana Patricia Ayala
- Gerstein Information Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mikaela Gray
- Gerstein Information Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Debra Morgan
- Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Amanda Froehlich Chow
- Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | | | | - Lori Hale
- The Change Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Veronique Dubé
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Janet McElhaney
- Health Sciences North Research Institute and Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sentell TL, Shen C, Landsittel D, Mays MH, Southerland J, King MH, Taira DA. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Those Accompanying Medicare Patients to the Doctor: Insights from the 2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary's Survey. J Immigr Minor Health 2018; 20:776-783. [PMID: 28405871 PMCID: PMC5656534 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-017-0582-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Surprisingly little current, population-level detail exists regarding companion accompaniment for health care among Medicare beneficiaries, particularly by race/ethnicity. For respondents in the 2013 Medicare Current Beneficiary's Survey Access to Care public use data (N = 12,253), multivariable models predicted accompaniment to the doctor by race/ethnicity, adjusting for confounders. Chi square analyses compared, by race/ethnicity, who was accompanying and why. Overall, 37.5% of beneficiaries had accompaniment. In multivariable analyses, non-Hispanic blacks (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.03-1.36) and Hispanics (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.25-1.74) were significantly more likely than non-Hispanic whites to have accompaniment. Over 35% of all three groups had someone to "take notes," "ask questions," and/or "explain things," which did not vary by race/ethnicity; significant differences were seen for "explain instructions," "translate," and "moral support." Hispanics had the highest percentages for all three. Many Medicare beneficiaries have accompaniment to doctors' appointments, particularly in minority racial/ethnic groups, which should be considered in policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetine Lynn Sentell
- Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 1960 East-West Road, Biomed D104-G, Honolulu, HI, 96821, USA.
| | - Chengli Shen
- Section on Biomarkers and Prediction Modeling, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Doug Landsittel
- Section on Biomarkers and Prediction Modeling, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mary Helen Mays
- Puerto Rico Clinical and Translational Research Consortium, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, PR, USA
| | | | | | - Deborah A Taira
- Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy, University of Hawai'i at Hilo, Hilo, HI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bunn F, Goodman C, Russell B, Wilson P, Manthorpe J, Rait G, Hodkinson I, Durand MA. Supporting shared decision-making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundHealth-care systems are increasingly moving towards more integrated approaches. Shared decision-making (SDM) is central to these models but may be complicated by the need to negotiate and communicate decisions between multiple providers, as well as patients and their family carers; this is particularly the case for older people with complex needs.ObjectivesTo provide a context-relevant understanding of how models to facilitate SDM might work for older people with multiple health and care needs and how they might be applied to integrated care models.DesignRealist synthesis following Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) publication standards.ParticipantsTwenty-four stakeholders took part in interviews.Data sourcesElectronic databases including MEDLINE (via PubMed), The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google and Google Scholar (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). Lateral searches were also carried out. All types of evidence were included.Review methodsIterative stakeholder-driven, three-stage approach, involving (1) scoping of the literature and stakeholder interviews (n = 13) to develop initial programme theory/ies, (2) systematic searches for evidence to test and develop the theories and (3) validation of programme theory/ies with stakeholders (n = 11).ResultsWe included 88 papers, of which 29 focused on older people or people with complex needs. We identified four theories (context–mechanism–outcome configurations) that together provide an account of what needs to be in place for SDM to work for older people with complex needs: understanding and assessing patient and carer values and capacity to access and use care; organising systems to support and prioritise SDM; supporting and preparing patients and family carers to engage in SDM; and a person-centred culture of which SDM is a part. Programmes likely to be successful in promoting SDM are those that create trust between those involved, allow service users to feel that they are respected and understood, and engender confidence to engage in SDM.LimitationsThere is a lack of evidence on interventions to promote SDM in older people with complex needs or on interprofessional approaches to SDM.ConclusionsModels of SDM for older people with complex health and care needs should be conceptualised as a series of conversations that patients, and their family carers, may have with a variety of different health and care professionals. To embed SDM in practice requires a shift from a biomedical focus to a more person-centred ethos. Service providers are likely to need support, both in terms of the way services are organised and delivered and in terms of their own continuing professional development. Older people with complex needs may need support to engage in SDM. How this support is best provided needs further exploration, although face-to-face interactions and ongoing patient–professional relationships are key.Future workThere is a need for further work to establish how organisational structures can be better aligned to meet the requirements of older people with complex needs. This includes a need to define and evaluate the contribution that different members of health and care teams can make to SDM for older people with complex health and care needs.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016039013.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Bunn
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Bridget Russell
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Patricia Wilson
- Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Greta Rait
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London Medical School (Royal Free Campus), London, UK
| | - Isabel Hodkinson
- Tower Hamlets Clinical Commissioning Group, The Tredegar Practice, London, UK
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Preference Laboratory, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bunn F, Goodman C, Russell B, Wilson P, Manthorpe J, Rait G, Hodkinson I, Durand MA. Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18:165. [PMID: 30021527 PMCID: PMC6052575 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0853-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care systems are increasingly moving towards more integrated approaches. Shared decision making (SDM) is central to these models but may be complicated by the need to negotiate and communicate decisions between multiple providers, as well as patients and their family carers; particularly for older people with complex needs. The aim of this review was to provide a context relevant understanding of how interventions to facilitate SDM might work for older people with multiple health and care needs, and how they might be applied in integrated care models. METHODS Iterative, stakeholder driven, realist synthesis following RAMESES publication standards. It involved: 1) scoping literature and stakeholder interviews (n = 13) to develop initial programme theory/ies, 2) systematic searches for evidence to test and develop the theories, and 3) validation of programme theory/ies with stakeholders (n = 11). We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google, Google Scholar, and undertook lateral searches. All types of evidence were included. RESULTS We included 88 papers; 29 focused on older people or people with complex needs. We identified four context-mechanism-outcome configurations that together provide an account of what needs to be in place for SDM to work for older people with complex needs. This includes: understanding and assessing patient and carer values and capacity to access and use care, organising systems to support and prioritise SDM, supporting and preparing patients and family carers to engage in SDM and a person-centred culture of which SDM is a part. Programmes likely to be successful in promoting SDM are those that allow older people to feel that they are respected and understood, and that engender confidence to engage in SDM. CONCLUSIONS To embed SDM in practice requires a radical shift from a biomedical focus to a more person-centred ethos. Service providers will need support to change their professional behaviour and to better organise and deliver services. Face to face interactions, permission and space to discuss options, and continuity of patient-professional relationships are key in supporting older people with complex needs to engage in SDM. Future research needs to focus on inter-professional approaches to SDM and how families and carers are involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Bunn
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB UK
| | - Bridget Russell
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB UK
| | - Patricia Wilson
- Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, George Allen Wing, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London, Strand, London, WC2B 4LL UK
| | - Greta Rait
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Medical School (Royal Free Campus), Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
| | - Isabel Hodkinson
- Tower Hamlets Clinical Commissioning Group, The Tredegar Practice, London, E3 5JD UK
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Preference Laboratory, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Level 5, Williamson Translational Research Building, Lebanon, New Hampshire USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Etkind SN, Bone AE, Lovell N, Higginson IJ, Murtagh FEM. Influences on Care Preferences of Older People with Advanced Illness: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66:1031-1039. [PMID: 29512147 PMCID: PMC6001783 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To determine and explore the influences on care preferences of older people with advanced illness and integrate our results into a model to guide practice and research. Design Systematic review using Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and OpenGrey databases from inception to February 2017 and reference and citation list searching. Included articles investigated influences on care preference using qualitative or quantitative methodology. Thematic synthesis of qualitative articles and narrative synthesis of quantitative articles were undertaken. Setting Hospital and community care settings. Participants Older adults with advanced illness, including people with specific illnesses and markers of advanced disease, populations identified as in the last year of life, or individuals receiving palliative care (N = 15,164). Measurements The QualSys criteria were used to assess study quality. Results Of 12,142 search results, 57 articles were included. Family and care context, illness, and individual factors interact to influence care preferences. Support from and burden on family and loved ones were prominent influences on care preferences. Mechanisms by which preferences are influenced include the process of trading‐off between competing priorities, making choices based on expected outcome, level of engagement, and individual ability to form and express preferences. Conclusion Family is particularly important as an influence on care preferences, which are influenced by complex interaction of family, individual, and illness factors. To support preferences, clinicians should consider older people with illnesses and their families together as a unit of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon N Etkind
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Anna E Bone
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Natasha Lovell
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Fliss E M Murtagh
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London, London, UK.,Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Vermunt NP, Harmsen M, Elwyn G, Westert GP, Burgers JS, Olde Rikkert MG, Faber MJ. A three-goal model for patients with multimorbidity: A qualitative approach. Health Expect 2017; 21:528-538. [PMID: 29193557 PMCID: PMC5867317 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To meet the challenge of multimorbidity in decision making, a switch from a disease‐oriented to a goal‐oriented approach could be beneficial for patients and clinicians. More insight about the concept and the implementation of this approach in clinical practice is needed. Objective This study aimed to develop conceptual descriptions of goal‐oriented care by examining the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) and clinical geriatricians (CGs), and how the concept relates to collaborative communication and shared decision making with elderly patients with multimorbidity. Method Qualitative interviews with GPs and CGs were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Clinicians distinguished disease‐ or symptom‐specific goals, functional goals and a new type of goals, which we labelled as fundamental goals. “Fundamental goals” are goals specifying patient's priorities in life, related to their values and core relationships. These fundamental goals can be considered implicitly or explicitly in decision making or can be ignored. Reasons to explicate goals are the potential mismatch between medical standards and patient preferences and the need to know individual patient values in case of multimorbidity, including the management in acute situations. Conclusion Based on the perspectives of clinicians, we expanded the concept of goal‐oriented care by identifying a three‐level goal hierarchy. This model could facilitate collaborative goal‐setting for patients with multiple long‐term conditions in clinical practice. Future research is needed to refine and validate this model and to provide specific guidance for medical training and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeltje P Vermunt
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,The Dutch Council for Health and Society (Raad voor Volksgezondheid en Samenleving, RVS), The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam Harmsen
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.,Cochrane Institute for Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Gert P Westert
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jako S Burgers
- Family Medicine Department, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel G Olde Rikkert
- Radboud University Medical Center/Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan J Faber
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Reflections from a Patient and Carer on Involvement in Research and Integrating Care in the Health System. Int J Integr Care 2017; 17:16. [PMID: 28970757 PMCID: PMC5624061 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|