1
|
Zhang Y, Xiong H, Cheng F, Wang Q, Li J. A case of death after the severing three appendiceal arteries during appendectomy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2024:10.1007/s12024-024-00841-4. [PMID: 39002064 DOI: 10.1007/s12024-024-00841-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal issues requiring surgery and is usually treated by appendectomy. During the process of removing the appendix, the appendiceal artery is severed. In most individuals, the appendix is supplied by only one appendiceal artery. CASE PRESENTATION A 50-year-old man underwent appendectomy. During the surgical procedure, the appendix artery and two accessory arteries of the appendix were severed, leading to massive hemorrhaging in the abdominal cavity, which ultimately resulted in the patient's unfortunate demise. CONCLUSION Through this case, we hope that surgeons can learn more about the anatomy of the appendiceal artery and understand the possibility of accessory arteries to the appendix. During surgery, the blood vessels supplying the appendix should be carefully explored, and the "one-size-fits-all approach" should be avoided. Moreover, attention should be given to complications after appendectomy, and timely symptomatic treatment should be provided. Key points 1. Rare typing: The case of death due to improper handling of the accessory appendicular artery during appendectomy in patients with three appendiceal arteries is currently unreported. 2. Detailed anatomical knowledge: Surgeons performing an appendectomy need to make a detailed exploration of the blood vessel supply of the appendix to avoid ignoring anatomically different blood vessels. 3. Avoid a one-size-fits-all approach: In the surgical process, a "one-size-fits-all" approach should be avoided, that is, the same surgical approach should not be used in all cases, but should be adjusted according to the anatomical characteristics of the individual. 4. Observation of postoperative bleeding: In the perioperative period, peritoneal drainage should be closely observed. If a large amount of bloody fluid is found, timely surgical treatment should be carried out. 5. Attention to complications: Surgeons should pay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongtai Zhang
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Hongli Xiong
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Fang Cheng
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Qi Wang
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Jianbo Li
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alabbad J, Alhamly H, Alrubaiaan A, Kabli A, Abdulraheem F. The utility of intraperitoneal drain placement after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in postoperative intraperitoneal abscess prevention. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:3571-3577. [PMID: 38750172 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10869-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perforated appendicitis is associated with postoperative development of intraperitoneal abscess. Intraperitoneal drain placement during appendectomy is thought to reduce the risk of developing postoperative intraperitoneal abscess. The aim of this study was to determine whether intraperitoneal drainage could reduce the incidence of intraperitoneal abscess formation after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. METHODS This is a retrospective study of all patients (aged 7 and above) who were diagnosed with perforated appendicitis and subsequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between January 2018 and December 2022 at two government hospitals in the state of Kuwait. Demographic, clinical, and perioperative characteristics were compared between patients who underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal drain placement and those who did not. The primary outcome was the development of postoperative intraperitoneal abscess. Secondary outcomes included overall postoperative complications, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), length of stay (LOS), readmission and postoperative percutaneous drainage. RESULTS A total of 511 patients met the inclusion criteria between 2018 and 2022. Of these, 307 (60.1%) underwent intraoperative intraperitoneal drain placement. Patients with and without drains were similar regarding age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (Table 1). The overall rate of postoperative intraperitoneal abscess was 6.1%. Postoperatively, there was no difference in postoperative intraperitoneal abscess formation between patients who underwent intraperitoneal drain placement and those who did not (6.5% vs. 5.4%, p = 0.707). Patients with intraperitoneal drains had a longer LOS (4 [4, 6] vs. 3 [2, 5] days, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the overall complication (18.6% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.065), superficial SSI (2.9% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.791) or readmission rate (4.9% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.835). CONCLUSIONS Following laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis, intraperitoneal drain placement appears to confer no additional benefit and may prolong hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasim Alabbad
- Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Jabriya, Kuwait.
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 24923, 3110, Safat, Kuwait.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aday U, Çetin E, Kafadar MT, Oğuz A, Bahadır MV, Ülger BV, Gedik E, Girgin S, Yılmaz M. Single versus double Hem-o-lok clips to secure the apendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized multicentric clinical trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:89. [PMID: 38457041 PMCID: PMC10924000 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03281-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Polymeric clips (Hem-o-lok ligation system) are now widely used to securing the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Studies comparing the use of single or double hem-o-lok clips are limited. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of a single hem-o-lok clips with a double hem-o-lok clips for closure of an appendiceal stump. METHODS This prospective randomized study includes patients from two centers who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy with the diagnosis of appendicitis between September 2020 and March 2023. Demographic, operative and clinical outcomes of the use of single or double hem-o-lok clips for closure of the appendiceal stump were compared. Factors affecting long postoperative hospital stay were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyzes. RESULTS One hundred forty two (48.3%) patients in the single hem-o-lok arm and 152 (51.7%) patients in the double hem-o-lok arm were included in the analysis.The shortest operative time was noted in the single hem-o-lok group (52.1 ± 19.9 versus 61.6 ± 24.9 min, p < 0.001). The median hospital stay was 1 day (range 1-10) in the single hem-o-lok group and 1 day (range 1-12) in the double hem-o-lok group, and was shorter in the single hem-o-lok arm (1.61 ± 1.56 vs 1.84 ± 1.69, p = 0.019). Based on multivariate analysis, drain placement was identified as an independent predictive factor for long hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS The use of single hem-o-lok clips for appendiceal stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and effective. Trial registration NCT04387370 ( http://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulaş Aday
- Department of Gastroenterologycal Surgery, Dicle University School of Medicine, 21280, Sur/Diyarbakır, Turkey.
| | - Erman Çetin
- Department of General Surgery, Batman Regional Hospital, Batman, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Tolga Kafadar
- Department of General Surgery, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Oğuz
- Department of General Surgery, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Veysi Bahadır
- Department of General Surgery, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Burak Veli Ülger
- Department of General Surgery, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Ercan Gedik
- Department of General Surgery, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Sadullah Girgin
- Department of General Surgery, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Yılmaz
- Department of General Surgery, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Freys JC, Bigalke SM, Mertes M, Lobo DN, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Freys SM. Perioperative pain management for appendicectomy: A systematic review and Procedure-specific Postoperative Pain Management recommendations. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:174-187. [PMID: 38214556 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite being a commonly performed surgical procedure, pain management for appendicectomy is often neglected because of insufficient evidence on the most effective treatment options. OBJECTIVE To provide evidence-based recommendations by assessing the available literature for optimal pain management after appendicectomy. DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES This systematic review-based guideline was conducted according to the PROSPECT methodology. Relevant randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the English language from January 1999 to October 2022 were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Databases using PRISMA search protocols. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included studies on adults and children. If articles reported combined data from different surgeries, they had to include specific information about appendicectomies. Studies needed to measure pain intensity using a visual analogue scale (VAS) or a numerical rating scale (NRS). Studies that did not report the precise appendicectomy technique were excluded. RESULTS Out of 1388 studies, 94 met the inclusion criteria. Based on evidence and consensus, the PROSPECT members agreed that basic analgesics [paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)] should be administered perioperatively for open and laparoscopic appendicectomies. A laparoscopic approach is preferred because of lower pain scores. Additional recommendations for laparoscopic appendicectomies include a three-port laparoscopic approach and the instillation of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic. For open appendicectomy, a preoperative unilateral transverse abdominis plane (TAP) block is recommended. If not possible, preincisional infiltration with local anaesthetics is an alternative. Opioids should only be used as rescue analgesia. Limited evidence exists for TAP block in laparoscopic appendicectomy, analgesic adjuvants for TAP block, continuous wound infiltration after open appendicectomy and preoperative ketamine and dexamethasone. Recommendations apply to children and adults. CONCLUSION This review identified an optimal analgesic regimen for open and laparoscopic appendicectomy. Further randomised controlled trials should evaluate the use of regional analgesia and wound infiltrations with adequate baseline analgesia, especially during the recommended conventional three-port approach. REGISTRATION The protocol for this study was registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration No. CRD42023387994).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C Freys
- From the Department of Surgery, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Hamburg (JCF), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany (EMP-Z, MM), Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham (DNL), MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom (DNL), Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive and Pain Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, BG-University Hospital Bergmannsheil gGmbH, Bochum (SMB) and Department of Surgery, DIAKO Ev. Diakonie-Krankenhaus, Bremen, Germany (SMF)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beltzer C, Haas F, Jahn LS, Bellmann V, Strohäker J, Willms A, Schmidt R. Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis-Results of a Propensity Score Matching Analysis of 542 Patients and Consequences for the Military Surgeon. Mil Med 2024; 189:e632-e637. [PMID: 37715681 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usad356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Appendectomy is the treatment of choice for acute appendicitis. The procedure can be performed open or laparoscopically. However, laparoscopy is not available on military missions abroad. It is unclear whether treatment outcomes differ between the two surgical approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment data of all patients undergoing open and laparoscopic appendectomies in the German Armed Forces Hospital of Ulm from 2013 to 2017 were collected retrospectively. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to minimize the influence of potential confounders and to assess the influence of surgical approach on outcome (reoperations, superficial and deep surgical infections, length of postoperative ileus, need for intravenous analgesics, and operative time). RESULTS A total of 542 patients with complete datasets were included in the propensity score matching analysis, among these 64 with open and 478 laparoscopic procedures. There were no statistically significant differences between open and laparoscopic surgeries with respect to all outcome variables, with the exception of a 25-minute prolonged operative time for the open approach. CONCLUSIONS Open appendectomy can be considered equivalent in outcome to the laparoscopic procedure and thus can be performed on military missions abroad without compromising outcome. Military surgeons must continue to be trained and confident in open appendectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Beltzer
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital, Ulm 89081, Germany
| | - Frank Haas
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital, Ulm 89081, Germany
| | - Lena-Sofia Jahn
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital, Ulm 89081, Germany
| | - Valerie Bellmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital, Ulm 89081, Germany
| | - Jens Strohäker
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Arnulf Willms
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital, Hamburg 22049, Germany
| | - Roland Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital, Ulm 89081, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mazzinari G, Rovira L, Albers-Warlé KI, Warlé MC, Argente-Navarro P, Flor B, Diaz-Cambronero O. Underneath Images and Robots, Looking Deeper into the Pneumoperitoneum: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1080. [PMID: 38398395 PMCID: PMC10889570 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopy offers numerous advantages over open procedures, minimizing trauma, reducing pain, accelerating recovery, and shortening hospital stays. Despite other technical advancements, pneumoperitoneum insufflation has received little attention, barely evolving since its inception. We explore the impact of pneumoperitoneum on patient outcomes and advocate for a minimally invasive approach that prioritizes peritoneal homeostasis. The nonlinear relationship between intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and intra-abdominal volume (IAV) is discussed, emphasizing IAP titration to balance physiological effects and surgical workspace. Maintaining IAP below 10 mmHg is generally recommended, but factors such as patient positioning and surgical complexity must be considered. The depth of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is explored as another variable affecting laparoscopic conditions. While deep NMB appears favorable for surgical stillness, achieving a balance between IAP and NMB depth is crucial. Temperature and humidity management during pneumoperitoneum are crucial for patient safety and optical field quality. Despite the debate over the significance of temperature drop, humidification and the warming of insufflated gas offer benefits in peritoneal homeostasis and visual clarity. In conclusion, there is potential for a paradigm shift in pneumoperitoneum management, with dynamic IAP adjustments and careful control of insufflated gas temperature and humidity to preserve peritoneal homeostasis and improve patient outcomes in minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Mazzinari
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Health Research Institute la Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (P.A.-N.); (O.D.-C.)
- Department of Anesthesiology, La Fe University Hospital, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Statistics and Operational Research, University of Valencia, Calle Doctor Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, Spain
| | - Lucas Rovira
- Department of Anesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Av. de les Tres Creus, 2, L’Olivereta, 46014 València, Spain; (L.R.); (B.F.)
| | - Kim I. Albers-Warlé
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, La Fe University Hospital, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C. Warlé
- Departments of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Pilar Argente-Navarro
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Health Research Institute la Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (P.A.-N.); (O.D.-C.)
| | - Blas Flor
- Department of Anesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Av. de les Tres Creus, 2, L’Olivereta, 46014 València, Spain; (L.R.); (B.F.)
| | - Oscar Diaz-Cambronero
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Health Research Institute la Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (P.A.-N.); (O.D.-C.)
- Department of Anesthesiology, La Fe University Hospital, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rolle U, Bechstein WO, Fahlenbrach C, Heller G, Meyer HJ, Schuler E, Stier A, Waibel B, Jeschke E, Günster C, Maneck M. The Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Childhood. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2024; 121:39-44. [PMID: 37967286 PMCID: PMC10979443 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appendectomy in children is performed either lapa - roscopically (LA) or by open surgery (OA). We studied whether, and how, the outcome is affected by the technique used and by the intraoperative conversion of LA to OA. METHODS We analyzed routine data from children and adolescents in three age groups (1-5 years, 6-12 years, and 13-17 years) who were insured by the AOK statutory health insurance carrier in Germany and who underwent appendectomy in the period 2017-2019. General surgical complications and reoperations within 90 days were assessed with relevant indicators. Associations between the surgical technique and these indicators were studied with logistic regression. RESULTS Of the 21 541 patients included in the study, general surgical complications were observed in 2.1% and reoperations in 1.8% overall. Broken down by age group, the corresponding figures were 5.4% and 4.4% (age 1 to 5), 2.5% and 1.8% (age 6 to 12), and 1.5% and 1.6% (age 13 to 17). The main risk factors for complications and reoperations were acute complicated appendicitis and conversion from LA to OA. Regression analysis revealed similar outcomes with OA compared to LA in the 1-to-5 age group, (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals: 1.1 [0.6; 2.1] for general surgical complications and 1.5 [0.8; 2.7] for reoperations), but worse outcomes with OA in the other two age groups (age 6 to 12: 1.9 [1.2; 2.9] and 2.1 [1.5; 2.9]; age 13 to 17: 1.7 [1.0; 2.9] and 2.2 [1.4; 3.6]). When conversions were assigned to the LA group, the odds ratio (OA compared to LA) for reoperation across all age groups was 3.5 [2.8; 4.4] in patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis and 4.2 [3.4; 5.3] in patients with complicated appendicitis. Complicated appendicitis also increased the rate of general surgical complications and the length of stay in hospital. CONCLUSION Among children in the two older age groups, LA was followed by fewer general surgical complications and reoperations than OA. These differences were less pronounced when conversions were counted as belonging to the LA group. Children aged 1-5 appear to benefit the least from the lapa - roscopic technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udo Rolle
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Wolf O. Bechstein
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | | | - Günther Heller
- Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare (IQTIG), Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Ekkehard Schuler
- Helios Kliniken, Division of Quality Management, Berlin, Germany
| | - Albrecht Stier
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Beate Waibel
- Medical Service of the Health Insurance Fund Baden-Württemberg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sermonesi G, Tian BWCA, Vallicelli C, Abu-Zidan FM, Damaskos D, Kelly MD, Leppäniemi A, Galante JM, Tan E, Kirkpatrick AW, Khokha V, Romeo OM, Chirica M, Pikoulis M, Litvin A, Shelat VG, Sakakushev B, Wani I, Sall I, Fugazzola P, Cicuttin E, Toro A, Amico F, Mas FD, De Simone B, Sugrue M, Bonavina L, Campanelli G, Carcoforo P, Cobianchi L, Coccolini F, Chiarugi M, Di Carlo I, Di Saverio S, Podda M, Pisano M, Sartelli M, Testini M, Fette A, Rizoli S, Picetti E, Weber D, Latifi R, Kluger Y, Balogh ZJ, Biffl W, Jeekel H, Civil I, Hecker A, Ansaloni L, Bravi F, Agnoletti V, Beka SG, Moore EE, Catena F. Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:57. [PMID: 38066631 PMCID: PMC10704840 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma. METHODS This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement. RESULTS A total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma. CONCLUSIONS The WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Sermonesi
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | - Brian W C A Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Carlo Vallicelli
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | | | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Joseph M Galante
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Edward Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Vladimir Khokha
- Department of Emergency Surgery, City Hospital, Mozyr, Belarus
| | - Oreste Marco Romeo
- Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Care Program, Bronson Methodist Hospital, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Mircea Chirica
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- 3Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgical Diseases No. 3, Gomel State Medical University, Gomel, Belarus
| | | | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Imtiaz Wani
- Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India
| | - Ibrahima Sall
- General Surgery Department, Military Teaching Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Enrico Cicuttin
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Adriana Toro
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Francesco Amico
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Francesca Dal Mas
- Department of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Campus Economico San Giobbe Cannaregio, 873, 30100, Venice, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Donegal Clinical Research Academy Emergency Surgery Outcome Project, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Isidoro Di Carlo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- General Surgery Department Hospital of San Benedetto del Tronto, Marche Region, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Michele Pisano
- General and Emergency Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Mario Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery, University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Andreas Fette
- Pediatric Surgery, Children's Care Center, SRH Klinikum Suhl, Suhl, Thuringia, Germany
| | - Sandro Rizoli
- Surgery Department, Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital (HGH), Doha, Qatar
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero‑Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Dieter Weber
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Zsolt Janos Balogh
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Walter Biffl
- Division of Trauma/Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Hans Jeekel
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ian Civil
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andreas Hecker
- Emergency Medicine Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Bravi
- Healthcare Administration, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Ernest Eugene Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Destek S, Kundakcioglu H, Bektasoglu HK, Kunduz E, Yigman S, Tak AY, Gul VO, Deger KC. Comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques in the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis. North Clin Istanb 2023; 10:704-710. [PMID: 38328728 PMCID: PMC10846568 DOI: 10.14744/nci.2022.08941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common cause of acute abdomen and appendectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures. In this study, we aimed to compare open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic (LA) surgical techniques in the treatment of AA. METHODS The data of 236 patients treated with the diagnosis of AA in 2019-2020 were analyzed. Of these patients, 85 patients who received OA and 84 patients who received LA were included in the study. Then, the two groups were compared in terms of demographic, laboratory, clinical, and surgical treatments. RESULTS A total of 169 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 34.9 years (range 16-78), and the male-to-female ratio was 0.69. Statistical analysis revealed that the OA group had more leukocytosis, more female gender, and longer operation time than the LA group, but the LA group's complication rate was lower (p<0.05). CONCLUSION LA offers less morbidity, a shorter duration of hospital stay, and a fast return to normal activities compared to OA. In the surgical treatment of AA, LA can be applied as a routine and first-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabahattin Destek
- Department of General Surgery, Sancaktepe Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - Hacer Kundakcioglu
- Department of General Surgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | | | - Enver Kunduz
- Department of General Surgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - Samet Yigman
- Department of General Surgery, Koc University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - Aysegul Yabaci Tak
- Department of Biostatistics, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - Vahit Onur Gul
- Department of General Surgery, Koru Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye
| | - Kamuran Cumhur Deger
- Department of General Surgery, Biruni University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
AlSaleh R, Kishta AJ, Shamakh AA, Balamesh AA, Alabaidy MH, Alsharari NA, Suleiman SI. Awareness of Appendectomy and Its Complications Among Saudis. Cureus 2023; 15:e46823. [PMID: 37954733 PMCID: PMC10636530 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical causes of acute abdominal pain in adults and children in the emergency department. It is treated by appendectomy by either an open or laparoscopic approach. Although laparoscopic appendectomy has been used for the last 35 years, there are still indications for an open approach in some cases. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to explore the awareness of the general population in Saudi Arabia of appendectomy according to the surgical approach. METHODS A cross-sectional survey using a questionnaire constructed by an expert based on Google Forms (Google, Mountain View, CA) was used from February to March 2022. Variables were demographical data, general knowledge, history of appendectomy, its surgical approach, and postoperative complications, if any. RESULTS The study included 162 participants. The awareness level of acute appendicitis was high (72.2%). History of appendectomy was almost 30% and was significantly more common in males than females (p = 0.045). The rate of postoperative complications showed a significant difference between open (4.3%) vs. laparoscopic approaches (8%) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Young, educated Saudis are aware of the importance of surgical intervention for acute appendicitis. However, further hospital-based studies are recommended concerning the role of the surgical approach and its various impacts on postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rehab AlSaleh
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Ahmed J Kishta
- Medicine, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, SAU
| | | | - Adnan A Balamesh
- Surgery, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, SAU
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Proctor DW, Goodall R, Borsky K, Salciccioli JD, Marshall DC, Shanmugarajah K, Mohamed A, Shalhoub J. Trends in the mortality, incidence and disability-adjusted life-years of appendicitis in EU15+ countries: an observational study of the Global Burden of Disease Database, 1990-2019. Int J Surg 2023; 109:2608-2613. [PMID: 37232122 PMCID: PMC10498886 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appendicitis places a substantial burden on healthcare systems, with acute appendicitis alone being the most common abdominal surgical emergency worldwide. Further characterisation of the disease burden in EU15+ countries may help optimise the distribution of healthcare resources. The aim of this observational study was to assess the trends in mortality, incidence and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) of appendicitis across European Union (EU) 15+ countries between the years 1990 and 2019, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/A589 . MATERIALS AND METHODS Age-standardised mortality rates (ASMRs), age-standardised incidence rates (ASIRs) and DALYs data for appendicitis in males and females were extracted from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. Temporal trends within the study period were analysed using Joinpoint regression analysis. RESULTS The median ASMRs across EU15+ countries in 2019 were 0.08/100 000 and 0.13/100 000 for females and males, respectively. Between 1990 and 2019 the median percentage change in ASMR was -52.12% for females and -53.18% in males. The median ASIRs in 2019 for females and males were 251/100 000 and 278/100 000, respectively, with a median percentage change of +7.22% for females and +3.78% for males during the observation period. Decreasing trends in DALYs were observed over the 30-year study period, with median percentage changes of -23.57% and -33.81% for females and males, respectively, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/A589 . CONCLUSION Overall, a general trend of decreasing appendicitis ASMRs and DALYs was observed across EU15+ countries, despite small overall increases in appendicitis ASIRs, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/A589 . Variations in both diagnostic and management strategies over the study period are likely contributory to the changing trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kim Borsky
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Salisbury Hospital, Salisbury, UK
| | - Justin D. Salciccioli
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA
| | | | | | - Abdulla Mohamed
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Imperial College London, London
| | - Joseph Shalhoub
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
- Imperial College London, London
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gu Q, Hua Y. Perforated appendicitis treated with laparoscopic appendicectomy or open appendicectomy: A meta-analysis. J Minim Access Surg 2023; 19:348-354. [PMID: 37357489 PMCID: PMC10449044 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_158_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim This analysis compared the impact of laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) on treating adult perforated appendicitis (PA). Methods Articles relating to LA and OA in treating PA were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase since their founding to January 2022. These articles were independently filtered based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two investigators. The quality of these articles was assessed and article data were extracted. Dichotomous data were presented in the form of odd's ratio (OR), whereas continuous data were in the form of weighted mean difference (WMD). The included articles reported at least one of the following outcomes: intra-abdominal abscess (IAA), wound infection, operative time, hospital stay and complications. Results Three randomised control trials (198 LA cases vs. 205 OA cases) and 12 case - control trials (914 LA cases vs. 2192 OA cases) were included. This analysis revealed that although the IAA formation rate was similar in the LA and OA groups (OR: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-1.88), the wound infection rate was lower in the LA group (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.28-0.51). Furthermore, LA was associated with shorter hospital stay (WMD: -1.43 days, 95% CI: -2.33--0.52) and fewer complications than OA (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28-0.57). Conclusion LA has significant benefits in treating PA and is associated with better post-operative outcomes such as shorter hospital stay, lower incidence of wound infection and other complications. However, more studies with randomised and large-sample populations are still required to determine the clinical benefit of LA in treating PA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianquan Gu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College, Chongqing, China
| | - Ye Hua
- Department of General Surgery, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bancke Laverde BL, Maak M, Langheinrich M, Kersting S, Denz A, Krautz C, Weber GF, Grützmann R, Brunner M. Risk Factors for Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Appendectomy. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4299. [PMID: 37445334 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Since its introduction in the 1990s, laparoscopic appendectomy has become established over the years and is today considered the standard therapy for acute appendicitis. In some cases, however, a conversion to the open approach is still necessary. The primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the need to convert from the laparoscopic to an open approach during appendectomy for acute appendicitis. (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1220 adult patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis from 2010 to 2020 at the University Hospital Erlangen was performed. Data, including patient demographics and pre-, intra-, and postoperative findings, were collected and compared between patients with and without conversion. (3) Results: The conversion rate in our cohort was 5.5%. A higher preoperative WBC count and CRP (OR 1.9, p = 0.042, and OR 2.3, p = 0.019, respectively), as well as the presence of intraoperative perforation, necrosis or gangrene, perityphlitic abscess and peritonitis (OR 3.2, p = 0.001; OR 2.3, p = 0.023; OR 2.6, p = 0.006 and OR 2.0, p = 0.025, respectively) were identified as independent risk factors for conversion from the laparoscopic to the open approach. Conversion was again independently associated with higher morbidity (OR 2.2, p = 0.043). (4) Conclusion: The laparoscopic approach is feasible and safe in the majority of patients with acute appendicitis. Only increased inflammatory blood markers could be detected as the preoperative risk factors potentially influencing the choice of surgical approach but only with low specificity and sensitivity. For the decision to convert, intraoperative findings are additionally crucial. However, patients with conversion should receive special attention in the postoperative course, as these have an increased risk of developing complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Leonardo Bancke Laverde
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Maak
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Melanie Langheinrich
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Stephan Kersting
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Axel Denz
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian Krautz
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Georg F Weber
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Robert Grützmann
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Brunner
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shiihara M, Sudo Y, Matsushita N, Kubota T, Hibi Y, Osugi H, Inoue T. Therapeutic strategy for acute appendicitis based on laparoscopic surgery. BMC Surg 2023; 23:161. [PMID: 37312100 PMCID: PMC10265908 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02070-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The treatment strategies for acute appendicitis differ depending on the facility, and various studies have investigated the usefulness of conservative treatment with antibiotics, laparoscopic surgery, and interval appendectomy (IA). However, although laparoscopic surgery is widely used, the clinical strategy for acute appendicitis, especially complicated cases, remains controversial. We assessed a laparoscopic surgery-based treatment strategy for all patients diagnosed with appendicitis, including those with complicated appendicitis (CA). METHODS We retrospectively analysed patients with acute appendicitis treated in our institution between January 2013 and December 2021. Patients were classified into uncomplicated appendicitis (UA) and CA groups based on computed tomography (CT) findings on the first visit, and the treatment course was subsequently compared. RESULTS Of 305 participants, 218 were diagnosed with UA and 87 with CA, with surgery performed in 159 cases. Laparoscopic surgery was attempted in 153 cases and had a completion rate of 94.8% (145/153). All open laparotomy transition cases (n = 8) were emergency CA surgery cases. No significant differences were found in the incidence of postoperative complications in successful emergency laparoscopic surgeries. In univariate and multivariate analyses for the conversion to open laparotomy in CA, only the number of days from onset to surgery ≥ 6 days was an independent risk factor (odds ratio: 11.80; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic surgery is preferred in all appendicitis cases, including CA. Since laparoscopic surgery is difficult for CA when several days from the onset have passed, it is necessary that surgeons make an early decision on whether to operate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Shiihara
- Department of Surgery, Kamifukuoka General Hospital, 931 Fukuoka Fujimino-Shi, Saitama, 356-0011, Japan.
| | - Yasuhiro Sudo
- Department of Surgery, Kamifukuoka General Hospital, 931 Fukuoka Fujimino-Shi, Saitama, 356-0011, Japan
| | - Norimasa Matsushita
- Department of Surgery, Kamifukuoka General Hospital, 931 Fukuoka Fujimino-Shi, Saitama, 356-0011, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kubota
- Department of Surgery, Kamifukuoka General Hospital, 931 Fukuoka Fujimino-Shi, Saitama, 356-0011, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hibi
- Department of Surgery, Kamifukuoka General Hospital, 931 Fukuoka Fujimino-Shi, Saitama, 356-0011, Japan
| | - Harushi Osugi
- Department of Surgery, Kamifukuoka General Hospital, 931 Fukuoka Fujimino-Shi, Saitama, 356-0011, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Inoue
- Department of Surgery, Kamifukuoka General Hospital, 931 Fukuoka Fujimino-Shi, Saitama, 356-0011, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Damous SHB, Menegozzo CAM, Rocha MC, Collet-E-Silva FS, Utiyama EM. Challenges to implement laparoscopic appendectomy as the first-line treatment for acute appendicitis: a fifteen-year experience in a tertiary hospital in Brazil. Rev Col Bras Cir 2023; 50:e20233527. [PMID: 37222347 PMCID: PMC10508672 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233527-en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND the barriers to implement emergency laparoscopy in public teaching hospitals involve issues such as resident learning curves and resource costs and availability. This study was designed to describe the issues facing the implementation of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis over 15 years in a single academic center in Brazil. MATERIALS AND METHODS retrospective study of patients undergoing emergency appendectomy from 2004 to 2018. Clinical data were compared to four major actions implemented in the emergency surgical service: minimally invasive surgery training for residents (2007), laparoscopic stump closure using metal clips (2008), 24/7 availability of laparoscopic instruments for emergency surgeries (2010), and third-party contract for maintenance of the laparoscopic instruments and implementation of polymeric clips for stump closure (2013). We evaluated the increase in laparoscopic appendectomy after the implementation of those major changes. RESULTS we identified 1168 appendectomies during the study period, of which 691 (59%), 465 (40%), and 12 (1%) were open, laparoscopic, and converted, respectively. The implementation of the major changes since 2004 resulted in an increase of laparoscopic appendectomies from 11% in 2007 to 80% in 2016. These actions were decisive in the widespread use of laparoscopy for acute appendicitis (p<0.001). The standardization of the hem-o-lok clip in the treatment of the appendiceal stump made the procedure more feasible, reducing the surgical time using laparoscopic access and increasing the team's adherence, so that this became the route of choice in about 85% of cases in the period from 2014 to 2018, 80% performed by 3rd year resident physicians. No intraoperative complications were noted related to laparoscopic access, even in more complicated appendicitis. There was no mortality reported, no reoperations or readmissions to hospital during a 30-day postoperative period. CONCLUSION the development of a feasible, reproducible, and safe technical standardization, associated with continuous cost optimization, are the cornerstones for a consistent and viable change in the current practice for appendectomies in middle and lower-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marcelo Cristiano Rocha
- - Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Cirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | | | - Edivaldo Massazo Utiyama
- - Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Cirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pogorelić Z, Janković Marendić I, Čohadžić T, Jukić M. Clinical Outcomes of Daytime Versus Nighttime Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:children10040750. [PMID: 37189999 DOI: 10.3390/children10040750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Aim of the study: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and complication rate of laparoscopic appendectomy in children operated on during the daytime versus nighttime. Methods: A total of 303 children who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into two study groups. The first group consisted of the patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy during the day shift from 07:00-21:00 (n = 171), while the patients in the second group underwent laparoscopic appendectomy during the night shift from 21:00-07:00 (n = 132). The groups were compared for baseline clinical and laboratory data, treatment outcomes, and complications. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables, while the Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. A two-sided Fisher's exact test was used when the frequency of events in a certain cell was low. All p values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The proportion of complicated appendicitis was almost the same in both patient groups (n = 63, 36.8% vs. n = 49, 37.1%, p = 0.960). Out of the total number of patients presenting during the daytime and nighttime, 11 (6.4%) and 10 (7.6%) developed a postoperative complication, respectively (p = 0.697). Additionally, rates of readmission (n = 5 (2.9%) vs. n = 2 (1.5%); p = 0.703), redo-surgery (n = 3 (1.7%) vs. n = 0; p = 0.260), conversion to open surgery (n = 0 vs. n = 1 (0.8%); p = 0.435) and length of hospital stay (n = 3 (IQR 1, 5) vs. n = 3 (IQR 2, 5); p = 0.368) did not differ significantly between daytime and nighttime appendectomies. The duration of the surgery was significantly shorter in patients presenting during the day than in those presenting at night (26 min (IQR 22, 40) vs. 37 min (31, 46); p < 0.001). Conclusions: Different shift times did not affect the treatment outcomes or complication rates for children receiving laparoscopic appendectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zenon Pogorelić
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | | | - Tin Čohadžić
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Miro Jukić
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pushpanathan NR, Hashim MNM, Zahari Z, Aziz SHSA, Zain WZW, Ramely R, Wong MPK, Mohamad IS, Mokhter WMW, Yahya MM, Merican SRHI, Zakaria Z, Zakaria AD. Conversion rate and risk factors of conversion to open in laparoscopic appendicectomy. Ann Coloproctol 2022; 38:409-414. [PMID: 34407370 PMCID: PMC9816552 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.00437.0062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) has several advantages over conventional open appendicectomy (OA). However, about 5% to 10% of LA patients still need to be converted to open surgery. Identifying risk factors that contribute to conversion to OA allows for early identification of patients who may benefit from primary OA. This study aimed to determine the conversion rate of LA to OA and to identify its associated risk factors among patients with acute or perforated appendicitis. METHODS A retrospective review of medical records was performed among patients with acute or perforated appendicitis who underwent LA between December 2015 and January 2017. With the use of multivariable logistic regression analyses, the predictors of conversion from laparoscopic to OA were investigated. RESULTS Out of 120 patients, 33 cases were converted to OA which gives a conversion rate of 27.5%. Among 33 patients who were converted to OA, 27 patients (81.8%) had perforated appendix, while in the LA group, perforated appendix cases consisted of 34.5% (P<0.001). Histopathology of the appendix was the predictor of conversion from LA to OA (adjusted odds ratio, 8.82; 95% confidence interval, 3.13-24.91; P<0.001). CONCLUSION The result from our study shows that the overall conversion rate for the study period was high. Patients with perforated appendicitis had a higher risk of conversion to OA. Therefore, preoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis may be paramount in predicting conversion to OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelson Rao Pushpanathan
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Nizam Md Hashim
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Correspondence to: Mohd Nizam Md Hashim, M.Med (Surgery) Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia Tel: +60-9-7676777, Fax: +60-9-7653370 E-mail:
| | - Zalina Zahari
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Besut Campus, Besut, Terengganu, Malaysia,Correspondence to: Mohd Nizam Md Hashim, M.Med (Surgery) Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia Tel: +60-9-7676777, Fax: +60-9-7653370 E-mail:
| | - Syed Hassan Syed Abd. Aziz
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Wan Zainira Wan Zain
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Rosnelifaizur Ramely
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Michael Pak-Kai Wong
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Ikhwan Sani Mohamad
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Wan Mokhzani Wan Mokhter
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Maya Mazuwin Yahya
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Siti Rahmah Hashim Isa Merican
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Zaidi Zakaria
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Andee Dzulkarnaen Zakaria
- Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia,Department of Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Elvira López J, Sales Mallafré R, Padilla Zegarra E, Carrillo Luna L, Ferreres Serafini J, Tully R, Memba Ikuga R, Jorba Martin R. Outpatient management of acute uncomplicated appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial. World J Emerg Surg 2022; 17:59. [PMID: 36419071 PMCID: PMC9685067 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00465-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To confirm the safety and efficacy of outpatient management of laparoscopic appendectomy, with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, in adult patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible and secure in selected patients in observational studies. The benefits include reduced length of stay (LOS) and postoperative complications. This is the first randomized controlled trial of outpatient management following ERAS protocol. METHODS Patients admitted from the emergency department with acute appendicitis were randomized into one of two groups: standard care within the hospital (HG) or the outpatient group (OG). An ERAS protocol was followed for both groups. Patients in the HG were admitted to the surgical ward. Patients in the OG were referred to the day-surgery unit. The primary endpoint was the length of stay. RESULTS Ninety-seven patients were included: 49 in the OG and 48 in the HG. LOS was significantly shorter in the OG (mean 8.82 h) than in the HG (mean 43.53 h), p < 0.001. There was no difference in readmission rates (p = 0.320); we observed only one readmission in the OG. No further emergency consultations or complications were observed. The cost saving was $516.52/patient as a result of the intervention. CONCLUSION Outpatient management of appendectomy is safe and feasible procedure in selected patients. This approach could become the standard of care for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, showing fewer complications, lower LOS and cost. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registration: www. CLINICALTRIALS gov (NCT05401188) Clinical Trial ID: NCT05401188.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Elvira López
- grid.410367.70000 0001 2284 9230General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital of Tarragona Joan XXIII, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain ,grid.420268.a0000 0004 4904 3503Institut d’investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili (IISPV), 43007 Tarragona, Spain
| | - Ricard Sales Mallafré
- grid.410367.70000 0001 2284 9230General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital of Tarragona Joan XXIII, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain ,grid.420268.a0000 0004 4904 3503Institut d’investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili (IISPV), 43007 Tarragona, Spain
| | - Erlinda Padilla Zegarra
- grid.410367.70000 0001 2284 9230General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital of Tarragona Joan XXIII, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain ,grid.420268.a0000 0004 4904 3503Institut d’investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili (IISPV), 43007 Tarragona, Spain
| | - Luis Carrillo Luna
- grid.410367.70000 0001 2284 9230Anesthesiology Department, University Hospital of Tarragona Joan XXIII, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Joan Ferreres Serafini
- grid.410367.70000 0001 2284 9230General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital of Tarragona Joan XXIII, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain ,grid.420268.a0000 0004 4904 3503Institut d’investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili (IISPV), 43007 Tarragona, Spain
| | - Roisin Tully
- grid.412751.40000 0001 0315 8143General Surgery Department, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Robert Memba Ikuga
- grid.410367.70000 0001 2284 9230General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital of Tarragona Joan XXIII, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain ,grid.420268.a0000 0004 4904 3503Institut d’investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili (IISPV), 43007 Tarragona, Spain
| | - Rosa Jorba Martin
- grid.410367.70000 0001 2284 9230General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital of Tarragona Joan XXIII, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain ,grid.420268.a0000 0004 4904 3503Institut d’investigació Sanitaria Pere Virgili (IISPV), 43007 Tarragona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Energy Devices for Clipless-Sutureless Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Utility and Safety. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58111535. [PMID: 36363491 PMCID: PMC9694935 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58111535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: While laparoscopic appendectomy is standardized, techniques for appendiceal stump closure and mesoappendix division remain variable. Novel vessel sealing techniques are increasingly utilized ubiquitously. We sought to systematically summarize all relevant data and to define the current evidence on the safety and utility of energy devices for clipless−sutureless laparoscopic appendectomy in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria included studies with laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis. The intervention included patients undergoing division of mesoappendix and/or securing of the appendicular base using diathermy (Monopolar or Bipolar or LigaSure Sealing Device) or Harmonic Scalpel (Group A) compared to patients undergoing division of mesoappendix and/or securing of the appendicular base using endoclip or Hem-o-lok or ligature (Group B). The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Downs and Black scale. The outcomes of surgical site infection (SSI) or intra-abdominal collection, postoperative ileus, average operative duration, and length of hospital stay (LHS) were compared. Results: Six comparative studies were included; three were retrospective, two were prospective, and one was ambispective. Meta-analysis revealed a shorter operative duration in Group A with respect to appendicular base ligation (MD −12.34, 95% CI −16.57 to −8.11, p < 0.00001) and mesoappendix division (MD −8.06, 95% CI −14.03 to −2.09, p = 0.008). The pooled risk ratios showed no difference in SSI between groups. Additionally, no difference was observed in LHS. The risk of postoperative ileus was higher in group B regarding mesoappendix division (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.93, p = 0.02), but no difference was found concerning appendicular base ligation. The included studies showed a moderate-to-high risk of bias. Conclusions: Clipless−sutureless laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and fast. Postoperative ileus seems less common with energy devices for mesoappendix division. However, the studies included have a moderate-to-high risk of bias. Further studies addressing the individual devices with surgeons of similar levels are needed.
Collapse
|
20
|
Diagnostic, Therapy and Complications in Acute Appendicitis of 19,749 Cases Based on Routine Data: A Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154495. [PMID: 35956110 PMCID: PMC9369616 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common emergencies in general surgery. The gold standard treatment is surgery. Complications may occur during or after an appendectomy. In addition to age, clinically important factors for the outcome after appendicitis seems to be the comorbidities and the stage of the appendicitis at the time of the operation. Large observational data describing these facts are missing. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter observational study, all inpatients over the age of 17 years with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis in 47 hospitals of the Clinotel Hospital Group between 2010 and 2017 were included. Results: A total of 19,749 patients with acute appendicitis were operated on. The number of patients with more than five secondary diagnoses has increased from 8.4% (2010) to 14.5% (2017). The number of secondary diagnoses correlates with the ages of the patients and leads to a significantly longer hospital stay. Computer tomography (CT) has gained in importance in recent years in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A total of 19.9% of patients received a CT in 2017. Laparoscopic appendectomy increased from 88% in 2010 to 95% in 2017 (p < 0.001). The conversion rate did not change relevant in the study period (i.e., 2.3% in 2017). Appendicitis with perforation, abscess, or generalized peritonitis was observed in 24.8% of patients. Mortality was 0.6% during the observation period and was associated with age and the number of secondary diagnoses. The analysis is based on administrative data collected primarily for billing purposes, subject to the usual limitations of such data. This includes partially incomplete clinical data. Conclusions: Multimorbidity is increasingly present in patients with acute appendicitis. Mortality is still in an acceptably low range with no increase. A CT scan is necessary for a precise diagnosis in unclear clinical situations to avoid unnecessary operations and was performed more often at the end of the study than at the beginning.
Collapse
|
21
|
Sertcakacilar G, Yildiz GO. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and lateral approach quadratus lumborum block after laparoscopic appendectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 79:104002. [PMID: 35860161 PMCID: PMC9289327 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
22
|
Shugaba A, Lambert JE, Bampouras TM, Nuttall HE, Gaffney CJ, Subar DA. Should All Minimal Access Surgery Be Robot-Assisted? A Systematic Review into the Musculoskeletal and Cognitive Demands of Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1520-1530. [PMID: 35426034 PMCID: PMC9296389 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05319-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeons are among the most at risk of work-related musculoskeletal health decline because of the physical demands of surgery, which is also associated with cognitive fatigue. Minimally invasive surgery offers excellent benefits to patients but the impact of robotic or laparoscopic surgery on surgeon well-being is less well understood. This work examined the musculoskeletal and cognitive demands of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery. METHODS Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for 'Muscle strain' AND 'musculoskeletal fatigue' AND 'occupational diseases' OR 'cognitive fatigue' AND 'mental fatigue' OR 'standard laparoscopic surgery' AND 'robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery'. Primary outcomes measured were electromyographic (EMG) activity for musculoskeletal fatigue and questionnaires (NASA-TLX, SMEQ, or Borg CR-10) for cognitive fatigue. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) Guidelines. The study was preregistered on Prospero ID: CRD42020184881. RESULTS Two hundred and ninety-eight original titles were identified. Ten studies that were all observational studies were included in the systematic review. EMG activity was consistently lower in robotic than in laparoscopic surgery in the erector spinae and flexor digitorum muscles but higher in the trapezius muscle. This was associated with significantly lower cognitive load in robotic than laparoscopic surgery in 7 of 10 studies. CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggests a reduction in musculoskeletal demands during robotic surgery in muscles excluding the trapezius, and this is associated with most studies reporting a reduced cognitive load. Robotic surgery appears to have less negative cognitive and musculoskeletal impact on surgeons compared to laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Shugaba
- Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.
- Royal Blackburn Hospital, East Lancashire NHS Hospitals Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK.
| | - Joel E Lambert
- Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK
- Royal Blackburn Hospital, East Lancashire NHS Hospitals Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK
| | | | - Helen E Nuttall
- Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK
| | | | - Daren A Subar
- Royal Blackburn Hospital, East Lancashire NHS Hospitals Trust, Blackburn, BB2 3HH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Risk factors for periappendiceal adhesions in acute appendicitis: a retrospective comparative study. BMC Surg 2022; 22:134. [PMID: 35392891 PMCID: PMC8991578 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01579-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Acute appendicitis usually requires immediate surgical treatment, but appendectomies were difficult for some patients with severe periappendiceal adhesions. We investigated risk factors of intraoperative adhesions to help surgeons make better treatment plans for appendicitis. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 186 cases diagnosed with acute appendicitis and underwent surgery in Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University between January 2018 and December 2019. According to the degree of intraoperative adhesions, they were divided into mild, moderate and severe groups. Then, we analyzed a number of preoperative factors contributed to adhesions, suppuration and perforation during appendectomy in 186 patients. Results Contrast to the moderate group (MoG) and the mild group (MiG), the severe degree of adhesions group (SG) had a higher intraoperative perforation and suppuration rate, a greater likelihood of conversion to open and more postoperative complications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that recurrent appendicitis and high neutrophil percentage were independently associated with periappendiceal adhesions. The preoperative ultrasonography (US) revealed periappendiceal fluid and high neutrophil percentage were independently associated with appendix suppuration. A high preoperative neutrophil percentage was independently associated with appendix perforation. Conclusions Recurrent appendicitis and preoperative high neutrophil percentage were risk factors of periappendiceal adhesions; preoperative US revealed periappendiceal fluid and high neutrophil percentage were risk factors of appendix suppuration; and a high preoperative neutrophil percentage was a risk factor of appendix perforation.
Collapse
|
24
|
Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2022; 57:394-405. [PMID: 34332757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the preferred approach in uncomplicated appendicitis. However, in patients with complicated appendicitis (CA), the best approach is still unclear though laparoscopy is being increasingly preferred over open appendicectomy (OA) nowadays. AIM To comprehensively review the current literature and compare the associations of LA and OA concerning various postoperative outcomes in order to determine the best approach for children with CA. METHODS The PRISMA guidelines were adhered to and an electronic database search was extensively performed. Data analysis, including subgroup analysis of randomized-control trials, was performed using RevMan 5.3. Methodological and statistical heterogeneity, as well as publication bias of the included studies, were assessed. RESULTS Four randomized controlled trials (266 LA versus 354 OA) and thirty-six case-controlled trials (2580 LA versus 3043 OA) were included in the analysis. Compared to OA, LA has a shorter length of stay, a lower rate of surgical site infection as well as a significantly lower overall complication rate. The rates of intraabdominal abscess formation, post-operative fever, pneumonia and ileus are similar in the two groups. So are the rates of readmissions and reoperations. LA was also shown to have a shorter time taken to oral intake and a lesser requirement of analgesics as well as intravenous antibiotics. Operative time for OA was found to be significantly shorter than that for LA. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis objectively demonstrates that laparoscopy has a better overall complication profile compared to OA and should be the procedure of choice in children with complicated appendicitis.
Collapse
|
25
|
Kapuller V, Kammar H, Zugayyar D, Luques L, Michael S, Arbell D. Bowel Resection Through a Single Umbilical Incision: A Case Series. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2022; 32:448-451. [PMID: 34990296 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The advent of laparoscopy has revolutionized surgery. The surgeon strives to minimize incisions and their adverse consequences. Although laparoscopy has gained widespread popularity, several advantages in open surgery are thereby lost. Tactile sensation of the tissue, hand-sewn anastomosis, and nonthermic vascular control are most prominent. To combine both approaches, single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery (SILS) was advanced, trying to combine the best in both worlds. This approach is widely used in appendectomies. After having gained experience in this approach, we expanded the indications and hereby present our experience with bowel resections utilizing SILS. Patients and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from operations performed during the past 3 years. We found 11 cases of SILS bowel resections: 3 sigmoidectomies, 3 small bowel atresia repairs, 1 subtotal colectomy, 1 Meckel's diverticulectomy, and 3 resections of bowel duplications. The age of the patients ranged from 2 days to 17 years. In all cases, a working 10 mm scope was inserted through the umbilicus, the bowel was extracted outside the abdomen through the umbilicus, dissection and resection with anastomosis were performed outside the abdomen in the classic open approach, and the bowel was returned to the abdomen. Results and Conclusions: All patients recovered promptly with no need for further intervention. There were no cases of wound infection, leak, or intra-abdominal abscess formation. Cosmesis was excellent with a small umbilical scar. We conclude that this approach is feasible and safe in a select population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vadim Kapuller
- The Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hadassah University Hospital, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Haguy Kammar
- The Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hadassah University Hospital, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Diaa Zugayyar
- The Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hadassah University Hospital, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Lisandro Luques
- The Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hadassah University Hospital, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Samer Michael
- The Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hadassah University Hospital, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Dan Arbell
- The Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hadassah University Hospital, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Park BK, Kim JW, Suh SW, Park JM, Park YG. Comparison of postoperative pain after needle grasper-assisted single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial (PANASILA trial). Ann Surg Treat Res 2021; 101:350-359. [PMID: 34934762 PMCID: PMC8651985 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2021.101.6.350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study was performed to compare the efficacies of newly developed needle grasper-assisted (Endo Relief) single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (NASILA) and single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA). Methods This study enrolled 110 patients with acute appendicitis without periappendiceal abscess, diagnosed using computed tomography, who were randomized to the SILA (n = 54) and NASILA groups (n = 56) between December 2017 and August 2018 (6 patients withdrawn). The NASILA technique entailed a small umbilical incision for the glove port (equivalent to that for a 12-mm trocar), and a 2.5-mm suprapubic incision for the needle grasper. Results The SILA and NASILA groups included 49 (male, 61.2%) and 55 (male, 54.5%) patients, respectively. Age, body mass index, abdominal surgical history, symptom duration, and use of patient-controlled analgesia did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The main wound size was significantly smaller in the NASILA group than in the SILA group (1.8 ± 0.4 cm vs. 2.2 ± 0.4 cm, P < 0.001). The operative time and estimated blood loss did not differ significantly between both groups. The immediate postoperative pain score, i.e., the primary endpoint, was significantly lower in the NASILA group than in the SILA group (2.33 ± 0.98 vs. 2.82 ± 1.29, P = 0.031). The complaints for scar status 1 month postoperatively did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion NASILA could attenuate postoperative pain by minimizing the size of the surgical wound; further, NASILA may not be inferior to SILA in terms of cosmetic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byung Kwan Park
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Won Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk Won Suh
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joong-Min Park
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Gum Park
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nikolovski A, Otljanski A, Seljmani R, Antovic S, Jankulovski N. Mastering the learning curve significantly reduces operative time for laparoscopic treatment of complicated appendicitis. Arch Public Health 2021. [DOI: 10.3889/aph.2021.6000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred operative method for acute appendicitistreatment. In terms of complicated appendicitis it can be effective in hands of an experiencedlaparoscopist that overwhelmed the learning curve for the method. Aim: Тhis retrospectivestudy examines whether the operative time for laparoscopic appendectomy for complicatedappendicitis is shortened after mastering the learning curve. Material and methods: A totalnumber of 196 patients were operated for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, of whom 77were diagnosed with complicated appendicitis. They were subsequently divided in two groups(laparoscopic and open). Operative time in both groups was measured and the conversionand postoperative complications were noted. Results: Conversion rate was 2.3%. Operativetime was shorter in the laparoscopic group (67.4 ± 22.9 vs. 77.9 ± 17.9 minutes; p = 0.033).Overall postoperative morbidity was 25.97% with wound infection present only in the opengroup (p = 0.018). Intraabdominal abscess occurred in one patient from the laparoscopicgroup (0.38%). Length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (4.3 ± 2.2 vs. 5.7 ± 2.1, p = 0.0052).
Collapse
|
28
|
Tepelenis K, Stefanou CK, Stefanou SK, Tsoumanis P, Ntalapa KM, Galani V, Gogos-Pappas G, Vlachos K. Post-colonoscopy appendicitis: a case report. J Surg Case Rep 2021; 2021:rjab285. [PMID: 34276957 PMCID: PMC8279750 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjab285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Appendicitis after colonoscopy is rare, with an estimated incidence of 3.8 cases per 10 000 colonoscopies. Herein, we report a 56-year-old female who visited the emergency department with a history of diffuse abdominal pain and nausea 8 h after a screening colonoscopy. Abdominal examination disclosed deep tenderness at Mc Burney point and positive Rovsign's sign. Laboratory studies revealed elevated white blood cells and neutrophils (WBC 15.37 K/Ul and NEUT 86.5%) with normal C-reactive protein (5 mg/l). The initial diagnosis was acute appendicitis, which was confirmed by the ultrasonographic findings. The patient was admitted to the surgical department, and a laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. Post-colonoscopy appendicitis is increasingly recognized as a complication after colonoscopy in the last decade. Early recognition is vital in preventing morbidity and mortality. It may also be worthwhile to include appendicitis after colonoscopy as a possible complication during the consent before the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kostas Tepelenis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Christos K Stefanou
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Ioannina, "G. Xatzikosta", Ioannina, Greece
| | - Stefanos K Stefanou
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Ioannina, "G. Xatzikosta", Ioannina, Greece
| | - Periklis Tsoumanis
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | | | - Vasiliki Galani
- Department of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hiyoshi Y, Miyamoto Y, Akiyama T, Daitoku N, Sakamoto Y, Tokunaga R, Eto K, Nagai Y, Iwatsuki M, Iwagami S, Baba Y, Yoshida N, Baba H. Time trial of dry box laparoscopic surgical training improves laparoscopic surgical skills and surgical outcomes. Asian J Endosc Surg 2021; 14:373-378. [PMID: 33084215 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The present study assessed the utility of a dry box time trial during laparoscopic surgical training to improve laparoscopic surgical skills and surgical outcomes. METHODS In a monthly time trial, surgeon trainees twice completed a set task that involved grasping a suture, aligning a needle with a needle holder, passing the suture, making three knots, and cutting the two tails of the suture. The mean suturing time was then analyzed. To assess the utility of this time trial, we analyzed the short-term outcomes of patients with stage I to III colon cancer who had undergone laparoscopic colectomy before and after the introduction of the time trial. RESULTS The monthly time trial was introduced in October 2018, and 52 surgeon trainees participated in the trials examined in this study. Within 6 months of the program's introduction, the mean suturing time had significantly declined to less than 70% of the time trial, while the standard deviations had declined to less than 30%. In comparisons of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery before (n = 49) and after (n = 46) the introduction of the time trial, the operative time tended to decline (P = .074) after the introduction of the time trial, and blood loss was significantly reduced (P = .018). The rate of postoperative complications was similar before and after the introduction. CONCLUSION Regular time trials of laparoscopic surgical suture training using a dry box can be useful for improving laparoscopic surgical skills and surgical outcomes. Moreover, time trials can keep trainees motivated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukiharu Hiyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Takahiko Akiyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Nobuya Daitoku
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yuki Sakamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Ryuma Tokunaga
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kojiro Eto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yohei Nagai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Masaaki Iwatsuki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Shiro Iwagami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Naoya Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Guevara-Cuellar CA, Rengifo-Mosquera MP, Parody-Rúa E. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nonoperative management versus open and laparoscopic surgery for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in Colombia. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2021; 19:34. [PMID: 34112179 PMCID: PMC8194214 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-021-00288-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Traditionally, uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA) has been treated with appendectomy. However, the surgical alternatives might carry out significant complications, impaired quality of life, and higher costs than nonoperative treatment. Consequently, it is necessary to evaluate the different therapeutic alternatives' cost-effectiveness in patients diagnosed with uncomplicated appendicitis. Methods We performed a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing nonoperative management (NOM) with open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in patients otherwise healthy adults aged 18–60 years with a diagnosis of uncomplicated AA from the payer´s perspective at the secondary and tertiary health care level. The time horizon was 5 years. A discount rate of 5% was applied to both costs and outcomes. The health outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs were identified, quantified, and valorized from a payer perspective; therefore, only direct health costs were included. An incremental analysis was estimated to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). In addition, the net monetary benefit (NMB) was calculated for each alternative using a willingness to pay lower than one gross domestic product. A deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Methods We performed a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing nonoperative management (NOM) with open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in patients otherwise healthy adults aged 18–60 years with a diagnosis of uncomplicated AA from the payer’s perspective at the secondary and tertiary health care level. The time horizon was five years. A discount rate of 5% was applied to both costs and outcomes. The health outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs were identified, quantified, and valorized from a payer perspective; therefore, only direct health costs were included. An incremental analysis was estimated to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). In addition, the net monetary benefit (NMB) was calculated for each alternative using a willingness to pay lower than one gross domestic product. A deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed. Results LA presents a lower cost ($363 ± 35) than OA ($384 ± 41) and NOM ($392 ± 44). NOM exhibited higher QALYs (3.3332 ± 0.0276) in contrast with LA (3.3310 ± 0.057) and OA (3.3261 ± 0.0707). LA dominated the OA. The ICER between LA and NOM was $24,000/QALY. LA has a 52% probability of generating the highest NMB versus its counterparts, followed by NOM (30%) and OA (18%). There is a probability of 0.69 that laparoscopy generates more significant benefit than medical management. The mean value of that incremental NMB would be $93.7 per patient. Conclusions LA is a cost-effectiveness alternative in the management of patients with uncomplicated AA. Besides, LA has a high probability of producing more significant monetary benefits than NOM and OA from the payer’s perspective in the Colombian health system. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12962-021-00288-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elizabeth Parody-Rúa
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Icesi, Calle 18 No. 122-135 Pance, 70000, Cali, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ihnát P, Tesař M, Tulinský L, Ihnát Rudinská L, Okantey O, Durdík Š. A randomized clinical trial of technical modifications of appendix stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. BMC Surg 2021; 21:272. [PMID: 34059039 PMCID: PMC8165989 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01279-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Closure of the appendix stump presents the most critical part of laparoscopic appendectomy. The aim of the present study was to compare the medical outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy with respect to the different methods of stump closure.
Methods This was a prospective randomized clinical trial conducted in a single institution (University Hospital Ostrava) within a 2-year study period. All included patients were randomized into one of three trial arms (endoloop, hem-o-lok clips or endostapler). Results In total, 180 patients (60 patients in each arm) were enrolled into the study. The mean length of hospital stay (3.6 ± 1.7 days) was comparable in all study arms. The shortest operative time was noted in the hem-o-lok subgroup of patients (37.9 ± 12.5 min). Superficial surgical site infection was detected in 4.4% of study patients; deep surgical site infection was noted in 1.7% of the patients. The frequency of surgical site infections was comparable in all study arms (p = 0.7173). The mean direct costs of laparoscopic appendectomy were significantly the lowest in the hem-o-lok subgroup of patients. Laparoscopic appendectomy is not a profit-making procedure in our institution (mean profit of made from the study patients was—104.3 ± 579.2 Euro). Closure of the appendix stump by means of endostapler presents the most expensive and the highest loss-incurring technique (p = 0.0072). Conclusions The present study indicates that all technical modifications of appendix stump closure are comparable with regards to postoperative complications. The stapler technique is significantly the most expensive. We concluded that hem-o-lok clips have the potential for becoming the preferred method of securing the appendix base during laparoscopic appendectomy. Trial registration NCT03750032 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Ihnát
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17.listopadu 1790, Ostrava, 708 52, Czech Republic.
| | - Milan Tesař
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17.listopadu 1790, Ostrava, 708 52, Czech Republic
| | - Lubomír Tulinský
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17.listopadu 1790, Ostrava, 708 52, Czech Republic
| | - Lucia Ihnát Rudinská
- Department of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, 17.listopadu 1790, Ostrava, 708 52, Czech Republic.,Department of Oncosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Commenius University Bratislava, Spitalska 24, Bratislava, 813 72, Slovakia
| | - Okaikor Okantey
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 17.listopadu 1790, Ostrava, 708 52, Czech Republic
| | - Štefan Durdík
- Department of Oncosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Commenius University Bratislava, Spitalska 24, Bratislava, 813 72, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pringle HCM, Donigiewicz U, Bennett MR, Walker E, Fowler GE, Narang S, Ball S, Bethune RM. Appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learnt from a district general hospital. BMC Surg 2021; 21:242. [PMID: 33980191 PMCID: PMC8114653 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01231-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically influenced the delivery of healthcare. In line with the UK Royal Colleges' advice the management of acute appendicitis (AA) changed with greater consideration for non-operative management (NOM) or open appendicectomy when operative management (OM) was sought. We describe our experience of the presentation, management and outcomes for these patients to inform care for future viral pandemics. METHODS This retrospective, cohort study compared patients diagnosed with AA between March and July 2019 with those during the pandemic period of March to July 2020. Medical records were reviewed to obtain demographics, inflammatory markers, imaging, severity, management, histology, length of stay (LOS) and 90-day outcomes. RESULTS There were 149 and 125 patients in the 2019 and 2020 cohorts respectively. 14 patients (9.4%) had NOM in 2019 versus 31 (24.8%) in 2020 (p = 0.001). In the 2019 operative management (OM) group 125 patients (92.6%) had laparoscopic appendicectomy versus 65 (69.1%) in 2020. 59 patients (39.6%) had a CT in 2019 versus 70 (56%) in 2020. The median LOS was 4 days in 2019 and 3 days in 2020 (p = 0.03). Two patients in each year who received NOM had treatment failure (14.3% in 2019 and 6.5% in 2020). Three patients in 2019 who received OM had treatment failure (2.2%). Of 95 patients tested for COVID-19 all but one tested negative. CONCLUSION During the COVID-19 pandemic there was no observed increase in severity of AA, patients had a shorter LOS and were more likely to have imaging. NOM proportionally increased with no observed change in outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Melissa-Rose Bennett
- Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, EX2 5DW, Devon, UK.,University of Exeter Medical School, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK
| | - Eleanor Walker
- Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, EX2 5DW, Devon, UK
| | | | - Sunil Narang
- Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, EX2 5DW, Devon, UK
| | - Susan Ball
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK
| | - Robert M Bethune
- Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, EX2 5DW, Devon, UK.,University of Exeter Medical School, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yamada T, Endo H, Hasegawa H, Kimura T, Kakeji Y, Koda K, Ishida H, Sakamoto K, Hirata K, Yamamoto H, Miyata H, Matsuda A, Yoshida H, Kitagawa Y. Risk of emergency surgery for complicated appendicitis: Japanese nationwide study. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:236-242. [PMID: 33860144 PMCID: PMC8034695 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Appendicitis is divided into two categories: complicated appendicitis (CA) and uncomplicated appendicitis (UA). In pediatric patients with CA, the use of interval appendectomy (IA), which is non-operative management followed by elective surgery, has decreased the number of postoperative complications. Before discussing the merit of IA for adult patients, we need to clarify whether the frequency and seriousness of the complication rate after emergency surgery is higher for CA than for UA. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent appendectomy and who were registered in the National Clinical Database (NCD) from 2014 to 2016. Patients with CA who underwent emergency appendectomy comprised the CA group. Patients with UA comprised the UA group. Patients with chronic or recurrent appendicitis who underwent elective appendectomy comprised the elective appendectomy (EA) group. Primary outcomes were all morbidity, serious morbidity, and mortality within 30 days after appendectomy. RESULTS We included 109 256 patients in the study: 14 798 CA, 86 876 UA, and 7582 EA patients. Compared with the UA group, the rates of all morbidity, serious morbidity, and mortality were significantly higher in the CA group. All morbidity, serious morbidity, and mortality rates were significantly lower in the EA group than in the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed that emergency surgery for CA places the patient at relatively higher risk. We also showed that the risk associated with EA is significantly lower than that for the other methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Hideki Endo
- Department of Healthcare Quality AssessmentGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Hasegawa
- Project Management SubcommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Toshimoto Kimura
- Project Management SubcommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Database CommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Keiji Koda
- Department of SurgeryTeikyo University Chiba Comprehensive Medical CenterChibaJapan
| | - Hideyuki Ishida
- Department of Digestive Tract and General SurgerySaitama Medical UniversitySaitamaJapan
| | - Kazuhiro Sakamoto
- Department of Coloproctological SurgeryJuntendo University Faculty of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Keiji Hirata
- Department of Surgery 1University of Occupational and Environmental HealthKitakyushuJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Healthcare Quality AssessmentGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Healthcare Quality AssessmentGraduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zhai Z, Zhang K, Wang Z. Barium Spill from Perforated Appendix After Barium Enema. Indian J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12262-020-02330-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
35
|
Advances and Trends in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9123999. [PMID: 33321836 PMCID: PMC7764454 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
As many meta-analyses comparing pediatric minimally invasive to open surgery can be found in the literature, the aim of this review is to summarize the current state of minimally invasive pediatric surgery and specifically focus on the trends and developments which we expect in the upcoming years. Print and electronic databases were systematically searched for specific keywords, and cross-link searches with references found in the literature were added. Full-text articles were obtained, and eligibility criteria were applied independently. Pediatric minimally invasive surgery is a wide field, ranging from minimally invasive fetal surgery over microlaparoscopy in newborns to robotic surgery in adolescents. New techniques and devices, like natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), single-incision and endoscopic surgery, as well as the artificial uterus as a backup for surgery in preterm fetuses, all contribute to the development of less invasive procedures for children. In spite of all promising technical developments which will definitely change the way pediatric surgeons will perform minimally invasive procedures in the upcoming years, one must bear in mind that only hard data of prospective randomized controlled and double-blind trials can validate whether these techniques and devices really improve the surgical outcome of our patients.
Collapse
|
36
|
Olarinoye-Alegbejo MI, Steve K, Ologun GO. Incidental finding of double appendix during laparotomy for intussusception: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2020; 75:219-221. [PMID: 32966929 PMCID: PMC7509365 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 09/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A double caecal appendix is an uncommon anatomical variation with significant surgical implications. Patients with double appendix are usually asymptomatic. When symptomatic, the problems that may arise from a missed diagnosis have serious health consequences. The double appendix can be classified using the Cave-Wallbridge classification.
Introduction A double caecal appendix is an uncommon anatomical variation with significant surgical implications. A few cases of the double caecal appendix have been reported worldwide, mostly in adults. The diagnosis is, usually incidental, typically made intraoperatively. Case report We present the case of a 6-month-old boy with an incidental diagnosis of the double appendix during laparotomy for intussusception. Discussion The double appendix can be classified using the Cave-Wallbridge classification, which identifies three types of the duplicated appendix: A, B, and C. The complication of appendiceal duplications includes acute appendicitis, colonic perforation, obstruction, bleeding, pain, failure to thrive, abdominal mass. In the case of abdominal pain with diagnostic uncertainty, with appropriate patient selection (without hemodynamic instability), diagnostic laparoscopy may be offered as an initial intraoperative evaluation, and if the procedure cannot be safely completed laparoscopically, it can be converted to a laparotomy. Conclusion Although uncommon, knowledge of appendiceal duplication is of great significance in the surgical patient, as a missed diagnosis or delay in diagnosis in symptomatic patients may result in increased morbidity and possibly mortality secondary to sepsis, with its medico-legal ramifications in today's practice of medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kache Steve
- Department of Surgery, Kaduna State University, Nigeria.
| | - Gabriel O Ologun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit Number 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cross W, Kowdley GC. Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Safe Same-day Surgery Procedure? Am Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481307900822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Over 250,000 cases of appendicitis occur annually in the United States. The mainstay of treatment is surgical removal with admission. Recently, antibiotic therapy as an alternative has been introduced and the state of Maryland has incentivized 23-hour procedures. We studied patients with appendicitis discharged from the recovery room and those with length of stay (LOS) less than 24 hours. We retrospectively reviewed all appendectomies performed from June 2010 to October 2012 by three general surgeons. We excluded cases that were converted to open, appendectomies performed in the setting of another disease process, and incidental appendectomies. A total of 84 laparoscopic appendectomies were included. Of these, 55 patients had LOS less than 24 hours. Pathology, comorbidities, and readmission were recorded. χ2 analysis was used for determining statistical significance. Average LOS for all patients was 25 hours with a minimum stay of 2 hours and a maximum stay of 96 hours. For patients discharged in less than 24 hours, there was one readmission and 52 (95%) of these patients had simple appendicitis on pathology. A total of 19 patients (22%) were discharged in less than 7 hours (from the recovery room). Among these patients, there were no readmissions, and 18 (95%) were cases of simple appendicitis ( P = 0.4431). There was no significant difference in complications or readmission between patients discharged in less than 24 hours and those who stayed longer. Our subgroup analysis indicated that discharge from the postanesthesia care unit after uncomplicated laparoscopic appendectomy should be further evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wirt Cross
- From Saint Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Neville AL, Nemceff D, Bricker SD, Plurad D, Bongard F, Putnam BA. Open Appendectomy: No Longer an Intern Case. Am Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481207801036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopy and work-hour restrictions are altering surgical training. We hypothesized interns were no longer gaining experience in open appendectomy, historically an intern index case. We retrospectively reviewed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case logs of postgraduate Year (PGY) 1 general surgery trainees from our academic teaching program for the last 9 years. Number of appendectomies performed (Current Procedural Terminology codes 44950, 44960, and 44970) were recorded and analyzed. The national ACGME database was similarly evaluated for resident experience during junior (PGY-1 to 4) years. Data were available for 47 residents completing internship at our institution between 2003 and 2011. Mean number of appendectomies performed per intern steadily decreased throughout the study period from 22 in 2003 to 5 in 2011 ( P = 0.0367). Mean percentage of cases done open decreased from 79.5 to 2.4 per cent ( P = 0.0001). National data found residents graduating in the year 2000 performed an average of 26.6 open appendectomies during junior years, whereas those graduating in 2011 had done only 13.7. Surgical trainees are performing fewer open appendectomies than just several years ago. Open appendectomy traditionally served as an introduction to open surgery. Because outcome differences are small between open and laparoscopic appendectomy, we propose teaching institutions consider performing open appendectomies in select patients to preserve an important educational experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela L. Neville
- From the Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Dennis Nemceff
- From the Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Scott D. Bricker
- From the Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - David Plurad
- From the Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Frederick Bongard
- From the Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Brant A. Putnam
- From the Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ivakhov GB, Sazhin AV, Ermakov IV, Titkova SM, Anurov MV, Nechaj TV. [Laparoscopic surgery for advanced appendicular peritonitis]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2020:20-26. [PMID: 32500685 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202005120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the results of laparoscopic treatment of patients with advanced appendicular peritonitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 271 patients with acute appendicitis complicated by peritonitis. The main group consisted of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy after diagnostic laparoscopy (n=231), the control group - diagnostic laparoscopy followed by conversion to median laparotomy (n=36). Four extremely ill patients were operated through laparotomy and excluded from the further analysis. RESULTS Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 267 patients with advanced appendicular peritonitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy, debridement and abdominal drainage were performed in 231 (85.2%) patients. Mean age of patients was 44±18.5 years, duration of disease - 36.2±20.3 hours. Diffuse peritonitis was diagnosed in 219 (82%) patients, advanced peritonitis - in 48 (16.5%) cases. Incidence of conversion was 13.5%. Mortality was absent in both groups. Postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the conversion group (72.2% vs. 29.4%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic interventions for common appendicular peritonitis are feasible, effective and reduce postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G B Ivakhov
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Sazhin
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - I V Ermakov
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - S M Titkova
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - M V Anurov
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - T V Nechaj
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Augustin G, Gori A, Boermeester M, Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Tarasconi A, De' Angelis N, Weber DG, Tolonen M, Birindelli A, Biffl W, Moore EE, Kelly M, Soreide K, Kashuk J, Ten Broek R, Gomes CA, Sugrue M, Davies RJ, Damaskos D, Leppäniemi A, Kirkpatrick A, Peitzman AB, Fraga GP, Maier RV, Coimbra R, Chiarugi M, Sganga G, Pisanu A, De' Angelis GL, Tan E, Van Goor H, Pata F, Di Carlo I, Chiara O, Litvin A, Campanile FC, Sakakushev B, Tomadze G, Demetrashvili Z, Latifi R, Abu-Zidan F, Romeo O, Segovia-Lohse H, Baiocchi G, Costa D, Rizoli S, Balogh ZJ, Bendinelli C, Scalea T, Ivatury R, Velmahos G, Andersson R, Kluger Y, Ansaloni L, Catena F. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 2020; 15:27. [PMID: 32295644 PMCID: PMC7386163 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 430] [Impact Index Per Article: 107.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Acute appendicitis (AA) is among the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Diagnosis of AA is still challenging and some controversies on its management are still present among different settings and practice patterns worldwide. In July 2015, the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) organized in Jerusalem the first consensus conference on the diagnosis and treatment of AA in adult patients with the intention of producing evidence-based guidelines. An updated consensus conference took place in Nijemegen in June 2019 and the guidelines have now been updated in order to provide evidence-based statements and recommendations in keeping with varying clinical practice: use of clinical scores and imaging in diagnosing AA, indications and timing for surgery, use of non-operative management and antibiotics, laparoscopy and surgical techniques, intra-operative scoring, and peri-operative antibiotic therapy. METHODS This executive manuscript summarizes the WSES guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AA. Literature search has been updated up to 2019 and statements and recommendations have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. The statements were voted, eventually modified, and finally approved by the participants to the consensus conference and by the board of co-authors, using a Delphi methodology for voting whenever there was controversy on a statement or a recommendation. Several tables highlighting the research topics and questions, search syntaxes, and the statements and the WSES evidence-based recommendations are provided. Finally, two different practical clinical algorithms are provided in the form of a flow chart for both adults and pediatric (< 16 years old) patients. CONCLUSIONS The 2020 WSES guidelines on AA aim to provide updated evidence-based statements and recommendations on each of the following topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) non-operative management for uncomplicated AA, (3) timing of appendectomy and in-hospital delay, (4) surgical treatment, (5) intra-operative grading of AA, (6) ,management of perforated AA with phlegmon or abscess, and (7) peri-operative antibiotic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salomone Di Saverio
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, University Hospital of Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Regione Lombardia, Varese, Italy.
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Maggiore Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- Emergency and General Surgery Department, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Goran Augustin
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Centre of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Alice Gori
- Maggiore Hospital Regional Emergency Surgery and Trauma Center, Bologna Local Health District, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marja Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Tarasconi
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Maggiore Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Nicola De' Angelis
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Dieter G Weber
- Trauma and General Surgeon Royal Perth Hospital & The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Matti Tolonen
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Arianna Birindelli
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale, di Valle Camonica, Italy
| | - Walter Biffl
- Queen's Medical Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Denver Health System - Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, USA
| | - Michael Kelly
- Acute Surgical Unit, Canberra Hospital, ACT, Canberra, Australia
| | - Kjetil Soreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jeffry Kashuk
- Department of Surgery, University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Richard Ten Broek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Augusto Gomes
- Department of Surgery Hospital Universitario, Universidade General de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
| | | | - Richard Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Dimitrios Damaskos
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrew Kirkpatrick
- General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrew B Peitzman
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC-Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (FCM) - Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Ronald V Maier
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Raul Coimbra
- UCSD Health System - Hillcrest Campus Department of Surgery Chief Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns, and Acute Care Surgery, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Department of Emergency Surgery, "A. Gemelli Hospital", Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Adolfo Pisanu
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gian Luigi De' Angelis
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Edward Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Harry Van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Pata
- Department of Surgery, Nicola Giannettasio Hospital, Corigliano-Rossano, and La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Isidoro Di Carlo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgery, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia
| | - Fabio C Campanile
- Department of Surgery, San Giovanni Decollato Andosilla Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Gia Tomadze
- Department of Surgery, Tbilisi State Medical University, TSMU, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Zaza Demetrashvili
- Department of Surgery, Tbilisi State Medical University, TSMU, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Section of Acute Care Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Department of Surgery, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Fakri Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | | | - Gianluca Baiocchi
- Surgical Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - David Costa
- Hospital universitario de Alicante, departamento de Cirugia General, Alicante, Spain
| | - Sandro Rizoli
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zsolt J Balogh
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Cino Bendinelli
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Rao Ivatury
- Professor Emeritus Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - George Velmahos
- Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | | | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Department of General Surgery and Trauma, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Maggiore Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to review the cases of postcolonoscopy appendicitis (PCA) reported in the literature. A comprehensive search using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar identified 57 cases. The median age at presentations of PCA was 55 years. PCAs typically occurred during the first 24 hours after colonoscopy, and the majority developed after diagnostic colonoscopy. Clinical presentations were similar to those with common acute appendicitis, though with a high perforation rate. Most patients were correctly diagnosed using ultrasound or computed tomography scan. Treatment included open appendicectomy, laparoscopic appendicectomy or cecotomy, radiologic drainage of the abscess, nonoperative treatment with antibiotics. In addition to barotrauma, fecalith impaction into the appendiceal lumen, direct trauma to the appendiceal orifice, and underlying ulcerative colitis, a pre-existing subclinical disease of the appendix seems to play an important role in the pathogenesis. For PCA, timely diagnosis and management are crucial to attain a satisfactory outcome.
Collapse
|
42
|
Grbas H, Grebić D, Jerković A, Karlović D, Tomašić AM, Rinčić Antulov M. Comparison of laparoscopic and classic appendectomy at clinical hospital center Rijeka over a ten year period. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2020. [DOI: 10.23736/s0394-9508.19.05002-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
43
|
Danwang C, Bigna JJ, Tochie JN, Mbonda A, Mbanga CM, Nzalie RNT, Guifo ML, Essomba A. Global incidence of surgical site infection after appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034266. [PMID: 32075838 PMCID: PMC7045165 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most studied healthcare-associated infections, the global burden of SSI after appendectomy remains unknown. OBJECTIVE We estimated the incidence of SSI after appendectomy at global and regional levels. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. PARTICIPANTS Appendectomy patients. DATA SOURCES EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science were searched, with no language restrictions, to identify observational studies and clinical trials published between 1 January 2000 and 30 December 2018 and reporting on the incidence of SSI after appendectomy. A random-effect model meta-analysis served to obtain the pooled incidence of SSI after appendectomy. RESULTS In total, 226 studies (729 434 participants from 49 countries) were included in the meta-analysis. With regard to methodological quality, 59 (26.1%) studies had low risk of bias, 147 (65.0%) had moderate risk of bias and 20 (8.8%) had high risk of bias. We found an overall incidence of SSI of 7.0 per 100 appendectomies (95% prediction interval: 1.0-17.6), varying from 0 to 37.4 per 100 appendectomies. A subgroup analysis to identify sources of heterogeneity showed that the incidence varied from 5.8 in Europe to 12.6 per 100 appendectomies in Africa (p<0.0001). The incidence of SSI after appendectomy increased when the level of income decreased, from 6.2 in high-income countries to 11.1 per 100 appendectomies in low-income countries (p=0.015). Open appendectomy (11.0 per 100 surgical procedures) was found to have a higher incidence of SSI compared with laparoscopy (4.6 per 100 appendectomies) (p=0.0002). CONCLUSION This study suggests a high burden of SSI after appendectomy in some regions (especially Africa) and in low-income countries. Strategies are needed to implement and disseminate the WHO guidelines to decrease the burden of SSI after appendectomy in these regions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017075257.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celestin Danwang
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium
- Department of Surgery and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Jean Joel Bigna
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Centre Pasteur of Cameroon, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Joel Noutakdie Tochie
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Aimé Mbonda
- Department of General Medicine, Djohong District Hospital, Djohong, Cameroon
| | - Clarence Mvalo Mbanga
- Department of General Medicine, Mankon Sub-Divisional Hospital, Bamenda, North West Region, Cameroon
| | - Rolf Nyah Tuku Nzalie
- Department of General Medicine, Ngong District Hospital, Ngong, North Region, Cameroon
| | - Marc Leroy Guifo
- Department of Surgery and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Arthur Essomba
- Department of Surgery and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Inagaki K, Blackshear C, Morris MW, Hobbs CV. Pediatric Appendicitis–Factors Associated With Surgical Approach, Complications, and Readmission. J Surg Res 2020; 246:395-402. [PMID: 31629495 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
45
|
An Enhanced Recovery Protocol that Facilitates Same-day Discharge for Simple Laparoscopic Appendectomies. Pediatr Qual Saf 2019; 4:e243. [PMID: 32010869 PMCID: PMC6946221 DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute appendicitis is the most common gastrointestinal condition requiring urgent operation in the pediatric population with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) being the current surgical technique. We describe the implementation of a standardized protocol to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and facilitate same-day discharge after LA.
Collapse
|
46
|
Prechal D, Post S, Pechlivanidou I, Ronellenfitsch U. Feasibility, acceptance, safety, and effectiveness of antibiotic therapy as alternative treatment approach to appendectomy in uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:1839-1847. [PMID: 31515616 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03392-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Based on results from randomized controlled trials, there is an increasing discussion if antibiotic treatment is an equivalent therapeutic approach to appendectomy in uncomplicated acute appendicitis. This observational prospective study evaluates its feasibility, safety, and effectiveness in clinical practice. METHODS The study included all consecutive adults treated for acute appendicitis over an 18-month period in one hospital. Patients receiving antibiotics were compared to those treated surgically. Follow-up comprised 1 year. The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as no secondary appendectomy during follow-up (antibiotic group) or successful appendectomy (primary surgical group). Secondary endpoints were complications, duration of hospital stay, pain intensity, and length of absence from work. RESULTS 54/124 (43.6%) patients were primarily treated with antibiotics and 70/124 (56.4%) surgically. Treatment success at 1 year was 77.1% (95%-CI 62.8-88%) for antibiotic and 100% for surgical treatment. Complications were non-significantly less frequent both among all patients treated with antibiotics and among patients undergoing secondary appendectomy compared to patients undergoing primary appendectomy (20.8% vs. 27.1% and 9.1% vs. 27.1%). The initial hospital stay was significantly shorter in the antibiotic group (mean 3.6 vs. 4.8 days, median 3 days, p = 0.03). After 1 year, the cumulative hospital stay was not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS Appendectomy remains the most effective treatment for the definitive cure of acute appendicitis. However, antibiotic therapy can be a safe alternative approach for selected patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION DRKS00010401.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Prechal
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefan Post
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ioanna Pechlivanidou
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ulrich Ronellenfitsch
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. .,Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Yu ZL, Lin DZ, Hu JC, Chen YF, Cai ZR, Zou YF, Ke J, Guo XF, Lan P, Wu XJ. Laparoscopic Surgery for Complex Crohn's Disease: A Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29:1397-1404. [PMID: 31414963 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zhao-liang Yu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - De-zheng Lin
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Ambulatory Surgery Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian-cong Hu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Ambulatory Surgery Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu-feng Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ze-rong Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-feng Zou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jia Ke
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xue-feng Guo
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Ambulatory Surgery Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ping Lan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-jian Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Risk factors for serious morbidity, prolonged length of stay and hospital readmission after laparoscopic appendectomy - results from Pol-LA (Polish Laparoscopic Appendectomy) multicenter large cohort study. Sci Rep 2019; 9:14793. [PMID: 31616053 PMCID: PMC6794313 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51172-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for treatment of acute appendicitis has gained acceptance with its considerable benefits over open appendectomy. LA, however, can involve some adverse outcomes: morbidity, prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS) and hospital readmission. Identification of predictive factors may help to identify and tailor treatment for patients with higher risk of these adverse events. Our aim was to identify risk factors for serious morbidity, prolonged LOS and hospital readmission after LA. A database compiled information of patients admitted for acute appendicitis from eighteen Polish and German surgical centers. It included factors related to the patient characteristics, peri- and postoperative period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for serious perioperative complications, prolonged LOS, and hospital readmissions in acute appendicitis cases. 4618 laparoscopic appendectomy patients were included. First, although several risk factors for serious perioperative complications (C-D III-V) were found in the univariate analysis, in the multivariate model only the presence of intraoperative adverse events (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.32-12.65, p = 0.014) and complicated appendicitis (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.74-7.61, p = 0.001) was statistically significant. Second, prolonged LOS was associated with the presence of complicated appendicitis (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.53-5.12, p = 0.001), postoperative morbidity (OR 5.01, 95% CI: 2.33-10.75, p < 0.001), conversions (OR 6.48, 95% CI: 3.48-12.08, p < 0.001) and reinterventions after primary procedure (OR 8.79, 95% CI: 3.2-24.14, p < 0.001) in the multivariate model. Third, although several risk factors for hospital readmissions were found in univariate analysis, in the multivariate model only the presence of postoperative complications (OR 10.33, 95% CI: 4.27-25.00), reintervention after primary procedure (OR 5.62, 95% CI: 2.17-14.54), and LA performed by resident (OR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.03-3.70) remained significant. Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe procedure associated with low rates of complications, prolonged LOS, and readmissions. Risk factors for these adverse events include complicated appendicitis, postoperative morbidity, conversion, and re-intervention after the primary procedure. Any occurrence of these factors during treatment should alert the healthcare team to identify the patients that require more customized treatment to minimize the risk for adverse outcomes.
Collapse
|
49
|
Ngo S, Gee K, Burkhalter L, Beres AL. Parental satisfaction with same-day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis. Paediatr Child Health 2019; 24:318-322. [PMID: 31379433 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxy177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Recent studies suggest that same-day discharge is safe for the paediatric population after various laparoscopic procedures. Same-day discharge is increasingly common after laparoscopic surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis although it is not standard practice. This prospective study aims to assess parental satisfaction with same-day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis. Methods At our institution, 849 patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis underwent laparoscopic appendectomy in 2016; of which, 382 were discharged on the same calendar day. Postdischarge surveys assessing parental satisfaction were administered by telephone at the 2-week follow-up. Results Approximately 65% of 185 total parental responses reported initial satisfaction with same-day discharge. About 30% were nervous at that time, and 5% did not feel ready to go home yet. Upon reflection, a higher proportion of parents (81.6%) felt same-day discharge was the appropriate course of action, 11.4% were unsure, and 7.0% would not do it again. Some parents cited concerns regarding pain control and incongruous expectations from conversations with staff or surgical experiences of their own. Conclusions The majority of parents recalled being happy at discharge, with an increase to 82% retrospectively. Only 7% of parents would not elect to go home on the same day again. Opportunities for improvement include a unified plan from all providers with expectations of same-day discharge if appendicitis is intraoperatively confirmed to be uncomplicated and better analgesic instructions at discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Ngo
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kristin Gee
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Alana L Beres
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Children's Health, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ogata H, Nakamoto S, Miyawaki H, Ueki R, Kariya N, Tatara T, Hirose M. Association between intraoperative nociception and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 2019; 34:575-581. [PMID: 31264131 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00347-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
A higher degree of surgical invasiveness, which increases intraoperative nociception, might induce postoperative complications. Although several nociceptive indices for use during surgery are available in clinical practice, association between intraoperative nociception and postoperative complications has not been reported. An index representing intraoperative nociception, which is the averaged value of Nociceptive Response throughout the surgery (mean NR) was applied to examine the association in the present study. The retrospective study evaluated consecutive adult patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists-physical status (ASA-PS) I or II, whose preoperative C-reactive protein level was < 0.3 mg dL-1. We first used ordinal logistic analysis to examine the association between preoperative and intraoperative risk factors and complications graded by the Clavien-Dindo classification. Next, we performed propensity score matched analysis to evaluate the effects of mean NR throughout surgery on postoperative complications. Ordinal logistic analysis (n = 158) revealed that duration of surgery (P < 0.001), mean NR during surgery (P = 0.002), and ASA-PS (P = 0.016) were risk factors for postoperative complications. Then all patients were divided into two propensity score matched groups, based on a mean NR of < 0.85 and ≥ 0.85, with matching for age, ASA-PS, body mass index and duration of surgery. The severity of postoperative complications was significantly higher in the high NR group than in the low NR group (P = 0.005). In conclusion, there was likely an association between intraoperative nociception and postoperative complications in patients without serious preoperative conditions and comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Ogata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Shiroh Nakamoto
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Miyawaki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Ryusuke Ueki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Nobutaka Kariya
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tsuneo Tatara
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Munetaka Hirose
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|