1
|
Tzela P, Antsaklis P, Kanellopoulos D, Antonakopoulos N, Gourounti K. Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process for Undergoing Invasive Prenatal Testing. Cureus 2024; 16:e58803. [PMID: 38654958 PMCID: PMC11036145 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Invasive prenatal testing, amniocentesis, and chorionic villus sampling offer insights into fetal genetic integrity and health, but carry inevitable minor risks of miscarriage and infection, thus complicating the decision-making process for parents. Previous research has revealed several factors that influence the decision to undergo invasive prenatal testing, including demographic, clinical, and psychological aspects, and attitudes towards testing. Informed choice, involving understanding options and aligning them with personal values, is crucial, with healthcare providers playing a key role in offering unbiased information. This systematic review aims to gather and synthesize literature data on the above factors to draw conclusions to aid antenatal care providers in supporting couples to make more informed decisions about their prenatal care. A systematic search was performed in PubMed and PsycInfo databases using the appropriate keywords and an in-depth evaluation of the studies retrieved followed. Finally, 17 articles were eligible for our review investigating the decision-making process of invasive prenatal testing. Factors like maternal age, education, and ethnicity are pivotal during the decision-making process. Clinical characteristics also influence decisions and women with pregnancies categorized as high-risk or those who have undergone fertility treatment display a preference for invasive testing. There seems to be a direct correlation between a woman's willingness to consider pregnancy termination, deeply rooted in psychological and moral stances, and the inclination to undergo invasive testing. In the patient decision-making process, the provision and depth of knowledge are of paramount importance. A comprehensive understanding facilitates more informed decisions. Finally, attitudes towards termination of pregnancy, as another factor influencing the decision-making process, reveal a nuanced landscape where personal beliefs, religious considerations, legal restrictions, and perspectives on disability converge. Within this complex context, religion emerges as an important determinant, shaping individuals' views on the morality of abortion. This review sheds light on the most important factors influencing the couples' consent for invasive prenatal testing. Healthcare professionals must identify which factors are critical in every specific case among several sociodemographic, clinical, emotional, and religious factors. Thus, they will be able to provide balanced and comprehensive information to help couples under this stressful procedure. We advocate for a patient-centered multidisciplinary approach while navigating couples through the intricate landscape of decision-making concerning invasive prenatal testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiota Tzela
- Department of Midwifery, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC
| | - Panagiotis Antsaklis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
- Department of Midwifery, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC
| | - Nikolaos Antonakopoulos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, Patras, GRC
| | - Kleanthi Gourounti
- Department of Midwifery, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kamphof HD, van Roekel M, Henrichs J, de Vreede H, Verhoeven CJ, Franx A, de Jonge A, Ganzevoort W, Gordijn SJ. Predictive value of fetal growth trajectory from 20 weeks of gestation onwards for severe adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk population: secondary analysis of IRIS study. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2023; 62:796-804. [PMID: 37204332 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The placental dysfunction underlying fetal growth restriction (FGR) may result in severe adverse perinatal outcome (SAPO) related to fetal hypoxia. Traditionally, the diagnostic criteria for FGR have been based on fetal size, an approach that is inherently flawed because it often results in either over- or underdiagnosis. The anomaly ultrasound scan at 20 weeks' gestation may be an appropriate time at which to set a benchmark for growth potential of the individual fetus. We hypothesized that the fetal growth trajectory from that point onwards may be informative regarding third-trimester placental dysfunction. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value for SAPO of a slow fetal growth trajectory between 18 + 0 to 23 + 6 weeks and 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation in a large, low-risk population. METHODS This was a post-hoc data analysis of the IUGR Risk Selection (IRIS) study, a Dutch nationwide cluster-randomized trial assessing the (cost-)effectiveness of routine third-trimester sonography in reducing SAPO. In the current analysis, for the first ultrasound examination we used ultrasound data from the routine anomaly scan at 18 + 0 to 23 + 6 weeks' gestation, and for the second we used data from an ultrasound examination performed between 32 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. Using multilevel logistic regression, we analyzed whether SAPO was predicted by a slow fetal growth trajectory, which was defined as a decline in abdominal circumference (AC) and/or estimated fetal weight (EFW) of more than 20 percentiles or more than 50 percentiles or as an AC growth velocity (ACGV) < 10th percentile (p10). In addition, we analyzed the combination of these indicators of slow fetal growth with small-for-gestational age (SGA) (AC or EFW < p10) and severe SGA (AC/EFW < 3rd percentile) at 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. RESULTS Our sample included the data of 6296 low-risk singleton pregnancies, among which 82 (1.3%) newborns experienced at least one SAPO. Standalone declines in AC or EFW of > 20 or > 50 percentiles or ACGV < p10 were not associated with increased odds of SAPO. EFW < p10 between 32 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks' gestation combined with a decline in EFW of > 20 percentiles was associated with an increased rate of SAPO. The combination of AC or EFW < p10 between 32 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks' gestation with ACGV < p10 was also associated with increased odds of SAPO. The odds ratios of these associations were higher if the neonate was SGA at birth. CONCLUSIONS In a low-risk population, a slow fetal growth trajectory as a standalone criterion does not distinguish adequately between fetuses with FGR and those that are constitutionally small. This absence of association may be a result of diagnostic inaccuracies and/or post-diagnostic (e.g. intervention and selection) biases. We conclude that new approaches to detect placental insufficiency should integrate information from diagnostic tools such as maternal serum biomarkers and Doppler ultrasound measurements. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H D Kamphof
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M van Roekel
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, InHolland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Henrichs
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, InHolland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - H de Vreede
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C J Verhoeven
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, InHolland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Division of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - A Franx
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A de Jonge
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, InHolland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W Ganzevoort
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S J Gordijn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spelten E, Gitsels J, Verhoeven C, Hutton EK, Martin L. The DELIVER study; the impact of research capacity building on research, education, and practice in Dutch midwifery. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287834. [PMID: 37906553 PMCID: PMC10617737 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few examples exist of research capacity building (RCB) in midwifery. As in other jurisdictions, at the turn of this century midwives in the Netherlands lagged in research-based practice. Dutch professional and academic organisations recognised the need to proactively undertake RCB. This paper describes how a large national research project, the DELIVER study, contributed to RCB in Dutch midwifery. METHODS Applying Cooke's framework for RCB, we analysed the impact of the DELIVER study on RCB in midwifery with a document analysis comprising the following documents: annual reports on research output, websites of national organizations that might have implemented research findings, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)), midwifery guidelines concerning DELIVER research topics, publicly available career information of the PhD students and a google search using the main research topic and name of the researcher to look for articles in public papers. RESULTS The study provided an extensive database with nationally representative data on the quality and provision of midwifery-led care in the Netherlands. The DELIVER study resulted in 10 completed PhD projects and over 60 publications. Through close collaboration the study had direct impact on education of the next generation of primary, midwifery care practices and governmental and professional bodies. DISCUSSION The DELIVER study was intended to boost the research profile of primary care midwifery. This reflection on the research capacity building components of the study shows that the study also impacted on education, policy, and the midwifery profession. As such the study shows that this investment in RCB has had a profound positive impact on primary care midwifery in the Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien Spelten
- Violet Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Janneke Gitsels
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, InHolland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Corine Verhoeven
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, InHolland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Eileen K. Hutton
- McMaster Midwifery Research Unit, McMaster University Hamilton, Canada
| | - Linda Martin
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Midwifery Academy Amsterdam Groningen, InHolland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thomas J, Keels J, Calzone KA, Badzek L, Dewell S, Patch C, Tonkin ET, Dwyer AA. Current State of Genomics in Nursing: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Provider Oriented (Clinical and Educational) Outcomes (2012-2022). Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:2013. [PMID: 38002957 PMCID: PMC10671121 DOI: 10.3390/genes14112013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
In the 20 years since the initial sequencing of the human genome, genomics has become increasingly relevant to nursing. We sought to chart the current state of genomics in nursing by conducting a systematic scoping review of the literature in four databases (2012-2022). The included articles were categorized according to the Cochrane Collaboration outcome domains/sub-domains, and thematic analysis was employed to identify key topical areas to summarize the state of the science. Of 8532 retrieved articles, we identified 232 eligible articles. The articles primarily reported descriptive studies from the United States and other high-income countries (191/232, 82%). More than half (126/232, 54.3%) aligned with the "healthcare provider oriented outcomes" outcome domain. Three times as many articles related to the "knowledge and understanding" sub-domain compared to the "consultation process" subdomain (96 vs. 30). Five key areas of focus were identified, including "nursing practice" (50/126, 40%), "genetic counseling and screening" (29/126, 23%), "specialist nursing" (21/126, 17%), "nurse preparatory education" (17/126, 13%), and "pharmacogenomics" (9/126, 7%). Only 42/126 (33%) articles reported interventional studies. To further integrate genomics into nursing, study findings indicate there is a need to move beyond descriptive work on knowledge and understanding to focus on interventional studies and implementation of genomics into nursing practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Thomas
- Genomics Policy Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK;
| | - Jordan Keels
- William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02476, USA;
| | - Kathleen A. Calzone
- Global Genomics Nursing Alliance (G2NA), Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK; (K.A.C.); (L.B.); (S.D.); (C.P.)
- National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Genetics Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Laurie Badzek
- Global Genomics Nursing Alliance (G2NA), Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK; (K.A.C.); (L.B.); (S.D.); (C.P.)
- Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - Sarah Dewell
- Global Genomics Nursing Alliance (G2NA), Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK; (K.A.C.); (L.B.); (S.D.); (C.P.)
- School of Nursing, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC V2C 0C8, Canada
| | - Christine Patch
- Global Genomics Nursing Alliance (G2NA), Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK; (K.A.C.); (L.B.); (S.D.); (C.P.)
- Engagement and Society, Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton CB10 1RQ, UK
| | - Emma T. Tonkin
- Genomics Policy Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK;
- Global Genomics Nursing Alliance (G2NA), Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK; (K.A.C.); (L.B.); (S.D.); (C.P.)
| | - Andrew A. Dwyer
- William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02476, USA;
- Global Genomics Nursing Alliance (G2NA), Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK; (K.A.C.); (L.B.); (S.D.); (C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koopmanschap I, Martin L, Gitsels - van der Wal JT, Suurmond J. Counselling for prenatal anomaly screening to migrant women in the Netherlands: An interview study of primary care midwives’ perceived barriers with client–midwife communication. Eur J Midwifery 2022; 6:29. [PMID: 35633755 PMCID: PMC9118623 DOI: 10.18332/ejm/147911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Large ethnic inequalities exist in the prenatal screening offer, counselling, informed decision-making, and uptake of prenatal anomaly tests. More insight into midwives’ experiences with offering prenatal counselling to migrant women may provide better insight into the origins and consequences of these ethnic inequalities. METHODS We conducted interviews with 12 midwives certified as counsellors for prenatal anomaly screening for women they identified as migrants. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Midwives reported most difficulties in communicating with women of ‘non-western migrant background’, which include first- and second-generation migrants from Africa, Latin-America, Asia, and Turkey. They experienced barriers in communication related to linguistics, health literacy, sociocultural and religious differences, with midwife stereotyping affecting all three aspects of counselling: health education, decision-making support, and the client–midwife relation. Health education was difficult because of language barriers and low health-literacy of clients, decision-making support was hampered by sociocultural and religious midwife–client differences, and client–midwife relations were under pressure due to sociocultural and religious midwife–client differences and midwife stereotyping. CONCLUSIONS Barriers to optimal communication seem to contribute to suboptimal counselling, especially for women of ‘non-western migrant background’. Client–midwife communication thus potentially adds to the ethnic disparities observed in the offer of and informed decision-making about prenatal anomaly screening in the Netherlands. The quality of prenatal counselling for women from all ethnic backgrounds might be improved by addressing linguistic, health literacy, sociocultural and religious barriers in future training and continuing education of prenatal counsellors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Koopmanschap
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Linda Martin
- Department of Midwifery Science, Academy Midwifery Amsterdam and Groningen (AVAG), Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Janneke T. Gitsels - van der Wal
- Department of Midwifery Science, Academy Midwifery Amsterdam and Groningen (AVAG), Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jeanine Suurmond
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trottmann F, Mollet AE, Amylidi-Mohr S, Surbek D, Raio L, Mosimann B. Integrating Combined First Trimester Screening for Preeclampsia into Routine Ultrasound Examination. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:333-340. [PMID: 35250382 PMCID: PMC8893983 DOI: 10.1055/a-1534-2599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction
The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) London has developed a first trimester screening algorithm for preeclampsia (PE), based on maternal characteristics and past risk
factors, mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), and placental growth factor (PlGF). The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of integrating PE
screening into routine practice.
Material and Methods
All pregnancies with a fetal crown-rump length of 45 – 84 mm presenting to our ultrasound department between January 2014 and September 2020 were included in
this analysis. Screening for PE was offered to singleton pregnancies only. The number of screening tests performed in the eligible population was assessed and the reasons for missed
screenings identified with the help of the electronic clinical database. SPSS Statistics 25 and GraphPad version 8.0 for Windows were used for statistical analysis.
Results
6535 pregnancies were included, 4510 (69.0%) of which were screened for PE. The percentage of patients being offered PE screening increased over the years from 63.1 to 96.7%
(r
s
= 0.96; p = 0.003), while the rate of screenings performed in eligible patients remained stable at a median [range] of 86.2% [78.0 – 91.8%] (p = ns). 2025 (31.0%)
pregnancies were not screened for PE, 1306 (64.5%) because they were not eligible for screening. 145 (2.2%) women explicitly declined PE screening; their background risk was lower than that
of women who accepted screening.
Conclusion
Our study shows that integration of PE screening into the routine first trimester ultrasound scan is feasible and widely accepted by pregnant women and health care
providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabienne Trottmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, University Hospital Insel Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anne Elena Mollet
- Department of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, University Hospital Insel Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sofia Amylidi-Mohr
- Department of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, University Hospital Insel Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Surbek
- Department of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, University Hospital Insel Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luigi Raio
- Department of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, University Hospital Insel Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Beatrice Mosimann
- Department of Obstetrics and Feto-maternal Medicine, University Hospital Insel Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Emodi O, Capucha T, Shilo D, Ohayon C, Ginini JG, Ginsberg Y, Aizenbud D, Rachmiel A. Trends in cleft palate incidence in the era of obstetric sonography and early detection. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35:9350-9355. [PMID: 35129039 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2032635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of improvement in prenatal identification of cleft lip or palate (CL/P) on termination of pregnancy (TOP) worldwide is scarcely reported. Our aim was to assess changes in the prevalence of cleft palate attributed to the high access and availability of prenatal advanced screening and pregnancy termination in Israel. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on CL/P patients which were treated in our institute and born between January 2000 and December 2018. Clinical and demographic data were extracted from medical records. Data on TOP were collected based on accessible information from the Ministry of Health. Cleft palate severity was evaluated using the Veau Classification. RESULTS The study was conducted on 258 patients. Higher incidence of Veau II and III was evident throughout the examined period (2000-2018). However, when evaluating the incidence per year, we found that the incidence of severe cases (Veau III and IV) decreased every year showing a major decline of 60% in the last decade, whereas mild cases (Veau type I and II) demonstrated a marked increase of 90%. Regarding the incidence of abortions in Israel, a decrease of 30% was observed in the last two decades, meanwhile a substantial increase was detected in the rate of abortions related to physical malformations of the fetus. Additionally, the number of late terminations due to physical malformations significantly increased in the last decade. CONCLUSIONS Significant decrease was observed in the incidence of severe cleft palate cases in the last decade. Concurrently, we found a substantial increase in percentage of abortions performed due to physical malformations. We suggest that these changes might be attributed to the accessibility of advanced prenatal screening and pregnancy termination in Israel under the social healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omri Emodi
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.,The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Tal Capucha
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Dekel Shilo
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.,The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Chaim Ohayon
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Jiriys George Ginini
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Yuval Ginsberg
- The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.,Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Dror Aizenbud
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.,Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Anomalies, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Adi Rachmiel
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.,The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ogamba CF, Babah OA, Roberts AA, Nwanaji-Enwerem JC, Nwanaji-Enwerem P, Ikwuegbuenyi CA, Ologunja OJ. Knowledge, attitudes, and decision making towards prenatal testing among antenatal clinic attendees in Lagos University Teaching Hospital: an institution-based cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J 2021; 39:106. [PMID: 34512842 PMCID: PMC8396387 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.106.23667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction in Africa, genetic diseases and congenital anomalies remain a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Existing data suggests a gap in the use of prenatal tests among pregnant women to better inform decision making. We examined relationships of socio-demographic factors with willingness to terminate affected pregnancies, and the use of, knowledge of, and attitudes towards prenatal screening/diagnostic tests. Methods this was a cross-sectional descriptive study of pregnant women who attended antenatal clinics at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (N = 422) selected by convenience sampling. Responses were obtained with assisted self-administered structured questionnaires. Results mean ± S.D. age of the respondents was 32.5 ± 5.3 years. The majority of the participants (92.2%) had at least a secondary education. Ultrasound scans in the second trimester were the most frequently used test (39.1%). Only 77 (18.2%) of the respondents indicated willingness to terminate affected pregnancies. The majority of the respondents had fair knowledge and good attitude scores. Knowledge and attitude scores were significantly correlated (r = 0.25, p < 0.001). Compared to married women, being single was associated with a 2.62-point lower knowledge score (95% CI: -4.63, -0.62, p = 0.01). Compared to women who responded “no” when asked if they were willing to terminate an affected pregnancy, women who responded “maybe” had a 0.81-point lower attitude score (95% CI: -1.45, -0.17, p = 0.01). Conclusion our results suggest important socio-demographic differences in women´s knowledge/ behaviours towards prenatal diagnostic tests. Further research is needed to explore these relationships and broader pregnancy-related ethical beliefs among pregnant women in Lagos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chibuzor Franklin Ogamba
- Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine University of Lagos/Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Ochuwa Adiketu Babah
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine University of Lagos/Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Alero Ann Roberts
- Department of Community Medicine and Primary Care, College of Medicine University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | | | - Pamaji Nwanaji-Enwerem
- Department of Business and Entrepreneurship, Barber-Scotia College, Concord, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Chibuikem Anthony Ikwuegbuenyi
- Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine University of Lagos/Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Oluwaseun Joseph Ologunja
- Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine University of Lagos/Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van der Meij KRM, Kooij C, Bekker MN, Galjaard RJH, Henneman L. Non-invasive prenatal test uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Prenat Diagn 2021; 41:1395-1400. [PMID: 34505288 PMCID: PMC9291196 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) is increasingly being implemented worldwide. In public health programs, equitable access to healthcare is a fundamental principle which also applies to fetal aneuploidy screening. However, the out-of-pocket costs of NIPT may lead to sociodemographic disparities in uptake of screening. This study assessed whether there is a difference in the uptake of NIPT in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods compared to all other neighborhoods in the Netherlands, where NIPT is implemented in a national screening program (TRIDENT-2 study). METHOD NIPT uptake, postal code and age of 156,562 pregnant women who received pre-test counselling for prenatal screening in 2018 were retrieved from the national prenatal screening database. Postal codes were used as a proxy to categorize neighborhoods as being either socioeconomically disadvantaged or other. The out-of-pocket costs for NIPT were €175. RESULTS NIPT uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods was 20.3% whereas uptake in all other neighborhoods was 47.6% (p < 0.001). The difference in NIPT uptake between socioeconomic disadvantaged neighborhoods and other areas was smaller for the youngest maternal age-group (≤25 years) compared to other age-groups. CONCLUSION The variation in uptake suggest underlying disparities in NIPT uptake, which undermines the goals of a national fetal aneuploidy screening program of providing reproductive autonomy and equitable access. This has ethical and policy implications for ensuring fair and responsible implementation of fetal aneuploidy screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karuna R M van der Meij
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline Kooij
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Garcia E, Henneman L, Gitsels-van der Wal JT, Martin L, Koopmanschap I, Bekker MN, Timmermans DRM. Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and pregnant women's views on good motherhood: a qualitative study. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 30:669-675. [PMID: 34400811 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00945-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Women's views on responsible motherhood influence decision-making regarding participation in prenatal screening. Previous studies showed that the probabilistic nature of the first-trimester combined test and the potential requirement for subsequent invasive diagnostics serve as legitimate reasons for women to exclude prenatal screening from their moral responsibilities. These moral barriers might now be less relevant with the introduction of the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) resulting in women feeling a moral duty to use NIPT screening as part of responsible motherhood. This qualitative study explores the impact of NIPT on women's moral beliefs about the meaning of prenatal screening in relation to responsible motherhood. We performed semi-structured interviews with 29 pregnant women who were offered NIPT as a first-tier screening test within a Dutch nationwide study (TRIDENT-2). Results show that the inherent uncertainty about the fetus's health despite improved accuracy and the lack of treatment for a detected disorder, combined with the possibility to obtain information about actionable anomalies through the fetal anomaly scan, support women's perspectives that NIPT is not an obligation of responsible motherhood. Acceptance of NIPT is considered to be a free decision related to the information each woman needs to be a good mother for her child and her family. Women's views may change when NIPT has expanded to include treatable or preventable conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Garcia
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Martin
- Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabel Koopmanschap
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R M Timmermans
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van der Meij KRM, Njio A, Martin L, Gitsels-van der Wal JT, Bekker MN, van Vliet-Lachotzki EH, van der Ven AJEM, Kater-Kuipers A, Timmermans DRM, Sistermans EA, Galjaard RJH, Henneman L. Routinization of prenatal screening with the non-invasive prenatal test: pregnant women's perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 30:661-668. [PMID: 34385671 PMCID: PMC9177612 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00940-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the favorable test characteristics of the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in the screening of fetal aneuploidy, there has been a strong and growing demand for implementation. In the Netherlands, NIPT is offered within a governmentally supported screening program as a first-tier screening test for all pregnant women (TRIDENT-2 study). However, concerns have been raised that the test’s favorable characteristics might lead to uncritical use, also referred to as routinization. This study addresses women’s perspectives on prenatal screening with NIPT by evaluating three aspects related to routinization: informed choice, freedom to choose and (personal and societal) perspectives on Down syndrome. Nationwide, a questionnaire was completed by 751 pregnant women after receiving counseling for prenatal screening. Of the respondents, the majority (75.5%) made an informed choice for prenatal screening as measured by the multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC). Education level and religious affiliation were significant predictors of informed choice. The main reason to accept screening was “seeking reassurance” (25.5%), and the main reason to decline was “every child is welcome” (30.6%). The majority of respondents (87.7%) did not perceive societal pressure to test. Differences between test-acceptors and test-decliners in personal and societal perspectives on Down syndrome were found. Our study revealed high rates of informed decision-making and perceived freedom to choose regarding fetal aneuploidy screening, suggesting that there is little reason for concern about routinization of NIPT based on the perspectives of Dutch pregnant women. Our findings highlight the importance of responsible implementation of NIPT within a national screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karuna R M van der Meij
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annabel Njio
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Martin
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Adriana Kater-Kuipers
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R M Timmermans
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A Sistermans
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert-Jan H Galjaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pop-Tudose ME, Armean P, Pop IV. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: popularity, perceptions and factors associated with acceptance or refusal of testing. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 35:6505-6509. [PMID: 33910457 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1916910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prenatal screening tests for aneuploidies have become increasingly used in maternal and fetal medicine. Given that all pregnancies associate a potential risk of Down syndrome, adequate knowledge of the tests, and their characteristics as well as facilitating decision-making autonomy are fundamental rights that must be respected. OBJECTIVES Identification of the popularity of the tests, their perception and the factors associated with the acceptance or refusal to perform them. METHODS A cross-sectional study was carried out in the South-East region of Romania, between April and September 2016. The data were collected from 275 postpartum women. The instrument used was a self-administered questionnaire and the data obtained were processed using the IBM SPSS 20.0 statistical software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normality of the distribution was analyzed with Chi-square, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Factorial Analysis was carried out for the Principal Components of the scales for the reasons for performing and not performing. RESULTS The 2nd Trimester Morphology had the popularity as well as the highest rate of accomplishment (98.2% respectively 67.6%) among the investigated women. It is also the preferred recommendation of the specialists (81.1%). The least popular test was the TPNI, only 13.1% of the participants heard about it, as it was recommended in only 2% of the situations. Most of the participants perceived the screening tests as essential and useful, but 43.3% considered that they become mandatory if the doctor recommends them. The acceptance of the child with DS and the misperception of the risk were the main factors associated with the refusal of the test and the compliance with the recommendation of the specialist (system confidence), and social influence (non-acceptance of the Down syndrome by the society) were the main factors associated with the acceptance. CONCLUSIONS The number of women who made the decision to accept the test was greater than the ones who refused. The amendment is that acceptance was based on the custom of socio-economic-medical compliance and responsibility. For many women, the motivation of acceptance meant alignment with the normality directed by the society and the system. Even the popularity of the tests carries the imprint of the beliefs and values of the system and the specialists involved. For an adequate perception and an autonomous and informed choice of women, the screening program must include adequate information and communication services by involving specialists responsible for multidisciplinary competencies. The percentage of completion and the type of test performed almost perfectly align with the recommendations received.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melania Elena Pop-Tudose
- Department of Genetics, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Petru Armean
- Specific Disciplines, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioan Victor Pop
- Department of Genetics, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van der Meij KRM, de Groot-van Mooren M, Carbo EWS, Pieters MJ, Rodenburg W, Sistermans EA, Cornel MC, Henneman L. Uptake of fetal aneuploidy screening after the introduction of the non-invasive prenatal test: A national population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021; 100:1265-1272. [PMID: 33465829 PMCID: PMC8359325 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The introduction of the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) has shifted the prenatal screening landscape. Countries are exploring ways to integrate NIPT in their national prenatal screening programs, either as a first- or second-tier test. This study aimed to describe how the uptake of fetal aneuploidy screening changed after the introduction of NIPT as a second-tier and as a first-tier test within the national prenatal screening program of the Netherlands. MATERIAL AND METHODS A population-based register study in the Netherlands, recording uptake of fetal aneuploidy screening. Data from all pregnant women choosing to have the first-trimester combined test (FCT) or first-tier NIPT between January 2007 and March 2019 were retrospectively collected using national registration systems. Uptake percentages for fetal aneuploidy screening (FCT and NIPT) were calculated and stratified by region and maternal age. Statistical significance was determined using trend analysis and chi-squared tests. RESULTS Between 2007 and 2013 FCT uptake increased from 14.8% to 29.5% (P = .004). In April 2014 NIPT was introduced as a second-tier test for high-risk women after FCT (TRIDENT-1 study). FCT uptake rose from 29.5% in 2013 to 34.2% in 2015 (P < .0001). After the introduction of NIPT as a first-tier test for all women in April 2017 (TRIDENT-2 study), FCT uptake declined significantly from 35.8% in 2016 to 2.6% in 2018 (P < .0001). NIPT uptake increased to 43.4% in 2018. Regionally, NIPT uptake ranged from 31.8% to 67.9%. Total uptake (FCT and NIPT) between 2007 and 2018 increased significantly from 14.8% to 45.9% (P < .0001). However, total uptake stabilized at 46% for both years of TRIDENT-2 (April 2017-March 2019). CONCLUSIONS An increase in total fetal aneuploidy screening uptake up to 45.9% was observed after the introduction of NIPT. Uptake appears to have stabilized within a year after introducing first-tier NIPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karuna R M van der Meij
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maurike de Groot-van Mooren
- Department of Pediatrics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen W S Carbo
- Center for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Mijntje J Pieters
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Foundation Prenatal Screening Southeast Region of the Netherlands, Maastricht, the Netherlands, On Behalf of the Regional Centers for Prenatal Screening, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Wendy Rodenburg
- Center for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Erik A Sistermans
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hammond J, Klapwijk JE, Hill M, Lou S, Ormond KE, Diderich KEM, Riedijk S, Lewis C. Parental experiences of uncertainty following an abnormal fetal anomaly scan: Insights using Han's taxonomy of uncertainty. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:198-210. [PMID: 32638447 PMCID: PMC8432163 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
For a number of prospective parents, uncertainty during pregnancy starts when an anomaly is found during a routine fetal anomaly scan. This may be followed by numerous tests to determine the etiology and nature of the anomaly. In this study, we aimed to understand how prospective parents perceive and manage uncertainty after being confronted with a structural anomaly during their routine ultrasound. Han's taxonomy of uncertainty was used as a framework to identify and understand the different types of uncertainty experienced. Interviews were held in the UK (n = 8 women and n = 1 male partner) and in the Netherlands (n = 7 women) with participants who had experienced uncertainty in their pregnancy after a fetal scan. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, and the uncertainties experienced by parents were mapped against the dimensions of the Han taxonomy (sources, issues, and locus). Participants' experience of uncertainty was relevant to all dimensions and subcategories of the Han taxonomy, showing its applicability in the prenatal setting. Sources of uncertainty included receiving probabilistic or ambiguous information about the anomaly, or information that was complex and challenging to understand. Issues of uncertainty included were those that were scientific—such as a probable diagnosis with no further information, personal—such as the emotional impact of uncertainty, and practical—such as limited information about medical procedures and practical aspects of care. Additionally, participants described what helped them to manage uncertainty. This included active coping strategies such as searching for information on the Internet, external coping resources such as seeking social support, and internal coping resources such as using positivity and hope. Several recommendations for the healthcare professional to minimize uncertainty and help the patient deal with uncertainty have been proposed based on these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Hammond
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetic and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | | | - Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetic and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Stina Lou
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Sam Riedijk
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Celine Lewis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Population, Policy and Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hens K, Hens G. Pregnancy Termination in the Case of an Orofacial Cleft: An Investigation of the Concept of Reproductive Autonomy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2020; 57:1134-1139. [PMID: 32495649 DOI: 10.1177/1055665620929775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe ethical approaches to the issue of pregnancy termination after prenatal detection of cleft lip ± palate. RESULTS Gynecologists and cleft surgeons are sometimes confronted with the demand for a pregnancy termination after ultrasound detection of an isolated cleft lip/cleft palate. In this article, we discuss different ethical theories and principles that can be applied to the dilemma at hand. We formulate recommendations that will respect the right to autonomy of the pregnant woman and at the same time acknowledge that a termination of pregnancy for a cleft lip may in most cases not be the best option. CONCLUSION The recognition of each person's right to reproductive autonomy also entails that clinicians should make sure that prospective parents are provided with up-to-date and relevant clinical information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristien Hens
- Department of Philosophy, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.,Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Greet Hens
- Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schuurmans J, Birnie E, Ranchor AV, Abbott KM, Fenwick A, Lucassen A, Berger MY, Verkerk M, van Langen IM, Plantinga M. GP-provided couple-based expanded preconception carrier screening in the Dutch general population: who accepts the test-offer and why? Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:182-192. [PMID: 31570785 PMCID: PMC6974594 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0516-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Next generation sequencing has enabled fast and relatively inexpensive expanded carrier screening (ECS) that can inform couples' reproductive decisions before conception and during pregnancy. We previously showed that a couple-based approach to ECS for autosomal recessive (AR) conditions was acceptable and feasible for both health care professionals and the non-pregnant target population in the Netherlands. This paper describes the acceptance of this free test-offer of preconception ECS for 50 severe conditions, the characteristics of test-offer acceptors and decliners, their views on couple-based ECS and reasons for accepting or declining the test-offer. We used a survey that included self-rated health, intention to accept the test-offer, barriers to test-participation and arguments for and against test-participation. Fifteen percent of the expected target population-couples potentially planning a pregnancy-attended pre-test counselling and 90% of these couples proceeded with testing. Test-offer acceptors and decliners differed in their reproductive characteristics (e.g. how soon they wanted to conceive), educational level and stated barriers to test-participation. Sparing a child a life with a severe genetic condition was the most important reason to accept ECS. The most important reason for declining was that the test-result would not affect participants' reproductive decisions. Our results demonstrate that previously uninformed couples of reproductive age, albeit a selective part, were interested in and chose to have couple-based ECS. Alleviating practical barriers, which prevented some interested couples from participating, is recommended before nationwide implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Schuurmans
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Ethics and Law, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Erwin Birnie
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Adelita V Ranchor
- Department of Health Psychology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Kristin M Abbott
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Angela Fenwick
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Ethics and Law, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Anneke Lucassen
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Ethics and Law, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Marjolein Y Berger
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, General Practice and Elderly Care, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marian Verkerk
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Irene M van Langen
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam Plantinga
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Seidler Y, Mosor E, Stamm T. "No one to consult! That is the hardest part" choice-making experiences for prenatal screening tests among Japanese women and their spouses in Austria - A qualitative interview study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:2286-2295. [PMID: 31358327 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Japan is the only country in the world that allows abortions due to economic reasons but illegalise them due to foetal anomaly. The objective of this study was to explore the choice-making experiences for prenatal screening among Japanese women and their spouses in Austria. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured face-to-face interviews with Japanese women and their spouses in Austria. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Twenty-five participants (14 women and 11 men) took part in the interviews. Four themes were identified: 1) Knowledge, information and memory; 2) Communication and interactions with health professionals; 3) Reasons for choice; and 4) Emotional support. Participants had limited knowledge and experienced directive counselling. Women expressed negative emotions in the choice-making processes, did not perceive husbands as a source of support and lacked a person to consult. CONCLUSION There are common characteristics among East Asian population despite different context and differences found between our Japanese participants and women in other European countries. PRACTICE IMPLICATION Proactive interventions aimed at increasing knowledge that help women to develop their preferences and reflect on their values could be further promoted among women of all socio-cultural backgrounds in Austria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Seidler
- Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/ 1, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Center for Health and Migration, Wasagasse 12/3/5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
| | - Erika Mosor
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, BT88/E 03, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Section for Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, BT88/E 03, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bellai-Dussault K, Meng L, Huang T, Reszel J, Walker M, Lanes A, Okun N, Armour C, Dougan S. A 2-year review of publicly funded cell-free DNA screening in Ontario: utilization and adherence to funding criteria. Prenat Diagn 2019; 40:164-172. [PMID: 31525278 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ontario offers a publicly funded modified contingent model of prenatal screening for aneuploidy in which cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening is covered for pregnancies at higher risk of fetal aneuploidy. The objective of this study was to review utilization of provincially funded cfDNA screening and adherence to the criteria laid out in Ontario prenatal screening guidelines. METHODS This was a descriptive cohort study using data collected by Ontario's prescribed maternal and child registry. The study population included all pregnant individuals who received cfDNA screening from January 2016 to December 2017. RESULTS The most common criteria for provincially funded cfDNA screening were advanced maternal age ≥40 years (37.7%), positive multiple marker screen (34.1%), modifying risk factors such as ultrasound soft markers (7.1%), and previous aneuploidy (5.5%). The audit demonstrated that 2.9% of funded cfDNA screens tests did not meet funding criteria, and that 11.4% of self-paid cfDNA screens could have been publicly funded. CONCLUSION Reviewing and auditing the application of criteria for funded cfDNA screening using prescribed registry data allows an opportunity to identify areas where targeted education may improve adherence to standardized screening protocols, and provides a basis for reassessment of the funding model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara Bellai-Dussault
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lynn Meng
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tianhua Huang
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,The Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation & Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica Reszel
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Walker
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Lanes
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nan Okun
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine Armour
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shelley Dougan
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Westerneng M, Diepeveen M, Witteveen AB, Westerman MJ, van der Horst HE, van Baar AL, de Jonge A. Experiences of pregnant women with a third trimester routine ultrasound - a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:319. [PMID: 31477046 PMCID: PMC6720093 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2470-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Studies showed that pregnant women generally value routine ultrasounds in the first two trimesters because these provide reassurance and a chance to see their unborn baby. This, in turn, might help to decrease maternal anxiety levels and increase the bond with the baby. However, it is unclear whether pregnant women hold the same positive views about a third trimester routine ultrasound, which is increasingly being used in the Netherlands as a screening tool to monitor fetal growth. The aim of this study was to explore pregnant women’s experiences with a third trimester routine ultrasound. Methods We held semi-structured interviews with fifteen low-risk pregnant women who received a third trimester routine ultrasound in the context of the Dutch IUGR RIsk Selection (IRIS) study. The IRIS study is a nationwide cluster randomized controlled trial carried out among more than 13,000 women to examine the effectiveness of a third trimester routine ultrasound to monitor fetal growth. For the interviews, participants were purposively selected based on parity, age, ethnicity, and educational level. We performed thematic content analysis using MAXQDA. Results Most pregnant women appreciated a third trimester routine ultrasound because it provided them confirmation that their baby was fine and an extra opportunity to see their baby. At the same time they expressed that they already felt confident about the health of their baby, and did not feel that their bond with their baby had increased after the third trimester ultrasound. Women also reported that they were getting used to routine ultrasounds throughout their pregnancy, and that this increased their need for another one. Conclusions Pregnant women seem to appreciate a third trimester routine ultrasound, but it does not seem to reduce anxiety or to improve bonding with their baby. Women’s appreciation of a third trimester routine ultrasound might arise from getting used to routine ultrasounds throughout pregnancy. We recommend to examine the psychological impact of third trimester routine ultrasounds in future studies. Results should be taken into consideration when balancing the gains, which are as yet not clear, of introducing a third trimester routine ultrasound against unwanted side effects and costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrte Westerneng
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Mariëlle Diepeveen
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Medical Humanities and the Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anke B Witteveen
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan J Westerman
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henriette E van der Horst
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ank de Jonge
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nov-Klaiman T, Raz AE, Hashiloni-Dolev Y. Attitudes of Israeli parents of children with Down syndrome toward non-invasive prenatal screening and the scope of prenatal testing. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:1119-1129. [PMID: 31469214 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Due to its early utilization and increasing ability to provide genetic information, non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) has reinforced social and bioethical quandaries concerning prenatal genetics. This paper presents exploratory findings based on 20 semi-structured interviews conducted in 2017-2019 with Israeli parents of children with Down syndrome (DS), four of whom also serving as representatives of DS organizations. Their views are presented regarding the pros and cons of NIPS; the social context of decision-making about NIPS; and views on life with DS and termination of pregnancies on that ground. While illustrating the large heterogeneity of views concerning NIPS and prenatal diagnosis (PND) amongst parents of children with DS, our respondents commonly criticized the imbalanced information provided by professionals regarding DS, seen as sending a discriminating message in line with the public ignorance surrounding DS. These views are further discussed in the multi-cultural, ableist and pro-natal context of Israeli society. We conclude by offering practical implications concerning NIPS, parental autonomy, and informed choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Nov-Klaiman
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Aviad E Raz
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Yael Hashiloni-Dolev
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Peters IA, Heetkamp KM, Ursem NTC, Steegers EAP, Denktaş S, Knapen MFCM. Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands. Matern Child Health J 2019; 22:343-354. [PMID: 28884405 PMCID: PMC5845051 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-017-2364-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective We aimed to conduct an analysis of the associations between the information provision procedure of prenatal screening for Down's syndrome and congenital anomalies and the intention to participate in prenatal screening (PS) of ethnicity groups and Dutch language proficiency groups. Design Using a prospective web-based registration form, we asked counselors (midwives, general practitioners, nurses and gynecologists) to report whether and how they offered information about PS to pregnant women. Duration The study was conducted from 2008 to 2010. Participants We collected data on the characteristics of the women who received an information offer about PS from counselors. Measurements Measures included socio-demographic and language proficiency level (LPL) characteristics, key elements of the provision procedure of PS, and intentional participation in PS. Findings The dataset represents 37% of the total population in the study area. Women with a non-native Dutch background and/or insufficient Dutch LPL received fewer information offers about PS, faced a reduced chance of receiving counseling, and showed lower intentional participation rates for PS. Key Conclusions Women with a non-native Dutch background and/or with an insufficient LPL are underserved in the Dutch PS program. These findings present evidence indicating that the fundamental principle of the Dutch Population Screening Act, namely, equal access to PS for all pregnant women, is not being realized. Implications for Practice Therefore, the study findings are important for national and international healthcare, policy makers and governmental professionals to allow ethnic and LPL-related differences in the provision and intentional uptake of PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid A Peters
- Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, Na-1515, 3015 GE, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Wytemaweg 80, Na-1509, 3015 GE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Kirsten M Heetkamp
- Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, Na-1515, 3015 GE, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rochussenstraat 198, 3015 EK, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolette T C Ursem
- Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, Na-1515, 3015 GE, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Wytemaweg 80, Na-1509, 3015 GE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eric A P Steegers
- Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, Na-1515, 3015 GE, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Semiha Denktaş
- Department Social and Behavioural Sciences, EUC/Erasmus University Rotterdam, Nieuwemarkt 1a, 3011 HP, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F C M Knapen
- Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Wytemaweg 80, Na-1515, 3015 GE, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Wytemaweg 80, Na-1509, 3015 GE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
van Bruggen MJ, Henneman L, Timmermans DRM. Women's decision making regarding prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy: A qualitative comparison between 2003 and 2016. Midwifery 2018; 64:93-100. [PMID: 29990629 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Situational factors of prenatal screening have changed in recent decades. To explore the effect of a changing context on women's decision making, differences and similarities in the decision-making process of pregnant women regarding prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy between two periods in time were studied. DESIGN A qualitative comparison was made between a dataset of 22 semi-structured interviews with pregnant women from 2003 and a newly collected dataset with 19 semi-structured interviews from 2016. FINDINGS Overall, women reported similar considerations in their decision-making process in 2003 and 2016, suggesting that decision making has not essentially changed. In 2016, women were still making a deliberate decision, however for some women costs and societal views as to what is acceptable did appear to impact the decision-making process. Moreover, new screening possibilities (e.g. improved test characteristics and including more conditions to be screened) seemed to impact the decision outcome. CONCLUSIONS Since most women based their decisions mainly on their personal values and personal experiences rather than on situational factors, the results suggest that the changing context with regard to prenatal screening had no major effect on women's decision making. It therefore seems unlikely that future changes in the field of prenatal screening will drastically change the decision-making process of pregnant women as long as informed and deliberate decision making is safeguarded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Metje J van Bruggen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Daniëlle R M Timmermans
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hjort-Pedersen K, Olesen AW, Garne E, Sperling L. Reasons for non-participation in malformation scans in Denmark: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18:231. [PMID: 29898683 PMCID: PMC6001061 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1877-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to estimate the proportion of women giving birth in two hospitals in the Region of Southern Denmark who did not attend the malformation scan and to elucidate the reasons for not participating. Methods In this register-based descriptive study, we used patient administration systems to identify women who had given birth at two Danish hospitals between March 2013 and January 2015. We then linked this information with the hospital database for fetal medicine (Astraia) to identify women who did not attend the malformation scan at week 18–20. We reviewed the medical records of these women to validate the data and to identify the reason for non-participation. Results Of 7690 births, 153 (2%) women did not attend the malformation scan. The main reason for non-participation was a passive deselection (81%). Most of these women were not present in Denmark at the time of the malformation scan (61%) and few women declined (8%). Conclusions Less than 2% of a birth cohort in two major hospitals in Denmark did not attend the free offer of a malformation scan. Most of these women (81%) did not actively decide against the malformation scan. Very few (0.2%) declined the malformation scan. Non-attendance is not always due to an active decision made by the pregnant woman. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1877-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina Hjort-Pedersen
- Research Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kloevervaenget 10, 10th floor, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. .,OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Annette Wind Olesen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Soendre Blvd., 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Ester Garne
- Paediatric Department, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark
| | - Lene Sperling
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Soendre Blvd., 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hui L, Barclay J, Poulton A, Hutchinson B, Halliday JL. Prenatal diagnosis and socioeconomic status in the non-invasive prenatal testing era: A population-based study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 58:404-410. [PMID: 29380343 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in technology can bring great benefits to human health, but their implementation may be influenced by socioeconomic factors, particularly in the field of prenatal screening for Down syndrome. AIM To analyse screening test indications for, and diagnostic yield of, invasive prenatal diagnostic testing (PNDx) according to socioeconomic status. METHODS Retrospective analysis of population-based data on PNDx and karyotype results for 2014-2015 in the Australian state of Victoria. Women having PNDx < 25 weeks due to combined first trimester screening (CFTS), second trimester serum screening (STSS), or noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results were included. PNDx data were analysed by indication and maternal Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD), the latter determined by postcode. RESULTS There were 145 206 births in 2014-2015; 1906 women underwent PNDx for the indication of CFTS (70.1%), NIPT (17.8%) or STSS (12.0%). Covariates positively associated with NIPT-indicated PNDx, compared with CFTS-indicated testing, were residence in a region of socioeconomic advantage, metropolitan status and maternal age. Women from the most advantaged regions had higher adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of NIPT-indicated testing compared with women from disadvantaged regions (aOR 5.72, 95% CI: 2.95-11.09). The diagnostic yield of PNDx increased with socioeconomic region, from 14% in the lowest IRSAD quintile to 31.2% in the highest (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Population-based data reveal significant disparities in screening indications for PNDx and hence, in diagnostic yield, according to socioeconomic region. This finding may have ethical and policy implications for prenatal screening in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Hui
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Mercy Perinatal, The Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Northern Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jenna Barclay
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alice Poulton
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Briohny Hutchinson
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Mercy Perinatal, The Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane L Halliday
- Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Posthumus AG, Peters IA, Borsboom GJ, Knapen MFCM, Bonsel GJ. Inequalities in uptake of prenatal screening according to ethnicity and socio-economic status in the four largest cities of the Netherlands (2011-2013). Prenat Diagn 2017. [PMID: 28621806 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In the Netherlands, all women are claimed to have equal access to prenatal screening (PS). Prior research demonstrated substantial inequalities in PS uptake associated with socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnic background. The suggested pathway was a lack of intention to participate in PS among these subgroups. We studied the background of inequalities in PS participation, challenging intention heterogeneity as the single explanation. METHODS Multivariable logistic regression analyses of the national PS registry, focusing on the four largest cities in the Netherlands (n = 4578, years 2011-2013), stratified by SES. OUTCOME MEASURES (1) any uptake of PS (yes/no) and (2) uptake (one/two tests) for women who intended to participate in two tests. Determinants included intention, ethnicity, practice, and age. RESULTS Of non-Western women, 85.7% were screened versus 89.7% of Western women. Intention was an important explanatory factor in all models. However, after correction for intention, ethnicity remained a significant determinant for differences in uptake. Ethnicity and SES also interacted, indicating that non-Western women in low SES areas had the lowest uptake (corrected for intention). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE Socioeconomic status and ethnicity related inequalities in PS uptake are only partially explained by intention heterogeneity; other pathways, in particular provider-related determinants, may play a role. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke G Posthumus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid A Peters
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard J Borsboom
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F C M Knapen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gouke J Bonsel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Utrecht Medical Centre (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
van Schendel RV, Page-Christiaens GCML, Beulen L, Bilardo CM, de Boer MA, Coumans ABC, Faas BHW, van Langen IM, Lichtenbelt KD, van Maarle MC, Macville MVE, Oepkes D, Pajkrt E, Henneman L. Women's Experience with Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Emotional Well-being and Satisfaction after Test-Results. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:1348-1356. [PMID: 28667567 PMCID: PMC5672853 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0118-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Increasingly, high-risk pregnant women opt for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) instead of invasive diagnostic testing. Since NIPT is less accurate than invasive testing, a normal NIPT result might leave women less reassured. A questionnaire study was performed among pregnant women with elevated risk for fetal aneuploidy based on first-trimester combined test (risk ≥1:200) or medical history, who were offered NIPT in the nationwide Dutch TRIDENT study. Pre- and post-test questionnaires (n = 682) included measures on: experiences with NIPT procedure, feelings of reassurance, anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI), child-related anxiety (PRAQ-R), and satisfaction. The majority (96.1%) were glad to have been offered NIPT. Most (68.5%) perceived the waiting time for NIPT results (mean: 15 days, range 5–32) as (much) too long. Most women with a normal NIPT result felt reassured (80.9%) or somewhat reassured (15.7%). Levels of anxiety and child-related anxiety were significantly lower after receiving a normal NIPT result as compared to the moment of intake (p < 0.001). Women with inadequate health literacy or a medical history (e.g. previous child with trisomy) experienced significantly higher post-test-result anxiety (Mean (M) STAI = 31.6 and 30.0, respectively) compared to those with adequate health literacy (M = 28.6) and no medical history (M = 28.6), indicating these women might benefit from extra information and/or guidance when communicating NIPT test-results. Introducing NIPT as an alternative to invasive testing, led to an offer that satisfied and largely reassured high-risk pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachèl V van Schendel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lean Beulen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Caterina M Bilardo
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjon A de Boer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Audrey B C Coumans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht UMC +, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Brigitte H W Faas
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Irene M van Langen
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Klaske D Lichtenbelt
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Merel C van Maarle
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Merryn V E Macville
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht UMC +, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Dick Oepkes
- Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Pajkrt
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Payne O, Pillai A, Wise M, Stone P. Inequity in timing of prenatal screening in New Zealand: Who are our most vulnerable? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 57:609-616. [DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Payne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences; The University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| | - Avinesh Pillai
- Department of Statistics; The University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| | - Michelle Wise
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences; The University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| | - Peter Stone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences; The University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Peters IA, Posthumus AG, Reijerink-Verheij JCIY, Van Agt HME, Knapen MFCM, Denktaş S. Effect of culturally competent educational films about prenatal screening on informed decision making of pregnant women in the Netherlands. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2017; 100:776-782. [PMID: 27887753 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2016] [Revised: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/12/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of a culturally competent educational film (CCEF) on informed decision making (IDM) regarding prenatal screening (PS) in a study population consisting of multicultural pregnant women. METHODS A cross-sectional study with 262 women in the control group and 117 in the intervention group. All counselled participants received a self-report questionnaire to obtain data on IDM and only the intervention group received the CCEF. Twenty two percent of the study population had an ethnic minority background and 52% had a low or medium educational level. RESULTS After exposure to the CCEF, knowledge about the Fetal Anomaly Scan (FAS) was significantly increased in ethnic minority women and in 'medium' and 'highly' educated women. Among women in the intervention group who had the intention to participate in FAS, there was an increase of 11% in IDM and a decrease of 12% in uninformed decision making. CONCLUSION CCEF leads to a significant increase in the level of knowledge in medium and highly educated groups as well as non-western ethnic minority groups. The increase in IDM among intentional participants in the FAS is promising as well. CCEF's are a valuable complement to counseling about PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I A Peters
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - A G Posthumus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - H M E Van Agt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M F C M Knapen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Denktaş
- Department Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University College, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Seven M, Akyüz A, Eroglu K, Daack-Hirsch S, Skirton H. Women's knowledge and use of prenatal screening tests. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26:1869-1877. [PMID: 27487389 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to determine the rate of use of prenatal screening tests and the factors affecting the decision to have a prenatal screening test in pregnant women in Turkey. BACKGROUND Prenatal genetic screening as an optional service is commonly used to determine a level of risk for genetic conditions in the foetus. DESIGN A quantitative cross-sectional survey. METHODS Pregnant women (n = 274) who sought prenatal care from one hospital in Turkey were recruited and asked to complete questionnaires that were developed by the researchers. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data. RESULTS Almost half (44·2) % of the women were primiparas, and the majority (97·8%) were in the third trimester of pregnancy. Only 36·1% of the women reported that they had prenatal screening by either the double test or triple test. Women had a low level of knowledge regarding prenatal screening: the mean knowledge score was 3·43 ± 3·21 of a possible score of 10. Having consanguineous marriage, a history of spontaneous abortion, a child with genetic disorder, multiparity or a longer marriage duration were positively correlated with accepting a prenatal screening test. CONCLUSIONS This study has provided baseline data on the uptake and reasons for accepting or declining a prenatal screening in a cohort of Turkish women. There is evidence to suggest that more education is needed to improve knowledge and provide comprehensive nursing care to promote informed consent in this context. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Perinatal nurses are ideally situated to inform pregnant women about prenatal screening tests to improve access to healthcare services and to ensure informed decisions are made by pregnant women and their partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Memnun Seven
- School of Nursing, Koç University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Aygül Akyüz
- School of Nursing, Koç University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | - Heather Skirton
- Professor of Applied Health Genetics, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Crombag NMTH, Lamain-de Ruiter M, Kwee A, Schielen PCJI, Bensing JM, Visser GHA, Franx A, Koster MPH. Perspectives, preferences and needs regarding early prediction of preeclampsia in Dutch pregnant women: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17:12. [PMID: 28061818 PMCID: PMC5219667 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1195-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2016] [Accepted: 12/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve early risk-identification in pregnancy, research on prediction models for common pregnancy complications is ongoing. Therefore, it was the aim of this study to explore pregnant women's perceptions, preferences and needs regarding prediction models for first trimester screening for common pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia, to support future implementation. METHOD Ten focus groups (of which five with primiparous and five with multiparous women) were conducted (n = 45). Six focus groups were conducted in urban regions and four in rural regions. All focus group discussions were audio taped and NVIVO was used in order to facilitate the thematic analysis conducted by the researchers. RESULTS Women in this study had a positive attitude towards first trimester screening for preeclampsia using prediction models. Reassurance when determined as low-risk was a major need for using the test. Self-monitoring, early recognition and intensive monitoring were considered benefits of using prediction models in case of a high-risk. Women acknowledged that high-risk determination could cause (unnecessary) anxiety, but it was expected that personal and professional interventions would level out this anxiety. CONCLUSION Women in this study had positive attitudes towards preeclampsia screening. Self-monitoring, together with increased alertness of healthcare professionals, would enable them to take active actions to improve pregnancy outcomes. This attitude enhances the opportunities for prevention, early recognition and treatment of preeclampsia and probably other adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeltje M T H Crombag
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room KE04.123.1, P.O. Box 85090, 3508AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marije Lamain-de Ruiter
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room KE04.123.1, P.O. Box 85090, 3508AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke Kwee
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room KE04.123.1, P.O. Box 85090, 3508AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter C J I Schielen
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Research, Diagnostics and Screening (IDS), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jozien M Bensing
- Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard H A Visser
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room KE04.123.1, P.O. Box 85090, 3508AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arie Franx
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room KE04.123.1, P.O. Box 85090, 3508AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maria P H Koster
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room KE04.123.1, P.O. Box 85090, 3508AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of obstetrics and gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
van Schendel RV, Page-Christiaens GCL, Beulen L, Bilardo CM, de Boer MA, Coumans ABC, Faas BH, van Langen IM, Lichtenbelt KD, van Maarle MC, Macville MVE, Oepkes D, Pajkrt E, Henneman L. Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives. Prenat Diagn 2016; 36:1091-1098. [PMID: 27739584 PMCID: PMC5213994 DOI: 10.1002/pd.4941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 09/02/2016] [Accepted: 10/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate preferences and decision‐making among high‐risk pregnant women offered a choice between Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT), invasive testing or no further testing. Methods Nationwide implementation study (TRIDENT) offering NIPT as contingent screening test for women at increased risk for fetal aneuploidy based on first‐trimester combined testing (>1:200) or medical history. A questionnaire was completed after counseling assessing knowledge, attitudes and participation following the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice. Results A total of 1091/1253 (87%) women completed the questionnaire. Of these, 1053 (96.5%) underwent NIPT, 37 (3.4%) invasive testing and 1 (0.1%) declined testing. 91.7% preferred NIPT because of test safety. Overall, 77.9% made an informed choice, 89.8% had sufficient knowledge and 90.5% had positive attitudes towards NIPT. Women with intermediate (odds ratio (OR) = 3.51[1.70–7.22], p < 0.001) or high educational level (OR = 4.36[2.22–8.54], p < 0.001) and women with adequate health literacy (OR = 2.60[1.36–4.95], p = 0.004) were more likely to make an informed choice. Informed choice was associated with less decisional conflict and less anxiety (p < 0.001). Intention to terminate the pregnancy for Down syndrome was higher among women undergoing invasive testing (86.5%) compared to those undergoing NIPT (58.4%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions The majority of women had sufficient knowledge and made an informed choice. Continuous attention for counseling is required, especially for low‐educated and less health‐literate women. © 2016 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. What's already known about this topic?NIPT is offered as alternative to invasive testing to screen pregnant women at high risk for fetal aneuploidy. Although NIPT has many advantages, concerns have been raised about the consequences for informed decision‐making.
What does this study adds?Implementation of NIPT in a national healthcare‐funded prenatal screening program, accompanied by pre‐test counseling, results in most women having sufficient knowledge and making an informed choice Compared to women choosing invasive testing, women undergoing NIPT have less intention to terminate the pregnancy for Down syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachèl V van Schendel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lean Beulen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Catia M Bilardo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjon A de Boer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Audrey B C Coumans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte H Faas
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Irene M van Langen
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Klaske D Lichtenbelt
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Merel C van Maarle
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merryn V E Macville
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dick Oepkes
- Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Pajkrt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Smith SK, Sousa MS, Essink-Bot ML, Halliday J, Peate M, Fransen M. Socioeconomic Differences in Informed Decisions About Down Syndrome Screening: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2016; 21:868-907. [PMID: 27410478 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1177145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Supporting pregnant women to make informed choices about Down syndrome screening is widely endorsed. We reviewed the literature on: (a) the association between socioeconomic position and informed choices and decision-making about Down syndrome screening, and (b) the possible mediating variables (e.g., health literacy, numeracy skills, behavioral and communication variables) that might explain the relationship. EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from January 1999 to September 2014. The methodological quality of studies was determined by predefined criteria regarding the research aims, study design, study population and setting, measurement tools, and statistical analysis. A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Women from lower socioeconomic groups experience greater difficulties making informed choices about Down syndrome screening compared to women from higher socioeconomic groups. Most studies focus on individual dimensions of informed decision-making rather than assessing elements in conjunction with one another. Few studies have explored why there are socioeconomic differences in women's ability to make informed screening decisions. Future work is needed to identify mediating variables in this pathway. Systematic evidence-based intervention development to improve communication, understanding, and decision-making about Down syndrome screening is needed to ensure that women have an equal opportunity to make an informed choice about screening regardless of their socioeconomic position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sian K Smith
- a Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine , University of New South Wales , Sydney , New South Wales , Australia
| | - Mariana S Sousa
- b Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery , University of Western Sydney , Penrith , New South Wales , Australia
- c Prince of Wales Clinical School , University of New South Wales , Sydney , New South Wales , Australia
| | - Marie-Louise Essink-Bot
- d Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Jane Halliday
- e Murdoch Children's Research Institute , Royal Children's Hospital , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia
- f Department of Paediatrics , University of Melbourne , Parkville , Victoria , Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- g Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital , University of Melbourne , Parkville , Victoria , Australia
| | - Mirjam Fransen
- d Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Naqvi M, Goldfarb IT, Hanmer KJ, Bryant A. Chromosomal microarray use among women undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2016; 36:656-61. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.4835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2015] [Revised: 04/19/2016] [Accepted: 04/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Naqvi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston MA USA
| | - Ilona T. Goldfarb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston MA USA
| | - Kaitlin J. Hanmer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston MA USA
| | - Allison Bryant
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Crombag NMTH, Boeije H, Iedema-Kuiper R, Schielen PCJI, Visser GHA, Bensing JM. Reasons for accepting or declining Down syndrome screening in Dutch prospective mothers within the context of national policy and healthcare system characteristics: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16:121. [PMID: 27229318 PMCID: PMC4880977 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0910-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2015] [Accepted: 05/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uptake rates for Down syndrome screening in the Netherlands are low compared to other European countries. To investigate the low uptake, we explored women's reasons for participation and possible influences of national healthcare system characteristics. Dutch prenatal care is characterised by an approach aimed at a low degree of medicalisation, with pregnant women initially considered to be at low risk. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome is offered to all women, with a 'right not to know' for women who do not want to be informed on this screening. At the time this study was performed, the test was not reimbursed for women aged 35 and younger. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study to explore reasons for participation and possible influences of healthcare system characteristics. Data were collected via ten semi-structured focus groups with women declining or accepting the offer of Down syndrome screening (n = 46). All focus groups were audio- and videotaped, transcribed verbatim, coded and content analysed. RESULTS Women declining Down syndrome screening did not consider Down syndrome a condition severe enough to justify termination of pregnancy. Young women declining felt supported in their decision by perceived confirmation of their obstetric caregiver and reassured by system characteristics (costs and age restriction). Women accepting Down syndrome screening mainly wanted to be reassured or be prepared to care for a child with Down syndrome. By weighing up the pros and cons of testing, obstetric caregivers supported young women who accepted in the decision-making process. This was helpful, although some felt the need to defend their decision to accept the test offer due to their young age. For some young women accepting testing, costs were considered a disincentive to participate. CONCLUSIONS Presentation of prenatal screening affects how the offer is attended to, perceived and utilised. By offering screening with age restriction and additional costs, declining is considered the preferred choice, which might account for low Dutch uptake rates. Autonomous and informed decision-making in Down syndrome screening should be based on the personal interest in knowing the individual risk of having a child with Down syndrome and system characteristics should not influence participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeltje M T H Crombag
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85090, Room KE04.123.1, 3508AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Hennie Boeije
- The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rita Iedema-Kuiper
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85090, Room KE04.123.1, 3508AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter C J I Schielen
- Centre for Infectious Diseases Research, Diagnostics and Screening (IDS), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard H A Visser
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85090, Room KE04.123.1, 3508AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jozien M Bensing
- The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Crombag NMTH, Schielen PCJI, Hukkelhoven CW, Iedema R, Bensing JM, Visser GHA, Stoutenbeek P, Koster MPH. Determinants of first trimester combined test participation within the central region of the Netherlands. Prenat Diagn 2016; 35:486-92. [PMID: 25613681 DOI: 10.1002/pd.4564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2014] [Revised: 01/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective is to study the association between potentially influential determinants and first-trimester combined test (FCT) uptake rates in the central region of the Netherlands. METHODS Data were extracted from the national prenatal screening database Peridos and the Netherlands Perinatal Registry and compared at the level of the health care provider. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis was used to determine the effect of determinants (maternal age, parity, socio-economic status (SES), mode of conception, ethnicity and urbanisation) on uptake. RESULTS Prenatal screening data were available for 24 657 women and overall uptake rate was 25.7%. The strongest association with FCT uptake was found for advanced maternal age (β 2.2; 95% CI [1.7, 2.8]). Grand multiparity had a significantly negative association with FCT uptake (β -4.3; 95% CI [-5.9, -2.7]). Positive associations were found for very high urbanisation (β 0.3; 95% CI [0.1, 0.4]) and high SES (β 0.2; 95% CI [0.0, 0.3]). CONCLUSION Advanced maternal age is strongly associated with participation in prenatal testing. The role of age related risk perception should be incorporated in future policy making to support women in informed and autonomous decision making. The negative association of grand multiparity and FCT might be religion based but requires further research. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeltje M T H Crombag
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Li C, Shi L, Huang J, Qian X, Chen Y. Factors associated with utilization of maternal serum screening for Down syndrome in mainland China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16:8. [PMID: 26762138 PMCID: PMC4712508 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1260-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge of the factors that influence maternal serum screening (MSS) service utilization can be used to develop health policies to promote equitable access to MSS and further diagnostic tests. The purpose of this study was to find the factors associated with utilization of MSS as well as the current status of service utilization in mainland China. METHODS This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study with respondents interviewed with a questionnaire designed based on Andersen's behavioral model. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis, and multilevel logistic regression analysis were used to identify the factors associated with MSS utilization, and to explore potential methods to improve screening uptake. RESULTS A total of 8110 women who had given birth within the previous 7 days in one of 111 participating institutions from six provinces in mainland China were interviewed. Approximately 36% of the participants had used MSS. Women between 20 and 35 years, who resided in urban areas, were educated, were in a stable occupation, who had health knowledge, who attended maternal preparation classes, who had received eight or more prenatal checkups, who were from a region of higher social economic status, and who delivered in a tertiary healthcare institution were significantly more likely to use MSS than their counterparts. As compared with other factors, insufficient education is the single most important demographic factor for service underutilization. CONCLUSIONS Efforts should not only be made to target the population that underuses MSS, but the overall organization of MSS service delivery should be assessed during policy development to make access to MSS equitable to the entire population of mainland China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuanlin Li
- School of Public Health, Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment (Ministry of Health), Fudan University, No.138 Yixueyuan Rd, Post box No. 197, Shanghai, 200032, PRC.
| | - Leiyu Shi
- Primary Care Policy Center, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| | - Jiayan Huang
- School of Public Health, Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment (Ministry of Health), Fudan University, No.138 Yixueyuan Rd, Post box No. 197, Shanghai, 200032, PRC.
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Shanghai, 200032, PRC.
| | - Xu Qian
- School of Public Health, Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment (Ministry of Health), Fudan University, No.138 Yixueyuan Rd, Post box No. 197, Shanghai, 200032, PRC.
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Shanghai, 200032, PRC.
| | - Yingyao Chen
- School of Public Health, Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment (Ministry of Health), Fudan University, No.138 Yixueyuan Rd, Post box No. 197, Shanghai, 200032, PRC.
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Shanghai, 200032, PRC.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Martin L, Gitsels-van der Wal JT, Pereboom MTR, Spelten ER, Hutton EK, van Dulmen S. Clients' psychosocial communication and midwives' verbal and nonverbal communication during prenatal counseling for anomaly screening. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2016; 99:85-91. [PMID: 26298217 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Revised: 07/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/18/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study focuses on facilitation of clients' psychosocial communication during prenatal counseling for fetal anomaly screening. We assessed how psychosocial communication by clients is related to midwives' psychosocial and affective communication, client-directed gaze and counseling duration. METHODS During 184 videotaped prenatal counseling consultations with 20 Dutch midwives, verbal psychosocial and affective behavior was measured by the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). We rated the duration of client-directed gaze. We performed multilevel analyses to assess the relation between clients' psychosocial communication and midwives' psychosocial and affective communication, client-directed gaze and counseling duration. RESULTS Clients' psychosocial communication was higher if midwives' asked more psychosocial questions and showed more affective behavior (β=0.90; CI: 0.45-1.35; p<0.00 and β=1.32; CI: 0.18-2.47; p=0.025, respectively). Clients "psychosocial communication was not related to midwives" client-directed gaze. Additionally, psychosocial communication by clients was directly, positively related to the counseling duration (β=0.59; CI: 0.20-099; p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS In contrast with our expectations, midwives' client-directed gaze was not related with psychosocial communication of clients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS In addition to asking psychosocial questions, our study shows that midwives' affective behavior and counseling duration is likely to encourage client's psychosocial communication, known to be especially important for facilitating decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Martin
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO(+) Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO(+) Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Faculty of Theology, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Monique T R Pereboom
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO(+) Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Evelien R Spelten
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO(+) Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eileen K Hutton
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO(+) Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Obstetrics & Gynecology, Midwifery Education Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Faculty of Health Sciences, Buskerud and Vestfold University College, Drammen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hill M, Johnson JA, Langlois S, Lee H, Winsor S, Dineley B, Horniachek M, Lalatta F, Ronzoni L, Barrett AN, Advani HV, Choolani M, Rabinowitz R, Pajkrt E, van Schendel RV, Henneman L, Rommers W, Bilardo CM, Rendeiro P, Ribeiro MJ, Rocha J, Bay Lund IC, Petersen OB, Becher N, Vogel I, Stefánsdottir V, Ingvarsdottir S, Gottfredsdottir H, Morris S, Chitty LS. Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 24:968-75. [PMID: 26577044 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Revised: 09/06/2015] [Accepted: 10/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing is increasingly available worldwide and stakeholder viewpoints are essential to guide implementation. Here we compare the preferences of women and health professionals from nine different countries towards attributes of non-invasive and invasive prenatal tests for Down syndrome. A discrete choice experiment was used to obtain participants' stated preference for prenatal tests that varied according to four attributes: accuracy, time of test, risk of miscarriage, and type of information. Pregnant women and health professionals were recruited from Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Singapore, and the United Kingdom. A total of 2666 women's and 1245 health professionals' questionnaires were included in the analysis. Differences in preferences were seen between women and health professionals within and between countries. Overall, women placed greater emphasis on test safety and comprehensive information than health professionals, who emphasised accuracy and early testing. Differences between women's and health professionals' preferences are marked between countries. Varied approaches to implementation and service delivery are therefore needed and individual countries should develop guidelines appropriate for their own social and screening contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Hill
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jo-Ann Johnson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sylvie Langlois
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hyun Lee
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stephanie Winsor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brigid Dineley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marisa Horniachek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Faustina Lalatta
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Luisa Ronzoni
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
| | - Angela N Barrett
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Henna V Advani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mahesh Choolani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ron Rabinowitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Eva Pajkrt
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rachèl V van Schendel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wieke Rommers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Caterina M Bilardo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - José Rocha
- CGC Genetics, Porto, Portugal.,IINFACTS, CESPU, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Olav B Petersen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Naja Becher
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ida Vogel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Vigdis Stefánsdottir
- Department of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Sigrun Ingvarsdottir
- Landspitali, National University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Helga Gottfredsdottir
- Landspitali, National University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Stephen Morris
- Research Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shahhosseini Z, Arabi H, Salehi A, Hamzehgardeshi Z. Factors Affecting Improved Prenatal Screening: A Narrative Review. Glob J Health Sci 2015; 8:160-5. [PMID: 26652091 PMCID: PMC4877239 DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2015] [Revised: 08/13/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Prenatal screening deals with the detection of structural and functional abnormalities in the fetus. Health care providers can minimize unintended pregnancy outcomes by providing proper counseling and performing prenatal screening. The purpose of the present review study is to investigate factors affecting improved prenatal screening. Methods: The present study is a narrative review searching public databases such as Google Scholar and specialized databases such as Pubmed, Magiran, Scientific Information Database, Elsevier, Ovid and Science Direct as well. Using the keywords “prenatal screening”, “fetus health” and “prenatal counseling”, 70 relevant articles published from 1994 to 2014 were selected. After reviewing the abstracts, the full data from 26 articles were ultimately used for writing the present review study. Results: Three general themes emerged from reviewing the studies: health care providers’ skills, clients’ characteristics and ethical considerations, which were the main factors affecting improved prenatal screening. Conclusion: Prenatal screening can be successful if performed by a trained and experienced expert through techniques suitable for the mother’s age. Also simultaneously providing proper counseling and giving a full description of the risks and benefits of the procedures for clients is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zohreh Shahhosseini
- Department of reproductive health and Midwifery, Nasibeh Nursing and Midwifery faculty, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran Traditional and Complementary Medicine Research Centre, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
de Jonge A, de Vries R, Lagro-Janssen ALM, Malata A, Declercq E, Downe S, Hutton EK. The importance of evaluating primary midwifery care for improving the health of women and infants. Front Med (Lausanne) 2015; 2:17. [PMID: 25853136 PMCID: PMC4369669 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In most countries, maternal and newborn care is fragmented and focused on identification and treatment of pathology that affects only the minority of women and babies. Recently, a framework for quality maternal and newborn care was developed, which encourages a system-level shift to provide skilled care for all. This care includes preventive and supportive care that works to strengthen women's capabilities and focuses on promotion of normal reproductive processes while ensuring access to emergency treatment when needed. Midwifery care is pivotal in this framework, which contains several elements that resonate with the main dimensions of primary care. Primary health care is the first level of contact with the health system where most of the population's curative and preventive health needs can be fulfilled as close as possible to where people live and work. In this paper, we argue that midwifery as described in the framework requires the application of a primary care philosophy for all childbearing women and infants. Evaluation of the implementation of the framework should therefore include tools to monitor the performance of primary midwifery care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ank de Jonge
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Raymond de Vries
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Midwifery Academy Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Antoine L. M. Lagro-Janssen
- Gender and Women’s Health Unit, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Address Malata
- Kamuzu College of Nursing, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi
| | | | - Soo Downe
- Research in Childbirth and Health (ReaCH) Group, School of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Eileen K. Hutton
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Midwifery Education Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gitsels-van der Wal JT, Martin L, Manniën J, Verhoeven P, Hutton EK, Reinders HS. A qualitative study on how Muslim women of Moroccan descent approach antenatal anomaly screening. Midwifery 2015; 31:e43-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2014] [Revised: 10/20/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
42
|
Antenatal counselling for congenital anomaly tests: Pregnant Muslim Moroccan women׳s preferences. Midwifery 2015; 31:e50-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2014] [Revised: 12/23/2014] [Accepted: 01/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|