1
|
Head M, Cohn B, Wernli KJ, Palazzo L, Ehrlich K, Matson A, Knerr S. Young Women's Perspectives on Being Screened for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk During Routine Primary Care. Womens Health Issues 2024; 34:268-275. [PMID: 38448251 PMCID: PMC11116046 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2024.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening women to identify individuals eligible for genetic counseling based on a priori hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) risk (i.e., risk assessment). However, risk assessment has not been widely integrated into primary care. This qualitative study explored young women's views on implementing routine HBOC risk assessment with a focus on equity and patient-centeredness. METHODS We conducted group discussions with young women (aged 21-40 years) receiving care in an integrated health care system. Discussion groups occurred in two phases and used a modified deliberative approach that included a didactic component and prioritized developing consensus. Twenty women participated in one of three initial small group discussions (phase one). All 20 were invited to participate in a subsequent large group discussion (phase two), and 15 of them attended. FINDINGS Key themes and recommendations were as follows. Risk assessment should be accessible, contextualized, and destigmatized to encourage participation and reduce anxiety, particularly for women who do not know their family history. Providers conducting risk assessments must be equipped to address women's informational needs, relieve emotionality, and plan next steps after positive screens. Finally, to minimize differential screening uptake, health care systems must prioritize equity in program design and contribute to external educational and outreach efforts. CONCLUSION Young women see pragmatic opportunities for health systems to optimize HBOC screening implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mady Head
- Genetic Counseling Graduate Program, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Betty Cohn
- Institute for Public Health Genetics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Karen J Wernli
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lorella Palazzo
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kelly Ehrlich
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Abigail Matson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sarah Knerr
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al-Shamsi HO, Alwbari A, Azribi F, Calaud F, Thuruthel S, Tirmazy SHH, Kullab S, Ostomane S, Abulkhair O. BRCA testing and management of BRCA-mutated early-stage breast cancer: a comprehensive statement by expert group from GCC region. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1358982. [PMID: 38725624 PMCID: PMC11080009 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1358982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BReast CAncer (BRCA)1 and BRCA2 gene pathogenic variants account for most hereditary breast cancers (BC). Identification of BRCA mutations can significantly influence both prognosis and treatment outcomes. Furthermore, it enables the identification of individuals who are at heightened risk of developing BC due to inherited genetic mutations. Many developing countries rely on western guidelines for BRCA testing and BC management; however, there exist wide disparities in the prevalence of risk factors, availability of medical resources, and practice patterns. Guidelines tailored to specific regions can help mitigate healthcare variations, promote consistency in treatment, and aid healthcare providers in identifying effective therapies for improving patient outcomes. Hence, oncologists from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) congregated virtually in March 2023 and reviewed existing data on the epidemiology of BC, BRCA mutations, practices and challenges associated with BRCA testing and management of BRCA mutated early-stage BC in the GCC region. They also provided insights on the real-world diagnostic and treatment practices and challenges in the GCC region in the BRCA-mutated early-stage BC domain and suggested some variations to international guidelines to aid their uptake in this region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Humaid O. Al-Shamsi
- Burjeel Medical City, Burjeel Holding, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
- Emirates Oncology Society, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
- Gulf Cancer Society, Alsafa, Kuwait
| | - Ahmed Alwbari
- Almoosa Specialist Hospital Cancer Center, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | | | | | - Sharif Kullab
- King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rivera-Nunez Y, Smith DL. Efficacy of implementing a BRCA screening protocol in primary care. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 2024; 36:12-16. [PMID: 37506047 DOI: 10.1097/jxx.0000000000000916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death for women, whereas ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecological cancer. Breast cancer gene 1 ( BRCA1 ) and breast cancer gene 2 ( BRCA2 ) mutations can increase the risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. Screening can assist in prevention and early detection. This study aimed to increase provider knowledge of BRCA mutations, the use of BRCA screening tools, and genetic referrals. An Institutional Review Board-approved study was implemented for providers for training on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and the importance of screening and referral for those at risk. Measures included provider confidence and knowledge after training as well as number of patient referrals. A standardized webinar was required with further education provided in multiple modalities. The number of BRCA screenings and referrals for genetic screening was monitored through the electronic health record (EHR). Eight providers including five nurse practitioners and three medical doctors participated in the complete project. As a result, 56 patients were BRCA screened, and four referrals were made to receive genetic counseling. Education enhanced knowledge, increased screening tool use, and resulted in improvement in genetic referrals through the EHR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diane L Smith
- Department of Nursing, Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Henning JW, Boileau JF, Peck L, McFarlane T. Clinical Considerations for the Integration of Adjuvant Olaparib into Practice for Early Breast Cancer: A Canadian Perspective. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:7672-7691. [PMID: 37623037 PMCID: PMC10453371 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30080556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
With the recent Health Canada approval of olaparib for high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer, physicians are now facing the practical challenges of integrating olaparib into current management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HR-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer. This review provides perspectives on some of the challenges related to identification of olaparib candidates, with a focus on the latest guidance for germline BRCA testing and considerations regarding high-risk disease definitions. Updated treatment pathways are explored for both disease states, including other adjuvant treatment options such as pembrolizumab, capecitabine, and abemaciclib. Gaps in the current literature regarding the sequential or combined use of these adjuvant therapies are noted and future, potentially informative, studies are briefly examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Willem Henning
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Jean-François Boileau
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada;
| | - Larissa Peck
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada;
| | - Tom McFarlane
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kuo WL, Lin PH, Peng MT, Chu CH, Cho CW. Patients' attitudes regarding genetic counseling before germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants testing in Taiwan: A single-country, multi-center, patient-reported outcome study. J Genet Couns 2023. [PMID: 36872635 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants of BRCA1 or BRCA2 cause hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes. The present study investigated the participants' understanding and awareness of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants before genetic counseling, the expectations and obstacles for genetic testing from the perspective of participants and their families, and their attitudes towards genetic testing after counseling. In this single-country, multicenter, non-interventional, patient-reported outcome study, untested cancer patients and their families who visited genetic counseling clinics or who wanted to receive pre-test genetic counseling were eligible to fill in the questionnaire after pre-test counseling for germline BRCA1/2 testing. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and information collected from the questionnaires, including the understanding of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants before genetic counseling, understanding of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and feelings after genetic counseling, willingness to share results of genetic testing with family, and willingness to receive genetic testing, were summarized using descriptive statistics. A total of 88 participants were enrolled. The proportion of slight understanding of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants increased from 11.4% to 67.0%, and the proportion of full understanding increased from 0% to 8.0%. After genetic counseling, most participants were willing to undergo genetic testing (87.5%) and share the results with their families (96.6%). The main factors that may affect participants' willingness to undergo BRCA1/2 testing were management (61.2%) and testing costs (25.9%). After pre-test counseling, there was a high acceptance of BRCA1/2 testing and in-family information sharing in Taiwanese patients with cancer and their families, which may serve as a reference for implementing genetic counseling in Taiwan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Ling Kuo
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Po-Han Lin
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Ting Peng
- Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Division of Haematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hui Chu
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cassani C, Rossi C, Camnasio CA, Urtis M, Fiandrino G, Grasso M, Zanellini F, Lucioni M, D’Ambrosio G, Di Toro A, Rossi M, Roccio M, Ferrari A, Secondino S, Nappi RE, Arbustini E, Paulli M, Spinillo A, Cesari S. Pathologic Findings at Risk Reducing Surgery in BRCA and Non- BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Single-Center Experience. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12123054. [PMID: 36553061 PMCID: PMC9776991 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12123054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing surgery (RRS) is recommended in BRCA-mutated carriers because of their increased risk of developing ovarian cancer, while its role is still discussed for women harboring mutations in non-BRCA homologous repair genes. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the occurrence of pathological findings in a high-risk population undergoing RRS in San Matteo Hospital, Pavia between 2012 and 2022, and correlate their genetic and clinical outcomes, comparing them with a control group. The final cohort of 190 patients included 85 BRCA1, 63 BRCA2, 11 CHEK2, 7 PALB2, 4 ATM, 1 ERCC5, 1 RAD51C, 1 CDH1, 1 MEN1, 1 MLH1 gene mutation carriers and 15 patients with no known mutation but with strong familial risk. Occult invasive serous carcinoma (HGSC) and serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) were diagnosed in 12 (6.3%) women, all of them BRCA carriers. No neoplastic lesion was diagnosed in the non-BRCA group, in women with familial risk, or in the control group. Oral contraceptive use and age ≤45 at surgery were both found to be favorable factors. While p53 signature and serous tubal intraepithelial lesion (STIL) were also seen in the control group and in non-BRCA carriers, STIC and HGSC were only found in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Cassani
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pavia, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Chiara Rossi
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Unit of Anatomic Pathology, University of Pavia, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Cristina Angela Camnasio
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pavia, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Mario Urtis
- Transplant Research Area and Centre for Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Giacomo Fiandrino
- Unit of Anatomic Pathology, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Maurizia Grasso
- Transplant Research Area and Centre for Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Zanellini
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Lucioni
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Unit of Anatomic Pathology, University of Pavia, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Gioacchino D’Ambrosio
- Unit of Anatomic Pathology, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Di Toro
- Transplant Research Area and Centre for Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Margherita Rossi
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Marianna Roccio
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberta Ferrari
- General Surgery III—Breast Surgery, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Simona Secondino
- Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Rossella Elena Nappi
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Gynecological Endocrinology and Menopause, University of Pavia, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Eloisa Arbustini
- Transplant Research Area and Centre for Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Paulli
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Unit of Anatomic Pathology, University of Pavia, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Arsenio Spinillo
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pavia, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefania Cesari
- Unit of Anatomic Pathology, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Germline Genetic Testing in Breast Cancer: Systemic Therapy Implications. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:1791-1800. [PMID: 36255604 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01340-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In this article, we discuss recent advances in germline genetic testing for patients with breast cancer and highlight current limitations and impacts on clinical care. We also provide an update on the therapeutic implications of having a germline mutation, including targeted systemic therapy options for treating early and metastatic breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Approximately 5 to 10% of women diagnosed with breast cancer have a pathogenic variant in a hereditary cancer susceptibility gene, which has significant implications for managing these patients. Previously, testing was done mainly to inform screening and risk-reduction treatment; however, more recently, germline genetic results have significant systemic therapy implications that can meaningfully improve outcomes in breast cancer patients, especially with oral poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. These systemic therapy advances implore a shift in paradigm for whom to test moving forward and how to modify the existing testing models to meet the increasing demand for germline testing, which is expected to grow exponentially.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pessanha RM, Schuab SIPDC, Nunes KZ, Lopes-Júnior LC. Use of family history taking for hereditary neoplastic syndromes screening in primary health care: A systematic review protocol. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0271286. [PMID: 35877607 PMCID: PMC9312395 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although most neoplasms result from complex interactions between the individual’s genome and the environment, a percentage of cases is particularly due to inherited alterations that confer a greater predisposition to the development of tumors. Hereditary Neoplastic Syndromes have a high psychosocial and economic burden, in addition to being characterized by an increased risk for one or more types of cancer, onset of malignancy at a young age, high risk of secondary malignancies, and occurrence in successive generations of the family. Personal and family history, as well as pedigree, may be useful resources to estimate the risk for developing cancer, especially in Primary Health Care settings. Objective To identify and evaluate the evidence regarding the impact of using family history as a genomic technology for Hereditary Neoplastic Syndromes screening at Primary Health Care. Methods This systematic review protocol was elaborated in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). We will include all observational as well as experimental study designs published up to end of July 2022, and studies covering the impact of family history on screening for Hereditary Neoplastic Syndromes in primary health care. Qualitative studies, as well as guidelines, reviews, and studies undertaken in hospitals, outpatient clinic, or medical environments will be excluded. Five databases will be searched, including MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and LILACS. Additional sources will also be retrieved, including Clinical trials.gov-NIH, The British Library, and Google Scholar. No restriction to language or date will be employed in the search strategy. Three investigators will select studies independently, perform data extraction, and conduct the critical appraisal of the risk of bias and overall quality of the selected studies according to their designs. Regarding data synthesis, the study characteristics will be summarized and presented in tables and results will be presented according to the study design. A qualitative synthesis of data will also be provided in this systematic review. Discussion To the best of our knowledge, this systematic review will be the first to identify and critically assess evidence regarding the impact of using family history as a genomic technology for Hereditary Neoplastic Syndromes screening in Primary Health Care settings worldwide. This study is expected to provide consistent evidence that will aid the primary care decision-makers regarding hereditary cancer screening, thus helping individuals and families at risk for cancer. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020166211.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Manhães Pessanha
- Graduate Program in Public Health-PPGSC, Health Sciences Center at the Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitoria, ES, Brazil
| | | | - Karolini Zuqui Nunes
- Health Sciences Center at the Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitoria, ES, Brazil
| | - Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior
- Graduate Program in Public Health-PPGSC, Health Sciences Center at the Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitoria, ES, Brazil
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Miroševič Š, Klemenc-Ketiš Z, Peterlin B. Family history tools for primary care: A systematic review. Eur J Gen Pract 2022; 28:75-86. [PMID: 35510897 PMCID: PMC9090347 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2061457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Many medical family history (FH) tools are available for various settings. Although FH tools can be a powerful health screening tool in primary care (PC), they are currently underused. Objectives This review explores the FH tools currently available for PC and evaluates their clinical performance. Methods Five databases were systematically searched until May 2021. Identified tools were evaluated on the following criteria: time-to-complete, integration with electronic health record (EMR) systems, patient administration, risk-assessment ability, evidence-based management recommendations, analytical and clinical validity and clinical utility. Results We identified 26 PC FH tools. Analytical and clinical validity was poorly reported and agreement between FH and gold standard was commonly inadequately reported and assessed. Sensitivity was acceptable; specificity was found in half of the reviewed tools to be poor. Most reviewed tools showed a capacity to successfully identify individuals with increased risk of disease (6.2–84.6% of high and/or moderate or increased risk individuals). Conclusion Despite the potential of FH tools to improve risk stratification of patients in PC, clinical performance of current tools remains limited as well as their integration in EMR systems. Twenty-one FH tools are designed to be self-administered by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Špela Miroševič
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.,Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Borut Peterlin
- Clinical Institute for Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Investigating men's motivations to engage in genetic screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265387. [PMID: 35303741 PMCID: PMC8932559 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are associated with an increased risk of developing numerous cancers, including breast, ovarian, pancreatic, melanoma and prostate cancer. Men face BRCA-related cancer risks as women do. However, there is considerably less research on the psychological determinants of men engaging in BRCA1/2-related cancer prevention compared to women. The present research aimed to study the determinants of men’s motivations to engage in genetic screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 through the lens of the Health Action Process Approach. One hundred and twenty-five men (mean age = 58.53 y/o, SD = 10.37) completed an online survey. The intention to undergo genetic screening for BRCA1/2 mutations in men was significantly and positively associated with self-efficacy and risk perception. Moreover, having offspring positively affected intention as well. The relationships between intention (and planning) and positive outcome expectancies, age, and family history of breast-related cancer were not statistically significant. Most information on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is tailored to women due to the availability of effective surgical risk reduction procedures for women’s breast and ovarian cancer. Future research should focus on the best methods of communicating informed decision-making for men facing the risk of such mutations.
Collapse
|
11
|
Vafaei Z, Najafian J, Shekarchizadeh M, Mostafavi S, Darakhshandeh A, Khosravifarsani M, Ashrafi F, Sharifi M, Mohammadifard N, Emami MH, Haghjooy-Javanmard S, Sarrafzadegan N. Validation of a newly developed questionnaire regarding clinical history in patients with breast and colorectal cancers. ARYA ATHEROSCLEROSIS 2021; 17:1-10. [PMID: 35685447 PMCID: PMC9145839 DOI: 10.22122/arya.v17i0.2212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the close interaction between the specialties of cardiology and oncology is necessary for early detection of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in cancer patients. For the risk assessment of CVD in Breast and Colorectal Cancers (CIBC) study, in the current study we aimed to validate a questionnaire for the assessment of clinical history in patients with breast cancer and colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS We determined the content validity of the questionnaire using the 2 indexes of content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) to examine the specificity, simplicity, clarity, and transparency of the items. Content validity assessment was performed through a panel of experts including 2 oncologists, 5 cardiologists, 2 general practitioners, and 1 epidemiologist. The reliability of the questionnaire was estimated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient in 50 patients. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to examine the reproducibility of the questionnaire during 1 week. RESULTS The CRC and breast cancer questionnaire were designed with 16 and 32 questions, respectively. To obtain acceptable CVR, 5 and 11 questions were removed from the CRC and breast cancer questionnaires, respectively. Cronbach's alpha was 0.70 in the breast cancer questionnaire and 0.94 in the CRC questionnaire. All questions had a CVI of higher than 80%. The ICC in the breast cancer questionnaire ranged between 0.71 and 0.96 and in CRC questionnaire ranged between 0.78 and 0.98. CONCLUSION The validity and reliability of our newly developed questionnaire was desirable. The reliability of the breast cancer questions was acceptable and that of the CRC questions was excellent. Thus, thus questionnaire can be used in this group of patients regardless of whether the goal is cardiac care or not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zamaneh Vafaei
- Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Jamshid Najafian
- Hypertension Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Masood Shekarchizadeh
- Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Samaneh Mostafavi
- Interventional Cardiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Ali Darakhshandeh
- Department of Medical Oncology-Hematology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | | | - Farzaneh Ashrafi
- Cardio-Oncology Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehran Sharifi
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Cancer Prevention Research Center, Seyyed AlShohada Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Noushin Mohammadifard
- Pediatric Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hassan Emami
- Poursina Hakim Digestive Diseases Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Shaghayegh Haghjooy-Javanmard
- Applied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Nizal Sarrafzadegan
- Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran,Address for correspondence: Nizal Sarrafzadegan; Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan
University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Moura JBD, Ghedin CC, Takakura ÉT, Scandolara TB, Rech D, Panis C. Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Screening Syndrome Profile in Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer from Paraná State Southwest. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRÍCIA 2021; 43:616-621. [PMID: 34547796 PMCID: PMC10183857 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the risk of the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome in patients with breast cancer by using the Family History Screening 7 (FHS-7) tool, a validated low-cost questionnaire with high sensitivity able to screen the HBOC risk in the population. METHODS Women diagnosed with breast cancer (n = 101) assisted by the Unified Health System at the 8th Regional Health Municipal Office of the state of Paraná answered the FHS-7, and the results were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS The risk of HBOC was 19.80% (n = 20). Patients at risk exhibited aggressive tumor characteristics, such as high-grade tumors (30%), presence of angiolymphatic emboli (35%), and premenopausal at diagnosis (50%). Significant associations between the prevalence of high-grade tumors were observed in women younger than 50 years at diagnosis with HBOC (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest a possible family inheritance associated with worse clinical features in women with breast cancer in this population, indicating that HBOC investigation can be initially performed with low-cost instruments such as FHS-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carla Camila Ghedin
- Laboratory of Tumor Biology, Universidade do Estado do Paraná, Francisco Beltrão, PR, Brazil
| | - Érika Tomie Takakura
- Laboratory of Tumor Biology, Universidade do Estado do Paraná, Francisco Beltrão, PR, Brazil
| | - Thalita Basso Scandolara
- Laboratory of Tumor Biology, Universidade do Estado do Paraná, Francisco Beltrão, PR, Brazil.,Department of Genetics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Daniel Rech
- Center of Health Sciences, Francisco Beltrão Cancer Hospital, Francisco Beltrão, PR, Brazil
| | - Carolina Panis
- Laboratory of Tumor Biology, Universidade do Estado do Paraná, Francisco Beltrão, PR, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Buranello MC, Walsh IAPD, Pereira GDA, Castro SSD. Histórico familiar para câncer de mama em mulheres: estudo populacional em Uberaba (MG) utilizando o Family History Screen-7. SAÚDE EM DEBATE 2021. [DOI: 10.1590/0103-1104202113009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
RESUMO Objetiva-se determinar a prevalência de mulheres com risco de desenvolvimento de câncer de mama pelo histórico familiar em Uberaba (MG), e essa prevalência nas diferentes condições socioeconômicas e epidemiológicas. Pesquisa quantitativa, analítica, observacional e transversal de base populacional. Amostra com 1.520 mulheres a partir de 20 anos. Dados coletados por entrevistas domiciliares sobre informações socioeconômicas e epidemiológicas. A avaliação do risco hereditário de câncer de mama foi realizada pelo Family History Screen-7 (FHS-7). Como resultado, 28,6% da amostra apresentaram risco hereditário para câncer de mama. Houve associação significativa do risco de câncer quanto a: faixa etária, sendo nas mulheres com idade de 70 anos ou mais a maior proporção com risco (33,5%); etnia, sendo a maior proporção entre mulheres de etnia branca (31,2%); renda familiar, com maior ocorrência para renda per capita > 2,5 salários-mínimos (31,6%); prática de exames preventivos (30,6%); e alterações benignas na mama (46,7%). Conclui-se que, a partir do histórico familiar pelo FHS-7, o risco de as mulheres desenvolverem câncer mostrou-se significativamente associado com maior faixa etária, etnia branca e maior renda per capita, com a prática de exames preventivos em dia e alterações benignas na mama. Tais resultados possibilitam melhores direcionamentos de políticas públicas.
Collapse
|
14
|
Miroševič Š, Krajc K, Klemenc-Ketiš Z, Selič-Zupančič P. Mapping Users' Experience of a Family History and Genetic Risk Algorithm Tool in Primary Care. Public Health Genomics 2021; 25:1-10. [PMID: 34515220 DOI: 10.1159/000518086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The development of a family history (FH) questionnaire (FHQ) provides an insight into a patient's familiarity of a trait and helps to identify individuals at increased risk of disease. A critical aspect of developing a new tool is exploring users' experience. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to examine users' experience, obstacles and challenges, and their views and concerns in the applicability of a new tool for determining genetic risk in Slovenia's primary care. METHODS We used a qualitative approach. The participants completed a risk assessment software questionnaire that calculates users' likelihood of developing familial diseases. Audio-taped semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted to evaluate their experience. There were 21 participants, and analyses using the constant comparative method were employed. RESULTS We identified 3 main themes: obstacles/key issues, suggestions for improvements, and coping. The participants were poorly satisfied with the clarity of instructions, technical usability problems, and issues with the entry of relatives' data. They expressed satisfaction with some of the characteristics of the FHQ (e.g., straightforward and friendly format, easy entry, and comprehension). They suggested simpler language, that the disease risk should be targeted toward the disease, that the FHQ should include patient-specific recommendations, and that it should be part of the electronic medical records. When discussing what would they do with the results of the FHQ, the participants used different coping strategies: active (e.g., seeking information) or passive (e.g., avoidance). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION User experience was shown to be a synthesis of obstacles, overcoming them with suggestions for improvements, and exploration of various coping mechanisms that may emerge from dealing with the stressor of "being at risk."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Špela Miroševič
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Kaja Krajc
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
| | - Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Polona Selič-Zupančič
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kaphingst KA, Kohlmann W, Chambers RL, Goodman MS, Bradshaw R, Chan PA, Chavez-Yenter D, Colonna SV, Espinel WF, Everett JN, Gammon A, Goldberg ER, Gonzalez J, Hagerty KJ, Hess R, Kehoe K, Kessler C, Kimball KE, Loomis S, Martinez TR, Monahan R, Schiffman JD, Temares D, Tobik K, Wetter DW, Mann DM, Kawamoto K, Del Fiol G, Buys SS, Ginsburg O. Comparing models of delivery for cancer genetics services among patients receiving primary care who meet criteria for genetic evaluation in two healthcare systems: BRIDGE randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:542. [PMID: 34078380 PMCID: PMC8170651 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06489-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in genetics and sequencing technologies are enabling the identification of more individuals with inherited cancer susceptibility who could benefit from tailored screening and prevention recommendations. While cancer family history information is used in primary care settings to identify unaffected patients who could benefit from a cancer genetics evaluation, this information is underutilized. System-level population health management strategies are needed to assist health care systems in identifying patients who may benefit from genetic services. In addition, because of the limited number of trained genetics specialists and increasing patient volume, the development of innovative and sustainable approaches to delivering cancer genetic services is essential. METHODS We are conducting a randomized controlled trial, entitled Broadening the Reach, Impact, and Delivery of Genetic Services (BRIDGE), to address these needs. The trial is comparing uptake of genetic counseling, uptake of genetic testing, and patient adherence to management recommendations for automated, patient-directed versus enhanced standard of care cancer genetics services delivery models. An algorithm-based system that utilizes structured cancer family history data available in the electronic health record (EHR) is used to identify unaffected patients who receive primary care at the study sites and meet current guidelines for cancer genetic testing. We are enrolling eligible patients at two healthcare systems (University of Utah Health and New York University Langone Health) through outreach to a randomly selected sample of 2780 eligible patients in the two sites, with 1:1 randomization to the genetic services delivery arms within sites. Study outcomes are assessed through genetics clinic records, EHR, and two follow-up questionnaires at 4 weeks and 12 months after last genetic counseling contactpre-test genetic counseling. DISCUSSION BRIDGE is being conducted in two healthcare systems with different clinical structures and patient populations. Innovative aspects of the trial include a randomized comparison of a chatbot-based genetic services delivery model to standard of care, as well as identification of at-risk individuals through a sustainable EHR-based system. The findings from the BRIDGE trial will advance the state of the science in identification of unaffected patients with inherited cancer susceptibility and delivery of genetic services to those patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION BRIDGE is registered as NCT03985852 . The trial was registered on June 6, 2019 at clinicaltrials.gov .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 S. Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| | - Wendy Kohlmann
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | | | - Melody S Goodman
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, 726 Broadway, New York, NY, 10012, USA
| | - Richard Bradshaw
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Priscilla A Chan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Daniel Chavez-Yenter
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 S. Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Sarah V Colonna
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Veterans Administration Medical Center, 500 S. Foothill Boulevard, Salt Lake City, UT, 84149, USA
| | - Whitney F Espinel
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Jessica N Everett
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Amanda Gammon
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Eric R Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Javier Gonzalez
- Medical Center Information Technology, NYU Langone Health, 360 Park Avenue South, New York, NY, 10010, USA
| | - Kelsi J Hagerty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Rachel Hess
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Kelsey Kehoe
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Cecilia Kessler
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Kadyn E Kimball
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Shane Loomis
- NYU Langone Health, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Boost Services, Epic Systems Corporation, 1979 Milky Way, Verona, WI, 53593, USA
| | - Tiffany R Martinez
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Rachel Monahan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Joshua D Schiffman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Dani Temares
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Katie Tobik
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - David W Wetter
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Devin M Mann
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Kensaku Kawamoto
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Ophira Ginsburg
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cai Y, Li J, Gao Y, Yang K, He J, Li N, Tian J. A systematic review of recommendations on screening strategies for breast cancer due to hereditary predisposition: Who, When, and How? Cancer Med 2021; 10:3437-3448. [PMID: 33932123 PMCID: PMC8124106 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is a global health problem that cannot be underestimated. Many studies have shown that breast cancer is related to pathogenic mutations in hereditary predisposition genes. Clinical practice guidelines play a vital role in guiding the selection of breast cancer screening. Little is known about the quality and consistency of guidelines' recommendations and their changes over these years. METHODS We reviewed the existing screening guidelines for genetic susceptibility to breast cancer and assessed the methodological quality, and summarized the recommendations to aid clinicians to make decisions. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and guideline-specific databases, aiming to find the guidelines of breast cancer due to hereditary predisposition. The necessary information was exacted by Excel. We also summarized different evidence grading systems. The qualities of the guidelines were assessed by the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. RESULTS A total of 54 recommendations from 13 guidelines were extracted. Generally speaking, the recommendations were consistent, mainly focusing on mammography and MRI. CONCLUSIONS The recommendations differ in details. Moreover, different guidelines are based on different grading systems, and some guidelines are not divided for age limits, which may limit the promotion and implementation of the guidelines. It is suggested that improvement can be made in this regard in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yitong Cai
- Evidence‐Based CenterLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
| | - Jiang Li
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Ya Gao
- Evidence‐Based Medicine CenterSchool of Basic Medical SciencesLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
| | - Kelu Yang
- Evidence‐Based CenterLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
| | - Jie He
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Ni Li
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Jinhui Tian
- Evidence‐Based Medicine CenterSchool of Basic Medical SciencesLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ginsburg O, Ashton-Prolla P, Cantor A, Mariosa D, Brennan P. The role of genomics in global cancer prevention. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2021; 18:116-128. [PMID: 32973296 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0428-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Despite improvements in the understanding of cancer causation, much remains unknown regarding the mechanisms by which genomic and non-genomic factors initiate carcinogenesis, drive cell invasion and metastasis, and enable cancer to develop. Technological advances have enabled the analysis of whole genomes, comprising thousands of tumours across populations worldwide, with the aim of identifying mutation signatures associated with particular tumour types. Large collaborative efforts have resulted in the identification and improved understanding of causal factors, and have shed light on new opportunities to prevent cancer. In this new era in cancer genomics, discoveries from studies conducted on an international scale can inform evidence-based strategies in cancer control along the cancer care continuum, from prevention to treatment. In this Review, we present the relevant history and emerging frontiers of cancer genetics and genomics from the perspective of global cancer prevention. We highlight the importance of local context in the adoption of new technologies and emergent evidence, with illustrative examples from worldwide. We emphasize the challenges in implementing important genomic findings in clinical settings with disparate resource availability and present a conceptual framework for the translation of such findings into clinical practice, and evidence-based policies in order to maximize the utility for a population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ophira Ginsburg
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
- Section for Global Health, Division of Health and Behavior, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Patricia Ashton-Prolla
- Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre and Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Anna Cantor
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Paul Brennan
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hirsch S, Gieldon L, Sutter C, Dikow N, Schaaf CP. Germline testing for homologous recombination repair genes—opportunities and challenges. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2020; 60:332-343. [DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Hirsch
- Institute of Human Genetics Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Laura Gieldon
- Institute of Human Genetics Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
| | - Nicola Dikow
- Institute of Human Genetics Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
| | - Christian P. Schaaf
- Institute of Human Genetics Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas
- Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute Texas Children's Hospital Houston Texas
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Breast cancer screening for women at high risk: review of current guidelines from leading specialty societies. Breast Cancer 2020; 28:1195-1211. [PMID: 32959120 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-020-01157-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to overview the existing breast cancer screening guidelines for women at high risk from world-leading specialty societies. Accumulation of evidence and development of accessible genetic testing strategies have changed the idea of breast cancer screening for high-risk women. Personalized tailor-made screening adjusted for risk factors has been conducted in accordance with guidelines. The use of imaging modalities other than mammography including contrast-enhanced MRI and other various strategies for improving screening are discussed. The present review also mentions the existing challenges in high-risk screening and the latest information based on two large-scale studies.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ataseven B, Tripon D, Rhiem K, Harter P, Schneider S, Heitz F, Baert T, Traut A, Pauly N, Ehmann S, Plett H, Schmutzler RK, du Bois A. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Patients with Primary Ovarian Cancer - Does the German Checklist for Detecting the Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Adequately Depict the Need for Consultation? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2020; 80:932-940. [PMID: 32905297 PMCID: PMC7467803 DOI: 10.1055/a-1222-0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundBRCA1/2
mutations are the leading cause of hereditary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer has defined inclusion criteria, which are retrievable as a checklist and facilitate genetic counselling/testing for affected persons with a mutation probability of ≥ 10%. Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence of the
BRCA1/2
mutation(s) based on the checklist score (CLS).
Methods
A retrospective data analysis was performed on EOC patients with a primary diagnosis treated between 1/2011 – 5/2019 at the Central Essen Clinics, where a
BRCA1/2
genetic analysis result and a CLS was available. Out of 545 cases with a
BRCA1/2
result (cohort A), 453 cases additionally had an extended gene panel result (cohort B).
Results
A
BRCA1/2
mutation was identified in 23.3% (127/545) in cohort A, pathogenic mutations in non-
BRCA1/2
genes were revealed in a further 6.2% in cohort B. In cohort A, 23.3% (127/545) of patients had a
BRCA1
(n = 92) or
BRCA2
(n = 35) mutation. Singular EOC (CLS 2) was present in 40.9%. The prevalence for a
BRCA1/2
mutation in cohort A was 10.8%, 17.2%, 25.0%, 35.1%, 51.4% and 66.7% for patients with CLS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and ≥ 7 respectively. The mutation prevalence in cohort B was 15.9%, 16.4%, 28.2%, 40.4%, 44.8% and 62.5% for patients with CLS 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and ≥ 7 respectively.
Conclusions
The
BRCA1/2
mutation prevalence in EOC patients positively correlates with a rising checklist score. Already with singular EOC, the prevalence of a
BRCA1/2
mutation exceeds the required 10% threshold. Our data support the recommendation of the S3 guidelines Ovarian Cancer of offering genetic testing to all patients with EOC. Optimisation of the checklist with clear identification of the testing indication in this population should therefore be aimed for.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beyhan Ataseven
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen.,Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe der LMU München, München
| | - Denise Tripon
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinik Köln, Köln
| | - Philipp Harter
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen
| | - Stephanie Schneider
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen
| | - Florian Heitz
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen.,Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Zentrum für onkologische Chirurgie (CVK) und Klinik für Gynäkologie (CBF), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - Thais Baert
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen.,Abteilung für Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgien
| | - Alexander Traut
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen
| | - Nina Pauly
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen
| | - Sarah Ehmann
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen
| | - Helmut Plett
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen.,Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Zentrum für onkologische Chirurgie (CVK) und Klinik für Gynäkologie (CBF), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinik Köln, Köln
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chelmow D, Pearlman MD, Young A, Bozzuto L, Dayaratna S, Jeudy M, Kremer ME, Scott DM, O'Hara JS. Executive Summary of the Early-Onset Breast Cancer Evidence Review Conference. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135:1457-1478. [PMID: 32459439 PMCID: PMC7253192 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched the Bring Your Brave campaign to increase knowledge about early-onset breast cancer, defined as breast cancer in women aged 18-45 years. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened a panel of experts in breast disease from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology to review relevant literature, validated tools, best practices, and practice guidelines as a first step toward developing educational materials for women's health care providers about early-onset breast cancer. Panel members conducted structured literature reviews, which were then reviewed by other panel members and discussed at an in-person meeting of stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations in April 2019. This article summarizes the relevant literature, existing guidance, and validated tools to guide health care providers in the prevention, early detection, and special considerations of early-onset breast cancer. Substantive knowledge gaps were noted and summarized to provide guidance for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Chelmow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; the Department of Women's Health, the University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas; the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Southeast Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Atlanta, Georgia; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut Medical School, Farmington, Connecticut; and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hacker ML, Ploucher S, Naik AG, Turchan M, Meystedt JC, Harper K, Hedera P, Pirtle CJ, Stubblefield K, Charles D. A Simple Bedside Screening Tool for Spasticity Referral. Clin Interv Aging 2020; 15:655-662. [PMID: 32523335 PMCID: PMC7234972 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s248602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Spasticity is common in long-term care facilities; however, this often-disabling condition is largely underdiagnosed in this setting and therefore left untreated. This study aimed to test the ability of a three-question flowchart used at the bedside by primary care providers in the long-term care setting to identify residents in need of referral to a specialist for spasticity consultation. Methods All residents of a single long-term care facility were approached for participation in this cross-sectional, observational study. Spasticity diagnostic evaluations by a movement disorders specialist neurologist (reference standard) were compared with referral determinations made by two primary care providers [a primary care physician (PCP) and a nurse practitioner (NP)] using the simple flowchart. Results The analysis included 49 residents (80% male, age 78.2±9.0 years) who were evaluated by the reference standard neurologist and at least one primary care provider. The bedside referral tool demonstrated high sensitivity and moderate specificity when used by the PCP (92% and 78%, respectively; AUC=0.84) and NP (80% and 53%, respectively; AUC=0.67). Conclusion This simple tool may be useful for primary care providers to identify residents to be referred to a specialist for evaluation and treatment of spasticity. These results warrant further investigation of the potential utility of this screening tool across multiple long-term care facilities and various types of care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mallory L Hacker
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Shelby Ploucher
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - Aaditi G Naik
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Maxim Turchan
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Kelly Harper
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Peter Hedera
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Claude J Pirtle
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - David Charles
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Selič P, Klemenc-Ketiš Z, Zelko E, Kravos A, Rifel J, Makivić I, Poplas Susič A, Tevžič Š, Cerovič M, Peterlin B, Kopčavar Guček N. Development of an Algorithm for Determining of Genetic Risk at the Primary Healthcare Level - A New Tool for Primary Prevention: A Study Protocol. Zdr Varst 2020; 59:27-32. [PMID: 32952700 PMCID: PMC7478082 DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2020-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Family history (FH) is an important part of the patients' medical history during preventive management at model family medicine practices (MFMP). It currently includes a one (or two) generational inquiry, predominately in terms of cardiovascular diseases, arterial hypertension, and diabetes, but not of other diseases with a probable genetic aetiology. Beside family history, no application-based algorithm is available to determine the risk level for specific chronic diseases in Slovenia. METHODS A web application-based algorithm aimed at determining the risk level for selected monogenic and polygenic diseases will be developed. The data will be collected in MFMP; approximately 40 overall with a sample including healthy preventive examination attendees (approximately 1,000). Demographic data, a three-generational FH, a medical history of acquired and congenital risk factors for the selected diseases, and other important clinical factors will be documented. RESULTS The results will be validated by a clinical genetic approach based on family pedigrees and the next-generation genetic sequencing method. After the risk of genetic diseases in the Slovenian population has been determined, clinical pathways for acting according to the assessed risk level will be prepared. CONCLUSION By means of a public health tool providing an assessment of family predisposition, a contribution to the effective identification of people at increased risk of the selected monogenic and polygenic diseases is expected, lessening a significant public health burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Polona Selič
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Taborska 8, 2000Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Erika Zelko
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Taborska 8, 2000Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Andrej Kravos
- University of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Taborska 8, 2000Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Janez Rifel
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Irena Makivić
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Špela Tevžič
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Metka Cerovič
- Community Health Centre dr. Adolfa Drolca Maribor, Ulica talcev 9, 2000Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Borut Peterlin
- University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, Šlajmerjeva 4, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nena Kopčavar Guček
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Metelkova 9, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Doubeni CA, Epling JW, Kubik M, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Pbert L, Silverstein M, Simon MA, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2019; 322:652-665. [PMID: 31429903 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.10987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 261] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Potentially harmful mutations of the breast cancer susceptibility 1 and 2 genes (BRCA1/2) are associated with increased risk for breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. For women in the United States, breast cancer is the most common cancer after nonmelanoma skin cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death. In the general population, BRCA1/2 mutations occur in an estimated 1 in 300 to 500 women and account for 5% to 10% of breast cancer cases and 15% of ovarian cancer cases. OBJECTIVE To update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for potentially harmful BRCA1/2 mutations in asymptomatic women who have never been diagnosed with BRCA-related cancer, as well as those with a previous diagnosis of breast, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer who have completed treatment and are considered cancer free. In addition, the USPSTF reviewed interventions to reduce the risk for breast, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer in women with potentially harmful BRCA1/2 mutations, including intensive cancer screening, medications, and risk-reducing surgery. FINDINGS For women whose family or personal history is associated with an increased risk for harmful mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes, or who have an ancestry associated with BRCA1/2 gene mutations, there is adequate evidence that the benefits of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, and interventions are moderate. For women whose personal or family history or ancestry is not associated with an increased risk for harmful mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes, there is adequate evidence that the benefits of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, and interventions are small to none. Regardless of family or personal history, the USPSTF found adequate evidence that the overall harms of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, and interventions are small to moderate. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF recommends that primary care clinicians assess women with a personal or family history of breast, ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer or who have an ancestry associated with BRCA1/2 gene mutations with an appropriate brief familial risk assessment tool. Women with a positive result on the risk assessment tool should receive genetic counseling and, if indicated after counseling, genetic testing. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against routine risk assessment, genetic counseling, or genetic testing for women whose personal or family history or ancestry is not associated with potentially harmful BRCA1/2 gene mutations. (D recommendation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Douglas K Owens
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
- Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Karina W Davidson
- Feinstein Institute for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
| | - Alex H Krist
- Fairfax Family Practice Residency, Fairfax, Virginia
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lori Pbert
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester
| | | | | | - Chien-Wen Tseng
- University of Hawaii, Honolulu
- Pacific Health Research and Education Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - John B Wong
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, Haney E, Holmes R. Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2019; 322:666-685. [PMID: 31429902 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.8430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Pathogenic mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 increase risks for breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer in women; interventions reduce risk in mutation carriers. OBJECTIVE To update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force review on benefits and harms of risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA1/2-related cancer in women. DATA SOURCES Cochrane libraries; MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE (January 1, 2013, to March 6, 2019, for updates; January 1, 1994, to March 6, 2019, for new key questions and populations); reference lists. STUDY SELECTION Discriminatory accuracy studies, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and observational studies of women without recently diagnosed BRCA1/2-related cancer. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data on study methods, setting, population characteristics, eligibility criteria, interventions, numbers enrolled and lost to follow-up, outcome ascertainment, and results were abstracted. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cancer incidence and mortality; discriminatory accuracy of risk assessment tools for BRCA1/2 mutations; benefits and harms of risk assessment, genetic counseling, genetic testing, and risk-reducing interventions. RESULTS For this review, 103 studies (110 articles; N = 92 712) were included. No studies evaluated the effectiveness of risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing in reducing incidence and mortality of BRCA1/2-related cancer. Fourteen studies (n = 43 813) of 8 risk assessment tools to guide referrals to genetic counseling demonstrated moderate to high accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.68-0.96). Twenty-eight studies (n = 8060) indicated that genetic counseling was associated with reduced breast cancer worry, anxiety, and depression; increased understanding of risk; and decreased intention for testing. Twenty studies (n = 4322) showed that breast cancer worry and anxiety were higher after testing for women with positive results and lower for others; understanding of risk was higher after testing. In 8 RCTs (n = 54 651), tamoxifen (relative risk [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.59-0.84]; 4 trials), raloxifene (RR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.24-0.80]; 2 trials), and aromatase inhibitors (RR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.26-0.70]; 2 trials) were associated with lower risks of invasive breast cancer compared with placebo; results were not specific to mutation carriers. Mastectomy was associated with 90% to 100% reduction in breast cancer incidence (6 studies; n = 2546) and 81% to 100% reduction in breast cancer mortality (1 study; n = 639); oophorectomy was associated with 69% to 100% reduction in ovarian cancer (2 studies; n = 2108); complications were common with mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among women without recently diagnosed BRCA1/2-related cancer, the benefits and harms of risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing to reduce cancer incidence and mortality have not been directly evaluated by current research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi D Nelson
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Miranda Pappas
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Amy Cantor
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Elizabeth Haney
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Rebecca Holmes
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee TC, Reyna C, Shaughnessy E, Lewis JD. Screening of populations at high risk for breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2019; 120:820-830. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.25611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany C. Lee
- Department of SurgerySchool of MedicineUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnati Ohio
| | - Chantal Reyna
- Department of SurgerySchool of MedicineUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnati Ohio
| | | | - Jaime D. Lewis
- Department of SurgerySchool of MedicineUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnati Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vianna FSL, Giacomazzi J, Oliveira Netto CB, Nunes LN, Caleffi M, Ashton-Prolla P, Camey SA. Performance of the Gail and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk assessment models in women screened in a primary care setting with the FHS-7 questionnaire. Genet Mol Biol 2019; 42:232-237. [PMID: 31170278 PMCID: PMC6687344 DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2018-0110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) risk assessment models base their estimations on different aspects of a woman's personal and familial history. The Gail and Tyrer-Cuzick models are the most commonly used, and BC risks assigned by them vary considerably especially concerning familial history. In this study, our aim was to compare the Gail and Tyrer-Cuzick models after initial screening for familial history of cancer in primary care using the FHS-7 questionnaire. We compared 846 unrelated women with at least one positive answer to any of the seven FHS-7 questions (positive group) and 892 unrelated women that answered negatively (negative group). Concordance between BC risk estimates was compared by Bland-Altman graphics. Mean BC risk estimates were higher using the Tyrer-Cuzick Model in women from the positive group, while women from the negative group had higher BC risk estimates using the Gail model. With increasing estimates, discordance also increased, mainly in the FHS-7 positive group. Our results show that in women with a familial history of cancer, the Gail model underestimates risk and the Tyrer-Cuzick seems to be more appropriate. FHS-7 can be a useful tool for the identification of women with higher breast cancer risks in the primary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Sales Luiz Vianna
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.,Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.,Laboratório de Medicina Genômica, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | | | - Luciana Neves Nunes
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Maira Caleffi
- Associação Hospitalar Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Patricia Ashton-Prolla
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.,Laboratório de Medicina Genômica, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Serviço de Genética Médica, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Suzi Alves Camey
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yadav S, Couch FJ. Germline Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Risk: The Past, Present, and Future. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:61-74. [PMID: 31099663 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_238987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The field of germline genetic testing for breast cancer (BC) risk has evolved substantially in the last decade. The introduction of multigene panel testing (MGPT) led to an urgent need to understand the cancer risk associated with several genes included in the panels. Although the research on understanding the cancer risk associated with mutations in several genes continues, there is also a need to understand the modifying effects of race and ethnicity, family history, and BC pathology on the prevalence of germline mutations and associated BC risk. Furthermore, polygenic risk scores (PRSs) to predict BC risk in patients with or without germline mutations in cancer-predisposition genes are now available for clinical use, although data on the clinical utility of PRSs are lacking. In patients with advanced BC associated with BRCA1/2 mutation, olaparib and talazoparib are now approved for treatment. In addition, molecular profiling studies are being used to clarify the BC tumor biology in mutation carriers to identify potential therapeutic options. In this article, we discuss these advances in the field of germline genetic testing and highlight current limitations and implications for clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fergus J Couch
- 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ozanne EM, Howe R, Mallinson D, Esserman L, Van't Veer LJ, Kaplan CP. Evaluation of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-based Tool for Risk Assessment for breast and ovarian Cancer (N-TRAC): A patient-reported survey for genetic high-risk assessment for breast and ovarian cancers in women. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:507-515. [PMID: 30663827 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Identification of mutations that increase lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer is critical to improving women's health. Because these mutations are relatively rare in the general population, there is a need for efficient methods to identify appropriate women to undergo genetic testing. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility, accuracy, and performance of the NCCN guideline-based Tool for Risk Assessment for breast and ovarian Cancer (N-TRAC)-a patient-facing assessment for those affected and unaffected by cancer. This study enrolled a prospective cohort of 100 affected and 100 unaffected women that used N-TRAC in a clinical setting. Recommendations for referral to genetic counseling based on N-TRAC and other standard risk assessment methods were compared.Seventy-seven of the 100 affected women and 35 of the 100 unaffected women were identified as high risk by N-TRAC. The average completion time was approximately 2 min for both groups. N-TRAC accuracy for family history was exceptional in both groups (kappa > 0.96). N-TRAC and other risk assessment methods do not always identify the same high risk population. N-TRAC is an accurate and feasible tool that can assist in identifying women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and may lead to more informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elissa M Ozanne
- Division of Health System Innovation and Research, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Rebecca Howe
- Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut
| | - David Mallinson
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Laura Esserman
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Departments of Surgery and Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Carol Franc Buck Breast Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Laura J Van't Veer
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Celia P Kaplan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Genetic cancer risk assessment in general practice: systematic review of tools available, clinician attitudes, and patient outcomes. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 69:e97-e105. [PMID: 30510097 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18x700265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A growing demand for cancer genetic services has led to suggestions for the involvement of GPs. How, and in which conditions, they can be involved, and whether there are important barriers to implementation should be ascertained. AIM To review the tools available, clinician attitudes and experiences, and the effects on patients of genetic cancer risk assessment in general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING Systematic review of papers published worldwide between 1996 and 2017. METHOD The MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases and grey literature were searched for entries dating from January 1996 to December 2017. Study quality was assessed with relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool checklists and a narrative synthesis of findings was conducted. RESULTS In total, 40 studies were included in the review. A variety of testing and screening tools were available for genetic cancer risk assessment in general practice, principally for breast, breast-ovarian, and colorectal cancer risk. GPs often reported low knowledge and confidence to engage with genetic cancer risk assessment; however, despite time pressures and concerns about confidentiality and the impact of results on family members, some recognised the potential importance relating to such a development of the GP's role. Studies found few reported benefits for patients. Concerns about negative impacts on patient anxiety and cancer worries were largely not borne out. CONCLUSION GPs may have a potential role in identifying patients at risk of hereditary cancer that can be facilitated by family-history tools. There is currently insufficient evidence to support the implementation of population-wide screening for genetic cancer risk, especially given the competing demands of general practice.
Collapse
|
31
|
Cleophat JE, Nabi H, Pelletier S, Bouchard K, Dorval M. What characterizes cancer family history collection tools? A critical literature review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 25:e335-e350. [PMID: 30111980 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.4042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Many tools have been developed for the standardized collection of cancer family history (fh). However, it remains unclear which tools have the potential to help health professionals overcome traditional barriers to collecting such histories. In this review, we describe the characteristics, validation process, and performance of existing tools and appraise the extent to which those tools can support health professionals in identifying and managing at-risk individuals. Methods Studies were identified through searches of the medline, embase, and Cochrane central databases from October 2015 to September 2016. Articles were included if they described a cancer fh collection tool, its use, and its validation process. Results Based on seventy-nine articles published between February 1978 and September 2016, 62 tools were identified. Most of the tools were paper-based and designed to be self-administered by lay individuals. One quarter of the tools could automatically produce pedigrees, provide cancer-risk assessment, and deliver evidence-based recommendations. One third of the tools were validated against a standard reference for collected fh quality and cancer-risk assessment. Only 3 tools were integrated into an electronic health records system. Conclusions In the present review, we found no tool with characteristics that might make it an efficient clinical support for health care providers in cancer-risk identification and management. Adequately validated tools that are connected to electronic health records are needed to encourage the systematic identification of individuals at increased risk of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Cleophat
- Centre de recherche du chu de Québec, Axe Oncologie, Quebec City, QC.,Université Laval, Faculté de pharmacie, Quebec City, QC.,Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, QC
| | - H Nabi
- Centre de recherche du chu de Québec, Axe Oncologie, Quebec City, QC.,Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, QC.,inserm, U1018, Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations, Villejuif, France
| | - S Pelletier
- Centre de recherche du chu de Québec, Axe Oncologie, Quebec City, QC.,Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, QC
| | - K Bouchard
- Centre de recherche du chu de Québec, Axe Oncologie, Quebec City, QC.,Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, QC
| | - M Dorval
- Centre de recherche du chu de Québec, Axe Oncologie, Quebec City, QC.,Université Laval, Faculté de pharmacie, Quebec City, QC.,Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Quebec City, QC.,Centre de recherche du cisss Chaudière-Appalaches, Lévis, QC
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Migowski A, Silva GAE, Dias MBK, Diz MDPE, Sant'Ana DR, Nadanovsky P. Guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil. II - New national recommendations, main evidence, and controversies. CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2018; 34:e00074817. [PMID: 29947654 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00074817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in Brazilian women. The new Brazilian guidelines for early detection of breast cancer were drafted on the basis of systematic literature reviews on the possible harms and benefits of various early detection strategies. This article aims to present the recommendations and update the summary of evidence, discussing the main controversies. Breast cancer screening recommendations (in asymptomatic women) were: (i) strong recommendation against mammogram screening in women under 50 years of age; (ii) weak recommendation for mammogram screening in women 50 to 69 years of age; (iii) weak recommendation against mammogram screening in women 70 to 74 years of age; (iv) strong recommendation against mammogram screening in women 75 years or older; (v) strong recommendation that screening in the recommended age brackets should be every two years as opposed to shorter intervals; (vi) weak recommendation against teaching breast self-examination as screening; (vii) absence of recommendation for or against screening with clinical breast examination; and (viii) strong recommendation against screening with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, thermography, or tomosynthesis alone or as a complement to mammography. The recommendations for early diagnosis of breast cancer (in women with suspicious signs or symptoms) were: (i) weak recommendation for the implementation of awareness-raising strategies for early diagnosis of breast cancer; (ii) weak recommendation for use of selected signs and symptoms in the current guidelines as the criterion for urgent referral to specialized breast diagnosis services; and (iii) weak recommendation that every breast cancer diagnostic workup after the identification of suspicious signs and symptoms in primary care should be done in the same referral center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arn Migowski
- Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
| | - Gulnar Azevedo E Silva
- Instituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
| | | | | | | | - Paulo Nadanovsky
- Instituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.,Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hull LE, Haas JS, Simon SR. Provider Discussions of Genetic Tests With U.S. Women at Risk for a BRCA Mutation. Am J Prev Med 2018; 54:221-228. [PMID: 29241717 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Revised: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that primary care providers screen unaffected women with a family history of BRCA mutation-associated cancers, but without a personal history of BRCA-related cancer, for referral to genetic counseling and potential genetic testing. METHODS The 2015 National Health Interview Survey was analyzed in January 2017 to determine the rates at which unaffected adult women with a positive family history of BRCA-related cancers, assessed using the Family History Screen-7, reported discussing genetic testing with a provider, using genetic counseling services, and having genetic testing for increased cancer risk. Clinical correlates associated with these outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression (AOR with 95% CI). RESULTS Among unaffected Family History Screen-7 screen-positive women, 9.5% reported discussing genetic testing with a provider, 5.1% reported genetic counseling, and 2.7% reported uptake of genetic testing. Younger women (aged 18-39 and 40-49 years) were more likely to discuss genetic testing than women aged ≥60 years (AOR=1.50, 95% CI=1.09, 2.06 and AOR=1.64, 95% CI=1.15, 2.33, respectively). Women of black race (AOR=1.50, 95% CI=1.09, 2.07) and women with greater than a high school education (AOR=1.85, 95% CI=1.41, 2.43) were more likely to discuss genetic testing than women of white race and women with a high school education or less, respectively. Among a higher risk subgroup with an even stronger family history of BRCA-associated cancers, 18.5% of women reported discussions. CONCLUSIONS Despite a decade-old U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation, few unaffected women at risk for BRCA-associated cancer report discussing genetic testing with a provider.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland E Hull
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts; Section of General Internal Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Jennifer S Haas
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven R Simon
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts; Geriatrics and Extended Care Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Campacci N, de Lima JO, Carvalho AL, Michelli RD, Haikel R, Mauad E, Viana DV, Melendez ME, Vazquez FDL, Zanardo C, Reis RM, Rossi BM, Palmero EI. Identification of hereditary cancer in the general population: development and validation of a screening questionnaire for obtaining the family history of cancer. Cancer Med 2017; 6:3014-3024. [PMID: 29055968 PMCID: PMC5727305 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2017] [Revised: 08/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the challenges for Latin American countries is to include in their healthcare systems technologies that can be applied to hereditary cancer detection and management. The aim of the study is to create and validate a questionnaire to identify individuals with possible risk for hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes (HCPS), using different strategies in a Cancer Prevention Service in Brazil. The primary screening questionnaire (PSQ) was developed to identify families at‐risk for HCPS. The PSQ was validated using discrimination measures, and the reproducibility was estimated through kappa coefficient. Patients with at least one affirmative answer had the pedigree drawn using three alternative interview approaches: in‐person, by telephone, or letter. Validation of these approaches was done. Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to analyze data's reproducibility considering the presence of clinical criteria for HCPS. The PSQ was applied to a convenience sample of 20,000 women of which 3121 (15.6%) answered at least one affirmative question and 1938 had their pedigrees drawn. The PSQ showed sensitivity and specificity scores of 94.4% and 75%, respectively, and a kappa of 0.64. The strategies for pedigree drawing had reproducibility coefficients of 0.976 and 0.850 for the telephone and letter approaches, respectively. Pedigree analysis allowed us to identify 465 individuals (24.0%) fulfilling at least one clinical criterion for HCPS. The PSQ fulfills its function, allowing the identification of HCPS at‐risk families. The use of alternative screening methods may reduce the number of excluded at‐risk individuals/families who live in locations where oncogenetic services are not established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Campacci
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Juliana O de Lima
- Center of Molecular Diagnostics, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - André L Carvalho
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | - Rafael Haikel
- Prevention Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Edmundo Mauad
- Oncogenetics Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Prevention Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Danilo V Viana
- Oncogenetics Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Matias E Melendez
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | - Cleyton Zanardo
- Center for Research Support - NAP, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Rui M Reis
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Center of Molecular Diagnostics, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Life and Health Sciences Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus Gualtar, Braga, Portugal; ICVS/3B's-PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
| | | | - Edenir I Palmero
- Molecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Center of Molecular Diagnostics, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Oncogenetics Department, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Barretos School of Health Sciences, Dr. Paulo Prata - FACISB, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Thu H, Sukartini T. The Effectiveness of a Pain Management Program on Intensify of Pain and Quality of Life Among Cancer Patients in Myanmar. JURNAL NERS 2017. [DOI: 10.20473/jn.v12i2.5192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and is rapidly becoming a global pandemic. Cancer pain significantly affects the diagnosis, quality of life and survival of patients with cancer. The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of a Pain Management Program (PMP) on pain and quality of life in a patient with cancer.Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental design with a randomised pre-post test design approach. The data was collected from cancer patients in No 2 Military Hospital (500-Bedded), Yangon, Myanmar. The patients were recruited using a random allocation sampling technique and consisted of 30 respondents (experimental group) and 30 respondents (control group) taken according to the inclusion criteria. The Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ 2) was used to assess pain, and The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to assess the quality of life.Results: A MANOVA test was used to analyse the effect of PMP. It showed that 1) PMP decreased the pain and 2) PMP increased the quality of life in patients with cancer.Conclusion: Improvements in the quality of life and to do with pain-related cancer suggests that the vicious cycle of chronic pain may be alleviated by PMP. As we look at the results, PMP can be an effective treatment to be used by nurses for decreasing pain and increasing the quality of life in patients with cancer.
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Peairs KS, Choi Y, Stewart RW, Sateia HF. Screening for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2017; 44:60-72. [PMID: 28395765 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2017.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Revised: 01/29/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This review will give a general overview of the impact of breast cancer, as well as breast cancer risk factors, identification of high-risk groups, screening modalities, and guidelines for screening average-risk and high-risk individuals, including a case discussion of the primary care provider's approach to screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly S Peairs
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Youngjee Choi
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rosalyn W Stewart
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Heather F Sateia
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Heisey R, Carroll JC. Identification et prise en charge des femmes ayant des antécédents familiaux de cancer du sein. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN MEDECIN DE FAMILLE CANADIEN 2016; 62:e572-e577. [PMID: 27737991 PMCID: PMC5063782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Objectif Résumer les meilleures données portant sur les stratégies d’identification et de prise en charge des femmes qui présentent des antécédents familiaux de cancer du sein. Sources d’information Une recherche a été effectuée sur PubMed à l’aide des mots-clés anglais suivants : breast cancer, guidelines, risk, family history, management et magnetic resonance imaging screening, entre 2000 et 2016. La plupart des données sont de niveau II. Message principal Une bonne anamnèse familiale est essentielle lors de l’évaluation du risque de cancer du sein afin d’identifier les femmes qui sont candidates à une recommandation en counseling génétique pour un éventuel test génétique. On peut sauver des vies en offrant aux femmes porteuses d’une mutation au gène BRCA des interventions chirurgicales de réduction des risques (mastectomie bilatérale prophylactique, salpingo-ovariectomie bilatérale). Il faut encourager toutes les femmes qui présentent des antécédents familiaux de cancer du sein à demeurer actives et à limiter leur consommation d’alcool à moins de 1 verre par jour; certaines femmes sont admissibles à la chimioprévention. Il faut offrir aux femmes dont le risque à vie de cancer du sein est de 20 à 25 % ou plus un dépistage poussé par imagerie par résonance magnétique en plus d’une mammographie. Conclusion Une vie saine et la chimioprévention (chez les candidates) pourraient réduire l’incidence du cancer du sein; le dépistage poussé pourrait entraîner une détection plus précoce. Le fait d’aiguiller des femmes porteuses d’une mutation au BRCA vers la chirurgie de réduction des risques sauve des vies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Heisey
- Chef du Service de médecine familiale et communautaire à l'Hôpital Women's College à Toronto, en Ontario, généraliste-oncologue à l'Hôpital Princess Margaret à Toronto, et investigatrice clinicienne et professeure agrégée au Département de médecine familiale et communautaire de l'Université de Toronto.
| | - June C Carroll
- Médecin de famille au centre Granovsky Gluskin Family Medicine Centre de l'Hôpital Mount Sinai à Toronto, et scientifique clinicienne et professeure agrégée au Département de médecine familiale et communautaire de l'Université de Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Heisey R, Carroll JC. Identification and management of women with a family history of breast cancer: Practical guide for clinicians. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN MEDECIN DE FAMILLE CANADIEN 2016; 62:799-803. [PMID: 27737975 PMCID: PMC5063766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the best evidence on strategies to identify and manage women with a family history of breast cancer. SOURCES OF INFORMATION A PubMed search was conducted using the search terms breast cancer, guidelines, risk, family history, management, and magnetic resonance imaging screening from 2000 to 2016. Most evidence is level II. MAIN MESSAGE Taking a good family history is essential when assessing breast cancer risk in order to identify women suitable for referral to a genetic counselor for possible genetic testing. Offering risk-reducing surgery (bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) to women with BRCA genetic mutations can save lives. All women with a family history of breast cancer should be encouraged to stay active and limit alcohol intake to less than 1 drink per day; some will qualify for chemoprevention. Women with a 20% to 25% or greater lifetime risk of breast cancer should be offered enhanced screening with annual magnetic resonance imaging in addition to mammography. CONCLUSION Healthy living and chemoprevention (for suitable women) could reduce breast cancer incidence; enhanced screening could result in earlier detection. Referring women who carry BRCA mutations for risk-reducing surgery will save lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Heisey
- Chief of Family and Community Medicine at Women's College Hospital in Toronto, Ont, a GP-oncologist at Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto, and Clinician Investigator and Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto.
| | - June C Carroll
- Family physician in the Granovsky Gluskin Family Medicine Centre at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto and Clinician Scientist and Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Solomon BL, Whitman T, Wood ME. Contribution of extended family history in assessment of risk for breast and colon cancer. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2016; 17:126. [PMID: 27580697 PMCID: PMC5007707 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0521-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family history is important for identifying candidates for high risk cancer screening and referral for genetic counseling. We sought to determine the percentage of individuals who would be eligible for high risk cancer screening or genetic referral and testing if family history includes an extended (vs limited) family history. METHODS Family histories were obtained from 626 women at UVMMC associated mammography centers from 2001 to 2002. ACS guidelines were used to determine eligibility for high risk breast or colon cancer screening. Eligibility for referral for genetic counseling for hereditary breast and colon cancer was determined using the Referral Screening Tool and Amsterdam II screening criteria, respectively. All family histories were assessed for eligibility by a limited history (first degree relatives only) and extended history (first and second degree relatives). RESULTS Four hundred ninety-nine histories were eligible for review. 18/282 (3.6 %) and 62/123 (12 %) individuals met criteria for high risk breast and colon cancer screening, respectively. 13/18 (72 %) in the high risk breast cancer screening group and 12/62 (19 %) in the high risk colon cancer screening group met criteria based upon an extended family history. 9/282 (1.8 %) and 31/123 (6.2 %) individuals met criteria for genetic counseling referral and testing for breast and colon cancer, respectively. 2/9 (22 %) of individuals in the genetic breast cancer screening group and 21/31 (68 %) individuals in the genetic colon cancer screening group met criteria based upon extended family history. CONCLUSIONS This is one of the first studies to suggest that first degree family history alone is not adequate for identification of candidates for high risk screening and referral for genetic counseling for hereditary breast and colon cancer syndromes. A larger population is needed to further validate this data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L Solomon
- University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA
| | - Todd Whitman
- Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital, 75 Beekman St, Plattsburgh, NY, 12901, USA
| | - Marie E Wood
- University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Flória-Santos M, Lopes-Júnior LC, Alvarenga LDM, Ribeiro MS, Ferraz VEDF, Nascimento LC, Pereira-da-Silva G. Self-reported cancer family history is a useful tool for identification of individuals at risk of hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome at primary care centers in middle-income settings: a longitudinal study. Genet Mol Biol 2016; 39:178-83. [PMID: 27275666 PMCID: PMC4910551 DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2014-0362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2014] [Accepted: 02/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Analysis of cancer family history (CFH) offers a low-cost genetic tool to identify
familial cancer predisposition. In middle-income settings, the scarcity of individual
records and database-linked records hinders the assessment of self-reported CFH
consistency as an indicator of familial cancer predisposition. We used self-reported
CFH to identify those families at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes in
community-based primary care centers of a low-income Brazilian area. We also
evaluated the consistency of the information collected by reassessing CFH five years
later. We interviewed 390 families and constructed their pedigrees for genetic cancer
risk assessment. We found 125 families affected by cancer, 35.2% with moderate to
high risk of familial susceptibility to cancer, a number that represents a relatively
high prevalence of potential hereditary cancer syndromes in the overall study sample.
Upon reassessment of CFH in 14/20 families that were previously identified as having
at least one first-degree and one second-degree relative affected by cancer, and
presented moderate to high risk for developing cancer, 90% of initial pedigrees were
confirmed. These results demonstrate the reliability of self-reports as a means of
early identification of healthy individuals at risk, encouraging the wider use of
this method in low- and middle-income primary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Flória-Santos
- Departamento de Enfermagem Materno-Infantil e Saúde Pública, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior
- Departamento de Enfermagem Materno-Infantil e Saúde Pública, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Larissa de Melo Alvarenga
- Departamento de Enfermagem Materno-Infantil e Saúde Pública, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Mayara Segundo Ribeiro
- Departamento de Enfermagem Materno-Infantil e Saúde Pública, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Lucila Castanheira Nascimento
- Departamento de Enfermagem Materno-Infantil e Saúde Pública, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Gabriela Pereira-da-Silva
- Departamento de Enfermagem Materno-Infantil e Saúde Pública, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Neuner J. Capsule Commentary on Bell et al., Impact of a Randomized Control Educational Trial to Improve Physician Practice Behaviors Around Screening for Inherited Breast Cancer. J Gen Intern Med 2016; 31:326. [PMID: 25608741 PMCID: PMC4762828 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-3175-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Neuner
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Marie Lewis K. Identifying hereditary cancer: Genetic counseling and cancer risk assessment. Curr Probl Cancer 2014; 38:216-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2014.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
44
|
Identification of familial clustering for cancer through the family health strategy program in the municipality of Angra dos Reis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Community Genet 2014; 6:9-16. [PMID: 25063732 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-014-0196-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2014] [Accepted: 07/16/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Identification of families with history of cancer in the municipality of Angra dos Reis, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), through the Brazilian Unified Primary Health Care System was explored based in the Community Health Agents (CHA) program. This study was divided into two phases: a descriptive one with a cross-sectional epidemiological data of families with history of cancer based on CHA-collected data from home visits in four primary health care units. The second phase consisted in identifying familial clustering of three or more individuals with cancer through construction of a three-generation pedigree and revisited by an itinerant group of medical geneticists. Genetic counseling was carried out with the intent of selecting potential families at risk for hereditary familial cancers. In the first phase of the study, 1,581 families were interviewed by the CHA at their homes. A positive history for cancer was present in 42.3 % of families, comprising 22.3 % with only one case per family, 11.2 % with two cases, and 8.6 % with three or more cases in the family. The informant reported that 15 % of the cases were from the father lineage, 12 % from the mother lineage, and 12.1 % within siblings. In the remaining 60.9 % families, cancer was present in both sides of the family. The types of cancer reported were uterus 8.7 % (n = 137), stomach 7.7 % (n = 122), breast 6.9 % (n = 109), throat 6.8 % (n = 99), prostate 5.4 % (n = 85), lung 5.6 % (n = 88), bowel 3.7 % (n = 59), and unspecified sites in 6.8 % (n = 108) of families. No statistical differences were noted between the data collected on each primary care unit. In the second phase of the study, 136 families (2.9 %) from the total of families interviewed in phase 1 were selected due to the presence of three or more individuals with cancer in the family. Among those, only 73 families attended genetic counseling. Comparison between the data obtained by the CHA and the medical geneticists shows complete agreement in 36 cases (49.3 %), partial agreement in 25 cases (34.2 %) with more detailed information in the CHA sheets, discordance in 4 cases (5.5 %), and not possible to correlate in 8 cases due to identification inconsistency. Risk assessment for cancer was calculated based on the criteria adopted by Scheuner et al. (Genet Med 12(11):726-735, 2010) and revealed that 50.0 % of the families were classified as having a weak risk, 36.1 % a moderate risk, and 13.8 % were considered of high risk. Concerning known hereditary cancer syndromes, we found one family that met the criteria for breast and ovary hereditary cancer (1.4 %) and one family with non-polyposis hereditary colon cancer as revised by Bethesda protocol. Such preliminary results indicated that the Brazilian Primary Health Care system based on the CHA framework can be an effective entrance into the Unified Brazilian Health Care System (SUS-Brazil) for individuals with genetically determined diseases, such as familial cancer. Families with a history of three or more cases of cancer and considered of high risk for familial cancer could be referred to a tertiary health center for proper oncogenetic counseling.
Collapse
|
45
|
Blackson TC, De La Rosa M, Sanchez M, Li T. Latino Immigrants' Biological Parents' Histories of Substance Use Problems in Their Country of Origin Predict Their Pre- and Post-Immigration Alcohol Use Problems. Subst Abus 2014; 36:257-63. [PMID: 24960302 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2014.932886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No studies to date have assessed whether recent young adult (aged 18-34) Latino immigrants' biological parents' histories of substance use problems (BPHSUP) in their country of origin predict their alcohol use problems at pre- and post-immigration to the United States (US). METHODS BPHSUP in their country of origin were assessed via interviews conducted by bilingual Latino researchers with recent Latino immigrants primarily from Cuba and Central and South America recruited through respondent-driven sampling at the time of their immigration to southeastern US. Three waves of data were collected to document Latino immigrants' severity of alcohol use problems at pre-immigration and 2 annual post-immigration follow-up assessments. BPHSUP+/- status was used as a predictor of Latinos' (N = 452; 45.8% female, 54.2% male) Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores at pre- and post-immigration with age, education, and income as covariates as wells as odds ratios for AUDIT classifications of hazardous use, harmful use, and dependence. RESULTS BPHSUP+ status predicted Latino immigrants' higher AUDIT scores pre- and post-immigration by gender (P < .01) compared with Latino immigrants of BPHSUP- status, controlling for age, education, and income. BPHSUP+ status predicted odds ratios of 3.45 and 2.91 for AUDIT alcohol dependence classification for men and women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study documents that BPHSUP+/- status in their country of origin predict their young adult Latino offspring's severity of alcohol use problems pre- and post-immigration. These results may inform (1) community-based health care providers to screen recent young adult Latino immigrants for their BPHSUP+/- status and severity of alcohol use problems to redirect trajectories away from alcohol use disorders toward more normative post-immigration outcomes through culturally relevant prevention services and (2) future research advantages of differential susceptibility theory. Implications for future research and the need for replication studies in other geographic regions of the US are discussed.
Collapse
|
46
|
DE Vargas Wolfgramm E, Gavioli CFB, Entringer ML, Alves LNR, Stur E, DE Castro Neto AK, Motta LLDA, Pereira FEL, Louro ID. Histological profile and age at diagnosis of breast and ovarian tumors: A register-based study in Espirito Santo, Brazil. Mol Clin Oncol 2014; 1:353-358. [PMID: 24649174 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2012.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2012] [Accepted: 10/29/2012] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast and ovarian cancers are important public health problems in Brazil. However, in various locations in the Brazilian territory these types of cancer remain poorly characterized. Therefore, this study aimed to compare data collected from the Pathology Services of two Oncology Reference Hospitals in Espirito Santo state (Brazil) with the data in previous Brazilian studies. Histological type frequency and age at diagnosis of breast and ovarian tumors between 2001-2004 and 2009-2010 were analyzed. Tumor size, histological grade, lymph node status, hormone receptor status [estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR)] as well as HER2 and Ki-67 marker status were obtained for the cases of infiltrating ductal carcinomas of the breast during the period 2009-2010. Categorical variables were described by their absolute and/or relative frequencies, while quantitative variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and median, using 95% confidence intervals. Chi-square tests were performed to examine whether or not the studied variables differed by age at the time of diagnosis. Malignant breast tumors (1,758) and 119 malignant ovarian tumors were examined. Mean ages for malignant breast and ovarian tumors were 53.59 and 52.98 years, respectively. An increased tumor frequency in the age group of ≤35 years was observed for other malignant tumors of the breast during the period of 2009-2010, compared to 2001-2004. When considering only infiltrating ductal carcinomas with immunohistochemistry records available, there were 82.1% (133 cases) of ER+/PR+ tumors, 1.9% (3 cases) of ER-/PR-/HER2 3+ and 16.04% (26 cases) of ER-/PR-/HER2- tumors. The findings of this study demonstrated detailed information concerning breast and ovarian tumor behavior in the Espirito Santo state (Brazil), allowing for a precise comparison with other populations (Brazilian or international), which may be helpful in the planning of prevention and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eldamária DE Vargas Wolfgramm
- Center of Molecular and Human Genetics, Department of Biology, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória 29043-900
| | | | - Mayara Lemos Entringer
- Center of Molecular and Human Genetics, Department of Biology, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória 29043-900
| | - Lyvia Neves Rebello Alves
- Center of Molecular and Human Genetics, Department of Biology, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória 29043-900
| | - Elaine Stur
- Center of Molecular and Human Genetics, Department of Biology, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória 29043-900
| | | | - Luciene Lage DA Motta
- Pathology Laboratory, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitoria Hospital, Vitória 29018-180, Espirito Santo, Brazil
| | - Fausto Edmundo Lima Pereira
- Center of Molecular and Human Genetics, Department of Biology, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória 29043-900
| | - Iuri Drumond Louro
- Center of Molecular and Human Genetics, Department of Biology, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória 29043-900
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Vogel TJ, Stoops K, Bennett RL, Miller M, Swisher EM. A self-administered family history questionnaire improves identification of women who warrant referral to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer risk. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125:693-8. [PMID: 22446623 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2012] [Revised: 03/14/2012] [Accepted: 03/14/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study was undertaken to assess a self-administered family history questionnaire in order to better identify women within a gynecologic oncology practice for referral to genetic counseling services. METHODS Returning patients at an outpatient gynecologic oncology clinic completed a self-administered family health history questionnaire and a detailed telephone interview. A genetic counselor separately assessed blinded information garnered from the questionnaire, structured genetic interview, and electronic medical records to determine whether these data warranted referral to genetic counseling based on established criteria. The structured genetic interview was considered the gold standard to which the questionnaire and medical record information were compared. RESULTS Of the 45 total participants in the study, 26 (58%) were identified from the structured genetic interview as meeting criteria for referral to genetic counseling. The questionnaire identified 21 (81%) of these 26 referrals, while the medical record identified 13 (50%) of these 26 referrals. This led to a 62% increase in referral capture by the questionnaire. The median time to complete the questionnaire was 17 min (range 5-57 min). Thirty-four participants (75.6%) had more family members with cancer identified on the questionnaire compared to the electronic medical record. The questionnaire identified fewer family members with cancer in the five cases that were missed for appropriate referral. CONCLUSIONS Current standard clinical practices are insufficient at identifying patients in need of referral to genetic counseling. A self-administered questionnaire improves recognition of candidates for genetic counseling in a gynecologic oncology practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilley Jenkins Vogel
- University of Washington, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356469, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Weitzel JN, Blazer KR, MacDonald DJ, Culver JO, Offit K. Genetics, genomics, and cancer risk assessment: State of the Art and Future Directions in the Era of Personalized Medicine. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61:327-59. [PMID: 21858794 PMCID: PMC3346864 DOI: 10.3322/caac.20128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Scientific and technologic advances are revolutionizing our approach to genetic cancer risk assessment, cancer screening and prevention, and targeted therapy, fulfilling the promise of personalized medicine. In this monograph, we review the evolution of scientific discovery in cancer genetics and genomics, and describe current approaches, benefits, and barriers to the translation of this information to the practice of preventive medicine. Summaries of known hereditary cancer syndromes and highly penetrant genes are provided and contrasted with recently discovered genomic variants associated with modest increases in cancer risk. We describe the scope of knowledge, tools, and expertise required for the translation of complex genetic and genomic test information into clinical practice. The challenges of genomic counseling include the need for genetics and genomics professional education and multidisciplinary team training, the need for evidence-based information regarding the clinical utility of testing for genomic variants, the potential dangers posed by premature marketing of first-generation genomic profiles, and the need for new clinical models to improve access to and responsible communication of complex disease risk information. We conclude that given the experiences and lessons learned in the genetics era, the multidisciplinary model of genetic cancer risk assessment and management will serve as a solid foundation to support the integration of personalized genomic information into the practice of cancer medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey N Weitzel
- Division of Clinical Cancer Genetics, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Caleffi M, Ribeiro RA, Bedin AJ, Viegas-Butzke JMP, Baldisserotto FDG, Skonieski GP, Giacomazzi J, Camey SA, Ashton-Prolla P. Adherence to a breast cancer screening program and its predictors in underserved women in southern Brazil. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19:2673-9. [PMID: 20716620 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to breast cancer screening is a key element to ensure effectiveness of programs aiming at downstaging of breast cancer. In this study, we evaluated adherence to a screening program and its predictors in underserved women in southern Brazil. METHODS Attendance to the program, which is based on yearly mammogram and clinical examination, was evaluated prospectively. Mean time frames between visits were calculated. Possible predictors of adherence (defined as mean intervals ≤18 mo), such as socioeconomic indicators and health/lifestyle behaviors, were investigated. RESULTS A total of 3,749 women (age 51 ± 8 y, illiteracy rate of 6.8%, 57.4% with parity ≥3) were analyzed. Median time between screening rounds was 16.5 months (interquartile range, 13.1-25.7), and median number of rounds attended was 3 (interquartile range, 2-4); 57.6% had mean intervals ≤18, and 71% ≤24 months. The most important independent predictors of adherence were high genetic risk [relative risk (RR), 1.25; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.11-1.40], illiteracy (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90), parity ≥5 (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96), and smoking (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.88). CONCLUSIONS Although the proposed screening interval was 1 year, compliance to biannual screening (accepted in several international programs) was high, especially when considering the low socioeconomic level of the sample. IMPACT This project aims to test a breast cancer screening model for underserved populations in limited-resource countries where adherence is an issue. The identification of worst adherence predictors can point to interventions to improve outcomes of similar public health screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maira Caleffi
- Núcleo Mama Porto Alegre, Associação Hospitalar Moinhos de Vento, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|