1
|
Floris L, Michoud-Bertinotti B, Martinez de Tejada B, de Oliveira S, Pfister R, Parguey S, Thorn-Cole HE, de Labrusse C. Exploring health care professionals' experiences and knowledge of woman-centred care in a university hospital. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286852. [PMID: 37405995 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Inspired by the six quality-of-care goals developed by the Institute of Medicine, woman-centred care (WCC) as model of care is used in maternity services as it gives an emphasis on the woman as an individual and not her status as a patient. Bringing stronger attention to women's needs and values, is proven to have clear benefits for perinatal outcomes, but fails to be known or recognised by healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and implemented. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study aimed to explore HCPs definitions of WCC and identify the degree of agreement and knowledge regarding perinatal indicators when a WCC model of care is implemented. The quantitative part was carried using a self-administered questionnaire with perinatal indicators identified from the literature. Semi-structured interviews were realized using a purposive sample of 15 HCPs and an interview grid inspired by Leap's WCC model. The study was conducted in the maternity of a university hospital in French-speaking part of Switzerland. Out of 318 HCPs working with mothers and their newborns, 51% had already heard of WCC without being familiar with Leap's model. The HCPs were aware of the positive perinatal care outcomes when WCC was implemented: women's satisfaction (99.2%), health promotion (97.6%), HCP's job satisfaction (93.2%) and positive feelings about their work (85.6%), which were strongly emphasised in the interviews. The respondents reported institutional difficulties in implementing the model such as administrative overload and lack of time. The positive outcomes of WCC on spontaneous deliveries and improved neonatal adaptation were known by most HCPs (63.4% and 59.9%, respectively). However, fewer than half of the HCPs highlighted the model's positive effects on analgesia and episiotomies or its financial benefits. Knowledge of quality-of-care outcomes (i.e women's satisfaction, positive impact on practice…) was prevalent among most of HCPs. Without adhering to a common definition and without a specific model for consensus, most providers have integrated some aspects of WCC into their practice. However, specific perinatal indicators remain largely unknown, which may hinder the implementation of WCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Floris
- HESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland
| | - Benedicte Michoud-Bertinotti
- HESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland
| | - Begoña Martinez de Tejada
- Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sara de Oliveira
- Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Riccardo Pfister
- Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stéphanie Parguey
- Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Harriet E Thorn-Cole
- HESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland
| | - Claire de Labrusse
- HESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Das J, Barry G, Walker R, Vitorio R, Morris R, Stuart S. The integration of technology into a home-based visuo-cognitive training intervention for people with Parkinson's: Is the future digital? PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285100. [PMID: 37319251 PMCID: PMC10270359 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile applications and technology (e.g., stroboscopic glasses) are increasingly being used to deliver combined visual and cognitive (termed visuo-cognitive) training that replaces standard pen and paper-based interventions. These 'technological visuo-cognitive training' (TVT) interventions could help address the complex problems associated with visuo-cognitive dysfunction in people with long term neurological conditions such as Parkinson's disease. As data emerges to support the effectiveness of these technologies, patient perspectives offer an insight into how novel TVT is received by people living with long term neurological conditions. OBJECTIVE To explore experiences of people with Parkinson's in using technology as part of a home-based visuo-cognitive training programme compared to traditional approaches to rehabilitation. METHODS Eight people with Parkinson's who took part in a pilot randomised cross-over trial, investigating the efficacy and feasibility of TVT compared to standard care, were interviewed to explore their experiences of each arm of the training they received. Integration of Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) into the analysis enabled examination of the potential to embed novel TVT into a home-based rehabilitation intervention for people with Parkinson's disease. RESULTS Three key themes emerged from the thematic analysis as factors influencing the implementation potential of TVT for people with Parkinson's disease: perceived value of technology, perceived ease of use and support mechanisms. Further examination of the data through the lens of NPT revealed that the implantation and embedding of novel technology was dependent on positive user experience, individual disease manifestation and engagement with a professional. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide insights into the challenges of engaging with technology-based interventions while living with a progressive and fluctuating disease. When implementing technology-based interventions for people with Parkinson's, we recommend that patients and clinicians collaborate to determine whether the technology fits the capacity, preference, and treatment needs of the individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Das
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Gill Barry
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Walker
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Rodrigo Vitorio
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Rosie Morris
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel Stuart
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davis SD, Bayes S, Geraghty S. Development of a tool to identify barriers and enablers to practice innovation in midwifery: A participatory action research study. Eur J Midwifery 2023; 7:1. [PMID: 36761447 PMCID: PMC9885374 DOI: 10.18332/ejm/157459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transferring research evidence into midwifery practice is fraught with challenges and obstacles. Implementation tools can streamline the process and are most effective when they are discipline-specific; however, there are currently no midwifery specific implementation tools. The aim of this study was to develop a midwifery specific tool to identify barriers and enablers to evidence-informed practice change within the clinical setting. METHODS Participatory action research methodology was employed to ensure potential end-users contributed to content and format of the tool. Purposeful sampling ensured participants were selected from a range of midwifery practice settings in Western Australia and the United Kingdom. Data were collected through stakeholder advisory groups (SAGs) and online surveys. RESULTS Ten midwives participated in this project. Consultation occurred through face-to-face SAG meetings and online surveys until consensus was reached among participants about the content, format, and functionality of the end product which we called the 'Midwifery Tool for Change' (MT4C). CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, the MT4C is the first readiness for change context assessment tool specific to midwifery practice settings. Evaluation of the MT4C in real-world practice change implementation initiatives will enable further refinement of the tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara D. Davis
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| | - Sara Bayes
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sadie Geraghty
- School of Nursing, Midwifery, Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Kesavan B, Chinnaraju N, Manoharan EV, Kesavan P. An Observational Study to Assess Postoperative Pain Control and Formulate a Comprehensive Approach to the Implementation of Policy Change for Pain Control in Postoperative Units. Cureus 2022; 14:e33026. [PMID: 36589705 PMCID: PMC9797766 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative pain control irrespective of the magnitude of surgery has always remained a challenge for clinicians and healthcare workers. Good postoperative pain control is pivotal for unremarkable recovery and shorter hospital stays. Unfortunately, there is no uniform approach across the globe to address postoperative pain control. This provoked our thought to conduct a prospective observational study in our center to assess the already existing efficacy of pain management. Materials and methods This is a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care center in Coimbatore, India. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of an ongoing pain management system to compare it with standards in the literature to introduce changes and re-examine the results. A total of 100 patients who underwent major surgical procedures from various specialities were included after satisfying the inclusion criteria. The study was conducted over a period of four months to collect data from patients in the postoperative ward. Data were collected, pain-related variables were tabulated, and deficits were identified. Standardized pain assessment tools were not used. The results suggested the need for a policy change for quality improvement. This article gives reports on initial study results and plans to address the deficits in the current pain management system. A systematic and schematic approach for the implementation of the policy change and the framework for the new acute pain service team aiming at quality improvement have been discussed in detail. Results The results show that 28 patients were prescribed only routine paracetamol and rescue nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). At rest, 56 patients had some pain, and 29 complained of moderate to severe pain. On movement, only seven patients had no pain, 48 had mild pain, and 45 had moderate to severe pain. Only 12 patients out of 100 had good sleep, 27 had moderate, and 43 had little sleep. Twelve patients had no sleep due to continuous ongoing pain in spite of ongoing pain control modalities. Sixteen patients complained of undue delay in receiving their analgesics. Twenty-two patients were dissatisfied, and 44 suggested the need for improvement of current pain control strategies. These data clearly suggest that the pain control strategies are inadequate and need improvement undoubtedly for quality improvement. The Wendy Hirsch model is chosen to create a framework for implementing a new change, and a detailed report is done to present to the hospital quality control department. These changes will be done after the approval, and a post-implementation outcome will be studied. Conclusion Good postoperative pain control is of paramount significance for both patients and healthcare professionals. With the current availability of various pain relief modalities, one should consider establishing a pain control pathway, if possible an acute pain team with a systematic approach. These measures not only improve patient satisfaction but also improve postoperative outcomes and better ways of utilizing healthcare resources.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hewitt L, Dadich A, Hartz DL, Dahlen HG. Midwife-centred management: a qualitative study of midwifery group practice management and leadership in Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1203. [PMID: 36163048 PMCID: PMC9513938 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08532-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Midwifery group practice (MGP) has consistently demonstrated optimal health and wellbeing outcomes for childbearing women and their babies. In this model, women can form a relationship with a known midwife, improving both maternal and midwife satisfaction. Yet the model is not widely implemented and sustained, resulting in limited opportunities for women to access it. Little attention has been paid to how MGP is managed and led and how this impacts the sustainability of the model. This study clarifies what constitutes optimal management and leadership and how this influences sustainability. Methods This qualitative study forms part of a larger mixed methods study investigating the management of MGP in Australia. The interview findings presented in this study are part of phase one, where the findings informed a national survey. Nine interviews and one focus group were conducted with 23 MGP managers, clinical midwife consultants, and operational/strategic managers who led MGPs. Transcripts of the audio-recordings were analysed using inductive, reflexive, thematic analysis. Results Three themes were constructed, namely: The manager, the person, describing the ideal personal attributes of the MGP manager; midwifing the midwives, illustrating how the MGP manager supports, manages, and leads the group practice midwives; and gaining acceptance, explaining how the MGP manager can gain acceptance beyond group practice midwives. Participants described the need for MGP managers to display midwife-centred management. This requires the manager to have qualities that mirror what is generally accepted as requirements for good midwifery care namely: core beliefs in feminist values and woman-centred care; trust; inclusiveness; being an advocate; an ability to slow down or take time; an ability to form relationships; and exceptional communication skills. Since emotional labour is a large part of the role, it is also necessary for them to encourage and practice self-care. Conclusions Managers need to practice in a way that is midwife-centred and mimics good midwifery care. To offset the emotional burden and improve sustainability, encouraging and promoting self-care practices might be of value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Hewitt
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
| | - Ann Dadich
- School of Business, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
| | - Donna L Hartz
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Gosford Hospital, Level 9, 77a Holden St, Gosford, NSW, 2250, Australia
| | - Hannah G Dahlen
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McDonald CE, Paynter C, Francis JJ, Rodda D, Bajwa S, Jackson D, Story D. Exploring patient acceptability of a short-stay care pathway in hospital post arthroplasty: A theory-informed qualitative study. Health Expect 2022; 25:2002-2014. [PMID: 35775115 PMCID: PMC9327831 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Arthroplasty is an effective, yet costly, surgical procedure for end-stage osteoarthritis. Shorter stays in hospital are being piloted in Australia. In some countries, short stay is established practice, associated with improving perioperative care and enhanced recovery after surgery practices. Exploring the acceptability to patients of a short stay care pathway in hospital postarthroplasty is important for informing health policy, adoption and potential scalability of this model of care. METHODS Consecutive patients at one site, at least 3 months post total joint arthroplasty, were invited to participate in theory-informed semi-structured qualitative interviews. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) informed development of the interview guide. Interview data were analysed using the Framework Method. RESULTS Eighteen patients were invited. Fifteen consented to be contacted and were interviewed. Short-stay post arthroplasty was highly acceptable to patients who had the supports necessary to recover safely at home. Key findings were as follows: flexibility of short-stay care pathway was essential and valued; prior beliefs and expectations informed acceptability; and the absence of out-of-pocket expenses had an incentivizing effect, but was not the primary reason for patients choosing this care pathway. Further themes analysed within the TFA constructs highlighted nuances of acceptability relating to this model of care. CONCLUSIONS A short stay in hospital post arthroplasty appeared to be acceptable to patients who had experienced this care pathway. Our thematic findings identified aspects of the short-stay care pathway that enhanced acceptability and some aspects that limited acceptability. These findings can inform refinement of the short-stay care pathway. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patients/people with lived experience were not involved in the study design or conduct of this preliminary work; as this short-stay model of care was recently introduced, only a small group of patients was eligible to participate in this study. This study is the first step towards understanding the experiences of patients about a short-stay model of care post arthroplasty. The findings will help inform future patient and public involvement in expanding the programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassie E McDonald
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Allied Health, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Camille Paynter
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jill J Francis
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daevyd Rodda
- Vermont Private Hospital, Vermont South, Victoria, Australia.,Cabrini Private Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.,Sunshine Coast University Private Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.,Buderim Private Hospital, Buderim, Queensland, Australia.,University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Supreet Bajwa
- Sunshine Coast Orthopaedic Group, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia
| | - Dwane Jackson
- Sunshine Coast University Private Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.,Buderim Private Hospital, Buderim, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Story
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Manhas KP, Olson K, Churchill K, Miller J, Teare S, Vohra S, Wasylak T. Exploring patient centredness, communication and shared decision-making under a new model of care: Community rehabilitation in canada. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:1051-1063. [PMID: 33825236 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Patient-centred care and patient engagement in healthcare and health research are widely mandated by funders, health systems and institutions. Increasingly, shared decision-making (SDM) is recognised as promoting patient-centred care. We explore this relationship by studying SDM in the context of integrating novel patient-centred policies in community rehabilitation. There is little research on SDM in rehabilitation, and less so in the critical community context. Patient co-investigators led study co-design. We aimed to describe how patients and providers experience SDM at community rehabilitation sites that adopted a novel, patient-centred Rehabilitation Model of Care (RMoC). Guided by focused ethnography, we conducted focus groups and interviews. Patient and professional participants were recruited from 10 RMoC early-adopter community rehabilitation sites. Sites varied in geography, patient population and provider disciplines. Patient and community engagement researchers used a set-collect-reflect method to document patient perspectives. Researchers captured provider perspectives using a semi-structured question guide. We completed 11 focus groups and 18 interviews (n = 45 providers, n = 17 patients). We found that most early-adopter providers spoke in a shared, patient-first language that focused on patient readiness, barriers and active listening. Congruent patient perceptions reflected inclusion in decision-making, goal setting and positive relationships. Many patients queried how care would become and remain accessible before and after community rehabilitation care respectively. Remaining connected while in the community was described as important to patients. Providers identified barriers like time, team dynamics and lack of clarity on the RMoC aims, which challenged the initiative's long-term sustainability. Policy innovations can promote SDM and communication through multiple strategies and training to facilitate candid, encouraging conversations. Sustainability of SDM gains is paramount. Most providers moved beyond tokenistic engagement, but competing responsibilities and team member resistance could thwart continuity. Further research is needed to empirically assess respectful and compassionate communication and SDM in community rehabilitation long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran Pohar Manhas
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Integrative Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Karin Olson
- Integrative Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Katie Churchill
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Jean Miller
- Patient and Community Engagement Research Program, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Sylvia Teare
- Patient and Community Engagement Research Program, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Sunita Vohra
- Integrative Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Departments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Tracy Wasylak
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hanley A, Davis D, Kurz E. Job satisfaction and sustainability of midwives working in caseload models of care: An integrative literature review. Women Birth 2021; 35:e397-e407. [PMID: 34257046 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Demand for caseload midwifery care continues to outstrip supply. We know little about what sustains midwives working in caseload models of care. AIM This review systematically identifies and synthesises research findings reporting on factors which contribute to job satisfaction, and therefore the sustainability of practice, of midwives working in caseload models of care. METHODS A comprehensive search strategy explored the electronic databases CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, PubMED, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Articles were assessed using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool. Data analysis and synthesis of these publications were conducted using a narrative synthesis approach. FINDINGS Twenty-two articles were reviewed. Factors which contribute to the job satisfaction and sustainability of practice of midwives working in caseload models are: the ability to build relationships with women; flexibility and control over own working arrangements; professional autonomy and identity; and, organisational and practice arrangements. CONCLUSION Insights into the factors which contribute to the job satisfaction and sustainability of practice of midwives in caseload models of care enables both midwives and healthcare administrators to more effectively implement and support midwifery-led caseload models of care which have been shown to improve outcomes for childbearing women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Hanley
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra and ACT Government Health Directorate, ACT, Australia
| | - Deborah Davis
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra and ACT Government Health Directorate, ACT, Australia
| | - Ella Kurz
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, University Drive, Belconnen, ACT 2617, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pace CA, Crowther S, Lau A. Midwife experiences of providing continuity of carer: A qualitative systematic review. Women Birth 2021; 35:e221-e232. [PMID: 34253467 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM Continuity of carer models present positives and challenges for midwives working in them, and are difficult to sustain. BACKGROUND Research shows midwifery continuity of carer improves perinatal outcomes and experiences, and is considered the optimal model of care. AIM To synthesise existing research on midwives' experiences of providing continuity of carer and generate further understanding of what sustains them in practice. METHODS Protocol for the review was developed using PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO. 22 studies were included with original themes and findings extracted using JBI tools and synthesised using meta-ethnographic techniques. GRADE CERQual assessment of review findings showed high confidence. FINDINGS Midwives identified working in continuity of carer models as both fulfilling and challenging. Professional autonomy and ability to develop meaningful relationships were the most commonly cited positives, while lack of work life balance and conflict with the wider maternity team were the main challenges. 15 studies identified strategies employed by midwives which sustained them in practice. DISCUSSION Midwife experiences of providing continuity are impacted by personal and professional factors. Of paramount importance to sustainability of the model is the support of the wider organisation, and their alignment with principles of person-centred, relational care. CONCLUSION Relational models of care are desired by midwives, service users and are recommended in policy. Relational models of care must be responsive to midwives needs as well as birthing people, and therefore need to be designed and managed by those working in them and supported by the whole organisation to be sustainable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Ashley Pace
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedic Practice, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
| | - Susan Crowther
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedic Practice, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK; AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Annie Lau
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedic Practice, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Exploring the usability of the COM-B model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to define the helpers of and hindrances to evidence-based practice in midwifery. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:7. [PMID: 33436092 PMCID: PMC7805209 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00100-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the advancement of scientific research in the field of maternity care, midwives face challenges translating latest evidence into evidence-based practice (EBP) and express reticence towards leading practice change in clinical areas. This study aimed to explore midwifery leaders’ views on what factors help or hinder midwives’ efforts to translate latest evidence into everyday practice and consider them in relation to both the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Methods This qualitative study formed part of a larger action research (AR) project that was designed to improve midwives’ EBP implementation capability. Data were obtained from eight Western Australian midwifery leaders who were employed in either managerial or executive positions within their organisation. Five midwives attended a focus group workshop and three opted for face-to-face interviews. Thematic analysis was used to code the transcribed data and group alike findings into sub-categories, which were collapsed to four major categories and one overarching core finding. These were mapped to a matrix combining the COM-B and TDF to establish the usability of these tools in midwifery contexts. Results Four major categories were developed from the data collected in this study. Three reported the hindrances midwives’ experienced when trying to initiate new EBPs: ‘For midwives, medical opposition and workplace culture are the biggest challenges’, ‘Fear can stop change: it’s personal for midwives’ and ‘Midwives are tired of fighting the battle for EBP; they need knowledge and the confidence to bring about practice change.’ The other major category highlighted factors midwives’ considered helpers of EBP: ‘Having stakeholder buy-in and strong midwifery leadership is a huge advantage.’ When mapped to the TDF and COM-B, these findings provided valuable insight into the helpers of and hindrances to evidence-based practice in midwifery. Conclusion Midwives are motivated to initiate evidence-based change yet have limited knowledge of implementation processes or the confidence to lead practice change. Factors such as inter-disciplinary buy-in, clear instruction for midwives and support from midwifery leaders were considered beneficial to implementing practice change in clinical areas. The TDF when used in combination with the COM-B was deemed useful to midwives wanting to lead practice change projects in clinical areas.
Collapse
|
11
|
Krieger T, Boumans N, Feron F, Dorant E. The development of implementation management instruments for a new complex stroke caregiver intervention based on systematic stakeholder and risk analyses. Scand J Caring Sci 2019; 34:215-229. [PMID: 31250940 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stakeholders are important contributors in the implementation of a complex public health intervention. During the development phase of an implementation, alongside careful design of its components and investing in the exploration of the dynamic multi-stakeholder stroke rehabilitation setting, it is essential to assess possible implementation risks. Systematic stakeholder and risk analyses can guide the exploration process and enable teams involved in complex interventions to develop context-tailored implementation management instruments. PURPOSE To develop instruments that facilitate the implementation of the complex stroke caregiver intervention project in the real-life support system. METHODS Systematic stakeholder and risk analyses were conducted composing five activities. Project stakeholders were identified, classified and assessed using a top-down approach, while implementation risks were identified and assessed by applying a bottom-up approach. Data were collected through interviews and focus groups. RESULTS Based on the knowledge provided by the stakeholders, two context-tailored implementation management instruments were designed with a top-down approach: (1) a comprehensive 'stakeholder-risk atlas' providing individual stakeholder information, such as role, access, contribution, power and interest, expectations, perceived risks and specific engagement activities and (2) an overall 'project implementation strategy' concentrating on communication, transparency, network building and professionalism. CONCLUSION Complex interventions will benefit from early and comprehensive stakeholder and risk analyses. The early involvement of stakeholders, with their insightful knowledge, enables the research team to develop context-tailored implementation management instruments. Instruments will support the team during implementation and may impact positively on the outcome of the intervention. Knowledge can be obtained by combining top-down and bottom-up working approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresia Krieger
- Institute for Health Research and Social Psychiatry, Catholic University of Applied Sciences North-Rhine Westphalia, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nicolle Boumans
- Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Social Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans Feron
- Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Social Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth Dorant
- Department of Social Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kaler J, Ruston A. Technology adoption on farms: Using Normalisation Process Theory to understand sheep farmers' attitudes and behaviours in relation to using precision technology in flock management. Prev Vet Med 2019; 170:104715. [PMID: 31421497 PMCID: PMC6745618 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2018] [Revised: 06/22/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Evidence suggests that UK sheep farmers experience lower productivity and profit margins than other livestock sectors and that they do not necessarily know where they gain or lose income from their flocks. More efficient use of precision technology has been identified as a potential way of addressing this problem. The mandatory requirement for Electronic Identification (EID) tags to be placed on all sheep offers an opportunity for sheep farmers to adopt precision technologies to manage herd health and maximise production and profit. Although the charactistics of farmers that are associated with adoption or non adoption of technology have been identified little is known about the social processes, meanings and experiences that influence uptake. This paper is novel as it draws on data from 36 sheep farmers in the UK and applies Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to gain an understanding of the reasons they do or do not use EID related precision technology on their farms. The interviews were tape recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using NVivo. Although respondents acknowledged the potential value of precision technology to improve their farm businesses they appeared to have alternative beliefs that were counter productive. Their beliefs that using precision technology posed a threat to their role as a good stockman, that it could not replace the need for hands-on interaction with their animals and that it was costly and difficult to use created an implementation gap. The use of NPT as an evaluation framework provided a valuable tool for increasing the understanding of contextual characteristics that undermine the routine embedding of such technology by sheep farmers. The data suggests that normalisation of the use of precision technology amongst sheep farmers could potentially be increased if manufacturers/suppliers co-design and work with farmer’s to ensure that the technology enables the farmer to be in control and operates as an aid to achieving high quality stockmanship rather than a mechanism for profit maximisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmeet Kaler
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, UK.
| | - Annmarie Ruston
- College of Health and Social Care, University of Derby, Kedleston Road, Derby, DE22 1GB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jepsen I, Juul S, Foureur MJ, Sørensen EE, Nohr EA. Labour outcomes in caseload midwifery and standard care: a register-based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18:481. [PMID: 30522453 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2090-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on caseload midwifery in a Danish setting is missing. This cohort study aimed to compare labour outcomes in caseload midwifery and standard midwifery care. METHODS A historical register-based cohort study was carried out using routinely collected data about all singleton births 2013-2016 in two maternity units in the North Denmark Region. In this region, women are geographically allocated to caseload midwifery or standard care, as caseload midwifery is only available in some towns in the peripheral part of the uptake areas of the maternity units, and it is the only model of care offered here. Labour outcomes of 2679 all-risk women in caseload midwifery were compared with those of 10,436 all-risk women in standard midwifery care using multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Compared to women in standard care, augmentation was more frequent in caseload women (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.20; 95% CI 1.06-1.35) as was labour duration of less than 10 h (aOR 1.26; 95% CI 1.13-1.42). More emergency caesarean sections were observed in caseload women (aOR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03-1.34), but this might partly be explained by longer distance to the maternity unit in caseload women. When caseload women were compared to women in standard care with a similar long distance to the hospital, no difference in emergency caesarean sections was observed (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 0.84-1.28). Compared to standard care, infants of caseload women more often had Apgar ≤7 after 5 min. (aOR 1.57; 95% CI 1.11-2.23) and this difference remained when caseload women were compared to women with similar distance to the hospital. For elective caesarean sections, preterm birth, induction of labour, dilatation of cervix on admission, amniotomy, epidural analgesia, and instrumental deliveries, we did not obseve any differences between the two groups. After birth, caseload women more often experienced no laceration (aOR 1.17; 95% CI 1.06-1.29). CONCLUSIONS For most labour outcomes, there were no differences across the two models of midwifery-led care but unexpectedly, we observed slightly more augmentation and adverse neonatal outcomes in caseload midwifery. These findings should be interpreted in the context of the overall low intervention and complication rates in this Danish setting and in the context of research that supports the benefits of caseload midwifery. Although the observational design of the study allows only cautious conclusions, this study highlights the importance of monitoring and evaluating new practices contextually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Jepsen
- University College of Northern Denmark, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 2, 9220, Aalborg Øst, Denmark. .,Clinical Nursing Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Sdr. Skovvej 15, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Sdr. Skovvej 15, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Svend Juul
- Section for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Maralyn Jean Foureur
- Research unit for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Sdr Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.,Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Erik Elgaard Sørensen
- Clinical Nursing Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Sdr. Skovvej 15, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Sdr. Skovvej 15, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ellen Aagaard Nohr
- Research unit for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Sdr Boulevard 29, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.,Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Centre of Women's, Family and Child Health, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Elf M, Nordmark S, Lyhagen J, Lindberg I, Finch T, Åberg AC. The Swedish version of the Normalization Process Theory Measure S-NoMAD: translation, adaptation, and pilot testing. Implement Sci 2018; 13:146. [PMID: 30509289 PMCID: PMC6278165 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0835-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The original British instrument the Normalization Process Theory Measure (NoMAD) is based on the four core constructs of the Normalization Process Theory: Coherence, Cognitive Participation, Collective Action, and Reflexive Monitoring. They represent ways of thinking about implementation and are focused on how interventions can become part of everyday practice. AIM To translate and adapt the original NoMAD into the Swedish version S-NoMAD and to evaluate its psychometric properties based on a pilot test in a health care context including in-hospital, primary, and community care contexts. METHODS A systematic approach with a four-step process was utilized, including forward and backward translation and expert reviews for the test and improvement of content validity of the S-NoMAD in different stages of development. The final S-NoMAD version was then used for process evaluation in a pilot study aimed at the implementation of a new working method for individualized care planning. The pilot was executed in two hospitals, four health care centres, and two municipalities in a region in northern Sweden. The S-NoMAD pilot results were analysed for validity using confirmatory factor analysis, i.e. a one-factor model fitted for each of the four constructs of the S-NoMAD. Cronbach's alpha was used to ascertain the internal consistency reliability. RESULTS In the pilot, S-NoMAD data were collected from 144 individuals who were different health care professionals or managers. The initial factor analysis model showed good fit for two of the constructs (Coherence and Cognitive Participation) and unsatisfactory fit for the remaining two (Collective Action and Reflexive Monitoring) based on three items. Deleting those items from the model yielded a good fit and good internal consistency (alphas between 0.78 and 0.83). However, the estimation of correlations between the factors showed that the factor Reflexive Monitoring was highly correlated (around 0.9) with the factors Coherence and Collective Action. CONCLUSIONS The results show initial satisfactory psychometric properties for the translation and first validation of the S-NoMAD. However, development of a highly valid and reliable instrument is an iterative process, requiring more extensive validation in various settings and populations. Thus, in order to establish the validity and reliability of the S-NoMAD, additional psychometric testing is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Elf
- School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sofi Nordmark
- Department of Health Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
| | - Johan Lyhagen
- Department of Statistics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Inger Lindberg
- Department of Health Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden
| | - Tracy Finch
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Anna Cristina Åberg
- School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden. .,Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Geriatrics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rapley T, Girling M, Mair FS, Murray E, Treweek S, McColl E, Steen IN, May CR, Finch TL. Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 1 - development of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT). BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18:133. [PMID: 30442093 PMCID: PMC6238361 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0590-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding and measuring implementation processes is a key challenge for implementation researchers. This study draws on Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to develop an instrument that can be applied to assess, monitor or measure factors likely to affect normalization from the perspective of implementation participants. METHODS An iterative process of instrument development was undertaken using the following methods: theoretical elaboration, item generation and item reduction (team workshops); item appraisal (QAS-99); cognitive testing with complex intervention teams; theory re-validation with NPT experts; and pilot testing of instrument. RESULTS We initially generated 112 potential questionnaire items; these were then reduced to 47 through team workshops and item appraisal. No concerns about item wording and construction were raised through the item appraisal process. We undertook three rounds of cognitive interviews with professionals (n = 30) involved in the development, evaluation, delivery or reception of complex interventions. We identified minor issues around wording of some items; universal issues around how to engage with people at different time points in an intervention; and conceptual issues around the types of people for whom the instrument should be designed. We managed these by adding extra items (n = 6) and including a new set of option responses: 'not relevant at this stage', 'not relevant to my role' and 'not relevant to this intervention' and decided to design an instrument explicitly for those people either delivering or receiving an intervention. This version of the instrument had 53 items. Twenty-three people with a good working knowledge of NPT reviewed the items for theoretical drift. Items that displayed a poor alignment with NPT sub-constructs were removed (n = 8) and others revised or combined (n = 6). The final instrument, with 43 items, was successfully piloted with five people, with a 100% completion rate of items. CONCLUSION The process of moving through cycles of theoretical translation, item generation, cognitive testing, and theoretical (re)validation was essential for maintaining a balance between the theoretical integrity of the NPT concepts and the ease with which intended respondents could answer the questions. The final instrument could be easily understood and completed, while retaining theoretical validity. NoMAD represents a measure that can be used to understand implementation participants' experiences. It is intended as a measure that can be used alongside instruments that measure other dimensions of implementation activity, such as implementation fidelity, adoption, and readiness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Rapley
- Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus West, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7XA UK
| | - Melissa Girling
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
| | - Frances S. Mair
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow, G12 9LX UK
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper Floor 3, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, 3rd Floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK
| | - Elaine McColl
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
| | - Ian Nicholas Steen
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4AX UK
| | - Carl R. May
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| | - Tracy L. Finch
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus West, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7XA UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Implementing Same Day Discharge Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Process Evaluation. J Nurs Care Qual 2018; 34:54-60. [PMID: 29912023 DOI: 10.1097/ncq.0000000000000337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety and effectiveness of same day discharge (SDD) following percutaneous coronary intervention are well demonstrated; however, the uptake of this model of care is low. PURPOSE The aim was to examine the effectiveness of implementing SDD using a process evaluation methodology. METHODS This study was undertaken in a cardiac services department of a tertiary teaching hospital in southeast Queensland, Australia. It was anticipated before the implementation that 120 patients could be discharged the same day in a 6 months' time period. Patient selection process and guideline adherence were assessed along with patients' and relatives' satisfaction. RESULTS During implementation, 22 patients were discharged home the same day. It was found that staff did not follow the guideline consistently, with an overall adherence of 77.3%. CONCLUSION The uptake of SDD was low in this implementation. The study is important as it provides direction for future improvement both in the criteria and the implementation process.
Collapse
|
17
|
Goodridge D, Rana M, Harrison EL, Rotter T, Dobson R, Groot G, Udod S, Lloyd J. Assessing the implementation processes of a large-scale, multi-year quality improvement initiative: survey of health care providers. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:237. [PMID: 29615014 PMCID: PMC5883256 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3045-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Beginning in 2012, Lean was introduced to improve health care quality and promote patient-centredness throughout the province of Saskatchewan, Canada with the aim of producing coordinated, system-wide change. Significant investments have been made in training and implementation, although limited evaluation of the outcomes have been reported. In order to better understand the complex influences that make innovations such as Lean “workable” in practice, Normalization Process Theory guided this study. The objectives of the study were to: a) evaluate the implementation processes associated with Lean implementation in the Saskatchewan health care system from the perspectives of health care professionals; and b) identify demographic, training and role variables associated with normalization of Lean. Methods Licensed health care professionals were invited through their professional associations to complete a cross-sectional, modified, online version of the NoMAD questionnaire in March, 2016. Analysis was based on 1032 completed surveys. Descriptive and univariate analyses were conducted. Multivariate multinomial regressions were used to quantify the associations between five NoMAD items representing the four Normalization Process Theory constructs (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring). Results More than 75% of respondents indicated that neither sufficient training nor resources (collective action) had been made available to them for the implementation of Lean. Compared to other providers, nurses were more likely to report that Lean increased their workload. Significant differences in responses were evident between: leaders vs. direct care providers; nurses vs. other health professionals; and providers who reported increased workload as a result of Lean vs. those who did not. There were no associations between responses to normalization construct proxy items and: completion of introductory Lean training; participation in Lean activities; age group; years of professional experience; or employment status (full-time or part-time). Lean leader training was positively associated with proxy items reflecting coherence, cognitive participation and reflexive monitoring. Conclusions From the perspectives of the cross-section of health care professionals responding to this survey, major gaps remain in embedding Lean into healthcare. Strategies that address the challenges faced by nurses and direct care providers, in particular, are needed if intended goals are to be achieved. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3045-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Goodridge
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
| | - Masud Rana
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Elizabeth L Harrison
- School of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Thomas Rotter
- Health Quality Programs, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Roy Dobson
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Gary Groot
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Sonia Udod
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Joshua Lloyd
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kemp J, Bannon EM, Mwanja MM, Tebuseeke D. Developing a national standard for midwifery mentorship in Uganda. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GOVERNANCE 2018. [DOI: 10.1108/ijhg-09-2017-0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of a national standard for midwifery mentorship in Uganda, part of a wider project which aimed to develop a model of mentorship for Ugandan midwifery using the principles of action research. It aims to stimulate debate about strengthening the capacity of a health regulatory body, midwifery twinning partnerships and the use of international health volunteer placements.
Design/methodology/approach
Model of mentorship for Ugandan midwifery was a 20-month project implemented by the Royal College of Midwives UK and the Uganda Private Midwives Association. Following a situational analysis, the project was structured around three action reflection cycles, participatory workshops, individual twinning relationships between UK and Ugandan midwives and peer exchange visits. The capacity of the Ugandan Nurses and Midwives Council (UNMC) to develop a standard for midwifery mentorship was assessed. A capacity building programme was then designed and implemented to develop the standard for midwifery mentorship.
Findings
The capacity of UNMC was increased and the standard was developed though has yet to be validated and adopted. However, this intervention may not be replicable as a stand-alone intervention because its success was inextricably linked to the wider programme activities and support structures.
Originality/value
This is the first paper describing midwifery twinning to strengthen the capacity of a regulatory body to develop practice standards.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ament SMC, Gillissen F, Moser A, Maessen JMC, Dirksen CD, von Meyenfeldt MF, van der Weijden T. Factors associated with sustainability of 2 quality improvement programs after achieving early implementation success. A qualitative case study. J Eval Clin Pract 2017; 23:1135-1143. [PMID: 28425574 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2016] [Revised: 02/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES Sustainability of innovations is a relatively new concept in health care research and has become an issue of growing interest. The current study explored factors related to the sustainability of 2 multidisciplinary hospital-based programs 3 to 6 years after achieving early implementation success. METHOD An exploratory qualitative study was conducted into 2 implementation cases, an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program for colorectal surgery and a short-stay program for breast cancer surgery. Semistructured interviews were held with key persons involved in the care process in 14 hospitals from both cases minimally 3 years after the implementation, between March 2012 and May 2013. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to direct the development of the interview guide, during data collection and during analysis. A directed content analysis was performed. RESULTS A total of 21 interviews with 26 individuals were held, 18 regarding the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery case and 8 regarding the short-stay program case. Respondents mentioned the following factors associated with sustainability of the programs: modification and adaptability of the program, cost-effectiveness, institutionalization into existing systems, short communication lines within the multidisciplinary team, an innovative culture, benefits for patients, cosmopolitanism, the existence of external policies and incentives, trust and belief in the program, and spread of the program to other settings. Two factors are not covered by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, ie, modification of the program over the years and spread of the program to other contexts. CONCLUSIONS The factors associated with sustainability put forward in both cases were largely the same. Leadership and the implementation project were not mentioned as having influenced the long-term sustainability of the benefits achieved. Sustainability of the innovations is influenced by determinants stemming from all ecological levels of the health care system and demands continuous effort in the postimplementation phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M C Ament
- CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, KEMTA, Maastricht University Medical Centre; CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Gillissen
- CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,GROW, School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, KEMTA, Maastricht University Medical Centre; CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Albine Moser
- CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Faculty of Healthcare, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - José M C Maessen
- CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Quality & Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Faculty of Healthcare, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Carmen D Dirksen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, KEMTA, Maastricht University Medical Centre; CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Trudy van der Weijden
- CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
O'Donnell CA, Mair FS, Dowrick C, Brún MOD, Brún TD, Burns N, Lionis C, Saridaki A, Papadakaki M, Muijsenbergh MVD, Weel-Baumgarten EV, Gravenhorst K, Cooper L, Princz C, Teunissen E, Mareeuw FVDD, Vlahadi M, Spiegel W, MacFarlane A. Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research: a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e014289. [PMID: 28827231 PMCID: PMC5724160 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe and reflect on the process of designing and delivering a training programme supporting the use of theory, in this case Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), in a multisite cross-country health services research study. DESIGN Participatory research approach using qualitative methods. SETTING Six European primary care settings involving research teams from Austria, England, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS RESTORE research team consisting of 8 project applicants, all senior primary care academics, and 10 researchers. Professional backgrounds included general practitioners/family doctors, social/cultural anthropologists, sociologists and health services/primary care researchers. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Views of all research team members (n=18) were assessed using qualitative evaluation methods, analysed qualitatively by the trainers after each session. RESULTS Most of the team had no experience of using NPT and many had not applied theory to prospective, qualitative research projects. Early training proved didactic and overloaded participants with information. Drawing on RESTORE's methodological approach of Participatory Learning and Action, workshops using role play, experiential interactive exercises and light-hearted examples not directly related to the study subject matter were developed. Evaluation showed the study team quickly grew in knowledge and confidence in applying theory to fieldwork.Recommendations applicable to other studies include: accepting that theory application is not a linear process, that time is needed to address researcher concerns with the process, and that experiential, interactive learning is a key device in building conceptual and practical knowledge. An unanticipated benefit was the smooth transition to cross-country qualitative coding of study data. CONCLUSION A structured programme of training enhanced and supported the prospective application of a theory, NPT, to our work but raised challenges. These were not unique to NPT but could arise with the application of any theory, especially in large multisite, international projects. The lessons learnt are applicable to other theoretically informed studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine A O'Donnell
- General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of MVLS, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Frances S Mair
- General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of MVLS, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christopher Dowrick
- Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mary O'Reilly-de Brún
- Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Tomas de Brún
- Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Nicola Burns
- General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of MVLS, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster Medical School, Furness College, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK
| | | | | | - Maria Papadakaki
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
- Department of Social Work, School of Health and Social Welfare, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Maria van den Muijsenbergh
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Pharos Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Katja Gravenhorst
- Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lucy Cooper
- Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christine Princz
- Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Erik Teunissen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maria Vlahadi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Wolfgang Spiegel
- Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anne MacFarlane
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Leidel S, Leslie G, Boldy D, Girdler S. A comprehensive theoretical framework for the implementation and evaluation of opt-out HIV testing. J Eval Clin Pract 2017; 23:301-307. [PMID: 27451938 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Revised: 06/14/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Opt-out HIV testing (in which patients are offered HIV testing as a default) is a potentially powerful strategy for increasing the number of people who know their HIV status and thus limiting viral transmission. Like any change in clinical practice, implementation of opt-out HIV testing in a health service requires a change management strategy, which should have theoretical support. This paper considers the application of three theories to the implementation and evaluation of an opt-out HIV testing programme: Behavioural Economics, the Health Belief Model and Normalisation Process Theory. An awareness, understanding and integration of these theories may motivate health care providers to order HIV tests that they may not routinely order, influence their beliefs about who should be tested for HIV and inform the operational aspects of opt-out HIV testing. Ongoing process evaluation of opt-out HIV testing programmes (based on these theories) will help to achieve individual health care provider self-efficacy and group collective action, thereby improving testing rates and health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Leidel
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Gavin Leslie
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Duncan Boldy
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sonya Girdler
- School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Adams M, Gardner G, Yates P. Investigating nurse practitioners in the private sector: a theoretically informed research protocol. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26:1608-1620. [DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Adams
- School of Nursing; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; Queensland University of Technology; Kelvin Grove Qld Australia
| | - Glenn Gardner
- School of Nursing; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; Queensland University of Technology; Kelvin Grove Qld Australia
| | - Patsy Yates
- School of Nursing; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation; Queensland University of Technology; Kelvin Grove Qld Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jepsen I, Juul S, Foureur M, Sørensen EE, Nøhr EA. Is caseload midwifery a healthy work-form? – A survey of burnout among midwives in Denmark. SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE 2017; 11:102-106. [DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
24
|
Yao J, Zhu X, Lu H. Assessing the midwifery workforce demand: Utilising Birthrate Plus in China. Midwifery 2016; 42:61-66. [PMID: 27764683 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2016] [Revised: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 09/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the ability of the Birthrate Plus Workforce Planning Methodology (BR+) to forecast midwifery workforce demand in Chinese settings. DESIGN A retrospective analysis of medical records. SETTING ten hospitals in Beijing District. METHODS Hospitals were selected using stratified sampling methods. The client category and midwife hours in each hospital were analysed over 1 month in consecutive three years (2013, 2014, and 2015). FINDINGS Client category allocation varied between different hospital levels; Clients in higher category tended to need longer midwife hours; Mean birthrate of the ten hospitals was 154.30 (SD=40.700). Seven out of the ten hospitals were in need of more midwives. CONCLUSIONS Birthrate Plus was proved to be effective and efficient in Chinese settings; Gaps between available and needed midwives were large and prevalent in Chinese hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiasi Yao
- Peking University, School of Nursing, Xueyuan Road 38th, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Xiu Zhu
- Peking University, School of Nursing, Xueyuan Road 38th, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Lu
- Peking University, School of Nursing, Xueyuan Road 38th, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gear C, Koziol-McLain J, Wilson D, Clark F. Developing a response to family violence in primary health care: the New Zealand experience. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2016; 17:115. [PMID: 27542353 PMCID: PMC4992219 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0508-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite primary health care being recognised as an ideal setting to effectively respond to those experiencing family violence, responses are not widely integrated as part of routine health care. A lack of evidence testing models and approaches for health sector integration, alongside challenges of transferability and sustainability, means the best approach in responding to family violence is still unknown. The Primary Health Care Family Violence Responsiveness Evaluation Tool was developed as a guide to implement a formal systems-led response to family violence within New Zealand primary health care settings. Given the difficulties integrating effective, sustainable responses to family violence, we share the experience of primary health care sites that embarked on developing a response to family violence, presenting the enablers, barriers and resources required to maintain, progress and sustain family violence response development. Methods In this qualitative descriptive study data were collected from two sources. Firstly semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted during 24-month follow-up evaluation visits of primary health care sites to capture the enablers, barriers and resources required to maintain, progress and sustain a response to family violence. Secondly the outcomes of a group activity to identify response development barriers and implementation strategies were recorded during a network meeting of primary health care professionals interested in family violence prevention and intervention; findings were triangulated across the two data sources. Results Four sites, representing three PHOs and four general practices participated in the focus group interviews; 35 delegates from across New Zealand attended the network meeting representing a wider perspective on family violence response development within primary health care. Enablers and barriers to developing a family violence response were identified across four themes: ‘Getting started’, ‘Building effective relationships’, ‘Sourcing funding’ and ‘Shaping a national approach to family violence’. Conclusions The strong commitment of key people dedicated to addressing family violence is essential for response sustainability and would be strengthened by prioritising family violence response as a national health target with dedicated resourcing. Further analysis of the health care system as a complex adaptive system may provide insight into effective approaches to response development and health system integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Gear
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Trauma Research, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
| | - Jane Koziol-McLain
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Trauma Research, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Denise Wilson
- School of Public Health & Psychosocial Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Faye Clark
- Doctors for Sexual Abuse Care Inc., Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Long Term Effect on Professionals' Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes towards User Involvement Four Years after Implementing an Organisational Development Plan: A Controlled Study. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0150742. [PMID: 26974971 PMCID: PMC4790889 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health service organisations are increasingly implementing user involvement initiatives according to requirements from governments, such as user representation in administrational boards, better information to users, and more involvement of the users during treatment. Professionals are vital in all initiatives to enhance user involvement, and initiatives to increase involvement should influence the professionals’ practice and attitudes. The implementation of a development plan intending to enhance user involvement in a mental health hospital in Central Norway had no effect on the professionals after 16 months. The objective was therefore to investigate the long term effect on the professionals’ knowledge, practice and attitudes towards user involvement after four years. Methods This was a non-randomized controlled study including professionals from three mental health hospitals in Central Norway. A development plan intended to enhance user participation was implemented in one of the hospitals, including establishing a patient education centre and a user office, purchasing of user expertise, appointing contact professionals for next of kin, and improving of the centre’s information and the professional culture. The professionals at two other hospitals constituted the control group. All professionals were invited to answer the Consumer Participation Questionnaire (CPQ) and additional questions, at a four year interval. Results A total of 399 professionals participated (43% response rate). Comparing the changes in the intervention group with the changes in the control group, the results showed that the plan had improved some aspects of the professionals’ knowledge about the user involvement taking place in the hospital. In addition, some parts of the professionals’ practice of providing information to the service users was improved, and the development plan might have raised their awareness about insufficient involvement of next of kin. Conclusions This is the first controlled study on the long term effect on professionals from implementing a development plan to enhance user participation in a mental health hospital. Since there was more effect after four years than after 16 months, this study indicates that it takes time before the effect of complex interventions to enhance patient participation in organisations can be detected among the professionals. More long-term studies are thus warranted.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cummins AM, Denney-Wilson E, Homer CSE. The challenge of employing and managing new graduate midwives in midwifery group practices in hospitals. J Nurs Manag 2016; 24:614-23. [PMID: 26923939 DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM(S) This study explores the views of midwifery managers and key stakeholders, regarding the facilitators and barriers to employing new graduate midwives in midwifery continuity of care models. BACKGROUND Maternity services in Australia are shifting towards midwifery continuity of care models, where midwives work in small group practices, requiring a change to the management of staff. Public policy in Australia supports maternity services to be reconfigured in this way. Historically, experienced midwives work in these models, as demand grows; new graduates are employed to staff the models. METHOD(S) A qualitative descriptive approach exploring the manager's experience of employing new graduate's in the models. Managers, clinical educators and hospital midwifery consultants (n = 15) were recruited by purposeful sampling. RESULTS Drivers, enablers, facilitators and barriers to employing new graduates in the models were identified. Visionary leadership enabled the managers to employ new graduates in the models through initial and ongoing support. Managing the myths stemming from fear of employing new graduates to work in midwifery continuity of care models was challenging. CONCLUSION Managers and other key stakeholders provide initial and ongoing support through orientation and providing a reduced workload. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT Visionary leadership can be seen as critical to supporting new graduates into midwifery continuity of care models. The challenges for management to overcome include managing the myths stemming from fear of employing new graduates to work in a flexible way around the needs of the women within an organisation culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison M Cummins
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Broadway, NSW, Australia
| | - E Denney-Wilson
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Broadway, NSW, Australia
| | - C S E Homer
- International and Development, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Broadway, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shulver W, Killington M, Morris C, Crotty M. 'Well, if the kids can do it, I can do it': older rehabilitation patients' experiences of telerehabilitation. Health Expect 2016; 20:120-129. [PMID: 26890025 PMCID: PMC5217918 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Although trials continue to emerge supporting the role of telerehabilitation, implementation has been slow. Key users include older people living with disabilities who are frequent users of hospital rehabilitation services but whose voices are rarely heard. It is unclear whether the use of technologies and reduced face‐to‐face contact is acceptable to these people. We report on a qualitative study of community dwelling participants who had received a home telerehabilitation programme as an alternative to conventional rehabilitation. Design Thirteen older participants, three spouses and one carer were interviewed. All had participated in an individualized therapy programme, using a combination of face‐to‐face and video consults with therapists. The programme used ‘off‐the‐shelf’ technologies including iPads for videoconferencing and electronic FitBitR devices. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using NVivo software. Results Thematic analysis resulted in five emergent themes: (i) telerehabilitation is convenient; (ii) telerehabilitation promotes motivation and self‐awareness; (iii) telerehabilitation fosters positive therapeutic relationships; (iv) mastering technologies used by younger relatives is a valued aspect of telerehabilitation; and (v) Telerehabilitation does not replace traditional face‐to‐face rehabilitation therapies. Conclusions Participants found telerehabilitation convenient and motivating, coped well with the technology and developed positive therapeutic relationships. The learning and practice aspects sat well in the context of a rehabilitation programme. The use of commercially available technologies may have contributed to respondents' high levels of acceptability. The perception of telerehabilitation as complementary to in‐person care and the expectation of technological support have implications for the implementation and delivery of telerehabilitation services to older people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Shulver
- Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Flinders University, Daw Park, SA, Australia
| | - Maggie Killington
- Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Flinders University, Daw Park, SA, Australia.,Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, SA, Australia
| | - Claire Morris
- Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, SA, Australia
| | - Maria Crotty
- Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Flinders University, Daw Park, SA, Australia.,Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ng E, de Colombani P. Framework for Selecting Best Practices in Public Health: A Systematic Literature Review. J Public Health Res 2015; 4:577. [PMID: 26753159 PMCID: PMC4693338 DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2015.577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence-based public health has commonly relied on findings from empirical studies, or research-based evidence. However, this paper advocates that practice-based evidence derived from programmes implemented in real-life settings is likely to be a more suitable source of evidence for inspiring and guiding public health programmes. Selection of best practices from the array of implemented programmes is one way of generating such practice-based evidence. Yet the lack of consensus on the definition and criteria for practice-based evidence and best practices has limited their application in public health so far. To address the gap in literature on practice-based evidence, this paper hence proposes measures of success for public health interventions by developing an evaluation framework for selection of best practices. The proposed framework was synthesised from a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed and grey literature on existing evaluation frameworks for public health programmes as well as processes employed by health-related organisations when selecting best practices. A best practice is firstly defined as an intervention that has shown evidence of effectiveness in a particular setting and is likely to be replicable to other situations. Regardless of the area of public health, interventions should be evaluated by their context, process and outcomes. A best practice should hence meet most, if not all, of eight identified evaluation criteria: relevance, community participation, stakeholder collaboration, ethical soundness, replicability, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability. Ultimately, a standardised framework for selection of best practices will improve the usefulness and credibility of practice-based evidence in informing evidence-based public health interventions. Significance for public healthBest practices are a valuable source of practice-based evidence on effective public health interventions implemented in real-life settings. Yet, despite the frequent branding of interventions as best practices or good practices, there is no consensus on the definition and desirable characteristics of such best practices. Hence, this is likely to be the first systematic review on the topic of best practices in public health. Having a single widely accepted framework for selecting best practices will ensure that the selection processes by different agencies are fair and comparable, as well as enable public health workers to better appreciate and adopt best practices in different settings. Ultimately, standardisation will improve the credibility and usefulness of practice-based evidence to that of research-based evidence.
Collapse
|
30
|
O'Donnell CA, Browne S, Pierce M, McConnachie A, Deckers K, van Boxtel MPJ, Manera V, Köhler S, Redmond M, Verhey FRJ, van den Akker M, Power K, Irving K. Reducing dementia risk by targeting modifiable risk factors in mid-life: study protocol for the Innovative Midlife Intervention for Dementia Deterrence (In-MINDD) randomised controlled feasibility trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2015; 1:40. [PMID: 27965818 PMCID: PMC5154057 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-015-0035-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2015] [Accepted: 11/04/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Dementia prevalence is increasing as populations live longer, with no cure and the costs of caring exceeding many other conditions. There is increasing evidence for modifiable risk factors which, if addressed in mid-life, can reduce the risk of developing dementia in later life. These include physical inactivity, low cognitive activity, mid-life obesity, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol. This study aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility and impact of giving those in mid-life, aged between 40 and 60 years, an individualised dementia risk modification score and profile and access to personalised on-line health information and goal setting in order to support the behaviour change required to reduce such dementia risk. A secondary aim is to understand participants’ and practitioners’ views of dementia prevention and explore the acceptability and integration of the Innovative Midlife Intervention for Dementia Deterrence (In-MINDD) intervention into daily life and routine practice. Methods/design In-MINDD is a multi-centre, primary care-based, single-blinded randomised controlled feasibility trial currently being conducted in four European countries (France, Ireland, the Netherlands and the UK). Participants are being recruited from participating general practices. Inclusion criteria will include age between 40 and 60 years; at least one modifiable risk factor for dementia risk (including diabetes, hypertension, obesity, renal dysfunction, current smoker, raised cholesterol, coronary heart disease, current or previous history of depression, self-reported sedentary lifestyle, and self-reported low cognitive activity) access to the Internet. Primary outcome measure will be a change in dementia risk modification score over the timescale of the trial (6 months). A qualitative process evaluation will interview a sample of participants and practitioners about their views on the acceptability and feasibility of the trial and the links between modifiable risk factors and dementia prevention. This work will be underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. Discussion This study will explore the feasibility and acceptability of a risk profiler and on-line support environment to help individuals in mid-life assess their risk of developing dementia in later life and to take steps to alleviate that risk by tackling health-related behaviour change. Testing the intervention in a robust and theoretically informed manner will inform the development of a future, full-scale randomised controlled trial. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN 98553005 (DOI: 10.1186/ISRCTN98553005). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40814-015-0035-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine A O'Donnell
- General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow, G12 9LX Scotland UK
| | - Susan Browne
- General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow, G12 9LX Scotland UK
| | - Maria Pierce
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Alex McConnachie
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kay Deckers
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centrum Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin P J van Boxtel
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centrum Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Valeria Manera
- CoBTeK COgnition Behaviour Technology, Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
| | - Sebastian Köhler
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centrum Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Muriel Redmond
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Frans R J Verhey
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centrum Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan van den Akker
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centrum Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin Power
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kate Irving
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Caseload midwifery as organisational change: the interplay between professional and organisational projects in Denmark. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15:121. [PMID: 26013394 PMCID: PMC4493809 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0546-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2014] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The large obstetric units typical of industrialised countries have come under criticism for fragmented and depersonalised care and heavy bureaucracy. Interest in midwife-led continuity models of care is growing, but knowledge about the accompanying processes of organisational change is scarce. This study focuses on midwives’ role in introducing and developing caseload midwifery. Sociological studies of midwifery and organisational studies of professional groups were used to capture the strong interests of midwives in caseload midwifery and their key role together with management in negotiating organisational change. Methods We studied three hospitals in Denmark as arenas for negotiating the introduction and development of caseload midwifery and the processes, interests and resources involved. A qualitative multi-case design was used and the selection of hospitals aimed at maximising variance. Ten individual and 14 group interviews were conducted in spring 2013. Staff were represented by caseload midwives, ward midwives, obstetricians and health visitors, management by chief midwives and their deputies. Participants were recruited to maximise the diversity of experience. The data analysis adopted a thematic approach, using within- and across-case analysis. Results The analysis revealed a highly interdependent interplay between organisational and professional projects in the change processes involved in the introduction and development of caseload midwifery. This was reflected in three ways: first, in the key role of negotiations in all phases; second, in midwives’ and management’s engagement in both types of projects (as evident from their interests and resources); and third in a high capacity for resolving tensions between the two projects. The ward midwives’ role as a third party in organisational change further complicated the process. Conclusions For managers tasked with the introduction and development of caseload midwifery, our study underscores the importance of understanding the complexity of the underlying change processes and of activating midwives’ and managers’ interests and resources in addressing the challenges. Further studies of female-dominated professions such as midwifery should offer good opportunities for detailed analysis of the deep-seated interdependence of professional and organisational projects and for identifying the key dimensions of this interdependence.
Collapse
|
32
|
Fullerton JT, Ghérissi A. Midwifery Professional Relationships: Collaboration Across the Novice-to-Expert Continuum. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILDBIRTH 2015. [DOI: 10.1891/2156-5287.5.1.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
This article describes the types of helpful and supportive interactions or communication strategies that characterize the collaborative relationships in which a midwife can engage across the novice-to-expert continuum of professional development. Similarities and distinctions are drawn between the various terms describing types of collaboration and discussed with respect to the added value that each relationship can have for the individual and for the health care team. A conceptual depiction of the essential components of effective teamwork or collaboration is presented. Emphasis is placed on the dynamic nature of the process of developing and sustaining these relationships across the midwife’s professional lifetime.
Collapse
|
33
|
Fox A, Gardner G, Osborne S. A theoretical framework to support research of health service innovation. AUST HEALTH REV 2015; 39:70-75. [DOI: 10.1071/ah14031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2014] [Accepted: 09/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective Health service managers and policy makers are increasingly concerned about the sustainability of innovations implemented in health care settings. The increasing demand on health services requires that innovations are both effective and sustainable; however, research in this field is limited, with multiple disciplines, approaches and paradigms influencing the field. These variations prevent a cohesive approach, and therefore the accumulation of research findings, in the development of a body of knowledge. The purpose of this paper is to provide a thorough examination of the research findings and provide an appropriate theoretical framework to examine sustainability of health service innovation. Methods This paper presents an integrative review of the literature available in relation to sustainability of health service innovation and provides the development of a theoretical framework based on integration and synthesis of the literature. Results A theoretical framework serves to guide research, determine variables, influence data analysis and is central to the quest for ongoing knowledge development. This research outlines the sustainability of innovation framework; a theoretical framework suitable for examining the sustainability of health service innovation. Conclusion If left unaddressed, health services research will continue in an ad hoc manner, preventing full utilisation of outcomes, recommendations and knowledge for effective provision of health services. The sustainability of innovation theoretical framework provides an operational basis upon which reliable future research can be conducted. What is known about the topic? Providers of health services are rapidly implementing innovations in an effort to provide effective health care. Little research has been conducted to evaluate the sustainability of these health service innovations. What does this paper add? This paper aims presents an integration and synthesis of the current body of knowledge to provide a theoretical framework to evaluate the sustainability of health service innovation. What are the implications for the practitioner? An improved body of knowledge surrounding the sustainability of health service innovations generated from research will consequently result in more appropriate use of resources and improved provision of health services.
Collapse
|
34
|
McKinnon LC, Prosser SJ, Miller YD. What women want: qualitative analysis of consumer evaluations of maternity care in Queensland, Australia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14:366. [PMID: 25344778 PMCID: PMC4216658 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-014-0366-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2014] [Accepted: 10/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternity care reform plans have been proposed at state and national levels in Australia, but the extent to which these respond to maternity care consumers' expressed needs is unclear. This study examines open-text survey comments to identify women's unmet needs and priorities for maternity care. It is then considered whether these needs and priorities are addressed in current reform plans. METHODS Women who had a live single or multiple birth in Queensland, Australia, in 2010 (n 3,635) were invited to complete a retrospective self-report survey. In addition to questions about clinical and interpersonal maternity care experiences from pregnancy to postpartum, women were asked an open-ended question "Is there anything else you'd like to tell us about having your baby?" This paper describes a detailed thematic analysis of open-ended responses from a random selection of 150 women (10% of 1,510 who responded to the question). RESULTS Four broad themes emerged relevant to improving women's experiences of maternity care: quality of care (interpersonal and technical); access to choices and involvement in decision-making; unmet information needs; and dissatisfaction with the care environment. Some of these topics are reflected in current reform goals, while others provide evidence of the need for further reforms. CONCLUSIONS The findings reinforce the importance of some existing maternity reform objectives, and describe how these might best be met. Findings affirm the importance of information provision to enable informed choices; a goal of Queensland and national reform agendas. Improvement opportunities not currently specified in reform agendas were also identified, including the quality of interpersonal relationships between women and staff, particular unmet information needs (e.g., breastfeeding), and concerns regarding the care environment (e.g., crowding and long waiting times).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loretta C McKinnon
- />School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, 4059 QLD Australia
- />Queensland Centre for Mothers & Babies, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Samantha J Prosser
- />School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, 4059 QLD Australia
- />Queensland Centre for Mothers & Babies, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yvette D Miller
- />School of Public Health and Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, 4059 QLD Australia
- />Queensland Centre for Mothers & Babies, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wiegers TA, Warmelink JC, Spelten ER, Klomp T, Hutton EK. Work and workload of Dutch primary care midwives in 2010. Midwifery 2014; 30:991-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2013] [Revised: 07/15/2013] [Accepted: 08/13/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
36
|
McEvoy R, Ballini L, Maltoni S, O’Donnell CA, Mair FS, MacFarlane A. A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes. Implement Sci 2014; 9:2. [PMID: 24383661 PMCID: PMC3905960 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 226] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2013] [Accepted: 12/03/2013] [Indexed: 12/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a well-recognized need for greater use of theory to address research translational gaps. Normalization Process Theory (NPT) provides a set of sociological tools to understand and explain the social processes through which new or modified practices of thinking, enacting, and organizing work are implemented, embedded, and integrated in healthcare and other organizational settings. This review of NPT offers readers the opportunity to observe how, and in what areas, a particular theoretical approach to implementation is being used. In this article we review the literature on NPT in order to understand what interventions NPT is being used to analyze, how NPT is being operationalized, and the reported benefits, if any, of using NPT. METHODS Using a framework analysis approach, we conducted a qualitative systematic review of peer-reviewed literature using NPT. We searched 12 electronic databases and all citations linked to six key NPT development papers. Grey literature/unpublished studies were not sought. Limitations of English language, healthcare setting and year of publication 2006 to June 2012 were set. RESULTS Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria; in the main, NPT is being applied to qualitatively analyze a diverse range of complex interventions, many beyond its original field of e-health and telehealth. The NPT constructs have high stability across settings and, notwithstanding challenges in applying NPT in terms of managing overlaps between constructs, there is evidence that it is a beneficial heuristic device to explain and guide implementation processes. CONCLUSIONS NPT offers a generalizable framework that can be applied across contexts with opportunities for incremental knowledge gain over time and an explicit framework for analysis, which can explain and potentially shape implementation processes. This is the first review of NPT in use and it generates an impetus for further and extended use of NPT. We recommend that in future NPT research, authors should explicate their rationale for choosing NPT as their theoretical framework and, where possible, involve multiple stakeholders including service users to enable analysis of implementation from a range of perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel McEvoy
- Graduate Entry Medical School, 4i Research Center, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Luciana Ballini
- Responsabile di Area, Osservatorio Regionale per l’Innovazione (ORI), Agenzia sanitaria e sociale regionale, viale Aldo Moro 21-40127, Bologna, Italy
| | - Susanna Maltoni
- Responsabile di Area, Osservatorio Regionale per l’Innovazione (ORI), Agenzia sanitaria e sociale regionale, viale Aldo Moro 21-40127, Bologna, Italy
| | - Catherine A O’Donnell
- General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, MVLS. University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, G12 9LX, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Frances S Mair
- General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, MVLS. University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, G12 9LX, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Anne MacFarlane
- Graduate Entry Medical School, 4i Research Center, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lovarini M, Clemson L, Dean C. Sustainability of community-based fall prevention programs: a systematic review. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH 2013; 47:9-17. [PMID: 24237865 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2013] [Revised: 06/30/2013] [Accepted: 08/14/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fall prevention programs may be implemented but not sustained. We conducted a systematic review to identify any theories, models, frameworks, influencing factors or interventions for sustaining fall prevention programs in the community. METHODS Peer-reviewed publications describing, investigating, or evaluating program sustainability were accessed. A narrative review was conducted to compare and synthesize study findings. RESULTS Nineteen publications were included. Three conceptual frameworks were identified describing how programs may be better sustained. While ongoing financial support and the participation of older people were commonly reported influences, other factors specific to the type of program and setting were also reported. Planning, training, and collaboration between program stakeholders may facilitate sustainable programs. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY Organizations can use these findings when planning for sustainable programs. However more robust empirical studies are needed to confirm the value of conceptual frameworks, the critical factors and most effective interventions for sustaining community-based fall prevention programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meryl Lovarini
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Datta J, Petticrew M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:568. [PMID: 23758638 PMCID: PMC3699389 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2012] [Accepted: 05/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is continuing interest among practitioners, policymakers and researchers in the evaluation of complex interventions stemming from the need to further develop the evidence base on the effectiveness of healthcare and public health interventions, and an awareness that evaluation becomes more challenging if interventions are complex.We undertook an analysis of published journal articles in order to identify aspects of complexity described by writers, the fields in which complex interventions are being evaluated and the challenges experienced in design, implementation and evaluation. This paper outlines the findings of this documentary analysis. METHODS The PubMed electronic database was searched for the ten year period, January 2002 to December 2011, using the term "complex intervention*" in the title and/or abstract of a paper. We extracted text from papers to a table and carried out a thematic analysis to identify authors' descriptions of challenges faced in developing, implementing and evaluating complex interventions. RESULTS The search resulted in a sample of 221 papers of which full text of 216 was obtained and 207 were included in the analysis. The 207 papers broadly cover clinical, public health and methodological topics. Challenges described included the content and standardisation of interventions, the impact of the people involved (staff and patients), the organisational context of implementation, the development of outcome measures, and evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis of these papers suggests that more detailed reporting of information on outcomes, context and intervention is required for complex interventions. Future revisions to reporting guidelines for both primary and secondary research may need to take aspects of complexity into account to enhance their value to both researchers and users of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Datta
- Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, WC1H 9SH, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Finch TL, Rapley T, Girling M, Mair FS, Murray E, Treweek S, McColl E, Steen IN, May CR. Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol. Implement Sci 2013; 8:43. [PMID: 23578304 PMCID: PMC3637119 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2013] [Accepted: 04/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding implementation processes is key to ensuring that complex interventions in healthcare are taken up in practice and thus maximize intended benefits for service provision and (ultimately) care to patients. Normalization Process Theory (NPT) provides a framework for understanding how a new intervention becomes part of normal practice. This study aims to develop and validate simple generic tools derived from NPT, to be used to improve the implementation of complex healthcare interventions. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study are to: develop a set of NPT-based measures and formatively evaluate their use for identifying implementation problems and monitoring progress; conduct preliminary evaluation of these measures across a range of interventions and contexts, and identify factors that affect this process; explore the utility of these measures for predicting outcomes; and develop an online users' manual for the measures. METHODS A combination of qualitative (workshops, item development, user feedback, cognitive interviews) and quantitative (survey) methods will be used to develop NPT measures, and test the utility of the measures in six healthcare intervention settings. DISCUSSION The measures developed in the study will be available for use by those involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating complex interventions in healthcare and have the potential to enhance the chances of their implementation, leading to sustained changes in working practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy L Finch
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Using documents to investigate links between implementation and sustainability in a complex community intervention: the PRISM study. Soc Sci Med 2012; 75:1222-9. [PMID: 22749443 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2011] [Revised: 05/01/2012] [Accepted: 05/18/2012] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The increasing imperative to find what works in health services has meant a rise in research trialing interventions deemed 'complex'. While the strength of these interventions comes from taking a 'whole of problem' approach using multiple and inter-linking strategies, ways of examining implementation are under-explored. Building sustainability is an important part of implementing complex intervention research, but this too has received little exploration in the implementation literature. This paper explores issues of implementation and sustainability by examining the case of PRISM (Program of Resources, Information and Support for Mothers), a community randomised trial in Victoria, Australia aimed at improving maternal health and wellbeing. It examines documents placed on the project website. Three groups of documents relating to implementation of the intervention were examined - implementation reports, media reports and community newsletters. Analysing these documents allowed a focus on the 'work' of the intervention - who does the work and what activities comprise the work - in order to examine implementation as it relates to sustainability. Document analysis provides a useful way of considering implementation and sustainability of complex intervention research. It can 'value add' to findings from process evaluation and extend our understanding of an intervention beyond outcome measures. Analysis of the documents in this case provides insights into why sustainability of an intervention may be difficult to achieve during implementation.
Collapse
|
41
|
Finch TL, Mair FS, O’Donnell C, Murray E, May CR. From theory to 'measurement' in complex interventions: methodological lessons from the development of an e-health normalisation instrument. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12:69. [PMID: 22594537 PMCID: PMC3473304 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2011] [Accepted: 04/16/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although empirical and theoretical understanding of processes of implementation in health care is advancing, translation of theory into structured measures that capture the complex interplay between interventions, individuals and context remain limited. This paper aimed to (1) describe the process and outcome of a project to develop a theory-based instrument for measuring implementation processes relating to e-health interventions; and (2) identify key issues and methodological challenges for advancing work in this field. METHODS A 30-item instrument (Technology Adoption Readiness Scale (TARS)) for measuring normalisation processes in the context of e-health service interventions was developed on the basis on Normalization Process Theory (NPT). NPT focuses on how new practices become routinely embedded within social contexts. The instrument was pre-tested in two health care settings in which e-health (electronic facilitation of healthcare decision-making and practice) was used by health care professionals. RESULTS The developed instrument was pre-tested in two professional samples (N=46; N=231). Ratings of items representing normalisation 'processes' were significantly related to staff members' perceptions of whether or not e-health had become 'routine'. Key methodological challenges are discussed in relation to: translating multi-component theoretical constructs into simple questions; developing and choosing appropriate outcome measures; conducting multiple-stakeholder assessments; instrument and question framing; and more general issues for instrument development in practice contexts. CONCLUSIONS To develop theory-derived measures of implementation process for progressing research in this field, four key recommendations are made relating to (1) greater attention to underlying theoretical assumptions and extent of translation work required; (2) the need for appropriate but flexible approaches to outcomes measurement; (3) representation of multiple perspectives and collaborative nature of work; and (4) emphasis on generic measurement approaches that can be flexibly tailored to particular contexts of study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy L Finch
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE2 4AX, England
| | - Frances S Mair
- Institute of Health and WellBeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow, G12 9LX, Scotland
| | - Catherine O’Donnell
- Institute of Health and WellBeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow, G12 9LX, Scotland
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper Floor 3, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, England
| | - Carl R May
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Building 67, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rise M. Mer brukermedvirkning? TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2012; 132:1882-4. [DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
43
|
Taft AJ, Bandyopadhyay M. Introduction to COMPASS: navigating complexity in public health research. BMC Public Health 2011; 11 Suppl 5:S1. [PMID: 22168346 PMCID: PMC3247024 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-s5-s1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Angela J Taft
- Mother and Child Health Research, La Trobe University, 215 Franklin St, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|