A systematic review on tracheostomy decannulation: a proposal of a quantitative semiquantitative clinical score

Clinical management and nursing care for patients with tracheostomy following traumatic brain injury

Tracheostomy is a routine surgical procedure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury, which requires mechanical ventilation to maintain gas exchange and avoid hypoxemia. Inadequate tracheostomy timing, nursing care, and decannulation would lead to a series of complications, such as aggravated pneumonia and prolonged intubation. The effects of early tracheostomy versus late tracheostomy have been explored. And early tracheostomy is more likely associated with shorter hospital stays and fewer complications. But the relevant reports are controversial. A safe and fast tracheostomy decannulation would facilitate the recovery. However, there was a broad variability in the indications and timing of tracheostomy and decannulation. High-quality evidence is subsequently lacking. We conducted this review to address gaps in knowledge regarding the management strategy and nursing protocol in patients with tracheostomy and decannulation following traumatic brain injury. A multidisciplinary tracheostomy team containing nursing care was also discussed to provide the best service to these patients.

Decannulation protocol in pediatric patients: case series study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the phases of a decannulation protocol and the results from its application in hospitalized children.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational study. Data were collected from medical records of decannulated patients followed up in a pediatric hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais between 2011 and 2021.

RESULTS

Among the children followed up in the service (n=526), 23% (n=120) were successfully decannulated. Children aged between 2 months and 16 years, with a mean age of 4 years, 69% of whom were male, were evaluated. About 75% of the patients have tracheostomy due to upper airway obstruction and 60% of these due to acquired subglottic stenosis. At the beginning of the decannulation protocol, 5.5% of the patients had moderate oropharyngeal dysphagia, while 80.4% had normal swallowing. Correction in the upper airway pre-decannulation was performed in 39.5% of the patients, dilation in 63.8%, and endoscopic correction was performed in 55.3%. After performing the decannulation, none of the patients had complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The described decannulation protocol is safe, since no complications such as death and need for recannulation happened.

Single-Stage Bronchoscopy-Guided Protocol for Tracheostomy Decannulation in Adult Patients

INTRODUCTION

Tracheostomy decannulation is a routine procedure in airway management. There is no standard decannulation method; however, the two commonly practiced approaches are tracheostomy downsizing and intermittent capping, which are both accompanied by multiple visits to the clinic and increase patient discomfort. Herein, we explore fiberoptic bronchoscopy application in a novel single-stage decannulation protocol.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on tracheostomy patients eligible for decannulation. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed on patients with spontaneous ventilation for ≥48 h, age ≥18, hemodynamic stability, normal chest X-ray, adequate swallowing, effective cough, adequate consciousness, patent speaking valve, and absent history of recurrent aspiration. Tracheostomy removal occurred after evaluating the airway and ruling out tracheomalacia, tracheitis with stenosis, obstructive granulation tissue, and moderate-to-severe stenosis. We documented patients' demographic and clinical information, along with details of their post-decannulation course.

RESULTS

Out of 58 patients admitted for tracheostomy removal, we excluded six patients (10.3%) from the study because, despite clinical indications for successful weaning, they exhibited abnormalities that interrupted the decannulation process. Of the remaining 52 patients, 50 (96.1%) were successfully weaned off, while two needed reinsertion during their hospital course. Bronchoscopy findings were unremarkable in 33 (63.5%) patients, and the most frequently observed abnormalities were paucity of vocal cord movement in 5 (9.6%) patients and granulation tissue formation in 5 (9.6%) patients. No further airway management was necessary after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study introduces the innovative approach of single-stage bronchoscopic decannulation as a potentially beneficial tool for immediate decannulation. Based on our experience, we achieved a relatively satisfactory outcome following single-stage tracheostomy decannulation with bronchoscopy. The approach shows promise in providing valuable airway insights and predicting possible decannulation failures. Further research is needed to evaluate its impact on stress reduction for patients and surgeons, its superiority compared to traditional techniques, its long-term effects on healthcare, and its potential cost-effectiveness.

Development and validation of a novel prediction model for Carbapenem-resistant organism infection in a large-scale hospitalized patients

Carbapenem-resistant organism (CRO) are defined as gram-negative bacteria. The lack of safe and effective antibiotics has led to an increase in incidence rate. The purpose of this study is to establish and determine a risk nomogram to predict CRO infection in hospitalized patients. Hospitalized patients' information were collected from the electronic medical record system of hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we identified 131390 inpatients who met the criteria for this study. For the training cohort, the area under the curves (AUC) for predicting the CRO infection was 0.935. For the validation cohort, the AUC for predicting the CRO infection was 0.937. We have developed the first novel nomogram to predict CRO infection in hospitalized patients, which is reliable and high-performance. The nomogram performs well among hospitalized patients and has good predictive ability.

A Pluridisciplinary Tracheostomy Weaning Protocol for Brain-Injured Patients, Outside of the Intensive Care Unit and Without Instrumental Assessment: Results of Pilot Study

Concurrently to the recent development of percutaneous tracheostomy techniques in the intensive care unit (ICU), the amount of tracheostomized brain-injured patients has increased. Despites its advantages, tracheostomy may represent an obstacle to their orientation towards conventional hospitalization or rehabilitation services. To date, there is no recommendation for tracheostomy weaning outside of the ICU. We created a pluridisciplinary tracheostomy weaning protocol relying on standardized criteria but adapted to each patient's characteristics and that does not require instrumental assessment. It was tested in a prospective, single-centre, non-randomized cohort study. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years, hospitalized for an acquired brain injury (ABI), tracheostomized during an ICU stay, and weaned from mechanical ventilation. The exclusion criterion was severe malnutrition. Decannulation failure was defined as recannulation within 96 h after decannulation. Thirty tracheostomized ABI patients from our neurosurgery department were successively and exhaustively included after ICU discharge. Twenty-six patients were decannulated (decannulation rate, 90%). None of them were recannulated (success rate, 100%). Two patients never reached the decannulation stage. Two patients died during the procedure. Mean tracheostomy weaning duration (inclusion to decannulation) was 7.6 (standard deviation [SD]: 4.6) days and mean total tracheostomy time (insertion to decannulation) was 42.5 (SD: 24.8) days. Our results demonstrate that our protocol might be able to determine without instrumental assessment which patient can be successfully decannulated. Therefore, it may be used safely outside ICU or a specialized unit. Moreover, our tracheostomy weaning duration is very short as compared to the current literature.

Predictive Factors for Successful Decannulation in Patients with Tracheostomies and Brain Injuries: A Systematic Review

Neurological patients frequently have disorders of consciousness, swallowing disorders, or neurological states that are incompatible with extubation. Therefore, they frequently require tracheostomies during their stay in an intensive care unit. After the acute phase, tracheostomy weaning and decannulation are generally expected to promote rehabilitation. However, few reliable predictive factors (PFs) for decannulation have been identified in this patient population. We sought to identify PFs that may be used during tracheostomy weaning and decannulation in patients with brain injuries. We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding potential PFs for decannulation; searches were performed on 16 March 2021 and 1 June 2022. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, OPENGREY, OPENSIGLE, Science Direct, CLINICAL TRIALS and CENTRAL. We searched for all article types, except systematic reviews, meta-analyses, abstracts, and position articles. Retrieved articles were published in English or French, with no date restriction. In total, 1433 articles were identified; 26 of these were eligible for inclusion in the review. PFs for successful decannulation in patients with acquired brain injuries (ABIs) included high neurological status, traumatic brain injuries rather than stroke or anoxic brain lesions, younger age, effective swallowing, an effective cough, and the absence of pulmonary infections. Secondary PFs included early tracheostomy, supratentorial lesions, the absence of critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy, and the absence of tracheal lesions. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to identify PFs for decannulation in patients with ABIs. These PFs may be used by clinicians during tracheostomy weaning.

Prognostic factors for tracheostomy early decannulation in acquired brain injury patients

After severe brain injuries, a tracheostomy tube is usually inserted for respiratory support. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic factors for tracheostomy early decannulation in patients with acquired brain injuries. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of inpatients with acquired brain injuries who underwent successful tracheostomy decannulation between March 2021 and June 2022. Fifty-six patients were included; median age was 68 (59-72) years; 28 (50%) were men; 28 (50%) underwent tracheostomy due to stroke. The median time to decannulation was 47 days. The patients were divided into the early and the late decannulation groups based on the median time, and compared. In univariate analysis, the early decannulation group had a higher BMI, peak cough flow, and acquired brain injuries due to trauma, and a lower penetration-aspiration scale score, duration of antibiotic use, and duration of oxygen use. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a higher initial peak cough flow [hazard ratio (HR) 1.142; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.912-0.954; P  < 0.001] and lower duration of oxygen use (HR 0.930; 95% CI 0.502-0.864; P  = 0.016) were independent factors for early tracheostomy decannulation, with each unit increase in peak cough flow corresponding to a 14.2% increase and each additional day of duration of oxygen use corresponding to a 7.0% decrease in the likelihood of early decannulation. In conclusion, key prognostic factors for early tracheostomy decannulation were identified as the initial cough strength and duration of oxygen use. These results could play important role in decannulation plans for patients with tracheostomy tube.

Increased physiotherapy capacity reduces duration of tracheostomy in situ, reduces hospital length of stay and improves functional outcomes for people with an acquired brain injury (ABI): a service review

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of increased physiotherapy capacity in an acute regional Neurosurgery Centre on outcomes for people with an acquired brain injury (ABI) requiring a tracheostomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A service review of patients undergoing active tracheostomy weaning, admitted over two 15-week time periods; normal physiotherapy staffing with enhanced physiotherapy staffing.

RESULTS

With a 50% increase in staffing, physiotherapy rehabilitation sessions increased from 2 to 4 times weekly. A mean improvement was found for patient outcomes; time with a tracheostomy in situ reduced by 11 days and the length of hospital stay reduced by 19 days. Functional status on discharge also improved, with 33% of patients able to mobilise on discharge with normal staffing levels and 77% of patients able to mobilise on discharge with enhanced staffing levels.

CONCLUSION

A temporary increase in physiotherapy capacity gave the opportunity to evaluate the impact on physiotherapy rehabilitation frequency and patient outcomes. Results demonstrate the positive impact for this complex patient group on outcomes including rehabilitation frequency, length of stay, time to decannulation, and functional status on discharge. Early access to high-frequency specialist physiotherapy rehabilitation is a critical component of improving functional independence in people with an ABI requiring a tracheostomy.

Cough flows as a criterion for decannulation of autonomously breathing patients with tracheostomy tubes

BACKGROUND

Adequate cough or exsufflation flow can indicate an option for safe tracheostomy decannulation to noninvasive management. Cough peak flow via the upper airways with the tube capped is an outcome predictor for decannulation readiness in patients with neuromuscular impairment. However, this threshold value is typically measured with tracheotomy tube removed, which is not acceptable culturally in China. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of using cough flow measured with tracheostomy tube and speaking valve (CFSV) > 100 L/min as a cutoff value for decannulation.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study conducted between January 2019 and September 2022 in a tertiary rehabilitation hospital.

METHODS

Patients with prolonged tracheostomy tube placement were referred for screening. Each patient was assessed using a standardized tracheostomy decannulation protocol, in which CFSV greater than 100 L/min indicated that the patients' cough ability was sufficient for decannulation. Patients whose CFSV matched the threshold value and other protocol criteria were decannulated, and the reintubation and mortality rates were followed-up for 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 218 patients were screened and 193 patients were included. A total of 105 patients underwent decannulation, 103 patients were decannulated successfully, and 2 patients decannulated failure, required reinsertion of the tracheostomy tube within 48 h (failure rate 1.9%). Three patients required reinsertion or translaryngeal intubation within 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

CFSV greater than 100 L/min could be a reliable threshold value for successful decannulation in patients with various primary diseases with a tracheostomy tube.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This observational study was not registered online.

Tracheotomy versus tracheostomy, the need for lexicographical clarification

In the healthcare field, the terms "traqueotomía" and "traqueostomía" are frequently used, often leading to confusion among professionals regarding the appropriate definition for each term or which one should be considered more correct in specific cases. A search was conducted for the terms "traqueotomía" and "traqueostomía" in general Spanish-language dictionaries such as the Dictionary of the Royal Spanish Academy (DRAE) and the Historical Dictionary of the Spanish Language of the Royal Spanish Academy (DHLE), as well as for the English terms "tracheotomy" and "tracheostomy" in English general dictionaries like the Oxford Dictionary, the Cambridge Dictionary, and the Collins English Dictionary. Additionally, searches were performed in medical dictionaries in both Spanish, specifically the Dictionary of Medical Terms of the National Academy of Medicine (DTM), and English, including the Farlex Dictionary. The terms were also explored using the Google search engine. Definitions were analyzed from both lexicographical and etymological perspectives. Definitions found in general dictionaries, in both Spanish and English, were found to be imprecise, limited, and ambiguous, as they mixed outdated indications with criteria that deviated from etymology. In contrast, definitions in medical dictionaries in both languages were more aligned with etymology. "Traqueotomía" strictly identifies the surgical procedure of creating an opening in the anterior face of the trachea. "Traqueostomía" identifies the creation of an opening that connects the trachea to the exterior, involving a modification of the upper airway by providing an additional entry for the respiratory pathway. "Traqueostomía" becomes the sole means of entry to the airway in total laryngectomies. Both terms can be used synonymously when a traqueotomía culminates in a traqueostomía. However, it is not appropriate to use the term "traqueostomía" when the procedure concludes with the closure of the planes and does not result in the creation of a stoma. Traqueostomas can be qualified with adjectives indicating permanence (temporary/permanent), size (large/small), shape (round/elliptical), or depth, without being linked to any specific disease or surgical indication. Not all permanent traqueostomas are the result of total laryngectomies, and they do not necessarily have an irreversible character systematically.

Development and Effect Evaluation of an Action-Oriented Interdisciplinary Weaning Protocol for Cuffed Tracheostomy Tubes in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury

The objective was to develop an interdisciplinary weaning protocol (IWP) for patients with tracheostomy tubes due to acquired brain injury, and to effect evaluate implementation of the IWP on decannulation rates and weaning duration. An expert panel completed a literature review in 2018 to identify essential criteria in the weaning process. Based on consensus and availability in clinical practice, criteria for guiding the weaning process were included in the protocol. Using the IWP, dysphagia is graded as either severe, moderate, or mild. The weaning process is guided through a protocol which specified the daily duration of cuff deflation until decannulation, along with recommendations for treatment and rehabilitation interventions. Data from 337 patient records (161 before and 176 after implementation) were included for effect evaluation. Decannulation rate during hospitalization was unchanged at 91% vs. 90% before and after implementation (decannulation rate at 60 days was 68% vs. 74%). After implementation, the weaning duration had decreased compared to before implementation, hazard ratio 1.309 (95%CI: 1.013; 1.693), without any increased risk of tube-reinsertion or pneumonia. Furthermore, a tendency toward decreased length of stay was seen with median 102 days (IQR: 73-138) and median 90 days (IQR: 58-119) (p = 0.061) before and after implementation, respectively. Scientific debate on weaning protocols for tracheostomy tubes are encouraged.

Tracheostomy decannulation in severe acquired brain injury patients: The role of flexible bronchoscopy

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Subjects with severe acquired brain injury (sABI) require long-term mechanical ventilation and, as a consequence, the tracheostomy tube stays in place for a long time. In this observational study, we investigated to what extent the identification of late tracheostomy complications by flexible bronchoscopy (FBS) might guide clinicians in the treatment of tracheal lesions throughout the weaning process and lead to successful decannulation.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

One hundred and ninety-four subjects with sABI admitted to our rehabilitation unit were enrolled in the study. All subjects received FBS and tracheal lesions were treated either by choosing a more suitable tracheostomy tube, or by laser therapy, or by steroid therapy, or by a combination of the above treatments.

RESULTS

Overall, 122 subjects (63%) were decannulated successfully. Our subjects received 495 FBSs (2.55 per subject) and as many as 270 late tracheostomy complications were identified. At least one complication was found in 160 subjects (82%). In only 11 subjects, late tracheostomy complications did not respond to the treatment and were the cause of decannulation failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, in sABI patients FBS is able to guide successful tracheostomy weaning in the presence of late tracheostomy complications that could get in the way decannulation.

A Study of Difficulty in Decannulation of Tracheostomized Head Injury Patients

A prospective observational study was done with the aim to analyze the difficulties during decannulation of tracheostomized head injury patients and to devise a sound protocol for decannulation. It was done over 2 years in a tertiary care Army Hospital with 40 tracheostomized head injury cases in the age group of 10-70 years. Once the indication of tracheostomy was over, their Glasgow Coma Scale score, airway adequacy, phonation, swallowing, cough reflex, and lung pathology were assessed. Fit patients were decannulated if they tolerated tube capping for 3 days. Data was statistically analyzed. Road traffic accident was the cause of head injury in 90% cases. 45% patients had traumatic brain injury. All the cases required ventilatory support. 80% patients required neurosurgery. Tracheostomy was done between 5th to 10th day. Decannulation could be achieved in 75% patients. Factors like neurological status, duration of ventilatory need, number of days on T piece, cough reflex, suction requirement, phonation, consistency of tracheal secretion, lung condition, and three days? capping of tracheostomy tube were significantly associated with outcome of decannulation trial (p <0.05). Factors like mode of injury, neurosurgical intervention, absence of phonation, and downsizing of tube did not affect the outcome significantly (p >0.05). The factors like strong cough reflex, thin minimal tracheal secretion, aspiration free swallowing, better GCS score, early weaning from ventilator and younger age favour early successful decannulation. Gradual downsizing of tube or presence of phonation are not essential prerequisites for decannulation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03504-y.

Does a decannulation protocol exist in COVID-19 patients? The importance of working in a multiprofessional team

As a Covid Hub in Emilia Romagna, we have experienced an increasing number of tracheostomized patients, prompting us to develop a standardized decannulation protocol for COVID-19 ARDS patients. Currently, there are no guidelines or protocols for decannulation in this population, and few studies have investigated the early outcomes of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients, with no detailed analysis of the decannulation process. We recognized the importance of mutual reliance among our team members and the significant achievements we made compared to previous decannulation methods. Through the optimization of the decannulation process, we identified a clear, safe, and repeatable method based on clinical best practice and literature evidence. We decided to implement an existing standardized decannulation protocol, which was originally designed for severe brain-damaged patients, due to the growing number of COVID-19 patients with tracheostomy. This protocol was designed for daily practice and aimed to provide a uniform approach to using devices like fenestrated cannulas, speaking valves, and capping. The results of our implementation include:expanding the applicability of the protocol beyond severe brain-damaged patients to different populations and settings (in this case, patients subjected to a long period of sedation and invasive ventilation)early activation of speech therapy to facilitate weaning from the cannula and recovery of physiological swallowing and phonationearly activation of otolaryngologist evaluation to identify organic problems related to prolonged intubation, tracheostomy, and ventilation and address proper speech therapy treatmentactivation of more fluid and effective management paths for decannulation with a multiprofessional team.

Functional Laryngeal Assessment in Patients with Tracheostomy Following COVID-19 a Prospective Cohort Study

To explore laryngeal function of tracheostomised patients with COVID-19 in the acute phase, to identify ways teams may facilitate and expedite tracheostomy weaning and rehabilitation of upper airway function. Consecutive tracheostomised patients underwent laryngeal examination during mechanical ventilation weaning. Primary outcomes included prevalence of upper aerodigestive oedema and airway protection during swallow, tracheostomy duration, ICU frailty scores, and oral intake type. Analyses included bivariate associations and exploratory multivariable regressions. 48 consecutive patients who underwent tracheostomy insertion as part of their respiratory wean following invasive ventilation in a single UK tertiary hospital were included. 21 (43.8%) had impaired airway protection on swallow (PAS ≥ 3) with 32 (66.7%) having marked airway oedema in at least one laryngeal area. Impaired airway protection was associated with longer total artificial airway duration (p = 0.008), longer tracheostomy tube duration (p = 0.007), multiple intubations (p = 0.006) and was associated with persistent ICU acquired weakness at ICU discharge (p = 0.03). Impaired airway protection was also an independent predictor for longer tracheostomy tube duration (p = 0.02, Beta 0.38, 95% CI 2.36 to 27.16). The majority of our study patients presented with complex laryngeal findings which were associated with impaired airway protection. We suggest a proactive standardized scoring and review protocol to manage this complex group of patients in order to maximize health outcomes and ICU resources. Early laryngeal assessment may facilitate weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation and liberation from tracheostomy, as well as practical and objective risk stratification for patients regarding decannulation and feeding.

Good outcome of tracheostomy in a COVID-19 child with Joubert syndrome-Case report

Pediatric tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients is a rarity. Joubert syndrome is a rare genetic disease, involving a lack of muscle control. We report the case of a child with Joubert syndrome and a severe form of COVID-19 infection, in whom we performed tracheostomy in order to replace prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation; successful decannulation was performed after 12 months. Successful decannulation is still possible in a child with severe comorbidities (Joubert syndrome) even if it might take much longer than in patients without comorbidities.

The impact of early surgical treatment of tracheal stenosis on neurorehabilitation outcome in patients with severe acquired brain injury

INTRODUCTION

Acquired tracheal stenosis (TS) is a potentially life-threatening condition following prolonged intubation and/or tracheostomy in adult patients with severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI), requiring a tracheal resection and reconstruction.

METHODS

We included 38 sABI adult patients with TS, admitted at a post-acute Neurorehabilitation Hospital. Disability Rating Scale (DRS) and other functional assessment measures were recorded at admission (t₁), before TS surgical treatment (t₂), and at discharge (t₃). Patients were defined as 'improved' when they changed from a more severe to a less severe disability, between time t₂ and time t₃, and as "not improved" when they did not show any further improvement between t₂ and t₃, or they already exhibited a disability improvement since time interval t₁-t₂.

RESULTS

Time interval between the injury onset and TS surgical treatment (t₂-t₀) was associated with the patient's disability improvement, suggesting the t₂-t₀ time interval ≤ 115 days as a cutoff value for a possible functional recovery. A t₂-t₀ time interval ≤ 170 days is also associated to absence of persistent dysphagia.

CONCLUSIONS

Early TS surgical treatment within 115 days from the injury onset contributes to the improvement of the disability level in patients with sABI, optimizing their functional outcomes and recovery potential.

How the work of respiratory physiotherapists changes the tracheostomy management and decannulation in a NICU department: an Italian experience

Tracheotomy is a clinical procedure that is often necessary though not without complications, hence the need for appropriate and timely decannulation. The inclusion of trained respiratory physiotherapists (RPT) in the staff and the use of shared protocols could help the team to manage the patient with tracheotomy cannula. The objective of this study was to describe the difference in the rate of decannulation and clinical outcomes of tracheostomized patients admitted to a NeuroIntensive Care Unit (NICU) team after the inclusion of a group of physiotherapists specialized in respiratory physiotherapy and a new phoniatric protocol. It is a 6-year retrospective study, in which two periods of 3 years each were compared: in the first period (P1: September 2013-August 2016) physiotherapists were called to treat NICU patients on a consultative basis (2 hours/day for 5 days a week); in the second period (P2: September 2016-August 2019) two full-time respiratory physiotherapists were present on the ward (7 hours/day, 6/7 days/week). In P2 period, a decannulation protocol was used. Patients who had undergone a tracheotomy procedure and who were alive at the time of discharge were retrospectively evaluated. We described the number of decannulations, the length of stay in NICU and decannulation time; the diagnosis of decannulated patients and the number of deaths. 928 total patients were analysed: 468 in P1, 460 in P2. Total length of stay or number of deaths did not change significantly between the two periods, while the number of decannulated patients before the discharge was higher in P2 143 (64%), compared with P1 79 (36%) p<0.001. More patients with neurological pathologies involving possible swallowing disorders, such as cerebral haemorrhage, head trauma and stroke, have been successfully decannulated in P2 than in P1 (120 patients in P2 vs 54 in P1). A multidisciplinary approach, including respiratory physiotherapist, dedicated to tracheostomy management, decannulation and early mobilization in NICU is safe, feasible and seems to improve the number of severe patients decannulated, even if no change was observed in NICU length of stay or deaths. Further studies must confirm our results in other ICU settings.

Development of the Tracheostomy Well-Being Score in critically ill patients

PURPOSE

Little attention has been given to understanding the experiences and perceptions of tracheostomized patients. This study aimed to measure the impact of tracheostomy on well-being in critically ill patients with the development of the Tracheostomy Well-Being Score (TWBS).

METHODS

This is a prospective, monocentric, observational study including critically ill patients with a tracheostomy without delirium. A 25-item questionnaire with items from six categories (respiration, coughing, pain, speaking, swallowing, and comfort) was used to select the 12 best items (two per category) to form the TWBS score after testing on two consecutive days. Item selection secured (1) that there were no skewed response distributions, (2) high stability from day 1 to day 2, and (3) high prototypicality for the category in terms of item-total correlation.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients with a mean age of 56 years were included. The 12 items of the TWBS were characterized by a high retest reliability (τ = 0.67-0.93) and acceptable internal consistency. The overlap with the clinician rating was low, suggesting that acquiring self-report data is strongly warranted.

CONCLUSION

With the TWBS, an instrument is available for the assessment of the subjective effects a tracheostomy has on in critically ill patients. The score potentially offers a chance to increase well-being of these patients. Additionally, this score could also increase their quality of life by improving tracheostomy and weaning management.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register Identifier DRKS00022073 (2020/06/02).

Incidence, causes, and predictors of unsuccessful decannulation following prolonged weaning

Background

Liberation from prolonged tracheostomy ventilation involves ventilator weaning and removal of the tracheal cannula (referred to as decannulation). This study evaluated the incidence, causes, and predictors of unsuccessful decannulation following prolonged weaning.

Methods

Observational retrospective cohort study of 532 prolonged mechanically ventilated, tracheotomized patients treated at a specialized weaning center between June 2013 and January 2021. We summarized the causes for unsuccessful decannulations and used a binary logistic regression analysis to derive and validate associated predictors.

Results

Failure to decannulate occurred in 216 patients (41%). The main causes were severe intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired dysphagia (64%), long-term ventilator dependence following weaning failure (41%), excessive respiratory secretions (12%), unconsciousness (4%), and airway obstruction (3%). Predictors of unsuccessful decannulation from any cause were age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.04 year^-1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.06; p < 0.01], body mass index [0.96 kg/m² (0.93-1.00); p = 0.027], Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score [1.05 (1.00-1.10); p = 0.036], pre-existing non-invasive home ventilation [3.57 (1.51-8.45); p < 0.01], percutaneous tracheostomies [0.49 (0.30-0.80); p < 0.01], neuromuscular diseases [4.28 (1.21-15.1); p = 0.024], and total mechanical ventilation duration [1.02 day^-1 (1.01-1.02); p < 0.01]. Regression models examined in subsets of patients with severe dysphagia and long-term ventilator dependence as the main reason for failure revealed little overlapping among predictors, which even showed opposite effects on the outcome. The application of non-invasive ventilation as a weaning technique contributed to successful decannulation in 96 of 221 (43%) long-term ventilator-dependent patients following weaning failure.

Conclusion

Failure to decannulate after prolonged weaning occurred in 41%, mainly resulting from persistent ICU-acquired dysphagia and long-term ventilator dependence following weaning failure, each associated with its own set of predictors.

Successful decannulation of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: A scoping review

Context: Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) often require tracheostomy as an immediate life-saving measure. Successful decannulation, or removal of the tracheostomy, improves patient quality of life, function, and physical appearance and is considered an important rehabilitative milestone for SCI patients.Objective: We sought to synthesize the existing published literature on SCI patients undergoing decannulation.Methods: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched through July 2, 2019 using appropriate keywords and MeSH terms pertaining to tracheostomy and SCI. Searches were human-subject only without language restrictions. Published literature discussing the outcomes of SCI patients who underwent decannulation were screened using inclusion/exclusion criteria determined a priori and reviewed.Results: Twenty-six publications were eligible for review and synthesis out of 1,493 unique articles. Over half of the studies were retrospective case series or reports. The research was nearly all published within the fields of physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, and pulmonary/critical care. Three themes emerged from review: (1) interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary tracheostomy team management to optimize decannulation processes, (2) non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilatory support instead of tracheostomy-based ventilator support, and (3) wide variation in the reporting of post-decannulation clinical outcomes.Conclusion: Published research lacks a consistent taxonomy for reporting post-decannulation outcomes in SCI patients. Non-invasive ventilation research could benefit many SCI patients but has been studied in depth primarily by a single authorship group. Further investigation into the socioeconomic and fiscal impact on tracheostomies on SCI patients is warranted.

Gram-negative multidrug-resistant organisms were dominant in neurorehabilitation ward patients in a general hospital in southwest China

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of and risk factors for multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) infection in the rehabilitation ward of a general hospital in Southwest China. We analyzed rehabilitation patients with nosocomial infections caused by MDROs from June 2016 to June 2020. MDRO infection pathogens and associated antibiotic resistance were calculated. Possible risk factors for MDRO-related infection in the neurorehabilitation ward were analyzed using chi-square, and logistic regression. A total of 112 strains of MDRO were found positive from 96 patients. The MDRO test-positive rate was 16.70% (96/575). Ninety-five MDRO strains were detected in sputum, of which 84.82% (95/112) were gram-negative bacteria. Acinetobacter baumannii (A. Baumannii), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), and Klebsiella pneumonia (K. pneumonia) were the most frequently isolated MDRO strains. The logistic regression model and multifactorial analysis showed that long-term (≥ 7 days) antibiotic use (OR 6.901), history of tracheotomy (OR 4.458), and a low albumin level (< 40 g/L) (OR 2.749) were independent risk factors for the development of MDRO infection in patients in the rehabilitation ward (all P < 0.05). Gram-negative MRDOs were dominant in rehabilitation ward patients. Low albumin, history of a tracheostomy, and long-term use of antibiotics were independent risk factors for MRDO infection and are worthy of attention.

Tracheostomy Decannulation and Disorders of Consciousness Evolution

BACKGROUND

Tracheostomy is a frequent surgical procedure in subjects with chronic disorders of consciousness (DOC). There is no consensus about safety of tracheostomy decannulation in this population.The aim of our study was to estimate if DOC improvement is a predictor for tracheostomy decannulation. Secondary outcomes include mortality rate and discharge destination.

METHODS

We conducted an observational, retrospective, case-control study at a weaning and rehabilitation center (WRC). We included tracheostomized subjects with DOC admitted between August 2015 and December 2017. We matched groups based on the consciousness level at admission assessed withthe coma recovery scale revised (CRS-R). Subjects who were later decannulated formed the cases, while those that remained tracheostomized at the end of follow-up formed the controls. Improvement of DOC was defined as a progress in the categories of the CRS-R.

RESULTS

22 subjects were included in each group. No significant differences were found in clinical and demographic variables, except that controls had longer neurologic injury evolution (65.5 vs 51 days, P = .047), more tracheostomy days at admission to ourinstitution (53 vs 33.5, P = .02), and higher prevalence of neurological comorbidities (12 vs 4, P = .03). Subjects who improved their DOC had more chances of being decannulated (OR 11.28, 95% CI 1.96-123.08). Tracheostomy decannulation could not be achieved in most subjects who did not improve from vegetative state (VS) (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.60). 8 subjects, however, could be decannulated in VS, with only one decannulation failure and no deaths. Mortality was higher in controls (0 vs 6, P = .02), especially among VS (0 vs 5, P = .049). No significant differences were found in discharge destination between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects who improve their DOC are more likely to achieve tracheostomy decannulation. Some subjects in VS were decannulated, with lower mortality than those who remained tracheostomized.

Decannulation: a retrospective cohort study of clinical and swallowing indicators of success

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical and swallowing indicators related to a successful decannulation process during the hospital stay.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort clinical study. The study sample comprised a heterogeneous patient population who had submitted to a tracheostomy procedure in a tertiary hospital. Patients were divided into two groups (decannulated vs. non-decannulated) and compared not only in terms of demographic and clinical data but also the results of a swallowing assessment and intervention outcome.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were included in the present study: 25 (39%) who had been successfully decannulated, and 39 (61%) who could not be decannulated. Between-group comparisons indicated that both groups presented similar clinical and demographic characteristics. The groups also presented similar swallowing assessment results prior to intervention. However, significant differences were observed regarding the time to begin swallowing rehabilitation. The decannulated group was assessed nine days earlier than the non-decannulated group. Other significant differences included the removal of the alternate feeding method (72.0% of decannulated patients vs. 5.1% of non-decannulated patients) and the reintroduction of oral feeding (96.0% of decannulated patients vs. 41.0% of non-decannulated patients) and functional swallowing level at patient disclosure. The non-decannulated patient group presented higher death rates at disclosure.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study indicated that the following parameters were associated with a successful decannulation process: early swallowing assessment, swallowing rehabilitation, and improvement in the swallowing functional level during the hospital stay. The maintenance of low swallowing functional levels was found to be negatively associated with successful decannulation.

An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Management of Individuals with Tracheostomy

BACKGROUND

Study objectives were to identify the proportion of tracheostomy subjects with successful decannulation, time to decannulation after ICU discharge, and predictors of long-term tracheostomy based on an interdisciplinary team approach.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study recruited all adult tracheostomy patients admitted between January 2016 and December 2018. Long-term tracheostomy patients with recurrent admissions and compromised airway and patients with neck tumors obstructing the airway were excluded. Data regarding subjects' demographics, comorbidities, Glasgow coma score (GCS), feeding, ICU discharge date, decannulation date, and outcome were collected. The interdisciplinary team members included tracheostomy resource nurse; respiratory therapist; speech clinician; ear, nose, and throat specialist; and rehab medicine specialist.

RESULTS

Of the 221 subjects followed during the study period, 16% (36/221) were excluded, and the remaining 84% (185/221) underwent the decannulation protocol. Subjects who failed capping multiple times 114/185 (62%) were labeled long term and did not progress to decannulation. We successfully decannulated 71/185 subjects (38%), and none developed decannulation failure. Forty deaths occurred during hospitalization, but none was due to tracheostomy complications. The median time to decannulation after ICU discharge was 47 d. Predictors of long-term tracheostomy were GCS < 11 (odds ratio [OR] 5.6 [95% CI 2.7-12.0]), age ≥ 65 y (OR 4.5 [95% CI (2.1-10.0]), comorbidities ≥ 2 (OR 4.0 [95% CI 1.5-11.2]), and female sex (OR 3.0 [95% CI 1.3-7.4]). The proportion of subjects with long-term tracheostomy significantly increased with the total number of predictors (Fisher exact test, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term tracheostomy was a common outcome among subjects with a tracheostomy. Older age, low GCS, female gender, and the number of comorbidities were significant long-term tracheostomy predictors. Further studies to assess outcomes and predictors of tracheostomy are needed.

External Validation and Calibration of the DecaPreT Prediction Model for Decannulation in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury

We propose a new set of clinical variables for a more accurate early prediction of safe decannulation in patients with severe acquired brain injury (ABI), during a post-acute rehabilitation course. Starting from the already validated DecaPreT scale, we tested the accuracy of new logistic regression models where the coefficients of the original predictors were reestimated. Patients with tracheostomy were retrospectively selected from the database of the neurorehabilitation unit at the S. Anna Institute of Crotone, Italy. New potential predictors of decannulation were screened from variables collected on admission during clinical examination, including (a) age at injury, (b) coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-r) scores, and c) length of ICU period. Of 273 patients with ABI (mean age 53.01 years; 34% female; median DecaPreT = 0.61), 61.5% were safely decannulated before discharge. In the validation phase, the linear logistic prediction model, created with the new multivariable predictors, obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.901. Our model improves the reliability of simple clinical variables detected at the admission of the post-acute phase in predicting decannulation of ABI patients, thus helping clinicians to plan better rehabilitation.

Tracheostomy, ventilatory wean, and decannulation in COVID-19 patients

PURPOSE

COVID-19 patients requiring mechanical ventilation can overwhelm existing bed capacity. We aimed to better understand the factors that influence the trajectory of tracheostomy care in this population to facilitate capacity planning and improve outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study of patients in a high-volume centre in the worst-affected region of the UK including all patients that underwent tracheostomy for COVID-19 pneumonitis ventilatory wean from 1st March 2020 to 10th May 2020. The primary outcome was time from insertion to decannulation. The analysis utilised Cox regression to account for patients that are still progressing through their tracheostomy pathway.

RESULTS

At the point of analysis, a median 21 days (IQR 15-28) post-tracheostomy and 39 days (IQR 32-45) post-intubation, 35/69 (57.4%) patients had been decannulated a median of 17 days (IQR 12-20.5) post-insertion. The overall median age was 55 (IQR 48-61) with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. In Cox regression analysis, FiO2 at tracheostomy ≥ 0.4 (HR 1.80; 95% CI 0.89-3.60; p = 0.048) and last pre-tracheostomy peak cough flow (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.78-4.45; p = 0.001) were independent variables associated with prolonged time to decannulation.

CONCLUSION

Higher FiO2 at tracheostomy and higher pre-tracheostomy peak cough flow are associated with increased delay in COVID-19 tracheostomy patient decannulation. These finding comprise the most comprehensive report of COVID-19 tracheostomy decannulation to date and will assist service planning for future peaks of this pandemic.

Prediction of successful de-cannulation of tracheostomised patients in medical intensive care units

Background

Limited data are available on practical predictors of successful de-cannulation among the patients who undergo tracheostomies. We evaluated factors associated with failed de-cannulations to develop a prediction model that could be easily be used at the time of weaning from MV.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort of 346 tracheostomised patients managed by a standardized de-cannulation program, multivariable logistic regression analysis identified variables that were independently associated with failed de-cannulation. Based on the logistic regression analysis, the new predictive scoring system for successful de-cannulation, referred to as the DECAN score, was developed and then internally validated.

Results

The model included age > 67 years, body mass index < 22 kg/m², underlying malignancy, non-respiratory causes of mechanical ventilation (MV), presence of neurologic disease, vasopressor requirement, and presence of post-tracheostomy pneumonia, presence of delirium. The DECAN score was associated with good calibration (goodness-of-fit, 0.6477) and discrimination outcomes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.890, 95% CI 0.853–0.921). The optimal cut-off point for the DECAN score for the prediction of the successful de-cannulation was ≤ 5 points, and was associated with the specificities of 84.6% (95% CI 77.7–90.0) and sensitivities of 80.2% (95% CI 73.9–85.5).

Conclusions

The DECAN score for tracheostomised patients who are successfully weaned from prolonged MV can be computed at the time of weaning to assess the probability of de-cannulation based on readily available variables.

The tracheotomy tube weaning in patients with severe acquired brain injury: comparison of two operative procedures in a postacute rehabilitation hospital

BACKGROUND

Despite the high frequency of tracheotomy in severe acquired brain injury (sABI) patients, available literature about the weaning procedure is mainly represented by expert opinions with no standardized and evidence-based criteria.

AIM

The Institute of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine "Gervasutta" adopted a new decannulation procedure, recommended by the Italian Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (SIMFER). This study evaluates whether the new procedure helps to improve the decannulation process of sABI patients.

DESIGN

A prospective observational with historical control was performed by dividing sABI patients into two groups depending on whether they were treated with or without the new procedure.

SETTING

The Department of Neurorehabilitation of the Institute of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine "Gervasutta" in Udine, Italy.

POPULATION

sABI patients with tracheal cannula admitted to the Institute of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine "Gervasutta" from January 2015 to March 2019.

METHODS

Clinical data were collected as both process and outcome indicators before and after the adoption of the new procedure. Data have been processed with Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis (SISA; Irving, TX, USA) software.

RESULTS

A sample of 141 patients was analysed. Among the 141 patients, 57 (40.4%) were treated with the new procedure. No differences were found between the two groups in terms of complications, functional independence measure (FIM), or level of cognitive functioning (LCF) at the admission. When the new procedure was applied, the decannulation rate was significantly higher (OR=1.8; 95% CI=1.2-9.8; P=0.01) and the time (days) between admission and oral feeding resumption was significantly lower (P<0.001; 95% CI=-10, -34 days).

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of the new protocol allowed the safe achievement of both oral feeding resumption and decannulation, which are two of the main early rehabilitation goals.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

The standardization of the decannulation process has determined the achievement of a significantly faster oral feeding resumption and an increase in the decannulation rate during the rehabilitation of sABI patients.

Value of endoscopic examination of airways and swallowing in tracheostomy decannulation

Background

Tracheostomy decannulation decision is the major challenge in the clinical management of tracheostomy patients. Little evidence is available to guide the weaning process and optimal timing of tracheostomy tube removal. The purpose of the study was to investigate the value of endoscopic assessment in the tracheostomy decannulation decision.

Results

The study included 154 tracheostomized adult patients. Bedside assessment was done for 112 patients, and the other 42 patients were deceased. The results of bedside assessment lead to successful decannulation in 18 patients (16%), while 94 patients (84%) were unfit for decannulation. The most common cause of unfitness was aspiration and poor swallowing in 41% of patients. The endoscopic assessment was done for 59 patients out of 94 patients that were unfit for decannulation; thirteen patients of them were fit for decannulation (22%). The final status of the patients before discharge was decannulated in 31 cases and 81 patients were discharged with a tracheostomy.

Conclusions

The results indicated the importance of endoscopic assessment in the decannulation decision of tracheostomized patients. A large proportion of patients who are unfit for decannulation by bedside assessment could be fit after endoscopic assessment. Endoscopic assessment is essential particularly in tracheostomized patients who have failed to achieve decannulation through conventional protocols.

Tracheostomy decannulation methods and procedures for assessing readiness for decannulation in adults: a systematic scoping review

Despite the undisputable benefits of tracheostomy, it has been reported to have links with impaired communication, reduced quality of life and a risk of health complications such as bleeding, tracheal stenosis and in some cases resulting in mortality. There is a paucity of literature on tracheostomy decannulation methods and procedures, leaving the decision to expert opinion and institutional guidelines. This study aimed to map evidence on methods and procedures of tracheostomy decannulation in adults and assessment of readiness for decannulation, to reveal knowledge gaps and inform further research. We conducted a systematic search of peer reviewed and grey literature on PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Union Catalogue of Theses and Dissertations via SABINET Online, World Cat Dissertations and Theses via OCLC, WHO library and governmental websites from 1985 to present. Following title screening, abstract and full article screening was performed by two independent reviewers guided by the eligibility criteria. Data from included studies were extracted, collated, summarized and synthesized into the following themes: assessment, removal, monitoring and definition of failure of decannulation. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2011. Twenty-five out of 51 screened articles were eligible for data extraction. There was wide variation in the assessment methods employed across and within similar patient groups. The common themes that emerged in the assessment for readiness for decannulation are informed consent, clinical stability, airway patency, physiological decannulation, swallowing assessment, level of consciousness, effectiveness of cough and clearance of secretions. In conclusion, the current body of evidence is inadequate and requires further research, particularly validation of different parameters used. A protocol approach to decannulation may be inappropriate but rather an algorithmic approach using validated parameters.

High-Flow Oxygen with Capping or Suctioning for Tracheostomy Decannulation

BACKGROUND

When patients with a tracheostomy tube reach a stage in their care at which decannulation appears to be possible, it is common practice to cap the tracheostomy tube for 24 hours to see whether they can breathe on their own. Whether this approach to establishing patient readiness for decannulation leads to better outcomes than one based on the frequency of airway suctioning is unclear.

METHODS

In five intensive care units (ICUs), we enrolled conscious, critically ill adults who had a tracheostomy tube; patients were eligible after weaning from mechanical ventilation. In this unblinded trial, patients were randomly assigned either to undergo a 24-hour capping trial plus intermittent high-flow oxygen therapy (control group) or to receive continuous high-flow oxygen therapy with frequency of suctioning being the indicator of readiness for decannulation (intervention group). The primary outcome was the time to decannulation, compared by means of the log-rank test. Secondary outcomes included decannulation failure, weaning failure, respiratory infections, sepsis, multiorgan failure, durations of stay in the ICU and hospital, and deaths in the ICU and hospital.

RESULTS

The trial included 330 patients; the mean (±SD) age of the patients was 58.3±15.1 years, and 68.2% of the patients were men. A total of 161 patients were assigned to the control group and 169 to the intervention group. The time to decannulation was shorter in the intervention group than in the control group (median, 6 days [interquartile range, 5 to 7] vs. 13 days [interquartile range, 11 to 14]; absolute difference, 7 days [95% confidence interval, 5 to 9]). The incidence of pneumonia and tracheobronchitis was lower, and the duration of stay in the hospital shorter, in the intervention group than in the control group. Other secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Basing the decision to decannulate on suctioning frequency plus continuous high-flow oxygen therapy rather than on 24-hour capping trials plus intermittent high-flow oxygen therapy reduced the time to decannulation, with no evidence of a between-group difference in the incidence of decannulation failure. (REDECAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02512744.).

Guidelines for Tracheostomy From the Korean Bronchoesophagological Society

The Korean Bronchoesophagological Society appointed a task force to develop a clinical practice guideline for tracheostomy. The task force conducted a systematic search of the Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to key questions. Evidence-based recommendations for practice were ranked according to the American College of Physicians grading system. An external expert review and a Delphi questionnaire were conducted to reach a consensus regarding the recommendations. Accordingly, the committee developed 18 evidence-based recommendations, which are grouped into seven categories. These recommendations are intended to assist clinicians in performing tracheostomy and in the management of tracheostomized patients.

The role of non-invasive ventilation in weaning and decannulating critically ill patients with tracheostomy: A narrative review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is associated with several complications. Placement of a long-term airway (tracheostomy) is also associated with short and long-term risks for patients. Nevertheless, tracheostomies are placed to help reduce the duration of IMV, facilitate weaning and eventually undergo successful decannulation.

METHODS

We performed a narrative review by searching PubMed, Embase and Medline databases to identify relevant citations using the search terms (with synonyms and closely related words) "non-invasive ventilation", "tracheostomy" and "weaning". We identified 13 publications comprising retrospective or prospective studies in which non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was one of the strategies used during weaning from IMV and/or tracheostomy decannulation.

RESULTS

In some studies, patients with tracheostomies represented a subgroup of patients on IMV. Most of the studies involved patients with underlying cardiopulmonary comorbidities and conditions, and primarily involved specialized weaning centres. Not all studies provided data on decannulation, although those which did, report high success rates for weaning and decannulation when using NIV as an adjunct to weaning patient off ventilatory support. However, a significant percentage of patients still needed home NIV after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The review supports a potential role for NIV in weaning patients with a tracheostomy either off the ventilator and/or with its decannulation. Additional research is needed to develop weaning protocols and better characterize the role of NIV during weaning.

Failure of standard tracheostomy decannulation criteria to detect suprastomal pathology

Meeting established criteria for tracheostomy decannulation should improve success, although there will be a small proportion of patients with a tracheostomy who fail decannulation. Failure rates depend on patient characteristics and disparity between institutional practices and expert opinion. However, there are no widely accepted published failure rates, or agreement on the time-point at which failure is assessed. We present a patient who had evidence of readiness for decannulation, but had immediate failure due to extrinsic tracheal compression, which proved difficult to diagnose and required surgery to resolve. Capping the tracheostomy before decannulation may or may not have given rise to suspicion of potential failure and this practice requires further evaluation as it is not without risk. For subglottic, but suprastomal lesions, nasendoscopy is not of value. It is important to decannulate patients in a safe environment, preferably early in the day to allow post decannulation observations and interventions should they become necessary, and with the close involvement of the multi-professional team. This report illustrates the failure of our standard Tracheostomy decannulation criteria, and direct upper airway view to identify suprastomal tracheal pathology, and we discuss the potential for additional criteria which may have identified the issue before decannulation attempts.

Current Status of Indications, Timing, Management, Complications, and Outcomes of Tracheostomy in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

Tracheostomy is the commonest bedside surgical procedure performed on patients needing mechanical ventilation with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The researchers made an effort to organize a narrative review of the indications, timing, management, complications, and outcomes of tracheostomy in relation to neuronal and brain-injured patients following TBI. The study observations were collated from the published literature, namely original articles, book chapters, case series, randomized studies, systematic reviews, and review articles. Information sorting was restricted to tracheostomy and its association with TBI. Care was taken to review the correlation of tracheostomy with clinical correlates including indications, scheduling, interventions, prognosis, and complications of the patients suffering from mild, moderate and severe TBIs using Glasgow Coma Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale, intraclass correlation coefficient, and other internationally acclaimed outcome scales. Tracheostomy is needed to overcome airway obstruction, prolonged respiratory failure and as indispensable component of mechanical ventilation due to diverse reasons in intensive care unit. Researchers are divided over early tracheostomy or late tracheostomy from days to weeks. The conventional classic surgical technique of tracheostomy has been superseded by percutaneous techniques by being less invasive with lesser complications, classified into early and late complications that may be life threatening. Additional studies have to be conducted to validate and streamline varied observations to frame evidence-based practice for successful weaning and decannulation. Tracheostomy is a safer option in critically ill TBI patients for which a universally accepted protocol for tracheostomy is needed that can help to optimize indications and outcomes.

Expiratory airflow obstruction due to tracheostomy tube: A spirometric study in 50 patients

OBJECTIVES

Tracheostomy is commonly used in intensive care units and in head and neck departments. Airway obstruction due to occluded cuffless tracheostomy tubes themselves remains unknown, although capping trials are commonly used before decannulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent to which airway obstruction can be caused by occluded cuffless tubes in patients who underwent head and neck surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective Research Outcome.

SETTINGS

University teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty patients requiring transient tracheostomy after head and neck surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A flow-volume loop (FVL) through the mouth using a portable spirometer, with the occluded fenestrated cuffless tube, was measured before and immediately after decannulation, by obstructing the orifice of tracheostomy tube. The measurement of FVL recorded the forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁ ), peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory flow at 50% of FVC, peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and forced inspiratory flow at 50% of FVC.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference between all spirometric parameters was found. Mean PEF and PIF, respectively, increased from 2.8 to 4.5 L/s (P < .0001) and 2.3 to 2.7 L/s (P < .01) before and after decannulation, with a strong positive correlation (r = 0.7; P < .05). A mean expiratory (34%) and inspiratory (9%) airflow reduction was observed due to cannula.

CONCLUSIONS

Occluded cuffless tracheostomy tubes cause a dramatic airflow obstruction, mainly in the expiratory phase of FVL. This should be taken into account during capping trials.

Obese Tracheostomy: A Challenging Path From Surgery to Decannulation

PURPOSE

Well-defined or standardized tracheostomy decannulation guidelines are not available, and the long-term data on the outcomes in the obese are limited. The purpose of the present study was to determine the outcomes associated with tracheostomy for obese patients from surgery to decannulation. The specific aims were to measure 1) the rate of successful tracheostomy downsize; 2) the rate of successful tracheostomy decannulation; and 3) the associated pre-, intra-, and postoperative subject variables with tracheostomy downsizing and decannulation success.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was implemented to determine the outcomes associated with downsizing and decannulation after obese tracheostomy. The predictive value of the independent variables from the subjects' pre-, intra-, and postoperative periods were evaluated as they related to successful downsizing and decannulation. The included subjects had undergone tracheostomy from April 2016 to December 2018. The primary outcomes were successful downsizing and successful decannulation. A downsize checklist was created with the following yes/no criteria that should reasonably be met before downsizing a tracheostomy in an obese subject. The secondary analysis was the association between the checklist criteria and successful downsize and decannulation. The data were analyzed using the χ² test, analysis of variance, t test, likelihood ratio, Kaplan-Meier analysis with Cox regression, and logistic binary regression, with statistical significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The study sample included 82 obese subjects (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m²), with a mean age of 55.7 ± 15.0 years; 56% were men. Only 62 of the subjects could be downsized (75.6%) and 39 (47.6%) could be decannulated. The general trend showed that an increased BMI resulted in an increased time to decannulation, long-term tracheostomy dependence, and less successful downsize and decannulation. For patients with a BMI of 30 kg/m² or more, the downsize success rate was 93.5% and the decannulation success rate was 89.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese patients have a greater likelihood of complications and an increased risk of remaining tracheostomy dependent. Consideration of the patient's BMI is crucial when initiating the decannulation progression.

Use of a Silicon Stoma Stent as an Interim Step in High-Risk Tracheostomy Decannulation

Objective

To describe use of a stoma stent to facilitate high-risk decannulation.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of 14 consecutive patients who received a stent from March 2013 to December 2016 at a quaternary health care service. Primary outcome measures were decannulation outcome and adverse events.

Results

Decannulation outcome: 12 of 14 patients had their tracheostomy tube (TT) removal facilitated by stent use. Patients had the stent for a median of 6 days (interquartile range, 49). Reasons for use included medical instability, risk of sputum retention, uncertain airway patency, and the need for ongoing airway access. All patients survived to discharge. One patient residing in the community has retained a stoma stent. Adverse events: One patient removed the stent on the day of insertion, necessitating reinsertion of the TT. Granulation tissue at the stoma site was seen in 2 patients.

Discussion

A tracheostoma will normally close within 48 hours following decannulation, which is problematic if TT reinsertion is required. By using the stent, reversal of decannulation becomes a simple ward-based procedure. In comparison to a TT, which is secured with ties, the stoma stent proved unsuitable for use in an agitated patient.

Implications for Practice

Decreasing total cannulation time is of benefit as patients with tracheostomy are subject to high rates of complications and adverse events. A stoma stent poses little risk and a low morbidity burden to the patient in comparison to alternative management.

The role of polysomnography in decannulation of children with brain and spinal cord injuries

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this retrospective review was to determine the utility of polysomnography (PSG) in influencing the decision to decannulate pediatric patients with brain and spinal cord injuries in an inpatient rehabilitation hospital setting.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2016, data were collected on pediatric patients with brain and/or spinal cord injuries who had PSG performed with the goal of decannulation. Patients underwent a decannulation protocol involving toleration of continuous tracheostomy capping and bedside tracheoscopy by otolaryngology. Decision to decannulate was determined with input from multiple disciplines. Associations were examined between decannulation success and findings on PSG as well as demographic factors, injury characteristics, otolaryngology findings, and timeline from initial injury to selected events.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients underwent PSG, after which 38 (83%) were deemed appropriate and eight (17%) were deemed inappropriate for decannulation. Individuals who were deemed ready for decannulation had significantly lower obstructive apnea hypopnea indexes (AHI) (1.7 vs 5.4 events/h, P = 0.03), respiratory disturbance indexes (RDI) (2.4 vs 7.6 events/h, P = 0.006), and peak end tidal carbon dioxide (CO₂ ) levels (50.0 vs 58.7 torr, P = 0.009) on PSG compared to those who were not decannulated. There were no complications following decannulation prior to discharge.

CONCLUSION

PSG provided important additional information as part of a multidisciplinary team assessment of clinical readiness for decannulation in pediatric patients with brain and spinal cord injuries who underwent a decannulation protocol. Obstructive AHI, RDI, and peak end tidal CO₂ level were associated with successful decannulation prior to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation.

Critérios para decanulação da traqueostomia: revisão de literatura

RESUMO Objetivo Realizar um levantamento bibliográfico a respeito da decanulação da traqueostomia para verificar os fatores e protocolos utilizados em estudos internacionais. Estratégia de pesquisa Estudo de revisão de literatura utilizando a base de dados PubMed com os descritores em língua inglesa “Tracheostomy”, “Weaning”, “Decannulation”, “Removal tube”, “Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences”, “Intensive Care Units”, “Dysphagia”, “Swallowing”, “Deglutition” e “Deglutition Disorders”. Critérios de seleção Estudos publicados nos últimos cinco anos (2012 a 2017), com população acima de 18 anos de idade; pesquisas realizadas somente com seres humanos; artigos publicados em língua inglesa; artigos com acesso completo irrestrito; pesquisas relacionadas aos objetivos do estudo. Análise dos dados foram analisados quanto aos seguintes itens: caracterização da amostra; profissionais envolvidos no processo da decanulação; etapas do processo de decanulação; tempo total em dias de uso da traqueostomia; tempo total em dias para concluir processo de decanulação; fatores de insucesso para conclusão do processo de decanulação. Resultados A maior parte da população estudada foi do gênero masculino e com alterações neurológicas. Dos profissionais envolvidos no processo de decanulação, participaram em ordem decrescente médicos, fonoaudiólogos, fisioterapeutas e enfermeiros. As etapas da decanulação mais citadas foram: avaliação da deglutição; treino de oclusão; avaliação da permeabilidade de passagem do ar; habilidade de manipulação de secreção e troca de cânula; desinsuflação do cuff e treino de tosse; uso de válvula de fala. Além disso, obtiveram-se dados a respeito do tempo total de traqueostomia e de decanulação. Conclusão A presença do fonoaudiólogo é extremamente importante no processo de decanulação, visto que a avaliação da deglutição foi a etapa mais citada nos estudos, sendo esse trabalho realizado em conjunto com médicos e fisioterapeutas.

Development of the Decannulation Prediction Tool in Patients With Dysphagia After Acquired Brain Injury

OBJECTIVES

Patients with acquired brain injuries (ABIs) often need tracheostomy because of dysphagia. However, many of them may recover over time and be eventually decannulated during post-acute rehabilitation. We developed the Decannulation Prediction Tool (DecaPreT) to identify, early in the post-acute course, patients with ABIs who can be safely decannulated.

DESIGN

Nonconcurrent cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients with ABI, as well as with dysphagia and tracheostomy, were retrospectively selected from the database of a neurorehabilitation unit in Correggio, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

MEASURES

Potential bivariate predictors of decannulation were screened from variables collected on admission during clinical examination, conducted by an expert speech therapist. Multivariable prediction was then obtained in 2 separate random subsamples to develop and validate the logistic regression model of the DecaPreT.

RESULTS

Of 463 patients with ABI (mean age 52.2 years) selected, 73.0% could be safely decannulated before discharge. After bivariate screening, multivariable predictors of decannulation were identified in the development subsample and confirmed in the validation subsample, each with its odds ratio and 95% confidence interval as follows: age tertile (1.77, 1.08-2.89; P = .024), no saliva aspiration (3.89, 1.73-8.64; P = .001), pathogenesis of ABI (trauma vs other causes vs stroke vs anoxia: 2.23, 1.41-3.54; P = .001), no vegetative status (8.47; 2.91-24.63; P < .001), and coughing score (voluntary and reflex vs voluntary vs reflex vs neither voluntary nor reflex cough: 2.62, 1.70-4.05; P < .001). In the validation subsample, the predicting equation obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.836.

IMPLICATIONS

The DecaPreT predicts safe decannulation in patients with dysphagia and tracheostomy, using simple clinical variables detected early in the post-acute phase of ABI. The tool can help clinicians choose timing and intensity of rehabilitation interventions and plan discharge.

Early Tracheostomy in Patients With Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Appears Safe and May Improve Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize outcomes associated with tracheostomy timing following traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The morbidity associated with cervical spine trauma is substantially increased in the setting of concomitant CSCI. Despite recent evidence, it remains uncertain if early tracheostomy following traumatic CSCI can improve outcomes.

METHODS

From January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2015, retrospective chart review identified 70 patients who presented to a single Level 1 trauma center with traumatic CSCI and received tracheostomy for management of respiratory compromise. Patients were subdivided into two groups based on time from initial intubation to tracheostomy procedure: early (tracheostomy ≤7 d from initial intubation) and late (>7 d from initial intubation).

RESULTS

This series included 75.7% males and 24.3% females with mean age 50.5 years. A chest injury was present in 31.4% of patients. AIS A was the most common AIS score (41.4%), and 70.1% of patients had an injury level at C4 or above. Early tracheostomy was performed in 52.4% of patients. Factors most predictive of early tracheostomy were more severe AIS score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.72) and higher neurological level of injury (OR = 1.91) (P < 0.001, pseudo-R = 0.241). Controlling for AIS and neurological level of injury, early tracheostomy was associated with fewer ventilator days (23.9 vs. 36.9, P = 0.0268), fewer days to decannulation (53.0 vs. 74.3, P = 0.0075), and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stays (20.7 vs. 26.0, P = 0.0217). Rates of pneumonia, surgical site infection, in-hospital mortality, 90-day mortality, and 90-day readmission rates were not different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Tracheostomy within 7 days of intubation may improve respiratory outcomes in patients with traumatic CSCI, regardless of level or severity of injury, without increasing complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Early Rehabilitation Reduces Time to Decannulation in Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Retrospective Study

Purpose: Early decannulation is considered a main rehabilitative goal in tracheostomized patients. Our aim is to evaluate whether a very early rehabilitation protocol helps to reduce the tracheostomy duration in patients affected by an Acquired Brain Injury (ABI).

Methods: Data about consecutive tracheostomized patients admitted in our Neuro-Rehabilitation Unit (NRU) were retrospectively collected. We defined two groups: Early Rehabilitation Group patients came from our ICU, where they started the rehabilitative treatment; Delayed Rehabilitation Group patients arrived from external ICUs and started rehabilitation in our NRU. Primary outcome was the time from tracheostomy to decannulation. Secondary outcomes were: ICU length of stay, time from NRU admission to decannulation, Glasgow Coma Scale, Coma Recovery Scale revised and Levels of Cognitive Functioning scores at NRU discharge and the re-cannulation rate.

Results: We enrolled 66 patients, 40 in the Early Rehabilitation Group and 26 in the Delayed Rehabilitation Group. 70% of patients for each group could be decannulated (p = 0.73) and were analyzed. Only one patient was re-cannulated. Early Rehabilitation Group showed a shorter tracheostomy duration (61.0 vs. 94.5 days, p = 0.013), a higher probability of occurrence of decannulation (p = 0.008) and a lower ICU length of stay (30.0 vs. 52.0 days, p = 0.001). The time to decannulation in NRU was similar between groups (30.0 vs. 45.50 days, p = 0.14). All the scale scores had a significant improvement in both groups (p < 0.0001 all).

Conclusions: The present study shows that an early neuro-rehabilitation protocol helps to reduce the time to decannulation in tracheostomized patients affected by ABI.

Changes in Swallowing and Cough Functions Among Stroke Patients Before and After Tracheostomy Decannulation

We investigated the functional changes in swallowing and voluntary coughing before and after tracheostomy decannulation among stroke patients who had undergone a tracheostomy. We also compared these functions between stroke patients who underwent tracheostomy tube removal and those who did not within 6 months of their stroke. Seventy-seven stroke patients who had undergone a tracheostomy were enrolled. All patients were evaluated by videofluoroscopic swallowing studies and a peak flow meter through the oral cavity serially until 6 months after their stroke. During the intensive rehabilitation period, if a patient satisfied the criteria for tracheostomy tube removal, the tube was removed. The patients were divided into the 'decannulated' group and the 'non-decannulated' group according to their tracheostomy tube removal status. In the decannulated group, swallowing function did not change before and after tracheostomy decannulation; however, cough function was significantly improved after decannulation. Although both groups exhibited functional improvement in swallowing and coughing over time, the improvement in the decannulated group was more significant than the improvement in the non-decannulated group. Our results revealed that stroke patients who had better functional improvement in swallowing and coughing were more likely to be potential candidates for tracheostomy decannulation. Stroke patients who recovered from neurogenic dysphagia, they were no longer affected by the mechanical effect of the tracheostomy tube on swallowing function. This study suggests that if patients show improvement in swallowing and coughing after their stroke, a multidisciplinary approach to tracheostomy decannulation would be needed to achieve better rehabilitation outcomes.