1
|
Lemke MK, Thiese MS, Hege A, Ogbonnaya UC, Hegmann KT. Metabolic syndrome among commercial truck drivers: The relationship between condition prevalence and crashes. Am J Ind Med 2023; 66:54-64. [PMID: 36268908 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is especially prevalent among US truck drivers. However, there has been limited research exploring associations between MetS conditions with roadway crashes among truck drivers. The objective of this paper is to assess relationships between specific combinations of individual MetS components and crashes and near-misses. METHODS Survey, biometric, and anthropometric data were collected from 817 truck drivers across 6 diverse US states. Survey data focused on demographics and roadway safety outcomes, and anthropometric/biometric data corresponded to five MetS conditions (waist circumference blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol). Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios of lifetime crashes and near-miss 1-month period prevalence associated with: 1) specific MetS conditions regardless of presence or absence of other MetS conditions, and 2) specific MetS conditions and counts of other accompanying MetS conditions. RESULTS Hypertension was the MetS characteristic most strongly associated with lifetime crash and 1-month near-miss outcomes, while high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, and large waist circumference were most commonly present among groups of conditions associated with crashes and near-misses. Overall, an increasing number of specific co-occurring MetS conditions were associated with higher reporting of roadway crashes. CONCLUSIONS Specific combinations and higher prevalence of MetS conditions were associated with increased frequency of reported crashes. Moreover, when the co-occurrence of MetS conditions is aggregated, a dose-response relationship with crashes appears. These results suggest that policy changes and interventions addressing MetS may increase driver health and reduce crash risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Lemke
- Department of Social Sciences, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew S Thiese
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, University of Utah and Weber State University, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Adam Hege
- Department of Public Health & Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA
| | - Uchenna C Ogbonnaya
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, University of Utah and Weber State University, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kurt T Hegmann
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, University of Utah and Weber State University, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang R, Kapellusch JM, Hegmann KT, Thiese MS, Wang I, Merryweather AS. Evaluating Different Measures of Low Back Pain Among U.S. Manual Materials Handling Workers: Comparisons of Demographic, Psychosocial, and Job Physical Exposure. HUMAN FACTORS 2022; 64:973-996. [PMID: 33300376 DOI: 10.1177/0018720820971101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine differences in demographic, psychosocial, and job physical exposure risk factors between multiple low back pain (LBP) outcomes in a prospective cohort of industrial workers. BACKGROUND LBP remains a leading cause of lost industrial productivity. Different case definitions involving pain (general LBP), medication use (M-LBP), seeking healthcare (H-LBP), and lost time (L-LBP) are often used to study LBP outcomes. However, the relationship between these outcomes remains unclear. METHOD Demographic, health status, psychosocial, and job physical exposure risk factors were quantified for 635 incident-eligible industrial workers. Incident cases of LBP outcomes and pain symptoms were quantified and compared across the four outcomes. RESULTS Differences in age, gender, medical history, and LBP history were found between the four outcomes. Most incident-eligible workers (67%) suffered an LBP outcome during follow-up. Cases decreased from 420 for LBP (25.4 cases/100 person-years) to 303 for M-LBP (22.0 cases/100 person-years), to 151 for H-LBP (15.6 cases/100 person-years), and finally to 56 for L-LBP (8.7 cases/100 person-years). Conversely, pain intensity and duration increased from LBP to H-LBP. However, pain duration was relatively lower for L-LBP than for H-LBP. CONCLUSION Patterns of cases, pain intensity, and pain duration suggest the influence of the four outcomes. However, few differences in apparent risk factors were observed between the outcomes. Further research is needed to establish consistent case definitions. APPLICATION Knowledge of patterns between different LBP outcomes can improve interpretation of research and guide future research and intervention studies in industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruoliang Tang
- 12530 Sichuan University-Pittsburgh Institute, Chengdu, China
- 14751 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA
| | | | | | | | - Inga Wang
- 14751 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pagé GM, Lacasse A, Beaudet N, Choinière M, Deslauriers S, Diatchenko L, Dupuis L, Grégoire S, Hovey R, Leclair E, Leonard G, Meloto CB, Montagna F, Parent A, Rainville P, Roy JS, Roy M, Ware MA, Wideman TH, Stone LS. The Quebec Low Back Pain Study: a protocol for an innovative 2-tier provincial cohort. Pain Rep 2020; 5:e799. [PMID: 32072095 PMCID: PMC7004506 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The neurobiological mechanisms underlying recovery from or persistence of low back pain (LBP) remain misunderstood, limiting progress toward effective management. We have developed an innovative two-tier design to study the transition from acute to chronic LBP. The objective of the first tier is to create a provincial web-based infrastructure to recruit and monitor the trajectory of individuals with acute LBP. The objective of the second tier is to fuel hypothesis-driven satellite data collection centers with specialized expertise to study the role of biomechanical, epigenetic, genetic, neuroanatomical, ontological, physiological, psychological, and socioeconomic factors in LBP chronicity. METHODS This article describes the first tier of the protocol: establishment of the Core Dataset and Cohort. Adults with acute LBP will be recruited through networks, media, and health care settings. A web-based interface will be used to collect self-reported variables at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Acute LBP will be defined according to the Dionne 2008 consensus. Measurements will include the Canadian minimum data set for chronic LBP research, DN4 for neuropathic pain, comorbidities, EQ-5D-5L for quality of life, and linkage with provincial medico-administrative databases. The primary outcome will be the transition to chronic LBP, as defined by Deyo 2014. Secondary outcomes include health care resource utilization, disability, sick leave, mood, and quality of life. PERSPECTIVE This study brings together diverse research expertise to investigate the transition from acute to chronic LBP, characterize the progression to recovery or chronicity, and identify patterns associated with that progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle M. Pagé
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Anaïs Lacasse
- Départment des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, QC, Canada
| | - the Quebec Back Pain Consortium (in alphabetical order)
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Départment des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, QC, Canada
- Quebec Pain Research Network, QC, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS, CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada
- Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Center on Aging, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Estrie—Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie—CHUS), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Stomatology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central (GRSNC), and Centre de recherche en Neuropsychologie et Cognition (CERNEC), Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nicolas Beaudet
- Quebec Pain Research Network, QC, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Sherbrooke (CRCHUS), Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Manon Choinière
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Simon Deslauriers
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS, CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Luda Diatchenko
- Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada
- Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Laurent Dupuis
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Stéphanie Grégoire
- Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada
- Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Richard Hovey
- Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada
- Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Erwan Leclair
- Quebec Pain Research Network, QC, Canada
- Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada
| | - Guillaume Leonard
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Center on Aging, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Estrie—Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie—CHUS), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Carolina B. Meloto
- Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada
- Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francesca Montagna
- Alan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), QC, Canada
- Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Pierre Rainville
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Stomatology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central (GRSNC), and Centre de recherche en Neuropsychologie et Cognition (CERNEC), Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Sébastien Roy
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS, CIUSSS-CN), Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Mathieu Roy
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark A. Ware
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Timothy H. Wideman
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Laura S. Stone
- Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, CIUSSS Centre-sud-de-l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Thiese MS, Hegmann KT, Wood EM, Garg A, Moore JS, Kapellusch J, Foster J, Ott U. Prevalence of low back pain by anatomic location and intensity in an occupational population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15:283. [PMID: 25146722 PMCID: PMC4153910 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2014] [Accepted: 08/15/2014] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Low Back Pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem, with variation in prevalence. Epidemiological reports of rating of pain intensity and location within the low back area are rare. The objective is to describe LBP in a large, multi-center, occupational cohort detailing both point and 1-month period prevalence of LBP by location and intensity measures at baseline. Methods In this cross-sectional report from a prospective cohort study, 828 participants were workers enrolled from 30 facilities performing a variety of manual material handling tasks. All participants underwent a structured interview detailing pain rating and location. Symptoms in the lower extremities, demographic and other data were collected. Body mass indices were measured. Outcomes are pain rating (0–10) in five defined lumbar back areas (i) LBP in the past month and (ii) LBP on the day of enrollment. Pain ratings were reported on a 0–10 scale and subsequently collapsed with ratings of 1–3, 4–6 and 7–10 classified as low, medium and high respectively. Results 172 (20.8%) and 364 (44.0%) of the 828 participants reported pain on the day of enrollment or within the past month, respectively. The most common area of LBP was in the immediate paraspinal area with 130 (75.6%) participants with point prevalence LBP and 278 (77.4%) with 1-month period prevalence reported having LBP in the immediate paraspinal area. Among those 364 reporting 1-month period prevalence pain, ratings varied widely with 116 (31.9%) reporting ratings classified as low, 170 (46.7%) medium and 78 (21.4%) providing high pain ratings in any location. Among the 278 reporting 1-month period prevalence pain in the immediate paraspinal area, 89 (32.0%) reported ratings classified as low, 129 (46.4%), medium and 60 (21.6%) high pain ratings. Conclusions Pain ratings varied widely, however less variability was seen in pain location, with immediate paraspinal region being the most common. Variations may suggest different etiological factors related to LBP. Aggregation of different locations of pain or different intensities of pain into one binary classification of LBP may result in loss of information which may potentially be useful in prevention or treatment of LBP. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-283) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S Thiese
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational & Environment Health, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 391 Chipeta Way, Suite C, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|