1
|
Whitelaw S, Vijay D, Clark D. Where are the values in evaluating palliative care? Learning from community-based palliative care provision. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2024; 18:26323524241287223. [PMID: 39381713 PMCID: PMC11459518 DOI: 10.1177/26323524241287223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 10/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The World Health Organization Astana Declaration of 2018 sees primary healthcare as key to universal health coverage and gives further support to the goal of building sustainable models of community palliative care. Yet evaluating the benefits of such models continues to pose methodological and conceptual challenges. Objective To explore evaluation issues associated with a community-based palliative care approach in Kerala, India. Design An illuminative case study using a rapid evaluation methodology. Methodology Qualitative interviews, documentary analysis and observations of home care and community organising. Results We appraise a community palliative care programme in Kerala, India, using three linked 'canvases' of enquiry: (1) 'complex' multi-factorial community-based interventions and implications for evaluation; (2) 'axiological' orientations that foreground values in any evaluation process and (3) the status of evaluative evidence in postcolonial contexts. Three values underpinning the care process were significant: heterogeneity, voice and decentralisation. We identify 'objects of interest' related to first-, second- and third-order outcomes: (1) individuals and organisations; (2) unintended targets outside the core domain and (3) indirect, distal effects within and outside the domain. Conclusion We show how evaluation of palliative care in complex community circumstances can be successfully accomplished when attending to the significance of community care values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Whitelaw
- School of Social and Environmental Sustainability, University of Glasgow, Dumfries Campus, Bankend Road, Dumfries, DG1 4ZL, UK
| | - Devi Vijay
- Department of Organizational Behavior, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Kolkata, India
| | - David Clark
- School of Social and Environmental Sustainability, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mondejar-Pont M, Rota-Musoll L, Gómez-Batiste X, Ramon-Aribau A. Assessing Healthcare Integration: An Integrated Palliative Care System in Spain. Int J Integr Care 2024; 24:1. [PMID: 39372516 PMCID: PMC11451549 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.8613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study explored the Osona palliative care system, recognized internationally for its good results in managing the chronic patient. The literature notices a gap of models that evaluate integration in healthcare systems. This study assesses the degree of integration of the Osona palliative care system, as well it implements a model that evaluates integration. Methods This research used a qualitative methodology, involving a case study design with three study phases. The first phase involved reviewing primary sources, followed by conducting interviews. The final phase entailed comparing the findings with a theoretical model to analyse and validate the results. Results The study found the integrative elements that the Osona system includes such as: multidisciplinary teams, leadership and a palliative care system that is cost-efficient. It also found aspects to improve including collaboration, continuity of care, early patient identification and lack of funding. Discussion Our findings suggest that the Osona system has made significant progress toward integration, even though it continues the path of ongoing development in integrated care. Conclusion This research found that the Osona palliative care system includes many integrating aspects such as multidisciplinary teams, leadership and the system's cost-efficiency. Nevertheless, some aspects need changes such as continuity of care, collaboration, enhanced early patient identification and increase funding. Furthermore, this study provides an example of how to assess integration in a system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meritxell Mondejar-Pont
- Research Group Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain
- Institute for Research and Innovation in Life Sciences and Health in Central Catalonia (IRISCC), Vic, Spain
| | - Laura Rota-Musoll
- Research Group Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain
- Institute for Research and Innovation in Life Sciences and Health in Central Catalonia (IRISCC), Vic, Spain
| | - Xavier Gómez-Batiste
- Institute for Research and Innovation in Life Sciences and Health in Central Catalonia (IRISCC), Vic, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain
| | - Anna Ramon-Aribau
- Research Group Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McMillan K, Jyothi Kumar S, Bainbridge D, Kortes-Miller K, Winemaker S, Kilbertus F, Marshall D, Seow H. Increasing interprofessional collaboration in community-based palliative care: a pilot study of the CAPACITI education program for primary care providers. J Interprof Care 2024; 38:799-806. [PMID: 39082237 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2024.2375631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/30/2024]
Abstract
Interprofessional collaboration in palliative care is essential to ensuring high-quality care for seriously ill patients. Education interventions to increase competency in palliative care should incorporate team-building skills to encourage an interprofessional approach. We developed and piloted a virtual educational program named CAPACITI for interprofessional teams to promote a community palliative approach to care. Primary care teams from across Ontario, Canada, participated in CAPACITI which consisted of 10 facilitated sessions that emphasized how to operationalize a palliative care approach as a team. Pre- and post-study questionnaires were completed by each team, including the AITCS-II, a validated instrument that measures interprofessional collaboration. We analyzed individual paired differences in summary scores and in each of three subdomains of the AITCS-II questionnaire: partnership, cooperation, and coordination. Seventeen teams completed the AITCS-II post survey, representing 133 participants. Teams varied demographically and ranged from 5 to 16 members. After CAPACITI, the overall mean AITCS-II summary score among teams increased to 96.0 (SD = 10.0) for a significant paired mean difference increase of 9.4 (p = .03). There were also significant increases in the partnership (p = .01) and in the cooperation subdomains (p = .04). CAPACITI demonstrated the potential for improving collaboration among primary care teams, which can lead to improved provider and patient outcomes in palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla McMillan
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Frances Kilbertus
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Thunder Bay, Canada
| | - Denise Marshall
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Röwer HAA, Herbst FA, Schwabe S. Regional hospice and palliative care networks worldwide: scoping review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024:spcare-2024-004974. [PMID: 38936971 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional hospice and palliative care networks (RHPCNs) are increasingly being established to improve integrative care for patients with life-limiting illnesses. This scoping review aimed at identifying and synthesising international literature on RHPCNs, focusing on structures, outcomes, benefits, success factors and good practices. METHOD Following Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework, a search of four electronic databases (CINAHL, Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection) was conducted on 7 July 2023. Additionally, a manual search of reference lists of the identified articles was performed. Original research, qualification theses and descriptive reports on RHPCNs at a structural level were included. FINDINGS Two researchers analysed 777 article abstracts, screened 104 full texts and selected 24 articles. The included studies predominantly used qualitative designs. RHPCNs self-identify as local stakeholders, employ coordination offices and steering committees, and actively recruit network partners. Outcomes included improved professional practices, enhanced quality of care, increased patient utilisation of regional care offerings and improved patient transitions between care providers. Success factors included clear coordination, transparent communication, strategic planning and resource-securing strategies. CONCLUSIONS The analysis identified key RHPCN success factors such as effective communication and adaptive leadership. Despite the need for further research, the findings emphasise RHPCNs' potential to improve palliative care and encourage policymaker support. OTHER This scoping review is part of the research project HOPAN, which aims at assessing and analysing RHPCNs in Germany. The project is funded by the German Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) (Grant N° 01VSF22042; funding period: 01/2023-12/2024).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna A A Röwer
- Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Franziska A Herbst
- Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Sven Schwabe
- Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matthew M, Bainbridge D, Bishop V, Sinding C, Winemaker S, Kilbertus F, Kortes-Miller K, Seow H. Implementing palliative care education into primary care practice: a qualitative case study of the CAPACITI pilot program. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:143. [PMID: 37759200 PMCID: PMC10537555 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01265-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CAPACITI is a virtual education program that teaches primary care teams how to provide an early palliative approach to care. After piloting its implementation, we conducted an in-depth qualitative study with CAPACITI participants to assess the effectiveness of the components and to understand the challenges and enablers to virtual palliative care education. METHODS We applied a qualitative case study approach to assess and synthesize three sources of data collected from the teams that participated in CAPACITI: reflection survey data, open text survey data, and focus group transcriptions. We completed a thematic analysis of these responses to gain an understanding of participant experiences with the intervention and its application in practice. RESULTS The CAPACITI program was completed by 22 primary care teams consisting of 159 participants across Ontario, Canada. Qualitative data was obtained from all teams, including 15 teams that participated in focus groups and 21 teams that provided reflection survey data on CAPACITI content and how it translated into practice. Three major themes arose from cross-analysis of the data: changes in practice derived from involvement in CAPACITI, utility of specific elements of the program, and barriers and challenges to enacting CAPACITI in practice. Importantly, participants reported that the multifaceted approach of CAPACITI was helpful to them building their confidence and competence in applying a palliative approach to care. CONCLUSIONS Primary care teams perceived the CAPACITI facilitated program as effective towards incorporating palliative care into their practices. CAPACITI warrants further study on a national scale using a randomized trial methodology. Future iterations of CAPACITI need to help mitigate barriers identified by respondents, including team fragmentation and system-based challenges to encourage interprofessional collaboration and knowledge translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Midori Matthew
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Daryl Bainbridge
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Valerie Bishop
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Frances Kilbertus
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | | | - Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bainbridge D, Bishop V, Myers J, Marshall D, Stajduhar K, Seow H. Effectiveness of Training Programs About a Palliative Care Approach: A Systematic Review of Intervention Trials for Health Care Professionals. J Palliat Med 2022; 26:564-581. [PMID: 36378898 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Palliative care (PC) training initiatives have proliferated to assist generalist health care providers (HCPs) develop skills for applying an early PC approach. To date, there is little synthesis of high-level evidence to review the content and effectiveness of these programs. To address this gap in knowledge, we conducted a systematic review of trials of training inventions to build PC competency in HCPs, according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration no. 271741). Materials and Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, HealthSTAR, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Clinical Trials for studies published since 2000. Eligible studies were trials assessing PC training for HCPs. Interventions had to address at least two of six PC-related components, adapted from the National Consensus Project: identification or assessment; illness understanding; symptom management; decision making; coping; and referral. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion, using Rayyan, and extracted relevant data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB2 or ROBINS-I tools. Results: Of 1209 articles reviewed, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria, with the majority being conducted in the United States (n = 9) or Europe (n = 8). Nearly all studies (n = 19) collected data through self-reported surveys; administrative (n = 4), clinical outcomes (n = 4), or interaction analysis (n = 6) data were also or solely used. Interventions featured didactic, skill-based training followed by role-play and/or individual coaching. Communication around illness understanding was the most taught PC component. Few interventions involved comprehensive PC training, with 12 studies representing 3 or less of the 6 framework components. Most studies (n = 16) reported a significant positive impact on at least one outcome, most often HCP self-reported outcomes. Conclusions: While many of these interventions demonstrated improved confidence among HCPs in the PC components taught, findings were mixed on more objective outcome measures. Further trial-based evidence is required on comprehensive PC training to help inform these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Bainbridge
- Department of Oncology and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valerie Bishop
- Department of Oncology and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeff Myers
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Denise Marshall
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelli Stajduhar
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seow H, Bainbridge D, Stajduhar K, Marshall D, Howard M, Brouwers M, Barwich D, Burge F, Kelley ML. Building Palliative Care Capacity for Generalist Providers in the Community: Results From the Capaciti Pilot Education Program. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2022:10499091221134709. [PMID: 36269212 DOI: 10.1177/10499091221134709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Primary care providers play an important role in providing early palliative care, however they often lack practical supports to operationalize this approach in practice. CAPACITI is a virtual training program aimed at providing practical tips, strategies, and action plans to help primary care providers offer an early palliative approach to care. The CAPACITI pilot program consisted of 10 facilitated, monthly training sessions, covering identification and assessment, communication, and engaging caregivers and specialists. We present the findings of an evaluation of the pilot program. Method: We conducted a single cohort study of primary care providers who participated in CAPACITI. Study outcomes were the change in the percentage of caseload reported as requiring palliative care and improved confidence in competencies measured on a 20-item, study-created survey. Pre and post survey data were analyzed using paired t-tests. Results: Twenty-two teams representing 127 care providers (including 36 physicians and 28 Nurse Practitioners) completed CAPACITI. Paired comparisons showed a moderate improvement in confidence across the competencies covered (.6 to 1.3 mean improvement across items using seven-point scales, all P < .05). Pre-CAPACITI, clinician prescribers (N = 32) identified a mean of 1.2% of their caseload requiring a palliative approach to care, which increased to 1.6% post-program (P = .02). Said differently, the total group of paired clinician prescribers identified 338 patients as requiring palliative care in their caseloads at baseline vs 482 patients following the intervention, for an overall increase of 144 patients in their collective caseloads. Conclusion: CAPACITI improved self-assessed palliative care identification and provider confidence in core competencies. The program demonstrated potential for building palliative care capacity in primary care teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Daryl Bainbridge
- Department of Oncology, 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Kelli Stajduhar
- Department of School of Nursing and Institute on Aging and Lifelong Health, 8205University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Denise Marshall
- Department of Health Sciences, 62703McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle Howard
- Department of Family Medicine, 152996McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Melissa Brouwers
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, 177403University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Doris Barwich
- 12358The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Fred Burge
- Department of Family Medicine, 152980Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Mary Lou Kelley
- School of Social Work, 157782Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Análise da evolução histórica do conceito de cuidados paliativos: revisão de escopo. ACTA PAUL ENFERM 2022. [DOI: 10.37689/acta-ape/2022ar018066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
9
|
Degen Jermann E, Liebig B. [Vulnerable persons, partners or warriors? How relatives perceive their roles in palliative care]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2022; 168:33-39. [PMID: 35148969 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Relatives play a very important role in palliative care. Whilst previous research has investigated this role from the perspective of health professionals, this article focuses on the perspectives of the relatives of palliative patients. The present paper aims to identify relatives' perceptions of their role with respect to their relationship to professionals and to describe their significance for satisfaction with palliative care. Content analysis of 23 guideline-based interviews with relatives in Switzerland identified three main role perceptions of relatives, namely as: "vulnerable persons", as "partners" or "warriors". The results indicate that relatives' satisfaction with palliative care depends on the role assigned to them by specialists in the care process. This article demonstrates that well-trained health personnel in the field of palliative care and a common understanding of the roles within the palliative care team are central to supporting relatives. These findings can help inform good collaboration between relatives and professionals in palliative care (e.g., general practitioners, nurses, specialized doctors, such as oncologists, and specialized nurses) and to encourage families to feel comfortable with the care their loved ones receive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline Degen Jermann
- Hochschule für Angewandte Psychologie der Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz, Olten, Schweiz.
| | - Brigitte Liebig
- Hochschule für Angewandte Psychologie der Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz, Olten, Schweiz
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bennett V, Hain R, Pritchard AW, Noyes J. Synthesis of health promotion concepts in children's palliative care. Int J Palliat Nurs 2021; 27:490-503. [PMID: 34919416 DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2021.27.10.490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care improves the health of children with a life-limiting condition and appears to draw implicitly on concepts shared with a model of health promotion. However, to date there has been no scrutiny about how this relationship may shape understanding about children's palliative care. AIM To explore the influence of health promoting concepts on children's palliative care models, policies and guidelines. DATA SOURCES Health and social care databases were searched for policies, models and guidelines published between 2000-2018. Additional searches of professional national and international healthcare websites, children's palliative care charities and UK and Ireland government websites were conducted. METHODS A best fit framework synthesis was used. FINDINGS A total of 55 policies and guidelines were reviewed for the framework synthesis. Eight themes were generated: (1) health promoting children's palliative care policy and guidelines; (2) planning ahead; (3) creating a supportive environment; (4) enabling coping and independence; (5) reorienting children's palliative care sectors; (6) the lengthening trajectory of need for support; (7) strengthening community engagement in children's palliative care; and (8) quality of life and value-based ideologies. CONCLUSION The best fit framework synthesis confirmed a conceptual relationship between children's palliative care and health promotion. This is captured in a new model that will extend professionals' understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Bennett
- Senior Lecturer in Children and Young People's Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Chester
| | - Richard Hain
- Consultant and Lead Clinician Paediatric Palliative Care, Children's Hospital, Cardiff; Honorary Senior Lecturer School for Medical Sciences, Bangor University
| | | | - Jane Noyes
- Professor of Health and Social Services Research and Child health, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schweighoffer R, Blaese R, Liebig B. Organizational determinants of information transfer in palliative care teams: A structural equation modeling approach. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252637. [PMID: 34081729 PMCID: PMC8174710 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Several organizational factors facilitate or hinder information transfer in palliative care teams. According to past research, organizational factors that reduce information transfer include the inconsistent use of shared electronic patient files, frequent changes of healthcare staff, a lack of opportunities for personal exchange, and a lack of evaluation of collaborative processes. Insufficient information sharing between professionals can negatively impact patient safety, whereas studies have shown that some organizational factors improve collaboration between professionals and thus contribute to improved patient outcomes. The main purpose of this study is thus to investigate whether, and if so how, organizational factors contribute to successful information exchange in palliative care teams in Switzerland, while also accounting for the different care contexts of primary and specialized palliative care. A nationwide survey was aimed at medical professionals working in palliative care. In total, 379 participants (mean age = 49.8 years, SD = 10.3) were included in this study. Two main outcome variables were examined: healthcare providers' satisfaction with information transfer in their team and their overall satisfaction with communication in their team. Hypotheses were tested by employing structural equation modeling. Findings revealed that the strongest predictors for effective information transfer in palliative care teams were sufficient opportunities for face-to-face meetings and supervision alongside feedback tools to improve collaborative practices and the application of guidelines and standards for collaboration. Face-to-face meetings were an even greater contributor to information transfer in specialized settings, whereas sharing the same work-based values with colleagues was considered more important in primary settings. Results from this study contribute to the existing literature elucidating how information transfer is facilitated in the field of palliative care. If proposed measures are implemented, this could possibly improve patient outcomes in palliative care. Furthermore, the findings can be useful for healthcare organizations and associations to make more efficient resource allocation decisions with the aim to optimize information transfer within the workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reka Schweighoffer
- Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- School of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland
| | - Richard Blaese
- Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- School of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland
| | - Brigitte Liebig
- School of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland
- Department of Sociology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Court L, Olivier J. Approaches to integrating palliative care into African health systems: a qualitative systematic review. Health Policy Plan 2020; 35:1053-1069. [PMID: 32514556 PMCID: PMC7553764 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Africa is characterized by a high burden of disease and health system deficits, with an overwhelming and increasing demand for palliative care (PC). Yet only one African country is currently considered to have advanced integration of palliative care into medical services and generalized PC is said to be available in only a handful of others. The integration of PC into all levels of a health system has been called for to increase access to PC and to strengthen health systems. Contextually appropriate evidence to guide integration is vital yet limited. This qualitative systematic review analyses interventions to integrate PC into African health systems to provide insight into the 'how' of PC integration. Forty articles were identified, describing 51 different interventions. This study found that a variety of integration models are being applied, with limited best practices being evaluated and repeated in other contexts. Interventions typically focused on integrating specialized PC services into individual or multiple health facilities, with only a few examples of PC integrated at a population level. Four identified issues could either promote integration (by being present) or block integration (by their absence). These include the provision of PC at all levels of the health system alongside curative care; the development and presence of sustainable partnerships; health systems and workers that can support integration; and lastly, placing the client, their family and community at the centre of integration. These echo the broader literature on integration of health services generally. There is currently a strong suggestion that the integration of PC contributes to health system strengthening; however, this is not well evidenced in the literature and future interventions would benefit from placing health systems strengthening at the forefront, as well as situating their work within the context of integration of health services more generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Court
- Health Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jill Olivier
- Health Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Background: Clearly identified professionals who are appointed for care coordination are invaluable for ensuring efficient coordination of health care services. However, challenges to identifying roles in palliative care are well documented in literature. Notably, in order to meet high demands on palliative home care settings, many care practitioners perform tasks that surpass the responsibilities and regulations of their role, including care coordination. Without clearly defined roles, standards of care cannot be guaranteed. Yet, little is understood about who plays the key role in palliative home care. Aim: The present study aims to address the gap in the research by identifying who plays a key role in coordination in palliative home care. Methods: Interviews with general practitioners (GPs), nurses and relatives of palliative patients were carried out in Swiss cantons (Vaud, Ticino, Luzern and Basel) to identify key coordinators of care. Interviews were analyzed using content analysis and presented using grounded theory. Results: Findings indicated that there was considerable ambiguity of the key coordinator role. 1) Causal conditions of this phenomenon were; informality of professional roles and lack of communication between team members, 2) Consequences of this included; conflicting understandings of key coordinator role and family members feeling overburdened, 3) Strategies adopted by interviewees included; adapting or taking control of care coordination. These findings are highly indicative of areas for improvement for care coordination in palliative home care settings. Specifically, they underline a profound need for clear communication between palliative care service providers regarding which professionals assume a key coordative role, or who are delegated a coordinative role at any given time. Crucially, since the findings reveal that relatives are intimately involved in care coordination, the findings point to a lack of adequate financial and psycho-social support for relatives of palliative patients who are burdened with coordination tasks, without the appropriate recompense.
Collapse
|
14
|
Tziraki C, Grimes C, Ventura F, O’Caoimh R, Santana S, Zavagli V, Varani S, Tramontano D, Apóstolo J, Geurden B, De Luca V, Tramontano G, Romano MR, Anastasaki M, Lionis C, Rodríguez-Acuña R, Capelas ML, dos Santos Afonso T, Molloy DW, Liotta G, Iaccarino G, Triassi M, Eklund P, Roller-Wirnsberger R, Illario M. Rethinking palliative care in a public health context: addressing the needs of persons with non-communicable chronic diseases. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2020; 21:e32. [PMID: 32928334 PMCID: PMC7503185 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423620000328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-communicable chronic diseases (NCCDs) are the main cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Demographic aging has resulted in older populations with more complex healthcare needs. This necessitates a multilevel rethinking of healthcare policies, health education and community support systems with digitalization of technologies playing a central role. The European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Aging (A3) working group focuses on well-being for older adults, with an emphasis on quality of life and healthy aging. A subgroup of A3, including multidisciplinary stakeholders in health care across Europe, focuses on the palliative care (PC) model as a paradigm to be modified to meet the needs of older persons with NCCDs. This development paper delineates the key parameters we identified as critical in creating a public health model of PC directed to the needs of persons with NCCDs. This paradigm shift should affect horizontal components of public health models. Furthermore, our model includes vertical components often neglected, such as nutrition, resilience, well-being and leisure activities. The main enablers identified are information and communication technologies, education and training programs, communities of compassion, twinning activities, promoting research and increasing awareness amongst policymakers. We also identified key 'bottlenecks': inequity of access, insufficient research, inadequate development of advance care planning and a lack of co-creation of relevant technologies and shared decision-making. Rethinking PC within a public health context must focus on developing policies, training and technologies to enhance person-centered quality life for those with NCCD, while ensuring that they and those important to them experience death with dignity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chariklia Tziraki
- Israel Gerontological Data Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- MELABEV – Community Clubs for Elders, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Filipa Ventura
- The Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Rónán O’Caoimh
- Department of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Silvina Santana
- Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | | | | | - Donatella Tramontano
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - João Apóstolo
- Department of Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Bart Geurden
- Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincenzo De Luca
- Research and Development Unit, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Tramontano
- Hospital Care Division, General Directorate for Health, Campania Region, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Romano
- Hospital Care Division, General Directorate for Health, Campania Region, Naples, Italy
| | - Marilena Anastasaki
- Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Christos Lionis
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Manuel Luis Capelas
- Interdisciplinary Health Research Center (CIIS), Institute of Health Sciences, Portuguese Catholic University, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Tânia dos Santos Afonso
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Center for Pharmaceutical Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - David William Molloy
- Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University College of Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Giuseppe Liotta
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Guido Iaccarino
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Triassi
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Patrik Eklund
- Department of Computing Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Maddalena Illario
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
- Health Innovation Division, General Directorate for Health, Campania Region, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Relationships Among Structures, Team Processes, and Outcomes for Service Users in Quebec Mental Health Service Networks. Int J Integr Care 2020; 20:12. [PMID: 32565762 PMCID: PMC7292103 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Few studies have identified and compared profiles of mental health service networks (MHSN) in terms of structures, processes, and outcomes, based on cluster analyses and perceptions of team managers, MH professionals and service users. This study assessed these associations in Quebec metropolitan, urban and semi-urban MHSN. Methods: A framework adapted from the Donabedian model guided data management, and cluster analyses were used to identify categories. Study participants included team managers (n = 45), MH professionals (n = 311) and service users (n = 327). Results: For all three MHSN, a common outcome category emerged: service users with complex MH problems and negative outcomes. The Metropolitan network reported two categories for structures (specialized MH teams, primary care MH teams) and processes (senior medical professional, psychosocial professionals), and outcomes (middle-age men with positive outcomes, older women with few MH problems). The Urban and Semi-urban networks revealed one category for structures (all teams) and service user (young service users with drug disorders), but two for processes (psychosocial professionals: urban, all professionals: semi-urban). Conclusion: The Metropolitan MHSN showed greater heterogeneity regarding structures and team processes than the other two MHSN. Service user outcomes were largely associated with clinical characteristics, regardless of network configurations for structures and team processes.
Collapse
|
16
|
Dudgeon D. The Impact of Measuring Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Quality of and Access to Palliative Care. J Palliat Med 2020; 21:S76-S80. [PMID: 29283866 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measuring performance for palliative care is complex as care is delivered in many sites, over time and jointly to the patient and family. Measures of structural processes do not necessarily capture aspects that are important to patients and families nor reflect holistic multidisciplinary outcomes of care. This article focuses on the question as to whether measurement of patient-reported outcome measures improves the outcomes of quality and access to palliative care. OBJECTIVES To review the international evidence that measurement of indicators of desired outcomes improves the quality of and access to palliative care, in order to apply them to the Canadian context. DESIGN Rapid review. SETTING Canadian context. FINDINGS This review identified six systematic reviews and forty-seven studies that describe largely national efforts to arrive at a consensus as to what needs to be measured to assess quality of palliative care. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are becoming more prevalent, with emerging evidence to suggest that their measurement improves outcomes that are important to patients. Several Canadian initiatives are in place, including the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer's efforts, in conjunction with other partners, to develop common quality measures. Results from Australia's Palliative Care Outcomes Collaborative demonstrate that patient-centered improvements in palliative care can be measured by using patient-reported outcomes derived at the point of care and delivered nationally. CONCLUSIONS Measurement of quality palliative and end-of-life care is very complex. It requires that both administrative data and PROMs be assessed to reflect outcomes that are important to patients and families. Australia's national initiative is a promising exemplar for continued work in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Dudgeon
- School of Medicine, Queen's University , Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Reeves E, Schweighoffer R, Liebig B. An investigation of the challenges to coordination at the interface of primary and specialized palliative care services in Switzerland: A qualitative interview study. J Interprof Care 2020; 35:21-27. [PMID: 32101081 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1724085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Good coordination of healthcare services is vital for ensuring health cost efficiency and high-quality care for patients. It is especially important in the context of palliative care as services are often highly fragmented due to a combination of diverse professional groups, organizations, and approaches to care. However, the coordination of services in this field is often evaluated as insufficient. Little is known about the challenges to coordination in this sector in Switzerland. The present study addresses this gap in research by investigating the challenges to coordination at the interface of palliative care services in Switzerland. Interviews (n = 24) with 38 healthcare practitioners working in palliative care in four cantons (Basel-City, Lucerne, Ticino, and Vaud) form the basis for this investigation. The selected cantons not only represent French, Italian, and German language regions of Switzerland but also represent diverse rural, urban, and historical contexts. Expert interviews are analyzed using structural content analysis. Three clusters of challenges to coordination were identified in the data: (1) organizational challenges to coordination, which relate to explicit forms of coordination; (2) relational challenges to coordination; and (3) structural challenges to coordination, which relate to implicit forms of coordination. The study reveals a need for better financial support for coordination in palliative care and a stronger focus on interprofessional coordination in educating professionals in palliative care. Future research on how to further foster good team coordination practices between primary and specialized palliative services merits further investigation. Since these findings are indicative of areas for improvement for coordination at the interface of Swiss palliative care services, they are of particular interest for healthcare practitioners, policymakers, and researchers involved in the evolution of coordinative practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Reeves
- Fakultät Für Psychologie, Universität Basel , Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Brigitte Liebig
- Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz FHNW, Hochschule Für Angewandte Psychologie , Olten, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hasson F, Nicholson E, Muldrew D, Bamidele O, Payne S, McIlfatrick S. International palliative care research priorities: A systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:16. [PMID: 32013949 PMCID: PMC6998205 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-0520-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been increasing evidence and debate on palliative care research priorities and the international research agenda. To date, however, there is a lack of synthesis of this evidence, examining commonalities, differences, and gaps. To identify and synthesize literature on international palliative care research priorities originating from Western countries mapped to a quality assessment framework. METHODS A systematic review of several academic and grey databases were searched from January 2008-June 2019 for studies eliciting research priorities in palliative care in English. Two researchers independently reviewed, critically appraised, and conducted data extraction and synthesis. RESULTS The search yielded 10,235 articles (academic databases, n = 4108; grey literature, n = 6127), of which ten were included for appraisal and review. Priority areas were identified: service models; continuity of care; training and education; inequality; communication; living well and independently; and recognising family/carer needs and the importance of families. Methodological approaches and process of reporting varied. There was little representation of patient and caregiver driven agendas. The priorities were mapped to the Donabedian framework for assessing quality reflecting structure, process and outcomes and key priority areas. CONCLUSIONS Limited evidence exists pertaining to research priorities across palliative care. Whilst a broad range of topics were elicited, approaches and samples varied questioning the credibility of findings. The voice of the care provider dominated, calling for more inclusive means to capture the patient and family voice. The findings of this study may serve as a template to understand the commonalities of research, identify gaps, and extend the palliative care research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicity Hasson
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, School of Nursing, Ulster University, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland.
| | - Emma Nicholson
- UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, UCD College of Health and Agricultural Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Deborah Muldrew
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, School of Nursing, Ulster University, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland
| | - Olufikayo Bamidele
- Academcy of Primary Care, Hull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RZ, England
| | - Sheila Payne
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, LA14YX, Lancaster, UK
| | - Sonja McIlfatrick
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, School of Nursing, Ulster University, Shore Road, Newtownabbey, BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rotar Pavlič D, Aarendonk D, Wens J, Rodrigues Simões JA, Lynch M, Murray S. Palliative care in primary care: European Forum for Primary Care position paper. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2019; 20:e133. [PMID: 31530333 PMCID: PMC6764185 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423619000641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The aim of this position paper is to assist primary health care (PHC) providers, policymakers, and researchers by discussing the current context in which palliative health care functions within PHC in Europe. The position paper gives examples for improvements to palliative care models from studies and international discussions at European Forum for Primary Care (EFPC) workshops and conferences. BACKGROUND Palliative care is a holistic approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families facing problems associated with terminal illness, through the prevention and relief of suffering by means of early identification and diligent assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, whether physical, psychosocial, or spiritual. Unfortunately, some Europeans, unless they have cancer, still do not have access to generalist or specialist palliative care. METHODS A draft of this position paper was distributed electronically through the EFPC network in 2015, 2016, and 2017. Active collaboration with the representatives of the International Primary Palliative Care Network was established from the very beginning and more recently with the EAPC Primary Care Reference Group. Barriers, opportunities, and examples of good and bad practices were discussed at workshops focusing on palliative care at the international conferences of Southeastern European countries in Ljubljana (2015) and Budva (2017), at regular conferences in Amsterdam (2015) and Riga (2016), at the WONCA Europe conferences in Istanbul (2015), Copenhagen (2016), and Prague (2017), and at the EAPC conference in Madrid (2017). FINDINGS There is great diversity in the extent and type of palliative care provided in primary care by European countries. Primary care teams (PCTs) are well placed to encourage timely palliative care. We collected examples from different countries. We found numerous barriers influencing PCTs in preparing care plans with patients. We identified many facilitators to improve the organization of palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danica Rotar Pavlič
- Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Johan Wens
- Professor of General Practice/Family Medicine, Senior University Lecturer, Research director, Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | | | - Marie Lynch
- Programme Development Manager, The Irish Hospice Foundation, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Scott Murray
- St Columba’s Hospice Professor of Primary Palliative Care, University of Edinburgh and Co-Chair, European Association of Palliative Care Primary Care Reference Group, Emeritus Professor of Primary Palliative Care, University of Edinburgh,Edinburgh, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The growing number of patients with terminal and chronic conditions and co-morbidities constitutes a challenge for any healthcare system, to provide effective and efficient patient-centred care at the end of life. Resources are limited, and complexity is rising within patients' situations and healthcare professionals interventions. This review presents the state of art of the role of complexity in specialist palliative care provision. RECENT FINDINGS Although studies related to complexity in palliative care are still limited, interesting reviews on complexity frameworks in co-morbidity conditions and palliative care are growing more present in current literature. They identify multidimensional issues, resource utilisation, and the relationship between them as fundamental aspects of complexity constructs, helping to define and understand complexity, and to therefore design validated tools to support healthcare professionals identifying the most complex patients, such as Hui's criteria, PALCOM, INTERMED, and IDC-Pal which is presented in this review. SUMMARY There is an urgent need to guarantee quality and equity of care for all the patients eligible for palliative care, from those who need a palliative care approach to those needing specialist intensive palliative care. Implementing complexity theory into practice is paramount. In this review, complexity science, complexity frameworks, as well as tools evaluating complexity in palliative care are described.
Collapse
|
21
|
Peterson K, Anderson J, Bourne D, Charns MP, Gorin SS, Hynes DM, McDonald KM, Singer SJ, Yano EM. Health Care Coordination Theoretical Frameworks: a Systematic Scoping Review to Increase Their Understanding and Use in Practice. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34:90-98. [PMID: 31098976 PMCID: PMC6542910 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-04966-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care coordination is crucial to avoid potential risks of care fragmentation in people with complex care needs. While there are many empirical and conceptual approaches to measuring and improving care coordination, use of theory is limited by its complexity and the wide variability of available frameworks. We systematically identified and categorized existing care coordination theoretical frameworks in new ways to make the theory-to-practice link more accessible. METHODS To identify relevant frameworks, we searched MEDLINE®, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and SocINDEX from 2010 to May 2018, and various other nonbibliographic sources. We summarized framework characteristics and organized them using categories from the Sustainable intEgrated chronic care modeLs for multi-morbidity: delivery, FInancing, and performancE (SELFIE) framework. Based on expert input, we then categorized available frameworks on consideration of whether they addressed contextual factors, what locus they addressed, and their design elements. We used predefined criteria for study selection and data abstraction. RESULTS Among 4389 citations, we identified 37 widely diverse frameworks, including 16 recent frameworks unidentified by previous reviews. Few led to development of measures (39%) or initiatives (6%). We identified 5 that are most relevant to primary care. The 2018 framework by Weaver et al., describing relationships between a wide range of primary care-specific domains, may be the most useful to those investigating the effectiveness of primary care coordination approaches. We also identified 3 frameworks focused on locus and design features of implementation that could prove especially useful to those responsible for implementing care coordination. DISCUSSION This review identified the most comprehensive frameworks and their main emphases for several general practice-relevant applications. Greater application of these frameworks in the design and evaluation of coordination approaches may increase their consistent implementation and measurement. Future research should emphasize implementation-focused frameworks that better identify factors and mechanisms through which an initiative achieves impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Peterson
- Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Portland Health Care System, Evidence-based Synthesis Program (ESP) Coordinating Center, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Johanna Anderson
- Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Portland Health Care System, Evidence-based Synthesis Program (ESP) Coordinating Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Donald Bourne
- Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Portland Health Care System, Evidence-based Synthesis Program (ESP) Coordinating Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Martin P Charns
- VA HSR&D Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.,Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
- New York Physicians against Cancer (NYPAC), New York, NY, USA.,The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Denise M Hynes
- Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.,Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | | | - Sara J Singer
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Yano
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Health Policy & Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Herbst FA, Heckel M, Stiel S, Ostgathe C. Development of empirical recommendations for regional hospice and palliative care networks in Germany: A qualitative study. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2018; 140:35-42. [PMID: 30591230 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, efforts are underway to develop coordinated and standardized approaches for palliative care service delivery by improving service quality in hospice and palliative care networks. German legal regulations explicitly demand networking between hospice and palliative care providers. However, there is little research on models of cooperation and the building and development of hospice and palliative care networks. Research-based recommendations for network building and advancement are lacking. OBJECTIVE The study aim was to develop empirical recommendations for the building of new and advancement of existing hospice and palliative care networks in Bavaria, Germany. METHODS The project utilized a qualitative approach. The research project was structured in six sequential phases: 1) semi-structured individual interviews on status quo of networks, 2) a workshop including a focus group to develop definitions of key terms and prioritize major network themes, 3) semi-structured face-to-face interviews on factors enabling and inhibiting cooperation, 4) drafting of a recommendation for regional hospice and palliative care networks, 5) an online consensus survey questionnaire to rate relevance and feasibility of the draft recommendation and an internal consensus meeting to revise the draft, and 6) an expert workshop to develop examples of realization. Coordinators and chairpersons of 12 hospice and palliative care networks constitute the study population for study phases 1 to 3, 5, and 6. Network representatives partook in one (n=6), two (n=6), three (n=4), four (n=2), or all five (n=1) of the study phases 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6. Further experts participated in one (n=10) or both (n=1) of the phases 5 and 6. RESULTS Recommendations were drafted for six thematic fields: (i) missions and aims, (ii) roles and responsibilities, (iii) coordination, (iv) communication and information channels, (v) public visibility, and (vi) funding. The whole set of recommendations was rated by 90% of the participants to be fully or somewhat important for network building and development. A total of 22 recommendations was approved. CONCLUSIONS The call for establishing and developing standards for hospice and palliative care networks was situated within the current policy climate of Germany and the broader international community. The present recommendations can aid implementation of this request and have a strong relevance for practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska A Herbst
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Maria Heckel
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stiel
- Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christoph Ostgathe
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bainbridge D, Brazil K, Krueger P, Ploeg J, Taniguchi A, Darnay J. Evaluating Program Integration and the Rise in Collaboration: Case study of A Palliative Care Network. J Palliat Care 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/082585971102700403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: There is increasing global interest in using regional palliative care networks (PCNs) to integrate care and create systems that are more cost-effective and responsive. We examined a PCN that used a community development approach to build capacity for palliative care in each distinct community in a region of southern Ontario, Canada, with the goal of achieving a competent integrated system. Methods: Using a case study methodology, we examined a PCN at the structural level through a document review, a survey of 20 organizational administrators, and an interview with the network director. Results: The PCN identified 14 distinct communities at different stages of development within the region. Despite the lack of some key features that would facilitate efficient palliative care delivery across these communities, administrators largely viewed the network partnership as beneficial and collaborative. Conclusion: The PCN has attempted to recognize specific needs in each local area. Change is gradual but participatory. There remain structural issues that may negatively affect the functioning of the PCN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Bainbridge
- D Bainbridge (corresponding author) Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession Street, Room 4-203, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8V 5C2
| | - Kevin Brazil
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, and St. Joseph's Health System Research Network, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Krueger
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenny Ploeg
- School of Nursing, and Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, and Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan Taniguchi
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, and Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Darnay
- Hamilton, Niagara, Haldimand, Brant Hospice Palliative Care Network, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Seow H, Bainbridge D. The development of specialized palliative care in the community: A qualitative study of the evolution of 15 teams. Palliat Med 2018; 32:1255-1266. [PMID: 29737244 PMCID: PMC6041761 DOI: 10.1177/0269216318773912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interprofessional specialized palliative care teams at home improve patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and support many patients to die at home. However, practical details about how to develop home-based teams in different regions and health systems are scarce. AIM To examine how a variety of home-based specialized palliative care teams created and grew their team over time and to identify critical steps in their evolution. DESIGN A qualitative study was designed based on a grounded theory approach, using semi-structured interviews and other documentation. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS In all, 15 specialized palliative care teams from Ontario, Canada, representing rural and urban areas. Data were collected from core members of the teams, including nurses, physicians, personal support workers, spiritual counselors, and administrators. RESULTS In all, 122 individuals where interviewed, ranging from 4 to 10 per team. The analysis revealed four stages in team evolution: Inception, Start-up (n = 4 teams), Growth (n = 5), and Mature (n = 6). In the Inception stage, a champion provider was required to leverage existing resources to form the team. Start-up teams were testing and adjusting care processes to solidify their presence in the community. Growth teams had core expertise, relationships with fellow providers, and 24/7 support. Mature teams were fully integrated in the community, but still engaged in continuous quality improvement. CONCLUSION Understanding the developmental stages of teams can help to inform the progress of other community-based teams. Appropriate outcome measures at each stage are also critical for team motivation and steady progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- 1 Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,2 Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,3 Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Daryl Bainbridge
- 1 Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,3 Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Grooten L, Borgermans L, Vrijhoef HJM. An Instrument to Measure Maturity of Integrated Care: A First Validation Study. Int J Integr Care 2018; 18:10. [PMID: 29588644 PMCID: PMC5853880 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lessons captured from interviews with 12 European regions are represented in a new instrument, the B3-Maturity Model (B3-MM). B3-MM aims to assess maturity along 12 dimensions reflecting the various aspects that need to be managed in order to deliver integrated care. The objective of the study was to test the content validity of B3-MM as part of SCIROCCO (Scaling Integrated Care into Context), a European Union funded project. METHODS A literature review was conducted to compare B3-MM's 12 dimensions and their measurement scales with existing measures and instruments that focus on assessing the development of integrated care. Subsequently, a three-round survey conducted through a Delphi study with international experts in the field of integrated care was performed to test the relevance of: 1) the dimensions, 2) the maturity indicators and 3) the assessment scale used in B3-MM. RESULTS The 11 articles included in the literature review confirmed all the dimensions described in the original version of B3-MM. The Delphi study rounds resulted in various phrasing amendments of indicators and assessment scale. Full agreement among the experts on the relevance of the 12 B3-MM dimensions, their indicators, and assessment scale was reached after the third Delphi round. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION The B3-MM dimensions, maturity indicators and assessment scale showed satisfactory content validity. While the B3-MM is a unique instrument based on existing knowledge and experiences of regions in integrated care, further testing is needed to explore other measurement properties of B3-MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liset Grooten
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, B-1090 Brussels, BE
| | - Liesbeth Borgermans
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, B-1090 Brussels, BE
| | - Hubertus JM Vrijhoef
- Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, B-1090 Brussels, BE
- Department Patient and Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, NL
- Panaxea B.V., Amsterdam, NL
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Seow H, Bainbridge D. A Review of the Essential Components of Quality Palliative Care in the Home. J Palliat Med 2018; 21:S37-S44. [PMID: 29283868 PMCID: PMC5733665 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The home is an important and often preferable setting of palliative care. While much research has demonstrated the benefits of specialized palliative homecare on patient and system outcomes, there has been little delineation of the underlying components of these efficacious programs. We synthesized the essential elements of palliative homecare from a combined review of successful programs, perspectives of patients and caregivers, and views of healthcare providers in palliative care. METHODS Five unique palliative homecare studies were included in the rapid review and synthesis-(1) systematic review of the components of efficacious programs; (2) in-depth analysis of 11 effective community-based teams; (3) survey of bereaved caregivers; (4) survey of the general public; and (5) interviews of providers and administrators. A qualitative approach was used to identify transcending themes across the studies. RESULTS Six essential elements of quality palliative homecare were common across the studies: (1) Integrated teamwork; (2) Management of pain and physical symptoms; (3) Holistic care; (4) Caring, compassionate, and skilled providers; (5) Timely and responsive care; and (6) Patient and family preparedness. CONCLUSIONS Our metasynthesis of effective palliative homecare models, as well as, the values of those who use and provide these services, illuminates the underpinning elements of quality home-based care for patients with a life-limiting illness. However, the application of these elements must be relevant to the local community context. To create impactful, sustainable homecare programs, it is critical to capitalize on existing processes, partnerships, and assets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daryl Bainbridge
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Siouta N, Van Beek K, Payne S, Radbruch L, Preston N, Hasselaar J, Centeno C, Menten J. Is the content of guidelines/pathways a barrier for the integration of palliative Care in Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) and chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD)? A comparison with the case of cancer in Europe. BMC Palliat Care 2017; 16:62. [PMID: 29179703 PMCID: PMC5704525 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-017-0243-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a notable inequity in access to palliative care (PC) services between cancer and Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)/Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients which also translates into discrepancies in the level of integration of PC. By cross-examining the levels of PC integration in published guidelines/pathways for CHF/COPD and cancer in Europe, this study examines whether these discrepancies may be attributed to the content of the guidelines. DESIGN A quantitative evaluation was made between integrated PC in published guidelines for cancer and CHF/COPD in Europe. The content of integrated PC in guidelines/pathways was measured using an 11 point integrated PC criteria tool (IPC criteria). A statistical analysis was carried out to detect similarities and differences in the level of integrated PC between the two groups. RESULTS The levels of integration between CHF/COPD and cancer guidelines/pathways have been shown to be statistically similar. Moreover, the quality of evidence utilized and the date of development of the guidelines/pathways appear not to impact upon the PC integration in the guidelines. CONCLUSION In Europe, the empirically observed imbalance in integration of PC for patients with cancer and CHF/COPD may only partially be attributed to the content of the guidelines/pathways that are utilized for the PC implementation. Given the similarities detected between cancer and CHF/COPD, other barriers appear to play a more prominent role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naouma Siouta
- Dept. of Radiation-Oncology and Palliative Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karen Van Beek
- Dept. of Radiation-Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sheila Payne
- International Observatory on End of Life Care Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Lukas Radbruch
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Nancy Preston
- International Observatory on End of Life Care Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Jeroen Hasselaar
- Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care, UMC St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos Centeno
- Institute for Culture and Society, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Johan Menten
- Dept. of Radiation-Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Palliative care demonstrably improves quality of life for the seriously ill in a manner that averts preventable health crises and their associated costs. Because of these outcomes, palliative care is now broadening its reach beyond hospitals, and hospice care for those near death, to patients and their families living in the community with chronic multimorbidities that have uncertain or long expected survival. In this article, we address research needed to enable policies supportive of palliative care access and quality, including changes in regulatory, accreditation, financing, and training approaches in the purview of policy makers. Mr. K. is an 86-year-old male with multimorbidities, including severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and atrial fibrillation requiring anticoagulation therapy. He fell in his mobile home and was unable to reach the telephone to call for help. Six hours later, his neighbor found him lying on the bedroom floor in pain and confused, and called 911. On examination, he was found to have a cold blue foot complicated by a large hematoma. The vascular surgery service was consulted to evaluate Mr. K. for revascularization or amputation. Although Mr. K. had several risk factors complicating his candidacy for general anesthesia, the team thought the benefits of surgery would outweigh the risks. Mr. K's daughter agreed to surgery telling her father "the doctors know best." Mr. K. replied "I just want to be out of pain." Six months later, Mr. K. remains in a skilled nursing facility due to post-op complications, including pneumonia, worsened confusion, and the inability to recover to enough function to live safely at home. He now suffers from depression, cognitive deficits, and social isolation. His daughter has had to take on a second job because she is struggling to pay for his continued long-term care, which costs $6000 per month. Money she had saved for her own retirement and her daughter's college tuition is already gone. In retrospect, she realizes the surgical team did not discuss the possibility of his survival with chronic debility and long-term functional dependency, nor the fact that Medicare would not pay for the care he now requires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn F. Reinke
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services R&D, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Diane E. Meier
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Center to Advance Palliative Care, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Seow H, Bainbridge D, Brouwers M, Bryant D, Tan Toyofuku S, Kelley ML. Common care practices among effective community-based specialist palliative care teams: a qualitative study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2017; 10:e3. [PMID: 28424194 PMCID: PMC7063387 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2016] [Revised: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Objective Evidence has shown that, despite wide variation in models of care, community-based specialist palliative care teams can improve outcomes and reduce acute care use at end of life. The goal of this study was to explore similarities in care practices among effective and diverse specialist teams to inform the development of other community-based teams. Methods Interviews with 78 providers and administrators from 11 distinct community-based specialist palliative care teams from Ontario, Canada were conducted. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using an inductive approach to identify common themes. Results 3 key themes across all teams emerged. First, the distinct models of care were generally summarised into 3 models: primary care and specialist providers either collaborated by transferring, sharing or consulting in care. Second, teams explicitly or implicitly followed 7 common care practices related to: specialised expertise 24/7; intrateam communication; timeliness; physical symptom and psychosocial–spiritual management; education; peace and fulfilment; and advocacy for patient preferences. Third, all teams emphasised the importance of team building, even more than using clinical tools and processes. Conclusions Despite wide variation in models of care among community-based specialist palliative care teams, this large qualitative study identified several common themes in care practices that can guide the development of other teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsien Seow
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daryl Bainbridge
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melissa Brouwers
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Escarpment Cancer Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Mary Lou Kelley
- School of Social Work & Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Evans JM, Grudniewicz A, Baker GR, Wodchis WP. Organizational Capabilities for Integrating Care: A Review of Measurement Tools. Eval Health Prof 2016; 39:391-420. [PMID: 27664122 DOI: 10.1177/0163278716665882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The success of integrated care interventions is highly dependent on the internal and collective capabilities of the organizations in which they are implemented. Yet, organizational capabilities are rarely described, understood, or measured with sufficient depth and breadth in empirical studies or in practice. Assessing these capabilities can contribute to understanding why some integrated care interventions are more effective than others. We identified, organized, and assessed survey instruments that measure the internal and collective organizational capabilities required for integrated care delivery. We conducted an expert consultation and searched Medline and Google Scholar databases for survey instruments measuring factors outlined in the Context and Capabilities for Integrating Care Framework. A total of 58 instruments were included in the review and assessed based on their psychometric properties, practical considerations, and applicability to integrated care efforts. This study provides a bank of psychometrically sound instruments for describing and comparing organizational capabilities. Greater use of these instruments across integrated care interventions and studies can enhance standardized comparative analyses and inform change management. Further research is needed to build an evidence base for these instruments and to explore the associations between organizational capabilities and integrated care processes and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna M Evans
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada .,Enhanced Program Evaluation Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - Agnes Grudniewicz
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - G Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Walter P Wodchis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Krawczyk M, Gallagher R. Communicating prognostic uncertainty in potential end-of-life contexts: experiences of family members. BMC Palliat Care 2016; 15:59. [PMID: 27405352 PMCID: PMC4941030 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-016-0133-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This article reports on the concept of "communicating prognostic uncertainty" which emerged from a mixed methods survey asking family members to rank their satisfaction in seven domains of hospital end-of-life care. METHODS Open-ended questions were embedded within a previously validated survey asking family members about satisfaction with end-of-life care. The purpose was to understand, in the participants' own words, the connection between their numerical rankings of satisfaction and the experience of care. RESULTS Our study found that nearly half of all family members wanted more information about possible outcomes of care, including knowledge that the patient was "sick enough to die". Prognostic uncertainty was often poorly communicated, if at all. Inappropriate techniques included information being cloaked in confusing euphemisms, providing unwanted false hope, and incongruence between message and the aggressive level of care being provided. In extreme cases, these techniques left a legacy of uncertainty and suspicion. Family members expressed an awareness of both the challenges and benefits of communicating prognostic uncertainty. Most importantly, respondents who acknowledged that they would have resisted (or did) knowing that the patient was sick enough to die also expressed a retrospective understanding that they would have liked, and benefitted, from more prognostic information that death was a possible or probable outcome of the patient's admission. Family members who reported discussion of prognostic uncertainty also reported high levels of effective communication and satisfaction with care. They also reported long-term benefits of knowing the patient was sick enough to die. CONCLUSION While a patient who is sick enough to die may survive to discharge, foretelling with family members in potential end of life contexts facilitates the development of a shared and desired prognostic awareness that the patient is nearing end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian Krawczyk
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, 588 - 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
| | - Romayne Gallagher
- Division of Palliative Care, UBC, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Providence Health Care, 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bergenholtz H, Jarlbaek L, Hølge-Hazelton B. Generalist palliative care in hospital - Cultural and organisational interactions. Results of a mixed-methods study. Palliat Med 2016; 30:558-66. [PMID: 26643731 DOI: 10.1177/0269216315619861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It can be challenging to provide generalist palliative care in hospitals, owing to difficulties in integrating disease-oriented treatment with palliative care and the influences of cultural and organisational conditions. However, knowledge on the interactions that occur is sparse. AIM To investigate the interactions between organisation and culture as conditions for integrated palliative care in hospital and, if possible, to suggest workable solutions for the provision of generalist palliative care. DESIGN A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was chosen using two independent studies: a quantitative study, in which three independent datasets were triangulated to study the organisation and evaluation of generalist palliative care, and a qualitative, ethnographic study exploring the culture of generalist palliative nursing care in medical departments. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS A Danish regional hospital with 29 department managements and one hospital management. RESULTS Two overall themes emerged: (1) 'generalist palliative care as a priority at the hospital', suggesting contrasting issues regarding prioritisation of palliative care at different organisational levels, and (2) 'knowledge and use of generalist palliative care clinical guideline', suggesting that the guideline had not reached all levels of the organisation. CONCLUSION Contrasting issues in the hospital's provision of generalist palliative care at different organisational levels seem to hamper the interactions between organisation and culture - interactions that appear to be necessary for the provision of integrated palliative care in the hospital. The implementation of palliative care is also hindered by the main focus being on disease-oriented treatment, which is reflected at all the organisational levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Bergenholtz
- The Regional Research Unit, Region Zealand, Denmark Department of Surgery, Roskilde-Koege Hospital, Koege, Denmark
| | - Lene Jarlbaek
- PAVI, Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bibi Hølge-Hazelton
- Roskilde-Koege Hospital, Denmark The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bainbridge D, Brazil K, Ploeg J, Krueger P, Taniguchi A. Measuring healthcare integration: Operationalization of a framework for a systems evaluation of palliative care structures, processes, and outcomes. Palliat Med 2016; 30:567-79. [PMID: 26934948 DOI: 10.1177/0269216315619862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare integration is a priority in many countries, yet there remains little direction on how to systematically evaluate this construct to inform further development. The examination of community-based palliative care networks provides an ideal opportunity for the advancement of integration measures, in consideration of how fundamental provider cohesion is to effective care at end of life. AIM This article presents a variable-oriented analysis from a theory-based case study of a palliative care network to help bridge the knowledge gap in integration measurement. DESIGN Data from a mixed-methods case study were mapped to a conceptual framework for evaluating integrated palliative care and a visual array depicting the extent of key factors in the represented palliative care network was formulated. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS The study included data from 21 palliative care network administrators, 86 healthcare professionals, and 111 family caregivers, all from an established palliative care network in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS The framework used to guide this research proved useful in assessing qualities of integration and functioning in the palliative care network. The resulting visual array of elements illustrates that while this network performed relatively well at the multiple levels considered, room for improvement exists, particularly in terms of interventions that could facilitate the sharing of information. CONCLUSION This study, along with the other evaluative examples mentioned, represents important initial attempts at empirically and comprehensively examining network-integrated palliative care and healthcare integration in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Bainbridge
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Kevin Brazil
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Jenny Ploeg
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Department of Health, Aging & Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Krueger
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alan Taniguchi
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hillis R, Ling J, Quinn C, Brenner M. Evaluating a pilot paediatric hospice-at-home service: a literature review. Int J Palliat Nurs 2016; 22:90-7. [PMID: 26926349 DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2016.22.2.90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background: This literature review aims to offer practitioners an overview of the key components involved in designing the evaluation of a paediatric hospice-at-home pilot that will assess the effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of the programme. The literature was reviewed in two stages: the first examined existing literature in the area of paediatric palliative care. The second looked at the wider field of adult palliative care to gain further insights into evaluation tool design. The findings are presented as a conceptual model to highlight each component of the pilot development stage as identified for evaluation purposes, emphasising their role and impact on the resultant delivery of integrated care. The clarity and transparency of this model offers a comprehensive overview of the evaluation process to all involved in the pilot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan Hillis
- Research Assistant, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Julie Ling
- Chief Executive Officer, European Association for Palliative Care, Dublin
| | - Claire Quinn
- Head of Research, LauraLynn, Ireland's Children's Hospice, Dublin
| | - Maria Brenner
- Lecturer and Programme Coordinator Critical Care Nursing (Children), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hui D, Bansal S, Strasser F, Morita T, Caraceni A, Davis M, Cherny N, Kaasa S, Currow D, Abernethy A, Nekolaichuk C, Bruera E. Indicators of integration of oncology and palliative care programs: an international consensus. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:1953-1959. [PMID: 26088196 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2015] [Accepted: 05/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, the concept of integrating oncology and palliative care has gained wide professional and scientific support; however, a global consensus on what constitutes integration is unavailable. We conducted a Delphi Survey to develop a consensus list of indicators on integration of specialty palliative care and oncology programs for advanced cancer patients in hospitals with ≥100 beds. METHODS International experts on integration rated a list of indicators on integration over three iterative rounds under five categories: clinical structure, processes, outcomes, education, and research. Consensus was defined a priori by an agreement of ≥70%. Major criteria (i.e. most relevant and important indicators) were subsequently identified. RESULTS Among 47 experts surveyed, 46 (98%), 45 (96%), and 45 (96%) responded over the three rounds. Nineteen (40%) were female, 24 (51%) were from North America, and 14 (30%) were from Europe. Sixteen (34%), 7 (15%), and 25 (53%) practiced palliative care, oncology, and both specialties, respectively. After three rounds of deliberation, the panelists reached consensus on 13 major and 30 minor indicators. Major indicators included two related to structure (consensus 95%-98%), four on processes (88%-98%), three on outcomes (88%-91%), and four on education (93%-100%). The major indicators were considered to be clearly stated (9.8/10), objective (9.4/10), amenable to accurate coding (9.5/10), and applicable to their own countries (9.4/10). CONCLUSIONS Our international experts reached broad consensus on a list of indicators of integration, which may be used to identify centers with a high level of integration, and facilitate benchmarking, quality improvement, and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Hui
- Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - S Bansal
- Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - F Strasser
- Oncological Palliative Medicine, Hematology-Oncology, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - T Morita
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care and Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - A Caraceni
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Davis
- Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, USA
| | - N Cherny
- Cancer Pain and Palliative Medicine Service, Department of Medical Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - S Kaasa
- European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology and The Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital - Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - D Currow
- Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - A Abernethy
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - C Nekolaichuk
- Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - E Bruera
- Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bainbridge D, Seow H, Sussman J, Pond G, Barbera L. Factors associated with not receiving homecare, end-of-life homecare, or early homecare referral among cancer decedents: A population-based cohort study. Health Policy 2015; 119:831-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Revised: 10/27/2014] [Accepted: 11/25/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
37
|
|
38
|
Valentijn PP, Boesveld IC, van der Klauw DM, Ruwaard D, Struijs JN, Molema JJW, Bruijnzeels MA, Vrijhoef HJ. Towards a taxonomy for integrated care: a mixed-methods study. Int J Integr Care 2015; 15:e003. [PMID: 25759607 PMCID: PMC4353214 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.1513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2013] [Revised: 01/09/2015] [Accepted: 01/20/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Building integrated services in a primary care setting is considered an essential important strategy for establishing a high-quality and affordable health care system. The theoretical foundations of such integrated service models are described by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, which distinguishes six integration dimensions (clinical, professional, organisational, system, functional and normative integration). The aim of the present study is to refine the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care by developing a taxonomy that specifies the underlying key features of the six dimensions. METHODS First, a literature review was conducted to identify features for achieving integrated service delivery. Second, a thematic analysis method was used to develop a taxonomy of key features organised into the dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Finally, the appropriateness of the key features was tested in a Delphi study among Dutch experts. RESULTS The taxonomy consists of 59 key features distributed across the six integration dimensions of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care. Key features associated with the clinical, professional, organisational and normative dimensions were considered appropriate by the experts. Key features linked to the functional and system dimensions were considered less appropriate. DISCUSSION This study contributes to the ongoing debate of defining the concept and typology of integrated care. This taxonomy provides a development agenda for establishing an accepted scientific framework of integrated care from an end-user, professional, managerial and policy perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim P Valentijn
- Scientific Centre for Care and Welfare (Tranzo), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Inge C Boesveld
- The Netherlands Expert Centre Integrated Primary Care, Jan van Es Institute, Almere, The Netherlands
| | | | - Dirk Ruwaard
- Public Health and Health Care Innovation, Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen N Struijs
- Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc A Bruijnzeels
- The Netherlands Expert Centre Integrated Primary Care, Jan van Es Institute, Almere, The Netherlands
| | - Hubertus Jm Vrijhoef
- Chronic Care, Scientific Centre for Care and Welfare (Tranzo), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bainbridge D, Brazil K, Krueger P, Ploeg J, Taniguchi A, Darnay J. Measuring horizontal integration among health care providers in the community: an examination of a collaborative process within a palliative care network. J Interprof Care 2014; 29:245-52. [PMID: 25418319 DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2014.984019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
In many countries formal or informal palliative care networks (PCNs) have evolved to better integrate community-based services for individuals with a life-limiting illness. We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a customized tool to determine the perceptions of the processes of palliative care delivery reflective of horizontal integration from the perspective of nurses, physicians and allied health professionals working in a PCN, as well as to assess the utility of this tool. The process elements examined were part of a conceptual framework for evaluating integration of a system of care and centred on interprofessional collaboration. We used the Index of Interdisciplinary Collaboration (IIC) as a basis of measurement. The 86 respondents (85% response rate) placed high value on working collaboratively and most reported being part of an interprofessional team. The survey tool showed utility in identifying strengths and gaps in integration across the network and in detecting variability in some factors according to respondent agency affiliation and profession. Specifically, support for interprofessional communication and evaluative activities were viewed as insufficient. Impediments to these aspects of horizontal integration may be reflective of workload constraints, differences in agency operations or an absence of key structural features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Bainbridge
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University , Hamilton, Ontario , Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Posthumus AG, Schölmerich VLN, Waelput AJM, Vos AA, De Jong-Potjer LC, Bakker R, Bonsel GJ, Groenewegen P, Steegers EAP, Denktaş S. Bridging between professionals in perinatal care: towards shared care in the Netherlands. Matern Child Health J 2014; 17:1981-9. [PMID: 23229171 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-1207-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Relatively high perinatal mortality rates in the Netherlands have required a critical assessment of the national obstetric system. Policy evaluations emphasized the need for organizational improvement, in particular closer collaboration between community midwives and obstetric caregivers in hospitals. The leveled care system that is currently in place, in which professionals in midwifery and obstetrics work autonomously, does not fully meet the needs of pregnant women, especially women with an accumulation of non-medical risk factors. This article provides an overview of the advantages of greater interdisciplinary collaboration and the current policy developments in obstetric care in the Netherlands. In line with these developments we present a model for shared care embedded in local 'obstetric collaborations'. These collaborations are formed by obstetric caregivers of a single hospital and all surrounding community midwives. Through a broad literature search, practical elements from shared care approaches in other fields of medicine that would suit the Dutch obstetric system were selected. These elements, focusing on continuity of care, patient centeredness and interprofessional teamwork form a comprehensive model for a shared care approach. By means of this overview paper and the presented model, we add direction to the current policy debate on the development of obstetrics in the Netherlands. This model will be used as a starting point for the pilot-implementation of a shared care approach in the 'obstetric collaborations', using feedback from the field to further improve it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G Posthumus
- Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
The definition of palliative care is the cornerstone of a medical subspecialty that plays a particular role for all who need it, for all who practice it, and increasingly for those who try to understand it. The difficulties around the definition and terminology arise from problems in separating it from other concepts such as supportive care, constructs such as “palliative care is only about dying”, or, in children, the rather vague use of terms like life-threatening and life-limiting diseases. These weaknesses have been recognized and important steps have been taken. This review discusses current definitions as well as efforts to overcome their weaknesses and make the term palliative care—for both children and adults—more intelligible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Bergstraesser
- University Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Palliative Care and Oncology, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
The role of the keyworker in breaking down professional culture barriers to providing high-quality palliative care: a literature review. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2013. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396913000447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundPalliative cancer care is by definition multi-professional in nature. An interdisciplinary approach to disease management emphasising continuity of care results in increased quality of life for patients and families. Complex disease management demands the provision of a full spectrum of high-quality care; requiring both specialist and generalist services. Appointed keyworkers are knowledgeable about patient preferences enabling effective coordination of care and promotes collaborative team-working. The need for diversity in the provision of palliative care is recommended but can challenge effective interdisciplinary collaboration by creating tension and limiting the interdisciplinary team (IDT) from reaching its full potential resulting in adverse outcomes.PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to review the literature available regarding how IDTs and keyworkers influence high-quality palliative care; evaluate how professional culture barriers can influence team collaboration; discuss the keyworker role in minimising these barriers and clinical implications.MethodologyA review of the English literature from 2003 to 2013 was performed using the databases PubMed (NML), OVID Medline and Google Scholar.Results and conclusionKeyworkers can help overcome professional culture barriers that result from ineffective team communication. Facilitating improved communication regarding professional roles fosters mutual understanding among team members. The dissemination of relevant and timely information minimises fragmentation, prompting team decision-making and promotes continuity of high-quality palliative care.
Collapse
|
43
|
Noyes J, Edwards RT, Hastings RP, Hain R, Totsika V, Bennett V, Hobson L, Davies GR, Humphreys C, Devins M, Spencer LH, Lewis M. Evidence-based planning and costing palliative care services for children: novel multi-method epidemiological and economic exemplar. BMC Palliat Care 2013; 12:18. [PMID: 23617814 PMCID: PMC3651264 DOI: 10.1186/1472-684x-12-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2013] [Accepted: 04/17/2013] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Children’s palliative care is a relatively new clinical specialty. Its nature is multi-dimensional and its delivery necessarily multi-professional. Numerous diverse public and not-for-profit organisations typically provide services and support. Because services are not centrally coordinated, they are provided in a manner that is inconsistent and incoherent. Since the first children’s hospice opened in 1982, the epidemiology of life-limiting conditions has changed with more children living longer, and many requiring transfer to adult services. Very little is known about the number of children living within any given geographical locality, costs of care, or experiences of children with ongoing palliative care needs and their families. We integrated evidence, and undertook and used novel methodological epidemiological work to develop the first evidence-based and costed commissioning exemplar. Methods Multi-method epidemiological and economic exemplar from a health and not-for-profit organisation perspective, to estimate numbers of children under 19 years with life-limiting conditions, cost current services, determine child/parent care preferences, and cost choice of end-of-life care at home. Results The exemplar locality (North Wales) had important gaps in service provision and the clinical network. The estimated annual total cost of current children’s palliative care was about £5.5 million; average annual care cost per child was £22,771 using 2007 prevalence estimates and £2,437- £11,045 using new 2012/13 population-based prevalence estimates. Using population-based prevalence, we estimate 2271 children with a life-limiting condition in the general exemplar population and around 501 children per year with ongoing palliative care needs in contact with hospital services. Around 24 children with a wide range of life-limiting conditions require end-of-life care per year. Choice of end-of-life care at home was requested, which is not currently universally available. We estimated a minimum (based on 1 week of end-of-life care) additional cost of £336,000 per year to provide end-of-life support at home. Were end-of-life care to span 4 weeks, the total annual additional costs increases to £536,500 (2010/11 prices). Conclusions Findings make a significant contribution to population-based needs assessment and commissioning methodology in children’s palliative care. Further work is needed to determine with greater precision which children in the total population require access to services and when. Half of children who died 2002-7 did not have conditions that met the globally used children's palliative care condition categories, which need revision in light of findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Noyes
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Noyes J, Hastings RP, Lewis M, Hain R, Bennett V, Hobson L, Spencer LH. Planning ahead with children with life-limiting conditions and their families: development, implementation and evaluation of 'My Choices'. BMC Palliat Care 2013; 12:5. [PMID: 23384400 PMCID: PMC3579717 DOI: 10.1186/1472-684x-12-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2012] [Accepted: 11/23/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The United Kingdom has led the world in the development of children’s palliative care. Over the past two decades, the illness trajectories of children with life-limiting conditions have extended with new treatments and better home-based care. Future planning is a critically under-researched aspect of children’s palliative care globally. This paper describes the development, implementation and evaluation of innovative child and parent-held palliative care planning resources. The resources were designed to facilitate parent and child thinking and engagement in future planning, and to determine care preferences and preferred locations of care for children with life-limiting conditions from diagnosis onwards. These resources fill a significant gap in palliative care planning before the end-of-life phase. Methods Drawing on contemporaneous research on producing evidence-based children’s health information, we collaborated with leading children’s not-for-profit organisations, parents, children, and professionals. A set of resources (My Choices booklets) were developed for parents and children and evaluated using interviews (parents, children, professionals) and questionnaires (professionals) and an open web-based consultation. Results Parents and children responded in three ways: Some used the booklets to produce detailed written plans with clear outcomes and ideas about how best to achieve desired outcomes. Others preferred to use the booklet to help them think about potential options. Remaining parents found it difficult to think about the future and felt there was no point because they perceived there to be no suitable local services. Professionals varied in confidence in their ability to engage with families to plan ahead and identified many challenges that prevented them from doing so. Few families shared their plans with professionals. Parents and children have far stronger preferences for home-care than professionals. Conclusion The My Choices booklets were revised in light of findings, have been endorsed by Together for Short Lives, and are free to download in English and Welsh for use by parents and young people globally. More work needs to be done to support families who are not yet receptive to planning ahead. Professionals would benefit from more training in person-centred approaches to future planning and additional communications skills to increase confidence and ability to engage with families to deliver sensitive palliative care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Noyes
- Noreen Edwards Chair in Health Services Research and Child Health, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Payne S, Leget C, Peruselli C, Radbruch L. Quality indicators for palliative care: debates and dilemmas. Palliat Med 2012; 26:679-80. [PMID: 22733962 DOI: 10.1177/0269216312450123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila Payne
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, UK
| | - Carlo Leget
- School of Humanities, Tilburg University, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lukas Radbruch
- University of Bonn, Germany
- University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sussman J, Barbera L, Bainbridge D, Howell D, Yang J, Husain A, Librach SL, Viola R, Walker H. Health system characteristics of quality care delivery: a comparative case study examination of palliative care for cancer patients in four regions in Ontario, Canada. Palliat Med 2012; 26:322-35. [PMID: 21831915 DOI: 10.1177/0269216311416697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A number of palliative care delivery models have been proposed to address the structural and process gaps in this care. However, the specific elements required to form competent systems are often vaguely described. AIM The purpose of this study was to explore whether a set of modifiable health system factors could be identified that are associated with population palliative care outcomes, including less acute care use and more home deaths. DESIGN A comparative case study evaluation was conducted of 'palliative care' in four health regions in Ontario, Canada. Regions were selected as exemplars of high and low acute care utilization patterns, representing both urban and rural settings. A theory-based approach to data collection was taken using the System Competency Model, comprised of structural features known to be essential indicators of palliative care system performance. Key informants in each region completed study instruments. Data were summarized using qualitative techniques and an exploratory factor pattern analysis was completed. RESULTS 43 participants (10+ from each region) were recruited, representing clinical and administrative perspectives. Pattern analysis revealed six factors that discriminated between regions: overall palliative care planning and needs assessment; a common chart; standardized patient assessments; 24/7 palliative care team access; advanced practice nursing presence; and designated roles for the provision of palliative care services. CONCLUSIONS The four palliative care regional 'systems' examined using our model were found to be in different stages of development. This research further informs health system planners on important features to incorporate into evolving palliative care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Sussman
- Supportive Cancer Care Research Unit, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lundström S, Axelsson B, Heedman PA, Fransson G, Fürst CJ. Developing a national quality register in end-of-life care: the Swedish experience. Palliat Med 2012; 26:313-21. [PMID: 21737480 DOI: 10.1177/0269216311414758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The complexity of end-of-life care, represented by a large number of units caring for dying patients, different types of organizations and difficulties in identification and prognostication, signifies the importance of finding ways to measure the quality of end-of-life care. AIM To establish, test and manage a national quality register for end-of-life care. DESIGN Two questionnaires were developed with an attempt to retrospectively identify important aspects of the care delivered during the last week in life. An internet-based IT platform was created, enabling the physician and/or nurse responsible for the care during the last week in life to register answers online. SETTING Units caring for dying people, such as hospital wards, home care units, palliative in-patient care units and nursing facilities. RESULTS The register received status as a National Quality Register in 2006. More than 30,000 deaths in nursing facilities, hospital wards, palliative in-patient units and private homes were registered during 2010, representing 34% of all deaths in Sweden and 58% of the cancer deaths. CONCLUSIONS We have shown that it is feasible to establish a national quality register in end-of-life care and collect data through a web-based system. Ongoing data analyses will show in what way this initiative can lead to improved quality of life for patients and their families. There is an ongoing process internationally to define relevant outcome measures for quality of care at the end-of-life in different care settings; the registry has a potentially important role in this development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Staffan Lundström
- Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|