Role of primary surgery in advanced ovarian cancer

Functional MR imaging in gynecologic malignancies: current status and future perspectives

Using functional MR imaging techniques, we can approach the functional assessment of gynecologic malignancies. Among them, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DCE-MRI) are two important techniques. This article provides an overview of functional MR imaging techniques, focusing DWI and DCE-MRI on clinical application in gynecologic malignancies. Functional MR imaging techniques play an important role in detection, characterization, staging, treatment response, and outcome prediction, as well as providing conventional morphologic imaging. Familiarity with the characteristics and imaging features of functional MR imaging in gynecologic malignancies will facilitate prompt and accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of ovarian cancer by hydrogel depot of paclitaxel nanocrystals

Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy is a promising post-surgical therapy of ovarian cancer, but the full potential is yet to be realized. To facilitate IP chemotherapy of ovarian cancer, we developed an in-situ crosslinkable hydrogel depot containing paclitaxel (PTX) nanocrystals (PNC). PNC suppressed SKOV3 cell proliferation more efficiently than microparticulate PTX precipitates (PPT), and the gel containing PNC (PNC-gel) showed a lower maximum tolerated dose than PPT-containing gel (PPT-gel) in mice, indicating greater dissolution and cellular uptake of PNC than PPT. A single IP administration of PNC-gel extended the survival of tumor-bearing mice significantly better than Taxol, but PPT-gel did not. These results support the advantage of PNC over PPT and demonstrate the promise of a gel depot as an IP drug delivery system.

The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know

Many treatment options are available to patients with endometrial, cervical, or ovarian cancer. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging plays an important role in the patient journey from the initial evaluation of the extent of the disease to appropriate treatment selection and follow-up. The purpose of this review is to highlight the added role of MR imaging in the treatment stratification and overall care of patients with endometrial, cervical, or ovarian cancer. Several MR imaging techniques used in evaluation of patients with gynecologic malignancies are described, including both anatomic MR imaging sequences (T1- and T2-weighted sequences) and pulse sequences that characterize tissue on the basis of physiologic features (diffusion-weighted MR imaging), dynamic contrast agent-enhanced MR imaging, and MR spectroscopy. MR imaging findings corresponding to the 2009 revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging of gynecologic malignancies are also described in detail, highlighting possible pearls and pitfalls of staging. With the growing role of the radiologist as a core member of the multidisciplinary treatment planning team, it is crucial for imagers to recognize that MR imaging has become central in tailoring treatment options and therapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Advanced ovarian cancer: multiparametric MR imaging demonstrates response- and metastasis-specific effects

PURPOSE

To investigate the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the evaluation of response to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer and to compare imaging parameters between primary ovarian mass and metastatic disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluable patients suspected of having advanced ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in a prospective protocol-driven study. Research ethics committee approval and written informed consent were obtained. Multiparametric MR imaging (diffusion-weighted MR imaging, dynamic contrast material-enhanced [DCE] MR imaging, and hydrogen 1 MR spectroscopy) was performed with a 3.0-T wholebody MR imaging system. Three marker lesions-primary ovarian mass, omental cake, and peritoneal deposit-were outlined by a radiologist on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and vascular signal fraction (VSF) maps and on DCE MR images. Comparisons of mean ADC, mean VSF, DCE MR imaging parameters, and choline concentration between responders and nonresponders were based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and CA-125 criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were evaluable. The mean ADC for peritoneal metastases was lower than that for ovarian (P = .015) and omental (P = .006) sites. There were no differences in pretreatment DCE MR imaging parameters between tumor sites. After treatment, responders showed a significantly larger increase in ADC (P = .021) and fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space (v(e)) (P = .025) of ovarian lesions compared with nonresponders, but there was no change in ADC at other sites. Pre- and posttreatment values of choline concentration of ovarian lesions were lower in responders (P = .025) than in nonresponders (P = .010).

CONCLUSION

The significant differences in baseline ADCs among primary ovarian cancer, omental cake, and peritoneal deposits indicate that diffusivity profiles may be tumor-site dependent, suggesting biologic heterogeneity of disease. ADC and v(e) parameters correlated with the cytotoxic effects of platinum-based therapy and may be useful response markers, while choline concentration predicted but did not reflect response.

Thoracic metastasis in advanced ovarian cancer: comparison between computed tomography and video-assisted thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine which computed tomography (CT) imaging features predict pleural malignancy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) using video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), pathology, and cytology findings as the reference standard.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 44 patients with International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage III or IV primary or recurrent EOC who had chest CT ≤30 days before VATS. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CT studies and recorded the presence and size of pleural effusions and of ascites; pleural nodules, thickening, enhancement, subdiaphragmatic tumour deposits and supradiaphragmatic, mediastinal, hilar, and retroperitoneal adenopathy; and peritoneal seeding. VATS, pathology, and cytology findings constituted the reference standard.

RESULTS

In 26/44 (59%) patients, pleural biopsies were malignant. Only the size of left-sided pleural effusion (reader 1: rho=-0.39, p=0.01; reader 2: rho=-0.37, p=0.01) and presence of ascites (reader 1: rho=-0.33, p=0.03; reader 2: rho=-0.35, p=0.03) were significantly associated with solid pleural metastasis. Pleural fluid cytology was malignant in 26/35 (74%) patients. Only the presence (p=0.03 for both readers) and size (reader 1: rho=0.34, p=0.04; reader 2: rho=0.33, p=0.06) of right-sided pleural effusion were associated with malignant pleural effusion. Interobserver agreement was substantial (kappa=0.78) for effusion size and moderate (kappa=0.46) for presence of solid pleural disease. No other CT features were associated with malignancy at biopsy or cytology.

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced EOC, ascites and left-sided pleural effusion size were associated with solid pleural metastasis, while the presence and size of right-sided effusion were associated with malignant pleural effusion. No other CT features evaluated were associated with pleural malignancy.

Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer among women. In addition to diagnosis and staging, primary surgery is performed to achieve optimal cytoreduction (surgical efforts aimed at removing the bulk of the tumour) as the amount of residual tumour is one of the most important prognostic factors for survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. An optimal outcome of cytoreductive surgery remains a subject of controversy to many practising gynae-oncologists. The Gynaecologic Oncology group (GOG) currently defines 'optimal' as having residual tumour nodules each measuring 1 cm or less in maximum diameter, with complete cytoreduction (microscopic disease) being the ideal surgical outcome. Although the size of residual tumour masses after surgery has been shown to be an important prognostic factor for advanced ovarian cancer, it is unclear whether it is the surgical procedure that is directly responsible for the superior outcome that is associated with less residual disease.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of optimal primary cytoreductive surgery for women with surgically staged advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (stages III and IV).To assess the impact of various residual tumour sizes, over a range between zero and 2 cm, on overall survival.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3) and the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Review Group Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE (up to August 2010). We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Retrospective data on residual disease from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective and retrospective observational studies which included a multivariate analysis of 100 or more adult women with surgically staged advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. We only included studies that defined optimal cytoreduction as surgery leading to residual tumours with a maximum diameter of any threshold up to 2 cm.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, the data were synthesised in a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

There were no RCTs or prospective non-RCTs identified that were designed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgery when performed as a primary procedure in advanced stage ovarian cancer.We found 11 retrospective studies that included a multivariate analysis that met our inclusion criteria. Analyses showed the prognostic importance of complete cytoreduction, where the residual disease was microscopic that is no visible disease, as overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly prolonged in these groups of women. PFS was not reported in all of the studies but was sufficiently documented to allow firm conclusions to be drawn.When we compared suboptimal (> 1 cm) versus optimal (< 1 cm) cytoreduction the survival estimates were attenuated but remained statistically significant in favour of the lower volume disease group There was no significant difference in OS and only a borderline difference in PFS when residual disease of > 2 cm and < 2 cm were compared (hazard ratio (HR) 1.65, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.31; and HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.61, P = 0.05 for OS and PFS respectively).There was a high risk of bias due to the retrospective nature of these studies where, despite statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors, selection bias was still likely to be of particular concern.Adverse events, quality of life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness were not reported by treatment arm or to a satisfactory level in any of the studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

During primary surgery for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer all attempts should be made to achieve complete cytoreduction. When this is not achievable, the surgical goal should be optimal (< 1 cm) residual disease. Due to the high risk of bias in the current evidence, randomised controlled trials should be performed to determine whether it is the surgical intervention or patient-related and disease-related factors that are associated with the improved survival in these groups of women. The findings of this review that women with residual disease < 1 cm still do better than women with residual disease > 1 cm should prompt the surgical community to retain this category and consider re-defining it as 'near optimal' cytoreduction, reserving the term 'suboptimal' cytoreduction to cases where the residual disease is > 1 cm (optimal/near optimal/suboptimal instead of complete/optimal/suboptimal).

The Value of Postoperative/Preadjuvant Chemotherapy Computed Tomography in the Management of Patients With Ovarian Cancer

Objective:

The objectives of the study were to compare the operative assessment of residual disease with the postoperative computed tomography (CT) findings in patients with ovarian cancer who underwent primary surgical cytoreduction or interval debulking surgery to residual disease 1 cm or less and to assess the effect of potential prognostic factors on patient survival.

Methods:

Patients scheduled for surgery and with an available postoperative CT were eligible for the study. Images were retrospectively analyzed in consensus by 2 radiologists. A 5-point qualitative scoring system was used to evaluate the CT findings (1 = tumor definitely absent, 2 = tumor probably absent, 3 = tumor possibly present, 4 = tumor probably present, 5 = tumor definitely present).

Results:

Between September 2005 and December 2008, 206 consecutive patients were enrolled; 51 were eligible. In 30 cases (59%), the postoperative CT findings correlated with the surgeon's assessment of residual disease. For the univariate analyses, the only significant prognostic factors associated with overall survival were no residual disease versus residual disease of less than 1 cm as assessed by the surgeon (hazard ratio [HR], 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-7.27;P= 0.011) and no residual disease versus residual disease greater than 1 cm on CT (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.02-6.48;P= 0.045). The interaction of surgical residual disease and stage 3 was significant (HR, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.42-8.16;P= 0.006) in the multivariate Cox model.

Conclusions:

There was only 59% correlation between the surgical assessment and postoperative CT findings of residual disease in patients reported to have undergone optimal surgery. Stage and residual disease as assessed by the surgeon were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. The value for postoperative CT may lie in those cases with small-volume residual disease (visible but reported as <1 cm) at surgery.

Gene expression profiles as prognostic markers in women with ovarian cancer

The purpose was to find a gene expression profile that could distinguish short-term from long-term survivors in our collection of serous epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Furthermore, it should be able to stratify in an external validation set. Such a classifier profile will take us a step forward toward investigations for more individualized therapies and the use of gene expression profiles in the clinical practice. RNA from tumor tissue from 43 Danish patients with serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (11 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage I/II, 32 FIGO stage III/IV) was analyzed using Affymetrix U133 plus 2.0 microarrays. A multistep statistical procedure was applied to the data to find the gene set that optimally split the patients into short-term and long-term survivors in a Kaplan-Meier plot. A 14-gene prognostic profile with the ability to distinguish short-term survivors (median overall survival of 32 months) from long-term survivors (median overall survival not yet reached after a median follow-up of 76 months) with a P value of 3.4 x 10 was found. The prognostic gene set was also able to distinguish short-term from long-term survival in patients with advanced disease. Furthermore, its ability to classify in an external validation set was demonstrated. The identified 14-gene prognostic profile was able to predict survival (short- vs long-term survival) with a strength that is better than any other prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer including FIGO stage. This stratification method may form the basis of determinations for new therapeutic approaches, as patients with poor prognosis could obtain the biggest advantage from new treatment modalities.

Gene expression in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of intratumor heterogeneity

The aim of this study was to investigate the intratumor heterogeneity of gene expression profiles in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This was done to evaluate whether sampling of a single macrodissected tissue sample from each EOC case would bias the data and result in, eg, prognostic studies based on gene expression microarray experiments. From nine EOCs removed at Odense University Hospital, Denmark, three tumor samples of 200-300 mg each were taken with greatest possible mutual distance. The samples were immediately flash frozen. A parallel section was taken for histopathologic comparison. RNA was extracted from the tissue samples. Five micrograms of each RNA sample was used for labeling. The fragmented biotin-labeled complementary RNA was hybridized to Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U133 plus 2.0 arrays, and scanning was performed on the GeneArray scanner 3000 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Data were evaluated using hierarchical clustering and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from reliability analysis. All evaluation methods revealed low intratumor heterogeneity. Intratumor ICCs ranged from 0.888 to 0.978. In contrast, "between-tumor" ICC was 0.549 indicating much lower intra- than intertumor heterogeneity. Due to a low degree of intratumor variation, we conclude that it is sufficiently accurate in a clinical setup to use single, macrodissected tumor samples in the evaluation of gene expression in EOCs.

Surgery by consultant gynecologic oncologists improves survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Consultant gynecologic oncologists from the regional Comprehensive Cancer Center assisted community gynecologists in the surgical treatment of patients with ovarian carcinoma when they were invited. For this report, the authors evaluated the effects of primary surgery by a gynecologic oncologist on treatment outcome.

METHODS

The hospital files from 680 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma who were diagnosed between 1994 and 1997 in the northern part of the Netherlands were abstracted. Treatment results were analyzed according to the operating physician's education by using survival curves and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Primary surgery was performed on 184 patients by gynecologic oncologists, and on 328 patients by general gynecologists. Gynecologic oncologists followed surgical guidelines more strictly compared with general gynecologists (patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] Stage I-II disease, 55% vs. 33% [P=0.01]; patients with FIGO Stage III disease, 60% vs. 40% [P=0.003]) and more often removed all macroscopic tumor in patients with FIGO Stage III disease (24% vs. 12%; P=0.02). When patients were stratified according to FIGO stage, the 5-year overall survival rate was 86% versus 70% (P=0.03) for patients with Stage I-II disease and 21% versus 13% (P=0.02) for patients with Stage III-IV disease who underwent surgery by gynecologic oncologists and general gynecologists, respectively. The hazards ratio for patients who underwent surgery by gynecologic oncologists was 0.79 (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.61-1.03; adjusted for patient age, disease stage, type of hospital, and chemotherapy); when patients age 75 years and older were excluded, the hazards ratio fell to 0.71 (95% CI, 0.54-0.94) in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical treatment of patients with ovarian carcinoma by gynecologic oncologists occurred more often according to surgical guidelines, tumor removal more often was complete, and survival was improved.

Long-Term Survival of Patients with Apparent Early-Stage (FIGO I–II) Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Women with presumed early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who have not received comprehensive surgical staging are at risk for recurrence. The aim of our study was to analyze the overall long term survival of EOC patients with a presumed early stage EOC.

METHODS

A population-based cancer registry was used to identify patients with an early-stage EOC cancer diagnosed between 1989 and 1997. The area under study has no surgical gynecologic oncologist and no tertiary referral center. We categorized patients into two subgroups: low-risk (Ia-Ib well and moderately differentiated) and high-risk (Ia-Ib poorly differentiated or IC-II). Survival curves were calculated from the time of surgery using Kaplan-Meier methods and statistical comparisons were performed using the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Fifty patients having an apparent early-stage disease (FIGO I-II) were evaluated. Forty-one patients have been operated by obstetrician-gynecologists and 9 by general surgeons. Twenty-one (42%) have been categorized as low-risk and 29 (58%) as high-risk. An optimal, modified, minimal and inadequate surgical staging was performed in 6, 10, 26 and 58, respectively. The median follow-up time was 147 months (range: 2.5-165). The 5- and 10-year overall survival was 95 and 89% for low-risk and 72 and 33% for high-risk subgroups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical staging is frequently incomplete when performed in small hospitals with few patients by nonspecialists. Women in the high-risk group and incompletely staged have a less favorable prognosis than those reported in the literature.

Abdominal carcinomatosis in women with a history of breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to: (1) characterize the etiology of abdominal carcinomatosis, (2) identify clinical features predictive of primary ovarian/peritoneal cancer, and (3) evaluate the survival impact of cytoreductive surgery among patients with advanced ovarian/peritoneal cancer and a history of breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with a history of prior breast cancer undergoing surgical exploration for abdominal carcinomatosis between 1/1/88 and 12/31/02 were retrospectively identified from tumor registry databases. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore clinical characteristics predictive of primary ovarian/peritoneal cancer versus recurrent breast cancer. Survival analyses and comparisons were performed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients underwent surgery for abdominal carcinomatosis a median of 5.39 years after initial breast cancer diagnosis. Abdominal carcinomatosis was due to primary ovarian/primary peritoneal cancer in 74.7% of cases. A history of Stage I breast cancer [OR = 10.73, 95%CI = 2.6-43.7, P < 0.001] and the lack of a prior breast cancer recurrence [OR = 10.60, 95%CI = 2.5-45.2, P < 0.001] were independently predictive of primary ovarian/peritoneal cancer. Among patients with primary ovarian/peritoneal cancer, optimal (< or =1 cm) cytoreductive surgery was associated with a median survival of 44.0 months compared to 18.0 months for patients with suboptimal residual disease [HR = 6.81, 95%CI = 3.37-13.77, P < 0.0001]. Recurrent breast cancer was associated with a median survival time of 6.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with prior breast cancer presenting with abdominal carcinomatosis, early-stage disease and the absence of a prior recurrence were predictive of primary ovarian/peritoneal cancer. Optimal cytoreductive surgery was associated with a significant survival advantage for patients with primary ovarian/peritoneal cancer.