1
|
Adamu AA, Ndwandwe D, Jalo RI, Wiysonge CS. Positioning implementation science in national immunization programmes to improve coverage equity and advance progress toward Immunization Agenda 2030: An urgent global health imperative. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2331872. [PMID: 38556477 PMCID: PMC10984125 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2331872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite the availability of effective vaccines for preventing common childhood infectious diseases, there is still significant disparities in access and utilization across many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The factors that drive these disparities are often multilevel, originating from individuals, health facilities, health systems and communities, and also multifaceted. Implementation science has emerged as a field to help address "know-do" gaps in health systems, and can play a significant role in strengthening immunization systems to understand and solve implementation barriers that limit access and uptake within their contexts. This article presents a reflexive perspective on how to position implementation research in immunization programmes to improve coverage equity. Furthermore, key points of synergy between implementation research and vaccination are highlighted, and some potential practice changes that can be applied within specific contexts were proposed. Using a human rights lens, it was concluded that the cost that is associated with implementation failure in immunization programmes is significant and unjust, and future directions for implementation research to optimize its application in practice settings have been recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdu A. Adamu
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Duduzile Ndwandwe
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Rabiu I. Jalo
- Department of Community Medicine, Bayero University/Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Charles S. Wiysonge
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
- Vaccine-Preventable Diseases Programme, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kouanda S, Ouedraogo AM, Sogo AE, Bagaya O, Sorgho TEV, Hien YC, Gbenou DV, Sawadogo Windsouri SR, Zoungrana W, Dadjoari M, Zombré Sanou VM, Usmanova G, Jain Y, Chahar R, Kumar S, Kumar SVV, Srivastava A, Nair TS, Sarkar AH, Bajpai N, Patwardhan V, Joshi CS, Chotiya M, Baswal D, Musange S, Sayinzoga F, Mutabazi V, Murindahabi NK, Nzeyimana D, Rwabufigiri BN, Kabuteni TJ, Mugabo M, Mbizvo M, Chizuni C, Chelwa N, Muliokela R, Phiri C, Kasonda K, Okpara N, Nyirenda M, Malumo SB, Mwiche A, Simushi V, Nsubuga Bakyaita N, Barreix M, Tunçalp Ö, Thwin SS, Bucagu M, Tamrat T, Habib N, Lefevre AE, Lorencatto F. New Antenatal Model in Africa and India (NAMAI) study: implementation research to improve antenatal care using WHO recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:82. [PMID: 37563619 PMCID: PMC10416399 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01014-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2020, an estimated 287 000 women died globally from pregnancy-related causes and 2 million babies were stillborn. Many of these outcomes can be prevented by quality healthcare during pregnancy and childbirth. Within the continuum of maternal health, antenatal care (ANC) is a key moment in terms of contact with the health system, yet it remains an underutilized platform. This paper describes the protocol for a study conducted in collaboration with Ministries of Health and country research partners that aims to employ implementation science to systematically introduce and test the applicability of the adapted WHO ANC package in selected sites across four countries. METHODS Study design is a mixed methods stepped-wedge cluster randomized implementation trial with a nested cohort component (in India and Burkina Faso). The intervention is composed of two layers: (i) the country- (or state)-specific ANC package, including evidence-based interventions to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes, and (ii) the co-interventions (or implementation strategies) to help delivery and uptake of the adapted ANC package. Using COM-B model, co-interventions support behaviour change among health workers and pregnant women by (1) training health workers on the adapted ANC package and ultrasound (except in India), (2) providing supplies, (3) conducting mentoring and supervision and (4) implementing community mobilization strategies. In Rwanda and Zambia, a fifth strategy includes a digital health intervention. Qualitative data will be gathered from health workers, women and their families, to gauge acceptability of the adapted ANC package and its components, as well as experience of care. The implementation of the adapted ANC package of interventions, and their related costs, will be documented to understand to what extent the co-interventions were performed as intended, allowing for iteration. DISCUSSION Results from this study aim to build the global evidence base on how to implement quality ANC across different settings and inform pathways to scale, which will ultimately lead to stronger health systems with better maternal and perinatal outcomes. On the basis of the study results, governments will be able to adopt and plan for national scale-up, aiming to improve ANC nationally. This evidence will inform global guidance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN, ISRCTN16610902. Registered 27 May 2022. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16610902.
Collapse
|
3
|
Jackson-Morris AM, Miranda J, Nugent R. Tailoring off-the-shelf global evidence with local implementation research can boost action on overweight and obesity. THE LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2023; 11:e826-e827. [PMID: 37031686 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00173-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jaime Miranda
- CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru; The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rachel Nugent
- Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases, RTI International, Durham, NC 27709, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Becerril-Montekio V, García-Bello LA, Torres-Pereda P, Alcalde-Rabanal J, Reveiz L, Langlois EV. Collaboration between health system decision makers and professional researchers to coproduce knowledge, a scoping review. Int J Health Plann Manage 2022; 37 Suppl 1:45-58. [PMID: 35643849 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent literature uses different terms and approaches to the collaboration between researchers and health system decision-makers in the research process. In 2012, the World Health Organisation proposed to "Embed research within decision-making processes". Yet, important contributions use other terms and perspectives for the same issue. This scoping review aimed to identify these terms, approaches, their application and eventual influence on the utilization of evidence. METHODS We searched papers published between January 2000 and February 2019 in English, Spanish, French and Portuguese in the databases of PubMed, Scielo, Google Scholar and EBSCOhost, thus accessing MedicLatina, MEDLINE Complete and eBook Collection. Our main inclusion criterion was the participation of health personnel in non-clinical research activities. We considered three domains for in depth analysis: Definition, name and description of the participation of decision makers and health staff; Forms of collaboration and actual/effective participation of health staff in research; Eventual influence on the utilization of research results. RESULTS We identified 607 articles and selected 74 for full text analysis. Nineteen different terms are currently used in twelve countries to describe the participation of health decision-makers and staff in research activities. Most publications refer to Integrated Knowledge Translation or Embedded Research, and were published in Canada and the United Kingdom. Forty-five papers discuss the participation of health staff in research activities; 20 leading the whole process and 21 as collaborators. CONCLUSIONS The identification of the different terms and approaches to the close collaboration of health staff and decision-makers with professional researchers is essential to promote its effective application and influence on the utilization of evidence. Yet, it is also necessary to insist in their co-participation throughout the whole investigation process as a relevant way to improve research results uptake, strengthen health systems and advance towards universal health coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ludovic Reveiz
- Department of Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, Columbia, USA
| | - Etienne V Langlois
- Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reichmann S, Wieser B. Open science at the science-policy interface: bringing in the evidence? Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:70. [PMID: 35725491 PMCID: PMC9208144 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00867-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Part of the current enthusiasm about open science stems from its promises to reform scientific practice in service of the common good, to ensure that scientific outputs will be found and reused more easily, and to enhance scientific impact on policy and society. With this article, we question this optimism by analysing the potential for open science practices to enhance research uptake at the science–policy interface. Science advice is critical to help policy-makers make informed decisions. Likewise, some interpretations of open science hold that making research processes and outputs more transparent and accessible will also enhance the uptake of results by policy and society at large. However, we argue that this hope is based on an unjustifiably simplistic understanding of the science–policy interface that leaves key terms (“impact”, “uptake”) undefined. We show that this understanding—based upon linear models of research uptake—likewise grounds the influential “evidence–policy gap” diagnosis which holds that to improve research uptake, communication and interaction between researchers and policy-makers need to be improved. The overall normative stance of both discussions has sidelined empirical description of the science–policy interface, ignoring questions about the underlying differences between the policy domain and academia. Importantly, both open science and literature on closing the evidence–policy gap recommend improving communication (in terms of either the content or the means) as a viable strategy. To correct some of these views, we combine insights from policy theory with a narrative review of the literature on the evidence–policy gap in the health domain and find that removing barriers to access by itself will not be enough to foster research uptake.
Collapse
|
6
|
Varallyay NI, Kennedy C, Bennett SC, Peters DH. Strategies to promote evidence use for health programme improvement: learning from the experiences of embedded implementation research teams in Latin America and the Caribbean. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:38. [PMID: 35392931 PMCID: PMC8991468 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00834-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To achieve global health targets, innovative approaches are needed to strengthen the implementation of efficacious interventions. New approaches in implementation research that bring together health system decision-makers alongside researchers to collaboratively design, produce and apply research evidence are gaining traction. Embedded implementation research (EIR) approaches led by decision-maker principal investigators (DM PIs) appear promising in this regard. Our aim is to describe the strategies study teams employ in the post-research phase of EIR to promote evidence-informed programme or policy improvement. Methods We conducted a prospective, comparative case study of an EIR initiative in Bolivia, Colombia and Dominican Republic. Guided by a conceptual framework on EIR, we used semi-structured key informant interviews (n = 51) and document reviews (n = 20) to examine three decision-maker-led study teams (“cases”). Focusing on three processes (communication/dissemination, stakeholder engagement with evidence, integrating evidence in decision-making) and the main outcome (enacting improvements), we used thematic analysis to identify associated strategies and enabling or hindering factors. Results Across cases, we observed diverse strategies, shaped substantially by whether the DM PI was positioned to lead the response to study findings within their sphere of work. We found two primary change pathways: (1) DM PIs implement remedial measures directly, and (2) DM PIs seek to influence other stakeholders to respond to study findings. Throughout the post-research phase, EIR teams adapted research use strategies based on the evolving context. Conclusions EIR led by well-positioned DM PIs can facilitate impactful research translation efforts. We draw lessons around the importance of (1) understanding DM PI positionality, (2) ongoing assessment of the evolving context and stakeholders and (3) iterative adaptation to dynamic, uncertain circumstances. Findings may guide EIR practitioners in planning and conducting fit-for-purpose and context-sensitive strategies to advance the use of evidence for programme improvement. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-022-00834-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Ilona Varallyay
- Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States of America.
| | - Caitlin Kennedy
- Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States of America
| | - Sara C Bennett
- Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States of America
| | - David H Peters
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Macaulay B, Reinap M, Wilson MG, Kuchenmüller T. Integrating citizen engagement into evidence-informed health policy-making in eastern Europe and central Asia: scoping study and future research priorities. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:11. [PMID: 35042516 PMCID: PMC8764649 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00808-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The perspectives of citizens are an important and often overlooked source of evidence for informing health policy. Despite growing encouragement for its adoption, little is known regarding how citizen engagement may be integrated into evidence-informed health policy-making in low- and middle-income counties (LMICs) and newly democratic states (NDSs). We aimed to identify the factors and variables affecting the potential integration of citizen engagement into evidence-informed health policy-making in LMICs and NDSs and understand whether its implementation may require a different approach outside of high-income western democracies. Further, we assessed the context-specific considerations for the practical implementation of citizen engagement in one focus region-eastern Europe and central Asia. METHODS First, adopting a scoping review methodology, we conducted and updated searches of six electronic databases, as well as a comprehensive grey literature search, on citizen engagement in LMICs and NDSs, published before December 2019. We extracted insights about the approaches to citizen engagement, as well as implementation considerations (facilitators and barriers) and additional political factors, in developing an analysis framework. Second, we undertook exploratory methods to identify relevant literature on the socio-political environment of the focus region, before subjecting these sources to the same analysis framework. RESULTS Our searches identified 479 unique sources, of which 28 were adjudged to be relevant. The effective integration of citizen engagement within policy-making processes in LMICs and NDSs was found to be predominantly dependent upon the willingness and capacity of citizens and policy-makers. In the focus region, the implementation of citizen engagement within evidence-informed health policy-making is constrained by a lack of mutual trust between citizens and policy-makers. This is exacerbated by inadequate incentives and capacity for either side to engage. CONCLUSIONS This research found no reason why citizen engagement could not adopt the same form in LMICs and NDSs as it does in high-income western democracies. However, it is recognized that certain political contexts may require additional support in developing and implementing citizen engagement, such as through trialling mechanisms at subnational scales. While specifically outlining the potential for citizen engagement, this study highlights the need for further research on its practical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby Macaulay
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Marge Reinap
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael G Wilson
- McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tanja Kuchenmüller
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ezenwankwo EF, Ogbodo VE, Alom GO, Nwadilibe IB, Ofodum CM, Nwankwo CA, Okigbo CC, Omeje CA, Onyebuchi SJ, Oladoyimbo CA, Ezeani A, Akin-Odanye EO, Ogunsanya M. Behavioural oncology research in Africa: Lessons from the last two decades and key considerations moving forward. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 31:e13545. [PMID: 34931724 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyse the state of behavioural oncology research in Africa and outline key considerations for future research. METHODS Five bibliographic databases were searched to identify original English-language articles published between January 2000 and August 2020. The Behavioural Epidemiology Framework was applied to studies with data/findings from Africa to delineate their current state. Research gaps/opportunities available for behavioural oncology research in Africa were further highlighted. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-seven original research with findings from Africa has been published over the last two decades, with the highest contribution arising from Nigeria, Kenya, Ethiopia and South Africa. Cervical and breast cancers were the most widely investigated. Prominently studied behaviours relate to cancer screening, health literacy, lifestyle, and vaccination. Behavioural oncology literature in Africa is generally in Phases I and III and lacks in measurement studies (<2%) and studies that seek to evaluate behaviour change/health promotion interventions (<6%) or translate them into practice (13.2%). CONCLUSION Embracing new and progressive approaches, including methodological/analytical paradigms and implementation science is imperative to advance the frontiers of behavioural oncology research in Africa. This calls for a responsive research approach that can mobilise multidisciplinary/multilevel coalitions, ensuring a research structure that effectively integrates behavioural research and cancer prevention/control in the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elochukwu Fortune Ezenwankwo
- Division of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,Cancer Research Initiative, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | | | | | - Chidimma Mirian Ofodum
- Division of Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Adaora Ezeani
- Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium, UF, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Motolani Ogunsanya
- College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
da Silva Carvalho VK, da Silva EN, Barreto JOM. Public engagement in health technology assessment in Brazil: the case of the public consultation on National Clinical Guidelines for Care in Normal Birth. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1825. [PMID: 34627182 PMCID: PMC8502292 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11855-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of public engagement in health technology assessment. However, there is still uncertainty regarding how the results should be recorded, analyzed, and used by decision makers. OBJECTIVE Synthesize the contributions of the Brazilian public (women, health professionals, managers, educational institutions, and companies) about the implementation of the National Clinical Guidelines for Care in Normal Birth from the public consultation carried out in Brazil. METHOD IRaMuTeQ software was used to organize and summarize the corpus based on three types of analysis: descriptive statistics; descending hierarchical classification; and specificities analysis. The public consultation was conducted in 2016 by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) in the Brazilian public health system as part of the guideline development process. RESULTS The corpus consisted of 303 texts, separated into 1233 text segments, 1081 of which were used, corresponding to retention of 87.67%. Five classes emerged from our analyses: mandatory presence of an obstetrician during labor and delivery in hospital settings; barriers and facilitators for guideline implementation; use of evidence-based practices by health professionals; progression of labor and delivery and women's rights; and mobilization to promote the guideline For each class, the most frequent words and sentences with the highest chi-squared scores were presented. Barriers were associated with lack of financial resources, training and professional motivation, and facilitators with training to change the practices of health professionals. Obstetric nurses emerged as an alternative for supervising normal births as well as the mandatory presence of an obstetrician during childbirth in hospital settings. CONCLUSION Our findings summarize the contributions provided by the Brazilian public and shed some light on the barriers and facilitators of clinical guidelines for care in normal birth. These topics are not typically explored by quantitative studies. Including this information in the decision-making process would not only increase public engagement, but provide greater evidence for implementing the clinical guidelines nationwide.
Collapse
|
10
|
Varallyay NI, Bennett SC, Kennedy C, Ghaffar A, Peters DH. How does embedded implementation research work? Examining core features through qualitative case studies in Latin America and the Caribbean. Health Policy Plan 2021; 35:ii98-ii111. [PMID: 33156937 PMCID: PMC7646734 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Innovative strategies are needed to improve the delivery of evidence-informed health interventions. Embedded implementation research (EIR) seeks to enhance the generation and use of evidence for programme improvement through four core features: (1) central involvement of programme/policy decision-makers in the research cycle; (2) collaborative research partnerships; (3) positioning research within programme processes and (4) research focused on implementation. This paper examines how these features influence evidence-to-action processes and explores how they are operationalized, their effects and supporting conditions needed. We used a qualitative, comparative case study approach, drawing on document analysis and semi-structured interviews across multiple informant groups, to examine three EIR projects in Bolivia, Colombia and the Dominican Republic. Our findings are presented according to the four core EIR features. The central involvement of decision-makers in EIR was enhanced by decision-maker authority over the programme studied, professional networks and critical reflection. Strong research-practice partnerships were facilitated by commitment, a clear and shared purpose and representation of diverse perspectives. Evidence around positioning research within programme processes was less conclusive; however, as all three cases made significant advances in research use and programme improvement, this feature of EIR may be less critical than others, depending on specific circumstances. Finally, a research focus on implementation demanded proactive engagement by decision-makers in conceptualizing the research and identifying opportunities for direct action by decision-makers. As the EIR approach is a novel approach in these low-resource settings, key supports are needed to build capacity of health sector stakeholders and create an enabling environment through system-level strategies. Key implications for such supports include: promoting EIR and creating incentives for decision-makers to engage in it, establishing structures or mechanisms to facilitate decision-maker involvement, allocating funds for EIR, and developing guidance for EIR practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Ilona Varallyay
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School
of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
- Corresponding author. Malabia 1970, Buenos Aires CABA 1414,
Argentina. E-mail:
| | - Sara C Bennett
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School
of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Caitlin Kennedy
- Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Department of
International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St,
Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Abdul Ghaffar
- The Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research at the
World Health Organization, 20 avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - David H Peters
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School
of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jessani NS, Rohwer A, Schmidt BM, Delobelle P. Integrated knowledge translation to advance noncommunicable disease policy and practice in South Africa: application of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:82. [PMID: 34001141 PMCID: PMC8127442 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00733-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In response to the “know–do” gap, several initiatives have been implemented to enhance evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM). These include individual training, organizational culture change management, and legislative changes. The importance of relationships and stakeholder engagement in EIDM has led to an evolution of models and approaches including integrated knowledge translation (IKT). IKT has emerged as a key strategy for ensuring that engagement is equitable, demand-driven, and responsive. As a result, the African-German Collaboration for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Public Health in Africa (CEBHA+) incorporated an IKT approach to influence noncommunicable diseases (NCD) policy and practice. We documented the phased process of developing, implementing, and monitoring the IKT approach in South Africa; and explored the appropriateness of using the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment (EPIS) framework for this purpose. Methods We mapped the South Africa IKT approach onto the EPIS framework using a framework analysis approach. Notes of team meetings, stakeholder matrices, and engagement strategies were analysed and purposefully plotted against the four phases of the framework in order to populate the different constructs. We discussed and finalized the analysis in a series of online iterations until consensus was reached. Results The mapping exercise revealed an IKT approach that was much more iterative, dynamic, and engaging than initially thought. Several constructs (phase-agnostic) remained important and stable across EPIS phases: stable and supportive funding; committed and competent leadership; skilled and dedicated IKT champions; diverse and established personal networks; a conducive and enabling policy environment; and boundary-spanning intermediaries. Constructs such as “innovations” constantly evolved and adapted to the changing inner and outer contexts (phase-specific). Conclusions Using the EPIS framework to interrogate, reflect on, and document our IKT experiences proved extremely relevant and useful. Phase-agnostic constructs proved critical to ensure resilience and agility of NCD deliberations and policies in the face of highly dynamic and changing local contexts, particularly in view of the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Bridging IKT with a framework from implementation science helps to reflect on this process and can guide the development and planning of similar interventions and strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasreen S Jessani
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. .,Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
| | - Anke Rohwer
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Bey-Marrie Schmidt
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.,School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Peter Delobelle
- Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Strengthening health policy development and management systems in low- and middle- income countries: South Africa's approach. HEALTH POLICY OPEN 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
13
|
Vega J, Shroff ZC, Sheikh K, Agyepong IA, Tilahun B, Tangcharoensathien V, Hafeez A, Bhushan I, Ghaffar A, Peters D. Capacity, committed funding and co-production-institutionalizing implementation research in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan 2020; 35:ii7-ii8. [PMID: 33156931 PMCID: PMC7646729 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zubin Cyrus Shroff
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kabir Sheikh
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Binyam Tilahun
- University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | | | | | | | - Abdul Ghaffar
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - David Peters
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Partridge ACR, Mansilla C, Randhawa H, Lavis JN, El-Jardali F, Sewankambo NK. Lessons learned from descriptions and evaluations of knowledge translation platforms supporting evidence-informed policy-making in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:127. [PMID: 33129335 PMCID: PMC7603785 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00626-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge translation (KT) platforms are organisations, initiatives and networks that focus on supporting evidence-informed policy-making at least in part about the health-system arrangements that determine whether the right programmes, services and products get to those who need them. Many descriptions and evaluations of KT platforms in low- and middle-income countries have been produced but, to date, they have not been systematically reviewed. METHODS We identified potentially relevant studies through a search of five electronic databases and a variety of approaches to identify grey literature. We used four criteria to select eligible empirical studies. We extracted data about seven characteristics of included studies and about key findings. We used explicit criteria to assess study quality. In synthesising the findings, we gave greater attention to themes that emerged from multiple studies, higher-quality studies and different contexts. RESULTS Country was the most common jurisdictional focus of KT platforms, EVIPNet the most common name and high turnover among staff a common infrastructural feature. Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues were the activities/outputs that were the most extensively studied and viewed as helpful, while rapid evidence services were the next most studied but only in a single jurisdiction. None of the summative evaluations used a pre-post design or a control group and, with the exception of the evaluations of the influence of briefs and dialogues on intentions to act, none of the evaluations achieved a high quality score. CONCLUSIONS A large and growing volume of research evidence suggests that KT platforms offer promise in supporting evidence-informed policy-making in low- and middle-income countries. KT platforms should consider as next steps expanding their current, relatively limited portfolio of activities and outputs, building bridges to complementary groups, and planning for evaluations that examine 'what works' for 'what types of issues' in 'what types of contexts'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun C R Partridge
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Cristián Mansilla
- McMaster Health Forum and Health Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Harkanwal Randhawa
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - John N Lavis
- McMaster Health Forum and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Africa Centre for Evidence, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Fadi El-Jardali
- Knowledge to Policy Center and Department of Health Management and Policy, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nelson K Sewankambo
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Department of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Haddad SM, Souza RT, Cecatti JG, Barreix M, Tamrat T, Footitt C, Mehl GL, Syah IF, Shankar AH, Tunçalp Ö. Building a Digital Tool for the Adoption of the World Health Organization's Antenatal Care Recommendations: Methodological Intersection of Evidence, Clinical Logic, and Digital Technology. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e16355. [PMID: 33001032 PMCID: PMC7983224 DOI: 10.2196/16355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background One of the key mandates of the World Health Organization (WHO) is to develop guidelines, defined as “a document containing recommendations for clinical practice or public health policy.” Guidelines represent the global standard for information sources shaping clinical practice and public health policies. Despite the rigorous development process and the value of guidelines for setting standards, implementing such standards within local contexts and at the point of care is a well-documented challenge. Digital technologies enable agile information management and may facilitate the adaptation of guidelines to diverse settings of health services delivery. Objective The objective of this paper is to detail the systematic and iterative process involved in transforming the WHO Antenatal Care (ANC) guidelines into a digital decision-support and patient-record application for routine use in primary health care settings, known as the WHO digital ANC module. Methods The WHO convened a team of clinical and digital health experts to develop the WHO digital ANC module as a tool to assist health care professionals in the implementation of WHO evidence-based recommendations for pregnant women. The WHO digital ANC module’s creation included the following steps: defining a minimum viable product (MVP), developing clinical workflows and algorithms, algorithm testing, developing a data dictionary, and the creation of a user interface or application development. The overall process of development took approximately 1 year to reach a stable prototype and to finalize the underlying content requirements of the data dictionary and decision support algorithms. Results The first output is a reference software reflecting the generic WHO ANC guideline content, known as the WHO digital ANC module. Within it, all actionable ANC recommendations have related data fields and algorithms to confirm whether the associated task was performed. WHO recommendations that are not carried out by the health care worker are saved as pending tasks on a woman’s health record, and those that are adequately fulfilled trigger messages with positive reinforcement. The second output consists of the structured documentation of the different components which contributed to the development of the WHO digital ANC module, such as the data dictionary and clinical decision support workflows. Conclusions This is a novel approach to facilitate the adoption and adaptation of recommendations through digital systems at the health service delivery level. It is expected that the WHO digital ANC module will support the implementation of evidence-based practices and provide information for monitoring and surveillance; however, further evidence is needed to understand how the WHO digital ANC module impacts the implementation of WHO recommendations. Further, the module’s implementation will inform the WHO’s ongoing efforts to create a pathway to adaptive and integrated (Smart) Guidelines in Digital Systems to improve health system quality, coverage, and accountability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samira M Haddad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.,Center for Research in Reproductive Health of Campinas (CEMICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Renato T Souza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.,Center for Research in Reproductive Health of Campinas (CEMICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Jose Guilherme Cecatti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.,Center for Research in Reproductive Health of Campinas (CEMICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Maria Barreix
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tigest Tamrat
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Garrett L Mehl
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Anuraj H Shankar
- Summit Institute of Development, Mataram, Indonesia.,Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Eijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit, Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Özge Tunçalp
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Scarlett J, Forsberg BC, Biermann O, Kuchenmüller T, El-Khatib Z. Indicators to evaluate organisational knowledge brokers: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:93. [PMID: 32831095 PMCID: PMC7444249 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00607-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Knowledge translation (KT) is currently endorsed by global health policy actors as a means to improve outcomes by institutionalising evidence-informed policy-making. Organisational knowledge brokers, comprised of researchers, policy-makers and other stakeholders, are increasingly being used to undertake and promote KT at all levels of health policy-making, though few resources exist to guide the evaluation of these efforts. Using a scoping review methodology, we identified, synthesised and assessed indicators that have been used to evaluate KT infrastructure and capacity-building activities in a health policy context in order to inform the evaluation of organisational knowledge brokers. Methods A scoping review methodology was used. This included the search of Medline, Global Health and the WHO Library databases for studies regarding the evaluation of KT infrastructure and capacity-building activities between health research and policy, published in English from 2005 to 2016. Data on study characteristics, outputs and outcomes measured, related indicators, mode of verification, duration and/or frequency of collection, indicator methods, KT model, and targeted capacity level were extracted and charted for analysis. Results A total of 1073 unique articles were obtained and 176 articles were qualified to be screened in full-text; 32 articles were included in the analysis. Of a total 213 indicators extracted, we identified 174 (174/213; 81.7%) indicators to evaluate the KT infrastructure and capacity-building that have been developed using methods beyond expert opinion. Four validated instruments were identified. The 174 indicators are presented in 8 domains based on an adaptation of the domains of the Lavis et al. framework of linking research to action – general climate, production of research, push efforts, pull efforts, exchange efforts, integrated efforts, evaluation and capacity-building. Conclusion This review presents a total of 174 method-based indicators to evaluate KT infrastructure and capacity-building. The presented indicators can be used or adapted globally by organisational knowledge brokers and other stakeholders in their monitoring and evaluation work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Scarlett
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Birger C Forsberg
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.,Region Stockholm, Hantverkargatan 11B, 112 21, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olivia Biermann
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tanja Kuchenmüller
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, UN City, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Ziad El-Khatib
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. .,World Health Programme, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), 445 Boulevard de l'Université, Rouyn-Noranda, QC, J9X 5E4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Patiño-Lugo DF, Pastor Durango MDP, Lugo-Agudelo LH, Posada Borrero AM, Ciro Correa V, Plata Contreras JA, Vera Giraldo CY, Aguirre-Acevedo DC. Implementation of the clinical practice guideline for individuals with amputations in Colombia: a qualitative study on perceived barriers and facilitators. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:538. [PMID: 32539755 PMCID: PMC7296745 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05406-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The issue of lower extremity amputation has been in the Colombian political agenda for its relationship with the armed conflict and antipersonnel mines. In 2015 the Colombian Ministry of Health published a national clinical practice guideline (CPG) for amputee patients. However, there is a need to design implementation strategies that target end-users and the context in which the CPG will be used. This study aims to identify users’ perceptions about the barriers and facilitators for implementing the guideline for the care of amputee patients in a middle-income country such as Colombia. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 38 users, including patients, health workers, and administrative staff of institutions of the health system in Colombia. Individuals were purposively selected to ensure different perspectives, allowing a balance of individual positions. Results According to participants’ perceptions, barriers to implementation are classified as individual barriers (characteristics of the amputee patient and professionals), health system barriers (resource availability, timely care, information systems, service costs, and regulatory changes), and barriers related to clinical practice guidelines (utility, methodological rigour, implementation flexibility, and characteristics of the group developing the guidelines). Conclusions Our study advances knowledge on the perceived individual and health system barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the CPG for amputee patients in Colombia. Importantly, the governance, financial, and service delivery arrangements of the Colombian health system are determining factors in implementing CPGs. For example, the financial arrangements between the insurance companies and the health care provider institutions were identified as barriers for the implementation of recommendations related to the continuity and opportunity of care of patients with amputations. The design of implementation strategies that successfully address the individual behaviours and the contextual health systems arrangements may significantly impact the health care process for amputee patients in Colombia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel F Patiño-Lugo
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia.
| | - María Del Pilar Pastor Durango
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Luz Helena Lugo-Agudelo
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Ana María Posada Borrero
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Verónica Ciro Correa
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Jesús Alberto Plata Contreras
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Claudia Yaneth Vera Giraldo
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Daniel Camilo Aguirre-Acevedo
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Grupo de investigación en reahabilitación en salud, Carrera 51 D # 62-29 oficina MUA 302, Medellín, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Varallyay NI, Langlois EV, Tran N, Elias V, Reveiz L. Health system decision-makers at the helm of implementation research: development of a framework to evaluate the processes and effectiveness of embedded approaches. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:64. [PMID: 32522238 PMCID: PMC7288439 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00579-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Embedded approaches to implementation research (IR), whereby health system decision-makers participate actively in the research process, are gaining traction as effective approaches to optimise the delivery of health programmes and policies. However, the evidence base on the processes and effectiveness of such collaborative research remains inchoate. Standardised approaches to evaluate these initiatives are needed to identify core elements of ‘embeddedness’, unveil the underlying pathways of change, and assess contribution to evidence uptake in decision-making and overall outcomes of effect. The framework presented in this paper responds to this need, designed to guide the systematic evaluation of embedded IR. Methods This evaluation framework for embedded IR approaches is based on the experience of a joint initiative by the Pan American Health Organization/Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, which has supported 19 IR grants in 10 Latin American and Caribbean countries from 2014 to 2017. The conceptualisation of this framework drew on various sources of information, including empirical evidence and conceptual insights from the literature, interviews with content experts, and a prospective evaluation of the 2016 cohort that included semi-structured key informant interviews, document analysis, and a research team survey to examine key aspects of embedded research. Results We developed a widely applicable conceptual framework to guide the evaluation of embedded IR in various contexts. Focused on uncovering how this collaborative research approach influences programme improvement, it outlines expected processes and intermediate outcomes. It also highlights constructs with which to assess ‘embeddedness’ as well as critical contextual factors. The framework is intended to provide a structure by which to systematically examine such embedded research initiatives, proposing three key stages of evidence-informed decision-making – co-production of evidence, engagement with research, and enactment of programme changes. Conclusion Rigorous evaluation of embedded IR is needed to build the evidence on its processes and effectiveness in influencing decision-making. The evaluation framework presented here addresses this gap with consideration of the complexity of such efforts. Its applicability to similar initiatives is bolstered by virtue of being founded on real-world experience; its potential to contribute to a nuanced understanding of embedded IR is significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Ilona Varallyay
- Department of International Health of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
| | - Etienne V Langlois
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nhan Tran
- Unintentional Injury Prevention Department for the Management of Non-communicable Diseases, Disability, Violence, and Injury Prevention (NVI), World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vanesa Elias
- Department of Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health, Pan American Health Organization, 525 Twenty-third Street, N.W, Washington, D.C, USA
| | - Ludovic Reveiz
- Department of Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health, Pan American Health Organization, 525 Twenty-third Street, N.W, Washington, D.C, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
González Block MA, Arroyo Laguna J, Cetrángolo O, Crocco Ábalos P, Guerrero R, Riva Knauth D, Ghaffar A, Pavón León P, Del Rocío Saénz M, González McQuire R, Martínez Zavala B, Gutiérrez Calderón E. Health policy and systems research publications in Latin America warrant the launching of a new specialised regional journal. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:59. [PMID: 32503569 PMCID: PMC7275341 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00565-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Scientific journals play a critical role in research validation and dissemination and are increasingly vocal about the identification of research priorities and the targeting of research results to key audiences. No new journals specialising in health policy and systems research (HPSR) and focusing in the developing world or in a specific developing world region have been established since the early 1980s. This paper compares the growth of publications on HPSR across Latin America and the world and explores the potential, feasibility and challenges of innovative publication strategies. Methods A bibliometric analysis was undertaken using HPSR MeSH terms with journals indexed in Medline. A survey was undertaken among 2500 authors publishing on HPSR in Latin America (LA) through an online survey, with a 13.1% response rate. Aggregate indicators were constructed and validated, and two-way ANOVA tests were performed on key variables. Results HPSR publications on LA observed an average annual growth of 27.5% from the years 2000 to 2018, as against 11.4% worldwide and yet a lag on papers published per capita. A total of 48 journals with an Impact Factor publish HPSR on LA, of which 5 non-specialised journals are published in the region and are ranked in the bottom quintile of Impact Factor. While the majority of HPSR papers worldwide is published in specialised HPSR journals, in LA this is the minority. Very few researchers from LA sit in the Editorial Board of international journals. Researchers highly support strengthening quality HPSR publications through publishing in open access, on-line journals with a focus on the LA region and with peer reviewers specialized on the region. Researchers would support a new open access journal specializing in the LA region and in HPSR, publishing in English. Open access up-front costs and disincentives while waiting for an Impact Factor can be overcome. Conclusion Researchers publishing on HPSR in LA widely support the launching of a new specialised journal for the region with a vigorous editorial policy focusing on regional and country priorities. Strategies should be in place to support English-language publishing and to develop a community of practice around the publication process. In the first years, special issues should be promoted through a priority-setting process to attract prominent authors, develop the audience and attain an Impact Factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Juan Arroyo Laguna
- Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Escuela de Gobierno y Políticas Públicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru
| | - Oscar Cetrángolo
- Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la UBA, Buenos Aires & Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Ramiro Guerrero
- Centro de Estudios en Protección Social y Economía de la Salud, Universidad ICESI, Cali, Colombia
| | - Daniela Riva Knauth
- Departamento de Medicina Social, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Abdul Ghaffar
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Patricia Pavón León
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dodd M, Ivers R, Zwi AB, Rahman A, Jagnoor J. Investigating the process of evidence-informed health policymaking in Bangladesh: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan 2020; 34:469-478. [PMID: 31237941 PMCID: PMC6736329 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last four decades, Bangladesh has made considerable improvements in population health, this is in part due to the use of evidence to inform policymaking. This systematic review aims to better understand critical factors that have facilitated the diffusion of scientific evidence into multiple phases of health policymaking in Bangladesh. To do this an existing policy framework designed by Shiffman and Smith in 2007, was used to extract and synthesize data from selected policy analyses. This framework was used to ensure the content, context and actors involved with evidence-informed policymaking were considered in each case where research had helped shape a health policy. The 'PRISMA Checklist' was employed to design pre-specified eligibility criteria for the selection of information sources, search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and process of data extraction and synthesis. Through our systematic search conducted from February to May 2017, we initially identified 1859 articles; after removal of duplicates, followed by the screening of titles, abstracts and full-texts, 24 articles were included in the analysis. Health policy issues included the following topics: maternal and child health, tobacco control, reproductive health, infectious disease control and the impact and sustainability of knowledge translation platforms. Findings suggested that research evidence that could be used to meet key targets associated with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were more likely to be considered as a political (and therefore policy) priority. Furthermore, avenues of engagement between research organizations and the government as well as collective action from civil-society organizations were important for the diffusion of evidence into policies. Through this article, it is apparent that the interface between evidence and policy formulation occurs when evidence is, disseminated by a cohesive policy-network with strong leadership and framed to deliver solutions for problems on both the domestic and global development agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Dodd
- Injury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, 1 King Street, Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Ivers
- Injury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, 1 King Street, Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Public Health & Community Medicine, UNSW; The George Institute for Global Health Australia, UNSW, Australia
| | - Anthony B Zwi
- Health, Rights and Development (HEARD@UNSW), Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aminur Rahman
- Centre for Injury Prevention and Research (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Jagnoor Jagnoor
- Injury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, 1 King Street, Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mc Sween-Cadieux E, Dagenais C, Somé DT, Ridde V. A health knowledge brokering intervention in a district of Burkina Faso: A qualitative retrospective implementation analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0220105. [PMID: 31349363 PMCID: PMC6660220 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A knowledge brokering (KB) intervention was implemented in Burkina Faso. By creating partnerships with health system actors in one district, the broker was expected to assess their knowledge needs, survey the literature to provide the most recent research evidence, produce various knowledge translation tools, and support them in using research to improve their actions. The purpose of this study was to analyze the key factors that influenced the KB project and to make recommendations for future initiatives. METHODS The qualitative design involved a single case study in which the KB intervention implementation was evaluated retrospectively. Data came from interviews with the intervention team (n = 4) and with various actors involved in the intervention (n = 16). Data from formative evaluations conducted during the KB implementation and observation data from a two-month field mission were also used. Two conceptual frameworks were combined to guide the analysis: the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (Damschroder et al., 2009) and the Ecological Framework (Durlak & DuPre, 2008). RESULTS Various KB activities were conducted during the first two years of implementation at the local level. The project came to an early end following vain efforts to relocate the intervention at the central level in order to further influence the policy process. Certain shortcomings in the implementation team negatively influenced the implementation: inadequate leadership, no shared vision regarding the reorientation of the intervention, challenges related to the KB role, and lack of frank communications internally. Other impediments to the intervention's deployment included local actors' lack of decision-making authority, the unavailability of resources and of organizational incentives for involvement in the KB intervention, and contextual challenges in accessing the central level. However, the KB strategy presented several strengths: collaborative development, support provided to local partners by the broker, and training opportunities and support provided to the broker. CONCLUSIONS More attention must be paid to intervention planning, partners' engagement, human, financial and technical resources availability, continuous development of skills and of communications within the KB team, and periodic assessment of potential obstacles related to the complexity of the system within which the intervention has been implemented. Using implementation science frameworks when developing KB strategies in the West African context should be promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christian Dagenais
- Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Donmozoun Télesphore Somé
- Agence de Formation de Recherche et d’Expertise en Santé pour l’Afrique (AFRICSanté), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
| | - Valéry Ridde
- French Institute for Research on Sustainable Development (IRD), CEPED (IRD-Université Paris Descartes), Universités Paris Sorbonne Cités, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France
- University of Montreal Public Health Research Institute (IRSPUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Edwards A, Zweigenthal V, Olivier J. Evidence map of knowledge translation strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers in African health systems. Health Res Policy Syst 2019; 17:16. [PMID: 30732634 PMCID: PMC6367796 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0419-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need for research-based knowledge to inform health policy formulation and implementation is a chronic global concern impacting health systems functioning and impeding the provision of quality healthcare for all. This paper provides a systematic overview of the literature on knowledge translation (KT) strategies employed by health system researchers and policy-makers in African countries. METHODS Evidence mapping methodology was adapted from the social and health sciences literature and used to generate a schema of KT strategies, outcomes, facilitators and barriers. Four reference databases were searched using defined criteria. Studies were screened and a searchable database containing 62 eligible studies was compiled using Microsoft Access. Frequency and thematic analysis were used to report study characteristics and to establish the final evidence map. Focus was placed on KT in policy formulation processes in order to better manage the diversity of available literature. RESULTS The KT literature in African countries is widely distributed, problematically diverse and growing. Significant disparities exist between reports on KT in different countries, and there are many settings without published evidence of local KT characteristics. Commonly reported KT strategies include policy briefs, capacity-building workshops and policy dialogues. Barriers affecting researchers and policy-makers include insufficient skills and capacity to conduct KT activities, time constraints and a lack of resources. Availability of quality locally relevant research was the most reported facilitator. Limited KT outcomes reflect persisting difficulties in outcome identification and reporting. CONCLUSION This study has identified substantial geographical gaps in knowledge and evidenced the need to boost local research capacities on KT practices in low- and middle-income countries. Evidence mapping is also shown to be a useful approach that can assist local decision-making to enhance KT in policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Edwards
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925 South Africa
| | - Virginia Zweigenthal
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925 South Africa
- Western Cape Government Health, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jill Olivier
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925 South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hanney SR, González-Block MA. 'Knowledge for better health' revisited - the increasing significance of health research systems: a review by departing Editors-in-Chief. Health Res Policy Syst 2017; 15:81. [PMID: 28965493 PMCID: PMC5623979 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-017-0248-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
How can nations organise research investments to obtain the best bundle of knowledge and the maximum level of improved health, spread as equitably as possible? This question was the central focus of a major initiative from WHO led by Prof Tikki Pang, which resulted in a range of developments, including the publication of a conceptual framework for national health research systems - Knowledge for better health - in 2003, and in the founding of the journal Health Research Policy and Systems (HARPS). As Editors-in-Chief of the journal since 2006, we mark our retirement by tracking both the progress of the journal and the development of national health research systems. HARPS has maintained its focus on a range of central themes that are key components of a national health research system in any country. These include building capacity to conduct and use health research, identifying appropriate priorities, securing funds and allocating them accountably, producing scientifically valid research outputs, promoting the use of research in polices and practice in order to improve health, and monitoring and evaluating the health research system. Some of the themes covered in HARPS are now receiving increased attention and, for example, with the assessment of research impact and development of knowledge translation platforms, the journal has covered their progress throughout that expansion of interest. In addition, there is increasing recognition of new imperatives, including the importance of promoting gender equality in health research if benefits are to be maximised. In this Editorial, we outline some of the diverse and developing perspectives considered within each theme, as well as considering how they are held together by the growing desire to build effective health research systems in all countries.From 2003 until mid-June 2017, HARPS published 590 articles on the above and related themes, with authors being located in 76 countries. We present quantitative data tracing the journal's growth and the increasing external recognition of its role. We thank the many colleagues who have kindly contributed to the journal's success, and finish on an exciting note by welcoming the new Editors-in-Chief who will take HARPS forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R. Hanney
- Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH United Kingdom
| | - Miguel A. González-Block
- Universidad Anáhuac, Av. Universidad Anáhuac 46, Lomas Anáhuac, 52786 Huixquilucan Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Uneke CJ, Sombie I, Keita N, Lokossou V, Johnson E, Ongolo-Zogo P. Improving maternal and child health policymaking processes in Nigeria: an assessment of policymakers' needs, barriers and facilitators of evidence-informed policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst 2017; 15:48. [PMID: 28722554 PMCID: PMC5516839 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-017-0217-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Nigeria, interest in the evidence-to-policy process is gaining momentum among policymakers involved in maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH). However, numerous gaps exist among policymakers on use of research evidence in policymaking. The objective of this study was to assess the perception of MNCH policymakers regarding their needs and the barriers and facilitators to use of research evidence in policymaking in Nigeria. METHODS The study design was a cross-sectional assessment of perceptions undertaken during a national MNCH stakeholders' engagement event convened in Abuja, Nigeria. A questionnaire designed to assess participants' perceptions was administered in person. Group consultations were also held, which centred on policymakers' evidence-to-policy needs to enhance the use of evidence in policymaking. RESULTS A total of 40 participants completed the questionnaire and participated in the group consultations. According to the respondents, the main barriers to evidence use in MNCH policymaking include inadequate capacity of organisations to conduct policy-relevant research; inadequate budgetary allocation for policy-relevant research; policymakers' indifference to research evidence; poor dissemination of research evidence to policymakers; and lack of interaction fora between researchers and policymakers. The main facilitators of use of research evidence for policymaking in MNCH, as perceived by the respondents, include capacity building for policymakers on use of research evidence in policy formulation; appropriate dissemination of research findings to relevant stakeholders; involving policymakers in research design and execution; and allowing policymakers' needs to drive research. The main ways identified to promote policymakers' use of evidence for policymaking included improving policymakers' skills in information and communication technology, data use, analysis, communication and advocacy. CONCLUSION To improve the use of research evidence in policymaking in Nigeria, there is a need to establish mechanisms that will facilitate the movement from evidence to policy and address the needs identified by policymakers. It is also imperative to improve organisational initiatives that facilitate use of research evidence for policymaking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chigozie J Uneke
- Knowledge Translation Platform, African Institute for Health Policy & Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, PMB 053, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
| | - Issiaka Sombie
- West African Health Organisation, 175 avenue Ouezzin Coulibaly, 01 BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso
| | - Namoudou Keita
- West African Health Organisation, 175 avenue Ouezzin Coulibaly, 01 BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso
| | - Virgil Lokossou
- West African Health Organisation, 175 avenue Ouezzin Coulibaly, 01 BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso
| | - Ermel Johnson
- West African Health Organisation, 175 avenue Ouezzin Coulibaly, 01 BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso 01, Burkina Faso
| | - Pierre Ongolo-Zogo
- Hopital Central Yaounde, CDBPH Lawrence VERGNE Building 2nd Floor, Avenue Henry Dunant Messa, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Head MG, Goss S, Gelister Y, Alegana V, Brown RJ, Clarke SC, Fitchett JRA, Atun R, Scott JAG, Newell ML, Padmadas SS, Tatem AJ. Global funding trends for malaria research in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic analysis. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2017; 5:e772-e781. [PMID: 28668230 PMCID: PMC5567191 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30245-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 05/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Total domestic and international funding for malaria is inadequate to achieve WHO global targets in burden reduction by 2030. We describe the trends of investments in malaria-related research in sub-Saharan Africa and compare investment with national disease burden to identify areas of funding strength and potentially neglected populations. We also considered funding for malaria control. Methods Research funding data related to malaria for 1997–2013 were sourced from existing datasets, from 13 major public and philanthropic global health funders, and from funding databases. Investments (reported in US$) were considered by geographical area and compared with data on parasite prevalence and populations at risk in sub-Saharan Africa. 45 sub-Saharan African countries were ranked by amount of research funding received. Findings We found 333 research awards totalling US$814·4 million. Public health research covered $308·1 million (37·8%) and clinical trials covered $275·2 million (33·8%). Tanzania ($107·8 million [13·2%]), Uganda ($97·9 million [12·0%]), and Kenya ($92·9 million [11·4%]) received the highest sum of research investment and the most research awards. Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda remained highly ranked after adjusting for national gross domestic product. Countries with a reasonably high malaria burden that received little research investment or funding for malaria control included Central African Republic (ranked 40th) and Sierra Leone (ranked 35th). Congo (Brazzaville) and Guinea had reasonably high malaria mortality, yet Congo (Brazzaville) ranked 38th and Guinea ranked 25th, thus receiving little investment. Interpretation Some countries receive reasonably large investments in malaria-related research (Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda), whereas others receive little or no investments (Sierra Leone, Central African Republic). Research investments are typically highest in countries where funding for malaria control is also high. Investment strategies should consider more equitable research and operational investments across countries to include currently neglected and susceptible populations. Funding Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G Head
- Global Health Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Sian Goss
- Global Health Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; WorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Yann Gelister
- Global Health Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Victor Alegana
- WorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rebecca J Brown
- Global Health Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Stuart C Clarke
- Global Health Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Southampton NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Joseph R A Fitchett
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rifat Atun
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J Anthony G Scott
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Marie-Louise Newell
- Global Health Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sabu S Padmadas
- Department of Social Statistics and Demography and Centre for Global Health, Population, Poverty and Policy, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrew J Tatem
- WorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Flowminder Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kiefer S, Knoblauch AM, Steinmann P, Barth-Jaeggi T, Vahedi M, Maher D, Utzinger J, Wyss K. Operational and implementation research within Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria grants: a situation analysis in six countries. Global Health 2017; 13:22. [PMID: 28340619 PMCID: PMC5366106 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-017-0245-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Operational/implementation research (OR/IR) is a key activity to improve disease control programme performance. We assessed the extent to which malaria and tuberculosis (TB) grants from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria ("Global Fund") include support for OR/IR, and discuss the implications of the current Global Fund operating mechanisms for OR/IR support. METHODS The situation analysis focussed on malaria and TB, while HIV was excluded. Stakeholder interviews were conducted at the Global Fund secretariat and in six purposefully selected high disease burden countries, namely the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Myanmar and Zimbabwe. Interviewed in-country stakeholders included the relevant disease control programme managers, project implementation partners, representatives from international organisations with a stake in global health, academic and governmental research institutions, and other relevant individuals such as members of the country coordination mechanism. Additionally, documentation of grants and OR/IR obtained from the Global Fund was reviewed. RESULTS The Global Fund provides substantial resources for malaria and TB surveys, and supports OR/IR if such support is requested and the application is well justified. We observed considerable variations from one country to another and between programmes with regards to need, demand, absorption capacity and funding for OR/IR related to malaria and TB. Important determinants for the extent of such funding are the involvement of national research coordination bodies, established research agendas and priorities, human and technical research capacity, and involvement of relevant stakeholders in concept note development. Efforts to disseminate OR/IR findings were generally weak, and the Global Fund does not maintain a central OR/IR database. When faced with a need to choose between procurement of commodities for disease control and supporting research, countries tend to seek research funding from other donors. The Global Fund is expected to issue more specific guidance on the conditions under which it supports OR/IR, and to adapt administrative procedures to facilitate research. CONCLUSIONS The importance of OR/IR for optimising disease control programmes is generally accepted but countries vary in their capacity to demand and implement studies. Countries expect guidance on OR/IR from the Global Fund. Administrative procedures specifically related to the budget planning should be modified to facilitate ad-hoc OR/IR funding. More generally, several countries expressed a need to strengthen capacity for planning, negotiating and implementing research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Kiefer
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, P.O. Box, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Astrid M. Knoblauch
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, P.O. Box, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Peter Steinmann
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, P.O. Box, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tanja Barth-Jaeggi
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, P.O. Box, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mahnaz Vahedi
- The Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dermot Maher
- The Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jürg Utzinger
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, P.O. Box, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kaspar Wyss
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, P.O. Box, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Olayemi E, Asare EV, Benneh-Akwasi Kuma AA. Guidelines in lower-middle income countries. Br J Haematol 2017; 177:846-854. [PMID: 28295193 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Guidelines include recommendations intended to optimize patient care; used appropriately, they make healthcare consistent and efficient. In most lower-middle income countries (LMICs), there is a paucity of well-designed guidelines; as a result, healthcare workers depend on guidelines developed in Higher Income Countries (HICs). However, local guidelines are more likely to be implemented because they are applicable to the specific environment; and consider factors such as availability of resources, specialized skills and local culture. If guidelines developed in HICs are to be implemented in LMICs, developers need to incorporate local experts in their development. Involvement of local stakeholders may improve the rates of implementation by identifying and removing barriers to implementation in LMICs. Another option is to encourage local experts to adapt them for use in LMICs; these guidelines may recommend strategies different from those used in HICs, but will be aimed at achieving the best practicable standard of care. Infrastructural deficits in LMICs could be improved by learning from and building on the successful response to the human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome pandemic through interactions between HICs and LMICs. Similarly, collaborations between postgraduate medical colleges in both HICs and LMICs may help specialist doctors training in LMICs develop skills required for guideline development and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edeghonghon Olayemi
- Department of Haematology, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.,Ghana Institute of Clinical Genetics, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana
| | - Eugenia V Asare
- Ghana Institute of Clinical Genetics, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Health research capacity building in Georgia: a case-based needs assessment. Public Health 2017; 147:1-7. [PMID: 28404484 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Revised: 01/15/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Research capacity building in the health sciences in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has typically focused on bench-science capacity, but research examining health service delivery and health workforce is equally necessary to determine the best ways to deliver care. The Republic of Georgia, formerly a part of the Soviet Union, has multiple issues within its healthcare system that would benefit from expended research capacity, but the current research environment needs to be explored prior to examining research-focused activities. The purpose of this project was to conduct a needs assessment focused on developing research capacity in the Republic of Georgia with an emphasis on workforce and network development. STUDY DESIGN A case study approach guided by a needs assessment format. METHODS We conducted in-country, informal, semi-structured interviews in English with key informants and focus groups with faculty, students, and representatives of local non-governmental organizations. Purposive and snowball sampling approaches were used to recruit participants, with key informant interviews scheduled prior to arrival in country. Documents relevant to research capacity building were also included. Interview results were coded via content analysis. Final results were organized into a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threat) analysis format, with the report shared with participants. RESULTS There is widespread interest among students and faculty in Georgia around building research capacity. Lack of funding was identified by many informants as a barrier to research. Many critical research skills, such as proposal development, qualitative research skills, and statistical analysis, were reported as very limited. Participants expressed concerns about the ethics of research, with some suggesting that research is undertaken to punish or 'expose' subjects. However, students and faculty are highly motivated to improve their skills, are open to a variety of learning modalities, and have research priorities aligned with Georgian health needs. CONCLUSIONS This study's findings indicate that while the Georgian research infrastructure needs further development, Georgian students and faculty are eager to supplement its gaps by improving their own skills. These findings are consistent with those seen in other developing country contexts.
Collapse
|
29
|
Nabyonga-Orem J, Tumusiime P, Nyoni J, Kwamie A. Harmonisation and standardisation of health sector and programme reviews and evaluations - how can they better inform health policy dialogue? Health Res Policy Syst 2016; 14:87. [PMID: 27986084 PMCID: PMC5162096 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-016-0161-9;14(87)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health sector and programme performance assessments provide a rich source of contextual data directly linked to implementation of programmes and can inform health policy dialogue, planning and resource allocation. In seeking to maximise this opportunity, there are challenges to overcome. A meeting convened by the World Health Organization African Region discussed the strengths, weaknesses and challenges to harmonising and standardising health sector and programme performance assessments, as well as use of evidence from such processes in decision making. This article synthesises the deliberations which emerged from the meeting. Discussing these in light of other literature we propose practical options to standardising health sector and programme performance assessment and improve realisation of using evidence in decision making. DISCUSSION Use of evidence generated from health sector and programme performance assessments into regular country processes of sectoral monitoring, dialogue and policy modification is crucial. However, this process faces several challenges. Identified challenges were categorised under several themes, namely the weak institutional capacities for monitoring and evaluation in reference to weak health information systems, a lack of tools and skills, and weak accountability mechanisms; desynchronised planning timeframes between programme and overall health sector strategies; inadequate time to undertake comprehensive and good quality performance assessment; weak mechanisms for following up on implementation of recommendations; lack of effective stakeholder participation; and divergent political aspirations. CONCLUSION The question of what performance assessment is for in a country must be asked and answered clearly if the utility of these processes is to be realised. Standardising programme and sector reviews offers numerable opportunities that need to be maximised. Identified challenges need to be overcome through strengthened Ministry of Health leadership, effective stakeholder engagement and institutionalising follow-up mechanisms for agreed recommendations. In addition, health sector performance assessments need to be institutionalised as part of the accountability mechanism, and they must be planned for and funding secured within annual budget and medium term expenditure frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
- Health Systems and Services Cluster, Health Systems Governance, World Health Organization, Inter-Country Support Team for Eastern & Southern Africa, P.O. Box CY 348, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Prosper Tumusiime
- Health Systems and Services cluster, World Health Organization Regional office for Africa, BP 06, Cite de Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Jennifer Nyoni
- Health Systems and Services cluster, World Health Organization Regional office for Africa, BP 06, Cite de Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Aku Kwamie
- Ghana Health Service, Research and Development Division, PMB M9, Ministries, Accra, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nabyonga-Orem J, Tumusiime P, Nyoni J, Kwamie A. Harmonisation and standardisation of health sector and programme reviews and evaluations - how can they better inform health policy dialogue? Health Res Policy Syst 2016; 14:87. [PMID: 27986084 PMCID: PMC5162096 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-016-0161-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health sector and programme performance assessments provide a rich source of contextual data directly linked to implementation of programmes and can inform health policy dialogue, planning and resource allocation. In seeking to maximise this opportunity, there are challenges to overcome. A meeting convened by the World Health Organization African Region discussed the strengths, weaknesses and challenges to harmonising and standardising health sector and programme performance assessments, as well as use of evidence from such processes in decision making. This article synthesises the deliberations which emerged from the meeting. Discussing these in light of other literature we propose practical options to standardising health sector and programme performance assessment and improve realisation of using evidence in decision making. DISCUSSION Use of evidence generated from health sector and programme performance assessments into regular country processes of sectoral monitoring, dialogue and policy modification is crucial. However, this process faces several challenges. Identified challenges were categorised under several themes, namely the weak institutional capacities for monitoring and evaluation in reference to weak health information systems, a lack of tools and skills, and weak accountability mechanisms; desynchronised planning timeframes between programme and overall health sector strategies; inadequate time to undertake comprehensive and good quality performance assessment; weak mechanisms for following up on implementation of recommendations; lack of effective stakeholder participation; and divergent political aspirations. CONCLUSION The question of what performance assessment is for in a country must be asked and answered clearly if the utility of these processes is to be realised. Standardising programme and sector reviews offers numerable opportunities that need to be maximised. Identified challenges need to be overcome through strengthened Ministry of Health leadership, effective stakeholder engagement and institutionalising follow-up mechanisms for agreed recommendations. In addition, health sector performance assessments need to be institutionalised as part of the accountability mechanism, and they must be planned for and funding secured within annual budget and medium term expenditure frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
- Health Systems and Services Cluster, Health Systems Governance, World Health Organization, Inter-Country Support Team for Eastern & Southern Africa, P.O. Box CY 348, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Prosper Tumusiime
- Health Systems and Services cluster, World Health Organization Regional office for Africa, BP 06, Cite de Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Jennifer Nyoni
- Health Systems and Services cluster, World Health Organization Regional office for Africa, BP 06, Cite de Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Aku Kwamie
- Ghana Health Service, Research and Development Division, PMB M9, Ministries, Accra, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Becerril-Montekio V, Alcalde-Rabanal J, Darney BG, Orozco-Nuñez E. Using systematized tacit knowledge to prioritize implementation challenges in existing maternal health programs: implications for the post MDG era. Health Policy Plan 2016; 31:1031-8. [PMID: 27060787 PMCID: PMC5013782 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Strategic priority setting and implementation of strategies to reduce maternal mortality are key to the post Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 2015 agenda. This article highlights the feasibility and the advantages of using a systematized tacit knowledge approach, using data from maternal health program personnel, to identify local challenges to implementing policies and programs to inform the post MDG era. Communities of practice, conceived as groups of people sharing professional interests, experiences and knowledge, were formed with diverse health personnel implementing maternal health programs in Mexico and Nicaragua. Participants attended several workshops and developed different online activities aiming to strengthen their capacities to acquire, analyze, adapt and apply research results and to systematize their experience and knowledge of the actual implementation of these programs. Concept mapping, a general method designed to organize and depict the ideas of a group on a particular topic, was used to manage, discuss and systematize their tacit knowledge about implementation problems of the programs they work in. Using a special online concept mapping platform, participants prioritized implementation problems by sorting them in conceptual clusters and rating their importance and feasibility of solution. Two hundred and thirty-one participants from three communities of practice in each country registered on the online concept mapping platform and 200 people satisfactorily completed the sorting and rating activities. Participants further discussed these results to prioritize the implementation problems of maternal health programs. Our main finding was a great similarity between the Mexican and the Nicaraguan general results highlighting the importance and the feasibility of solution of implementation problems related to the quality of healthcare. The use of rigorously organized tacit knowledge of health personnel proved to be a feasible and useful tool for prioritization to inform implementation priorities in the post MDG agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Becerril-Montekio
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública / Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud (National Institute of Public Health / Centre for Health Systems Research), Av. Universidad 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos CP 62100, Mexico
| | - Jacqueline Alcalde-Rabanal
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública / Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud (National Institute of Public Health / Centre for Health Systems Research), Av. Universidad 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos CP 62100, Mexico
| | - Blair G Darney
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública / Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud (National Institute of Public Health / Centre for Health Systems Research), Av. Universidad 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos CP 62100, Mexico Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Emanuel Orozco-Nuñez
- Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública / Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud (National Institute of Public Health / Centre for Health Systems Research), Av. Universidad 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos CP 62100, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Puchalski Ritchie LM, Khan S, Moore JE, Timmings C, van Lettow M, Vogel JP, Khan DN, Mbaruku G, Mrisho M, Mugerwa K, Uka S, Gülmezoglu AM, Straus SE. Low- and middle-income countries face many common barriers to implementation of maternal health evidence products. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 76:229-37. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2015] [Revised: 12/16/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
33
|
Challenges and opportunities associated with the introduction of next-generation long-lasting insecticidal nets for malaria control: a case study from Burkina Faso. Implement Sci 2016; 11:103. [PMID: 27450082 PMCID: PMC4957273 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0469-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 07/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Reductions in malaria incidence in Africa can largely be attributed to increases in malaria vector control activities; predominately the use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs). With insecticide resistance affecting an increasing number of malaria-endemic countries and threatening the effectiveness of conventional LLINs, there is an increasing urgency to implement alternative tools that control these resistant populations. The aim of this study was to identify potential challenges and opportunities for accelerating access to next-generation LLINs in Burkina Faso, a country with areas of high levels of insecticide resistance. Methods An analytical framework was used to guide the selection of interviewees, data collection and analysis. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with key informants in April 2014 in Burkina Faso. Interviews were conducted in French and English, audio recorded, transcribed and entered into NVivo 10 for data management and analysis. Data were coded according to the framework themes and then analysed to provide a description of the key points and explain patterns in the data. Results Interviewees reported that the policy architecture in Burkina Faso is characterised by a strong framework of actors that contribute to policymaking and strong national research capacity which indirectly contributes to national policy change via collaboration with internationally led research. Financing significantly impacts the potential adoption, availability and affordability of next-generation LLINs. This confers significant power on international donors that fund vector control. National decisions around which LLINs to procure were restricted to quantity and delivery dates; the potential to tackle insecticide resistance was not part of the decision-making process. Furthermore, at the time of the study, there was no World Health Organization (WHO) guidance on where and when next-generation LLINs might positively impact on malaria transmission, severely limiting their adoption, availability and affordability. Conclusions This study shows that access to next-generation LLINs was severely compromised by the lack of global guidance. In a country like Burkina Faso where WHO recommendations are relatively quickly adopted, a clear WHO recommendation and adequate financing will be key to accelerate access to next-generation LLINs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0469-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
34
|
Romore I, Njau RJA, Semali I, Mwisongo A, Ba Nguz A, Mshinda H, Tanner M, Abdulla S. Policy analysis for deciding on a malaria vaccine RTS,S in Tanzania. Malar J 2016; 15:143. [PMID: 26956944 PMCID: PMC4782348 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1197-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2015] [Accepted: 03/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Traditionally, it has taken decades to introduce new interventions in low-income countries. Several factors account for these delays, one of which is the absence of a framework to facilitate comprehensive understanding of policy process to inform policy makers and stimulate the decision-making process. In the case of the proposed introduction of malaria vaccines in Tanzania, a specific framework for decision-making will speed up the administrative process and shorten the time until the vaccine is made available to the target population. Methods Qualitative research was used as a basis for developing the Policy Framework. Interviews were conducted with government officials, bilateral and multilateral partners and other stakeholders in Tanzania to assess malaria treatment policy changes and to draw lessons for malaria vaccine adoption. Results The decision-making process for adopting malaria interventions and new vaccines in general takes years, involving several processes: meetings and presentations of scientific data from different studies with consistent results, packaging and disseminating evidence and getting approval for use by the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MOHSW). It is influenced by contextual factors; Promoting factors include; epidemiological and intervention characteristics, country experiences of malaria treatment policy change, presentation and dissemination of evidence, coordination and harmonization of the process, use of international scientific evidence. Barriers factors includes; financial sustainability, competing health and other priorities, political will and bureaucratic procedures, costs related to the adoption and implementations of interventions, supply and distribution and professional compliance with anti-malarial drugs. Conclusion The framework facilitates the synthesis of information in a coherent way, enabling a clearer understanding of the policy process, thereby speeding up the policy decision-making process and shortening the time for a malaria vaccine to become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Idda Romore
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. .,Ifakara Health Institute (IHI), P.O. Box 78373, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
| | - Ritha J A Njau
- World Health Organization Country Office, P.O Box 9292, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
| | - Innocent Semali
- Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Science (MUHAS), P.O. Box 65015, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
| | - Aziza Mwisongo
- Centres for Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | | | - Hassan Mshinda
- Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH), P.O. Box 4302, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
| | - Marcel Tanner
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Salim Abdulla
- Ifakara Health Institute (IHI), P.O. Box 78373, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Berman J, Mitambo C, Matanje-Mwagomba B, Khan S, Kachimanga C, Wroe E, Mwape L, van Oosterhout JJ, Chindebvu G, van Schoor V, Puchalski Ritchie LM, Panisset U, Kathyola D. Building a knowledge translation platform in Malawi to support evidence-informed health policy. Health Res Policy Syst 2015; 13:73. [PMID: 26646212 PMCID: PMC4673758 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-015-0061-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2015] [Accepted: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
With the support of the World Health Organization's Evidence-Informed Policy Network, knowledge translation platforms have been developed throughout Africa, the Americas, Eastern Europe, and Asia to further evidence-informed national health policy. In this commentary, we discuss the approaches, activities and early lessons learned from the development of a Knowledge Translation Platform in Malawi (KTPMalawi). Through ongoing leadership, as well as financial and administrative support, the Malawi Ministry of Health has strongly signalled its intention to utilize a knowledge translation platform methodology to support evidence-informed national health policy. A unique partnership between Dignitas International, a medical and research non-governmental organization, and the Malawi Ministry of Health, has established KTPMalawi to engage national-level policymakers, researchers and implementers in a coordinated approach to the generation and utilization of health-sector research. Utilizing a methodology developed and tested by knowledge translation platforms across Africa, a stakeholder mapping exercise and initial capacity building workshops were undertaken and a multidisciplinary Steering Committee was formed. This Steering Committee prioritized the development of two initial Communities of Practice to (1) improve data utilization in the pharmaceutical supply chain and (2) improve the screening and treatment of hypertension within HIV-infected populations. Each Community of Practice's mandate is to gather and synthesize the best available global and local evidence and produce evidence briefs for policy that have been used as the primary input into structured deliberative dialogues. While a lack of sustained initial funding slowed its early development, KTPMalawi has greatly benefited from extensive technical support and mentorship by an existing network of global knowledge translation platforms. With the continued support of the Malawi Ministry of Health and the Evidence-Informed Policy Network, KTPMalawi can continue to build on its role in facilitating the use of evidence in the development and refinement of health policy in Malawi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Collins Mitambo
- Ministry of Health, Department of Research, Public Health Institute of Malawi, Community Health Sciences Unit (CHSU), P.O. Box 65, Lilongwe, Malawi.
| | - Beatrice Matanje-Mwagomba
- Ministry of Health, Department of Research, Public Health Institute of Malawi, Community Health Sciences Unit (CHSU), P.O. Box 65, Lilongwe, Malawi.
| | - Shiraz Khan
- University of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Malawi.
| | | | | | - Lonia Mwape
- Department of Nursing Sciences and Zambia Forum for Health Research, University of Zambia, School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
| | - Joep J van Oosterhout
- Dignitas International, Zomba, Malawi.
- Department of Medicine, University of Malawi College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi.
| | | | | | - Lisa M Puchalski Ritchie
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Ulysses Panisset
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (School of Medicine-UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
| | - Damson Kathyola
- Ministry of Health, Department of Research, Public Health Institute of Malawi, Community Health Sciences Unit (CHSU), P.O. Box 65, Lilongwe, Malawi.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Health systems research for policy change: lessons from the implementation of rapid assessment protocols for diabetes in low- and middle-income settings. Health Res Policy Syst 2015; 13:41. [PMID: 26427953 PMCID: PMC4591713 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-015-0029-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2014] [Accepted: 09/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As many challenges exist for access to diabetes care in developing countries, the International Insulin Foundation developed a Rapid Assessment tool and implemented this approach to identify barriers to care and propose concrete recommendations for decision makers. The objective of this paper is to identify the factors that contributed to informing and influencing policymakers with regards to this work. Methods A documentary review comprised Stage 1. Stage 2 used an online questionnaire to gain insight from users of the Rapid Assessment results. Based on Stages 1 and 2, Stage 3 comprised in-depth interviews with a total of nine individuals (one individual each from the six participating countries; two individuals from the World Health Organization; one “Global Diabetes Advocate”). Interviews were analyzed based on a list of themes developed from Stage 2. Results Stage 1 led to the identification of various types of documents referring to the results. The online questionnaire had a response rate of 33%. Respondents directly involved in the assessment had a “Good” or “Very Good” appreciation of most aspects and scored these higher than those not directly involved. From the interviews, formalized methods and close collaboration between the international team and local partners were strengths. Trust and a relationship with local partners were also seen as assets. All stakeholders valued the results and the credibility of the data generated. Local partners felt that more could have been done for dissemination. Conclusion This study shows the importance of specific results from the different assessments. In addressing complex issues having external experts involved was seen as an advantage. The uptake of results was due to the credibility of the research which was influenced by a mix of the people involved, past assessments, trusted local partners, and the use of the results by knowledge brokers, such as the World Health Organization. Through these brokers, others gained ownership of the data. The methods used and the fact that this data was grounded in a local context also reinforced its value. Despite limitations, this study offers a unique perspective where a similar research approach was taken in six countries.
Collapse
|
37
|
Abou-Malham S, Hatem M, Leduc N. Analyzing barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an action plan to strengthen the midwifery professional role: a Moroccan case study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15:382. [PMID: 26373637 PMCID: PMC4571078 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1037-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2015] [Accepted: 09/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As part of a national strategy for reaching Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 in Morocco, an action plan covering three systems (sociocultural, educational and professional) was developed to strengthen midwives' professional role in order to contribute to high quality maternity care. This study aimed to understand the implementation process by identifying the characteristics of this intervention and the dimensions of the three-systems which could act as barriers to/facilitators of the implementation process. We used a conceptual framework that builds on Hatem-Asmar's model that describes change in a health professional role; and on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research for our analysis. METHODS An embedded case study with three levels of analysis was conducted during June and July 2010. Data were collected through 11 semi-structured interviews, 20 focus groups, training session observations and documents. A purposive sample of 106 multi-stakeholders from two Moroccan regions (health professionals, academic staff, students, medical administrative officers and health programmers) and one international consultant were recruited. A thematic analysis was conducted using QDA Miner. RESULTS Data showed a failure to carry out the plan as intended. Seventeen barriers and seven facilitators were identified. Misalignment of the values, methods, actors and targets of the sociocultural system with the values, methods and actors of the educational and professional systems, on one hand, and with the intervention, on the other hand, were likely the greatest impediments to implementing the plan. The bureaucratic structure and lack of readiness of the sociocultural system were among the most influential barriers to: dissemination of information, involvement of key actors in the process and readiness of the educational system. The main facilitators were the values promoted related to human rights, and the national and international policies to strengthen midwifery and reduce maternal mortality. The plan was perceived as beneficial, but complex and externally driven. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that successful implementation requires redesigning the implementation strategy to adapt to the factors identified in our study. The results would be very useful to health planners seeking the expansion of such an intervention to other developing countries looking to strengthen midwives' role and to improve maternity health care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Abou-Malham
- IRSPUM, Université de Montréal, P.O. Box 6128, Centre-ville Station, Montreal, QC, H3C 3 J7, Canada.
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Marie Hatem
- IRSPUM, Université de Montréal, P.O. Box 6128, Centre-ville Station, Montreal, QC, H3C 3 J7, Canada.
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Nicole Leduc
- IRSPUM, Université de Montréal, P.O. Box 6128, Centre-ville Station, Montreal, QC, H3C 3 J7, Canada.
- Department of Health Administration, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Makan A, Fekadu A, Murhar V, Luitel N, Kathree T, Ssebunya J, Lund C. Stakeholder analysis of the Programme for Improving Mental health carE (PRIME): baseline findings. Int J Ment Health Syst 2015; 9:27. [PMID: 26155307 PMCID: PMC4493963 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-015-0020-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2015] [Accepted: 06/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The knowledge generated from evidence-based interventions in mental health systems research is seldom translated into policy and practice in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). Stakeholder analysis is a potentially useful tool in health policy and systems research to improve understanding of policy stakeholders and increase the likelihood of knowledge translation into policy and practice. The aim of this study was to conduct stakeholder analyses in the five countries participating in the Programme for Improving Mental health carE (PRIME); evaluate a template used for cross-country comparison of stakeholder analyses; and assess the utility of stakeholder analysis for future use in mental health policy and systems research in LMIC. METHODS Using an adapted stakeholder analysis instrument, PRIME country teams in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa and Uganda identified and characterised stakeholders in relation to the proposed action: scaling-up mental health services. Qualitative content analysis was conducted for stakeholder groups across countries, and a force field analysis was applied to the data. RESULTS Stakeholder analysis of PRIME has identified policy makers (WHO, Ministries of Health, non-health sector Ministries and Parliament), donors (DFID UK, DFID country offices and other donor agencies), mental health specialists, the media (national and district) and universities as the most powerful, and most supportive actors for scaling up mental health care in the respective PRIME countries. Force field analysis provided a means of evaluating cross-country stakeholder power and positions, particularly for prioritising potential stakeholder engagement in the programme. CONCLUSION Stakeholder analysis has been helpful as a research uptake management tool to identify targeted and acceptable strategies for stimulating the demand for research amongst knowledge users, including policymakers and practitioners. Implementing these strategies amongst stakeholders at a country level will hopefully reduce the knowledge gap between research and policy, and improve health system outcomes for the programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Makan
- />Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, University of Cape Town, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, 7700 Cape Town South Africa
| | - Abebaw Fekadu
- />Department of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, PO Box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- />Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Centre for Affective Disorders and Affective Disorders Research Group, London, UK
| | - Vaibhav Murhar
- />Public Health Foundation of India, Sangath House, House Number 6, Rishi Nagar, Char Imli, Bhopal, 462016 Madhya Pradesh India
| | - Nagendra Luitel
- />Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Baluwatar, Box 8974, Kathmandu, GPO Nepal
| | - Tasneem Kathree
- />School of Psychology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College Campus, Durban, 4000 South Africa
| | | | - Crick Lund
- />Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, University of Cape Town, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, 7700 Cape Town South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Enhancing health policymakers' information literacy knowledge and skill for policymaking on control of infectious diseases of poverty in Nigeria. Online J Public Health Inform 2015; 7:e221. [PMID: 26284149 PMCID: PMC4537854 DOI: 10.5210/ojphi.v7i2.5874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Nigeria, one of the major challenges associated with evidence-to-policy
link in the control of infectious diseases of poverty (IDP), is deficient
information literacy knowledge and skill among policymakers. There is need
for policymakers to acquire the skill to discover relevant information,
accurately evaluate retrieved information and to apply it correctly. Objectives To use information literacy tool of International Network for Availability of
Scientific Publications (INASP) to enhance policymakers' knowledge
and skill for policymaking on control of IDP in Nigeria. Methods Modified "before and after" intervention study design was
used in which outcomes were measured on target participants both before the
intervention is implemented and after. This study was conducted in Ebonyi
State, south-eastern Nigeria and participants were career health policy
makers. A two-day health-policy information literacy training workshop was
organized to enhance participants" information literacy capacity.
Topics covered included: introduction to information literacy; defining
information problem; searching for information online; evaluating
information; science information; knowledge sharing interviews; and training
skills. Results A total of 52 policymakers attended the workshop. The pre-workshop mean
rating (MNR) of knowledge and capacity for information literacy ranged from
2.15-2.97, while the post-workshop MNR ranged from 3.34-3.64 on 4-point
scale. The percentage increase in MNR of knowledge and capacity at the end
of the workshop ranged from 22.6%-55.3%. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that through information literacy training
workshop policy makers can acquire the knowledge and skill to identify,
capture and share the right kind of information in the right contexts to
influence relevant action or a policy decision.
Collapse
|
40
|
Redman S, Turner T, Davies H, Williamson A, Haynes A, Brennan S, Milat A, O'Connor D, Blyth F, Jorm L, Green S. The SPIRIT Action Framework: A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy. Soc Sci Med 2015; 136-137:147-55. [PMID: 26004208 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The recent proliferation of strategies designed to increase the use of research in health policy (knowledge exchange) demands better application of contemporary conceptual understandings of how research shapes policy. Predictive models, or action frameworks, are needed to organise existing knowledge and enable a more systematic approach to the selection and testing of intervention strategies. Useful action frameworks need to meet four criteria: have a clearly articulated purpose; be informed by existing knowledge; provide an organising structure to build new knowledge; and be capable of guiding the development and testing of interventions. This paper describes the development of the SPIRIT Action Framework. A literature search and interviews with policy makers identified modifiable factors likely to influence the use of research in policy. An iterative process was used to combine these factors into a pragmatic tool which meets the four criteria. The SPIRIT Action Framework can guide conceptually-informed practical decisions in the selection and testing of interventions to increase the use of research in policy. The SPIRIT Action Framework hypothesises that a catalyst is required for the use of research, the response to which is determined by the capacity of the organisation to engage with research. Where there is sufficient capacity, a series of research engagement actions might occur that facilitate research use. These hypotheses are being tested in ongoing empirical work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tari Turner
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Huw Davies
- Research Unit for Research Utilisation, University of St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom.
| | - Anna Williamson
- Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | | | - Sue Brennan
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | - Denise O'Connor
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | - Louisa Jorm
- University of Western Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Sally Green
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Tabak RG, Eyler AA, Dodson EA, Brownson RC. Accessing evidence to inform public health policy: a study to enhance advocacy. Public Health 2015; 129:698-704. [PMID: 25795018 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2014] [Revised: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Improving population health often involves policy changes that are the result of complex advocacy efforts. Information exchanges among researchers, advocates, and policymakers is paramount to policy interventions to improve health outcomes. This information may include evidence on what works well for whom and cost-effective strategies to improve outcomes of interest. However, this information is not always readily available or easily communicated. The purposes of this paper are to describe ways advocates seek information for health policy advocacy and to compare advocate demographics. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional telephone survey. METHODS Seventy-seven state-level advocates were asked about the desirable characteristics of policy-relevant information including methods of obtaining information, what makes it useful, and what sources make evidence most reliable/trustworthy. Responses were explored for the full sample and variety of subsamples (i.e. gender, age, and position on social and fiscal issues). Differences between groups were tested using t-tests and one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS On average, advocates rated frequency of seeking research information as 4.3 out of five. Overall, advocates rated the Internet as the top source, rated unbiased research and research with relevancy to their organization as the most important characteristics, and considered information from their organization as most reliable/believable. When ratings were examined by subgroup, the two characteristics most important for each question in the total sample (listed above) emerged as most important for nearly all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Advocates are a resource to policymakers on health topics in the policy process. This study, among the first of its kind, found that advocates seek research information, but have a need for evidence that is unbiased and relevant to their organizations and report that university-based information is reliable. Researchers and advocates should partner so research is useful in advocating for evidence-based policy change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R G Tabak
- Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, 621 Skinker Boulevard, St Louis, MO 63130, USA.
| | - A A Eyler
- Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, 621 Skinker Boulevard, St Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - E A Dodson
- Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, 621 Skinker Boulevard, St Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - R C Brownson
- Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, 621 Skinker Boulevard, St Louis, MO 63130, USA; Division of Public Health Sciences and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wamai RG, Morris BJ, Bailey RC, Klausner JD, Boedicker MN. Male circumcision for protection against HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: the evidence in favour justifies the implementation now in progress. Glob Public Health 2015; 10:639-66. [PMID: 25613581 PMCID: PMC6352987 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2014.989532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
This article responds to a recent 'controversy study' in Global Public Health by de Camargo et al. directed at three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of male circumcision (MC) for HIV prevention. These trials were conducted in three countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and published in 2005 and 2007. The RCTs confirmed observational data that had accumulated over the preceding two decades showing that MC reduces by 60% the risk of HIV infection in heterosexual men. Based on the RCT results, MC was adopted by global and national HIV policy-makers as an additional intervention for HIV prevention. Voluntary medical MC (VMMC) is now being implemented in 14 SSA countries. Thus referring to MC for HIV prevention as 'debate' and viewing MC through a lens of controversy seems mistaken. In their criticism, de Camargo et al. misrepresent and misinterpret current science supporting MC for HIV prevention, omit previous denunciations of arguments similar to theirs, and ignore evidence from ongoing scientific research. Here we point out the flaws in three areas de Camargo et al. find contentious. In doing so, we direct readers to growing evidence of MC as an efficacious, safe, acceptable, relatively low-cost one-off biomedical intervention for HIV prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard G. Wamai
- Department of African-American Studies, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian J. Morris
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert C. Bailey
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeffrey D. Klausner
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ellen ME, Léon G, Bouchard G, Ouimet M, Grimshaw JM, Lavis JN. Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decision-making in health systems: a qualitative study. Implement Sci 2014; 9:179. [PMID: 25476735 PMCID: PMC4299810 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0179-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 11/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobilizing research evidence for daily decision-making is challenging for health system decision-makers. In a previous qualitative paper, we showed the current mix of supports that Canadian health-care organizations have in place and the ones that are perceived to be helpful to facilitate the use of research evidence in health system decision-making. Factors influencing the implementation of such supports remain poorly described in the literature. Identifying the barriers to and facilitators of different interventions is essential for implementation of effective, context-specific, supports for evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) in health systems. The purpose of this study was to identify (a) barriers and facilitators to implementing supports for EIDM in Canadian health-care organizations, (b) views about emerging development of supports for EIDM, and (c) views about the priorities to bridge the gaps in the current mix of supports that these organizations have in place. METHODS This qualitative study was conducted in three types of health-care organizations (regional health authorities, hospitals, and primary care practices) in two Canadian provinces (Ontario and Quebec). Fifty-seven in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with senior managers, library managers, and knowledge brokers from health-care organizations that have already undertaken strategic initiatives in knowledge translation. The interviews were taped, transcribed, and then analyzed thematically using NVivo 9 qualitative data analysis software. RESULTS Limited resources (i.e., money or staff), time constraints, and negative attitudes (or resistance) toward change were the most frequently identified barriers to implementing supports for EIDM. Genuine interest from health system decision-makers, notably their willingness to invest money and resources and to create a knowledge translation culture over time in health-care organizations, was the most frequently identified facilitator to implementing supports for EIDM. The most frequently cited views about emerging development of supports for EIDM were implementing accessible and efficient systems to support the use of research in decision-making (e.g., documentation and reporting tools, communication tools, and decision support tools) and developing and implementing an infrastructure or position where the accountability for encouraging knowledge use lies. The most frequently stated priorities for bridging the gaps in the current mix of supports that these organizations have in place were implementing technical infrastructures to support research use and to ensure access to research evidence and establishing formal or informal ties to researchers and knowledge brokers outside the organization who can assist in EIDM. CONCLUSIONS These results provide insights on the type of practical implementation imperatives involved in supporting EIDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moriah E Ellen
- Jerusalem College of Technology, ᅟ, Jerusalem, Israel. .,Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL 209, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada. .,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. .,Israeli Center for Technology Assessment in Health Care, Gertner Institute, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
| | - Grégory Léon
- Department of Political Science and CHUQ Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
| | - Gisèle Bouchard
- Department of Political Science and CHUQ Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
| | - Mathieu Ouimet
- Department of Political Science and CHUQ Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. .,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - John N Lavis
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL 209, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada. .,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. .,Department of Political Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. .,Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA. .,McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Aridi JO, Chapman SA, Wagah MA, Negin J. A comparative study of an NGO-sponsored CHW programme versus a ministry of health sponsored CHW programme in rural Kenya: a process evaluation. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH 2014; 12:64. [PMID: 25371240 PMCID: PMC4230347 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-12-64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2013] [Accepted: 10/01/2014] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
The varied performance of Community Health Worker (CHW) programmes in different contexts has highlighted the need for implementation of research that focuses on programme delivery issues. This paper presents the results of process evaluations conducted on two different models of CHW programme delivery in adjacent rural communities in in Gem District of Western Kenya. One model was implemented by the Millennium Villages Project (MVP), and the other model was implemented in partnership with the Ministry of Health (MoH) as part of Kenya's National CHW programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackline O Aridi
- />The Ford Family Program in Human Development Studies and Solidarity, University of Notre Dame, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Sarah A Chapman
- />Institute of Monitoring and Evaluation, Department of Organizational Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Joel Negin
- />Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nabyonga-Orem J, Nanyunja M, Marchal B, Criel B, Ssengooba F. The roles and influence of actors in the uptake of evidence: the case of malaria treatment policy change in Uganda. Implement Sci 2014; 9:150. [PMID: 25294279 PMCID: PMC4193992 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0150-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2014] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uganda changed its malaria treatment policy in response to evidence of resistance to commonly used antimalarials. The use of evidence in policy development--also referred to as knowledge translation (KT)--is crucial, especially in resource-limited settings. However, KT processes occur amidst a complex web of stakeholder interactions. Stakeholder involvement in evidence generation and in KT activities is essential. In the present study, we explored how stakeholders impacted the uptake of evidence in the malaria treatment policy change in Uganda. METHODS We employed a qualitative case study methodology involving interviews with key informants and review of documents. A timeline of events was developed, which guided the purposive sampling of respondents and identification of relevant documents. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis techniques. RESULTS Stakeholders played multiple roles in evidence uptake in the malaria treatment policy change. Donors, the Ministry of Health (MoH), service providers, and researchers engaged in the role of evidence generation. The MoH, parliamentarians, and opinion leaders at the national and local levels engaged in dissemination of evidence. The donors, MoH, researchers, and service providers engaged in the uptake of evidence in policy development and implementation. Stakeholders exerted varying levels of support and influence for different reasons. It is noteworthy that all of the influential stakeholders were divided regarding the best antimalarial alternative to adopt. CONCLUSION Our results showed a diverse group of stakeholders who played multiple roles, with varying levels of support and influence on the uptake of evidence in the malaria treatment policy change. For a given KT processes, mapping the relevant stakeholders and devising mechanism for their engagement and for how to resolve conflicts of interest and disagreements a priori will enhance uptake of evidence in policy development.
Collapse
|
46
|
Ramos S, Romero M, Ramón Michel A. Health care providers' opinions on abortion: a study for the implementation of the legal abortion public policy in the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina. Reprod Health 2014; 11:72. [PMID: 25249396 PMCID: PMC4197265 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-72] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2014] [Accepted: 09/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Argentina, abortion has been decriminalized under certain circumstances since the enactment of the Penal Code in 1922. Nevertheless, access to abortion under this regulatory framework has been extremely limited in spite of some recent changes. This article reports the findings of the first phase of an operations research study conducted in the Province of Santa Fe, Argentina, regarding the implementation of the local legal and safe abortion access policy. Methods The project combined research and training to generate a virtuous circle of knowledge production, decision-making, and the fostering of an informed healthcare policy. The project used a pre-post design of three phases: baseline, intervention, and evaluation. It was conducted in two public hospitals. An anonymous self-administered questionnaire (n = 157) and semi-structured interviews (n = 27) were applied to gather information about tacit knowledge about the regulatory framework; personal opinions regarding abortion and its decriminalization; opinions on the requirements needed to carry out legal abortions; and service’s responses to women in need of an abortion. Results Firstly, a fairly high percentage of health care providers lack accurate information on current legal framework. This deficit goes side by side with a restrictive understanding of both health and rape indications. Secondly, while a great majority of health care providers support abortion under the circumstances consider in the Penal Code, most of them are reluctant towards unrestricted access to abortion. Thirdly, health care providers’ willingness to perform abortions is noticeably low given that only half of them are ready to perform an abortion when a woman’s life is at risk. Willingness is even lower for each of the other current legal indications. Conclusions Findings suggest that there are important challenges for the implementation of a legal abortion policy. Results of the study call for specific strategies targeting health care providers in order to better inform about current legal abortion regulations and to sensitize them about abortion social determinants. The interpretation of the current legal framework needs to be broadened in order to reflect a comprehensive view of the health indication, and stereotypes regarding women’s sexuality and abortion decisions need to be dismantled. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1742-4755-11-72) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvina Ramos
- Center for the Study of State and Society (CEDES), Sánchez de Bustamante 27, 1173 Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mijumbi RM, Oxman AD, Panisset U, Sewankambo NK. Feasibility of a rapid response mechanism to meet policymakers' urgent needs for research evidence about health systems in a low income country: a case study. Implement Sci 2014; 9:114. [PMID: 25208522 PMCID: PMC4172950 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0114-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 08/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite the recognition of the importance of evidence-informed health policy and practice, there are still barriers to translating research findings into policy and practice. The present study aimed to establish the feasibility of a rapid response mechanism, a knowledge translation strategy designed to meet policymakers' urgent needs for evidence about health systems in a low income country, Uganda. Rapid response mechanisms aim to address the barriers of timeliness and relevance of evidence at the time it is needed. METHODS A rapid response mechanism (service) designed a priori was offered to policymakers in the health sector in Uganda. In the form of a case study, data were collected about the profile of users of the service, the kinds of requests for evidence, changes in answers, and courses of action influenced by the mechanism and their satisfaction with responses and the mechanism in general. RESULTS We found that in the first 28 months, the service received 65 requests for evidence from 30 policymakers and stakeholders, the majority of whom were from the Ministry of Health. The most common requests for evidence were about governance and organization of health systems. It was noted that regular contact between the policymakers and the researchers at the response service was an important factor in response to, and uptake of the service. The service seemed to increase confidence for policymakers involved in the policymaking process. CONCLUSION Rapid response mechanisms designed to meet policymakers' urgent needs for research evidence about health systems are feasible and acceptable to policymakers in low income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhona M Mijumbi
- />College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Andrew D Oxman
- />Norwegian Knowledge Center for the Health Services, St Olavs plass, Oslo, 0130 Norway
| | - Ulysses Panisset
- />World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva 27, 1211 Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Holdsworth M, Kruger A, Nago E, Lachat C, Mamiro P, Smit K, Garimoi-Orach C, Kameli Y, Roberfroid D, Kolsteren P. African stakeholders' views of research options to improve nutritional status in sub-Saharan Africa. Health Policy Plan 2014; 30:863-74. [PMID: 25124084 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czu087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Setting research priorities for improving nutrition in Africa is currently ad hoc and there is a need to shift the status quo in the light of slow progress in reducing malnutrition. This study explored African stakeholders' views on research priorities in the context of environmental and socio-demographic changes that will impact on nutritional status in Africa in the coming years. METHODS Using Multi-Criteria Mapping, quantitative and qualitative data were gathered from 91 stakeholders representing 6 stakeholder groups (health professionals, food Industry, government, civil society, academics and research funders) in Benin, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania, Togo and Uganda. Stakeholders appraised six research options (ecological nutrition, nutritional epidemiology, community nutrition interventions, behavioural nutrition, clinical nutrition and molecular nutrition) for how well they could address malnutrition in Africa. RESULTS Impact (28.3%), research efficacy (23.6%) and social acceptability (22.4%) were the criteria chosen the most to evaluate the performance of research options. Research on the effectiveness of community interventions was seen as a priority by stakeholders because they were perceived as likely to have an impact relatively quickly, were inexpensive and cost-effective, involved communities and provided direct evidence of what works. Behavioural nutrition research was also highly appraised. Many stakeholders, particularly academics and government were optimistic about the value of ecological nutrition research (the impact of environmental change on nutritional status). Research funders did not share this enthusiasm. Molecular nutrition was least preferred, considered expensive, slow to have an impact and requiring infrastructure. South Africa ranked clinical and molecular nutrition the highest of all countries. CONCLUSION Research funders should redirect research funds in Africa towards the priorities identified by giving precedence to develop the evidence for effective community nutrition interventions. Expanding research funding in behavioural and ecological nutrition was also valued and require multi-disciplinary collaborations between nutritionists, social scientists, agricultural and climate change scientists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Holdsworth
- Public Health Section, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK,
| | - Annamarie Kruger
- Africa Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research, North West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| | - Eunice Nago
- Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques, University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin
| | - Carl Lachat
- Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, Nutrition and Child Health Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Peter Mamiro
- Department of Food Science and Technology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania
| | - Karlien Smit
- Africa Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research, North West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| | | | - Yves Kameli
- Research Unit 'NUTRIPASS', Institute of Research for Development, Montpellier, France
| | - Dominique Roberfroid
- Nutrition and Child Health Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Patrick Kolsteren
- Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, Nutrition and Child Health Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ayah R, Jessani N, Mafuta EM. Institutional capacity for health systems research in East and Central African schools of public health: knowledge translation and effective communication. Health Res Policy Syst 2014; 12:20. [PMID: 24890939 PMCID: PMC4064507 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2013] [Accepted: 04/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local health systems research (HSR) provides policymakers and practitioners with contextual, evidence-based solutions to health problems. However, producers and users of HSR rarely understand the complexities of the context within which each operates, leading to the "know-do" gap. Universities are well placed to conduct knowledge translation (KT) integrating research production with uptake. The HEALTH Alliance Africa Hub, a consortium of seven schools of public health (SPHs) in East and Central Africa, was formed to build capacity in HSR. This paper presents information on the capacity of the various SPHs to conduct KT activities. METHODS In 2011, each member of the Africa Hub undertook an institutional HSR capacity assessment using a context-adapted and modified self-assessment tool. KT capacity was measured by several indicators including the presence of a KT strategy, an organizational structure to support KT activities, KT skills, and institutional links with stakeholders and media. Respondents rated their opinions on the various indicators using a 5-point Likert scale. Averages across all respondents for each school were calculated. Thereafter, each school held a results validation workshop. RESULTS A total of 123 respondents from all seven SPHs participated. Only one school had a clear KT strategy; more commonly, research was disseminated at scientific conferences and workshops. While most respondents perceived their SPH as having strong institutional ties with organizations interested in HSR as well as strong institutional leadership, the organizational structures required to support KT activities were absent. Furthermore, individual researchers indicated that they had little time or skills to conduct KT. Additionally, institutional and individual links with policymakers and media were reported as weak. CONCLUSIONS Few SPHs in Africa have a clear KT strategy. Strengthening the weak KT capacity of the SPHs requires working with institutional leadership to develop KT strategies designed to guide organizational structure and development of networks with both the media and policymakers to improve research uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Ayah
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O. BOX 19676-00202, KNH, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Nasreen Jessani
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore 21205, MD, USA
| | - Eric M Mafuta
- School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, P.O. BOX 11850, Kinshasa 1, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hanney SR, González-Block MA. Organising health research systems as a key to improving health: the World Health Report 2013 and how to make further progress. Health Res Policy Syst 2013; 11:47. [PMID: 24341347 PMCID: PMC3878484 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2013] [Accepted: 12/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The World Health Report 2013 provides a major boost to the health research community and, in particular, to those who believe that health research will make its greatest impact on improving health when it is organised through a systems approach. The World Health Report 2013, Research for Universal Health Coverage, starts with three key messages. Firstly, that universal health coverage, with full access to high-quality services, needs research evidence if it is to be achieved; second, all nations should conduct and use research; and finally, the report states that systems are needed to develop national research agendas, to raise funds, to strengthen research capacity, and to make effective use of research findings. Each of these themes is elaborated in the report and supported by extensive references. In this editorial, we first outline the key messages from the World Health Report 2013 and highlight the contributions made by papers from our journal, Health Research Policy and Systems. In addition, we discuss very recent papers that advance some issues even further. In particular, we consider new evidence both on how to achieve financial protection for those who use health services, and on whether healthcare professionals and organisations who engage in research provide an improved healthcare performance. Finally, we propose additional perspectives that add to the impressive body of evidence and analyses presented in the report. Specifically, we suggest that considering the needs of various stakeholders, as attempted in the UK, in parallel with analysing how to fulfil essential functions, should boost the prospects of successfully building and strengthening health research systems. This is important because research is vital for achieving universal health coverage, and consequently for improving the health of millions of people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R Hanney
- Health Economics Research Group, Kingston Lane, Brunel University, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|