1
|
Ogbonnaya LU, Okedo-Alex IN, Akamike IC, Azuogu B, Urochukwu H, Ogbu O, Uneke CJ. Assessing the usefulness of policy brief and policy dialogue as knowledge translation tools towards contextualizing the accountability framework for routine immunization at a subnational level in Nigeria. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:154. [PMID: 34969398 PMCID: PMC8717671 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00804-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence suggests that implementing an accountability mechanism such as the accountability framework for routine immunization in Nigeria (AFRIN) will improve routine immunization (RI) performance. The fact that the AFRIN, which was developed in 2012, still had not been operationalized at the subnational level (Ebonyi State) by 2018 may in part account for the poor RI coverage (33%) in 2017. Knowledge translation (KT) is defined as the methods for closing the gaps from knowledge to practice. Policy briefs (useful in communicating research findings to policy-makers) and policy dialogues (that enable stakeholders to understand research evidence and create context-resonant implementation plans) are two KT tools. This study evaluated their usefulness in enabling policy-makers to contextualize AFRIN in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Methods The study design was cross-sectional descriptive with mixed-methods data collection. A policy brief developed from AFRIN guided deliberations in a 1-day multi-stakeholder policy dialogue by 30 policy actors. The usefulness of the KT tools in contextualizing policy recommendations in the AFRIN was assessed using validated questionnaires developed at McMaster University, Canada. Results At the end of the policy dialogue, the policy options in the policy brief were accepted but their implementation strategies were altered to suit the local context. The respondents’ mean ratings (MNR) of the overall usefulness of the policy brief and the policy dialogue in contextualizing the implementation strategies were 6.39 and 6.67, respectively, on a seven-point Likert scale (very useful). The MNR of the different dimensions of the policy brief and policy dialogue ranged from 6.17 to 6.60 and from 6.10 to 6.83, respectively (i.e. moderately helpful to very helpful). Conclusion The participants perceived the KT tools (policy brief and policy dialogue) as being very useful in contextualizing policy recommendations in a national policy document into state context-resonant implementable recommendations. We recommend the use of these KT tools in operationalizing AFRIN at the subnational level in Nigeria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence Ulu Ogbonnaya
- African Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.,Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Medicine College of Health Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.,Department of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria
| | - Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-Alex
- African Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.,Department of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria
| | - Ifeyinwa Chizoba Akamike
- African Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria. .,Department of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria.
| | - Benedict Azuogu
- African Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.,Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Medicine College of Health Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.,Department of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria
| | - Henry Urochukwu
- African Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.,Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Clinical Medicine College of Health Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.,National Obstetric Fistula Centre (NOFIC), Abakaliki, Nigeria
| | - Ogbonnaya Ogbu
- African Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.,Department of Applied Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria
| | - Chigozie Jesse Uneke
- African Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria.,Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eddy KE, Vogel JP, Zahroh RI, Bohren MA. Factors affecting use of magnesium sulphate for pre-eclampsia or eclampsia: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BJOG 2021; 129:379-391. [PMID: 34520111 PMCID: PMC9291451 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Hypertensive disorders account for 14% of global maternal deaths. Magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) is recommended for prevention and treatment of pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia. However, MgSO4 remains underused, particularly in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Objective This qualitative evidence synthesis explores perceptions and experiences of healthcare providers, administrators and policy‐makers regarding factors affecting use of MgSO4 to prevent or treat pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia. Search strategy We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, CINAHL, Global Health and Global Index Medicus, and grey literature for studies published between January 1995 and June 2021. Selection criteria Primary qualitative and mixed‐methods studies on factors affecting use of MgSO4 in healthcare settings, from the perspectives of healthcare providers, administrators and policy‐makers, were eligible for inclusion. Data collection and analysis We applied a thematic synthesis approach to analysis, using COM‐B behaviour change theory to map factors affecting appropriate use of MgSO4. Main results We included 22 studies, predominantly from LMICs. Key themes included provider competence and confidence administering MgSO4 (attitudes and beliefs, complexities of administering, knowledge and experience), capability of health systems to ensure MgSO4 availability at point of use (availability, resourcing and pathways to care) and knowledge translation (dissemination of research and recommendations). Within each COM‐B domain, we mapped facilitators and barriers to physical and psychological capability, physical and social opportunity, and how the interplay between these domains influences motivation. Conclusions These findings can inform policy and guideline development and improve implementation of MgSO4 in clinical care. Such action is needed to ensure this life‐saving treatment is widely available and appropriately used. Tweetable abstract Global qualitative review identifies factors affecting underutilisation of MgSO4 for pre‐eclampsia and eclampsia. Global qualitative review identifies factors affecting underutilisation of MgSO4 for pre‐eclampsia and eclampsia. This article includes Author Insights, a video abstract available at https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/623192027 Linked article This article is commented on by LA Magee, p. 392 in this issue. To view this mini commentary visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16971.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K E Eddy
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.,Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Programme, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - J P Vogel
- Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Programme, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - R I Zahroh
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - M A Bohren
- Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yimgang D, Danhoundo G, Kusi-Appiah E, Sunder V, Campbell S, Yaya S. A scoping review of researchers' involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa. Syst Rev 2021; 10:190. [PMID: 34174957 PMCID: PMC8236190 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01745-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving evidence-informed policy dialogue to support the development and implementation of national health policies is vital, but there is limited evidence on researchers' roles in policy dialogue processes in Africa. The objective of this study is to examine researchers' involvement in health policy dialogue in Africa. METHODS The database search of this scoping review was conducted from inception to January 24, 2021, by an expert searcher/librarian to determine the extent of evidence, barriers, and facilitators of researchers' involvement in health policy dialogues in Africa. PROSPERO, Wiley Cochrane Library, OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, OVID PsycINFO, OVID Global Health, EBSCO CINAHL, BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), and Google/Google Scholar were searched using key words representing the concepts "policy dialogue", "health", and "Africa". No limits were applied. A narrative summary of results was presented. RESULTS There were 26 eligible studies representing 21 African countries. Significant discrepancies in researchers' involvement existed across countries. In 62% of the countries, there was suboptimal involvement of researchers in policy dialogues due to no or partial participation in policy dialogues. Major barriers included limited funding, lack of evidence in the public health field of interest, and skepticism of policymakers. The presence of an interface for exchange, demand for scientific evidence, and donors' funding were the most reported facilitators. CONCLUSIONS To improve the uptake of evidence in health policy-making processes, an environment of trust and communication between policymakers and researchers must be established. Policymakers need to demonstrate that they value research, by providing adequate funding, promoting knowledge translation activities, and supporting personal and professional development opportunities for researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Sanni Yaya
- School of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, 120 University Private, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6 N5, Canada. .,The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Strengthening health policy development and management systems in low- and middle- income countries: South Africa's approach. HEALTH POLICY OPEN 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
5
|
Mukamba N, Beres LK, Mwamba C, Law JW, Topp SM, Simbeza S, Sikombe K, Padian N, Holmes CB, Geng EH, Sikazwe I. How might improved estimates of HIV programme outcomes influence practice? A formative study of evidence, dissemination and response. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:121. [PMID: 33066785 PMCID: PMC7568347 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00640-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While HIV programmes have started millions of persons on life-saving antiretroviral therapy in Africa, longitudinal health information systems are frail and, therefore, data about long-term survival is often inaccurate or unknown to HIV programmes. The ‘Better Information for Health in Zambia’ (BetterInfo) Study – a regional sampling-based survey to assess retention and mortality in HIV programmes in Zambia – found both retention and mortality to be higher than prevailing estimates from national surveillance systems. We sought to understand how Zambian health decision-makers at different health system levels would respond to these new data, with a view to informing research translation. Methods We interviewed 25 purposefully sampled health decision-makers from community, facility, district, provincial and national levels. During the interviews, we shared retention and mortality estimates from both routine programme surveillance and those generated by the study. Transcripts were analysed for inductive and deductive themes, the latter drawing on Weiss’s framework that policy-makers interpret and apply evidence as ‘warning’, ‘guidance’, ‘reconceptualisation’ or ‘mobilisation of support’. Findings All decision-makers found study findings relevant and important. Decision-makers viewed the underestimates of mortality to be a warning about the veracity and informativeness of routine data systems. Decision-makers felt guided by the findings to improve data monitoring and, acknowledging limitations of routine data, utilised episodic patient tracing to support improved data accuracy. Findings catalysed renewed motivation and mobilisation by national level decision-makers for differentiated models of HIV care to improve patient outcomes and also improved data management systems to better capture patient outcomes. Inductive analysis highlighted a programmatic application data interpretation, in which study findings can influence facility and patient-level decision-making, quality of care and routine data management. Conclusions New epidemiological data on patient outcomes were widely seen as informative and relevant and can potentially catalyse health system action such as using evaluations to supplement electronic medical record data to improve HIV programmes. Formative evidence suggests that targeting research dissemination at different levels of the health system will elicit different responses. Researchers supporting the translation of evidence to action should leverage all relevant levels of the health system to facilitate both policy and programmatic action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Njekwa Mukamba
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
| | - Laura K Beres
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Chanda Mwamba
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Jeanna Wallenta Law
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Stephanie M Topp
- College of Public Health, Medicine and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Sandra Simbeza
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Nancy Padian
- Division of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of America
| | - Charles B Holmes
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.,Centre for Global Health and Quality, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Elvin H Geng
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Izukanji Sikazwe
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martin K, Mullan Z, Horton R. Overcoming the research to policy gap. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2020; 7 Suppl 1:S1-S2. [PMID: 30857615 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30082-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Martin
- Consortium of Universities for Global Health, Washington, DC, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Buffardi AL, Njambi-Szlapka S. Questions for future evidence-informed policy initiatives: insights from the evolution and aspirations of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:40. [PMID: 32321521 PMCID: PMC7178973 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00551-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attention to evidence-informed policy has grown; however, efforts to strengthen the quality and use of evidence are not starting from a blank slate. Changes in health architectures and financing pose different considerations for investments in evidence-informed policy than in the past. We identify major trends that have shifted the environment in which health policies are made, and use the evolution and future aspirations of National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) in low- and middle-income countries to identify questions the sector must confront when determining how best to structure and strengthen evidence-informed health policy. DISCUSSION Trends over the last two decades have resulted in a dense arena with many issue-specific groups, discrete initiatives to strengthen evidence-informed policy and increasing responsibility for subnational institutions. Many countries face a shifting resource base, which for some reduces the amount of resources for health. There is global momentum around universal health coverage, reflecting a broader systems approach, but few examples of how the vast array of stakeholders relate within it are available. NITAG aspirations reflect four interconnected themes related to their scope, their integration in national policy processes, health financing and relationships with ministries of finance, and NITAG positioning relative to other domestic and international entities, raising questions such as, What are the bounds of issue-specific groups and their relationship to allocation decision-making processes across health areas? How do technical advisory groups interface with what are inherently political processes? When are finances considered, by whom and how? What is the future of existing groups whose creation was intended to enhance national ownership but who need continued external support to function? When should new entities be created, in what form and with what mandate? CONCLUSIONS Countries must determine who makes decisions about resources, when, using what criteria, and how to do so in a robust yet efficient way given the existing and future landscape. While answers to these questions are necessarily country specific, they are collective matters that cannot be addressed by specialised groups alone and have implications for new investments in evidence-informed policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne L. Buffardi
- Overseas Development Institution (ODI), 203 Blackfriars Rd, London, SE1 8NJ United Kingdom
| | - Susan Njambi-Szlapka
- Overseas Development Institution (ODI), 203 Blackfriars Rd, London, SE1 8NJ United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Murunga VI, Oronje RN, Bates I, Tagoe N, Pulford J. Review of published evidence on knowledge translation capacity, practice and support among researchers and research institutions in low- and middle-income countries. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:16. [PMID: 32039738 PMCID: PMC7011245 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0524-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge translation (KT) is a dynamic and iterative process that includes synthesis, dissemination, exchange and ethically sound application of knowledge to yield beneficial outcomes for society. Effective KT requires researchers to play an active role in promoting evidence uptake. This paper presents a systematised review of evidence on low- and middle-income country (LMIC) researchers' KT capacity, practice and interventions for enhancing their KT practice (support) with the aim of identifying gaps and informing future research and interventions. METHODS An electronic search for peer-reviewed publications focusing on LMIC researchers' KT capacity, practice and support across all academic fields, authored in English and from the earliest records available to February 2019, was conducted using PubMed and Scopus. Selected studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, data pertaining to publication characteristics and study design extracted, and an a priori thematic analysis of reported research findings completed. RESULTS The search resulted in 334 screened articles, of which 66 met the inclusion criteria. Most (n = 43) of the articles presented original research findings, 22 were commentaries and 1 was a structured review; 47 articles reported on researchers' KT practice, 12 assessed the KT capacity of researchers or academic/research institutions and 9 reported on KT support for researchers. More than half (59%) of the articles focused on sub-Saharan Africa and the majority (91%) on health research. Most of the primary studies used the case study design (41%). The findings suggest that LMIC researchers rarely conduct KT and face a range of barriers at individual and institutional levels that limit their KT practice, including inadequate KT knowledge and skills, particularly for communicating research and interacting with research end-users, insufficient funding, and inadequate institutional guidelines, structures and incentives promoting KT practice. Furthermore, the evidence-base on effective interventions for enhancing LMIC researchers' KT practice is insufficient and largely of weak quality. CONCLUSIONS More high-quality research on researchers' KT capacity, practice and effective KT capacity strengthening interventions is needed. Study designs that extend beyond case studies and descriptive studies are recommended, including better designed evaluation studies, e.g. use of realist approaches, pragmatic trials, impact evaluations, implementation research and participatory action research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violet Ibukayo Murunga
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX United Kingdom
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Center for Capacity Research, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L35QA United Kingdom
- African Institute for Development Policy, 6th Floor, Block A, Westcom Point Bldg, Mahiga Mairu Ave Off Waiyaki Way, Westlands, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Rose Ndakala Oronje
- African Institute for Development Policy, 6th Floor, Block A, Westcom Point Bldg, Mahiga Mairu Ave Off Waiyaki Way, Westlands, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Imelda Bates
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Center for Capacity Research, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L35QA United Kingdom
| | - Nadia Tagoe
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Office of Grants and Research, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
| | - Justin Pulford
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Center for Capacity Research, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L35QA United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Malla C, Aylward P, Ward P. Knowledge translation for public health in low- and middle- income countries: a critical interpretive synthesis. Glob Health Res Policy 2018; 3:29. [PMID: 30377666 PMCID: PMC6196454 DOI: 10.1186/s41256-018-0084-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Effective knowledge translation allows the optimisation of access to and utilisation of research knowledge in order to inform and enhance public health policy and practice. In low- and middle- income countries, there are substantial complexities that affect the way in which research can be utilised for public health action. This review attempts to draw out concepts in the literature that contribute to defining some of the complexities and contextual factors that influence knowledge translation for public health in low- and middle- income countries. Methods A Critical Interpretive Synthesis was undertaken, a method of analysis which allows a critical review of a wide range of heterogeneous evidence, through incorporating systematic review methods with qualitative enquiry techniques. A search for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2016 on the topic of knowledge translation for public health in low- and middle – income countries was carried out, and 85 articles were reviewed and analysed using this method. Results Four main concepts were identified: 1) tension between ‘global’ and ‘local’ health research, 2) complexities in creating and accessing evidence, 3) contextualising knowledge translation strategies for low- and middle- income countries, and 4) the unique role of non-government organisations in the knowledge translation process. Conclusion This method of review has enabled the identification of key concepts that may inform practice or further research in the field of knowledge translation in low- and middle- income countries. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s41256-018-0084-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Malla
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia 5042 Australia
| | - Paul Aylward
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia 5042 Australia
| | - Paul Ward
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia 5042 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kredo T, Cooper S, Abrams A, Daniels K, Volmink J, Atkins S. National stakeholders' perceptions of the processes that inform the development of national clinical practice guidelines for primary healthcare in South Africa. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:68. [PMID: 30064440 PMCID: PMC6069850 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0348-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is increased international focus on improving the rigour of clinical practice guideline (CPG) development practices. However, few empirical studies on CPG development have been conducted in low- and middle-income countries. This paper explores national stakeholders’ perceptions of processes informing CPG development for primary healthcare in South Africa, focusing on both their aspirations and views of what is actually occurring. Methods A qualitative study design was employed including individual interviews with 37 South African primary care CPG development role-players. Participants represented various disciplines, sectors and provinces. The data were analysed through thematic analysis and an interpretivist conceptual framework. Results Strongly reflecting current international standards, participants identified six ‘aspirational’ processes that they thought should inform South African CPG development, as follows: (1) evidence; (2) stakeholder consultation; (3) transparency; (4) management of interests; (5) communication/co-ordination between CPG development groups; and (6) fit-for-context. While perceptions of a transition towards more robust processes was common, CPG development was seen to face ongoing challenges with regards to all six aspirational processes. Many challenges were attributed to inadequate financial and human resources, which were perceived to hinder capacity to undertake the necessary methodological work, respond to stakeholders’ feedback, and document and share decision-making processes. Challenges were also linked to a complex web of politics, power and interests. The CPG development arena was described as saturated with personal and financial interests, groups competing for authority over specific territories and unequal power dynamics which favour those with the time, resources and authority to make contributions. These were all perceived to affect efforts for transparency, collaboration and inclusivity in CPG development. Conclusion While there is strong commitment amongst national stakeholders to advance CPG development processes, a mix of values, politics, power and capacity constraints pose significant challenges. Contrasting perspectives regarding managing interests and how best to adapt to within-country contexts requires further exploration. Dedicated resources for CPG development, standardised systems for managing conflicting interests, and the development of a political environment that fosters collaboration and more equitable inclusion within and between CPG development groups are needed. These initiatives may enhance CPG quality and acceptability, with associated positive impact on patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Kredo
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sara Cooper
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Amber Abrams
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Karen Daniels
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.,Health Policy and Systems Division, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jimmy Volmink
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.,Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.,Deans Office, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Salla Atkins
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,New Social Research and Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Onyiah P, Adamu AMY, Afolabi RF, Ajumobi O, Ughasoro MD, Odeyinka O, Nguku P, Ajayi IO. Bottlenecks, concerns and needs in malaria operational research: the perspectives of key stakeholders in Nigeria. BMC Res Notes 2018; 11:272. [PMID: 29728139 PMCID: PMC5935974 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3379-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective We conducted a study to determine stakeholders’ perspective of the bottlenecks, concerns and needs to malaria operational research (MOR) agenda setting in Nigeria. Results Eighty-five (37.9%) stakeholders identified lack of positive behavioural change as the major bottleneck to MOR across the malaria thematic areas comprising of malaria prevention 58.8% (50), case management 34.8% (39), advocacy communication and social mobilisation 4.7% (4) while procurement and supply chain management (PSM) and programme management experts had the least response of 1.2% (1) each. Other bottlenecks were inadequate capacity to implement (13.8%, n = 31), inadequate funds (11.6%, n = 26), poor supply management (9.4%, n = 21), administrative bureaucracy (5.8%, n = 13), inadequacy of experts (1.3%, n = 3) and poor policy implementation (4.9%, n = 11). Of the 31 stakeholders who opined lack of capacity to execute malaria operational research; 17 (54.8%), 10 (32.3%), 3 (9.7%) and 1 (3.2%) were experts in case management, malaria prevention, surveillance, monitoring and evaluation and PSM respectively. Improvement in community enlightenment and awareness strategies; and active involvement of health care workers public and private sectors were identified solutions to lack of positive behavioural change. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3379-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Onyiah
- Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Al-Mukhtar Y Adamu
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Rotimi F Afolabi
- Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Queen Elizabeth Road, UCH Campus, Ibadan, 23402, Oyo State, Nigeria.
| | - Olufemi Ajumobi
- Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.,African Field Epidemiology Network, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Maduka D Ughasoro
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Oluwaseun Odeyinka
- Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Queen Elizabeth Road, UCH Campus, Ibadan, 23402, Oyo State, Nigeria
| | - Patrick Nguku
- Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.,African Field Epidemiology Network, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - IkeOluwapo O Ajayi
- Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, Abuja, Nigeria.,Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Queen Elizabeth Road, UCH Campus, Ibadan, 23402, Oyo State, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oluoch D, Murphy G, Gathara D, Abuya N, Nzinga J, English M, Jones C. Neonatal nursing policy and practice in Kenya: Key stakeholders and their views on task-shifting as an intervention to improve care quality. Wellcome Open Res 2018. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14291.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Improving the quality of facility based neonatal care is central to tackling the burden of neonatal mortality in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). Quality neonatal care is highly dependent on nursing care but a major challenge facing health systems in LMICs is human resource shortage. In Kenya, task-shifting among professional care cadres is being discussed as one potential strategy of addressing the human resource shortage, but little attention is being paid to the potential for task-shifting in the provision of in-patient sick newborn care. This study identified key neonatal policy-making and implementation stakeholders in Kenya and explored their perceptions of task-shifting in newborn units. Methods: The study was exploratory and descriptive, employing qualitative methods including: document review, stakeholder analysis, observation of policy review process meetings and stakeholder feedback. A framework approach was used for analysis. Results: In Kenya, guidelines for the care of sick neonates exist but there are few specialized neonatal nurses and no policy documents outlining the nurse to patient ratio required in neonatal care or other higher dependency areas. The Ministry of Health, Nursing Council of Kenya and international agencies were identified as playing key roles in policy formulation while County governments, the National Nurses Association of Kenya and frontline care providers are central to implementation. Newborns were perceived to be highly vulnerable requiring skilled care but in light of human resources challenges, most expressed some support for shifting ‘unskilled’ tasks. However, a few of the key implementers were concerned about the use of unqualified staff and all stakeholders emphasized the need for training, regulation and supervision. Conclusions: Task-shifting has the potential to help address human recourse challenge in low-income settings. However, any potential task-shifting intervention in neonatal care would require a carefully planned process involving all key stakeholders and clear regulations to steer implementation.
Collapse
|
13
|
Angulo-Tuesta A, Santos LMP, Iturri JA. Processos e desafios da interação entre pesquisa e política na perspectiva dos pesquisadores. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2018; 23:7-15. [DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232018231.23372017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 08/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo As políticas informadas por evidências podem produzir impactos sociais e econômicos e benefícios na equidade e na saúde. A interação dos pesquisadores na política depende de interesses dos atores sociais e de ambientes políticos favoráveis. Este artigo busca compreender os significados e as perspectivas de pesquisadores sobre os processos de interação entre cientistas e tomadores de decisão que influenciam o impacto da pesquisa na política de saúde. Trata-se de estudo qualitativo, realizado em 2014, de análise de conteúdo para identificar os núcleos de sentido e as relações entre a pesquisa e a política. Baseou-se na abordagem do programa RAPID da Overseas Development Institute. Foram entrevistados 14 pesquisadores de projetos sobre morbimortalidade materna e neonatal financiados pelo Ministério da Saúde. Os pesquisadores orientaram-se para a produção de conhecimentos, o fortalecimento de capacidades de pesquisa e a divulgação dos resultados. Participaram, em algumas ocasiões, da definição de políticas de cuidado clínico e desempenho dos serviços de saúde. Apontaram barreiras para interatuar e produzir impactos na política devido às tensões do contexto político, econômico e social, às mudanças institucionais e organizacionais no setor saúde, e ao sistema de avaliação acadêmica.
Collapse
|
14
|
Danhoundo G, Wiktorowicz ME, Premji SS, Nasiri K. Determinants of bed net policy implementation: A case study of Southern Benin. Int J Health Plann Manage 2017; 33:e279-e292. [DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary E. Wiktorowicz
- Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research, Community and Global, Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Nursing; York University; Canada
| | - Shahirose Sadrudin Premji
- UofC, Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing; University of Calgary (UofC); Calgary Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hanney SR, González-Block MA. 'Knowledge for better health' revisited - the increasing significance of health research systems: a review by departing Editors-in-Chief. Health Res Policy Syst 2017; 15:81. [PMID: 28965493 PMCID: PMC5623979 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-017-0248-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
How can nations organise research investments to obtain the best bundle of knowledge and the maximum level of improved health, spread as equitably as possible? This question was the central focus of a major initiative from WHO led by Prof Tikki Pang, which resulted in a range of developments, including the publication of a conceptual framework for national health research systems - Knowledge for better health - in 2003, and in the founding of the journal Health Research Policy and Systems (HARPS). As Editors-in-Chief of the journal since 2006, we mark our retirement by tracking both the progress of the journal and the development of national health research systems. HARPS has maintained its focus on a range of central themes that are key components of a national health research system in any country. These include building capacity to conduct and use health research, identifying appropriate priorities, securing funds and allocating them accountably, producing scientifically valid research outputs, promoting the use of research in polices and practice in order to improve health, and monitoring and evaluating the health research system. Some of the themes covered in HARPS are now receiving increased attention and, for example, with the assessment of research impact and development of knowledge translation platforms, the journal has covered their progress throughout that expansion of interest. In addition, there is increasing recognition of new imperatives, including the importance of promoting gender equality in health research if benefits are to be maximised. In this Editorial, we outline some of the diverse and developing perspectives considered within each theme, as well as considering how they are held together by the growing desire to build effective health research systems in all countries.From 2003 until mid-June 2017, HARPS published 590 articles on the above and related themes, with authors being located in 76 countries. We present quantitative data tracing the journal's growth and the increasing external recognition of its role. We thank the many colleagues who have kindly contributed to the journal's success, and finish on an exciting note by welcoming the new Editors-in-Chief who will take HARPS forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R. Hanney
- Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH United Kingdom
| | - Miguel A. González-Block
- Universidad Anáhuac, Av. Universidad Anáhuac 46, Lomas Anáhuac, 52786 Huixquilucan Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Story WT, LeBan K, Altobelli LC, Gebrian B, Hossain J, Lewis J, Morrow M, Nielsen JN, Rosales A, Rubardt M, Shanklin D, Weiss J. Institutionalizing community-focused maternal, newborn, and child health strategies to strengthen health systems: A new framework for the Sustainable Development Goal era. Global Health 2017; 13:37. [PMID: 28651632 PMCID: PMC5485706 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-017-0259-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Stronger health systems, with an emphasis on community-based primary health care, are required to help accelerate the pace of ending preventable maternal and child deaths as well as contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The success of the SDGs will require unprecedented coordination across sectors, including partnerships between public, private, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). To date, little attention has been paid to the distinct ways in which NGOs (both international and local) can partner with existing national government health systems to institutionalize community health strategies. Discussion In this paper, we propose a new conceptual framework that depicts three primary pathways through which NGOs can contribute to the institutionalization of community-focused maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) strategies to strengthen health systems at the district, national or global level. To illustrate the practical application of these three pathways, we present six illustrative cases from multiple NGOs and discuss the primary drivers of institutional change. In the first pathway, “learning for leverage,” NGOs demonstrate the effectiveness of new innovations that can stimulate changes in the health system through adaptation of research into policy and practice. In the second pathway, “thought leadership,” NGOs disseminate lessons learned to public and private partners through training, information sharing and collaborative learning. In the third pathway, “joint venturing,” NGOs work in partnership with the government health system to demonstrate the efficacy of a project and use their collective voice to help guide decision-makers. In addition to these pathways, we present six key drivers that are critical for successful institutionalization: strategic responsiveness to national health priorities, partnership with policymakers and other stakeholders, community ownership and involvement, monitoring and use of data, diversification of financial resources, and longevity of efforts. Conclusion With additional research, we propose that this framework can contribute to program planning and policy making of donors, governments, and the NGO community in the institutionalization of community health strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William T Story
- The University of Iowa, College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Karen LeBan
- Independent Consultant (formerly CORE Group), Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Bette Gebrian
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
| | | | - Judy Lewis
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Melanie Morrow
- Maternal and Child Survival Program and ICF, Washington, DC and Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Marcie Rubardt
- Independent Consultant (formerly CARE USA), Vashon, WA, USA
| | - David Shanklin
- Independent Consultant (formerly CORE Group), Washington, DC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mukanu MM, Zulu JM, Mweemba C, Mutale W. Responding to non-communicable diseases in Zambia: a policy analysis. Health Res Policy Syst 2017; 15:34. [PMID: 28438177 PMCID: PMC5402674 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-017-0195-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are an emerging global health concern. Reports have shown that, in Zambia, NCDs are also an emerging problem and the government has begun initiating a policy response. The present study explores the policy response to NCDs by the Ministry of Health in Zambia using the policy triangle framework of Walt and Gilson. METHODS A qualitative approach was used for the study. Data collected through key informant interviews with stakeholders who were involved in the NCD health policy development process as well as review of key planning and policy documents were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS The government's policy response was as a result of international strategies from WHO, evidence of increasing disease burden from NCDs and pressure from interest groups. The government developed the NCD strategic plan based on the WHO Global Action Plan for NCDs 2013-2030. Development of the NCD strategic plan was driven by the government through the Ministry of Health, who set the agenda and adopted the final document. Stakeholders participated in the fine tuning of the draft document from the Ministry of Health. The policy development process was lengthy and this affected consistency in composition of the stakeholders and policy development momentum. Lack of representative research evidence for some prioritised NCDs and use of generic targets and indicators resulted in the NCD strategic plan being inadequate for the Zambian context. The interventions in the strategic plan also underutilised the potential of preventing NCDs through health education. Recent government pronouncements were also seen to be conflicting the risk factor reduction strategies outlined in the NCD strategic plan. CONCLUSION The content of the NCD strategic plan inadequately covered all the major NCDs in Zambia. Although contextual factors like international strategies and commitments are crucial catalysts to policy development, there is need for domestication of international guidelines and frameworks to match the disease burden, resources and capacities in the local context if policy measures are to be comprehensive, relevant and measurable. Such domestication should be guided by representative local research evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mulenga M. Mukanu
- The University of Zambia, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joseph Mumba Zulu
- The University of Zambia, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Chrispin Mweemba
- The University of Zambia, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Wilbroad Mutale
- The University of Zambia, School of Public Health, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dalglish SL, Rodríguez DC, Harouna A, Surkan PJ. Knowledge and power in policy-making for child survival in Niger. Soc Sci Med 2017; 177:150-157. [PMID: 28167340 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2015] [Revised: 01/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/25/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Calls to enhance the use of scientific evidence in international health and development policy have increased in recent years; however, analytic frameworks for understanding evidence use focus narrowly on scientific research and were created using data and observations nearly exclusively from Western countries. We examine processes of health policy development in a case study of Niger, a low-income West African country that adopted integrated community case management of childhood illness (iCCM) beginning in 2007, resulting in measurable declines in child mortality. Data collection included in-depth interviews with policy actors in Niger (N = 32), document review (N = 103) and direct observation of policy forums (N = 3). Data analysis used process tracing methodology and applied an Aristotelian definition of "knowledge" as 1) episteme (facts), 2) techne (skills) and 3) phronesis (practical wisdom), while also using a critical perspective to understand issues of power. We found sharp differentials in policy-makers' possession and use of codified forms of knowledge (episteme), with Nigerien policy officers' access highly mediated by actors at international agencies. Government policy-makers possessed skills and capacities (techne) to negotiate with donors and deliberate and weigh conflicting considerations; however they lacked capacity and resources to formally evaluate and document programs and thus reliably draw lessons from them. Practical wisdom (phronesis) emerged as key to the iCCM policy enterprise, particularly among Nigerien government actors, who used logical and ethical arguments to make decisions later found to be critical to iCCM's success. While codified knowledge confers power on members of policy discussions who can access it, this represents only one form of knowledge used in the policy process and perhaps not the most important. Future research on evidence-based policy should use broader definitions of evidence or knowledge, examine on how power conditions the use of knowledge, and examine challenges specific to low-resource policy environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Dalglish
- Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
| | - Daniela C Rodríguez
- Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| | - Abdoutan Harouna
- Laboratoire d'Études et de recherche sur les Dynamiques sociales et le développement local, Niamey, Niger
| | - Pamela J Surkan
- Social and Behavioral Interventions Program, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rodríguez DC, Shearer J, Mariano ARE, Juma PA, Dalglish SL, Bennett S. Evidence-informed policymaking in practice: country-level examples of use of evidence for iCCM policy. Health Policy Plan 2017; 30 Suppl 2:ii36-ii45. [PMID: 26516149 PMCID: PMC4625759 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czv033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Integrated Community Case Management of Childhood Illness (iCCM) is a policy for providing treatment for malaria, diarrhoea and pneumonia for children below 5 years at the community level, which is generating increasing evidence and support at the global level. As countries move to adopt iCCM, it becomes important to understand how this growing evidence base is viewed and used by national stakeholders. This article explores whether, how and why evidence influenced policy formulation for iCCM in Niger, Kenya and Mozambique, and uses Carol Weiss’ models of research utilization to further explain the use of evidence in these contexts. A documentary review and in-depth stakeholder interviews were conducted as part of retrospective case studies in each study country. Findings indicate that all three countries used national monitoring data to identify the issue of children dying in the community prior to reaching health facilities, whereas international research evidence was used to identify policy options. Nevertheless, policymakers greatly valued local evidence and pilot projects proved critical in advancing iCCM. World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) functioned as knowledge brokers, bringing research evidence and experiences from other countries to the attention of local policymakers as well as sponsoring site visits and meetings. In terms of country-specific findings, Niger demonstrated both Interactive and Political models of research utilization by using iCCM to capitalize on the existing health infrastructure. Both Mozambique and Kenya exhibit Problem-Solving research utilization with different outcomes. Furthermore, the persistent quest for additional evidence suggests a Tactical use of research in Kenya. Results presented here indicate that while evidence from research studies and other contexts can be critical to policy development, local evidence is often needed to answer key policymaker questions. In the end, evidence may not be enough to overcome resistance if the policy is viewed as incompatible with national goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela C Rodríguez
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Dept. of International Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA,
| | - Jessica Shearer
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Dept. of International Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Alda R E Mariano
- Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Community Health Department, Maputo, Mozambique and
| | - Pamela A Juma
- African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Sarah L Dalglish
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Dept. of International Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Sara Bennett
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Dept. of International Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rodríguez DC, Banda H, Namakhoma I. Integrated community case management in Malawi: an analysis of innovation and institutional characteristics for policy adoption. Health Policy Plan 2017; 30 Suppl 2:ii74-ii83. [PMID: 26516153 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czv063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2007, Malawi became an early adopter of integrated community case management for childhood illnesses (iCCM), a policy aimed at community-level treatment for malaria, diarrhoea and pneumonia for children below 5 years. Through a retrospective case study, this article explores critical issues in implementation that arose during policy formulation through the lens of the innovation (i.e. iCCM) and of the institutions involved in the policy process. Data analysis is founded on a documentary review and 21 in-depth stakeholder interviews across institutions in Malawi. Findings indicate that the characteristics of iCCM made it a suitable policy to address persistent challenges in child mortality, namely that ill children were not interacting with health workers on a timely basis and consequently were dying in their communities. Further, iCCM was compatible with the Malawian health system due to the ability to build on an existing community health worker cadre of health surveillance assistants (HSAs) and previous experiences with treatment provision at the community level. In terms of institutions, the Ministry of Health (MoH) demonstrated leadership in the overall policy process despite early challenges of co-ordination within the MoH. WHO, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and implementing organizations played a supportive role in their position as knowledge brokers. Greater challenges were faced in the organizational capacity of the MoH. Regulatory issues around HSA training as well as concerns around supervision and overburdening of HSAs were discussed, though not fully addressed during policy development. Similarly, the financial sustainability of iCCM, including the mechanisms for channelling funding flows, also remains an unresolved issue. This analysis highlights the role of implementation questions during policy development. Despite several outstanding concerns, the compatibility between iCCM as a policy alternative and the local context laid the foundation for Malawi's road to early adoption of iCCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela C Rodríguez
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore MD, USA and
| | - Hastings Banda
- Replace with Research on Equity and Community Health Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Ireen Namakhoma
- Replace with Research on Equity and Community Health Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nabyonga-Orem J, Dovlo D, Kwamie A, Nadege A, Guangya W, Kirigia JM. Policy dialogue to improve health outcomes in low income countries: what are the issues and way forward? BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16 Suppl 4:217. [PMID: 27454794 PMCID: PMC4959394 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1450-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper has three objectives: to review the health development landscape in the World Health Organization African Region, to discuss the role of health policy dialogue in improving harmonisation and alignment to national health policies and strategic plans, and to provide an analytical view of the critical factors in realising a good outcome from a health policy dialogue process. DISCUSSION Strengthening policy dialogue to support the development and implementation of robust and comprehensive national health policies and plans, as well as to improve aid effectiveness, is seen as a strategic entry point to improving health sector results. However, unbalanced power relations, the lack of contextualised and relevant evidence, the diverse interests of the actors involved, and the lack of conceptual clarity on what policy dialogue entails impact the outcomes of a policy dialogue process. The critical factors for a successful policy dialogue have been identified as adequate preparation; secured time and resources to facilitate an open, inclusive and informed discussion among the stakeholders; and stakeholders' monitoring and assessment of the dialogue's activities for continued learning. Peculiarities of low income countries pose a challenge to their policy dialogue processes, including the chaotic-policy making processes, the varied capacity of the actors and donor dependence. CONCLUSION Policy dialogue needs to be appreciated as a complex and iterative process that spans the whole process of policy-making, implementation, review and monitoring, and subsequent policy revisions. The existence of the critical factors for a successful policy dialogue process needs to be ensured whilst paying special attention to the peculiarities of low income countries and potential power relations, and mitigating the possible negative consequences. There is need to be cognisant of the varied capacities and interests of stakeholders and the need for capacity building, and to put in place mechanisms to manage conflict of interest. The likelihood of a favourable outcome from a policy dialogue process will depend on the characteristics of the issue under consideration and whether it is contested or not, and the policy dialogue process needs to be tailored accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
- Health Systems and Services Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, B.P. 06, Brazzaville, Congo.
| | - Delanyo Dovlo
- Health Systems and Services Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, B.P. 06, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Aku Kwamie
- University of Ghana, School of Public Health, P.O. Box LG 13, Accra, Ghana
| | - Ade Nadege
- Engage Africa Foundation, 73 Aspen Hills Terr SW, Calgary, AB, T3H OP4, Canada
| | - Wang Guangya
- The London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton St, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Joses Muthuri Kirigia
- Health Systems and Services Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, B.P. 06, Brazzaville, Congo
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mwendera C, de Jager C, Longwe H, Phiri K, Hongoro C, Mutero CM. Malaria research and its influence on anti-malarial drug policy in Malawi: a case study. Health Res Policy Syst 2016; 14:41. [PMID: 27246503 PMCID: PMC4888534 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-016-0108-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2015] [Accepted: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In 1993, Malawi changed its first-line anti-malarial treatment for uncomplicated malaria from chloroquine to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), and in 2007, it changed from SP to lumefantrine-artemether. The change in 1993 raised concerns about whether it had occurred timely and whether it had potentially led to early development of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to SP. This case study examined evidence from Malawi in order to assess if the policy changes were justifiable and supported by evidence. Methods A systematic review of documents and published evidence between 1984 and 1993, when chloroquine was the first-line drug, and 1994 and 2007, when SP was the first-line drug, was conducted herein. The review was accompanied with key informant interviews. Results A total of 1287 publications related to malaria drug policy changes in sub-Saharan Africa were identified. Using the inclusion criteria, four articles from 1984 to 1993 and eight articles from 1994 to 2007 were reviewed. Between 1984 and 1993, three studies reported on chloroquine poor efficacy prompting policy change according to WHO’s recommendation. From 1994 to 2007, four studies conducted in the early years of policy change reported a high SP efficacy of above 80%, retaining it as a first-line drug. Unpublished sentinel site studies between 2005 and 2007 showed a reduced efficacy of SP, influencing policy change to lumefantrine-artemether. The views of key informants indicate that the switch from chloroquine to SP was justified based on local evidence despite unavailability of WHO’s policy recommendations, while the switch to lumefantrine-artemether was uncomplicated as the country was following the recommendations from WHO. Conclusion Ample evidence from Malawi influenced and justified the policy changes. Therefore, locally generated evidence is vital for decision making during policy change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chikondi Mwendera
- University of Pretoria Centre for Sustainable Malaria Control (UP CSMC), School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X363, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa
| | - Christiaan de Jager
- University of Pretoria Centre for Sustainable Malaria Control (UP CSMC), School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X363, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.
| | - Herbert Longwe
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Kamija Phiri
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Charles Hongoro
- University of Pretoria Centre for Sustainable Malaria Control (UP CSMC), School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X363, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.,Population Health, Health Systems and Innovation, Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC), Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Clifford M Mutero
- University of Pretoria Centre for Sustainable Malaria Control (UP CSMC), School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X363, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa.,International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shearer JC, Abelson J, Kouyaté B, Lavis JN, Walt G. Why do policies change? Institutions, interests, ideas and networks in three cases of policy reform. Health Policy Plan 2016; 31:1200-11. [PMID: 27233927 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Policy researchers have used various categories of variables to explain why policies change, including those related to institutions, interests and ideas. Recent research has paid growing attention to the role of policy networks-the actors involved in policy-making, their relationships with each other, and the structure formed by those relationships-in policy reform across settings and issues; however, this literature has largely ignored the theoretical integration of networks with other policy theories, including the '3Is' of institutions, interests and ideas. This article proposes a conceptual framework integrating these variables and tests it on three cases of policy change in Burkina Faso, addressing the need for theoretical integration with networks as well as the broader aim of theory-driven health policy analysis research in low- and middle-income countries. We use historical process tracing, a type of comparative case study, to interpret and compare documents and in-depth interview data within and between cases. We found that while network changes were indeed associated with policy reform, this relationship was mediated by one or more of institutions, interests and ideas. In a context of high donor dependency, new donor rules affected the composition and structure of actors in the networks, which enabled the entry and dissemination of new ideas and shifts in the overall balance of interest power ultimately leading to policy change. The case of strategic networking occurred in only one case, by civil society actors, suggesting that network change is rarely the spark that initiates the process towards policy change. This analysis highlights the important role of changes in institutions and ideas to drive policymaking, but hints that network change is a necessary intermediate step in these processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica C Shearer
- Health Systems Innovation and Delivery, PATH, Seattle Washington, USA
| | - Julia Abelson
- Center for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - John N Lavis
- Center for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gill Walt
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
George A, Rodríguez DC, Rasanathan K, Brandes N, Bennett S. iCCM policy analysis: strategic contributions to understanding its character, design and scale up in sub-Saharan Africa. Health Policy Plan 2015; 30 Suppl 2:ii3-ii11. [DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czv096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
25
|
Health systems research for policy change: lessons from the implementation of rapid assessment protocols for diabetes in low- and middle-income settings. Health Res Policy Syst 2015; 13:41. [PMID: 26427953 PMCID: PMC4591713 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-015-0029-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2014] [Accepted: 09/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As many challenges exist for access to diabetes care in developing countries, the International Insulin Foundation developed a Rapid Assessment tool and implemented this approach to identify barriers to care and propose concrete recommendations for decision makers. The objective of this paper is to identify the factors that contributed to informing and influencing policymakers with regards to this work. Methods A documentary review comprised Stage 1. Stage 2 used an online questionnaire to gain insight from users of the Rapid Assessment results. Based on Stages 1 and 2, Stage 3 comprised in-depth interviews with a total of nine individuals (one individual each from the six participating countries; two individuals from the World Health Organization; one “Global Diabetes Advocate”). Interviews were analyzed based on a list of themes developed from Stage 2. Results Stage 1 led to the identification of various types of documents referring to the results. The online questionnaire had a response rate of 33%. Respondents directly involved in the assessment had a “Good” or “Very Good” appreciation of most aspects and scored these higher than those not directly involved. From the interviews, formalized methods and close collaboration between the international team and local partners were strengths. Trust and a relationship with local partners were also seen as assets. All stakeholders valued the results and the credibility of the data generated. Local partners felt that more could have been done for dissemination. Conclusion This study shows the importance of specific results from the different assessments. In addressing complex issues having external experts involved was seen as an advantage. The uptake of results was due to the credibility of the research which was influenced by a mix of the people involved, past assessments, trusted local partners, and the use of the results by knowledge brokers, such as the World Health Organization. Through these brokers, others gained ownership of the data. The methods used and the fact that this data was grounded in a local context also reinforced its value. Despite limitations, this study offers a unique perspective where a similar research approach was taken in six countries.
Collapse
|
26
|
Tesfazghi K, Hill J, Jones C, Ranson H, Worrall E. National malaria vector control policy: an analysis of the decision to scale-up larviciding in Nigeria. Health Policy Plan 2015; 31:91-101. [PMID: 26082391 PMCID: PMC4724167 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czv055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: New vector control tools are needed to combat insecticide resistance and reduce malaria transmission. The World Health Organization (WHO) endorses larviciding as a supplementary vector control intervention using larvicides recommended by the WHO Pesticides Evaluation Scheme (WHOPES). The decision to scale-up larviciding in Nigeria provided an opportunity to investigate the factors influencing policy adoption and assess the role that actors and evidence play in the policymaking process, in order to draw lessons that help accelerate the uptake of new methods for vector control. Methods: A retrospective policy analysis was carried out using in-depth interviews with national level policy stakeholders to establish normative national vector control policy or strategy decision-making processes and compare these with the process that led to the decision to scale-up larviciding. The interviews were transcribed, then coded and analyzed using NVivo10. Data were coded according to pre-defined themes from an analytical policy framework developed a priori. Results: Stakeholders reported that the larviciding decision-making process deviated from the normative vector control decision-making process. National malaria policy is normally strongly influenced by WHO recommendations, but the potential of larviciding to contribute to national economic development objectives through larvicide production in Nigeria was cited as a key factor shaping the decision. The larviciding decision involved a restricted range of policy actors, and notably excluded actors that usually play advisory, consultative and evidence generation roles. Powerful actors limited the access of some actors to the policy processes and content. This may have limited the influence of scientific evidence in this policy decision. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that national vector control policy change can be facilitated by linking malaria control objectives to wider socioeconomic considerations and through engaging powerful policy champions to drive policy change and thereby accelerate access to new vector control tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kemi Tesfazghi
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, UK
| | - Jenny Hill
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Pembroke Place, UK
| | - Caroline Jones
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, UK and Department of Public Health Research, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Hilary Ranson
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, UK
| | - Eve Worrall
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, UK,
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Utilization of research findings for health policy making and practice: evidence from three case studies in Bangladesh. Health Res Policy Syst 2015; 13:26. [PMID: 26016797 PMCID: PMC4449578 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-015-0015-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In striving to contribute towards improved health outcomes, health research institutions generate and accumulate huge volumes of relevant but often underutilized data. This study explores activities undertaken by researchers from the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), an international research institution that promotes the utilization of their findings in the policymaking processes in Bangladesh. Methods The study used an exploratory case study design and employed qualitative methods to explore activities implemented to promote research utilization and the extent to which researchers felt that their findings contributed to the policymaking process. Data were collected between September and December 2011 through key informant interviews, focus group discussions with study investigators, and database and document reviews. We reviewed findings from 19 reproductive health studies conducted and completed by icddr,b researchers between 2001 and 2011. We interviewed 21 key informants, including 13 researchers, two policy makers, and six programme implementers. Data were entered into Microsoft Word and analyzed manually following a thematic framework approach. Following the World Health Organization/Turning Research into Practice (WHO/TRIP) framework, three case studies of how research findings were utilized in the policymaking processes in Bangladesh were documented. Results Activities implemented to promote research utilization included conducting dissemination workshops, publishing scientific papers, developing policy briefs, providing technical assistance to policymakers and programme implementers, holding one-on-one meetings, and joining advocacy networks. The majority of the researchers (12 of 13) reported that their study findings were utilized to influence policymaking processes at different levels. However, some researchers reported being unaware of whether and how their findings were utilized. As regards actual utilization of research findings, the evidence from the three case studies indicate that research findings can be utilized instrumentally, conceptually and symbolically, and at different stages within the policymaking process, including agenda setting and policy formulation and implementation. Conclusions The results show that research findings from icddr,b were promoted and utilized in health policymaking processes in Bangladesh using a variety of utilization approaches. These results suggest a need for using multiple approaches to promote utilization of research findings in health policymaking processes.
Collapse
|
28
|
Shearer JC, Dion M, Lavis JN. Exchanging and using research evidence in health policy networks: a statistical network analysis. Implement Sci 2014; 9:126. [PMID: 25358894 PMCID: PMC4226903 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0126-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2014] [Accepted: 09/04/2014] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-informed health policymaking is a goal of equitable and effective health systems but occurs infrequently in reality. Past research points to the facilitating role of interpersonal relationships between policy-makers and researchers, imploring the adoption of a social network lens. This study aims to identify network-level factors associated with the exchange and use of research evidence in policymaking. METHODS Data on social networks and research use were collected from seventy policy actors across three health policy cases in Burkina Faso (child health, malaria, and HIV). Networks were graphed for actors' interactions, their provision of, and request for research evidence. Exponential random graph models estimated the probability of evidence provision and request between actors, controlling for network- and individual-level covariates. Logistic regression models estimated actors' use of research evidence to inform policy. RESULTS Network structure explained more than half of the evidence exchanges (ties) observed in these networks. Across all cases, a pair of actors was more likely to form a provision tie if they already had a request tie between them and visa versa (θ=6.16, p<0.05; θ=2.87, p<0.05; θ=2.31, p<0.05). The child health network displayed clustering tendencies, meaning that actors were more likely to form ties if they shared an acquaintance (θ=2.36, p<0.05). Actors' use of research evidence was positively associated with their centrality (i.e., connectedness). CONCLUSIONS The exchange and use of research evidence in policymaking can be partly explained by the structure of actors' networks of relationships. Efforts to support knowledge translation and evidence-informed policymaking should consider network factors.
Collapse
|
29
|
McKee M, Haines A, Ebrahim S, Lamptey P, Barreto ML, Matheson D, Walls HL, Foliaki S, Miranda JJ, Chimeddamba O, Garcia-Marcos L, Vineis P, Pearce N. Towards a comprehensive global approach to prevention and control of NCDs. Global Health 2014; 10:74. [PMID: 25348262 PMCID: PMC4215019 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-014-0074-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2014] [Accepted: 10/15/2014] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The "25×25" strategy to tackle the global challenge of non-communicable diseases takes a traditional approach, concentrating on a few diseases and their immediate risk factors. DISCUSSION We propose elements of a comprehensive strategy to address NCDs that takes account of the evolving social, economic, environmental and health care contexts, while developing mechanisms to respond effectively to local patterns of disease. Principles that underpin the comprehensive strategy include: (a) a balance between measures that address health at the individual and population level; (b) the need to identify evidence-based feasible and effective approaches tailored to low and middle income countries rather than exporting questionable strategies developed in high income countries; (c) developing primary health care as a universal framework to support prevention and treatment; (d) ensuring the ability to respond in real time to the complex adaptive behaviours of the global food, tobacco, alcohol and transport industries; (e) integrating evidence-based, cost-effective, and affordable approaches within the post-2015 sustainable development agenda; (f) determination of a set of priorities based on the NCD burden within each country, taking account of what it can afford, including the level of available development assistance; and (g) change from a universal "one-size fits all" approach of relatively simple prevention oriented approaches to more comprehensive multi-sectoral and development-oriented approaches which address both health systems and the determinants of NCD risk factors. SUMMARY The 25×25 is approach is absolutely necessary but insufficient to tackle the the NCD disease burden of mortality and morbidity. A more comprehensive approach is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin McKee
- />European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition (ECOHOST), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| | - Andy Haines
- />Departments of Social and Environmental Health Research and of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Shah Ebrahim
- />Centre for Global NCDs, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Peter Lamptey
- />Centre for Global NCDs, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Mauricio L Barreto
- />Instituto de Saude Coletiva, Federal University of Bahia, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Don Matheson
- />Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Helen L Walls
- />Centre for Global NCDs, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- />Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and Health, London, UK
- />National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Sunia Foliaki
- />Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - J Jaime Miranda
- />CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, and School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Oyun Chimeddamba
- />Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (SPHPM), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Luis Garcia-Marcos
- />Respiratory and Allergy Units, Arrixaca University Children’s Hospital, University of Murcia and IMIB-Arrixaca Research Institute, Murcia, Spain
| | - Paolo Vineis
- />MRC-PHE Center for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Neil Pearce
- />Centre for Global NCDs, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- />Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nabyonga-Orem J, Nanyunja M, Marchal B, Criel B, Ssengooba F. The roles and influence of actors in the uptake of evidence: the case of malaria treatment policy change in Uganda. Implement Sci 2014; 9:150. [PMID: 25294279 PMCID: PMC4193992 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0150-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2014] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uganda changed its malaria treatment policy in response to evidence of resistance to commonly used antimalarials. The use of evidence in policy development--also referred to as knowledge translation (KT)--is crucial, especially in resource-limited settings. However, KT processes occur amidst a complex web of stakeholder interactions. Stakeholder involvement in evidence generation and in KT activities is essential. In the present study, we explored how stakeholders impacted the uptake of evidence in the malaria treatment policy change in Uganda. METHODS We employed a qualitative case study methodology involving interviews with key informants and review of documents. A timeline of events was developed, which guided the purposive sampling of respondents and identification of relevant documents. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis techniques. RESULTS Stakeholders played multiple roles in evidence uptake in the malaria treatment policy change. Donors, the Ministry of Health (MoH), service providers, and researchers engaged in the role of evidence generation. The MoH, parliamentarians, and opinion leaders at the national and local levels engaged in dissemination of evidence. The donors, MoH, researchers, and service providers engaged in the uptake of evidence in policy development and implementation. Stakeholders exerted varying levels of support and influence for different reasons. It is noteworthy that all of the influential stakeholders were divided regarding the best antimalarial alternative to adopt. CONCLUSION Our results showed a diverse group of stakeholders who played multiple roles, with varying levels of support and influence on the uptake of evidence in the malaria treatment policy change. For a given KT processes, mapping the relevant stakeholders and devising mechanism for their engagement and for how to resolve conflicts of interest and disagreements a priori will enhance uptake of evidence in policy development.
Collapse
|
31
|
Nabyonga-Orem J, Ssengooba F, Macq J, Criel B. Malaria treatment policy change in Uganda: what role did evidence play? Malar J 2014; 13:345. [PMID: 25179532 PMCID: PMC4164770 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2014] [Accepted: 08/26/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although increasing attention is being paid to knowledge translation (KT), research findings are not being utilized to the desired extent. The present study explores the role of evidence, barriers, and factors facilitating the uptake of evidence in the change in malaria treatment policy in Uganda, building on previous work in Uganda that led to the development of a middle range theory (MRT) outlining the main facilitatory factors for KT. Application of the MRT to a health policy case will contribute to refining it. Methods Using a case study approach and mixed methods, perceptions of respondents on whether evidence was available, had been considered and barriers and facilitatory factors to the uptake of evidence were explored. In addition, the respondents’ rating of the degree of consistency between the policy decision and available evidence was assessed. Data collection methods included key informant interviews and document review. Qualitative data were analysed using content thematic analysis, whereas quantitative data were analysed using Excel spreadsheets. The two data sets were eventually triangulated. Results Evidence was used to change the malaria treatment policy, though the consistency between evidence and policy decisions varied along the policy development cycle. The availability of high-quality and contextualized evidence, including effective dissemination, Ministry of Health institutional capacity to lead the KT process, intervention of the WHO and a regional professional network, the existence of partnerships for KT with mutual trust and availability of funding, tools, and inputs to implement evidence, were the most important facilitatory factors that enhanced the uptake of evidence. Among the barriers that had to be overcome were resistance from implementers, the health system capacity to implement evidence, and financial sustainability. Conclusion The results agree with facilitatory factors identified in the earlier developed MRT, though additional factors emerged. These results refine the earlier MRT stating that high-quality and contextualized evidence will be taken up in policies, leading to evidence-informed policies when the MoH leads the KT process, partnerships are in place for KT, the WHO and regional professional bodies play a role, and funding, tools, and required inputs for implementing evidence are available. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1475-2875-13-345) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
32
|
Bennett S, George A, Rodriguez D, Shearer J, Diallo B, Konate M, Dalglish S, Juma P, Namakhoma I, Banda H, Chilundo B, Mariano A, Cliff J. Policy challenges facing integrated community case management in Sub-Saharan Africa. Trop Med Int Health 2014; 19:872-82. [PMID: 24750516 PMCID: PMC4282431 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report an in-depth analysis of policy change for integrated community case management of childhood illness (iCCM) in six sub-Saharan African countries. We analysed how iCCM policies developed and the barriers and facilitators to policy change. METHODS Qualitative retrospective case studies drawing from document reviews, semi-structured interviews and in-country validation workshops were conducted in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique and Niger. These countries were selected to maximise variation in iCCM policy status, community health worker (CHW) models and different African regions. RESULTS Country iCCM policies evolved in an ad hoc fashion, but were substantially influenced by the history of primary health care and the nature of CHW programmes. Technical officers within Ministries of Health led iCCM policy change with support from international donors, but neither communities nor political leadership was mobilised. Concerns about achieving the Millennium Development Goals, together with recognition of the shortcomings of existing child health programmes, led to the adoption of iCCM policies. Availability of external financing played a critical role in facilitating policy change. CONCLUSIONS iCCM policy change has been promoted by international agencies, but national governments have struggled to align iCCM with country health systems. Greater investment is needed in tailoring global policy initiatives to match country needs. High-level, political ownership of iCCM policies could facilitate policy change, as could clearer strategies for ensuring the long-term sustainability of such policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Bennett
- Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nabyonga Orem J, Marchal B, Mafigiri D, Ssengooba F, Macq J, Da Silveira VC, Criel B. Perspectives on the role of stakeholders in knowledge translation in health policy development in Uganda. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13:324. [PMID: 23958173 PMCID: PMC3751734 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2012] [Accepted: 08/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stakeholder roles in the application of evidence are influenced by context, the nature of the evidence, the policy development process, and stakeholder interactions. Past research has highlighted the role of stakeholders in knowledge translation (KT) without paying adequate attention to the peculiarities of low-income countries. Here we identify the roles, relations, and interactions among the key stakeholders involved in KT in Uganda and the challenges that they face. METHODS This study employed qualitative approaches to examine the roles of and links among various stakeholders in KT. In-depth interviews were conducted with 21 key informants and focused on the key actors in KT, their perceived roles, and challenges. RESULTS Major stakeholders included civil society organizations with perceived roles of advocacy, community mobilization, and implementation. These stakeholders may ignore unconvincing evidence. The community's role was perceived as advocacy and participation in setting research priorities. The key role of the media was perceived as knowledge dissemination, but respondents noted that the media may misrepresent evidence if it is received in a poorly packaged form. The perceived roles of policy makers were evidence uptake, establishing platforms for KT and stewardship; negative roles included ignoring or even misrepresenting evidence that is not in their favor. The roles of parliamentarians were perceived as advocacy and community mobilization, but they were noted to pursue objectives that may not be supported by the evidence. The researchers' main role was defined as evidence generation, but focusing disproportionately on academic interests was cited as a concern. The donors' main role was defined as funding research and KT, but respondents were concerned about the local relevance of donor-supported research. Respondents reported that links among stakeholders were weak due to the absence of institutionalized, inclusive platforms. Challenges facing the stakeholders in the process of KT were identified. CONCLUSIONS Our investigation revealed the need to consider the roles that various stakeholders are best placed to play. Links and necessary platforms must be put in place to achieve synergy in KT. Relevant capacities need to be built to overcome the challenges faced by the various stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet Nabyonga Orem
- WHO Uganda office, Health systems and services cluster, P. O. Box 24578, Kampala, Uganda.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Koon AD, Rao KD, Tran NT, Ghaffar A. Embedding health policy and systems research into decision-making processes in low- and middle-income countries. Health Res Policy Syst 2013; 11:30. [PMID: 23924162 PMCID: PMC3750690 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2013] [Accepted: 07/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Attention is increasingly directed to bridging the gap between the production of knowledge and its use for health decision-making in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). An important and underdeveloped area of health policy and systems research (HPSR) is the organization of this process. Drawing from an interdisciplinary conception of embeddedness, a literature review was conducted to identify examples of embedded HPSR used to inform decision-making in LMICs. The results of the literature review were organized according to the World Health Organization’s Building Blocks Framework. Next, a conceptual model was created to illustrate the arrangement of organizations that produce embedded HPSR and the characteristics that facilitate its uptake into the arena of decision-making. We found that multiple forces converge to create context-specific pathways through which evidence enters into decision-making. Depending on the decision under consideration, the literature indicates that decision-makers may call upon an intricate combination of actors for sourcing HPSR. While proximity to decision-making does have advantages, it is not the position of the organization within the network, but rather the qualities the organization possesses, that enable it to be embedded. Our findings suggest that four qualities influence embeddedness: reputation, capacity, quality of connections to decision-makers, and quantity of connections to decision-makers and others. In addition to this, the policy environment (e.g. the presence of legislation governing the use of HPSR, presence of strong civil society, etc.) strongly influences uptake. Through this conceptual model, we can understand which conditions are likely to enhance uptake of HPSR in LMIC health systems. This raises several important considerations for decision-makers and researchers about the arrangement and interaction of evidence-generating organizations in health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam D Koon
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tran NT, Bennett SC, Bishnu R, Singh S. Analyzing the sources and nature of influence: how the Avahan program used evidence to influence HIV/AIDS prevention policy in India. Implement Sci 2013; 8:44. [PMID: 23594956 PMCID: PMC3639919 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2012] [Accepted: 02/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major investments by development partners in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often seek to develop a supportive policy environment. There is limited knowledge about the mechanisms that development partners use to influence government policy, or which mechanisms are effective. This study assessed the influence of Avahan, a large HIV/AIDS prevention program in India supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, on the development of HIV/AIDS policies in India, particularly the National AIDS Control Program III (NACP III). METHODS A retrospective assessment of the contributions of Avahan to the development of NACP III was conducted based upon document review and in-depth interviews with key informants, including Avahan staff and staff of implementing partners. This assessment was carried out within a framework centered on three domains: evidence considered by policy and decision-makers; the channel through which influence is exerted; and the target audience for influence. RESULTS Respondents identified a number of respects in which Avahan influenced NACP III policy, notably, Avahan influenced perception of the feasibility of scaling up services (through a demonstration effect) and Avahan, along with others, helped ensure a strong focus on targeted interventions. Overall Avahan's influence was greatest during policy implementation. While the extent to which research evidence generated by Avahan influenced NACP III was limited, best practice evidence generated by Avahan, including the lessons learned from routine implementation and management, contributed significantly to NACP III. This was largely due to the credibility Avahan had established and strategic 'inside track' communications. CONCLUSION While studies of knowledge translation typically focus primarily on scientific evidence, this study suggests that other forms of evidence, notably best practice evidence derived from program experience, and disseminated through personal communication, were particularly influential. The framework developed for the paper provides a useful tool to analyze how evidence-based influence is exerted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nhan T Tran
- Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cruz VO, Walt G. Brokering the boundary between science and advocacy: the case of intermittent preventive treatment among infants. Health Policy Plan 2012; 28:616-25. [PMID: 23161588 PMCID: PMC3753881 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czs101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The process of translating research into policy has gained considerable attention in recent years and a number of studies have investigated the nexus between the two ‘worlds’ of research and policy. One issue that has been little addressed is about the boundaries between research and advocacy: how far scientists do, or should, promote particular findings to policy makers and others. This article analyses a particular intervention in malaria control and the Consortium set up to accelerate its potential implementation. Using a framework that emphasizes the interplay of interests, institutions and ideas, it provides an example of how a network of committed researchers and funders attempted to follow a rational policy process, but faced conflicts and fundamental questions about their roles in generating scientific evidence and influencing global health policy. In an era of ever more and larger researcher groups and consortia, the findings offer insights and lessons to those engaged in the process of knowledge translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Oliveira Cruz
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Burchett HED, Mounier-Jack S, Griffiths UK, Biellik R, Ongolo-Zogo P, Chavez E, Sarma H, Uddin J, Konate M, Kitaw Y, Molla M, Wakasiaka S, Gilson L, Mills A. New vaccine adoption: qualitative study of national decision-making processes in seven low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan 2012; 27 Suppl 2:ii5-16. [PMID: 22513732 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czs035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
As more new and improved vaccines become available, decisions on which to adopt into routine programmes become more frequent and complex. This qualitative study aimed to explore processes of national decision-making around new vaccine adoption and to understand the factors affecting these decisions. Ninety-five key informant interviews were conducted in seven low- and middle-income countries: Bangladesh, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Kenya, Mali and South Africa. Framework analysis was used to explore issues both within and between countries. The underlying driver for adoption decisions in GAVI-eligible countries was the desire to seize GAVI windows of opportunity for funding. By contrast, in South Africa and Guatemala, non-GAVI-eligible countries, the decision-making process was more rooted in internal and political dynamics. Decisions to adopt new vaccines are, by nature, political. The main drivers influencing decisions were the availability of funding, political prioritization of vaccination or the vaccine-preventable disease and the burden of disease. Other factors, such as financial sustainability and feasibility of introduction, were not as influential. Although GAVI procedures have established more formality in decision-making, they did not always result in consideration of all relevant factors. As familiarity with GAVI procedures increased, questioning by decision-makers about whether a country should apply for funding appeared to have diminished. This is one of the first studies to empirically investigate national processes of new vaccine adoption decision-making using rigorous methods. Our findings show that previous decision-making frameworks (developed to guide or study national decision-making) bore little resemblance to real-life decisions, which were dominated by domestic politics. Understanding the realities of vaccine policy decision-making is critical for developing strategies to encourage improved evidence-informed decision-making about new vaccine adoptions. The potential for international initiatives to encourage evidence-informed decision-making should be realised, not assumed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H E D Burchett
- Department of Global Health & Development, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Burchett HED, Mayhew SH, Lavis JN, Dobrow MJ. When can research from one setting be useful in another? Understanding perceptions of the applicability and transferability of research. Health Promot Int 2012; 28:418-30. [DOI: 10.1093/heapro/das026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
39
|
Kok MO, Schuit AJ. Contribution mapping: a method for mapping the contribution of research to enhance its impact. Health Res Policy Syst 2012; 10:21. [PMID: 22748169 PMCID: PMC3464695 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2012] [Accepted: 07/02/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background At a time of growing emphasis on both the use of research and accountability, it is important for research funders, researchers and other stakeholders to monitor and evaluate the extent to which research contributes to better action for health, and find ways to enhance the likelihood that beneficial contributions are realized. Past attempts to assess research 'impact' struggle with operationalizing 'impact', identifying the users of research and attributing impact to research projects as source. In this article we describe Contribution Mapping, a novel approach to research monitoring and evaluation that aims to assess contributions instead of impacts. The approach focuses on processes and actors and systematically assesses anticipatory efforts that aim to enhance contributions, so-called alignment efforts. The approach is designed to be useful for both accountability purposes and for assisting in better employing research to contribute to better action for health. Methods Contribution Mapping is inspired by a perspective from social studies of science on how research and knowledge utilization processes evolve. For each research project that is assessed, a three-phase process map is developed that includes the main actors, activities and alignment efforts during research formulation, production and knowledge extension (e.g. dissemination and utilization). The approach focuses on the actors involved in, or interacting with, a research project (the linked actors) and the most likely influential users, who are referred to as potential key users. In the first stage, the investigators of the assessed project are interviewed to develop a preliminary version of the process map and first estimation of research-related contributions. In the second stage, potential key-users and other informants are interviewed to trace, explore and triangulate possible contributions. In the third stage, the presence and role of alignment efforts is analyzed and the preliminary results are shared with relevant stakeholders for feedback and validation. After inconsistencies are clarified or described, the results are shared with stakeholders for learning, improvement and accountability purposes. Conclusion Contribution Mapping provides an interesting alternative to existing methods that aim to assess research impact. The method is expected to be useful for research monitoring, single case studies, comparing multiple cases and indicating how research can better be employed to contribute to better action for health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten O Kok
- Department of Health Sciences, V U University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
de Goede J, van Bon-Martens MJH, Putters K, van Oers HAM. Looking for interaction: quantitative measurement of research utilization by Dutch local health officials. Health Res Policy Syst 2012; 10:9. [PMID: 22414224 PMCID: PMC3341192 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2010] [Accepted: 03/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the Netherlands, local authorities are required by law to develop local health memoranda, based on epidemiological analyses. The purpose of this study was to assess the actual use of these epidemiological reports by municipal health officials and associated factors that affect this use. Method Based on a conceptual framework, we designed a questionnaire in which we operationalized instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic use, the interaction between researchers and local health officials, and four clusters of barriers in this interaction process. We conducted an internet survey among 155 Dutch local health officials representing 35% of all Dutch municipalities. By means of multiple regression analyses, we gained insight into the related factors for each of the three types of research utilization. Results The results show that local health officials use epidemiological research more often in a conceptual than an instrumental or symbolic way. This can be explained by the complexity of the local policy process which is often linked to policies in other areas, and the various policy actors involved. Conceptual use was statistically associated with a presentation given by the epidemiologist during the policy process, the presence of obstructions regarding the report's accessibility, and the local official's personal belief systems and interests originating from different professional values and responsibilities. Instrumental and symbolic use increased with the involvement of local officials in the research process. Conclusions The results of this study provide a partial solution to understanding and influencing research utilization. The quantitative approach underpins earlier qualitative findings on this topic. The outcomes suggest that RPHS epidemiologists can use different strategies to improve research utilization. 'Blurring the boundaries', and the enhancement of interfaces between epidemiologists and local health officials, like direct interactions into each other's work processes, is expected to create better possibilities for optimizing research use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce de Goede
- Academic Collaborative Centre of Public Health Brabant, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Daniels K, Clarke M, Ringsberg KC. Developing lay health worker policy in South Africa: a qualitative study. Health Res Policy Syst 2012; 10:8. [PMID: 22410185 PMCID: PMC3315411 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2011] [Accepted: 03/12/2012] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past half decade South Africa has been developing, implementing and redeveloping its Lay Health Worker (LHW) policies. Research during this period has highlighted challenges with LHW programme implementation. These challenges have included an increased burden of care for female LHWs. The aim of this study was to explore contemporary LHW policy development processes and the extent to which issues of gender are taken up within this process. METHODS The study adopted a qualitative approach to exploring policy development from the perspective of policy actors. Eleven policy actors (policy makers and policy commentators) were interviewed individually. Data from the interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS Considerations of LHW working conditions drove policy redevelopment. From the interviews it seems that gender as an issue never reached the policy making agenda. Although there was strong recognition that the working conditions of LHWs needed to be improved, poor working conditions were not necessarily seen as a gender concern. Our data suggests that in the process of defining the problem which the redeveloped policy had to address, gender was not included. There was no group or body who brought the issue of gender to the attention of policy developers. As such the issue of gender never entered the policy debates. These debates focused on whether it was appropriate to have LHWs, what LHW programme model should be adopted and whether or not LHWs should be incorporated into the formal health system. CONCLUSION LHW policy redevelopment focused on resolving issues of LHW working conditions through an active process involving many actors and strong debates. Within this process the issue of gender had no champion and never reached the LHW policy agenda. Future research may consider how to incorporate the voices of ordinary women into the policy making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Daniels
- Health Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council, PO Box 19070, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa
- Nordic School of Public Health, NHV, Box 12133, SE 402 42 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marina Clarke
- Nursing Division, Stellenbosch University, Francie Van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa
| | - Karin C Ringsberg
- Nordic School of Public Health, NHV, Box 12133, SE 402 42 Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Aas RW, Alexanderson K. Challenging Evidence-based Decision-making: A Hypothetical Case Study about Return to Work. Occup Ther Int 2011; 19:28-44. [DOI: 10.1002/oti.326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2011] [Revised: 09/10/2011] [Accepted: 09/14/2011] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Randi W. Aas
- PreSenter; International Research Institute of Stavanger (IRIS); Stavanger Norway
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- PreSenter, Faculty of Health Sciences; Institute of Occupational Therapy, Oslo and Akershus University College; Oslo Norway
| | - Kristina Alexanderson
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hanney SR, González-Block MA. Yes, research can inform health policy; but can we bridge the 'Do-Knowing It's Been Done' gap? Health Res Policy Syst 2011; 9:23. [PMID: 21679397 PMCID: PMC3142246 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2011] [Accepted: 06/16/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R Hanney
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Osungbade KO, Ige OK. Public health perspectives of preeclampsia in developing countries: implication for health system strengthening. J Pregnancy 2011; 2011:481095. [PMID: 21547090 PMCID: PMC3087154 DOI: 10.1155/2011/481095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2010] [Revised: 12/20/2010] [Accepted: 01/19/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Review of public health perspectives of preeclampsia in developing countries and implications for health system strengthening. METHODS Literature from Pubmed (MEDLINE), AJOL, Google Scholar, and Cochrane database were reviewed. RESULTS The prevalence of preeclampsia in developing countries ranges from 1.8% to 16.7%. Many challenges exist in the prediction, prevention, and management of preeclampsia. Promising prophylactic measures like low-dose aspirin and calcium supplementation need further evidence before recommendation for use in developing countries. Treatment remains prenatal care, timely diagnosis, proper management, and timely delivery. Prevailing household, community, and health system factors limiting effective control of preeclampsia in these countries were identified, and strategies to strengthen health systems were highlighted. CONCLUSION Overcoming the prevailing challenges in the control of preeclampsia in developing countries hinges on the ability of health care systems to identify and manage women at high risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayode O Osungbade
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine and University College Hospital, University of Ibadan, P.M.B. 5017 General Post Office, Ibadan, Nigeria.
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Daniels K, Lewin S. The growth of a culture of evidence-based obstetrics in South Africa: a qualitative case study. Reprod Health 2011; 8:5. [PMID: 21443794 PMCID: PMC3072938 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-8-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2010] [Accepted: 03/28/2011] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the past two decades have seen a shift towards evidence-based obstetrics and midwifery, the process through which a culture of evidence-based practice develops and is sustained within particular fields of clinical practice has not been well documented, particularly in LMICs (low- and middle-income countries). Forming part of a broader qualitative study of evidence-based policy making, this paper describes the development of a culture of evidence-based practice amongst maternal health policy makers and senior academic obstetricians in South Africa. METHODS A qualitative case-study approach was used. This included a literature review, a policy document review, a timeline of key events and the collection and analysis of 15 interviews with policy makers and academic clinicians involved in these policy processes and sampled using a purposive approach. The data was analysed thematically. RESULTS The concept of evidence-based medicine became embedded in South African academic obstetrics at a very early stage in relation to the development of the concept internationally. The diffusion of this concept into local academic obstetrics was facilitated by contact and exchange between local academic obstetricians, opinion leaders in international research and structures promoting evidence-based practice. Furthermore the growing acceptance of the concept was stimulated locally through the use of existing professional networks and meetings to share ideas and the contribution of local researchers to building the evidence base for obstetrics both locally and internationally. As a testimony to the extent of the diffusion of evidence-based medicine, South Africa has strongly evidence-based policies for maternal health. CONCLUSION This case study shows that the combined efforts of local and international researchers can create a culture of evidence-based medicine within one country. It also shows that doing so required time and perseverance from international researchers combined with a readiness by local researchers to receive and actively promote the practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Daniels
- Health Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council, South Africa.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Expanding Postpartum Hemorrhage Prevention to the Community in Resource-Poor Contexts: Critical Considerations and Next Steps. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILDBIRTH 2011. [DOI: 10.1891/2156-5287.1.1.39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Increasing the proportion of pregnant women with medically skilled care at childbirth is widely regarded as the best strategy for reducing maternal mortality and morbidity in resource-poor contexts. For many countries, however, local conditions necessitate continuing discussion concerning the role of targeted, community-based interventions in efforts to tackle this problem. One such intervention gaining momentum is community-based use of uterotonic drugs to prevent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). But how this intervention fits within the larger maternal health agenda still needs addressing, as do questions regarding whether, where, and how to proceed. This article presents a usable framework for context-based decision making around PPH prevention, evaluating why and under what circumstances it might make sense to implement uterotonic drugs at the community level. Using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data along with current evidence, we identify four critical considerations for policymakers to take into account: (a) where births are happening, (b) which women are delivering in what settings, (c) capacity of health care systems, and (d) criteria for selecting specific uterotonic drugs. Incorporating these considerations, we propose a checklist to aid policymakers in determining what strategy realistically suits the needs of their particular country contexts. Although a large and rigorous body of evidence supports PPH prevention methods, research gaps remain. Even with sufficient evidence, however, a global consensus may not be reached because of the ongoing debates over community- versus facility-based interventions. Despite these issues, it is still possible to arrive at policy decisions on community-based use of uterotonic drugs by taking a careful, context-based approach. In many settings, implementation of this intervention can be pursued in conjunction with improvements to facility-based care. As a complement to skilled attendance, expanding PPH prevention to the community can be part of a national push to target the reduction of PPH as an achievable goal.
Collapse
|
47
|
Daniels K, Lewin S. Translating research into maternal health care policy: a qualitative case study of the use of evidence in policies for the treatment of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in South Africa. Health Res Policy Syst 2008; 6:12. [PMID: 19091083 PMCID: PMC2645395 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2008] [Accepted: 12/17/2008] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Few empirical studies of research utilisation have been conducted in low and middle income countries. This paper explores how research information, in particular findings from randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews, informed policy making and clinical guideline development for the use of magnesium sulphate in the treatment of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in South Africa. Methods A qualitative case-study approach was used to examine the policy process. This included a literature review, a policy document review, a timeline of key events and the collection and analysis of 15 interviews with policy makers and academic clinicians involved in these policy processes and sampled using a purposive approach. The data was analysed thematically and explored theoretically through the literature on agenda setting and the policy making process. Results Prior to 1994 there was no national maternal care policy in South Africa. Consequently each tertiary level institution developed its own care guidelines and these recommended a range of approaches to the management of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. The subsequent emergence of new national policies for maternal care, including for the treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, was informed by evidence from randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews. This outcome was influenced by a number of factors. The change to a democratic government in the mid 1990s, and the health reforms that followed, created opportunities for maternal health care policy development. The new government was open to academic involvement in policy making and recruited academics from local networks into key policy making positions in the National Department of Health. The local academic obstetric network, which placed high value on evidence-based practice, brought these values into the policy process and was also linked strongly to international evidence based medicine networks. Within this context of openness to policy development, local researchers acted as policy entrepreneurs, bringing attention to priority health issues, and to the use of research evidence in addressing these. This resulted in the new national maternity care guidelines being informed by evidence from randomised controlled trials and recommending explicitly the use of magnesium sulphate for the management of eclampsia. Conclusion Networks of researchers were important not only in using research information to shape policy but also in placing issues on the policy agenda. A policy context which created a window of opportunity for new research-informed policy development was also crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Daniels
- Health Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|