1
|
Appel KS, Lee CH, Nunes de Miranda SM, Maier D, Reese JP, Anton G, Bahmer T, Ballhausen S, Balzuweit B, Bellinghausen C, Blumentritt A, Brechtel M, Chaplinskaya-Sobol I, Erber J, Fiedler K, Geisler R, Heyder R, Illig T, Kohls M, Kollek J, Krist L, Lorbeer R, Miljukov O, Mitrov L, Nürnberger C, Pape C, Pley C, Schäfer C, Schaller J, Schattschneider M, Scherer M, Schulze N, Stahl D, Stubbe HC, Tamminga T, Tebbe JJ, Vehreschild MJGT, Wiedmann S, Vehreschild JJ. A precise performance-based reimbursement model for the multi-centre NAPKON cohorts - development and evaluation. Sci Rep 2024; 14:13607. [PMID: 38871878 PMCID: PMC11176345 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63945-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Fair allocation of funding in multi-centre clinical studies is challenging. Models commonly used in Germany - the case fees ("fixed-rate model", FRM) and up-front staffing and consumables ("up-front allocation model", UFAM) lack transparency and fail to suitably accommodate variations in centre performance. We developed a performance-based reimbursement model (PBRM) with automated calculation of conducted activities and applied it to the cohorts of the National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON) within the Network of University Medicine (NUM). The study protocol activities, which were derived from data management systems, underwent validation through standardized quality checks by multiple stakeholders. The PBRM output (first funding period) was compared among centres and cohorts, and the cost-efficiency of the models was evaluated. Cases per centre varied from one to 164. The mean case reimbursement differed among the cohorts (1173.21€ [95% CI 645.68-1700.73] to 3863.43€ [95% CI 1468.89-6257.96]) and centres and mostly fell short of the expected amount. Model comparisons revealed higher cost-efficiency of the PBRM compared to FRM and UFAM, especially for low recruitment outliers. In conclusion, we have developed a reimbursement model that is transparent, accurate, and flexible. In multi-centre collaborations where heterogeneity between centres is expected, a PBRM could be used as a model to address performance discrepancies.Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04768998 ; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04747366 ; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04679584 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina S Appel
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Center for Internal Medicine, Medical Department 2 (Hematology/Oncology and Infectious Diseases), Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt, Germany.
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Chin Huang Lee
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Susana M Nunes de Miranda
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniel Maier
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Center for Internal Medicine, Medical Department 2 (Hematology/Oncology and Infectious Diseases), Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens-Peter Reese
- University of Würzburg, Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Würzburg, Germany
- University Hospital Würzburg, Institute for medical Data Science, Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Gabriele Anton
- Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Thomas Bahmer
- Internal Medicine Department I, Pneumology Section, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Sabrina Ballhausen
- Internal Medicine Department I, Pneumology Section, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Beate Balzuweit
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carla Bellinghausen
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Arne Blumentritt
- Independent Trusted Third Party of the University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Markus Brechtel
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Irina Chaplinskaya-Sobol
- Department of Medical Informatics at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Johanna Erber
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Department for Internal Medicine II, Technical University of Munich, University Medical Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Karin Fiedler
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Center for Internal Medicine, Medical Department 2 (Hematology/Oncology and Infectious Diseases), Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt, Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ramsia Geisler
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Center for Internal Medicine, Medical Department 2 (Hematology/Oncology and Infectious Diseases), Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt, Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ralf Heyder
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, NUM Coordination Office, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Illig
- Hannover Medical School, Hannover Unified Biobank, Hannover, Germany
| | - Mirjam Kohls
- University of Würzburg, Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jenny Kollek
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care, Clinical Trial Unit Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lilian Krist
- Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Roberto Lorbeer
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Institute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Olga Miljukov
- University of Würzburg, Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Würzburg, Germany
- University Hospital Würzburg, Institute for medical Data Science, Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Lazar Mitrov
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carolin Nürnberger
- University of Würzburg, Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Würzburg, Germany
- University Hospital Würzburg, Institute for medical Data Science, Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Christian Pape
- Department of Medical Informatics at the University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Christina Pley
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Clinical Trial Office, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Schäfer
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Jens Schaller
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Institute of Computer-Assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mario Schattschneider
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Margarete Scherer
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Center for Internal Medicine, Medical Department 2 (Hematology/Oncology and Infectious Diseases), Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nick Schulze
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Center for Internal Medicine, Medical Department 2 (Hematology/Oncology and Infectious Diseases), Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt, Germany
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dana Stahl
- Independent Trusted Third Party of the University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstraße 1-2, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Hans Christian Stubbe
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner-Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thalea Tamminga
- Internal Medicine Department I, Pneumology Section, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Johannes Josef Tebbe
- Hospital Lippe, Department of Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases, Lippe, Germany
- Bielefeld University, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Maria J G T Vehreschild
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Department II of Infectious Diseases, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Silke Wiedmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, NUM Coordination Office, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Janne Vehreschild
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Center for Internal Medicine, Medical Department 2 (Hematology/Oncology and Infectious Diseases), Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt, Germany.
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Cologne, Germany.
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner-Site Cologne-Bonn, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Post AR, Luther J, Loveless JM, Ward M, Hewitt S. Enhancing research informatics core user satisfaction through agile practices. JAMIA Open 2021; 4:ooab103. [PMID: 34927001 PMCID: PMC8672926 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Huntsman Cancer Institute Research Informatics Shared Resource (RISR), a software and database development core facility, sought to address a lack of published operational best practices for research informatics cores. It aimed to use those insights to enhance effectiveness after an increase in team size from 20 to 31 full-time equivalents coincided with a reduction in user satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS RISR migrated from a water-scrum-fall model of software development to agile software development practices, which emphasize iteration and collaboration. RISR's agile implementation emphasizes the product owner role, which is responsible for user engagement and may be particularly valuable in software development that requires close engagement with users like in science. RESULTS All RISR's software development teams implemented agile practices in early 2020. All project teams are led by a product owner who serves as the voice of the user on the development team. Annual user survey scores for service quality and turnaround time recorded 9 months after implementation increased by 17% and 11%, respectively. DISCUSSION RISR is illustrative of the increasing size of research informatics cores and the need to identify best practices for maintaining high effectiveness. Agile practices may address concerns about the fit of software engineering practices in science. The study had one time point after implementing agile practices and one site, limiting its generalizability. CONCLUSIONS Agile software development may substantially increase a research informatics core facility's effectiveness and should be studied further as a potential best practice for how such cores are operated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Post
- Research Informatics Shared Resource, Huntsman
Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah,
USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of
Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jared Luther
- Research Informatics Shared Resource, Huntsman
Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah,
USA
| | - J Maxwell Loveless
- Research Administration, Huntsman Cancer Institute,
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Melanie Ward
- Research Administration, Huntsman Cancer Institute,
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Shirleen Hewitt
- Research Informatics Shared Resource, Huntsman
Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mazumdar M, Moshier EL, Özbek U, Parsons R. Ten Essential Practices for Developing or Reforming a Biostatistics Core for a NCI Designated Cancer Center. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2018; 2:pky010. [PMID: 31360841 PMCID: PMC6649702 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pky010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Revised: 02/11/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
There are 69 National Cancer Institute (NCI) designated Cancer Centers (CCs) in the United States. Biostatistical collaboration is pivotal in cancer research, and support for a cancer biostatistics shared resource facility (C-BSRF) is included in the award. Although the services and staff needed in a C-BSRF have been outlined in general terms and best practices for biostatistical consultations and collaboration in an academic health center have been agreed upon, implementing these practices in the demanding setting of cancer centers interested in pursuing or maintaining NCI designation remains challenging. We surveyed all C-BSRF websites to assess their organizational charts, governance, size, services provided, and financial models and have identified 10 essential practices for the development of a successful C-BSRF. Here, we share our success with, and barriers to, implementation of these practices. Showcasing development plans for these essential practices resulted in an NCI score of "Excellent to Outstanding" for our C-BSRF in 2015, and performance metrics in 2016-2017 demonstrated notable improvement since our original Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) application in 2014. We believe that the essential practices described here can be adapted and adjusted, as needed, for CCs of various sizes and with different types of cancer research programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhu Mazumdar
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
- Biostatistics Shared Resource Facility, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Erin L Moshier
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
- Biostatistics Shared Resource Facility, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Umut Özbek
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
- Biostatistics Shared Resource Facility, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Ramon Parsons
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
- Medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
![]()
Development
of novel imaging probes for cancer diagnostics remains
critical for early detection of disease, yet most imaging agents are
hindered by suboptimal tumor accumulation. To overcome these limitations,
researchers have adapted antibodies for imaging purposes. As cancerous
malignancies express atypical patterns of cell surface proteins in
comparison to noncancerous tissues, novel antibody-based imaging agents
can be constructed to target individual cancer cells or surrounding
vasculature. Using molecular imaging techniques, these agents may
be utilized for detection of malignancies and monitoring of therapeutic
response. Currently, there are several imaging modalities commonly
employed for molecular imaging. These imaging modalities include positron
emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography
(SPECT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, optical imaging (fluorescence
and bioluminescence), and photoacoustic (PA) imaging. While antibody-based
imaging agents may be employed for a broad range of diseases, this
review focuses on the molecular imaging of pancreatic cancer, as there
are limited resources for imaging and treatment of pancreatic malignancies.
Additionally, pancreatic cancer remains the most lethal cancer with
an overall 5-year survival rate of approximately 7%, despite significant
advances in the imaging and treatment of many other cancers. In this
review, we discuss recent advances in molecular imaging of pancreatic
cancer using antibody-based imaging agents. This task is accomplished
by summarizing the current progress in each type of molecular imaging
modality described above. Also, several considerations for designing
and synthesizing novel antibody-based imaging agents are discussed.
Lastly, the future directions of antibody-based imaging agents are
discussed, emphasizing the potential applications for personalized
medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G England
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States
| | - Reinier Hernandez
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States
| | - Savo Bou Zein Eddine
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States
| | - Weibo Cai
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States.,Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States.,University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center , Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Riegman PHJ, de Jong B, Daidone MG, Söderström T, Thompson J, Hall JA, Mendy M, Ten Hoeve J, Broeks A, Reed W, Morente MM, López-Guerrero JA, Collins VP, Rogan J, Ringborg U. Optimizing sharing of hospital biobank samples. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7:297fs31. [PMID: 26203078 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Implementing technical guidelines and standards as well as ways to boost cooperation should facilitate sharing of hospital biobank samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter H J Riegman
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Bas de Jong
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maria Grazia Daidone
- Department of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Tommy Söderström
- Karolinska Healthcare Research Biobank, Clinical Pathology/Cytology, Karolinska University Hospital, T5:01, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - James Thompson
- Karolinska Institutet Biobank, Karolinska Institutet SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jacqueline A Hall
- Translational Research, Imaging and Radiotherapy Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maimuna Mendy
- Laboratory Services and Biobank Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, F-69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
| | - Jelle Ten Hoeve
- Research IT, Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Research IT, Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wenche Reed
- Research, Innovation and Education Unit, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Manuel M Morente
- Biobanco, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - José Antonio López-Guerrero
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Biobank, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, 46009 Valencia, Spain
| | - V Peter Collins
- Division of Molecular Histopathology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Jane Rogan
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre Biobank, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Ulrik Ringborg
- Cancer Center Karolinska, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|