Adverse drug reactions and off-label and unlicensed medicines in children: a nested case-control study of inpatients in a pediatric hospital

Model-informed drug development in pediatric, pregnancy and geriatric drug development: States of the art and future

The challenges of drug development in pediatric, pregnant and geriatric populations are a worldwide concern shared by regulatory authorities, pharmaceutical companies, and healthcare professionals. Model-informed drug development (MIDD) can integrate and quantify real-world data of physiology, pharmacology, and disease processes by using modeling and simulation techniques to facilitate decision-making in drug development. In this article, we reviewed current MIDD policy updates, reflected on the integrity of physiological data used for MIDD and the effects of physiological changes on the drug PK, as well as summarized current MIDD strategies and applications, so as to present the state of the art of MIDD in pediatric, pregnant and geriatric populations. Some considerations are put forth for the future improvements of MIDD including refining regulatory considerations, improving the integrity of physiological data, applying the emerging technologies, and exploring the application of MIDD in new therapies like gene therapies for special populations.

Getting the dose right using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling: dexamethasone to prevent post-extubation stridor in children as proof of concept

Introduction

Critically ill patients show large variability in drug disposition due to e.g., age, size, disease and treatment modalities. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models can be used to design individualized dosing regimens taking this into account. Dexamethasone, prescribed for the prevention post-extubation stridor (PES), is metabolized by the drug metabolizing enzyme CYP3A. As CYP3A4 undergoes major changes during childhood, we aimed to develop age-appropriate dosing recommendations for children of dexamethasone for PES, as proof of concept for PBPK modeling to individualize dosing for critically ill patients.

Methods

All simulations were conducted in Simcyp™ v21 (a population-based PBPK modeling platform), using an available dexamethasone compound model and pediatric population model in which CYP3A4 ontogeny is incorporated. Published pharmacokinetic (PK) data was used for model verification. Evidence for the dose to prevent post-extubation stridor was strongest for 2-6 year old children, hence simulated drug concentrations resulting from this dose from this age group were targeted when simulating age-appropriate doses for the whole pediatric age range.

Results

Dexamethasone plasma concentrations upon single and multiple intravenous administration were predicted adequately across the pediatric age range. Exposure-matched predictions of dexamethasone PK indicated that doses (in mg/kg) for the 2-6 years olds can be applied in 3 month-2 year old children, whereas lower doses are needed in children of other age groups (60% lower for 0-2 weeks, 40% lower for 2-4 weeks, 20% lower for 1-3 months, 20% lower for 6-12 year olds, 40% lower for 12-18 years olds).

Discussion

We show that PBPK modeling is a valuable tool that can be used to develop model-informed recommendations using dexamethasone to prevent PES in children. Based on exposure matching, the dose of dexamethasone should be reduced compared to commonly used doses, in infants <3 months and children ≥6 years, reflecting age-related variation in drug disposition. PBPK modeling is an promising tool to optimize dosing of critically ill patients.

Use of unlicensed drugs in a Swiss Pediatric University Hospital and associated prescribing error rates - a retrospective observational study

AIMS OF THE STUDY

Unlicensed drugs are frequently used in paediatric care. To what extent they are prescribed in hospital care in Switzerland is unclear. Because prescribing errors seem to occur more frequently with unlicensed drugs, we aimed to assess the prevalence of unlicensed drug prescriptions in two study periods (2018 and 2019) at the University Children's Hospital Zurich, compare these periods and investigate whether unlicensed drugs were more prone to prescribing errors than licensed drugs.

METHODS

We conducted a sub-analysis of a retrospective single-centre observational study and analysed 5,022 prescriptions for a total of 1,000 patients from 2018 and 2019 in paediatric general wards. The rate of unlicensed drugs, consisting of imported or formula drugs, was investigated. The prescriptions from 2019 were further analysed on prescribing errors to see whether errors occurred more often in unlicensed or licensed drug use.

RESULTS

Of all prescriptions, 10.8% were unlicensed drugs, with around half each being imported and formula drugs. Among all patients, 34% were prescribed at least one unlicensed drug. Younger paediatric patients were prescribed more unlicensed drugs than older paediatric patients (newborns: 15.8% of prescriptions, infants: 13.4%, children: 10.6%, adolescents: 7.1%). Ibuprofen suppositories, midazolam oral solution and gentamicin i.v. solution were the most frequently prescribed imported drugs. Macrogol powder, lisinopril oral suspension and potassium chloride i.v. solution were the most frequently prescribed formula drugs. The most common drug forms in unlicensed use were oral liquid forms and i.v.

SOLUTIONS

Unlicensed drugs had a significantly higher rate of prescribing errors than licensed drugs (31.6 errors per 100 prescriptions [95% CI: 26.1-37.0] versus 24.3 errors per 100 prescriptions [95% CI: 22.3-26.2], p = 0.024). In particular, formula drugs carried a higher risk (36.4 errors per 100 prescriptions, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlicensed drugs are frequently prescribed in this paediatric hospital setting in Switzerland. Around every tenth prescription is an unlicensed drug. Because unlicensed drugs showed a significantly higher rate of prescribing errors, licensed drugs are favourable in terms of medication safety and should be prescribed whenever possible. If no licensed drug is available, imported drugs should be favoured over formula drugs due to lower prescribing error rates. To increase medication safety in paediatrics in Switzerland, efforts are necessary to increase the number of suitable licensed drug formulations for paediatric patients, including developing new innovative drug formulations for children.

Evaluation of off-label medication use and drug safety in a pediatric intensive care unit

Safety and efficacy are essential in the process of disease treatment. However, off-label medication use is inevitable because various medications do not contain regulatory labels for pediatric use. We aimed to examine off-label medication use and analyze the risk factors correlated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This study was performed retrospectively using electronic medical data from a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary hospital in Korea from July 2019 to June 2020. A total 6,183 prescribed medications from 502 PICU patients were examined in the present study. A total of 80% were infants or children, and 96.0% of them were treated with off-label medications. It was discovered that 4,778 off-label cases (77.2%) of the top 100 drugs had prescriptions with dosage (67.8%). Drugs prescribed to patients admitted to the cardiothoracic department (odds ratio [OR], 3.248; p = 0.019), total number of medications (OR, 1.116; p = 0.001), and length of PICU stay of ≥ 7 days (OR, 4.981; p = 0.008) were significantly associated with ADRs. ADRs were noted to be more severe in off-label use (p = 0.0426). For appropriate medication use, evidence regarding the safety of off-label medications is required and ultimately reflected in the official regulation.

Advances in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling for pediatric drug development: extrapolations and exposure-response analyses

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacokinetic (PK)-Pharmacodynamic (PD) and exposure-response (E-R) modeling are critical parts of pediatric drug development. By integrating available knowledge and supportive data to support the design of future studies and pediatric dose selection, these techniques increase the efficiency of pediatric drug development and lowers the risk of exposing pediatric study participants to suboptimal or unsafe dose regimens.

AREAS COVERED

The role of PK, PK-PD and E-R modeling within pediatric drug development and pediatric dose selection is discussed. These models allow investigation of the impact of age and bodyweight on PK and PD in children, despite the often sparse data on the pediatric population. Also discussed is how E-R analyses strengthen the evidence basis to support (full or partial) extrapolation of drug efficacy from adults to children, and between different pediatric age groups.

EXPERT OPINION

Accelerated pediatric drug development and optimized pediatric dosing guidelines are expected from three future developments: (1) Increased focus on E-R modeling of currently approved drugs in children resulting in (novel) E-R modeling techniques and best practices, (2) increased use of real-world data for E-R (3) increased implementation of available population PK and E-R information in pediatric drug dosing guidelines.

Urschitz M, Rascher W. A Complex Intervention to Prevent Medication-Related Hospital Admissions

BACKGROUND

Children are often treated off-label and are at a disadvantage in pharmacotherapy. The aim of this study was to implement and evaluate a quality assurance measure (PaedPharm) for pediatric pharmacotherapy whose purpose is to reduce medication-related hospitalizations among children and adolescents.

METHODS

PaedPharm consisted of the digital pediatric drug information system PaedAMIS, pediatric pharmaceutical quality circles (PaedZirk), and an adverse drug event (ADE) reporting system (PaedReport). The intervention was implemented in a cluster-randomized trial (DRKS 00013924) in 12 regions, with a pediatric and adolescent medicine clinic in each and a total of 152 surrounding private practitioners, in 6 sequences over 8 quarters. In addition to the proportion of ADE-related hospital admissions (primary endpoint), comprehensive process evaluation included other endpoints such as coverage, user acceptance, and relevance to practice.

RESULTS

41 829 inpatient admissions were recorded, of which 5101 were patients of physicians who participated in our study. 4.1% of admissions were ADE-related under control conditions, and 3.1% under intervention conditions (95% CI: [2.3; 5.9] and [1.8; 4.5], respectively). A model-based comparison yielded an intervention effect of 0.73 (population-based odds ratio; [0.39; 1.37]; p = 0.33). PaedAMIS achieved moderate user acceptance and PaedZirk achieved high user acceptance.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of PaedPharm was associated with a decrease in medication-related hospitalizations that did not reach statistical significance. The process evaluation revealed broad acceptance of the intervention in outpatient pediatrics and adolescent medicine.

Factors affecting the patient journey and patient care when receiving an unlicensed medicine: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Unlicensed medicines are used across the UK to treat an individual's clinical needs when there are no appropriate licensed alternatives. Patients, carers and parents have reported facing challenges with unlicensed medicines at the points of transfer of care between settings, a key time when medication errors may occur. There is little known about the patient journey as a whole, or the factors affecting patient care when receiving an unlicensed medicine.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of UK literature to better understand factors that affect the entire patient journey from the decision to initiate treatment with an unlicensed medicine to the point at which treatment is supplied through a community pharmacy or ends.

METHODS

Scopus, OVID EMCARE, EMBASE, OVID Medline ALL, CINAHL, Web of Science and Joanna Briggs Institute were searched from 1968 (introduction of the Medicines Act) until November 2020, using the PRISMA guidelines. Narrative synthesis of UK studies was employed to analyse descriptive and qualitative data on any reported findings that would impact the patient journey or care related to the use of unlicensed medicines, and any described barriers or enablers.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies met criteria for final inclusion, with high levels of heterogeneity in terms of designs and methods. Specific challenges that were seen to impact the continuity of care across care settings, patient safety and provision of patient-centred care included diversity of clinical needs and impact of patient population age; healthcare professional awareness and acceptability of the use of unlicensed medicines; the hierarchical structure of the NHS; inconsistent doses and formulations with varying bioequivalence; patient/parent/carer/public awareness of unlicensed medicines use and perceived acceptability.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified a clear need for consistent information to be provided to healthcare professional and patients alike to support the safe and effective use of unlicensed medicines across care settings.

Medical treatment in infants and young children with epilepsy: Off-label use of antiseizure medications. Survey Report of ILAE Task Force Medical Therapies in Children

OBJECTIVE

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) remain the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. These ASMs have mainly been tested in trials in adults with epilepsy, which subsequently led to market authorization (MA). For treatment of - especially young - children with epilepsy, several ASMs do not have a MA and guidelines are lacking, subsequently leading to "off-label" use of ASMs. Even though "off-label" ASM prescriptions for children could lead to more adverse events, it can be clinically appropriate and rational if the benefits outweigh the risks. This could be the case if "on-label" ASM, in mono- or polytherapy, fails to achieve adequate seizure control.

METHODS

The Medical Therapies Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Commission for Pediatrics performed a survey to study the current treatment practices in six classic, early life epilepsy scenarios. Our aim was not only to study first- and second-line treatment preferences but also to illustrate the use of "off-label" drugs in childhood epilepsies.

RESULTS

Our results reveal that several ASMs (e.g. topiramate, oxcarbazepine, benzodiazepines) are prescribed "off-label" in distinct scenarios of young children with epilepsy. In addition, recent scientific guidelines were not always adopted by several survey respondents, suggesting a potential knowledge gap.

SIGNIFICANCE

We report the relatively common use of "off-label" prescriptions that underlines the need for targeted and appropriately designed clinical trials, including younger patients, which will also result in the ability to generate evidence-based guidelines.

Paediatric drug development and evaluation: Existing challenges and recommendations

Despite various international regulatory initiatives over the last 20 years, many challenges remain in the field of paediatric drug development and evaluation. Indeed, drug research and development is still focused essentially on adult indications, thereby excluding many paediatric patients, limiting the feasibility of trials and favouring competing developments. Off-label prescribing persists and the development of age-appropriate dosage forms for children remains limited. Against this background, the members of this panel (TR) recommend the launch of multi-partner exchange forums on specific topics in order to focus new drug research and development on the real, unmet medical needs of children and adolescents, and in keeping with the underlying mechanisms of action. Scientific information sharing and cooperation between stakeholders are also essential for defining reference evaluation methods in each medical field. These forums can be organised through existing paediatric facilities and research networks at the French and European level. The latter are specifically dedicated to paediatric research and can facilitate clinical trial implementation and patient enrolment. Moreover, specific grants and public/private partnerships are still needed to support studies on the repositioning of drugs in paediatric indications, and pharmacokinetic studies aimed at defining appropriate dosages. The development of new pharmaceutical forms, better suited for paediatric use, and the promotion of resulting innovations will stimulate future investments. Initiatives to gather observational safety and efficacy data following off-label and/or derogatory early access should also be encouraged to compensate for the lack of information available in these situations. Finally, the creation of Ethics Committees (EC) with a specific "mother-child" advisory expertise should be promoted to ensure that the current regulation (Jardé law in France) is implemented whilst also taking into account the paediatric specificities in medical trials.

Off-Label, but on-Evidence? A Review of the Level of Evidence for Pediatric Pharmacotherapy

Many drugs are still prescribed off-label to the pediatric population. Although off-label drug use not supported by high level of evidence is potentially harmful, a comprehensive overview of the quality of the evidence pertaining off-label drug use in children is lacking. The Dutch Pediatric Formulary (DPF) provides best evidence-based dosing guidelines for drugs used in children. For each drug-indication-age group combination-together compiling one record-we scored the highest available level of evidence: labeled use, systematic review or meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparative research, noncomparative research, or consensus-based expert opinions. For records based on selected guidelines, the original sources were not reviewed. These records were scored as guideline. A total of 774 drugs were analyzed comprising a total of 6,426 records. Of all off-label records (n = 2,718), 14% were supported by high quality evidence (4% meta-analysis or systematic reviews, 10% RCTs of high quality), 20% by comparative research, 14% by noncomparative research, 37% by consensus-based expert opinions, and 15% by selected guidelines. Fifty-eight percent of all records were authorized, increasing with age from 30% in preterm neonates (n = 110) up to 64% in adolescents (n = 1,630). Many have advocated that off-label use is only justified when supported by a high level of evidence. We show that this prerequisite would seriously limit available drug treatment for children as the underlying evidence is low across ages and drug classes. Our data identify the drugs and therapeutic areas for which evidence is clearly missing and could drive the global research agenda.

Adverse Drug Reactions in Pediatric Oncohematology: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients. Due to the disease severity and chemotherapy safety profile, oncologic patients are at higher risk of ADR. However, there is little evidence on pharmacovigilance studies evaluating drug safety in this specific population.

Methods: In order to assess the incidence and characteristics of ADR in pediatric patients with oncohematogical diseases and the methodology used in the studies, a systematic review was carried out using both free search and a combination of MeSH terms. Data extraction and critical appraisal were performed independently using a predefined form.

Results: Fourteen studies were included, of which eight were prospective and half focused in inpatients. Sample size and study duration varied widely. Different methods of ADR identification were detected, used alone or combined. Causality and severity were assessed frequently, whereas preventability was lacking in most studies. ADR incidence varied between 14.4 and 67% in inpatients, and 19.6–68.1% in admissions, mainly in the form of hematological, gastrointestinal and skin toxicity. Between 11 and 16.4% ADR were considered severe, and preventability ranged from 0 to 74.5%.

Conclusion: ADR in oncohematology pediatric patients are frequent. A high variability in study design and results has been found. The use of methodological standards and preventability assessment should be reinforced in order to allow results comparison between studies and centers, and to detected areas of improvement.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=96513, identifier CRD42018096513.

Value of Literature Review to Inform Development and Use of Biologics in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is one of the most common pediatric inflammatory rheumatic diseases (PiRDs). Uncontrolled disease activity is associated with decreased quality of life and chronic morbidity. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have considerably improved clinical outcomes. For optimized patient care, understanding the efficacy-safety profile of biologics in subgroups of JIA is crucial. This systematic review based on published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to assess efficacy and safety data for bDMARDs and JAKi with various JIA subgroups after 3 months of treatment.

METHODS

Data for American College of Rheumatology (ACR) pediatric (Pedi) 30, 50, and/or 70 responses after 3 months of treatment were selected from RCTs investigating bDMARDs or JAKi in JIA according to predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Treatment and control arms were compared by calculating risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and proportions of overall, serious adverse events (AEs) and infections were analyzed. Forest plots were generated to summarize efficacy and safety endpoints across studies, JIA subgroups, and type of biologics.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight out of 41 PiRD RCTs investigated bDMARD or JAKi treatments in JIA. 9 parallel RCTs reported ACR Pedi 30, 50, and/or 70 responses 3 months after treatment initiation. All treatment arms showed improved ACR Pedi responses over controls. RRs ranged from 1.05 to 3.73 in ACR Pedi 30, from 1.20 to 7.90 in ACR Pedi 50, and from 1.19 to 8.73 in ACR Pedi 70. An enhanced effect for ACR Pedi 70 was observed with infliximab combined with methotrexate in PJIA vs. methotrexate monotherapy. A slightly higher risk of gastrointestinal AEs and infections was observed with treatment arms compared to placebo or methotrexate monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Investigated bDMARDs and JAKi showed superior treatment responses compared to controls after 3 months of treatment, which were more pronounced in ACR Pedi 50 and 70 than in ACR Pedi 30. Higher susceptibility to infections associated with bDMARDs or JAKi vs. control arms must be weighed against efficacious treatment of the underlying disease and prevention of disease-related damage. Additional RCTs are warranted to further inform development and utilization of biologics in JIA.

Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children

BACKGROUND

Medicines designed for adults may be inappropriate for use in children in terms of strength, dosage form and/or excipient content. There is currently no standardised method of assessing the age-appropriateness of a medicine for paediatric use.

AIM

To develop and test a tool to assess whether a dosage form (formulation) is appropriate for children and estimate the proportion of formulations considered 'inappropriate' in a cohort of hospitalised paediatric patients with a chronic illness.

METHOD

A multi-phase study: patient data collection, tool development, case assessments and tool validation. Inpatients aged 0-17 years at two UK paediatric/neonatal hospitals during data collection periods between January 2015 and March 2016. Written informed consent/assent was obtained. Medicines assessed were new or regularly prescribed to inpatients as part of their routine clinical care. All medicine administration episodes recorded were assessed using the Age-appropriate Formulation tool. The tool was developed by a consensus approach, as a one-page flowchart. Independent case assessments were evaluated in 2019.

RESULTS

In 427 eligible children; 2,199 medicine administration episodes were recorded. Two assessors reviewed 220 episodes in parallel: percentage exact agreement was found to be 91.7% (99/108) and 93.1% (95/102). In total, 259/2,199 (11.8%) medicine administration episodes involved a dosage form categorised as 'age-inappropriate'.

CONCLUSION

A novel tool has been developed and internally validated. The tool can identify which medicines would benefit from development of an improved paediatric formulation. It has shown high inter-rater reliability between users. External validation is needed to further assess the tool's utility in different settings.

Combined Use of Cyclodextrins and Amino Acids for the Development of Cefixime Oral Solutions for Pediatric Use

Cefixime (CEF) is a cephalosporin included in the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children. Liquid formulations are considered the best choice for pediatric use, due to their great ease of administration and dose-adaptability. Owing to its very low aqueous solubility and poor stability, CEF is only available as a powder for oral suspensions, which can lead to reduced compliance by children, due to its unpleasant texture and taste, and possible non-homogeneous dosage. The aim of this work was to develop an oral pediatric CEF solution endowed with good palatability, exploiting the solubilizing and taste-masking properties of cyclodextrins (CDs), joined to the use of amino acids as an auxiliary third component. Solubility studies indicated sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin (SBEβCD) and Histidine (His) as the most effective CD and amino acid, respectively, even though no synergistic effect on drug solubility improvement by their combined use was found. Molecular Dynamic and ¹H-NMR studies provided insight into the interactions of binary CEF:His and ternary CEF:His:SBEβCD systems used to prepare CEF solutions, which resulted stable and maintained unchanged antimicrobial activity during the two-weeks-use in therapy. The ternary solution was superior in terms of more tolerable pH (5.6 vs. 4.7) and better palatability, being resulted completely odorless by a panel test.

Off-label drug use in neonates and infants in Spain: A five-year observational study

OBJECTIVES

To provide information about the off-label rate of all drug prescriptions in neonates and infants up to 1 year in Spain. Also, to analyse the off-label prescription of medicines under current practice in this age group according to different evidence sources.

STUDY DESIGN

A five-year (2015-2019) exploratory observational study about off-label prescription in neonates and infants (0 to 1 year) at primary health care in Spain. All drug prescriptions in this age group were analysed and classified according to their labelling in off-label or on-label. The drugs prescribed off-label were subsequently reviewed in national formularies and other databases to assess its evidence of use beyond what is recommended in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).

RESULTS

On average 34.50% of total prescriptions were prescribed off-label according to the SmPC. 17.93% of total prescriptions in neonates and infants up to 1 year old were not based on clinical evidence from SmPC, Pediamécum, BNF or DailyMed. In more than 88% of cases, off-label use was related to the posology section of the SmPC, followed by the therapeutic indications and contraindications sections, in 35.20% and 24.10% of cases, respectively. Almost 13% of off-label drugs were over-the-counter. Salbutamol followed by topical tobramycin and colecalciferol were the drugs most prescribed off-label.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label use of drugs remains as an important public health concern, especially for neonates and infants up to 1 year, who receive the greatest proportion of off-label prescriptions. The evidence-based off-label prescription is a widespread practice that has shown a stable trend during the 5-year study period providing also a certain extent of flexibility to paediatricians in some therapeutic decisions.

Adverse Events Related to Off-Label Drugs Using Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting Systems

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the adverse events (AEs) related to the use of off-label drugs.

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out using available data pertaining to off-label drug were sourced from U.S. FDA spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting database (FAERS) and Korea Adverse Event Reporting System database (KIDS-KD) for the years 2014 to 2018. The number and frequencies of AE cases were calculated. Disproportionality was analyzed using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the information component (IC), and the empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) methods.

Results

The reported AEs associated with off-label drug use were more common among older patients compared with younger patients. Gastric nonspecific symptoms and therapeutic procedure (4.16–4.57%) and haemorrage term (4.16–5.29%) were the most common AE symptoms and antithrombotic agents and immunosuppressants were the drugs most commonly reported to cause AEs in FAERS. Secondary term events (43.45–48.62%) including inappropriate schedule of drug administration and medication error were the most common AEs, and immunosuppressants and antipsychotics were the most common AE-related drugs from KIDS-KD. The numbers of reported AEs in new drug categories such as other antineoplastic agents trended to increase from 2014 to 2018 in both datasets.

Conclusion

The numbers of reported AEs with off-label drug increased annually. AEs associated with off-label drugs may have a significant impact on older patients. Healthcare experts should be concerned about prescriptions of off-label drugs, especially anticoagulants and newly developed drugs such as immunosuppressants and antineoplastic agents.

Path towards efficient paediatric formulation development based on partnering with clinical pharmacologists and clinicians, a conect4children expert group white paper

Improved global access to novel age-appropriate formulations for paediatric subsets, either of new chemical entities or existing drugs, is a priority to ensure that medicines meet the needs of these patients. However, despite regulatory incentives, the introduction to the market of paediatric formulations still lags behind adult products. This is mainly caused by additional complexities associated with the development of acceptable age-appropriate paediatric medicines. This position paper recommends the use of a paediatric Quality Target Product Profile as an efficient tool to facilitate early planning and decision making across all teams involved in paediatric formulation development during the children-centric formulation design for new chemical entities, or to repurpose/reformulate off-patent drugs. Essential key attributes of a paediatric formulation are suggested and described. Moreover, greater collaboration between formulation experts and clinical colleagues, including healthcare professionals, is advocated to lead to safe and effective, age-appropriate medicinal products. Acceptability testing should be a secondary endpoint in paediatric clinical trials to ensure postmarketing adherence is not compromised by a lack of acceptability. Not knowing the indications and the related age groups and potential dosing regimens early enough is still a major hurdle for efficient paediatric formulation development; however, the proposed paediatric Quality Target Product Profile could be a valuable collaborative tool for planning and decision making to expedite paediatric product development, particularly for those with limited experience in developing a paediatric product.

French pediatricians' views on industry-sponsored clinical trials: Toward stronger research on ethics?

INTRODUCTION

There is a crucial need to perform clinical trials in pediatrics due to an increased prescription rate of unapproved drugs. Since pediatricians are the gatekeepers of clinical trials, the primary objective of the current study was to evaluate, for the first time in France, pediatricians' views on performing clinical trials. The second objective was to identify the factors that influence their perceptions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 2017, pediatricians who were members of the French Pediatric Society completed an online survey comprising 27 questions. Fisher's exact test was performed to evaluate possible correlations between pediatrician characteristics (age, sex, parenthood, professional experience, status, type of practice, previous participation in clinical trials, ethics education) and personal views on clinical trials. A value of P≤0.001 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Overall, 207 pediatricians completed the questionnaire. Almost all participants (96.6%) were in favor of performing clinical trials. Pediatricians with teaching experience at university hospitals were more reluctant to propose children's participation in clinical trials for fear of increasing parental stress (P<0.001), or the occurrence of serious adverse reactions (P<0.001). Pediatricians with coordinator or investigator experience considered that one of the ethical drifts in pediatric clinical trials is the risk of child exploitation (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a favorable position of pediatricians concerning clinical trials, despite numerous concerns. Another outcome is the need to create an educational system of research in ethics in France dedicated to pediatricians in order to guarantee good clinical practice in research.

Accuracy of Dose Administered to Children Using Off-Labelled or Unlicensed Oral Dosage Forms

The pediatric population suffers from a lack of age-appropriate medicines leading to unsafe situations when off-labelled or unlicensed drugs are used. Assessing the best option to administrate medicines when manipulations are required is essential in order to improve child care. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the administered dose provided by three dosage forms and their techniques of administration. Different techniques of administration were assessed, covering three oral dosage forms (commercially available tablets, capsules, oral suspensions) using two APIs not available in a children-adapted dosage form. Techniques of administration were simulated and administered doses were determined using HPLC-UV. Means were compared to the target dose while distributions of doses were compared between each technique. For both APIs, mean administered doses obtained with capsules and tablets were significantly different from the target dose, whereas there was no statistical difference with oral suspensions. Distributions of doses showed significant difference between the three dosage forms. This study demonstrates that manipulations of solid oral dosage forms provide dramatic underdosing leading to unsafe situations. Compounded oral suspension is the best option to avoid underdosing and dose variation. This solution should be prioritized when age-appropriate commercial medicines are not available.

Evidence of support used for drug treatments in pediatric cardiology

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Clinical support systems are widely used in pediatric care. The aim of this study was to assess the support for drug treatments used at pediatric cardiac wards and intensive care units in Sweden.

METHODS

Drug information, such as type of drug, indication, dose, and route of administration, for all in-hospital pediatric cardiac patients, was included in the study. Treatments were classified as either on-label (based on product information) or off-label. Support for off-label treatment was stratified by the use of clinical support systems (the national database on drugs, local, or other clinical experience guidelines).

RESULTS

In all, 28 patients were included in the study. The total number of drug treatments was 233, encompassing 65 different drugs. Overall, 175 (75%) treatments were off-label. A majority of off-label drug treatments were supported by other sources of information shared by experts. A total of 7% of the drug treatments were used without support.

CONCLUSION

Off-label drug treatment is still common in Swedish pediatric cardiac care. However, the majority of treatments were supported by the experience shared in clinical support systems.

KEY POINTS

Seventy-five percent of all prescriptions in pediatric cardiology care were off-label.A majority of patients received three or more drug treatments off-label.Use of clinical support systems and guidelines was common, but in 7% of all drug treatments, no support was found for the chosen treatment.

Adverse Reactions to Drugs of Special Interest in a Pediatric Oncohematology Service

Introduction: Drugs used in oncological diseases are frequently related to adverse drug reactions (ADR). Few studies have analyzed the toxicity of cancer treatments in children in real practice.

Methods: An observational, longitudinal and prospective study has been carried out in an Oncohematology Service of a tertiary hospital. During 2017, patients exposed to one or more drugs of a previously agreed list were identified and followed-up for at least 6 months each. Characteristics of ADR, incidence, causality and possible preventability, have been evaluated.

Results: 72 patients have been treated with at least one study drug, and 159 ADR episodes involving at least one of these drugs have been identified, with a total of 293 ADR. Most episodes required hospital admission (35.2%) or happened during the hospital stay (33%), and 91.2% were severe. Blood disorders were the most frequent ADR (96; 32.8%), related to thioguanine (42) and pegaspargase (39) mainly, followed by infections (86; 29.4%) related to thioguanine (32), pegaspargase (27), Erwinia asparaginase (14) and rituximab (13). Two ADR were unknown. Most ADR were dose-dependent or expectable (>90%). The global incidence of ADR was 3.1/100 days at risk (95% CI 2.7–3.5), with 3.5 ADR/100 days at risk with pegaspargase (95% CI 2.9–4.2), 1.2/100 days at risk with rituximab (95% CI 0.8–1.8) and 11.6/100 days at risk with thioguanine (95% CI 9.4–14.2). Controversial additional measures of prevention, other than those already used, were identified.

Conclusion: ADR are frequent in pediatric oncohematological patients, mainly blood disorders and infectious diseases. Findings regarding incidence and preventability may be useful to compare data between different centers and to evaluate new possibilities for action or prevention.

Biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs and Janus kinase inhibitors in paediatric rheumatology - what we know and what we do not know from randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are prescribed in adult and paediatric rheumatology. Due to age-dependent changes, disease course, and pharmacokinetic processes paediatric patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (PiRD) differ from adult rheumatology patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in PiRD treated with bDMARDs/JAK inhibitors was conducted on Medline, clinicaltrials.gov , clinicaltrialsregister.eu and conference abstracts as of July 2020. RCTs were included if (i) patients were aged ≤20 years, (ii) patients had a predefined rheumatic diagnosis and (iii) RCT reported predefined outcomes. Selected studies were excluded in case of (i) observational or single arm study or (ii) sample size ≤5 patients. Study characteristics were extracted.

RESULTS

Out of 608 screened references, 65 references were selected, reporting 35 unique RCTs. All 35 RCTs reported efficacy while 34/3 provided safety outcomes and 16/35 provided pharmacokinetic data. The most common investigated treatments were TNF inhibitors (60%), IL-1 inhibitors (17%) and IL-6 inhibitors (9%). No RCTs with published results were identified for baricitinib, brodalumab, certolizumab pegol, guselkumab, risankizumab, rituximab, sarilumab, secukinumab, tildrakizumab, or upadacitinib. In patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) 25/35 RCTs were conducted. The remaining 10 RCTs were performed in non-JIA patients including plaque psoriasis, Kawasaki Disease, systemic lupus erythematosus and non-infectious uveitis. In JIA-RCTs, the control arm was mainly placebo and the concomitant treatments were either methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) or corticosteroids. Non-JIA patients mostly received NSAID. There are ongoing trials investigating abatacept, adalimumab, baricitinib, brodalumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, guselkumab, infliximab, risankizumab, secukinumab, tofacitinib and tildrakizumab.

CONCLUSION

Despite the FDA Modernization Act and support of major paediatric rheumatology networks, such as the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG) and the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO), which resulted in drug approval for PiRD indications, there are limited RCTs in PiRD patients. As therapy response is influenced by age-dependent changes, pharmacokinetic processes and disease course it is important to consider developmental changes in bDMARDs/JAK inhibitor use in PiRD patients. As such it is critical to collaborate and conduct international RCTs to appropriately investigate and characterize efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of bDMARDs/JAK inhibitors in paediatric rheumatology.

Causality and avoidability of adverse drug reactions of antibiotics in hospitalized children: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions are a problem in healthcare systems worldwide. Children are more susceptible than adults, especially when exposed to specific drug classes, such as antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the incidence, causality, severity, and avoidability of antibiotic-associated adverse drug reactions in hospitalized pediatric patients.

SETTING

Pediatric ward of a high-complexity public hospital in northeast Brazil.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted over six months, including children aged between 28 days and 12 years, hospitalized for more than 48 h, and receiving antibiotics. Liverpool's causality and avoidability assessment tools were used. Primary outcome measures: Incidence of adverse drug reactions, causality, severity, and avoidability, major antibiotics implicated, risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients were followed, and 35 suspected adverse drug reactions were recorded overall incidence equal to 14.7%. Most adverse drug reactions were classified as moderate severity (76.7%), probable (57.1%) and defined (28.6%) causality, and unavoidable (66.7%). The affected organs were the gastrointestinal system (74.1%) and skin (25.9%). Major antibiotics implicated were ceftriaxone (40.7%), azithromycin (25.9%), and crystalline penicillin (11.1%). The number of antibiotics prescribed per patient during hospitalization and the length of stay were the risk factors identified.

CONCLUSION

Causality and severity assessment indicated that most adverse drug reactions were probable and moderate. Possibly avoidable reactions occurred due to inappropriate prescribing when preventive measures were not implemented. Monitoring the use of antibiotics in children is essential to ensure the safety of these patients.

Safety considerations selecting antiseizure medications for the treatment of individuals with Dravet syndrome

Introduction: Management of individuals with Dravet Syndrome has evolved significantly over the past 10 years. Progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology, the long-term outcome and possible consequences of inappropriate therapies, new drugs have been approved by the regulatory authorities and patients and families expressed their needs beyond seizures' control.Areas covered: The authors aimed at providing an overview of the main antiseizure medications used in Dravet syndrome with a particular focus on safety considerations. As the highly active phase of seizures takes place before the age of 5 years, the characteristics of antiseizure medications in infancy and childhood have also been considered due to their impact on antiseizure medication safety.Expert opinion: Recent treatments, evaluated via randomized clinical trials, are promising in terms of efficacy and safety in individuals with DS. However, the balance between expected benefits and risks taken must be accurately assessed on an individual basis. There is a lack of data to understand the needs of patients and families, a major point particularly in this population, where the evaluation of efficacy and safety beyond seizures is difficult due to cognitive delay and behavioral disorders and where this evaluation is coming almost exclusively from caregivers.

Relationship between adverse drug reactions and unlicensed/off-label drug use in hospitalized children (EREMI): A study protocol

INTRODUCTION

To date, few studies have shown a significant association between off-label drug use and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The main aims of this study is to evaluate the relationship between adverse drug reactions and unlicensed or off-label drugs in hospitalized children and to provide more information on prescribing practice, the amplitude, consequences of unlicensed or off-label drug use in pediatric inpatients.

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective study started from 2013, we use the French summaries of product characteristics in Theriaque (a prescription products guide) as a primary reference source for determining pediatric drug labeling. The detection of ADRs is carried out spontaneously by health professionals and actively by research groups using a trigger tool and patients' electronic health records. The causality between suspected ADRs and medication is evaluated using the Naranjo and the French methods of imputability independently by pharmacovigilance center. All suspected ADRs are submitted for a second evaluation by an independent pharmacovigilance experts.

STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY

For our best knowledge, EREMI is the first large multicenter prospective and objective study in France with an active ADRs monitoring and independent ADRs validation. This study identifies the risk factors that could be used to adjust preventive actions in children's care, guides future research in the field and increases the awareness of physicians in off-label drug use and in detecting and declaring ADRs. As data are obtained through extraction of information from hospital database and medical records, there is likely to be some under-reporting of items or missing data. In this study the field specialists detect all adverse events, experts in pharmacovigilance centers assess them and finally only the ADRs assessed by the independent committee are confirmed. Although we recruit a high number of patients, this observational study is subject to different confounders.

Exploration and evaluation of dynamic dose-control platform for pediatric medicine based on Drop-on-Powder 3D printing technology

Patient responses to doses vary widely, and affording limited doses to such a diverse population will inevitably yield unsatisfactory therapeutic effects and even adverse effects. In Particular, there is an urgent demand for a dynamic dose-control platform for pediatric patients, many of whom require diverse doses and flexible dose adjustments. The aim of this study was to explore the possibility of using a drop-on-powder (DoP) technology-based desktop 3D printer to build a dynamic dose-control platform for theophylline (TP) and metoprolol tartrate (MT). In addition, the impact of drug loading patterns on the accuracy of dose regulation was also assessed. All of the printed tablets exhibited good mechanical properties and satisfactory structural integrity. On printing tablets with target drug doses, the accuracy was in the range of 91.2~108% with a small variation coefficient in the range of 0.5~3.2%. Compared with traditional divided-dose methods, drop-on-powder 3D printing technology exhibited higher accuracy in dose regulation, but had less impact on the in vitro drug release behavior. The results in this work clearly indicate the possibility and ability of DoP technology as a promising method for constructing a dynamic dose-control platform for the fabrication of personalized medicines for pediatric patients.

Development and Evaluation of a Web-Based Paediatric Drug Information System for Germany

Background: Off-label use is frequent in paediatrics but that does not necessarily mean that the risk-benefit ratio is negative. Nevertheless, evidence-based data is essential for safe drug therapy. In Germany, there is no publicly available compendium providing transparent, evidence-based information for paediatric pharmacotherapy to date. This work describes the development of a web-based paediatric drug information system (PDIS) for Germany and its evaluation by health care professionals (HCP). Methods: Since 2012, a PDIS is being developed by the authors and is supported by the Federal Ministry of Health since 2016. Dosing recommendations were established based on systematic literature reviews and subsequent evaluation by clinical experts. The prototype was evaluated by HCP. Based on the results, the further development was concluded. Results: 92% of HCP believed that the PDIS could improve the quality of prescribing, as currently available information is deficient. Besides the license and formulations, dosing recommendations were the most relevant modules. A dosage calculator was the most wanted improvement. To facilitate sustainability of future development, a collaboration with the Dutch Kinderformularium was established. As of 2021, the database will be available to German HCP. Conclusion: The fundamentals for a German PDIS were established, and vital steps were taken towards successful continuation.

Improved infrastructure and support needed for paediatric clinical trials in Sweden

AIM

There is a lack of authorised medicines for paediatric patients and improved drug development is necessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the need for infrastructure and support for paediatric clinical trials in Sweden.

METHODS

A web-based survey was sent to doctors and nurses involved in the care of neonates, children and adolescents assessing the current situation and future needs for paediatric clinical trials in Sweden. Questions regarding premises, competence, organisation, support for paediatric clinical trials and Good Clinical Practice Training were addressed.

RESULTS

In total, 137 individuals responded to the survey (109 doctors and 28 nurses). Overall, 61% of the respondents had previous experience of paediatric clinical trials. Some respondents had access to trial units, but only 34% had used the trial unit for support. Half of the responders were interested in recurrent paediatric Good Clinical Practice training. Doctors responded that clinical work often had to be prioritised and emphasised the need for research time.

CONCLUSION

This study clearly shows the commitment for clinical trials among doctors and nurses involved in paediatric care in Sweden, but also that administrative, logistic and economic support in a sustainable setting and an expanded national collaboration are needed.

Unlicensed and off-label prescription of drugs to children in primary health care: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate unlicensed and off-label prescription and use of drugs to children in primary health care.

METHODS

This is a systematic review that was written based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The studies were extracted from the databases: LILACS, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus. Studies in English, Spanish or Portuguese with abstract available regarding the use and prescription of off-label and unlicensed drugs to children aged 0-18 years in primary health care were included. The evaluation of the titles, abstracts and Full-text were performed independently by two reviewers, and the divergences were resolved by a third reviewer.

RESULTS

Six studies were included. The incidence of off-label prescription varied from 29.5% to 51.7% in relation to the total number of drugs prescribed. The prevalence of off-label drugs ranged from 31.7% to 93.5% in relation to the total number of drugs prescribed. It was observed a higher proportion of off-label prescription related to age and dose. For unlicensed drugs, there was a small variation in incidence between 2.4% and 3.9%, relative to the total number of prescriptions, or between 2.4% and 10.0%, relative to the sample size. It was observed a higher proportion of unlicensed prescription related to children under 2 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The unlicensed and off-label prescription of drugs is recurring in the pediatric population of primary health care. It is necessary to have better information on these drugs by the regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industries for rational use of drugs in children.

Phase 0/microdosing approaches: time for mainstream application in drug development?

Phase 0 approaches - which include microdosing - evaluate subtherapeutic exposures of new drugs in first-in-human studies known as exploratory clinical trials. Recent progress extends phase 0 benefits beyond assessment of pharmacokinetics to include understanding of mechanism of action and pharmacodynamics. Phase 0 approaches have the potential to improve preclinical candidate selection and enable safer, cheaper, quicker and more informed developmental decisions. Here, we discuss phase 0 methods and applications, highlight their advantages over traditional strategies and address concerns related to extrapolation and developmental timelines. Although challenges remain, we propose that phase 0 approaches be at least considered for application in most drug development scenarios.

Development of a stable oral pediatric solution of hydrochlorothiazide by the combined use of cyclodextrins and hydrophilic polymers

Hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) is widely used in pediatrics for hypertension management. Due to the lack of pediatric commercial forms, community or hospital pharmacies generally prepare HCT extemporaneous pediatric suspensions by dispersing in water a portion of a crushed tablet or the drug powder; however, any dose or stability control is usually done on these preparations. Obtaining stable HCT solutions is very challenging, due to its low water-solubility and pH-dependent degradation. The aim of this work was to develop a stable 2 mg/mL-HCT oral pediatric solution without using co-solvents. Combined use of cyclodextrins (CD) and hydrophilic polymers was exploited to improve poor HCT solubility and stability. HPβCD and SBEβCD were selected, considering their safe toxicological profiles, while PVP resulted the best among the tested polymers. Low PVP concentrations (0.2-1.0%) improved the solubilizing efficiency of both CDs, allowing to reach the prefixed HCT concentration. Different CD-PVP concentrations were used to prepare several 2 mg/mL-HCT solutions in pH 5.5 buffer. The best stability was shown by solutions containing the highest SBEβCD concentration (25 mM), which allowed a 3-months stability at 4 °C. In vivo studies on rats showed that such formulation allowed a more pronounced and more reproducible diuretic effect than the corresponding HCT suspension.

Prevalence and Nature of Medication Errors and Preventable Adverse Drug Events in Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Settings: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Children admitted to paediatric and neonatal intensive care units may be at high risk from medication errors and preventable adverse drug events.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to review empirical studies examining the prevalence and nature of medication errors and preventable adverse drug events in paediatric and neonatal intensive care units.

DATA SOURCES

Seven electronic databases were searched between January 2000 and March 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Quantitative studies that examined medication errors/preventable adverse drug events using direct observation, medication chart review, or a mixture of methods in children ≤ 18 years of age admitted to paediatric or neonatal intensive care units were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data on study design, detection method used, rates and types of medication errors/preventable adverse drug events, and medication classes involved were extracted.

RESULTS

Thirty-five unique studies were identified for inclusion. In paediatric intensive care units, the median rate of medication errors was 14.6 per 100 medication orders (interquartile range 5.7-48.8%, n = 3) and between 6.4 and 9.1 per 1000 patient-days (n = 2). In neonatal intensive care units, medication error rates ranged from 4 to 35.1 per 1000 patient-days (n = 2) and from 5.5 to 77.9 per 100 medication orders (n = 2). In both settings, prescribing and medication administration errors were found to be the most common medication errors, with dosing errors the most frequently reported error subtype. Preventable adverse drug event rates were reported in three paediatric intensive care unit studies as 2.3 per 100 patients (n = 1) and 21-29 per 1000 patient-days (n = 2). In neonatal intensive care units, preventable adverse drug event rates from three studies were 0.86 per 1000 doses (n = 1) and 0.47-14.38 per 1000 patient-days (n = 2). Anti-infective agents were commonly involved with medication errors/preventable adverse drug events in both settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication errors occur frequently in critically ill children admitted to paediatric and neonatal intensive care units and may lead to patient harm. Important targets such as dosing errors and anti-infective medications were identified to guide the development of remedial interventions.

Off-label use of medicines in neonates, infants, children, and adolescents: a joint policy statement by the European Academy of Paediatrics and the European society for Developmental Perinatal and Pediatric Pharmacology

Health-care professionals who prescribe medicines have the professional duty to choose medicines that are in the best interest of their individual patient, irrespective if that patient is an adult or a child. However, the availability of medicines with an appropriate label for pediatric use is lagging behind those for adults, and even available pediatric drugs are sometimes not suitable to administer to children. Consequently, health-care professionals often have no other option than to prescribe off-label medicines to children. An important reason for use of off-label medicines is to improve access to (innovative) treatments or to address medical needs and preferences of patients, especially when no other options are available. However, off-label use of medicines is in general not supported by the same level of evidence as medicines licensed for pediatric use. This may result in increased uncertainty on efficacy as well as the risk for toxicity and other side effects. In addition, liability may also be of concern, counterbalanced by professional guidelines.Conclusion: The purpose of this joint EAP/ESDPPP policy statement is to offer guidance for HCPs on when and how to prescribe off-label medicines to children and to provide recommendations for future European policy.

Informed consent for neonatal trials: practical points to consider and a check list

Obtaining informed consent from parents of critically ill neonates can be challenging. The parental decision-making process is influenced by the severity of the child's condition, the benefit-risk balance, their emotional state and the quality of the relationship with the clinical team. Independent of local legislation, parents may prefer that consent is sought from both. Misconceptions about the absence of risks or unrealistic expectations about benefits should be openly addressed to avoid misunderstandings which may harm the relationship with the clinical team. Continuous consent can be sought where it is unclear whether the free choice of parental consent has been compromised. Obtaining informed consent is a dynamic process building on trusting relationships. It should include open and honest discussions about benefits and risks. Investigators may benefit from training in effective communication. Finally, involving parents in neonatal research including the development of the informed consent form and the process of obtaining consent should be considered standard practice.

Innovations in Pediatric Drug Formulations and Administration Technologies for Low Resource Settings

Despite advances in regulations and initiatives to increase pediatric medicine development, there is still an unmet need for age-appropriate medicines for children. The availability of pediatric formulations is particularly lacking in resource poor areas, due to, for example, area-specific disease burden and financial constraints, as well as disconnected supply chains and fragmented healthcare systems. The paucity of authorized pediatric medicines often results in the manipulation and administration of products intended for adults, with an increased risk of mis-dosing and adverse reactions. This article provides an overview of the some of the key difficulties associated with the development of pediatric medicines in both high and low resource areas, and highlights shared and location specific challenges and opportunities. The utilization of dispersible oral dosage forms and suppositories for low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are described in addition to other platform technologies that may in the future offer opportunities for future pediatric medicine development for low resource settings.

Pediatric drug development in China: Reforms and challenges

In China, child and adolescent pediatricians often face challenges in treating children with the appropriate medications. Within the last 8 years, the Chinese government has already initiated a series of policies to promote development of age-appropriate medicines for children. In this study,we introduced the current status of pediatric drugs, obstacles for pediatric drugs development and regulatory reforms in China. The lack of label information in drugs for children, inadequacy of age-appropriate dosage forms and strengths, and shortage of pediatric drugs are some of the problems commonly faced. There exists neither mandatory requirements nor enough financial drivers for development of pediatric medicines. Though some progress in terms of pediatric drugs development as well as distribution have been made by Chinese government over past years, further efforts are necessary to improve availability of pediatric medications.

Phase 0, including microdosing approaches: Applying the Three Rs and increasing the efficiency of human drug development

Phase 0 approaches, including microdosing, involve the use of sub-therapeutic exposures to the tested drugs, thus enabling safer, more-relevant, quicker and cheaper first-in-human (FIH) testing. These approaches also have considerable potential to limit the use of animals in human drug development. Recent years have witnessed progress in applications, methodology, operations, and drug development culture. Advances in applications saw an expansion in therapeutic areas, developmental scenarios and scientific objectives, in, for example, protein drug development and paediatric drug development. In the operational area, the increased sensitivity of Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), expansion of the utility of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging, and the introduction of Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy (CRDS), have led to the increased accessibility and utility of Phase 0 approaches, while reducing costs and exposure to radioactivity. PET has extended the application of microdosing, from its use as a predominant tool to record pharmacokinetics, to a method for recording target expression and target engagement, as well as cellular and tissue responses. Advances in methodology include adaptive Phase 0/Phase 1 designs, cassette and cocktail microdosing, and Intra-Target Microdosing (ITM), as well as novel modelling opportunities and simulations. Importantly, these methodologies increase the predictive power of extrapolation from microdose to therapeutic level exposures. However, possibly the most challenging domain in which progress has been made, is the culture of drug development. One of the main potential values of Phase 0 approaches is the opportunity to terminate development early, thus not only applying the principle of 'kill-early-kill-cheap' to enhance the efficiency of drug development, but also obviating the need for the full package of animal testing required for therapeutic level Phase 1 studies. Finally, we list developmental scenarios that utilised Phase 0 approaches in novel drug development.

The practice of off label prescribing and associated adverse drug reactions in pediatric inpatients in a tertiary care hospital in India

Objectives

To assess the extent of use, patterns, variables and Adverse Drug Reactions associated with off label prescribing in Pediatrics.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted for a period of 6 months for children of the age group 0-17 years in a tertiary care Hospital in Maharashtra, India. Off label drug use was assessed using Micromedex and British National Formulary for Children (BNFC 2016–2017). Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) were assessed according to the physicians' notes, recorded during the patient's hospital stay. Pearson correlation coefficient was computed to assess the relationship between age and the number of off-label drugs. Odds ratio was calculated for the occurrence of ADRs in on-label prescriptions Vs off label-prescriptions. A P value of &lt;0.05 was considered as significant.

Key findings

A total of 1514 prescriptions were evaluated in 300 patients. Out of which 542 (35.79%) and 423 (27.9%) were off label according to Micromedex and BNFC respectively. The number of patients who received at least one off label was found to be 225 (75%) – Micromedex and 223 (74.3%) – BNFC Unspecified indication and use of drugs outside the specified age limit were identified as the main variables associated with off label prescribing. Highest proportion of off-label drugs was found in Alimentary system. A total of 35 ADRs (OR 6.92 CI 95%(OR 6.92, 95% CI, 3.13-15.27)) were identified in 31 patients.

Conclusions

Off-label drug use is prevalent in the pediatric population and warrants an evidence-based approach to improve prescribing practices in pediatrics.

Serious Adverse Events Associated with Off-Label Use of Azithromycin or Fentanyl in Children in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Chart Review

OBJECTIVES

Half of prescription drugs commonly given to children lack product labeling on pediatric safety, efficacy, and dosing. Two drugs most widely used off-label in pediatrics are azithromycin and fentanyl. We sought to determine the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) when oral azithromycin or intravenous/intramuscular fentanyl are used off-label compared to on-label in pediatric intensive care units (ICUs).

STUDY DESIGN

Six pediatric hospitals participated in a retrospective chart review of patients administered oral azithromycin (n = 241) or intravenous/intramuscular fentanyl (n = 367) between January 5, 2013 and December 26, 2014. Outcomes were SAEs by drug and labeling status: off-label compared to on-label by Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved age and/or indication. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

Twenty-one (9%) children receiving azithromycin experienced SAEs. Off-label use of azithromycin was not associated with a higher risk of SAE (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.27-2.71, p = 0.81). Ninety-five (26%) children receiving fentanyl experienced SAEs. Fentanyl off-label use by both age and indication was not associated with a higher risk of overall SAEs compared to on-label use (OR 1.99, 95% CI 0.94-4.19, p = 0.07). However, the risk of the SAE respiratory depression was significantly greater when fentanyl was used off-label by both age and indication (OR 5.05, 95% CI 1.08-23.56, p = 0.044). Results based on HRs were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Azithromycin off-label use in pediatric ICUs does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of SAEs. Off-label use of fentanyl appears to be more frequently associated with respiratory depression when used off-label by both age and indication in pediatric ICUs. Prospective studies should be undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of fentanyl in the pediatric population so that data can be added to the FDA labeling.

Combined Approach of Cyclodextrin Complexationand Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for the Development of a Pediatric Liquid Oral Dosage Form of Hydrochlorothiazide

The development of specific and age-appropriate pediatric formulations is essential to assure that all children and their care-givers can easily access to safe and effective dosage forms. The need for developing specific pediatric medicinal products has been highlighted by the European Medicines Agency. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of combining the advantages of both cyclodextrin (CD) complexation and loading into nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC), to obtain a liquid oral pediatric formulation of hydrochlorothiazide (HCT), endowed with safety, dosage accuracy, good stability and therapeutic efficacy. Equimolar drug combinations as physical mixture (P.M.) or coground product (GR) with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) or sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin (SBEβCD) were loaded into NLC, then characterized for particle size, homogeneity, Zeta potential, entrapment efficiency, gastric and storage stability. The presence of HPβCD allowed higher entrapment efficacy than NLC loaded with the plain drug, and enabled, in the case of GR systems a complete and sustained drug release, attributable to the wetting and solubilising properties of HPβCD toward HCT. In vivo studies on rats proved the superior therapeutic effectiveness of HCT-in HPβCD-in NLC formulations compared to the corresponding free HCT-loaded NLC, thus confirming the successfulness of the proposed approach in the development of an efficacious liquid oral formulation of the drug.

Two decades of off-label prescribing in children: a literature review

BACKGROUND

In the past two decades, many legislative and regulatory initiatives were taken globally to improve drug use in children. However, children are still found to be prescribed with off-label drugs. This study was conducted to provide an overview of the worldwide trend in off-label prescribing in children from the year 1996 to 2016.

DATA SOURCES

The articles published in PubMed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar were searched using text words: off-label, unlicensed, paediatric and children. Additional articles were identified by reviewing the bibliography of the retrieved articles. Full-text articles published in English which reported on the prevalence of off-label prescribing in children between January 1996 and December 2016 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 101 studies met the inclusion criteria. Off-label prescribing definition included four main categories: age, indication, dose and route of administration. The three most common reference sources used in the studies were summary of product characteristics, national formularies and package inserts. Overall, the off-label prescribing rates in children ranged from 1.2 to 99.7%. The most common category of off-label prescribing in children was dose and age.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlighted that off-label prescribing in children was found to be highly prevalent throughout the past two decades, persistently in the neonatal intensive care units. This suggests that besides legislative and regulatory initiatives, behavioural, knowledge aspects and efforts to integrate evidence into practice related to off-label prescribing also need to be evaluated and consolidated as part of the concerted efforts to narrow the gaps in prescribing for children.

Safety and Efficacy of Off-label and Unlicensed Medicines in Children

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to explore the use of off-label/unlicensed drugs to confirm the safety and efficacy of their prescription in children in Korea.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed data of patients who received any of the 32 drugs between January-December 2014 in tertiary hospitals in Korea, including demographics, diagnoses, reasons for the medication, administration route, and details of adverse drug reactions. Additionally, the mortality in the cohort was assessed. The primary outcomes were efficacy and safety, including mortality, of these drugs in pediatric patients. The secondary outcomes were the current statuses of the use of off-label/unlicensed drugs in two centers.

RESULTS

Totally, 5,130 prescriptions were found in 2,779 patients. Age (73.5%) and indication (11.7%) were the most frequent reasons for prescriptions being off-labeled/unlicensed. Approximately 88% of the prescriptions were effective, and 19% of the patients developed adverse drug reactions. The number of prescriptions was significantly higher in children with adverse drug reactions than it was in those without (2.8 vs. 1.5; P < 0.001). The number of prescribed off-label/unlicensed medicines and age at prescription were independently associated with adverse drug events (odds ratio, 1.55 and 1.1; P < 0.001 and 0.034, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Children are still prescribed medicines that are not authorized in terms of age, weight, indications, or routes of administration. Therefore, many old products require re-assessment of authorization. More prospective clinical studies should be performed to confirm the efficacy and safety of drugs in the pediatric population.

Barriers to the success of an electronic pharmacovigilance reporting system in Kenya: an evaluation three years post implementation

Objective

Electronic pharmacovigilance reporting systems are being implemented in many developing countries in an effort to improve reporting rates. This study sought to establish the factors that acted as barriers to the success of an electronic pharmacovigilance reporting system in Kenya 3 years after its implementation.

Materials and Methods

Factors that could act as barriers to using electronic reporting systems were identified in a review of literature and then used to develop a survey questionnaire that was administered to pharmacists working in government hospitals in 6 counties in Kenya.

Results

The survey was completed by 103 out of the 115 targeted pharmacists (89.5%) and included free-text comments. The key factors identified as barriers were: unavailable, unreliable, or expensive Internet access; challenges associated with a hybrid system of paper and electronic reporting tools; and system usability issues. Coordination challenges at the national pharmacovigilance center and changes in the structure of health management in the country also had an impact on the success of the electronic reporting system.

Discussion

Different personal, organizational, infrastructural, and reporting system factors affect the success of electronic reporting systems in different ways, depending on the context. Context-specific formative evaluations are useful in establishing the performance of electronic reporting systems to identify problems and ensure that they achieve the desired objectives.

Conclusion

While several factors hindered the optimal use of the electronic pharmacovigilance reporting system in Kenya, all were considered modifiable. Effort should be directed toward tackling the identified issues in order to facilitate use and improve pharmacovigilance reporting rates.

Off-label use and manipulations of antiepileptic drugs in children: Analysis of the outpatient prescriptions in a tertiary center

OBJECTIVES

Little is known about off-label use and manipulations to achieve the prescribed dose of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in outpatient prescriptions. This study aimed to evaluate this practice in a tertiary center for child epilepsy.

METHODS

We reviewed off-label use and manipulations of AEDs delivered to the outpatient's epilepsy clinic. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine the factors associated with off-label and manipulated uses.

RESULTS

Five hundred eleven consultations generated 897 AED deliveries (1.75/consultation). Off-label use involved 182 (20.3%) of prescribed AEDs. Factors associated with off-label use were polytherapy and new AEDs while increase of age and nondevelopmental and structural-metabolic etiologies have a protective effect. Among the 1725 doses of AEDs prescribed per day, 33.5% generated manipulations (n=582): 40% inadequate (n=237) and 60% adequate (203 syrups, 112 scored tablets, 30 drops medicine). Polytherapy (p<10^-4) and the absence of market authorization significantly favored manipulations whereas the increase in age restricted them.

CONCLUSION

Off-label use and manipulations of AEDs remain an important problem in home care of children with epilepsy. This is mainly a concern for the most vulnerable groups, i.e., young patients, patients undergoing polytherapy, and patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). International initiatives have been launched to improve the availability of labeled and adapted drugs in this population.